
==== Front
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
0936-8051
1434-3916
Springer Berlin Heidelberg Berlin/Heidelberg

39008075
5413
10.1007/s00402-024-05413-3
Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
Fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation for knee full-thickness articular cartilage lesions using femoral head of living donors: short-term results
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3911-9493
Soubih Hesham Ossama heshamossama826@gmail.com

Al-Saed Ahmed M.
Ghazaly Sherif A. El
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7395-994X
Sobhy Mohamed H.
Kamel Muhammad Elsayed
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5276-641X
Ebied Wessam Fakhry
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5466-5601
Haroun Haitham K.
https://ror.org/00cb9w016 grid.7269.a 0000 0004 0621 1570 Orthopedic Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
15 7 2024
15 7 2024
2024
144 8 34793489
22 1 2024
21 6 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Background

Fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation is a good treatment option of cartilage defects. However, this treatment option is not available in all countries due to limited graft availability and tissue banks limitations. The purpose of this study is to assess the short term functional and imaging outcomes of fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee using the femoral head of living donors.

Hypothesis

Fresh osteochondral allografts from the femoral heads of living donors is a valid graft source for management of distal Femur cartilage defects. This technique can improve functional knee scores with good radiological outcomes.

Study Design

Prospective case series.

Methods

Fifteen patients with full thickness cartilage defects of the distal femur underwent osteochondral allograft transplantation from the femoral heads of living donors. Grafts were transplanted by both shell and multiple dowels techniques. The average follow up duration was 18.3 months (range, 12–25 months). Patients were evaluated by Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, radiography and MR imaging using Osteochondral Allograft MRI Scoring System (OCAMRISS).

Results

There was a statistically significant improvement (P < 0.001) in both Lysholm and IKDC average scores at 6 months and 12 months postoperative. Postoperative MRI was done at an average 6.8 months (range, 5–11 months) postoperative. The mean total OCAMRISS score was 3.4 (range, 1–7). A second look arthroscopy was done in four patients and showed intact articular cartilage in all three patients.

Conclusion

Femoral head of living donors is a valid new source for fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation of knee osteochondral lesions. Short term results showed improvement in clinical assessment scores. Follow up imaging showed graft incorporation and good MRI scores.

Key message

What is known about the subject

Fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation is a successful treatment option for full thickness cartilage lesions in the knee. Osteochondral allografts are harvested from the knee of young deceased donors. There are limitations regarding the graft availability and postmortem tissue banks.

What this study adds to existing knowledge

In our study, we used fresh osteochondral allografts from the femoral heads of living donors. The donor population is the non-arthritic patients who undergo hip replacement for traumatic neck femur fractures. This will provide a new source for fresh osteochondral allografts in countries who lack postmortem tissue banks. Even with available tissue banks, this provides an additional stable source of grafts which may expand the indications for osteochondral allografts and facilitate preoperative scheduling. To our knowledge, this is the first clinical study that used the femoral head of living donors as a source of fresh osteochondral allografts in the knee.

Keywords

Osteochondral allografts
Femoral heads
Living donors
Ain Shams UniversityOpen access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

issue-copyright-statement© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Focal Articular Cartilage injuries are common as they can be found in more than 50% of knee arthroscopies. Abrasion chondroplasty, microfracture, osteochondral allograft, osteochondral autograft, and autologous chondrocyte implantation are the main available treatment lines [1–6]. Microfracture and drilling are technically easy and short procedures with good short term results. However, the data are insufficient regarding the long term results and the results are less favourable in lesions larger than 4 cm2 and patellar lesions [5, 7–9].

Osteochondral autografts(OATs) means harvesting the osteochondral plugs from non weight bearing areas of the patient’s knee in a single stage procedure. Disadvantages include limited donor surface area and donor site morbidity. Results of OATs are dependent on the lesion size. Good to excellent results are reported with lesion size 1 to 4 cm2. Poor results are reported with lesion size more than 6 cm2 [10]. Autologous Chondrocyte implantation is another treatment option that can restore large chondral injuries. However, it is difficult to restore the subchondral bone and the results are poor with large osteochondral defects [11, 12].

Fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation is a good treatment option because it restores both the hyaline cartilage and subchondral bone in a single stage procedure allowing reconstruction of large complex defects and uncontained lesions. The mid-term and long-term patient-reported outcomes are good with 80% graft survival in five to ten years [13, 14]. There is no donor size morbidity, limitation to the graft size or difficulty to restore the subchondral bone. The allograft survival rate and patient-reported outcomes are comparable to osteochondral autografts [15]. Osteochondral allograft has lower reoperation rate and lower cost compared to autologous chondrocyte implantation [12].

Fresh osteochondral allografts pose several limitations. First limitaion is the cost and availability of post mortem tissue banks. They are unavailable in some countries due to increased cost and religious restrictions [10, 16]. Second limitation, osteochondral allografts have the potential of disease transmission. Graft contamination can result from occult infection of the donor, postmortem invasion of the tissues by gut flora, or contamination during the recovery process [17]. The number of viable chondrocytes starts to decrease after 14 days from the harvest and reaches the least accepted count after 28 days. This leads to the third limitation, a narrow 14 days’ time frame for recipient matching and preoperative preparations [18], leading to a complex preoperative scheduling.

Femoral heads represent an alternative source for fresh osteochondral allografts. Femoral heads can be retrieved from non-arthritic patients who undergo femoral head replacement for femoral neck fractures. This technique carries the theoretical advantages of graft availability, low cost and lower risk of infection. It could present a solution for the problem of large or uncontained cartilage defects in countries lacking postmortem tissue banks and chondrocyte implantation technology. However there is a theoretical concern regarding the graft contour. The femoral head is more convex than the distal femoral condyles. The purpose of this prospective study is to assess the short term functional and imaging outcomes of fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation for knee full-thickness articular cartilage lesions using femoral head of living donors. Our hypothesis is fresh osteochondral allografts from the femoral heads of living donors is a valid graft source for management of distal femur cartilage defects.

Materials and methods

Patient selection

This study was approved by our hospital’s Research Ethics Committee (Faculty of Medicine Ain Shams University Research Ethics Committee [FMASU REC] with reference number FWA 000017585). Written informed consents were signed by all participants. Between April 2021 and June 2022, we included patients who had osteochondral allograft transplantation for a symptomatic full thickness cartilage lesion in the distal femur articular surface that failed conservative medical treatment and physiotherapy. We excluded patients with bipolar cartilage lesions, inflammatory arthropathy, body mass index more than 30, untreated limb malalignment or ligament injury and absence of more than 50% of ipsilateral meniscus.

Full thickness cartilage lesions were diagnosed by history, examination and MR images. Radiography was performed to assess subchondral bone and exclude osteoarthritis. Knee arthroscopy was performed in the same operative session to diagnose other knee pathologies, confirm the diagnosis of full thickness cartilage lesion and assess the defect size.

Graft selection

Fresh osteochondral allografts were taken from the femoral heads of patients undergoing arthroplasty for traumatic femoral neck fractures. Donors were screened preoperatively for viral markers and history of malignancy or collagen disease. We did not perform blood-type or human leukocyte antigen matching as it is not needed in the standard postmortem fresh allografts. Assessment of the femoral head cartilage status included two main steps [19]. First, donors’ hip radiographs were assessed using the Tonnis grading system [20]. Only donor hips with Tonnis grade 0 (No signs of hip arthrosis) were included. Second, gross inspection and taking photos were used to score the femoral head cartilage status according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grading system [5]. Only femoral heads with grade 0 (No cartilage injury) cartilage status were included. Femoral heads were harvested, stored and transplanted under complete aseptic conditions without a sterilization technique to avoid chondrocytes destruction. They were stored at 4 °C in a Lactate Ringer’s solution containing polymyxin B bacitracin antibiotics as the standard postmortem fresh allografts [21–25].

Fresh osteochondral allografts transplantation started in university based centers. The allografts were transplanted within a week from the harvest. This was favorable regarding the number of viable chondrocytes [8]. When allografts became widely available through uniform cartilage banking, safety concerns resulted in guidelines with a minimum 14 days serologic and bacteriologic test panels. The number of viable chondrocytes start to decrease after 14 days. The minimum number of viable chondrocytes sufficient for transplantation is thought to be at 28 up to 35 days. So, usually by the time of transplantation, the number of viable chondrocytes has decreased due to apoptosis [8, 19]. In our study, being a university based research study, the allograft was transplanted within average 6 days from the harvest. Since allografts from living donors have lower risk of infection, there is a possibility these grafts can have shorter duration test panel. This can be favorable for chondrocytes viability.

Operative technique

Knee arthroscopy was done in all cases to confirm cartilage defect size and location and examine the knee ligaments and menisci. Any loose bodies were removed. Stability of osteochondral fragments and subchondral bone were assessed during arthroscopy. Arthrotomy was done according to the location of the defect. The lesion size was measured after debridement of unstable cartilage flaps and lesion edges. One of two main techniques was used in our cases according to the lesion size. We used the shell technique if the defect size was more than 4 cm2 and the dowel technique if the lesion size was less than 4 cm2. In the shell technique, cartilage lesion edges were trimmed to make a regular edge. Subchondral bone was cut to the depth of 6–8 mm by a burr (Fig. 1). A piece of sterile paper was used as a template and cut to match the defect dimensions. The same surface area was cut from the femoral head. In order to avoid mismatch of the graft contour, we harvested the grafts from large femoral heads of male donors. We also cut the graft from the widest suprafoveal area of the femoral head. Subchondral bone was cut to match the same depth of the recipient defect. The graft was washed with saline to remove the marrow elements (Fig. 2). Then the graft was fixed using 2.0 mm and 2.7 mm Mini screws (Fig. 6) or 2.4 mm and 3.0 mm headless compression screws (Figs. 3, 9 and 10) (Synthes USA, Paoli, PA).

Fig. 1 Subchondral bone was cut to the depth of 6–8 mm by a burr (A: No. 7 patient, B: No. 3 patient)

Fig. 2 A and B: Subchondral bone was cut to match the same depth of the recipient defect. C: The graft was washed with saline to remove the marrow elements

Fig. 3 45 years old male presented 3 weeks after left knee trauma. A: Intraoperative image showing uncontained defect in the medial femoral condyle measuring 32 mm * 19 mm. B: Shell osteochondral allograft fixed by 2 headless compression screws. C and D: 3 months postoperative X-ray showing well contoured graft incorporation. E: 5 months postoperative CT scan showing well contoured graft incorporation. F and G: 5 months postoperative MRI showing 75–100% cartilage fill with good contour. H: 5 months postoperative second look arthroscopy showing intact hyaline cartilage

Alternatively, we used the dowel technique if the defect size was less than 4 cm2. It is difficult to restore a regular stable articular surface with too many dowels in lesions larger than 4 cm2 [10]. The use of multiple dowels in lesions larger than 4 cm2 is associated with fibrous tissue formation and fissuring between the grafts with poor outcomes [26, 27]. We harvested single or multiple dowels according to the lesion size using 8–10 mm Arthrex OATS system (Arthrex OATS system, Naples, FL, USA). First, the lesion was cut using the recipient dowel knife to a depth of 6 to 15 mm according to the status of subchondral bone (Fig. 4). Then the femoral head was cut using the donor site dowel knife to a depth of one millimeter more than the recipient depth (Fig. 5). The graft was washed with saline to remove the marrow elements. The graft was press-fit into the prepared recipient site. The press-fit was found to be secure enough precluding any other additional fixation. The same sequence was repeated for additional dowels (Fig. 6).

Fig. 4 A: The lesion was cut by the recipient dowel knife to a depth of 6 to 15 mm. B: A system tool was used to assess the cut dowel depth

Fig. 5 The femoral head was cut by the donor site dowel knife into a depth of one millimeter more than the recipient depth

Fig. 6 22 years old male Left knee. A: osteochondral defect lateral femoral condyle measuring 18 mm by 12 mm. B: 10 mm dowel donor site knife used on the femoral head. C: Two overlapping osteochondral allografts using the dowel technique

The same post-operative protocol was used in both groups. Early unrestricted passive range of motion was allowed from postoperative day one. Patients were kept non weight bearing until standard radiographs demonstrated graft incorporation; this ranged from 6 to 12 weeks according to graft size.

Clinical assessment

All 15 patients were assessed using 2 subjective scoring systems: Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scoring systems. Both scoring systems were filled by each patient preoperatively, 6 months postoperative and 12 months postoperative.

Imaging assessment

Standard knee AP and lateral radiographs were performed immediately postoperative to assess the restoration of the femoral condyle contour. After 6 weeks, radiographs were performed every two weeks till graft incorporation. Follow up MR images were requested after 6 months postoperative. The Osteochondral Allograft MRI Scoring System (OCAMRISS) was used to assess the survival of the osteochondral allograft [28–33]. Scoring was performed according to the consensus of two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists. The OCAMRISS includes 5 primary cartilage features (cartilage signal of the graft relative to adjacent host cartilage, cartilage “fill” of the graft (percentage volume), cartilage edge integration at the host-graft junction, cartilage surface congruity of the graft and host-graft junction, calcified cartilage integrity of the graft), 4 primary bone features (subchondral bone plate congruity of graft and host-graft junction, subchondral bone marrow signal intensity of graft relative to epiphyseal bone, osseous integration at host-graft junction, and presence of cystic changes of graft and host-graft junction), and 4 ancillary features (opposing cartilage, meniscal tears, synovitis, and fat pad scarring).

Statistical analysis

Analysis of data was done using SPSS program version 25 (IBM© Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Quantitative data were presented as minimum, maximum, mean, SD and 95% confidence interval. Qualitative data were presented as count and percentage. Paired samples t test was used to compare quantitative data measured at two different time points for the same group. P value less than or equal to 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Between April 2021 and June 2022, 19 patients who had preoperative diagnosis of full thickness cartilage injury were identified. Four patients were excluded from the study due to intraoperative arthroscopy findings. Two patients had healed injuries by white fibrocartilage. The third patient had kissing full thickness ulcer in the medial femoral condyle and medial tibial plateau and microfracture was done. The fourth patient had superficial cartilage injury for which ablation chondroplasty was done. Fifteen patients who received osteochondral allografts from the femoral heads of living donors were included in our prospective study (Table 1). Patients mean age was 33.8 years (± 5.7 years). There were twelve men and three women. Three patients had lesions in the lateral femoral condyle. The remaining twelve patients had lesions on the medial femoral condyle. The etiology of the lesions was traumatic in 2 patients, degenerative in 6 patients and advanced osteochondritis dessicans in 7 patients (Table 1). One patient had complex tear at the body of the medial meniscus involving less than 50% of the meniscal width. Arthroscopic partial menisectomy was done. On initial diagnostic evaluation, there were remnants of the injured cartilage discovered in traumatic and osteochondritis dessicans lesions. These were in the form of unstable cartilage flaps in 4 patients and loose bodies in 5 patients. There were no remnants of the injured cartilage in the 4 degenerative lesions. The subchondral bone affection varied in the 15 patients from being intact to deficient up to 5 mm depth. The average lesion size was 3.9 cm2 (± 1.1 cm2).

Table 1 Showing patients’ and grafts’ characteristics and outcomes

Id	Age	Lesion etiology	Lesion size
Cm 2	Graft age (days)	Technique	Pre lysholm	6 MONTHS Post lysholm	12 MONTHS Post lysholm	Pre
IKDC %	6 MONTHS Post IKDC %	12 MONTHS Post IKDC %	Follow up months	
1	18	Traumatic	0.7	8	Dowel	66	71	79	58.6	69	70.1	25	
2	21	Osteochondritis dessicans	3.6	10	Dowel	39	89	94	29.9	90.8	81.6	25	
3	45	Traumatic	6.08	6	Shell	27	94	94	25.3	86.2	79.3	24	
4	49	Degenerative	2	4	Dowel	52	76	86	16.1	60.9	71.3	23	
5	39	Degenerative	5.8	12	Shell	31	62	69	26.4	52.9	50.6	22	
6	52	Degenerative	2.1	7	Dowel	60	85	95	49.4	79.3	74.7	20	
7	35	Osteochondritis dessicans	6.21	2	Shell	65	95	94	40.2	86.2	87.4	20	
8	22	Osteochondritis dessicans	2.16	6	Dowel	70	90	95	59.8	87.4	85.1	19	
9	31	Osteochondritis dessicans	1.8	1	Dowel	52	91	90	58.6	87.4	86.2	18	
10	37	Degenerative	5.94	12	Shell	57	87	90	36.8	85.1	87.4	15	
11	44	Degenerative	2	2	Dowel	47	85	87	34.5	72.4	79.3	14	
12	24	Osteochondritis dessicans	7.14	2	Shell	81	87	95	60.9	75.9	77	13	
13	45	Degenerative	5.8	3	Shell	23	67	82	17.2	57.5	69	13	
14	25	Osteochondritis dessicans	5.22	3	Shell	23	84	88	13.8	60.9	75.9	12	
15	20	Osteochondritis dessicans	2	4	Dowel	44	90	94	40.2	81.6	88.5	12	

Our study included 15 grafts with average storage duration of 5.47 days (± 1.8 days).The mean donors’ age was 73.5 years (± 4.3 years). We used the free hand shell technique in 7 patients and the Dowel technique in 8 patients. In the Dowel technique, the average number of dowels was 2.13 per patient (± 0.54 dowels). There was a good restoration of the contour of the distal femoral condyle in all 15 cases.

Clinical assessment

Mean follow up was 18.3 months (± 2.37 months). Improvements in Lysholm and IKDC scores were statistically significant. The mean Lysholm scores (Fig. 7) improved from 49.1 (± 8.76) to 83.5 (± 4.85) and 88.8 (± 3.64) at 6 months postoperative and 12 months postoperative respectively (P < 0.001). The mean IKDC scores (Fig. 8) improved from 37.9% (± 8.12) to 75.6% (± 6.12) and 77.6% (± 4.86) at 6 months postoperative and 12 months postoperative respectively (P < 0.001).

Fig. 7 Preoperative and postoperative Lysholm scores

Fig. 8 Preoperative and postoperative IKDC scores

Imaging assessment

Immediate postoperative radiography showed restoration of the distal femoral condyle contour. Delayed postoperative radiography showed graft incorporation in all patients (Fig. 3). The mean duration till radiographic graft incorporation was 8.4 weeks (± 1.29 weeks). Postoperative MR images were performed in 13 patients at an average of 6.8 months postoperative (± 0.88 months) (Figs. 9 and 10). Two patient refused to do postoperative MR imaging. They had painless full range of motion with good postoperative Lysholm and IKDC scores. A mean total OCAMRISS score was 3.4 (± 1.11). This total graft score included mean cartilage, bone and ancillary subscales of 1.2 (± 0.85), 1.8 (± 0.41) and 0.4 (± 0.33). The cartilage-fill item score for all 13 grafts was 76 to 100%.

Fig. 9 35 years old male right knee. A: Intraoperative image showing osteochondral defect of the medial femoral condyle measuring 27 mm * 23 mm. B: Shell osteochondral allograft fixed by two headless compression screws. C and D: 7 months postoperative MRI showing 75–100% cartilage fill with good contour

Fig. 10 39 years old female Left knee. A: osteochondral defect lateral femoral condyle measuring 29 mm * 20 mm. B: osteochondral allograft using the shell technique fixed by two mini-screws. C: 8 months post-operative MRI showing 100% cartilage filling and good contour

Arthroscopic assessment

A diagnostic second look arthroscopy was performed in four patients (Fig. 11). All four arthroscopies showed survival of intact regular articular cartilage. First patient diagnostic arthroscopy was performed 5 months postoperative early in the case series to confirm cartilage survival (Fig. 3; H). Arthroscopy was performed in two other patients to treat postoperative stiffness at 6 months postoperative. Arthroscopy was performed for the fourth patient at 3 month to remove a prominent screw.

Fig. 11 Second look arthroscopies of patients No. 3 (A, B and C) and No. 5 (D, E and F) showing intact allograft hyaline cartilage

Complications

Out of the 15 patients only 3 cases (20%) had complications throughout the follow up period. Two cases had post-operative stiffness that was managed by arthroscopic adhesiolysis and mobilization under GA. The third case developed intra-articular screw prominence. It was managed by arthroscopic removal of the screw. There were no postoperative infections in all 15 patients.

Discussion

Our study presents a new technique for fresh ostechondral allograft transplantation. The source of allografts is the non-arthritic femoral heads of patients undergoing hip replacement for femoral neck fractures. All fifteen patients had significant improvement in clinical knee scores. Postoperative radiography showed good restoration of the distal femoral condyle contour and graft incorporation. Postoperative MR images were assessed using OCAMRISS scoring system. MR images showed short term survival of regular articular cartilage. Second-look arthroscopy was done in four patients and showed intact allograft hyaline cartilage.

In our study, we achieved intraoperative and radiological restoration of the distal femoral condyle contour. Theoretically, the femoral head is more convex than the distal femoral condyles. This contour did not present a problem in small defects where we used multiple dowels. This is similar to the use of precut nonorthotopic grafts described by Jones et al. [34]. They used fresh precut osteochondral allograft cores taken from the lateral femoral condyle for a medial femoral condyle lesion. Fresh osteochondral allografts were also harvested from the distal femur and transplanted in the capitillum in cases of osteochondritis dessicans [35, 36]. Osteochondral autografts from the knee have been taken for a long time to treat osteochondral lesions of the talus [37]. In large defects where we used the shell technique, two defects measured 27 mm * 23 mm and 32*19 mm. They both were located in the lateral half of the medial femoral condyle weight bearing area. We achieved a good intraoperative and radiological restoration of the contour. This finding could be attributed to using larger femoral heads of male donors. We also harvested the graft from the widest suprafoveal part of the femoral head. Despite this, we think we may face a challenge with the contour in larger defects.

Comparison of our results with other studies in the literature could be difficult. We do not know about other clinical studies that used fresh living donor osteochondral allograft for restoration of knee full thickness cartilage defects. However in a histological study about osteochondral grafts from living donor knee arthroplasty resections, Hevesi et al [19] reported satisfactory chondrocyte viability and histologic quality compared to postmortem allografts. They mentioned that, the main limitation of allografts from being the gold standard in cartilage defects management is limited resources. Fresh osteochondral allografts are currently obtained from young deceased donors. Being young, the unexpected death of donors adds to the complexity of scheduling. This leads to difficult patient scheduling due absence of permanent stable resource. Hevesi et al. suggested the use of osteochondral allografts from the non-arthritic compartments of patients undergoing total knee replacement. They reported satisfactory chondrocyte viability and histology compared to postmortem allografts. They mentioned several advantages of the graft being from a living donor. First, it provides additional stable source of osteochondral allografts. Second, chondrocytes viability could be better if the transplant could be done earlier than the standard postmortem allografts. However, they mentioned a main limitation; their donor population is a highly selected subset of the total knee arthroplasty population. We think their technique may face another limitation if applied clinically. The thin total knee cuts will lead to a limited thickness of the subchondral bone allograft.

Long term outcomes of fresh osteochonral transplantation using allografts from deceased donors are reported in multiple studies. The allografts can survive with long term improvements in knee scores and functional outcomes reported up to 13 years [8, 10, 16]. The incidence of postoperative infections is low and ranges from 0.9 to 3.3% [38, 39].

There were no postoperative infections in all 15 cases. The femoral heads from living donors have lower risk of infection than postmortem allografts. This could be explained by the fact that arthroplasty patients must have prophylactic antibiotics, leading to a very low risk of hematogenous contamination by high virulence organisms. Also the graft harvest occurs exclusively in the operating theatre. There is only a low a risk of superficial contamination by the flora dispersed by the operating personnel [40]. In contrast, the postmortem graft harvest takes place in the operating room only in 33% of the grafts. The remaining 67% of the graft harvest occurs in the hospital morgue, coroner’s facility or the tissue bank facility [17]. This can lead to superficial contamination of the graft. Also there is a risk of postmortem septicemia that results from postmortem break in the gut barrier. This can lead to hematogenous contamination of the graft [40].

Regarding the postoperative MRI assessment, the mean total OCAMRISS score was 3.4 (± 1.11). This is comparable to the results published by Ackermann et al. [32] about a 6-month postoperative MRI osteochondral allograft evaluation, which showed a mean total OCAMRISS score of 3.9 ± 2.

This study has three main limitations. First, the short term follow up, especially that there is a theoretical concern regarding the survival of chondrocytes. Although we harvested the femoral head from non-arthritic donors, arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures is mainly done in the geriatric population. Despite good clinical and imaging short term results, long term survival is a major concern. However, the main concern in this study is to assess clinical outcomes, graft incorporation and cartilage survival which can be assessed in 6 months. Second limitation, the sample size is limited. We recommend further studies with larger sample size to assess the long term results of this technique. Third limitation, we did not perform histological analysis to assess the viability of chondrocytes at the time of transplantation.

This technique can have future implications regarding the fresh osteochondral allograft availability. Despite the increase in tissue banks, they are not available in all countries due to legislation issues. Even if tissue banks are available, the number of osteochondral allografts is still limited due to logistic scheduling challenges as they are obtained from young deceased donors. Our technique will provide an additional stable source of grafts which may expand the indications for osteochondral allografts and facilitate the preoperative scheduling. This will also provide a new source for fresh osteochondral allografts in countries who lack postmortem tissue banks. This is especially important in patients with large or uncontained defects for whom the autograft dowels is not a valid option.

Conclusion

Femoral heads from living donors is a valid source of osteochondral allograft transplantation for knee full-thickness articular cartilage lesions. This technique showed good clinical and radiological short term results.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Weißenberger M Heinz T Boelch SP Correction to: is debridement beneficial for focal cartilage defects of the knee: data from the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU) (archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, (2020), 140, 3, (373–382), 10.1007/s00402-020-03338-1) Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2021 141 1081 1082 10.1007/s00402-021-03905-0 33950276
Weißenberger M, Heinz T, Boelch SP et al (2021) Correction to: is debridement beneficial for focal cartilage defects of the knee: data from the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU) (archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, (2020), 140, 3, (373–382), 10.1007/s00402-020-03338-1). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141:1081–1082. 10.1007/s00402-021-03905-033950276
2. Eichinger M Henninger B Petry B Treatment of cartilage defects in the patellofemoral joint with matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation effectively improves pain, function, and radiological outcomes after 5–7 years Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2024 144 1655 1665 10.1007/s00402-023-05179-0 38206448
Eichinger M, Henninger B, Petry B et al (2024) Treatment of cartilage defects in the patellofemoral joint with matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation effectively improves pain, function, and radiological outcomes after 5–7 years. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 144:1655–1665. 10.1007/s00402-023-05179-038206448
3. Ossendorff R Walter SG Schildberg FA Biologic principles of minced cartilage implantation: a narrative review Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023 143 3259 3269 10.1007/s00402-022-04692-y 36385655
Ossendorff R, Walter SG, Schildberg FA et al (2023) Biologic principles of minced cartilage implantation: a narrative review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143:3259–3269. 10.1007/s00402-022-04692-y36385655
4. Jeuken RM van Hugten PPW Roth AK Cartilage repair strategies in the knee according to Dutch Orthopedic surgeons: a survey study Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023 143 5175 5188 10.1007/s00402-023-04800-6 36810798
Jeuken RM, van Hugten PPW, Roth AK et al (2023) Cartilage repair strategies in the knee according to Dutch Orthopedic surgeons: a survey study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 143:5175–5188. 10.1007/s00402-023-04800-636810798
5. Farr J, Cole B, Dhawan A et al (2011) Clinical cartilage restoration: Evolution and overview. In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. pp 2696–2705
6. Ross KA Ferati SR Alaia MJ Current and emerging techniques in articular cartilage repair Bull Hosp Jt Dis 2024 82 91 99
Ross KA, Ferati SR, Alaia MJ et al (2024) Current and emerging techniques in articular cartilage repair. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 82:91–99
7. Mithoefer K Mcadams T Williams RJ Clinical efficacy of the microfracture technique for articular cartilage repair in the knee: an evidence-based systematic analysis Am J Sports Med 2009 37 2053 2063 10.1177/0363546508328414 19251676
Mithoefer K, Mcadams T, Williams RJ et al (2009) Clinical efficacy of the microfracture technique for articular cartilage repair in the knee: an evidence-based systematic analysis. Am J Sports Med 37:2053–2063. 10.1177/036354650832841419251676
8. McCulloch PC Kang RW Sobhy MH Prospective evaluation of prolonged fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation of the femoral condyle: Minimum 2-year follow-up Am J Sports Med 2007 35 411 420 10.1177/0363546506295178 17261573
McCulloch PC, Kang RW, Sobhy MH et al (2007) Prospective evaluation of prolonged fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation of the femoral condyle: Minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 35:411–420. 10.1177/036354650629517817261573
9. Steadman JR Briggs KK Rodrigo JJ Outcomes of microfracture for traumatic chondral defects of the knee: average 11-year follow-up Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 2003 19 477 484 10.1053/jars.2003.50112
Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Rodrigo JJ et al (2003) Outcomes of microfracture for traumatic chondral defects of the knee: average 11-year follow-up. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 19:477–484. 10.1053/jars.2003.50112
10. Di Roberti T, Fiore M, Coco V et al (2021) Fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation in osteochondritis dissecans in the knee joint. Life 11
11. Carey JL Shea KG Lindahl A Autologous chondrocyte implantation as treatment for unsalvageable Osteochondritis dissecans: 10- to 25-Year follow-up Am J Sports Med 2020 48 1134 1140 10.1177/0363546520908588 32181674
Carey JL, Shea KG, Lindahl A et al (2020) Autologous chondrocyte implantation as treatment for unsalvageable Osteochondritis dissecans: 10- to 25-Year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 48:1134–1140. 10.1177/036354652090858832181674
12. Sochacki KR Varshneya K Calcei JG Comparison of Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation and Osteochondral Allograft transplantation of the knee in a large insurance database: Reoperation Rate, complications, and cost analysis Cartilage 2021 13 1187S 1194S 10.1177/1947603520967065 33106002
Sochacki KR, Varshneya K, Calcei JG et al (2021) Comparison of Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation and Osteochondral Allograft transplantation of the knee in a large insurance database: Reoperation Rate, complications, and cost analysis. Cartilage 13:1187S–1194S. 10.1177/194760352096706533106002
13. Cook JL Rucinski K Crecelius CR Treatment failures (revision or arthroplasty) after knee osteochondral allograft transplantation with minimum two-year follow-up Knee 2024 46 128 135 10.1016/j.knee.2023.12.002 38128151
Cook JL, Rucinski K, Crecelius CR et al (2024) Treatment failures (revision or arthroplasty) after knee osteochondral allograft transplantation with minimum two-year follow-up. Knee 46:128–135. 10.1016/j.knee.2023.12.00238128151
14. Familiari F Cinque ME Chahla J Clinical outcomes and failure rates of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the knee: a systematic review Am J Sports Med 2018 46 3541 3549 10.1177/0363546517732531 29039969
Familiari F, Cinque ME, Chahla J et al (2018) Clinical outcomes and failure rates of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the knee: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 46:3541–3549. 10.1177/036354651773253129039969
15. Trofa DP Hong IS Lopez CD Isolated Osteochondral Autograft Versus Allograft transplantation for the treatment of symptomatic cartilage lesions of the knee: a systematic review and Meta-analysis Am J Sports Med 2022 51 812 824 10.1177/03635465211053594 35139311
Trofa DP, Hong IS, Lopez CD et al (2022) Isolated Osteochondral Autograft Versus Allograft transplantation for the treatment of symptomatic cartilage lesions of the knee: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 51:812–824. 10.1177/0363546521105359435139311
16. Tschon M Veronesi F Giannini S Fini M Fresh osteochondral allotransplants: outcomes, failures and future developments Injury 2017 48 1287 1295 10.1016/j.injury.2017.05.006 28551052
Tschon M, Veronesi F, Giannini S, Fini M (2017) Fresh osteochondral allotransplants: outcomes, failures and future developments. Injury 48:1287–1295. 10.1016/j.injury.2017.05.00628551052
17. Vangsness CT Garcia IA Mills CR Allograft transplantation in the knee: tissue regulation, procurement, processing, and sterilization Am J Sports Med 2003 31 474 481 10.1177/03635465030310032701 12750147
Vangsness CT, Garcia IA, Mills CR et al (2003) Allograft transplantation in the knee: tissue regulation, procurement, processing, and sterilization. Am J Sports Med 31:474–481. 10.1177/0363546503031003270112750147
18. Sadr KN Pulido PA McCauley JC Bugbee WD Osteochondral allograft transplantation in patients with Osteochondritis dissecans of the knee Am J Sports Med 2016 44 2870 2875 10.1177/0363546516657526 27496906
Sadr KN, Pulido PA, McCauley JC, Bugbee WD (2016) Osteochondral allograft transplantation in patients with Osteochondritis dissecans of the knee. Am J Sports Med 44:2870–2875. 10.1177/036354651665752627496906
19. Hevesi M Denbeigh JM Paggi CA Fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee: a viability and histologic analysis for optimizing graft viability and expanding existing Standard Processed Graft resources using a living Donor Cartilage Program Cartilage 2021 13 948S 956S 10.1177/1947603519880330 31617404
Hevesi M, Denbeigh JM, Paggi CA et al (2021) Fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee: a viability and histologic analysis for optimizing graft viability and expanding existing Standard Processed Graft resources using a living Donor Cartilage Program. Cartilage 13:948S–956S. 10.1177/194760351988033031617404
20. Kovalenko B Bremjit P Fernando N Classifications in brief: Tonnis classification of hip osteoarthritis Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018 476 1680 1684 10.1097/01.blo.0000534679.75870.5f 30020152
Kovalenko B, Bremjit P, Fernando N (2018) Classifications in brief: Tonnis classification of hip osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 476:1680–1684. 10.1097/01.blo.0000534679.75870.5f30020152
21. Goodfriend B Essilfie AA Jones IA Thomas Vangsness C Fresh osteochondral grafting in the United States: the current status of tissue banking processing Cell Tissue Bank 2019 20 331 337 10.1007/s10561-019-09768-5 31214919
Goodfriend B, Essilfie AA, Jones IA, Thomas Vangsness C (2019) Fresh osteochondral grafting in the United States: the current status of tissue banking processing. Cell Tissue Bank 20:331–337. 10.1007/s10561-019-09768-531214919
22. Jiang Z Clausen JD Jahn D Ex vivo storage of human osteochondral allografts: long-term analysis over 300 days using a Ringer-based solution J Orthop Res 2024 10.1002/jor.25821 38751161
Jiang Z, Clausen JD, Jahn D et al (2024) Ex vivo storage of human osteochondral allografts: long-term analysis over 300 days using a Ringer-based solution. J Orthop Res. 10.1002/jor.2582138751161
23. Tabbaa SM Guilak F Sah RL Bugbee WD Fresh Osteochondral and Chondral Allograft Preservation and Storage Media: a systematic review of the literature Am J Sports Med 2022 50 1702 1716 10.1177/03635465211016832 34310184
Tabbaa SM, Guilak F, Sah RL, Bugbee WD (2022) Fresh Osteochondral and Chondral Allograft Preservation and Storage Media: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Sports Med 50:1702–1716. 10.1177/0363546521101683234310184
24. Souto R Petros B Augusto R Harvest, Transport, and Storage of Fresh Humeral Head Osteochondral Allograft: step-by-step protocol Arthrosc Tech 2021 10 e1805 e1813 10.1016/j.eats.2021.03.025 34336579
Souto R, Petros B, Augusto R et al (2021) Harvest, Transport, and Storage of Fresh Humeral Head Osteochondral Allograft: step-by-step protocol. Arthrosc Tech 10:e1805–e1813. 10.1016/j.eats.2021.03.02534336579
25. Paul Romil K Arguello AM Kwapisz A Brabston EW Stannard JP Ponce BA Momaya AM KD. P Variability in the Processing of Fresh Osteochondral allografts J Knee Surg 2021 36 450 455 10.1055/s-0041-1736148 34600436
Paul Romil K, Arguello AM, Kwapisz A, Brabston EW, Stannard JP, Ponce BA, Momaya AM, KD. P (2021) Variability in the Processing of Fresh Osteochondral allografts. J Knee Surg 36:450–455. 10.1055/s-0041-173614834600436
26. Wang CJ Treatment of focal articular cartilage lesions of the knee with autogenous osteochondral grafts. A 2- to 4-year follow-up study Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2002 122 169 172 10.1007/s004020100343 11928001
Wang CJ (2002) Treatment of focal articular cartilage lesions of the knee with autogenous osteochondral grafts. A 2- to 4-year follow-up study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122:169–172. 10.1007/s00402010034311928001
27. Smolders JMH Kock NB Koëter S Van Susante JLC Osteochondral autograft transplantation for osteochondritis dissecans of the knee preliminary results of a prospective case series Acta Orthop Belg 2010 76 208 218 20503947
Smolders JMH, Kock NB, Koëter S, Van Susante JLC (2010) Osteochondral autograft transplantation for osteochondritis dissecans of the knee preliminary results of a prospective case series. Acta Orthop Belg 76:208–21820503947
28. Chang EY Pallante-Kichura AL Bae WC Development of a Comprehensive Osteochondral Allograft MRI Scoring System (OCAMRISS) with Histopathologic, micro-computed tomography, and Biomechanical Validation Cartilage 2014 5 16 27 10.1177/1947603513514436 24489999
Chang EY, Pallante-Kichura AL, Bae WC et al (2014) Development of a Comprehensive Osteochondral Allograft MRI Scoring System (OCAMRISS) with Histopathologic, micro-computed tomography, and Biomechanical Validation. Cartilage 5:16–27. 10.1177/194760351351443624489999
29. Meric G Gracitelli GC McCauley JC Osteochondral Allograft MRI Scoring System (OCAMRISS) in the knee: Interobserver Agreement and clinical application Cartilage 2015 6 142 149 10.1177/1947603515573987 26175859
Meric G, Gracitelli GC, McCauley JC et al (2015) Osteochondral Allograft MRI Scoring System (OCAMRISS) in the knee: Interobserver Agreement and clinical application. Cartilage 6:142–149. 10.1177/194760351557398726175859
30. Lin KM Wang D Burge AJ Osteochondral allograft transplant of the Patella using femoral condylar allografts: magnetic resonance imaging and clinical outcomes at Minimum 2-Year follow-up Orthop J Sport Med 2020 8 1 9 10.1177/2325967120960088
Lin KM, Wang D, Burge AJ et al (2020) Osteochondral allograft transplant of the Patella using femoral condylar allografts: magnetic resonance imaging and clinical outcomes at Minimum 2-Year follow-up. Orthop J Sport Med 8:1–9. 10.1177/2325967120960088
31. Mirzayan R Charles MD Batech M Bipolar osteochondral allograft transplantation of the Patella and Trochlea Cartilage 2020 11 431 440 10.1177/1947603518796124 30173540
Mirzayan R, Charles MD, Batech M et al (2020) Bipolar osteochondral allograft transplantation of the Patella and Trochlea. Cartilage 11:431–440. 10.1177/194760351879612430173540
32. Ackermann J Merkely G Shah N Gomoll AH Decreased graft thickness is Associated with subchondral cyst formation after Osteochondral Allograft transplantation in the knee Am J Sports Med 2019 47 2123 2129 10.1177/0363546519851098 31169995
Ackermann J, Merkely G, Shah N, Gomoll AH (2019) Decreased graft thickness is Associated with subchondral cyst formation after Osteochondral Allograft transplantation in the knee. Am J Sports Med 47:2123–2129. 10.1177/036354651985109831169995
33. Wang D Lin KM Burge AJ Bone marrow aspirate Concentrate does not improve Osseous Integration of Osteochondral allografts for the treatment of Chondral defects in the knee at 6 and 12 months: a comparative magnetic resonance imaging analysis Am J Sports Med 2019 47 339 346 10.1177/0363546518813915 30543757
Wang D, Lin KM, Burge AJ et al (2019) Bone marrow aspirate Concentrate does not improve Osseous Integration of Osteochondral allografts for the treatment of Chondral defects in the knee at 6 and 12 months: a comparative magnetic resonance imaging analysis. Am J Sports Med 47:339–346. 10.1177/036354651881391530543757
34. Jones KJ Mosich GM Williams RJ Fresh Precut Osteochondral Allograft Core transplantation for the treatment of femoral cartilage defects Arthrosc Tech 2018 7 e791 e795 10.1016/j.eats.2018.03.016 30167355
Jones KJ, Mosich GM, Williams RJ (2018) Fresh Precut Osteochondral Allograft Core transplantation for the treatment of femoral cartilage defects. Arthrosc Tech 7:e791–e795. 10.1016/j.eats.2018.03.01630167355
35. Shin JJ Haro M Yanke AB Topographic analysis of the capitellum and distal femoral condyle: finding the best match for treating osteochondral defects of the humeral capitellum Arthrosc - J Arthrosc Relat Surg 2015 31 843 849 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.11.039
Shin JJ, Haro M, Yanke AB et al (2015) Topographic analysis of the capitellum and distal femoral condyle: finding the best match for treating osteochondral defects of the humeral capitellum. Arthrosc - J Arthrosc Relat Surg 31:843–849. 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.11.039
36. Mirzayan R Lim MJ C MOSP Fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation for osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum in baseball players J Shoulder Elb Surg 2016 25 1839 1847 10.1016/j.jse.2016.08.006
Mirzayan R, Lim MJ, C MOSP (2016) Fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation for osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum in baseball players. J Shoulder Elb Surg 25:1839–1847. 10.1016/j.jse.2016.08.006
37. Scranton PE Frey CC Feder KS Outcome of osteochondral autograft transplantation for type-V cystic osteochondral lesions of the talus J Bone Jt Surg - Ser B 2006 88 614 619 10.1302/0301-620X.88B5.17306
Scranton PE, Frey CC, Feder KS (2006) Outcome of osteochondral autograft transplantation for type-V cystic osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser B 88:614–619. 10.1302/0301-620X.88B5.17306
38. Thomas D Shaw KA Waterman BR Outcomes after Fresh Osteochondral Allograft transplantation for medium to large Chondral defects of the knee Orthop J Sport Med 2019 7 1 7 10.1177/2325967119832299
Thomas D, Shaw KA, Waterman BR (2019) Outcomes after Fresh Osteochondral Allograft transplantation for medium to large Chondral defects of the knee. Orthop J Sport Med 7:1–7. 10.1177/2325967119832299
39. Rucinski K Stannard JP Leary EV Cook JL Incidence and cost of Surgical Site infections after Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation and Meniscal Allograft transplantation in the knee Orthop J Sport Med 2022 10 1 8 10.1177/23259671221084701
Rucinski K, Stannard JP, Leary EV, Cook JL (2022) Incidence and cost of Surgical Site infections after Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation and Meniscal Allograft transplantation in the knee. Orthop J Sport Med 10:1–8. 10.1177/23259671221084701
40. Vehmeyer SBW Slooff ARM Bloem RM Petit PLC Bacterial contamination of femoral head allografts from living donors Acta Orthop Scand 2002 73 165 169 10.1080/000164702753671740 12079013
Vehmeyer SBW, Slooff ARM, Bloem RM, Petit PLC (2002) Bacterial contamination of femoral head allografts from living donors. Acta Orthop Scand 73:165–169. 10.1080/00016470275367174012079013
