
==== Front
J Educ Health Promot
J Educ Health Promot
JEHP
J Edu Health Promot
Journal of Education and Health Promotion
2277-9531
2319-6440
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow India

JEHP-13-47
10.4103/jehp.jehp_528_23
Review Article
Critical thinking in nursing and midwifery learning: Quantitative and qualitative review
Atif Ibtissam
Elamri Nabila
Gantare Abdellah
Hassan First University of Settat, Higher Institute of Health Sciences, Laboratory of Health Sciences and Technologies, Settat, Morocco
Address for correspondence: Ms. Ibtissam Atif, Institut Supérieur des Sciences de la Santé, Complexe Universitaire, Route de Casablanca B.P 555 Settat, Morocco. E-mail: i.atif@uhp.ac.ma
2024
26 2 2024
13 4717 4 2023
10 8 2023
Copyright: © 2024 Journal of Education and Health Promotion
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
BACKGROUND:

This study tried to make a quantitative and qualitative review of the scientific production of the mobilization of critical thinking in nursing and midwifery learning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

The search was carried out in the “Web of Science” and “PubMed” databases between 2001 and 2021, resulting in 43 articles using several keywords “critical thinking,” “learning”, “nursing,” “midwifery”. The study will be split into two parts: A quantitative review in the form of a bibliometric analysis and a qualitative one in the form of a literature review. The quality of the articles has been verified by assessing the risk of bias (selection bias, detection bias, and interpretation bias) and using the Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence method.

RESULTS AND OBSERVATIONS:

The selected articles were the subject of a quantitative study leading to several results: chronology of publications, types of publications, number of publications, top journals of publications, etc. The same articles have been processed to produce a full qualitative review of the experimental studies.

CONCLUSION:

The results showed that the total and annual articles need to be higher. Experimental studies, especially quasi-experimental, are far higher than reviews or descriptive studies. The qualitative research showed a controversial relationship between critical thinking and learning improvement.

Critical thinking
midwifery
nursing
review
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

The literature has long reported the importance and necessity of critical thinking in developing the capacities of nursing and midwifery students, thus facilitating the exercise of their jobs in a professional environment.

Several research works have recently focused on the factors and forms of learning that can improve learners’ critical thinking. We cite interprofessional learning based on problem-solving,[1] case studies,[234] self-assessment,[5] integrated training (simulation and critical thinking),[56] participatory education,[3] repeated simulation,[7] and “Escape Room”. These publications have all shown a correlation between the factors cited and the induction of motivation and curiosity or even creativity among students.

This work will try to make a cartography of the actual level of research in critical thinking about learning in the nursing and midwifery field. To reach this goal, this work will develop a double quantitative and qualitative analysis of critical thinking in the learning of nursing and midwifery students. Such studies are essential to know where we are and what we expect in the future, especially with the significant development of all the elements around human health, such as sciences, technologies, education, and AI.

On the other hand, significant challenges have been experienced in recent years, especially with the appearance of COVID-19, with all the demanding conditions accompanying it. It can be described as a precursor to several epidemiologies that may appear in the future and how we can manage it;[89101112] hence, the need to develop critical thinking in the health field, giving us the tools and reflexes necessary to handle different situations.

Materials and Methods

Study design and setting

The first part of the study is a bibliometric analysis of the scientific production of using critical thinking in nursing and midwifery learning. It deals with different aspects like the chronology of publications, topics of publications, top publishing journals, etc.

The second is a review of scientific production linking critical thinking to nursing and midwifery learning. The results showed relevant information like the study’s design, instrument used, intervention period, findings, etc.

Study participants and sampling

The research used two popular databases search: “PubMed” and “Web of Sciences” from 2001 until 2021.

Several keywords were used. The keywords used are critical thinking, learning, nursing, and midwifery.

We have also adopted truncations and the addition of “*” for better precision in the search and words such as “critical think*”, “learn*”, “nurs*”, and “midwi*”.

Flowchart

The search identified 85 articles. After merging the two databases, 48 papers remain. Five were discarded due to their nonconformity,[1314151617] leading to a final result of 43 articles illustrated in the PRISMA flowchart as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1 PRISMA flowchart of the articles selection method

Data collection tool and technique

The data were managed by Zotero software, allowing us to collect articles and keep the most relevant of them, as shown in Figure 1.

The content of those articles was transferred and proceeded by Excel software, allowing us to extract the essential elements of studies and define the main topics on which we will focus.

Quantitative results

Qualitative results

The quantitative results show that experimental studies are the most published papers in two decades. A full review of those articles is shown below in Table 1.

Table 1 Review of experimental studies dealing with critical thinking in nursing and midwifery

Design	Sample	Intervention	Instrument	Findings	Author, year	
Cross-sectional study	139 nursing students	Semester	Demographic questionnaire, Kolb’s Learning Style Standard Questionnaire, and the California Critical Thinking Skills Questionnaire	No relationship between critical thinking and academic achievement was identified.	Shirazi, et al. (2019)	
Quasi-experimental	78 nursing students	1 week	Self-reported questionnaire	S-PBL is an effective strategy for improving nursing students’ learning transfer	Son (2020)	
Quasi-experimental	103 nursing students	5 months	The self-reflection and insight scale (SRIS) and Taiwan Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (TCTDI)	Experiential Learning Program has a significant impact on self-reflection and critical thinking.	Cheng, et al. (2020)	
Quasi-experimental	20 undergraduate nursing and 28 midwifery students	10 hours	Five 2-h training sessions	Interprofessional education has been able to enhance the overall critical skills of students.	Aein, et al. (2020)	
Case study	38 nursing students	1-hour test	California critical thinking questionnaire	An increased score of critical thinking among students with “learning based on participatory education”	Salar, et al. (2020)	
Quasi-experimental	40 nursing students	16 weeks	Standardized self-report questionnaires, including the California Critical Thinking Skills Test-B (CCTST-B) and the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI)	No significant changes were observed in the students’ critical thinking skills and metacognitive awareness after performing the lecture method.	Gholami, et al. (2016)	
Comparative study	80 nursing students	18 weeks	The critical thinking disposition inventory (CTDI-CV)	The “nursing case-based learning” was a practical course to develop the critical thinking abilities of nursing students.	Li, et al. (2019)	
Randomized controlled trial	295 undergraduate nursing students	1 year	Final examination, Process Assessment	Using blended case-centered learning showed promising results in improving students’ academic performance.	Yu, et al. (2021)	
Quasi-experimental	90 nursing students	16 weeks	Standardized self-administered questionnaires of critical thinking, problem-solving, and self-directed learning abilities	Outcomes were not statistically different between groups.	Choi, et al. (2014)	
Quasi-experimental	44 mental healthcare nurses	5 weeks	Semi-structured and open-ended interview	The experimental group with PBL had better skills but no significant difference for the group with LBL in the pretest and post-test scores.	Hung, et al. (2015)	
Cross-sectional study	149 sophomore nursing students	2 months	Self-reported questionnaires	Teaching methods are necessary to increase nursing students’ critical thinking disposition and learning competence.	Oh, et al. (2021)	
Investigation	76 nursing students	1 semester	California Critical Thinking Skill Test	PBL improved the participant’s metacognition and problem-solving process but not critical thinking.	Choi (2004)	
Cross-sectional study	3,047 nursing students	2 months	Ocio-demographic date Metacognitive Ability Scale (Kanitical Thinking Disposition Inventory-Chinese Version)	The metacognitive ability of the 5-year vocational nursing students was not high, and the SDL ability and CT ability were both at a medium level.	Jin, et al. (2021)	
Case study	Six students/preceptor dyads	6 months	Stakes phases of data analysis	Contextual learning can be a model of clinical learning in nursing education.	Forneris, et al. (2007)	
Quasi-experimental	46 undergraduate nursing students	1 semester	The California Critical Thinking Skills Test Form A	Nursing students improved their critical thinking skills in China by experiencing a PBL approach to learning.	Yuan, et al. (2008)	
Crossover study	76 undergraduate nursing students	1 semester–hour	California Critical Thinking Dispositions Inventory, California Critical Thinking Dispositions Inventory Chinese Version	No significant differences between groups were significant.	Yu, et al. (2013)	
Quasi-experimental	50 nursing students	6 months	The California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI), the Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory-Chinese Version (CTDI), self-designed data from.	The cooperative learning-based clinical practicum helps promote students’ critical thinking dispositions.	Zhang, et al. (2021)	
Prepost test	54 nursing students	17 weeks	Descriptive Information Questionnaire, the ATI Critical Thinking Test, the Pre-Post Critical Thinking Test	No significant differences between the problem-based learning method and the lecture method.	Lyons (2008)	
Randomized controlled trial	122 undergraduate nursing students	8 months	Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory Chinese version (CTDI-CV)	Improvement in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group.	Hong, et al. (2017)	
Prepost test	14 novice nurses	6 weeks	Traditional multiple-choice examinations, Survey	Most nurses graduating from the program have remained in their clinical units.	Celia, et al. (2001)	
Prepost test	47 nursing students	4 weeks	Critical-Thinking Disposition, Self-Directed Learning Ability, Simulation Effectiveness, Open-Ended Questions	No statistically significant differences emerged between the assessments on critical thinking or self-directed learning ability before and after the virtual simulation.	Kang, et al. (2020)	
Quasi-experimental	230 nursing and 134 midwifery students		California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory, Kolb Learning Style Inventory	A statistically significant difference was found between critical thinking dispositions based on learning styles.	Karadag, et al. (2018)	
Comparative study	40 nursing students	1 semester	The California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI)	Concerning critical thinking, a significant relationship was found between the PBL and lecture groups.	Dehkordi, et al. (2008)	
Quasi-experimental	115 nursing and midwifery students		The California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI)	Critical thinking disposition does not improve in a short time by using active strategies.	Iranfar, et al. (2012)	
Quasi-experimental	55 nursing students	16 weeks	California critical thinking questionnaire, t-test	The tendency to critical thinking was higher in the group that was trained by a virtual learning-based learning method than in the trained group that was introduced in the traditional way.	Ghadi, et al. (2018)	
Quasi-experimental	72 nursing students	2 week	The researchers used the learning motivation scale, learning attitudes scale, and learning satisfaction scale.	The students learning with the contextual game showed better skills, including critical thinking tendency, than those who received the traditional instruction.	Chang, et al. (2020)	
Semi-experimental	55 nursing students	8 weeks	California Critical Thinking Skills Test Form B (CCTST), College Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (CASES)	Integrative education methods significantly enhanced students’ critical thinking and academic self-efficacy.	Roshangar, et al. (2020)	
Randomized controlled trial	108 midwifery students	12 months	Questionnaire, test	Problem-based learning teaching methodology affects problem-solving skills and critical thinking.	Kousar, et al. (2021)	

Below [Table 2] is a summary of the main results obtained from the quantitative and qualitative reviews.

Table 2 Mains quantitative and qualitative critical thinking review results in nursing and midwifery learning

Critical thinking in nursing and midwifery learning	
Type of review	Main results	
Quantitative	The scientific production of critical thinking in nursing and midwifery learning still needs improvement. However, the last decade knew a gap of about 220% compared with the first one.	
	Compared to descriptive and review studies, experimental studies present almost 65% of the production.	
	Quasi-experimental studies present approximately half of all the experimental works; what remains is split between RCT, cross-sectional, etc.	
	“Journal of Nursing Education” and “Nurse Education Today” are the journals that have published the most articles in the last two decades	
Qualitative	Experimental studies showed that the relationship between using critical thinking and improving learning among nursing and midwifery students is controversial.	
	Descriptive/qualitative studies showed that critical thinking in nursing and midwifery could be very promising for helping students learn.	
	Several review studies have reported that learning styles like problem-based learning and classic-based learning might help improve students’ critical thinking skills.	

Discussion

Critical thinking in nursing and midwifery science is relatively recent. The analysis of Figure 2 shows that scientific production can be split into two periods [2001-2010] and [2011-2021].

Figure 2 Timeline of publications distribution between 2001 and 2021

[2001-2010]: The number of publications is relatively limited to one publication per year, except in 2008, which records four publications. It should also be noted that there are some empty years with zero publications, such as 2002, 2003, 2005, and 2006. In total, over a decade, the number of publications was 12.

[2011-2021]: The number of publications has increased remarkably, between one (only in 2016) and eight (in 2020). No year is empty. The total number is 31.

The total production remains low, with a maximum of eight articles per year; however, a trend of 220% has been recorded between the two decades.

As shown in Figure 3, the most dominant category of the articles listed from 2001 to 2021 is experimental studies (28 articles),[1234181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041] followed by descriptive and qualitative studies (eight articles),[56424344454647] and finally reviews (seven articles).[7484950515253]

Figure 3 Number of papers published between 2001 and 2021 according to their kind

This difference is explained by the fact that the integration of critical thinking in nursing and midwifery remains relatively recent, requiring more experimental work to define the subjects and produce data. These can then be used to develop studies in descriptive or qualitative form or reviews.

Approximately half of the experimental studies [Figure 4] are a quasi-experimental design; the rest is split between randomized controlled trial, cross-sectional, etc. This is explained by the simplicity of this type of study compared to the rest, especially randomized controlled trials. Quasi-experimental studies are optimal when randomized controlled trials are difficult or impossible, and intervention and control groups are not deliberately allocated.

Figure 4 Distribution of experimental studies between 2001 and 2021 according to their kind

Concerning the descriptive/qualitative studies [Figure 5] and reviews [Figure 6], the total number is minimal, with eight and seven articles, respectively. The nature of these studies explains this, as the theme of critical thinking is recent, requiring quantitative data and time to launch such works.

Figure 5 Distribution of descriptive/qualitative studies between 2001 and 2021 according to their kind

Figure 6 Distribution of review studies between 2001 and 2021 according to their kind

Figure 7 shows the number of articles dealing with the theme of critical thinking in nursing and midwifery sciences, published in internationally indexed journals. The “Journal of Nursing Education” and “Nurse Education Today” are at the top of the ranking with six publications each, followed by the “International Journal of Environment Resources Public Health” with three publications, then the other journals do not exceed two publications.

Figure 7 Number of papers produced between 2001 and 2021 according to the publication journals

The quantitative and qualitative review analysis performed in this study may be very useful for every researcher willing, to begin with the state of the art on applying critical thinking in nursing and midwifery.

The actual results can also be used to define new lines of research on critical thinking, which can be linked to the simulation tools in nursing and midwifery. Simulation has been growing these last years, and it was an exciting method, especially during the Mondial lockdown due to COVID-19.

As a limitation of our study, we could only find substantial production on critical thinking in nursing and midwifery after 2001. Also, we note the absence of similar studies on the same topic; we could not compare and extract some conclusions and interpretations according to our research.

Conclusion

Developing techniques and care practices increase significantly, which impose a significant challenge on academic training to support these continuous changes. Critical thinking is an exciting tool for dealing with many difficulties in nursing or midwifery practice. Our analysis attempts to provide a current map of the state of the work carried out and identified to date in scientific production. A significant transformation has been observed in the last 20 years, particularly in the previous decade, both quantitatively and qualitatively. Regarding the nature of production, experimental studies generally take over because the ground is still empty, and many paths remain to be dug. Qualitative studies and reviews still need improvement without data and further studies. It is important to note that a few scientific journals in the field are active. A problem that also limits production in the themes of critical thinking in the nursing and midwifery disciplines.

Finally, according to our study, one of the essential elements that need to be clarified and are not standard at an international scale is the critical thinking evaluation tool. The need for further studies is imminent, and more experimental works should be done with a performant and accurate evaluation tool.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

Special acknowledgment to the nursing and midwifery sciences research unit staff at the Sciences and Technologies of Health Laboratory University Hassan First for helping us analyze the data of this study.
==== Refs
References

1. Aein F Hosseini R Naseh L Safdari F Banaian S The effect of problem-solving-based interprofessional learning on critical thinking and satisfaction with learning of nursing and midwifery students J Educ Health Promot 2020 9 109. 32642465
2. Hong S Yu P Comparison of the effectiveness of two styles of case-based learning implemented in lectures for developing nursing students’ critical thinking ability: A randomized controlled trial Int J Nurs Stud 2017 68 16 24 28043015
3. Salar AR Fouladi B Sarabandi A Comparing the effect of “learning based on classic education” and “learning based on participatory education” on nursing students critical thinking: A case-control study J Educ Health Promot 2020 9 47. 32318615
4. Yu Z Hu R Ling S Zhuang J Chen Y Chen M Effects of blended versus offline case-centred learning on the academic performance and critical thinking ability of undergraduate nursing students: A cluster randomised controlled trial Nurse Educ Pract 2021 53 103080. 34044341
5. Guhde J Nursing students’ perceptions of the effect on critical thinking, assessment, and learner satisfaction in simple versus complex high-fidelity simulation scenarios J Nurs Educ 2011 50 73 8 21117535
6. Kaddoura MA New graduate nurses’ perceptions of the effects of clinical simulation on their critical thinking, learning, and confidence J Contin Educ Nurs 2010 41 506 16 20672760
7. Yuan H Williams BA Fan L A systematic review of selected evidence on developing nursing students’ critical thinking through problem-based learning Nurse Educ Today 2008 28 657 63 18267348
8. Sheikhbardsiri H Abdar ZE Sheikhasadi H Mahani SA Sarani A Observance of patients’ rights in emergency department of educational hospitals in south-east Iran Int J Hum Rights Healthc 2020 13 435 44
9. Sheikhbardsiri H Khademipour G Davarani ER Tavan A Amiri H Sahebi A Response capability of hospitals to an incident caused by mass gatherings in southeast Iran Injury 2022 53 1722 6 35027219
10. Molavi-Taleghani Y Ebrahimpour H Sheikhbardsiri H A proactive risk assessment through healthcare failure mode and effect analysis in pediatric surgery department J Compr Ped 2020 11 e56008.
11. Sheikhbardsiri H Sheikhasadi H Mahani SA Mohamadi MMD Emotional intelligence and learning strategies of postgraduate students at Kerman University of Medical Sciences in the southeast of Iran J Educ Health Promot 2020 9 66. 32490001
12. Sarani A Mousavi SH Salahi S Hasani F Abdar ZE Sheikhbardsiri H Emotional intelligence and self-efficacy among deputy’s administrative staff of Kerman University of Medical Sciences J Educ Health Promot 2020 9 105. 32642461
13. Andreou C Papastavrou E Merkouris A Learning styles and critical thinking relationship in baccalaureate nursing education: A systematic review Nurse Educ Today 2014 34 362 71 23830067
14. Gyeong JA Myung SY Critical thinking and learning styles of nursing students at the Baccalaureate nursing program in Korea Contemp Nurse 2008 29 100 9 18844547
15. Searing LM Kooken WC The relationship between the california critical thinking disposition inventory and student learning outcomes in baccalaureate nursing students J Nurs Educ 2016 55 224 6 27023893
16. Warren BJ Donaldson R Whaley M Service learning: An adjunct to therapeutic communication and critical thinking skills for baccalaureate nursing students J Nurs Educ 2005 44 147.
17. Zhang H Lambert V Critical thinking dispositions and learning styles of baccalaureate nursing students from China Nurs Health Sci 2008 10 175 81 18786058
18. Celia LM Gordon PR Using problem-based learning to promote critical thinking in an orientation program for novice nurses J Nurses Staff Dev 2001 17 12 7 12759935
19. Chang CY Kao CH Hwang GJ Lin FH From experiencing to critical thinking: A contextual game-based learning approach to improving nursing students’ performance in Electrocardiogram training Educ Technol Res Dev 2020 68 1225 45
20. Cheng YC Huang LC Yang CH Chang HC Experiential learning program to strengthen self-reflection and critical thinking in freshmen nursing students during COVID-19: A quasi-experimental study Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020 17 5442. 32731648
21. Choi E Lindquist R Song Y Effects of problem-based learning vs. traditional lecture on Korean nursing students’ critical thinking, problem-solving, and self-directed learning Nurse Educ Today 2014 34 52 6 23535270
22. Choi H [The effects of PBL (Problem-Based Learning) on the metacognition, critical thinking, and problem solving process of nursing students] Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi 2004 34 712 21 15502436
23. Dehkordi AH Heydarnejad MS The effects of problem-based learning and lecturing on the development of Iranian nursing students’ critical thinking Pak J Med Sci 2008 24 740 3
24. Forneris SG Peden-McAlpine C Evaluation of a reflective learning intervention to improve critical thinking in novice nurses J Adv Nurs 2007 57 410 21 17291205
25. Ghadi MZ Hosseinzadeh H Comparison of the effect of learning based on virtual education and traditional education on the critical thinking of nursing students of Islamic Azad university of Babol branch Int J Health Med Curr Res 2018 3 819 25
26. Gholami M Moghadam PK Mohammadipoor F Tarahi MJ Sak M Toulabi T Comparing the effects of problem-based learning and the traditional lecture method on critical thinking skills and metacognitive awareness in nursing students in a critical care nursing course Nurse Educ Today 2016 45 16 21 27429398
27. Hung TM Tang LC Ko CJ How mental health nurses improve their critical thinking through problem-based learning J Nurses Prof Dev 2015 31 170 5 25993456
28. Iranfar K Iranfar S Mohammadi G Developing critical thinking disposition in the students of nursing and midwifery through collaborative and individual methods of learning HealthMED 2012 6 4047 52
29. Jin M Ji C The correlation of metacognitive ability, self-directed learning ability and critical thinking in nursing students: A cross-sectional study Nurs Open 2021 8 936 45 33570293
30. Kang SJ Hong CM Lee H The impact of virtual simulation on critical thinking and self-directed learning ability of nursing students Clinical Simulation in Nursing 2020 49 66 72
31. Karadag M Alparslan O Iseri OP Critical thinking tendencies and learning styles of midwifery and nursing students Cukurova Med J 2018 43 13 21
32. Kousar R Afzal M The effects of problem based learning on critical thinking and problem solving skills among midwifery students Pakistan J Medical Health Sci 2021 15 722 5
33. Li S Ye X Chen W Practice and effectiveness of “nursing case-based learning” course on nursing student’s critical thinking ability: A comparative study Nurse Educ Pract 2019 36 91 6 30897460
34. Lyons EM Examining the effects of problem-based learning and NCLEX-RN scores on the critical thinking skills of associate degree nursing students in a Southeastern Community College Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh 2008 5 Article21 18597667
35. Oh H Cho H Yim SY Influence of perceived helicopter parenting, critical thinking disposition, cognitive ability, and learning motivation on learning behavior among nursing students Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021 18 1362. 33540930
36. Roshangar F Azar EF Sarbakhsh P Azarmi R The effect of case-based learning with or without conceptual mapping method on critical thinking and academic self-efficacy of nursing students J Biochem Technol 2020 11 37 44
37. Shirazi F Heidari S The relationship between critical thinking skills and learning styles and academic achievement of nursing students J Nurs Res 2019 27 e38. 30676427
38. Son HK Effects of S-PBL in maternity nursing clinical practicum on learning attitude, metacognition, and critical thinking in nursing students: A quasi-experimental design Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020 17 7866. 33121028
39. Yu D Zhang Y Xu Y Wu J Wang C Improvement in critical thinking dispositions of undergraduate nursing students through problem-based learning: A crossover-experimental study J Nurs Educ 2013 52 574 81 24063287
40. Yuan H Kunaviktikul W Klunklin A Williams BA Improvement of nursing students’ critical thinking skills through problem-based learning in the People’s Republic of China: A quasi-experimental study Nurs Health Sci 2008 10 70 6 18257835
41. Zhang J Chen B The effect of cooperative learning on critical thinking of nursing students in clinical practicum: A quasi-experimental study J Prof Nurs 2021 37 177 83 33674089
42. Chan ZC Critical thinking and creativity in nursing: Learners’ perspectives Nurse Educ Today 2013 33 558 63 23058105
43. Hernandez CA Student articulation of a nursing philosophical statement: An assignment to enhance critical thinking skills and promote learning J Nurs Educ 2009 48 343 9 19552322
44. Itatani T Nagata K Yanagihara K Tabuchi N Content analysis of student essays after attending a problem-based learning course: Facilitating the development of critical thinking and communication skills in Japanese nursing students Healthcare (Basel) 2017 5 47. 28829362
45. Lin CC Han CY Pan IJ Chen LC The teaching-learning approach and critical thinking development: A qualitative exploration of Taiwanese nursing students J Prof Nurs 2015 31 149 57 25839955
46. Martyn J Terwijn R Kek MY Huijser H Exploring the relationships between teaching, approaches to learning and critical thinking in a problem-based learning foundation nursing course Nurse Educ Today 2014 34 829 35 23706962
47. Wagner EA Using a kinesthetic learning strategy to engage nursing student thinking, enhance retention, and improve critical thinking J Nurs Educ 2014 53 348 51 24814353
48. Coward M Does the use of reflective models restrict critical thinking and therefore learning in nurse education? What have we done? Nurse Educ Today 2011 31 883 6 21333414
49. Kong LN Qin B Zhou YQ Mou SY Gao HM The effectiveness of problem-based learning on development of nursing students’ critical thinking: A systematic review and meta-analysis Int J Nurs Stud 2014 51 458 69 23850065
50. Lai CY Wu CC Supporting nursing students’ critical thinking with a mobile web learning environment Nurse Educ 2012 37 235 6 23086062
51. Oja KJ Using problem-based learning in the clinical setting to improve nursing students’ critical thinking: An evidence review J Nurs Educ 2011 50 145 51 21210603
52. Sapeni MA Said S The effectiveness of case-based learning in increasing critical thinking of nursing students: A literature review Enfermeria Clinica 2020 30 182 5
53. Tang LC Christina Sung HC the effectiveness of problem-based learning on nursing students’ critical thinking: A systematic review JBI Libr Syst Rev 2012 10 3907 16 27820512
