
==== Front
Clin Pract
Clin Pract
clinpract
Clinics and Practice
2039-7275
2039-7283
MDPI

10.3390/clinpract14050134
clinpract-14-00134
Article
Comparison between Conventional and Simple Measuring Methods of Mean Nocturnal Baseline Impedance in Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3425-184X
Pop Radu Samuel Conceptualization Methodology Investigation Writing – original draft Writing – review & editing 1*
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3221-4276
Chiperi Lăcrămioara Eliza Conceptualization Methodology Software Writing – review & editing 2
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3097-707X
Nechita Vlad-Ionuț Software Writing – original draft 3
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6210-5014
Man Sorin Claudiu Validation Supervision 14
Dumitrașcu Dan Lucian Validation Writing – review & editing Supervision 5
Capasso Anna Academic Editor
1 3rd Department of Pediatrics, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400217 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; claudiu.man@umfcluj.ro
2 Department of Pediatrics, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology, 540136 Târgu Mureș, Romania; lacramioara-eliza.pop@umfst.ro
3 Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; nechita.vlad@umfcluj.ro
4 3rd Pediatric Clinic, Clinical Emergency Hospital for Children, 400217 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
5 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; ddumitrascu@umfcluj.ro
* Correspondence: radu.samuel.pop@umfcluj.ro; Tel.: +40-740268504
27 8 2024
10 2024
14 5 16821695
29 5 2024
01 8 2024
26 8 2024
© 2024 by the authors.
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
(1) Background: Multichannel intraluminal impedance–pH (MII-pH) monitoring is commonly used to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) is an important parameter, reflecting the esophageal mucosal integrity and improvement in GERD. This study aims to evaluate the correlation between conventionally measured MNBI and a recently described simple MNBI measurement method in diagnosing pediatric GERD. (2) Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled 64 children aged one month to 18 years who underwent 24 h MII-pH monitoring. Conventional MNBI was measured during stable 10 min intervals at night, while the simple MNBI method averaged impedance throughout the nocturnal supine period. (3) Results: Strong correlations were found between conventional and simple MNBI values across all impedance channels in both infants (r > 0.85) and older children (r > 0.9). Conventional and simple MNBIs in the most distal channel (Z6) effectively differentiated non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) from other phenotypes, with AUCs of 0.864 and 0.860, respectively. The simple MNBI demonstrated good diagnostic performance with similar sensitivity and specificity to the conventional MNBI. (4) Conclusions: Including MNBI measurements into routine MII-pH monitoring may enhance GERD diagnosis and reduce the need for more invasive procedures.

GERD
pediatric
impedance-pH monitoring
MNBI
This research received no external funding.
==== Body
pmc1. Introduction

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) represents a common condition among infants and children that is characterized by the reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus, resulting in a variety of symptoms that significantly impact the child’s quality of life or that lead to complications [1,2,3,4].

In infants, the global prevalence of GERD has not been determined [5]. Curien-Chotard et al. reported that infant GERD had a prevalence peak at one month of age (19%) and subsequently decreased from 9% at three months to 2% at 12 months of age. In older children, prevalence has a wide range between 0.2% and 32.0% [6].

Due to its ability to quantify and describe every reflux episode as well as its possible correlation with symptoms, multichannel intraluminal impedance–pH (MII-pH) monitoring has become the most widely used test for diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease. In older children, MII-pH can distinguish several GERD phenotypes with different pathophysiologies [7], as follows: Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) refers to individuals who experience GERD symptoms and who have no proven esophagitis on endoscopy but abnormal acid exposure during MII-pH monitoring [8]. Another two functional phenotypes are reflux hypersensitivity (RH), represented by negative endoscopy, normal acid exposure of the esophagus but positive association between symptoms; and reflux episodes and functional heartburn (FH) in children that can describe typical GERD symptoms and have negative endoscopy, normal esophageal acid exposure and no association between reflux episodes and symptoms during MII-pH monitoring [9,10]. The real challenge is found in patients with inconclusive acid exposure time [11]. In such a scenario, an additional MII-pH parameter is used, namely the number of reflux episodes/24 h, which is considered pathological if it is more than 100/24 h in infants and more than 70/24 h in older children [12,13,14,15].

In recent years, there has been a focus on determining the baseline impedance (BI), which refers to the average impedance of the esophagus when it is empty and when there are no reflux episodes or swallows. Low distal baseline impedance has been observed in patients with esophagitis and proven to negatively correlate with acid reflux metrics [16,17,18,19]. Recently, there has been a proposal to utilize the mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI), which represents the average of three measurements in 10 min stable intervals [20]. MNBI determines the baseline electrical conductivity of the esophageal mucosa when there is no reflux, reflecting the integrity of the esophageal mucosa and the reflux burden [21,22].

The MNBI is considered to improve the diagnosis of GERD [23,24,25]; increase the accuracy in delineating the GERD phenotype, especially in cases of inconclusive acid exposure time [26,27]; and enhance predictions of the anti-reflux treatment response [28,29,30]. Adult protocols have included MNBI as a standard measurement in MII-pH interpretation [11,31]. Additionally, MNBI has been proposed as a marker for laryngopharyngeal reflux, further expanding its diagnostic applications [32].

Nevertheless, the majority of available commercial software does not provide an automatic calculation option, and manually measuring MNBI is time consuming. More time is needed for patients with frequent nocturnal reflux and swallowing. Hoshikawa and al. [33] recently described a new method of MNBI assessment that calculates the average impedance throughout the entire nocturnal supine period. This simple method showed an excellent correlation with the conventional method in the distal esophagus and a moderately good correlation in the proximal esophagus [34].

However, the evaluation of whether this simple method of assessing MNBI is useful in pediatric GERD is not known. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between conventional MNBI and simply acquired MNBI values and their utility in the diagnosis of GERD non-erosive phenotypes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Patient Selection

We conducted a prospective, observational study between October 2019 and December 2023 at the Emergency Clinical Hospital for Children, 3rd Pediatric Clinic. Patients between one month and 18 years of age referred for MII-pH monitoring were enrolled and were divided into two groups based on age: Group 1, consisting of infants, and Group 2, including children above one year of age. Inclusion criteria for infants were persisting troublesome symptoms suggestive of GERD, and criteria for children > 1 year were represented by negative endoscopy and persistent GERD symptoms despite standard proton-pump inhibitor therapy. The exclusion criteria comprised individuals presenting with eosinophilic esophagitis, psychiatric or neurological impairment, and esophageal motor dysfunctions. Recordings with a duration of less than 20 h were also excluded.

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local ethics committee (Nr. 299/11.09.2019). Written informed consent was also obtained from parents of all the children and infants before their inclusion in the study.

2.2. Twenty-Four-Hour Impedance–pH Monitoring

Twenty-four h MII-pH (Sandhill Scientific, Highlands Ranch, CO, USA) monitoring was conducted concurrently in all patients. Age-appropriate catheters were used together with seven impedance sensors and one pH sensor. Each pair of electrodes forms a segment, which creates one impedance channel. Therefore, probes with seven electrodes have a total of six impedance channels (Z1–Z6). Before insertion, calibration was performed using buffer solutions with pHs of 4 and 7. The catheter position was estimated according to the formula proposed by Mutalib et al. [35] and checked through fluoroscopy. Patients fasted for at least 3 h prior to the examination. Acid-suppressive treatment and prokinetic drugs were ceased seven days prior to the investigation, and alginate was stopped 24 h prior, in accordance with the current recommendation [36].

Pathological acid exposure time (AET) was defined as a value of more than 7% in patients older than one year or of more than 10% in infants. According to most guidelines, an AET between 3 and 7% was considered inconclusive [1,13,36]. Conventional parameters were automatically calculated by the Bioview Analysis software: mean acid clearance time (MACT), mean bolus clearance time (MBCT), symptom index (SI), symptom sensitivity index (SSI), and symptom association probability (SAP). Patients older than one year were categorized into several phenotypes: NERD, RH, FH, and indeterminate, with the latter described as having a anormal reflux index not otherwise specified (“normal RI-NOS”) and consisting of patients characterized by normal esophageal acid exposure time and an unreliable symptom association due to fewer than three reported symptoms during MII-pH monitoring, according to Blasi et al. [37]. An SAP was considered reliable when a gastrointestinal symptom was reported at least three times or an extraesophageal symptom was reported at least five times. In patients with an indeterminate AET and a positive SAP and/or SI, the pathological number of reflux episodes was used to differentiate NERD patients from those with RH. Infants were categorized as GERD and normal MII-pH. A manual evaluation of all tracings was also made despite the automatic software analysis provided by Sandhill. The post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW) was calculated according to Frazzoni et al. [23].

The MNBI was measured in every impedance channel (Z1–Z6) by two methods. The conventional MNBI was measured during the night while patients were in a recumbent position, as described by Martinucci et al. [38]. The MNBI was represented by the mean value of 3 measurements of during stable timeframes of 10 min at 1:00 AM, 2:00 AM, and 3:00 AM, excluding pH drops, swallows, or reflux episodes. The simple method of measuring MNBI was also assessed throughout the entire recumbent duration utilizing the software’s “electronic ruler” (Figure 1). If there were two or more supine period markings, we selected the longest one, as described by Hoshikawa et al. [33].

2.3. Statistical Methods

Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM SPSS® version 29.0.2.0 for Windows, IBM Crop. Armonk, New York, NY, USA) and R version 4.0.5 with R Commander (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) were used for the statistical analysis. The normal quantitative data distribution was evaluated using the Shapiro–Wilk test, skewness, and kurtosis. The mean ± standard deviation or median and interquartile range were used to present normal distributed and non-normal distributed data, respectively. To compare frequencies, we used the chi-square test, and where frequencies were under 5, we used Fisher’s exact test. To compare quantitative data, we used ANOVA analysis, the Mann–Whitney U test, the Kruskal–Wallis test, and the student’s t-test, depending on the distribution. Post hoc analysis was performed using the Games–Howell method for unequal variances and the Tukey method for equal variances. To evaluate the correlation between quantitative data, we used Pearson’s or Spearman’s correlation coefficients. The diagnostic performance of parameters such as the MNBI was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) analysis using the maximum Youden index, achieving cut-off values for sensitivity and specificity. We considered a p-value of less than 0.05 to be statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Patient Characteristics and pH–Impedance Measurements

Seventy patients were eligible for the study. Six children were excluded due to several factors: misplacement of the catheter, the discovery of other diagnoses, or technical issues. Of the sixty-four pediatric patients that were enrolled in the study, 23% were infants and 77% were children. Children categorized into non-erosive phenotypes included 12 children (24.5%) having non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), 20 (40.8%) with reflux hypersensitivity (RH), 13 (26.5%) with functional heartburn, and 4 (8.2%) with normal reflux index not otherwise specified (RI-NOS), as previously published in our pilot study [39]. A total of 67% of the infants were diagnosed with GERD based on the MII-pH results. General characteristics of the patients are presented in Table 1. Our study included 23 male patients (46.9.6%) and 26 female patients (53.1%). There were significantly more male patients having NERD and normal RI-NOS. No difference was observed regarding the BMI percentile among the phenotypes in children, and there was no difference regarding the weight-for-length among infants with GERD compared to those with a normal MII-pH tracing.

Among the infants (group 1), GERD patients had significantly lower PSPW index values compared with those without GERD. There was no significant difference regarding the total number of reflux episodes, proximal extension episodes, bolus clearance time, acid clearance time, and the MNBI in different channels.

Among the children (group 2), NERD patients had a significantly higher number of reflux episodes and a higher number of proximal reflux episodes compared with non-NERD patients (p = 0.003 and p = 0.001, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between infants with GERD and normal MII-pH regarding the number of reflux episodes or bolus and acid clearance time. NERD patients had a significantly lower PSPW index value compared with non-NERD patients. We found significantly higher PSPW index values among patients with FH compared with those with RH (p < 0.01).

3.2. Conventional MNBI Measurement

There was a significant statistical difference between conventional MNBI-Z5 and MNBI-Z6 values among GERD phenotypes (p = 0.001), as shown in Table 1. Patients diagnosed with NERD presented the lowest values, which were significantly different from patients with normal acid exposure (p < 0.001). Patients with RH had a significantly lower value of conventional MNBI-Z6 (p = 0.03) when compared with patients with FH. FH patients had significantly higher conventional MNBI-Z5 values (p = 0.002) and conventional MNBI-Z6 values (p < 0.001) compared with non-FH patients.

3.3. Simple MNBI Measurement

The distribution of simple MNBI-Z6 values is illustrated in Figure 2. The simple MNBI measurements in all impedance channels among the different subgroups are shown in Table 2. We found significant statistical differences comparing MNBI-Z5 (0.005) and MNBI-Z6 values (<0.001) among the GERD phenotypes. NERD patients had the lowest MNBI-Z5 and MNBI-Z6 values, which were significantly different from patients with normal acid exposure (p = 0.006 and p < 0.001, respectively). Patients with RH showed significantly lower values of simple MNBI-Z6 (p = 0.02) compared with those with FH. FH patients had significantly higher simple MNBI-Z5 values (p = 0.005) and simple MNBI-Z6 values (p < 0.001) compared with non-FH patients. There was no significant difference between simple MNBI values among all the impedance channels between infants with GERD and those with a normal MII-pH.

3.4. Comparison between Conventional and Simple MNBI Measurements

We found similar values of MNBI in every impedance channel using the two methods of measurement, except for MNBI-Z4, as presented in Table 3 and Table 4. We found a strong correlation between simple MNBI and conventional MNBI in all channels in children (r > 0.9, p < 0.001) as well as in infants (r > 0.85, p < 0.001). We also found a strong inverse correlation between conventional MNBI-Z6 and AET (r = −0.528, p < 0.001), as well as between simple MNBI-Z6 and AET (r = −0.519, p < 0.001).

We found a very strong correlation between simple MNBI and conventional MNBI values in MNBI-Z5 in all GERD phenotypes except those categorized as normal RI-NOS. A strong correlation was found between simple MNBI and conventional MNBI values when measuring in the most distal channel (Z6) in all phenotypes, as shown in Table 5.

Using an ROC curve analysis (Figure 3), we observed a good overall performance of both conventional MNBI-Z5 (AUC 0.795, CI 95% 0.656–0.934) and simple MNBI-Z5 (AUC 0.775, CI 95% 0.637–0.912) to differentiate between NERD and non-NERD phenotypes. Conventional MNBI-Z5 was able to distinguish NERD from non-NERD phenotypes with a sensitivity of 72.97% and a specificity of 83.33% at a cut-off value of 2329 Ω. Simple MNBI-Z5 was able to distinguish NERD from non-NERD phenotypes with a sensitivity of 70.27% and a specificity of 83.33% at a cut-off value of 2404 Ω.

Conventional MNBI-Z6 (AUC 0.864, CI 95% 0.756–0.972) and simple MNBI-Z6 (AUC 0.860, CI 95%, 0.754–0.967) showed similar overall performance in distinguishing between NERD and non-NERD children at a cut-off value of 1935 Ω, while simple MNBI-Z6 diagnosed NERD with a sensitivity of 78.38% and specificity of 83.33%. Using a DeLong test, we found no significant difference between the performance of simple and conventional MNBI-Z5 or MNBI Z6 in distinguishing NERD patients from those with normal acid exposure.

The Bland-Altman plot for MNBI-Z6 (Figure 4) displayed a uniform distribution of points, demonstrating a strong agreement between the two methods and indicating minimal bias when using either the simple or conventional methods in this channel.

4. Discussion

Studies have indicated that the presence of acid can negatively impact the intercellular junctional complexes in the esophageal epithelium, causing leakage between cells and the dilated intercellular spaces [40,41,42,43] The injured epithelium persistently exposed to acid has been demonstrated to have a decreased baseline impedance, both in adults and children [16,17,18,19]. We found a significant strong correlation between conventional MNBI in the most distal channel and acid exposure time (r = −0.528, p < 0.001), as well as between simple MNBI-Z6 and AET (r = −0.519, p < 0.001). This is consistent with several studies that showed that pediatric patients with abnormal acid exposure have significantly lower MNBI values compared with those with normal acid exposure times. Blasi et al. [37] and Rosado-Arias et al. [44] described children with severe esophagitis as having a lower MNBI than patients without severe esophagitis.

A study conducted by Eiamkulbutr et al. [45] reported that the MNBI could diagnose GERD in children with a sensitivity of 50.0% and a specificity of 33.33% at a cutoff value of 1466 Ω. Rosado-Arias et al. [46] showed that MNBI in the most distal channel had an acceptable ability to diagnose GERD in children with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 45% at a cutoff value of 2183 Ω. This indicates that the assessment of nocturnal baseline impedance might be a useful diagnostic method, perhaps having the potential to eliminate the need for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in the diagnosis of esophagitis.

We found significantly lower conventional MNBI-Z6 and simple MNBI-Z6 values in NERD patients compared with those with normal acid exposure, which is in concordance with the data reported by Blasi et al. [37]. Using an ROC curve analysis, we observed an excellent ability of simple MNBI in the most distal channel (AUC 0.864, CI 95% 0.756–0.972) to differentiate between NERD and non-NERD phenotypes. Simple MNBI-Z6 was able to differentiate NERD from non-NERD phenotypes with a sensitivity of 78.38% and specificity of 83.33% at a cut-off value of 1935 Ω.

Conventional MNBI-Z6 and simple MNBI-Z6 showed an excellent ability to discriminate FH from the rest of the phenotypes. Conventional MNBI-Z6 (AUC 0.802, CI 95% 0.676–0.928) was able to diagnose FH with a sensitivity of 84.6% and a specificity of 80.6% at a cut-off value of 2563. However, simple MNBI-Z6 cm was better able to predict the presence of FH (AUC 0.823, CI 95% 0.697–0.949), with a sensitivity of 92.3% and a specificity of 80.6% at a cut-off value of 2494 Ω. We found a very strong correlation between simple MNBI-Z6 and MNBI-Z7 in NERD children (r = 0.953, p < 0.001), showing the potential of simple MNBI measurement to be used in standard impedance assessment.

Both conventional MNBI-Z6 and simple MNBI-Z6 demonstrated the same ability to differentiate between NERD and RH in patients with an inconclusive reflux index (AUC = 0.741). Conventional MNBI-Z6 was able to diagnose NERD with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 55.67% at a cut-off value of 1447 Ω. In adult populations, MNBI has been demonstrated to be useful in distinguishing between GERD phenotypes, especially when conventional metrics provide inconclusive results [26,30,33,47,48].

Due to its utility, it may be used to diagnose GERD without the need for endoscopy, offering the advantage of being less invasive and not requiring fasting or sedation.

We found no difference in conventional MNBI or simple MNBI values in infants with GERD compared to those without GERD in all impedance channels. This could be explained by the predominance of non-acid reflux episodes in this age group. Several studies have shown that in this age group, non-acid or weakly acid reflux episodes are predominant [49,50,51,52,53]. The utility of the simple method to measure MNBI is debatable due to the fact that infants have meals during the night and also have more reflux episodes.

To the best of our knowledge, there are no published studies regarding the validation of the simple MNBI measurement method in children. We found a strong correlation between simple MNBI and conventional MNBI in all channels in children (r > 0.9, p < 0.001), especially in the distal esophagus, as well as in infants (r > 0.85, p < 0.001). This is consistent with the data published in adult populations by Hoshikawa et al. [33], who found a very strong correlation between conventional MNBI and simple MNBI in the most distal channels (r = 0.95, p < 0.001). Another study conducted by Park et al. [34] showed a very good correlation as well between the two measurement methods in the distal esophagus (r = 0.94, p < 0.001) in adults.

Values obtained by the two methods of measurement showed very similar results. In the two most distal channels, the mean difference was 9 Ω and 1 Ω, respectively. The Bland–Altman plot for MNBI-Z6 showed the distribution of points to be uniformly scattered, indicating a good agreement between the two methods and suggesting minimal bias when using either the simple or the conventional methods in this channel. However, the points outside the red dashed lines indicate discrepancies between the methods that may need further investigation.

There were certain limitations in our study. Firstly, the current software for MII-pH does not include an automated feature for measuring the conventional or simple MNBI. As a result, manual measurements of the MNBI were conducted, which are susceptible to human error. Artificial intelligence may be a promising solution for automatic measurement of the MNBI, according to recent studies. AI systems can provide automated analysis of MII-pH tracings, significantly enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of these measurements. With the capability of identifying the PSPW with an accuracy of up to 82%, AI technologies can streamline the diagnostic process by reducing human error and expediting the interpretation of complex data. As AI continues to evolve, its role in the clinical setting is expected to expand, offering even greater advancements in the diagnosis and management of GERD through the sophisticated analysis of impedance parameters [54,55,56]. Additionally, it should be noted that the study sample size was small, and patients were evaluated from a single tertiary center, potentially limiting the generalization of the findings to wider populations. These are preliminary results, and the study will be continued in order to provide more accurate data.

Further research is needed to determine the appropriate thresholds and to develop protocols for consistent measurements in future studies to be conducted across multiple centers.

5. Conclusions

Our study provides evidence for the value of utilizing simple MNBI measurement in the two distal channels to differentiate between different phenotypes of GERD in children. According to our findings and the available evidence, we highly encourage the use of MNBI as a routine method of assessing MII-pH monitoring in children who have negative upper endoscopy results and who show symptoms of GERD despite receiving medication.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.S.P. and L.E.C.; methodology, R.S.P. and L.E.C.; statistical analysis, V.-I.N. and L.E.C.; validation, S.C.M. and D.L.D.; interpretation of the MII-pH tracings, R.S.P.; writing—original draft preparation, V.-I.N. and R.S.P.; writing—review & editing, L.E.C. and R.S.P.; supervision, S.C.M. and D.L.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca (Nr. 299/11.09.2019) for studies involving humans.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy and ethical restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figure 1 The simple method of measuring the mean nocturnal baseline impedance (24 h multichannel intraluminal impedance tracing, with the nocturnal recumbent period highlighted in green). Mean measurements in each channel using the software’s “electronic ruler” are highlighted in the red box.

Figure 2 Distribution of simple MNBI-Z6 values between GERD phenotypes (p < 0.001). MNBI, mean nocturnal baseline impedance; NERD, non-erosive reflux disease; RH, reflux hypersensitivity; FH, functional heartburn; Normal RI-NOS, normal reflux index not otherwise-specified; Z6, the most distal impedance channel.

Figure 3 ROC curves for conventional mean nocturnal baseline impedance in MNBI-Z5, conventional MNBI-Z6, simple MNBI-Z5, and simple MNBI-Z6 in differentiating NERD patients from non-NERD patients.

Figure 4 Bland–Altman plot for conventional and simple mean nocturnal baseline impedance measurements in the most distal channel. MNBI-Z6, mean nocturnal baseline impedance in channel Z6; SD, standard deviation.

clinpract-14-00134-t001_Table 1 Table 1 General characteristics and pH–impedance measurements among the subgroups.

	Group 1 (n = 15)	Group 2 (n = 49) *	
	GERD
(n = 10)	Normal
(n = 5)	p-Value	NERD
(n = 12)	RH
(n = 20)	FH
(n = 13)	Normal RI-NOS
(n = 4)	p-Value	
Age (months/years) (mean ± SD)	6 ± 3.27	8 ± 3.67	0.302	13.42 ± 2.27	13.4 ± 3.6	14.46 ± 2.07	12.75 ± 4.72	0.69	
Sex (male, %)	40	40	NS	75	40	23.08	75	0.03	
Weight-for-length/BMI-for-age percentile (%)	34 ± 31.9	33 ± 30.4	NS	49.9 ± 28.3	47.4 ± 30.7	51.4 ± 38.4	63.5 ± 40.84	0.85	
Acid exposure time (%, median, IQR)	1.8 (1.2–2.5)	0.4 (0.3–0.6)	0.04	5.9 (5.28–7.18)	1.35 (0.5–2.5)	0.4 (0.3–1.9)	0.95 (0.7–1.15)	<0.001	
Total reflux episodes number (mean ± SD)	69.5 ± 26.7	51.8 ± 19.6	0.21	94.7 ± 44.3	66.3 ± 45.4	32.8 ± 15	36 ± 29.5	0.003	
Acid reflux episode number	33.2 ± 23.3	17.2 ± 15.1	0.14	76.3 ± 37.8	31.6 ± 22.2	18.9 ± 11.8	20.8 ± 11.4	<0.001	
Proximal reflux episodes	42.9 ± 22.3	31 ± 14.4	0.3	53.4 ± 24	34 ± 27.1	15.8 ± 6.7	17.3 ± 15.02	0.001	
Mean acid clearance time (s) (median, IQR)	76.5 (61.5–126.75)	32.0 (32.0–51.0)	0.07	120.6 ± 79.8	62.7 ± 46.7	53.8 ± 51.8	44.5 ± 30.3	0.015	
Bolus clearance time (s) (mean ± SD)	15.5 ± 4.6	13.6 ± 2.3	0.4	12.3 ± 3.55	15.4 ± 5.9	12.5 ± 3.18	16.5 ± 6.76	0.16	
PSPW index (%)	36.4 ± 12.9	52.9 ± 12.6	0.03	36.1 ± 13.9	47.6 ± 14.8	69.9 ± 14.4	65.4 ± 11.3	<0.001	
Conventional 
MNBI-Z1	1559 ± 775	1411 ± 650	0.72	2327 ± 1057	2724 ± 959	2453 ± 585	1725 ± 1233	0.23	
Conventional 
MNBI-Z2	1674 ± 661	1795 ± 506	0.72	2536 ± 1066	2492 ± 721	2497 ± 537	1748 ± 1182	0.37	
Conventional 
MNBI-Z3	1892 ± 560	2209 ± 351	0.27	2796 ± 1152	2895 ± 1013	2912 ± 594	2180 ± 1313	0.59	
Conventional 
MNBI-Z4	2170 ± 528	2197 ± 418	0.92	2388 ± 1038	2887 ± 995	2811 ± 623	2127 ± 1298	0.108	
Conventional 
MNBI-Z5	2334 ± 752	2155 ± 576	0.65	1812 ± 875	2645 ± 984	3256 ± 613	1941 ± 1146	0.001	
Conventional 
MNBI-Z6	2342 ± 911	2357 ± 426	0.97	1121 ± 773	2281 ± 890	2882 ± 526	1652 ± 1225	<0.001	
NERD, non-erosive reflux disease; RH, reflux hypersensitivity; FH, functional heartburn; Normal RI-NOS, normal reflux index not otherwise specified; SD, standard deviation; BMI for age—percentile, Body-mass index for age—percentile; MNBI, mean nocturnal baseline impedance; PSPW, post-reflux swallow peristaltic wave; IQR. Interquartile; Z1–Z6, impedance channels 1–6. * Partial data previously published in a pilot study [39].

clinpract-14-00134-t002_Table 2 Table 2 Simple method values of the mean nocturnal baseline impedance among groups.

	Group 1	Group 2	
	GERD
(n = 10)	Normal
(n = 5)	p-Value	NERD
(n = 12)	RH
(n = 20)	FH
(n = 13)	Normal RI-NOS
(n = 4)	p-Value	
Simple 
MNBI-Z1	1731 ± 804	1526 ± 715	0.63	2300 ± 900	2697 ± 803	2469 ± 563	1803 ± 1244	0.203	
Simple 
MNBI-Z2	1758 ± 578	1851 ± 335	0.74	2398 ± 946	2472 ± 634	2482 ± 605	1791 ± 1199	0.751	
Simple 
MNBI-Z3	1883 ± 532	2180 ± 224	0.25	2641 ± 1089	2887 ± 995	2811 ± 623	2127 ± 1298	0.520	
Simple 
MNBI-Z4	2177 ± 565	2062 ± 232	0.68	2257 ± 1044	2868 ± 1045	3136 ± 756	2084 ± 1276	0.088	
Simple 
MNBI-Z5	2318 ± 760	2156 ± 538	0.6	1872 ± 853	2609 ± 976	3172 ± 600	2101 ± 1263	0.005	
Simple 
MNBI-Z6	2259 ± 871	2342 ± 500	0.84	1194 ± 735	2233 ± 820	2868 ± 517	1708 ± 1128	<0.001	
GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease; NERD, non-erosive reflux disease; RH, reflux hypersensitivity; FH, functional heartburn; Normal RI-NOS, normal reflux index not otherwise specified; MNBI, mean nocturnal baseline impedance; Z1–Z6, impedance channels 1–6.

clinpract-14-00134-t003_Table 3 Table 3 Correlation between conventional and simple mean nocturnal baseline impedance values in all impedance channels in infants (Group 1).

	Absolute Values (Means)	Correlation	
	Conventional MNBI	Simple MNBI	p-Value	r-Value	p-Value	
MNBI-Z1	1510	1663	0.873	0.95	<0.001	
MNBI-Z2	1714	1789	0.320	0.88	<0.001	
MNBI-Z3	1998	1982	0.143	0.93	<0.001	
MNBI-Z4	2179	2138	<0.001	0.88	<0.001	
MNBI-Z5	2274	2264	0.806	0.98	<0.001	
MNBI-Z6	2347	2287	0.972	0.96	<0.001	
MNBI, mean nocturnal baseline impedance; Z1–Z6, impedance channels 1–6.

clinpract-14-00134-t004_Table 4 Table 4 Correlation between conventional and simple mean nocturnal baseline impedance values in all impedance channels in children (Group 2).

	Absolute Values (Means)	Correlation	
	Conventional MNBI	Simple MNBI	p-Value	r-Value	p-Value	
MNBI-Z1	2473	2466	0.873	0.95	<0.001	
MNBI-Z2	2444	2401	0.320	0.93	<0.001	
MNBI-Z3	2817	2744	0.143	0.94	<0.001	
MNBI-Z4	2840	2725	<0.001	0.98	<0.001	
MNBI-Z5	2545	2536	0.806	0.97	<0.001	
MNBI-Z6	2105	2104	0.972	0.97	<0.001	
MNBI, mean nocturnal baseline impedance; Z1–Z6, impedance channels 1–6.

clinpract-14-00134-t005_Table 5 Table 5 Correlations with the simple mean nocturnal baseline.

MNBI Impedance Channel	GERD
Phenotype	Correlation Coefficient (r-Value)	p-Value	
MNBI-Z5	NERD	0.952	<0.001	
RH	0.980	<0.001	
FH	0.897	<0.001	
Normal RI-NOS	0.4	0.6	
MNBI-Z6	NERD	0.953	<0.001	
RH	0.973	<0.001	
FH	0.816	<0.001	
Normal RI-NOS	0.969	<0.001	
NERD, non-erosive reflux disease; RH, reflux hypersensitivity; FH, functional heartburn; Normal RI-NOS, normal reflux index not otherwise specified; MNBI-Z5, mean nocturnal baseline impedance in the fifth impedance channel; MNBI-Z6, mean nocturnal baseline impedance in the most distal impedance channel.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
==== Refs
References

1. Vandenplas Y. Rudolph C.D. Di Lorenzo C. Hassall E. Liptak G. Mazur L. Sondheimer J. Staiano A. Thomson M. Veereman-Wauters G. Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux Clinical Practice Guidelines: Joint Recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2009 49 498 547 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181b7f563 19745761
2. Rosen R. Vandenplas Y. Singendonk M. Cabana M. DiLorenzo C. Gottrand F. Gupta S. Langendam M. Staiano A. Thapar N. Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux Clinical Practice Guidelines: Joint Recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutritio J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2018 66 516 554 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001889 29470322
3. Özen M.A. Uzuner S. Gökçe S. Tekin M. Eroğlu E. Gündoğdu G. Nissen Fundoplikasyon Sonrası Nüks Oluşum Mekanizmalarının Yeniden Değerlendirilmesi Turk. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2019 33 105 111 10.5222/JTAPS.2019.45403
4. Tural D.A. Büyükşahin H.N. Yalçın E.G. Soyer T. Ozsezen B. Guzelkas İ. Sunman B. Emiralioğlu N. Dogru D. Özçelik U. Opere Özofagus Atrezisi ve Trakeoözofagial Fistülü Olan Çocukların Solunum Sistemi Problemleri Turk. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2022 36 006 010 10.29228/JTAPS.53857
5. Vandenplas Y. Orsi M. Benninga M. Gatcheco F. Rosen R. Thomson M. Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Management Consensus Acta Paediatr. Int. J. Paediatr. 2024 113 403 410 10.1111/apa.17074 38116947
6. Singendonk M. Goudswaard E. Langendam M. Van Wijk M. Van Etten-Jamaludin F. Benninga M. Tabbers M. Prevalence of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms in Infants and Children: A Systematic Review J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2019 68 811 817 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002280 31124988
7. Soto-Pérez J.C. Abdo-Francis J.M. Fenotipos de La Enfermedad Por Reflujo Gastroesofágico: Una Visión Basada En Su Fisiopatología Cirugía Cir. 2023 91 403 410 10.24875/CIRU.22000495 37441725
8. Junko F. Moore D. Omari T. Seiboth G. Abu-Assi R. Hammond P. Couper R. Multichannel Impedance Monitoring for Distinguishing Nonerosive Reflux Esophagitis with Minor Changes on Endoscopy in Children Ther. Adv. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2021 14 26317745211030464 10.1177/26317745211030466
9. Hirsch S. Rosen R. The Real Relevance of Nonacid Reflux in Pediatric Patients J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2023 57 754 759 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001868 37436834
10. Mahoney L.B. Nurko S. Rosen R. The Prevalence of Rome IV Nonerosive Esophageal Phenotypes in Children J. Pediatr. 2017 189 86 91 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.06.019 28711175
11. Prakash Gyawali C. Kahrilas P.J. Savarino E. Zerbib F. Mion F. Smout A.J.P.M. Vaezi M. Sifrim D. Fox M.R. Vela M.F. Modern Diagnosis of GERD: The Lyon Consensus Gut 2018 67 1351 1362 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314722 29437910
12. López-Alonso M. Moya M.J. Cabo J.A. Ribas J. del Carmen Macías M. Silny J. Sifrim D. Twenty-Four-Hour Esophageal Impedance-PH Monitoring in Healthy Preterm Neonates: Rate and Characteristics of Acid, Weakly Acidic, and Weakly Alkaline Gastroesophageal Reflux Pediatrics 2006 118 e299 e308 10.1542/peds.2005-3140 16831894
13. Quitadamo P. Tambucci R. Mancini V. Cristofori F. Baldassarre M. Pensabene L. Francavilla R. Di Nardo G. Caldaro T. Rossi P. Esophageal PH-Impedance Monitoring in Children: Position Paper on Indications, Methodology and Interpretation by the SIGENP Working Group Dig. Liver Dis. 2019 51 1522 1536 10.1016/j.dld.2019.07.016 31526716
14. Pilic D. Fröhlich T. Nöh F. Pappas A. Schmidt-Choudhury A. Köhler H. Skopnik H. Wenzl T.G. Detection of Gastroesophageal Reflux in Children Using Combined Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance and PH Measurement: Data from the German Pediatric Impedance Group J. Pediatr. 2011 158 650 654 650–654.e1 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.09.033 21035128
15. Mousa H. Machado R. Orsi M. Chao C.S. Alhajj T. Alhajj M. Port C. Skaggs B. Woodley F.W. Combined Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance-PH (MII-PH): Multicenter Report of Normal Values from 117 Children Curr. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2014 16 400 10.1007/s11894-014-0400-6 25064319
16. Salvatore S. Salvatoni A. Van Steen K. Ummarino D. Hauser B. Vandenplas Y. Behind the (Impedance) Baseline in Children Dis. Esophagus 2014 27 726 731 10.1111/dote.12152 24118437
17. Salvatore S. Salvatoni A. Van Berkel M. Van Steen K. Unmarino D. Ghanma A. Hauser B. Vandenplas Y. Esophageal Impedance Baseline Is Age Dependent J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2013 57 506 513 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31829b68cd 23698024
18. Pilic D. Hankel S. Koerner-Rettberg C. Hamelmann E. Schmidt-Choudhury A. The Role of Baseline Impedance as a Marker of Mucosal Integrity in Children with Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2013 48 785 793 10.3109/00365521.2013.793388 23795658
19. Borrelli O. Salvatore S. Mancini V. Ribolsi M. Gentile M. Bizzarri B. Cicala M. Lindley K.J. de’Angelis G.L. Relationship between Baseline Impedance Levels and Esophageal Mucosal Integrity in Children with Erosive and Non-Erosive Reflux Disease Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2012 24 828-e394 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01947.x 22680230
20. Frazzoni M. de Bortoli N. Frazzoni L. Tolone S. Savarino V. Savarino E. Impedance-PH Monitoring for Diagnosis of Reflux Disease: New Perspectives Dig. Dis. Sci. 2017 62 1881 1889 10.1007/s10620-017-4625-8 28550489
21. Frazzoni M. de Bortoli N. Frazzoni L. Furnari M. Martinucci I. Tolone S. Farioli A. Marchi S. Fuccio L. Savarino V. Impairment of Chemical Clearance and Mucosal Integrity Distinguishes Hypersensitive Esophagus from Functional Heartburn J. Gastroenterol. 2017 52 444 451 10.1007/s00535-016-1226-9 27241210
22. Patel A. Wang D. Sainani N. Sayuk G.S. Gyawali C.P. Distal Mean Nocturnal Baseline Impedance on PH-Impedance Monitoring Predicts Reflux Burden and Symptomatic Outcome in Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2016 44 890 898 10.1111/apt.13777 27554638
23. Frazzoni M. Savarino E. de Bortoli N. Martinucci I. Furnari M. Frazzoni L. Mirante V.G. Bertani H. Marchi S. Conigliaro R. Analyses of the Post-Reflux Swallow-Induced Peristaltic Wave Index and Nocturnal Baseline Impedance Parameters Increase the Diagnostic Yield of Impedance-PH Monitoring of Patients with Reflux Disease Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016 14 40 46 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.06.026 26122764
24. Wang N. Guo Z.H. Wu Y.H. Zhang C. Mean Nocturnal Baseline Impedance: Influencing Factors and Diagnostic Value in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Technol. Health Care 2023 31 1875 1886 10.3233/THC-220814 36970927
25. Rogers B.D. Rengarajan A. Ribolsi M. Ghisa M. Quader F. Penagini R. de Bortoli N. Mauro A. Cicala M. Savarino E. Postreflux Swallow-Induced Peristaltic Wave Index from PH-Impedance Monitoring Associates with Esophageal Body Motility and Esophageal Acid Burden Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2021 33 e13973 10.1111/nmo.13973 33249687
26. Sararu E.R. Peagu R. Fierbinteanu-Braticevici C. Association between Mean Nocturnal Baseline Impedance (MNBI) and Post-Reflux Swallow-Induced Peristaltic Wave Index (PSPW) in GERD Patients Diagnostics 2023 13 3602 10.3390/diagnostics13243602 38132186
27. Rengarajan A. Savarino E. Della Coletta M. Ghisa M. Patel A. Gyawali C.P. Mean Nocturnal Baseline Impedance Correlates with Symptom Outcome When Acid Exposure Time Is Inconclusive on Esophageal Reflux Monitoring Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020 18 589 595 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.05.044 31163276
28. Ribolsi M. De Bortoli N. Frazzoni M. Marchetti L. Savarino E. Cicala M. Proximal Esophageal Impedance Baseline Increases the Yield of Impedance-PH and Is Associated with Response to PPIs in Chronic Cough Patients Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2024 36 e14775 10.1111/nmo.14775 38424679
29. Frazzoni L. Frazzoni M. de Bortoli N. Tolone S. Furnari M. Martinucci I. Bertani H. Marchi S. Conigliaro R. Fuccio L. Postreflux Swallow-Induced Peristaltic Wave Index and Nocturnal Baseline Impedance Can Link PPI-Responsive Heartburn to Reflux Better than Acid Exposure Time Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2017 29 e13116 10.1111/nmo.13116
30. Wang Y. Ye B. Wang M. Lin L. Jiang L. Esophageal Nocturnal Baseline Impedance and Post-Reflux Swallow-Induced Peristaltic Wave Index in Identifying Proton Pump Inhibitor-Refractory Non-Erosive Reflux Disease J. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2021 27 525 532 10.5056/jnm20073 34642272
31. Gyawali C.P. Yadlapati R. Fass R. Katzka D. Pandolfino J. Savarino E. Sifrim D. Spechler S. Zerbib F. Fox M.R. Updates to the Modern Diagnosis of GERD: Lyon Consensus 2.0 Gut 2023 73 361 371 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330616 37734911
32. Luo H.N. Wang C.C. Lin Y.C. Chuang C.Y. Tsou Y.A. Fu J.C. Yang S.S. Chang C.S. Lien H.C. Distal Mean Nocturnal Baseline Impedance Predicts Pathological Reflux of Isolated Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms J. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2023 29 174 182 10.5056/jnm22049 37019863
33. Hoshikawa Y. Sawada A. Sonmez S. Nikaki K. Woodland P. Yazaki E. Sifrim D. Measurement of Esophageal Nocturnal Baseline Impedance: A Simplified Method J. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2020 26 241 247 10.5056/jnm19183 32235031
34. Park J.S. Van der Wall H. Falk G.L. Conventional and Simple Methods of Measuring Esophageal Nocturnal Baseline Impedance Show Excellent Agreement J. Dig. Dis. 2021 22 419 424 10.1111/1751-2980.13024 34042298
35. Mutalib M. Sintusek P. Punpanich D. Thapar N. Lindley K. A New Method to Estimate Catheter Length for Esophageal Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance Monitoring in Children Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2015 27 728 733 10.1111/nmo.12547 25824711
36. Mutalib M. Rawat D. Lindley K. Borrelli O. Perring S. Auth M.K.H. Thapar N. BSPGHAN Motility Working Group Position Statement: Paediatric Multichannel Intraluminal PH Impedance Monitoring-Indications, Methods and Interpretation Frontline Gastroenterol. 2017 8 156 162 10.1136/flgastro-2016-100796 28839903
37. Blasi E. Stefanelli E. Tambucci R. Salvatore S. De Angelis P. Quitadamo P. Pacchiarotti C. Di Nardo G. Crocco F. Felici E. Prevalence of Non-Erosive Esophageal Phenotypes in Children: A European Multicenter Study J. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2023 29 156 165 10.5056/jnm22115 37019861
38. Martinucci I. De Bortoli N. Savarino E. Piaggi P. Bellini M. Antonelli A. Savarino V. Frazzoni M. Marchi S. Esophageal Baseline Impedance Levels in Patients with Pathophysiological Characteristics of Functional Heartburn Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2014 26 546 555 10.1111/nmo.12299 24433456
39. Pop R.S. Pop D. Chiperi L.E. Nechita V.-I. Man S.C. Dumitrașcu D.L. Utility of the Post-Reflux Swallow-Induced Peristaltic Wave Index and Mean Nocturnal Baseline Impedance for the Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Phenotypes in Children Children 2024 11 773 10.3390/children11070773 39062223
40. Tobey N.A. Carson J.L. Alkiek R.A. Orlando R.C. Dilated Intercellular Spaces: A Morphological Feature of Acid Reflux- Damaged Human Esophageal Epithelium Gastroenterology 1996 111 1200 1205 10.1053/gast.1996.v111.pm8898633 8898633
41. Tobey N.A. Hosseini S.S. Argote C.M. Dobrucali A.M. Awayda M.S. Orlando R.C. Dilated Intercellular Spaces and Shunt Permeability in Nonerosive Acid-Damaged Esophageal Epithelium Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2004 99 13 22 10.1046/j.1572-0241.2003.04018.x 14687135
42. Ustaoglu A. Nguyen A. Spechler S. Sifrim D. Souza R. Woodland P. Mucosal Pathogenesis in Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2020 32 e14022 10.1111/nmo.14022 33118247
43. Liu C.C. Lee J.W. Liu T.T. Yi C.H. Chen C.L. Relevance of Ultrastructural Alterations of Intercellular Junction Morphology in Inflamed Human Esophagus J. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2013 19 324 331 10.5056/jnm.2013.19.3.324 23875099
44. Rosado-Arias Y.M.R. Monjaraz E.M.T. Mayans J.A.R. Mondragón F.E.Z. Arellano K.R.I. Barrios E.M. León J.F.C. Mayer A.L. Bustamante R.C. Baseline Impedance and Mean Nocturnal Baseline Impedance Values in Children with Erosive Oesophagitis J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2021 72 207 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003177
45. Eiamkulbutr S. Dumrisilp T. Sanpavat A. Sintusek P. Prevalence of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Children with Extraesophageal Manifestations Using Combined-Video, Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance-PH Study World J. Clin. Pediatr. 2023 12 151 161 10.5409/wjcp.v12.i3.151 37342455
46. Rosado-Arias Y. Toro-Monjaraz E.M. Cervantes-Bustamante R. Zarate-Mondragon F. Cadena-Leon J. Ignorosa-Arellano K. Loredo-Mayer A. Ramírez-Mayans J. Low Mean Nocturnal Baseline Impedance Is Associated with a Pathological Acid Exposure Time in Children J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2022 74 215 220 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003331 34694265
47. Ribolsi M. Gyawali C.P. Savarino E. Rogers B. Rengarajan A. Della Coletta M. Ghisa M. Cicala M. Correlation between Reflux Burden, Peristaltic Function, and Mucosal Integrity in GERD Patients Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2020 32 e13752 10.1111/nmo.13752 31670453
48. Visaggi P. Mariani L. Svizzero F.B. Tarducci L. Sostilio A. Frazzoni M. Tolone S. Penagini R. Frazzoni L. Ceccarelli L. Clinical Use of Mean Nocturnal Baseline Impedance and Post-Reflux Swallow-Induced Peristaltic Wave Index for the Diagnosis of Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease Esophagus 2022 19 525 534 10.1007/s10388-022-00933-6 35768671
49. Condino A.A. Sondheimer J. Pan Z. Gralla J. Perry D. O’Connor J.A. Evaluation of Infantile Acid and Nonacid Gastroesophageal Reflux Using Combined PH Monitoring and Impedance Measurement J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2006 42 16 21 10.1097/01.mpg.0000188008.66752.72 16385248
50. Woodley F.W. Fernandez S. Mousa H. Diurnal Variation in the Chemical Clearance of Acid Gastroesophageal Reflux in Infants Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2007 5 37 43 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.10.003 17234555
51. Salvatore S. Pagliarin F. Huysentruyt K. Bosco A. Fumagalli L. Van De Maele K. Agosti M. Vandenplas Y. Distress in Infants and Young Children: Don’t Blame Acid Reflux J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2020 71 465 469 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002841 32639449
52. van Wijk M.P. Benninga M.A. Omari T.I. Role of the Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance Technique in Infants and Children J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2009 48 2 12 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31818f0902 19172117
53. Loots C.M. Wijnakker R. van Wijk M.P. Davidson G. Benninga M.A. Omari T.I. Esophageal Impedance Baselines in Infants before and after Placebo and Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2012 24 758 762 758–762, e351-2 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01922.x 22512786
54. Wong M.W. Rogers B.D. Liu M.X. Lei W.Y. Liu T.T. Yi C.H. Hung J.S. Liang S.W. Tseng C.W. Wang J.H. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Measuring Novel PH-Impedance Metrics for Optimal Diagnosis of GERD Diagnostics 2023 13 960 10.3390/diagnostics13050960 36900104
55. Rogers B. Samanta S. Ghobadi K. Patel A. Savarino E. Roman S. Sifrim D. Gyawali C.P. Artificial Intelligence Automates and Augments Baseline Impedance Measurements from PH-Impedance Studies in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease J. Gastroenterol. 2021 56 34 41 10.1007/s00535-020-01743-2 33151406
56. Wong M.W. Liu M.X. Lei W.Y. Liu T.T. Yi C.H. Hung J.S. Liang S.W. Lin L. Tseng C.W. Wang J.H. Artificial Intelligence Facilitates Measuring Reflux Episodes and Postreflux Swallow-Induced Peristaltic Wave Index from Impedance-PH Studies in Patients with Reflux Disease Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2023 35 e14506 10.1111/nmo.14506 36458529
