
==== Front
Int J Obes (Lond)
Int J Obes (Lond)
International Journal of Obesity (2005)
0307-0565
1476-5497
Nature Publishing Group UK London

39048696
1576
10.1038/s41366-024-01576-6
Article
Breastfeeding behaviours in women with obesity; associations with weight retention and the serum metabolome: a secondary analysis of UPBEAT
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0958-6725
Dalrymple Kathryn V. Kathryn.dalrymple@kcl.ac.uk

1
Briley Annette L. 23
Tydeman Florence A. S. 3
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7904-7933
Seed Paul T. 3
Singh Claire M. 4
Flynn Angela C. 14
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7979-0508
White Sara L. 35
Poston Lucilla 3
on behalf of the UPBEAT ConsortiumBriley Annette L. 6
Seed Paul T. 6
Singh Claire M. 6
Flynn Angela C. 6
Poston Lucilla 6

1 https://ror.org/0220mzb33 grid.13097.3c 0000 0001 2322 6764 Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
2 https://ror.org/01kpzv902 grid.1014.4 0000 0004 0367 2697 Caring Futures Institute, CHNS, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA Australia
3 https://ror.org/0220mzb33 grid.13097.3c 0000 0001 2322 6764 Department of Women and Children’s Health, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
4 https://ror.org/01hxy9878 grid.4912.e 0000 0004 0488 7120 School of Population Health, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
5 https://ror.org/00j161312 grid.420545.2 Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
6 grid.13097.3c 0000 0001 2322 6764 King’s College London, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
24 7 2024
24 7 2024
2024
48 10 14721480
20 2 2024
17 6 2024
1 7 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Background/Objectives

Maternal obesity is associated with a decreased intention and initiation of breastfeeding as well as a shortened duration of breastfeeding. This analysis was undertaken to identify breastfeeding behaviours, and relationships with maternal anthropometry and the serum metabolome at 6-months postpartum in an ethnically diverse cohort of women with obesity.

Subjects/Methods

A cohort analysis of 715 women from the UK Pregnancies Better Eating and Activity Trial (UPBEAT); a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of an antenatal lifestyle intervention in women with obesity. Maternal data were collected in early pregnancy and included body mass index (BMI), socio-demographic characteristics and anthropometry. At 6-months postpartum, breastfeeding behaviours, anthropometry and 158 maternal metabolic measures from blood samples were recorded. Kaplan–Meier curves of breastfeeding duration were constructed and were stratified by obesity class (I: BMI 30.0–34.9 kg/m2, II: 35.0–39.9 kg/m2, III: ≥40.0 kg/m2). Relationships between breastfeeding behaviours, socio-demographic characteristics, the metabolome, and anthropometry were determined using regression analyses.

Results

Eighty-two percent (591/715) of the cohort-initiated breastfeeding and at the 6-month follow-up 40% (283/715) were breastfeeding exclusively or partially. Duration of exclusive breastfeeding decreased with increasing BMI: Compared to BMI class I (mean 90.4 ± 64 days) the difference in mean for classes II and III were −15.8 days (95% confidence interval: −28.5, −3.1, p < 0.05) and −16.7 (95% CI: −32.0 to −1.35, p < 0.05), respectively. Compared to no breastfeeding, any breastfeeding at 6-months postpartum was associated with improvements in metabolites towards a healthier profile, reduced weight retention by −1.81 kg (95% CI −0.75, −2.88, p < 0.05 ) and reduced anthropometric measures, including mid-upper arm and hip circumferences. The breastfeeding related changes in anthropometry were not evident in women of Black ethnicity.

Conclusions

Greater emphasis on enabling breastfeeding for women with obesity could improve duration, women’s weight management and metabolic health. The lack of breastfeeding related anthropometric effects in Black women requires further investigation.

Clinical trial registry

ISRCTN reference 89971375.

Subject terms

Nutrition
Lipidomics
issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months of a child’s life for optimum infant development and health [1]. Despite this advice, exclusive breastfeeding rates in the UK at hospital discharge and 6–8 weeks postpartum remain low at ~70% [2] and~33%, respectively [3]. Some reports have shown that maternal obesity (BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2) is associated with a lower prevalence of breastfeeding compared with women of a healthy BMI (18.5–24.9 kg/m2) [4, 5], with up to 13% lower rates of initiation and 20% decreased likelihood of any breastfeeding by 6-months postpartum [4, 6], whereas others have reported no differences between initiation of breastfeeding and maternal BMI [7]. Despite wide cultural and international variation, maternal obesity has been associated with reduced breastfeeding rates, independent of country of study [8].

Barriers to breastfeeding in heterogeneous women with BMI, such as embarrassment, fear of pain and concerns about insufficient milk, are commonly reported [9, 10]. However, in women with obesity a range of factors further impact on breastfeeding initiation and duration, such as delayed lactogenesis, low prolactin and poor body confidence [6, 8, 11, 12]. These additional barriers faced by women with obesity are reflected in breastfeeding behaviours, including lower initiation and duration.

The metabolome, a descriptor for the small-molecule chemicals of body processes, responds to environmental and genomic interactions, and is increasingly utilised as a precision medicine tool with which to identify those at risk of cardiometabolic and other diseases. Whilst the benefit of breastfeeding on maternal weight and BMI is well recognised, the impact of breastfeeding on maternal metabolic health remains unclear [13]. Exploration of the metabolome in breastfeeding women may provide further insight into biological changes that occur during lactogenesis.

Participants were from the UK Pregnancy Better Eating and Activity Trial (UPBEAT), a multicentre randomised controlled trial of an antenatal lifestyle intervention. As the UPBEAT intervention did not affect breastfeeding initiation or duration, this data was treated as a cohort. In a secondary analysis, we have investigated breastfeeding initiation after birth and behaviours (exclusivity, mixed or no breastfeeding), anthropometry, postnatal weight retention (PPWR) and the impact breastfeeding had on the maternal metabolome in a population of women with obesity up to 6-months postpartum [14]. As UPBEAT participants were an ethnically diverse cohort, the influences of ethnicity have also been explored.

Materials/subjects and methods

Between 2009–2014 UPBEAT recruited 1555 women (15+0–18+6 weeks’ gestation), with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 (median 35.1 kg/m2 (IQR 32.8, 38.5)) from UK inner city settings, including, London, Glasgow, Newcastle, Sunderland, Bradford and Manchester. Participants were randomised to standard antenatal care or to a lifestyle intervention aimed at reducing dietary glycaemic load and increasing physical activity, superimposed on standard antenatal care. The primary aim of UPBEAT was to reduce the incidence of gestational diabetes (GDM) and large-for-gestational age infants. Sociodemographic, pregnancy information, anthropometric measurements and blood samples were obtained at study entry and at two further time points during pregnancy and at 6-months postpartum (2010–2015) [15]. All participants provided written informed consent. The NHS research ethics committee granted approval for all participating centres (UK integrated research application system, reference 09/H0802/5). Additional approvals were obtained through local Research and Development departments in each participating centre. UPBEAT was also registered with the ISRCTN reference 88971375).

At birth, pregnancy outcomes and mode of feeding were recorded. At 6-months postpartum, data on infant feeding intention in pregnancy, breastfeeding initiation at birth and duration were obtained. Additional data regarding infant weaning practices and the rationale for feeding choices for their infant were also recorded.

For the mother, weight was measured at the 6-month visit and the following circumferences and skinfold thicknesses were measured in triplicate and a mean obtained: neck, mid-arm, waist, hip (cm) and wrist (mm) using a tape measure. Skinfold thickness of triceps, biceps, suprailiac and subscapular were measured using Harpenden callipers and the sum of skinfolds was generated.

The primary maternal outcomes for this analysis were breastfeeding behaviours. For this study, these were defined as the percentage of all women who intended to breastfeed, the percentage of women who initiated breastfeeding (baby put to the breast on at least one occasion), the average duration of exclusive breastfeeding (infant received only breast milk, directly or expressed, and no other liquids or solids) and the percentage of any breastfeeding at 6-months postpartum.

Secondary maternal outcomes included the relationship between breastfeeding behaviours and obesity class (WHO obesity class I [BMI 30.0–34.9 kg/m2], II [BMI 35.0–39.9 kg/m2], III [≥40.0 kg/m2]), ethnicity, mode of birth, diagnosis of gestational diabetes and infant birthweight ≥4 kg. Maternal postnatal weight retention and anthropometry in relation to breastfeeding initiation and duration were also explored.

Maternal metabolome

A total of 158 metabolites were evaluated using serum blood samples from 6-months postpartum. Targeted to multiple pathways relevant to obesity and insulin resistance, we used a high throughput NMR metabolomic platform (Nightingale Health Ltd, Finland). This platform accurately quantifies numerous lipid measures; lipoprotein particles include very low density (VLDL) subdivided into six subclasses (extremely large, very large, large, medium, small, very small), (Intermediate) IDL, (low) LDL subdivided into three subclasses (large, medium, small), and high (HDL) subdivided into four subclasses (very large, large, medium, small). The platform also elucidates the constituents within each lipoprotein particle type (triglyceride, total cholesterol, free cholesterol and cholesterol ester levels, and phospholipid concentrations). Fatty acids, amino acids, glycolysis related metabolites, ketone bodies and inflammatory markers are also measured.

Statistical analyses

Missing data mechanism was assumed missing at random therefore a complete case analysis was used. All UPBEAT women who provided infant feeding data at the 6-month postpartum visit were included in the analysis. Chi-square and t-tests were used to investigate associations between breastfeeding behaviours and maternal variables. Descriptive statistics were used to identify the maternal rationales for choice of infant feeding, with percentages calculated for the proportion of women opting for each given reason when asked by the midwives during the follow up visits. Interval regression analysis with right sided censoring as not all mothers had stopped breastfeeding at the time of follow up was used to assess the duration of breastfeeding between obesity classes. Regression analyses were used to assess the difference between maternal variables for those who did and did not initiate breastfeeding.

For the serum metabolome, multivariable linear regression was applied for each metabolite with breastfeeding as the primary independent variable of interest, adjusted for the following confounders: age, BMI, parity, and intervention arm. The models for all women (n = 485) were also adjusted for ethnicity. All analytes were checked for normality and transformations were made as appropriate; analytes were then scaled and centred [16]. Results were presented as standard deviation (SD) differences between groups to allow for comparisons across multiple measured units. We present analysis for the entire cohort and, for comparison, for samples from women randomised to the control arm only. Metabolome analyses were also analysed by ethnicity for Black and White women. Women were excluded from the anthropometric and metabolomic analysis if they were pregnant at the 6-month follow-up visit. Statistical analyses were conducted using Stata (version 18) and RStudio version 3.5.2. p values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Participants

Data were available for 715/1555 (46.0%) UPBEAT participants who attended the 6-month postpartum follow-up visit. Of the 840 non-participants, 1 participant was excluded after randomisation, 19 pregnancies were affected by a major health problem, miscarriage or sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS); 100 declined participation; 701 either did not respond or were unable to participate as they had either, returned to full-time employment, living overseas or the child was not the primary responsibility of the woman. Five women had no infant feeding data recorded at the 6-month follow-up. Of those attending the 6-month postpartum visit with their child 354, 225 and 136 women were classified as BMI obesity classes I, II and III respectively at baseline (15+0 to 18+6 weeks gestation) (for study flow diagram see Fig. 1).Fig. 1 Summary diagram of recruitment process by maternal BMI at trial entry.

Compared to those women who did not return for the 6-month visit, the women who attended the 6-month follow-up were more likely to be of White ethnicity and less likely to be of Black or Asian ethnicity. Women were more likely to be nulliparous at study entry, less likely to be a smoker, more likely to have had GDM in pregnancy and more likely to have had an in-labour caesarean or an operative vaginal birth (Table 1).Table 1 Demography of women included in analysis of breastfeeding behaviour compared to UPBEAT women who did not attend 6 months postnatal follow up visit.

	Included in analysis
n = 715	Not included in analysis n = 839	Comparison	
Mean (SD)/N (%)	Beta-coefficient/Risk ratio/Odds ratio (95% CI)	
Age (years)	31.2 (5.31)	29.9 (5.60)	1.32 (0.78–1.87)	
BMI (kg/m2)	36.3 (4.90)	36.3 (4.66)	0.04 (−0.43–0.52)	
Ethnic origin	
White	506 (71%)	467 (56%)	ref	
Black	141 (20%)	260 (31%)	0.50 (0.39–0.63)***	
Asian	5 (3%)	70 (8%)	0.33 (0.20–0.53)***	
Other	43 (6%)	42 (5%)	0.94 (0.61–1.47)	
Nulliparous	363 (51%)	311 (37%)	1.75 (1.43–2.14)***	
Current smoker	27 (4%)	81 (10%)	0.37 (0.23–0.57)***	
Index of multiple deprivation	
1 (least deprived)	35 (5%)	30 (4%)	1.51 (0.91–2.51)	
2	49 (7%)	54 (6%)	1.17 (0.77–1.78)	
3	76 (11%)	101 (12%)	0.97 (0.60–1.36)	
4	261 (37%)	272 (33%)	1.24 (0.98–1.56)	
5 (most deprived)	292 (41%)	378 (45%)	ref	
Pregnancy outcomes	
Diagnosis of GDMa	197/699 (28%)	141/606 (23%)	1.29 (1.00–1.66)*	
Gestation at birth ≤37 weeks	32/715 (4.5%)	67/805 (8.3%)	0.52 (0.33–0.79)	
Unassisted vaginal birth	345/715 (48%)	453/805 (56%)	ref	
Operative vaginal birth	93/715 (13%)	85/805 (10%)	1.43 (1.04–1.99)*	
Pre-labour caesarean section	144/715 (20%)	151/805 (19%)	1.25 (0.96–1.63)	
In labour caesarean section	133/715 (18%)	116/805 (14%)	1.50 (1.13–2.00)**	
Birthweight ≥4 kg	101/715 (14%)	109/805 (13%)	1.05 (0.78–1.41)	
BMI body mass index, CI confidence interval, GDM gestational diabetes, SD standard deviation.

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

aOGTT results not available for all participants therefore denominator noted here.

Effect of intervention

There was no significant difference in breastfeeding intention, initiation or exclusive or partial breastfeeding at 6 months by UPBEAT group allocation (Supplementary Table 1). Therefore, data for intervention and control arms of the trial were combined and the participants treated as a cohort.

Breastfeeding behaviours

Table 2 summarises breastfeeding intention and practices by maternal BMI class at trial entry for those who completed the 6-month follow up visit. Overall, 76.3% of women stated antenatally that they intended to breastfeed, and 82.7% put their baby to the breast on at least one occasion. For those women who initiated breastfeeding, the percentage of any breastfeeding at 6-months postpartum decreased in BMI class III compared to classes I and II (class 1, 51.7%, II, 48.2% and III 30.7%, p < 0.05). The percentage of those using formula milk at the 6-month follow-up increased with BMI class, 75.0%, 80.0% and 84.0%, respectively.Table 2 Infant feeding outcomes recorded at the 6-month follow-up, stratified by maternal BMI class at trial entry.

	BMI Class I (30.0–34.9 kg/m2)	BMI Class II (35.0–39.9 kg/m2)	BMI Class III (≥40.0 kg/m2)	
N (%)/Mean (standard deviation)	
Intended to breastfeed	267/354 (75.4%)	178/225 (79.1%)	101/136 (74.3%)	
Initiated breastfeeding at birth	294/354 (83.1%)	189/225 (84.0%)	108/136 (79.4%)	
6-month breastfeeding status of those who initiated breastfeeding		
Age of infant at 6-month follow-up	5.9 (0.86)	5.8 (0.87)	6.0 (1.01)	
Exclusive breastfeeding	11/294 (3.7%)	7/189 (3.7%)	1/108 (0.9%)	
Formula milk only	8/294 (2.7%)	6/189 (3.2%)	0/108 (0%)	
Breastfeeding + other fluids	4/294 (1.3%)	4/189 (2.1%)	5/108 (4.6%)	
Breastfeeding + solids ± other fluids	73/294 (24.8%)	41/189 (21.6%)	16/108 (14.8%)*	
Formula + solids ± other fluids	134/294 (45.6%)	92/189 (48.7%)	68/108 (63.0%)*	
Breastfeeding + Formula milk + solids ± other fluids	64/294 (21.7%)	39/189 (20.6%)	18/108 (16.7%)*	
Any breastfeeding at 6 months	152/294 (51.7%)	91/189 (48.2%)	40/108 (30.7%)*	
All women	
Formula feeding at 6 months	266/354 (75.0%)	203/255 (80.0%)	114/136 (84.0%)	
Introduced solids at 6 months	329/354 (92.9%)	201/225 (89.3%)	128/136 (94.1%)	
Mean duration of exclusive breastfeeding (days)	90.4 (64.0)	74.6 (66.3)	73.7 (65.1)	
Difference in mean (95%CI) vs. class I		−15.8 (−28.5, −3.1)*	−16.7 (−32.0, −1.35)*	
Never breastfed	60 (17.0%)	36 (16.0%)	28 (20.7%)	
Other fluids defined as drinks such as water or juice.

*p < 0.05.

Figure 2 shows a Kaplan–Meier survival curve for breastfeeding duration according to BMI category. Interval regression analysis showed duration of exclusive breastfeeding in women with class I obesity was 90.4 days compared to 74.6 days and 73.7 days in those with class II and class III obesity, respectively; mean differences were: class II −15.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) −28.5 to −3.1), p < 0.01) and class III −16.7 (95% CI −32.0 to −1.35), p < 0.05), compared to class I (Table 2). More women with obesity class I compared with class II and III were more likely offering breastfeeding in combination with solids and other fluids (e.g., water) at 6-months postpartum (24.8, 21.6 and 14.8%) (Table 2). 92% of the cohort had introduced solids by the 6-month follow-up.Fig. 2 Kaplan–Meier survival curve for duration of exclusive breastfeeding from birth until cessation in women in each obesity class.

Breastfeeding behaviours demonstrated associations with educational attainment; a higher education attainment was associated with a likelihood of partial or exclusive breastfeed at 6-months postpartum. Maternal age ≥30 years and cohabitation were associated with a higher percentage of breastfeeding initiation and duration (Supplementary Table 2). Whereas being of White ethnicity and smoking were associated with lower rates of breastfeeding initiation and duration.

Table 3 presents the birth outcomes stratified by BMI class. There was no statistical difference in the relationship between initiation of breastfeeding and maternal obesity category (Table 3). There were no differences between mode of birth or infant birthweight ≥4 kg when stratified by maternal BMI. Diagnosis of GDM was significantly more common in BMI classes II and III, compared to class I (Table 3).Table 3 Initiation of breastfeeding and pregnancy outcomes according to BMI class.

	BMI Class I (30.0–34.9 kg/m2)	BMI Class II (35.0–39.9 kg/m2)	BMI Class III (≥40.0 kg/m2)	Class 2 compared to class 1	Class 3 compared to class 1	
N (%)	Odds ratio (95% CI)	
Initiation of breastfeeding	294/354 (83.1%)	189/225 (84.0%)	108/136 (79.4%)	1.07 (0.68–1.68)	0.79 (0.48–1.30)	
Parity	176/354 (50%)	120/354 (53%)	67 (49%)	1.15 (0.83, 1.62)	0.98 (0.66, 1.46)	
Unassisted vaginal	176/354 (50%)	112/225 (50%)	57/136 (42%)	ref	ref	
Operative vaginal	44/354 (12%)	33/225 (15%)	16/136 (11%)	1.18 (0.71–1.96)	1.12 (0.59–2.14)	
Pre-labour caesarean	75/354 (21%)	37/225 (16%)	32/136 (23%)	0.78 (0.49–1.23)	1.32 (0.79–2.19)	
Caesarean in labour	59/354 (17%)	43/225 (19%)	31/136 (23%)	1.14 (0.72–1.81)	1.62 (0.96–2.75)	
GDM diagnosis	77/345 (22%)	75/218 (34%)	45/136 (33%)	1.82 (1.25–2.66)**	1.11 (1.11–2.66)*	
Infant birthweight ≥4 kg	54/354 (15%)	30/221 (13%)	17/136 (13%)	0.85 (0.53–1.38)	0.79 (0.44–1.43)	
Data presented as number of women/total (%).

BMI body mass index, CI confidence interval, GDM gestational diabetes.

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.

Weight and anthropometric measures

Supplementary Table 3 summarises the data stratified by any vs. no breastfeeding, at 6-months postpartum. Women who were offering any breast milk at 6 months (n = 283) weighed 1.12 kg less than their pre-pregnancy weight. Whereas women who were not breastfeeding at 6 months demonstrated weight retention of 0.70 kg (mean difference of 1.81 kg (95% CI 0.75, 2.88) p < 0.01). Changes from baseline to 6 months in neck, mid-arm, wrist and hip circumferences were also significantly lower in women who were fully or partially breastfeeding at 6 months compared to those women who were not breastfeeding. There were no statistically significant associations between maternal skinfold thicknesses and breastfeeding behaviours (Supplementary Table 3).

Subgroup analysis between women of Black and White ethnicity showed that changes in weight retention and circumferences associated with breastfeeding apparent in the White women were not evident in women of Black African or Black Afro-Caribbean ethnicity (Supplementary Table 4). Black women who were breastfeeding at the 6-month follow-up had an average postpartum weight retention of 3.35 kg (95% CI 1.39, 5.30) compared to White women. Similar observations were apparent in mid-upper arm [0.93 (0.36, 1.51)] and hip circumferences [3.59 (2.00, 5.19)]. However, women of Black ethnicity were more likely to initiate breastfeeding (95% vs. 78%) and be breastfeeding at the 6-month follow-up (62% vs. 32%) compared to women of White ethnicity (Supplementary Table 2).

Metabolome

There were no significant differences in the metabolome at 6-months postpartum between women randomised to the control and intervention arms following adjustment for age, ethnicity and parity, and the data were therefore treated as a cohort. Exclusive or partial breastfeeding vs. no breastfeeding at 6-months postpartum was associated with marked changes in the NMR metabolome (Figs. 3 and 4). Breastfeeding was associated with a reduction in some metabolites and an increase in others. A marked reduction in total triglycerides was observed (Fig. 4b), reflecting a reduction within multiple subclasses of VLDL, LDL and HDL lipoprotein particles, and within the IDL lipoprotein subclass (Fig. 3b). VLDL particle 13-1 was smaller (Fig. 4b), and there were lower total lipids in VLDL (Very large, large, medium, small and very small) subclasses which was attributable to lower VLDL triglycerides, cholesterol, and phospholipids (Fig. 3a, b). HDL particle size was higher and there were higher total lipids in HDL (very large and large) subclasses (Fig. 4b) which was attributable to greater total cholesterol and phospholipid content (Fig. 3a). Apolipoprotein A-1 concentration was higher and Apolipoprotein B and the ApoA/ApoB ratio were lower (Fig. 4b). When expressed as proportions of total fatty acids, polyunsaturated fatty acids were increased (linoleic, omega-6 and PUFA), there was a decrease in mono-unsaturated fatty acids (Fig. 4a). In addition, glycoprotein acetyls, an inflammatory marker, was reduced, whereas acetate and the amino acids alanine and glycine were increased (Fig. 4a) in the breastfeeding group compared to those who did not breastfeed.Fig. 3 Standard deviation difference in lipoprotein particle concentration and subclass constituents between breastfeeding and non-breastfeeding UPBEAT womenat 6 months postpartum (n = 485).

The right-hand side of the x-axis represents positive associations with breastfeeding (fully or mixed) at 6 months, compared to non-breastfeeding women, and negative associations to the left-hand side.

Fig. 4 Standard deviation difference for fatty acids, amino acids, glycaemic and other markers, as well as lipoprotein particle groups between breastfeeding and non-breastfeeding UPBEAT women at 6 months postpartum (n = 485).

The right-hand side of the x-axis represents positive associations with breastfeeding (fully or mixed) at 6 months, compared to non-breastfeeding women, and negative associations to the left-hand side.

When considered according to ethnic group, a similar metabolic profile to the whole group was observed in the White women who were breastfeeding at 6-months postpartum (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2). However, although numbers were smaller there were a number of notable differences seen in the metabolome of Black breastfeeding mothers compared to White mothers; IDL and LDL particle size, concentration and content, were little impacted by breastfeeding in White women (apart from triglyceride content), there was a tendency for these to be lower in breastfeeding women of Black ethnicity, likely as a result of lower phospholipid and total cholesterol content in these particles (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b). Reductions in total fatty acids including polyunsaturated, monounsaturated and saturated fatty acids appeared more marked in women of Black ethnicity who breastfed (Supplementary Fig. 2a). Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4 demonstrate that the metabolic profile comparing breastfeeding and non-breastfeeding women in the control arm only (n = 253), was similar to that in the entire cohort (n = 485).

Reasons for maternal choices regarding infant feeding

Of the 124 women who did not initiate breastfeeding, 64% reported “never planned to”, 13% gave reasons including “difficulty in establishing lactation”, “feeding issues with a previous child” and “inverted nipples”. A further 5% reported being “advised not to breastfeed”. Of those who initiated breastfeeding but stopped before their child was 6-months old, the most common reason was “perceived inadequate milk supply” (23%); others were “discomfort” (7%) and “convenience” (5%). Thirty nine percent of women reported “other” reasons for cessation including: infant tongue tie, difficulty in ‘latching on’, needing to return to work and partner/family members wanting to feed the baby. Of the 290 women who maintained some breastfeeding at 6-months, the most cited reasons for continuing were that breast milk is the “best nutrition for baby” (74%), “convenience” (55%), “enjoyment” (47%), “cheaper” (37%) and “maternal weight loss” (22%).

Discussion

This study reports original observations on breastfeeding behaviours and the metabolome in an ethnically diverse cohort of women with obesity. The findings also strengthen the case for additional support and strategies to enable women with obesity to breastfeed for a longer duration. We have described the relationship between severity of obesity and breastfeeding and found that women with a higher BMI had a shorter exclusive breastfeeding duration of 17 days compared with women from a lower obesity class. We have also described the previously recognised relationships between breastfeeding and reduction of postpartum weight and measures of anthropometry, although these positive changes in anthropometry were not observed amongst women of Black ethnicity, despite Black women being more likely to initiate and continue to breastfeed until 6-months postpartum, compared to other ethnic groups.

Breastfeeding duration has previously been identified as an important determinant of maternal weight loss postpartum [17, 18], with previous reports documenting the largest reduction in weight amongst women of heterogeneous BMI breastfeeding at 6-months and beyond [17, 19]. Compared to no breastfeeding, we have reported a −1.8 kg difference in those women who were giving any breastfeeding at 6-months postpartum. Although modest, our study confirms that breastfeeding duration is equally relevant to weight loss in women with obesity; and indeed, to reduce adiposity, providing further evidence for healthcare professionals to support women with obesity to breastfeed, and to encourage longer durations of breastfeeding to aid postpartum weight loss. An ongoing randomised controlled trial in Columbia is investigating the impact of breastfeeding counselling on breastfeeding prevalence and postpartum weight loss in women with a BMI > 24.9 kg/m2, which may contribute to an evidence based intervention for encouraging women with a higher BMI to breastfeed [20].

In contrast to the present study, a study from the USA with smaller sample size (n = 37) reported that postnatal weight retention in women with obesity was associated with increased energy intake, independent of breastfeeding, eating behaviours and metabolic biomarkers [21]. The authors investigated body composition, diet and activity from early pregnancy until 12 months postpartum and stratified results by PPWR vs. postpartum weight loss. Duration of breastfeeding was similar in both groups (30 ± 5 vs. 29 ± 6 weeks), indicating that higher energy intake could override the role of breastfeeding in postpartum weight loss.

We found that intention to, and initiation of, breastfeeding in the study cohort of women with obesity was higher than reported in a general UK population [2, 3]. Contributary factors may include participation in a clinical trial, or changes in local midwifery and health visitor practice to support breastfeeding in line with the UK Baby Friendly Initiative [22]. The follow up rate of 46% of the original trial participants could also reflect selection bias, with findings less generalisable to the whole study cohort, although those choosing not to take part at 6-months postpartum had similar characteristics at baseline to the participants included in this analysis.

We found that increasing BMI class was associated with decreased duration of breastfeeding. A retrospective cohort study of women from the USA reported a similar relationship, although with different BMI classification; 18.5–24.9 kg/m2; 30.0–39.9 kg/m2; 40.0–49.9 kg/m2; ≥50.0 kg/m2 [23]. The authors found that overall breastfeeding rates were low (32%) with no data on continued breastfeeding beyond hospital discharge, a strength of the present study.

Previously reported reasons for decreased duration of breast feeding in women with obesity have included reduced maternal confidence to breastfeed associated with larger breasts [8, 11] and delayed lactogenesis II [24]. Once initiated, milk supply may be impacted by hormonal imbalance [8, 25] or through consequences of the mother’s perceived body image [12].

We report here reasons given by the study participants for non-initiation and shorter duration of breastfeeding. These indicated that family and healthcare staff support are important in facilitating breastfeeding in women with obesity. To achieve this would require relevant healthcare staff in acute and primary care settings to acquire appropriate competencies and skills, with inherent cost implications. Insufficient regulations of the marketing of breastmilk substitute as well as food insecurity also undermine breastfeeding prevalence [26, 27, 28]. Also, more research is required to explore women’s perceptions of inadequate milk supply and to identify why some of the participants, and indeed the wider population of women, do not consider breastfeeding.

A 2017 narrative review suggested that interventions aimed at breastfeeding women will not be successful unless there is protection, promotion, and support at a population health level, along with increased investment in health services to support women to breastfeed [29]. Furthermore, open responses from the participants indicated that at 6-months postpartum many had returned to paid employment, or were imminently planning to, a common reason for early weaning and cessation of breastfeeding. Comments from women on reasons for not initiating breastfeeding, or for stopping early, highlighted several areas for further research to better comprehend the complexity surrounding maternal breastfeeding behaviours.

Our study was also supported by a biological ‘read out’ of metabolic health through the NMR metabolome at 6-months postpartum, until which time the WHO recommend exclusive breastfeeding. To our knowledge changes in the metabolome in women with obesity continuing to breastfeed at 6-months postpartum, either partially or exclusively, have not previously been reported and may provide insight into the mechanisms of weight loss associated with breastfeeding [19, 30]. This could contribute to the protective effect of breastfeeding against progression to diabetes after gestational diabetes [31, 32]. There were numerous indications of metabolic health, when compared with non-breast feeding women, including a reduction in atherogenic VLDL particles and triglycerides across lipoprotein particles, and an increase in anti-atherogenic larger HDL particles, including constituent HDL cholesterol and phospholipids. In addition, continuation of breastfeeding was associated with higher polyunsaturated fatty acids and lower mono-unsaturated fatty acids. The majority of fats in breastmilk comprise triglycerides, synthesised in the mammary glands of the breast from de-novo lipogenesis of breast fat [33, 34] and intact triglycerides are not directly transported from the circulation into breast milk [35]. The fall in maternal plasma triglycerides observed in association with breastfeeding likely reflects increased mobilisation of maternal fat stores and enhanced metabolism to fatty acids that would contribute to generation of energy to meet the demands of breastfeeding. Mechanistically, it has been proposed that the stimulation of prolactin during lactation would lead to a fall in maternal oestrogens which, in turn, would stimulate lipolysis [18]. An increase in the proteogenic amino acid glycine could be advantageous to maternal health. Our findings are consistent with a targeted mass spectrometry metabolome undertaken 6–8 weeks postpartum in a cohort of individuals with normoglycaemia but with previous GDM, where lactation intensity was associated with lower triglycerides (and diglycerides) and higher phospholipids [36]; indeed they suggest that downregulation of triglycerides/diglyceride lipogenesis during lactation is directly associated with formation of phospho- and sphingolipids through the CEPT1 gene. In addition, the ‘healthy’ metabolic profile seen here mirrors that seen during pregnancy in individuals with obesity who were normoglycaemic compared to those who had GDM [37] and may reflect a comparatively insulin-sensitive state in those who are breastfeeding. As we had previously reported a beneficial effect of the intervention on the maternal metabolic profile between 16 and 36 weeks of gestation [38], to exclude any residual effect of the intervention postpartum we also analysed the metabolome in women in the control arm, which demonstrated similar differences in the profile between the breastfeeding and non-breastfeeding mothers as that of the metabolome from the whole cohort.

The lack of effect of breastfeeding on weight and measures of adiposity in women of Black African or Black Afro-Caribbean ethnicity compared with women of White ethnicity is a novel observation. There may be fundamental differences of genetic origin in fat metabolism, or differences in postpartum physical activity, and diet. We have previously reported [39] the longitudinal dietary trajectories in the UPBEAT women across pregnancy and up to 3-years postpartum. Amongst the women who had a high adherence to an African/Caribbean dietary pattern, we observed a dietary rebound for those women who followed a high adherence to the African/Caribbean trajectory at 6-months postpartum. This may reflect food insecurity, sociocultural drivers of diet such as social support or family food preferences and may contribute to the null findings for postpartum weight loss for women of Black ethnicity. Differences in the metabolome observed between White and Black women who breastfeed are novel. These may be driven by a modification in their diets [39], or implicated by the lower sample of Black women in the study; these findings need to be evaluated in a larger cohort.

Strengths and limitations

Strengths of the study include the rich UPBEAT dataset which provided comprehensive information on breastfeeding and anthropometry outcomes at 6-months postpartum in an ethnically diverse cohort. To our knowledge, this study is the first to report metabolomic changes associated with breastfeeding in a cohort of women with obesity. The main limitation is the observational study design, which is subject to residual confounding and potential overestimation of reported effects [40]. Although the breastfeeding outcomes are reported in detail, these outcomes are self-reported by the mother which may be subject to recall bias [41]. Furthermore, while the findings are generalisable amongst women with obesity, they may not be directly generalisable to the general population of women with a heterogeneous BMI.

Conclusion

Given the prevalence of obesity in women of reproductive age, strategies to support and enable women with a BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2 to initiate and continue to breastfeed are required to improve long-term maternal health outcomes. This study supports strategies to encourage, support and enable all women to continue breastfeeding for at least 6 months, according to the WHO recommendation, and to overcome barriers associated with breastfeeding. The initiation and duration of breastfeeding requires collective societal approaches, including support from family members, healthcare professionals, as well as government action to enable and support breastfeeding, such as the development of actionable policies which promote breastfeeding and reduce the misleading advertising and marketing of breastmilk substitutes [42]. Further exploration into the null findings for postpartum weight loss in women of Black ethnicity are required.

Supplementary information

Supplementary file

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41366-024-01576-6.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the contribution of the research midwives and nurses who recruited and followed up the participants. We also acknowledge the contribution of Maryam Ahmad, BSc student, and wish to thank all the participants in the trial for their patience, time, interest and goodwill.

Author contributions

AB, CS, PS and LP designed research; AB, CS and AF conducted research, KD and FT analysed data, KD, AB and LP wrote the paper. SW provided metabolomic expertise. KD had primary responsibility for the final content.

Funding

UPBEAT was supported by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013), project Early Nutrition, grant agreement no. 289346, and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (UK) Programme Grants for Applied Research Programme (RP-0407-10452). Support was also provided by the Chief Scientist Office Scotland, Guy’s and St Thomas’ Charity, and Tommy’s Charity (Registered charity no. 1060508). KVD and SLW are funded by the MRC (grant numbers: MR/V005839/1 and MR/W003740/1, respectively).

Data availability

The datasets generated during and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request pending application (via a research application form) and approval by the UPBEAT Consortium.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

The NHS research ethics committee granted approval for all participating centres (UK integrated research application system, reference 09/H0802/5). Additional approvals were obtained through local Research and Development departments in each participating centre. UPBEAT was also registered with the ISRCTN reference 88971375).

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Kathryn V. Dalrymple, Annette L. Briley.

A list of authors and their affiliations appears at the end of the paper.
==== Refs
References

1. World Health Organisation. The optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. World Health Organisation; 2001.
2. UK Health Security Agency. Breastfeeding Celebration Week—supporting mothers who breastfeed. UK Health Security Agency; 2021. https://ukhsa.blog.gov.uk/2021/06/25/breastfeeding-celebration-week-supporting-mothers-who-breastfeed/.
3. Office for Health Improvement and Disparities. Breastfeeding at 6 to 8 weeks after birth: annual data 2021 to 2022. GOV.UK; 2023. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/breastfeeding-at-6-to-8-weeks-after-birth-annual-data-2021-to-2022.
4. Marshall NE Lau B Purnell JQ Thornburg KL Impact of maternal obesity and breastfeeding intention on lactation intensity and duration Matern Child Nutr 2019 15 e12732 10.1111/mcn.12732 30345729
Marshall NE, Lau B, Purnell JQ, Thornburg KL. Impact of maternal obesity and breastfeeding intention on lactation intensity and duration. Matern Child Nutr. 2019;15:e12732.30345729
5. Turcksin R Bel S Galjaard S Devlieger R Maternal obesity and breastfeeding intention, initiation, intensity and duration: a systematic review: maternal obesity and breastfeeding Matern Child Nutr 2014 10 166 83 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2012.00439.x 22905677
Turcksin R, Bel S, Galjaard S, Devlieger R. Maternal obesity and breastfeeding intention, initiation, intensity and duration: a systematic review: maternal obesity and breastfeeding. Matern Child Nutr. 2014;10:166–83.22905677
6. Nommsen-Rivers LA Chantry CJ Peerson JM Cohen RJ Dewey KG Delayed onset of lactogenesis among first-time mothers is related to maternal obesity and factors associated with ineffective breastfeeding Am J Clin Nutr 2010 92 574 84 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29192 20573792
Nommsen-Rivers LA, Chantry CJ, Peerson JM, Cohen RJ, Dewey KG. Delayed onset of lactogenesis among first-time mothers is related to maternal obesity and factors associated with ineffective breastfeeding. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;92:574–84.20573792
7. Campbell T Shackleton N Pre-pregnancy body mass index and breastfeeding initiation, early cessation and longevity: evidence from the first wave of the UK Millennium Cohort Study J Epidemiol Community Health 2018 72 1124 31 10.1136/jech-2017-209074 30201697
Campbell T, Shackleton N. Pre-pregnancy body mass index and breastfeeding initiation, early cessation and longevity: evidence from the first wave of the UK Millennium Cohort Study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018;72:1124–31.30201697
8. Bever Babendure J Reifsnider E Mendias E Moramarco MW Davila YR Reduced breastfeeding rates among obese mothers: a review of contributing factors, clinical considerations and future directions Int Breastfeed J 2015 10 21 10.1186/s13006-015-0046-5 26140049
Bever Babendure J, Reifsnider E, Mendias E, Moramarco MW, Davila YR. Reduced breastfeeding rates among obese mothers: a review of contributing factors, clinical considerations and future directions. Int Breastfeed J. 2015;10:21.26140049
9. UNICEF, WHO, Bank W. Levels and trends in child malnutrition. 2015. http://www.who.int/nutgrowthdb/jme_brochure2017.pdf.
10. McAndrew F, Thompson J, Fellows L, Large A, Speed M, Renfrew MJ. Infant feeding survey 2010. Leeds Health Soc Care Inf Cent. 2012;2:1–186.
11. Garcia AH Voortman T Baena Cristina P Chowdhurry R Muka T Jaspers L Maternal weight status, diet, and supplement use as determinants of breastfeeding and complementary feeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis Nutr Rev 2016 74 490 516 10.1093/nutrit/nuw016 27330143
Garcia AH, Voortman T, Baena Cristina P, Chowdhurry R, Muka T, Jaspers L, et al. Maternal weight status, diet, and supplement use as determinants of breastfeeding and complementary feeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Rev. 2016;74:490–516.27330143
12. Swanson V Keely A Denison FC Does body image influence the relationship between body weight and breastfeeding maintenance in new mothers? Br J Health Psychol 2017 22 557 76 10.1111/bjhp.12246 28547837
Swanson V, Keely A, Denison FC. Does body image influence the relationship between body weight and breastfeeding maintenance in new mothers? Br J Health Psychol. 2017;22:557–76.28547837
13. Cirulli ET Guo L Leon Swisher C Shah N Huang L Napier LA Profound perturbation of the metabolome in obesity is associated with health risk Cell Metab 2019 29 488 500.e2 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.09.022 30318341
Cirulli ET, Guo L, Leon Swisher C, Shah N, Huang L, Napier LA, et al. Profound perturbation of the metabolome in obesity is associated with health risk. Cell Metab. 2019;29:488–500.e2.30318341
14. Briley AL Barr S Badger S Bell R Croker H Godfrey KM A complex intervention to improve pregnancy outcome in obese women; the UPBEAT randomised controlled trial BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014 14 74 10.1186/1471-2393-14-74 24533897
Briley AL, Barr S, Badger S, Bell R, Croker H, Godfrey KM, et al. A complex intervention to improve pregnancy outcome in obese women; the UPBEAT randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:74.24533897
15. Patel N Godfrey K Pasupathy D Levin J Flynn A Hayes L Infant adiposity following a randomised controlled trial of a behavioural intervention in obese pregnancy Int J Obes 2017 41 1018 26 10.1038/ijo.2017.44
Patel N, Godfrey K, Pasupathy D, Levin J, Flynn A, Hayes L, et al. Infant adiposity following a randomised controlled trial of a behavioural intervention in obese pregnancy. Int J Obes. 2017;41:1018–26.
16. van den Berg RA Hoefsloot HC Westerhuis JA Smilde AK van der Werf MJ Centering, scaling, and transformations: improving the biological information content of metabolomics data BMC Genomics 2006 7 142 10.1186/1471-2164-7-142 16762068
van den Berg RA, Hoefsloot HC, Westerhuis JA, Smilde AK, van der Werf MJ. Centering, scaling, and transformations: improving the biological information content of metabolomics data. BMC Genomics. 2006;7:142.16762068
17. Dalrymple KV Uwhubetine O Flynn AC Pasupathy D Briley AL Relph SA Modifiable determinants of postpartum weight loss in women with obesity: a secondary analysis of the UPBEAT trial Nutrients 2021 13 1979 10.3390/nu13061979 34207523
Dalrymple KV, Uwhubetine O, Flynn AC, Pasupathy D, Briley AL, Relph SA, et al. Modifiable determinants of postpartum weight loss in women with obesity: a secondary analysis of the UPBEAT trial. Nutrients. 2021;13:1979.34207523
18. Lambrinou C-P Karaglani E Manios Y Breastfeeding and postpartum weight loss Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2019 22 413 7 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000597 31577639
Lambrinou C-P, Karaglani E, Manios Y. Breastfeeding and postpartum weight loss. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2019;22:413–7.31577639
19. Baker JL Gamborg M Heitmann BL Lissner L Sørensen TI Rasmussen KM Breastfeeding reduces postpartum weight retention Am J Clin Nutr 2008 88 1543 51 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26379 19064514
Baker JL, Gamborg M, Heitmann BL, Lissner L, Sørensen TI, Rasmussen KM. Breastfeeding reduces postpartum weight retention. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;88:1543–51.19064514
20. Aldana-Parra F Olaya G Fewtrell M Effectiveness of a new approach for exclusive breastfeeding counselling on breastfeeding prevalence, infant growth velocity and postpartum weight loss in overweight or obese women: protocol for a randomized controlled trial Int Breastfeed J 2020 15 2 10.1186/s13006-019-0249-2 31921328
Aldana-Parra F, Olaya G, Fewtrell M. Effectiveness of a new approach for exclusive breastfeeding counselling on breastfeeding prevalence, infant growth velocity and postpartum weight loss in overweight or obese women: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Int Breastfeed J. 2020;15:2.31921328
21. Most J Altazan AD St Amant M Beyl RA Ravussin E Redman LM Increased energy intake after pregnancy determines postpartum weight retention in women with obesity J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2020 105 e1601 11 10.1210/clinem/dgz330 31905403
Most J, Altazan AD, St Amant M, Beyl RA, Ravussin E, Redman LM. Increased energy intake after pregnancy determines postpartum weight retention in women with obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105:e1601–11.31905403
22. Manifesto L. Blog: Removing barriers to breastfeeding in the UK. Baby Friendly Initiat. 2016. https://www.unicef.org.uk/babyfriendly/removing-barriers-breastfeeding-uk/.
23. Jarlenski MP Bennett WL Bleich SN Barry CL Stuart EA Effects of breastfeeding on postpartum weight loss among U.S. women Prev Med 2014 69 146 50 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.09.018 25284261
Jarlenski MP, Bennett WL, Bleich SN, Barry CL, Stuart EA. Effects of breastfeeding on postpartum weight loss among U.S. women. Prev Med. 2014;69:146–50.25284261
24. Bogaerts A Witters I Van den Bergh BRH Jans G Devlieger R Obesity in pregnancy: altered onset and progression of labour Midwifery 2013 29 1303 13 10.1016/j.midw.2012.12.013 23427851
Bogaerts A, Witters I, Van den Bergh BRH, Jans G, Devlieger R. Obesity in pregnancy: altered onset and progression of labour. Midwifery. 2013;29:1303–13.23427851
25. Carlsen SM Jacobsen G Vanky E Mid-pregnancy androgen levels are negatively associated with breastfeeding Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010 89 87 94 10.3109/00016340903318006 19900072
Carlsen SM, Jacobsen G, Vanky E. Mid-pregnancy androgen levels are negatively associated with breastfeeding. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89:87–94.19900072
26. Pérez-Escamilla R Tomori C Hernández-Cordero S Baker P Barros AJD Bégin F Breastfeeding: crucially important, but increasingly challenged in a market-driven world Lancet 2023 401 472 85 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01932-8 36764313
Pérez-Escamilla R, Tomori C, Hernández-Cordero S, Baker P, Barros AJD, Bégin F, et al. Breastfeeding: crucially important, but increasingly challenged in a market-driven world. Lancet. 2023;401:472–85.36764313
27. Bell Z Scott S Visram S Rankin J Bambra C Heslehurst N Food insecurity and the nutritional health and well-being of women and children in high-income countries: protocol for a qualitative systematic review BMJ Open 2021 11 e048180 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048180 34446488
Bell Z, Scott S, Visram S, Rankin J, Bambra C, Heslehurst N. Food insecurity and the nutritional health and well-being of women and children in high-income countries: protocol for a qualitative systematic review. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e048180.34446488
28. Tomori C. Global lessons for strengthening breastfeeding as a key pillar of food security. Front Public Health. 2023;11. 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1256390.
29. Brown A Breastfeeding as a public health responsibility: a review of the evidence J Hum Nutr Diet J Br Diet Assoc 2017 30 759 70 10.1111/jhn.12496
Brown A. Breastfeeding as a public health responsibility: a review of the evidence. J Hum Nutr Diet J Br Diet Assoc. 2017;30:759–70.
30. Yamamoto M Takami M Misumi T Kawakami C Miyagi E Ito S Effects of breastfeeding on postpartum weight change in Japanese women: the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS) PLoS ONE 2022 17 e0268046 10.1371/journal.pone.0268046 35507607
Yamamoto M, Takami M, Misumi T, Kawakami C, Miyagi E, Ito S, et al. Effects of breastfeeding on postpartum weight change in Japanese women: the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0268046.35507607
31. Gunderson EP Lewis CE Lin Y Sorel M Gross M Sidney S Lactation duration and progression to diabetes in women across the childbearing years JAMA Intern Med 2018 178 328 37 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.7978 29340577
Gunderson EP, Lewis CE, Lin Y, Sorel M, Gross M, Sidney S, et al. Lactation duration and progression to diabetes in women across the childbearing years. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178:328–37.29340577
32. Gunderson EP Hurston SR Ning X Lo JC Crites Y Walton D Lactation and progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study Ann Intern Med 2015 163 889 98 10.7326/M15-0807 26595611
Gunderson EP, Hurston SR, Ning X, Lo JC, Crites Y, Walton D, et al. Lactation and progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163:889–98.26595611
33. Hachey DL Silber GH Wong WW Garza C Human lactation. II: Endogenous fatty acid synthesis by the mammary gland Pediatr Res 1989 25 63 68 10.1203/00006450-198901000-00015 2919120
Hachey DL, Silber GH, Wong WW, Garza C. Human lactation. II: Endogenous fatty acid synthesis by the mammary gland. Pediatr Res. 1989;25:63–68.2919120
34. Mohammad MA Sunehag AL Haymond MW De novo synthesis of milk triglycerides in humans Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2014 306 E838 47 10.1152/ajpendo.00605.2013 24496312
Mohammad MA, Sunehag AL, Haymond MW. De novo synthesis of milk triglycerides in humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2014;306:E838–47.24496312
35. Neville MC Picciano MF Regulation of milk lipid secretion and composition Annu Rev Nutr 1997 17 159 83 10.1146/annurev.nutr.17.1.159 9240924
Neville MC, Picciano MF. Regulation of milk lipid secretion and composition. Annu Rev Nutr. 1997;17:159–83.9240924
36. Zhang Z Lai M Piro AL Alexeeff SE Allalou A Röst HL Intensive lactation among women with recent gestational diabetes significantly alters the early postpartum circulating lipid profile: the SWIFT study BMC Med 2021 19 241 10.1186/s12916-021-02095-1 34620173
Zhang Z, Lai M, Piro AL, Alexeeff SE, Allalou A, Röst HL, et al. Intensive lactation among women with recent gestational diabetes significantly alters the early postpartum circulating lipid profile: the SWIFT study. BMC Med. 2021;19:241.34620173
37. White SL Pasupathy D Sattar N Nelson SM Lawlor DA Briley AL Metabolic profiling of gestational diabetes in obese women during pregnancy Diabetologia 2017 60 1903 12 10.1007/s00125-017-4380-6 28766127
White SL, Pasupathy D, Sattar N, Nelson SM, Lawlor DA, Briley AL, et al. Metabolic profiling of gestational diabetes in obese women during pregnancy. Diabetologia. 2017;60:1903–12.28766127
38. Mills HL Patel N White SL Pasupathy D Briley AL Santos Ferreira DL The effect of a lifestyle intervention in obese pregnant women on gestational metabolic profiles: findings from the UK Pregnancies Better Eating and Activity Trial (UPBEAT) randomised controlled trial BMC Med 2019 17 15 10.1186/s12916-018-1248-7 30661507
Mills HL, Patel N, White SL, Pasupathy D, Briley AL, Santos Ferreira DL, et al. The effect of a lifestyle intervention in obese pregnant women on gestational metabolic profiles: findings from the UK Pregnancies Better Eating and Activity Trial (UPBEAT) randomised controlled trial. BMC Med. 2019;17:15.30661507
39. Dalrymple KV Vogel C Flynn AC Seed PT Godfrey KM Poston L Longitudinal dietary trajectories from pregnancy to 3 years post delivery in women with obesity: relationships with adiposity Obesity 2023 31 1159 69 10.1002/oby.23706 36876599
Dalrymple KV, Vogel C, Flynn AC, Seed PT, Godfrey KM, Poston L, et al. Longitudinal dietary trajectories from pregnancy to 3 years post delivery in women with obesity: relationships with adiposity. Obesity. 2023;31:1159–69.36876599
40. Grimes DA Schulz KF Bias and causal associations in observational research Lancet 2002 359 248 52 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07451-2 11812579
Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Bias and causal associations in observational research. Lancet. 2002;359:248–52.11812579
41. Sedgwick P What is recall bias? BMJ 2012 344 e3519 10.1136/bmj.e3519
Sedgwick P. What is recall bias? BMJ. 2012;344:e3519.
42. Breastfeeding Series. Lancet. 2023; 401:472–524.
