
==== Front
Audiol Res
Audiol Res
audiolres
Audiology Research
2039-4330
2039-4349
MDPI

10.3390/audiolres14050067
audiolres-14-00067
Article
Abnormal Vestibulo–Ocular Reflex Function Correlates with Balance and Gait Impairment in People with Multiple Sclerosis
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6034-0638
Tramontano Marco Conceptualization 12*
Casagrande Conti Laura Data curation 3
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0884-3315
Orejel Bustos Amaranta Soledad Investigation 34
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8563-9967
Ferri Nicola Formal analysis 1
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2547-8307
Lelli Tommaso Investigation 3
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7445-4441
Nocentini Ugo Resources 35
Grasso Maria Grazia Resources Writing – original draft 3
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1609-8060
Turolla Andrea Formal analysis 12
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8396-2250
Pillastrini Paolo Writing – review & editing Visualization 12
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7126-2719
Manzari Leonardo Conceptualization 6
Dumas Georges Academic Editor
1 Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; nicola.ferri11@unibo.it (N.F.); andrea.turolla@unibo.it (A.T.); paolo.pillastrini@unibo.it (P.P.)
2 Unit of Occupational Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
3 Santa Lucia Foundation, Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care, 00179 Rome, Italy; laura.casagrandeconti@gmail.com (L.C.C.); a.orejel@hsantalucia.it (A.S.O.B.); tommi.lelli99@gmail.com (T.L.); u.nocentini@hsantalucia.it (U.N.); mg.grasso@hsantalucia.it (M.G.G.)
4 Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, 00135 Rome, Italy
5 Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
6 MSA ENT Academy Center, 03043 Cassino, Italy; lmanzari1962@gmail.com
* Correspondence: marco.tramontano@unibo.it
09 9 2024
10 2024
14 5 799808
19 8 2024
30 8 2024
06 9 2024
© 2024 by the authors.
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Background: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is the most prevalent autoimmune neurological condition in the world, leading to a wide variety of symptoms, including balance disorders. Objective: To evaluate the angular vestibulo–ocular reflex (aVOR) of all six semicircular canals (SCCs) through Head Impulse (HIMP) and Suppression HIMP (SHIMP) paradigms and any correlations with clinical balance scales. Methods: All participants were assessed using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and Mini-BESTest (MBT). Vestibular function was measured by video Head Impulse Test (vHIT), obtaining aVOR gain for each SSC. Results: Twenty-seven PwMS (mean age 47.93 ± 8.51 years old, 18 females) were recruited. Most of the patients (81.48%) presented abnormal aVOR gains for at least one SSC. A moderate to strong correlation between aVOR gains of the left anterior SSC and, respectively, the MBT and the BBS was found. The subgroup analysis, based on the EDSS class, confirmed the correlation with the BBS in the patients with the most significant disability. Conclusions: People with MS may present impairments of the aVOR in one or more semicircular canals. The aVOR gain impairment of the vertical semicircular canals correlates with balance and gait disorders identified through clinical scales in PwMS.

multiple sclerosis
vestibular
head impulse test
technology
rehabilitation
balance
This research received no external funding.
==== Body
pmc1. Introduction

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory, demyelinating, degenerative disease of the central nervous system that affects approximately 2.8 million worldwide [1,2]. People with MS (PwMS) present different symptoms depending on lesion location. The most common symptoms are fatigue and difficulty walking, which affect the activities of daily living and lead to disability. Difficulties in gait and balance disorders are the most common mobility limitations in PwMS [3]. Indeed, balance impairments are present in almost 86% of individuals with MS, and part of these disorders could be related to vestibular system dysfunction.

Rehabilitation plays a crucial role in improving functional outcomes, activity, and participation in PwMS, with moderate-quality evidence supporting its effectiveness even in the long term [4]. Specific training aimed to enhance the vestibular reflexes was found to be equally effective as other exercise-based interventions and more effective than no intervention in improving balance and dizziness symptoms in PwMS [5]. Some studies suggest a significant correlation between vestibular functioning and fatigue in PwMS [6], confirming its essential connections with balance and non-motor functions [7]. Although vestibular rehabilitation shows positive effects, one important limitation of these studies is the lack of an instrumental evaluation of the vestibular reflexes before and after the training [8,9].

In the last decades, new instrumental tools have been developed to assess vestibular function. A quick, well-tolerated, and safe vestibular test, the video Head Impulse Test (vHIT), was developed to measure the angular vestibulo–ocular reflex (aVOR) objectively [10]. In 2016, the vHIT was enhanced with the Suppressed Head Impulse (SHIMP) paradigm, a complementary variant of the traditional test that assesses the VOR gain [11]. Previous studies using the vHIT found that aVOR gain in the horizontal canals was significantly lower in PwMS with brainstem involvement compared to healthy people or PwMS without brainstem involvement, suggesting the use of vHIT to detect lesions in the brainstem vestibular pathway in PwMS [12,13]. Furthermore, worse aVOR gains and compensatory oculomotor functions were associated with a greater MS-related disability [14].

To the best of our knowledge, no study has been conducted to understand a correlation between aVOR alterations and balance disorders in PwMS, and no study compared the aVOR assessment through Head Impulse (HIMP) and SHIMP paradigms. Our hypothesis is that an altered function of the semicircular canals could be correlated to balance and gait impairment in PwMS. For this reason, the primary aim of this study is to evaluate the aVOR gains of all six semicircular canals through both HIMP and SHIMP paradigms. A secondary aim is to correlate the aVOR gain with the scores of the balance and gait scales.

2. Materials and Methods

This cross-sectional study was carried out at Santa Lucia Foundation Hospital and approved by the Local Independent Ethics Committee (Prot. CE/2022_011). All procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional human experimentation guidelines and the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. This article adheres to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines [15].

2.1. Participants

Participants with a diagnosis of MS according to the McDonald criteria [16] were recruited and enrolled based on consecutive sampling at the Hospital between March 2022 and July 2023. The inclusion criteria were (i) diagnosis of relapsing–remitting (RRMS) or secondary-progressive (SPMS) MS diagnosed by a certified neurologist, (ii) over 18 years of age, (iii) Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) [17] between 1 and 6, and (iv) ability to walk independently for at least 50 m. Exclusion criteria were (i) the presence of psychiatric and neurological disorders (other than MS) and other pathological conditions and/or clinical disorders severe enough to interfere with cognitive functioning and/or the performance of motor or cognitive tasks; (ii) the occurrence of clinical relapse in the three months prior to enrollment; (iii) steroid therapies administered in the 30 days preceding enrollment; (iv) the occurrence of a lower extremity fracture within three months prior to enrolment and/or other medical conditions that would interfere in the study procedures; and (v) history of vestibular disorders. All participants gave prior written consent.

2.2. Outcome Measures

At enrolment, clinical and demographic data were collected. A researcher not involved in the assessment performed a balance and gait assessment through the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) [18] and the Mini-BESTest scale (MBT) [19].

The BBS is a balance and fall risk assessment scale that includes 14 items; the total score ranges from 0 to 56, and the higher the score, the higher the function.

The MBT is a 14-item scale designed to assess static balance and fall risk in adult populations; the total score ranges from 0 to 28, the latter indicating the highest level of function. It contains several sections, among which we considered ‘Walking’, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10, with the same scoring direction as the MBT.

2.3. Instrumental Assessment of the VOR

The vHIT (ICS Impulse, Otometrics/Natus, Denmark) was used to evaluate the aVOR gain for movements in the direction and plane of the stimulation of the six semicircular canals, and the outcome was collected for both the HIMP and SHIMP paradigms. The assessment protocol followed strict and consistent procedures to reduce variability and obtain accurate and reliable data [20]. All the evaluations were performed by two physiotherapists specifically trained by an expert clinician (LM) and supervised during the study by a senior physiotherapist (MT) expert in the vestibular field.

During the HIMP paradigm, the patient was instructed to fixate an earth-fixed point on the wall at a 1 m distance in front of them. Room lighting conditions were adjusted to ensure that the pupil was small and that its image was not affected by reflections at any point in the range of head movement. At each testing time, about 14 brief, rapid, horizontal head turns (head impulses) were applied to each side, always starting from the center, with unpredictable timing and direction with minimal bounce-back or overshoot at the end of the head impulse: each head impulse was “turn and stop”. The amplitude of the head rotation was about 10–15 deg, and the peak head velocity of the impulse was about 140–220 deg/s, with angular accelerations between about 3000 deg/s2 and 5000 deg/s2. Eye velocity and head velocity were recorded for each head turn. The usual measure of the adequacy of the vestibulo–ocular reflex in the HIMP paradigm is gain in terms of the quotient of eye velocity over head velocity at the peak of head acceleration; under physiological conditions, no compensatory saccades are expected [21,22]. To evaluate the vertical semicircular canals, the patient’s head was positioned approximately 35 degrees to the left for the RALP (Right Anterior–Left Posterior) plane test and 35 degrees to the right for the LARP (Left Anterior–Right Posterior) plane test. This positioning ensured the vertical canals were aligned with the head rotation plane, maximizing stimulation by head pitch movements. The clinician placed one hand on top of the patient’s head and the other under the chin. The head was then moved through a small angle (about 10–20 degrees) quickly and unpredictably. The intention was to move the skull rather than the skin to prevent the goggles from slipping relative to the eye, which would cause the appearance of an eye movement [23].

In the SHIMP paradigm, the patient is asked to follow a red dot on the wall generated by a laser attached to the top of the head while the clinician delivers head impulses; under physiological conditions, a saccade of opposite direction to the aVOR reflex after a short latency is expected.

In the HIMP paradigm, we considered 0.76–1.29 a functional aVOR gain range for the vertical canals and 0.80–1.29 for the horizontal canals; we considered 0.66–1.29 a functional aVOR gain range in the SHIMP paradigm [21]. If the aVOR gain was outside these ranges, it was classified based on direction and defined as either a hypo-gain or hyper-gain [24].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All the data were analyzed using SPSS software (IBM Corp. Released 2021. Version 28.0. Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp). Continuous data are presented as mean and standard deviation and categorical data are reported with frequencies (count and percentage). Spearman’s rank correlation tests were performed to assess the correlations between balance outcomes and VOR gains. There were no missing data.

A sub-group analysis based on the severity of the EDSS score was performed considering Class 1 (EDSS = 1.0–3.5, n = 7) and Class 2 (EDSS = 4.0–6, n = 20).

3. Results

Twenty-seven PwMS (mean age 47.93 ± 8.51 years old, 18 females) were involved; clinical and demographic characteristics are reported in Table 1. The aVOR gain for 162 semicircular canals through the HIMP paradigm and 54 semicircular canals through the SHIMP paradigm was evaluated (Table 1).

Approximately 81% of the enrolled participants exhibited abnormal aVOR gain in one or more semicircular canals when assessed using either the HIMP or SHIMP paradigm.

Specifically, 26.5% of the 162 canals in the HIMP paradigm and 18.5% of the 54 canals in the SHIMP paradigm were abnormal. In Table 2, the distributions of hyper-gain (i.e., VOR > 1.29) and hypo-gain (i.e., VOR < 0.76 for HIMP, VOR < 0.66 for SHIMP) were reported.

The correlations between the VOR gain and clinical scale scores were analyzed as reported in Table 3. A significant correlation between the left anterior semicircular canal (HIMP) and the MBT and BBS scores was found. Instead, in the subgroup analysis based on the EDSS Classes, the BBS maintained a significant correlation with the left anterior semicircular canal in the patients of Class 2 (Table 4 and Table 5).

The SHIMP paradigm assessment revealed that seven horizontal semicircular canals reported a functional aVOR gain and the absence of anti-compensatory saccades (Figure 1).

Horizontal semicircular canal function in both paradigms HIMP (A) and SHIMP (B) with video Head Impulse Test technology for one PwMS were objectively measured. Each panel shows a superimposed time series of head velocity (black for the head impulses) and the corresponding eye velocity (red) for the lateral canal dynamic function. The signs of head velocity for leftward impulses and eye velocity for rightward impulses have been inverted to allow for easier comparison. Functional horizontal angular vestibulo-ocular reflex (aVOR) gains are approximately 0.8–1.0 for the horizontal semicircular canals during the HIMP paradigm and 0.66–1.0 during the SHIMP. In the SHIMP paradigm (B) for rotations toward the right side, aVOR gain is 0.73. The red arrow indicates the unexpected absence of the aVOR suppression strategies (anti-compensatory saccades).

4. Discussion

This study aimed to assess vestibular semicircular canal function in PwMS using vHIT to ascertain the angular vestibular reflex related to the stimulation of all six semicircular canals. Our findings revealed that PwMS may have aVOR dysfunction, with a significant correlation between the aVOR gains of the vertical canals and balance clinical scales. From a rehabilitative standpoint, these correlations could be significant and may guide the decision-making process when customizing rehabilitative programs to improve dynamic postural and gait stability. Indeed, training the aVOR reflex could potentially enhance balance and gait in PwMS [9,21,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Future studies should introduce instrumental vestibular assessment as an outcome measure to evaluate the enhancement of the vestibular reflexes after rehabilitation.

People with distinct levels of disability were involved, and we found a different correlation between aVOR gains and clinical scale scores if analyzed separately according to the EDSS classification. These results are consistent with the positive correlation found by Grove and colleagues [14] between the severity of disability in PwMS and an altered vestibular function. Furthermore, the significant correlation of the BBS with vestibular function in EDSS Class 2 alone is consistent with the role of the EDSS cutoff in identifying individuals with abnormalities in balance system integration [31].

Our study revealed isolated canal dysfunctions in PwMS, which differ from those typically observed in the various stages of vestibular unilateral hypofunction [32]. These isolated dysfunctions may be attributed to demyelination plaques manifesting within the vestibular pathways, leading to dizziness and balance disorders [33]. Specifically, these plaques could develop in the brainstem, where both efferent and afferent vestibular pathways coexist, contributing to the observed vestibular impairments. Additionally, inflammatory demyelination has been frequently identified in the vestibular nuclei and the root entry zone of the eighth cranial nerve, further supporting the connection between central nervous system lesions and vestibular dysfunction in PwMS.

Demyelination in peripheral neural connections within the inner ear structures may also play a role in these isolated dysfunctions, potentially exacerbating balance and gait disorders in PwMS. Our analysis indicated a qualitative reduction in aVOR gains across multiple semicircular canals, suggesting a potential generalized impairment in vestibular function in this population.

The SHIMP paradigm provided valuable insights into the central nervous system’s ability to suppress aVOR through visual input, known as visuo–vestibular interaction. However, it is important to note that the SHIMP paradigm primarily assesses aVOR suppression in the plane of the horizontal semicircular canals. Therefore, potential alterations in the suppression mechanism in the vertical semicircular canals remain unassessed with the current methodology. This limitation highlights the need for further research to determine whether the observed reductions in slow-phase velocity in the vertical canals are due to peripheral or central lesions. Interestingly, some PwMS exhibited functional aVOR gains without anti-compensatory saccades in the SHIMP test, which may indicate a lack of central suppression of the aVOR due to lesions in the central pathways. This finding suggests that central regulatory mechanisms of the aVOR, processed in the vestibular nuclei complex within the brainstem, may be compromised in PwMS.

In our sample, we found a significative prevalence of abnormal aVOR gains in PwMS, with both hypo- and hyperfunctions. This finding aligns with our previous study focused on stroke survivors in the sub-acute and chronic phases where impairment of the semicircular canal was observed [34]. While hypofunctions are more easily interpreted from a clinical point of view, hyperfunctions have not yet been fully framed in scientific literature to date. Choi and colleagues [35] observed increased aVOR gains in diffuse cerebellar lesions, followed by a corrective backup saccade in the opposite direction than the overt saccade typically seen during vHIT. These authors hypothesized that this could suggest initial cerebellar involvement. One possible explanation for this phenomenon is the reduced inhibitory control exerted by the cerebellum on vestibular reflexes [36]. This mechanism is akin to what occurs in cerebellar ataxia, where aVOR gain is typically decreased in the horizontal canals but increased in the vertical canals [37]. The processing of vestibular semicircular canal function primarily takes place in the brainstem, within the vestibular nuclei complex. Information from the semicircular canals is relayed by the first neuron of the reflex arc to the superior and medial vestibular nuclei. Second-order neurons then relay impulses through the medial longitudinal fasciculus to the III, IV, and VI cranial nerves via ipsilateral and contralateral connections. Finally, third-order neurons send excitatory and inhibitory impulses to the corresponding extraocular muscles, generating eye movements equal in speed and amplitude but opposite to head movements, thereby stabilizing the image on the fovea.

Given the complex integration of afferent signals across multiple structures, it is challenging to attribute the observed aVOR impairments solely to peripheral lesions. The possibility of central lesions in the reflex arc due to demyelination in the pons or other brainstem areas cannot be ruled out. This complexity underscores the necessity of a comprehensive approach to understanding and managing vestibular dysfunction in PwMS.

The impairments in aVOR gain observed in PwMS contribute to a deeper understanding of vestibular function in this population, addressing a significant gap in the current literature. Future research should explore the underlying mechanisms of semicircular canal dysfunction in PwMS more thoroughly, particularly through longitudinal studies that could elucidate the natural history of aVOR gain impairments and their impact on long-term outcomes.

The diagnosis and treatment of vestibular diseases can vary due to differences in assessment tools and outcome measures used by healthcare providers. Standardization efforts and an interdisciplinary approach can help improve the consistency and effectiveness of care for individuals with balance disorders. Additionally, innovative rehabilitation strategies, including tailored vestibular physical therapy exercises, could be developed to optimize balance, mobility, and overall quality of life for individuals living with MS and aVOR dysfunction. Multiple sensory information is involved in balance control, and proprioceptive, visual, and vestibular cues are integrated by the central nervous system depending on the environmental conditions, according to the motor activities the person engages in their daily activities [38,39,40].

Our study has some limitations. The observational design implies not being able to infer a causal link between MS and abnormal aVOR gain; we cannot attribute aVOR anomalies with certainty to the underlying pathology, to the reduction in physical activity resulting from disability, or to other factors not considered. Additional vestibular testing, such as rotational chair testing and caloric vestibular stimulation, was not performed. Moreover, the sample size was small, and 74% of the participants included exhibited a moderate level of disability. This could potentially compromise the robustness and generalizability of our findings. Finally, we did not compare the vHIT with the clinical Head Impulse Test (HIT), which is usually performed as a bedside test; this, in relation to recent literature [35], could have confirmed the discrepancy between clinical and video-assisted HIT, with patterns related to central lesions. Furthermore, future research will aim to address the limitations identified in this study, including the expansion of the patient cohort and the investigation of VOR impairments in PwMS with comorbid vestibular conditions, such as Vestibular Migraine. Additionally, incorporating a wider range of vestibular tests will help to further elucidate the complex vestibular dysfunctions in PwMS.

5. Conclusions

PwMS may present impairments of the aVOR in one or more semicircular canals. The aVOR gain impairment of the vertical semicircular canals correlates with balance and gait disorders identified through clinical scales. Both HIMP and SHIMP paradigms could be valid strategies to assess vestibular canal function in PwMS. Further studies should confirm our results to consolidate the use of the instrumental VOR assessment in the clinical management of the PwMS.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.T. and L.M.; methodology, M.T. and L.M.; formal analysis, N.F. and A.T.; investigation, L.C.C., A.S.O.B. and T.L.; resources, U.N. and M.G.G.; data curation, M.T.; writing—original draft preparation, M.T. and N.F.; writing—review and editing, A.T., L.M., U.N. and M.G.G.; visualization, P.P.; supervision, M.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Local Independent Ethics Committee of Santa Lucia Foundation Hospital with protocol number Prot. CE/2022_011 (approval date: 21th March 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient(s) to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figure 1 Absence of anti-compensatory saccades during the SHIMP paradigm.

audiolres-14-00067-t001_Table 1 Table 1 Characteristics of participants.

Sex F (%)	66.67		
Age (years)	47.93 ± 8.51		
Stature (m)	1.70 ± 0.09		
Weight (kg)	66.4 ± 15.05		
EDSS 1.0–3.5 (%)	25.93		
EDSS 4.0–6.5 (%)	74.07		
Time from diagnosis (years)	16.22 ± 10.02		
Education (years)	13.89 ± 2.98		
Mini-BESTest	17.30 ± 5.74		
Walking MBT	6.00 ± 2.13		
BBS	44.67 ± 8.85		
HIMP aVOR gain (mean ±SD)	Left	Right	
Anterior	0.78 (±0.22)	0.86 (±0.14)	
Horizontal	0.92 (±0.19)	0.98 (±0.24)	
Posterior	0.82 (±0.12)	0.76 (±0.17)	
SHIMP aVOR gain (mean ±SD)	Left	Right	
Horizontal	0.78 (±0.21)	0.87 (±0.23)	
EDSS: Expanded Disability Status Scale; MBT: MiniBESTest; BBS: Berg Balance Scale; Walking MBT: refers to the Walking section of MBT; ± = standard deviation.

audiolres-14-00067-t002_Table 2 Table 2 Percentages of abnormal VOR gain for both HIMP and SHIMP paradigms.

	Abnormal (n)	Hypo- or Hyper-Gains (%)	Total Abnormal Gains (%)	
HIMP VOR Gain				
Right Horizontal	<0.76	2	7.41	8.52	
>1.29	3	1.11	
Left Horizontal	<0.76	2	7.41	11.11	
>1.29	1	3.70	
Left Anterior	<0.76	9	33.33	37.03	
>1.29	1	3.70	
Right Posterior	<0.76	14	51.85	51.85	
>1.29	0	0	
Right Anterior	<0.76	4	14.81	14.81	
>1.29	0	0	
Left Posterior	<0.76	7	25.93	25.93	
>1.29	0	0	
SHIMP VOR gain				
Right Horizontal	<0.66	4	14.81	18.51	
>1.29	1	3.70	
Left Horizontal	<0.66	5	18.52	18.52	
>1.29	0	0	
HIMP: Head Impulse Paradigm; SHIMP: Suppression Head Impulse Paradigm.

audiolres-14-00067-t003_Table 3 Table 3 Correlation between VOR gain and clinical scale scores.

N = 162 Semicircular Canals	Walking MBT	MBT	BBS	
HIMP aVOR Gain				
Right Horizontal	−0.005	0.068	0.069	
Left Horizontal	−0.092	−0.072	−0.055	
Left Anterior	0.203	0.428 *	0.465 *	
Right Posterior	0.212	0.191	0.163	
Right Anterior	0.014	0.122	0.129	
Left Posterior	0.101	0.142	0.143	
N = 54 semicircular canals
SHIMP aVOR gain (mean ± SD)				
Right Horizontal	0.153	0.014	−0.069	
Left Horizontal	−0.165	−0.172	−0.295	
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed). MBT: MiniBESTest; BBS: Berg Balance Scale; Walking MBT: refers to the Walking section of MBT; HIMP: Head Impulse Paradigm; SHIMP: Suppression Head Impulse Paradigm.

audiolres-14-00067-t004_Table 4 Table 4 Correlations in Class 1 (EDSS 1.0–3.5).

N = 42 Semicircular Canals	Walking MBT	MBT	BBS	
HIMP aVOR Gain				
Right Horizontal	0.200	0.252	0.200	
Left Horizontal	−0.127	−0.072	−0.273	
Left Anterior	0.018	0.018	0.202	
Right Posterior	0.431	0.391	0.266	
Right Anterior	−0.257	−0.209	−0.055	
Left Posterior	0.385	0.400	0.385	
N = 14 semicircular canals
SHIMP aVOR gain				
Right Horizontal	0.436	0.414	0.255	
Left Horizontal	0.436	0.396	0.073	
MBT: MiniBESTest; BBS: Berg Balance Scale; Walking MBT: refers to the Walking section of MBT; HIMP: Head Impulse Paradigm; SHIMP: Suppression Head Impulse Paradigm; EDSS: Expanded Disability Status Scale.

audiolres-14-00067-t005_Table 5 Table 5 Correlations in Class 2 (EDSS 4.0–6.5).

N = 120 Semicircular Canals	Walking MBT	MBT	BBS	
			
HIMP aVOR Gain				
Right Horizontal	−0.163	−0.077	−0.051	
Left Horizontal	−0.176	−0.169	−0.107	
Left Anterior	0.105	0.398	0.491 *	
Right Posterior	0.177	0.207	0.178	
Right Anterior	0.022	0.135	0.135	
Left Posterior	0.096	0.103	0.142	
N = 40 semicircular canals
SHIMP aVOR gain				
Right Horizontal	0.192	0.009	−0.042	
Left Horizontal	−0.181	−0.135	−0.196	
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed). MBT: MiniBESTest; BBS: Berg Balance Scale; Walking MBT refers to the Walking section of MBT; HIMP: Head Impulse Paradigm; SHIMP: Suppression Head Impulse Paradigm; EDSS: Expanded Disability Status Scale.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
==== Refs
References

1. Walton C. King R. Rechtman L. Kaye W. Leray E. Marrie R.A. Robertson N. La Rocca N. Uitdehaag B. Van Der Mei I. Rising prevalence of multiple sclerosis worldwide: Insights from the Atlas of MS Mult. Scler. J. 2020 26 1816 1821 10.1177/1352458520970841 33174475
2. Browne P. Chandraratna D. Angood C. Tremlett H. Baker C. Taylor B.V. Thompson A.J. Atlas of Multiple Sclerosis 2013: A growing global problem with widespread inequity Neurology 2014 83 1022 1024 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000768 25200713
3. Young C.A. Mills R. Rog D. Sharrack B. Majeed T. Constantinescu C.S. Kalra S. Harrower T. Santander H. Courtald G. Quality of life in multiple sclerosis is dominated by fatigue, disability and self-efficacy J. Neurol. Sci. 2021 426 117437 10.1016/j.jns.2021.117437 33991718
4. Amatya B. Khan F. Galea M. Rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis: An overview of Cochrane Reviews Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019 2019 CD012732 10.1002/14651858.CD012732.pub2 30637728
5. García-Muñoz C. Cortés-Vega M.D. Heredia-Rizo A.M. Martín-Valero R. García-Bernal M.I. Casuso-Holgado M.J. Effectiveness of Vestibular Training for Balance and Dizziness Rehabilitation in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis J. Clin. Med. 2020 9 590 10.3390/jcm9020590 32098162
6. Cochrane G.D. Christy J.B. Motl R.W. Central Vestibular Functions Correlate With Fatigue and Walking Capacity in People With Multiple Sclerosis Phys. Ther. 2021 101 pzab168 10.1093/ptj/pzab168 34174079
7. Guo J. Wang J. Liang P. Tian E. Liu D. Guo Z. Chen J. Zhang Y. Zhou Z. Kong W. Vestibular dysfunction leads to cognitive impairments: State of knowledge in the field and clinical perspectives (Review) Int. J. Mol. Med. 2024 53 36 10.3892/ijmm.2024.5360 38391090
8. Tramontano M. Grasso M.G. Soldi S. Casula E.P. Bonnì S. Mastrogiacomo S. D’acunto A. Porrazzini F. Caltagirone C. Koch G. Cerebellar Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation Combined with Vestibular Rehabilitation Improves Gait and Balance in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Preliminary Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Cerebellum 2020 19 897 901 10.1007/s12311-020-01166-y 32681455
9. Tramontano M. Cinnera A.M. Manzari L. Tozzi F.F. Caltagirone C. Morone G. Pompa A. Grasso M.G. Vestibular rehabilitation has positive effects on balance, fatigue and activities of daily living in highly disabled multiple sclerosis people: A preliminary randomized controlled trial Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 2018 36 709 718 10.3233/RNN-180850 30412513
10. Weber K.P. MacDougall H.G. Halmagyi G.M. Curthoys I.S. Impulsive testing of semicircular-canal function using video-oculography Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2009 1164 486 491 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2008.03730.x 19645955
11. MacDougall H.G. McGarvie L.A. Halmagyi G.M. Rogers S.J. Manzari L. Burgess A.M. Curthoys I.S. Weber K.P. A new saccadic indicator of peripheral vestibular function based on the video head impulse test Neurology 2016 87 410 418 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002827 27251884
12. Eğilmez O.K. Tunç A. Yılmaz M.S. Şahiner B.G. Koçoğlu M. Eryılmaz H.A. Güven M. Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials and video head impulse test studies: Alternative methods for detecting brainstem involvement in multiple sclerosis Acta Oto-Laryngol. 2022 142 168 174 10.1080/00016489.2022.2039759 35200078
13. Pavlović I. Ruška B. Pavičić T. Skorić M.K. Crnošija L. Adamec I. Habek M. Video head impulse test can detect brainstem dysfunction in multiple sclerosis Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2017 14 68 71 10.1016/j.msard.2017.04.001 28619435
14. Grove C.R. Wagner A. Yang V.B. Loyd B.J. Dibble L.E. Schubert M.C. Greater Disability Is Associated with Worse Vestibular and Compensatory Oculomotor Functions in People Living with Multiple Sclerosis Brain Sci. 2022 12 1519 10.3390/brainsci12111519 36358444
15. von Elm E. Altman D.G. Egger M. Pocock S.J. Gøtzsche P.C. Vandenbroucke J.P. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2008 61 344 349 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008 18313558
16. Polman C.H. Reingold S.C. Banwell B. Clanet M. Cohen J.A. Filippi M. Fujihara K. Havrdova E. Hutchinson M. Kappos L. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria Ann. Neurol. 2011 69 292 302 10.1002/ana.22366 21387374
17. Kurtzke J.F. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS) Neurology 1983 33 1444 1452 10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444 6685237
18. Cattaneo D. Regola A. Meotti M. Validity of six balance disorders scales in persons with multiple sclerosis Disabil. Rehabil. 2006 28 789 795 10.1080/09638280500404289 16754576
19. Franchignoni F. Horak F. Godi M. Nardone A. Giordano A. Using psychometric techniques to improve the Balance Evaluation Systems Test: The mini-BESTest J. Rehabil. Med. 2010 42 323 331 10.2340/16501977-0537 20461334
20. Money-Nolan L.E. Flagge A.G. Factors affecting variability in vestibulo-ocular reflex gain in the Video Head Impulse Test in individuals without vestibulopathy: A systematic review of literature Front. Neurol. 2023 14 1125951 10.3389/fneur.2023.1125951 36970532
21. Manzari L. Tramontano M. Suppression Head Impulse Paradigm (SHIMP) in evaluating the vestibulo-saccadic interaction in patients with vestibular neuritis Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 277 3205 3212 10.1007/s00405-020-06085-6 32472160
22. Shen Q. Magnani C. Sterkers O. Lamas G. Vidal P.-P. Sadoun J. Curthoys I.S. de Waele C. Saccadic Velocity in the New Suppression Head Impulse Test: A New Indicator of Horizontal Vestibular Canal Paresis and of Vestibular Compensation Front. Neurol. 2016 7 160 10.3389/fneur.2016.00160 27721805
23. MacDougall H.G. McGarvie L.A. Halmagyi G.M. Curthoys I.S. Weber K.P. Application of the video head impulse test to detect vertical semicircular canal dysfunction Otol. Neurotol. 2013 34 974 979 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31828d676d 23714711
24. Curthoys I.S. Manzari L. Rey-Martinez J. Dlugaiczyk J. Burgess A.M. Enhanced Eye Velocity in Head Impulse Testing—A Possible Indicator of Endolymphatic Hydrops Front. Surg. 2021 8 666390 10.3389/fsurg.2021.666390 34026816
25. Afrasiabifar A. Karami F. Najafi Doulatabad S. Comparing the effect of Cawthorne-Cooksey and Frenkel exercises on balance in patients with multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled trial Clin. Rehabil. 2017 32 57 65 10.1177/0269215517714592 28629268
26. Karami F. Afrasiabifar A. Najafi Doulatabad S. Comparing the Effectiveness of Vestibular Rehabilitation and Frenkel Exercise on Fatigue Reduction in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial Iran. Red. Crescent Med. J. 2018 20 e68913 10.5812/ircmj.68913
27. Loyd B.J. Fangman A. Peterson D.S. Gappmaier E. Thackeray A. Schubert M.C. Dibble L.E. Rehabilitation to Improve Gaze and Postural Stability in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial Neurorehabil. Neural Repair. 2022 36 678 688 10.1177/15459683221124126 36113117
28. Hebert J.R. Corboy J.R. Manago M.M. Schenkman M. Effects of vestibular rehabilitation on multiple sclerosis-related fatigue and upright postural control: A randomized controlled trial Phys. Ther. 2011 91 1166 1183 10.2522/ptj.20100399 21680771
29. Hebert J.R. Corboy J.R. Vollmer T. Forster J.E. Schenkman M. Efficacy of Balance and Eye-Movement Exercises for Persons With Multiple Sclerosis (BEEMS) Neurology 2018 90 e797 e807 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005013 29386274
30. Ozgen G. Karapolat H. Akkoc Y. Yuceyar N. Is customized vestibular rehabilitation effective in patients with multiple sclerosis? A randomized controlled trial Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2016 52 466 478 27050082
31. Aydın Cantürk İ. Mutlu B.Ö. Yılmaz O. Bayazıt Y.A. Peripheral Vestibular System Involvement in Multiple Sclerosis and Associations with the Disease Severity ORL 2023 85 150 155 10.1159/000529579 36907176
32. Manzari L. Tramontano M. Identifying the Clinical Signs on the Healthy Side Using Video Head Impulse Test During Different Stages of Vestibular Neuritis J. Int. Adv. Otol. 2021 17 433 437 10.5152/iao.2021.21155 34617895
33. Gür E. Binkhamis G. Kluk K. Effects of multiple sclerosis on the audio-vestibular system: A systematic review BMJ Open 2022 12 e060540 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060540
34. Tramontano M. Ferri N. Turolla A. Orejel Bustos A.S. Casagrande Conti L. Sorge C. Pillastrini P. Manzari L. Video head impulse test in subacute and chronic stroke survivors: New perspectives for implementation of assessment in rehabilitation Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 2024 10.1007/s00405-024-08721-x 38758244
35. Choi J.Y. Kim H.J. Kim J.S. Recent advances in head impulse test findings in central vestibular disorders Neurology 2018 90 602 612 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005206 29490911
36. Walker M.F. Zee D.S. Cerebellar disease alters the axis of the high-acceleration vestibuloocular reflex J. Neurophysiol. 2005 94 3417 3429 10.1152/jn.00375.2005 16033941
37. Jeong S.-H. Kim J.-S. Baek I.C. Shin J.W. Jo H. Lee A.Y. Kim J.-M. Perverted head impulse test in cerebellar ataxia Cerebellum 2013 12 773 775 10.1007/s12311-013-0480-0 23595656
38. Bent L.R. McFadyen B.J. Inglis J.T. Vestibular contributions during human locomotor tasks Exerc. Sport. Sci. Rev 2005 33 107 113 10.1097/00003677-200507000-00002 16006817
39. Horak F.B. Postural orientation and equilibrium: What do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls? Age Ageing 2006 35 (Suppl. 2) ii7 ii11 10.1093/ageing/afl077 16926210
40. Bonnì S. Ponzo V. Tramontano M. Cinnera A.M. Caltagirone C. Koch G. Peppe A. Neurophysiological and clinical effects of blindfolded balance training (BBT) in Parkinson’s disease patients: A preliminary study Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2019 55 176 182 10.23736/S1973-9087.18.05126-2 29745627
