
==== Front
Clin Res Cardiol
Clin Res Cardiol
Clinical Research in Cardiology
1861-0684
1861-0692
Springer Berlin Heidelberg Berlin/Heidelberg

37902845
2320
10.1007/s00392-023-02320-2
Original Paper
Ventricular arrhythmia burden in ICD patients during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic
Rath Benjamin benjamin.rath@ukmuenster.de

Doldi Florian
Willy Kevin
Ellermann Christian
Köbe Julia
Güner Fatih
Reinke Florian
Lange Philipp Sebastian
Frommeyer Gerrit
Eckardt Lars
https://ror.org/01856cw59 grid.16149.3b 0000 0004 0551 4246 Department of Cardiology II-Electrophysiology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Münster, Germany
30 10 2023
30 10 2023
2024
113 10 14631468
13 2 2023
9 10 2023
© The Author(s) 2023
2023
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Aim

COVID-19 has been associated with cardiovascular complications including ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and an increased number of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. Nevertheless, several authors described a decrease of VA burden in patients with an implantable defibrillator (ICD) during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of this study was to determine if these observations could be transferred to later periods of the pandemic as well.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed a total of 1674 patients with an ICD presenting in our outpatient clinic during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic and during a control period for the occurrence of VA requiring ICD interventions.

Results

Seven hundred ninety-five patients with an ICD had a device interrogation in our ambulatory clinic during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to eight hundred seventy-nine patients in the control period. There was significant higher amount of adequate ICD therapies in the course of the COVID-19 period. Thirty-six patients (4.5%) received in total eighty-five appropriate ICD interventions during COVID-19, whereas only sixteen patients (1.8%) had sustained VA in the control period (p = 0.01).

Conclusion

In contrast to the first wave of COVID-19, which was characterized by a decrease or least stable number of ICD therapies in several centers, we found a significant increase of VA in ICD patients during the second wave of COVID-19. Possible explanations for this observation include higher infectious rates, potential cardiac side effects of the vaccination as well as personal behavioral changes, or reduced utilization of medical services.

Keywords

COVID-19
ICD
Ventricular arrhythmia
VT
VF
Universitätsklinikum Münster (8918)Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

issue-copyright-statement© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Since the first emergence of COVID-19 in late 2019, there has been a vastly documented surge in cases of infected patients followed by various vaccines and treatment attempts aimed at reducing the infectious rate and possible severe courses of the disease. COVID-19 primarily affects the respiratory system, but major cardiovascular complications including ventricular arrhythmias (VA) have been reported in hospitalized patients [1–3]. Despite or as a result of a decline in cardiovascular hospitalizations [4], several countries reported an increased number of out-of-cardiac-arrests (OHCA) during the COVID-19 pandemic [5, 6]. The risk of VA arises in settings of elevated sympathetic tone like illness, physical or emotional distress [7]. Historically, a significant increase of myocardial infarctions and VA has been observed during earthquakes or terrorists attacks [8, 9]. Patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) are naturally more prone to develop VA because of their underlying structural or electrical heart disease. The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on VA burden in ICD patients has been described by several authors in different regions so far [10–13]. Of note, despite the abovementioned considerations, a reduction or at least no increase of ICD interventions has been observed in the majority of these collectives [10–12]. The authors assumed an increased sedentary behavior due to extensive lockdown measures as the most probable cause for this observation. However, all these observations referred to the first wave of COVID-19 in late 2019 and early 2020. We, therefore, sought to determine if these results could also be observed in later periods of the pandemic.

Methods

Study cohort and design

We retrospectively analyzed all patients presenting to our outpatient clinic either for a regular check of their ICD or for an unplanned visit (e.g., because of an ICD shock). Patients were screened individually for the occurrence of sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VF or VT) requiring appropriate ICD interventions [antitachycardia pacing (ATP) or ICD shock]. Patients were examined in our outpatient clinic either during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany (15 November 2020–15 March 2021) or during a control period (15 November 2018–15 March 2019). As routine follow-up of ICD patients regulary takes place every 4 months in our clinic, the screened time period for the occurrence of VA in the majority of patients was 4 months since the preceding device interrogation. In patients with longer control intervals or unplanned visits (e.g., as a result of ICD shock), only VA within the last 4 months were recorded to ensure comparability between groups. Programming of specific ICD parameters such as intervention heart rate or detection intervals was left to the physician’s discretion. The study was approved by the local ethics committee.

Statistical analysis

For descriptive statistics, continuous data were presented as means with standard deviation (SD) and medians with interquartile ranges (IQR), respectively. Categorical data were presented as proportions. Normality of data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Comparisons between groups were performed using the Pearson’s Chi-squared test for categorical variables, and Student’s t test or Mann–Whitney U test for unpaired continuous variables, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for paired variables, according to data distribution. Logistic regression models with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to assess the risk of an ICD intervention. A p value of < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant. The statistical software used for data analysis and visualization was R version 1.4.1717 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Results

A total of 795 patients with an ICD had a device interrogation in our ambulatory clinic during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to 879 patients in the control period. Baseline characteristics of all patients are summarized in Table 1. Six hundred ninety-nine (71.7%) of these patients had device interrogation both during COVID-19 and the control period.Table 1 Baseline characteristics

	COVID-19
(11/20–03/21)	Control period
(11/18–03/19)	p value	
n	795 (47.5%)	879 (52.5%)		
Age	64.5 [41.2, 72.2]	61.8 [51.9, 78.4]	0.64	
Sex (male)	568 (71.4%)	655 (74.5%)	0.82	
ICD type	
 Transvenous ICD	595 (74.8%)	662 (75.3%)	0.09	
 CRT-ICD	110 (13.8%)	142 (16.1%)	
 Subcutanous ICD	90 (11.3%)	75 (8.5%)	
Cardiomyopathy	
 Ischemic	436 (54.8%)	558 (63.5%)	0.98	
 Non ischemic	254 (31.9%)	233 (26.5%)	
 Other	105 (13.2%)	88 (10.0%)	
Antiarrhythmic medication	
 ß-blocker	629 (79.1%)	659 (76.1%)	0.91	
 Amiodarone	56 (7.0%)	71 (8.1%)	0.11	
 Flecainide	16 (2.0%)	19 (2.2%)	0.38	
 Sotalol	8 (1.0%)	12 (1.4%)	0.06	

Overall, 49 patients (5.0%) received in total 119 appropriate ICD interventions due to sustained VA. Baseline characteristics of these patients are listed in Table 2. Forty (81.6%) of these patients had follow-up during both COVID-19 and the control period. The most common arrhythmia was monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (mVT) (46.2%) followed by ventricular fibrillation (VF) (31.1%) and polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (pVT) (22.7%). Ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) was the underlying heart disease in more than half of these patients (53.8%) and 26.9% were treated with antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD), predominately amiodarone (23.1%). Despite a smaller overall number of investigated ICD recipients, there was a significant higher amount of patients requiring adequate ICD therapies during the COVID-19 period. Thirty-six patients (4.5%) received in total eighty-five appropriate ICD interventions during the second wave of COVID-19, whereas only sixteen patients (1.8%) had thirty-four episodes of sustained VA in the control period (OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.50, 5.01, p = 0.01). Three of these patients received appropriate ICD therapies in both time periods. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Distribution of arrhythmia type (mVT, pVT, VF) and ICD treatment (shock vs. ATP) were similar in both groups as well. No correlation was found between use of AAD, respectively, underlying heart disease or type of ICD and arrhythmic risk during or before COVID-19. There was no significant difference of inappropriate ICD interventions during COVID-19 and the control period (Table 3). This applies both to lead malfunction and inappropriate detection of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). When focusing only on the 699 overlapping patients with ICD interrogation during both periods (Table 4), we still found a significant higher number of patients with appropriate ICD therapies during COVID-19 compared to the control period (OR 0.48 CI 0.26, 0.91 p = 0.03, Table 5).Table 2 Baseline characteristics of patients with appropriate ICD therapies

	COVID-19
(11/20–03/21)	Control period
(11/18–03/19)	p value	
n	36 (4.5%)	16 (1.8%)	0.01	
Age	63.5 [52.8, 71.5]	63.5 [43.2, 71.2]	0.88	
Sex (male)	29 (80.6%)	13 (81.2%)	1.00	
ICD type	
 Transvenous ICD	24 (66.7%)	14 (87.5%)	0.23	
 CRT-ICD	8 (22.2%)	2 (12.5%)	
 Subcutanous ICD	4 (11.1%)	0 (0.0%)	
Treated VA episodes	85	34	0.25	
 mVT	38 (44.7%)	17 (50%)	
 pVT	19 (22.4%)	8 (23.5%)	
 VF	28 (32.9%)	9 (26.5%)	
 Termination with ATP	26 (30.6%)	15 (44.1%)	
 Termination with ICD shock	59 (69.4%)	19 (55.9%)	
Cardiomyopathy	
 Ischemic	18 (50.0%)	10 (62.5%)	0.26	
 Non-ischemic	11 (30.6%)	3 (18.8%)	
 Other	7 (19.4%)	3 (18.8%)	
Antiarrhythmic medication	
 ß-blocker	35 (97.5%)	15 (93.8%)	1.00	
 Amiodarone	9 (25.0%)	3 (18.8%)	0.89	
 Flecainide	0 (0.0%)	2 (12.5%)	0.17	

Table 3 Inappropriate ICD interventions

	COVID-19
(11/20–03/21)	Control period
(11/18–03/19)	p value	
n	5 (0.6%)	6 (0.7%)	0.14	
SVT	1	2	0.98	
Lead malfunction	4	4	0.82	
ICD type			0.71	
 Transvenous ICD	3	3		
 CRT-ICD	1	2		
 Subcutanous ICD	1	1		
Cardiomyopathy			0.12	
 Ischemic	3	4		
 Non-ischemic	1	1		
 Other	1	1		

Table 4 Baseline characteristics of overlapping patients

	COVID-19	Control period	p value	
(11/20–03/21)	(11/18–03/19)	
n	699	699		
Age	63.5	61.5		
Sex (male)	482 (69.0)	482 (69.0)		
ICD type	
 Transvenous ICD	517 (74.0%)	520 (74.4%)	0.90	
 CRT-ICD	99 (14.2%)	97 (13.9%)	
 Subcutanous ICD	83 (11.9%)	82 (11.7%)	
Cardiomyopathy	
 Ischemic	367 (52.5%)	367 (52.5%)		
 Non-ischemic	231 (33.0%)	231 (33.0%)	
 Other	101 (14.4%)	101 (14.4%)	
Antiarrhythmic medication	
 ß-blocker	566 (81.0%)	561 (80.3%)	0.79	
 Amiodarone	48 (6.9%)	51 (7.3%)	0.83	
 Flecainide	12 (1.7%)	14 (2.0%)	0.84	
 Sotalol	7 (1.0%)	9 (1.3%)	0.80	

Table 5 Baseline characteristics of overlapping patients with appropriate ICD therapies

	COVID-19	Control period	p value	
(11/20–03/21)	(11/18–03/19)	
n	30 (4.3%)	15 (2.1%)	0.03	
Age	62.2	60.8	0.22	
Sex (male)	21 (70.0%)	12 (80%)	0.21	
ICD type	
 Transvenous ICD	21 (70.0%)	13 (86.6%)	0.18	
 CRT-ICD	7 (23.3%)	2 (13.3%)	
 Subcutanous ICD	2 (6.7%)	0 (0.0%)	
Treated VA episodes	71	31	0.49	
 mVT	32 (45.1%)	14 (45.2%)		
 pVT	12 (16.9%)	8 (25.8%)		
 VF	27 (38.0%)	9 (29.0%)		
Termination with ATP	20 (28.2%)	12 (38.7%)	0.17	
Termination with	51 (71.8%)	19 (61.3%)	0.12	
ICD shock	
Cardiomyopathy	
 Ischemic	15 (50%)	9 (60%)	0.09	
 Non-ischemic	9 (30.0%)	3 (20%)	
 Other	6 (20.0%)	3 (20%)	
Antiarrhythmic medication	
 ß-blocker	29 (96.7%)	15 (100%)	0.47	
 Amiodarone	7 (23.3%)	3 (20%)		
 Flecainide	0 (0.0%)	2 (13.3%)		
p < 0.05

Discussion

This study identified an increased burden of VA in patients with an ICD during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. In the past, a correlation between dramatic events like natural disasters or terroristic attacks and cardiac arrhythmias could be observed [9, 14, 15], most probably explained due to an increased sympathetic tone. Furthermore, an increased number of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest [5, 6] during the COVID-19 pandemic and major cardiovascular complications including malignant VA in COVID-hospitalized patients have been described [1, 2]. Previous studies have also reported a seasonal accumulation of VA in ICD patients in times of high influenza-virus incidences [16].

As a consequence, one could assume an increased burden of VA during the COVID-19 pandemic in patients with an ICD, who are generally prone to the development of VA. In addition, most ICD patients are of elevated age, and therefore particularly at risk of severe COVID-19 disease [12].

However, the majority of authors investigating the influence of COVID-19 on the incidence of VA in ICD patients found a decrease or at least no increase of ICD therapies. O’Shea et al. [10] described a 32% reduction in adequate ICD therapies in 20 centers in the United States with an even more pronounced reduction (39%) in states with higher COVID-19 incidences. In a group of 455 ICD recipients in Bergamo, no change of VA burden was found during the COVID-19 outbreak (February 2020 to April 2020) in comparison to a control period in 2019 [11]. Sassone et al. [17] also found no increase of ICD therapies and a significant decrease of non-sustained VT during the first COVID lockdown in the province of Ferrara, Italy. Only Adabag et al. [13] described a significant rise of ICD therapies in New York City, New Orleans, and Boston between February and May 2020.

The authors assumed a more sedentary behavior due to extensive lockdown measures or home office regulations as the most probable cause of this observation that outbalances potential arrhythmogenic effects of COVID-19 as increased emotional stress, inflammation, or direct myocardial injury [10, 17]. This theory is supported by the findings of Galand et al. [12] who observed the distribution of ICD therapies during the first wave of COVID-19 in 30 French centers more precisely. The authors described a significant increase of ATP deliveries during the first weeks of the COVID spread, a period of presumable elevated emotional stress (first COVID case in France, increasing television coverage including the first French President television allocation). After the lockdown order and the 11 following weeks, there was significant drop of ICD therapies in France. According to the decrease of VA, the authors observed a significant reduction of mean heart rate which supports the theory of less sympathetic activity because of quarantine, social distancing, and/or home office leading to less ICD therapies.

In contrast to the abovementioned studies which focused on the first global COVID-19 outbreak (late 2019 and early 2020), we found a significant increase of appropriate ICD therapies during the second COVID-19 wave, a period of, at least in Germany, even higher COVID-19 incidences compared to early 2020 [18]. This observation may have several possible explanations. First, the higher degree of COVID-19 infections itself might cause a higher VA burden due to inflammation and direct myocardial damage. Even though the authors could not definitely determine this explanation, because the current infectious status of the patients developing VA was not available, we consider other factors more relevant. Hospitality and mortality rates were still lower in Germany in the observed period than during the first wave of COVID-19 in Italy or France where reduced VA rates have been described [19]. Therefore it seems unlikely that the higher infection rate alone can explain the rise of VA and ICD therapies.

COVID-19 vaccines were available in Germany from late 2020 and large governmental organized vaccination campaigns started in early 2021. As older people and patients with relevant comorbidities like heart failure were prioritized in the distribution, it can be assumed that a considerable proportion of the investigated collective has received a COVID-19 vaccine during the observation period. Similar to the infection itself, an association of cardiac complications including arrhythmias and COVID-19 vaccines has been described [20–22] which might also explain the increase of VA in the observed period. But comparable to the infectious status, we are not aware which patients were already vaccinated or if there was temporal association between vaccination and ICD therapies.

The general adherence to the lockdown measures and social distancing has declined throughout the pandemic [23]. As a consequence, the activity level of the observed ICD carriers might also have increased and could no longer outweigh the negative arrhythmogenic impact of the pandemic as chronic stress or direct inflammatory effects.

Most ICD patients suffer from an underlying cardiomyopathy requiring a strict regime of pharmacotherapy and fluid restriction which requires regular medical surveillance. The relationship between a rise of intrathoracic impedance reflecting fluid overload and risk of VA has been described in heart failure patients with an ICD [24]. There has been significant reduction of patient visits in all fields of cardiology services (inpatient and outpatient) especially in the first year of the pandemic [25]. The reasons for these reductions are multifactorial and include prioritization of medical services and especially patients’ reluctance to seek medical help due to fear of contracting the virus. A possible explanation for the difference of ICD therapies between the first and second COVID-19 wave might be a relative stable cardiac condition of patients with heart failure at the beginning of the pandemic that has worsened in the course of the year 2020 due to a reduction of medical surveillance.

Limitations

This study has several potential limitations. First, it is limited by its retrospective character. Second, we are not aware of the infectious or vaccination status of the observed patients. Therefore, potential associations between infection, respectively, vaccination and an elevated risk of VA remain speculative. We did not systemically assess individual behavioral changes like physical activity, home office arrangement, or adherence to medical services; hence, the abovementioned correlations could not be proven as well. We found no significant difference of inappropriate ICD interventions during COVID-19 and the control period. However, the incidence of supraventricular tachycardia (e.g., atrial fibrillation) might differ between both groups, which would also be an interesting finding. As supraventricular arrhythmias are not routinely recorded in our ICD database (as long as they do not lead to inappropriate therapies), a systematic investigation of this question was not possible in this retrospective study. Similar considerations could be made regarding non-sustained VA. We solely observed the incidence of sustained VA requiring ICD interventions. Differences in the frequency of non-sustained VA might support or contradict our hypothesis about the relationship between COVID-19 and arrhythmia burden. Unfortunately, only VA requiring ICD interventions are routinely recorded in the database of our ambulatory clinic. Therefore, a systematic investigation of non-sustained VT was not possible in this retrospective study.

Conclusion

In contrast to first COVID-19 spread in early 2020, which was characterized by a decrease or at least stable number of VA needing device therapies in most areas, we observed a significant rise of appropriate ICD therapies during the second wave of COVID-19 (November 2020–March 2021). Possible explanations for this observation include higher infectious rates, potential cardiac side effects of the vaccination as well as personal behavioral changes in physical activity or reduced utilization of medical services.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no relationships that could be construed as a conflict of interest.

Benjamin Rath and Florian Doldi have contributed equally.
==== Refs
References

1. Shi S Qin M Shen B Cai Y Liu T Yang F Association of cardiac injury with mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China JAMA Cardiol 2020 5 7 802 810 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0950 32211816
Shi S, Qin M, Shen B, Cai Y, Liu T, Yang F et al (2020) Association of cardiac injury with mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Cardiol 5(7):802–81032211816
2. Wang D Hu B Hu C Zhu F Liu X Zhang J Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China JAMA 2020 323 11 1061 1069 10.1001/jama.2020.1585 32031570
Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J et al (2020) Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA 323(11):1061–106932031570
3. Niehues P Wegner FK Wolfes J Willy K Ellermann C Vollenberg R Incidence and predictors of cardiac arrhythmias in patients with COVID-19 induced ARDS J Cardiol 2022 80 4 298 302 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.04.010 35589465
Niehues P, Wegner FK, Wolfes J, Willy K, Ellermann C, Vollenberg R et al (2022) Incidence and predictors of cardiac arrhythmias in patients with COVID-19 induced ARDS. J Cardiol 80(4):298–30235589465
4. De Rosa S Spaccarotella C Basso C Calabro MP Curcio A Filardi PP Reduction of hospitalizations for myocardial infarction in Italy in the COVID-19 era Eur Heart J 2020 41 22 2083 2088 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa409 32412631
De Rosa S, Spaccarotella C, Basso C, Calabro MP, Curcio A, Filardi PP et al (2020) Reduction of hospitalizations for myocardial infarction in Italy in the COVID-19 era. Eur Heart J 41(22):2083–208832412631
5. Marijon E Karam N Jost D Perrot D Frattini B Derkenne C Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during the COVID-19 pandemic in Paris, France: a population-based, observational study Lancet Public Health 2020 5 8 e437 e443 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30117-1 32473113
Marijon E, Karam N, Jost D, Perrot D, Frattini B, Derkenne C et al (2020) Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during the COVID-19 pandemic in Paris, France: a population-based, observational study. Lancet Public Health 5(8):e437–e44332473113
6. Baldi E Sechi GM Mare C Canevari F Brancaglione A Primi R COVID-19 kills at home: the close relationship between the epidemic and the increase of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests Eur Heart J 2020 41 32 3045 3054 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa508 32562486
Baldi E, Sechi GM, Mare C, Canevari F, Brancaglione A, Primi R et al (2020) COVID-19 kills at home: the close relationship between the epidemic and the increase of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. Eur Heart J 41(32):3045–305432562486
7. Lampert R Joska T Burg MM Batsford WP McPherson CA Jain D Emotional and physical precipitants of ventricular arrhythmia Circulation 2002 106 14 1800 1805 10.1161/01.CIR.0000031733.51374.C1 12356633
Lampert R, Joska T, Burg MM, Batsford WP, McPherson CA, Jain D (2002) Emotional and physical precipitants of ventricular arrhythmia. Circulation 106(14):1800–180512356633
8. Ranjbar F Akbarzadeh F Kazemi B Ranjbar A Sharifi Namin S Sadeghi-Bazargani H Increased likelihood of arrhythmic events associated with increased anxiety in patients with implanted cardiac defibrillators after the Ahar-Varzegan Earthquake in East Azarbaijan, 2012 Bull Emerg Trauma 2016 4 4 202 210 27878125
Ranjbar F, Akbarzadeh F, Kazemi B, Ranjbar A, Sharifi Namin S, Sadeghi-Bazargani H (2016) Increased likelihood of arrhythmic events associated with increased anxiety in patients with implanted cardiac defibrillators after the Ahar-Varzegan Earthquake in East Azarbaijan, 2012. Bull Emerg Trauma 4(4):202–21027878125
9. Shedd OL Sears SF Jr Harvill JL Arshad A Conti JB Steinberg JS The World Trade Center attack: increased frequency of defibrillator shocks for ventricular arrhythmias in patients living remotely from New York City J Am Coll Cardiol 2004 44 6 1265 1267 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.058 15364330
Shedd OL, Sears SF Jr, Harvill JL, Arshad A, Conti JB, Steinberg JS et al (2004) The World Trade Center attack: increased frequency of defibrillator shocks for ventricular arrhythmias in patients living remotely from New York City. J Am Coll Cardiol 44(6):1265–126715364330
10. O’Shea CJ Thomas G Middeldorp ME Harper C Elliott AD Ray N Ventricular arrhythmia burden during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic Eur Heart J 2021 42 5 520 528 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa893 33321517
O’Shea CJ, Thomas G, Middeldorp ME, Harper C, Elliott AD, Ray N et al (2021) Ventricular arrhythmia burden during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Eur Heart J 42(5):520–52833321517
11. Malanchini G Ferrari P Leidi C Ferrari G Racheli M Senni M Ventricular arrhythmias among patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator during the COVID-19 pandemic J Arrhythm 2021 37 2 407 413 10.1002/joa3.12518 33821178
Malanchini G, Ferrari P, Leidi C, Ferrari G, Racheli M, Senni M et al (2021) Ventricular arrhythmias among patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Arrhythm 37(2):407–41333821178
12. Galand V Hwang E Gandjbakhch E Sebag F Marijon E Boveda S Impact of COVID-19 on the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients followed by remote monitoring Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2021 114 5 407 414 10.1016/j.acvd.2021.02.005 34088625
Galand V, Hwang E, Gandjbakhch E, Sebag F, Marijon E, Boveda S et al (2021) Impact of COVID-19 on the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients followed by remote monitoring. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 114(5):407–41434088625
13. Adabag S Zimmerman P Black A Madjid M Safavi-Naeini P Cheng A Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks during COVID-19 outbreak J Am Heart Assoc 2021 10 11 e019708 10.1161/JAHA.120.019708 34044586
Adabag S, Zimmerman P, Black A, Madjid M, Safavi-Naeini P, Cheng A (2021) Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks during COVID-19 outbreak. J Am Heart Assoc 10(11):e01970834044586
14. Meisel SR Kutz I Dayan KI Pauzner H Chetboun I Arbel Y Effect of Iraqi missile war on incidence of acute myocardial infarction and sudden death in Israeli civilians Lancet 1991 338 8768 660 661 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91234-L 1679475
Meisel SR, Kutz I, Dayan KI, Pauzner H, Chetboun I, Arbel Y et al (1991) Effect of Iraqi missile war on incidence of acute myocardial infarction and sudden death in Israeli civilians. Lancet 338(8768):660–6611679475
15. Steinberg JS Arshad A Kowalski M Kukar A Suma V Vloka M Increased incidence of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in implantable defibrillator patients after the World Trade Center attack J Am Coll Cardiol 2004 44 6 1261 1264 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.032 15364329
Steinberg JS, Arshad A, Kowalski M, Kukar A, Suma V, Vloka M et al (2004) Increased incidence of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in implantable defibrillator patients after the World Trade Center attack. J Am Coll Cardiol 44(6):1261–126415364329
16. Madjid M Connolly AT Nabutovsky Y Safavi-Naeini P Razavi M Miller CC Effect of high influenza activity on risk of ventricular arrhythmias requiring therapy in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators Am J Cardiol 2019 124 1 44 50 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.04.011 31047651
Madjid M, Connolly AT, Nabutovsky Y, Safavi-Naeini P, Razavi M, Miller CC (2019) Effect of high influenza activity on risk of ventricular arrhythmias requiring therapy in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators. Am J Cardiol 124(1):44–5031047651
17. Sassone B Virzi S Bertini M Pasanisi G Manzoli L Myers J Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on the arrhythmic burden of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2021 44 6 1033 1038 10.1111/pace.14280 34022067
Sassone B, Virzi S, Bertini M, Pasanisi G, Manzoli L, Myers J et al (2021) Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on the arrhythmic burden of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 44(6):1033–103834022067
18. Dings C Gotz KM Och K Sihinevich I Werthner Q Smola S Model-based analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infections, hospitalization and outcome in Germany, the Federal States and Districts Viruses 2022 10.3390/v14102114 36298669
Dings C, Gotz KM, Och K, Sihinevich I, Werthner Q, Smola S et al (2022) Model-based analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infections, hospitalization and outcome in Germany, the Federal States and Districts. Viruses. 10.3390/v1410211436298669
19. Ceylan Z Estimation of COVID-19 prevalence in Italy, Spain, and France Sci Total Environ 2020 729 138817 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138817 32360907
Ceylan Z (2020) Estimation of COVID-19 prevalence in Italy, Spain, and France. Sci Total Environ 729:13881732360907
20. Ho JS Sia CH Ngiam JN Loh PH Chew NW Kong WK A review of COVID-19 vaccination and the reported cardiac manifestations Singapore Med J 2021 10.11622/smedj.2021125 35001116
Ho JS, Sia CH, Ngiam JN, Loh PH, Chew NW, Kong WK et al (2021) A review of COVID-19 vaccination and the reported cardiac manifestations. Singapore Med J. 10.11622/smedj.202112535001116
21. Patone M Mei XW Handunnetthi L Dixon S Zaccardi F Shankar-Hari M Risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and cardiac arrhythmias associated with COVID-19 vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection Nat Med 2022 28 2 410 422 10.1038/s41591-021-01630-0 34907393
Patone M, Mei XW, Handunnetthi L, Dixon S, Zaccardi F, Shankar-Hari M et al (2022) Risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and cardiac arrhythmias associated with COVID-19 vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Med 28(2):410–42234907393
22. Jeet Kaur R Dutta S Charan J Bhardwaj P Tandon A Yadav D Cardiovascular adverse events reported from COVID-19 vaccines: a study based on WHO database Int J Gen Med 2021 14 3909 3927 10.2147/IJGM.S324349 34349544
Jeet Kaur R, Dutta S, Charan J, Bhardwaj P, Tandon A, Yadav D et al (2021) Cardiovascular adverse events reported from COVID-19 vaccines: a study based on WHO database. Int J Gen Med 14:3909–392734349544
23. Becher H Bonisch S Wegscheider K Reduction of mobility during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany according to age, sex, and federal state Dtsch Arztebl Int 2021 118 31–32 536 537 34612192
Becher H, Bonisch S, Wegscheider K (2021) Reduction of mobility during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany according to age, sex, and federal state. Dtsch Arztebl Int 118(31–32):536–53734612192
24. Osman M Ahmed A Alzubi H Kheiri B Osman K Barbarawi M Association between changes in the intrathoracic impedance and ventricular arrhythmias in patients with heart failure Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2018 41 12 1577 1582 10.1111/pace.13535 30362185
Osman M, Ahmed A, Alzubi H, Kheiri B, Osman K, Barbarawi M et al (2018) Association between changes in the intrathoracic impedance and ventricular arrhythmias in patients with heart failure. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 41(12):1577–158230362185
25. Fersia O Bryant S Nicholson R McMeeken K Brown C Donaldson B The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiology services Open Heart 2020 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001359 32855212
Fersia O, Bryant S, Nicholson R, McMeeken K, Brown C, Donaldson B et al (2020) The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiology services. Open Heart. 10.1136/openhrt-2020-00135932855212
