
==== Front
iScience
iScience
iScience
2589-0042
Elsevier

S2589-0042(24)02037-6
10.1016/j.isci.2024.110812
110812
Review
Recent approaches and advancement in biochar-based environmental sustainability: Is biochar fulfilling the sustainable development goals?
Patro Ashmita 12
Dwivedi Saurabh 12
Thakur Anjali 3
Sahoo Prafulla Kumar pk.sahoo@cup.edu.in
3∗
Biswas Jayanta Kumar 4
1 Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 201002, India
2 CSIR-Institute of Minerals and Materials Technology, Bhubaneswar 751013, Odisha, India
3 Department of Environmental Science and Technology, Central University of Punjab, V.P.O. Ghudda, Bathinda 151401, Punjab, India
4 Department of Ecological Studies and International Centre for Ecological Engineering, University of Kalyani, Kalyani, Nadia 741235, West Bengal, India
∗ Corresponding author pk.sahoo@cup.edu.in
07 9 2024
20 9 2024
07 9 2024
27 9 110812© 2024 The Author(s)
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Summary

This review highlights the application of biochar (BC) for attaining different SDGs (SDG 6: clean water and sanitation, SDG 7: affordable and clean energy, SDG 13: climate action, and SDG 15: life on land). These goals coincide with the various existing environmental problems including wastewater treatment, soil amendment, greenhouse gas remediation, and bioenergy generation. So, the review encompasses the various mechanisms involved in the BC-assisted treatment and reclamation of water, pollutant immobilization and enhancing soil properties, reduction of greenhouse gas emission during the wastewater treatment process and soil amendment mechanisms, bioenergy generation through various electrode material, biodiesel production, and many more. The review also explains the various drawbacks and limitations of BC application to the available environmental issues. Conclusively, it was apprehended that BC is an appropriate material for several environmental applications. More research interventions are further required to analyze the applicability of different BC materials for attaining other available SDGs.

Graphical abstract

Soil science; Environmental management; Soil chemistry; Soil biology

Subject areas

Soil science
Environmental management
Soil chemistry
Soil biology
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

In the past decades, the occurrence of industrial revolution has brought vast changes in the lifestyle of human beings that adversely affected the environment. Urbanization, industrialization, and widespread chemical applications in agriculture and daily life influenced climatic variations and rapid environmental pollution (water, soil, air).1 This led to the occurrence of deforestation, reduced sanitation, lack of drinking water access, decreasing air quality index, huge solid waste generation, reduction in soil fertility, increased soil erosion, reduction in groundwater recharge, high cases of diseases, frequent floods, and droughts. As a result, selective competition for survival and existence began between different classes of society that unveiled the unequal distribution of food, water, and natural resources. To address these socio-economic and environmental issues of society, in 2015, the General Assembly of the United Nations proposed 17 sustainable developmental goals (SDGs) and 169 targets to sustainably improve the competing human lives globally. Some of the SDGs include Clean water and sanitation (goal 6), affordable and clean energy (goal-7), climate action (goal-13), life below water (goal-14), and life on land (goal-15). These SDGs were targeted to be achieved by the year 2030.2 To attain these SDGs, various materials, methods, approaches, and technological developments were proposed and implemented on a massive scale. For example, to achieve SDG 6 (clean water and sanitation) which corroborates the target of enhanced wastewater treatment, numerous advanced wastewater treatment technologies and methodologies have been investigated, such as wastewater treatment plants, sewage treatment plants, effluent treatment plants, reverse osmosis, anaerobic digesters, and constructed wetlands.3 Incorporating such wastewater treatment technologies led to the enhanced treatment of pollutants (organic compounds and inorganic compounds) from various waste streams and produced vast amounts of clean water for reuse. Likewise, for successfully accomplishing SDG 15 (life on land), i.e., to advance the properties of soil, various physical (soil replacement and soil thermal desorption), chemical (chemical oxidation and reduction, chemical leaching) and biological (phytoremediation and microbial degradation) technologies have been experimented.4 Enhancing the soil properties advanced the biological lives on land as increasing the soil quality through nutrient enrichment and nutrient uptake up-scaled the nutritional value of plants. So, the surplus growth of healthy plants will simultaneously reduce the rising issues of food security and will simultaneously decrease the threat to human lives from hunger. This will simultaneously help to achieve SDG 2 i.e., zero hunger. Similarly, SDG 13 (climate action) could be been attained through advanced air pollution control equipment (cyclone separator, fabric filters, electrostatic precipitators) which favored efficient purification of noxious gases and particulate matters released into the atmosphere through different industrial residual air discharges.5 Additionally, SDG 7 (clean and affordable energy) has also been achieved through various costly noble metals, semiconductors, photovoltaics, thermal power plants, fuel cells/batteries, wind turbines, hydropower plants, and so forth. that produced clean energy for various applications.6 However, these technologies are highly energy intensive, incur excessive costs, require greater maintenance and operational costs which evolved as major drawbacks of these systems. To overcome these disadvantages, several natural and cost-effective materials and technologies have been designed such as constructed wetlands,7 microbial fuel cell8 and their integration,9,10,11 and so forth. Nevertheless, the substrate material used in these technologies played a vital role in pollution abatement.12 Though various types of substrate material such as gravel, graphite, and zeolite have been investigated in these systems, still major research studies have claimed biochar (BC) as a potential candidate that effectively reduced wastewater pollutants and soil contaminants, enhanced soil properties and reduced the emission of greenhouse gases.13,14

Recently, BC has been considered as an essential material that is used widely for various environmental applications. It is a pyrolyzed product developed from various natural and synthetic feedstock materials in the prevalence of oxygen and temperature-controlled conditions.15 BC possesses various physio-chemical properties depending upon the raw biomass used and the pyrolysis conditions.16 These influential parameters affect the characteristics of BC, e.g., the surface area, porosity of BC, functional group, long-term stability, and adsorption property.17 As a result, such evolved properties of BC favor the enhancement of wastewater treatment, facilitating efficient soil amendment, carbon sequestration, reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emission (such as methane, and nitrous oxide), heavy metal bioavailability in soil and water, and bio-energy production. Modified BC has also been used to achieve many other targets especially for wastewater treatment, nutrient immobilization, and as a slow-release fertilisers.18,19 BC also contributes to the global nutrient cycle such as carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus.20 It helps to reduce the biomass waste burden and fix the carbon for a longer period, reducing greenhouse gas emissions.20 Furthermore, BC production from photosynthetic/microbial biomass shows the economic benefits in terms of its reproducibility, low-cost raw material, waste reduction, easy availability, and wider environmental applications.16 BC also possesses some profound properties such as specific functional groups, high porosity, high cation exchange capacity, high specific surface area, and high stability, which makes it a suitable candidate for different environmental applications.17 Consequently, BC has been used on a larger scale for scientific studies and field-scale application as well.21,22,23 Interestingly, the summation of these environmental applications of BC resonates completely with some of the goals associated with SDGs (i.e., SDG 6, SGD 7, SDG 13, and SDG 15) as mentioned above. So, these assumptions ascertain BC as a suitable candidate for fulfilling several goals of SDGs. Till now, various research studies have been available that determine BC as a potential material for treating various wastewater types, remediating pollutants from soil and aqueous environment, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and so forth. Similarly, there exist different review articles demonstrating the role of BC in such environmental applications. However, very limited review studies are available that correlate the application of BC with the available SDGs. So, the present review is designed to affirm the potential applications of BC in dealing with various environmental aspects which simultaneously corroborate well with the targets of SDGs. Moreover, the review article has accumulated different research articles available till date to justify the effective use of BC for remediating pollutants efficiently from soil, air, and water mediums and generating bioenergy for other implications. Further sections will explicitly provide insights into the mechanisms and the functions of BC taking place during these environment upliftment processes.

Review methodology

Considering a systematic review,24 we have first initiated with the identification of a knowledge area followed by a research question. The formulated research question is then followed by the study protocol consisting of data extraction, analyzing the methodology, extracting results, formulating the results in text, and finally publishing the entire research and results. Based on such procedures, a mapping of experimental research regarding the application of BC for achieving SDGs has been collected and analyzed. The collected studies include BC application in the field of wastewater treatment, soil amendment, greenhouse gas reduction, and bioenergy generation. The articles were selected in January 2024 from Science Direct, Web of Science (WOS), Scopus, and Google Scholar.

Following this, a research strategy has been established by providing keywords in the search platform (Web of Science) utilizing earlier research articles. The investigation of the search string was initiated by examining the terms “review,” “papers,” “biochar,” “applications,” “wastewater treatment,” “energy and production,” “greenhouse gas and reduction,” “soil and amendments,” “sustainable development goals” (as depicted in Figure 1). The search was mediated between the years 2013–2023. Around 250 articles related to BC (2000–2023) and the selected SDGs were obtained (for writing the review) and then multiple-level inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to selectively incorporate the articles in different sections.Figure 1 Assessment of total number of articles with respect to biochar in various environmental applications and related fields

(A) Total number of review articles published; (B) Total number of articles published. The data collection was undertaken through systematic upscaling in Web of Science (https://www.webofscience.com) using search keywords, i.e., review, papers, biochar, applications, wastewater treatment, energy and production, greenhouse gas and reduction, soil and amendments, sustainable development goals. (C) Total number of research articles and review articles published on biochar during the year 2013–2023.

Further, for constructing the inclusion-exclusion approach, screening of necessary articles was carried out from the earlier collected studies. Filters were applied wherever necessary. As mentioned earlier, the review contains around 250 articles that were withdrawn since the year 2013–2023. The filtering was carried out by selectively segregating the articles based on the particular SDGs mentioned. Around 80 articles were selected for wastewater treatment, 50 articles for soil amendment, 30 articles for greenhouse gas remediation, and 20 articles for bioenergy generation. During the initial phase, screening filters were applied to the titles, keywords, and abstracts. Those 30 articles were excluded having the required title and abstract but were not suitable for the research theme. Those studies that adhere to the desired central objective of the systematic review proceeded to the next stage of selection. The last stage, where a total number of 220 articles was included were thoroughly read and further systematized for review writing. During this stage, various modulating adjustments were carried out to resolve the errors and inconsistencies obtained in the database. A full reading of each of the articles was then performed and a careful investigation of the collected articles was undertaken to design the summary. Then, the segregated articles based on the confined SDGs were presented in individual sections to clarify the actual applicability of BC in each of the determined categories. So, further sections were strategically provided based on the collected articles to accomplish the systematic review writing process relating to the thematic idea.

Overview of biochar

Currently, the utilization of BC has been substantially extended to several environmental applications such as the qualitative treatment of wastewater, managing the generated solid waste, energy production, mitigating the prevailing climate change conditions and many more.25 The suitability of BC for various applications exists because of its property to act as biosorbent,26 photocatalyst,27 and so forth, which had helped in the remediation of various solid, liquid and gaseous environmental contaminants. Taking into account the applicability of BC for resolving the issues for treating all three phases of contaminants, BC has been widely used for removing various organic (dyes, pesticides, phenols) and inorganic (anions and heavy metals)28 pollutants from aqueous medium involving various types of wastewaters, drinking water, river water, and so forth. Worthwhile, BC has also been used for sequestering noxious gases, specifically CO2, CH4 and mitigating nitrogenous gas, i.e., N2O.29 Likewise, the utilization of BC has been further targeted to distinct soil components for various reasons inculcating pollutant removal, enhancing soil properties, and many more. The associated mechanisms for attaining these tendencies were predominantly due to physisorption and chemisorption mechanisms (complexation, precipitation, electrostatic interaction, ion exchange, capillary condensation, and sorption)26 occurring in the presence of BC. The availability of precise conditions for achieving appropriate wastewater treatment, mitigating gaseous pollutants, and remediating different soil types was better achieved by various influential parameters required for BC development, as they drive the BC properties and surface morphology. These parameters include the different types of feedstock material, production technique, temperature, and so forth.30,31

BC is a pyrolyzed material produced from carbonizing different feedstock materials at variable temperature ranges. The feedstock material used for the production of BC consists of inorganic and organic solid residue attained from living and non-living sources.32 The biomass used as feedstock material is distinctively classified into various types based on their coherent properties. Vassilev et al.33 divided BC into five classes which were aquatic biomass, woody waste, industrial waste, agricultural biomass, and human and animal waste. Likewise, Jafri et al.34 categorized biomass into two classes, i.e., woody (residue from forest and tree) and non-woody biomass (agricultural crop residue, industrial waste, and animal waste). Similarly, Hopkins et al.35 divided feedstock into lignocellulosic biomass and marine biomass. However, the BC developed from such feedstock material was highly affected by the persisting temperature and technique used.15 Till now, four different types of techniques are known to be involved in producing BC. The techniques consisted of hydrothermal carbonization, dry torrefaction, pyrolysis, and gasification which worked at a temperature range of 180°C–260°C, 200°C–300°C, 300°C–650°C and 600°C–1200°C respectively for producing BC from biomass.36,37,38,39,40,41,42 These production techniques and temperature influence the different surface morphologies of BC including specific surface area (SSA), porosity, and cation exchange capacity.43 For example, Li et al.44 mentioned that at greater temperature range, the porosity of BC increases. Likewise, increasing the temperature to about 400°C–800°C enhances the SSA and beyond that temperature negligible improvement of SSA occurs.45 Corresponding to temperature, feedstock material also affects the BC properties, where, higher water content and micro-organic molecule containing substances generate more porous BC.46 The BC derived from manures or biological solids contain lower SSA as compared to woody biomass due to occurrence of deformation, structural cracking and pore blocking.15 In contrast, these manures contain greater CEC and pH opposite to woody BC as oxidized surface and inorganic functional groups are generated upon BC surface during heating.47 Insoluble precipitates are formed during BC development creating sites for specific reaction and consequently facilitates the production of effective CEC on BC.48 These inherited BC properties with advanced porosity, SSA and CEC supports growth of distinct micro biota which favored efficient retention of nutrients and pollutants, enhanced soil properties and remediated several noxiuos gases.15,49 These active properties of BC with an ability to rehabilitate the prevailing environmental conditions (soil, air, and water) coherently make it a promising candidate to achieve various SDGs. The different goals of SDGs include various targets for uplifting the lives residing in the environment, whereby, the characteristics of BC depicted specific potential to help resolve partially or completely the targets of SDGs. So, further subsections will provide an in-depth analysis of the capacity of BC to achieve the different SDGs.

Application of biochar for fulfilling sustainable development goals

Biochar possesses various essential inherent properties including sustainability, cost-effectiveness, high productivity, and so forth. that make it a viable material for extensively solving environmental pollution. As aforesaid, the influential physicochemical properties of BC have explicitly facilitated its application for remediating pollutants from various wastewater types, and soil environment, enhancing soil properties, reducing the release of toxic greenhouse gases, and sustainable energy generation in the environment. The utilization of BC for producing bioenergy and remediating, soil, water, and air resonates its applicability with the targets of SDGs. The validation of BC’s sustainable application has been confirmed strongly in the IPCC Report 2018, where, BC is regarded as a negative emission technology (NET).50 The properties and applicability of BC suitably fit to achieve some of the goals (provided in Figure 2) among the 17 SDGs which are targeted to be achieved by 2030. However, in the present review, it was estimated that BC could successfully afford to accomplish four SDGs. The tendency of BC to remediate a wide range of pollutants from wastewater is priorly targeted to SDG 6 depicting clean water and sanitation. Treating the water at source using BC and restricting the discharge of pollutants into open waterbodies would deliberately reduce the deleterious effects on various forms of life residing below water, and thus target to achieve SDG 14 (Life below water) simultaneously. Furthermore, using BC for soil productivity enhancement and contaminant removal renders the attainment of SDG 15 (Life on land). Similarly, using BC prohibits the emission of greenhouse gases into the environment apprehending the successful accomplishment of SDG 13 (Climate action). Meanwhile, the enhanced properties and cost-effectiveness of BC also contributed to effective bioenergy generation that supplemented the attainment of SDG 7 (Affordable and clean energy). Summarizing the overall potential of BC for alleviating environmental issues sustainably would persuade good health for each and every living individual residing on land as well as the aquatic body which is quite relatable to SDG 3 (Good health and well-being). So, looking into the vivid utilization of BC for acquiring the various SDGs, below provided subsections will depict an insight into the sustainable applications of BC to help improve the vital issues existing in different spheres of the environment.Figure 2 Schematic representation of total number of SDGs fulfilled by biochar

(A) Total number of SDGs targeted to be achieved by 2030. Tick mark (✓) depicts the SDGs attained using biochar application; (B) Targeted SDGs achieved using biochar as a potential material.

Reclamation of water (SDG 6: Improve clean water and sanitation)

Since past decades various physicochemical and biological treatment technologies have been actively designed to treat the enormous amount of wastewater being generated.51 Extensively used biological treatment methods include anaerobic digestion, activated sludge process, whereas, physicochemical treatment involves advance oxidation process (AOP), ultrasonic irradiation, and so forth.52 Interestingly, among these techniques, the process of adsorption has been of greater interest for remediating organic and inorganic wastewater pollutants.53 However, the primary application of adsorption was experimented using carbonaceous material such as activated carbon.54 Several experimental studies demonstrate pieces of evidence for applicability of low-cost and sustainable activated carbon for the treatment of organic and inorganic wastewater contaminants.55 In this regard, a rising trend had been introduced to prioritize and investigate carbonaceous materials for novel environmental remediation technologies. Consequently, the concept of BC has been introduced and affirmed by numerous research studies to deal with aquatic pollutants in a sustainable manner.52 Enormous experimental research confirmed BC as a potent adsorbent for treating inorganic pollutants such as heavy metals,56 conventional pollutants, and organic pollutants such as dyes,57 pesticides and many other contaminants58,59,60,61 from various aqueous solution. These efficient characteristics of BC also effectively serve the target of SDG 6 concerning “Clean Water and Sanitation.” As SDG 6 deals with sustainably generating clean water, the properties of BC affirm better reproducibility for achieving these targets. However, BC pertaining to SDG 6 has been discussed in detail in very limited studies. So, further subsections will provide an idea of BC and its global implications for treating pollutants from aqueous solutions and accomplishing SDG 6.

Heavy metals and other toxic elements

In recent years, the highly toxic nature of heavy metals has contributed to a greater surge in inculcating BC as an effective adsorbent for remediating these heavy metals. Application of BC has caused the efficient removal of a large number of heavy metals from several wastewaters originating from different sources. Due to the lower efficiency of conventional wastewater treatment systems,3 the use of BC has been widely accepted for treating these toxic metals from polluted wastewater. The efficiency and economic feasibility of BC induced greater efforts for exploring distinct BC types for enhanced removal of pollutants. Furthermore, for enhancing the performance of BC, different modification strategies have also been applied to increase the heavy metal adsorption process from aqueous solution. Such approaches led to the removal of a large number of heavy metals using BC that includes Cd, Cu, Ni, Zn, Pb, and so forth. As mentioned by Ni et al.,62 metal ions having a smaller ionic radius and greater electronegativity consisted of good binding affinity toward the surface functional groups, such as –OH, -COOH, of hard Lewis bases present on BC. As a result, surface complexation and cation exchange processes have a major contribution to the sorption of heavy metals on BC in a pH-controlled environment. Several studies have reported that the use of BC had reduced the concentration of heavy metals from wastewaters to a level lesser than the concerned drinking water standards including ion exchange with the available elements upon BC surface, i.e., Na+, K+, and Ca2+; surface complexation reactions, electrostatic interaction; forming insoluble compounds through precipitation with SO42− and CO32−; and physisorption.56 For example, Bandara et al.63 reported that the use of poultry litter BC removed about 99% of Cd(II) and Cu(II) from acid mine wastewater, where the initial concentrations were 0.58 and 2.28 mg/L respectively. According to WHO, the drinking level standard for Cu(II) was 2 mg/L, and the use of poultry litter BC efficiently treated the Cu(II) ions below the drinking standard level. The greater removal of Cu(II) as compared to Cd(II) ions was attributed to the presence of PO43− and CO32− ions present in BC that favored the occurrence of precipitation and surface adsorption and simultaneously enhanced the removal of Cu(II). Additionally, BC having higher N content possesses a higher affinity for Cu(II), thus, facilitating effective Cu(II) removal. Similarly, Manyuchi et al.64 reduced the concentration of heavy metals from gold tailing wastewater to a range below the WHO guidelines for effluent discharge. The study incorporated mixture of saw-dust and molasses BC for treating gold tailing wastewater, having initial concentration of 0.23 ± 0.01 mg/L of Cr3+, 0.80 ± 0.06 mg/L of Fe2+, 8.59 ± 8.60 mg/L of Zn2+, 0.92 ± 0.06 mg/L of Ni2+, 0.71 ± 0.04 mg/L of Pb2+, 0.12 ± 0.01 mg/L of Mn2+ and 5.53 ± 0.40 mg/L of Cu2+. It was observed that the BC was able to treat about 78.3%, 73.8%, 85.9%, 81.5%, 70.4%, 83.3%, and 90.8% of Cr3+, Fe2+, Zn2+, Ni2+, Pb2+, Mn2+ and Cu2+ respectively. The reduction in heavy metal concentration was attributed to the available retention time, pore size, and surface area of BC for adsorption. All the factors together uplifted the BC adsorption efficiency in treating heavy metals from the provided wastewater.

Various factors affect the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution by using different types of biochar including, initial concentration of pollutants, pH of the solution, BC production temperature, adsorbent dosage, and so forth. For example, Cheng et al.65 used BC derived from poplar sawdust for treating Pb2+ and Cd2+ revealing a removal rate of 9.01% and 7.53% respectively at an initial concentration of 200 mg/L for each of the pollutants. Instead, when the initial concentration of Pb2+ and Cd2+ was 400 mg/L each, the removal rates were 6.95% and 9.81% respectively. The removal of Pb2+ and Cd2+ was due to the precipitation reaction with the mineral content of BC developed at 600°C. Also, the co-precipitation of Pb2+ and Cd2+ could also occur with metal ions such as K+, Mg2+, and Ca2+ due to surface complexation or electrostatic cation exchange. Pb2+ and Cd2+ were also possibly treated due to the interaction of heavy metals with π electrons in C=C. The cyclic aromatic π-system donates the π electron (as the cation- π binding site tends to be a weak bond) for interacting with Pb2+/Cd2+ and resultantly formed Pb-π and Cd- π.66,67

Moreover, differential results were observed with BC developed using different feedstock types (provided in Table 1). Earlier studies have reported the use of various types of BC involving agricultural waste, paper waste, marine waste, and so forth. for efficient heavy metal removal from different wastewater. The study reported by Singh et al.68 mentioned that using sugarcane BC provided a removal efficiency of 99.24%, 10.95%, and 95.52% for Cd, Fe, and Pb respectively. Instead using BC derived from plastics of polyethylene terephthalate and polyethylene demonstrated a removal rate of 28.31%, 4.0%, and 70.07% for Cd, Fe, and Pb, respectively. While, Das et al.69 utilized BC with different feedstock materials (maize stalk, Lantana camara, pine needle, black gram) for analyzing effective heavy metal removal from wastewater collected from the municipal treatment plant. The initial concentration of Cd, Cr, Pb, Zn and Cu were 0.19μg/L, 34.3μg/L, 1.67μg/L, 64.5μg/L and 51.2μg/L respectively and after treatment with different BC types, the removal rates were in the range of 52.6–94.7%, 83.1–88.1%, 94.6–77.8%, 90.1–94.5%, and 93.3–95.5%, respectively. The affinity of heavy metal ions differently to different BC types depicted that the removal rate depends greatly upon feedstock materials due to varying rates of surface electrostatic interaction, surface complexation, and precipitation mechanism taking place. Interestingly, when BC was modified with different forms of iron, the efficiency of BC material was enhanced. More pronouncing results were observed in modified BC due to the interaction of heavy metals with iron oxides and the simultaneous occurrence of an endothermic chemisorption mechanism. For example, Hasan et al.70 demonstrated that BC modified with nanoscale zerovalent iron could remove about 91.7% and 94.2% of Cd2+ and Zn2+ respectively, instead, unmodified BC could only treat about 42.6% and 42.2% of Cd2+ and Zn2+, respectively. Also, Liu et al.71 used BC alginate beads where BC was modified with ferric/ferrous sulfate. The results represented that on increasing the pH between 6 and 8, the adsorption capacity (Alginat BC: 25 mg Cd2+/g, modified alginate BC: 30 mg Cd2+/g) of both substances was increased. In addition, when these BCs were developed under different temperature conditions, the adsorption capacity of the adsorbent varied. The unmodified BC alginate beads and ferric/ferrous sulfate modified BC alginate beads were developed at 300°C, 500°C and 700°C, where, both the types of BC developed at higher pyrolytic temperatures (500°C and 700°C) depicted higher adsorption tendency for heavy metals. Likewise, when the temperature of the solution was increased from 24°C to 37°C in the same study, the adsorption capacity of the BC material was enhanced due to endothermic chemisorption reaction. Coherent results pertaining to the temperature modification of BC were observed by Singh et al.68 for treating Cd from an aqueous solution. Enhanced removal of Cd was provided by different feedstock material at a temperature range of 550°C as compared to BC developed at 450°C. BC with feedstock material as neem, sugarcane, polyvinyl chloride and polyethylene, polyethylene terephthalate, and polyethylene produced Cd removal efficiency of 45.86%, 98.36%, 7.89% and 3.97% at 450°C, whereas at 550°C, the removal rates were 66.40%, 99.24%, 24.58%, 28.31%, respectively. The reduced removal rates at lower temperatures were due to the production of BC with lesser surface area and higher non-carbonized organic matter available for adsorption which was opposite to the BC developed at higher temperatures. Oppositely, when Shan et al.56 compared the efficiency of BC developed at 350°C, 400°C, 500°C and 600°C, the results suggested that BC developed at lower pyrolysis temperature of 400°C showcased higher adsorption of heavy metals (Pb2+: 45.98 mg/g, Cd2+: 34.22 mg/g, Ni2+: 22.1 mg/g, Cu2+: 33.5 mg/g and Zn2+: 15.39 mg/g). The higher adsorption efficiency at this particular temperature was attributed to greater cation exchange and the existence of a more oxygen-functional group for productive adsorption.Table 1 Applications of biochar for the treatment of various aquatic pollutants

Sl.no.	Type of biomass used	Production technique and temperature	Type of water	BC dosage	Efficiency (%)/adsorption capacity (mg/g)	Pollutant type	Initial conc.	Reference	
1	Poplar saw dust	Heated at 600°C	River water	0.1g/100mL	9.01	Pb2+	200 mg/L	Cheng et al.65	
	7.53	Cd2+	200 mg/L	
2	Hardwood	NA	Stream water	0.5g/50mL	99	Cu2+	0.015 mM/L	Richards et al.72	
					100	Zn2+	0.015 mM/L		
3	Peanut shell	Heated at 600°C	Drinking water	14 g/L	86	Pb2+	2 mg/L	Pineda et al.73	
	“Chonta” pulp			12 g/L	74	Pb2+	2 mg/L		
4	Corn cob			12 g/L	85	Pb2+	2 mg/L		
	Poultry litter	Pyrolysis at 550°C	Acid mine wastewater treatment	0.4g/40mL	>99	Cd(II)	0.58 mg/L	Bandara et al.63	
					> 99	Cu (II)	2.28 mg/L		
5	Maize stalk, Lantana camara, pine needle, black gram	Pyrolysis at 600°C	Municipal treatment plant wastewater	2.5–5.0g/1L	78.5–86.5	As	16.3μg/L	Das et al.69	
	52.6–94.7	Cd	0.19μg/L	
	83.1–88.1	Cr	34.3μg/L	
	94.6–77.8	Pb	1.67μg/L	
	90.1–94.5	Zn	64.5μg/L	
	93.3–95.5	Cu	51.2μg/L	
6	Pinewood	Pyrolysis at 600°C	Synthetic stormwater runoff	50mg/300mL	42.6	Cd	25.62 mg/L	Hasan et al.70	
Pyrolysis at 600°C + doped with nanoscale zerovalent iron			91.7	Cd	
7	Macro-algal bloom	Heated at 400°C–500°C	Synthetic wastewater (Solution pH 5)	0.250g/100mL	53.40	Cu	20 mg/L	Jaiswal et al.74	
	27.25	Ni	10 mg/L	
	29.3	Co	10 mg/L	
	78.9	Cd	30 mg/L	
Synthetic wastewater (Solution pH 2)		10.39	Cu	20 mg/L	
	7.65	Ni	10 mg/L	
	7.3	Co	10 mg/L	
	16.8	Cd	30 mg/L	
8	Jackfruit seed waste	Thermally activated with orthophosphoric acid at 500°C	Synthetic solution (pH 7)	0.1g	99.8	Fe (II)	5-100 mg/L	Khadem et al.75	
	99.8	Cd (II)	
	99.6	Pb (II)	
	99.7	Cu (II)	
	61.6	Mn (II)	
9	Saw-dust and molasses	Ignited at 500°C	Gold tailing wastewater	50 mg/L	78.3	Cr3+	0.23 ± 0.01 mg/L	Manyuchi et al.64	
	73.8	Fe2+	0.80 ± 0.06 mg/L	
	85.9	Zn2+	8.59 ± 8.60 mg/L	
	81.5	Ni2+	0.92 ± 0.06 mg/L	
	70.4	Pb2+	0.71 ± 0.04 mg/L	
	83.3	Mn2+	0.12 ± 0.01 mg/L	
	90.8	Cu2+	5.53 ± 0.40 mg/L	
10	Date seed	Pyrolyzed at 300°C	Synthetic aqueous solution	0.06g/50mL	90	As (III)	1 mg/L	Pal et al.76	
	Delonix regia seed		87.7	As (III)	
11	(unmodified)	Pyrolyzed at 550°C–600°C	Synthetic aqueous solution	0.5g/50mL	14	Ni2+	100 mg/L	Sajjadi et al.77	
Pine wood (Ultrasonicated)		42	Ni2+	
12	Sugarcane	Pyrolyzed at 550°C	Synthetic aqueous solution	0.1–0.5g	99.24	Cd	20 mg/L	Singh et al.68	
	10.95	Fe	
	95.52	Pb	
Polyethylene terephthalate and Polyethylene	Synthetic aqueous solution		28.31	Cd	20 mg/L	
				4.0	Fe	
				70.07	Pb	
13	Acacia leucophloea	Pyrolyzed at 700°C	Synthetic solution	25-200mg/50mL	98	BR29	60 mg/L	Nirmaladevi et al.57	
		98	RR2	
14	Cow dung	Pyrolyzed at 500°C	Synthetic solution	0.5–6.0g/100mL	97.0–99.0,	Methylene Blue	100 mg/L	Ahmad et al.78	
	Rice husk		73.0–98.9	
	Sludge		71.0–99.0	
15	Aegle marmelos	Carbonized at 270°C	Synthetic solution	0.5–3.0g/100mL	74	Patent Blue	0.05 gm/L	Ahmad et al.79	
16	Casuarina equisetifolia	Pyrolyzed at 500°C	Synthetic solution	5g/250mL	89.1	Methylene Blue	50 mg/L	Bharti et al.80	
17	Crab shell	Pyrolyzed at 800°C	Synthetic solution	0.5 g/L	20	Malachite Green	4000 mg/L	Dai et al.81	
18	Rice husk	Pyrolyzed at 400°C–600°C	Synthetic solution	1.5 g/L	96.5	Malachite Green	20 mg/L	Ganguly et al.82	
19	Date Palm	Pyrolyzed at 400°C–600°C	Synthetic solution	0.1g/50mL	94.94	NO3	10 mg/L	Fseha et al.83	
20	Rice husk (BC)	Pyrolyzed at 500°C	Synthetic solution	0.1g/30mL	10.12	NO3	10-40 mg/L	Sadeghi Afjeh et al.84	
	Rice husk (BC + hydrogel)		34.3	
21	White oak+white cedar wood.	Pyrolyzed at 550°C	Synthetic solution	–	6.1–89.6	NO3-N	10 mg/L	Tian et al.85	
	BC + zro-valent iron		30.6–95.7	
22	Steel pickling waste liquor and sugarcane bagasse (modified Fe/Ni)	Burned at 600°C	Synthetic solution	0.5g/50mL	98.39%	NO3	20-50 mg/L	Li et al.86	
23	Rice straw	Pyrolyzed at 500°C	Synthetic solution	5 mg/50 mL	428.25 mg/g	U(VI)	50 mg/L	Ahmed et al.87	
24	Pine needles	Pyrolyzed at 600°C	Synthetic solution	5 g/L	623.7 mg/g	U(VI)	11.9 mg/L	Philippou et al.88	
25	Rice straw	Pyrolyzed at 500°C for 2 h	Synthetic solution	1 g/L	111.11 mg/g	F−	6 mg/L	Zhou et al.89	
26	Rice husk	Pyrolyzed at 300°C and 700°C for 40 and 60 min	Synthetic solution	4 g/L	4.45 mg/g	F−	5 mg/L	Yadav and Jagadevan90	
27	Tamarix hispida	Pyrolyzed at 350°C for 2 h	Synthetic and real wastewater	5 g/L	164.23 mg/g (synthetic wastewater), 86.69% (real wastewater)	F−	40 mg/L (synthetic wastewater), 3 mg/L spiked to 23 mg/L (real wastewater)	Habibi et al.91	
The table depicts the reclamation of different types of water consisting of heavy metals, conventional pollutants, dye, and geogenic pollutants. The factors involving feedstock material, production technique, adsorbent dosage, and the type of pollutant affecting the removal mechanism are provided below.

Coherently, several studies have reported that providing a solution pH of around 4 to 6 facilitates effective heavy metal removal from various aqueous solutions. Jaiswal et al.74 mentioned that the heavy metal removal efficiency of BC gets enhanced when the pH of the solution is increased from 2.0 to 5.0. At pH 2, the BC could treat about 10.39%, 7.65%, 7.3%, and 16.8%, and at pH 5, the BC could remove about 53.40%, 27.25%, 29.3% 78.9% of Cu (II), Ni (II), Co (II) and Cd (II) respectively. At lower pH, the BC surface gets positively charged due to the existence of a higher concentration of H+ ions. As a result, the positively charged metal ions endure electrostatic repulsion from the protonated surface. Also, competition between ions of heavy metals and hydrogen atoms occurring for adsorption sites reduces the adsorption tendencies of the material.92,93 Oppositely, on increasing the solution pH, the surface of BC became negatively charged and the adsorption of heavy metals upon the BC surface was enhanced.74 Also, increasing the solution pH toward 6 produces stronger electronegativity upon the BC surface and strengthens the development of the bond between BC and heavy metal ions.94 Corresponding to this study, Khadem et al.75 reported that when BC was exposed to solutions with a pH range of 4–9, the BC represented higher removal efficiency at pH 7, where the removal rates were 99.8%, 99.8%, 99.6%, 99.7% and 61.6% for Fe (II), Cd (II), Pb (II), Cu (II), Mn (II) respectively, and the initial concentration of the heavy metal ions was 5–100 mg/L. A similar pH-dependent study was executed by Singh et al.68 which depicted a removal rate of 89.36%, 89.93%, 99.01%, 0.14%, 72.51%, and 98.78% for Cu, Pb, Cd, Fe, Ni, and Cr at pH 4; 91.60%, 81.88%, 95.52%, 99.24%, 99.03% and 4.81% for Cu, Ni, Pb, Cd, Cr, and Fe at pH 6; 34.03%, 72.10%, 58.64%, 61.07%, 49.08% for Cu, Ni, Pb, Cd, Cr and Fe at pH 8, respectively. Likewise, Shan et al.56 mentioned that among the provided pH range of solution between 2 and 6, BC produced effective adsorption at pH 5 for all the heavy metals (Pb2+: 46.7 mg/g, Cd2+: 28.3 mg/g, Ni2+: 18.75 mg/g, Cu2+: 35.05 mg/g and Zn2+: 12.65 mg/g due to greater presence of negative charge upon BC surface, hence, availing more scope for the adsorption of positively charged heavy metals.

Nevertheless, there are various other modulating factors that help enhance the BC tendency for effective wastewater treatment. Earlier studies have mentioned that the presence of organic compounds promoted the removal of heavy metal ions. Lin et al.94 utilized oxidized BC for the removal of heavy metals, where, the coexistence of benzoate improved the heavy metal treatment by chelating with the oxygen-containing group of BC and selectively caused the adsorption of heavy metals. Similarly, convincing results were reported by Singh et al.,68 where, increasing the BC dosage from 0.1 to 0.5g increased the removal efficiency of Cd, Pb, Cr, Fe, Ni, and Cu ions from 11.76 to 99.24%, 59.0 to 95.52% 87.62 to 99.36%, 0.60 to 10.95%, 11.56 to 43.31%, and 36.43 to 91.59%, respectively. Increasing the dosage rate of BC consequently increased the available sites for sorption and simultaneously the free sites upon the exposed surface area for the enhanced adsorption of heavy metals through different BC materials. Moreover, exposing the BC surface to different physical and chemical conditions changes the adsorbing properties and simultaneously the heavy metal removal rate of the adsorbent. For example, Lee et al.95 used three different types of BC derived from rice husk, wood chips, and their mixture for the adsorption of three heavy metals, i.e., Cd, Pb, and Zn, under varying conditions (acidic: HCl, alkaline: NaOH, oxidizing: H2O2, manganese oxide: KMnO4, iron oxide: FeCl3). The results reported that BC modified with KMNO4 had greater adsorption capacity due to an increased number of functional groups including -OH, C=O, and Mn-O. The enhanced removal was attributed to the increased cation exchange with Mn and surface complexation reactions using delocalized π electrons or –OH groups formed by the impregnation of MnOx. Furthermore, the enhancement of BC adsorption property was also carried out by ultrasonicating the desired BC, as reported by Sajjadi et al.77 The results revealed that unmodified BC was able to treat 14% of Ni2+, instead, ultrasonicated BC could remove 42% of Ni2+. The acoustic wave used for the modification of the BC material developed certain other porous structures upon the surface simultaneously improved the porosity of BC and facilitated effective adsorption for wastewater treatment. Moreover, in the same study, when unmodified and ultrasonicated BC were treated with 10%, 20%, and 30% of HNO3, around 4% increase in Ni2+ uptake in 10% and 20% HNO3 solution in comparison to ultrasonicated BC having 30% HNO3 concentration. Although, ultrasonication exfoliated the structure of BC, enhanced the pore surface area, and favored leaching of mineral content out of BC, still, increasing the HNO3 concentration to 30%, produced no improvement in Ni2+ uptake due to the entrapment of greater nitrate ion conc. in the microporous structure of BC.96,97

The collective results from the different studies suggested that a higher rate of electrostatic attraction is produced between the different –OH and –COOH groups present on the BC surface and the heavy metal ions possessing greater electronegativity and smaller ionic radius. Likewise, the probable treatment of heavy metals using BC could also occur through the donation of π electrons from the weak cation- π binding site of BC (present in C=C) to the heavy metal (supposed to be X) and subsequently develops X- π heavy metal ions that possessed reduced toxicity. Such surface properties of BC adsorb the heavy metal ions through different phenomena (Figure 3) including surface complexation reactions, cation exchange, electrostatic interaction, physisorption, chemisorption, precipitation, and many more. These mechanisms are further affected by various controlling parameters such as retention time, pore size, BC surface characteristics, initial concentration of pollutants, pH of the solution, BC production temperature, modification of BC surface, and modification of solution through different oxidizing and reducing agents. Among these factors, BC surface characteristics tend to be the primary factor that should be taken into consideration for demonstrating effective heavy metal removal, as different materials possess a varying affinity to heavy metals due to modulations in the different influencing phenomena (such as precipitation, surface complexation, and so forth.) taking place. If these surfaces of BC were further modified with iron oxides, various endothermic chemisorption mechanisms come into existence that suitably removed heavy metal ions from the solution. However, the surface of BC also gets affected by different pyrolysis temperature that modifies its properties. BC produced at lower pyrolytic temperatures has a lower surface area and more non-carbonized organic matter opposite to that of BC at a higher pyrolytic temperature which reduces the affinity of heavy metals to BC. Likewise, the solution pH also affects the BC surface characteristics, where lower pH donates positive ions upon the BC surface and higher pH converts it into a negatively charged particle. At lower pH, H+ ions surmount the BC surface, thus causing electrostatic repulsion to the similarly charged heavy metal ions, while on increasing pH the BC surface gets more electronegative and attracts the toxic heavy metal ions. Similarly, various modification strategies and approaches have been applied to enhance the heavy metal remediation process using BC. Greater efforts are still required to attain a better understanding of the underlying mechanism for heavy metal removal. Although numerous adsorption studies are performed, comparatively, desorption studies are quite reluctant. A greater need for desorption study arises to study the sequential process taking place post adsorption. Additionally, toxicity tests need to be apprehended further to get a in-depth knowledge of BC sustainability post adsorption. Conclusively, the collected research studies demonstrate BC as a sustainable novel material for removing heavy metals from wastewater productively.Figure 3 Mechanisms involved in the removal of heavy metals using biochar

BC could sustain various mechanisms, i.e., surface complexation, electrostatic ion exchange, cation- π bonding, the role of pH, and temperature variation that favored effective removal of different toxic heavy metals from aqueous solutions.

Geogenic pollutants

BC has proven to be a low-cost adsorbent for the removal of U (VI), F−, and As (III) as well from different aqueous mediums. Such an approach has also been provided by Thakur et al.,98 where a detailed discussion related to recent studies on the use of BC for the removal of geogenic contaminants (U (VI), F− and As (III)) from aqueous solutions have been mentioned. When individual research articles with respect to these contaminants have been considered, different experimental studies suggested multiple tendencies of BC for treating these geogenic pollutants. However, most of the studies had performed modifications of BC to enhance the removal rate of the geogenic pollutants. For example, Sen et al.99 reported that rice husk-derived BC modified with ferric oxide nanoparticles removed about 99.8% U (VI) from water at an initial concentration of 3 mg/L. Similarly, Li et al.100 synthesized magnetic BC which reduced the U (VI) to U (IV) with a removal efficiency of 90% at pH 4 and an initial concentration of 10 mg/L. Likewise, Ahmed et al.101 examined the HNO3 oxidized rice straw BC for the adsorption of U (VI) from contaminated water. They observed that the maximum sorption capacity of BC was 242.65 mg/g at pH 5.5 with an initial concentration of 50 mg/L. Oxidized BC showed better removal efficiency due to increased surface area, functional groups, and porosity. The major mechanism responsible for the adsorption of U (VI) was inner sphere complexation. Further, Zhang et al.102 investigated the sorption potential of pine needles BC for the removal of U (VI) from wastewater. They reported that BC removed about 99.9% U (VI) from industrial wastewater, where the initial concentration was 15 mg/L. Coherently, Kumar et al.103 used hydrothermally produced BC derived from switchgrass for the treatment of U (VI) contaminated water. They found that BC successfully removed the U (VI) with a maximum sorption capacity of 4 mg/g. Moreover, Ahmed et al.87 evaluated BC derived from rice straw modified with hydroxyapatite nanocomposite for the adsorption of U(VI) from an aqueous solution. Primarily, hydroxyapaptite is a calcium phosphate substance that has a high capability to remove pollutants from the environment. The adsorption potential of fabricated biochar was found to be 428.25 mg/kg whereas raw BC had an adsorption capacity of 110.56 mg/kg at an initial concentration of 50 mg/L and pH 5.5.104 Similarly, Philippou et al.88 removed U(VI) from water using magnetic BC from pine needles. Magnetic modification escalated the sorption capacity of BC through the incorporation of oxygenated functional groups on the BC surface. Magnetized BC was effective even after four sorption/desorption cycles.

Moreover, several studies have been carried out for the removal of F− using BC. For example, Mohan et al.105 utilized pine wood and bark-based BC for the adsorption of F− and exhibited maximum sorption potential of 7.66 mg/g and 9.77 mg/g respectively at pH 2. Similarly, Oh et al.106 removed F− using BC prepared from orange peel and sludge at different pyrolytic temperatures. They revealed that F− adsorption is a pH-dependent phenomenon. Maximum F− sorption took place in acidic pH due to the protonation of functional groups resulting in electrostatic interaction. However, Goswami et al.107 used nanoscale rice husk BC for defluoridation and showed a maximum sorption potential of 17.3 mg/g at pH 7. The study reported the F− sorption at neutral pH which is quite challenging. Likewise, Sadhu et al.108 evaluated watermelon rind BC for F− uptake from groundwater and industrial wastewater. They reported a maximum sorption capacity of 9.5 mg/g at pH 1 and an initial concentration of 50 mg L−1. Further, Zhou et al.89 studied the rice straw-based BC loaded with metal oxide (La/Fe/Al) to remove the fluoride (F−) from water. Modification with tri-metallic oxide improved the efficiency of the BC, with a sorption potential of 10.85 mg/g for raw BC whereas modified BC showed F− sorption capacity of 111.11 mg/g at an initial concentration of 6 mg/L. Modification improved the surface properties by introducing the hydroxyl groups on the BC surface and high adsorption capacity because La/Fe/Al oxides have a positive charge while fluoride has a negative charge The possible removal mechanisms were ion exchange and electrostatic interactions. Similarly, Habibi et al.91 employed LaCl3-activated BC derived from Tamarix hispida for the defluoridation of simulated and real wastewater. The BC exhibited an F− adsorption capacity of 164.23 mg/g for simulated water and 86.69% for real wastewater. The prepared BC demonstrated high reusability, even after six cycles of reuse it showed an F− removal efficiency of 53%. Co-existing ions such as bicarbonate, chloride, sulfate, and nitrate had only little effect on the F− sorption. A combination of electrostatic attraction and precipitation was identified as the major mechanism for the removal of F− from aqueous mediums.

Similarly, when the treatment of As (III) was considered, a variable rate of removal was observed under different influential factors. For example, Pal et al.76 compared the efficiency of Date seed (DS) and Delonix regia seed (DRS) by varying the initial concentration of As(III) from 0.2 to 2.5 mg/L. Upon increasing the initial concentration from 0.2 to 2.0 mg/L, the removal rate of As(III) increased from 92.75 to 95% and 91 to 93.7% in DS and DRS respectively. Increasing the heavy metal concentration acted as a driving force and surmounted the barrier of mass transfer to the surface of BC, thus, effectively adsorbing the pollutant. In contrast, increasing the initial concentration from 2.0 to 2.5 mg/L decreased the pollutant removal tendency which was consequent due to the saturation of the adsorption site upon the BC surface with an increase in the concentration of metal ions.109,110 The saturation of active binding sites upon BC reduced the vacant position for heavy metals to attach and then reduced the removal efficiency.111,112 As surface electrostatic interaction, complexation, and precipitation mechanisms occur at varying rates on different BC types indicating that the removal rate is highly dependent on the feedstock type. Corresponding results were reported by Pal et al.,76 where the removal efficiency of BC from DS and DRS provided distinct results for treating As(III) from an aqueous solution. Date seed BC represented a removal efficiency of 90.0% and BC derived from Delonix regia seed provided a removal efficiency of 87.7%. Moreover, previous studies have demonstrated that the presence of organic compounds facilitated the adsorption of heavy metal ions. Lin et al.94 employed oxidized BC for the sorption of heavy metals, where the presence of benzoate enhanced the sorption potential of the BC by chelating with the oxygenated functional groups present on the BC surface. On the other hand, when the dosage of adsorbent was uplifted, enhanced heavy metal removal rates were observed, as provided by Pal et al.,76 where increasing the dosage of BC materials from 40 to 60 mg enhanced the removal rate of As(III) from 84.6 to 86.5 to 87–90%. While, Das et al.69 utilized BC with different feedstock materials (maize stalk, Lantana camara, pine needle, black gram) for analyzing effective heavy metal removal from wastewater collected from the municipal treatment plant. The initial concentration of As was 16.3μg/L and after treatment with different BC types, the removal rates were in the range of 78.5–86.5%. As aforementioned, Pal et al.76 compared the effectiveness of BC derived from DS and DRS, where a similar trend for As(III) removal was observed with increasing pH. At pH 3, the removal rate of DS and DRS for As(III) was 90% and 87.4%, instead, at pH 5, the removal rates were 93.2% and 92.4% respectively. The improved removal rate at the specific pH was a result of the nullification of OH− ions by the H+ ions upon the BC surface and reducing the impedance that prohibits the As(III) ion transport.

BC has been an effective adsorbent for the removal of geogenic pollutants such as U, F -, and As from water. From the available literature, it was observed that the fabrication of BC yielded better results. Effective modifications were acidic conditions, adding magnetic properties, and altering with metal oxides/hydroxides. The BCs showed high reusability, as they were effective even after five to six sorption-desorption cycles. Various feedstock were utilized for the production of BC, where crop residues such as rice husk, rice straw, maize stalk, softwood such as pine needles, and grasses were among the major feedstock materials. Moreover, the prior mechanisms responsible for the effective removal of these contaminants were electrostatic interactions, ion exchange, and inner sphere complexation.

Dye

Several research interventions have been made to analyze the capacity of BC for treating different organic pollutants including dyes, pesticides, phenols, and so forth. Among these, dyes occupy a major class of compounds having higher production rates due to their extensive utilization.113 The recalcitrant nature of these compounds poses a serious threat to nature,12 as a result, efficient treatment of these pollutants is highly essential. Consequently, different research interventions has demonstrated that the mechanism of adsorption plays a vital role in the detoxification and degradation of dyes.12 Earlier studies have reported BC acts as a better adsorbent for remediating several dyes from wastewater. The adsorption studies concerning the removal of dye using BC as an adsorbent displayed efficient removal of various anionic and cationic dyes from different types of aqueous solutions. Previous studies have reported that incorporating BC will suitably treat several types of dye molecules by exhibiting π-π interaction between the graphene layer of BC and the dye particle (this phenomenon becomes even stronger in the presence of OH− groups upon the surface of BC), electrostatic attraction/repulsion and intermolecular hydrogen bonding between the dye molecule and the BC. Those mechanisms were likely affirmed by the experimental findings of Qiu et al.114 depicting the higher adsorption efficiency of rice straw BC with respect to activated carbon for eliminating Reactive Brilliant Blue and Rhodamine B dye. The FTIR results evidenced that the intermolecular hydrogen bonding (O-H----O) took place between the O atom of C=O present on BC and the OH molecule of dye. Consequently, the formation of electrical attraction between the CO and OH readily favored the adsorption of dye onto BC. Additionally, the π-π dispersive interaction between the graphene layer of BC and the aromatic rings of dye molecules also takes place.115 These π-π interactions are greatly influenced by the surface functional groups of BC, as the existence of lactone and carboxyl groups exhibit electron-withdraw nature and diminish the π-π bond by declining the π-electron density on BC surface. On the contrary, the prevalence of phenolic hydroxyls, which are electron-donating in nature, tend to strengthen the π-π interactions. So, the presence of the higher amount of these surface functional groups, i.e., phenolic hydroxyls, than lactones and carboxyls support π-π interactions and selective adsorption of dye. Corresponding results were reported by various other studies detailing the treatment of differently charged dye using BC. Nirmaladevi et al.57 studied removal of cationic dye (Basic Red 29: BR29) and anionic dye (Reactive Red 2: RR2) using Acacia leucophloea BC under varied environmental conditions (pH of solution: 2–10, mixing speed: 30–170 rpm, initial concentration of dye: 40–100 mg/L, contact time: 100 min, temperature applied: 320, 310 and 300 K, adsorbent dosage: 25-20mg). The study revealed an effective removal of 98% for both RR2 and BR29 at pH 2 and 10 respectively. Apart from the pH differences, other optimum conditions for removal of both dye remained equivalent, i.e., mixing speed of 170 rpm, 300K temperature, adsorbent dosage of 50mg, and initial dye concentration of 60 mg/L). A better explanation of such behavioral capacities of cationic and anionic dye was provided by Deniz et al.116 through the electrokinetic study of the adsorbing material. The positive charge on BR29 and the negative charge of RR2 posed a decreasing removal rate with pH reduction and pH enhancement respectively. These reductions of removal rate were associated with the repulsion of similar charges, i.e., positive charge (H3O+) on cationic dye due to the presence of excessive H+ ions at reducing pH and negative charge on anionic dye due to excessive OH− ions at increasing pH. Moreover, pHzpc (point of zero charge) of the adsorbing material also describes the adsorption nature of different types of dye. The existence of electrostatic attraction comes into play when the pH of the solution is greater than pHzpc, the adsorbing material develops a negative charge and favors the removal of cationic BR29. On the other hand, when the pH of the solution is less than pHzpc, the adsorbing material becomes positively charged and removes anionic RR2. The results were consistent with the findings of Roy et al.,79 where, the removal of patent blue dye using bael shell (Aegle marmelos) BC at different pH involving 2.7, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9.2 ad 10.4 were associated with a removal efficiency of 74%, 62%, 58%, 55%, 47%, 48%, and 39%, respectively. Moreover, there exist distinct influential parameters affecting the treatment of several dye types which include the type of feedstock material, pH of the solution, adsorbent dosage rate, initial concentration of dye, and many more. For example, Ganguly et al.82 experimented with the removal of Malachite Green dye using BC at a pH range of 2–8. The dye removal efficiency achieved by BC at pH 2 was 81.1% and was gradually enhanced up to 96.5% at pH 4, instead, on the arrival of an alkaline pH of 8, the dye removal efficiency was significantly reduced to 73%.

Furthermore, to demonstrate the effect of feedstock material for the treatment of dyes, Ahmad et al.78 compared the differential removal of cationic dye methylene blue from three different feedstock materials consisting of rice husk, sludge sample, and cow dung. It was observed that cow dung BC had the highest removal rate of 99%, instead, rice husk and sludge BC had approximately ∼99% removal of dye at a pH range of 7.0–9.0. As aforementioned, the electrostatic affinity between BC and the dye molecule formed due to the surface charge density of the adsorbent and the electronegativity of the dye molecule facilitated an effective dye removal mechanism. On the other hand, using BC derived from Casuarina equisetifolia seeds and immobilized with cells of Alcaligenes faecalis opposite to free cells of the same species for the treatment of methylene blue dye resulted in the treatment of 81.5% of the dye in the presence of free microbial cells and 89.1% removal in presence of BC immobilized with the microbial cells.80 The dye removal capacity was induced in the presence of immobilized cells by the synergistic effect of BC and microbial cells. The greater SSA of the Casuarina BC inculcated more active sites and pore space upon the BC surface that exhibited higher adsorption of the dye and larger target reaction sites for the microbial attack. Additionally, the biodegradation of the dye molecule within the pores of BC reformed the structural appearance of pores by modifying the dye fraction into renewed benign products that diffused out of the pore.117 Coherent results were reported by Dai et al.,81 where the greater SSA of crab shell BC removed about 20% of 4000 mg/L of malachite green dye from the aqueous solution.

Convincingly, a similar effect of contact time between the BC material and the dye molecule also facilitated the efficient treatment of toxic dye. As mentioned earlier, the study reported by Nirmaladevi et al.57 estimated the removal of differently charged dye through Acacia leucophloea BC by varying the contact time between 0 and 100 min, where, the cationic dye BR29 and anionic dye RR2 was removed within 10 min and 70 min respectively. These behavioral tendencies to different dye molecules were due to the saturation of the active reaction site that attained equilibrium conditions within this contact time. Likewise, the experimental results of Ahmad et al.78 suggested that over the 0–96 h contact time of methylene blue dye with each of three different BC materials produced removal efficiencies ranging between 69.8 and 94.8% for a period of 12–24 h and the highest removal rate was observed at 60–72 h having a removal rate of 91.3–99.3%. Depending on the net charge available upon the BC surface, the adsorption capacities of BC initially increase followed by stabilization, and further depict gradual reduction till reaching an equilibrium stage.

The overall studies suggested that the properties of BC actively enhance the removal rate of dye molecule through π-π interaction, intermolecular hydrogen bonding, and electrostatic attraction. The π-π interaction specifically occurs between the graphene layer of BC material and the aromatic ring of the dye molecule. The presence of electron-donating groups on the BC surface fastens the interaction, while, electron-withdrawing groups weaken the π-π interaction. However, when intermolecular hydrogen bonding is considered, the binding of BC with the dye molecule initiates with O-H-----O bonding, where the O molecule belongs to C=O of the BC material and the OH molecules were donated by the dye fraction for forming CO and OH interactions, thus alleviating the concentration of dye molecule from the aqueous medium. Moreover, the developed surface charge density upon the BC surface and the electronegativity of the dye lead to the formation of electrostatic attraction between the BC surface and the dye molecule. The generated electrostatic affinity was driven by the pH of the solution through various ways. At lower solution pH, prevalence of H+ ions on BC surface form repulsive forces to the positively charged cationic dye (consisting of H3O+), while attractive forces were formed for negatively charged anionic dye (OH−) and vice versa. Further, having a pH of solution greater than pHzpc develops negative charge upon the adsorbent and thus attracts the positively charged cationic dye and vice versa. So, variation in pH results in the development of electrostatic attraction between the BC material and the dye particle, which simultaneously enhances the removal of dye from different aqueous mediums. Such versatility and flexibility make BC an ideal material to be used for the treatment of various colorants from wastewater. Although, in the present study much focus is given to the factors affecting the BC material for dye treatment. Still, more focused research objectives concerning the underlying kinetics and adsorption isotherm could be summarized to obtain a clear idea of the mechanistic approach and pathway followed by different BC materials for dye treatment from wastewater.

Conventional pollutants

In past decades, several traditional and advanced treatment technologies have been applied to remove conventional pollutants (phosphate, nitrate, ammonium) from wastewater 3 However, these technologies emerged with greater maintenance and operation costs with huge amounts of waste generation.118 Instead, when sorption-based methods using agricultural biomass were applied, the technology evolved to be user-friendly, cost-effective, and highly efficient for conventional pollutants. Following the sorption methods for conventional contaminants, when BC was used as an adsorbent, the experimental findings demonstrated highly effective results for such contaminants.119 To confirm such potential of BC, Fseha et al.83 incorporated date palm BC for removing NO3 from an aqueous solution. The results revealed that BC was able to treat about 86.52% of NO3 (initial concentration: 10 mg/L) at a BC dosage rate of 0.05 g/L and the efficiency further enhanced to 94.94% when the dosage was uplifted to 1 g/L. Such increased treatment efficiency was a result of higher active reaction sites available for the molecule at higher dosages to adsorb upon the BC surface. Likewise, when the pH of the solution was 4, the efficiency of the BC material was 86.21%. While, increasing the solution pH to 6, enhanced the efficiency of the system to 91.38%. However, improving the pH between 8 and 10 dropped the removal rate due to the competition of negatively charged NO3 ion with similar charge bearing hydroxide ions to adsorb upon the active sites of the BC surface. These efficient pollutant removal properties of BC also vary with vivid feedstock materials application. Sadeghi et al.84 compared the efficiency of three different types of material including BC, hydrogel and composite of hydrogel and BC for removing NO3 from aqueous solution. The results reported that the BC infused with hydrogel (34.3%) had the highest capacity for NO3 removal followed by standalone hydrogel (14.4%) and then by standalone BC (10.12%). Likewise, Adesemuyi et al.120 compared the BC derived from elephant grass at different pyrolysis temperatures. The BC derived at a higher temperature,600°C (96%) outperformed the one prepared at a lower temperature, 400°C (91%). Similarly, Sui et al.121 mentioned that the BC material had higher NO3 removal efficiency (97.0 ± 1.1%) at the production temperature of 600°C, whereas the below (400°C: 84.2 ± 2.6%) and above (800°C–1100°C: 28.0 ± 1.7%) that temperature range reduced efficiency of NO3 removal was observed. The study reported that adding BC with a production temperature of 600°C produced 3.5-, 2.6-, 1.1- and 1.2- times greater removal of NO3 in comparison to BC developed at a temperature range of 1100°C, 1000°C, 800°C and 400°C respectively. The capacity to treat NO3 effectively using BC produced at higher temperatures was accompanied by greater porosity through uplifted levels of π-π interaction or van der Waals’ interaction.120

Moreover, the physiological properties of BC and its tendency to release several nutrients, organic N and organic C could adhere to various types of denitrifying microbial consortium upon its surface for selective nitrate adsorption.122,123 The BC has greater synergy with denitrifiers, especially Pseudomonas N3, that favored up-regulation of NAR (nitrate reductase) and the narG gene expression associated with stimulated electron transport system activity (ETSA) for improved nitrate removal. Such influential effects of physiological properties (SSA and porosity) induced due to exposure of biomass at higher temperatures, solution pH, increasing the contact time, and so forth. were reported by various other studies for apprehending positive nitrate removal.124 As a result, to assess the activity of BC with denitrifiers, Bock et al.123 mentioned that denitrifying bioreactors consisting of BC and fed with 35 mg/L of initial NO3 concentration could remove about 86% of NO3 within 18h and 97% within 72h. On the contrary, control reactors in the absence of BC treated only 13% of NO3 at 18h and 75% at 72h. The higher SSA and the porous surface of BC provided an appropriate surface for retaining oppositely charged ions, water, and other organic compounds favoring the growth of denitrifying bacteria. These microbial communities further supplemented the denitrification process for assisting enhanced NO3 removal in the presence of BC.125 The occurrence of these denitrification processes can even prevail in the presence of BC and zero-valent iron which treated about 30.6–95.7% of NO3-N in comparison to control that could treat about 6.1–89.6%.85 The improvement in treatment efficiency was due to BC's ability to retain water and produce anoxic environment by donating electrons and facilitate effective denitrification. This similar strategy was observed in BC modified with Fe/Ni (BC-Fe/Ni) for nitrate removal as reported by Li et al.,86 where BC-Fe/Ni could amend 98.39% and nanoscale Fe/Ni treated 93.55%, while nanoscale zero-valent iron could remove only 86.53% of NO3. In the presence of bimetallic ions upon BC, no other metal toxicity was observed due to the adsorption of metal ions upon BC surface and no chance occurrence of metal release into the surroundings. Simultaneously, the nitrate removed from the solution turns majorly into ammonium ions, instead, a minor concentration remains as nitrite ions. Thus, iron-modified BC has a greater capacity to amend NO3 rather than unmodified BC with reduced metal toxicity.

Sometimes, BC fostered similar behavior for treating PO4 ions from different aqueous solutions through precipitation, ligand exchange, adsorption, surface complexation reactions, and many more.126 Several studies have reported that the application of BC induced better PO4 removal at higher temperatures. For example, Ramola et al.127 compared the efficiency of rice-husk BC produced at three different temperature ranges, i.e., 300°C, 500°C, 700°C. The experimental results revealed that BC developed at the highest temperature of 700°C produced the highest PO4 removal rate of 81–87%, whereas the BC at lower temperature could remove as much as 21% PO4 from the aqueous solution. At a greater temperature range, chances for the release of CO2 from BC exist which consequently causes a secondary reaction between the emitted CO2 and the C content of the BC matrix. As a result, the closed pores become open and the porosity gets enhanced for possible adsorption to take place. Additionally, at higher temperatures the hydrophobicity of BC also decreases due to lower levels of O, H content, and functional groups with the simultaneous formation of water clusters upon the BC surface that induces effective PO4 adsorption.128,129,130 As a result, increasing the pyrolysis temperature modifies the physicochemical properties of BC, hence, increasing the surface area and porous nature of BC. This avails higher active adsorption sites for PO4 to attach. Moreover, studies have reported that the removal of PO4 by BC is a physical as well as chemical adsorption process. The FT-IR spectrum of BC depicting the presence of tautomeric aciform of nitrite, protonated amine, and alcoholic forms develops electrostatic interaction with the PO4 ions through physisorption. Additionally, the XRD pattern resulted in the presence of Ca and Mg ions that favored effective chemical adsorption of PO4.131 Similarly, Yao et al.132 acclaimed that the removal of PO4 from aqueous solution was a surface adsorption phenomenon that occurred due to the prevalence of MgO particles upon the BC surface. Metal oxides have a greater capacity for the adsorption of anions, such as phosphate. In the presence of water, the surface of metal oxides gets hydroxylated and then attracts either a negative or positive charge with respect to the pH of the solution. The existence of similar surface functional groups upon the BC surface favors the efficient adsorption of phosphate ions from the solution upon its surface.

The overall results suggested that the inherent properties of BC make it a suitable candidate for the effective treatment of various types of water. The porosity is the major reason for such nature of BC as it sustains various chemical and biological reactions to occur and potentially remediate the toxic pollutants. Meanwhile, the SSA of BC also primarily facilitates different surface complexation reactions, ion exchange mechanisms, and pore-filling processes to effectively adsorb the existing conventional and advanced pollutants. These surface properties of BC are driven by the feedstock type, pH of the solution, pyrolysis temperature, contact time, adsorbent dosage, type of modification upon BC surface, and many more. Such factors upon modifying the surface properties of BC enforce the electron-enriching mechanisms (π-π interaction, hydrogen bonding) that support the binding or breakdown of the pollutant molecule. These favorable binding of pollutants upon BC surface navigates its further use for different applications. The use of spent BC post-treatment of heavy metals and geogenic pollutants has been used for developing electrodes and other bioenergy applications. Likewise, while treating the conventional pollutants, nitrogen, and phosphorus adsorbed BC will be further used as slow-release fertilizer. This could help improve the soil properties and qualities. These acquired characteristics of BC will favor the sufficient growth and nutritional value of plants. As a result, N and P adsorbed BC will contribute to a major portion of enhanced food security by improving soil properties and plant life. Based upon these characteristics of BC, further sections are designed to provide insights into the role of BC in reclaiming the contaminated soil and immobilizing the prevailing pollutants within the medium.

Soil amendments (SDG 15: Advance life on land)

The rapid increase in population, urbanization, and industrialization has reduced the agricultural areas and increased the demand for food. Consequently, the application of chemical fertilizers and pesticides has escalated, leading to the deterioration of soil health. While several techniques have been developed for soil amendment, there is still a significant demand for organic and sustainable remediation methods/technologies. To attain these needs, various research studies have suggested biochar and its related technologies as one such innovative, cost-effective, environmentally friendly, and sustainable soil amendment approach gaining rapid attention. As aforementioned, BC is a solid carbonaceous product derived from the thermal degradation of biomass that consists of high surface area, porosity, and oxygen-rich functional groups which makes it suitable for a wide range of applications involving the remediation of soil and water ecosystems.133,134,135 These properties of BC associated with better soil amendment characteristics make it an attractive tool to achieve the SDGs, specifically SDG 15, pertaining to advancing life on land.50 As improving the soil quality will favor the enhancement of the nutritional value of crops which when available for consumption will sufficiently provide enough nutrition to the consumer. So, utilizing BC stands as a viable option as it could adsorb nutrients better and is easily available and cost-effective in nature, hence, proven affordable to every individual. As a result, different experimental studies have been executed to explicitly study the role of BC in enhancing soil properties. Consequently, several research studies have reported BC as an effective material for soil remediation due to its ability to adsorb various contaminants.13,136 It enhances soil fertility, soil structure, electrical conductivity (EC), and cation exchange capacity (CEC), and aids in nutrient retention.133,136,137,138,139 So, further subsections will provide a detailed discussion of how BC can improve soil health and remediate various contaminants from the soil.

Utilization of biochar for contaminants immobilization in soil

BC has gained much attention in recent years for immobilizing various pollutants in soil (detailed in Table 2) through its high surface area, porosity, and functional groups (such as carbonyl, carboxyl, and hydroxyl) present on the surface. Studies have demonstrated that BC can effectively mitigate soil pollution by adsorbing organic contaminants such as polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), pesticides, dioxins and inorganic contaminants such as As, Pb, Cd, and Cu. For example, Kumar et al.140 investigated the wheat straw BC pyrolyzed at 500°C (WSB500) to remediate contaminated soil. WSB500 showed a maximum removal efficiency of 83.7% with an initial concentration of 8 ppm due to increased surface area, pH, porosity, and surface functional groups. In another study fungus-based BC derived from Trichoderma atroviride hyphae effectively removed the Cd from saline-alkali soil up to 95.10%.141 Likewise, Cu and Pb contaminated soil was amended with wheat straw and sludge composite BC, and the contamination content was reduced up to 36.81% for Cu and 25.61% for Pb, respectively.142 Khan et al.143 utilized BC from sugarcane bagasse and poplar wood to reduce Cr and Pb from mine-polluted soil. Maximum reduction was observed using sugarcane bagasse BC, with 50.4% for Cr and 59.4% for Pb, respectively. This was due to the higher soil pH and CEC of sugarcane bagasse BC than the poplar wood BC.Table 2 Application of biochar for pollutant immobilization in soil microclimate

Type of biomass used	Production technique and temperature	Pollutant	Type of study	BC dosage	Initial conc.	Removal efficiency	Reference	
Wheat straw	Pyrolysis at 500°C	As	Lab scale experiment	0.375 g in 5 g soil	8 mg/L	83.7%	Kumar and Bhattacharya140	
Ferromagnetic bamboo- based BC	Pyrolysis at 500°C for 2 h	As	Lab scale experiment	5 g in 500 g soil	142.5–165 mg/kg		Zhang et al.144	
Trichoderma atroviride hyphae (fungus)	Pyrolysis at 500°C	Cd		100 mg/kg		95.10%	Zhao et al.141	
Wheat straw and sludge composite BC	Pyrolysis at 500°C	Cu, Pb		2.4 and 4 g in 80 g soil	421.9, 681.4 mg/kg		Wang et al.142	
Sodium alginate based magnetic porous BC	Pyrolysis at 300°C	Cd, As	Pot study	0.5 g in each pot	1.55 ± 0.08, 1.26 ± 0.003 mg/kg	79.35%, 32.54%	Liu et al.145	
Magnetized cedar sawdust	Pyrolysis at 300°C for 2 h	As, Pb, Cd	Incubation experiment	1:10 (w:w) biochar to soil ratio	47.3 ± 6.7, 729 ± 92, 12.1 ± 4.4 mg/kg	28%, 32%, 25%	Wan et al.146	
Miscanthus straw pellets	Pyrolysis at 700°C for 12 h	Cd, Cu, Pb	Incubation experiment		25 mg/kg	65%, 39%, 16%	Achor et al.147	
British Oak, Ash, Sycamore and Birch derived BC and green waste compost		Pb, Cu	Pot study		21,000, 600 mg/kg	29.4%, 44.5%	Karami et al.148	
Broiler litter	Pyrolysis at 700°C for 1 h	Cu	Lab scale experiment	20% (g biochar/g soil)			Uchimiya et al.149	
Oak wood	Pyrolysis at 400°C	Pb	Pot study	25 g in 500 g soil	4626.39 mg/kg		Almaroai et al.150	
Poplar and conifer		Phenanthrene and pentachlorophenol	Lab scale experiment	20 and 50 mg/g	150 mg/kg	7.9%, 88.8%	Rao et al.151	
Oak wood	Pyrolysis at 400°C	Pb	Lab scale experiment	60 g in 1.2 kg soil	11,100 mg/kg	75.8%	Ahmad et al.152	
Dairy manure	Pyrolysis at 450°C for 4 h	Pb and Atrazine	Incubation experiment	12.5 and 25 g in 500 g soil	70,000 and 50 mg/kg	72-89%, 53–77%	Cao et al.153	
Rice husk	Pyrolysis at 500°C for 90 min	Cu, Cr, Zn	Pot study	0.5%, 1%, and 2% (w:w)		65.6%, 96.9%, 42%	Wang et al.154	
Rice straw	Pyrolysis at 600°C	Cd	Incubation experiment	5% (w:w)		26.4%	Xu et al.155	
Bamboo	Pyrolysis at 400°C	Ni	Pot study	90 g in 3 kg soil	100 mg/kg	38,2%	Hannan et al.156	
Tobacco stem	Pyrolysis at 450°C	Cd	Pot study	1% and 2% (w:w)	30 mg/kg	44.44%	Yao et al.157	
Poplar wood (PW) and sugarcane bagasse (SB)	Pyrolysis at 550°C	Cr and Pb	Pot study	3% and 7%	23, 6 mg/kg	PW:23.2 and 29.3%, SB: 50.4, 59.4%	Khan et al.143	
Corn residue	Pyrolysis at 500°C	Cd	Incubation experiment	2%	30 mg/kg	37.75%	Moradi and Karimi158	
Olive pulp	Pyrolysis at 350°C	Ni	Pot study	150 g in 1 kg soil	50 mg/kg	60%	Turan et al.159	
The table discusses the different types of pollutants immobilized in soil medium in the presence of various affecting parameters such as type of feedstock material, production technique, and temperature, type of pollutant, experimental conditions, and the concentration of pollutants.

Furthermore, several studies have mentioned that the modification of BC in different environmental conditions favored efficient pollutant removal from soil microclimate. For example, Zhang et al.144 treated the As contaminated soil with ferromanganese modified bamboo-based BC. The prepared BC not only remediated As but also improved the soil properties such as soil organic matter, CEC, NH3, N2, and available phosphorous due to the addition of Fe and Mn onto BC. The findings reported a complexation of pollutants with the oxygen-containing functional groups of BC as the major contaminant treatment mechanism. Similarly, Liu et al.145 utilized the alginate-based magnetic porous BC spheres to reduce the bioavailability of Cd and As in contaminated soil. They found that BC significantly reduced the concentrations of Cd by 79.35% and As by 32.45% in the soil through hydrogen bonding and electrostatic attraction between contaminants and the BC. Likewise, Wan et al.146 treated the multi-contaminated soil (As, Pb, and Cd) with magnetized cedar sawdust BC. In this study, the magnetic BC showed strong potential in the simultaneous removal of As, Pb, and Cd by 28%, 32%, and 25% respectively from the soil. Further, Karami et al.148 examined the synergistic effect of BC and green-waste compost to regulate the Cu and Pb mobility and their uptake in ryegrass vegetation. The amendments were mixed with contaminated soil and then their effects on plant uptake were measured. Compost amendment reduced high Pb concentrations in pore water, while biochar was more effective at reducing pore water Cu concentrations. The study showed that the two amendments had metal-specific suitability for treating contaminated soil. Similar to the above-mentioned study, Beesley et al.160 studied the potential of BC and green-waste compost to reduce the mobility, bioavailability, and toxicity of trace elements in multi-element contaminated soil. BC was found to be most effective in reducing Cu and As concentrations, as well as PAHs, indicating its potential for contaminated land remediation.

Further, Wang et al.154 utilized the BC-mineral (vermiculite-kaolin-attapulgite) composite for the immobilization of heavy metals (Cu, Cr, Cd, and Zn) from naturally contaminated soil. The composites increased the heavy metal removal rate due to increased surface area, pore volume, and pore diameter. The attapulgite-BC composite raised the soil pH from 3.77 to 5.18. The highest reduction was observed for the kaolin-BC composite, which was effective in reducing 96.9% Cr, and the attapulgite-BC composite reduced 65.6% Cu and 42% Zn, respectively. There was no significant reduction observed for Cd. Moreover, Uchimiya et al.149 used BC as a soil amendment to sequester Cu. They evaluated the sorption capacity of BC on two different soils: clay-rich, alkaline San Joaquin soil and eroded acidic Norfolk sandy loam soil. Results showed that San Joaquin soil showed better Cu sorption capacity than the Norfolk sandy loam soil through the cation exchange mechanism. However, Almaroai et al.150 examined the effect of BC on inhibiting Pb uptake to maize in saline water irrigated soil. It was found that BC increased the electrical conductivity (EC), water-soluble cations and anions, and decreased the water-soluble Pb concentration. Correspondingly, Rao et al.151 explored the poplar and conifer-derived BC for the remediation of POPs, phenanthrene, and pentachlorophenol from the soil. The remediation efficiency of conifer-based BC was better than poplar based due to its higher surface area of 114.67 m2/g and pore volume of 0.067 cm3/g than poplar-derived BC with surface area and pore volume of 76.88 m2/g and 0.047 cm3/g. The conifer-based BC showed a removal efficiency of 7.9% for phenanthrene and 88.8% for pentachlorophenol. Likewise, Cao et al.153 investigated the effectiveness of dairy-manure BC in immobilizing heavy metal Pb and organic pesticide atrazine in contaminated soils. BC prepared from dairy manure was found to be effective in immobilizing both atrazine and Pb, with its effectiveness increasing with incubation time and biochar rates. The study also found that biochar’s phosphorus reacts with soil Pb to form insoluble hydroxypyromorphite Pb5(PO4)3(OH), which was responsible for soil Pb immobilization. Likewise, Turan et al.159 investigated the olive pulp BC and calcite composite to remediate Ni-polluted soil. It was observed that amended soil showed increased soil pH by 1.16 units and showed a significant reduction of 60% compared to the control.

Based on the collective results from different research interventions, the pollutant immobilization processes in soil microclimate through BC are provided in Figure 4. The results demonstrated that the primary focus for treating contaminated soils should be the preparation of pollutant-specific BC. Such BC material will uplift the rate of electrostatic attraction and hydrogen bonding that majorly comes into action during pollutant immobilization in soil. Also, developing pollutant-specific BC will improve the influential properties such as increasing the surface area, porosity, and surface functional groups of the developed material. These characteristics of BC also get increased by surface modification with different materials or aligned with different mineral composites. As a result, the CEC of the BC material gets enhanced and fastens the pollutant exchange process between the soil environment and the BC. Thus, BC facilitates the effective immobilization of various toxic pollutants from the soil environment upon its surface. So, such pollutant removal studies related to BC demonstrate it as a highly essential material that could boost soil quality by the primary treatment of various organic and inorganic pollutants. Still, an in-depth analysis of the involved mechanisms in the microclimate of soil for such processes is greatly required. So, the further section will discuss the associated soil parameters enhanced through the application of BC.Figure 4 Mechanisms associated with biochar for efficient soil amendment and pollutant treatment

The porous nature of BC comprises several intricate characteristics that make it a suitable material for contaminant immobilization and soil amendment studies. These characteristics include uplifted water holding capacity, enhanced nutrient retention tendency, efficient material for contaminant adsorption, slow-release fertilizer properties, and enhanced rate of cation exchange capacity with the surroundings. In addition, the highly porous nature, and greater surface area associated with the presence of sufficient functional groups support improving the soil quality, thus improving the plant yield in response.

Enhancement of soil properties

It is widely known that the application of BC to soil improved its properties (detailed in Table 3), and crop yield, and removed toxic pollutants from the soil. BC has increased soil fertility and enhanced soil health by increasing soil pH, CEC, water-holding capacity, carbon sequestration, microbial diversity, and nutrient retention.161,162 Additionally, BC increases soil nitrogen retention by reducing gaseous loss and leaching. It also enhances the soil phosphorus availability by slowing down the leaching process.163 A meta-analysis on the influence of BC on the physicochemical properties of soil and crop productivity was conducted by Singh et al.162 The findings suggested that soil pH affects soil quality and fertility. It was also observed that BC improved the CEC, pH, and soil organic carbon by 20%, 46%, and 27%, respectively. In addition, the study evaluated the effect of pyrolytic temperature on BC properties and suggested that higher pyrolytic temperatures increased the soil porosity and reduced the bulk density while lower pyrolytic temperatures increased the microbial diversity. Likewise, Abrishamkesh et al.164 evaluated the impact of BC on alkaline soil and lentil growth. The study mentioned that BC enhanced the CEC, organic carbon, and available K, and reduced the bulk density, thus, simultaneously ameliorating the soil quality and plant growth. Similarly, when Savannah wood-based BC was incorporated into the soil for the enhancement of maize crop productivity, BC increased the crop yield better in sandy loam soil than silty loam soil indicating the effectiveness of BC on different soil textures.165 Further, Montagnoli et al.166 reported that BC-treated soil promoted the soil pH, nutrient availability, moisture content, and root and canopy development. Moreover, Abujabhah et al.167 explored the effect of BC in different soil types (brown sandy loam, black clay loam, and non-reactive red loam) with different loading rates of BC. It was observed that an increase in the loading rate of BC improved the soil conditions by raising soil pH, moisture content, and carbon levels.Table 3 Application of biochar for soil amendment

Type of biomass used	Production technique and temperature	Type of soil	Biochar dose	Experimental condition	Remarks	Reference	
Sewage sludge	Pyrolysis at 500°C for 6 h			Pot study	58–63.2% reduction in bioaccumulation of PAHs with respect to the control.	Khan et al.168	
Hardwood derived BC and green waste compost				Pot study	>50% PAH concentration reduced, and decrease in mobility, bioavailability, and toxicity of trace elements.	Beesley et al.160	
Rice husk	Pyrolysis at 250°C–300°C and 450°C–500°C	Alkaline	0.4, 0.8, 1.6, 2.4, and 3.3% by weight	Pot study	Enhanced CEC, organic carbon, available K, and reduced bulk density.	Abrishamkesh et al.164	
Savannah wood	Pyrolysis in hot tail oven	Sandy loam and silt loam	3 t/ha	Pot study	Enhanced the maize crop productivity	Yeboah et al.165	
Orchard pruning biomass	Pyrolysis at 500°C for 3 h	Alisol		Rhizobox-flatbed scanner system	Increase in soil pH by 1.3 units, nutrient availability, moisture content, root and canopy development	Montagnoli et al.166	
Eucalyptus green waste	Gasification at 650°C–750°C	Black clay loam (BCL), red loam (RL), brown sandy loam (BSL)	32.5, 65, and 130 g in 1300 g soil	Pot study	improved soil pH from 4.5 to 4.83 in BSL, from 4.6 to 4.98 in RL, increased the moisture content by 10% in RL, 22% in BSL, 10% in the BCL, and carbon levels.	Abujabhah et al.167	
Eucalyptus, papermill sludge, cow manure, poultry litter, and leaf waste	Pyrolysis at 400°C and 550°C			Lab scale experiment	High liming potential, nutrients, and carbon sequestration	Singh et al.169	
Cornstover	Fast pyrolysis at 450°C and gasification at 700°C	Alfisol		Lab scale experiment	Increased CEC: biochar showed higher CEC (50.967 ± 1.890 cmol/kg) than the control soil (29.853 ± 3.098 cmol/kg), high O:C ratio	Lee et al.170	
Eucalyptus	Pyrolysis at 350°C and 800°C	Sandy ultisol and clayey oxisol	20, 40, 80 g in 2 kg soil	Pot study	Lower temperature BCs were effective in increasing soil properties and plant growth.	Butnan et al.171	
Papermill waste	Pyrolysis at 550°C	Ferrosol and loamy calcarosol	10 t/ha	Pot study	Reduced soil acidity and increased soil fertility and crop production (250% times higher than the control)	van Zwieten et al.172	
Rice husk and shell of cotton seed	Pyrolysis at 400°C	Sandy loam soil	1kg in 20 kg soil	Pot study	enhanced soil moisture content, increased yield, (20% than the control), quality, and physiology of tomato in sandy loam soil under reduced irrigation	Akhtar et al.173	
Hardwood and softwood	Pyrolysis at 500°C	Sandy loam soil	1kg in 20 kg soil	Pot study	Mitigation of salt stress in potato	Akhtar et al.174	
Eucalyptus		Nitisol	4,8,12 t/ha	Lab scale experiment	Increased CEC (29.68% greater than the control), soil pH, yield (85.66% higher than the control), SOC, and available phosphorous, and enhanced fertilizer use efficiency	Abewa et al.175	
Grass clippings, cotton trash, and plant prunings	Pyrolysis at 450°C	Alfisol	10, 50, 100 t/ha	Pot study	Increased the efficiency of nitrogen fertilizer (266%), and soil quality: soil pH, exchangeable cations, organic carbon	Chan et al.176	
Corn stalk	Pyrolysis at 500°C for 6 h		2600, 5200, and 13000 kg/ha	Field experiment	Increased the pH, EC, and SOC. Enhanced the soil enzyme activities, and soil stability.	Tang et al.177	
Sugarcane bagasse	Pyrolysis at 400°C–450°C	Clay laom	10, 15, 20 and 30 t/ha	Field experiment	Reduced the Cd toxicity (2.77–1.75 mg/kg), increased the soil fertility by increasing soil organic matter (30.01 g/kg from 20.46 g/kg) and available phosphorus (12.98 from 6.01 mg/kg)	Mohamed et al.178	
The table discusses the various affecting parameters (feedstock material, production technique, pyrolysis temperature, and existing experimental conditions) prevailing during the soil amendment studies using BC. The table also highlights the different outcomes observed at the end of experiments.

As aforementioned, the properties of BC depend on the feedstock type and pyrolysis conditions. Singh et al.169 prepared BC from five different feedstock namely, eucalyptus, papermill sludge, cow manure, poultry litter, and leaf waste. The BC hence produced had high liming potential with minimal toxic elements and has high potential to sequester carbon and provide nutrients. Thus, it can be used to amend the degraded soil. In another study by Lee et al.,170 BC was produced under two different conditions, fast pyrolysis at 450°C and gasification at 700°C for soil amendment. Results showed that fast pyrolytic char had twice the cation exchange capacity (CEC) as that of gasification char indicating a higher O/C ratio as the major reason for such a mechanism. This was due to more hydroxyl, carboxylate, and carbonyl groups present in the fast pyrolysis char. The study indicated that controlling biomass pyrolysis conditions is crucial for producing desirable BC properties for soil amendment and carbon sequestration. Similarly, Butnan et al.171 explored the impact of pyrolysis temperature on soil fertility and plant growth (corn). Eucalyptus-based BC was produced at two different temperatures: 350°C and 800°C. Lower-temperature BCs were effective in increasing soil properties and plant growth. BC produced at higher temperatures demonstrated less efficacy due to high ash content than that produced at lower temperatures. High ash content in BC inhibited the plant growth. Meanwhile, Van et al.172 reported that papermill waste-derived BC produced through slow pyrolysis helped in reducing soil acidity due to its liming potential, thus increasing soil fertility and crop production.

BC also has possessed greater potential to ameliorate the negative effect of drought and salt stress in plants. For example, Saleem et al.173 examined the potential of BC on tomatoes under reduced irrigation. Results showed that the incorporation of BC enhanced the soil moisture content resulting in increased yield, quality, and physiology of tomato in sandy loam soil. The study suggested using BC as an effective measure for areas with limited water resources. Likewise, Akhtar et al.174 reported that BC helped in mitigating salt stress in potatoes. BC reduced the Na+ ions and soil bulk density leading to increased root growth, availability of K+ ions, and yield of potato suggesting BC could be a viable approach for soil amendment in saline soils. A study conducted by Wu et al.179 evaluated the effect of BC on saline soil. The results demonstrated that BC successfully lowered the soil pH, and exchangeable sodium percentage, and raised the soil organic carbon, available phosphorus, and cation exchange capacity.

Additionally, earlier studies have reported that BC has the ability to boost fertilizer use efficiency. In the study reported by Abewa et al.175 which evaluated the impact of BC on crop yield and soil properties, five different combinations of amendments were experimented; lime, BC, and N&P fertilizer. According to the study, BC improved the soil pH, CEC, soil organic carbon, and available phosphorus. BC combined with N&P fertilizer increased the crop yield suggesting that BC can significantly enhance the fertilizer use efficiency. Similarly, Chan et al.177 reported that BC can improve the efficiency of nitrogen fertilizer. They applied BC at three different rates, with and without nitrogen fertilizer to examine its potential on radish yield and soil quality in an Alfisol. It was found that BC enhanced the radish yield when applied at higher rates in the presence of nitrogen fertilizer. It also improved the soil quality by increasing the soil pH, exchangeable cations, and organic carbon, and decreasing tensile strength.

Conclusively, researchers have illustrated the capacity of BC to function as an eco-friendly sorbent in environmental applications, such as ameliorating soil health and mitigating soil contamination. BC demonstrated the potential to adsorb various organic and inorganic pollutants, increase soil fertility, improve soil properties such as pH, CEC, and microbial diversity, and retain nutrients, making it a viable tool for achieving sustainable development goals, particularly, SDG 15, which is focused on life on land. However, it is important to note that the BC properties vary depending on feedstock type and pyrolysis conditions. There is need for large scale application methods to understand the long term effects on soil health and crop productivity. Therefore, it is crucial to undertake extended field trials to offer more comprehensive insights into the evolution of biochar properties during aging, its enduring impact on soil properties, and the optimal timing for the re-application of various types of biochar. Further research is required to optimize BC production, integrate it with existing agricultural practices, and ensure its economic viability and environmental sustainability. Overall, BC holds significant potential to enhance soil health, increase crop yield, and provide a sustainable solution for soil and water ecosystem remediation.

Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions (SDG 13 - Organize climate action)

Global emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs) from developmental activities has become very alarming in a few decades. The current scenario of global warming will add a 1.5°C rise in global temperature by 2035, and 2.5°C by 2100. Further, envisioning the worldwide scenario, various reports demonstrate that seven countries (i.e., India, China, USA, Australia, Brazil, Canada, and Chile) emit more than 50% of global soil GHG emissions.180 Fossil fuel burning, farming/agricultural practices, deforestation, and urbanization are some of the major sources contributing to global GHG emissions. The GHGs released from different sources form a gaseous blanket in the troposphere which allows all the incoming solar radiation but captures all outgoing thermal/Infrared radiation producing a warming effect, hence, the term greenhouse effect has been coined. Consequently, the greenhouse effect then augments certain climatic variations in the atmosphere which simultaneously modulates the precipitation patterns, sea level rise, melting of glaciers, frequent floods, droughts, habitat fragmentation, biodiversity loss, and microbial activity (that causes several diseases) that affect the food security and human health in long run.181 As aforesaid, there exist different sources releasing GHGs which include agricultural practices that alone contributed to about 13.5% of GHG emissions and enhanced the anthropogenic GHG emissions by 81% globally between the period of 1961 and 2016.182 Arid and semi-arid parts of the world follow irrigated agricultural practices, which emit substantial amounts of GHG to the atmosphere. Rice cultivation, organic manure production/application, manure storage, agricultural residue fermentation/burning, and use of machinery are the practices of GHG emissions in farming. However, some practices of agriculture help in GHG reductions such as; carbon sequestration in the form of biomass, enhancing carbon sink into the soil, reduced microbial biomass decomposition, and reuse of agricultural residue instead of burning.14 Moreover, when these developmental activities limit the appropriate atmospheric pattern and climatic behavior, various government organizations have come into action to effectively combat such situations through different productive measures and approaches. Among these government organizations, as aforementioned, the UN general assembly formulated the 17 SDGs to resolve various issues existing in nature to uplift the life residing in the environment. Interestingly, these SDGs include one of the targets that dealt with climate actions (SDG 13) and further discussed 43% GHG emission reduction by 2030 and the commitment of net zero up to 2050. As a result, various materials, technologies, and processes are being developed to achieve SDG 13. To develop such materials, various research and experimental studies have been undertaken and thus, the viability of BC for such climate actions was identified (provided in Figure 5). Earlier studies have reported the applicability of BC for the reduction of different GHG emissions formed during the contaminant removal process from wastewater treatment and soil amendment purposes. So, further sections will provide insight into the efficiency of BC application in GHG mitigation during various treatment processes and associated mechanisms.Figure 5 Application of BC for mitigating GHGs during soil amendment and wastewater treatment processes

Utilization of BC in soil amendment supports the reduction of N2O, CO2, and CH4 emissions, declines open biomass burning, decreases agricultural waste biomass, and simultaneously helps reutilize the biomass. In addition, using BC in the treatment of water treats the various pollutants, and reduces the emission of GHGs while it supplements water for reuse and clean fertilizer for plant growth as a result. So, the application of BC to soil and an aqueous environment apprehends positive impacts on the surroundings.

GHG mitigation during soil amendment

BC production from agricultural and other biomass has gained much attention due to its renewable properties, recalcitrant nature, strong carbon chain, high functionality, surface properties, and non-sophisticated processing.14,183 Such characteristics of BC make it a sustainable potential material to deal with climatic variations in different ways. Noteworthy, as some of the climatic variations are a part of agricultural activities, hence, the primary application of BC to agricultural fields would help mitigate part of the emitted GHGs (depicted in Figure 6). So, several research studies have experimented with the utilization of BC in agricultural fields which then participated in carbon sequestration, methanogen activity, and biological nitrogen cycling and accomplished successful GHG mitigation. Additionally, BC possesses significant water-holding capacity, nutrient capture, carbon storage, nutrient release, wastewater treatment, and pathogen reduction ability.184 Its application in soil has helped in enhancing carbon sequestration in a stable form after organic matter degradation. In a study, Windeatt et al.,185 estimated that 300 ton annual BC production could help in 0.5 billion ton carbon sequestration from CO2 emission per annum. This is approximately 1.5% of annual CO2 emissions. Similarly, Liu et al.,186 reported that carbon storage in the form of BC could help to reduce the annual CO2 emission by 0.3 billion tons. As per an estimate, 78% carbon containing BC, could store about 7–110 giga-ton carbon through a maximum 10,0000 kg per hectare application rate, on a 1411 million hectare stretch of the cropland.16,187 So, BC application in the soil makes a steady carbon availability due to its longer stability. Some studies have validated that the application of BC will capture more CO2 than its release from the soil environment.188,189 Yang et al.,189 elucidated that 41.02% of BC application to the soil will reduce the GHG (CO2) emission up to zero. Furthermore, BC addition with a 2% (w/w) application in the soil will avenge methane emissions close to zero.190 However, very limited information is available which details the efficiency of BC in controlling GHG emissions (such as methane and nitrous oxide). In a study by Liu et al.,191 the combination of slag + BC (8 + 8 ton ha −1) application in a paddy field reduced the CH4 emission by 45%. The study was extended up to a duration of four years, where BC application had reduced up to 1/5th of the total methane emissions from paddy fields with the simultaneous upliftment of rice yield to about 5%. The successive reduction of methane emission occurred due to BC application as it limited the growth of methanogenic archaea microbes and subsequently favored the growth of methanogenic bacteria.192 The aromatic structure of BC also acts as an electron acceptor and adsorbs dissolved organic carbon (methanogen substrate), hampering methanogenic activity and CH4 emission reduction. Additionally, soil amendment in paddy fields modulates the GHG emission with seasonal variation. For instance, Liu et al.191 observed fluctuations in CH4 emission with BC application in different seasons for soil amendment during flooding periods in paddy fields. Early rice season produced higher CH4 emissions than late rice season, possibly due to high methanogen activities developed through anaerobic conditions created by flooding.193 Continuous BC application for more than four years in paddy fields have reduced half of the annual methane emission and enhanced the crop yield by 13% annually. In contrast, it increased more than 1.5-folds of N2O emissions simultaneously.191 Furthermore, Jeffrey et al.,194 elucidated that BC application in flooded soil promoted the strength of the methane sink resulting in CH4 emission reduction as it promoted the activity of methanotrophs for methane reduction.16,195 In addition, BC enhances carbon retention for a longer period of time, along with the development of healthy soil (such as soil aerobic conditions, soil moisture, porosity, and vital microbes).195 This property helped in mitigating methane emissions and thus, the reduction of one among the GHG emissions.Figure 6 Application of biochar for soil amendment and simultaneous GHG mitigation

Application of BC in soil enhances soil properties through improved nutrient uptake, storage capacity, and water holding capacity. Meanwhile, BC also reduces the emission of GHGs from soil and treats the pollutants from water, thus elevating the quality of air while enhancing the characteristics of soil and water. So, the utilization of BC in soil amendment and water treatment could subsequently amend in organizing climate action (SGD 13).

Although BC reduces the CO2 and CH4 emissions with high crop yield and quality, it increases the N2O emissions by 150–190% annually.196 Previous research studies have reported that soil amendment with straw BC alone has enhanced the N2O emissions up to 43–78%.197 In contrast, many studies have also reported a reduction in N2O emission while using BC for soil amendment. For example, Wang et al.,196,198 reported a maximum of 34.1% and 20.5% of CH4 and N2O emission reduction respectively using combined slag and BC (8t Ha−1 each). Similarly, Lee et al.,199 mentioned that 20-ton ha−1 BC application in soil has reduced 33.2% higher N2O emission as compared to control setups. The improvement in N2O mitigation was apprehended to BC application that enhanced the soil organic carbon pool along with N2O emission reduction in different soil.199 Such phenomenon occurs as BC interacts with the nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria and inhibits complete nitrogen transformation affecting the reduction in N2O mitigation, released either from soil or water systems. Also, fertilization or composting promotes these metabolic reactions catalyzed in soil and contributes to higher N2O emission. So, BC addition enhanced the soil pH and promoted higher N2O emission 191,200 Additionally, the moisture content of the soil also affects the rate of N2O emission. High soil moisture is associated with anaerobic conditions, favoring denitrification, whereas low moisture promotes nitrification reactions. Brunn et al.201 estimated that about 8–23 times more N2O is generated under 80% moisture content than 40% moisture content in the soil. Yanai et al.202 conducted a laboratory experiment and found that 10% BC (charcoal) addition to soil has reduced 89% of N2O emission. Jia et al.203 found that BC application reduced the N2O emission up to a maximum of 82% in high moisture and high nitrogen-containing soil for vegetable production. Various studies have also reported that a higher amount of BC addition enhanced the mitigation of N2O emission up to a certain level depending upon soil types, while no change in N2O emission was observed at low BC addition (2–10%).199,204 Also, nitrate adsorption on the BC surface is also responsible for N2O emission reduction in soil.205 Biochar having a high C/N ratio could effectively adsorb more NH3 from soil, thus successively reducing the ammonia volatilization.206 The growing season of the crop also contributed to nitrous oxide emissions, as it required fertilizer (nitrite/nitrate) at different intervals of time. In the early crop growing period mixing of nitrogen with BC has enhanced the nitrification rates resulting in higher nitrous oxide emission. This emission also reduced with the advancement of the growing season of the crops, due to reduced denitrification.207 Edwards et al.,207 estimated that BC addition with nitrogen could reduce 37% of nitrous oxide emission, while the contribution of N2O emission increased to 41% without any nitrogen addition to soil.

Moreover, the surface properties of BC play a crucial role in driving these microbial reactions in nature. Thus, the raw material of BC, pyrolysis condition, pyrolysis temperature, modification in BC, and combined application of BC with other types of amendments are responsible for differential mitigation in GHG emission. In a study Jeffery et al.194 reported that BC prepared at 450°C–600°C promoted the methane source potential and reduced the methane sink potential on the soil application. However, the methane source strength has decreased and methane sink strength has increased after the BC application pyrolyzed at 600°C. Thus, the pyrolysis conditions of BC also affect the methane emission in soil. Furthermore, different biomass has different constituents in its composition. Pyrolysis produces specific types of surfaces and pores depending on raw biomass properties. More specifically, it brought changes in carbon matrix and particle size. In terms of methane sink and source strengthening, lignocellulosic biomass produced by BC enhanced the source and hampers the sink, especially for methane emission.16

Earlier experimental studies have mentioned that BC helped in enhancing crop yield, through improvement in plant and soil health. This was visualized in the form of healthy plant growth, root development, enhanced gaseous exchange through the plant, soil moisture, soil air, bulk density, and reduction in methanogen development. As fossil fuel and biomass burning release huge amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere, this part of carbon could be stored in the form of plant biomass. On the opposite side, traditional biomass burning will relocate the CO2 back to the atmosphere. So, conversion of these plant biomass in the form of BC could fix the carbon for a longer period. Structurally, BC is resistant to many biological, chemical, and physical degradation, which generates a fixed carbon pool available in the soil for a longer period of time.25 However, in terms of GHG mitigation, BC has shown significant emission reduction of CO2 and CH4, still it limited in terms of N2O mitigation. As BC inhibits the growth of methanogenic bacteria, the release of CH4 gets suppressed, while, in terms of N2O, BC interacts with the nitrogen-transforming bacteria and thus disrupts the nitrogen cycle thereby releasing N2O as a by-product. Also, the characteristics of BC absorb moisture leading to the existence of anaerobic conditions in the soil microclimate. Such nature of BC facilitates denitrification and simultaneous release of N2O. The reduction of these GHGs has been an essential component of SDGs and will surely play an important role in global warming reduction. So, the application of BC in the soil will efficiently help in GHG mitigation with various approaches. Likewise, when such BC material was applied for the treatment of various wastewater, it also favored the reduction of the emitted GHGs during the process. So, the further section encompasses the GHG mitigation strategy during wastewater treatment through BC application.

GHG mitigation during wastewater treatment

Fossil fuel combustion, deforestation, and agricultural emissions are major GHG emission sources. However, CO2, CH4, and N2O emission also take place from swamps, drainage, septic tanks, wastewaters, and wastewater treatment plants (WWTP).208 Inadequate management of wastewater will lead to GHG emissions from many point and non-point sources. This makes the technique of wastewater treatment very important. WWTPs are the central facility for the treatment of wastewater, which also emits a substantial amount of GHG through its operational steps. WWTP operational units (such as biological and chemical), sludge dewatering, and sludge disposal are the main sources of GHG emissions. The emissions were in the form of CO2, CH4, and N2O as well. However, CO2 emissions from the WWTPs are not considered GHG by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), claiming that the emissions are from fugacious biogenic sources. However, the contribution of anthropogenic CO2 in the GHG effect is higher than other minor GHGs due to high resultant atmospheric concentration.209 Many studies on WWTP emissions endorse the hypothesis that the emissions from WWTPs should not be ignored.209,210,211 Depending upon the influent wastewater property a municipal WWTP could emit about 5–1000 g of CO2 per cubic meter of wastewater.212 Activated sludge, trickling filter, rotating biological contractor, and up-flow sludge anaerobic blankets such as WWTP units were used for municipal wastewater treatments, which could produce CO2 and CH4. WWTPs produce huge amounts of sludge on a daily basis that contains greater concentration of organics and nitrogen in complex forms, which could be pyrolyzed in the form of BC. This carbonaceous BC will retain the carbon for a longer period, hence prohibiting its transfer to the atmosphere in the form of CO2 and CH4.213 BC production through sludge will suppress the N2O emission, which is considered a much better application of sludge instead of direct use in crop fields.25 Direct use of sludge as soil conditioner will trigger health and ecological toxicity. Although sludge-derived BC also represents some environmental hazards such as heavy metal leaching, some intensive research will promote its applications. For example, Fang et al.,214 produced the phosphorus-enriched BC from municipal sludge by regulating the temperature between 500°C and 600°C through microwave-assisted pyrolysis. Such BC contains high surface area and total phosphorus content that binds the available phosphorus and releases it into the soil slowly according to the requirement. These modifications could help derive phosphorous-based fertilizers from municipal sludge for field-scale and long-term applications. Suitable temperature range and residence time optimization will reduce the energy input and required carbon footprint.209

Further, several studies have incorporated BC produced from biomass as an adsorbent for wastewater treatment. BC used as a substrate matrix in bio-filter shows better nutrient retention from wastewater.183 It helps in pollutant breakdown and biomass generation, reducing CO2, CH4, and N2O emissions.183 A similar strategy is incorporated in constructed wetlands (CW) for the mitigation of GHG emissions using BC as substrate material during wastewater treatment. N2O is produced in limited nitrogen removal conditions of CWs.215 BC helps in the regulation of microbial composition in CW systems, controlling GHG emissions. BC addition in the CW system as a substrate has reduced GHG fluxes, which are produced during the biological decomposition of wastewater. In order to do this, Guo et al.,216 have studied a CW system with different chemical oxygen demand/nitrogen ratios and found that BC containing CW has reduced the global warming potential from 18.5% to 24% of N2O and CH4 respectively. About 21 Ktaeq of CO2 could be captured through the BC production from 100 tons/day sludge generating WWTP with 65% BC yield,209 as 0.9 kg of GHG emission reduction takes place from per kg of BC production. Meanwhile, BC surface property could entrap the nitrogenous compounds of wastewater in CW systems as well. Recent studies highlighted that BC addition to gravel or ceramsite-based CW shown enhanced N2O reduction.217 Also, increasing the BC proportion in CWs will reduce the N2O emission from CWs,216 as BC supports more nos-Z promoting effective nitrification-denitrification and reducing the N2O emission.218 CWs itself produced biomass in the form of plant (aquatic macrophytes such as Canna indica and Glyceria maxima) and microbial biofilm apprehending better CO2, CH4, and N2O emission reduction potential.3,12,219 Microorganisms and plants in CW work in collaboration, where the organic matter of wastewater is being converted into carbon-containing substances and inorganic nutrients (such as nitrate and phosphate).220 This carbon-based compound is utilized by microbes for biomass generation and inorganic nutrients will be used by plants. Thus, CO2 and CH4 convert into biomass instead of getting released as GHGs. The macrophytes will capture atmospheric CO2 for photosynthesis which was released from wastewater. Moreover, protein, ammonia, nitrite, and other organic nitrogen compounds will convert in the form of nitrate. This nitrate will be used by the macrophytes of CW, limiting the emission of N2O.221 On the other hand, BC derived from sludge, biomass, and algae could also be used as a substrate matrix in CW systems. BC helps to promote biological metabolism which acts on CH4 reduction, carbon sequestration, and reduction in N2O flux through substrate matrix, flora, and fauna in CWs. Additionally, BC could adsorb the N2O generated in CWs for biotic and abiotic consumption. Ji et al.,222 reported lower methane emission from BC containing CW than ceramsite material, attributing high methanogens/methanotrophs in CW bed. High methane consumption will be observed due to good oxygen conditions produced through the porous BC structure.222 Such performance of BC is associated with its various characteristics. For example, BC surface properties especially free radicals, surface charge, phenolic and quinone contents interplay in CWs will lead to varied emission reduction.183 BC with some alkaline properties will promote CO2 dissolution and precipitation. But macrophytes require CO2 for their growth and subsequently utilize the released CO2 during photosynthesis.216

Overall, wastewater and simultaneously WWTPs could be a source of GHG emissions as it could emit CO2, CH4, and N2O-like gases. Sludge generation and other biological units of WWTP such as the activated sludge process, trickling filter, and rotating biological contractor contribute in GHG emissions through biological metabolic reactions. Similarly, CWs also contribute to GHG emissions from biological reactions. However, BC production and application in soil amendment and wastewater treatment have mitigated CO2, CH4, and N2O emissions. However, BC production from sludge and its applications such as soil amendment and wetland substrate matrix needs more scientific intervention and validation. Although it facilitated the reduction of GHG emissions, the adverse ecological effects are still vaguely identified. All types of natural and engineered wetlands play the role of carbon sinks if operated and adequately managed with BC. As proposed by Mitsch et al.,223 about 118 g-C m−2y−1 average carbon is being sequestered by wetlands which constitutes a maximum 8% of the whole terrestrial portion of the earth. Also, wetlands help in maintaining biodiversity, recreation, wastewater treatment, flood control, and GHG emission reduction. These properties of wetlands will help partially in many goals and targets associated with SDGs. So, the use of BC containing CW will reduce GHG emissions fulfilling SDG goal 13 of climate action. Still, more intensive research is highly essential to vitally inculcate BC as a suitable material for upscaling the natural environment and fulfilling the SDGs.

Bioenergy generation (SDG 7- affordable and clean energy)

The application of BC for energy generation using biomass has been extensively used for various approaches. The thermochemical and biological conversion of BC helped in producing bioenergy through several pathways. In the thermochemical pathway, heat and temperature are provided to biomass and the resultant product helps for building energy storage devices such as supercapacitors, electrodes for bioelectrochemical systems, and many more.224 While, in the biological pathway, microbes decompose (through anaerobic reactions and fermentation) the biomass for the production of biofuels such as bio-oil, biodiesel, bio-hydrogen, ethanol, and so forth.225 The BC, thus formed from these technologies is cost-effective and consists of several viable characteristics such as porosity, SSA, and so forth. that formulated a pathway for its further experimental research and application in industries for bioenergy production.226 Currently, the quality of BC has been of immense importance for which various studies have modulated BC properties through activation technologies (physical and chemical activation) and enhanced the quality of BC according to the desired application.227 As a result, nano-composites of BC, such as functional, magnetic, and nano-metal hydroxide/oxide are essential for future research.224 This application of BC coincides with SDG 7 listing affordable and clean energy for environmental applications. BC offers a sustainable option for producing bioenergy for various environmental applications. So, with respect to such applications, BC and its modifications for sustainable energy generation have been discussed in further subsections.

Supercapacitors

Supercapacitors (electrochemical capacitors and ultracapacitors) are devices required for storing energy. The wide application of supercapacitors has been extended because of their effective dynamics for charge transfer, pulse power supply, expanded life cycle, simple working principle, and high power density.228 As supercapacitors serve as uninterruptible sources of power, they have been extensively explored in various power grid stations, electrical devices, and electrical vehicles. Earlier studies have reported the fabrication of these supercapacitors using various carbon materials, metal oxides, metals, chalcogenides, and their integrated materials.229 Also, studies have investigated activated carbon, graphene, and carbon nanotubes as efficient supercapacitor materials due to their high SSA, porosity, and many other factors. Additionally, such materials have a reduced impact on the environment and are economically feasible.229 Previously, several experimental studies have reported similar properties in various BC materials, based on which the design and fabrication of different supercapacitors have been explored. For such purpose, different materials derived from various sources such as agricultural residues, industrial by-products, woody biomass, and so forth. have been used for producing BC.229 For example, Mu et al.230 incorporated bean curd which was activated using K2CO3 and utilized as a supercapacitor electrode. The obtained results exhibited an energy density as high as 11.9 W h/kg at a current density of 0.1 A/g in the presence of 1 M H2SO4 solution. A highly stable capacitance performance for 10,000 cycles was achieved using two symmetric capacitors. Additionally, it was also observed that a 10 wt. % K2CO3 concentration among the selected range of 0–15 wt. % was highly suitable for the enhanced rate of performance. Similarly, Zhang et al.231 used wheat bran activated with NaOH which resulted in a gravimetric capacitance of 294.3 F/g at a current density of 0.5 A/g. Simultaneously, the material performed a stable capacitance performance for 50,000 cycles with a cyclic life of 94%. Likewise, Wu et al.232 developed microrods from Albizia flowers and activated them with KOH. The microrods depicted a higher specific capacitance of 406 F/g at a current density of 0.5 A/g in KOH (6M) electrolyte. Further, the same material provided a power density of 429 W/kg and an energy density as high as 26.3 W h/Kg. So, it could be predicted that the surface properties of BC, i.e., structural, functional, and morphological characteristics are the primary factors responsible for the capacitive performance taking place. Moreover, the nature of the biomass material used, thermal conditions, and the fabrication method also play vital roles. Studies have also incorporated various modification processes such as activation, composite film fabrication, metal/metal hydroxide/metal oxide loading, and nitrogen-sulphur doping that favored enhancement in the electrical performance of the material. Still, an in-depth investigation for obtaining such sustainable and cost-effective BC material is highly essential. Also, future interventions are yet to be discovered for enhancing the efficiency of the developed material incurring less energy input and operation facility.

Bioelectricity generation in electrochemical systems

A typical electrochemical system consists of a fuel cell and an electrolysis cell. Between these two systems, the use of fuel cells has widely been studied for bioelectricity generation and treatment of wastewater. A typical microbial fuel cell (MFC) consists of two chambers, anode and cathode, having anaerobic and aerobic conditions in nature.233 Both chambers were separated by a proton exchange membrane and consisted of electrodes connected externally by a resistance. The flow of electrons occurs from the anode to the cathode to complete the redox process and simultaneously generate electrical energy.234 So, for this purpose, various studies have reported the use of different electrode materials, such as graphite, platinum, carbon cloth, carbon brush, and so forth. to enhance the power output and the pollutant treatment efficiency of the system.8 However, these electrodes prevailed with various drawbacks such as high cost, scarce availability, and so forth. So, when studies have experimented with BC for such purposes, it was observed that BC is cost-effective in nature and easily available. Additionally, as aforementioned, BC are highly sustainable, and environment-friendly, possesses high porosity, SSA, and many more characteristics, these properties of BC make it a suitable candidate for such activities. As a result, various studies have incorporated BC as electrode material in MFC to enhance the performance of the system. For example, Hung et al.235 used electrode material derived from activated carbon of coffee waste that obtained a power density of 3927 mW/m2, while the commercially available activated carbon resulted in a power density of 975 mW/m2. Likewise, Yuan et al.236 reported use of sewage sludge and coconut shell BC produced a power density of 969 ± 28 mW/m2, which was 2.4 times greater than that of graphite and Pt electrode. Similarly, Wang et al.237 used corn-straw BC produced at 500°C (BC500) and 900°C (BC900) and BC modified with KOH (BAC). The results demonstrated that the power density of the BES system was enhanced by 92%, 56%, and 17% using BAC, BC900, and BC500 respectively as anode electrodes., the power density was enhanced by 4.8, 5.2, and 3.1 times using BAC, BC900, and BC500 respectively as cathode electrodes with respect to carbon felt. Overall, it could be withdrawn that using BC as electrode material could help enhance the energy generation efficiency sustainably. Still, more research is essential to study the use of BC and its composites that could be used as electrode material for energy generation and associated sectors responsibly.

Other applications

Considering the various energy generation sectors, earlier studies have reported the extensive application of BC for various other purposes such as the production of biofuel (bio-oil and biodiesel),238 carrying out water splitting mechanism,239 serving as a catalyst during biohydrogen production240 and supports conversion of methane to hydrogen241 as well. For example, Ozcimen et al.242 produced bio-oil using BC of different biomass materials (Apricot stone: AS, Hazelnut shell: HS, Grapeseed: GS, and Chestnut shell: CS). The result demonstrated that the BC (AS: 30.76, HS: 29.08, GS: 26.73, CS: 25.86) obtained from these materials had higher calorific value followed by the bio-oil (AS: 22.72, HS: 26.79, GS: 29.76, CS: 26.72) products and then by the raw materials (AS: 19.28, HS: 18.33, GS: 20.51, CS: 15.49). Likewise, Zhao et al.243 utilized Pomelo peel BC activated using K2CO3 for synthesizing biodiesel through a transesterification reaction. The study resulted in a biodiesel (fatty acids methyl ester, FAME) yield of 98% and worthwhile, the material expressed a better stability performance (>82%) though being used repeatedly for 8 times. Similarly, Bhatia et al.244 synthesized biodiesel from discarded cooking oil by incorporating waste cork (Quercus suber) BC as a catalyst. The results demonstrated that the BC material synthesized at 600°C depicted the highest FAME yield of 98% at an alcohol-to-ratio of 25:1. Further, Xia et al.239 used BC obtained from Camellia japonica flowers for electrode material in electrochemical reactions and doped with sulfur for effective water splitting reactions. The study suggested that during the water-splitting reaction, the electrode had a highly stable performance for both oxygen and hydrogen generation associated with the over-potential value of 362 and 154 mV respectively, at a current density of 10 mA/cm2. However, when the production of hydrogen is considered using BC, Yao et al.245 produced hydrogen from biomass gasification by applying BC of different materials (cotton and rice) as a suitable catalyst. It was observed that cotton-char (92.08 mg/g and 64.02%) outperformed rice-char in terms of H2 production. Moreover, Kundu et al.246 developed carbon-encapsulated iron nanoparticles for the decomposition of methane and the simultaneous formation of hydrogen. The study compared the efficiency between two cellulose BC prepared at 700°C and 800°C, where BC prepared at 800°C outperformed the other material with a higher conversion efficiency of 95.7% that reduced to 36.8% within a duration of 180min.

Conclusively, if used efficiently and sustainably, BC can be incorporated as an effective material having the potential for bioenergy generation. The surface properties of BC associated with further modification/activation amended better results during energy generation. Moreover, it is also observed that production temperature and feedstock type vitally drive the activity of BC. As a result, more focus should be enlightened on deriving effective BC material with reduced energy input and monetary investments. Also, the utilization of spent over BC (incorporated during wastewater treatment and soil amendment) could be analyzed for future studies. Additionally, the composites of BC should also be taken into consideration during energy generation applications, as it will reduce the cost incurred in using expensive materials. Still, more research study is yet to be focused in this field for extensively analyzing the applicability of BC for other bioenergy applications.

Limitations and future prospects

BC has emerged as a potential material to fulfill sustainable developmental goals through its diverse properties.247 Partially, BC fulfills many SDG goals, but more specifically it contributes to SDG goal 6 (clean water and sanitation), 7 (Affordable and clean energy), 13 (Climate action), and 15 (life on land). BC applications for different purposes have addressed many social, environmental, and economic problems. Still, it faces various technical, financial, regulatory, environmental, and socio-economic barriers. BC production technologies should be well documented in terms of cost, surface properties, production emission, shelf life, and thermal condition.247 Much literature are available on these conditions, but well-documented studies/reports are still insufficient. For instance, different raw biomass for BC production required different thermal conditions for the production and incurred high costs based on availability. Such varied thermal conditions will produce BC with different ash contents, but their subsequent effects on soil, water, and other applications needs further research.171 Moreover, simple synthesis methods such as ball milling and co-pyrolysis methods should be studied and developed scientifically.17 Unplanned and poorly developed pyrolysis plants would release harmful air pollutants to the atmosphere leading to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change affecting SDG goal 13 of climate action. Meanwhile, the BC generated during this process could also cause various repercussions (human health hazards) to the associated workers/farmers which should be investigated and validated prior to its production.247 As a result, regulatory standards and specific application requirements mitigating those issues should be designed and developed efficiently but such processes might demand more cost and monetary inputs.248 Furthermore, BC application to soil would also enhance the growth of weeds and produce an inhibitory effect on soil aging.248,249 A high rate of BC application in the soil at the rate of 15 t/ha will increase the growth of weeds up to 200 times.250 Moreover, aged BC in soil will exert negative effects in soil by hampering the earthworm and fungus growth.251 Additionally, BC has produced distinct results (positive and negative) with different species and plant parts on soil application.248,252 Further, the pollutant adsorption capacity of BC in soil is limited to certain groups. For instance, BC application had not hampered dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane pesticide uptake in the soil.253 Bio-based production of fertilizers, chemicals, and other by-products could be used for soil conditioning and smart farming to uplift crop productivity and maintain the soil resource meeting SDGs.17 So, BC application to the soil medium should be clearly monitored and also release of BC and associated contents into the water bodies (underground/surface water) through soil should be regularly assessed to prohibit any futuristic reluctant activity.254 Moreover, it was observed that BC application in wastewater treatment have reduced organics, metals, nitrogen, and sulfur with its surface properties and helped in macrophyte growth in constructed wetlands (CWs) and other wastewater treatment systems.183 This helped in wastewater treatment and reduced the land footprint contributing to SDG goal 15. In contrast, the adsorption property of BC could remove essential nutrients such as iron and nitrogen from the soil, affecting plant growth.255 This could develop a competitive scenario between BC and plants for nutrients.248,256 Likewise, when the utilization of BC for bioenergy generation is considered, careful investigation should be carried out as a lack of proper BC material would degrade the energy generation tendency of the system. Also, modification, doping, and activation of the BC material should be analyzed prior to assessment, as it would facilitate the effective production of clean fuel for various purposes. So, to overcome such limitations of BC various other modification strategies or developing composites with other materials should be taken into consideration. Such methods could help in preparing BC material that enhances the bioenergy generation tendency with reduced cost and enhanced sustainability. These modifications will also favor limiting the drawbacks of BC with regard to the release of N2O into the environment. Possibly, modified or composite BC would accomplish nitrogen transformation processes successfully leading to a decline in N2O release. Also, the desorption processes should also be carried out to understand the longevity of the BC material sustaining the pollutants within it. Further, Kinetics of the pollutant removal should be highlighted and explicitly studied to get a clear insight into the existing mechanisms and the prevailing reaction pathway. This will also guide in making required configurational changes for producing efficient BC material. However, during this process, the economy of BC should be deliberately examined as the developed material should be cost-effective in nature. Incurring higher costs for preparing the BC would reduce its large-scale potential applications. Meanwhile, comprehensive risk assessment, toxic effects, and safe application ratio/rates of BC are also highly important for long-term use. Thus, BC with greater surface properties has been proven as a carbon-neutral material for achieving different SDGs. So, materials such as BC will be the future of a sustainable society and self-reliant ecosystem, if incurred vigilantly. Still, there exists a vital need for profound and extensive studies relating to BC production and field-scale application.

Conclusions

The sustainable characteristics of BC stand as a beneficial feature that strengthens and uplifts the different spheres of the environment, i.e., air, water, and soil. The attained feasibility of modified and unmodified BCs for treating different aqueous mediums, enhancing soil properties, remediating GHG release, and effective bioenergy generation acclaims the achievement of various SDGs. The efficiency of most of these developed BC materials was much higher (>80–90%) and their performance vitally depends on different parameters such as the initial concentration of pollutant, pH of solution, adsorbent dosage, and many more. For such phenomena to occur, hydrogen bonding, electrostatic attraction, and π-π bonding primarily come into action to enhance the remediation process. Although these BC materials supplement better performance for pollutant abatement, still they avail some limitations that drag attentive measures. During GHG mitigation, though BC reduces the release of CH4 and CO2, it compels the release of N2O. More focus needs to be driven for accounting the occurrence of such processes. Also, future use of spent BC is of prior concern, as the post-treatment BC material consists of different harmful pollutants which need further treatment. However, the nutrient-enriched and treated BC could be used for futuristic agricultural applications. Further, more findings highlighting the distinct composites of BC with other metals and minerals could demonstrate advanced energy applications and uplift remediation strategies. Meanwhile, the knowledge and compilation of underlying kinetics taking place during the pollutant removal mechanism also need an in-depth analysis, as these kinetic studies propose better reaction pathways and provide suitable practical implications. Overall, such sustainable applications of BC apprehended that these materials could effectively facilitate in achieving the primary goal of SDGs, i.e., to uplift man and the environment through ecological solutions. If such materials having high SSA, greater porosity, and abundance of functional groups could be modified and utilized properly, it would enhance the possibility of attaining other SDGs in the immediate future. Also, more research and development for identifying and designing similar materials with improvised characteristics should be carried out as sustainable solutions for uplifting the environment and society securely.

Acknowledgments

Ashmita Patro would like to acknowledge the UGC-NET fellowship provided by 10.13039/501100001501 University Grants Commission , India for assisting financial support. She is also thankful to AcSIR, New Delhi, and CSIR-Institute of Minerals and Materials Technology (CSIR-IMMT), Bhubaneswar, India for helping her to carry out Ph.D. work. PKS would like to thank the Department of Science and Technology (Government of India) for providing support to this work through DST-SERB Core Research Grant (CRG/2021/002567 ).

Author contributions

Ashmita Patro: Conceptualization, writing, design of the work, data collection and interpretation, drafting the article. Saurabh Dwivedi: writing, drafting the work, data collection, and editing of the article. Anjali Thakur: writing the work, data collection, and compilation. Dr. Prafulla Kumar Sahoo: Conceptualization and design of the work, supervision, review and critical revision of the article, and final approval of the version to be published.

Declaration of interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
==== Refs
References

1 Ahmad F. Saeed Q. Shah S.M.U. Gondal M.A. Mumtaz S. Jhariya M.K. Meena R.S. Banerjee A. S. N. B. T.-N. R. C. and A. for S. Meena Chapter 11 - Environmental sustainability: Challenges and approaches 2022 Elsevier 243 270 10.1016/B978-0-12-822976-7.00019-3
2 Alharthi S. Alharthi A. Alharthi M. Sustainable Development Goals in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s 2030 Vision WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 238 2019 455 467
3 Patro A. Dwivedi S. Panja R. Saket P. Gupta S. Mittal Y. Saeed T. Martínez F. Yadav A.K. Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Management: Basic Design, Abiotic and Biotic Components, and Their Interactive Functions Material-Microbes Interactions 2023 Elsevier 315 348
4 Song P. Xu D. Yue J. Ma Y. Dong S. Feng J. Recent advances in soil remediation technology for heavy metal contaminated sites: A critical review Sci. Total Environ. 838 2022 156417
5 Brauer H. Varma Y.B.G. Air Pollution Control Equipment 2012 Springer Science & Business Media
6 Onar O.C. Khaligh A. Energy Sources 2015 Elsevier Inc. 10.1016/B978-0-12-416714-8.00002-0
7 Sachdeva S. Chowdari J. Patro A. Mittal S. Sahoo P.K. Efficacy of Biotic Components in Constructed Wetlands for Mitigating Pesticides Emerging Aquatic Contaminants 2023 Elsevier 235 276
8 Dwivedi S. Patro A. Mittal Y. Gupta S. Srivastava P. Microbial fuel cell for landfill leachate treatment Landfill Leachate Manag. 57 2023 1
9 Gupta S. Patro A. Mittal Y. Dwivedi S. Saket P. Panja R. Saeed T. Martínez F. Yadav A.K. The race between classical microbial fuel cells, sediment-microbial fuel cells, plant-microbial fuel cells, and constructed wetlands-microbial fuel cells: Applications and technology readiness level Sci. Total Environ. 879 2023 162757
10 Mittal Y. Dwivedi S. Gupta S. Panja R. Saket P. Patro A. Saeed T. Martínez F. Yadav A.K. Progressive Transformation of Microbial Fuel Cells (MFC s) to Sediment MFC s, Plant MFC s, and Constructed Wetland Integrated MFC s Microb. Electrochem. Technol. Fundam. Appl. 2 2023 407 444
11 Dwivedi S. Patro A. Saket P. Yadav A.K. Marquez G.P. Srivastava P. Robust application of microbial electrochemical technology coupled with constructed wetla Emerging Trends and Advances in Microbial Electrochemical Technologies. 2024 Elsevier 245 269
12 Patro A. Gupta S. Dwivedi S. Mishra P.M. Yadav A.K. Spectrometric evidences to resolve the debate on direct role of macrophyte in organic pollutant removal and degradation in constructed wetlands Chem. Eng. J. 483 2024 148740 10.1016/j.cej.2024.148740
13 Haider F.U. Wang X. Zulfiqar U. Farooq M. Hussain S. Mehmood T. Naveed M. Li Y. Liqun C. Saeed Q. Biochar application for remediation of organic toxic pollutants in contaminated soils; An update Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 248 2022 114322 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.114322
14 Mosa A. Mansour M.M. Soliman E. El-Ghamry A. El Alfy M. El Kenawy A.M. Biochar as a Soil Amendment for Restraining Greenhouse Gases Emission and Improving Soil Carbon Sink: Current Situation and Ways Forward Sustain. Times 15 2023 1206 10.3390/su15021206
15 Ippolito J.A. Cui L. Kammann C. Wrage-Mönnig N. Estavillo J.M. Fuertes-Mendizabal T. Cayuela M.L. Sigua G. Novak J. Spokas K. Borchard N. Feedstock choice, pyrolysis temperature and type influence biochar characteristics: a comprehensive meta-data analysis review Biochar 2 2020 421 438 10.1007/s42773-020-00067-x
16 Kumar A. Bhattacharya T. Biochar: A Sustainable Solution 2021 Springer Netherlands 10.1007/s10668-020-00970-0
17 Xiong X. He M. Dutta S. Tsang D.C.W. Biochar and Sustainable Development Goals Biochar in agriculture for achieving sustainable development goals 2022 Elsevier 15 22
18 Kopecký M. Kolář L. Konvalina P. Strunecký O. Teodorescu F. Mráz P. Peterka J. Váchalová R. Bernas J. Bartoš P. Modified biochar—a tool for wastewater treatment Energies 13 2020 5270
19 Cheng N. Wang B. Wu P. Lee X. Xing Y. Chen M. Gao B. Adsorption of emerging contaminants from water and wastewater by modified biochar: A review Environ. Pollut. 273 2021 116448
20 Shoudho K.N. Khan T.H. Ara U.R. Khan M.R. Shawon Z.B.Z. Hoque M.E. Biochar in global carbon cycle: Towards sustainable development goals Curr. Res. Green Sustain. Chem. 8 2024 100409 10.1016/j.crgsc.2024.100409
21 Yu S. Zhang W. Dong X. Wang F. Yang W. Liu C. Chen D. A review on recent advances of biochar from agricultural and forestry wastes: Preparation, modification and applications in wastewater treatment J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 12 2024 111638
22 Enaime G. Baçaoui A. Yaacoubi A. Lübken M. Biochar for wastewater treatment—conversion technologies and applications Appl. Sci. 10 2020 3492
23 Xiang W. Zhang X. Chen J. Zou W. He F. Hu X. Tsang D.C.W. Ok Y.S. Gao B. Biochar technology in wastewater treatment: A critical review Chemosphere 252 2020 126539 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126539
24 Serafini P.G. Moura J.M.d. Almeida M.R.d. Rezende J.F.D.d. Sustainable Development Goals in Higher Education Institutions: A systematic literature review J. Clean. Prod. 370 2022 133473 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133473
25 Qambrani N.A. Rahman M.M. Won S. Shim S. Ra C. Biochar properties and eco-friendly applications for climate change mitigation, waste management, and wastewater treatment: A review Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 79 2017 255 273 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.057
26 Shakoor M.B. Ali S. Rizwan M. Abbas F. Bibi I. Riaz M. Khalil U. Niazi N.K. Rinklebe J. A review of biochar-based sorbents for separation of heavy metals from water Int. J. Phytoremediation 22 2020 111 126 10.1080/15226514.2019.1647405 31686525
27 Cui J. Zhang F. Li H. Cui J. Ren Y. Yu X. Recent progress in biochar-based photocatalysts for wastewater treatment: Synthesis, mechanisms, and applications Appl. Sci. 10 2020 1019 10.3390/app10031019
28 Mohan D. Sarswat A. Ok Y.S. Pittman C.U. Organic and inorganic contaminants removal from water with biochar, a renewable, low cost and sustainable adsorbent - A critical review Bioresour. Technol. 160 2014 191 202 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.120 24636918
29 Zhang C. Zeng G. Huang D. Lai C. Chen M. Cheng M. Tang W. Tang L. Dong H. Huang B. Biochar for environmental management: Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, contaminant treatment, and potential negative impacts Chem. Eng. J. 373 2019 902 922 10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.139
30 Mcbeath A.V. Smernik R.J. Krull E.S. Lehmann J. The influence of feedstock and production temperature on biochar carbon chemistry : A solid-state 13 C NMR study Biomass Bioenergy 60 2014 121 129 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.11.002
31 Masebinu S.O. Akinlabi E.T. Muzenda E. Aboyade A.O. A review of biochar properties and their roles in mitigating challenges with anaerobic digestion Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 103 2019 291 307 10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.048
32 Tomczyk A. Sokołowska Z. Boguta P. Biochar physicochemical properties: pyrolysis temperature and feedstock kind effects Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 19 2020 191 215 10.1007/s11157-020-09523-3
33 Vassilev S.V. Baxter D. Andersen L.K. Vassileva C.G. Morgan T.J. An overview of the organic and inorganic phase composition of biomass Fuel 94 2012 1 33 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.09.030
34 Jafri N. Wong W.Y. Doshi V. Yoon L.W. Cheah K.H. A review on production and characterization of biochars for application in direct carbon fuel cells Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 118 2018 152 166 10.1016/j.psep.2018.06.036
35 Hopkins D. Hawboldt K. Biochar for the removal of metals from solution: A review of lignocellulosic and novel marine feedstocks J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 8 2020 103975 10.1016/j.jece.2020.103975
36 Zhang L. Xu C.C. Champagne P. Overview of recent advances in thermo-chemical conversion of biomass Energy Convers. Manag. 51 2010 969 982 10.1016/j.enconman.2009.11.038
37 Hoekman S.K. Broch A. Robbins C. Zielinska B. Felix L. Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of selected woody and herbaceous biomass feedstocks Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 3 2013 113 126 10.1007/s13399-012-0066-y
38 Mumme J. Eckervogt L. Pielert J. Diakité M. Rupp F. Kern J. Hydrothermal carbonization of anaerobically digested maize silage Bioresour. Technol. 102 2011 9255 9260 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.06.099 21802284
39 Brewer C.E. Schmidt-rohr K. Satrio J.A. Brown R.C. Characterization of Biochar from Fast Pyrolysis and Gasification Systems Environ. Progress Sustain. Ener. Offi. Publ. Am. Instit. Chem. Eng. 28 2009 386 10.1002/ep
40 Kirubakaran V. Sivaramakrishnan V. Nalini R. Sekar T. Premalatha M. Subramanian P. A review on gasification of biomass Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13 2009 179 186 10.1016/j.rser.2007.07.001
41 Kambo H.S. Dutta A. A comparative review of biochar and hydrochar in terms of production, physico-chemical properties and applications Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 45 2015 359 378 10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.050
42 Laird D.A. Brown R.C. Amonette J.E. Lehmann J. Review of the pyrolysis platform for coproducing bio-oil and biochar Biofuel. Bioprod. Biorefin. 3 2009 547 562 10.1002/BBB
43 Laghari M. Naidu R. Xiao B. Hu Z. Mirjat M.S. Hu M. Kandhro M.N. Chen Z. Guo D. Jogi Q. Recent developments in biochar as an effective tool for agricultural soil management: a review J. Sci. Food Agric. 96 2016 4840 4849 10.1002/jsfa.7753 27116042
44 Li S. Barreto V. Li R. Chen G. Hsieh Y.P. Nitrogen retention of biochar derived from different feedstocks at variable pyrolysis temperatures J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 133 2018 136 146 10.1016/j.jaap.2018.04.010
45 Li S. Harris S. Anandhi A. Chen G. Predicting biochar properties and functions based on feedstock and pyrolysis temperature: A review and data syntheses J. Clean. Prod. 215 2019 890 902 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.106
46 Guo J. Chong Lua A. Characterization of chars pyrolyzed from oil palm stones for the preparation of activated carbons J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 46 1998 113 125 10.1016/S0165-2370(98)00074-6
47 Briggs C. Breiner J.M. Graham R.C. Physical and chemical properties of Pinus ponderosa charcoal: implications for soil modification Soil Sci. 177 2012 263 268
48 Ippolito J.A. Berry C.M. Strawn D.G. Novak J.M. Levine J. Harley A. Biochars Reduce Mine Land Soil Bioavailable Metals J. Environ. Qual. 46 2017 411 419 10.2134/jeq2016.10.0388 28380572
49 Edenborn S.L. Johnson L.M.K. Edenborn H.M. Albarran-Jack M.R. Demetrion L.D. Amendment of a hardwood biochar with compost tea: effects on plant growth, insect damage and the functional diversity of soil microbial communities Biol. Agric. Hortic. 34 2018 88 106 10.1080/01448765.2017.1388847
50 Neogi S. Sharma V. Khan N. Chaurasia D. Ahmad A. Chauhan S. Singh A. You S. Pandey A. Bhargava P.C. Sustainable biochar: A facile strategy for soil and environmental restoration, energygeneration, mitigation of global climate change and circular bioeconomy Chemosphere 293 2022 133474 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133474
51 Kamali M. Khodaparast Z. Review on recent developments on pulp and paper mill wastewater treatment Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 114 2015 326 342 24953005
52 Kamali M. Appels L. Kwon E.E. Aminabhavi T.M. Dewil R. Biochar in water and wastewater treatment - a sustainability assessment Chem. Eng. J. 420 2021 129946 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129946
53 Catalkaya E.C. Kargi F. Advanced oxidation treatment of pulp mill effluent for TOC and toxicity removals J. Environ. Manage. 87 2008 396 404 17360100
54 Wong S. Ngadi N. Inuwa I.M. Hassan O. Recent advances in applications of activated carbon from biowaste for wastewater treatment: a short review J. Clean. Prod. 175 2018 361 375
55 Çeçen F. Aktas Ö. Activated Carbon for Water and Wastewater Treatment: Integration of Adsorption and Biological Treatment 2011 John Wiley & Sons
56 Shan R. Shi Y. Gu J. Wang Y. Yuan H. Single and competitive adsorption affinity of heavy metals toward peanut shell-derived biochar and its mechanisms in aqueous systems Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 28 2020 1375 1383 10.1016/j.cjche.2020.02.012
57 Nirmaladevi S. Palanisamy N. A comparative study of the removal of cationic and anionic dyes from aqueous solutions using biochar as an adsorbent Desalin. Water Treat. 175 2020 282 292 10.5004/dwt.2020.24906
58 Khalid S. Shahid M. Murtaza B. Bibi I. Natasha Asif Naeem M. Niazi N.K. A critical review of different factors governing the fate of pesticides in soil under biochar application Sci. Total Environ. 711 2020 134645 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134645
59 Monisha R.S. Mani R.L. Sivaprakash B. Rajamohan N. Vo D.-V.N. Green remediation of pharmaceutical wastes using biochar: a review Environ. Chem. Lett. 1 2022 1 24
60 El-Adly R.A. Yossef M.A. Modather F.H. Ismail E.A. Abbas D.M. Biogrease based on biochar from rice straw and waste cooking oil Int. J. Adv. Pharmacy, Biol. Chem. 4 2015 91 97
61 Mohammed N.A.S. Abu-Zurayk R.A. Hamadneh I. Al-Dujaili A.H. Phenol adsorption on biochar prepared from the pine fruit shells: Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamics studies J. Environ. Manage. 226 2018 377 385 30138837
62 Ni B.-J. Huang Q.-S. Wang C. Ni T.-Y. Sun J. Wei W. Competitive adsorption of heavy metals in aqueous solution onto biochar derived from anaerobically digested sludge Chemosphere 219 2019 351 357 30551101
63 Bandara T. Xu J. Potter I.D. Franks A. Chathurika J.B.A.J. Tang C. Mechanisms for the removal of Cd(II) and Cu(II) from aqueous solution and mine water by biochars derived from agricultural wastes Chemosphere 254 2020 126745 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126745
64 Manyuchi M.M. Sukdeo N. Stinner W. Mutusva T.N. Influence of sawdust based biochar on gold tailings wastewater heavy metal contaminants removal S. Afr. J. Chem. Eng. 37 2021 81 91 10.1016/j.sajce.2021.05.003
65 Cheng S. Liu Y. Xing B. Qin X. Zhang C. Xia H. Lead and cadmium clean removal from wastewater by sustainable biochar derived from poplar saw dust J. Clean. Prod. 314 2021 128074 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128074
66 Uchimiya M. Lima I.M. Thomas Klasson K. Chang S. Wartelle L.H. Rodgers J.E. Immobilization of heavy metal ions (CuII, CdII, NiII, and PbII) by broiler litter-derived biochars in water and soil J. Agric. Food Chem. 58 2010 5538 5544 20402510
67 Xie M. Chen W. Xu Z. Zheng S. Zhu D. Adsorption of sulfonamides to demineralized pine wood biochars prepared under different thermochemical conditions Environ. Pollut. 186 2014 187 194 24384578
68 Singh E. Kumar A. Mishra R. You S. Singh L. Kumar S. Kumar R. Pyrolysis of waste biomass and plastics for production of biochar and its use for removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution Bioresour. Technol. 320 2021 124278 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124278
69 Das S.K. Ghosh G.K. Avasthe R. Conversion of crop, weed and tree biomass into biochar for heavy metal removal and wastewater treatment Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 13 2023 4901 4914 10.1007/s13399-021-01334-y
70 Hasan M.S. Geza M. Vasquez R. Chilkoor G. Gadhamshetty V. Enhanced Heavy Metal Removal from Synthetic Stormwater Using Nanoscale Zerovalent Iron–Modified Biochar Water Air Soil Pollut. 231 2020 220 10.1007/s11270-020-04588-w
71 Liu C. Ye J. Lin Y. Wu J. Price G.W. Burton D. Wang Y. Removal of Cadmium (II) using water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) biochar alginate beads in aqueous solutions Environ. Pollut. 264 2020 114785 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114785
72 Richards S. Dawson J. Stutter M. The potential use of natural vs commercial biosorbent material to remediate stream waters by removing heavy metal contaminants J. Environ. Manage. 231 2019 275 281 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.019 30347346
73 Pineda E.P. Guaya D. Tituana C. Osorio F. García-Ruiz M.J. Biochar from agricultural by-products for the removal of lead and cadmium from drinking water Water (Switzerland) 12 2020 1 16 10.3390/w12102933
74 Jaiswal K.K. Kumar V. Vlaskin M.S. Nanda M. Verma M. Ahmad W. Kim H. Hydropyrolysis of freshwater macroalgal bloom for bio-oil and biochar production: Kinetics and isotherm for removal of multiple heavy metals Environ. Technol. Innov. 22 2021 101440 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101440
75 Khadem M. Husni Ibrahim A. Mokashi I. Hasan Fahmi A. Noeman Taqui S. Mohanavel V. Hossain N. Baba Koki I. Elfasakhany A. Dhaif-Allah M.A.H. Removal of heavy metals from wastewater using low-cost biochar prepared from jackfruit seed waste Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 13 2023 14447 14456
76 Pal D.B. Singh A. Jha J.M. Srivastava N. Hashem A. Alakeel M.A. Abd Allah E.F. Gupta V.K. Low-cost biochar adsorbents prepared from date and delonix regia seeds for heavy metal sorption Bioresour. Technol. 339 2021 125606 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125606
77 Sajjadi B. Chen W.Y. Mattern D.L. Hammer N. Dorris A. Low-temperature acoustic-based activation of biochar for enhanced removal of heavy metals J. Water Process Eng. 34 2020 101166 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101166
78 Ahmad A. Khan N. Giri B.S. Chowdhary P. Chaturvedi P. Removal of methylene blue dye using rice husk, cow dung and sludge biochar: Characterization, application, and kinetic studies Bioresour. Technol. 306 2020 123202 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123202 32222427
79 Roy K. Verma K. Vikrant K. Goswami M. Sonwani R. Rai B. Vellingiri K. Kim K.H. Giri B. Singh R. Removal of patent blue (V) Dye using indian bael shell biochar: Characterization application and kinetic studies Sustain. Times 10 2018 2669 10.3390/su10082669
80 Bharti V. Vikrant K. Goswami M. Tiwari H. Sonwani R.K. Lee J. Tsang D.C.W. Kim K.H. Saeed M. Kumar S. Biodegradation of methylene blue dye in a batch and continuous mode using biochar as packing media Environ. Res. 171 2019 356 364 10.1016/j.envres.2019.01.051 30716513
81 Dai L. Zhu W. He L. Tan F. Zhu N. Zhou Q. He M. Hu G. Calcium-rich biochar from crab shell: An unexpected super adsorbent for dye removal Bioresour. Technol. 267 2018 510 516 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.090 30048926
82 Ganguly P. Sarkhel R. Das P. Synthesis of pyrolyzed biochar and its application for dye removal: Batch, kinetic and isotherm with linear and non-linear mathematical analysis Surface. Interfac. 20 2020 100616 10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100616
83 Fseha Y.H. Sizirici B. Yildiz I. Manganese and nitrate removal from groundwater using date palm biochar: Application for drinking water Environ. Adv. 8 2022 100237 10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100237
84 Sadeghi Afjeh M. Bagheri Marandi G. Zohuriaan-Mehr M.J. Nitrate removal from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto hydrogel-rice husk biochar composite Water Environ. Res. 92 2020 934 947 10.1002/wer.1288 31854048
85 Tian J. Jin J. Chiu P.C. Cha D.K. Guo M. Imhoff P.T. A pilot-scale, bi-layer bioretention system with biochar and zero-valent iron for enhanced nitrate removal from stormwater Water Res. 148 2019 378 387 10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.030 30396103
86 Li P. Lin K. Fang Z. Wang K. Enhanced nitrate removal by novel bimetallic Fe/Ni nanoparticles supported on biochar J. Clean. Prod. 151 2017 21 33 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.042
87 Ahmed W. Núñez-Delgado A. Mehmood S. Ali S. Qaswar M. Shakoor A. Chen D.Y. Highly efficient uranium (VI) capture from aqueous solution by means of a hydroxyapatite-biochar nanocomposite: Adsorption behavior and mechanism Environ. Res. 201 2021 111518 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111518 34129867
88 Philippou K. Anastopoulos I. Dosche C. Pashalidis I. Synthesis and characterization of a novel Fe3O4-loaded oxidized biochar from pine needles and its application for uranium removal. Kinetic, thermodynamic, and mechanistic analysis J. Environ. Manage. 252 2019 109677 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109677
89 Zhou N. Guo X. Ye C. Yan L. Gu W. Wu X. Zhou Q. Yang Y. Wang X. Cheng Q. Enhanced fluoride removal from drinking water in wide pH range using La/Fe/Al oxides loaded rice straw biochar Water Supply 22 2022 779 794 10.2166/ws.2021.232
90 Yadav K. Jagadevan S. Influence of torrefaction and pyrolysis on engineered biochar and its applicability in defluoridation: Insight into adsorption mechanism, batch adsorber design and artificial neural network modelling J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 154 2021 105015 10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105015
91 Habibi N. Rouhi P. Ramavandi B. Modification of Tamarix hispida Biochar by Lanthanum Chloride for Enhanced Fluoride Adsorption from Synthetic and Real Wastewater Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 38 2019 S298 S305 10.1002/ep.13026
92 Xiao Y. Xue Y. Gao F. Mosa A. Sorption of heavy metal ions onto crayfish shell biochar: effect of pyrolysis temperature, pH and ionic strength J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 80 2017 114 121
93 Zhang H. Xu F. Xue J. Chen S. Wang J. Yang Y. Enhanced removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solution using manganese dioxide-loaded biochar: Behavior and mechanism Sci. Rep. 10 2020 6067 32269275
94 Lin S. Huang W. Yang H. Sun S. Yu J. Recycling application of waste long-root Eichhornia crassipes in the heavy metal removal using oxidized biochar derived as adsorbents Bioresour. Technol. 314 2020 123749 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123749
95 Lee H.S. Shin H.S. Competitive adsorption of heavy metals onto modified biochars: Comparison of biochar properties and modification methods J. Environ. Manage. 299 2021 113651 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113651
96 Chingombe P. Saha B. Wakeman R.J. Surface modification and characterisation of a coal-based activated carbon Carbon N. Y. 43 2005 3132 3143
97 Stankovich S. Piner R.D. Chen X. Wu N. Nguyen S.T. Ruoff R.S. Stable aqueous dispersions of graphitic nanoplatelets via the reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide in the presence of poly (sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) J. Mater. Chem. 16 2006 155 158
98 Thakur A. Kumar R. Sahoo P.K. Uranium and Fluoride Removal from Aqueous Solution Using Biochar: A Critical Review for Understanding the Role of Feedstock Types, Mechanisms, and Modification Methods Water (Switzerland) 14 2022 4063 10.3390/w14244063
99 Sen K. Mishra D. Debnath P. Mondal A. Mondal N.K. Adsorption of Uranium (VI) from Groundwater by Silicon Containing Biochar Supported Iron Oxide Nanoparticle at Elsevier BV 2021 10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100659
100 Li M. Liu H. Chen T. Dong C. Sun Y. Synthesis of magnetic biochar composites for enhanced uranium(VI) adsorption Sci. Total Environ. 651 2019 1020 1028 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.259 30266047
101 Ahmed W. Mehmood S. Qaswar M. Ali S. Khan Z.H. Ying H. Chen D.Y. Núñez-Delgado A. Oxidized biochar obtained from rice straw as adsorbent to remove uranium (VI) from aqueous solutions J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 9 2021 105104 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105104
102 Zhang Z.b. Cao X.H. Liang P. Liu Y.H. Adsorption of uranium from aqueous solution using biochar produced by hydrothermal carbonization J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 295 2013 1201 1208 10.1007/s10967-012-2017-2
103 Kumar S. Loganathan V.A. Gupta R.B. Barnett M.O. An Assessment of U(VI) removal from groundwater using biochar produced from hydrothermal carbonization J. Environ. Manage. 92 2011 2504 2512 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.013 21665352
104 Su M. Tsang D.C.W. Ren X. Shi Q. Tang J. Zhang H. Kong L. Hou L. Song G. Chen D. Removal of U(VI) from nuclear mining effluent by porous hydroxyapatite: Evaluation on characteristics, mechanisms and performance Environ. Pollut. 254 2019 112891 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.07.059
105 Mohan D. Kumar S. Srivastava A. Fluoride removal from ground water using magnetic and nonmagnetic corn stover biochars Ecol. Eng. 73 2014 798 808 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.08.017
106 Oh T.-K. Choi B. Shinogi Y. Chikushi J. Effect of pH conditions on actual and apparent fluoride adsorption by biochar in aqueous phase Water Air Soil Pollut. 223 2012 3729 3738 10.1007/s11270-012-1144-2
107 Goswami R. Kumar M. Removal of fluoride from aqueous solution using nanoscale rice husk biochar Groundw. Sustain. Dev. 7 2018 446 451 10.1016/j.gsd.2017.12.010
108 Sadhu M. Bhattacharya P. Vithanage M. Padmaja Sudhakar P. Adsorptive removal of fluoride using biochar – A potential application in drinking water treatment Sep. Purif. Technol. 278 2021 119106 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119106
109 Sharma M. Rana M. Sharma P. Das S.K. Effect of different organic substrates and plant botanicals on growth and flowering of chincherinchee (Ornithogalum thyrosides Jacq) Indian J. hill farming 29 2016 1
110 Gopi R. Avasthe R.K. Kalita H. Kapoor C. Yadav A. Babu S. Das S.K. Traditional pest and disease management practices in Sikkim Himalayan region Int. J. Bio-Resour. Stress Manag. 7 2016 471 476
111 Sharma P. Sharma K. Das S.K. Ethno medicinal plants uses in health care by the Himalayan tribal people in India Pop Kheti 4 2016 41 45
112 Gopi R. Kapoor C. Kalita H. Das S.K. Avasthe R.K. A new report of downy mildew on buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) caused by Perenospora sp. in Sikkim J. Mycopathol. Res. 53 2015 95 297
113 Kataki S. Chatterjee S. Vairale M.G. Dwivedi S.K. Gupta D.K. Constructed wetland, an eco-technology for wastewater treatment: A review on types of wastewater treated and components of the technology (macrophyte, biolfilm and substrate) J. Environ. Manage. 283 2021 111986 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.111986
114 Qiu Y. Zheng Z. Zhou Z. Sheng G.D. Effectiveness and mechanisms of dye adsorption on a straw-based biochar Bioresour. Technol. 100 2009 5348 5351 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.05.054 19540756
115 Moreno-Castilla C. Adsorption of organic molecules from aqueous solutions on carbon materials Carbon N. Y. 42 2004 83 94
116 Deniz F. Karaman S. Saygideger S.D. Biosorption of a model basic dye onto Pinus brutia Ten.: Evaluating of equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic data Desalination 270 2011 199 205
117 Abu Talha M. Goswami M. Giri B.S. Sharma A. Rai B.N. Singh R.S. Bioremediation of Congo red dye in immobilized batch and continuous packed bed bioreactor by Brevibacillus parabrevis using coconut shell bio-char Bioresour. Technol. 252 2018 37 43 29306127
118 Shakoor M.B. Ye Z.L. Chen S. Engineered biochars for recovering phosphate and ammonium from wastewater : A review Sci. Total Environ. 779 2021 146240 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146240
119 Wu B. Wan J. Zhang Y. Pan B. Lo I.M.C. Selective phosphate removal from water and wastewater using sorption: process fundamentals and removal mechanisms Environ. Sci. Technol. 54 2020 50 66 31804806
120 Adesemuyi M.F. Adebayo M.A. Akinola A.O. Olasehinde E.F. Adewole K.A. Lajide L. Preparation and characterisation of biochars from elephant grass and their utilisation for aqueous nitrate removal: Effect of pyrolysis temperature J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 8 2020 104507 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104507
121 Sui M. Li Y. Jiang Y. Wang L. Zhang W. Sathishkumar K. Zakaria H. Sediment-based biochar facilitates highly efficient nitrate removal: Physicochemical properties, biological responses and potential mechanism Chem. Eng. J. 405 2021 126645 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126645
122 Liu Y. Liu S. Yang Z. Xiao L. Synergetic effects of biochars and denitrifier on nitrate removal Bioresour. Technol. 335 2021 125245 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125245
123 Bock E. Smith N. Rogers M. Coleman B. Reiter M. Benham B. Easton Z.M. Enhanced Nitrate and Phosphate Removal in a Denitrifying Bioreactor with Biochar J. Environ. Qual. 44 2015 605 613 10.2134/jeq2014.03.0111 26023979
124 Divband Hafshejani L. Hooshmand A. Naseri A.A. Mohammadi A.S. Abbasi F. Bhatnagar A. Removal of nitrate from aqueous solution by modified sugarcane bagasse biochar Ecol. Eng. 95 2016 101 111 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.06.035
125 Kookana R.S. Sarmah A.K. Van Zwieten L. Krull E. Singh B. Biochar application to soil: agronomic and environmental benefits and unintended consequences Adv. Agron. 112 2011 103 143
126 Almanassra I.W. Mckay G. Kochkodan V. Ali Atieh M. Al-Ansari T. A state of the art review on phosphate removal from water by biochars Chem. Eng. J. 409 2021 128211 10.1016/j.cej.2020.128211
127 Ramola S. Belwal T. Li C.J. Liu Y.X. Wang Y.Y. Yang S.M. Zhou C.H. Preparation and application of novel rice husk biochar–calcite composites for phosphate removal from aqueous medium J. Clean. Prod. 299 2021 126802 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126802
128 Ramola S. Belwal T. Li C.J. Wang Y.Y. Lu H.H. Yang S.M. Zhou C.H. Improved lead removal from aqueous solution using novel porous bentonite-and calcite-biochar composite Sci. Total Environ. 709 2020 136171
129 Thines K.R. Abdullah E.C. Mubarak N.M. Effect of process parameters for production of microporous magnetic biochar derived from agriculture waste biomass Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 253 2017 29 39
130 Saadat S. Raei E. Talebbeydokhti N. Enhanced removal of phosphate from aqueous solutions using a modified sludge derived biochar: Comparative study of various modifying cations and RSM based optimization of pyrolysis parameters J. Environ. Manage. 225 2018 75 83 30071368
131 Krishna Veni D. Kannan P. Jebakumar Immanuel Edison T.N. Senthilkumar A. Biochar from green waste for phosphate removal with subsequent disposal Waste Manag. 68 2017 752 759 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.06.032 28666631
132 Yao Y. Gao B. Inyang M. Zimmerman A.R. Cao X. Pullammanappallil P. Yang L. Removal of phosphate from aqueous solution by biochar derived from anaerobically digested sugar beet tailings J. Hazard Mater. 190 2011 501 507 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.03.083 21497441
133 Ahmad M. Rajapaksha A.U. Lim J.E. Zhang M. Bolan N. Mohan D. Vithanage M. Lee S.S. Ok Y.S. Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water : A review Chemosphere 99 2014 19 33 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.071 24289982
134 Wang J. Wang S. Preparation, modification and environmental application of biochar: a review J. Clean. Prod. 227 2019 1002 1022 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.282
135 Sohi S.P. Krull E. Lopez-Capel E. Bol R.B.T.-A. Chapter 2 - A Review of Biochar and Its Use and Function in Soil Advances in Agronomy 2010 Academic Press 47 82 10.1016/S0065-2113(10)05002-9
136 Nguyen T.B. Sherpa K. Bui X.T. Nguyen V.T. Vo T.D.H. Ho H.T.T. Chen C.W. Dong C.D. Biochar for soil remediation: A comprehensive review of current research on pollutant removal Environ. Pollut. 337 2023 122571 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122571
137 Beesley L. Moreno-Jiménez E. Gomez-Eyles J.L. Harris E. Robinson B. Sizmur T. A review of biochars’ potential role in the remediation, revegetation and restoration of contaminated soils Environ. Pollut. 159 2011 3269 3282 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.07.023 21855187
138 Ding Y. Liu Y. Liu S. Li Z. Tan X. Huang X. Zeng G. Zhou L. Zheng B. Biochar to improve soil fertility Agron. Sustain. Dev. 36 2016 36 10.1007/s13593-016-0372-z
139 Semida W.M. Beheiry H.R. Sétamou M. Simpson C.R. Abd El-Mageed T.A. Rady M.M. Nelson S.D. Biochar implications for sustainable agriculture and environment: A review South African J. Bot. 127 2019 333 347 10.1016/j.sajb.2019.11.015
140 Kumar A. Bhattacharya T. Removal of Arsenic by Wheat Straw Biochar from Soil Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 108 2022 415 422 10.1007/s00128-020-03095-2 33420803
141 Zhao Z. Liu L. Sun Y. Xie L. Liu S. Li M. Yu Q. Combined microbe-plant remediation of cadmium in saline-alkali soil assisted by fungal mycelium-derived biochar Environ. Res. 240 2024 117424 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117424
142 Wang X. Guo Q. Wang X. Jia Y. Chen W. Zhang Q. Yuan J. Study on the effects of new developed biochar and sludge composite materials on copper and lead contaminated soil and its remediation mechanism Environ. Technol. Innov. 32 2023 103429 10.1016/j.eti.2023.103429
143 Khan A.Z. Khan S. Ayaz T. Brusseau M.L. Khan M.A. Nawab J. Muhammad S. Popular wood and sugarcane bagasse biochars reduced uptake of chromium and led by lettuce from mine-contaminated soil Environ. Pollut. 263 2020 114446 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114446
144 Zhang L. Hu J. Li C. Chen Y. Zheng L. Ding D. Shan S. Synergistic mechanism of iron manganese supported biochar for arsenic remediation and enzyme activity in contaminated soil J. Environ. Manage. 347 2023 119127 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119127
145 Liu Y. Huang J. Xu H. Zhang Y. Hu T. Chen W. Hu H. Wu J. Li Y. Jiang G. A magnetic macro-porous biochar sphere as vehicle for the activation and removal of heavy metals from contaminated agricultural soil Chem. Eng. J. 390 2020 124638 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124638
146 Wan X. Li C. Parikh S.J. Simultaneous removal of arsenic, cadmium, and lead from soil by iron-modified magnetic biochar Environ. Pollut. 261 2020 114157 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114157
147 Achor S. Aravis C. Heaney N. Odion E. Lin C. Response of organic acid-mobilized heavy metals in soils to biochar application Geoderma 378 2020 114628 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114628
148 Karami N. Clemente R. Moreno-Jiménez E. Lepp N.W. Beesley L. Efficiency of green waste compost and biochar soil amendments for reducing lead and copper mobility and uptake to ryegrass J. Hazard Mater. 191 2011 41 48 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.04.025 21565444
149 Uchimiya M. Klasson K.T. Wartelle L.H. Lima I.M. Influence of soil properties on heavy metal sequestration by biochar amendment: 1. Copper sorption isotherms and the release of cations Chemosphere 82 2011 1431 1437 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.11.050 21147495
150 Almaroai Y.A. Usman A.R.A. Ahmad M. Moon D.H. Cho J.S. Joo Y.K. Jeon C. Lee S.S. Ok Y.S. Effects of biochar, cow bone, and eggshell on Pb availability to maize in contaminated soil irrigated with saline water Environ. Earth Sci. 71 2014 1289 1296 10.1007/s12665-013-2533-6
151 Rao M.A. Di Rauso Simeone G. Scelza R. Conte P. Biochar based remediation of water and soil contaminated by phenanthrene and pentachlorophenol Chemosphere 186 2017 193 201 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.07.125 28778017
152 Ahmad M. Soo Lee S. Yang J.E. Ro H.M. Han Lee Y. Sik Ok Y. Effects of soil dilution and amendments (mussel shell, cow bone, and biochar) on Pb availability and phytotoxicity in military shooting range soil Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 79 2012 225 231 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.01.003 22266035
153 Cao X. Ma L. Liang Y. Gao B. Harris W. Simultaneous immobilization of lead and atrazine in contaminated soils using dairy-manure biochar Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 2011 4884 4889 10.1021/es103752u 21542567
154 Wang Y.-Y. You L.-C. Lyu H.-H. Liu Y.-X. He L.-L. Hu Y.-D. Luo F.-C. Yang S.-M. Role of biochar–mineral composite amendment on the immobilization of heavy metals for Brassica chinensis from naturally contaminated soil Environ. Technol. Innov. 28 2022 102622 10.1016/j.eti.2022.102622
155 Xu M. Dai W. Zhao Z. Zheng J. Huang F. Mei C. Huang S. Liu C. Wang P. Xiao R. Effect of rice straw biochar on three different levels of Cd-contaminated soils: Cd availability, soil properties, and microbial communities Chemosphere 301 2022 134551 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134551
156 Hannan F. Islam F. Huang Q. Farooq M.A. Ayyaz A. Fang R. Ali B. Xie X. Zhou W. Interactive effects of biochar and mussel shell activated concoctions on immobilization of nickel and their amelioration on the growth of rapeseed in contaminated aged soil Chemosphere 282 2021 130897 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130897
157 Yao P. Zhou H. Li X. Wei L. Wang J. Zhang S. Ye X. Effect of biochar on the accumulation and distribution of cadmium in tobacco (Yunyan 87) at different developmental stages Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 207 2021 111295 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111295
158 Moradi N. Karimi A. Effect of modified corn residue biochar on chemical fractions and bioavailability of cadmium in contaminated soil Chem. Ecol. 37 2021 252 267 10.1080/02757540.2020.1858816
159 Turan V. Calcite in combination with olive pulp biochar reduces Ni mobility in soil and its distribution in chili plant Int. J. Phytoremediation 24 2022 166 176 10.1080/15226514.2021.1929826 34053385
160 Beesley L. Moreno-jiménez E. Gomez-eyles J.L. Effects of biochar and greenwaste compost amendments on mobility , bioavailability and toxicity of inorganic and organic contaminants in a multi-element polluted soil Environ. Pollut. 158 2010 2282 2287 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.02.003 20219274
161 Das S. Mohanty S. Sahu G. Rana M. Pilli K. Biochar: A Sustainable Approach for Improving Soil Health and Environment Vieira A. Rodrigues S.C. IntechOpen Ch. 7 2021 10.5772/intechopen.97136
162 Singh H. Northup B.K. Rice C.W. Prasad P.V.V. Biochar applications influence soil physical and chemical properties, microbial diversity, and crop productivity: a meta-analysis Biochar 4 2022 8 17 10.1007/s42773-022-00138-1
163 Hossain M.Z. Bahar M.M. Sarkar B. Donne S.W. Ok Y.S. Palansooriya K.N. Kirkham M.B. Chowdhury S. Bolan N. Biochar and its Importance on Nutrient Dynamics in Soil and Plant 2020 Springer 10.1007/s42773-020-00065-z
164 Abrishamkesh S. Gorji M. Asadi H. Bagheri-Marandi G.H. Pourbabaee A.A. Effects of rice husk biochar application on the propertiesof alkaline soil and lentil growth Plant Soil Environ. 61 2015 475 482 10.17221/117/2015-PSE
165 Yeboah E. Ofori P. Quansah G.W. Dugan E. Sohi S.P. Improving soil productivity through biochar amendments to soils African J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 3 2009 34 41
166 Montagnoli A. Baronti S. Alberto D. Chiatante D. Scippa G.S. Terzaghi M. Pioneer and fibrous root seasonal dynamics of Vitis vinifera L. are affected by biochar application to a low fertility soil: A rhizobox approach Sci. Total Environ. 751 2021 141455 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141455
167 Abujabhah I.S. Doyle R. Bound S.A. Bowman J.P. The effect of biochar loading rates on soil fertility, soil biomass, potential nitrification, and soil community metabolic profiles in three different soils J. Soils Sediments 16 2016 2211 2222 10.1007/s11368-016-1411-8
168 Khan S. Wang N. Reid B.J. Freddo A. Cai C. Reduced bioaccumulation of PAHs by Lactuca satuva L. grown in contaminated soil amended with sewage sludge and sewage sludge derived biochar Environ. Pollut. 175 2013 64 68 10.1016/j.envpol.2012.12.014 23337353
169 Singh B. Singh B.P. Cowie A.L. Characterisation and evaluation of biochars for their application as a soil amendment Soil Res. 48 2010 516 525 10.1071/SR10058
170 Lee J.W. Kidder M. Evans B.R. Paik S. Buchanan A.C. Garten C.T. Brown R.C. Characterization of biochars produced from cornstovers for soil amendment Environ. Sci. Technol. 44 2010 7970 7974 10.1021/es101337x 20836548
171 Butnan S. Deenik J.L. Toomsan B. Antal M.J. Vityakon P. Biochar characteristics and application rates affecting corn growth and properties of soils contrasting in texture and mineralogy Geoderma 237 2015 105 116 10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.08.010
172 van Zwieten L. Kimber S. Morris S. Chan K.Y. Downie A. Rust J. Joseph S. Cowie A. Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility Plant Soil 327 2010 235 246 10.1007/s11104-009-0050-x
173 Akhtar S.S. Li G. Neumann M. Liu F. Biochar enhances yield and quality of tomato under reduced irrigation Agric. Water Manag. 138 2014 37 44 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.02.016
174 Akhtar S.S. Andersen M.N. Liu F. Biochar Mitigates Salinity Stress in Potato J. Agron. Crop Sci. 201 2015 368 378 10.1111/jac.12132
175 Abewa A. Yitaferu B. Selassie Y.G. Tadele Amare T. The Role of Biochar on Acid Soil Reclamation and Yield of Teff (Eragrostis tef [Zucc] Trotter) in Northwestern Ethiopia J. Agric. Sci. 6 2013 1 12 10.5539/jas.v6n1p1
176 Chan K.Y.A. Van Zwieten L. Meszaros I.A. Downie A.C. Joseph S.D. Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment Aust. J. Soil Res. 45 2007 629 634
177 Tang B. Xu H. Song F. Ge H. Chen L. Yue S. Yang W. Effect of biochar on immobilization remediation of Cd-contaminated soil and environmental quality Environ. Res. 204 2022 111840 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111840
178 Mohamed I. Ali M. Ahmed N. Chen F. Cadmium immobilization and alleviation of its toxicity for soybean grown in a clay loam contaminated soil using sugarcane bagasse-derived biochar Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 26 2019 21849 21857 10.1007/s11356-019-05501-7 31134549
179 Wu Y. Xu G. Shao H.B. Furfural and its biochar improve the general properties of a saline soil Solid Earth 5 2014 665 671 10.5194/se-5-665-2014
180 Maraseni T.N. Qu J. An international comparison of agricultural nitrous oxide emissions J. Clean. Prod. 135 2016 1256 1266 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.035
181 Singh J.S. Singh C. Biochar applications in agriculture and environment management Biochar Appl. Agric. Environ. Manag 1 2020 1 272 10.1007/978-3-030-40997-5
182 Mbow H.-O.P. Reisinger A. Canadell J. O’Brien P. Special Report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems (SR2) Ginevra, IPCC 650 2017
183 Deng S. Chen J. Chang J. Application of biochar as an innovative substrate in constructed wetlands/biofilters for wastewater treatment: Performance and ecological benefits J. Clean. Prod. 293 2021 126156 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126156
184 Smith P. Adams J. Beerling D.J. Beringer T. Calvin K.V. Fuss S. Griscom B. Hagemann N. Kammann C. Kraxner F. Land-Management Options for Greenhouse Gas Removal and Their Impacts on Ecosystem Services and the Sustainable Development Goals Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 44 2019 255 286 10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033129
185 Windeatt J.H. Ross A.B. Williams P.T. Forster P.M. Nahil M.A. Singh S. Characteristics of biochars from crop residues: Potential for carbon sequestration and soil amendment J. Environ. Manage. 146 2014 189 197 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.08.003 25173727
186 Liu W.-J. Jiang H. Yu H.-Q. Development of Biochar-Based Functional Materials: Toward a Sustainable Platform Carbon Material Chem. Rev. 115 2015 12251 12285 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00195 26495747
187 Chan K.Y. Van Zwieten L. Meszaros I. Downie A. Joseph S. Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment Soil Res. 45 2007 629 634
188 Alhashimi H.A. Aktas C.B. Life cycle environmental and economic performance of biochar compared with activated carbon: A meta-analysis Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 118 2017 13 26 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.016
189 Yang Q. Han F. Chen Y. Yang H. Chen H. Greenhouse gas emissions of a biomass-based pyrolysis plant in China Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 53 2016 1580 1590 10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.049
190 Rondon M. Ramirez J.A. Lehmann J. Charcoal additions reduce net emissions of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere Proceedings of the 3rd USDA Symposium on Greenhouse Gases and Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture and Forestry 2005 USDA 21 24
191 Liu X. Wang W. Sardans J. Fang Y. Li Z. Tariq A. Zeng F. Peñuelas J. Legacy effects of slag and biochar application on greenhouse gas emissions mitigation in paddy field: A three-year study Sci. Total Environ. 906 2024 167442 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167442
192 Qi L. Ma Z. Chang S.X. Zhou P. Huang R. Wang Y. Wang Z. Gao M. Biochar decreases methanogenic archaea abundance and methane emissions in a flooded paddy soil Sci. Total Environ. 752 2021 141958 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141958
193 Martínez-Eixarch M. Alcaraz C. Viñas M. Noguerol J. Aranda X. Prenafeta-Boldú F.X. Català-Forner M. Fennessy M.S. Ibáñez C. The main drivers of methane emissions differ in the growing and flooded fallow seasons in Mediterranean rice fields Plant Soil 460 2021 211 227 10.1007/s11104-020-04809-5
194 Jeffery S. Verheijen F.G. Kammann C. Abalos D. Biochar effects on methane emissions from soils: a meta-analysis Soil Biol. Biochem. 101 2016 251 258
195 Feng Y. Xu Y. Yu Y. Xie Z. Lin X. Mechanisms of biochar decreasing methane emission from Chinese paddy soils Soil Biol. Biochem. 46 2012 80 88
196 Wang C. Liu J. Shen J. Chen D. Li Y. Jiang B. Wu J. Effects of biochar amendment on net greenhouse gas emissions and soil fertility in a double rice cropping system: A 4-year field experiment Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 262 2018 83 96 10.1016/j.agee.2018.04.017
197 Duan P. Zhang X. Zhang Q. Wu Z. Xiong Z. Field-aged biochar stimulated N2O production from greenhouse vegetable production soils by nitrification and denitrification Sci. Total Environ. 642 2018 1303 1310 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.166 30045510
198 Wang C. Wang W. Sardans J. Singla A. Zeng C. Lai D.Y.F. Peñuelas J. Effects of steel slag and biochar amendments on CO2, CH4, and N2O flux, and rice productivity in a subtropical Chinese paddy field Environ. Geochem. Health 41 2019 1419 1431 10.1007/s10653-018-0224-7 30535544
199 Lee S. Short-Term Effect of Biochar on Soil Organic Carbon Improvement and Nitrous Oxide Emission Reduction According to Different Soil Characteristics in Agricultural Land : A Laboratory Experiment 2022
200 Wang M. Lan X. Xu X. Fang Y. Singh B.P. Sardans J. Romero E. Peñuelas J. Wang W. Steel slag and biochar amendments decreased CO2 emissions by altering soil chemical properties and bacterial community structure over two-year in a subtropical paddy field Sci. Total Environ. 740 2020 140403 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140403
201 Bruun E.W. Müller-Stöver D. Ambus P. Hauggaard-Nielsen H. Application of biochar to soil and N2O emissions: potential effects of blending fast-pyrolysis biochar with anaerobically digested slurry Eur. J. Soil Sci. 62 2011 581 589 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2011.01377.x
202 Yanai Y. Toyota K. Okazaki M. Effects of charcoal addition on N2O emissions from soil resulting from rewetting air-dried soil in short-term laboratory experiments Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 53 2007 181 188
203 Jia J. Li B. Chen Z. Xie Z. Xiong Z. Effects of biochar application on vegetable production and emissions of N2O and CH4 Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 58 2012 503 509 10.1080/00380768.2012.686436
204 Clough T.J. Bertram J.E. Ray J.L. Condron L.M. O’Callaghan M. Sherlock R.R. Wells N.S. Unweathered Wood Biochar Impact on Nitrous Oxide Emissions from a Bovine-Urine-Amended Pasture Soil Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 74 2010 852 860 10.2136/sssaj2009.0185
205 Van Zwieten L. Kimber S. Downie A. Morris S. Petty S. Rust J. Chan K.Y. A glasshouse study on the interaction of low mineral ash biochar with nitrogen in a sandy soil Soil Res. 48 2010 569 576
206 Lehmann J. Rondon M. Bio-char soil management on highly weathered soils in the humid tropics Biol. Approaches Sustain. Soil Syst. 113 2006 e530
207 Edwards J.D. Pittelkow C.M. Kent A.D. Yang W.H. Dynamic biochar effects on soil nitrous oxide emissions and underlying microbial processes during the maize growing season Soil Biol. Biochem. 122 2018 81 90
208 Parravicini V. Svardal K. Krampe J. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Wastewater Treatment Plants Energy Proc. 97 2016 246 253 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.067
209 Pahunang R.R. Buonerba A. Senatore V. Oliva G. Ouda M. Zarra T. Muñoz R. Puig S. Ballesteros F.C. Li C.W. Advances in technological control of greenhouse gas emissions from wastewater in the context of circular economy Sci. Total Environ. 792 2021 148479 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148479
210 Bao Z. Sun S. Sun D. Characteristics of direct CO2 emissions in four full-scale wastewater treatment plants Desalin. Water Treat. 54 2015 1070 1079 10.1080/19443994.2014.940389
211 Law Y. Jacobsen G.E. Smith A.M. Yuan Z. Lant P. Fossil organic carbon in wastewater and its fate in treatment plants Water Res. 47 2013 5270 5281 10.1016/j.watres.2013.06.002 23863394
212 Monteith H.D. Sahely H.R. MacLean H.L. Bagley D.M. A rational procedure for estimation of greenhouse-gas emissions from municipal wastewater treatment plants Water Environ. Res. 77 2005 390 403 10.2175/106143005x51978 16121507
213 Mašek O. Brownsort P. Cross A. Sohi S. Influence of production conditions on the yield and environmental stability of biochar Fuel 103 2013 151 155 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.08.044
214 Fang Z. Liu F. Li Y. Li B. Yang T. Li R. Influence of microwave-assisted pyrolysis parameters and additives on phosphorus speciation and transformation in phosphorus-enriched biochar derived from municipal sewage sludge J. Clean. Prod. 287 2021 125550 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125550
215 Zheng F. Tan C. Hou W. Huang L. Pan J. Qi S. Does influent COD/N ratio affect nitrogen removal and N2O emission in a novel biochar-sludge amended soil wastewater infiltration system (SWIS)? Water Sci. Technol. 78 2018 347 357 10.2166/wst.2018.304 30101770
216 Guo F. Zhang J. Yang X. He Q. Ao L. Chen Y. Impact of biochar on greenhouse gas emissions from constructed wetlands under various influent chemical oxygen demand to nitrogen ratios Bioresour. Technol. 303 2020 122908 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122908
217 Zhou X. Wang X. Zhang H. Wu H. Enhanced nitrogen removal of low C/N domestic wastewater using a biochar-amended aerated vertical flow constructed wetland Bioresour. Technol. 241 2017 269 275 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.072 28575790
218 Liang Y. Wang Q. Huang L. Liu M. Wang N. Chen Y. Insight into the mechanisms of biochar addition on pollutant removal enhancement and nitrous oxide emission reduction in subsurface flow constructed wetlands: Microbial community structure, functional genes and enzyme activity Bioresour. Technol. 307 2020 123249 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123249
219 Chen X. Zhu H. Yan B. Shutes B. Xing D. Banuelos G. Cheng R. Wang X. Greenhouse gas emissions and wastewater treatment performance by three plant species in subsurface flow constructed wetland mesocosms Chemosphere 239 2020 124795 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124795
220 Gupta S. Srivastava P. Patil S.A. Yadav A.K. A comprehensive review on emerging constructed wetland coupled microbial fuel cell technology: Potential applications and challenges Bioresour. Technol. 320 2021 124376 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124376
221 Kang Y. Zhang J. Xie H. Guo Z. Ngo H.H. Guo W. Liang S. Enhanced nutrient removal and mechanisms study in benthic fauna added surface-flow constructed wetlands: The role of Tubifex tubifex Bioresour. Technol. 224 2017 157 165 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.035 27866806
222 Ji B. Chen J. Mei J. Chang J. Li X. Jia W. Qu Y. Bioresource Technology Roles of biochar media and oxygen supply strategies in treatment performance, greenhouse gas emissions, and bacterial community features of subsurface- flow constructed wetlands Bioresour. Technol. 302 2020 122890 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122890
223 Mitsch W.J. Bernal B. Nahlik A.M. Mander Ü. Zhang L. Anderson C.J. Jørgensen S.E. Brix H. Wetlands, carbon, and climate change Landsc. Ecol. 28 2013 583 597 10.1007/s10980-012-9758-8
224 Lee H.W. Kim Y.M. Kim S. Ryu C. Park S.H. Park Y.K. Review of the use of activated biochar for energy and environmental applications Carbon Lett 26 2018 1 10 10.5714/CL.2018.26.001
225 Osman A.I. Lai Z.Y. Farghali M. Yiin C.L. Elgarahy A.M. Hammad A. Ihara I. Al-Fatesh A.S. Rooney D.W. Yap P.S. Optimizing Biomass Pathways to Bioenergy and Biochar Application in Electricity Generation, Biodiesel Production, and Biohydrogen Production 2023 Springer International Publishing 10.1007/s10311-023-01613-2
226 Cha J.S. Park S.H. Jung S.-C. Ryu C. Jeon J.-K. Shin M.-C. Park Y.-K. Production and utilization of biochar: A review J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 40 2016 1 15
227 Lee J. Kim K.-H. Kwon E.E. Biochar as a catalyst Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 77 2017 70 79
228 Zhang L.L. Zhao X.S. Carbon-based materials as supercapacitor electrodes Chem. Soc. Rev. 38 2009 2520 2531 19690733
229 Li X. Zhang J. Liu B. Su Z. A critical review on the application and recent developments of post-modified biochar in supercapacitors J. Clean. Prod. 310 2021 127428 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127428
230 Mu J. Li Q. Kong X. Wu X. Sunarso J. Zhao Y. Zhou J. Zhuo S. Characterization of hierarchical porous carbons made from bean curd via K2CO3 activation as a supercapacitor electrode Chemelectrochem 6 2019 4022 4030
231 Zhang Y. Gao H. Song X. Kong X. Xu H. Preparation of Hierarchical Porous Carbon from Wheat Bran for Free-Standing Electrode of High Areal Capacitance Supercapacitor Chemelectrochem 6 2019 5486 5491
232 Wu F. Gao J. Zhai X. Xie M. Sun Y. Kang H. Tian Q. Qiu H. Hierarchical porous carbon microrods derived from albizia flowers for high performance supercapacitors Carbon N. Y. 147 2019 242 251
233 Logan B.E. Hamelers B. Rozendal R. Schröder U. Keller J. Freguia S. Aelterman P. Verstraete W. Rabaey K. Microbial fuel cells: Methodology and technology Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 2006 5181 5192 10.1021/es0605016 16999087
234 Logan B.E. Regan J.M. Electricity-producing bacterial communities in microbial fuel cells Trends Microbiol. 14 2006 512 518 10.1016/j.tim.2006.10.003 17049240
235 Hung Y.-H. Liu T.-Y. Chen H.-Y. Renewable coffee waste-derived porous carbons as anode materials for high-performance sustainable microbial fuel cells ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 7 2019 16991 16999
236 Yuan Y. Liu T. Fu P. Tang J. Zhou S. Conversion of sewage sludge into high-performance bifunctional electrode materials for microbial energy harvesting J. Mater. Chem. A 3 2015 8475 8482
237 Wang B. Wang Z. Jiang Y. Tan G. Xu N. Xu Y. Enhanced power generation and wastewater treatment in sustainable biochar electrodes based bioelectrochemical system Bioresour. Technol. 241 2017 841 848 28628988
238 Balajii M. Niju S. Biochar-derived heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production Environ. Chem. Lett. 17 2019 1447 1469
239 Xia C. Surendran S. Ji S. Kim D. Chae Y. Kim J. Je M. Han M. Choe W. Choi C.H. A sulfur self-doped multifunctional biochar catalyst for overall water splitting and a supercapacitor from Camellia japonica flowers Carbon Energy 4 2022 491 505
240 Zhang J. Yang M. Zhao W. Zhang J. Zang L. Biohydrogen production amended with nitrogen-doped biochar Energy Fuels 35 2021 1476 1487
241 Patel A. Mungray A.A. Mungray A.K. Technologies for the recovery of nutrients, water and energy from human urine: A review Chemosphere 259 2020 127372 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127372
242 Özçimen D. Ersoy-Meriçboyu A. Characterization of biochar and bio-oil samples obtained from carbonization of various biomass materials Renew. Energy 35 2010 1319 1324
243 Zhao C. Lv P. Yang L. Xing S. Luo W. Wang Z. Biodiesel synthesis over biochar-based catalyst from biomass waste pomelo peel Energy Convers. Manag. 160 2018 477 485
244 Bhatia S.K. Gurav R. Choi T.-R. Kim H.J. Yang S.-Y. Song H.-S. Park J.Y. Park Y.-L. Han Y.-H. Choi Y.-K. Conversion of waste cooking oil into biodiesel using heterogenous catalyst derived from cork biochar Bioresour. Technol. 302 2020 122872
245 Yao D. Hu Q. Wang D. Yang H. Wu C. Wang X. Chen H. Hydrogen production from biomass gasification using biochar as a catalyst/support Bioresour. Technol. 216 2016 159 164 27240230
246 Kundu R. Ramasubramanian V. Neeli S.T. Ramsurn H. Catalytic pyrolysis of methane to hydrogen over carbon (from cellulose biochar) encapsulated iron nanoparticles Energy Fuels 35 2021 13523 13533
247 Kamali M. Sweygers N. Al-Salem S. Appels L. Aminabhavi T.M. Dewil R. Biochar for soil applications-sustainability aspects, challenges and future prospects Chem. Eng. J. 428 2022 131189 10.1016/j.cej.2021.131189
248 Kavitha B. Reddy P.V.L. Kim B. Lee S.S. Pandey S.K. Kim K.H. Benefits and limitations of biochar amendment in agricultural soils: A review J. Environ. Manage. 227 2018 146 154 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.082 30176434
249 Anyanwu I.N. Alo M.N. Onyekwere A.M. Crosse J.D. Nworie O. Chamba E.B. Influence of biochar aged in acidic soil on ecosystem engineers and two tropical agricultural plants Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 153 2018 116 126 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.02.005 29425842
250 Safaei Khorram M. Fatemi A. Khan M.A. Kiefer R. Jafarnia S. Potential risk of weed outbreak by increasing biochar’s application rates in slow-growth legume, lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) J. Sci. Food Agric. 98 2018 2080 2088 10.1002/jsfa.8689 28940378
251 Zheng J. Chen J. Pan G. Liu X. Zhang X. Li L. Bian R. Cheng K. Jinwei Z. Biochar decreased microbial metabolic quotient and shifted community composition four years after a single incorporation in a slightly acid rice paddy from southwest China Sci. Total Environ. 571 2016 206 217 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.135 27471985
252 Vaccari F.P. Maienza A. Miglietta F. Baronti S. Di Lonardo S. Giagnoni L. Lagomarsino A. Pozzi A. Pusceddu E. Ranieri R. Biochar stimulates plant growth but not fruit yield of processing tomato in a fertile soil Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 207 2015 163 170 10.1016/j.agee.2015.04.015
253 Denyes M.J. Rutter A. Zeeb B.A. Bioavailability assessments following biochar and activated carbon amendment in DDT-contaminated soil Chemosphere 144 2016 1428 1434 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.10.029 26495827
254 Gwenzi W. Chaukura N. Mukome F.N.D. Machado S. Nyamasoka B. Biochar production and applications in sub-Saharan Africa: Opportunities, constraints, risks and uncertainties J. Environ. Manage. 150 2015 250 261 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.11.027 25521347
255 Kim H.-S. Kim K.-R. Kim H.-J. Yoon J.-H. Yang J.E. Ok Y.S. Owens G. Kim K.-H. Effect of biochar on heavy metal immobilization and uptake by lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) in agricultural soil Environ. Earth Sci. 74 2015 1249 1259 10.1007/s12665-015-4116-1
256 Joseph S. Kammann C.I. Shepherd J.G. Conte P. Schmidt H.-P. Hagemann N. Rich A.M. Marjo C.E. Allen J. Munroe P. Microstructural and associated chemical changes during the composting of a high temperature biochar: Mechanisms for nitrate, phosphate and other nutrient retention and release Sci. Total Environ. 618 2018 1210 1223 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.200 29126641
