
==== Front
Cureus
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus Palo Alto (CA)

10.7759/cureus.67582
Dentistry
Flapless Guided Dental Implant Surgery in a Systemically Compromised Patient: A Case Report
Muacevic Alexander
Adler John R
Campos Pamela 1
Manfro Rafael 1
Coura Gustavo 1
Formiga Márcio de Carvalho 1
1 Oral Implantology, Univali São José, São José, BRA
Márcio de Carvalho Formiga marciocformiga@gmail.com
23 8 2024
8 2024
16 8 e6758223 8 2024
Copyright © 2024, Campos et al.
2024
Campos et al.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This article is available from https://www.cureus.com/articles/283741-flapless-guided-dental-implant-surgery-in-a-systemically-compromised-patient-a-case-report
The use of surgical guides in implant treatment offers several advantages, including reduced surgery time, flapless procedures, and enhanced precision and reliability in implant placement. By utilizing tomography and scanning technologies, a patient’s complete anatomical structure can be transferred into software in three spatial planes. This allows for the three-dimensional printing of surgical guides that ensure the accurate execution of the procedure. Traditional techniques and planning using two-dimensional imaging are now considered outdated compared to the precision offered by guided surgery. In this study, we present the case of a patient with multiple systemic health complications whose primary concern was the absence of teeth 15 and 35. For this patient, flap surgeries were contraindicated. Given the effectiveness of surgical guides, this method was chosen for planning and treatment. Single Implacil implants were successfully placed. Despite the limitations of this case report, the use of guided surgery proved to be more precise and effective in determining the location, direction, and inclination of the implants while simultaneously enhancing patient comfort.

bone density
implant drills
3d printing
dental implants
guided surgery
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Initially, dental implants were placed with the sole aim of ensuring osseointegration. Over time, deviations from the correct implant position were compensated for during the prosthesis fabrication, leading to frequent errors due to improper positioning. Many researchers have highlighted the need for presurgical planning tools to improve accuracy in implant surgery and prosthetic rehabilitation [1,2]. Effective treatment requires collaboration between the surgeon and prosthetist, starting with the creation of a surgical guide to precisely locate each implant. Thus, achieving osseointegration alone is no longer adequate; three-dimensional (3D) positioning has become crucial to meeting patient needs for health, function, and aesthetics [3].

Initially, implant placement relied on X-rays and plaster models. Panoramic X-rays provided only bone height, not thickness, increasing the risk of failure [4]. With advancements in imaging and planning, relying solely on panoramic radiography is no longer sufficient, as two-dimensional imaging can result in inaccuracies and distortion [3].

Traditional implant protocols often involve longer surgery times, resulting in more postoperative scarring and discomfort for patients [5]. Guided surgery has emerged as a solution, utilizing devices that precisely direct the 3D positioning of implants. Custom surgical guides are developed for each patient, enabling accurate determination of implant direction, location, and inclination [6].

Flapless guided surgery offers several advantages, including reduced postoperative trauma and bleeding due to the precision of implant placement and the shorter surgical time. This technique employs specialized software to create 3D-printed surgical guides, minimizing distortions from the initial plan [5]. Turkyilmaz [7] noted that virtual planning and 3D printing of surgical guides lead to significantly greater accuracy compared to freehand techniques.

Guided surgery enhances planning and visualization for the implant dentist, improves communication between the dental surgeon and prosthodontist, and reduces patient morbidity [5]. The technology incorporates anatomical characteristics of the maxilla and mandible into the procedure, establishing a more effective protocol for functional and aesthetic rehabilitation [6].

The benefits of guided surgery include high predictability of results, reduced surgical time, minimized risk of injury to critical structures, less pain, faster healing, and decreased use of medications and anesthetics [8-10].

This study aims to report a clinical case involving a patient with comorbidities who underwent dental implantation using guided surgery and to highlight the advantages of this flapless technique compared to conventional methods.

Case presentation

The patient, a 34-year-old woman, presented with an esthetic concern due to the absence of teeth 15 and 35. She had type I diabetes, but her endocrinologist approved her desire for dental implants with restrictions on corticosteroid use. Additionally, she had a history of cerebral thrombosis in 2015 and was using anticoagulants. Her hematologist advised discontinuing the medication three days before the surgical procedure. She had no known allergies to any products or medications.

Her anamnesis was favorable, as she reported no issues with chewing, discomfort, or bleeding gums. An intraoral evaluation confirmed the absence of teeth 15 (Figure 1, Figure 2) and 35 (Figure 3, Figure 4).

Figure 1 Right side view showing the absence of tooth 15

Figure 2 Occlusal side view showing the absence of tooth 15

Figure 3 Left side view showing the absence of tooth 35

Figure 4 Left side occlusal view showing the absence of tooth 35

Tomography was performed to assess the quality and quantity of bone for implant placement (Figure 5, Figure 6).

Figure 5 Baseline tomograph view of tooth 15, demonstrating adequate bone volume for implant placement

Figure 6 Baseline tomograph view of tooth 35, showing sufficient bone volume for implant placement

Based on the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) images, a 3D surgical guide was planned and printed according to the digital design (Figure 7). Surgical guides were used for both teeth without flap elevation, given the patient’s systemic complications from diabetes and the associated risk of thrombosis.

Figure 7 Printed surgical guide for tooth 15

After positioning the surgical guide (Figure 8, Figure 9), guided instrumentation was performed according to the implant manufacturer’s instructions (Figure 10, Figure 11). This was followed by the placement of the implant, which was conducted with the surgical guide in place (Figure 12, Figure 13).

Figure 8 Right side view of tooth 15 showing the surgical guide in position

Figure 9 Right side occlusal view of tooth 15 showing the surgical guide in position

Figure 10 Use of Drill Spear 2.0 for initial drilling

Figure 11 Instrumentation with Drill 2.8

Figure 12 Final implant placement in the region of tooth 15, completed using a ratchet

Figure 13 Occlusal view of the installed implant

For tooth 35, an Implacil UN III Duecone AR implant (3.5 mm × 9 mm) was placed at 1 mm intraosseous (IO). For tooth 15, an Implacil UN III Maestro AR implant (3.5 mm × 11 mm) was placed at 2 mm IO. Healing devices were installed (Figure 14, Figure 15) to avoid a second surgical procedure after the osseointegration period. An X-ray was taken to confirm the implant position (Figure 16).

Figure 14 Verification of depth for installing the healing device

Figure 15 Healing abutment installed immediately after implant placement

Figure 16 Final radiograph of implant 15 immediately after placement, with the healing abutment in place

After four months, the final abutments and temporary crowns were installed (Figure 17). For tooth 35, a 3.3 × 4 × 1.5 mm Ideale Cone Morse Abutment (Implacil de Bortoli, São Paulo) was placed. For tooth 15, a 3.3 × 4 × 2.5 mm Ideale Cone Morse Abutment (Implacil de Bortoli, São Paulo) was installed.

Figure 17 Radiograph showing abutment and provisional restoration installed for implant 15

During the subsequent appointments, an impression was taken to produce metal-ceramic crowns, and the color was selected. In the following stage, the screwed-retained crowns were installed, and necessary adjustments were made (Figure 18, Figure 19, Figure 20).

Figure 18 Control radiograph of implant 15 with the ceramic screw-retained crown

Figure 19 Buccal view of the ceramic crown of implant 15

Figure 20 Occlusal view of the screwed ceramic crown on implant 15

Discussion

Guided surgery offers several advantages over conventional methods, such as the ability to perform surgery without raising flaps. In this case report, guided surgery was chosen due to the patient’s systemic complications, which contraindicated flap procedures [4]. Preoperative tomography scans were crucial for assessing the bone quantity required for implant placement, ensuring satisfactory functional and aesthetic results [6].

The patient in this case had comorbidities and was on anticoagulant medications. According to Cattoni et al., guided surgery is particularly recommended for such patients due to its less traumatic nature, reduced need for analgesics, faster healing, and the ability to resume oral hygiene immediately post-procedure [11].

Studies, including one by Yang et al., support guided surgery for patients with comorbidities. This technique, which uses conical implants in immunosuppressed patients, is preferred for its increased predictability and reduced risk of surgical complications [12].

Although guided surgery requires less experience compared to conventional methods due to its greater predictability, it is important to note that it is contraindicated in cases of restricted mouth opening and insufficient bone volume, highlighting the need for thorough planning [13]. The success of the surgery in this study was attributed to the reliable surgical guides that accurately indicated the ideal implant placement, a finding supported by several studies comparing post-procedure precision with presurgical virtual planning [14,15].

Conclusions

Guided surgery using advanced software enhances precision in achieving the ideal implant placement. This technique, driven by technological advancements, promotes faster recovery, greater postoperative comfort, and reduced pain and edema.

In this case report, the use of flapless guided surgery was particularly beneficial for a patient with comorbidities. It underscores the importance of detailed patient anamnesis for the successful planning and execution of the procedure by implant dentists.

Disclosures

Author Contributions

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Concept and design:  Márcio de Carvalho Formiga, Pamela Campos

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Márcio de Carvalho Formiga, Rafael Manfro, Gustavo Coura, Pamela Campos

Drafting of the manuscript:  Márcio de Carvalho Formiga, Pamela Campos

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Márcio de Carvalho Formiga, Rafael Manfro, Gustavo Coura, Pamela Campos

Supervision:  Márcio de Carvalho Formiga, Pamela Campos
==== Refs
References

1 Influence of residual ridge resorption patterns on fixture placement and tooth position, part III: presurgical assessment of ridge augmentation requirements Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent Mecall RA Rosenfeld AL 322 337 16 1996 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9242100/ 9242100
2 Cone beam computed tomography Dent Clin North Am Nasseh I Al-Rawi W 361 391 62 2018 29903556
3 The esthetic dental implant: letting restoration be the guide J Am Dent Assoc Garber DA 319 325 126 1995 7897100
4 An assessment of template-guided implant surgery in terms of accuracy and related factors J Adv Prosthodont Lee JH Park JM Kim SM Kim MJ Lee JH Kim MJ 440 447 5 2013 24353883
5 Accuracy evaluation of computer-guided implant surgery associated with prototyped surgical guides J Prosthet Dent Cunha RM Souza FÁ Hadad H Poli PP Maiorana C Carvalho PS 266 272 125 2021 32111393
6 Digital planning for immediate implants in anterior esthetic area: immediate result and follow-up after 3 years of clinical outcome-case report Dent J (Basel) Salviano SH Lopes JC da Silva Brum I Machado K Pedrazzi MT de Carvalho JJ 15 11 2023 36661552
7 Keys to achieving successful restoratively-driven implant placement with CAD/CAM surgical guide: a technical note J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg Turkyilmaz I 462 466 120 2019 30910764
8 Predictable implant placement with a diagnostic/surgical template and advanced radiographic imaging J Prosthet Dent Kopp KC Koslow AH Abdo OS 611 615 89 2003 12815357
9 Implant-site related and patient-based factors with the potential to impact patients' satisfaction, quality of life measures and perceptions toward dental implant treatment Implant Dent Topçu AO Yamalik N Güncü GN Tözüm TF El H Uysal S Hersek N 581 591 26 2017 28639985
10 Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study J Periodontol Arisan V Karabuda ZC Ozdemir T 43 51 81 2010 20059416
11 Digital smile designed computer-aided surgery versus traditional workflow in "all on four" rehabilitations: a randomized clinical trial with 4-years follow-up Int J Environ Res Public Health Cattoni F Chirico L Merlone A Manacorda M Vinci R Gherlone EF 3449 18 2021 33810379
12 Management of patients taking antithrombotic drugs before dental surgery J Dent Sci Yang JH Chen HM Kuo YS Chiang CP 222 224 15 2020 32595905
13 Computer-assisted virtual treatment planning combined with flapless surgery and immediate loading in the rehabilitation of partial edentulies Oral Implantol (Rome) DE Vico G Spinelli D Bonino M Schiavetti R Pozzi A Ottria L 3 10 5 2012 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23285400/ 23285400
14 A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates Clin Implant Dent Relat Res Verhamme LM Meijer GJ Boumans T de Haan AF Bergé SJ Maal TJ 343 352 17 2015 23879524
15 Narrative review regarding the applicability, accuracy, and clinical outcome of flapless implant surgery with or without computer guidance Clin Implant Dent Relat Res Naeini EN Atashkadeh M De Bruyn H D'Haese J 454 467 22 2020 32400121
