
==== Front
Geriatrics (Basel)
Geriatrics (Basel)
geriatrics
Geriatrics
2308-3417
MDPI

10.3390/geriatrics9050117
geriatrics-09-00117
Opinion
Embracing Connection: A Review of First-Ever Clinical Guidelines on Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5149-8158
Hoang Peter M. 1
Conn David on behalf of the Canadian Coalition for Senior’s Mental Health, Social Isolation and Loneliness Guidelines Working Group
23*†
Petretto Donatella Academic Editor
1 Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3H2, Canada; peter.hoang@medportal.ca
2 Baycrest Health Sciences, North York, ON M6A 2E1, Canada
3 Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1R8, Canada
* Correspondence: dconn@baycrest.org; Tel.: +1-416-785-2500 (ext. 2456)
† Membership of the Group is provided in the Acknowledgments.

11 9 2024
10 2024
9 5 11712 8 2024
01 9 2024
04 9 2024
© 2024 by the authors.
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Social isolation and loneliness are major public health concerns and are associated with morbidity and mortality. As this is an increasing issue in older adults, guidance for healthcare providers is a priority. The Canadian Coalition for Senior’s Mental Health (CCSMH) has developed the first Canadian social isolation and loneliness guidelines to help providers recognize, assess, and manage social isolation and loneliness among older adults. We review and summarize these guidelines to support healthcare and social service providers to apply best practices and evidence-based care for older adults experiencing social isolation and loneliness.

loneliness
social isolation
clinical practice guidelines
older adults
Waltons TrustThis project has been made possible through the generous philanthropic support of Waltons Trust.
==== Body
pmc1. Introduction

Social isolation and loneliness have major public health implications and remain a challenge internationally [1,2]. Loneliness is defined as the subjective feeling of unmet social needs or the feeling of being lonely [3]. Social isolation is defined as few or infrequent social contacts or the objective lack of social contact with other individuals [3]. Older adults (generally defined as 65 years of age or greater) [4] are particularly vulnerable to loneliness and social isolation due to changes in social structures, medical comorbidities, and living settings [5,6,7,8]. Given that over 10% of the global population is aged 65 years and over [9,10], social isolation and loneliness have far-reaching impacts and consequences for older adults [11]. Further, up to 58% of Canadian adults over fifty years of age experience loneliness, and 41% are at risk of social isolation [12]. European and American prevalence estimates of loneliness have reported that this issue affects up to one third of older adults [3,13,14]. As best practices in prevention, assessment, and management of social isolation and loneliness are paramount for healthcare and social service providers, the Canadian Coalition for Senior’s Mental Health (CCSMH) published the Canadian Clinical Guidelines on Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults in 2024 [15]. We describe the development of these guidelines as the first clinical practice guidelines on this issue and highlight key practice points to inform healthcare providers.

2. Development of the Practice Guidelines

The Canadian Coalition for Senior’s Mental Health is a not-for-profit interprofessional organization that was established in 2002 with the mandate of improving the mental health of older adults. Since then, the CCSMH has published clinical guidelines on mental health in long-term care, suicide prevention, depression, delirium, substance use disorders, behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, and anxiety.

The CCSMH created a Guideline Development Working Group of nine core members (including the authors of this commentary) with diversity in gender, clinical practice/expertise, professional discipline, and Canadian geographical area. These included one geriatric psychiatrist, one geriatrician, one care of the elderly family physician, two social workers, one occupational therapist, and two researchers. The CCSMH completed a rapid scoping review of reviews and identification of gray literature [16]. This was followed by a national survey to capture perspectives from healthcare providers and older adults. Due to the opportunity for many different healthcare professionals to identify and support older adults experiencing social isolation and loneliness, our aim was to provide guidance across multiple disciplines. As such, we use healthcare and social service providers (HCSSP) to broadly include all professionals who provide care for older adults.

The working group divided the sections by area of expertise for guideline drafting, later reaching consensus during teleconference meetings and subsequently voting on the guidelines. This methodology has been used in previous guidelines published by the CCSMH [17,18,19]. Sections of the guidelines were divided into Prevention, Screening and Assessment, and Interventions. These provide a framework for the healthcare provider across the spectrum from health promotion to management [20]. Interventions were divided by their primary intended category based on previous research [21,22]. The working group applied a modified version of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) to assess the quality of the evidence (low, moderate, or high) for each recommendation and its available strength (weak or strong) [23]. In brief, the GRADE domains assess the risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, and publication bias to rate the confidence in the available literature [23]. The modified approach further incorporates the confidence that patients will benefit from the action. Recommendations are then rated up or down, respectively, to obtain a scale from low to high. High certainty recommendations suggest a high degree of confidence in the true effect, and the opposite for low certainty recommendations.

The strength of the recommendation indicates the following: (1) the degree of confidence in which the proposed action (e.g., prevention, assessment, or intervention) has desirable effects that outweigh negative consequences; (2) uncertainty or variability in a patient’s values and preferences; and (3) the resources associated with the action. The balance of these factors are used to designate the strength of the recommendation (weak or strong). Recommendations that had limited evidence but were considered best clinical practice were categorized as consensus recommendations. Assessment criteria for the quality of the evidence and the strength of the recommendations can be found in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively. All recommendations were independently voted on by committee members and were adopted if they had at least 75% approval; consensus was reached on all recommendations. These guidelines were reviewed by three external academic experts to provide feedback prior to publication.

3. Applying the Guidelines to Clinical Practice

These guidelines are divided into sections on Prevention, Screening and Assessment, and Interventions (Table 3) and are briefly summarized below. We recommend that healthcare providers apply these guidelines to all practice settings. This may include primary care offices and clinics, hospitals, and community and government agencies, amongst others.

3.1. Prevention (Recommendations 1–3)

Healthcare providers should have knowledge of the risk factors associated with social isolation and loneliness in older adults, and these should be a core part of the educational curriculum. These risk factors include, but are not limited to: advanced age [24,25], female sex [26,27], identifying as 2SLGBTQIA+ (2S: Two-Spirit; L: Lesbian; G: Gay; B: Bisexual; T: Transgender; Q: Queer; I: Intersex; A: Asexual, and + [inclusive of people who identify as part of sexual and gender diverse communities]) [24,25,28], identifying as an ethnic minority [29], living alone, episodic mental or physical health issues [26], and being a caregiver/care partner [30]. Further, as healthcare and social service providers are an important point of contact for older adults, they should leverage their role and knowledge to educate patients and the public about social isolation and loneliness.

3.2. Screening and Assessment (Recommendations 4–7)

The CCSMH recommends targeted screening for those who have risk factors using evidence-based screening tools. These can include single-item measures [31], the UCLA Loneliness Scale [32], and the Lubben Social Isolation Scale [33], among others. Care providers should recognize that each tool may not capture loneliness and isolation in its entirety, as tools can capture components of each based on the degree of subjectivity and the degree of structure in the social relationships [3]. In those who have been identified as having social isolation and/or loneliness, a thorough review of the medical and social history, precipitating factors (e.g., life events), psychiatric symptoms, insight, and motivation for change should be prompted. When social isolation and loneliness are detected, these should be documented in health records as a social determinant of health.

3.3. Interventions (Recommendations 8–17)

Care providers should ensure that alternative etiologies are initially or concurrently managed (e.g., medical or mental health conditions). It is important that healthcare providers take an individualized approach with shared decision-making to identify interventions that balance the individual’s goals and preferences with the available evidence and local resources. Interventions may include social prescribing, physical activity, psychological therapies (e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy), leisure skill development, animal therapy, and technology [21]. While these are highlighted as potential management strategies, there remains an important research gap in implementation studies, cost-effectiveness, and the duration of the effect.

3.4. Special Populations

The guideline also considers the diversity of older adults and their personal experiences. As described in the Interventions section, tailored interventions should account for an individual’s sex, gender, culture, and personal identity. As such, this section highlights the importance of considering 2SLGBTQIA+ communities [12], Indigenous status [34], individuals who are refugees or immigrants [35], those living in long-term care [36], and dementia [37] when supporting those experiencing social isolation and loneliness. This is an area that requires further research.

4. Contextualizing the Guidelines in the Current Landscape

In 2011, the United Kingdom launched the Campaign to End Loneliness. Over a decade later, it created a legacy as one of the first multidisciplinary hubs on the topic, with far-reaching influences [38]. In 2020, the World Health Organization endorsed the United Nations Decade of Healthy Ageing [39]. That same year, the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine released a consensus report on social isolation and loneliness [3]. Since then, there have been national reports, including the U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory, calling for a national strategy to improve health and social systems [40]. Australia’s report on “Ending Loneliness Together in Australia” made similar recommendations and calls to action for a national plan [41]. The CCSMH guidelines echo similar national calls to action, in addition to providing practical tools that can be used in a point-of-care setting for the clinician and healthcare service provider. These guidelines can also be used to inform researchers and policymakers of best practices and future areas of study. While many studies have shown the association of social isolation and loneliness on negative clinical outcomes [11,42,43], there is a gap in identifying whether interventions that reduce social isolation and loneliness can improve clinical outcomes.

5. Future Directions

Healthcare and social service providers routinely witness the inequities implicit in the social determinants of health [44]. Social isolation and loneliness are closely tied to these and may be important in the causal pathway to negative clinical outcomes [45,46]. Further research is required to understand the experiences of high-risk groups, consistency in the findings from interventions, implementation strategies, and the associations to clinical outcomes upon prevention and management. Policymakers, healthcare professionals, and researchers must remain connected to the needs of the population, identifying further areas for research and health policy.

6. Conclusions

These guidelines apply the current evidence to support healthcare and social service providers and should be used as a tool to prevent, assess, and manage social isolation and loneliness. It should also be used by researchers and policymakers to guide future research and best practices.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to the other Working Group members: Tanya Billard, Suzanne Dupuis-Blanchard, Amy Freedman, Melanie Levasseur, Nancy Newall, Mary Pat Sullivan, and Andrew Wister. Mélanie Levasseur holds a Tier 1 Canadian Research Chair in Social Participation and Connection for Older Adults (CRC-2022-00331; 2023-2030). We would also like to thank Sid Feldman, Chase McMurren, and Samir Sinha for their support in reviewing the guideline and providing valuable perspectives. We are deeply grateful for the outstanding work of the CCSMH staff: Claire Checkland, Bette Watson-Borg, Lisa Tinley, John Saunders, and our research associates: Salinda Horgan and Jeanette Prorok. The CCSMH is a project of the Canadian Academy of Geriatric Psychiatry.

Supplementary Materials

The guidelines can be found at the following link: https://ccsmh.ca/areas-of-focus/social-isolation-and-loneliness/clinical-guidelines/ [47]. Further resources include: (1) For healthcare providers: https://ccsmh.ca/areas-of-focus/social-isolation-and-loneliness/health-care-professionals/ (accessed on 1 September 2024); (2) For older adults (includes information brochures): https://ccsmh.ca/areas-of-focus/social-isolation-and-loneliness/older-adults-and-care-partners/ (accessed on 1 September 2024); (3) Summary of our key findings, including the survey of health and social service providers and older adults: https://ccsmh.ca/areas-of-focus/social-isolation-and-loneliness/key-findings/ (accessed on 1 September 2024).

Author Contributions

Drafting of the manuscript: P.M.H. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: P.M.H. and D.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Conflicts of Interest

Funding for this project was provided by The Waltons Trust. The funder had no role in the creation or approval of the recommendations. Authors received an honorarium for their work. A rigorous process was undertaken to ensure that members of the working group did not have any significant conflict of interest.

geriatrics-09-00117-t001_Table 1 Table 1 Summary of the assessment criteria used to determine the quality of evidence.

Quality of the Evidence	Description	
High	Further research is unlikely to change confidence in the estimate of effect.	
Moderate	Further research is likely to have an important impact on the confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.	
Low	Further research is very likely to have an important impact on the confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.	
Adapted from the CCSMH Clinical Practice Guidelines for Social Isolation and Loneliness.

geriatrics-09-00117-t002_Table 2 Table 2 Summary of the assessment criteria used to determine the strength of the recommendation.

Strength of the Recommendation	Description	
Strong	Strong recommendations indicate high confidence that the desirable consequences of the proposed course of action outweigh the undesirable consequences or vice versa. In some cases, strong recommendations are made without high-quality evidence.	
Weak	Weak recommendations indicate that there is either a close balance between benefits and downsides (including adverse effects and burden of treatment), uncertainty regarding the magnitude of benefits and downsides, uncertainty or great variability in patients’/clients’ values and preferences, or that the cost or burden of the proposed intervention may not be justified.	
Adapted from the CCSMH Clinical Practice Guidelines for Social Isolation and Loneliness.

geriatrics-09-00117-t003_Table 3 Table 3 Summary of recommendations for Prevention, Screening and Assessment, and Interventions for social isolation and loneliness.

Recommendation	Evidence	Strength	
Prevention		
1. Healthcare providers should have knowledge of risk factors for social isolation and loneliness in older adults.

	Moderate	Strong	
2. Education and training about loneliness and social isolation should be a part of the curriculum for healthcare and social service professionals.

	Consensus	
3. Healthcare and social service professionals should use their role, as agents of change, to help inform and educate patients/clients and the general public about the association between social isolation and loneliness and poor mental and physical health, and to promote social connection.

	Consensus	
Assessment and Screening Tools		
4. HCSSPs should use targeted screening for those older adults who have risk factors for social isolation and loneliness.

	Consensus	
5. When screening patients/clients, HCSSPs should use evidence-based screening tools to identify patients/clients who are socially isolated and/or lonely, to assess the severity of the problem, and in routine follow-up to determine whether the patient’s/client’s social situation has changed and whether interventions are effective.

	Moderate	Strong	
6. When social isolation and loneliness are identified in older adults, they should be documented in the health record like other medical conditions and risk factors. Efforts should be made to collect data on social isolation and loneliness as important social determinants of health. Loneliness and social isolation may be considered “psychosocial vital signs” given their impact on health.

	Consensus	
7. A thorough clinical assessment with a patient/client who is socially isolated and/or lonely should aim to explore the possible causes and identify any underlying health conditions that may be contributing factors. Other causes that may be contributing should also be identified, adopting a biopsychosocial approach. A comprehensive assessment can guide the development of an appropriate management plan. The assessment may vary according to the healthcare and social service professional’s scope of practice.

	Consensus	
Interventions		
8. HCSSPs should apply several principles to help older patients/clients who are socially isolated and/or lonely, including:Ensure initially or concurrently that treatment is provided for any underlying medical conditions identified in their assessment.

Take an individualized approach with shared decision-making.

Identify individuals’ interests to determine interventions that may be the best fit, while appraising the individual and environmental resources available.

Recognize the diversity within older adult populations and, together with their patient/client, consider the incorporation of their culture and lived experience.

	Consensus	
9. Social prescribingSocial prescribing should be considered to manage or alleviate social isolation and loneliness. This can include connecting individuals with suitable organizations, programming, or community resources.

Link workers and system navigators can support the assessment of an individual’s needs and connect them with suitable organizations.

Community organizations and healthcare providers should collaborate and build relationships to support implementation.

	Moderate	Strong	
10. Social activityHCSSPs should support, encourage, and empower individuals to engage at their optimal level of social activity.

	Moderate	Strong	
11. Physical activityHCSSPs should encourage their patients/clients to engage in group and/or individual physical activity as a means to reduce social isolation and loneliness and to improve their overall health.

	Moderate	Strong	
12. Psychological therapiesPsychological therapies include, but are not limited to, cognitive behavioral therapy, social cognitive therapy, reminiscence therapy, and mindfulness-based stress reduction. There is greater available evidence for psychological therapies in reducing loneliness compared to social isolation.

	Moderate	Strong	
13. Animal-assisted therapies and animal ownershipAnimal-assisted interventions and pet ownership may be helpful to some individuals although the evidence for this intervention is limited.

	Low	Strong	
14. Leisure skill development and leisure activitiesHealthcare providers should discuss leisure skill development and activities. This can include leisure education, art therapy, horticulture, and music therapy, amongst others.

	Low	Weak	
15. TechnologyHealthcare providers should engage patients and consider technology as a potential opportunity. This may include teleconferencing, use of the Internet/social media, and conversational agents.

	Moderate	Strong	
16. HCSSPs should not use pharmacological agents as treatments for social isolation and loneliness in older adults.Due to the lack of generalizable studies in humans and the potential for harm, we recommend against pharmacotherapy.

	Low	Strong	
17. HCSSPs should take an individualized approach to the follow-up of social isolation and loneliness.Due to the limited studies on serial reassessment and lack of evidence on effect sustainability, an individualized, short-term follow-up is recommended.

	Consensus	
Adapted from the CCSMH Clinical Practice Guidelines for Social Isolation and Loneliness.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
==== Refs
References

1. Escalante E. Golden R.L. Mason D.J. Social Isolation and Loneliness: Imperatives for Health Care in a Post-COVID World JAMA 2021 325 520 521 10.1001/jama.2021.0100 33560310
2. Wu B. Social Isolation and Loneliness among Older Adults in the Context of COVID-19: A Global Challenge Glob. Health Res. Policy 2020 5 27 10.1186/s41256-020-00154-3 32514427
3. National Academies of Sciences and Medicine Engineering Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Health Care System The National Academies Press Washington, DC, USA 2020 978-0-309-67100-2
4. Orimo H. Ito H. Suzuki T. Araki A. Hosoi T. Sawabe M. Reviewing the Definition of “Elderly” Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 2006 6 149 158 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2006.00341.x
5. Social Care Institute for Excellence At a Glance 60: Preventing Loneliness and Social Isolation among Older People Social Care Institute for Excellence Egham, UK 2012
6. Dahlberg L. McKee K.J. Frank A. Naseer M. A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Risk Factors for Loneliness in Older Adults Aging Ment. Health 2022 26 225 249 10.1080/13607863.2021.1876638 33563024
7. Hawkley L.C. Cacioppo J.T. Aging and Loneliness: Downhill Quickly? Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2007 16 187 191 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00501.x
8. Kim H. Kwak S. Youm Y. Chey J. Social Network Characteristics Predict Loneliness in Older Adults Gerontology 2022 68 309 320 10.1159/000516226 34182553
9. Population Ages 65 and above (% of Total Population)|Data Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.65UP.TO.ZS (accessed on 30 May 2024)
10. United Nations: Department of Economic and Social Affairs World Population Ageing 2019: Highlights United Nations New York, NY, USA 2019
11. Rico-Uribe L.A. Caballero F.F. Martín-María N. Cabello M. Ayuso-Mateos J.L. Miret M. Association of Loneliness with All-Cause Mortality: A Meta-Analysis PLoS ONE 2018 13 e0190033 10.1371/journal.pone.0190033 29300743
12. Bull A. Iciaszczyk N. Sinha S. Understanding the Factors Driving the Epidemic of Social Isolation and Loneliness among Older Canadians Toronto Metropolitan University Toronto, ON, Canada 2023
13. Surkalim D.L. Luo M. Eres R. Gebel K. Van Buskirk J. Bauman A. Ding D. The Prevalence of Loneliness across 113 Countries: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis BMJ 2022 376 e067068 10.1136/bmj-2021-067068 35140066
14. World Health Organization Advocacy Brief: Social Isolation and Loneliness among Older People World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland 2021
15. Conn D.K. Billard T. Dupuis-Blanchard S. Freedman A. Hoang P. Levasseur M. Newall N. Sullivan M.P. Wister A. Canadian Clinical Guidelines on Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults 2024 Clinical Guidelines-Social Isolation Canadian Coalition for Seniors’ Mental Health (CCSMH) Toronto, ON, Canada 2024
16. Horgan S. Prorok J. Conn D. Checkland C. Saunders J. Watson-Borg B. Tinley L. Can ‘What Is Known’ about Social Isolation and Loneliness Interventions Sufficiently Inform the Clinical Practice of Health Care and Social Service Professionals Who Work with Older Adults? Exploring Knowledge-to-Practice Gaps Healthcare 2024 12 1111 10.3390/healthcare12111111 38891186
17. Conn D. Amdam L. Blumberger D.M. Frank C. Grief C. Madan R. Rahheru K. Dilara A. Minchopoulous D. Canadian Guidelines on Prevention, Assessment and Treatment of Depression Among Older Adults Canadian Coalition for Seniors’ Mental Health Markham, ON, Canada 2021
18. Bertram J.R. Porath A. Seitz D. Kalant H. Krishnamoorthy A. Nickerson J. Sidhu A. Smith A. Teed R. Canadian Guidelines on Cannabis Use Disorder among Older Adults Can. Geriatr. J. 2020 23 135 142 10.5770/cgj.23.424 32226572
19. Conn D.K. Hogan D.B. Amdam L. Cassidy K.L. Cordell P. Frank C. Gardner D. Goldhar M. Ho J.M.W. Kitamura C. Canadian Guidelines on Benzodiazepine Receptor Agonist Use Disorder among Older Adults Can. Geriatr. J. 2020 23 116 122 10.5770/cgj.23.419 32226570
20. Schoenborn C. Health Promotion and Disease Prevention The Aging Population in the Twenty-First Century: Statistics for Health Policy National Academies Press (US) Washington, DC, USA 1988 1 91 00831972
21. Hoang P. King J.A. Moore S. Moore K. Reich K. Sidhu H. Tan C.V. Whaley C. McMillan J. Interventions Associated with Reduced Loneliness and Social Isolation in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis JAMA Netw. Open 2022 5 e2236676 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.36676 36251294
22. Veazie S. Gilbert J. Winchell K. Paynter R. Guise J.-M. Addressing Social Isolation to Improve the Health of Older Adults: A Rapid Review Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US) Rockville, MD, USA 2019
23. Guyatt G.H. Oxman A.D. Vist G.E. Kunz R. Falck-Ytter Y. Alonso-Coello P. Schünemann H.J. GRADE: An Emerging Consensus on Rating Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations BMJ 2008 336 924 926 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD 18436948
24. Scoping Review of the Literature Social Isolation of Seniors 2013–2014—Canada.Ca Available online: https://www.canada.ca/en/national-seniors-council/programs/publications-reports/2014/scoping-social-isolation.html (accessed on 30 May 2024)
25. National Seniors Council—Report on the Social Isolation of Seniors, 2013–2014—Canada.Ca Available online: https://www.canada.ca/en/national-seniors-council/programs/publications-reports/2014/social-isolation-seniors.html (accessed on 30 May 2024)
26. Kirkland S.A. Griffith L.E. Oz U.E. Thompson M. Wister A. Kadowaki L. Basta N.E. McMillan J. Wolfson C. Raina P. Increased Prevalence of Loneliness and Associated Risk Factors during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) BMC Public Health 2023 23 872 10.1186/s12889-023-15807-4 37170234
27. De Jong Gierveld J. Keating N. Fast J.E. Determinants of Loneliness among Older Adults in Canada Can. J. Aging/La Rev. Can. Du Vieil. 2015 34 125 136 10.1017/S0714980815000070 25707297
28. 2SLGBTQI+ Terminology—Glossary and Common Acronyms—Canada.Ca Available online: https://www.canada.ca/en/women-gender-equality/free-to-be-me/2slgbtqi-plus-glossary.html (accessed on 31 August 2024)
29. Kadowaki L. Wister A. Older Adults and Social Isolation and Loneliness During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Integrated Review of Patterns, Effects, and Interventions Can. J. Aging 2023 42 199 216 10.1017/S0714980822000459 36345649
30. Li L. Wister A.V. Mitchell B. Social Isolation Among Spousal and Adult-Child Caregivers: Findings from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging J. Gerontol. Ser. B 2021 76 1415 1429 10.1093/geronb/gbaa197
31. Newmyer L. Verdery A.M. Margolis R. Pessin L. Measuring Older Adult Loneliness Across Countries J. Gerontol. Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2021 76 1408 10.1093/GERONB/GBAA109 32756903
32. Russell D.W. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure J. Pers. Assess. 1996 66 20 40 10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2 8576833
33. Lubben J. Blozik E. Gillmann G. Iliffe S. Von Kruse W.R. Beck J.C. Stuck A.E. Performance of an Abbreviated Version of the Lubben Social Network Scale among Three European Community-Dwelling Older Adult Populations Gerontologist 2006 46 503 513 10.1093/geront/46.4.503 16921004
34. Social Isolation of Seniors: A Focus on Indigenous Seniors in Canada—Canada.Ca Available online: https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/corporate/seniors/forum/social-isolation-indigenous.html (accessed on 27 July 2024)
35. Johnson S. Bacsu J. McIntosh T. Jeffery B. Novik N. Social Isolation and Loneliness among Immigrant and Refugee Seniors in Canada: A Scoping Review Int. J. Migr. Health Soc. Care 2019 15 177 190 10.1108/IJMHSC-10-2018-0067
36. Bethell J. Aelick K. Babineau J. Bretzlaff M. Edwards C. Gibson J.L. Hewitt Colborne D. Iaboni A. Lender D. Schon D. Social Connection in Long-Term Care Homes: A Scoping Review of Published Research on the Mental Health Impacts and Potential Strategies During COVID-19 J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2021 22 228 237.e25 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.11.025 33347846
37. Shen C. Rolls E.T. Cheng W. Kang J. Dong G. Xie C. Zhao X.M. Sahakian B.J. Feng J. Associations of Social Isolation and Loneliness with Later Dementia Neurology 2022 99 E164 E175 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201564 35676089
38. Jopling K. Exploring the Legacy of the Campaign to End Loneliness Sheffield Hallam University Sheffield, UK 2024
39. United Nations UN Decade of Healthy Ageing: Plan of Action United Nations San Francisco, CA, USA 2020
40. Office of the U.S. Surgeon General Our Epidemic of Loneliness and Isolation: The U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory on the Healing Effects of Social Connection and Community Office of the U.S. Surgeon General Washington, DC, USA 2023
41. Ending Loneliness Together in Australia Available online: www.endingloneliness.com.au (accessed on 30 May 2024)
42. Mehrabi F. Béland F. Effects of Social Isolation, Loneliness and Frailty on Health Outcomes and Their Possible Mediators and Moderators in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Scoping Review Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2020 90 104119 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104119 32562956
43. Lee S.L. Pearce E. Ajnakina O. Johnson S. Lewis G. Mann F. Pitman A. Solmi F. Sommerlad A. Steptoe A. The Association between Loneliness and Depressive Symptoms among Adults Aged 50 Years and Older: A 12-Year Population-Based Cohort Study Lancet Psychiatry 2021 8 48 57 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30383-7 33181096
44. Andermann A. Taking Action on the Social Determinants of Health in Clinical Practice: A Framework for Health Professionals CMAJ 2016 188 E474 E483 10.1503/cmaj.160177 27503870
45. Cené C.W. Beckie T.M. Sims M. Suglia S.F. Aggarwal B. Moise N. Jiménez M.C. Gaye B. McCullough L.D. Effects of Objective and Perceived Social Isolation on Cardiovascular and Brain Health: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2022 11 26493 10.1161/JAHA.122.026493
46. Naito R. McKee M. Leong D. Bangdiwala S. Rangarajan S. Islam S. Yusuf S. Social Isolation as a Risk Factor for All-Cause Mortality: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies PLoS ONE 2023 18 e0280308 10.1371/journal.pone.0280308 36634152
47. Social Isolation and Loneliness—Clinical Guidelines—Canadian Coalition for Seniors’ Mental Health Available online: https://ccsmh.ca/areas-of-focus/social-isolation-and-loneliness/clinical-guidelines/ (accessed on 1 May 2024)
