
==== Front
Curr Treat Options Oncol
Curr Treat Options Oncol
Current Treatment Options in Oncology
1527-2729
1534-6277
Springer US New York

39102167
1234
10.1007/s11864-024-01234-z
Article
Management Approaches for High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Perineural Invasion: An Updated Review
Catalano Martina martina.catalano@unifi.it

1
Nozzoli Filippo 2
De Logu Francesco 1
Nassini Romina 1
Roviello Giandomenico 1
1 https://ror.org/04jr1s763 grid.8404.8 0000 0004 1757 2304 Section of Clinical Pharmacology & Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
2 https://ror.org/04jr1s763 grid.8404.8 0000 0004 1757 2304 Section of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
5 8 2024
5 8 2024
2024
25 9 11841192
11 6 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Opinion Statement

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) stands as the second most prevalent non-melanoma skin cancer worldwide, comprising approximately 20% of all cutaneous malignancies. Determining its precise incidence poses challenges; however, reports indicate a global increase in its prevalence. At the time of diagnosis, the majority of cSCCs are localized, resulting in favorable 5-year cure rates surpassing 90%. Nevertheless, a subset of patients (3–7%) encounters locally advanced or metastatic cSCC, leading to substantial morbidity and mortality. The risk of metastasis ranges from 0.1% to 9.9%, carrying an associated mortality risk of 2.8%. Factors influencing recurrence, metastasis, and disease-specific mortality underscore the significance of perineural invasion (PNI) as a key indicator. Patients with PNI may manifest clinical symptoms and/or radiologic signs of PNI, while the majority remain asymptomatic, and PNI is frequently identified upon histologic examination. Despite its lower frequency compared to other cancer types, PNI serves as a recognized adverse prognostic factor for cSCC. Surgery is the elective treatment for these patients, while the role of adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) is yet contentious and have not been conclusively assessed, particularly in clear surgical margin. Prospective comparative studies are required to comprehensively evaluate the benefit and the risks of ART for cSCC and PNI patients.

Keywords

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
Perineural invasion
Adjuvant therapy
Surgery
Università degli Studi di FirenzeOpen access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Firenze within the CRUI-CARE Agreement.

issue-copyright-statement© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common non-melanoma skin cancer, constituting about 20% of global cutaneous malignancies [1, 2]. Determining its frequency precisely poses challenges, but reports to the World Health Organization indicate a worldwide increase in occurrence [3], with an annual rate of about 100 cases per 100,000 individuals in the United States [3, 4].

cSCC originates from epidermal keratinocytes, primarily affecting individuals with fair or light skin. Contributing factors include fair complexion, UV radiation exposure, advanced age, male gender, immunosuppression, smoking, and genetic predisposition [5, 6]. Most cSCCs are diagnosed in a localized state, with over 90% cure rates within 5 years [7]. However, a subset of patients faces locally advanced or metastatic cSCC, with 3–7% reporting metastasis, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. High-risk variations can exhibit metastatic rates as high as 37% [8].

High-risk cSCC, staged as N0 (lacking detectable regional lymph nodes) and M0 (devoid of distant metastasis), presents features linked to an elevated risk of local recurrence and metastasis [9]. For instance, high-risk cutaneous SCC in the head and neck region has a risk exceeding 5% for recurrence, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis due to patient and primary lesion characteristics. A significant proportion of cSCC metastases occur within the initial two years, predominantly involving locally invasive cSCC or nodal metastases [10].

Among factors linked to recurrence, metastasis, and mortality, perineural invasion (PNI) is highlighted as an indicator of heightened malignant potential [11]. PNI involves the microscopic identification of tumor proximity to nerve fibers, with the underlying mechanism remaining largely undisclosed. The incidence of PNI varies across cancer types, being infrequent in skin carcinoma (approximately 2% of basal cell carcinomas and 3% of HNcSCC). Individuals affected by PNI report sensory disturbances, emphasizing the need for early detection and improved risk assessment to reduce morbidity and mortality.

Perineural Invasion in cSCC

PNI is defined as the invasion of tumor cells into the perineural space of a peripheral nerve. This process is commonly held responsible to precede the perineural spread (PNS) that is by definition more advanced, being radiologically or clinically apparent, which takes place when tumor cells spread along the peripheral nerve within the perineural space away from the initial point of invasion [12]. PNI can be considered into two categories: clinical PNI (cPNI) and incidental PNI (iPNI). cPNI is qualified as evidence of spread along large caliber nerves, radiologically detected, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) recognized as the most sensitive imaging technique for diagnosis [13], or clinically significant. The definition of cPNI is particularly relevant in the head and neck region where critical cranial nerves such as the facial and trigeminal nerves can be involved, resulting in symptoms such as pain, paresthesia, anesthesia, or paralysis. iPNI is defined as invasion of nerves identified by histological examination and represents small caliber nerves involvement. It is estimated that between 60 and 70% of patients with PNI present with incidental findings [14]. However, there is no unanimous agreement on the histopathological definition of PNI and its assessment remains controversial [15–18].

Karia et al. conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis, encompassing a total of 640 tumors in 622 patients, which examined cases exhibiting either cPNI or iPNI [19]. Predominantly, the cSCC tumors (67%) were localized in the head and neck region. Among the cases examined, 20.8% of the cSCC instances were recurrent at the time of data collection. The analysis revealed no statistically significant variance in the risk of nodal and distant metastasis based on the PNI classification. However, it was observed that patients with cPNI faced a notably elevated risk of local recurrence and death attributed to cSCC in comparison to those with iPNI. Specifically, the figures indicated that patients with cPNI experienced higher rates of local recurrence (37% vs. 17%; p < 0.001) and mortality due to cSCC (27% vs. 6%; p < 0.001) than their iPNI counterparts. Conversely, individuals with iPNI exhibited a superior 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate when compared to those with cPNI (DSS, 88% vs. 70%; p = 0.002). Moreover, the overall 5-year OS rate was found to be higher for patients with cPNI than those with iPNI (66% vs. 43%; p = 0.003). It should be noted that the study cohorts comprised predominantly of elderly patients, who are inherently at an augmented risk of mortality due to numerous factors beyond cSCC.

Conversely, Cohen et al. recently presented retrospective data based on 104 patients diagnosed with HNcSCC, of which 61 exhibited PNI [20]. Histopathological examination revealed that 28 lesions displayed complete encirclement of nerves, 10 involved more than five nerves, and 12 implicated named nerves. Notably, patients presenting with facial weakness and positive surgical margins exhibited an elevated probability of histopathologic PNI. The study demonstrated a poorer disease-free survival (DFS) outcome in patients with PNI (p = 0.004), advanced tumor staging (p = 0.049), positive margins (p = 0.014), and involvement of more than five nerves (p = 0.0061). Histopathologic PNI, particularly when more than five nerves were involved, emerged as a predictor of DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 3.07; 95% CI, 0.33–1.38; p = 0.0061) both in the overall cohort and among patients with cPNI (HR, 3.43; 95% CI, 1.65–7.10; p = 0.00091). These findings suggest that cPNI may serve as a more potent prognostic indicator for survival than PNI in its entirety. Furthermore, DFS was markedly worse in patients displaying PNI, facial nerve weakness, advanced T stage, positive margins, and multiple nerve involvement.

These findings underscore the critical importance of meticulously assessing signs and symptoms of PNI during the initial clinical evaluation. Patients with cPNI may necessitate more aggressive treatment modalities and vigilant monitoring for potential recurrence post-treatment. It is advisable to consider continued long-term surveillance, employing MRI every six months for a duration of two to three years following treatment (refs if available). The decision should be tailored to individual patient preferences, age, and concurrent medical conditions. Timely detection and subsequent intervention hold the potential to enhance overall survival, although the precise efficacy of radiological surveillance remains insufficiently quantified.

Staging Systems and Risk’ Categories

The diagnosis of cSCC relies on clinical characteristics, confirmed through histological analysis. In cases with suspicious lesions, it is crucial to perform a biopsy or excision for histopathological confirmation [7]. This procedure is essential for accurate prognostic classification and appropriate therapeutic management.

Existing standards for cSCC classification are embodied in the AJCC and BWH systems [10, 21]. According to AJCC 8th edition staging, tumors are categorized based on size, with T3 upstaging indicating high-risk features [22]. Confirmed high-risk histologic features include PNI, tumor thickness > 2 mm, Clark level IV or V invasion, primary site on the ear or lip, and poor differentiation [23]. UICC classifies tumors primarily based on diameter, while BWH considers risk factors to determine T classification.

European guidelines propose intrinsic high-risk factors, including clinical diameter, localization, thickness, poor differentiation, desmoplasia, PNI, bone erosion, and immunosuppression. Positive surgical margins are considered an extrinsic high-risk factor [7].

NCCN guidelines distinguish between low and high-risk cSCC, with high-risk attributes encompassing advanced local disease, regional lymph node involvement, PNI, recurrence, and immunosuppression [24]. NCCN further differentiates between "high-risk" and "very high-risk" based on distinct pathological features, such as the presence of tumor cells within the nerve sheath of a nerve located deeper than the dermis or measuring ≥ 0.1 mm [24].

The variability in high-risk factors emphasizes the need for further empirical evidence to establish their correlation with prognosis. Comparison between different staging systems and their risk based on PNI is summarized in Table 1. Table 1 Summary of tumor risk classification based on the perineural invasion

Staging system (year), ref	Perineural invasion definition	Risk class	
NCCN (Version 1.2024), [24]	Perineural invasion-dermal only (nerve diameter < 0.1 mm)

Tumor cells within the nerve sheath of a nerve lying deeper than the dermis or measuring ≥ 0.1 mm (large PNI)

	High-risk

Very high-risk

	
AJCC 8th Edition (2017), [22]	Tumor cells in the nerve sheath of a nerve lying deeper than the dermis or measuring ≥ 0.1 mm in caliber or presenting with clinical or radiographic of named nerves	High-risk	
BWH (2019), [21]	Perineural invasion of nerve(s) ≥ 0.1 mm in caliber or tumor invasion beyond subcutaneous fat	T2a-T3*	
BAD (2020), [25]	Perineural invasion-dermal only (nerve diameter < 0.1 mm)

Perineural invasion present in named nerve; nerve diameter ≥ 0.1 mm; or nerve beyond dermis

	High risk

Very high risk

	
NCCN national comprehensive cancer network, AJCC American joint committee on cancer, BWH Brigham and women's hospital, BAD British association of dermatologists. *based on the number of risk factors

Management of cSCC with PNI

Current prognostic indicators for recurrence, pivotal in determining the appropriate course of definitive or adjuvant therapies, are grounded in clinicopathologic attributes expounded within solitary-center or expansive clinical investigations, or consensus conventions. These indicators have been formulated by assimilating local staging, site, depth, and pathological attributes.

Surgical Treatment

Surgery holds its place as the foremost therapeutic intervention in addressing cSCC. Main treatment objectives revolve around complete elimination of the tumor while preserving functional integrity and favorable cosmetic outcomes. In scenarios where surgical intervention is unfeasible, such as cases involving locally advanced disease or elderly patients with concurrent medical conditions, radiotherapy (RT) is the primary therapeutic strategy [26]. Prevailing clinical guidelines provide clear and definitive recommendations regarding primary treatments for high-risk cSCC. The objective of surgical excision is to achieve both clinical and microscopic comprehensive resection (R0 surgery), securing unambiguous (negative) histological margins [27].

In accordance with the European guidelines, a clinical safety margin of 5 mm is advised for lesions categorized as low-risk [27]. On the other hand, cases of high-risk cSCC call for a clinical safety margin ranging between 6 to 10 mm, or alternatively, an approach involving micrographically controlled surgery (MCS). MCS entails surgical excision followed by horizontal section processing of skin tissue, subjected to microscopic examination. This iterative process continues until the absence of cancerous cells is ascertained at the surgical margins, based on anatomical documentation. Within the realm of MCS, methodologies like Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) and 3D histology are embraced, utilizing frozen sections and paraffin sections respectively, to analyze tissue specimens [27]).

Chung et al. investigated the occurrence and risk factors associated with histopathologic upgrading of cSCC during MMS [28]. The term "upgrade" was defined as the identification of a less advanced degree of differentiation (poor or moderate) and/or the presence of bone or perineural invasion during MMS, which had not been initially detected in the histopathological evaluation of the initial biopsy. Among the 1558 tumors that underwent examination, 115 (7.4%) were subjected to upgrading during MMS. Through a comprehensive analysis involving multivariate logistic regression, it was found that male gender, prior field treatment, location on the ear/lip, rapid cSCC growth, and a tumor diameter exceeding ≥ 2 cm were all notable predictors of tumor upgrading. Those tumors that experienced upgrading appeared to necessitate more than three stages of MMS for adequate clearance, intricate closure methods such as flaps or grafts, or referral-based repairs.

Soleymani et al., observed that the cohort of high-risk cSCC cases treated with MMS exhibited decreased incidences of local recurrence (LR), nodal metastasis (NM), and disease-specific death (DSD) in comparison to historical reference controls [29]. This assessment was conducted by utilizing both the staging systems of BWH and the AJCC 8th edition. The study also revealed that MMS confers a survival advantage specific to the disease over the historical approach of wide local excision in the management of high-risk tumors. Furthermore, the enhancement of local tumor control with MMS appears to contribute to a reduction in the occurrence of regional metastatic disease, and it is plausible that MMS might confer a survival benefit even for patients who develop regional metastases [29]. An extensive meta-analysis by Fraga et al. underscores a diminished rate of locoregional recurrence associated with complete margin assessment in comparison to sectional assessment [30]. The discrepancy is particularly pronounced in cases of high-risk keratinocyte carcinomas and cSCC characterized by PNI. Therefore, the strategy of peripheral and deep end face margin assessment (PDEMA), advocates for excision in combination with meticulous histological evaluation of the peripheral and deep excision surgical margins, positioning it as the standardized therapeutic protocol.

While varying guidelines put forth differing recommendations concerning safety margin dimensions for high-risk cSCC, a consensus exists that wider margins are imperative for high-risk cases as opposed to low-risk tumors. Recommendations regarding margin sizes are primarily rooted in expert consensus, retrospective studies, and observational analyses. The overarching goal remains the achievement of negative surgical margins whenever feasible, with the consideration of re-excision in cases of positive margins, as deemed practicable.

Adjuvant Therapy

Adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) has been regarded as a treatment option for patients with high-risk cSCC (59). Figure 1 summarize the recommendations on ART in current guidelines. Nevertheless, the advantages of ART, particularly after achieving clear surgical margins, remain contentious and have not been conclusively assessed. Thus, substantial variation in the application of ART for cSCC. Certain studies reported in this analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference in survival outcomes between surgery and a combined approach involving surgery and ART (Table 2).Fig. 1 Current adjuvant radiotherapy recommendations for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell cancer. Created with BioRender.com

Table 2 Adjuvant radiotherapy in cSCC

Authors	Type of study	Population	N of patients	Intervention	Outcomes	Findings	
Ebrahimi et al	Retrospective study	Patients with metastatic cSCC (a single parotid gland or neck nodal metastasis 3 cm)	168	Surgery ± ART	5 y DFS for patients treated with surgery alone: 97%

RCR:87% vs. 91% with or without ART (p = 0.054)

	No 5 y DSS difference between surgery alone group and surgery plus ART group	
Zhang et al	Systematic review and meta-analysis	Patients with cSCC	2605	Surgery ± ART	ART reduce recurrence (OR, 0.56; p = 0.006) and prolong DFS (OR, 2.17; p = 0.008) and OS (OR: 2.94; p < 0.0001) in comparison with surgery alone

ART resulted in a non-significant benefit in DSS (OR, 1.35; p = 0.76)

	In cSCC patients with risk factors, including metastasis to the parotid gland, PNI and immunosuppression, the use of ART may be beneficial irrespective of surgical margin status	
Kim et al	Meta-analyses	High-risk cSCC patients	3867	Surgery ± ART	LR for the surgery alone vs. the surgery plus ART: 15.2% vs. 8.8%;

RM: 11.5% vs. 4%;

DM: 2.6% vs. 1.7%;

DSD: 8.2% vs.19.7%

	There are no significant differences in poor outcomes between the surgery only group and the surgery with ART group	
Stevenson et al	Retrospective study	Patients with SCC with PNI	31	Surgery ± ART	5-year DFS for patients treated with ART vs. those who did not receive ART: 100% vs. 68.8%	ART led to better DFS in cases of large-caliber PNI and small-caliber with other high-risk factors	
Jambusaria-Pahlajani et al	Systematic review	High-risk SCC patients	2449 (74 with PNI)	Surgery ± ART	No significant difference in outcomes of PNI cSCC between those treated with surgery and surgery plus ART	In cases of PNI, the extent of nerve involvement appears to affect outcomes, with involvement of larger nerves imparting a worse prognosis	
Garcia-Serra et al	Retrospective study	Patients with microscopic or clinical PNI of SCC	135	Radiotherapy ± surgery	5-year local control rates without salvage therapy in microscopic PNI vs. clinical PNI: 87% vs. 55%	Risk of local recurrence more than doubled in cases with advanced PNI (symptomatic or radiologically confirmed)	
Canueto et al	Retrospective study	cSCCs with PNI	110	Surgery + ART	The risk of DSPOs is 0.328 times in primary cSCC with PNI managed with ART (p = 0.006)

The risk of DSPOs is 0.248 times for patients managed with nerves involved ≥ 0.1 mm ART (p = 0.008)

	Postoperative radiotherapy improved outcomes for cSCC with PNI (mainly if large caliber) and positive margins	
Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, cSCC adjuvant radiotherapy, ART perineural invasion, PNI regional control rate, RCR local recurrence, LR regional metastases, RM distant metastases, DM disease-specific deaths, DSD disease-free survival, DFS disease-specific poor outcome events (DSPOs)(include local recurrence, metastasis (either to the parotid gland or to the lymph nodes), in-transit metastasis and disease-specific death)

In the study by Ebrahimi et al., the regional control rate stood at 91% vs. 87% (p = 0.054), and the average number of adverse features was 1.1 vs. 1.3 in the surgery-only and combined therapy groups, respectively [31]. However, this study revealed that 80% of patients with close margins, extracapsular spread (ECS), or other risk factors received ART, whereas over half of those treated solely with surgery did not have ECS. In other studies, ART was administered to patients with regional metastasis; this context potentially contributed to the absence of significant outcomes in these studies, given the potentially worse patient condition in the ART group [32, 33]. The pooled analysis conducted by Zhang et al., suggests potential benefits of ART in reducing recurrence rates and enhancing survival, both in the general population and in the subgroup with clear surgical margins [34]. Notably, studies demonstrating a survival benefit after ART often featured metastatic cSCC involving the parotid gland or regional lymph nodes, a common risk factor for significantly worse survival.

A meta-analysis by Kim et al. investigated the comparative risk of unfavorable outcomes among patients subjected to surgical intervention as opposed to those receiving both surgical treatment and ART [35]. The study encompassed a compilation of thirty-three investigations, enlisting a collective cohort of 3867 cases featuring high-risk cSCCs. They showed that for individuals harboring high-risk cSCCs who underwent margin-negative resections, the distinction in unfavorable outcomes between those subjected to surgical procedures and those receiving surgery with adjunctive radiotherapy was not different. However, retrospective analyses have underscored the efficacy of ART in cSCC patients with negative surgical margins, especially in cases featuring T3 stage, PNI > 0.1 mm, and poor histopathologic differentiation. Particularly, results hint at a potential reduction in the risk of local recurrence when combining surgery and ART (2.8%) compared to surgery alone (27.9%) in cases where PNI is the primary high-risk factor, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. To note that most studies that included cases with PNI focused on instances of large-caliber nerve invasion or cases with clinical and/or radiologic evidence of PNI. However, while a correlation between vascular involvement and positive surgical margins has been established as a risk factor for increased distant or regional recurrence, and a beneficial role of ART is suggested, data regarding survival outcomes linked to PNI nerve diameters or numbers are scarce and conflicting.

Stevenson et al. investigated individuals who had been diagnosed with histologically confirmed cSCC and evidence of PNI [36]. All patients were evaluated for eligibility to supplementary radiotherapy based on the identification of PNI characterized by large-caliber dimensions (≥ 0.1 mm in diameter), or PNI characterized by small-caliber dimensions (< 0.1 mm), coupled with other high-risk features such as dimensions exceeding 2 cm, limited differentiation, incursion surpassing subcutaneous adipose tissue, immunosuppression, and localization to the craniofacial region. Overall, 31 patients underwent MMS, achieving negative margins in all instances. Although the radiation oncologist recommended adjuvant radiotherapy for all patients, merely 15 individuals (48.4%) underwent the full course of treatment. The tolerability of ART was observed to be favorable, with 6 patients developing mild dermatitis. Over the span of a 5-year follow-up, no instances of local recurrence were recorded. A notable difference emerged between the two groups concerning nodal metastasis: all 5 patients who developed nodal metastases did not receive ART, whereas none among those treated with combined therapy exhibited nodal metastasis (p = 0.02). The 5-year period prognosis for DFS was different between individuals subjected (100% 95% CI, 100%-100%) or not subjected to ART (68.8%, 95% CI, 60.9%-76.7%). Large-diameter PNI was reported by 80% patients with nodal metastasis. However, one patient who underwent only surgical intervention and subsequently manifested nodal metastasis exhibited perineural invasion of smaller dimensions. These findings emphasize the plausible utility of ART for both cases involving large-caliber PNI and instances of small-caliber PNI associated with other high-risk attributes. While it was previously held that the caliber extent of involved nerve fibers could influence outcome, recent insights reveal that even instances of small-caliber PNI entail a fourfold increase in the likelihood of nodal metastasis if coupled with two additional risk factors The risk undergoes a further 14-fold increase if associates with three other risk factors [37].

Jambusaria-Pahlajani et al. compared the outcomes of high-risk SCC treated with surgical monotherapy to those subjected to a combination of surgery and ART [38]. Among the 2,449 instances of high-risk SCC considered, a subset of 91 cases was managed with surgery and ART. Within the 74 cases with PNI, outcomes encompassing local recurrence, distant metastasis, and disease-specific mortality were not different between the surgery and surgey plus ART. Analyzing the subset of 943 high-risk SCC cases featuring well-defined surgical margins, the risks associated with local recurrence, regional metastasis, distant metastasis, and disease-specific mortality were quantified at 5%, 5%, 1%, and 1%, respectively. Favorable therapeutic outcomes were reported for high-risk cutaneous SCC cases when clear surgical margins were achieved. Current available data do not offer specific high-risk features of patients who may benefit by ART. The extent of nerve involvement was found to impact on outcomes, as larger nerve involvement (diameters ≥ 0.1 mm) contributed to a worsened prognosis [38].

In another study focusing on PNI in cSCC conducted by Garcia-Serra and colleagues, it was determined that among 76 patients with advanced PNI, as defined by clinical symptoms or radiological findings, the risk of local recurrence was more than doubled (45%) when contrasted with 59 patients exhibiting only microscopic PNI (13%) [39]. Notably, this trend held true irrespective of the status of surgical margins. For cases featuring solely microscopic invasion, nearly all instances of recurrence were observed in cases with positive surgical margins. This underscores the significance of achieving clear surgical margins in yielding positive outcomes for microscopic PNI. However, this study does not provide a conclusive assessment of whether adjuvant radiotherapy further improves outcomes in cases with clear surgical margins, as all patients in this study received such treatment. Conversely, instances characterized by advanced PNI exhibited a substantial likelihood of recurrence even in the presence of clear surgical margins. This underscores the challenge of effectively managing advanced PNI solely through surgical intervention. Consequently, ART is generally recommended in cases featuring symptomatic or radiologically confirmed PNI.

In their most recent work, Canueto et al. conducted a comprehensive assessment of ART in cSCC with PNI. The primary objective was to identify the specific patient signatures that may better benefit of a specific therapeutic approach [40]. The retrospective analysis of a multicenter cohort comprising 110 instances of cSCC with PNI investigated the categories of PNI associated with unfavorable outcomes, evaluated the efficacy of ART in distinct subsets of cSCC with PNI, and examined the utility of ART with respect of the status of surgical margins (clear or positive). The outcomes showed that ART was superior to a strategy of observation alone, particularly for cases of cSCC with PNI and positive margins post-surgery. In patients undergoing observation alone the risk of adverse outcome events increased by a factor of 2.43 times (p = 0.025). This effect was particularly evident in cases withy positive margins and PNI measuring ≥ 0.1 mm (the likelihood of a negative prognosis increased eightfold, p = 0.0065). Notably, the implementation of ART yielded significant enhancements in long-term outcomes for patients afflicted with cSCC featuring PNI and positive margins following surgical intervention. However, the benefit of ART was less pronounced for cases with clear margins, particularly those with PNI in small-caliber nerves.

Although ART can lead to improved survival outcomes, it is also associated with increased post-treatment complications, such as skin erythema, mucositis, recurrent cellulitis, chronic pain, and others, severely impacting the patients' quality of life, or contributing to disease-specific death. Further prospective comparative studies are required to comprehensively evaluate the benefit and the risks of ART for cSCC patients.

Future Directions

In recent years, PNI studies have focused on identifying new biomarkers related to the pathogenetic mechanisms of PNI. The goal is to contribute to more precise prognostic stratification and potential targets for future therapies. Existing stratification tools have had limited impact, particularly among high-risk cSCC patients. It is crucial to detect PNI-related biomarkers with both prognostic and predictive significance.

PNI is currently understood as occurring through invasion, involving a reciprocal association process between tumor cells and nerve components [26]. Various neurotrophic agents, including nerve growth factors and adhesion molecules, play a role in this process [41].

Wysong et al. developed a prognostic 40-gene expression profile (GEP) test for high-risk cSCC, revealing positive predictive value [42]. Eviston et al. evaluated the GEP of HNcSCC cases with PNI, showing significantly different profiles in those likely to develop recurrence [43]. However, the retrospective nature of the study limits its predictive value.

Warren et al. focused on expression analysis of PNI specimens, emphasizing mutations affecting p53 activation [44]. The analysis showed p53 activation signatures in tumors with PNI compared to those without.

In 2020, a focus on the expression of Melanoma Antigen Family A, 3 (MAGE-A3) at the mRNA level in cSCC with PNI was proposed [45]. Upregulated expression of MAGE-A3 emerged in poorly differentiated cSCC with PNI, suggesting a role in cancer progression. Larger studies are needed to validate its prognostic significance.

Zilberg et al. studied somatic mutations associated with adverse histopathological features in high-risk HNcSCC, finding exclusive FGFR2 mutations in patients with PNI [46]. These mutations are targetable, providing potential treatment options.

Despite efforts to understand biomarkers associated with PNI, data on large case studies are still lacking, especially regarding prognostic and potentially predictive value.

Conclusion

This review aims to provide an updated insight into high-risk cSCC with PNI outlining the current, albeit undefined, management approaches for advanced cSCC with PNI.

The implementation of clinical/radiological evaluation to ameliorate the diagnosis of patients with PNI may add benefit to personalized treatment selection and follow-up. Furthermore, prospective randomized studies are necessary to assess whether Mosh surgery may be superior to standard treatments and whether ART therapy may be superior to surgery alone in patients with PNI.

Finally, a better histological definition and the identification of PNI related biomarkers could improve knowledge on the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying PNI, contribute to a more precise prognostic stratification and reveal potential targets for the development of future therapies.

Key References

Stratigos AJ, Garbe C, Dessinioti C, Lebbe C, van Akkooi A, Bataille V, et al. European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Part 1: Diagnostics and prevention-Update 2023. Eur J Cancer. 2023;193:113251.This reference is of particular importance because it shows the current treatment indications in patients with cSCC.

Chung E, Hoang S, McEvoy AM, Rosman IS, Hurst EA, Council ML. Histopathologic upgrading of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas during Mohs micrographic surgery: A retrospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85:923–30.This reference is of importance because because it shows that surgical treatment with the Mosh technique favors a more accurate diagnosis.

Zhang J, Wang Y, Wijaya WA, Liang Z, Chen J. Efficacy and prognostic factors of adjuvant radiotherapy for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatology Venereol. 2021;35:1777–87.This reference is of particular importance because collects all the evidence on the effectiveness post treatment radiotherapy, shown the complexity of reaching an unambiguos consensus.

Author Contributions

MC and FN had the idea for the article review, MC and FN performed the literature search and data analysis, FDL, RN and GR drafted and/or critically revised the work.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Firenze within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Martina Catalano and Filippo Nozzoli contributed equally.
==== Refs
References and Recommended Reading

1. Care PY, Urad M, Lam A, Ésirée D, Atner R. Review articles primary care. N Engl J Med. 2001.
2. Prieto-Granada C Rodriguez-Waitkus P Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and related entities: epidemiology, clinical and histological features, and basic science overview Curr Probl Cancer 2015 39 206 215 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2015.07.005 26239204
Prieto-Granada C, Rodriguez-Waitkus P. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and related entities: epidemiology, clinical and histological features, and basic science overview. Curr Probl Cancer. 2015;39:206–15.26239204
3. Cameron MC, Lee E, Hibler BP, Barker CA, Mori S, Cordova M, et al. Basal cell carcinoma: epidemiology; pathophysiology; clinical and histological subtypes; and disease associations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80:303–17. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29782900/.
4. Guy GP Machlin SR Ekwueme DU Yabroff KR Prevalence and costs of skin cancer treatment in the U.S., 2002-2006 and 2007-2011 Am J Prev Med 2015 48 183 7 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.08.036 25442229
Guy GP, Machlin SR, Ekwueme DU, Yabroff KR. Prevalence and costs of skin cancer treatment in the U.S., 2002-2006 and 2007-2011. Am J Prev Med. 2015;48:183–7.25442229
5. Thompson AK Kelley BF Prokop LJ Murad MH Baum CL Risk factors for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma recurrence, metastasis, and disease-specific death: a systematic review and meta-analysis JAMA Dermatol 2016 152 419 428 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.4994 26762219
Thompson AK, Kelley BF, Prokop LJ, Murad MH, Baum CL. Risk factors for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma recurrence, metastasis, and disease-specific death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152:419–28.26762219
6. Trosman SJ Zhu A Nicolli EA Leibowitz JM Sargi ZB High-risk cutaneous squamous cell cancer of the head and neck: risk factors for recurrence and impact of adjuvant treatment Laryngoscope 2021 131 E136 E143 10.1002/lary.28564 32065413
Trosman SJ, Zhu A, Nicolli EA, Leibowitz JM, Sargi ZB. High-risk cutaneous squamous cell cancer of the head and neck: risk factors for recurrence and impact of adjuvant treatment. Laryngoscope. 2021;131:E136–43.32065413
7. Stratigos AJ Garbe C Dessinioti C Lebbe C van Akkooi A Bataille V European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Part 1: Diagnostics and prevention-Update 2023 Eur J Cancer 2023 193 113251 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113251 37717283
Stratigos AJ, Garbe C, Dessinioti C, Lebbe C, van Akkooi A, Bataille V, et al. European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Part 1: Diagnostics and prevention-Update 2023. Eur J Cancer. 2023;193:113251.37717283
8. de Jong E Lammerts MUPA Genders RE Bouwes Bavinck JN Update of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2022 36 6 10.1111/jdv.17728 34855246
de Jong E, Lammerts MUPA, Genders RE, Bouwes Bavinck JN. Update of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022;36:6.34855246
9. Veness MJ High-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck J Biomed Biotechnol 2007 2007 1 10.1155/2007/80572
Veness MJ. High-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2007;2007:1.
10. Halim AS Ramasenderan N High-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC): challenges and emerging therapies Asian J Surg 2023 46 47 51 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.04.079 35545474
Halim AS, Ramasenderan N. High-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC): challenges and emerging therapies. Asian J Surg. 2023;46:47–51.35545474
11. Thompson AK Kelley BF Prokop LJ Murad MH Baum CL Risk factors for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis JAMA Dermatol 2016 152 419 10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.4994 26762219
Thompson AK, Kelley BF, Prokop LJ, Murad MH, Baum CL. Risk factors for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152:419.26762219
12. Bakst RL Glastonbury CM Parvathaneni U Katabi N Hu KS Yom SS Critical review perineural invasion and perineural tumor spread in head and neck cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019 103 5 1109 1124 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.12.009 30562546
Bakst RL, Glastonbury CM, Parvathaneni U, Katabi N, Hu KS, Yom SS. Critical review perineural invasion and perineural tumor spread in head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019;103(5):1109–24. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.12.009.30562546
13. Galloway TJ Morris CG Mancuso AA Amdur RJ Mendenhall WM Impact of radiographic findings on prognosis for skin carcinoma with clinical perineural invasion Cancer 2005 103 1254 1257 10.1002/cncr.20913 15693020
Galloway TJ, Morris CG, Mancuso AA, Amdur RJ, Mendenhall WM. Impact of radiographic findings on prognosis for skin carcinoma with clinical perineural invasion. Cancer. 2005;103:1254–7.15693020
14. Pérez García MP MateuPuchades A Sanmartín JO Perineural invasion in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma Actas Dermosifiliogr 2019 110 426 433 10.1016/j.ad.2018.10.006 31000135
Pérez García MP, MateuPuchades A, Sanmartín JO. Perineural invasion in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2019;110:426–33.31000135
15. Nerves and neurotropic carcinomas.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1985;94(4 Pt 1):426–7.
16. Dunn M Morgan MB Beer TW Perineural invasion: Identification, significance, and a standardized definition Dermatologic Surg 2009 35 214 221 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34412.x
Dunn M, Morgan MB, Beer TW. Perineural invasion: Identification, significance, and a standardized definition. Dermatologic Surg. 2009;35:214–21.
17. Liebig C Ayala G Wilks JA Berger DH Albo D Perineural invasion in cancer: a review of the literature Cancer 2009 115 3379 3391 10.1002/cncr.24396 19484787
Liebig C, Ayala G, Wilks JA, Berger DH, Albo D. Perineural invasion in cancer: a review of the literature. Cancer. 2009;115:3379–91.19484787
18. da Dolens ES de Morais EF Paranaíba LMR Rangel ALCA Almangush A Salo T Prognostic significance of the neural invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma J Oral Pathol Med 2023 52 476 482 10.1111/jop.13423 36850021
da Dolens ES, de Morais EF, Paranaíba LMR, Rangel ALCA, Almangush A, Salo T, et al. Prognostic significance of the neural invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 2023;52:476–82.36850021
19. Karia PS Morgan FC Ruiz ES Schmults CD Clinical and incidental perineural invasion of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma a systematic review and pooled analysis of outcomes data JAMA Dermatol 2017 153 781 788 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.1680 28678985
Karia PS, Morgan FC, Ruiz ES, Schmults CD. Clinical and incidental perineural invasion of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma a systematic review and pooled analysis of outcomes data. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153:781–8.28678985
20. Cohen ER Misztal C Dable C Gomez-Fernandez C Bhatia RG Roth P Redefining perineural invasion in head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma Otolaryngol Neck Surg 2022 167 705 715 10.1177/01945998221076110
Cohen ER, Misztal C, Dable C, Gomez-Fernandez C, Bhatia RG, Roth P, et al. Redefining perineural invasion in head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2022;167:705–15.
21. Ruiz ES Karia PS Besaw R Schmults CD Performance of the American joint committee on cancer staging manual, 8th edition vs the Brigham and women’s hospital tumor classification system for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma JAMA Dermatol 2019 155 819 25 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.0032 30969315
Ruiz ES, Karia PS, Besaw R, Schmults CD. Performance of the American joint committee on cancer staging manual, 8th edition vs the Brigham and women’s hospital tumor classification system for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155:819–25.30969315
22. Amin MB Greene FL Edge SB Compton CC Gershenwald JE Brookland RK The Eighth Edition AJCC cancer staging manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging CA Cancer J Clin 2017 67 93 9 10.3322/caac.21388 28094848
Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, Compton CC, Gershenwald JE, Brookland RK, et al. The Eighth Edition AJCC cancer staging manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:93–9.28094848
23. Elder DE Bastian BC Cree IA Massi D Scolyer RA The 2018 world health organization classification of cutaneous, mucosal, and uveal melanoma: detailed analysis of 9 distinct subtypes defined by their evolutionary pathway Arch Pathol Lab Med 2020 144 500 522 10.5858/arpa.2019-0561-RA 32057276
Elder DE, Bastian BC, Cree IA, Massi D, Scolyer RA. The 2018 world health organization classification of cutaneous, mucosal, and uveal melanoma: detailed analysis of 9 distinct subtypes defined by their evolutionary pathway. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020;144:500–22.32057276
24. Howell JY, Ramsey ML. Squamous cell skin cancer. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024
25. Keohane SG Botting J Budny PG Dolan OM Fife K Harwood CA British association of dermatologists guidelines for the management of people with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma 2020 Br J Dermatol 2021 184 401 414 10.1111/bjd.19621 33150585
Keohane SG, Botting J, Budny PG, Dolan OM, Fife K, Harwood CA, et al. British association of dermatologists guidelines for the management of people with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma 2020. Br J Dermatol. 2021;184:401–14.33150585
26. Cañueto J Jaka A Corchete LA González-Pérez AM García-Castro R Fuente MJ Postoperative radiotherapy provides better local control and long-term outcome in selective cases of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with perineural invasion J Eur Acad Dermatology Venereol 2020 34 1080 1091 10.1111/jdv.16001
Cañueto J, Jaka A, Corchete LA, González-Pérez AM, García-Castro R, Fuente MJ, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy provides better local control and long-term outcome in selective cases of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with perineural invasion. J Eur Acad Dermatology Venereol. 2020;34:1080–91.
27. Stratigos AJ Garbe C Dessinioti C Lebbe C Bataille V Bastholt L European interdisciplinary guideline on invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: Part 2 Treatment Eur J Cancer 2020 128 83 102 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.01.008 32113942
Stratigos AJ, Garbe C, Dessinioti C, Lebbe C, Bataille V, Bastholt L, et al. European interdisciplinary guideline on invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: Part 2. Treatment Eur J Cancer. 2020;128:83–102.32113942
28. Sara Espinosa N, Kumar R, McCullough B, Blitzblau R, Chair V, Aasi SZ, et al. Comprehensive Cancer Center at UAB ϖ Dermatology ‡ Hematology/Hematology oncology Þ Internal medicine † Medical oncology ζ Otolaryngology ≠ Pathology/Dermatopathology Ÿ Reconstructive surgery § Radiotherapy/Radiation oncology ¶ Surgery/Surgical oncology. 2023.
29. Chung E Hoang S McEvoy AM Rosman IS Hurst EA Council ML Histopathologic upgrading of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas during Mohs micrographic surgery: a retrospective cohort study J Am Acad Dermatol 2021 85 923 30 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.03.086 33812956
Chung E, Hoang S, McEvoy AM, Rosman IS, Hurst EA, Council ML. Histopathologic upgrading of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas during Mohs micrographic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85:923–30.33812956
30. Soleymani T Brodland DG Arzeno J Sharon DJ Zitelli JA Clinical outcomes of high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas treated with Mohs surgery alone: an analysis of local recurrence, regional nodal metastases, progression-free survival, and disease-specific death J Am Acad Dermatol 2023 88 109 117 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.06.1169 35760236
Soleymani T, Brodland DG, Arzeno J, Sharon DJ, Zitelli JA. Clinical outcomes of high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas treated with Mohs surgery alone: an analysis of local recurrence, regional nodal metastases, progression-free survival, and disease-specific death. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023;88:109–17.35760236
31. Zhang J Wang Y Wijaya WA Liang Z Chen J Efficacy and prognostic factors of adjuvant radiotherapy for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis J Eur Acad Dermatology Venereol 2021 35 1777 87 10.1111/jdv.17330
Zhang J, Wang Y, Wijaya WA, Liang Z, Chen J. Efficacy and prognostic factors of adjuvant radiotherapy for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatology Venereol. 2021;35:1777–87.
32. Ebrahimi A Clark JR Lorincz BB Milross CG Veness MJ Metastatic head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Defining a low-risk patient Head Neck 2012 34 365 370 10.1002/hed.21743 21472887
Ebrahimi A, Clark JR, Lorincz BB, Milross CG, Veness MJ. Metastatic head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Defining a low-risk patient. Head Neck. 2012;34:365–70.21472887
33. Jol JAD van Velthuysen MLF Hilgers FJM Keus RB Neering H Balm AJM Treatment results of regional metastasis from cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma Eur J Surg Oncol 2003 29 81 86 10.1053/ejso.2002.1330 12559082
Jol JAD, van Velthuysen MLF, Hilgers FJM, Keus RB, Neering H, Balm AJM. Treatment results of regional metastasis from cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003;29:81–6.12559082
34. Fraga SD Besaw RJ Murad F Schmults CD Waldman A Complete margin assessment versus sectional assessment in surgically excised high-risk keratinocyte carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis Dermatol Surg 2022 48 704 710 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003462 35778249
Fraga SD, Besaw RJ, Murad F, Schmults CD, Waldman A. Complete margin assessment versus sectional assessment in surgically excised high-risk keratinocyte carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dermatol Surg. 2022;48:704–10.35778249
35. Khurana VG Mentis DH O’Brien CJ Hurst TL Stevens GN Packham NA Parotid and neck metastases from cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck Am J Surg 1995 170 446 450 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80326-2 7485729
Khurana VG, Mentis DH, O’Brien CJ, Hurst TL, Stevens GN, Packham NA. Parotid and neck metastases from cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Am J Surg. 1995;170:446–50.7485729
36. Kim Y Lehrer EJ Wirth PJ Khesroh EA Brewer JD Billingsley EM Adjuvant radiotherapy may not significantly change outcomes in high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas with clear surgical margins: a systematic review and meta-analysis J Am Acad Dermatol 2022 86 1246 1257 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.11.059 34890701
Kim Y, Lehrer EJ, Wirth PJ, Khesroh EA, Brewer JD, Billingsley EM, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy may not significantly change outcomes in high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas with clear surgical margins: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86:1246–57.34890701
37. Stevenson ML Criscito MC Wilken R Doudican NA Bain EE Parashar B Use of adjuvant radiotherapy in the treatment of high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with perineural invasion JAMA Dermatol 2020 156 918 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.1984 32609298
Stevenson ML, Criscito MC, Wilken R, Doudican NA, Bain EE, Parashar B, et al. Use of adjuvant radiotherapy in the treatment of high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with perineural invasion. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156:918.32609298
38. Ross AS Miller Whalen F Elenitsas R Xu X Troxel AB Schmults CD Diameter of involved nerves predicts outcomes in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with perineural invasion: an investigator-blinded retrospective cohort study Dermatol Surg 2009 35 1859 1866 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01354.x 19889009
Ross AS, Miller Whalen F, Elenitsas R, Xu X, Troxel AB, Schmults CD. Diameter of involved nerves predicts outcomes in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with perineural invasion: an investigator-blinded retrospective cohort study. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35:1859–66.19889009
39. Jambusaria-Pahlajani A Miller CJ Quon H Smith N Klein RQ Schmults CD Surgical monotherapy versus surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy in high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review of outcomes Dermatol Surg 2009 35 574 584 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01095.x 19415791
Jambusaria-Pahlajani A, Miller CJ, Quon H, Smith N, Klein RQ, Schmults CD. Surgical monotherapy versus surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy in high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review of outcomes. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35:574–84.19415791
40. Garcia-Serra A Hinerman RW Mendenhall WM Amdur RJ Morris CG Williams LS Carcinoma of the skin with perineural invasion Head Neck 2003 25 1027 1033 10.1002/hed.10334 14648861
Garcia-Serra A, Hinerman RW, Mendenhall WM, Amdur RJ, Morris CG, Williams LS, et al. Carcinoma of the skin with perineural invasion. Head Neck. 2003;25:1027–33.14648861
41. Brugière C El Bouchtaoui M Leboeuf C Gapihan G Ait El Far R Sy M Perineural invasion in human cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is linked to neurotrophins, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and NCAM1 J Invest Dermatol 2018 138 2063 6 10.1016/j.jid.2018.02.044 29601811
Brugière C, El Bouchtaoui M, Leboeuf C, Gapihan G, Ait El Far R, Sy M, et al. Perineural invasion in human cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is linked to neurotrophins, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and NCAM1. J Invest Dermatol. 2018;138:2063–6.29601811
42. Wysong A Newman JG Covington KR Kurley SJ Ibrahim SF Farberg AS Validation of a 40-gene expression profile test to predict metastatic risk in localized high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma J Am Acad Dermatol 2021 84 361 369 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.04.088 32344066
Wysong A, Newman JG, Covington KR, Kurley SJ, Ibrahim SF, Farberg AS, et al. Validation of a 40-gene expression profile test to predict metastatic risk in localized high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84:361–9.32344066
43. Eviston TJ Minaei E Mueller SA Ahmadi N Ashford B Clark JR Gene expression profiling of perineural invasion in head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma Sci Rep 2021 11 1 10 10.1038/s41598-021-92335-4 33414495
Eviston TJ, Minaei E, Mueller SA, Ahmadi N, Ashford B, Clark JR, et al. Gene expression profiling of perineural invasion in head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1–10.33414495
44. Warren TA Broit N Simmons JL Pierce CJ Chawla S Lambie DLJ Expression profiling of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with perineural invasion implicates the p53 pathway in the process Sci Rep 2016 6 1 9 10.1038/srep34081 28442746
Warren TA, Broit N, Simmons JL, Pierce CJ, Chawla S, Lambie DLJ, et al. Expression profiling of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with perineural invasion implicates the p53 pathway in the process. Sci Rep. 2016;6:1–9.28442746
45. Chen A Santana AL Doudican N Roudiani N Laursen K Therrien JP MAGE-A3 is a prognostic biomarker for poor clinical outcome in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with perineural invasion via modulation of cell proliferation PLoS ONE 2020 15 1 19
Chen A, Santana AL, Doudican N, Roudiani N, Laursen K, Therrien JP, et al. MAGE-A3 is a prognostic biomarker for poor clinical outcome in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with perineural invasion via modulation of cell proliferation. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:1–19.
46. Zilberg C Lee MW Yu B Ashford B Kraitsek S Ranson M Analysis of clinically relevant somatic mutations in high-risk head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma Mod Pathol 2018 31 275 287 10.1038/modpathol.2017.128 28984303
Zilberg C, Lee MW, Yu B, Ashford B, Kraitsek S, Ranson M, et al. Analysis of clinically relevant somatic mutations in high-risk head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2018;31:275–87.28984303
