
==== Front
Heliyon
Heliyon
Heliyon
2405-8440
Elsevier

S2405-8440(24)13320-8
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37289
e37289
Research Article
Advanced polymeric matrix utilizing nanostructured bismuth and tungsten oxides for gamma rays shielding
Kassim Hamoud hkassim@ksu.edu.sa
⁎
Aldawood Saad sdawood@ksu.esu.sa
⁎⁎
Prasad Saradh
Asemi Nassar N.
Aziz Aziz A.
AlSalhi Mohamad S.
Department of Physics and Astronomy, College of Science, King Saud University, P. O. Box-2455, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia
⁎ Corresponding author. hkassim@ksu.edu.sa
⁎⁎ Corresponding author. sdawood@ksu.esu.sa
31 8 2024
15 9 2024
31 8 2024
10 17 e372898 6 2024
29 8 2024
30 8 2024
© 2024 The Authors
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
In this study, the shielding properties of novel polymer composites, developed by integrating glycidyl methacrylate with nanoparticles of bismuth oxide (Bi2O3) and tungsten oxide (WO3), were explored. The ability of the composites to attenuate gamma radiation was evaluated by measuring the emissions from Ba-133, Co-60, Cs-137, and Na-22. X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra were obtained for both the pure polymer glycidyl methacrylate and the samples containing nanostructures of Bi2O3, Bi2O3/WO3, and WO3, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to analyze the samples. The incorporation of Bi2O3 and WO3 nanoparticles into the polymer glycidyl methacrylate matrix significantly enhanced the composites' ability to attenuate gamma radiation, as demonstrated by the increased linear and mass attenuation coefficients. The results showed good agreement between the experiment and the XCOM database. The composites exhibited significant efficiency in attenuating lower-energy gamma rays, which is particularly advantageous in the medical and nuclear industries.

Keywords

Gamma radiation protection
Polymer composites
Nanoparticle fillers
Attenuation coefficients
==== Body
pmc1 Introduction

Electromagnetic radiation such as gamma rays, owing to its massless and uncharged nature, has high penetrating ability. Therefore, appropriate shielding materials must be used to protect individuals and the ecosystem from harmful radiation. Heavy metals, with their high atomic numbers and densities, are effective for gamma-ray shielding. However, their brittleness and poor mechanical properties limit their real-world applications, particularly when flexibility and long-term stability are required [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]]. To overcome these issues, researchers have recommended the use of reinforced polymer matrices to improve the flexibility, strength, and durability of heavy-metal compounds while maintaining their radiation-shielding effectiveness [7,8].

The use of nanoscale materials to fabricate reinforced polymers has improved their mechanical properties and radiation shielding efficiencies. Nanofillers, with their elevated surface-to-volume ratio, influence their molecular configurations. Incorporating nanofillers can enhance heat resistance, strength, stiffness, and reduce gas permeability. Furthermore, the addition of nanofillers can expand the surface area and increase the rate of interaction between gamma rays and matter, thereby improving radiation absorption [7,9,10].

Alabsy et al. (2020) [11] compared cadmium oxide and lead oxide as fillers in high-density polyethylene for gamma-ray shielding and found that cadmium oxide was more effective for lower-energy rays, while lead oxide was better for higher-energy rays, with nanosized fillers outperforming microsized ones. In 2021, Alabsy et al. [12] investigated the gamma-ray attenuation and mechanical properties of PVC composites with PbO and CuO nanoparticles, finding that the nanoparticles enhanced both attenuation and mechanical performance compared to bulk composites. Similarly, Badawi et al. (2020) [13] theoretically evaluated epoxy resin-metal chloride mixtures for gamma-ray shielding and demonstrated improved attenuation over both pure epoxy and lead. El-Khatib et al. (2021) [14] studied gamma-ray shielding in recycled rPVC composites reinforced with PbO and CuO particles, noting that nanosized PbO and CuO significantly enhanced radiation protection. Obeid et al. (2022) [15] examined HDPE composites filled with varying sizes and fractions of tungsten oxide (WO3), discovering that both the size and weight fraction of WO3 significantly affected gamma-ray shielding.

Several studies have focused on the use of reinforcing polymer materials for radiation shielding. Abunahel et al. (2018) [16] developed a nanocomposite material to shield against X-rays, utilizing a polymer matrix combined with Bi2O3 nanoparticles. This configuration increased the X-ray radiation absorption ability of the polymer due to the dispersion of nanostructured Bi2O3 in the PVA matrix. Higgins et al. (2019) [17] found that incorporating HfO2 and WO3 nanoparticles increased the mass attenuation coefficients (MAC) of an epoxy resin; at 122 keV, the MAC of both nanocomposites was five times higher than that of pure epoxy, and at 1112 keV and 1407 keV, the improvement was approximately 39.5–51.1 % and 15 %, respectively. These innovative nanocomposites offer improvements in mechanical, thermal, and chemical qualities while reducing reliance on lead-based materials. Abdalsalam et al. (2020) [8] prepared various concentrations of Bi2O3 nanopowders mixed with high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and exposed the samples to a focused gamma-ray beam at eight different energy levels ranging from 30.8 to 383.8 keV to determine the MAC. The addition of Bi2O3 nanopowder significantly improved the attenuation of gamma-ray shielding. Muthamma et al. (2021) [18] demonstrated a notable enhancement in the radiation-shielding efficiency of a Bi2O3 polymer composite by embedding bismuth oxide nanoparticles within a polymer matrix.

Moreover, several polymer matrices have been extensively examined for their effectiveness in radiation protection. These include composites such as poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) reinforced with bismuth oxide (Bi2O3), HDPE composites loaded with molybdenum sulfide (MoS2), boron carbide (B4C), zinc oxide (ZnO), lead oxide (PbO), and cadmium oxide (CdO) [[19], [20], [21], [22], [23]].

In the present investigation, an approach toward synthesizing gamma-radiation-shielding composites was explored by employing a radical polymerization technique. The matrix contained glycidyl methacrylate (PGMA), Bi2O3, and WO3 nanopowders. The composites were tested for their shielding effectiveness against gamma energy levels, including Ba-133 (81, 303, and 356 keV), Co-60 (1173 and 1332 keV), Cs-137 (662 keV), and Na-22 (511 and 1274 keV). The aim was to fabricate a polymer containing Bi2O3 and WO3 nanoparticles to improve its radiation-shielding capabilities. This results in a cost-effective, easily constructed, and environmentally friendly gamma shield material. This type of shielding material offers full-range protection against gamma radiation, crucial in nuclear medicine, radiotherapy, and industrial applications.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Synthesis of Bi2O3 NPs

A precipitation process was used to synthesize Bi2O3 NPs. 8 g of Bi(NO3)·5H2O was dissolved in 100 mL of nitric acid (HNO3). The resulting solution was then combined with urea in a molar ratio of 1:5 and heated in a water bath at 100 °C. A white precipitate was also observed. The solid substance was then decomposed at temperatures ranging from 400 to 700 °C. The powders exhibited an initial swelling behavior, filling the beaker and forming a foamy precursor. The foam consisted of uniformly distributed flakes with an average fine particle size of 80 nm.

2.2 Synthesis of WO3 NPs

The WO3 nanoparticles were produced using a hydrothermal method. 1.485 g of sodium chloride (NaCl) and 4 g of sodium tungstate dihydrate (Na2WO4·2H2O) were combined with 60 mL of distilled water. The mixture was then stirred for 30 min. During stirring, 16 mL of hydrochloric acid (HCl) was added incrementally. The solution was placed in an autoclave (100 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel) and heated at 140 °C for 24 h. The solution was then washed three times with ethanol and deionized water. Subsequently, the obtained materials were dried at 80 °C for 18 h, followed by a calcination process at 450 °C for 5 h.

2.3 Polymeric composites preparation

5 mL of glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) was polymerized by radical polymerization at 70 °C, using 2,2′-Azobis(2-methylpropionitrile) (AIBN) as the initiator, with a continuous flow of nitrogen gas. A high-viscosity solution formed after the reaction, confirming the formation of the polymer. An established quantity of Bi2O3-NPs (50 wt%) was introduced into the mixture, dispersed under stirring for 1 h, and subjected to sonication for 20 min to prevent the particles from clumping together. The final B-NPs/PGMA mixture was molded. The mold containing the sample was dried at 25 °C for 24 h. The W-NPs/PGMA and BW-NPs/PGMA polymer composites were prepared by repeating the procedures listed in Table 1. All the prepared samples had the same thickness of approximately 5 mm.Table 1 Composition of PGMA, B-NPs/PGMA, W-NPs/PGMA, and BW-NPs/PGMA samples.

Table 1Sample code	Sample density (g/cm3)	Bi2O3-NPs (wt.%)	WO3-NPs (wt.%)	PGMA-matrix (wt.%)	
PGMA	1.07	0	0	100	
B-NPs/PGMA	1.91	50	0	50	
W-NPs/PGMA	1.86	0	50	50	
BW-NPs/PGMA	1.88	25	25	50	

The densities of the prepared polymeric composites (Fig. 1) were theoretically calculated using equation (1) [24]:(1) ρcomposite=1∑(wiρi)

where:Fig. 1 Fabricated polymer composite samples.

Fig. 1

ρcomposite is the density of the composite material, wi is the weight fraction of the ith component, and ρi is the density of the ith component.

2.4 Shielding parameters

LAC and MAC are basic properties of gamma rays that determine the absorbed or reduced radiation quantity as they traverse a substance, and are evaluated using equations (2), (3) [25,26]:(2) LAC=ln(I0I)/t

(3) MAC=LACρ=ln(I0I)t*ρ

where “I” denotes the radiation intensity after passing through the layer “t” of the substance, whereas I0 denotes the initial intensity of the incoming radiation, and (ρ) is the material density.

The HVL is the matter thickness at which the photon intensity decreases by half after interacting with it. This is formally described by equation (4) [27]:(4) HVL=ln(2)LAC

2.5 Gamma radiation attenuation measurement

The gamma rays shielding ability of the polymeric composites was estimated by conducting experiments using a NaI(Tl) scintillation detector (BICRON: 2M2/2, Crystal Size: 2″ × 2″) and point radiation sources, namely Ba-133 (81, 303, and 356 keV) (9324 Bq), Co-60 (1173 and 1332 keV) (23643 Bq), Cs-137 (662 keV) (1.14 × 10⁵ Bq), and Na-22 (511 and 1274 keV) (5550 Bq). A CAEN controller (Model: V1718 VME) was used as the primary device. These instruments consisted of a CAEN analog-to-digital converter (ADC) (Model V785, 16/32), an amplifier (ORTEC, model: 485), and a gate generator (ORTEC, model: 416A). Fig. 2 shows the gamma-ray detection system setup used in this study. This establishes a fundamental measurement that can be used as a reference point for comparing the readings obtained using various types of shielding materials. Each measurement was taken for 20 min; to ensure accuracy, each measurement was performed three times, and the mean value was recorded.Fig. 2 Scheme of the gamma-ray attenuation measurement system.

Fig. 2

The XCOM database, developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), was used to compare the theoretical mass attenuation coefficients with the experimental values. This database offers comprehensive photon cross sections and attenuation coefficients for elements, compounds, and mixtures over a broad energy range of 1–100 GeV [28].

2.6 Materials characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed to ascertain the crystalline structure, phase composition, and crystallite size of the synthesized samples. The surface morphology and structural characteristics were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

3 Results and discussion

3.1 XRD analysis

Fig. 3(a) shows that the PGMA polymer was very broad, typical of any polymer or amorphous sample. Fig. 3(b) shows that the B-NPs/PGMA sample had peaks (corresponding to lattice points) at 27.6°(201), 30.48°(002), 32.39°(220), 47.09°(222), 52.94°(400), 55.51° (213), and 57.91° (402). The XRD pattern of B-NPs/PGMA was similar to that reported previously [29]. The XRD pattern of the W-NPs/PGMA sample contained several peaks. The broad peak around 22.94° corresponds to the (002) phase. Similarly, phases such as (020), (022), (202), (222), (400), and (420) [30] were observed. The XRD pattern of BW-NPs/PGMA shows peaks for both B-NPs and W-NPs, indicating the formation of a BW-NPs/PGMA composite. The relative intensity of the polymer was low for the composite sample, which could be due to the improved filling of the interstitial spaces, enhanced crystallinity, and sample homogeneity.Fig. 3 XRD pattern of the gamma ray attenuator samples (a) PGMA, (b) B-NPs/PGMA, (c) W-NPs/PGMA, (d) BW-NPs/PGMA.

Fig. 3

3.2 Morphology

Fig. 4 (a) shows SEM image of PGMA, which displayed round beads with an average size of 220 nm. The beads were nested together. However, Fig. 4 (b) showed B-NPs/PGMA nanoparticles with an average size of 80 nm, and most of the particles were less than 100 nm. SEM image in Fig. 4 (c) shows the structure of rhombus-shaped particles with an average size of 60 nm and a few large particles with lengths greater than 200 nm. The SEM images of BW-NPs/PGMA are depicted in Fig. 4(d), where the surface is very flat and aggregates of various shapes are found. The blend of B-NPs and W-NPs in an equal ratio to PGMA completely changed the morphology of the sample.Fig. 4 SEM images of (a) PGMA, (b) B-NPs/PGMA, (c) W-NPs/PGMA, (d) BW-NPs/PGMA.

Fig. 4

3.3 Radiation shielding properties

The produced reinforced polymer materials exhibited a significant increase in LAC values within the lower energy range. This characteristic makes these composites appropriate for radiotherapy, where low-energy gamma rays and X-rays are dominant [31]. The reinforced polymer B-NPs/PGMA composite showed an effective increase in the LAC of gamma radiation at low energies (<200 keV) compared to the reinforced polymer composites W-NPs/PGMA and BW-NPs/PGMA with the same weight ratio (50 wt%). Moreover, as the gamma energy exceeded 800 keV, the differences between the LAC values of B-NPs/PGMA and other composites began to decrease until they were almost equal, continuing in this manner until the high energies of gamma radiation (>1100 keV), as shown in Fig. 5. This behavior can be explained by the interaction between gamma radiation and the nanocomposite materials, as well as the characteristics of the NPs [7,9]. The Compton scattering process becomes the dominant mechanism for gamma radiation attenuation at intermediate energies greater than 300–1000 keV. The possibility of Compton scattering is influenced by the electron density and the atomic number (Z-number) of the material [32].Fig. 5 LAC vs. gamma energy at different prepared PGMA, B-NPs/PGMA, W-NPs/PGMA, and BW-NPs/PGMA filled composites.

Fig. 5

Fig. 5. The LAC values decreased as the gamma-ray energy increased, attributed to the lower probability of high-energy photons interacting with matter. However, the decreasing LAC values can be divided into two phases: one at low energy and the other at high energy levels. The sharp decrease observed at lower energies is due to the photoelectric absorption of photons by the polymer composites. Owing to the dominance of the Compton scattering mechanism, the LAC decreased more gradually at higher energies [30,[33], [34], [35]]. The LAC also increased with the addition of Bi2O3, WO3, and Bi2O3/WO3 NPs at each energy, as the nanocomposites increased the polymer sample density [27].

The average experimental MAC values of the prepared polymeric samples are listed in Table 2. The findings demonstrated a significant decline in the MAC values of the composites containing different fillers at low gamma-energy regions, and only a small change was observed at higher gamma-ray energy levels. Furthermore, the filler loading of the nanocomposites had little effect on their shielding capabilities in high gamma energy regions; the nanocomposites exhibited only a small enhancement in attenuation efficiency as the gamma-ray energy increased, mainly attributed to the prevalence of Compton scattering and the heightened occurrence of pair production interactions [32] (Fig. 6; b, c, d).Table 2 MAC values of PGMA, B-NPs/PGMA, W-NPs/PGMA, and BW-NPs/PGMA samples.

Table 2Gamma Energy (keV)	
Sample code	81	303	356	511	662	1173	1274	1332	
MAC (cm2/g)	PGMA	0.167
±0.0052	0.114
±0.0071	0.108
±0.0090	0.093
±0.0073	0.081
±0.0054	0.075
±0.0076	0.068
±0.0059	0.067
±0.0053	
B-NPs/PGMA	3.402
±0.0037	0.535
±0.0045	0.293
±0.0035	0.152
±0.0056	0.110
±0.0092	0.088
±0.0059	0.079
±0.0071	0.075
±0.0075	
W-NPS/PGMA	2.882
±0.0096	0.396
±0.0029	0.217
±0.0061	0.123
±0.0066	0.094
±0.0028	0.078
±0.0031	0.072
±0.0027	0.080
±0.0028	
BW-NPs/PGMA	3.201
±0.0073	0.462
±0.0048	0.255
±0.0082	0.137
±0.0049	0.102
±0.0069	0.086
±0.0057	0.076
±0.0046	0.073
±0.0062	

Fig. 6 The experimental and XCOM MAC of the studied samples: (a) PGMA, (b) B-NPs/PGMA, (c) W-NPs/PGMA, (d) BW-NPs/PGMA.

Fig. 6

A comparison of the empirical and theoretical MAC values from the XCOM database is shown in Fig. 6(a)–(d). The findings from the experimental and theoretical approaches exhibited high agreement with little difference across all energy levels. It is evident from Fig. 6 and previous studies [31,33,36] that the prepared polymeric nanocomposites showed lower MAC values than the lead material shield at lower gamma energy levels due to the dominant reaction mechanism of the photoelectric effect on the Z value of the reactant matter. As the gamma energy increased, the attenuation dependence on Z declined, therefore, the MAC of the nanocomposites became more comparable to that of the lead shield [34,35,37,38]. The MAC shielding performance values of the nanocomposites fabricated in this study were compared with those described in the literature at an energy of 662 keV (Table 3). This energy level was selected for comparative analysis because it has been extensively investigated in previous research.Table 3 Comparative shielding analysis of polymer composite MAC between this current study and data from literature at 662 keV gamma rays.

Table 3study	Material	MAC (cm2/g) at 662 keV	
Current study	PGMA	0.081	
B-NPs/PGMA	0.110	
W-NPs/PGMA	0.095	
BW-NPs/PGMA	0.102	
(Mahmoud et al., 2018a, b) [21]	HDPE	0.099	
HDPE-PbO 10 % bulk PbO	0.100	
HDPE-PbO 50 % bulk PbO	0.133	
HDPE-PbO 10 % bulk PbO nanoparticles	0.110	
HDPE-PbO 50 % bulk PbO nanoparticles	0.143	
(M. Higgins et al., 2019) [17]	Epoxy	0.029	
HfO2-epoxy	0.044	
WO3-epoxy	0.040	
(Alsayed et al., 2019) [23]	HDPE	0.070	
HDPE 10 %/bulk ZnO	0.068	
HDPE 20 %/bulk ZnO	0.067	
HDPE 30 %/bulk ZnO	0.065	
HDPE 40 %/bulk ZnO	0.065	
HDPE 10 %/bulk ZnO nanoparticles	0.072	
HDPE 20 %/bulk ZnO nanoparticles	0.077	
HDPE 30 %/bulk ZnO nanoparticles	0.078	
HDPE 40 %/bulk ZnO nanoparticles	0.077	
(Muthamma et al., 2021) [18]	Nano Bi2O3 filled epoxy/nB2	0.085	
Nano Bi2O3 filled epoxy/nB4	0.085	
Nano Bi2O3 filled epoxy/nB6	0.087	
Nano Bi2O3 filled epoxy/nB8	0.088	
Nano Bi2O3 filled epoxy/nB10	0.090	
Nano Bi2O3 filled epoxy/nB12	0.094	
Nano Bi2O3 filled epoxy/nB14	0.094	

Fig. 7 illustrates how the HVL values vary with gamma energy across various filler loadings of Bi2O3, WO3, and Bi2O3/WO3 NPs in the polymer matrix. The HVL is a crucial parameter in the evaluation of fabricated shielding. These results suggest that a greater thickness is necessary to effectively attenuate high-energy photons. Additionally, the HVL value at 662 keV for pure PGMA was reduced by 576 %, 411 %, and 492 % after being filled with B-NPs, W-NPs, and BW-NPs, respectively. Consequently, the observed HVL values for B-NPs/PGMA confirm its heightened attenuation characteristics compared to other compositions.Fig. 7 HVL as a function of gamma energy for the samples: PGMA, B-NPs/PGMA, W-NPs/PGMA, and BW-NPs/PGMA.

Fig. 7

4 Conclusion

This study investigated the shielding properties of novel polymer composites developed using glycidyl methacrylate with bismuth and tungsten oxide nanoparticles. The results demonstrated that the reinforced polymer composite, namely B-NPs/PGMA, exhibited a notable enhancement in the linear and mass attenuation coefficients of gamma radiation at energies below 200 keV. The results also showed a consistent increase in the half-value layer (HVL) of the B-NPs/PGMA samples as gamma ray energy increased. More precisely, the half-value layer for the B-NPs/PGMA sample increased from 0.0412 cm at 81 keV to 1.265 cm at 662 keV, and rose to 1.864 cm at 1332 keV. Conversely, the HVL at 662 keV of pure polymer glycidyl methacrylate decreased by 576 %, 411 %, and 492 % when strengthened with B-NPs, W-NPs, and BW-NPs, respectively. The aforementioned results promote the use of these materials for many shielding applications in the medical (radiotherapy and nuclear medicine) and environmental fields. This research contributes to the advancement of nanotechnology-based shielding materials with diverse uses, such as in medical radiation therapy and nuclear power.

Data availability statement

Data available on request.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Hamoud Kassim: Writing – original draft, Methodology. Saad Aldawood: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources, Funding acquisition. Saradh Prasad: Writing – original draft. Nassar N. Asemi: Methodology, Data curation. Aziz A. Aziz: Methodology. Mohamad S. AlSalhi: Investigation.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their sincere appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2024R328 ) at 10.13039/501100002383 King Saud University , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
==== Refs
References

1 Al-Hadeethi Y. Sayyed M.I. Nune M. Radiation shielding study of WO3–ZnO–PbO–B2O3 glasses using Geant4 and Phys-X: a comparative study Ceram. Int. 47 3 Feb. 2021 3988 3993 10.1016/J.CERAMINT.2020.09.263
2 Kaur P. Singh D. Singh T. Heavy metal oxide glasses as gamma rays shielding material Nucl. Eng. Des. 307 Oct. 2016 364 376 10.1016/J.NUCENGDES.2016.07.029
3 Mehrara R. Malekie S. Kotahi S.M.S. Kashian S. Introducing a novel low energy gamma ray shield utilizing Polycarbonate Bismuth Oxide composite Sci. Rep. 11 1 May 2021 1 13 10.1038/s41598-021-89773-5 2021 11:1 33414495
4 Sayyed M.I. Kaky K.M. Gaikwad D.K. Agar O. Gawai U.P. Baki S.O. Physical, structural, optical and gamma radiation shielding properties of borate glasses containing heavy metals (Bi2O3/MoO3) J. Non-Cryst. Solids 507 Mar. 2019 30 37 10.1016/J.JNONCRYSOL.2018.12.010
5 Luković J. Synthesis and characterization of tungsten carbide fine powders Ceram. Int. 41 1 2015 1271 1277 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.09.057 Part B
6 Singh V.P. Shirmardi S.P. Medhat M.E. Badiger N.M. Determination of mass attenuation coefficient for some polymers using Monte Carlo simulation Vacuum 119 Sep. 2015 284 288 10.1016/J.VACUUM.2015.06.006
7 More C.V. Alsayed Z. Badawi M.S. Thabet A.A. Pawar P.P. Polymeric composite materials for radiation shielding: a review Environ. Chem. Lett. 19 3 Jun. 2021 2057 2090 10.1007/S10311-021-01189-9 33558806
8 Abdalsalam A.H. Investigation of gamma ray attenuation features of bismuth oxide nano powder reinforced high-density polyethylene matrix composites Radiat. Phys. Chem. 168 Mar. 2020 108537 10.1016/J.RADPHYSCHEM.2019.108537
9 Makvandi P. Functionalization of polymers and nanomaterials for water treatment, food packaging, textile and biomedical applications: a review Environ. Chem. Lett. 19 1 Sep. 2020 583 611 10.1007/S10311-020-01089-4 2020 19:1
10 Hassan H.E. Badran H.M. Aydarous A. Sharshar T. Studying the effect of nano lead compounds additives on the concrete shielding properties for γ-rays Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 360 Oct. 2015 81 89 10.1016/J.NIMB.2015.07.126
11 Alharshan G.A. “Erratum to: a comparative study between nano-cadmium oxide and lead oxide reinforced in high density polyethylene as gamma rays shielding composites Nucl. Technol. Radiat. Protect. 35 1 2020 42 49 10.2298/NTRP2001042A Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection, vol. 35, no. 4, p. 386, 2020
12 Abbas Y.M. El-Khatib A.M. Badawi M.S. Alabsy M.T. Hagag O.M. Gamma attenuation through nano lead - nano copper PVC composites Nucl. Technol. Radiat. Protect. 36 1 2021 50 59 10.2298/NTRP210110001A
13 More C.V. Pawar P.P. Badawi M.S. Thabet A.A. Extensive theoretical study of gamma-ray shielding parameters using epoxy resin-metal chloride mixtures Nucl. Technol. Radiat. Protect. 35 2 2020 138 149 10.2298/NTRP2002138M
14 El-Khatib A.M. Abbas Y.M. Badawi M.S. Hagag O.M. Alabsy M.T. Gamma radiation shielding properties of recycled polyvinyl chloride composites reinforced with micro/nano-structured PbO and CuO particles Phys. Scripta 96 12 Nov. 2021 125316 10.1088/1402-4896/AC35C3
15 Obeid A. EL Balaa H. EL Samad O. Awad R. Badawi M.S. Attenuation parameters of HDPE filled with different nano-size and bulk WO3 for X-ray shielding applications The European Physical Journal Plus 137 11 Nov. 2022 1229 10.1140/EPJP/S13360-022-03361-8
16 Abunahel B.M. Mustafa I.S. Noor Azman N.Z. Characteristics of X-ray attenuation in nano-sized bismuth oxide/epoxy-polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) matrix composites Appl. Phys. Mater. Sci. Process 124 12 Dec. 2018 1 7 10.1007/S00339-018-2254-5/FIGURES/3
17 Molina Higgins M.C. Radcliffe N.A. Toro-González M. Rojas J.V. Gamma ray attenuation of hafnium dioxide- and tungsten trioxide-epoxy resin composites J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 322 2 Nov. 2019 707 716 10.1007/S10967-019-06714-3/TABLES/2
18 Muthamma M.V. Prabhu S. Bubbly S.G. Gudennavar S.B. Micro and nano Bi2O3 filled epoxy composites: thermal, mechanical and γ-ray attenuation properties Appl. Radiat. Isot. 174 Aug. 2021 109780 10.1016/J.APRADISO.2021.109780
19 Cao D. Yang G. Bourham M. Moneghan D. Gamma radiation shielding properties of poly (methyl methacrylate)/Bi2O3 composites Nucl. Eng. Technol. 52 11 Nov. 2020 2613 2619 10.1016/J.NET.2020.04.026
20 Afshar M. Morshedian J. Ahmadi S. Radiation attenuation capability and flow characteristics of HDPE composite loaded with W, MoS2, and B4C Polym. Compos. 40 1 Jan. 2019 149 158 10.1002/PC.24620
21 Alsayed Z. Badawi M.S. Awad R. Thabet A.A. El-Khatib A.M. Study of some γ-ray attenuation parameters for new shielding materials composed of nano ZnO blended with high density polyethylene Nucl. Technol. Radiat. Protect. 34 4 Dec. 2019 342 352 10.2298/NTRP190718033A
22 Mahmoud M.E. El-Khatib A.M. Badawi M.S. Rashad A.R. El-Sharkawy R.M. Thabet A.A. Fabrication, characterization and gamma rays shielding properties of nano and micro lead oxide-dispersed-high density polyethylene composites Radiat. Phys. Chem. 145 Apr. 2018 160 173 10.1016/J.RADPHYSCHEM.2017.10.017
23 El-Khatib A.M. Gamma attenuation coefficients of nano cadmium oxide/high density polyethylene composites Sci. Rep. 9 1 Nov. 2019 1 11 10.1038/s41598-019-52220-7 2019 9:1 30626917
24 Migliaresi C. Pegoretti A. Fundamentals of polymeric composite materials Integrated Biomaterials Science Dec. 2002 69 117 10.1007/0-306-47583-9_3
25 Elsafi M. Optimizing the gamma-ray shielding behaviors for polypropylene using lead oxide: a detailed examination J. Mater. Res. Technol. 19 Jul. 2022 1862 1872 10.1016/J.JMRT.2022.05.128
26 Akman F. Study on gamma radiation attenuation and non-ionizing shielding effectiveness of niobium-reinforced novel polymer composite Nucl. Eng. Technol. 54 1 Jan. 2022 283 292 10.1016/J.NET.2021.07.006
27 Sayyed M.I. Effect of TeO2 addition on the gamma radiation shielding competence and mechanical properties of boro-tellurite glass: an experimental approach J. Mater. Res. Technol. 18 May 2022 1017 1027 10.1016/J.JMRT.2022.02.130
28 Berger M.J. Hubbell J.H. XCOM: Photon Cross Sections on a Personal Computer Jul. 1987 10.2172/6016002
29 Vignesh S. Jt W. Nagaveena S. Sharma K. K A. Boron Carbide Dispersed Epoxy Composites for Gamma Radiation Shielding Applications‏ 2022 Elsevier‏ Vacuum, and undefined
30 Souza A.C. Characterization and determination of the gamma radiation attenuation coefficient in the W20Cu3Ni metallic alloy to be applied in the transport of radioactive substances J. Mater. Res. Technol. 21 2022 951 960 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.09.083
31 Eren Belgin E. Aycik G.A. Kalemtas A. Pelit A. Dilek D.A. Kavak M.T. Preparation and Characterization of a Novel Ionizing Electromagnetic Radiation Shielding Material: Hematite Filled Polyester Based Composites‏ 2015 Elsevier‏ 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.06.008
32 Eren Belgin E. Aycik G.A. Kalemtas A. Pelit A. Dilek D.A. Kavak M.T. Usability of natural titanium-iron oxide as filler material for ionizing electromagnetic radiation shielding composites; preparation, characterization and performance J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 309 2 Aug. 2016 659 666 10.1007/S10967-015-4643-Y
33 Eren Belgin E. Belgin E. Ezgi Comparison of gamma spectrometric method and XCOM method in calculating mass attenuation coefficients of reinforced polymeric composite materials RaPC 193 Apr. 2022 109960 10.1016/J.RADPHYSCHEM.2022.109960
34 El-Enany N. El-Kameesy S.U. Miligy Z. Ayad M.A. Al-Kanawi A.A. Practical study for the development of gamma rays shielding materials Int. J. Environ. Stud. 46 2–3 Aug. 1994 191 197 10.1080/00207239408710925
35 Aldhuhaibat M.J.R. Amana M.S. Jubier N.J. Salim A.A. Improved gamma radiation shielding traits of epoxy composites: evaluation of mass attenuation coefficient, effective atomic and electron number Radiat. Phys. Chem. 179 Feb. 2021 109183 10.1016/J.RADPHYSCHEM.2020.109183
36 Belgin E. A G. Preparation, Characterization and Comparative Ionizing Electromagnetic Radiation Performances: Part I—Metal Oxide Reinforced Polymeric Composites 2020 Springer J. of R. and N. Chemistry, and undefined
37 Akkurt I. Mavi B. Akkurt A. Basyigit C. Kilincarslan S. Yalim H.A. Study on Z dependence of partial and total mass attenuation coefficients J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 94 3–4 Sep. 2005 379 385 10.1016/J.JQSRT.2004.09.024
38 Han I. Demir L. Şahin M. Determination of mass attenuation coefficients, effective atomic and electron numbers for some natural minerals Radiat. Phys. Chem. 78 9 Sep. 2009 760 764 10.1016/J.RADPHYSCHEM.2009.03.077
