
==== Front
CNS Neurosci Ther
CNS Neurosci Ther
10.1111/(ISSN)1755-5949
CNS
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
1755-5930
1755-5949
John Wiley and Sons Inc. Hoboken

10.1111/cns.70047
CNS70047
CNSNT-2024-849.R1
Original Article
Original Article
A hypothalamus‐lateral periaqueductal gray GABAergic neural projection facilitates arousal following sevoflurane anesthesia in mice
Wang et al.
Wang Dan 1 2
Bao Chang 1 2
Wu Huimin 1 2
Li Jiannan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0748-957X
1 2
Zhang Xinxin 1 2
Wang Sa 1 2
Zhou Fang 1 2
Li Huiming 1 2 huimingli1218@163.com

Dong Hailong https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8984-9067
1 2 hldong6@hotmail.com

1 Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Xijing Hospital The Fourth Military Medical University Xi'an Shaanxi China
2 Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology (The Fourth Military Medical University) Ministry of Education of China Xi'an China
* Correspondence
Hailong Dong and Huiming Li, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi, China.
Email: hldong6@hotmail.com and huimingli1218@163.com

24 9 2024
9 2024
30 9 10.1111/cns.v30.9 e7004701 8 2024
29 4 2024
26 8 2024
© 2024 The Author(s). CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

The lateral hypothalamus (LHA) is an evolutionarily conserved structure that regulates basic functions of an organism, particularly wakefulness. To clarify the function of LHAGABA neurons and their projections on regulating general anesthesia is crucial for understanding the excitatory and inhibitory effects of anesthetics on the brain. The aim of the present study is to investigate whether LHAGABA neurons play either an inhibitory or a facilitatory role in sevoflurane‐induced anesthetic arousal regulation.

Methods

We used fiber photometry and immunofluorescence staining to monitor changes in neuronal activity during sevoflurane anesthesia. Opto‐/chemogenetic modulations were employed to study the effect of neurocircuit modulations during the anesthesia. Anterograde tracing was used to identify a GABAergic projection from the LHA to a periaqueductal gray (PAG) subregion.

Results

c‐Fos staining showed that LHAGABA activity was inhibited by induction of sevoflurane anesthesia. Anterograde tracing revealed that LHAGABA neurons project to multiple arousal‐associated brain areas, with the lateral periaqueductal gray (LPAG) being one of the dense projection areas. Optogenetic experiments showed that activation of LHAGABA neurons and their downstream target LPAG reduced the burst suppression ratio (BSR) during continuous sevoflurane anesthesia. Chemogenetic experiments showed that activation of LHAGABA and its projection to LPAG neurons prolonged the anesthetic induction time and promoted wakefulness.

Conclusions

In summary, we show that an inhibitory projection from LHAGABA to LPAGGABA neurons promotes arousal from sevoflurane‐induced loss of consciousness, suggesting a complex control of wakefulness through intimate interactions between long‐range connections.

In this study, we revealed an inhibitory projection from LHAGABA to LPAG facilitates arousal from sevoflurane, suggesting a complex control of wakefulness through intimate interactions between long‐range connections. These findings enhance our understanding of the mechanisms of consciousness shift and potentially facilitate the development of studies involving the GABAergic system.

arousal
GABAergic neuron
inhalation anesthetics
lateral hypothalamus
neurocircuits
National Natural Science Foundation of China 10.13039/501100001809 82101343 82030038 82221001 source-schema-version-number2.0
cover-dateSeptember 2024
details-of-publishers-convertorConverter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.4.8 mode:remove_FC converted:24.09.2024
Wang D , Bao C , Wu H , et al. A hypothalamus‐lateral periaqueductal gray GABAergic neural projection facilitates arousal following sevoflurane anesthesia in mice. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024;30 :e70047. doi:10.1111/cns.70047

The first three authors contributed equally to this work.
==== Body
pmc1 INTRODUCTION

Although considerable progress has been made in understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying the anesthetic effects of inhalational anesthetics, the process by which inhalational anesthetics such as sevoflurane induce loss of consciousness in neural circuits remains unclear. 1 , 2 , 3 Inhibition of glutamate‐mediated excitatory transmission and facilitation of GABA‐mediated inhibitory transmission to produce anesthesia has long been accepted as the mechanism of general anesthesia. 4 , 5 , 6 However, a number of recent studies have demonstrated that inhibitory neural pathways in specific brain regions are involved in facilitating emergence from general anesthesia. 7 , 8 , 9 Conversely, GABAergic neurons in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) effectively facilitate the onset of the general anesthetic effect of propofol. 10 Thus, these findings highlight the integral role of the inhibitory network in the process of reversible loss of consciousness induced by general anesthesia. 11

The lateral hypothalamus (LHA) has been extensively studied for its contribution to the integration of neuronal responses with various peripheral signals associated with seeking and arousal. 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 Our previous research has shown that LHA hypocretin/orexin (Hcrt/Ox) neurons and their projections facilitate arousal from general anesthesia, 16 , 17 , 18 while other work has demonstrated that activation of MCH neurons accelerates the REM state and reduces NREM sleep. 19 Notably, LHA GABAergic neurons are also essential for regulating the sleep–wake transition. Optogenetic activation of LHA GABAergic neurons induces rapid wakefulness by directly modulating circuits within the thalamic reticular nucleus (TRN), locus coeruleus (LC), 20 and dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN), 21 with concomitant inhibition of the sleep‐promoting pathway controlled by the anterior hypothalamus. 22 A previous study also showed that LHAVGAT neurons inhibited the activation of orexinergic neurons in the local circuit during sleep. 23 Therefore, it is necessary to further investigate the role of LHAGABA neurons in the regulation of anesthesia‐arousal regulation of general anesthesia.

LHAGABA neurons are reciprocally connected to several midbrain nuclei, including the periaqueductal gray (PAG) subregions. 13 , 14 , 24 , 25 The brainstem PAG has been implicated in the regulation of various pathophysiological functions, including motivation, pain perception, and threat responses, as the most important neuromodulator influencing sensation. 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 Recent studies have shown that the neuronal pathway LHAGABA projections to the PAG modulate hunting and motivation. 13 , 25 Importantly, activation of LHAGABA‐VLPAG significantly controls REM sleep. 24 Therefore, it is necessary to investigate whether and how LHAGABA neurons and their downstream brainstem PAG modulate consciousness during general anesthesia.

To investigate the potential role of the LHAGABA‐LPAG neural projection during the sevoflurane anesthesia, in the current study we used a combination of in vitro immunostaining, in vivo fiber photometry, opto‐/chemogenetic stimulation and anterograde tracing techniques to investigate the function of LHAGABA neurons in sevoflurane‐induced unconsciousness. Surprisingly, our results reveal how mutual disinhibition, mediated by long‐range inhibitory projections between its downstream brain area LPAG, facilitates arousal during sevoflurane anesthesia.

2 METHODS

2.1 Mice

All experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Experimentation and followed the Guidelines for Animal Experimentation of the Fourth Military Medical University (Xi'an, China) and ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) guidelines. All experiments in this project were performed with adult C57BL/six male mice and transgenic male mice (8–15 weeks, 22–30 g), except for whole‐cell patch‐clamp experiments (>3 weeks old). C57BL/6J mice were obtained from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd., Vglut2‐IRES‐Cre and Vgat‐IRES‐Cre mice were originally provided by the Jackson Laboratory. All mice were kept in a specific pathogen‐free environment under a 12 h/12 h light/dark cycle (lights on from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.) with ambient temperature (22–24°C), controlled humidity (38%–42%), and ad libitum access to food and water.

2.2 Experimental design

Activation of neurons in LHA and LPAG areas between O2‐2h group and Sevo‐2h group was observed by in vitro c‐Fos staining. The in vivo fiber photometry was recorded to study the activity changes of LHAGABA neurons during the sevoflurane anesthesia and the process of arousal. Optogenetic combined chemogenetic modulation was performed to study the role of LHAGABA neurons and their projections in LPAG during sevoflurane anesthesia‐induced unconsciousness, maintenance, and recovery. The downstream of LHA GABAergic neurons in the whole brain and the connection between the LHA GABAergic neurons and the LPAG were observed using anterograde tracing. To verify the electrophysiological characteristics in response to the activation of LHA GABAergic neurons during sevoflurane anesthesia, in vitro electrophysiology was used. Details are shown in the Figure S1 Flow Chart. Sample sizes were calculated via a Calculator from https://powerandsamplesize.com/Calculators/. Details can be seen in Material and Methods in Appendix S1 (Calculation of the sample size).

2.3 Optogenetic stimulation and EEG recording

To inhibit or activate LHAGABA neurons, 2‐min yellow (580 nm, 1 Hz) or blue (473 nm, 20 Hz, 30 ms) laser pulses were used, respectively. Mice were habituated to the plexiglass container for 10 min. A heating mat was used to keep the mice warm during the whole stage of EEG recording. Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals were continuously recorded from mice under sevoflurane anesthesia using the PowerLab system and LabChart software. 29 , 30 A monitor measured sevoflurane levels in the container. The raw EEG data were bandpass‐filtered (0.3–50 Hz at a frequency of 1000 Hz) using a fourth‐order Butterworth filter. A threshold calculated from manually labeled suppression periods was applied to the transformed signals to obtain a binary series of burst and suppression states for each mouse. The EEG data were presented as a binary time series. The final step was to verify whether this time series corresponded to the original burst suppression waves. To determine the burst suppression ratio (BSR), we limited the minimum duration of the suppressed waves to 0.5 s, and the BSR was calculated as the percentage of time in each 1‐min window spent in the suppressed state. The absolute power spectrum in each time window was calculated using the spectrogram function provided by the MATLAB signal processing toolbox. The window length was 2 min pre‐stim and stim‐on during optogenetic stimulation. A window length of 4 s with an overlap of 3.9 s was used to set the parameters. Spectrogram is a time‐varying version of power spectrum estimated from successive windows of EEG data. The EEG signal was classified into 5 frequency bands as follows: delta (δ: 0.3–4 Hz), theta (θ: 4–10 Hz), alpha (α: 10–15 Hz), beta (β: 15–25 Hz), and gamma (γ: 25–50 Hz). As a percentage of the total power from 0.3 to 50 Hz, the relative power of each frequency band was calculated. In the experiments to observe the induction and emergence time, the optogenetic stimulation was applied continuously until the test mouse showed loss or recovery of consciousness behaviors, the cycle being 60 s on and 20 s off.

2.4 Measurement of induction and emergence time

For chemogenetic experiments, 3 mg kg−1 clozapine N‐oxide (CNO) or an equivalent volume of 0.9% saline was intraperitoneally injected into mice to manipulate LHAGABA neurons. Behavioral tests were performed 30 min after the CNO injection. Anesthesia was induced and maintained using 2.4% sevoflurane and 1.5 L min−1 pure oxygen. The cylinder was rotated 90° every 15 s, and the induction time was measured as the interval from the start of anesthetic inhalation to loss of righting reflex (LoRR). Anesthesia was maintained for 30 min, and emergence time was defined as the interval from anesthesia cessation to return of righting reflex (RoRR). During anesthesia induction in optogenetic experiments, optical stimulation was administered at the start of sevoflurane inhalation and continued until LoRR. During emergence, the mice were optically stimulated from the end of sevoflurane inhalation until RoRR. A heating mat was used to keep the mice warm during the whole stage of measurement of induction and emergence. Meanwhile, the concentration of sevoflurane was measured by using Philips monitor (IntelliVue MX500).

2.5 Anterograde tracing and projection average intensity values

For anterograde tracing, 200 nL rAAV‐Ef1α‐DIO‐mCherry was microinjected into the LHA. The whole brain was sliced after 3 weeks of viral expression, and laser confocal fluorescence microscopy and ImageJ were used to count the projection intensity of LHA GABAergic neurons projection to each nucleus. Following the Allen Brain Atlas, the regions of interest (ROIs) and the boundaries for each regional area were plotted. The mean or average intensity was calculated for each region using ImageJ. The mean was calculated over all samples and averaged over four samples.

2.6 Statistical analyses

All analyses were conducted by investigators blinded to the experimental group. Statistical analyses were performed using Prism 9.0 (GraphPad Software, USA). Parametric data are presented as Mean ± SD. Data that met these conditions were analyzed using a two‐tailed unpaired, a one‐factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a two‐way (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni correction. Except for the optogenetic experiments of the BSR assays, all behavioral, fiber photometry recording and cell counting data were collected by counterbalancing the experimental conditions with controls. Details of some of the statistical analyses carried out can be found in Table S2 (statistical table). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Further description of the methods (including Stereotaxic Surgery, Fiber Photometry Recording, Immunofluorescence Staining, Slice Recording and Calculation of the sample size) can be found in the Appendix S1. Details of key resources including mice, viruses, antibodies, software and instruments are shown in the Table S1.

3 RESULTS

3.1 Neural response of LHAGABA neurons during sevoflurane anesthesia

To investigate the neural activity of LHA neurons during sevoflurane anesthesia, we initially examined c‐Fos expression, an immediate early gene associated with neural activity. We anesthetized C57BL/6 male mice 2 h with 2.4% sevoflurane vaporized in oxygen at a flow rate of 1.5 L min−1 and sacrificed the mice immediately after that (Figure 1A,B). Immunofluorescence staining showed that c‐Fos expression decreased from rostral to caudal after 2 h of sevoflurane anesthesia (Figure 1C). Compared to the oxygen inhalation group, the percentages of c‐Fos‐positive neurons in the LHA were severely inhibited in the sevoflurane anesthesia group (Figure 1E). And, especially the interneuron of the LHA, GABAergic neurons were significantly lower as orexinergic and glutamatergic excitatory neurons in the sevoflurane anesthesia group (Figure 1F, Figure S2), indicating that these neurons were severely inhibited by sevoflurane anesthesia (Figure 1F, Figure S2D middle and right). This result revealed that LHA GABAergic neurons play its role in consciousness transition during anesthesia through other brain regions. We also analyzed the percentage of c‐Fos‐positive MCH neurons, suggesting that LHAMCH neurons play a role opposite to other neurons (Figure S2A,D left). These results suggest that activity changes in LHA neurons, including LHAGABA neurons, regulate arousal from sevoflurane‐induced anesthesia.

FIGURE 1 Sevoflurane anesthesia decreases the neural activity of LHAGABA neurons. (A, B) Schematic representation of the brain slice experiment after inhalation of sevoflurane anesthesia or pure oxygen. (C) Representative images of c‐Fos expression in the brain regions of the control (O2‐2h) and sevoflurane anesthesia (Sevo‐2h) groups. (D) Representative micrographs showing overlapping GABA (green) and c‐Fos (red) stainings in the LHA after 2 h of oxygen exposure (O2‐2h) or sevoflurane anesthesia (Sevo‐2h). (E) Expression of c‐Fos in different planes of the LHA region from rostral to caudal. Two‐way ANOVA followed by post hoc Bonferroni's multiple comparisons: F[4,50] = 5.079, p = 0.0016. There are eight slices from four mice in each group. (F) Percentage of c‐Fos‐positive GABAergic neurons in the LHA of the control and sevoflurane groups. Two‐tailed unpaired Student's t‐test: t[10] = 4.464, p = 0.0012. There are eight slices from four mice in each group. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. Data are presented as Mean ± SD.

To further assess the in vivo activity of LHAGABA neurons, we microinjected AAV‐DIO‐GCaMP6f into the LHA of Vgat‐Cre mice, achieving Cre‐dependent expression of calcium indicators in LHAGABA neurons (Figure 2A,B) to observe alterations in neural activity in real‐time during anesthetic waking. After anesthesia initiation with sevoflurane, the calcium activity of LHAGABA neurons gradually decreased (Figure 2D,F,G) while BSR notably increased (Figure 2C,E). After anesthesia termination, the calcium activity of mice recovered before they regained consciousness (Figure 2I,K,L), and BSR gradually decreased (Figure 2H,J).

FIGURE 2 Calcium signals of LHAGABA neurons responding to sevoflurane anesthesia. (A) Schematic illustration of calcium virus injection (left) and experimental equipment (right). (B) The GCaMP6f viral verification in the LHA slice. (C, D) Representative EEG and calcium recordings during loss of consciousness induced by sevoflurane anesthesia. (H, I) EEG and calcium levels were recorded during recovery of consciousness. Calcium signals decrease after the loss of consciousness (D) but increase after recovery of consciousness from sevoflurane anesthesia (I). (E, F, J, K) BSR and calcium activity changes during baseline, sevoflurane anesthesia, and emergence periods. Quantified EEG and GCaMP signals change between wake (before Sevo on, −2 min to 0 min) and LORR (Sevo on, 5 min to 7 min); the BSR of EEG recordings increases (E; p = 0.039, t[5] = 2.764), while GCaMP6f signals are significantly reduced (F; p = 0.001, t[5] = 6.774). Quantified EEG and GCaMP signals change between sevoflurane anesthesia (before Sevo off, −2 min to 0 min) and emergence (Sevo off, 3 min to 5 min); the BSR of EEG recordings decreases (J; p = 0.022, t[5] = 3.242), while GCaMP signals increase (K; p = 0.009, t[5] = 8.22). (G, L) Averaged delta F/F0 ratios of calcium signals from LHAGABA neurons in response to sevoflurane‐induced LORR (G) and RORR (L). There are six mice in each group. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. Data are presented as Mean ± SD.

These findings imply that LHAGABA neurons were inhibited by sevoflurane anesthesia and reactivated during emergence from anesthesia, implying that LHAGABA neurons regulate general anesthesia.

3.2 Manipulation of LHAGABA neurons accelerates arousal and reduces BSR during sevoflurane anesthesia

To investigate the regulatory effect of LHAGABA neurons on sevoflurane general anesthesia, optogenetic AAV‐DIO‐ChR2/NpHR‐mCherry or chemogenetic AAV‐DIO‐hM3Dq/hM4Di‐mCherry viruses were microinjected into the LHA of Vgat‐Cre mice (Figure 3A,E left). After 3–4 weeks of viral expression, the efficacy of photoexcitation and chemogenetic stimulation was verified using in vitro brain slices (Figure 3D,G). The consciousness of mice under sevoflurane anesthesia was evaluated by assessing their righting reflexes during induction of and emergence from anesthesia (Figure 3A,E right). Compared with control groups, photoactivation of LHAGABA neurons prolonged the LoRR time and shortened the RoRR time (Figure 3B,C). Conversely, optogenetic inhibition of LHAGABA neurons prolonged the RoRR time and shortened the LoRR time (Figure 3B,C). Immunofluorescence was used to confirm the accuracy and specificity of viral expression (Figure 3F). Compared with control groups, chemogenetic activation of LHAGABA neurons prolonged the LoRR time and shortened the RoRR time (Figure 3H,I). Chemogenetic Inhibition of LHAGABA neurons has an opposing effect on LoRR but not a significant difference on RoRR time (Figure 3H,I). The results of both optogenetic and chemogenetic manipulations show that LHAGABA neurons may regulate anesthesia‐arousal transition.

FIGURE 3 Optogenetic and chemogenetic manipulations of LHAGABA neurons impact induction of and emergence from sevoflurane anesthesia. (A) Schematic illustrating the virus injection site (left) and the experimental paradigm for optogenetic manipulation combined with general anesthetic behavioral test (right). (B, C) Activation or inhibition of LHAGABA neurons in response to anesthesia induction and emergence time. One‐way ANOVA followed by post hoc Bonferroni's multiple comparisons: LoRR, F[2,21] = 0.6234, p < 0.0001; RoRR, F[2,21] = 8.295, p = 0.0022. (D) Whole‐cell patch‐clamp recordings of LHAGABA neurons activated in vitro in LHA slices by blue light of different frequencies. (E) Schematic illustration of chemogenetic viral conduction (left), experimental paradigm for chemogenetic stimulation, and general anesthetic behavioral test (right). (F) Verification of hM3Dq expression efficiency. (G) Representative traces of spontaneous firing upon CNO application to LHAGABA neurons transfected with hM3Dq in LHA slices. (H, I) Effects of activation or inhibition of LHAGABA neurons on induction of and arousal from sevoflurane anesthesia. Two‐way ANOVA followed by post hoc Bonferroni's multiple comparisons: LoRR, F[2,42] = 13.81, p < 0.0001; RoRR, F[2,40] = 9.790, p = 0.0003. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. Data are presented as Mean ± SD.

To verify the anesthesia depth change by modulation of LHAGABA neurons during sevoflurane anesthesia maintenance, burst suppression patterns and the power percentage of spectrum were observed in EEGs while optogenetic manipulation was used to modulate LHAGABA neural activity. Light‐sensitive channelrhodopsin‐2 (ChR2) or halorhodopsin (NpHR) was specifically expressed in LHAGABA neurons (Figure 4A), and EEG was recorded (Figure 4B). To obtain a stable burst suppression ratio (BSR) during anesthesia maintenance, the sevoflurane concentration was kept at 2.4%, resulting in a stable BSR of approximately 60%~70%. We compared the BSR 2 min pre‐stim and stim‐on during administration of the optogenetic stimulation (Figure 4C,F,I). A 20 Hz train of 473 nm blue light activated LHAGABA neurons and significantly reduced BSR (Figure 4D), there was also a significant change in the power of the delta and beta wave spectrograms (Figure 4E). Using yellow laser pulses to inhibit LHAGABA activation, BSR increased significantly in EEG recordings during the laser‐on period compared to that before optogenetic stimulation (Figure 4G). Meanwhile, the percentage of delta and theta power in the total spectrum were increased (Figure 4H). In the control group, BSR values and power of spectrograms have no change before and after blue laser stimulation (Figure 4J,K). Overall, these EEG results show that optogenetic activation of LHAGABA neurons reduced the anesthesia depth as shown on the EEG pattern.

FIGURE 4 Optogenetic manipulation of LHAGABA neurons alters sevoflurane anesthesia. (A) Diagrams of coronal brain sections showing the site of virus injection and optical fiber embedding (left). A typical photomicrograph showing the site of microinjection and virus transfection efficiency (right). (B) Schematic diagram of the apparatus used for behavioral observations, optical fiber stimulations, and EEG recordings during anesthesia. (C) Representative raw EEG trace (top) and the corresponding power spectrogram (bottom) during blue laser stimulation in a ChR2‐expressing mouse. (D) Compared to pre‐stimulation, activation of LHAGABA neurons significantly reduces the BSR during sevoflurane maintenance. Two‐tailed paired Student's t‐test: t[7] = 7.992, p < 0.0001. (E) Quantification of EEG power pre and during optogenetic activation of CHR2 mice (δ: Stim on vs. pre‐stim; p = 0.002, β: Stim on vs. pre‐stim; p = 0.021). (F) Representative EEG traces during yellow laser stimulation in an NpHR‐expressing mouse. (G) Compared to pre‐stimulation, inhibition of LHAGABA neurons increases the BSR during sevoflurane maintenance. Two‐tailed paired Student's t‐test: t[7] = 3.190, p = 0.0153. (H) Quantification of EEG power pre and during optogenetic inhabitation of NpHR mice (δ: Stim on vs. pre‐stim; p = 0.012, θ: Stim on vs. pre‐stim; p = 0.017). (I) Representative raw EEG trace (top) and the corresponding power spectrogram (bottom) during blue laser stimulation in a mCherry‐expressing mouse. (J) BSR 2 min before and 2 min after optical stimulation in mCherry‐expressing mice. Two‐tailed paired Student's t‐test: t[7] = 0.15, p = 0.8847. (K) Quantification of EEG power pre and during optogenetic activation of mCherry mice. There was no significant change between pre‐stim and stim on. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. Data are presented as Mean ± SD.

3.3 Disinhibition of the LHAGABA‐LPAG pathway rapidly activates LPAGGlu neurons

We used anterograde tracing to characterize and map the neurons innervated by LHAGABA neurons in whole‐brain slices. Firstly, we injected AAV‐Ef1a‐DIO‐mCherry into the LHA of Vgat‐Cre mice. LHAGABA neurons are projected to multiple areas of the brain (Figure 5A,B). Nucleus accumbens, LPO, PVT, VTA, and lateral periaqueductal gray (LPAG) nuclei showed high neural projections (Figure 5C,D). We found virus‐labeled neurons in various brain regions implicated in arousal, including the VTA and TRN. Unexpectedly, we also observed projections from LHAGABA neurons to brain regions implicated in motivation and pain responses, such as the basolateral amygdala and LPAG. These brain areas have also been implicated in modulating stress and depression, suggesting the role of LHAGABA neurons in this regulation. Since the projection of LHAGABA‐LPAG is one of the significantly higher areas in the midbrain, which is a crucial brain area of sleep, emotion, and anesthesia regulation, we focus on this projection for the next step of research. To explore the functional connections between LHAGABA projections and LPAG neurons, we optogenetically activated selectively LPAG neurons downstream of LHAGABA projections (Figure 6A). To identify the excitatory or inhibitory effects of LHAGABA projections on LPAGGABA or LPAGGlu neurons, we immunohistochemically characterized their projections using anti‐GABA or anti‐glutamate antibodies with overlapping changes in c‐Fos expression after optogenetic stimulation of projection terminal Of LHAGABA to LPAG (Figure 6B). c‐Fos‐positive neurons were mainly localized to glutamatergic, not GABAergic neurons in the LPAG, which indicates that activation of LHAGABA projection induces LPAGGlu excitation (Figure 6C). Further tests were performed on the LHAGABA‐LPAG projection neuron types. Vgat‐iCre: RosaTD (Ai 26) mice with specific encoding mCherry on GABAergic neurons were used in this experiment. We microinjected AAV‐DIO‐GCaMP6f virus into the LHA of Vgat‐iCre: RosaTD (Ai 26) mice and allowed 3 weeks for gene expression (Figure S3A). The virus was specifically expressed on LHAGABA neurons and projected several fibers downstream of LPAG (Figure S3B). The GABAergic neurons in the LPAG were labeled with mCherry (red), LHAGABA axon terminals were presented in GFP (green), while LPAG glutamatergic neurons were stained in pink (Figure S3C). A high proportion of GFP‐positive dots were observed surrounding LPAGGABA neurons, suggesting that the axons of LHAGABA neurons are in touch with the soma of GABAergic neurons in the LPAG. These results show that LHAGABA neurons exerted a disinhibitory effect on LPAGGlu neurons. To verify the activity of LPAG neurons during sevoflurane anesthesia, the c‐Fos expression of LPAGGlu and LPAGGABA neurons were examined (Figure 6D, Figure S3D). c‐Fos expression increased from rostral to caudal after 2 h of sevoflurane anesthesia (Figure 6E). Compared to the oxygen inhalation group, the percentage of c‐Fos‐positive LPAGGABA neuron was significantly increased, whereas that of LPAGGlu neuron was decreased in the sevoflurane anesthesia group (Figure 6F,G). These results indicate that LPAGGlu and LPAGGABA neurons play opposing roles in the induction of sevoflurane anesthesia.

FIGURE 5 Whole‐brain mapping of axonal projections from LHAGABA neurons. (A, B) Fluorescent images showing axons of neurons expressing AAV‐EF1α‐DIO‐eGFP in the AcbSh, LPO, PVA, CMT, BLA, TRN, PVT, LHb, SNR, VTA, and LPAG. (C) Main axonal projections of LHAGABA neurons. (D) Distribution intensity of LHAGABA axonal innervation in each nucleus. AcbSh, accumbens nucleus shell; BLA, basolateral amygdala; CMT, central medial thalamus; DRN, dorsal raphe nucleus; EW, Edinger‐Westphal nucleus; LHA, lateral hypothalamus; LHb, lateral habenular nucleus; LPAG, lateral periaqueductal gray; LPO, lateral preoptic area; PVA, periventricular; PVT, paraventricular thalamic nucleus; SNR, substantia nigra pars reticulate; TRN, thalamic reticular nucleus; VLPAG, ventrolateral periaqueductal gray; VTA, ventral tegmental area.

FIGURE 6 Comparison of the activity of LPAG neurons during sevoflurane anesthesia. (A) Schematic diagram of optogenetic virus injection and laser stimulation. (B) Representative immunofluorescence showing overlapping LHAChR2 projection (white), GABA/Glu (green), and c‐Fos (red) stainings in the LPAG after 473 nm optical laser stimulation for 20 min. (C) c‐Fos activity of LPAGGABA and LPAGGlu neurons. LPAGGlu neurons are activated (95% confidence interval, −13.58 to −0.894) following optogenetic stimulation, whereas LPAGGABA neurons are inhibited (95% confidence interval, 0.9133 to −13.60). (D) Schematic illustration of the brain slice experiments after inhalation of sevoflurane anesthesia or pure oxygen. (E) LPAG neural activity increases from rostral to caudal. Two‐way ANOVA followed by post hoc Bonferroni's multiple comparisons: F[3,40] = 3.866, p = 0.0003. There are eight slices from 4 mice in each group. (F) Representative micrographs showing overlapping GABA/Glu (red) and c‐Fos (green) stainings in the LPAG after 2 h of oxygen exposure (O2‐2h) or sevoflurane anesthesia (Sevo‐2h). (G) c‐Fos activity in LPAG GABAergic and glutamatergic neurons was compared between oxygen exposure (O2‐2h) and sevoflurane anesthesia (Sevo‐2h). Two‐way ANOVA followed by post hoc Bonferroni's multiple comparisons: F[1,16] = 51.06, p < 0.0001. There are eight slices from four mice in each group. The results indicate that GABAergic neurons in the LPAG were activated, whereas glutamatergic neuronal activity was inhibited by sevoflurane anesthesia. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. Data are presented as Mean ± SD.

3.4 LHAGABA projections to the LPAG promote emergence during sevoflurane anesthesia

To explore the role of LHAGABA axonal terminals in the LPAG during sevoflurane anesthesia, AAV‐DIO‐ChR2/NpHR‐mCherry or control AAV‐DIO‐mCherry virus was microinjected into the LHA of Vgat‐Cre mice, and optical fibers were embedded in the LPAG. Immunofluorescence staining confirmed the specificity of viral expression (Figure 7A). EEG was recorded during optical modulation as described above (Figure 7B). Representative EEG changes in burst suppression patterns were observed within 2 min before and after the light stimulus (Figure 7E,F). During sevoflurane maintenance, blue light pulses activated the LHAGABA‐LPAG projection, and BSR was significantly decreased during optogenetic stimulation (Figure 7G). However, when yellow laser pulsing was used to inhibit GABAergic terminals in the LPAG; BSR did not significantly change (Figure 7H). These results indicate that activating LHAGABA terminals in the LPAG can remarkably promote arousal from anesthesia.

FIGURE 7 The LHAGABA‐LPAG circuit significantly affects arousal under sevoflurane anesthesia in mice. (A) Diagram showing the injection of optogenetic viruses into the LHA and optical fiber insertion into the LPAG of Vgat‐Cre mice. Fluorescent images show virus expression, fiber position, and overlap of LHAGABA neurons. (B) Time course of the experiment. (C, D) Activation or inhibition of LHAGABA‐LPAG projections in response to anesthesia induction and emergence. One‐way ANOVA followed by post hoc Bonferroni's multiple comparisons: LoRR, F[2,27] = 0.6234, p = 0.037; RoRR, F[2,27] = 4.325, p = 0.024. (E, F) Representative raw EEG trace (top) and corresponding power spectrogram (bottom) during laser stimulation of optical‐expressing mice during sevoflurane anesthesia. (G) Compared to pre‐stimulation, activation of LHAGABA‐LPAG projections significantly reduces BSR during sevoflurane maintenance. Two‐tailed paired Student's t‐test: t[5] = 6.714, p = 0.0011. (H) Compared to pre‐stimulation, inhibition of LHAGABA‐LPAG projections has no significant effect on BSR during sevoflurane maintenance. Two‐tailed paired Student's t‐test: t[5] = 0.7973, p = 0.4615. (I) Illustration of the experimental equipment for DREADDs. (J, K) Effect of activation or inhibition of LHAGABA‐LPAG projections on the induction time and emergence time from sevoflurane anesthesia. Two‐way ANOVA followed by post hoc Bonferroni's multiple comparisons: LoRR, F[2,28] = 11.32, p = 0.0002; RoRR, F[2,26] = 10.44, p = 0.0005. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. Data are presented as Mean ± SD.

We also performed optical stimulation during the induction and emergence periods under sevoflurane anesthesia (Figure 7A,B). Optogenetic activation of LHAGABA terminals in the LPAG prolonged LoRR time and shortened RoRR time (Figure 7C,D). Inhibition of LHAGABA neurons did not affect LoRR or RoRR times (Figure 7C,D). These results indicate that optogenetic activation of the LHAGABA‐LPAG pathway prolongs induction and reduces emergence time under sevoflurane anesthesia.

Next, chemogenetic viruses were microinjected into the LHA, and a cannula was inserted into the LPAG of Vgat‐Cre mice (Figure 7I). Chemogenetic stimulation was combined with sevoflurane anesthesia, as described above. Compared to controls, activation of LHAGABA terminals in the LPAG prolonged LoRR time and shortened RoRR time (Figure 7J,K). Inhibition of LHAGABA terminals in the LPAG slightly affected LoRR but not RoRR time (Figure 7J,K).

4 DISCUSSION

In the present study, we aimed to test the hypothesis that LHAGABA neurons play a crucial role in modulating the anesthesia‐arousal transition during sevoflurane anesthesia. LHAGABA neuronal activity was significantly suppressed by sevoflurane anesthesia, as evidenced by both in vitro immunostaining and in vivo fiber photometry. Combined with chemogenetic, optogenetic, EEG, and behavioral tests, we established that the activation of LHAGABA neurons reduces BSR during anesthesia maintenance and facilitates emergence from sevoflurane anesthesia. Furthermore, using anterograde tracing, we identified relevant projection areas of LHAGABA neurons possibly related to arousal from anesthesia. Our findings revealed an LHAGABA‐LPAG pathway essential for the rapid alteration of whole‐brain states and facilitation of arousal from sevoflurane anesthesia.

In the transition of natural sleep, numerous subcortical arousal circuits have been identified to be involved in the modulation of the brain. 6 Our previous study found that activation of VTAGABA terminals in the LHA promotes NREM and REM sleep, demonstrating their role in sleep induction. 31 , 32 Disruption or inhibition of VTAGABA neurons leads to sustained wakefulness, whereas activation of VTAGABA neurons induces profound sedation. 33 Moreover, VTAGABA projections to the LHA facilitated anesthetic isoflurane effects during induction and maintenance. These projections similarly affected sleep and anesthesia, including an increased depth of unconsciousness, improved induction, and delayed recovery. However, other reports have shown that activation of preoptic GABAergic neurons modulates sleep–wake but not anesthetic state transitions. 8 , 34 It becomes increasingly evident that different mechanisms govern general anesthesia‐induced loss of consciousness and natural sleep. 5 , 35 , 36 , 37 Therefore, the role of various nuclei in sleep and under different anesthetics should be investigated. 12 , 37

The hypothalamus comprises various neuronal types with diverse molecular signatures and is a core player in regulating multiple fundamental physiological behaviors, implicating its complex role in consciousness modulation. 12 , 24 The LHA GABAergic neurons have traditionally been considered to be important for survival, feeding, and consciousness transition. 20 , 23 , 24 The direct inhibitory effect of anesthetics on any wake‐active regions, such as the VTA, is predicted to destabilize wakefulness and promote hypnosis. 38 In the current study, we also demonstrated that the activation of LHAGABA neurons accelerated emergence and reduced the BSR during sevoflurane anesthesia. Because electrical microstimulation can activate local neuron somata as well as the pass‐by axons of neurons from other brain regions, the precise LHA GABAergic neural circuits underlying promote arousal especially general anesthetic induced conscious transition remain to be dissected precisely. 13 , 25 The interaction between LHAGABA neurons and multiple brain regions regulating anesthesia‐arousal remains elusive, suggesting complex arousal control through interactions between long‐range connections.

Classical transection studies suggest that apart from the hypothalamus, the brainstem is essential for sustaining wakefulness. 26 Anatomical and physiological experiments were conducted to characterize that the LHA neurons projecting to the PAG may coordinate neuronal activity in multiple brain regions, such as in feeding and conscious behavior. PAG‐projecting LH neurons also project to other brain regions such as the thalamus and lateral habenular nucleus (LHb), and along the medial forebrain bundle (MFB) to the midbrain ventral tegmental area and substantia nigra compacta (SNc), as well as to the reticular nucleus posterior to the PAG. 25 , 39 However, whether the LHAGABA mediates the transition of consciousness induced by general anesthesia through LHAGABA‐PAG pathway remains unknown. Among the numerous downstream brain regions of LHAGABA neurons, the brainstem PAG is functionally segmented by distinct afferent and efferent connections, molecular profiles, and associated behaviors, specifically its lateral (LPAG) and ventrolateral (VLPAG) sections are implicated in modulating various complex behaviors, including pain perception, motivation, anxiety, responses to threats, and aggression. 13 , 25 , 26 , 27 The LPAG is a heterogeneous nucleus containing mainly glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons. Earlier studies have demonstrated that LPAGVgat neurons support seeking and attacking behaviors, whereas LPAGVglut2 neurons exclusively support attacking behaviors. 25 , 40 This implies varied regulatory functions among different types of LPAG neurons. The LPAG is also engaged in sleep–wake regulation, as LPAG neurotensinergic neurons promote NREM sleep. 28 Our results further proved that the GABAergic LHA projection to the LPAG plays a pro‐arousal role in sevoflurane anesthesia. Activation of the LHA GABAergic projections to the LPAG reduced the BSR during sevoflurane maintenance and changed the anesthetic behaviors. Compared to neural circuits stimulation and c‐Fos staining, our results suggested that LHAGABA neurons mediate the disinhibition of LPAG glutamatergic neuronal activity. This disinhibition effect of LPAG Glu neurons could have contributed to the inhibition of local GABA neurons in LPAG, thereby facilitating arousal following sevoflurane exposure in mice. Consistent with previous and our results, we hypothesized that GABA release from LHAGABA neurons inhibits GABAergic neurons within the LPAG area, thereby disinhibiting LPAGGlu neurons from projecting further to arousal‐associated brain regions and affecting sevoflurane anesthesia. In concert, these findings provide a mechanism for how LHAGABA neurons contribute to sevoflurane‐induced unconsciousness via their projections to the LPAG, elucidating the inhibitory pathway's role in promoting arousal from general anesthesia through a classical disinhibitory effect.

However, our study also has some limitations. First, only male mice were used. Our previous study found male mice were more sensitive to sevoflurane, representing sex differences in response to general anesthesia through the estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) in the medial preoptic area. 30 As another sexually dimorphic region, LPAG contains numerous ERα‐immunopositive neurons distributed in a species‐specific way. 41 Therefore, further research is needed to examine whether our findings can be extrapolated to females. Second, high‐frequency stimulation in the downstream could induce antidromic activation and cause retrograde depolarization of upstream starting cell bodies and then induce an excitatory effect through other projections; we have not excluded this possibility in this study.

In conclusion, this study identified that inhibitory LHAGABA neural projections to the LPAG play a pro‐emergency role in consciousness transitions during sevoflurane anesthesia. Our results added a piece of new evidence to support that the inhibitory neural pathways in specific brain regions are involved in facilitating the arousal from general anesthesia. These findings enhance our understanding of the mechanisms of consciousness shift and potentially facilitate the development of studies involving the GABAergic system. It also provides new insights into the discovery of novel neural targets for comparing the roles of central neuronal pathways in sleep and general anesthesia.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Hailong Dong and Dan Wang initiated and directed the study. Hailong Dong and Huiming Li revised the manuscript. Dan Wang and Huiming Li wrote the manuscript draft. Chang Bao, Huimin Wu, Xinxin Zhang, Fang Zhou and Sa Wang performed the experiments. Dan Wang, Jiannan Li and Huimin Wu analyzed the data. All authors contributed to and approved the manuscript.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

No conflict of interest exists in the submission of this manuscript, and the manuscript is approved by all authors for submission to CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics.

Supporting information

Table S1

Table S2

Appendix S1

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 82101343 to D.W.; No. 82030038, No. 82221001 to Prof. H.D. We thank Prof. Bairen Wang for helpful comments on the experimental design. We also thank Yaru Guo for the genetic mouse line generation. We thank all the members of the Laboratory of Department of Anesthesiology, Xijing Hospital, for their assistance.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
==== Refs
REFERENCES

1 Palanca B , Avidan MS , Mashour GA . Human neural correlates of sevoflurane‐induced unconsciousness. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119 (4 ):573‐582. doi:10.1093/bja/aex244 29121298
2 Xu W , Wang L , Yuan XS , et al. Sevoflurane depresses neurons in the medial parabrachial nucleus by potentiating postsynaptic GABA(a) receptors and background potassium channels. Neuropharmacology. 2020;181 :108249. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108249 32931816
3 Li JY , Gao SJ , Li RR , et al. A neural circuit from the paraventricular thalamus to the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis for the regulation of states of consciousness during sevoflurane anesthesia in mice. Anesthesiology. 2022;136 (5 ):709‐731. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000004195 35263424
4 Westphalen RI , Hemmings HC Jr . Effects of isoflurane and propofol on glutamate and GABA transporters in isolated cortical nerve terminals. Anesthesiology. 2003;98 (2 ):364‐372. doi:10.1097/00000542-200302000-00016 12552195
5 Franks NP . General anaesthesia: from molecular targets to neuronal pathways of sleep and arousal. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9 (5 ):370‐386. doi:10.1038/nrn2372 18425091
6 Yi T , Wang N , Huang J , et al. A sleep‐specific midbrain target for sevoflurane anesthesia. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2023;10 (15 ):e2300189. doi:10.1002/advs.202300189 36961096
7 Mashour GA , Pal D , Brown EN . Prefrontal cortex as a key node in arousal circuitry. Trends Neurosci. 2022;45 (10 ):722‐732. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2022.07.002 35995629
8 Oishi Y , Saito YC , Sakurai T . GABAergic modulation of sleep–wake states. Pharmacol Ther. 2023;249 :108505. doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2023.108505 37541595
9 Gelegen C , Miracca G , Ran MZ , et al. Excitatory pathways from the lateral habenula enable propofol‐induced sedation. Curr Biol. 2018;28 (4 ):580‐587.e5. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.050 29398217
10 Yan J , Hang BN , Ma LH , et al. GABAergic neurons in the nucleus accumbens are involved in the general anesthesia effect of propofol. Mol Neurobiol. 2023;60 (10 ):5789‐5804. doi:10.1007/s12035-023-03445-1 37349621
11 Guo J , Ran M , Gao Z , et al. Cell‐type‐specific imaging of neurotransmission reveals a disrupted excitatory‐inhibitory cortical network in isoflurane anaesthesia. EBioMedicine. 2021;65 :103272. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103272 33691246
12 Jiang J , Zou G , Liu J , et al. Functional connectivity of the human hypothalamus during wakefulness and nonrapid eye movement sleep. Hum Brain Mapp. 2021;42 (11 ):3667‐3679. doi:10.1002/hbm.25461 33960583
13 Li Y , Zeng J , Zhang J , et al. Hypothalamic circuits for predation and evasion. Neuron. 2018;97 (4 ):911‐924. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.005 29398361
14 Stuber GD , Wise RA . Lateral hypothalamic circuits for feeding and reward. Nat Neurosci. 2016;19 (2 ):198‐205. doi:10.1038/nn.4220 26814589
15 Yang Q , Zhou F , Li A , Dong H . Neural substrates for the regulation of sleep and general anesthesia. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2022;20 (1 ):72‐84. doi:10.2174/1570159X19666211214144639 34906058
16 Wang D , Guo Y , Li H , et al. Selective optogenetic activation of orexinergic terminals in the basal forebrain and locus coeruleus promotes emergence from isoflurane anaesthesia in rats. Br J Anaesth. 2021;126 (1 ):279‐292. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2020.09.037 33131759
17 Li A , Li R , Ouyang P , et al. Dorsal raphe serotonergic neurons promote arousal from isoflurane anesthesia. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2021;27 (8 ):941‐950. doi:10.1111/cns.13656 33973716
18 Dong HL , Fukuda S , Murata E , Zhu Z , Higuchi T . Orexins increase cortical acetylcholine release and electroencephalographic activation through orexin‐1 receptor in the rat basal forebrain during isoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2006;104 (5 ):1023‐1032. doi:10.1097/00000542-200605000-00019 16645455
19 Tsunematsu T , Ueno T , Tabuchi S , et al. Optogenetic manipulation of activity and temporally controlled cell‐specific ablation reveal a role for MCH neurons in sleep/wake regulation. J Neurosci. 2014;34 (20 ):6896‐6909. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5344-13.2014 24828644
20 Herrera CG , Cadavieco MC , Jego S , Ponomarenko A , Korotkova T , Adamantidis A . Hypothalamic feedforward inhibition of thalamocortical network controls arousal and consciousness. Nat Neurosci. 2016;19 (2 ):290‐298. doi:10.1038/nn.4209 26691833
21 Gazea M , Furdan S , Sere P , et al. Reciprocal lateral hypothalamic and raphe GABAergic projections promote wakefulness. J Neurosci. 2021;41 (22 ):4840‐4849. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2850-20.2021 33888606
22 Venner A , De Luca R , Sohn LT , et al. An inhibitory lateral hypothalamic‐preoptic circuit mediates rapid arousals from sleep. Curr Biol. 2019;29 (24 ):4155‐4168. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.10.026 31761703
23 Ferrari LL , Park D , Zhu L , Palmer MR , Broadhurst RY , Arrigoni E . Regulation of lateral hypothalamic orexin activity by local GABAergic neurons. J Neurosci. 2018;38 (6 ):1588‐1599. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1925-17.2017 29311142
24 Clément O , Sapin E , Libourel PA , et al. The lateral hypothalamic area controls paradoxical (REM) sleep by means of descending projections to brainstem GABAergic neurons. J Neurosci. 2012;32 (47 ):16763‐16774. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1885-12.2012 23175830
25 Yu H , Xiang X , Chen Z , et al. Periaqueductal gray neurons encode the sequential motor program in hunting behavior of mice. Nat Commun. 2021;12 (1 ):6523. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26852-1 34764279
26 Kashiwagi M , Kanuka M , Tatsuzawa C , et al. Widely distributed Neurotensinergic neurons in the brainstem regulate NREM sleep in mice. Curr Biol. 2020;30 (6 ):1002‐1010. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.047 32032507
27 Assareh N , Fenech C , Power R , Uddin MN , Otsu Y , Aubrey KR . Bidirectional modulation of nociception by GlyT2(+) neurons in the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray. eNeuro. 2023;10 (6 ):ENEURO.0069‐23.2023. doi:10.1523/ENEURO.0069-23.2023
28 Weber F , Hoang Do JP , Chung S , et al. Regulation of REM and non‐REM sleep by periaqueductal GABAergic neurons. Nat Commun. 2018;9 (1 ):354. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02765-w 29367602
29 Zhang Y , Li H , Zhang X , et al. Estrogen receptor‐A in medial preoptic area contributes to sex difference of mice in response to sevoflurane anesthesia. Neurosci Bull. 2022;38 (7 ):703‐719. doi:10.1007/s12264-022-00825-w 35175557
30 Zhou F , Wang D , Li H , et al. Orexinergic innervations at GABAergic neurons of the lateral habenula mediates the anesthetic potency of sevoflurane. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2023;29 (5 ):1332‐1344. doi:10.1111/cns.14106 36740262
31 Yu X , Li W , Ma Y , et al. GABA and glutamate neurons in the VTA regulate sleep and wakefulness. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22 (1 ):106‐119. doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0288-9 30559475
32 Yu X , Zhao G , Wang D , et al. A specific circuit in the midbrain detects stress and induces restorative sleep. Science. 2022;377 (6601 ):63‐72. doi:10.1126/science.abn0853 35771921
33 Yu X , Ba W , Zhao G , et al. Dysfunction of ventral tegmental area GABA neurons causes mania‐like behavior. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26 (9 ):5213‐5228. doi:10.1038/s41380-020-0810-9 32555422
34 Vanini G , Bassana M , Mast M , et al. Activation of preoptic GABAergic or glutamatergic neurons modulates sleep–wake architecture, but not anesthetic state transitions. Curr Biol. 2020;30 (5 ):779‐787. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.12.063 32084397
35 Cai S , Tang AC , Luo TY , et al. Effect of basal forebrain somatostatin and parvalbumin neurons in propofol and isoflurane anesthesia. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2021;27 (7 ):792‐804. doi:10.1111/cns.13635 33764684
36 Mashour GA , Pal D . Interfaces of sleep and anesthesia. Anesthesiol Clin. 2012;30 (2 ):385‐398. doi:10.1016/j.anclin.2012.05.003 22901616
37 Moody OA , Zhang ER , Vincent KF , et al. The neural circuits underlying general anesthesia and sleep. Anesth Analg. 2021;132 (5 ):1254‐1264. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000005361 33857967
38 Taylor NE , Van Dort CJ , Kenny JD , et al. Optogenetic activation of dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area induces reanimation from general anesthesia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113 (45 ):12826‐12831. doi:10.1073/pnas.1614340113 27791160
39 Behbehani MM , Park MR , Clement ME . Interactions between the lateral hypothalamus and the periaqueductal gray. J Neurosci. 1988;8 (8 ):2780‐2787. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-08-02780.1988 2900881
40 Morgan MM , Clayton CC . Defensive behaviors evoked from the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray of the rat: comparison of opioid and GABA disinhibition. Behav Brain Res. 2005;164 (1 ):61‐66. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2005.05.009 16029902
41 Wang L , Talwar V , Osakada T , et al. Hypothalamic control of conspecific self‐defense. Cell Rep. 2019;26 (7 ):1747‐1758. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.078 30759387
