
==== Front
Adv Biomed Res
Adv Biomed Res
ABR
Adv Biomed Res
Advanced Biomedical Research
2277-9175
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow India

ABR-13-9
10.4103/abr.abr_170_23
Review Article
The Application of Artificial Intelligence and Drug Repositioning for the Identification of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors: A Review
Zarei Parvin
Ghasemi Fahimeh
Department of Bioinformatics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Address for correspondence: Dr. Fahimeh Ghasemi, Department of Bioinformatics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. E-mail: f_ghasemi_82@yahoo.com
2024
30 1 2024
13 918 5 2023
24 8 2023
03 9 2023
Copyright: © 2024 Advanced Biomedical Research
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Abstract

Artificial intelligence talks about modeling intelligent behavior through a computer with the least human involvement. Drug repositioning techniques based on artificial intelligence accelerate the research process and decrease the cost of experimental studies. Dysregulation of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptors as the tyrosine kinase family of receptors plays a vital role in a wide range of malignancies. Because of their functional significance, they were considered promising drug targets for the therapy of various cancers. This review has summarized small molecules capable of inhibiting FGF receptors that progressed using artificial intelligence and repositioning drugs examined in clinical trials associated with cancer therapy. This review is based on a literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases to gather the necessary information in each chapter by employing keywords like artificial intelligence, computational drug design, drug repositioning, and FGF receptor inhibitors. To achieve this goal, a spacious literature review of human studies in these fields—published over the last 20 decades—was performed. According to published reports, nonselective FGF receptor inhibitors can be used for cancer management, and multitarget kinase inhibitors are the first drug class approved due to more advanced clinical studies. For example, AZD4547 and BGJ398 are gradually entering the consumption cycle and are good options as combined treatments. Artificial intelligence and drug repositioning methods can help preselect suitable drug targets more successfully for future inhibition of carcinogenicity.

Artificial intelligence
drug repositioning
fibroblast growth factor
receptors
==== Body
pmcINTRODUCTION

Features of fibroblast growth factors and fibroblast growth factors receptors

Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) are a family of secreted signaling polypeptides (with molecular mass from 17 to 34 kDa), and their function is regulated by tyrosine kinase receptors and non-signaling proteins causing an intracellular cascade that mediates their biological activity.[12] FGFs exist in different organisms, from nematodes to humans.[3]

Purification of these proteins is performed over the last thirty years; according to research, various biochemical and biological functions such as embryo development, organogenesis, tissue ripening, homeostasis, reaction to lesions, neuronal signal transduction, and pathological processes such as angiogenesis, tumor growth, inflammation, and drug resistance have been considered for them. These processes are vital to nearly every aspect of life.[123] Several metabolic pathways, such as cholesterol/bile acid balance, maintenance of vitamin D/phosphate, and metabolisms regulation of glucose/lipid, were conducted by FGF signaling.[4] Therefore, the different functions of FGFs make them a mediator involved in some diseases such as cancer, hypophosphatemia, familial tumor-like calcification, congenital craniosynostosis, Kallmann syndrome, dwarf syndrome, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease (CKD), obesity, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, and hearing loss, that their signaling is significant in the treatment of these diseases.[5]

Twenty-two structurally related members identified for FGFs had sequential similarity, biochemical function similarity, and evolutionary relations similarity divided into seven subfamilies including FGF1/2/5, FGF3/4/6, FGF7/10/22, FGF8/17/18, and FGF9/16/20.[1]

Studies show that members of the FGFs family are 30–70% similar in their elementary amino acid sequences. A similar central core is present in most FGFs in the inner region with 28 highly conserved and six similar amino acid residues.[3] In the process of binding FGFs to their receptors, ten of these conserved amino acids are involved.[6] There is a β trefoil structure with four-stranded β sheets in the form of a triangular array in the structure of FGF1 and FGF2.[7] Four categories of homologous human receptors have been reported for FGFs: FGFR1 (acidic FGF), FGFR2 (basic FGF), FGFR3, and FGFR which have a sequence similarity of 56 to 71%.[8] All of these receptors show the specific components in their structure[910] [Figure 1].[71112]

Figure 1 Schematic diagram of fibroblast growth factor receptors. D = Domain

FGFRs/FGFs signaling pathway

FGFs act in coordination with heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs)—located at the mast cell surface and within the extracellular matrix—as high-affinity agonists for FGF receptors (FGFRs). The following pathway can be defined for FGF signaling when linked to its receptor [Figure 2].

Figure 2 Key signaling pathways of activated fibroblast growth factor receptors. PI3K: Phosphoinositide 3-kinases. PIP2 and 3: Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate and Phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)- trisphosphate. AKT: Protein kinase B (PKB), also known as Akt. Grb2: Growth Factor Receptor Bound Protein 2. SOS: Son of Sevenless. RAS: Ras GTPase. RAF: Rapidly Accelerated Fibrosarcoma. MEK: Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (also known as MAP2K, MEK, MAPKK). Erk2: MAPK1. PLCγ: Phospholipase C Gamma. PKC: Protein kinase C. CaM kinase: Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase. JAK: Janus kinases. STAT: Signal transducer and activator of transcription

Following the binding of FGF/HSPG to FGFR, dimerization of monomer receptors occurs in the cell membrane; tyrosine residues located in the cytoplasmic kinase domain undergo autophosphorylation. Subsequently, tyrosine phosphorylation causes the binding of the Src homology (SH2) domain of phospholipase C gamma (PLC-γ) to the receptor and eventually activates the protein kinase C (PKC). PKC activation promotes the signaling pathway of RAS–MAPK and PI3K–AKT through FRS2 and GRB2 adaptor proteins. Jun N-terminal kinase and JAK/STAT pathways are also persuaded by FGFR signaling.[110]

Dysregulation of FGFRs/FGFs signaling pathway

The abnormal signaling of FGFRs relates to carcinogenicity in three chief positions: 1) resistance to anticancer agents, 2) angiogenesis, and 3) mutations in FGFR genes which stimulate the proliferation and differentiation of cancer cells.[2313] Advances in molecular diagnosis techniques and personalized medicine allow the identification of gene mutations involved in many malignancies.[1415161718]

Various studies have identified the FGFR signaling pathway as the most frequent signaling route for tyrosine kinase mutants.[1920] Induction of FGFR mutations may cause erroneous signaling by increased domain kinase activation, modified affinity for FGF ligands, and independent dimerization of receptor ligands.[212223242526]

Based on the clinical trials, the advantages of FGFR inhibitors have been demonstrated in breast cancer, brain tumors, gastric, and lung cancer.[272829]

So, it can be said that understanding the pathogenic mechanisms in FGFs and FGFRs due to mutations, gene mergers, and gene amplifications has resulted in therapeutic approaches for diseases such as chondrodysplasia and craniosynostosis syndromes.[2]

FGFs and angiogenesis

Angiogenesis, as a multi-step process, involves the formation of new blood vessels from pre-existing vessels and plays an essential role in wound, inflammation, embryonic development, and tumor growth.[30] Vessels grow in an unregulated way, under pathological conditions like diabetic retinopathy, cancer of rheumatoid arthritis, and tumor progression.[31] The FGFs family (introduced as the first angiogenic molecule)[32] is one of the angiogenesis inducers.[30] In endothelial cells, expression of FGFR1,2 in vitro has been reported, while expression of types 3 and 4 has not been reported.[333435363738] Given the role and importance of FGFs in the vascularization of human tumors, the development of anti-angiogenic therapies with a focus on FGF2, FGF3, and FGF4—particularly FGF2—is a practical and new approach for patient treatment.[9273039]

In addition to FGFR-targeted therapies, another therapeutic strategy for targeting the extracellular domains of FGFRs has been developed, which creates more opportunities for different isoforms’ selective inhibition of these receptors.[40414243]

FGFs and tumor growth/targeting FGFRs signaling in cancer

Tumors are made up of a variety of cancer and stromal cells, including inflammatory cells (macrophage, lymphocyte, and mast cells), fibroblasts, and vascular areas. Stromal and parenchymal cancer cells can express different types of FGFRs and release different kinds of FGFs in the tumor environment, creating an intricate system of autocrine and paracrine secretions.

The interaction between the tumor and the host regulates the remaining stages of tumor progression, including cancer cell survival, proliferation, angiogenesis, invasion, metastasis, and response to treatment. Studies have reported that activating FGF/FGFR system plays a significant role in tumor proliferation, differentiation, and resistance to chemotherapy by affecting both tumor and stromal cells.[1210] FGF signaling can be considered a target for cancer treatment. Various types of cancers such as endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer, cervical cancer, hepatocellular cancer, colorectal cancer, small cell lung cancer, gastric cancer, squamous head and neck cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, glioblastoma, and melanoma are related to phenomena such as mutation, amplification, overexpression, and translocation of FGFRs.[4445] This process justifies the necessity of developing FGFR inhibitors.[214647]

Resistance to anticancer therapy

One of the main challenges we face in creating an effective and stable dose for cancer treatment is resistance to treatment.

Interference between the FGFR signaling and other carcinogenic pathways may be involved in resistance to anticancer substances.[484950] For further understanding of biological response along with resistance to chemotherapy about FGF/FGFR inhibitors, concurrent utilization of next-generation sequencing (NGS) with the ctDNA can help us.[51]

Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to the modeling of intelligent behavior through a computer with the least human involvement.

The invention of robots led to the world of AI; it is the technology that can think. Of course, this ability to think is very different from what we know as human thinking, but it tries to imitate it. The basis of AI is to define human intelligence and its way of working in such a way that a machine can easily implement it and correctly perform the tasks assigned to it. The purpose of AI is based on three foundations: learning, reasoning, and understanding.

AI is a broad branch of computing concerned with the construction of intelligent machines able to perform tasks that are normally in need of human intelligence. AI is an interdisciplinary science with many approaches but advances in machine learning and deep learning are creating a paradigm shift in almost every part of the technology industry.[52535455]

AI in health

The most considerable point in this field is to improve patient outcomes while reducing costs. Companies active in the health field want to use machine learning to make a better and faster diagnosis and treatment process. One of the most well-known technologies in this field is the IBM Watson system.

Challenges of AI

The application of AI faces many challenges. The main challenge that businesses have to deal with in applying AI is related to people, the requirement of data and information, or business preferences and balances.[5657]

Drug discovery

Drug discovery is the process of identifying new medications or substances that can be used to treat diseases or conditions. It involves target identification/selection, target validation, lead compound identification, hit-to-lead optimization, preclinical development, clinical development, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, and post-marketing surveillance. The overall goal of drug discovery is to find safe and effective drugs that can be applied to improve human health and treat various ailments. This approach is complex and time-consuming; it is a big challenge to identify an effective drug for a specific disease. At present, AI is widely used in biological and chemical sciences for drug discovery and designing processes.[58596061626364]

Drug repurposing

Drug repurposing or drug repositioning is the identification of novel therapeutic properties for already existing US FDA-approved drugs. Specifically, a known molecule in usual use or a drug under development for treating specific diseases along with showing a potential effect for a different pathological condition is reinvestigated for that target.[6566] The progress of a new drug which is an expensive process may take 10 to 15 years. For this reason, since 1995, the number of drugs approved by the FDA has decreased. So, repurposing drugs has appeared as another way of drug development.[6768] This method is an AI approach, and its main purpose is to increase the speed and reduce the cost and risk of the drug discovery process.[65]

The two main advantages of this approach are knowing the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of drugs and the low cost of its implementation. In addition, this method is particularly significant in low- to middle-income countries because typical treatments are not economically available to the public.[697071]

Drug repositioning steps

Both experimental and computational methods can be performed for drug repositioning. An important step in drug repurposing is an in-depth understanding of the genomics and molecular pathways involved in human disease and the activity of drugs to discover new mechanisms, dosage rates, and the achievement of innovative goals. Various approaches available for this method are (1) target-based, (2) drug-based, and (3) disease-based. Target-based approach is associated with the integration of pathway knowledge, disease-associated proteins, and biomarkers to detect a new specific “druggable” goal or mechanism and therapy. Drug-based is based on the resemblance between molecular structures of available drugs, and disease-based is connected with the finding of new planning for drug intermediation in a disease. An example of the identification of a “druggable” disease phenotype includes cidofovir—an antiviral-endowed drug with an antitumor effect for the treatment of papillomavirus-associated tumors. Cidofovir works via the inhibition of FGF-2-dependent metastatic potential of FGF2-T-MAE and melanoma B16 tumors inseminated into mice and zebrafish embryos.[66]

Computational methods aggregate genomic, phenotypic, chemical, pharmacological, and clinical data from various databases, including Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), Biotechnology Information (NCBI), Drug Bank, PubChem, and PharmGKB. Technologies and bioinformatics approaches such as machine learning, text-mining research, and biological network analysis are useful to obtain thorough data about drugs and diseases. Recent advances in genomics knowledge, disease-related pathways, and the availability of databases support the potential of drug repositioning in personalized medicine.[66] Personalized medicine, also known as precision medicine, is a medical approach that aims to tailor medical treatments and interventions to individual patients. It involves the use of genetic, environmental, and lifestyle information to determine the most effective and safe treatment options for each patient.

Personalized medicine is based on the idea that every individual is unique, and their response to diseases, medications, and therapies can vary. Through personalized medicine, healthcare providers can better understand and predict an individual’s susceptibility to specific diseases, select the most appropriate treatment strategies, and adjust drug dosages or interventions based on each patient’s specific needs. It holds the potential to enhance patient care, prevent adverse drug reactions, improve treatment outcomes, and optimize resource allocation in healthcare systems. However, it is important to note that the implementation of personalized medicine in routine clinical practice is still an evolving field with ongoing research and technological developments.

So far, many studies have been conducted in the field of AI, drug repositioning, and FGF receptor inhibitors. However, the necessity of a study that can summarize the results of most of these studies and present them in one place is evident. For this reason, we decided to look at the published studies related to these fields in the last 20 years and present their results in the format of a review.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a broad literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases to obtain all available human studies in the past 20 years in related fields. The articles reviewed for this study are available in the mentioned databases.

Search Strategy

Specific human studies published in English that were available between 1997 and 2023—contained in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases—were reviewed. Four keyword groups including artificial intelligence, computational drug design, drug repositioning, and FGF receptor inhibitors were used in this study. The search strategy of the PubMed database was used as a pattern to search the other databases.

(“Artificial Intelligence” [Mesh] OR Artificial Intelligence [tiab]) AND (“Drug Repositioning” [Mesh] OR Drug Repositioning [tiab] OR drug repurposing [tiab] OR reprogramming [tiab]) AND (“Fibroblast Growth Factors” [Mesh] OR “Fibroblast Growth Factors” [All fields] OR “Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor” [Mesh] OR Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor [tiab] OR FGFR Protein [tiab]) AND (“Meta-Analysis” [Publication Type] OR “Meta-Analysis” OR “Systematic Review” [Publication Type] OR “Systematic Review”). The literature review was conducted on July 2, 2023.

Duplicate studies were removed using comprehensive management software (EndNote 20, Thomson Reuters, New York, NY, USA). After that, in the first stage, the researchers checked the articles’ titles and abstracts based on the inclusion criteria. In the second stage, they examined the articles’ study designs and the main texts. In the third step, the information extracted from the selected studies was analyzed.

After obtaining relevant studies through searching in the main databases, other sources including gray literature were searched to minimize the number of missing studies.

Selection criteria

Human and animal studies in the fields of AI, computational drug design, and drug repurposing or drug repositioning were used to conduct this review. Original and review studies were taken into consideration as well. Conference reports, articles for which the full text was not available, and also study protocols were excluded.

RESULTS

The article searches and features of the included studies

Using the search strategy, a total of 238 studies were recognized. 139 duplicate and non-related studies through reference management software were detected and removed. Based on the title and abstract assessment, 48 articles met the inclusion criteria. Finally, 26 articles were selected for the terminal analysis based on full-text retrieval [Figure 3].

Figure 3 Articles identified in the stages of screening, qualifying, and entering the review

Application of drug repositioning for the design of FGFRs inhibitors

Because cancer is one of the deadliest diseases known, many efforts are made to find more effective and safer alternatives using drug repurposing. For example, many studies have been conducted on cardiovascular drugs for antitumor therapy.[72]

Considering that FGF receptors, which are among receptor tyrosine kinases, are dysregulated in cancers, they have become key drug targets in the last two decades. To date, 62 kinase inhibitors have been approved, of which fifty-two kinase inhibitors are TKI. Failed TKIs are used by the drug repositioning approach to discover new applications.[68737475]

Classification of anti-FGFR drugs with IC50 < 100 nmol against at least one FGFR based on drug repositioning

Overall, there are two different classifications of FGFR inhibitors. The first class is “multitarget” TKIs or nonselective FGFR TKIs which often target VEGFRs and generally have remarkable bioactivity against the FGFR family. Highly bioactive FGFR or selective FGFR TKIs are the second class. Selective inhibitors were developed to dominate the off-target effects of nonselective inhibitors. Here, we mention some of them that have entered the clinical phases and are being used:[76]

TKI258 (dovitinib), BIBF1120 (nintedanib), E3810, E7080 (lenvatinib), BMS582664 (brivanib), ENMD-2076, TSU68 (orantinib), AP24534 (ponatinib) are multitargeted TKIs. AZD4547, BGJ398, LY2874455, monoclonal antibodies such as MGFR1877S, and finally FGF traps such as HGS1036/FP-1039 are selective TKIs.[777879808182838485868788]

Selective Anti-FGFR TKIs

AZD4547 (a highly active FGFR selective inhibitor), BGJ398, and LY2874455 as selective FGFR TKIs have been evaluated for clinical phases.

AZD4547 is a selective kinase inhibitor that suppresses FGFR1-3 signaling and growth in tumor cell lines. In phase II clinical trials, AZD4547 is estimated. For example, in the study of Gavine PR and Chell V et al., oral administration of AZD4547 in a representative FGFR3-driven human tumor xenograft model induced antitumor activity.[8589]

BGJ398 is the next selective inhibitor of FGFR1-3.[86] Successful results of using this type of inhibitor to reduce tumor-induced lesions in amplified lung cancer have been reported in some studies.[90]

LY2874455 is examined in phase I clinical trial and is more potent in vivo evaluation in FGFR1-4 inhibiting than VEGFR[87] [Table 1].

Table 1 Fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors identified using drug repositioning

Inhibitor name	Original indication	Target	CT phase	Reference	
AZD4547	Antitumor activity	FGFR1-3 signaling	II, The drug is gradually entering the consumer market	[8589]	
BGJ398	Reduction of tumor-induced lesions in amplified lung cancer	FGFR1-3 signaling	II, The drug is gradually entering the consumer market	[8690]	
LY2874455	Multiple myeloma cancer	FGFR1-4 signaling	I	[87]	
	VEGFR2 signaling			
Dovitinib/TKI258	Advanced solid tumors,	VEGFR signaling	III	[91]	
Melanoma patient,	PDGFR signaling			
Breast cancer	FGFR1 signaling			
E3810	Advanced solid tumors	CSF-1R signaling	I	[79]	
	FGFR1,2 signaling			
	VEGFR1–3 signaling			
Nintedanib/BIBF1120	Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, Systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease	FGFR signaling	I	[78]	
PDGFR signaling			
VEGFR signaling			
Ponatinib/AP24534	Chronic myelogenous leukemia,	FGFR signaling	II	[96]	
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia				
Brivanib/BMS582664	Antitumor activity, Hepatocellular	VEGFR signaling	III	[8082839798]	
carcinoma	FGFR signaling			
Orantinib/TSU-68	Antitumor activity,	VEGFR signaling	III	[8082839798]	
Lung Cancer, Breast Cancer, Kidney	FGFR1 signaling			
Cancer, Gastric Cancer, and Prostate				
Cancer				
ENMD-2076	Antitumor activity,	VEGFR signaling	I	[8082839798]	
Hematopoietic cancer,	FGFR signaling			
Multiple myeloma,				
Advanced Cancer				
lenvatinib/E7080	Antitumor activity, Thyroid cancer,	VEGFR1, 2, 3 signaling	Approved by FDA*	[8082839798]	
Renal cell carcinoma,	FGFR1-4 signaling	
Hepatocellular carcinoma	PDGFRα signaling	
*Food and Drug Administration

Nonselective FGFR TKIs

Dovitinib (TKI258) has antitumor and antiangiogenic activities by inhibition of VEGFR, PDGFR, and FGFR.[77] One of the trials conducted with this drug has reported that its use in 35 patients with advanced solid tumors had positive effects except for side effects such as fatigue and digestive disorders. For instance, one melanoma patient had a partial answer to the treatment, and two patients had a stable condition of the disease for six months or more.[91] The results of a clinical trial study with 45 patients with advanced melanoma, except for side effects such as dehydration and fatigue, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and anorexia are associated with an increase in plasma levels of VEGF and FGF23 at the beginning of the treatment cycle. Also, FGFR1 inhibition has been reported.[92] In addition, in the phase II of a clinical study regarding patients with HER2-negative breast cancer—previously treated, metastatic, and under-treated with dovitinib—the antitumor activity of it was seen to inhibit amplified/HR-positive subset-FGFR1.[93] Today, this drug is being evaluated in phase III of the clinical trial as the third line of treatment for patients who have already been treated with mTOR inhibitors and VEGFR-TKI.[94]

E3810 is a strong inhibitor of CSF-1R, FGFR1,2, and VEGFR1–3.[79] E3810 was tested in a phase I clinical trial in advanced solid tumors. Side effects such as hypothyroidism, proteinuria, and hypertension have been noticed. In some patients, a partial response to treatment and stable disease status were observed.[95]

Nintedanib (BIBF1120) is an oral derivative of indolinone that inhibits FGFR, PDGFR, and VEGFR. In the phase I trial in Japanese patients, usage of BIBF1120 led to stable disease status in 76% of patients, but an increase in hepatic enzyme was also reported.[78]

Ponatinib (AP24534) is a multikinase inhibitor of BCR–ABL. This drug is under investigation in phase II of clinical trials in chronic myelogenous leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. AP24534 is an FGFR inhibitor in experimental assays, and in vitro, it was able to block cell proliferation. Based on these results, ponatinib is introduced as a possible treatment for solid tumors.[96]

Compounds such as brivanib/BMS582664, orantinib/TSU-68, ENMD-2076, and lenvatinib/E7080 are VEGFR inhibitors, but they also have anti-FGFR activity.[8082839798]

Based on the studies, it is determined that nonselective FGFR inhibitors have the potential to be used for cancer management and therapy. However, the chief toxicity stays for inhibition of VEGFR.[99] In general, based on the published articles, it can be said that multitarget kinase inhibitors are the first drug class to be approved, due to more advanced clinical studies. Inhibitors such as AZD4547 and BGJ398 are gradually entering the market and consumption cycle and are good options as combined treatments.[95] In the drug design field, we had considerable advances in the second-generation selective FGFRs inhibitors, although the complex nature of FGF/FGFR signaling needs expanded research; multiple factors affect the response to therapy[76] [Table 1].

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Drug repositioning is a new and effective strategy, wherein existing drugs are assessed for new therapeutic uses beyond their original intended indications. This approach aims to identify new ways to repurpose approved or investigational drugs for different diseases or conditions. Drug repositioning can potentially save time and resources compared to de novo drug discovery (the main objective is to identify and develop entirely new drugs to target specific diseases or conditions). According to the reviewed studies, using AI systems, this approach can introduce new drug targets for the inhibition of different receptors like FGFRs. These strategies will be helpful for patients that have pharmacological resistance to current medication, mainly in low-income countries—as the required time and cost to produce a new drug will be saved. Besides, the drugs designed with this approach are based on the mechanism, and the treatment with them will be more targeted.

Inhibition of FGFRs using small molecules suggests a new and practical approach for cancer therapy induced by aberrations of FGFRs. A deep comprehension of the tissue-specific nature of the FGFRs signaling pathway and its integration with the AI and drug repositioning methods can help in the more successful treatment of tumorigenesis and different types of cancers. According to published reports, nonselective FGFRs inhibitors can be used for cancer management, and multitarget kinase inhibitors are the first drug class approved due to more advanced clinical studies. For example, AZD4547 and BGJ398 are gradually entering the consumption cycle and are good options as combined treatments. So, drug repositioning use can successfully design and run models to preselect suitable drug targets for inhibition of tumor development and carcinogenicity in the future.

Future perspective

AI and drug repositioning hold immense potential for identifying new drugs and therapeutic uses. Drug repositioning and AI can increase efficiency, repurpose existing drugs, treat rare diseases, and malignancies such as cancer, reduce costs, accelerate drug discovery, enable personalized medicine, and facilitate combination therapies; they are expected to revolutionize drug discovery and reshape the pharmaceutical industry in the future.

The design and implementation of such studies by providing new insights related to personalized medicine can be a basis for preliminary planning and providing correct interventions to improve the quality of life of patients; their results can strengthen the relationship between research and the clinic.[100]

Limitations

Lack of comprehensive data and literature, limitation of complete knowledge about the underlying molecular mechanisms, and the difficulty in the interpretation of complex data about AI and drug repositioning are the most significant limitations of this study.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study was supported by Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgment

This project has been completed with the support and cooperation of the Research Committee of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. Therefore, the authors would like to appreciate them.
==== Refs
REFERENCES

1 Presta M Chiodelli P Giacomini A Rusnati M Ronca R Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) in cancer:FGF traps as a new therapeutic approach Pharmacol Ther 2017 179 171 87 28564583
2 Ornitz DM Itoh N The Fibroblast Growth Factor signaling pathway Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol 2015 4 215 66 25772309
3 Ornitz DM Itoh N Fibroblast growth factors Genome Biol 2001 2 REVIEWS3005
4 Bernuy J Gonzales GF [Bone mineral metabolism in patients with chronic kidney disease:Review of its pathophysiology and morbimortality Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica 2015 32 326 34 26338395
5 Belov AA Mohammadi M Molecular mechanisms of fibroblast growth factor signaling in physiology and pathology Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2013 5 a015958 23732477
6 Plotnikov AN Hubbard SR Schlessinger J Mohammadi M Crystal structures of two FGF-FGFR complexes reveal the determinants of ligand-receptor specificity Cell 2000 101 413 24 10830168
7 Kurniawan F Kartasasmita RE Tjahjono DH Pyrazolylporphyrin Derivatives as New Potential Ligand for Melanoma Cancer Radiopharmaceutical Kit: In Silico Study, in 3rd International Conference on Computation for Science and Technology (ICCST-3) 2015 10 15 Atlantis Press
8 Itoh N Ornitz DM Evolution of the Fgf and Fgfr gene families Trends Genet 2004 20 563 9 15475116
9 Farrell B Breeze AL Structure, activation and dysregulation of fibroblast growth factor receptor kinases:Perspectives for clinical targeting Biochem Soc Trans 2018 46 1753 70 30545934
10 Gallo LH Nelson KN Meyer AN Donoghue DJ Functions of fibroblast growth factor receptors in cancer defined by novel translocations and mutations Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2015 26 425 49 26003532
11 Zhu X Komiya H Chirino A Faham S Fox GM Arakawa T Three-dimensional structures of acidic and basic fibroblast growth factors Science 1991 251 90 3 1702556
12 Eriksson AE Cousens LS Weaver LH Matthews BW Three-dimensional structure of human basic fibroblast growth factor Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991 88 3441 5 1707542
13 Katoh M Fibroblast growth factor receptors as treatment targets in clinical oncology Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2019 16 105 22 30367139
14 Brooks AN Kilgour E Smith PD Molecular pathways:Fibroblast growth factor signaling:A new therapeutic opportunity in cancer Clin Cancer Res 2012 18 1855 62 22388515
15 Singh D Chan JM Zoppoli P Niola F Sullivan R Castano A Transforming fusions of FGFR and TACC genes in human glioblastoma Science 2012 337 1231 5 22837387
16 Di Stefano AL Fucci A Frattini V Labussiere M Mokhtari K Zoppoli P Detection, characterization, and inhibition of FGFR-TACC fusions in IDH wild-type glioma Clin Cancer Res 2015 21 3307 17 25609060
17 Parker BC Annala MJ Cogdell DE Granberg KJ Sun Y Ji P The tumorigenic FGFR3-TACC3 gene fusion escapes miR-99a regulation in glioblastoma J Clin Invest 2013 123 855 65 23298836
18 Majewski IJ Mittempergher L Davidson NM Bosma A Willems SM Horlings HM Identification of recurrent FGFR3 fusion genes in lung cancer through kinome-centred RNA sequencing J Pathol 2013 230 270 6 23661334
19 Greenman C Stephens P Smith R Dalgliesh GL Hunter C Bignell G Patterns of somatic mutation in human cancer genomes Nature 2007 446 153 8 17344846
20 Ahmad I Iwata T Leung HY Mechanisms of FGFR-mediated carcinogenesis Biochim Biophys Acta 2012 1823 850 60 22273505
21 Billerey C Chopin D Aubriot-Lorton MH Ricol D Gil Diez de Medina S Van Rhijn B Frequent FGFR3 mutations in papillary non-invasive bladder (pTa) tumors Am J Pathol 2001 158 1955 9 11395371
22 Al-Ahmadie HA Iyer G Janakiraman M Lin O Heguy A Tickoo SK Somatic mutation of fibroblast growth factor receptor-3 (FGFR3) defines a distinct morphological subtype of high-grade urothelial carcinoma J Pathol 2011 224 270 9 21547910
23 Wang J Mikse O Liao RG Li Y Tan L Janne PA Ligand-associated ERBB2/3 activation confers acquired resistance to FGFR inhibition in FGFR3-dependent cancer cells Oncogene 2015 34 2167 77 24909170
24 Byron SA Chen H Wortmann A Loch D Gartside MG Dehkhoda F The N550K/H mutations in FGFR2 confer differential resistance to PD173074, dovitinib, and ponatinib ATP-competitive inhibitors Neoplasia 2013 15 975 88 23908597
25 Pollock PM Gartside MG Dejeza LC Powell MA Mallon MA Davies H Frequent activating FGFR2 mutations in endometrial carcinomas parallel germline mutations associated with craniosynostosis and skeletal dysplasia syndromes Oncogene 2007 26 7158 62 17525745
26 Byron SA Gartside MG Wellens CL Mallon MA Keenan JB Powell MA Inhibition of activated fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 in endometrial cancer cells induces cell death despite PTEN abrogation Cancer Res 2008 68 6902 7 18757403
27 Yoo JH Choi GD Kang SS Pathogenicity of thermolabile methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase for vascular dementia Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000 20 1921 5 10938012
28 Shern JF Chen L Chmielecki J Wei JS Patidar R Rosenberg M Comprehensive genomic analysis of rhabdomyosarcoma reveals a landscape of alterations affecting a common genetic axis in fusion-positive and fusion-negative tumors Cancer Discov 2014 4 216 31 24436047
29 Taylor JG 6th Cheuk AT Tsang PS Chung JY Song YK Desai K Identification of FGFR4-activating mutations in human rhabdomyosarcomas that promote metastasis in xenotransplanted models J Clin Invest 2009 119 3395 407 19809159
30 Presta M Dell'Era P Mitola S Moroni E Ronca R Rusnati M Fibroblast growth factor/fibroblast growth factor receptor system in angiogenesis Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2005 16 159 78 15863032
31 Cross MJ Claesson-Welsh L FGF and VEGF function in angiogenesis:Signalling pathways, biological responses and therapeutic inhibition Trends Pharmacol Sci 2001 22 201 7 11282421
32 Shing Y Folkman J Sullivan R Butterfield C Murray J Klagsbrun M Heparin affinity:Purification of a tumor-derived capillary endothelial cell growth factor Science 1984 223 1296 9 6199844
33 Bastaki M Nelli EE Dell'Era P Rusnati M Molinari-Tosatti MP Parolini S Basic fibroblast growth factor-induced angiogenic phenotype in mouse endothelium. A study of aortic and microvascular endothelial cell lines Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997 17 454 64 9102163
34 Javerzat S Auguste P Bikfalvi A The role of fibroblast growth factors in vascular development Trends Mol Med 2002 8 483 9 12383771
35 Dell'Era P Belleri M Stabile H Massardi ML Ribatti D Presta M Paracrine and autocrine effects of fibroblast growth factor-4 in endothelial cells Oncogene 2001 20 2655 63 11420677
36 Moscatelli D Presta M Joseph-Silverstein J Rifkin DB Both normal and tumor cells produce basic fibroblast growth factor J Cell Physiol 1986 129 273 6 3021787
37 Presta M Moscatelli D Joseph-Silverstein J Rifkin DB Purification from a human hepatoma cell line of a basic fibroblast growth factor-like molecule that stimulates capillary endothelial cell plasminogen activator production, DNA synthesis, and migration Mol Cell Biol 1986 6 4060 6 3025628
38 Polnaszek N Kwabi-Addo B Peterson LE Ozen M Greenberg NM Ortega S Fibroblast growth factor 2 promotes tumor progression in an autochthonous mouse model of prostate cancer Cancer Res 2003 63 5754 60 14522896
39 Wei J Hemmings GP Allelic association of the MTHFR gene with schizophrenia Mol Psychiatry 1999 4 115 6 10208443
40 Bono F De Smet F Herbert C De Bock K Georgiadou M Fons P Inhibition of tumor angiogenesis and growth by a small-molecule multi-FGF receptor blocker with allosteric properties Cancer Cell 2013 23 477 88 23597562
41 Pierce KL Deshpande AM Stohr BA Gemo AT Patil NS Brennan TJ FPA144, a humanized monoclonal antibody for both FGFR2-amplified and nonamplified, FGFR2b-overexpressing gastric cancer patients American Society of Clinical Oncology 2014
42 Blackwell C Sherk C Fricko M Ganji G Barnette M Hoang B Inhibition of FGF/FGFR autocrine signaling in mesothelioma with the FGF ligand trap, FP-|y1039/GSK3052230 Oncotarget 2016 7 39861 71 27223434
43 Herbert C Schieborr U Saxena K Juraszek J De Smet F Alcouffe C Molecular mechanism of SSR128129E, an extracellularly acting, small-molecule, allosteric inhibitor of FGF receptor signaling Cancer Cell 2013 23 489 501 23597563
44 Hierro C Rodon J Tabernero J Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) Receptor/FGF Inhibitors:Novel Targets and Strategies for Optimization of Response of Solid Tumors Semin Oncol 2015 42 801 19 26615127
45 Ghedini GC Ronca R Presta M Giacomini A Future applications of FGF/FGFR inhibitors in cancer Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2018 18 861 72 29936878
46 Qiu H Yashiro M Zhang X Miwa A Hirakawa K A FGFR2 inhibitor, Ki23057, enhances the chemosensitivity of drug-resistant gastric cancer cells Cancer Lett 2011 307 47 52 21482024
47 André F Bachelot T Campone M Dalenc F Perez-Garcia JM Hurvitz SA Targeting FGFR with dovitinib (TKI258):Preclinical and clinical data in breast cancer Clin Cancer Res 2013 19 3693 702 23658459
48 Ware KE Hinz TK Kleczko E Singleton KR Marek LA Helfrich BA A mechanism of resistance to gefitinib mediated by cellular reprogramming and the acquisition of an FGF2-FGFR1 autocrine growth loop Oncogenesis 2013 2 e39 23552882
49 Yadav V Zhang X Liu J Estrem S Li S Gong XQ Reactivation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway by FGF receptor 3 (FGFR3)/Ras mediates resistance to vemurafenib in human B-RAF V600E mutant melanoma J Biol Chem 2012 287 28087 98 22730329
50 Oliveras-Ferraros C Cufí S Queralt B Vazquez-Martin A Martin-Castillo B de Llorens R Cross-suppression of EGFR ligands amphiregulin and epiregulin and de-repression of FGFR3 signalling contribute to cetuximab resistance in wild-type KRAS tumour cells Br J Cancer 2012 106 1406 14 22491422
51 Chae YK Ranganath K Hammerman PS Vaklavas C Mohindra N Kalyan A Inhibition of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) pathway:The current landscape and barriers to clinical application Oncotarget 2017 8 16052 74 28030802
52 Hamet P Tremblay J Artificial intelligence in medicine Metabolism 2017 69S S36 40 28126242
53 Holzinger A Langs G Denk H Zatloukal K Müller H Causability and explainability of artificial intelligence in medicine Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov 2019 9 e1312 32089788
54 Amisha Malik P Pathania M Rathaur VK Overview of artificial intelligence in medicine J Family Med Prim Care 2019 8 2328 31 31463251
55 Mintz Y Brodie R Introduction to artificial intelligence in medicine Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2019 28 73 81 30810430
56 Gupta R Srivastava D Sahu M Tiwari S Ambasta RK Kumar P Artificial intelligence to deep learning:Machine intelligence approach for drug discovery Mol Divers 2021 25 1315 60 33844136
57 McCarthy J What is artificial intelligence 2007
58 Zhang L Tan J Han D Zhu H From machine learning to deep learning:Progress in machine intelligence for rational drug discovery Drug Discov Today 2017 22 1680 5 28881183
59 Jordan AM Artificial intelligence in drug design—the storm before the calm? ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters ACS Publications 2018 9 1150 2
60 Duch W Swaminathan K Meller J Artificial intelligence approaches for rational drug design and discovery Curr Pharm Des 2007 13 1497 508 17504169
61 Sternberg RJ Kaufman SB The Cambridge handbook of intelligence Cambridge University Press 2011
62 Harrer S Shah P Antony B Hu J Artificial intelligence for clinical trial design Trends Pharmacol Sci 2019 40 577 91 31326235
63 Hessler G Baringhaus KH Artificial intelligence in drug design Molecules 2018 23 1 13
64 Brown N Ertl P Lewis R Luksch T Reker D Schneider N Artificial intelligence in chemistry and drug design J Comput Aided Mol Des 2020 34 709 15 32468207
65 Peyvandipour A Saberian N Shafi A Donato M Draghici S A novel computational approach for drug repurposing using systems biology Bioinformatics 2018 34 2817 25 29534151
66 Würth R Thellung S Bajetto A Mazzanti M Florio T Barbieri F Drug-repositioning opportunities for cancer therapy:Novel molecular targets for known compounds Drug Discov Today 2016 21 190 9 26456577
67 Wong HH Jessup A Sertkaya A Birkenbach A Berlind A Eyraud J Examination of clinical trial costs and barriers for drug development final, Off Assist. Secr. Plan. Eval. US Dep Heal Hum Serv 2014 1 92
68 Xue H Li J Xie H Wang Y Review of drug repositioning approaches and resources Int J Biol Sci 2018 14 1232 44 30123072
69 Pantziarka P Bouche G Meheus L Sukhatme V Sukhatme VP Repurposing drugs in your medicine cabinet:Untapped opportunities for cancer therapy? Future Oncol 2015 11 181 4 25591833
70 Experts in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia The price of drugs for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a reflection of the unsustainable prices of cancer drugs:From the perspective of a large group of CML experts Blood 2013 121 4439 42 23620577
71 André N Banavali S Snihur Y Pasquier E Has the time come for metronomics in low-income and middle-income countries? Lancet Oncol 2013 14 e239 48 23639324
72 Malik JA Ahmed S Momin SS Shaikh S Alafnan A Alanazi J Drug repurposing:A new hope in drug discovery for prostate cancer ACS Omega 2023 8 56 73 36643505
73 McDonell LM Kernohan KD Boycott KM Sawyer SL Receptor tyrosine kinase mutations in developmental syndromes and cancer:Two sides of the same coin Hum Mol Genet 2015 24 R60 6 26152202
74 Roskoski R Jr Properties of FDA-approved small molecule protein kinase inhibitors:A 2021 update Pharmacol Res 2021 165 105463 33513356
75 Gudernova I Balek L Varecha M Kucerova JF Kunova Bosakova M Fafilek B Inhibitor repurposing reveals ALK, LTK, FGFR, RET and TRK kinases as the targets of AZD1480 Oncotarget 2017 8 109319 31 29312610
76 Rouanne M Loriot Y Lebret T Soria JC Novel therapeutic targets in advanced urothelial carcinoma Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2016 98 106 15 26589398
77 Lee SH Lopes de Menezes D Vora J Harris A Ye H Nordahl L In vivo target modulation and biological activity of CHIR-258, a multitargeted growth factor receptor kinase inhibitor, in colon cancer models Clin Cancer Res 2005 11 3633 41 15897558
78 Hilberg F Roth GJ Krssak M Kautschitsch S Sommergruber W Tontsch-Grunt U BIBF 1120:Triple angiokinase inhibitor with sustained receptor blockade and good antitumor efficacy Cancer Res 2008 68 4774 82 18559524
79 Bello E Colella G Scarlato V Oliva P Berndt A Valbusa G E-3810 is a potent dual inhibitor of VEGFR and FGFR that exerts antitumor activity in multiple preclinical models Cancer Res 2011 71 1396 405 21212416
80 Matsui J Yamamoto Y Funahashi Y Tsuruoka A Watanabe T Wakabayashi T E7080, a novel inhibitor that targets multiple kinases, has potent antitumor activities against stem cell factor producing human small cell lung cancer H146, based on angiogenesis inhibition Int J Cancer 2008 122 664 71 17943726
81 Bhide RS Cai ZW Zhang YZ Qian L Wei D Barbosa S Discovery and preclinical studies of (R)-1-(4-(4-fluoro-2-methyl-1H-indol-5-yloxy)-5-methylpyrrolo[2, 1-f][1, 2, 4] triazin-6-yloxy) propan- 2-ol (BMS-540215), an in vivo active potent VEGFR-2 inhibitor J Med Chem 2006 49 2143 6 16570908
82 Fletcher GC Brokx RD Denny TA Hembrough TA Plum SM Fogler WE ENMD-2076 is an orally active kinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic and antiproliferative mechanisms of action Mol Cancer Ther 2011 10 126 37 21177375
83 Laird AD Vajkoczy P Shawver LK Thurnher A Liang C Mohammadi M SU6668 is a potent antiangiogenic and antitumor agent that induces regression of established tumors Cancer Res 2000 60 4152 60 10945623
84 O'Hare T Shakespeare WC Zhu X Eide CA Rivera VM Wang F AP24534, a pan-BCR-ABL inhibitor for chronic myeloid leukemia, potently inhibits the T315I mutant and overcomes mutation-based resistance Cancer Cell 2009 16 401 12 19878872
85 Gavine PR Mooney L Kilgour E Thomas AP Al-Kadhimi K Beck S AZD4547:An orally bioavailable, potent, and selective inhibitor of the fibroblast growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase family Cancer Res 2012 72 2045 56 22369928
86 Guagnano V Furet P Spanka C Bordas V Le Douget M Stamm C Discovery of3-(2,6-dichloro-3,5-dimethoxy-phenyl)-1-{6-[4-(4-ethyl-piperazin-1-yl)-phenylamino]-pyrimidin-4-yl}-1-methyl-urea (NVP-BGJ398), a potent and selective inhibitor of the fibroblast growth factor receptor family of receptor tyrosine kinase J Med Chem 2011 54 7066 83 21936542
87 Zhao G Li WY Chen D Henry JR Li HY Chen Z A novel, selective inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptors that shows a potent broad spectrum of antitumor activity in several tumor xenograft models Mol Cancer Ther 2011 10 2200 10 21900693
88 Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res; 2009 Apr 18-22 Denver, CO. Philadelphia (PA): AACR 2009 Abstract nr 2789
89 Chell V Balmanno K Little AS Wilson M Andrews S Blockley L Tumour cell responses to new fibroblast growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and identification of a gatekeeper mutation in FGFR3 as a mechanism of acquired resistance Oncogene 2013 32 3059 70 22869148
90 Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4 Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA) AACR Cancer Res 2012;72 (8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-122. doi: 1538-7445.AM2012-LB-122
91 Sarker D Molife R Evans TR Hardie M Marriott C Butzberger-Zimmerli P A phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of TKI258, an oral, multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor in patients with advanced solid tumors Clin Cancer Res 2008 14 2075 81 18381947
92 Kim KB Chesney J Robinson D Gardner H Shi MM Kirkwood JM Phase I/II and pharmacodynamic study of dovitinib (TKI258), an inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptors and VEGF receptors, in patients with advanced melanoma Clin Cancer Res 2011 17 7451 61 21976540
93 Andre F Bachelot TD Campone M Dalenc F Perez-Garcia JM Hurvitz SA A multicenter, open-label phase II trial of dovitinib, an FGFR1 inhibitor, in FGFR1 amplified and non-amplified metastatic breast cancer J Clin Oncol 2011 29 (15_suppl) 508 508
94 Aghajanian C Blank SV Goff BA Judson PL Teneriello MG Husain A OCEANS:A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer J Clin Oncol 2012 30 2039 45 22529265
95 Soria J De Braud FG Cereda R Bahleda R Delmonte A Angevin E First-in-man study of E-|y3810, a novel VEGFR and FGFR inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors J Clin Oncol 2011 29 (15_suppl) TPS149
96 Gozgit JM Wong MJ Moran L Wardwell S Mohemmad QK Narasimhan NI Ponatinib (AP24534), a multitargeted pan-FGFR inhibitor with activity in multiple FGFR-amplified or mutated cancer models Mol Cancer Ther 2012 11 690 9 22238366
97 Jonker DJ Rosen LS Sawyer MB de Braud F Wilding G Sweeney CJ A phase I study to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a dual VEGFR and FGFR inhibitor, brivanib, in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors Ann Oncol 2011 22 1413 9 21131369
98 Yamada K Yamamoto N Yamada Y Nokihara H Fujiwara Y Hirata T Phase I dose-escalation study and biomarker analysis of E7080 in patients with advanced solid tumors Clin Cancer Res 2011 17 2528 37 21372218
99 Dieci MV Arnedos M Andre F Soria JC Fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors as a cancer treatment:From a biologic rationale to medical perspectives Cancer Discov 2013 3 264 79 23418312
100 Morand S Devanaboyina M Staats H Stanbery L Nemunaitis J Ovarian Cancer Immunotherapy and Personalized Medicine Int J Mol Sci 2021 22 6532 34207103
