
==== Front
Yale J Biol MedYale J Biol MedThe Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine0044-00861551-4056Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine Cancer MechanismsCancer issueThe Role of MicroRNAs in Cancer Stahlhut Espinosa Carlos E. Slack Frank J. *Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut* To whom all correspondence should be addressed: Carlos E. Stahlhut Espinosa and Frank J. Slack, Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University School of Medicine, 266 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, CT 06520. Tel: 203-432-3493; E-mail: carlos.stahlhut@yale.edu; frank.slack@yale.edu.10 2007 12 2006 79 3-4 131 140 Copyright ©2006, Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine2006Yale Journal of Biology and MedicineThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY-NC license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You may not use the material for commercial purposes.Cancer is a complex and dynamic disease, involving a variety of changes in gene expression and structure. Traditionally, the study of cancer has focused on protein-coding genes, considering these as the principal effectors and regulators of tumorigenesis. Recent advances, however, have brought non-protein-coding RNA into the spotlight. MicroRNAs (miRNAs), one such class of non-coding RNAs, have been implicated in the regulation of cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis [1]. While their study is still at an early stage, and their mechanism of action along with their importance in cancer is not yet fully understood, they may provide an important layer of genetic regulation in tumorigenesis, and ultimately become valuable therapeutic tools.
==== Body
Introduction
MicroRNAs are small, non-coding RNAs of 18 to 24 nucleotides, discovered in 1993 in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Lee et al. [2] found that a gene crucial for C. elegans post-embryonic development, lin-4, does not code for a protein, but rather is transcribed into a 22-nucleotide RNA molecule. This molecule could repress the expression of the lin-14 mRNA by directly interacting with its 3' untranslated region (UTR) [3]. While this was recognized as a new method of gene regulation, it was initially considered as an oddity peculiar to C. elegans. The discovery of let-7, another small RNA involved in developmental timing in C. elegans [4], and the finding that both its sequence and temporal expression pattern were largely conserved in a variety of organisms [5] immediately suggested these small RNAs might in fact play important and conserved roles in gene regulation, and the identification of hundreds of miRNAs in the worm, fly, and mammalian genomes followed [1].

To date, more than 300 miRNAs have been discovered in humans, and computational analyses predict that up to 1,000 miRNAs exist in the genome [6,7]. Since miRNAs can regulate more than one target, estimates indicate they may be able to regulate up to 30 percent of the protein-coding genes in the human genome [8], highlighting their importance as global regulators of gene expression.

miRNA Biogenesis and Method of Action
MiRNAs are transcribed by RNA Polymerase II into large precursor RNAs, often several kilobases in length, called pri-miRNAs. Notably, the majority of human miRNAs are transcribed from regions found within introns of either protein-coding or non-protein-coding transcripts, but a minority is found in isolated regions of the genome, within the exons of noncoding mRNA genes, or within the 3'UTRs of mRNA genes.

In the nucleus, these pri-miRNAs are capped and polyadenylated prior to being processed by Drosha, a member of the RNase III enzyme family, in conjunction with the double-stranded RNA-binding protein DGCR8/Pasha. This processing step produces segments ∽70 nucleotides in length, which fold into stem-loop structures known as pre-miRNAs [9]. These are exported from the nucleus in a GTP-dependent fashion by exportin 5 and are subject to an additional processing step by another RNase III enzyme, Dicer. This step releases a double-stranded RNA duplex, ∽22 nucleotides in length, which in turn is incorporated into the miRISC complex, in analogous fashion to that observed in RNA interference (RNAi). In this complex, the mature miRNA strand is retained, and the complex is now capable of regulating its target genes.

The identification of miRNA target transcripts remains one of the greatest challenges in the field today. MiRNAs can be organized into families based on sequence homology, which is particularly strong at the 5' end of the mature miRNA, suggesting this section of the mature transcript has been preserved through evolution and thus plays an important role in the process of target recognition. Indeed, studies have shown this 5' region, often called the "miRNA seed," to be crucial for both the stability of the mature miRNA and its incorporation into the miRISC complex [10-14]. Bioinformatic approaches have taken advantage of this "miRNA seed" to predict miRNA targets across the genome. It has been predicted that a single miRNA can bind over 200 different target transcripts, and, notably, these targets are highly diverse, from transcription factors to transporters [15-24].

There is nevertheless evidence supporting a role for the regions not encompassed within the "miRNA seed." Perhaps the clearest example of this is found in let-7, whose complete mature miRNA sequence is conserved across species [25], suggesting an important role for the 3' region of the miRNA in target transcript binding. Further insights into the miRNA-target recognition mechanism are needed, as they will make target prediction much more accurate and efficient.

A Potential Role for miRNAs in Cancer
Cancers of all types share a number of characteristics, such as the loss of cellular identity, an increased ability to grow and proliferate, and alterations in the systems controlling cell death. Studies performed in a variety of organisms have revealed that miRNAs have the ability to regulate these cellular processes, suggesting that they could be involved in cancer. For instance, lin-4 and let-7 control the timing of developmental events in C. elegans. Mutations in these miRNAs resulted in abnormalities in cell-cycle exit as well as in the execution of a terminal differentiation program, preventing cells from reaching their fully differentiated state [2].

In Drosophila, it has been found that over-expression of the Bantam miRNA causes excessive growth of wing and eye tissue by blocking the pro-apoptotic action of the gene hid [26,27]. It was also found that another Drosophila miRNA, miR-14, can act as a strong suppressor of apoptosis. Deletion of this miRNA caused increased expression of the apoptotic effector caspase, Drice, suggesting a direct regulation of this factor by miR-14 [28]. Likewise, the miR-2/6/11/13/308 family of Drosophila miRNAs has been reported to induce widespread apoptosis in embryos through the regulation of the proapoptotic factors hid, grim, reaper, and sickle, which act through the inhibition the caspase inhibitor Diap1 in response to a number of natural and toxic conditions [29].

Another aspect in which miRNAs appear to have a role is the proper differentiation of cells into different tissues. For example, miR-273 and the miRNA encoded by lys-6 have been shown to play important roles in the patterning of the C. elegans nervous system [30,31], and miR-430 has been implicated in brain development [3]. The importance of miRNA in development has been shown also in mammalian systems, examples of which are miR-181 in the differentiation of hematopoietic cells toward the B-cell lineage [33], miR-374 in pancreatic islet-cell development [34], miR-143 in adipocyte differentiation [35], miR-196 in limb patterning by SHH [36], and miR-1 in heart development [37].

miRNAs as Tumor Suppressors
miR-15a and miR-16-1 in CLL
The first study directly suggesting that dysregulation of miRNA played an important role for miRNAs in tumorigenesis came from Calin et al. [38] It was known that loss of chromosomal region 13q14 was strongly associated with B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the most common form of leukemia in the Western hemisphere; however, no gene or genes had been definitely directly linked with CLL. After refining the critical region within 13q14 to about 30kb, Calin et al. failed to identify any protein coding genes but recognized that two miRNAs, miR-15a and miR-16-1, were clustered within this chromosomal locus. Indeed, expression of these miRNAs was found to be diminished or completely ablated in > 65 percent of CLL cases examined. Further studies revealed a germline C-to-T mutation seven base pairs downstream of the miR-16-1 hairpin in two out of 75 CLL patients. This mutation was not found in any of 160 control individuals. Because the mechanisms for miRNA biogenesis are not yet fully understood, it is unclear what the precise effect of this mutation is; however, it was found that the mutation correlated with diminished expression of this miRNA in patient-derived CLL cells, while preventing the processing of the miRNA into its mature form when expressed in heterologous cell systems [39].

The common loss of miR-15a and miR-16-1 in CLL, as well as the loss of 13q14 in mantle cell lymphoma (50 percent of cases), multiple myeloma (16 to 40 percent) and prostate cancer (60 percent) [38,40], strongly suggests that these two miRNAs act as tumor suppressor genes. While their full target complement is unknown, they appear to mediate their effects largely by down-regulating the anti-apoptotic protein BCL2. This protein is often found expressed at high levels in CLL and is thought to be important for the survival of the malignant cells [41]. Consistent with a role for these miRNAs in the down-regulation of BCL2, loss of miR-15a and miR-16-1 correlates with elevated levels of BCL2, while heterologous expression of these miRNAs results in decreased levels of the endogenous proteins [42]. The 3'UTR of the Bcl2 transcript has been found to contain binding sites for miR-15a and miR-16-1, and reporter constructs containing the Bcl2 3'UTR are downregulated upon co-expression with miR-15a and miR-16-1. Moreover, expression of these miRNAs is capable of inducing apoptosis in a leukemia cell line. Further research is necessary to better evaluate whether miR-15a and miR-16-1 exert their effects mainly through BCL2 or target additional transcripts in CLL. Nonetheless, the evidence available supports an important role for miR-15a and miR-16-1 in the prevention of lymphomagenesis and leukaemogenesis.

The let-7 family can negatively regulate Ras
As noted earlier, the miRNAs of the let-7 family were among the first to be described, and experiments performed in C. elegans provided the first indication that they may be involved in cancer. Early studies showed that loss-of-function let-7 mutants were defective in the transition from late larval to adult stage. Upregulation of let-7 in adult seam cells, on the other hand, is necessary to induce cell-cycle exit and terminal differentiation. If this miRNA is absent, these cells fail to differentiate, undergoing additional rounds of division, a phenomenon often observed in cancer cells [43].

There are 12 let-7 homologs in the human genome, organized in eight clusters. These clusters map to fragile sites associated with lung, breast, urothelial, and cervical cancers, suggesting that let-7 family members may act as tumor suppressors. At least four of these clusters have been confirmed to be commonly lost in malignancies [44]. Studies by Takamizawa et al. and Yanaihara et al. have presented evidence that transcripts of certain let-7 homologs are significantly downregulated in human lung cancer and that low levels of let-7 correlate with poor prognosis [45,46]. Moreover, it has been shown that transient expression of miRNAs of the let-7 family in cell lines derived from lung adenocarcinomas inhibited colony formation, suggesting that these miRNAs could have growth-suppressing properties and opening the possibility that let-7 might be used as a therapeutic tool.

Important insights into the mechanism through which let-7 is capable of controlling cellular proliferation came from our laboratory, derived from the observation that the let-7 family member miR-84 negatively regulates let-60, the ortholog of human HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS in C. elegans [47]. We have shown that certain members of the let-7 family are capable of genetically interacting with RAS, and let-7 and RAS are reciprocally expressed in lung tumor samples. We also found that let-7 is capable of negatively regulating RAS in human cells, and overexpression of let-7 in human cancer cell lines results in reduced levels of RAS protein, compared to untreated cells. As expected, if let-7 levels are reduced in cancer cell lines, levels of RAS protein increase significantly. Moreover, through the use of reporter constructs, it was confirmed that the regulation of RAS by let-7 takes place through the direct interaction of the miRNA with the 3'UTR of Ras mRNA.

The human RAS family of proteins is one of the most important components of a myriad of signaling cascades, has been shown to possess oncogenic activity, and is often mutated in tumors [48]. As such, these studies position let-7 as a promising therapeutic tool for the treatment of lung cancer, as well as other malignancies resulting from the overexpression of RAS. It will be important to more carefully analyze the specific contributions of the individual members of this miRNA family, in order to better understand the let-7-mediated regulation of cell growth.

Other miRNAs acting as tumor suppressors
Studies have implicated other miRNAs in tumorigenesis. MiR-143 and miR-145, for instance, have been shown to be constantly down-regulated in colorectal tumors [49], and recent studies by Croce et al. also have shown that the downregulation of these miRNAs is a common occurrence in breast carcinomas and breast cancer lines [50]. Moreover, the location of these miRNAs is known to be in a genomic locus frequently deleted in myelodysplastic syndrome [44]. While some studies have ascribed the down-regulation of miR-143 and miR-145 in colon cancer to a block in Dicer processing [49], further studies are required to determine whether the expression levels of these miRNAs are specifically altered.

miRNAs as Oncogenes
Several microRNAs may regulate MYC in a dynamic manner
MicroRNAs can also act as oncogenes, either directly by down-regulating tumor suppressors or indirectly by down-regulating genes that can act to restrict the activity of known oncogenes. An example of this is found in the dynamics of the interaction between miR-155 and the MYC oncogene, a transcription factor with the ability to regulate cell growth through the induction of both cell proliferation and apoptosis [51]. Notably, MYC is often mutated or amplified in human cancers. The miRNA miR-155 has been linked with MYC overexpression and B-cell cancers, suggesting it may be playing a role in the regulation of this oncogene.

miR-155 is encoded by nucleotides 241-262 of BIC, which was originally identified as a transcript derived from an integration site for the avian leukosis virus and found to be overexpressed in B-cell lymphomas [52,53]. The understanding of how BIC might mediate its effects was limited for several years, as it remained unclear how a presumably non-protein-coding RNA with little overall conservation among avian, murine, and human genomes could consistently produce lymphomas and induce the overexpression of MYC. Metzler et al. analyzed the phylogenetically conserved regions in BIC and found that the highest homology was located in a 138 nucleotide section of the gene, which in fact encoded the pri-miRNA for miR-155 [54]. Subsequent studies showed that miR-155 expression is upregulated 100-fold in pediatric Burkitt lymphoma, as well as in Hodgkin’s lymphoma and primary mediastinal and certain subsets of large-B cell lymphomas [55,56,56]. The role of miR-155 is not restricted to B cell lymphomas, however. Recent studies have reported that miR-155 is upregulated in breast, lung, colon, and thyroid cancers [57-59]. It has also been reported that mice overexpressing miR-155 under the control of the Eµ enhancer rapidly develop B-cell malignancy, underscoring the ability of miR-155 to induce lymphomagenesis without the requirement for other major genetic changes, strongly suggesting miR-155 can act as a bona fide oncogene [60]. Nevertheless, the mechanism of action of miR-155 is unknown, stressing the need for further study of this miRNA.

The interaction with MYC is not exclusive to miR-155. Recent studies have described the relationship between MYC, cancer, and the 13q31 locus [61,62]. This genomic locus is amplified in a number of cancers, such as diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, and primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma. However, the only gene overexpressed in this amplicon is a non-protein-coding RNA, C13orf25 [63], which has been shown to encode the miR-17-92 cluster, containing seven miRNAs: miR-17-5p, miR-17-3p, miR-18a, miR-19a, miR-20a, miR-19b-1, and miR-92-1. He et al. have shown that cell lines carrying an amplification of 13q31 were analyzed, and it was found that six miRNAs had increased expression, five of which belonged to the miR-17-92 cluster [61]. Furthermore, it was also shown that the pri-miRNA for the miR-17-92 cluster was upregulated in 65 percent of the tested B cell lymphoma samples. These data suggested a direct involvement of this miRNA cluster in tumorigenesis.

Further indication of the involvement of the miR-17-92 cluster in cancer was found in subsequent experiments, in which the miR-17-19b-1 cluster (the vertebrate-specific segment of the miR-17-92 cluster) was overexpressed using a retroviral system in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) from mice carrying the Myc transgene. Lethally irradiated animals which received HSCs expressing both miR-17-19b-1 cluster and Myc developed malignant lymphomas more rapidly than those receiving HSCs expressing Myc alone. The lymphomas from mice expressing both Myc and miR-17-19b-1 were characterized by increased cell proliferation and decreased apoptosis levels, when compared to the malignancies arising from the mice receiving HSCs with Myc alone. Complementary experiments showed that this effect is exclusive to the miRNAs of the miR-17-19b-1 cluster and any one individual miRNA from this cluster is unable to cause accelerated lymphomagenesis. Together, these results suggest that the miRNAs composing the miR-17-19b-1 act cooperatively as oncogenes, presumably by targeting proapoptotic and anti-proliferative factors.

Independently, O’Donnell et al. identified the miR-17-92 cluster as a group of potentially cancer-related genes through microarray analysis of a set of human, mouse, and rat miRNAs to identify miRNAs with altered levels in a human B-cell line that overexpresses MYC [62]. It was found that MYC induced the expression of the miR-17-92 cluster. Moreover, chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments confirm this interaction by establishing that MYC binds within the first intronic region of C13orf25, suggesting that MYC has the ability to directly regulate the miR-17-92 cluster.

An intriguing scenario was suggested by the bioinformatic prediction that the members of the miR-17-92 cluster, miR-17-5p and miR-20a, target the transcription factor E2F1. E2F1 regulates the transition from G1 to S phase of the cell cycle by regulating genes that are involved in DNA replication, cell division, and apoptosis [64]. Notably, E2F1 is known to function in a reciprocal positive-feedback loop with MYC. Consistent with this, it was found that inhibition of miR-17-5 and miR-20a in a cervical cancer-derived cell line resulted in a concomitant increase in the expression level of E2F1. Likewise, mutations of the sites complementary to miR-17-5p and miR-20a in the 3'UTR of E2F1 resulted in increased reporter activity, compared with that of constructs harboring the wild-type sequence of E2F1’s 3'UTR. These results suggest a model in which MYC can induce the transcription of both the miR-17-92 cluster and E2F1; in turn, the miRNAs of the cluster negatively regulate the transcription of E2F1. One consequence of this model is that miRNAs of the miR-17-92 cluster directly regulate the effector of MYC-mediated cell growth.

An apparent paradox, however, also emerges from these results. In the presence of MYC, as noted above, the miR-17-92 cluster would function as a tumor suppressor, curbing the cellular growth mediated by E2F1, which is in contradiction with the results of He et al. that implicated miR-17-92 as an oncogene. These results can perhaps be reconciled by considering that while E2F1 can promote cellular proliferation, it has been reported that its presence in excess levels can induce apoptosis [64]. As such, the negative regulation of E2F1 by the miRNAs of the miR-17-92 cluster might in fact prevent E2F1 levels from reaching the threshold at which apoptosis is triggered, thus acting as an oncogene by supporting MYC-mediated proliferation.

It is clear that the interaction of miRNAs with their targets is not as straightforward as initial studies might have suggested and intricate regulatory networks are in place for any one cellular system. There exists the possibility that the precise role of miR-17-92 in a given cell depends on what other miRNAs are present, which in turn may be affected by spatial and temporal considerations.

miRNA Signatures and Detection Methods
The multiple lines of evidence indicating that microRNAs are differentially expressed in normal and in tumor samples suggest that miRNAs could serve as useful tumor profiling tools. Indeed, profiling studies have shown that each cancer type possesses a distinct miRNA expression signature, and this signature can provide useful information about the malignancy. The adaptation of high-throughput technologies have facilitated the study of the expression of multiple miRNAs in a given sample, making it possible to profile substantial sample numbers with relative ease. Among the most important methods for miRNA profiling is the use of oligonucleotide miRNA microarray analysis, which allows the researcher to simultaneously determine the expression levels of hundreds of miRNAs in a given sample [65-67]. Multiple variations of this technique have been developed, underscoring its position as the central miRNA profiling tool [68-71][68-71]. Other important approaches to the problem are also available, such as quantitative PCR for precursor miRNAs [72] or mature miRNAs [73,74]; genome-wide approaches with serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE), such as miRAGE [75]; and bead-based flow cytrometric techniques [76].

Taking advantage of these tools, several groups have studied the miRNA expression of several types of cancer. Michael et al. [49] and Cummins et al. [75] have studied the expression profile of the known miRNAs in colorectal cancer samples. These studies independently found a general down-regulation of miRNA levels in tumor cells compared to normal colonic epithelium, while also observing a significant decrease in the levels of miR-143 and miR-145 beyond this general effect. Cummins et al. found a signature of 50 differentially expressed miRNAs in malignant vs. normal colonic epithelium, of which 32 miRNAs had reduced levels in tumor cells. Yanaihara et al. studied over 100 patient-matched pairs of primary malignant and normal adjacent lung tissue and found that the expression of 43 miRNAs was significantly different in the tumor tissues compared to the normal adjacent tissues. Of these miRNAs, 28 were down-regulated and 15 were up-regulated in the malignant tissue [46]. Similar studies have been carried out in CLL [77], breast cancer [50], glioblastoma [78], pancreatic cancer [79], hepatocellular carcinoma [80], and thyroid papillary carcinoma [58].

The ability to profile the miRNA expression of a tumor with accuracy and reproducibility in a clinical setting would constitute a valuable medical tool. Indeed, miRNA profiles have been shown to be highly informative. Using a bead-based approach, Lu et al. attempted to classify 17 poorly differentiated tumors with non-diagnostic histological appearance based on their miRNA expression profiles. A clinical diagnosis on these tumors was established by anatomical context, whether directly (a primary tumor observed in a given organ) or indirectly (a metastasis of a previously identified primary tumor). They were able to correctly diagnose 12 of the 17 samples, against 1/17 correct diagnoses for an analysis using their mRNA profile [76]. While the number of transcripts analyzed was much smaller for miRNAs than for mRNAs (~200 against > 15,000), it is possible that the miRNA-based diagnoses are more accurate because of the regulatory role of these molecules, while most mRNAs will not be regulatory in nature. Further studies, however, are necessary to ascertain the value of miRNAs as diagnostic tools, and their potential value as prognostic markers, by correlating miRNA expression with type-specific parameters such as metastatic potential, proliferative index, and response to existing treatments.

Closing Remarks: miRNAs as Treatment Targets
While the field of miRNAs — and particularly the study of the roles of miRNAs in cancer — is at an early stage, their potential as targeted therapeutic tools has not gone unnoticed. A promising approach is to target oncogenic miRNAs with oligonucleotides complementary for either their mature or precursor sequence, deemed anti-miRNA oligonucleotides (AMOs). A number of chemical modifications for these oligonucleotides are available, with the purpose of making them more stable and less toxic. 2'-O-methylated AMOs are perhaps the most common form of modified RNA, conferring limited nuclease resistance, and enhancing the binding affinity to RNA. Inhibition of let-7 function with 31-nucleotide 2'-O-Me AMOs has been demonstrated in HeLa cells and C. elegans larvae [81], and 2'-O-Me AMOs have been reported to abrogate miRNA function in cellular assays [82,83], providing proof-of-principle on the blockage of miRNA function by extraneous oligomers. Another common modification to the structure of AMOs is that of the locked nucleic acid (LNA)-modified oligomers. In these RNAs, the 2' oxygen atom is linked to the 4' position through a methylene bridge, forming a rigid bicyclic structure locked into a C3'-endo (RNA) sugar conformation [84]. This modification results in greatly enhanced affinity for RNA and the formation of exceedingly strong duplexes with excellent mismatch discrimination properties [85-87]. This makes them prime candidates for AMO-based therapy, and results in rodents have been encouraging [88].

While the use of AMOs could be useful to inhibit oncogenic miRNAs, another therapeutic possibility concerns the cases in which certain miRNAs are under-expressed, such as let-7 in lung cancer, or miR-15a and mir-16-1 in CLL. In this case, synthetic miRNAs — likely modified as discussed above — in either their mature or precursor form could be delivered to the target cells to counteract the deficiency and halt malignant growth. While this approach has been attempted in cell culture [89], further testing in animal models is required.

A pressing challenge to the use of miRNAs as therapeutic tools concerns finding methods to deliver synthetic miRNAs or AMOs to the desired tissues in a targeted and effective manner. Given that these molecules cannot discriminate between healthy and malignant cells, side effects of treatment remain a concern. Likewise, since these studies are in their infancy, little is known about the pharmacokinetics of AMOs or synthetic miRNAs, limiting the discussion of their promise as therapeutic tools into the speculative arena. Upon reaching a deeper understanding of the mechanism of miRNA biogenesis and action, and the development of new delivery technologies, these small RNAs might well fulfill their promise as valuable therapeutics.

Abbreviations
miRNAsMicroRNAs

mRNAMessenger Ribonucleic Acid
==== Refs
Esquela-Kerscher A  Slack FJ   Oncomirs — microRNAs with a role in cancer Nat Rev Cancer 2006 6 4 259 269 16557279 
Lee RC  Feinbaum RL  Ambros V   The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14 Cell 1993 75 5 843 854 8252621 
Wightman B  Ha I  Ruvkun G   Posttranscriptional regulation of the heterochronic gene lin-14 by lin-4 mediates temporal pattern formation in C. elegans Cell 1993 75 855 862 8252622 
Reinhart BJ  Slack FJ  Basson M  Pasquinelli AE  Bettinger JC  Rougvie AE    The 21-nucleotide let-7 RNA regulates developmental timing in caenorhabditis elegans Nature 2000 403 6772 901 906 10706289 
Pasquinelli AE  Reinhart BJ  Slack F  Martindale MQ  Kuroda MI  Maller B    Conservation of the sequence and temporal expression of let-7 heterochronic regulatory RNA Nature 2000 408 6808 86 89 11081512 
Bentwich I  Avniel A  Karov Y  Aharonov R  Gilad S  Barad O    Identification of hundreds of conserved and nonconserved human microRNAs Nat Genet 2005 37 7 766 770 15965474 
Berezikov E  Guryev V  van de Belt J  Wienholds E  Plasterk RH  Cuppen E   Phylogenetic shadowing and computational identification of human microRNA genes Cell 2005 120 1 21 24 15652478 
Lewis BP  Burge CB  Bartel DP   Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets Cell 2005 120 1 15 20 15652477 
Cai X  Hagedorn CH  Cullen BR   Human microRNAs are processed from capped, polyadenylated transcripts that can also function as mRNAs RNA 2004 10 1957 1966 15525708 
Khvorova A  Reynolds A  Jayasena SD   Functional siRNAs and miRNAs exhibit strand bias Cell 2003 115 209 216 14567918 
Schwarz DS   Asymmetry in the assembly of the RNAi enzyme complex Cell 2003 115 199 208 14567917 
Doench JG  Sharp PA   Specificity of microRNA target selection in translational repression Genes Dev 2004 18 504 511 15014042 
Vella MC  Choi EY  Lin SY  Reinert K  Slack FJ   The C. elegans microRNA let-7 binds to imperfect let-7 complementary sites from the lin-41 3'UTR Genes Dev 2004 18 2 132 137 14729570 
Brennecke J  Stark A  Russell RB  Cohen SM   Principles of microRNA-target recognition PLoS Bio 2005 3 e85 15723116 
Lim LP   Microarray analysis shows that some microRNAs downregulate large numbers of target mRNAs Nature 2005 433 769 773 15685193 
Lim LP   The microRNAs of caenorhabditis elegans Genes Dev 2003 17 991 1008 12672692 
Grosshans H  Johnson T  Reinert KL  Gerstein M  Slack FJ   The temporal patterning microRNA let-7 regulates several transcription factors at the larval to adult transition in C. elegans Dev Cell 2005 8 3 321 330 15737928 
Krek A   Combinatorial microRNA target predictions Nature Genet 2005 37 495 500 15806104 
Rehmsmeier M  Steffen P  Hochsmann M  Giegerich R   Fast and effective prediction of microRNA/target duplexes RNA 2004 10 1507 1517 15383676 
John B   Human microRNA targets PLoS Biol 2004 2 e363 15502875 
Kiriakidou M   A combined computational-experimental approach predicts human microRNA targets Genes Dev 2004 18 1165 1178 15131085 
Enright AJ   MicroRNA targets in drosophila Genome Biol 2003 5 R1 14709173 
Rajewsky N  Socci ND   Computational identification of microRNA targets Dev Biol 2004 267 529 535 15013811 
Rajewsky N   MicroRNA target predictions in animals Nature Genet 2006 38 Suppl S8 S13 16736023 
Pasquinelli A  Reinhart B  Slack F  Maller B  Ruvkun G   Conservation across animal phylogeny of the sequence and temporal regulation of the 21 nucleotide C. elegans let-7 heterochronic regulatory RNA Nature 2000 408 86 89 11081512 
Brennecke J  Hipfner DR  Stark A  Russell RB  Cohen SM   Bantam encodes a developmentally regulated microRNA that controls cell proliferation and regulates the proapoptotic gene hid in drosophila Cell 2003 113 25 36 12679032 
Hipfner DR  Weigmann K  Cohen SM   The bantam gene regulates drosophila growth Genetics 2002 161 1527 1537 12196398 
Xu P  Vernooy SY  Guo M  Hay BA   The drosophila microRNA mir-14 suppresses cell death and is required for normal fat metabolism Curr Biol 2003 13 790 795 12725740 
Leaman D  Chen PY  Fak J  Yalcin A  Pearce M  Unnerstall U    Antisense-mediated depletion reveals essential and specific functions of microRNAs in drosophila development Cell 2005 121 7 1097 1108 15989958 
Johnston RJ  Hobert O   A microRNA controlling left/right neuronal asymmetry in caenorhabditis elegans Nature 2003 426 845 849 14685240 
Chang S  Johnston RJ  Frokjaer-Jensen C  Lockery S  Hobert O   MicroRNAs act sequentially and asymmetrically to control chemosensory laterality in the nematode Nature 2004 430 785 789 15306811 
Giraldez AJ   MicroRNAs regulate brain morphogenesis in zebrafish Science 2005 308 833 838 15774722 
Chen CZ  Li L  Lodish HF  Bartel DP   MicroRNAs modulate hematopoietic lineage differentiation Science 2004 303 83 86 14657504 
Poy MN   A pancreatic islet-specific microRNA regulates insulin secretion Nature 2004 432 226 230 15538371 
Esau C   143 regulates adipocyte differentiation J Biol Chem 2004 279 52361 52365 15504739 
Hornstein E   The microRNA miR-196 acts upstream of Hoxb8 and shh in limb development Nature 2005 438 671 674 16319892 
Zhao Y  Samal E  Srivastava D   Serum response factor regulates a muscle-specific microRNA that targets Hand2 during cardiogenesis Nature 2005 436 214 220 15951802 
Calin GA   Frequent deletions and down-regulation of micro-RNA genes miR15 and miR16 at 13q14 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002 99 15524 15529 12434020 
Calin GA   A microRNA signature associated with prognosis and progression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia N Engl J Med 2005 353 1793 1801 16251535 
Dong JT  Boyd JC  Frierson HF Jr.   Loss of heterozygosity at 13q14 and 13q21 in high grade, high stage prostate cancer Prostate 2001 49 3 166 171 11746261 
Sanchez-Beato M  Sanchez-Aguilera A  Piris MA   Cell cycle deregulation in B-cell lymphomas Blood 2003 101 1220 1235 12393483 
Cimmino A  Calin GA  Fabbri M  Iorio MV  Ferracin M  Shimizu M   miR-15 and miR-16 induce apoptosis by targeting BCL2 Proc Natl Sci USA 2005 102 13944 13949 
Reinhart BJ  Slack FJ  Basson M  Pasquinelli AE  Bettinger JC  Rougvie AE   The 21-nucleotide let-7 RNA regulates developmental timing in caenorhabditis elegans Nature 2000 403 901 906 10706289 
Calin GA  Sevignani C  Dumitru CD  Hyslop T  Noch E  Yendamuri S   Human microRNA genes are frequently located at fragile sites and genomic regions involved in cancers Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004 101 2999 3004 14973191 
Takamizawa J  Konishi H  Yanagisawa K  Tomida S  Osada H  Endoh H   Reduced expression of the let-7 microRNAs in human lung cancers in association with shortened postoperative survival Cancer Res 2004 64 3753 3756 15172979 
Yanaihara N  Caplen N  Bowman E  Seike M  Kumamoto K  Yi M   Unique microRNA molecular profiles in lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis Cancer Cell 2006 9 189 198 16530703 
Johnson SM  Grosshans H  Shingara J  Byrom M  Jarvis R  Cheng A   RAS is regulated by the let-7 microRNA family Cell 2005 120 635 647 15766527 
Malumbres M  Barbacid M   RAS oncogenes: The first 30 years Nat Rev Cancer 2003 3 459 465 12778136 
Michael MZ  SM OC  van Holst Pellekaan NG  Young GP  James RJ   Reduced accumulation of specific microRNAs in colorectal neoplasia Mol Cancer Res 2003 1 882 891 14573789 
Iorio MV  Ferracin M  Liu CG  Veronese A  Spizzo R  Sabbioni S   MicroRNA gene expression deregulation in human breast cancer Cancer Res 2005 65 7065 7070 16103053 
Pelengaris S  Khan M  Evan GI   Suppression of myc-induced apoptosis in [beta] cells exposes multiple oncogenic properties of myc and triggers carcinogenic progression Cell 2002 109 321 334 12015982 
Clurman BE  Hayward WS   Multiple proto-oncogene activations in avian leukosis virus-induced lymphomas: Evidence for stage-specific events Mol Cell Biol 1989 9 2657 2664 2548084 
Tam W  Ben-Yehuda D  Hayward WS   Bic, a novel gene activated by proviral insertions in avian leukosis virus-induced lymphomas, is likely to function through its noncoding RNA Mol Cell Biol 1997 17 1490 1502 9032277 
Metzler M  Wilda M  Busch K  Viehmann S  Borkhardt A   High expression of precursor microRNA-155/BIC RNA in children with Burkitt lymphoma Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2004 39 167 169 14695998 
Eis PS   Accumulation of miR-155 and BIC RNA in human B cell lymphomas Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005 102 3627 3632 15738415 
Kluiver J   BIC and miR-155 are highly expressed in Hodgkin, primary mediastinal and diffuse large B cell lymphomas J Pathol 2005 207 243 249 16041695 
Eis PS  Tam W  Sun L  Chadburn A  Li Z  Gomez MF   Accumulation of miR-155 and BIC RNA in human B cell lymphomas Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005 102 3627 3632 15738415 
He H  Jazdzewski K  Li W  Liyanarachchi S  Nagy R  Volinia S   The role of microRNA genes in papillary thyroid carcinoma Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005 102 19075 19080 16365291 
Volinia S  Calin GA  Liu CG  Ambs S  Cimmino A  Petrocca F   A microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006 103 2257 2261 16461460 
Costinean S   Pre B cell proliferation and lymphoblastic leukemia/high grade lymphoma in emiu miR 155 transgenic mice Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006 103 7024 7029 16641092 
He L  Thomson JM  Hemann MT  Hernando-Monge E  Mu D  Goodson S   A microRNA polycistron as a potential human oncogene Nature 2005 435 828 833 15944707 
O'Donnell KA  Wentzel EA  Zeller KI  Dang CV  Mendell JT   c-myc-regulated microRNAs modulate E2F1 expression Nature 2005 435 839 843 15944709 
Ambros V   Control of developmental timing in caenorhabditis elegans Curr Opin Genet Dev 2000 10 428 433 10889059 
Trimarchi JM  Lees JA   Sibling rivalry in the E2F family Nature Rev Mol Cell Biol 2002 3 11 20 11823794 
Kim VN  Nam JW   Genomics of microRNA Trends Genet 2006 22 165 173 16446010 
Liu CG   An oligonucleotide microchip for genome-wide microRNA profiling in human and mouse tissues Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004 101 9740 9744 15210942 
Hammond SM   MicroRNA detection comes of age Nature Methods 2006 3 12 13 16369545 
Liang RQ  Li W  Li Y  Tan CY  Li JX  Jin YX   An oligonucleotide microarray for microRNA expression analysis based on labeling RNA with quantum dot and nanogold probe Nucleic Acids Res 2005 33 e17 15684409 
Thomson JM  Parker J  Perou CM  Hammond SM   A custom microarray platform for analysis of microRNA gene expression Nat Methods 2004 1 47 53 15782152 
Esquela-Kerscher A  Slack FJ   The age of high-throughput microRNA profiling Nat Methods 2004 1 2 106 107 15782171 
Barad O  Meiri E  Avniel A  Aharonov R  Barzilai A  Bentwich I   MicroRNA expression detected by oligonucleotide microarrays: System establishment and expression profiling in human tissues Genome Res 2004 14 2486 2494 15574827 
Schmittgen TD  Jiang J  Liu Q  Yang L   A high-throughput method to monitor the expression of microRNA precursors Nucleic Acids Res 2004 32 e43 14985473 
Chen C  Ridzon DA  Broomer AJ  Zhou Z  Lee DH  Nguyen JT   Real-time quantification of microRNAs by stem-loop RT-PCR Nucleic Acids Res 2005 33 e179 16314309 
Raymond CK  Roberts BS  Garrett-Engele P  Lim LP  Johnson JM   Simple, quantitative primer-extension PCR assay for direct monitoring of microRNAs and short-interfering RNAs RNA 2005 11 1737 1744 16244135 
Cummins JM  He Y  Leary RJ  Pagliarini R  Diaz LA Jr.  Sjoblom T   The colorectal microRNAome Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006 103 3687 3692 16505370 
Lu J  Getz G  Miska EA  Alvarez-Saavedra E  Lamb J  Peck D   MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers Nature 2005 435 834 838 15944708 
Calin GA   MicroRNA profiling reveals distinct signatures in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemias Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004 101 11755 11760 15284443 
Ciafre SA  Galardi S  Mangiola A  Ferracin M  Liu CG  Sabatino G   Extensive modulation of a set of microRNAs in primary glioblastoma Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005 334 1351 1358 16039986 
Roldo C  Missiaglia E  Hagan J  Falconi M  Capelli P  Bersani S    MicroRNA expression abnormalities in pancreatic endocrine and acinar tumors are associated with distinctive pathological features and clinical behavior J Clin Oncol 2006 24 4677 4684 16966691 
Murakami Y   Comprehensive analysis of microRNA expression patterns in hepatocellular carcinoma and non-tumorous tissues Oncogene 2006 25 2537 2545 16331254 
Hutvagner G  Simard MJ  Mello CC  Zamore PD   Sequence-specific inhibition of small RNA function PLoS Biol 2004 2 E98 15024405 
Cheng AM  Byrom MW  Shelton J  Ford LP   Antisense inhibition of human miRNAs and indications for an involvement of miRNA in cell growth and apoptosis Nucleic Acids Res 2005 33 1290 1297 15741182 
Meister G  Landthaler M  Dorsett Y  Tuschl T   Sequence-specific inhibition of microRNA- and siRNA-induced RNA silencing RNA 2004 10 544 550 14970398 
Vester B  Wengel J   LNA (locked nucleic acid): High-affinity targeting of complementary RNA and DNA Biochemistry 2004 43 13233 13241 15491130 
Childs JL  Disney MD  Turner DH   Oligonucleotide directed misfolding of RNA inhibits candida albicans group I intron splicing Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002 99 11091 11096 12169671 
Elayadi AN  Braasch DA  Corey DR   Implications of high-affinity hybridization by locked nucleic acid oligomers for inhibition of human telomerase Biochemistry 2002 41 9973 9981 12146961 
Mouritzen P  Nielsen AT  Pfundheller HM  Choleva Y  Kongsbak L  Moller S   Single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping using locked nucleic acid (LNA) Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2003 3 27 38 12528362 
Fluiter K  ten Asbroek AL  de Wissel MB  Jakobs ME  Wissenbach M  Olsson H   In vivo tumor growth inhibition and biodistribution studies of locked nucleic acid (LNA) antisense oligonucleotides Nucleic Acids Res 2003 31 953 962 12560491 
Johnson SM  Grosshans H  Shingara J  Byrom M  Jarvis R  Cheng A    RAS is regulated by the let-7 microRNA family Cell 2005 120 5 635 647 15766527

