
==== Front
RSC Adv
RSC Adv
RA
RSCACL
RSC Advances
2046-2069
The Royal Society of Chemistry

d4ra05849f
10.1039/d4ra05849f
Chemistry
Iodine/DMSO-catalyzed oxidative deprotection of N-tosylhydrazone for benzoic acid synthesis†
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ra05849f

Singhal Rakshanda a
Mehra Manish K. b‡
Malik Babita a
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2211-2444
Pilania Meenakshi a
a Department of Chemistry, Manipal University Jaipur Jaipur (Rajasthan) VPO-Dehmi-Kalan, Off Jaipur-Ajmer Express Way Jaipur Rajasthan 303007 India meenakshi.pilania@jaipur.manipal.edu

b Department of Chemistry, Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani Pilani Campus Rajasthan 333031 India
‡ Current address: The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, 19104 USA.

24 9 2024
18 9 2024
24 9 2024
14 41 3048230486
12 8 2024
17 9 2024
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry
2024
The Royal Society of Chemistry
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.
An oxidative deprotection of tosylhyrdazones has been demonstrated to afford benzoic acids using iodine and DMSO system. This efficient oxidative deprotection protocol offers exceptional functional group toleration under mild reaction conditions without any initiators or bases. Notably, the tosylhydrazone with the heteroaryl ring or with the aryl ring having base-sensitive hydroxyl and ester functional groups smoothly afforded the corresponding benzoic acid analogues under developed conditions. Moreover, this method features short reaction times, high product yields and easy purification by avoiding column-chromatographic purification.

An oxidative deprotection approach has been developed using iodine-DMSO system to synthesize carboxylic acid derivatives from N-tosylhydraones, yielding good to excellent results.

pubstatusPaginated Article
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

N-tosylhydrazones are popular synthons in synthetic organic chemistry for constructing potent cyclic scaffolds.1,2 The synthesis of tosylhydrazones can be straightforwardly achieved in solid form via condensation of carbonyl compounds with tosylhydrazine in high yields.3,4 However, ascribed to their appealing features and potent diazo and 1,3-dipolar precursors, tosylhydrazones have played a crucial role in the synthesis or modification of various bioactive heterocycles.5–10 Additionally, due to their crystalline and stable nature, tosylhydrazones and its derivatives have been used as protection and purification agents for carbonyl compounds.11–14 The deprotection of hydrazones into corresponding carbonyl or carboxylic acid derivatives under mild conditions is a vital process in organic synthesis. The development of mild and effective methods for the deprotection of procarbonyl compounds has been of long-standing interest of organic chemists. To date, numerous conditions or catalysts such as copper(i) chloride,15 clayfen,16 potassium bromate,17 quinolinium dichromate (QDC),18 alumina-supported ammonium chlorochromate,19 6-benzyl-4-aza-1-azoniabicyclo[2.2.2]octane dichromate,20 and Amberlyst 15 supported nitrosonium ion21 have been reported to accomplish the deprotection of hydrazones into corresponding carbonyl compounds. Although multiple approaches for the regeneration of carbonyl compounds from oximes11,22,23 are reported in scientific literature, only a few reports are available from tosylhydrazones, especially with mild reaction conditions.

In 2000, Bandgar and his team reported the regeneration of carbonyl compounds using hexamethylenetetramine–bromine (HMTAB) and N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) (Scheme 1a).24 Similarly, in the same year, Chandrasekhar and his team disclosed the selective cleavage of tosylhydrazone using 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (DDQ) (Scheme 1b).25 In 2006, Movassagh and co-workers utilized K-catalyst and calcium hypochlorite for the deprotection of tosylhydrazones (Scheme 1c).26 Likewise, Jia and his group regenerated the carbonyl compounds using meta-chloroperbenzoic acid (mCPBA) (Scheme 1d).27 Despite many attempts thus far, existing methods or conditions often suffer from various disadvantages e.g. expensive syntheses, limited substrate scope, extended reaction time, and the use of hazardous oxidants and metal ions in certain cases. Noticeably, the usage of a mild oxidation approach for the direct conversion of tosylhydrazones to corresponding carboxylic acids is still desirable. It is therefore necessary to develop new methods based on readily available oxidants and safer chemicals. In this context, iodine and DMSO system have recently received attention as mild and selective oxidizing agent. The I2/DMSO duo is very suitable for chemoselective oxidation, dehydrogenation, oxidative aromatization, protection/deprotection of various functional groups, and regioselective and stereoselective transformations.28–30 On the other hand, the selective oxidation of carbonyl groups is a vital step in organic synthesis since it enables the production of acids, amides, acetals, and esters.31–38 Carboxylic acids are the most extensively used oxidized feedstocks and are needed in large amounts as bulk chemicals in various industries, including polymers, fine chemicals, and commercial products.39 Benzoic acids32,39,40 and its analogues are biologically important scaffold as they are featured in many natural products and medically potent drugs (Fig. 1).41–44

Scheme 1 Deprotection of N-tosylhydrazones.

Fig. 1 Representative biologically active benzoic acids.

They have a wide range of applications, including antimicrobial preservatives, antifungals, tablet and capsule lubricants, and UV protection agents.45–47 Utilizing a blend of medicinal plants that consist of Benzoic acid derivatives, amino acids, antioxidant chemicals, and certain minerals may be the optimal approach in formulating a phytomedicine for dealing with anemia or sickle cell disease (SCD).43,48–50 In 1971, Pierre and colleagues found that benzoic acid derivatives have anti-sickling properties in vitro using the root extract of Fagara xanthoxyloides.48 Similarly, Elekwa and his colleagues have revealed the anti-sickling benefits of p-fluorobenzoic acid.51

Hence, by deliberately avoiding hazardous substances, we have discovered that tosylhydrazones can undergo direct oxidative deprotection to produce benzoic acid derivatives (Scheme 1e). This developed method can be used in chemical industries as a cost-effective, efficient and ecologically benign synthesis.52–58 Herein, we report the metal and base-free deprotection of tosylhydrazones to the oxidative product of its parent aldehyde group using iodine and DMSO system with optimal conditions.

Results and discussion

The investigation started by examining the reaction conditions using tosylhydrazone 1a as the model substrate.

Initially, reaction was conducted in the DMSO without the use of iodine at 100 °C for 1 h. Unfortunately, the reaction was failed to afford the target product 2a in the absence of iodine (Table 1, entry 1). Next, we attempted to manipulate the reaction environment by adding various reagents such as NaI, TBAI, NH4I and KI (Table 1, entries 2–5). However, using these reagents were futile and resulted in no product formation. Further, the use of iodine reagent in catalytic amount (10 mol% or 0.1 equiv.) in DMSO afforded the needed product 2a in 30% yield (Table 1, entry 6). It indicates that the iodine reagent is essential for this conversion. Subsequently, increasing the equivalent of iodine from 0.1 equiv. to 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 equiv. improved the reaction efficiency to provide the 2a in 56%, 78% and 87% yields, respectively (Table 1, entries 7–9). Further, elevation in temperature from 100 to 120 °C also did not have any impactful effect on the productivity of this transformation (Table 1, entry 10). Reducing reaction temperature from 100 °C to room temperature and 70 °C significantly affected the reaction outcome, no reaction occurred at room temperature while only 60% yield of 2a was observed at 70 °C (Table 1, entries 11 and 12). Moreover, we noticed the reaction outcome by switching to the other solvents. Changing solvents from DMSO to toluene, acetonitrile (MeCN), 1,4-dioxane, water, MeOH, DMF, THF, chloroform (CHCl3) and DMA was entirely ineffective and 2a was either not observed or obtained in poor yields (Table 1, entries 13–22). It suggested that DMSO has a critical role in this reaction transformation. Finally, we found that the use of 1.5 equiv. of iodine in DMSO at 100 °C was the optimum condition for the satisfactory yield of 2a.

Optimization of reaction conditionsa

	
Entry	Reagent (equiv.)	Solvent	T (°C)	Yieldb (%)	
1	—	DMSO	100 °C	NR	
2	NaI (1.0)	DMSO	100 °C	NR	
3	TBAI (1.0)	DMSO	100 °C	NR	
4	NH4I (1.0)	DMSO	100 °C	NR	
5	KI (1.0)	DMSO	100 °C	NR	
6	I2 (0.1)	DMSO	100 °C	30	
7	I2 (0.5)	DMSO	100 °C	56	
8	I2 (1)	DMSO	100 °C	78	
9	I 2 (1.5)	DMSO	100 °C	87	
10	I2 (1.5)	DMSO	120 °C	86	
11	I2 (1.5)	DMSO	RT	NR	
12	I2 (1.5)	DMSO	70 °C	60	
13	I2 (1.5)	Toluene	100 °C	15	
14	I2 (1.5)	MeCN	80 °C	Trace	
15	I2 (1.5)	1,4-Dioxane	100 °C	10	
16	I2 (1.5)	H2O	100 °C	NR	
17	I2 (1.5)	MeOH	65 °C	NR	
18	I2 (1.5)	DMF	150 °C	NR	
19	I2 (1.5)	THF	60 °C	NR	
20	I2 (1.5)	CHCl3	60 °C	NR	
21	I2 (1.5)	DMF	100 °C	NR	
22	I2 (1.5)	DMA	100 °C	NR	
a Reaction conditions: 1a (0.36 mmol), I2 (0.54 mmol), solvent (1.5 mL), 100 °C.

b Isolated yields. NR = no reaction. RT = room temperature.

Under optimized reaction conditions, the accessibility of the protocol was observed with the use of a range of benzaldehyde tosylhydrazones 1 (Table 2). The reaction of benzaldehyde tosylhydrazones with electron-donating substituents such as methyl (1b), methoxy (1c, 1f), and isopropyl (1e) either at meta- or para-position of aryl rings proceeded efficiently to deliver the corresponding products 2b (88%), 2c (83%), 2e (93%) and 2f (87%). It is worth mentioning that the oxidizable thiomethyl (1d) group could sustained in the optimized reaction condition to give 2d in a 96% yield. Tosylhydrazones of benzaldehyde having halogen substituents such as fluoro (1g) chloro (1h) and bromo (1i) also worked well, resulting in the production of the corresponding products 2g, 2h and 2i in high yields of 92%, 85% and 89%, respectively. The strong electron-withdrawing nitro group at the para-position of tosylhydrazone 1j had little impact on the oxidative deprotection process, giving 2j a reduced yield of 65%. It was interesting to observe that other electron-withdrawing groups para-cyano (1k), nitro (1l) and ester (–COOMe; 1l′) group at meta-position did not have any negative influence on reaction outcome, providing expected products 2k, 2l and 2l′ in excellent yields (87–93%). Furthermore, tosylhydrazones 1m and 1n with hydroxy substitutions reacted well to afford the 2m and 2n in good yields (73–88%). It is worth mentioning that tosylhydrazones with base-sensitive functional groups such as ester (1l′) and hydroxy (1m and 1n) groups were well tolerated under the optimized conditions. Delightfully, the reaction of 4-methyl-N′-(thiophen-2-ylmethylene)benzene-sulfonohydrazide (1o) showed credible reactivity to afford 2o in 93% yield.

Oxidative deprotection of tosylhydrazones to benzoic acid derivativesa,b

	
a Reaction conditions: 1a (0.36 mmol), I2 (0.54 mmol), solvent (1.5 mL), 100 °C.

b Isolated yields.

Some of the control studies were designed to understand the mechanistic pathway (Scheme 2). Firstly, when the reaction of benzaldehyde 3 was performed under optimized reaction conditions, benzoic acid (2a) was observed only in trace amounts (Scheme 2a). Next, we speculated that in situ generated p-TSA acid might be involved as a catalyst in benzaldehyde to benzoic acid formation. Therefore, a reaction of 3 was performed with 0.5 equiv. of p-toluenesulfonic acid (p-TSA), but 2a formation was not observed. Further, we carried out the reaction mixture's LCMS analysis for the reaction of 1b under standard conditions. LCMS data suggested the generation of p-toluenesulfinic acid (TsH) instead of PTSA (see the ESI†). Hence, these experiments suggested no involvement of benzaldehyde intermediate in the developed oxidative deprotection process of N-tosylhydrazone.

Scheme 2 Control experiments.

Based on experimental outcomes and previous studies,59–63 a plausible mechanism for the synthesis of benzoic acid is presented in Scheme 3. Firstly, N-tosylhydrazone is believed to form a nitrogen-iodine species A by electrophilic attack of iodine. Then nucleophilic attack of H2O molecule may lead to species B and further elimination of a HI molecule may afford species C. Tautomerization of intermediate C is likely to give species D. Finally, an attack of water molecule may lead to the formation of desired product 2 with the loss of p-toluenesulfinic acid (TsH) with diimide (N2H2) or TsH with nitrogen gas (N2) and hydrogen iodide (HI). The release of p-toluenesulfinic acid was confirmed by LCMS analysis (see the ESI†).

Scheme 3 The plausible mechanism.

In conclusion, we have developed a feasible, economical, and environmentally benign method for the solvent-dependent oxidation of tosylhydrazone aldehydes into carboxylic acids. This particular transformation offers noteworthy benefits: (1) oxidation can be carried out without the need for an external catalyst, initiator, base, or additive; (2) the oxidation occurs under easy and mild reaction conditions, demonstrating excellent compatibility with functional groups, as shown by its ability to tolerate moisture, acid- and base-sensitive groups, as well as easily oxidizable groups. Considering these primary benefits, the current procedure can be considered as an important development in the field of oxidative deprotection of tosylhydrazones.

Data availability

I have no conflict in data availability.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Supplementary Material

RA-014-D4RA05849F-s001
==== Refs
References

Bamford W. R. Stevens T. S. J. Chem. Soc. 1952 4735 4740
Adlington R. M. Barrett A. G. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1983 16 55 59
Xie Z. Song Y. Xu L. Guo Y. Zhang M. Li L. Chen K. Liu X. ChemistryOpen 2018 7 977 983 30524923
de Oliveira Carneiro Brum J. França T. C. LaPlante S. R. Villar J. D. F. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2020 20 342 368 31612828
Singhal R. Choudhary S. P. Malik B. Pilania M. ChemistrySelect 2022 7 e202200134
Vaishya V. Singhal R. Mehra M. K. Pilania M. ChemistrySelect 2023 8 e202304377
Zeller K.-P. Kowallik M. Haiss P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005 3 2310 2318 16010366
Marziano N. Ronchin L. Tortato C. Ronchin S. Vavasori A. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2005 235 26 34
Marziano N. Ronchin L. Tortato C. Zingales A. Scantamburlo L. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2005 235 17 25
Jin S. J. Arora P. K. Sayre L. M. J. Org. Chem. 1990 55 3011 3018
Wuts P. G. and Greene T. W. , Greene's Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, John Wiley & Sons, 2006
Barluenga J. Valdés C. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2011 50 7486 7500 21748827
Fulton J. R. Aggarwal V. K. de Vicente J. Eur. J. Org Chem. 2005 2005 1479 1492
Wencel-Delord J. Dröge T. Liu F. Glorius F. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011 40 4740 4761 21666903
Ram R. N. Varsha K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991 32 5829 5832
Laszlo P. Polla E. Synthesis 1985 439 440
Narayanan S. Srinivasan V. S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1986 1557 1559
Sadeghi M. M. Mohammadpoor-Baltork I. Azarm M. Mazidi M. R. Synth. Commun. 2001 31 435 438
Zhang G.-S. Gong H. Yang D.-H. Chen M.-F. Synth. Commun. 1999 29 1165 1170
Hajipour A. Mallakpour S. Mohammadpoor-Baltork I. Khoee S. Synth. Commun. 2001 31 1187 1194
Lakouraj M. M. Noorian M. Mokhtary M. React. Funct. Polym. 2006 66 910 915
Varma R. S. Meshram H. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997 38 7973 7976
Demir A. S. Tanyeli C. Altinel E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997 38 7267 7270
Bandgar B. P. Makone S. S. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 2000 47 575 577
Chandrasekhar S. Reddy C. R. Reddy M. V. Chem. Lett. 2000 29 430 431
Movassagh B. Dahaghin E. Indian J. Chem. 2006 45B 1541 1543
Jia X.-C. Li J. Yu Z.-R. Wang Y.-H. Zhou L. Yu Y.-Y. J. Chem. Res. 2013 37 420 421
Gaikwad S. V. Gaikwad M. V. Lokhande P. D. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2021 58 1408 1414
Deka B. Rastogi G. K. Deb M. L. Baruah P. K. Top. Curr. Chem. 2022 380 1 38
Liang Y.-F. Li X. Wang X. Zou M. Tang C. Liang Y. Song S. Jiao N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016 138 12271 12277 27564642
Venkateswarlu V. Kumar K. A. Gupta S. Singh D. Vishwakarma R. A. Sawant S. D. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015 13 7973 7978 26110656
Liu K.-J. Fu Y.-L. Xie L.-Y. Wu C. He W.-B. Peng S. Wang Z. Bao W.-H. Cao Z. Xu X. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018 6 4916 4921
Dinizo S. E. Freerksen R. W. Pabst W. E. Watt D. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977 99 182 186
Zhang S. Neumann H. Beller M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020 49 3187 3210 32255444
Shimada N. Takahashi N. Ohse N. Koshizuka M. Makino K. Chem. Commun. 2020 56 13145 13148
Chhatwal A. R. Lomax H. V. Blacker A. J. Williams J. M. Marcé P. Chem. Sci. 2020 11 5808 5818 32832055
Li C. Zhao P. Li R. Zhang B. Zhao W. Angew. Chem. 2020 132 11005 11009
Wang C. Wan Q. Cheng J. Lin S. Savateev A. Antonietti M. Wang X. J. Catal. 2021 393 116 125
Kalmode H. P. Vadagaonkar K. S. Shinde S. L. Chaskar A. C. J. Org. Chem. 2017 82 3781 3786 28256127
Yu H. Ru S. Dai G. Zhai Y. Lin H. Han S. Wei Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017 56 3867 3871
Del Olmo A. Calzada J. Nuñez M. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017 57 3084 3103 26587821
Park E.-S. Moon W.-S. Song M.-J. Kim M.-N. Chung K.-H. Yoon J.-S. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2001 47 209 214
Manuja R. Sachdeva S. Jain A. Chaudhary J. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res. 2013 22 109 115
Kumar A. , Kamal Y. , Singh M. , Singh H. , Kaushik N. , Mishra A. and Mishra A. K. , Preprints, 2023, preprint, 2023051969, 10.20944/preprints202305.1969.v1
Hanson K. M. Gratton E. Bardeen C. J. Free Radicals Biol. Med. 2006 41 1205 1212
Crisan M. E. Bourosh P. Maffei M. E. Forni A. Pieraccini S. Sironi M. Chumakov Y. M. PLoS One 2014 9 e101892 25054237
Richards R. Xing D. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1994 12 1063 1068 7803552
Pierre L. Moses N. Peter C. Nat. Prod. Chem. Res. 2015 3 2
Afolabi I. S. Osikoya I. O. Fajimi O. D. Usoro P. I. Ogunleye D. O. Bisi-Adeniyi T. Adeyemi A. O. Adekeye B. T. BMC Complementary Altern. Med. 2012 12 1 11
PC C. Chikezie C. Amaragbulem P. Afr. J. Biochem. Res. 2011 5 39 42
Elekwa I. Monanu M. O. Anosike E. O. Biokemistri 2005 17 7 12
Yusubov M. S. Zhdankin V. V. Resour.-Effic. Technol. 2015 1 49 67
Tohma H. Kita Y. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004 346 111 124
Yoshimura A. Zhdankin V. V. Chem. Rev. 2016 116 3328 3435 26861673
Wu X.-F. Gong J.-L. Qi X. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014 12 5807 5817 24846326
Kim S. M. Shin H. Y. Kim D. W. Yang J. W. ChemSusChem 2016 9 241 245 26682633
Tohma H. Maegawa T. Takizawa S. Kita Y. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2002 344 328 337
Singhal R. Choudhary S. P. Malik B. Pilania M. RSC Adv. 2024 14 5817 5845 38362068
Sumran G. Aggarwal R. Hooda M. Sanz D. Claramunt R. M. Synth. Commun. 2018 48 439 446
Nakamura A. Kanou H. Tanaka J. Imamiya A. Maegawa T. Miki Y. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018 16 541 544 29313044
Idris M. S. F. Azhar N. H. A. Firdaus F. Ashari S. E. Yusoff S. F. M. Indones. J. Chem. 2019 19 882 891
Attanasi O. Serra-Zanetti F. Battistoni P. Fava G. J. Prakt. Chem. 1983 325 901 907
Attanasi O. Serra-Zanetti F. Synthesis 1980 314 315
