
==== Front
Nat Hum Behav
Nat Hum Behav
Nature Human Behaviour
2397-3374
Nature Publishing Group UK London

38987359
1919
10.1038/s41562-024-01919-3
Article
Investigating the impact of poverty on mental illness in the UK Biobank using Mendelian randomization
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2970-1276
Marchi Mattia 123
Alkema Anne 3
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8194-9351
Xia Charley 45
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2623-7172
Thio Chris H. L. 610
Chen Li-Yu 3
http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6627-6681
Schalkwijk Winni 3
Galeazzi Gian M. GianMaria.Galeazzi@ausl.re.it

111
Ferrari Silvia 12
Pingani Luca 12
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3649-0457
Kweon Hyeokmoon 7
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4691-2630
Evans-Lacko Sara 8
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7205-1606
David Hill W. 45
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6163-7484
Boks Marco P. m.p.m.boks@umcutrecht.nl

3912
1 https://ror.org/02d4c4y02 grid.7548.e 0000 0001 2169 7570 Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
2 Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
3 grid.5477.1 0000000120346234 Department of Psychiatry, Brain Center University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
4 https://ror.org/01nrxwf90 grid.4305.2 0000 0004 1936 7988 Lothian Birth Cohort Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
5 https://ror.org/01nrxwf90 grid.4305.2 0000 0004 1936 7988 Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
6 grid.4494.d 0000 0000 9558 4598 Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
7 https://ror.org/008xxew50 grid.12380.38 0000 0004 1754 9227 Department of Economics, School of Business and Economics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
8 https://ror.org/0090zs177 grid.13063.37 0000 0001 0789 5319 Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
9 grid.491134.a 0000 0004 0469 3190 Dimence Institute for Specialized Mental Health Care, Dimence Group, Deventer, The Netherlands
10 https://ror.org/04pp8hn57 grid.5477.1 0000 0000 9637 0671 Present Address: Department of Population Health Sciences, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
11 Present Address: Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
12 https://ror.org/05grdyy37 grid.509540.d 0000 0004 6880 3010 Present Address: Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
10 7 2024
10 7 2024
2024
8 9 17711783
6 7 2023
31 5 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
It is unclear whether poverty and mental illness are causally related. Using UK Biobank and Psychiatric Genomic Consortium data, we examined evidence of causal links between poverty and nine mental illnesses (attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), anorexia nervosa, anxiety disorder, autism spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder and schizophrenia). We applied genomic structural equation modelling to derive a poverty common factor from household income, occupational income and social deprivation. Then, using Mendelian randomization, we found evidence that schizophrenia and ADHD causally contribute to poverty, while poverty contributes to major depressive disorder and schizophrenia but decreases the risk of anorexia nervosa. Poverty may also contribute to ADHD, albeit with uncertainty due to unbalanced pleiotropy. The effects of poverty were reduced by approximately 30% when we adjusted for cognitive ability. Further investigations of the bidirectional relationships between poverty and mental illness are warranted, as they may inform efforts to improve mental health for all.

Although poverty and mental illness are strongly correlated, it is unclear whether they are causally linked. Using UK Biobank and Psychiatric Genomic Consortium data, Marchi et al. provide evidence of a causal relationship between poverty and some mental illnesses.

Subject terms

Risk factors
Economics
Human behaviour
Psychiatric disorders
issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcMain

The association between mental illness and social class was first demonstrated in a 1958 study by Hollingshead and Redlich, who found that individuals from lower socio-economic backgrounds had a higher incidence of severe and persistent mental illness and received less adequate treatment1. More than 50 years later, the same social conditions persist and affect mental health worldwide. Epidemiological studies throughout the world have demonstrated an association between mental health and socio-economic status (SES)2–4, with mental illness being more common among people from lower social classes5,6. Also, studies on income fluctuations have found consistent changes in mental health7,8.

Although the association between poverty and mental illness is strong across these studies, there is limited evidence that supports a causal relationship. Several factors, such as reverse causation and residual confounding, make it difficult to determine whether poverty causally contributes to mental illness or whether it is the other way around and mental illness leads to poverty. However, understanding the causality of the relationship between poverty and mental illness may be crucial for public health policies, as they may target essential aspects of poverty and improve public mental health9.

To date, the direction of the association between poverty and mental illness remains uncertain, and two explanatory hypotheses compete: social causation and social selection10. According to the social causation theory, the socio-economic adversity faced by lower socio-economic groups precipitates mental illness in vulnerable individuals, possibly mediated by factors such as housing insecurity, substance use and stress. Conversely, the social selection theory suggests that the overrepresentation of lower SES among people with mental illness is mainly attributable to downward social mobility as a consequence of the impairment associated with poor mental health11.

Conducting randomized controlled trials to determine the causality of the role of poverty is neither feasible nor ethical. An alternative method to investigate is Mendelian randomization (MR), which uses genetic data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to examine whether a risk factor fits in a causal model for an outcome12. The MR method takes advantage of the fact that genetic variants are fixed at conception and are less susceptible to the confounding effects that make results from observational studies difficult to interpret13.

Studies on poverty come with the challenge of defining poverty. Most of them use a single measure, usually based on income recorded at the household level, individual income or operationalized employment status of an individual, by occupational income7,11. However, no single indicator can capture the multiple dimensions of poverty, such as lack of material goods, limited access to education and health-care services, inadequate living standards, disempowerment, poor quality of work, the threat of violence, and living in areas that are environmentally hazardous, among others14–17. For that reason, the UK health authorities commonly use a composite measure known as the Townsend Deprivation Index to assess material deprivation within a population18.

In this study, we applied MR to examine the causal effects of poverty on nine mental illnesses. First, to maximize the power required to examine the common effects of poverty across its multidimensional aspects, we derived a poverty factor using household income (HI), occupational income (OI) and social deprivation (SD). These three measures capture poverty at the levels of the individual, the household and the area in which one lives and so facilitate a more informed understanding of which aspects of poverty present the greatest risk to individual mental health. Second, we investigated the causal relationship of the common factor of poverty and each of the three indicators of poverty with nine mental illnesses: attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), anorexia nervosa (AN), anxiety disorder (ANX), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), bipolar disorder (BD), major depressive disorder (MDD), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and schizophrenia (SZ). To account for potential confounding effects, we also extended the MR analyses to include cognitive ability (CA).

Results

The schematic overview of the study is represented in Fig. 1.Fig. 1 Research design.

β1 is the association between the genetic variants and the exposure of interest (MR relevance assumption), i is the potential violation of the MR independence assumption, p is the potential pleiotropic effect of the genetic variants on the outcome (that is, violation of the MR exclusion restriction assumption) and β2 is the causal association of interest. Created with BioRender.com.

Latent-poverty-factor estimation

To analyse the joint genetic architecture of poverty, we ran a multivariable GWAS for which a common factor defined by genetic indicators is regressed on a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). The multivariable GWAS of the latent poverty factor (PF) was modelled from three indicators: HI, SD and OI (see Methods and Supplementary Information for details and Supplementary Table 1 showing the factor loading of each indicator). The heritability of the common factor GWAS was estimated with h2 and was around 8.4%. The mean χ2, multivariable linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSC) intercept and h2 for the common factor GWAS and the GWAS of HI, SD and OI are presented in Supplementary Table 2.

The GWAS of the latent poverty factor identified 90 significantly associated independent loci at the GWAS threshold (P ≤ 5 × 10−8), as displayed in Fig. 2.Fig. 2 Manhattan plot of the latent poverty factor.

The x axis indicates the chromosomal position, and the y axis indicates the significance of the association (−log10(P)). The red line represents the genome-wide significance level (5 × 10−8). SNP effects are estimated with a linear regression model. The P values are two-sided and not adjusted for multiple testing.

The genetic correlation between PF and CA was strong (rg = 0.74, s.e. = 0.029; Supplementary Table 3). When we ran bidirectional MR of CA against PF, we found stronger evidence supporting the causal effect of CA on PF (inverse variance weighted (IVW) βCA→PF = −0.390 (95% confidence interval (CI): −0.408, −0.372)) rather than vice versa (IVW βPF→CA = −0.274 (95% CI: −0.288, −0.261)), as suggested by the results of Steger’s test (P < 0.001 and P = 0.423, respectively). The full results are presented in Supplementary Table 4 and Supplementary Figs. 1–4.

Bidirectional univariable MR of common factor poverty against mental illness

For the univariable analyses, the mean F statistic ranged from 31.5 to 45.6, indicating that the estimates were probably not subject to weak instrument bias. Forward IVW analysis of PF against the considered mental illnesses showed significant causal effects of PF on ADHD (β = 0.330 (95% CI: 0.287, 0.373)), ANX (β = 0.229 (95% CI: 0.101, 0.357)), MDD (β = 0.115 (95% CI: 0.074, 0.156)), PTSD (β = 0.140 (95% CI: 0.073, 0.207)) and SZ (β = 0.110 (95% CI: 0.074, 0.145)), and with the opposite direction on AN (β = −0.192 (95% CI: −0.254, −0.129)) and OCD (β = −0.202 (95% CI: −0.355, −0.049)). The estimate of the causal effect using the weighted median (WM) method was consistent in magnitude for ADHD, AN, MDD, PTSD and SZ, but not for ANX and OCD. We did not identify any significant causal effect of PF on BD or ASD.

Backward IVW analysis of mental illness against PF showed significant causal effects of ADHD (β = 0.402 (95% CI: 0.348, 0.455)), BD (β = −0.091 (95% CI: −0.133, −0.049)) and SZ (β = 0.082 (95% CI: 0.061, 0.102)) on PF. The estimate of the causal effect using the WM method was confirmed for both ADHD and SZ, but not for BD.

The results are displayed in Fig. 3 (see also the scatterplots in Supplementary Figs. 5–13 and 23–26) and in Supplementary Table 5 (see also Supplementary Table 6 for conversion to odds ratios).Fig. 3 Results of univariable bidirectional MR analysis of poverty against mental illness.

a, Forward analysis. b, Backward analysis. Poverty is a latent variable built using HI as the unit identification, so that an increase in the indicator’s load stands for increased income; the regression coefficients have therefore been reversed to facilitate interpretation of the effect of poverty. The effect estimates on the x axis are log-odds for binary traits (that is, for mental illnesses) and unstandardized linear regression coefficients for continuous traits (that is, for poverty); the error bars represent 95% CIs. Poverty factor, N = 453,688; ADHD, N = 225,534; AN, N = 72,517; ANX, N = 21,761; ASD, N = 46,350; BD, N = 413,466; MDD, N = 138,884; OCD, N = 9,725; PTSD, N = 206,655; SZ, N = 320,404.

Steiger tests indicated that the causal direction between the exposure and outcome was correct in all the analyses. Cochran’s Q heterogeneity statistics were significant in all the analyses (except for the effects of PF on ANX and P on OCD), which is suggestive of pleiotropy. Furthermore, we looked at the MR Egger regression (MR-Egger) intercept, which significantly deviated from 0 in the analysis of PF against ADHD (P = 0.001) and of PF against ASD (P = 0.035), suggesting that pleiotropy was unbalanced in these relationships. The MR-Egger causal effect, which provides a better estimate in cases of unbalanced pleiotropy than IVW MR, yielded uncertain results for the effect of PF on ADHD (β = −0.232 (95% CI: −0.568, 0.104)) and evidence of an inverse relationship between PF and ASD (β = −0.477 (95% CI: −0.899, −0.0.54), Egger’s intercept P = 0.035). MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) did not detect bias in the estimates due to horizontal pleiotropy in all the estimates. Causal Analysis Using Summary Effect Estimates (CAUSE) confirmed the causal effect of PF on ADHD bidirectionally, and unidirectionally on AN, MDD and PTSD. No significant difference between the sharing and the causal models was found for the effect of PF on SZ bidirectionally. The results of CAUSE are presented in Supplementary Table 7.

Leave-one-out analyses, in both the forward and backward directions, showed that the direction of the effect of each SNP is consistent with the direction of the overall causal estimate. In addition, for most of the analyses, a change in the estimations of less than 10% was obtained by leaving out each SNP, suggesting that none of the genetic variants were overly influential. The results of the leave-one-out analyses are provided in Supplementary Figs. 14–22 and 27–29. Finally, to test whether our results were robust to bias due to reverse causality, we repeated the MR analyses on a subset of SNPs selected through Steiger filtering. This sensitivity analysis confirmed the results of the main analysis, except for the effect of PF on OCD, which was no longer significant after Steiger filtering (β = −0.013 (95% CI: −0.199, 0.173)). The results are presented in Supplementary Table 8.

To further explore whether the effect of poverty on mental illness is driven by specific indicators, we performed bidirectional univariable MR using each of the poverty indicators (that is, HI, OI and SD) as the exposure. The results are presented in Fig. 4; Supplementary Tables 9 and 10 (HI), 13 and 14 (OI), and 17 and 18 (SD); and Supplementary Figs. 30–107. The HI GWAS had a higher level of power than the OI and SD GWAS, as indicated by the number of SNPs selected for the analyses (~50, ~30 and ~10, respectively).Fig. 4 Results of univariable bidirectional MR analysis for each poverty measure against mental illness.

a, Forward analysis. b, Backward analysis. To have a consistent direction of the effect, the SD effect has been reversed. The effect estimates on the x axis are log-odds for binary traits (that is, for mental illnesses) and unstandardized linear regression coefficients for continuous traits (that is, for the poverty indicators); the error bars represent 95% CIs. Missing results are due to an insufficient number of SNPs selected for the MR analysis. HI, N = 379,598; OI, N = 282,963; SD, N = 440,350; ADHD, N = 225,534; AN, N = 72,517; ANX, N = 21,761; ASD, N = 46,350; BD, N = 413,466; MDD, N = 138,884; OCD, N = 9,725; PTSD, N = 206,655; SZ, N = 320,404.

Overall, the direction of the associations obtained using the poverty common factor was consistent with those obtained for each indicator, where bidirectional causal effects of poverty on some mental illnesses were observed. Specifically, using HI as a poverty measure, we found evidence of bidirectional effects with ADHD (β = −0.830 (95% CI: −1.01, −0.647); β = −0.103 (95% CI: −0.120, −0.086); IVW forward and backward, respectively) and SZ (β = −0.415 (95% CI: −0.565, −0.265); β = −0.031 (95% CI: −0.037, −0.024); IVW forward and backward, respectively) and unidirectional causal effects on MDD (β = −0.422 (95% CI: −0.589, −0.255)) and AN (β = 0.448 (95% CI: 0.191, 0.704)). However, the effect of HI on ADHD was biased by high heterogeneity and unbalanced pleiotropy (Egger’s intercept P < 0.001), with the MR-Egger estimate yielding inconsistent results (β = 0.606 (95% CI: −0.684, 1.90)). The bidirectional effect of OI on ADHD (β = −0.859 (95% CI: −1.05, −0.669); β = −0.102 (95% CI: −0.120, −0.083); IVW forward and backward, respectively) and unidirectional effect on AN (β = −0.187 (95% CI: −0.344, −0.030)) and MDD (β = −0.322 (95% CI: −0.502, −0.143)) were also confirmed using OI as a measure of poverty. The effect of OI on SZ was also confirmed bidirectionally (β = −0.187 (95% CI: −0.344, −0.030); β = −0.010 (95% CI: −0.017, −0.003)), but sensitivity analyses using CAUSE and Steiger filtering selection detected potential bias due to pleiotropy in the forward analysis. Notably, the effect of OI on ADHD changed after Steiger filtering, with evidence of pleiotropy (Egger’s intercept, P = 0.033) and a non-significant MR-Egger estimate (β = 0.094 (95% CI: −1.36, 1.55)). Backward analyses using OI as the outcome confirmed the effect of BD on poverty using the IVW method but not the WM method (β = 0.042 (95% CI: 0.028, 0.057); β = 0.020 (95% CI: −0.005, 0.046); IVW and WM, respectively) as found using the common factor poverty; but new evidence was found for the causal effect of AN on OI (β = 0.045 (95% CI: 0.011, 0.080)), which was not replicated using the poverty common factor or other measures of poverty. Finally, using SD as a measure of poverty, the bidirectional effect on SZ (β = 0.213 (95% CI: 0.046, 0.380); β = 0.042 (95% CI: 0.026, 0.058); IVW forward and backward, respectively) and the unidirectional effect on AN (β = −0.352 (95% CI: −0.618, −0.087)) were confirmed. The bidirectional effect of SD on ADHD was also replicated (β = 0.713 (95% CI: 0.504, 0.922); β = 0.222 (95% CI: 0.181, 0.262); IVW forward and backward, respectively), with stronger evidence for the reverse effect as indicated by Steiger tests (forward, P = 0.079; backward, P < 0.001). However, when we applied Steiger filtering selection, the effect of SD on ADHD held strong (β = 0.557 (95% CI: 0.331, 0.784)). None of the other effects of SD remained significant after Steiger filtering, which is consistent with potential bias due to reverse causation in the relationship between SD and mental illness (for the CAUSE and Steiger filtering MR results, see Supplementary Tables 11 and 12 (HI), 15 and 16 (OI), and 19 and 20 (SD)).

Bidirectional univariable MR of HI categories against mental illness

To explore the shape of the relationship between HI and mental health, and specifically to answer the question whether there is a particular HI threshold at which the effect of HI on mental health kicks in, we used GWAS data for the HI categories and investigated the effect of each category on the considered mental illnesses. That led to the creation of four dichotomous dummy variables: (1) low HI (LHI), for which cases were those <£18,000 and controls were those ≥£18,000; (2) low-mid HI (LMHI), for which cases were those <£29,999 and controls were those ≥£29,999; (3) mid-high HI (MHHI), for which cases were those >£52,000 and controls were those ≤£52,000; and (4) high HI (HHI), for which cases were those >£100,000 and controls were those ≤£100,000. For each of these categories, bidirectional univariable MR was performed.

As shown in Fig. 5 and Supplementary Tables 21–24 (see also Supplementary Table 25 for conversion to odds ratios), we found a significant causal effect of being in the lowest HI class on ANX (β = 0.628 (95% CI: 0.095, 1.16)), BD (β = 0.306 (95% CI: 0.125, 0.487)), MDD (β = 0.351 (95% CI: 0.189, 0.513)) and PTSD (β = 0.506 (95% CI: 0.253, 0.759)), and bidirectional effects on ADHD (forward, β = 0.610; (95% CI: 0.415, 0.805); backward, β = 0.210 (95% CI: 0.170, 0.250)) and SZ (forward, β = 0.648 (95% CI: 0.488, 0.808); backward, β = 0.082 (95% CI: 0.066, 0.098)). In the LMHI class, the direction of the associations observed in the LHI class was maintained, and the effect size decreased, consistent with our leading hypothesis of more deleterious effects of poverty on mental health at very low levels of income. The exceptions were AN, ASD and OCD, for which being in the LMHI class was protective (β = −0.309 (95% CI: −0.526, −0.091); β = −0.268 (95% CI: −0.488, −0.047); β = −0.774 (95% CI: −1.34, −0.212), respectively). The analyses in the higher classes (that is, MHHI and HHI) showed that with each incremental increase or decrease of income, there is a corresponding effect on mental illness. For instance, AN and ASD (but not OCD) were causally associated with higher incomes, with stronger evidence for AN (βMHHI→AN = 0.371 (95% CI: 0.193, 0.550); βMHHI→ASD = 0.480 (95% CI: 0.303, 0.658); βHHI→AN = 0.333 (95% CI: 0.065, 0.600); βHHI→ASD = 0.094 (95% CI: −0.121, 0.308)), whereas the associations with ADHD, MDD, PTSD and SZ had the opposite sign, confirming the causal relationship with lower income. Notably, ADHD and SZ showed a consistent bidirectional pattern across income levels, where a lower income was causally related to these illnesses and the illnesses were also causal factors for lower incomes. This evidence supports a vicious cycle between poverty and severe mental illness.Fig. 5 Results of univariable bidirectional MR analysis of HI levels against mental illnesses.

a, Forward analysis. b, Backward analysis. For LHI, cases <£18,000 and controls ≥£18,000; for LMHI, cases <£29,999 and controls ≥£29,999; for MHHI, cases >£52,000 and controls ≤£52,000; and for HHI, cases >£100,000 and controls ≤£100,000. The effect estimates on the x axis are log-odds for both the forward and backward analyses given that all traits are binary; the error bars represent 95% CIs. Missing results are due to an insufficient number of SNPs selected for the MR analysis. HI, N = 379,598; ADHD, N = 225,534; AN, N = 72,517; ANX, N = 21,761; ASD, N = 46,350; BD, N = 413,466; MDD, N = 138,884; OCD, N = 9,725; PTSD, N = 206,655; SZ, N = 320,404.

The effect of the HI levels on BD showed a U-shaped distribution, in which BD was causally associated with both low and high HI (βLHI→BD = 0.306 (95% CI: 0.125, 0.487); βMHHI→BD = 0.179 (95% CI: 0.053, 0.304); βHHI→BD = 0.608 (95% CI: 0.423, 0.792)). However, these associations were not replicated using the WM method, and MR-PRESSO detected significant distortion in the estimate due to pleiotropy in the relationship between BD and MHHI, with non-significant outlier-adjusted causal estimates (β = 0.002 (95% CI: −0.039, 0.042)).

The estimate of the causal effect using the WM method was consistent in magnitude for the bidirectional effects of LHI on ADHD and SZ and for the unidirectional effects of LHI on ANX, MDD and PTSD and of MHHI and HHI on ASD.

Q statistics were suggestive of high levels of heterogeneity in most of the analyses; however, MR-Egger showed a significant intercept and causal effect only for the relationship between MHHI and BD (β = 1.69 (95% CI: 0.376; 3.00); Egger’s intercept P = 0.033). Steiger tests indicated that the causal direction between the exposure and outcome was correct in all the analyses except those on ASD (P = 0.994 and P = 0.057, respectively, for the associations with LMHI and MHHI).

The MR analyses on a subset of SNPs selected through Steiger filtering confirmed a stronger causal effect of the lowest HI level on ADHD, MDD, PTSD and SZ. The protective effect of MHHI on ASD was also confirmed. Interestingly, the effects observed in the main analysis were not confirmed for BD and AN, yielding evidence of reverse causation rather than direct causality for these associations. These results can be found in Supplementary Table 26.

Multivariable MR of poverty factor and CA against mental illness

Like other measures of SES, genetic effects are unlikely to influence poverty directly. Rather, genetic effects are likely to influence poverty through intermediary traits (such as health, personality, intelligence and other characteristics) that are themselves heritable19. Previous studies have shown that CA (referred to as general cognitive function, performance or intelligence) is one likely causal factor in income differences19 as well as being genetically associated with mental illness20. We used multivariable MR (MVMR) to estimate the effect of poverty on each mental illness, while controlling for CA. First, we performed bidirectional univariable MR of CA on mental illness, finding evidence supporting a bidirectional inverse causal relationship between CA and ADHD (β = −0.638 (95% CI: −0.720, −0.556); β = −0.151 (95% CI: −0.172, −0.131); forward and backward direction, respectively) and SZ (β = −0.297 (95% CI: −0.365, −0.228); β = −0.055 (95% CI: −0.063, −0.047); forward and backward direction, respectively), a unidirectional negative causal effect of CA on MDD and PTSD (β = −0.140 (95% CI: −0.215, −0.065) and β = −0.139 (95% CI:−0.264, −0.013), respectively) and a unidirectional causal effect of CA on AN and ASD (β = 0.306 (95% CI: 0.190, 0.422) and β = 0.310 (95% CI: 0.193, 0.427), respectively). These results are displayed in Supplementary Tables 27–30 and Supplementary Figs. 108–133. The MVMR analysis yielded results supporting a causal effect of PF on ADHD, AN, ANX, MDD, OCD, PTSD and SZ, beyond CA. Still, the effect of PF on mental illness decreased when including CA in the model. These results suggest that the univariable MR results for PF on mental illness are slightly biased by CA, but a direct effect of PF on ADHD, AN and ANX remains, nonetheless. The results of MVMR are shown in Table 1.Table 1 MVMR results for poverty and CA on mental illness

MVMR	No. of SNPs	IVW β (95% CI)	IVW P	
Outcome: ADHD	203			
Exposure 1: PF		0.232 (0.169, 0.295)	7.28 × 10−13	
Exposure 2: CA		−0.477 (−0.612, −0.342)	4.31 × 10−12	
Outcome: AN	205			
Exposure 1: PF		−0.109 (−0.183, −0.035)	0.004	
Exposure 2: CA		0.149 (−0.008, 0.306)	0.062	
Outcome: ANX	207			
Exposure 1: PF		0.114 (0.007, 0.221)	0.036	
Exposure 2: CA		−0.344 (−0.571, −0.117)	0.003	
Outcome: ASD	208			
Exposure 1: PF		0.022 (−0.054, 0.099)	0.564	
Exposure 2: CA		0.217 (0.054, 0.379)	0.009	
Outcome: BD	208			
Exposure 1: PF		0.020 (−0.044, 0.085)	0.538	
Exposure 2: CA		0.006 (−0.132, 0.144)	0.931	
Outcome: MDD	208			
Exposure 1: PF		0.076 (0.030, 0.123)	0.001	
Exposure 2: CA		−0.091 (−0.190, 0.008)	0.071	
Outcome: OCD	208			
Exposure 1: PF		−0.202 (−0.340, −0.0.064)	0.004	
Exposure 2: CA		0.320 (0.024, 0.615)	0.034	
Outcome: PTSD	208			
Exposure 1: PF		0.111 (0.048, 0.173)	4.90 × 10−4	
Exposure 2: CA		−0.160 (−0.294, −0.027)	0.019	
Outcome: SZ	208			
Exposure 1: PF		0.092 (0.018, 0.167)	0.015	
Exposure 2: CA		−0.297 (−0.457, −0.136)	2.94 × 10−4	
‘IVW’ indicates multivariable MR via the IVW method (random effects); the β effect estimates are log-odds.

Poverty is a latent variable built using HI as a unit identification, so that an increase in the indicator’s load stands for increased income; the regression coefficients have therefore been reversed to facilitate interpretation of the effect of poverty. All statistical tests are two-sided. The P values were not adjusted for multiple testing; therefore, P < 0.05 was considered significant (and is reported in bold).

Importantly, and unlike the univariable models, the inclusion of CA in the MVMR model produced highly dissimilar results comparing between the poverty factor and each indicator of poverty. First, the inclusion of CA in the MVMR model removed the effect of HI on mental illness. Second, for both OI and SD, some significant effects remained, where OI demonstrated a direct effect on ASD and SD showed a direct effect on AN. The results of these additional MVMR models are shown in Supplementary Tables 30–33. Taken together, these results support the idea that the majority of the genetic effects that link poverty to mental illness do act on CA. However, by using a general factor of poverty, the resulting increase in statistical power facilitated the discovery of genetic effects linking poverty to mental health independent of the effects of CA. Therefore, while CA is correlated with poverty, it does not fully account for the observed genetic effects on mental health. These findings, when considered alongside the results of the MR of PF and CA, point to CA fitting as an upstream component in the complex causal pathway linking poverty to mental illness.

Discussion

Building on data from 18 GWAS, this study provides support for a causal relationship between poverty and some mental illnesses. Jointly modelling different indicators of poverty using genomic structural equation modelling and subsequent MR provided converging evidence supporting bidirectional causal effects of poverty and ADHD/SZ, a unidirectional causal effect of poverty on MDD and an inverse causal relationship between poverty and AN. Notably, the evidence for a causal relationship between poverty and ADHD was influenced by unbalanced pleiotropy. Our findings, in two Western-ancestry samples, complement the available evidence on social inequalities in mental health collected across different countries, samples and study designs2,7,11,21,22, including previous MR studies focusing on MDD, HI and unemployment23–25. However, our research adds evidence that the relationship between poverty and mental illness is valid across different measures of poverty and extends the investigation to a wider range of mental illnesses.

This study primarily builds on genetic evidence and therefore warrants caution with respect to the conceptualization of poverty and mental illness. Moreover, while poverty and other measures of SES are heritable traits, it is very unlikely that there are direct genetic effects. Genetic associations with socio-economic traits are probably the result of vertical pleiotropy. Vertical pleiotropy describes instances where one trait is causally associated with a second trait. In these cases, the genetic effects that act on the first trait will also be detected as being associated with the second26. In that context, MR can best be viewed as a way to approximately randomly assign heritable traits that give rise to income differences. Two key candidates for such underlying traits are intelligence and personality. For example, intelligence may lead to both educational advantage and socio-economic success as well as healthier behaviours and thus lead to good mental health27–31. In this study, we adjusted for CA and made two additional observations. First, when we controlled for CA, the causal effect of the general factor of poverty decreased by around 30% compared with univariate estimates, indicating that CA was a contributor to the causal association between poverty and mental illness. Second, when we examined each of the indicators of poverty separately, the effect of HI on mental illness was no longer statistically significant after controlling for CA. For both OI and SD, most of the evidence of a direct causal effect of poverty was absent after adjusting for CA; however, lower levels of OI remained causally associated with increases in ADHD, and higher SD remained in an inverse association with AN. Nevertheless, the higher power obtained by using the common factor of poverty rather than the individual indicators probably facilitated the detection of the influence of heritable poverty traits above and beyond the role of CA and enabled the detection of the causal role of poverty in mental health.

Of note is the vast literature showing that health characteristics (for example, obesity), physical appearance and mental state can influence economic outcomes, including employment opportunities and wages32–34. Our results showing a causal effect of poverty on mental illness therefore should not be taken as proof supporting genetic determinism, but rather as epidemiological evidence of the detrimental effects of poverty and socio-economic inequalities on mental health, regardless of the mechanisms (see also the Frequently Asked Questions in the Supplementary Information).

The causal relationship between poverty and mental illness is likely to involve material, psychological, behavioural and biological pathways. For example, those with heritable traits linked to lower levels of poverty may be more able to move away from stressful environments/jobs/neighbourhoods and so place themselves at a lower risk of disorders35. Furthermore, the level of development of the welfare system may be a material mediator of the health-damaging effects of income losses36,37. Psychosocial mechanisms are a result of the interaction between people’s social environment and their feelings: living on a low income is stressful, and at the same time people in disadvantaged situations may have fewer resources to cope with difficult circumstances. Increasingly, biological research is providing evidence showing how experiences such as social defeat can ‘get under the skin’, causing biochemical changes in the body and brain and increasing the risk of developing mental health problems38,39. Other contributing factors to the relation between poverty and mental illness are the negative health behaviours that are more prevalent in socially disadvantaged groups40, probably as a consequence of the higher financial cost of healthy behaviours. For example, a healthy diet is more expensive than processed foods, and joining a gym or sporting clubs can be costly. Moreover, unhealthy behaviours such as smoking and drinking alcohol may be used as coping strategies for stressful situations41.

The findings of this study reiterate the need to further unravel the roles of poverty and mental illness and to use this insight to advance mental health for all. The choice of which action to take to address the problem is a political matter, but attention is warranted considering increasing income inequalities worldwide42, as well as the increasing incidence of mental illness43,44.

Previous studies examining antipoverty programmes reported positive and sustained effects on mental health45, including reduction of depression and suicide rates11,46,47. For example, a recent randomized controlled trial found that cash incentives provided to low-income individuals led to meaningful improvements in depression48. Additionally, specific economic interventions such as family assets, employment support and rental assistance may be effective in enhancing the mental health of programme beneficiaries49,50. However, it is important to note that previous quasi-experimental research using natural experiments (such as on the lottery winner population) have provided supportive evidence for a small association between SES and mental health51, and qualitative studies have shown that receiving money could be perceived as a debt or burdensome responsibility52,53, which may contribute to increased stress54,55. Further research is therefore necessary to identify the factors within economic support interventions (for example, microcredit, loans and personal health budgets) that influence mental health outcomes. Early studies have found that that combining antipoverty interventions, such as financial incentives and financial mentoring programmes, appears more effective in improving mental health than providing financial incentives alone47. Given these complexities, policymakers could consider policies that can be beneficial for both individuals living in poverty and those living with severe mental illness. Policymakers should also consider a key finding of this study about the effect of CA in the causal pathway linking poverty to mental illness. CA is closely associated with educational attainment and occupational status, which are often regarded as SES variables relevant to health27,29,56. Although the genetic relationship between CA and mental illness differs from the genetic relationship between education and mental illness20,57, educational attainment is a likely causal factor in CA differences58–60 and is a more straightforward target for interventions than CA. Future research should thus explore strategies aimed at facilitating individuals’ participation in education, which may lead to better mental health8,61.

This study has limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results. First, for ANX, ASD, MDD, OCD and PTSD, the GWAS sample sizes were relatively small, precluding their use as exposure variables for investigating the impact of these disorders on poverty. This is due to the insufficient number of SNPs retained following the selection, clumping and harmonization steps. For SNP selection, we used the threshold of P < 5 × 10−8, which is recommended by MR guidelines to ensure the validity of the MR relevance assumption62. We could have relaxed this threshold to include additional SNPs, but this could introduce bias. We therefore refrained from performing those MR analyses and trust that future, more powerful GWAS on these conditions will yield more suitable instruments for MR, bridging this gap. Second, most genetic studies were conducted in populations of European ancestry from high-income countries. Generalizability to populations from other ancestries and from low- and middle-income countries is therefore uncertain63. In particular, this raises questions about the specificity and universality of the effects of poverty on mental health in different cultures and contexts with different political and social systems. Third, it is well acknowledged that psychiatric phenotypes are complex and heterogeneous, which generally translates to low power. This is reflected by the relatively modest effects of each poverty indicator on mental illness. Fourth, it is essential to acknowledge the potential influence of the dynastic effect, wherein characteristics transmitted across generations (such as the association between a parent’s genotype and the offspring’s phenotype) are a known source of bias in MR studies as they violate the second assumption (that is, independence)64. Detecting the exact magnitude of bias resulting from this effect is challenging, as current sample sizes preclude such analyses today. Future studies examining the causal link between poverty and mental health outcomes in an MR framework will be better placed to assess any influence of dynastic effects on the causal estimates identified. We also advise triangulation of our findings using complementary research methods in future studies. Fifth, it should be noted that previous research pointed out that UK Biobank participants are on average healthier and live in less socio-economically deprived areas than the UK average65. This could introduce potential selection bias in MR studies using UK Biobank data, inflating the risk of type I error66,67. However, the impact of selection bias is particularly strong when the selection effect is large—for instance, when studying disease progression, secondary diseases or specific subpopulations, such as elderly people66. In the context of our research, the selection effect is likely to be low. Furthermore, there is evidence that the UK Biobank is sufficiently large and heterogeneous to provide valid scientific inferences of associations between exposures and health conditions, which is in line with the aim of our research65. Sixth, the selection of SNPs associated with the latent poverty factor was performed in the UK Biobank, leading to the potential risk of overestimation of the SNP–phenotype association due to winner’s curse bias. However, the impact of this bias is generally not substantial in large samples, such as the UK Biobank68. Other limitations of MR concern temporality and linearity: MR is thought to provide estimates of lifetime risk and assumes linear effects. Although the use of MR on HI levels and the inclusion of mental illness with onsets across the whole person’s lifespan (for example, ranging from ADHD and ASD to MDD and ANX) may have mitigated these limitations, future studies should particularly focus on assessing whether there are critical windows or acute reactions to poverty exposure. Finally, the genetic variants captured by our measure of poverty are likely to have pleiotropic effects69. However, to break the assumptions of MR, it is not sufficient for the genetic variants in the instrumental variable to have pleiotropic effects70. The genetic variants used as instrumental variables must have horizontally pleiotropic effects mediated via mechanisms other than those captured by poverty. Should genetic variants have vertically pleiotropic effects (for example, SNP → neuron → intelligence → education → poverty → health → psychiatric disorder), then our MR-derived causal estimates will not be biased. Furthermore, if the SNPs affect other phenotypes, but these phenotypes do not affect outcome, then these effects will not bias our MR estimates. It is possible that the genetic variants identified in our poverty GWAS do have horizontally pleiotropic effects, but it is unclear what mechanisms would mediate such effects (for example, personality). In the current study, we investigated potentially pleiotropic effects using MVMR to examine the role of CA71. Future research should use MVMR to investigate the roles of other traits that link poverty to mental health outcomes.

Methods

Study design and data sources

We conducted a two-sample MR study using summary-level GWAS data that for the most part were publicly available. Specifically, for this study, new GWAS on HI and SD were performed using UK Biobank data under application number 10279 (see ‘Data availability’ for the links to these data), the OI data are publicly available and can be downloaded from https://osf.io/rg8sh/, the CA data were obtained from the author of the relevant publication20, and the summary statistics files for the mental illness phenotypes are publicly available for download from the Psychiatric Genomic Consortium (PGC) website at https://pgc.unc.edu/for-researchers/download-results/. Further information on the sources of the summary data is reported in Table 2. Ethical approval was obtained in all original studies.Table 2 GWAS information for each phenotype

Trait	N	No. of cases	Consortium	Reference	
ADHD	225,534	38,691	PGC	Demontis et al.79	
AN	72,517	16,992	PGC	Watson et al.80	
ANX	21,761	7,016	PGC	Otowa et al.81	
ASD	46,350	18,381	PGC	Grove et al.82	
BD	413,466	41,917	PGC	Mullins et al.83	
CA	248,482	NA	UKB	Hill et al.20	
HI	379,598	NA	UKB	NA	
MDD	138,884	43,204	PGC	Howard et al.84	
OCD	9,725	2,688	PGC	Arnold et al.85	
OI	282,963	NA	NA	Kweon et al.76	
PTSD	206,655	32,428	PGC	Nievergelt et al.86	
SD	440,350	NA	UKB	NA	
SZ	320,404	76,755	PGC	Trubetskoy et al.87	
The traits are presented in alphabetical order.

NA, not applicable; PGC, Psychiatric Genomic Consortium; UKB, UK Biobank.

MR relies on three main assumptions on the validity of the genetic instrument variable: relevance, independence and exclusion restriction72. These require that the genetic variant (1) is related to the exposure (that is, only SNPs that reach genome-wide significance in the association with the exposure, or P < 5 × 10−8, are used), (2) is not correlated with confounders in the exposure–outcome relationship and (3) affects the outcome only through the risk factor (that is, the ‘no horizontal pleiotropy’ rule).

Poverty and CA instruments

For this research, seven new GWAS were performed: five on HI, one on SD and one on the common factor of poverty. The GWAS on CA and OI were publicly available. A total of 379,598 participants of European ancestry provided genotype data and data on their level of yearly HI before tax. HI was primarily analysed as a continuous variable. To investigate whether the relation between HI and mental illness is particularly strong at any specific level of income, we further categorized HI as a dichotomous variable, defining the cases in the following way: (1) LHI: less than £18,000; (2) LMHI: less than £29,999; (3) MHHI: more than £52,000; (4) HHI: more than £100,000. One GWAS for each HI category versus all the other categories was performed. A total of 440,350 individuals of European ancestry had genotype data and data on their level of SD, measured with the Townsend Deprivation Index, which was analysed as a continuous variable. GWAS of HI and SD were performed in REGENIE (version 3.1.3)73; for detailed methods, see the Supplementary Information. Previously published GWAS summary data on CA of 248,482 individuals were included20. The CA measure was derived from an already existing dataset of multiple cohorts in which each participant had been administered a battery of cognitive tests20. Correlations between tests of CA are high, with estimates between r = 0.8 and r = 1.0 being reported74,75. Further information on the CA data can be found in the Supplementary Information. In this study, CA was analysed as a continuous variable.

The results from a meta-analysis of two OI GWAS76, including the UK Biobank and the Health and Retirement Study (the latter involving participants from white American ancestry), were used to generate the instruments for OI, which were analysed as continuous variables.

We estimated a latent factor GWAS of poverty (PF) by jointly modelling cross-trait liability of continuous HI, OI and SD, using a common factor model in genomic structural equation modelling77. Before running the multivariable GWAS, we aligned the alleles across HI, SD and OI traits using the HAPMAP3 reference panel, and summary statistics passed quality control by selecting SNPs with minor allele frequency >0.01 and INFO >0.9. We then estimated the LDSC78 across HI, OI and SD using the 1000G European reference panel. Finally, we combined the LDSC output with the HI, OI and SD summary statistics to run the multivariable common factor GWAS. This common factor poverty GWAS was built using HI as the unit of identification, and the effective sample size was 453,689. To allow the estimation of poverty instead of income in the MR analyses on mental illness, we reversed the regression coefficients. The full details on the genomic structural equation modelling methods are available in the Supplementary Information.

Mental illness instruments

Results from the most updated GWAS of ADHD79, AN80, ANX81, ASD82, BD83, MDD84, OCD85, PTSD86 and SZ87 were obtained. The two-sample MR method requires minimal sample overlap between the exposure and outcome GWAS88; therefore, mental illness summary-level data were obtained mainly from the PGC, excluding UK Biobank participants. The GWAS of the mental illness traits considered were provided and analysed as case/control. The effective sample size across the cohorts contributing to the GWAS meta-analysis was calculated for each trait and ranged from 320,000 (for SZ) to 10,000 (for OCD). Table 2 summarizes the GWAS information.

MR

The full set of GWAS summary statistics for each exposure was first restricted to the variants reaching the genome-wide significance threshold (that is, P < 5 × 10−8). Then, to ensure independence between instruments, we applied a strict clumping procedure (LD r2 < 0.001 within 10 Mb, using 1000G EUR as the reference panel). Following that, SNP alleles were harmonized between exposure GWAS and outcome GWAS, using action = 2 (which tries to infer positive strand alleles, using allele frequencies for palindromes), before running MR.

We conducted bidirectional univariable MR between each poverty measure and mental illness. The IVW method was used to estimate effects in the primary analyses89, and the results are presented using forest plots. The WM90, MR-Egger91 and MR-PRESSO92 methods were used as sensitivity analyses, because each method makes different assumptions regarding instrument validity. Specifically, MR-Egger and MR-PRESSO are better than IVW in cases of horizontal pleiotropy (that is, violation of the exclusion restriction assumption). In addition, we used CAUSE93 to account for the presence of correlated or uncorrelated pleiotropy (that is, violation of the independence and exclusion restriction assumptions). Further information on MR-PRESSO and CAUSE is available in the Supplementary Information.

We present the results of the MR analyses as β values corresponding to the log-odds for binary traits (for example, mental illness) or to the unstandardized linear regression coefficients for continuous traits (for example, poverty measures) with their respective 95% CIs. When the outcome of the analysis was binary (that is, for mental illness and HI levels), we also provide a conversion to odds ratios with corresponding 95% CIs.

We also conducted leave-one-out analyses to investigate whether the effects are driven by one or a subset of the SNPs and investigated whether the instruments represent the correct causal direction using Steiger analyses, including Steiger tests and Steiger filtering94. Steiger filtering is particularly useful to avoid false positive findings due to reverse causation (that is, violation of the exclusion restriction assumption). The mr_wrapper() function of the TwosampleMR package performs Steiger tests on each SNP, evaluating whether the R2 of the exposure is greater than the R2 of the outcome and indicating the correct direction of the association. Subsequent Steiger filtering excluded SNPs with false results, allowing MR analyses to be performed on the subset of SNPs with verified associations.

Finally, we hypothesized that CA is probably involved in the poverty and mental illness causal pathway, and our instruments for poverty are possibly related to CA. We therefore used MVMR72 to estimate the direct effect of poverty on mental illness, independent of CA. For this purpose, we clumped the full list of SNPs from each poverty indicator GWAS (to ensure that only independent SNPs are included) and restricted it to those SNPs found in the outcome GWAS, and then ran the analyses on each instrument–mental illness set.

Instrument strength was quantified using the mean F statistic within the univariable IVW analyses, considering a value of F < 20 as indicative of weak instruments95.

All the analyses were conducted in R (version 4.4.0)96, using the packages TwosampleMR (version 0.6.2)97, CAUSE (version 1.2.0)93, and GenomicSEM (version 0.0.5)77. The statistical tests were two-tailed. The significance threshold was P < 0.05. Since only one relationship was tested—that between poverty and mental illness—we did not apply a multiple-testing P-value correction.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information Supplementary Figs. 1–133, Tables 1–33, Methods and Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ).

Reporting Summary

Peer Review File

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41562-024-01919-3.

Acknowledgements

The authors received no specific funding for this work. We thank M. C. Murari from the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia for help with High Performance Computing Cluster. W.D.H. and C.X. are supported by a Career Development Award from the Medical Research Council (no. MR/T030852/1) for the project titled ‘From genetic sequence to phenotypic consequence: genetic and environmental links between cognitive ability, socioeconomic position, and health’.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: M.M., M.P.M.B. and W.D.H. Methodology: M.M., M.P.M.B., W.D.H., C.X. and C.H.L.T. Software: M.M., C.X., W.D.H. and C.H.L.T. Formal Analysis: M.M., W.D.H. and C.X. Resources: M.M., W.D.H., C.X., C.H.L.T., H.K. and M.P.M.B. Data Curation: M.M., M.P.M.B., W.D.H., C.X. and H.K. Writing - Original Draft: M.M., A.A., W.S. and L.-Y.C. Writing - Review & Editing: M.P.M.B., G.M.G., S.F., L.P., S.E.-L., C.H.L.T., C.X., W.D.H., M.M., A.A. and W.S. Visualization: M.M. and W.D.H. Supervision: M.P.M.B. and W.D.H. All the authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Human Behaviour thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Data availability

The UK Biobank data used in this study are available via the UK Biobank data access process (http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/register-apply/). The PGC data can be publicly accessed via https://pgc.unc.edu/for-researchers/download-results/. The OI data are publicly available and can be downloaded from https://osf.io/rg8sh/. The CA data were obtained from the author of the relevant publication, accessible at https://www.nature.com/articles/s41380-017-0001-5. The full GWAS summary statistics on HI, SD and poverty have been uploaded to the GWAS catalogue (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/deposition/submission/6572ff9a53c4ef000109d322; study accession IDs: GCST90302879, GCST90302880, GCST90302881, GCST90302882, GCST90302883, GCST90302884 and GCST90302885).

Code availability

The code for replicating the analyses reported in this Article can be accessed at https://github.com/MattiaMarchi/Common-factor-GWAS–MR.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Hollingshead, A. B. & Redlich, F. C. Social Class and Mental Illness: Community Study (Wiley, 1958); 10.1037/10645-000
2. Chung RYN Deprivation is associated with worse physical and mental health beyond income poverty: a population-based household survey among Chinese adults Qual. Life Res. 2018 27 2127 2135 10.1007/s11136-018-1863-y 29761348
Chung, R. Y. N. et al. Deprivation is associated with worse physical and mental health beyond income poverty: a population-based household survey among Chinese adults. Qual. Life Res. 27, 2127–2135 (2018).29761348
3. Torquati L Mielke GI Brown WJ Burton NW Kolbe-Alexander TL Shift work and poor mental health: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies Am. J. Public Health 2019 109 E13 E20 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305278 31536404
Torquati, L., Mielke, G. I., Brown, W. J., Burton, N. W. & Kolbe-Alexander, T. L. Shift work and poor mental health: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Am. J. Public Health 109, E13–E20 (2019).31536404
4. Rapp MA When local poverty is more important than your income: mental health in minorities in inner cities World Psychiatry 2015 14 249 250 10.1002/wps.20221 26043348
Rapp, M. A. et al. When local poverty is more important than your income: mental health in minorities in inner cities. World Psychiatry 14, 249–250 (2015).26043348
5. Price JH Khubchandani J Webb FJ Poverty and health disparities: what can public health professionals do? Health Promot. Pract. 2018 19 170 174 10.1177/1524839918755143 29363333
Price, J. H., Khubchandani, J. & Webb, F. J. Poverty and health disparities: what can public health professionals do? Health Promot. Pract. 19, 170–174 (2018).29363333
6. Vaalavuo M Deterioration in health: what is the role of unemployment and poverty? Scand. J. Public Health 2016 44 347 353 10.1177/1403494815623654 26787551
Vaalavuo, M. Deterioration in health: what is the role of unemployment and poverty? Scand. J. Public Health 44, 347–353 (2016).26787551
7. Thomson RM How do income changes impact on mental health and wellbeing for working-age adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet Public Health 2022 7 e515 e528 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00058-5 35660213
Thomson, R. M. et al. How do income changes impact on mental health and wellbeing for working-age adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health 7, e515–e528 (2022).35660213
8. Ribeiro WS Income inequality and mental illness-related morbidity and resilience: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet Psychiatry 2017 4 554 562 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30159-1 28552501
Ribeiro, W. S. et al. Income inequality and mental illness-related morbidity and resilience: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry 4, 554–562 (2017).28552501
9. Park A-L Economic analyses of supported employment programmes for people with mental health conditions: a systematic review Eur. Psychiatry 2022 65 e51 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2309 35983840
Park, A.-L. et al. Economic analyses of supported employment programmes for people with mental health conditions: a systematic review. Eur. Psychiatry 65, e51 (2022).35983840
10. Murali V Oyebode F Poverty, social inequality and mental health Adv. Psychiatr. Treat. 2004 10 216 224 10.1192/apt.10.3.216
Murali, V. & Oyebode, F. Poverty, social inequality and mental health. Adv. Psychiatr. Treat. 10, 216–224 (2004).
11. Ridley M Rao G Schilbach F Patel V Poverty, depression, and anxiety: causal evidence and mechanisms Science 2020 370 eaay0214 10.1126/science.aay0214 33303583
Ridley, M., Rao, G., Schilbach, F. & Patel, V. Poverty, depression, and anxiety: causal evidence and mechanisms. Science 370, eaay0214 (2020).33303583
12. Wootton RE Jones HJ Sallis HM Mendelian randomisation for psychiatry: how does it work, and what can it tell us? Mol. Psychiatry 2021 27 53 57 10.1038/s41380-021-01173-3 34088980
Wootton, R. E., Jones, H. J. & Sallis, H. M. Mendelian randomisation for psychiatry: how does it work, and what can it tell us? Mol. Psychiatry 27, 53–57 (2021).34088980
13. Burgess S Foley CN Allara E Staley JR Howson JMM A robust and efficient method for Mendelian randomization with hundreds of genetic variants Nat. Commun. 2020 11 376 10.1038/s41467-019-14156-4 31953392
Burgess, S., Foley, C. N., Allara, E., Staley, J. R. & Howson, J. M. M. A robust and efficient method for Mendelian randomization with hundreds of genetic variants. Nat. Commun. 11, 376 (2020).31953392
14. Alkire, S. et al. Multidimensional Poverty Measurement and Analysis (Oxford Academic, 2015).
15. Galobardes B Shaw M Lawlor DA Lynch JW Smith GD Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 2) J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2006 60 95 101 10.1136/jech.2004.028092 16415256
Galobardes, B., Shaw, M., Lawlor, D. A., Lynch, J. W. & Smith, G. D. Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 2). J. Epidemiol. Community Health 60, 95–101 (2006).16415256
16. Galobardes B Shaw M Lawlor DA Lynch JW Smith GD Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1) J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2006 60 7 12 10.1136/jech.2004.023531 16361448
Galobardes, B., Shaw, M., Lawlor, D. A., Lynch, J. W. & Smith, G. D. Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). J. Epidemiol. Community Health 60, 7–12 (2006).16361448
17. Johnson S Acute psychiatric care: approaches to increasing the range of services and improving access and quality of care World Psychiatry 2022 21 220 236 10.1002/wps.20962 35524608
Johnson, S. et al. Acute psychiatric care: approaches to increasing the range of services and improving access and quality of care. World Psychiatry 21, 220–236 (2022).35524608
18. Townsend, P., Phillimore, P. & Beattie, A. Health and Deprivation: Inequality and the North (Croom Helm Ltd, 1988).
19. Hill WD Genome-wide analysis identifies molecular systems and 149 genetic loci associated with income Nat. Commun. 2019 10 5741 10.1038/s41467-019-13585-5 31844048
Hill, W. D. et al. Genome-wide analysis identifies molecular systems and 149 genetic loci associated with income. Nat. Commun. 10, 5741 (2019).31844048
20. Hill WD A combined analysis of genetically correlated traits identifies 187 loci and a role for neurogenesis and myelination in intelligence Mol. Psychiatry 2018 24 169 181 10.1038/s41380-017-0001-5 29326435
Hill, W. D. et al. A combined analysis of genetically correlated traits identifies 187 loci and a role for neurogenesis and myelination in intelligence. Mol. Psychiatry 24, 169–181 (2018).29326435
21. Lee J Maternal economic well-being and mental health among young adult children: race/ethnicity Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021 18 5691 10.3390/ijerph18115691 34073288
Lee, J. Maternal economic well-being and mental health among young adult children: race/ethnicity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 5691 (2021).34073288
22. Lin B Okyere MA Multidimensional energy poverty and mental health: micro-level evidence from Ghana Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020 17 6726 10.3390/ijerph17186726 32942745
Lin, B. & Okyere, M. A. Multidimensional energy poverty and mental health: micro-level evidence from Ghana. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17, 6726 (2020).32942745
23. Campbell D Effects of depression on employment and social outcomes: a Mendelian randomisation study J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2022 76 563 571 10.1136/jech-2021-218074 35318279
Campbell, D. et al. Effects of depression on employment and social outcomes: a Mendelian randomisation study. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 76, 563–571 (2022).35318279
24. Zheng X Modifiable risk factors of major depressive disorder: a Mendelian randomization study PLoS ONE 2023 18 e0289419 10.1371/journal.pone.0289419 37535610
Zheng, X. et al. Modifiable risk factors of major depressive disorder: a Mendelian randomization study. PLoS ONE 18, e0289419 (2023).37535610
25. Liu G Liu W Zheng X Li J The higher the household income, the lower the possibility of depression and anxiety disorder: evidence from a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study Front. Psychiatry 2023 14 1264174 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1264174 38053539
Liu, G., Liu, W., Zheng, X. & Li, J. The higher the household income, the lower the possibility of depression and anxiety disorder: evidence from a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. Front. Psychiatry 14, 1264174 (2023).38053539
26. van Rheenen W Peyrot WJ Schork AJ Lee SH Wray NR Genetic correlations of polygenic disease traits: from theory to practice Nat. Rev. Genet. 2019 20 567 581 10.1038/s41576-019-0137-z 31171865
van Rheenen, W., Peyrot, W. J., Schork, A. J., Lee, S. H. & Wray, N. R. Genetic correlations of polygenic disease traits: from theory to practice. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 567–581 (2019).31171865
27. Singh-Manoux A Ferrie JE Lynch JW Marmot M The role of cognitive ability (intelligence) in explaining the association between socioeconomic position and health: evidence from the Whitehall II prospective cohort study Am. J. Epidemiol. 2005 161 831 839 10.1093/aje/kwi109 15840615
Singh-Manoux, A., Ferrie, J. E., Lynch, J. W. & Marmot, M. The role of cognitive ability (intelligence) in explaining the association between socioeconomic position and health: evidence from the Whitehall II prospective cohort study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 161, 831–839 (2005).15840615
28. Batty GD Deary IJ Gottfredson LS Premorbid (early life) IQ and later mortality risk: systematic review Ann. Epidemiol. 2007 17 278 288 10.1016/j.annepidem.2006.07.010 17174570
Batty, G. D., Deary, I. J. & Gottfredson, L. S. Premorbid (early life) IQ and later mortality risk: systematic review. Ann. Epidemiol. 17, 278–288 (2007).17174570
29. Batty GD Deary IJ Early life intelligence and adult health: associations, plausible mechanisms, and public health importance are emerging Br. Med. J. 2004 329 585 586 10.1136/bmj.329.7466.585 15361422
Batty, G. D. & Deary, I. J. Early life intelligence and adult health: associations, plausible mechanisms, and public health importance are emerging. Br. Med. J. 329, 585–586 (2004).15361422
30. Deary IJ Hill WD Gale CR Intelligence, health and death Nat. Hum. Behav. 2021 5 416 430 10.1038/s41562-021-01078-9 33795857
Deary, I. J., Hill, W. D. & Gale, C. R. Intelligence, health and death. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 416–430 (2021).33795857
31. Pettersson E Larsson H D’Onofrio BM Bölte S Lichtenstein P The general factor of psychopathology: a comparison with the general factor of intelligence with respect to magnitude and predictive validity World Psychiatry 2020 19 206 213 10.1002/wps.20763 32394574
Pettersson, E., Larsson, H., D’Onofrio, B. M., Bölte, S. & Lichtenstein, P. The general factor of psychopathology: a comparison with the general factor of intelligence with respect to magnitude and predictive validity. World Psychiatry 19, 206–213 (2020).32394574
32. Han E Norton EC Stearns SC Weight and wages: fat versus lean paychecks Health Econ. 2009 18 535 548 10.1002/hec.1386 18677723
Han, E., Norton, E. C. & Stearns, S. C. Weight and wages: fat versus lean paychecks. Health Econ. 18, 535–548 (2009).18677723
33. Judge TA Hurst C Simon LS Does it pay to be smart, attractive, or confident (or all three)? Relationships among general mental ability, physical attractiveness, core self-evaluations, and income J. Appl. Psychol. 2009 94 742 755 10.1037/a0015497 19450010
Judge, T. A., Hurst, C. & Simon, L. S. Does it pay to be smart, attractive, or confident (or all three)? Relationships among general mental ability, physical attractiveness, core self-evaluations, and income. J. Appl. Psychol. 94, 742–755 (2009).19450010
34. Brouwers EPM Social stigma is an underestimated contributing factor to unemployment in people with mental illness or mental health issues: position paper and future directions BMC Psychol. 2020 8 36 10.1186/s40359-020-00399-0 32317023
Brouwers, E. P. M. Social stigma is an underestimated contributing factor to unemployment in people with mental illness or mental health issues: position paper and future directions. BMC Psychol. 8, 36 (2020).32317023
35. Abdellaoui A Genetic correlates of social stratification in Great Britain Nat. Hum. Behav. 2019 3 1332 1342 10.1038/s41562-019-0757-5 31636407
Abdellaoui, A. et al. Genetic correlates of social stratification in Great Britain. Nat. Hum. Behav. 3, 1332–1342 (2019).31636407
36. Morris JN Donkin AJM Wonderling D Wilkinson P Dowler EA A minimum income for healthy living J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2000 54 885 889 10.1136/jech.54.12.885 11076983
Morris, J. N., Donkin, A. J. M., Wonderling, D., Wilkinson, P. & Dowler, E. A. A minimum income for healthy living. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 54, 885–889 (2000).11076983
37. Evans GW Kantrowitz E Socioeconomic status and health: the potential role of environmental risk exposure Annu. Rev. Public Health 2002 23 303 331 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.112001.112349 11910065
Evans, G. W. & Kantrowitz, E. Socioeconomic status and health: the potential role of environmental risk exposure. Annu. Rev. Public Health 23, 303–331 (2002).11910065
38. Evans GW English K The environment of poverty: multiple stressor exposure, psychophysiological stress, and socioemotional adjustment Child Dev. 2002 73 1238 1248 10.1111/1467-8624.00469 12146745
Evans, G. W. & English, K. The environment of poverty: multiple stressor exposure, psychophysiological stress, and socioemotional adjustment. Child Dev. 73, 1238–1248 (2002).12146745
39. Montagud-Romero S Miñarro J Rodríguez-Arias M Unravelling the neuroinflammatory mechanisms underlying the effects of social defeat stress on use of drugs of abuse Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci. 2022 54 153 180 10.1007/7854_2021_260 34628585
Montagud-Romero, S., Miñarro, J. & Rodríguez-Arias, M. Unravelling the neuroinflammatory mechanisms underlying the effects of social defeat stress on use of drugs of abuse. Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci. 54, 153–180 (2022).34628585
40. Mackenbach JP Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries N. Engl. J. Med. 2008 358 2468 2481 10.1056/NEJMsa0707519 18525043
Mackenbach, J. P. et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. N. Engl. J. Med. 358, 2468–2481 (2008).18525043
41. Raphael D Researching income and income distribution as determinants of health in Canada: gaps between theoretical knowledge, research practice, and policy implementation Health Policy 2005 72 217 232 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.08.001 15802156
Raphael, D. et al. Researching income and income distribution as determinants of health in Canada: gaps between theoretical knowledge, research practice, and policy implementation. Health Policy 72, 217–232 (2005).15802156
42. Schorrocks, A., Davies, J. B. & Lluberas, R. Global Wealth Report 2020 (Credit Suisse Research Institute, 2020); https://www.credit-suisse.com/media/assets/corporate/docs/about-us/research/publications/global-wealth-report-2020-en.pdf
43. The WHO Special Initiative for Mental Health (2019–2023): Universal Health Coverage for Mental Health (WHO). https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/310981 Accessed 27 January 2023.
44. Ferrari AJ Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 Lancet Psychiatry 2022 9 137 150 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00395-3 35026139
Ferrari, A. J. et al. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Psychiatry 9, 137–150 (2022).35026139
45. Zimmerman A The impact of cash transfers on mental health in children and young people in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis BMJ Glob. Health 2021 6 e004661 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004661 33906845
Zimmerman, A. et al. The impact of cash transfers on mental health in children and young people in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob. Health 6, e004661 (2021).33906845
46. Bauer A Integrating youth mental health into cash transfer programmes in response to the COVID-19 crisis in low-income and middle-income countries Lancet Psychiatry 2021 8 340 346 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30382-5 33549174
Bauer, A. et al. Integrating youth mental health into cash transfer programmes in response to the COVID-19 crisis in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Psychiatry 8, 340–346 (2021).33549174
47. Ohrnberger J Fichera E Sutton M Anselmi L The effect of cash transfers on mental health—new evidence from South Africa BMC Public Health 2020 20 436 10.1186/s12889-020-08596-7 32245377
Ohrnberger, J., Fichera, E., Sutton, M. & Anselmi, L. The effect of cash transfers on mental health—new evidence from South Africa. BMC Public Health 20, 436 (2020).32245377
48. Bradley CJ Saunders HG Impact of cash incentives for low-income individuals to seek a primary care visit on mental health outcomes: evidence from a randomized controlled trial Soc. Sci. Med. 2020 265 113515 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113515 33221071
Bradley, C. J. & Saunders, H. G. Impact of cash incentives for low-income individuals to seek a primary care visit on mental health outcomes: evidence from a randomized controlled trial. Soc. Sci. Med. 265, 113515 (2020).33221071
49. Denary W Does rental assistance improve mental health? Insights from a longitudinal cohort study Soc. Sci. Med. 2021 282 114100 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114100 34144434
Denary, W. et al. Does rental assistance improve mental health? Insights from a longitudinal cohort study. Soc. Sci. Med. 282, 114100 (2021).34144434
50. Cavazos-Rehg P Evaluating potential mediators for the impact of a family-based economic intervention (Suubi+Adherence) on the mental health of adolescents living with HIV in Uganda Soc. Sci. Med. 2021 280 113946 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113946 34020312
Cavazos-Rehg, P. et al. Evaluating potential mediators for the impact of a family-based economic intervention (Suubi+Adherence) on the mental health of adolescents living with HIV in Uganda. Soc. Sci. Med. 280, 113946 (2021).34020312
51. Cesarini D Lindqvist E Östling R Wallace B Wealth, health, and child development: evidence from administrative data on Swedish lottery players Q. J. Econ. 2016 131 687 738 10.1093/qje/qjw001
Cesarini, D., Lindqvist, E., Östling, R. & Wallace, B. Wealth, health, and child development: evidence from administrative data on Swedish lottery players. Q. J. Econ. 131, 687–738 (2016).
52. Micai M Benefits and challenges of a personal budget for people with mental health conditions or intellectual disability: a systematic review Front. Psychiatry 2022 13 1733 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.974621
Micai, M. et al. Benefits and challenges of a personal budget for people with mental health conditions or intellectual disability: a systematic review. Front. Psychiatry 13, 1733 (2022).
53. Ibrahim F Microcredit as a public health initiative? Exploring mechanisms and pathways to health and wellbeing Soc. Sci. Med. 2021 270 113633 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113633 33395609
Ibrahim, F. et al. Microcredit as a public health initiative? Exploring mechanisms and pathways to health and wellbeing. Soc. Sci. Med. 270, 113633 (2021).33395609
54. Fernald LCH Hamad R Karlan D Ozer EJ Zinman J Small individual loans and mental health: a randomized controlled trial among South African adults BMC Public Health 2008 8 409 10.1186/1471-2458-8-409 19087316
Fernald, L. C. H., Hamad, R., Karlan, D., Ozer, E. J. & Zinman, J. Small individual loans and mental health: a randomized controlled trial among South African adults. BMC Public Health 8, 409 (2008).19087316
55. Plagerson, S., Patel, V., Harpham, T., Kielmann, K. & Mathee, A. Does money matter for mental health? Evidence from the Child Support Grants in Johannesburg, South Africa. Glob. Public Health10.1080/17441692.2010.516267 (2010).
56. Batty GD Der G Macintyre S Deary IJ Does IQ explain socioeconomic inequalities in health? Evidence from a population based cohort study in the west of Scotland Br. Med. J. 2006 332 580 583 10.1136/bmj.38723.660637.AE 16452104
Batty, G. D., Der, G., Macintyre, S. & Deary, I. J. Does IQ explain socioeconomic inequalities in health? Evidence from a population based cohort study in the west of Scotland. Br. Med. J. 332, 580–583 (2006).16452104
57. Hill WD Harris SE Deary IJ What genome-wide association studies reveal about the association between intelligence and mental health Curr. Opin. Psychol. 2019 27 25 30 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.07.007 30110665
Hill, W. D., Harris, S. E. & Deary, I. J. What genome-wide association studies reveal about the association between intelligence and mental health. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 27, 25–30 (2019).30110665
58. Anderson EL Education, intelligence and Alzheimer’s disease: evidence from a multivariable two-sample Mendelian randomization study Int. J. Epidemiol. 2020 49 1163 1172 10.1093/ije/dyz280 32003800
Anderson, E. L. et al. Education, intelligence and Alzheimer’s disease: evidence from a multivariable two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Int. J. Epidemiol. 49, 1163–1172 (2020).32003800
59. Ritchie, S. J. & Tucker-Drob, E. M. How much does education improve intelligence? A meta-analysis. Psychol. Sci.10.1177/0956797618774253 (2018).
60. Davies NM Multivariable two-sample Mendelian randomization estimates of the effects of intelligence and education on health eLife 2019 8 e43990 10.7554/eLife.43990 31526476
Davies, N. M. et al. Multivariable two-sample Mendelian randomization estimates of the effects of intelligence and education on health. eLife 8, e43990 (2019).31526476
61. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Preamble (United Nations, 2030).
62. Davies NM Holmes MV Davey Smith G Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians Br. Med. J. 2018 362 k601 10.1136/bmj.k601 30002074
Davies, N. M., Holmes, M. V. & Davey Smith, G. Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians. Br. Med. J. 362, k601 (2018).30002074
63. Mills MC Rahal C A scientometric review of genome-wide association studies Commun. Biol. 2019 2 9 10.1038/s42003-018-0261-x 30623105
Mills, M. C. & Rahal, C. A scientometric review of genome-wide association studies. Commun. Biol. 2, 9 (2019).30623105
64. Brumpton B Avoiding dynastic, assortative mating, and population stratification biases in Mendelian randomization through within-family analyses Nat. Commun. 2020 11 3519 10.1038/s41467-020-17117-4 32665587
Brumpton, B. et al. Avoiding dynastic, assortative mating, and population stratification biases in Mendelian randomization through within-family analyses. Nat. Commun. 11, 3519 (2020).32665587
65. Fry A Comparison of sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of UK Biobank participants with those of the general population Am. J. Epidemiol. 2017 186 1026 1034 10.1093/aje/kwx246 28641372
Fry, A. et al. Comparison of sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of UK Biobank participants with those of the general population. Am. J. Epidemiol. 186, 1026–1034 (2017).28641372
66. Gkatzionis A Burgess S Contextualizing selection bias in Mendelian randomization: how bad is it likely to be? Int. J. Epidemiol. 2019 48 691 701 10.1093/ije/dyy202 30325422
Gkatzionis, A. & Burgess, S. Contextualizing selection bias in Mendelian randomization: how bad is it likely to be? Int. J. Epidemiol. 48, 691–701 (2019).30325422
67. Schoeler T Participation bias in the UK Biobank distorts genetic associations and downstream analyses Nat. Hum. Behav. 2023 7 1216 1227 10.1038/s41562-023-01579-9 37106081
Schoeler, T. et al. Participation bias in the UK Biobank distorts genetic associations and downstream analyses. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7, 1216–1227 (2023).37106081
68. Jiang T Gill D Butterworth AS Burgess S An empirical investigation into the impact of winner’s curse on estimates from Mendelian randomization Int. J. Epidemiol. 2023 52 1209 1219 10.1093/ije/dyac233 36573802
Jiang, T., Gill, D., Butterworth, A. S. & Burgess, S. An empirical investigation into the impact of winner’s curse on estimates from Mendelian randomization. Int. J. Epidemiol. 52, 1209–1219 (2023).36573802
69. Pickrell JK Detection and interpretation of shared genetic influences on 42 human traits Nat. Genet. 2016 48 709 717 10.1038/ng.3570 27182965
Pickrell, J. K. et al. Detection and interpretation of shared genetic influences on 42 human traits. Nat. Genet. 48, 709–717 (2016).27182965
70. Hemani G Bowden J Davey Smith G Evaluating the potential role of pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies Hum. Mol. Genet. 2018 27 R195 R208 10.1093/hmg/ddy163 29771313
Hemani, G., Bowden, J. & Davey Smith, G. Evaluating the potential role of pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies. Hum. Mol. Genet. 27, R195–R208 (2018).29771313
71. Sanderson E Davey Smith G Windmeijer F Bowden J An examination of multivariable Mendelian randomization in the single-sample and two-sample summary data settings Int. J. Epidemiol. 2019 48 713 727 10.1093/ije/dyy262 30535378
Sanderson, E., Davey Smith, G., Windmeijer, F. & Bowden, J. An examination of multivariable Mendelian randomization in the single-sample and two-sample summary data settings. Int. J. Epidemiol. 48, 713–727 (2019).30535378
72. Burgess S Thompson SG Multivariable Mendelian randomization: the use of pleiotropic genetic variants to estimate causal effects Am. J. Epidemiol. 2015 181 251 260 10.1093/aje/kwu283 25632051
Burgess, S. & Thompson, S. G. Multivariable Mendelian randomization: the use of pleiotropic genetic variants to estimate causal effects. Am. J. Epidemiol. 181, 251–260 (2015).25632051
73. Mbatchou J Computationally efficient whole-genome regression for quantitative and binary traits Nat. Genet. 2021 53 1097 1103 10.1038/s41588-021-00870-7 34017140
Mbatchou, J. et al. Computationally efficient whole-genome regression for quantitative and binary traits. Nat. Genet. 53, 1097–1103 (2021).34017140
74. Johnson W Nijenhuis Jte Bouchard TJ Still just 1 g: consistent results from five test batteries Intelligence 2008 36 81 95 10.1016/j.intell.2007.06.001
Johnson, W., Nijenhuis, Jte & Bouchard, T. J. Still just 1 g: consistent results from five test batteries. Intelligence 36, 81–95 (2008).
75. Johnson W Bouchard TJ Krueger RF McGue M Gottesman II Just one g: consistent results from three test batteries Intelligence 2004 32 95 107 10.1016/S0160-2896(03)00062-X
Johnson, W., Bouchard, T. J., Krueger, R. F., McGue, M. & Gottesman, I. I. Just one g: consistent results from three test batteries. Intelligence 32, 95–107 (2004).
76. Kweon, H. et al. Genetic Fortune: Winning or Losing Education, Income, and Health (Tinbergen Institute, 2020).
77. Grotzinger AD Genomic structural equation modelling provides insights into the multivariate genetic architecture of complex traits Nat. Hum. Behav. 2019 3 513 525 10.1038/s41562-019-0566-x 30962613
Grotzinger, A. D. et al. Genomic structural equation modelling provides insights into the multivariate genetic architecture of complex traits. Nat. Hum. Behav. 3, 513–525 (2019).30962613
78. Bulik-Sullivan B LD score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies Nat. Genet. 2015 47 291 295 10.1038/ng.3211 25642630
Bulik-Sullivan, B. et al. LD score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 47, 291–295 (2015).25642630
79. Demontis D Genome-wide analyses of ADHD identify 27 risk loci, refine the genetic architecture and implicate several cognitive domains Nat. Genet. 2023 55 198 208 10.1038/s41588-022-01285-8 36702997
Demontis, D. et al. Genome-wide analyses of ADHD identify 27 risk loci, refine the genetic architecture and implicate several cognitive domains. Nat. Genet. 55, 198–208 (2023).36702997
80. Watson HJ Genome-wide association study identifies eight risk loci and implicates metabo-psychiatric origins for anorexia nervosa Nat. Genet. 2019 51 1207 1214 10.1038/s41588-019-0439-2 31308545
Watson, H. J. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies eight risk loci and implicates metabo-psychiatric origins for anorexia nervosa. Nat. Genet. 51, 1207–1214 (2019).31308545
81. Otowa T Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies of anxiety disorders Mol. Psychiatry 2016 21 1391 1399 10.1038/mp.2015.197 26754954
Otowa, T. et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies of anxiety disorders. Mol. Psychiatry 21, 1391–1399 (2016).26754954
82. Grove J Identification of common genetic risk variants for autism spectrum disorder Nat. Genet. 2019 51 431 444 10.1038/s41588-019-0344-8 30804558
Grove, J. et al. Identification of common genetic risk variants for autism spectrum disorder. Nat. Genet. 51, 431–444 (2019).30804558
83. Mullins N Genome-wide association study of more than 40,000 bipolar disorder cases provides new insights into the underlying biology Nat. Genet. 2021 53 817 829 10.1038/s41588-021-00857-4 34002096
Mullins, N. et al. Genome-wide association study of more than 40,000 bipolar disorder cases provides new insights into the underlying biology. Nat. Genet. 53, 817–829 (2021).34002096
84. Howard DM Genome-wide meta-analysis of depression identifies 102 independent variants and highlights the importance of the prefrontal brain regions Nat. Neurosci. 2019 22 343 352 10.1038/s41593-018-0326-7 30718901
Howard, D. M. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis of depression identifies 102 independent variants and highlights the importance of the prefrontal brain regions. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 343–352 (2019).30718901
85. Arnold PD Revealing the complex genetic architecture of obsessive-compulsive disorder using meta-analysis Mol. Psychiatry 2018 23 1181 1188 10.1038/mp.2017.154 28761083
Arnold, P. D. et al. Revealing the complex genetic architecture of obsessive-compulsive disorder using meta-analysis. Mol. Psychiatry 23, 1181–1188 (2018).28761083
86. Nievergelt CM International meta-analysis of PTSD genome-wide association studies identifies sex- and ancestry-specific genetic risk loci Nat. Commun. 2019 10 4558 10.1038/s41467-019-12576-w 31594949
Nievergelt, C. M. et al. International meta-analysis of PTSD genome-wide association studies identifies sex- and ancestry-specific genetic risk loci. Nat. Commun. 10, 4558 (2019).31594949
87. Trubetskoy V Mapping genomic loci implicates genes and synaptic biology in schizophrenia Nature 2022 604 502 508 10.1038/s41586-022-04434-5 35396580
Trubetskoy, V. et al. Mapping genomic loci implicates genes and synaptic biology in schizophrenia. Nature 604, 502–508 (2022).35396580
88. Burgess S Davies NM Thompson SG Bias due to participant overlap in two-sample Mendelian randomization Genet. Epidemiol. 2016 40 597 608 10.1002/gepi.21998 27625185
Burgess, S., Davies, N. M. & Thompson, S. G. Bias due to participant overlap in two-sample Mendelian randomization. Genet. Epidemiol. 40, 597–608 (2016).27625185
89. Lawlor DA Harbord RM Sterne JAC Timpson N Smith GD Mendelian randomization: using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology Stat. Med. 2008 27 1133 1163 10.1002/sim.3034 17886233
Lawlor, D. A., Harbord, R. M., Sterne, J. A. C., Timpson, N. & Smith, G. D. Mendelian randomization: using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology. Stat. Med. 27, 1133–1163 (2008).17886233
90. Bowden J Davey Smith G Haycock PC Burgess S Consistent estimation in Mendelian randomization with some invalid instruments using a weighted median estimator Genet. Epidemiol. 2016 40 304 314 10.1002/gepi.21965 27061298
Bowden, J., Davey Smith, G., Haycock, P. C. & Burgess, S. Consistent estimation in Mendelian randomization with some invalid instruments using a weighted median estimator. Genet. Epidemiol. 40, 304–314 (2016).27061298
91. Bowden J Smith GD Burgess S Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression Int. J. Epidemiol. 2015 44 512 525 10.1093/ije/dyv080 26050253
Bowden, J., Smith, G. D. & Burgess, S. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. Int. J. Epidemiol. 44, 512–525 (2015).26050253
92. Verbanck M Chen CY Neale B Do R Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases Nat. Genet. 2018 50 693 698 10.1038/s41588-018-0099-7 29686387
Verbanck, M., Chen, C. Y., Neale, B. & Do, R. Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases. Nat. Genet. 50, 693–698 (2018).29686387
93. Morrison J Knoblauch N Marcus JH Stephens M He X Mendelian randomization accounting for correlated and uncorrelated pleiotropic effects using genome-wide summary statistics Nat. Genet. 2020 52 740 747 10.1038/s41588-020-0631-4 32451458
Morrison, J., Knoblauch, N., Marcus, J. H., Stephens, M. & He, X. Mendelian randomization accounting for correlated and uncorrelated pleiotropic effects using genome-wide summary statistics. Nat. Genet. 52, 740–747 (2020).32451458
94. Hemani G Tilling K Davey Smith G Orienting the causal relationship between imprecisely measured traits using GWAS summary data PLoS Genet. 2017 13 e1007081 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007081 29149188
Hemani, G., Tilling, K. & Davey Smith, G. Orienting the causal relationship between imprecisely measured traits using GWAS summary data. PLoS Genet. 13, e1007081 (2017).29149188
95. Bowden J Assessing the suitability of summary data for two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses using MR-Egger regression: the role of the I2 statistic Int. J. Epidemiol. 2016 45 1961 1974 27616674
Bowden, J. et al. Assessing the suitability of summary data for two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses using MR-Egger regression: the role of the I2 statistic. Int. J. Epidemiol. 45, 1961–1974 (2016).27616674
96. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, v.4.4.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2024). https://www.R-project.org/
97. Hemani G The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome eLife 2018 7 e34408 10.7554/eLife.34408 29846171
Hemani, G. et al. The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome. eLife 7, e34408 (2018).29846171
