
==== Front
Wellcome Open Res
Wellcome Open Res
Wellcome Open Research
2398-502X
F1000 Research Limited London, UK

10.12688/wellcomeopenres.22769.1
Data Note
Articles
The genome sequence of a braconid wasp, Aleiodes leptofemur van Achterberg & Shaw, 2016
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

Broad Gavin R. Investigation Resources Writing – Original Draft Preparation Writing – Review & Editing https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7223-5333
1
Natural History Museum Genome Acquisition Lab
Darwin Tree of Life Barcoding collective
Wellcome Sanger Institute Tree of Life Management, Samples and Laboratory team
Wellcome Sanger Institute Scientific Operations: Sequencing Operations
Wellcome Sanger Institute Tree of Life Core Informatics team
Tree of Life Core Informatics collective
Darwin Tree of Life Consortiuma
1 Natural History Museum, London, England, UK
a mark.blaxter@sanger.ac.uk
No competing interests were disclosed.

12 8 2024
2024
9 46016 7 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Broad GR et al.
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

We present a genome assembly from an individual male Aleiodes leptofemur (braconid wasp; Arthropoda; Insecta; Hymenoptera; Braconidae). The genome sequence spans 271.20 megabases. Most of the assembly is scaffolded into 15 chromosomal pseudomolecules. The mitochondrial genome has also been assembled and is 32.28 kilobases in length.

Aleiodes leptofemur
braconid wasp
genome sequence
chromosomal
Hymenoptera
Wellcome Trust218328 206194 This work was supported by Wellcome through core funding to the Wellcome Sanger Institute [206194, <a href=https://doi.org/10.35802/206194>https://doi.org/10.35802/206194</a>] and the Darwin Tree of Life Discretionary Award [218328, <a href=https://doi.org/10.35802/218328>https://doi.org/10.35802/218328 </a>]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
==== Body
pmcSpecies taxonomy

Eukaryota; Opisthokonta; Metazoa; Eumetazoa; Bilateria; Protostomia; Ecdysozoa; Panarthropoda; Arthropoda; Mandibulata; Pancrustacea; Hexapoda; Insecta; Dicondylia; Pterygota; Neoptera; Endopterygota; Hymenoptera; Apocrita; Ichneumonoidea; Braconidae; Rogadinae; Aleiodes; Aleiodes leptofemur van Achterberg & Shaw, 2016 (NCBI:txid1844523).

Background

Aleiodes leptofemur is a small (about 4.5 mm long) braconid wasp of the subfamily Rogadinae. One of many similar species of Aleiodes, A. leptofemur can be identified using van Achterberg and Shaw (2016); useful features for distinguishing A. leptofemur from other dark and reddish-brown Aleiodes include the particularly slender femora and colour details of face, antenna and hind leg.

As with all other Rogadinae, where known, the hosts are Lepidoptera larvae which are mummified by the wasp larva, forming a hardened structure in which the wasp pupates ( Zaldívar-Riverón et al., 2008). A wide range of Noctuidae are attacked, with the common factor being that they feed low down in vegetation. The winter is spent as a larva in the host which is often manipulated to climb to an exposed position before being killed. This habit means that A. leptofemur is frequently reared from the exposed mummies. The adults are partly nocturnal and often light-trapped.

Found across much of Europe, A. leptofemur has multiple generations per year and adults are long-lived ( van Achterberg & Shaw, 2016). Until relatively recently, specimens had been misidentified as other Aleiodes, especially A. borealis (Thomson); however, van Achterberg & Shaw (2016) established that this species had been undescribed and formally described A. leptofemur, including extensive data on the ecology of this widespread species. This genome will help in deciphering the diversification of this very species-rich genus, including testing hypotheses of host range evolution ( Shaw, 2002).

Genome sequence report

The genome of an adult male Aleiodes leptofemur ( Figure 1) was sequenced using Pacific Biosciences single-molecule HiFi long reads, generating a total of 14.67 Gb (gigabases) from 1.40 million reads, providing approximately 59-fold coverage. Primary assembly contigs were scaffolded with chromosome conformation Hi-C data, which produced 116.45 Gbp from 771.22 million reads, yielding an approximate coverage of 429-fold. Specimen and sequencing information is summarised in Table 1.

Figure 1. Photograph of the Aleiodes leptofemur (iyAleLepo1) specimen used for genome sequencing.

Table 1. Specimen and sequencing data for Aleiodes leptofemur.

Project information	
Study title	Aleiodes leptofemur	
Umbrella BioProject	PRJEB66053	
Species	Aleiodes leptofemur	
BioSample	SAMEA111458715	
NCBI taxonomy ID	1844523	
Specimen information	
Technology	ToLID	BioSample accession	Organism part	
PacBio long read sequencing	iyAleLepo1	SAMEA111458777	Whole organism	
Hi-C sequencing	iyAleLepo1	SAMEA111458777	Whole organism	
Sequencing information	
Platform	Run accession	Read count	Base count (Gb)	
Hi-C Illumina NovaSeq 6000	ERR12071265	7.71e+08	116.45	
PacBio Sequel IIe	ERR12055583	1.40e+06	14.67	

Manual assembly curation corrected 87 missing joins or mis-joins, reducing the scaffold number by 66.67%. The final assembly has a total length of 271.20 Mb in 16 sequence scaffolds with a scaffold N50 of 17.3 Mb ( Table 2). The total count of gaps in the scaffolds is 263. The snail plot in Figure 2 provides a summary of the assembly statistics, while the distribution of assembly scaffolds on GC proportion and coverage is shown in Figure 3. The cumulative assembly plot in Figure 4 shows curves for subsets of scaffolds assigned to different phyla. Most (99.97%) of the assembly sequence was assigned to 15 chromosomal-level scaffolds. Chromosome-scale scaffolds confirmed by the Hi-C data are named in order of size ( Figure 5; Table 3). The specimen was a haploid male. The mitochondrial genome was also assembled and can be found as a contig within the multifasta file of the genome submission.

Table 2. Genome assembly data for Aleiodes leptofemur, iyAleLepo1.1.

Genome assembly	
Assembly name	iyAleLepo1.1	
Assembly accession	GCA_963942555.1	
Span (Mb)	271.20	
Number of contigs	280	
Contig N50 length (Mb)	1.8	
Number of scaffolds	16	
Scaffold N50 length (Mb)	17.3	
Longest scaffold (Mb)	26.01	
Assembly metrics *	Benchmark	
Consensus quality (QV)	63.6	≥ 50	
k-mer completeness	100.0%	≥ 95%	
BUSCO **	C:96.2%[S:95.8%,D:0.4%],
F:0.9%,M:2.9%,n:5,991	C ≥ 95%	
Percentage of assembly mapped to chromosomes	99.97%	≥ 95%	
Sex chromosomes	None	localised homologous pairs	
Organelles	Mitochondrial genome: 32.28 kb	complete single alleles	
* Assembly metric benchmarks are adapted from column VGP-2020 of “Table 1: Proposed standards and metrics for defining genome assembly quality” from Rhie et al. (2021).

** BUSCO scores based on the hymenoptera_odb10 BUSCO set using version 5.4.3. C = complete [S = single copy, D = duplicated], F = fragmented, M = missing, n = number of orthologues in comparison. A full set of BUSCO scores is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/Aleiodes_leptofemur/dataset/GCA_963942555.1/busco.

Figure 2. Genome assembly of Aleiodes leptofemur, iyAleLepo1.1: metrics.

The BlobToolKit snail plot shows N50 metrics and BUSCO gene completeness. The main plot is divided into 1,000 size-ordered bins around the circumference with each bin representing 0.1% of the 271,235,516 bp assembly. The distribution of scaffold lengths is shown in dark grey with the plot radius scaled to the longest scaffold present in the assembly (26,012,348 bp, shown in red). Orange and pale-orange arcs show the N50 and N90 scaffold lengths (17,287,625 and 15,370,087 bp), respectively. The pale grey spiral shows the cumulative scaffold count on a log scale with white scale lines showing successive orders of magnitude. The blue and pale-blue area around the outside of the plot shows the distribution of GC, AT and N percentages in the same bins as the inner plot. A summary of complete, fragmented, duplicated and missing BUSCO genes in the hymenoptera_odb10 set is shown in the top right. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/Aleiodes_leptofemur/dataset/GCA_963942555.1/snail.

Figure 3. Genome assembly of Aleiodes leptofemur, iyAleLepo1.1: BlobToolKit GC-coverage plot.

Sequences are coloured by phylum. Circles are sized in proportion to sequence length. Histograms show the distribution of sequence length sum along each axis. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/Aleiodes_leptofemur/dataset/GCA_963942555.1/blob.

Figure 4. Genome assembly of Aleiodes leptofemur iyAleLepo1.1: BlobToolKit cumulative sequence plot.

The grey line shows cumulative length for all sequences. Coloured lines show cumulative lengths of sequences assigned to each phylum using the buscogenes taxrule. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/Aleiodes_leptofemur/dataset/GCA_963942555.1/cumulative.

Figure 5. Genome assembly of Aleiodes leptofemur iyAleLepo1.1: Hi-C contact map of the iyAleLepo1.1 assembly, visualised using HiGlass.

Chromosomes are shown in order of size from left to right and top to bottom. An interactive version of this figure may be viewed at https://genome-note-higlass.tol.sanger.ac.uk/l/?d=ci1GSod4RD-2U_QcFn3hKA.

Table 3. Chromosomal pseudomolecules in the genome assembly of Aleiodes leptofemur, iyAleLepo1.

INSDC
accession	Name	Length
(Mb)	GC%	
OZ012609.1	1	26.01	34.0	
OZ012610.1	2	23.41	34.5	
OZ012611.1	3	23.36	34.0	
OZ012612.1	4	19.68	34.0	
OZ012613.1	5	18.17	34.5	
OZ012614.1	6	17.64	35.0	
OZ012615.1	7	17.29	34.0	
OZ012616.1	8	17.08	34.0	
OZ012617.1	9	16.46	34.0	
OZ012618.1	10	16.32	34.5	
OZ012619.1	11	16.08	34.5	
OZ012620.1	12	15.52	34.5	
OZ012621.1	13	15.43	34.0	
OZ012622.1	14	15.37	34.5	
OZ012623.1	15	13.37	35.0	
OZ012624.1	MT	0.03	12.5	

The estimated Quality Value (QV) of the final assembly is 63.6 with k-mer completeness of 100.0%, and the assembly has a BUSCO v5.4.3 completeness of 96.2% (single = 95.8%, duplicated = 0.4%), using the hymenoptera_odb10 reference set ( n = 5,991).

Metadata for specimens, BOLD barcode results, spectra estimates, sequencing runs, contaminants and pre-curation assembly statistics are given at https://links.tol.sanger.ac.uk/species/1844523.

Methods

Sample acquisition

An adult male Aleiodes leptofemur (specimen ID NHMUK010636352, ToLID iyAleLepo1) was collected from Tonbridge, England, UK (latitude 51.19, longitude 0.26) on 2021-05-28 using a light trap. The specimen was collected and identified by Gavin Broad (Natural History Museum), and was preserved by dry freezing at –80 °C.

Following morphological identification, the species taxonomy is verified by DNA barcoding according to the framework developed by Twyford et al. (2024). Briefly, legs from the specimen are taken and stored in ethanol. The tissue is lysed, the CO1 gene is amplified by PCR, and amplicons are sequenced and compared to the BOLD database ( Crowley et al., 2023). A DNA barcode is also generated from the PacBio sequencing data at a later stage for sample tracking through the genome production pipeline at the Wellcome Sanger Institute ( Twyford et al., 2024). The standard operating procedures for the Darwin Tree of Life barcoding have been deposited on protocols.io ( Beasley et al., 2023).

Nucleic acid extraction

The workflow for high molecular weight (HMW) DNA extraction at the Wellcome Sanger Institute (WSI) Tree of Life Core Laboratory includes a sequence of core procedures: sample preparation; sample homogenisation, DNA extraction, fragmentation, and clean-up. In sample preparation, the iyAleLepo1 sample was weighed and dissected on dry ice ( Jay et al., 2023). Tissue from the whole organism was homogenised using a PowerMasher II tissue disruptor ( Denton et al., 2023a).

HMW DNA was extracted at the WSI Scientific Operations core using the Automated MagAttract v2 protocol ( Oatley et al., 2023). The DNA was sheared into an average fragment size of 12–20 kb in a Megaruptor 3 system with speed setting 31 ( Bates et al., 2023). Sheared DNA was purified by solid-phase reversible immobilisation ( Strickland et al., 2023): in brief, the method employs AMPure PB beads to eliminate shorter fragments and concentrate the DNA. The concentration of the sheared and purified DNA was assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and Qubit Fluorometer using the Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity Assay kit. Fragment size distribution was evaluated by running the sample on the FemtoPulse system.

Protocols developed by the WSI Tree of Life laboratory are publicly available on protocols.io ( Denton et al., 2023b).

Sequencing

Pacific Biosciences HiFi circular consensus DNA sequencing libraries were constructed according to the manufacturers’ instructions. DNA sequencing was performed by the Scientific Operations core at the WSI on a Pacific Biosciences Sequel IIe instrument. Hi-C data were also generated from remaining whole organism tissue of iyAleLepo1 using the Arima-HiC v2 kit. The Hi-C sequencing was performed using paired-end sequencing with a read length of 150 bp on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 instrument.

Genome assembly, curation and evaluation

Assembly

Original assembly of HiFi reads is performed using Hifiasm ( Cheng et al., 2021) with the --primary option. Hi-C reads are further mapped with bwa-mem2 ( Vasimuddin et al., 2019) to the primary contigs, which are further scaffolded using the provided Hi-C data ( Rao et al., 2014) in YaHS ( Zhou et al., 2023) using the --break option. Scaffolded assemblies are evaluated using Gfastats ( Formenti et al., 2022), BUSCO ( Manni et al., 2021) and MERQURY.FK ( Rhie et al., 2020). The mitochondrial genome was assembled using MitoHiFi ( Uliano-Silva et al., 2023) and OATK ( Zhou, 2023).

Assembly curation

The assembly was decontaminated using the Assembly Screen for Cobionts and Contaminants (ASCC) pipeline (article in preparation). Flat files and maps used in curation were generated in TreeVal ( Pointon et al., 2023). Manual curation was primarily conducted using PretextView ( Harry, 2022), with additional insights provided by JBrowse2 ( Diesh et al., 2023) and HiGlass ( Kerpedjiev et al., 2018). Scaffolds were visually inspected and corrected as described by Howe et al. (2021). Any identified contamination, missed joins, and mis-joins were corrected, and duplicate sequences were tagged and removed. The entire process is documented at https://gitlab.com/wtsi-grit/rapid-curation (article in preparation).

Evaluation of the final assembly

The final assembly was post-processed and evaluated with the three Nextflow ( Di Tommaso et al., 2017) DSL2 pipelines “sanger-tol/readmapping” ( Surana et al., 2023a), “sanger-tol/genomenote” ( Surana et al., 2023b), and “sanger-tol/blobtoolkit” ( Muffato et al., 2024). The pipeline sanger-tol/readmapping aligns the Hi-C reads with bwa-mem2 ( Vasimuddin et al., 2019) and combines the alignment files with SAMtools ( Danecek et al., 2021). The sanger-tol/genomenote pipeline transforms the Hi-C alignments into a contact map with BEDTools ( Quinlan & Hall, 2010) and the Cooler tool suite ( Abdennur & Mirny, 2020), which is then visualised with HiGlass ( Kerpedjiev et al., 2018). It also provides statistics about the assembly with the NCBI datasets ( Sayers et al., 2024) report, computes k-mer completeness and QV consensus quality values with FastK and MERQURY.FK, and a completeness assessment with BUSCO ( Manni et al., 2021).

The sanger-tol/blobtoolkit pipeline is a Nextflow port of the previous Snakemake Blobtoolkit pipeline ( Challis et al., 2020). It aligns the PacBio reads with SAMtools and minimap2 ( Li, 2018) and generates coverage tracks for regions of fixed size. In parallel, it queries the GoaT database ( Challis et al., 2023) to identify all matching BUSCO lineages to run BUSCO ( Manni et al., 2021). For the three domain-level BUSCO lineage, the pipeline aligns the BUSCO genes to the Uniprot Reference Proteomes database ( Bateman et al., 2023) with DIAMOND ( Buchfink et al., 2021) blastp. The genome is also split into chunks according to the density of the BUSCO genes from the closest taxonomically lineage, and each chunk is aligned to the Uniprot Reference Proteomes database with DIAMOND blastx. Genome sequences that have no hit are then chunked with seqtk and aligned to the NT database with blastn ( Altschul et al., 1990). All those outputs are combined with the blobtools suite into a blobdir for visualisation.

The genome assembly and evaluation pipelines were developed using the nf-core tooling ( Ewels et al., 2020), use MultiQC ( Ewels et al., 2016), and make extensive use of the Conda package manager, the Bioconda initiative ( Grüning et al., 2018), the Biocontainers infrastructure ( da Veiga Leprevost et al., 2017), and the Docker ( Merkel, 2014) and Singularity ( Kurtzer et al., 2017) containerisation solutions.

Table 4 contains a list of relevant software tool versions and sources.

Table 4. Software tools: versions and sources.

Software tool	Version	Source	
BEDTools	2.30.0	https://github.com/arq5x/bedtools2	
BLAST	2.14.0	ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/executables/blast+/	
BlobToolKit	4.3.7	https://github.com/blobtoolkit/blobtoolkit	
BUSCO	5.4.3 and 5.5.0	https://gitlab.com/ezlab/busco	
bwa-mem2	2.2.1	https://github.com/bwa-mem2/bwa-mem2	
Cooler	0.8.11	https://github.com/open2c/cooler	
DIAMOND	2.1.8	https://github.com/bbuchfink/diamond	
fasta_windows	0.2.4	https://github.com/tolkit/fasta_windows	
FastK	427104ea91c78c3b8b8b49f1a7d6bbeaa869ba1c	https://github.com/thegenemyers/FASTK	
Gfastats	1.3.6	https://github.com/vgl-hub/gfastats	
GoaT CLI	0.2.5	https://github.com/genomehubs/goat-cli	
Hifiasm	0.16.1	https://github.com/chhylp123/hifiasm	
HiGlass	44086069ee7d4d3f6f3f0012569789ec138f42b84a
a44357826c0b6753eb28de	https://github.com/higlass/higlass	
Merqury.FK	d00d98157618f4e8d1a9190026b19b471055b22e	https://github.com/thegenemyers/MERQURY.FK	
MitoHiFi	3.2	https://github.com/marcelauliano/MitoHiFi	
MultiQC	1.14, 1.17, and 1.18	https://github.com/MultiQC/MultiQC	
NCBI Datasets	15.12.0	https://github.com/ncbi/datasets	
Nextflow	23.04.0-5857	https://github.com/nextflow-io/nextflow	
OATK	1	https://github.com/c-zhou/oatk	
PretextView	0.2	https://github.com/sanger-tol/PretextView	
samtools	1.16.1, 1.17, and 1.18	https://github.com/samtools/samtools	
sanger-tol/ascc	-	https://github.com/sanger-tol/ascc	
sanger-tol/genomenote	1.1.1	https://github.com/sanger-tol/genomenote	
sanger-tol/readmapping	1.2.1	https://github.com/sanger-tol/readmapping	
Seqtk	1.3	https://github.com/lh3/seqtk	
Singularity	3.9.0	https://github.com/sylabs/singularity	
TreeVal	1.0.0	https://github.com/sanger-tol/treeval	
YaHS	1.1a.2	https://github.com/c-zhou/yahs	

Wellcome Sanger Institute – Legal and Governance

The materials that have contributed to this genome note have been supplied by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner. The submission of materials by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner is subject to the ‘Darwin Tree of Life Project Sampling Code of Practice’, which can be found in full on the Darwin Tree of Life website here. By agreeing with and signing up to the Sampling Code of Practice, the Darwin Tree of Life Partner agrees they will meet the legal and ethical requirements and standards set out within this document in respect of all samples acquired for, and supplied to, the Darwin Tree of Life Project.

Further, the Wellcome Sanger Institute employs a process whereby due diligence is carried out proportionate to the nature of the materials themselves, and the circumstances under which they have been/are to be collected and provided for use. The purpose of this is to address and mitigate any potential legal and/or ethical implications of receipt and use of the materials as part of the research project, and to ensure that in doing so we align with best practice wherever possible. The overarching areas of consideration are:

• Ethical review of provenance and sourcing of the material

• Legality of collection, transfer and use (national and international)

Each transfer of samples is further undertaken according to a Research Collaboration Agreement or Material Transfer Agreement entered into by the Darwin Tree of Life Partner, Genome Research Limited (operating as the Wellcome Sanger Institute), and in some circumstances other Darwin Tree of Life collaborators.

Data availability

European Nucleotide Archive: Aleiodes leptofemur. Accession number PRJEB66053; https://identifiers.org/ena.embl/PRJEB66053 ( Wellcome Sanger Institute, 2024). The genome sequence is released openly for reuse. The Aleiodes leptofemur genome sequencing initiative is part of the Darwin Tree of Life (DToL) project. All raw sequence data and the assembly have been deposited in INSDC databases. The genome will be annotated using available RNA-Seq data and presented through the Ensembl pipeline at the European Bioinformatics Institute. Raw data and assembly accession identifiers are reported in Table 1 and Table 2.

Author information

Members of the Natural History Museum Genome Acquisition Lab are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12159242.

Members of the Darwin Tree of Life Barcoding collective are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12158331

Members of the Wellcome Sanger Institute Tree of Life Management, Samples and Laboratory team are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12162482.

Members of Wellcome Sanger Institute Scientific Operations: Sequencing Operations are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12165051.

Members of the Wellcome Sanger Institute Tree of Life Core Informatics team are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12160324.

Members of the Tree of Life Core Informatics collective are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12205391.

Members of the Darwin Tree of Life Consortium are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4783558.

10.21956/wellcomeopenres.25073.r96679
Reviewer response for version 1
Varaldi Julien 1Referee
1 Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France
21 9 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Varaldi J
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Version 1recommendationapprove
This manuscript presents the complete chromosome-level assembly of Aleiodes leptofemur (braconid wasp; Arthropoda; Insecta; Hymenoptera; Braconidae). This is a parasitoid wasp that attacks Lepidoptera caterpillars. The manuscript is clear and concise and the analysis is sound. The final assembly is of high quality thanks to the use of short and long reads and HiC data obtained from the DNA of a single (haploid) male.

I have only very minor comments: I think the peculiar way of life (parasitoid) of this species is not clearly stated in the introduction. A few additional details on its biology could also be useful to the reader. For instance is it an endo- or an ecto-parasitoid? a solitary or gregarious parasitoid? It would also have been nice to know why the authors focused on this particular species.

Please provide a reference for this assertion, if available. “The winter is spent as a larva in the host which is often manipulated to climb to an exposed position before being killed.”

There is a bit of inconsistency in the coverage values provided in the result section.

It is mentioned that 14.67Gb of PacBio reads have been produced, giving a 59-fold coverage: The genome is thus expected to be 14.67/59 = 0.2486441 Gb.

Next sentence, similar reasoning is given for Hi-C reads but this leads to a slightly different value: 116.45Gb/429=0.2714452Gb

Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?

Partly

Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Yes

Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

evolutionary biology, genomics, horizontal gene transfer

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

10.21956/wellcomeopenres.25073.r96678
Reviewer response for version 1
Austin Andrew D 1Referee https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9602-2276

1 The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
18 9 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Austin AD
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Version 1recommendationapprove
This is a very competent piece of research which presents a fully annotated genome of a braconid wasp. As such it will be highly useful for a plethora of future studies on the biology and evolution of the group.  The methods are well articulated and easy to follow, and the data clearly presented.

I have but two suggestions to improve the paper: First a little more detail about the characters helpful for identifying the subfamily and genus would assist anyone not familiar with the group.

Second, a statement at the end of the introduction regarding the rationale for choosing this particular genus/species AND the significance of this genome for guiding future studies would be useful. My understanding is that there are very few fully annotated genomes for braconid wasps, and so this study is of particular importance.

Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?

Partly

Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Yes

Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

molecular phylogenetics, evolution and systematics of parasitic wasps

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
==== Refs
Abdennur N Mirny LA : Cooler: scalable storage for Hi-C data and other genomically labeled arrays. Bioinformatics. 2020;36 (1 ):311–316. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz540 31290943
Altschul SF Gish W Miller W : Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215 (3 ):403–410. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 2231712
Bateman A Martin MJ Orchard S : UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51 (D1 ):D523–D531. 10.1093/nar/gkac1052 36408920
Bates A Clayton-Lucey I Howard C : Sanger Tree of Life HMW DNA fragmentation: diagenode Megaruptor ®3 for LI PacBio. protocols.io. 2023. 10.17504/protocols.io.81wgbxzq3lpk/v1
Beasley J Uhl R Forrest LL : DNA barcoding sops for the Darwin Tree of Life project. protocols.io. 2023; [Accessed 25 June 2024]. 10.17504/protocols.io.261ged91jv47/v1
Buchfink B Reuter K Drost HG : Sensitive protein alignments at Tree-of-Life scale using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2021;18 (4 ):366–368. 10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x 33828273
Challis R Kumar S Sotero-Caio C : Genomes on a Tree (GoaT): a versatile, scalable search engine for genomic and sequencing project metadata across the eukaryotic tree of life [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. Wellcome Open Res. 2023;8 :24. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18658.1 36864925
Challis R Richards E Rajan J : BlobToolKit – interactive quality assessment of genome assemblies. G3 (Bethesda). 2020;10 (4 ):1361–1374. 10.1534/g3.119.400908 32071071
Cheng H Concepcion GT Feng X : Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat Methods. 2021;18 (2 ):170–175. 10.1038/s41592-020-01056-5 33526886
Crowley L Allen H Barnes I : A sampling strategy for genome sequencing the British terrestrial arthropod fauna [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. Wellcome Open Res. 2023;8 :123. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18925.1 37408610
da Veiga Leprevost F Grüning BA Alves Aflitos S : BioContainers: an open-source and community-driven framework for software standardization. Bioinformatics. 2017;33 (16 ):2580–2582. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx192 28379341
Danecek P Bonfield JK Liddle J : Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. GigaScience. 2021;10 (2 ): giab008. 10.1093/gigascience/giab008 33590861
Denton A Oatley G Cornwell C : Sanger Tree of Life sample homogenisation: PowerMash. protocols.io. 2023a. 10.17504/protocols.io.5qpvo3r19v4o/v1
Denton A Yatsenko H Jay J : Sanger Tree of Life wet laboratory protocol collection V.1. protocols.io. 2023b. 10.17504/protocols.io.8epv5xxy6g1b/v1
Di Tommaso P Chatzou M Floden EW : Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35 (4 ):316–319. 10.1038/nbt.3820 28398311
Diesh C Stevens GJ Xie P : JBrowse 2: a modular genome browser with views of synteny and structural variation. Genome Biol. 2023;24 (1 ):74. 10.1186/s13059-023-02914-z 37069644
Ewels P Magnusson M Lundin S : MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics. 2016;32 (19 ):3047–3048. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354 27312411
Ewels PA Peltzer A Fillinger S : The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38 (3 ):276–278. 10.1038/s41587-020-0439-x 32055031
Formenti G Abueg L Brajuka A : Gfastats: conversion, evaluation and manipulation of genome sequences using assembly graphs. Bioinformatics. 2022;38 (17 ):4214–4216. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac460 35799367
Grüning B Dale R Sjödin A : Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences. Nat Methods. 2018;15 (7 ):475–476. 10.1038/s41592-018-0046-7 29967506
Harry E : PretextView (Paired Read Texture Viewer): a desktop application for viewing pretext contact maps. 2022; [Accessed 19 October 2022]. Reference Source
Howe K Chow W Collins J : Significantly improving the quality of genome assemblies through curation. GigaScience. 2021;10 (1 ): giaa153. 10.1093/gigascience/giaa153 33420778
Jay J Yatsenko H Narváez-Gómez JP : Sanger Tree of Life sample preparation: triage and dissection. protocols.io. 2023. 10.17504/protocols.io.x54v9prmqg3e/v1
Kerpedjiev P Abdennur N Lekschas F : HiGlass: web-based visual exploration and analysis of genome interaction maps. Genome Biol. 2018;19 (1 ): 125. 10.1186/s13059-018-1486-1 30143029
Kurtzer GM Sochat V Bauer MW : Singularity: scientific containers for mobility of compute. PLoS One. 2017;12 (5 ): e0177459. 10.1371/journal.pone.0177459 28494014
Li H : Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2018;34 (18 ):3094–3100. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191 29750242
Manni M Berkeley MR Seppey M : BUSCO update: novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38 (10 ):4647–4654. 10.1093/molbev/msab199 34320186
Merkel D : Docker: lightweight Linux containers for consistent development and deployment. Linux J. 2014;2014 (239 ): 2. Reference Source
Muffato M Butt Z Challis R : Sanger-tol/blobtoolkit: v0.3.0 – poliwag.2024. 10.5281/zenodo.10649272
Oatley G Denton A Howard C : Sanger Tree of Life HMW DNA extraction: automated MagAttract v.2. protocols.io. 2023. 10.17504/protocols.io.kxygx3y4dg8j/v1
Pointon DL Eagles W Sims Y : sanger-tol/treeval v1.0.0 – ancient Atlantis.2023. 10.5281/zenodo.10047654
Quinlan AR Hall IM : BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26 (6 ):841–842. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 20110278
Rao SSP Huntley MH Durand NC : A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell. 2014;159 (7 ):1665–1680. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021 25497547
Rhie A McCarthy SA Fedrigo O : Towards complete and error-free genome assemblies of all vertebrate species. Nature. 2021;592 (7856 ):737–746. 10.1038/s41586-021-03451-0 33911273
Rhie A Walenz BP Koren S : Merqury: reference-free quality, completeness, and phasing assessment for genome assemblies. Genome Biol. 2020;21 (1 ): 245. 10.1186/s13059-020-02134-9 32928274
Sayers EW Cavanaugh M Clark K : GenBank 2024 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52 (D1 ):D134–D137. 10.1093/nar/gkad903 37889039
Shaw MR : Host ranges of Aleiodes species (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), and an evolutionary hypothesis.In: Melika, G. and Thuróczy, C. (eds.) Parasitic wasps: Evolution, Systematics, Biodiversity and Biological Control.Budapest, Hungary: Agroinform,2002;321–327. Reference Source
Strickland M Cornwell C Howard C : Sanger Tree of Life fragmented DNA clean up: manual SPRI. protocols.io. 2023. 10.17504/protocols.io.kxygx3y1dg8j/v1
Surana P Muffato M Qi G : Sanger-tol/readmapping: sanger-tol/readmapping v1.1.0 - Hebridean Black (1.1.0). Zenodo. 2023a. 10.5281/zenodo.7755669
Surana P Muffato M Sadasivan Baby C : sanger-tol/genomenote (v1.0.dev). Zenodo. 2023b. 10.5281/zenodo.6785935
Twyford AD Beasley J Barnes I : A DNA barcoding framework for taxonomic verification in the Darwin Tree of Life project [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]. Wellcome Open Res. 2024;9 :339. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21143.1
Uliano-Silva M Ferreira JGRN Krasheninnikova K : MitoHiFi: a python pipeline for mitochondrial genome assembly from PacBio high fidelity reads. BMC Bioinformatics. 2023;24 (1 ): 288. 10.1186/s12859-023-05385-y 37464285
van Achterberg C Shaw MR : Revision of the western Palaearctic species of Aleiodes Wesmael ( Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Rogadinae). Part 1: Introduction, key to species groups, outlying distinctive species, and revisionary notes on some further species. ZooKeys. 2016;639 :1–164. 10.3897/zookeys.639.10893 28138281
Vasimuddin M Misra S Li H : Efficient architecture-aware acceleration of BWA-MEM for multicore systems. In: 2019 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS). IEEE,2019;314–324. 10.1109/IPDPS.2019.00041
Wellcome Sanger Institute: The genome sequence of a braconid wasp, Aleiodes leptofemur van Achterberg & Shaw, 2016. European Nucleotide Archive. [dataset], accession number PRJEB66053,2024.
Zaldívar-Riverón A Shaw MR Sáez AG : Evolution of the parasitic wasp subfamily Rogadinae (Braconidae): phylogeny and evolution of lepidopteran host ranges and mummy characteristics. BMC Evol Biol. 2008;8 (1 ): 329. 10.1186/1471-2148-8-329 19055825
Zhou C : c-zhou/oatk: Oatk-0.1. 2023. 10.5281/zenodo.7631375
Zhou C McCarthy SA Durbin R : YaHS: yet another Hi-C Scaffolding tool. Bioinformatics. 2023;39 (1 ): btac808. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac808 36525368
