
==== Front
Cureus
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus Palo Alto (CA)

10.7759/cureus.67531
Neurosurgery
Epidemiology/Public Health
Trauma
Epidemiological Characteristics of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review
Muacevic Alexander
Adler John R
Almallah Albaraa M 1
Albattah Ghaida A 1
Altarqi Asmaa A 2
Al Sattouf Amr A 2
Alameer Khalid M 3
Hamithi Dalal M 3
Alghamdi Ryan D 4
AlShammri Mohmmed S 5
Abuageelah Bandar M 6
Algahtani Abdulhadi Y 789
1 College of Medicine, Qassim University, Qassim, SAU
2 Medicine and Surgery, Ibn Sina National College, Jeddah, SAU
3 Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU
4 Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU
5 College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa, SAU
6 General Medicine Practice Program, Batterjee Medical College, Aseer, SAU
7 Department of Neuroscience, King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Jeddah, SAU
8 Research Office, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, SAU
9 College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU
Albaraa M. Almallah braalogy@gmail.com
22 8 2024
8 2024
16 8 e6753122 8 2024
Copyright © 2024, Almallah et al.
2024
Almallah et al.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This article is available from https://www.cureus.com/articles/285802-epidemiological-characteristics-of-traumatic-spinal-cord-injury-in-saudi-arabia-a-systematic-review
Traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) is a severe condition with high mortality and disability rates. Understanding the regional TSCI epidemiology may facilitate the development of targeted preventive initiatives and the optimization of resource allocation. The primary goal of this systematic review was to gather and analyze the existing literature on the frequency and characteristics of TSCI in Saudi Arabia. A literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was conducted in January 2024 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Observational studies reporting TSCI epidemiology in Saudi Arabia between 2010 and 2022 were included. Data on demographics, mechanisms, levels/severity, and outcomes were extracted. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Nine studies involving 2,356 TSCI cases were analyzed. Most patients were young males. Road traffic accidents were shown to be the predominant cause, accounting for 56.5-90.8% of cases. Thoracic (28.7-48.3%) and cervical (26.6-39%) levels were the most common. The extent of neurological deficits showed significant variation throughout the studies. This review provides a baseline understanding of TSCI epidemiology in Saudi Arabia but highlights critical gaps that future research should address. The review emphasizes the need for evidence-based interventions targeting road safety and falls, standardized cervical spine evaluation and management, and the use of validated metrics to optimize patient outcomes. Large-scale population-based studies with standardized methodologies are necessary to fully understand TSCI epidemiology, prognosis, and long-term disability burden in Saudi Arabia, leading to better prevention strategies and improved patient outcomes.

injuries
trauma
spinal column
saudi arabia
epidemiology
spinal cord injuries
==== Body
pmcIntroduction and background

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a severe condition that occurs when the spinal cord is injured from the base of the skull to the lower back, resulting in loss of sensation and motor abilities [1]. There are two classifications of SCIs, namely, traumatic injuries and nontraumatic injuries [2]. Traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) is considered one of the most severe and catastrophic types of injuries, leading to high mortality and disability rates. This condition causes physical and emotional challenges for patients, while also placing a considerable strain on families and society [3-5]. TSCI is the result of traumatic factors that cause injuries to neural structures within the spinal canal, including the spinal cord, nerve roots, and cauda equina [6].

The clinical outcomes of SCI depend on the severity and location of the lesion and may include partial or complete loss of sensory and/or motor function below the level of injury. SCI commonly results from a sudden, traumatic impact on the spine that fractures or dislocates vertebrae. The initial mechanical forces delivered to the spinal cord at the time of injury is known as primary injury where displaced bone fragments, disc materials, and/or ligaments bruise or tear into the spinal cord tissue. Regardless of the form of primary injury, these forces directly damage ascending and descending pathways in the spinal cord and disrupt blood vessels and cell membranes causing spinal shock, systemic hypotension, vasospasm, ischemia, ionic imbalance, and neurotransmitter accumulation [7].

The global incidence of TSCI has been estimated at 10.5 per 100,000 individuals [8]. Within Saudi Arabia, further research is needed to characterize epidemiological trends and severity levels associated with TSCI. Thus, this systematic review seeks to aggregate and analyze all available data related to the epidemiology of TSCI within Saudi Arabia. By synthesizing the existing literature, this study aims to enhance understanding of TSCI patterns and burdens affecting the Saudi population.

Review

Methodology

Search Strategy

This systematic review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024508271) and conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was performed in January 2024 independently by two authors using the terms “spinal cord injury” OR “traumatic spinal cord injury” AND “Saudi Arabia” to identify epidemiological studies of TSCI in the country. Reference lists were also reviewed to find relevant articles. Studies reporting incidence, prevalence, causes, injury levels, age, and gender distributions were included.

Study Selection

Five reviewers searched independently and screened titles and abstracts yielded by the search strategy to determine eligibility. Full potentially eligible texts were then independently assessed for inclusion against predefined criteria. Studies were included if they reported primary epidemiological data on TSCI in Saudi Arabia. Exclusion criteria involved nontraumatic etiologies, nonoriginal study designs, lack of outcomes of interest, and non-Saudi population applicability. Discrepancies were resolved through consensus discussion. Adherence to the PRISMA flow diagram (Figure 1) provided transparency in the systematic selection process.

Figure 1 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) flow diagram for study selection.

Analyzed Variables

Data extraction focused on key epidemiological variables using a standardized form. Study characteristics included duration, location, design, and setting. Demographic data comprised case numbers, mean/median age, age groups, and gender distribution. Injury details involved mechanisms, spinal level, and severity. Outcomes such as length of stay, complications, and mortality were also extracted. Where possible, incidence/prevalence rates were calculated. Geographic information and time trend analyses were noted when available. Correspondence with authors addressed unclear data. This systematic approach facilitated a comprehensive understanding of TSCI characteristics in Saudi Arabia.

Quality Assessment

Three reviewers independently assessed methodological quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies. The NOS evaluates the selection and comparability of groups and the outcome assessment on a nine-point scale. Studies scoring 6 points or above, representing higher quality based on the instrument’s selection criteria, comparability, and outcome identification, were considered to be of superior methodological rigor.

Results

The database search yielded nine studies (Figure 1) that met the study’s selection criteria involving 2,356 cases with TSCI in Saudi Arabia. These studies were primarily retrospective, published between 2010 and 2022, and conducted at tertiary centers. Most studies reported the etiology, level, and severity of injury, along with other epidemiological parameters. Sample sizes ranged widely, from just 23 patients in the smallest study to 495 cases in the largest.

Demographic Characteristics

Consistently, in all the studies analyzed, the vast majority of patients were male, with proportions varying from 74% to 90%. The study by Al-Habib et al. [12] found the lowest ratio of males to females, with a ratio of 2.8:1. Conversely, the study by Mehdar et al. [15] reported the highest ratio, with a ratio of 23:3. Among the studies analyzed in this review, one specifically focused on children under 18 years of age, with a mean age of 13.7 years. Seven articles documented the mean ages of patients with TSCI across all age groups, which ranged from 29 to 35 years. Table 1 provides further information regarding the demographic characteristics of the patients.

Table 1 A summary of the published data concerning patients with TSCIs.

TSCI = traumatic spinal cord injury; M = male; F = female

Study ID (reference)	Duration of the study	Study design	Region/City	Source population	Total cases	Mean age (SD)	Male (%)	M/F ratio	
Al-Jadid and Robert 2010 [9]	January 2005 to October 2008	Retrospective	Riyadh	Sultan Bin Abdulaziz Humanitarian City (SBAHC)	495	34.3 ± 0.68	404 (81.6%)	4.43:1	
Alshahri et al. 2012 [10]	January 2003 to December 2008	Retrospective	Riyadh	Riyadh Military Hospital (RMH)	307	29.5	271 (88%)	7.5:1	
Al-Jadid 2013 [11]	August 1982 to November 2010	Retrospective	Riyadh	Prince Sultan Military Medical City (PSMMC)	466	29.7 ± 0.73	398 (85.4%)	6:1	
Al-Habib et al. 2014 [12]	May 2001 to May 2009	Retrospective	Riyadh	King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC)	23	13.7	17 (74%)	2.8:1	
Alshahri et al. 2016 [13]	January 2012 to December 2015	Retrospective	Riyadh	King Fahad Medical City (KFMC)	216	28.94	187 (86.6%)	6.4:1	
Mahmoud et al. 2017 [14]	2009 to December 2014	Retrospective cohort study	Riyadh	King Fahad Medical City (KFMC)	312	35 ± 17	244 (78%)	3.5:1	
Mehdar et al. 2019 [15]	June 2018 to June 2019	Retrospective	Najran	King Khalid hospital (KKH)	182	-	161 (88.4%)	23:3	
Alnaami et al. 2021 [16]	January 2016 to December 2018	Retrospective search of electronic records	Abha	Aseer Central hospital (ACH)	112	32.1 ± 14.12	101 (90.2%)	9:1	
Dibas et al. 2022 [17]	January 2017 to December 2019	Retrospective	Qassim	Buraidah Central Hospital (BCH)	243	35	194 (79.8%)	4:1	

Etiology and Level of TSCIs

Among the nine studies included in the analysis, seven provided details regarding the causes or origins of the injury. Road traffic accidents were consistently identified as the main factor in all studies, accounting for 56.5% to 90.8% of cases. Falls were the second most common cause of TSCIs, representing 3.2% to 35% of all injuries. A study by Mehdar et al. revealed that falls were a prevalent factor contributing to TSCI in males and females, accounting for 15% and 7% of cases, respectively [15]. According to another study, falls accounted for 40% of TSCIs in females [12]. In a study conducted on children, falls were identified as the second most prevalent cause of TSCI in patients who were under the age of 12 years [12]. Falls accounted for 42.8% of injuries in individuals aged 56 years and older [13]. Less common causes of injury included sports-related incidents, occupational mishaps, acts of violence, and gunshot wounds. The level of SCI was documented in four studies [11,12,16,17]. The cervical and thoracic spine had the highest prevalence in TSCI cases, ranging from 26.6% to 39% and 28.7% to 48.3%, respectively. Table 2 provides detailed information on the etiology and levels of TSCIs.

Table 2 Etiology and level of injury in the included studies.

RTA = road traffic accident

Study ID (reference)	Etiology	Level of injury	
RTA	Falls	Penetrating wound	Others	Cervical	Thoracic	Lumbar	Sacral	
Al-Jadid and Robert 2010 [9]	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	
Alshahri et al. 2012 [10]	262 (85%)	28 (9%)	Gunshot: 14 (5%)	Diving: 3 (1%)	-	-	-	-	
Al-Jadid 2013 [11]	377 (80.1%)	44 (9.4%)	Gunshot: 30 (6.5%) Stab knife: 5 (1%)	Diving: 3 (0.6%) Object falling: 7 (1.5%)	146 (31.3%)	225 (48.3%)	95 (20.4%)	0	
Al-Habib et al. 2014 [12]	13 (56.5%)	8 (35%)	0	2 (8.6%)	9 (39%)	11 (47.8%)	Lumbosacral: 10 (43.5%)	
Alshahri et al. 2016 [13]	196 (90.8%)	7 (3.2%)	13 (6%)	0	-	-	-	-	
Mahmoud et al. 2017 [14]	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	
Mehdar et al. 2019 [15]	116 (64%)	40 (22%)	Gunshot: 15 (8%)	Bomb blast: 7 (4%)	-	-	-	-	
Alnaami et al. 2021 [16]	89 (79.50%)	23 (20.50%)	0	0	40 (35.7%)	37 (33%)	35 (31.3%)	0	
Dibas et al. 2022 [17]	162 (66.7%)	78 (32.1%)	0	3 (1.23%)	63 (26.6%)	68 (28.7%)	133 (56.1%)	5 (2.11%)	

Severity of Injury and Mortality

To comprehend prognostic variables and healing patterns after TSCI, outcome assessment is crucial. Only a small percentage of the studies included in this systematic review used standardized assessment measures to report injury severity and functional outcomes. Only three studies reported the severity of injury based on the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale [14,16,17]. The ASIA is a standardized neurological examination used to assess SCI-related sensory and motor impairment. The scale has five levels, ranging from complete neural function loss to normal. Grade A SCIs eliminate all motor and sensory functions, including sacral segments, distal to the injury site. However, incomplete injuries (B to D) retain motor or sensory function below the injury site. Grade B injuries have sensory but no motor function, while Grade C injuries have motor grades less than three below the neurologic level. Motor function is indicated by a motor grade of at least three below the neurologic level in grade D injuries. Grade E injuries show normal motor and sensory examinations but may have abnormal reflexes or neurologic phenomena. The study by Mahmoud et al. [14] reported that 84% of cases were classified as ASIA type A. In the study by Dibas et al., ASIA type E was the most common, accounting for 82.6% of cases, while in the study by Alnaami et al., it was 43.8%. Mortality was mentioned in two studies and ranged between 2% and 2.5% [15,17]. Further details on the severity of injury and mortality can be found in Table 3.

Table 3 Severity of injury and mortality in the included studies.

ASIA = American Spinal Injury Association

Study ID (reference)	Severity of the injury	
ASIA A	ASIA B	ASIA C	ASIA D	ASIA E	Complete paraplegia	Complete tetraplegia	Incomplete paraplegia	Incomplete tetraplegia	Mortality	
Al-Jadid and Robert 2010 [9]	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	
Alshahri et al. 2012 [10]	-	-	-	-	-	90 (29%)	66 (21%)	56 (18%)	95 (31%)	-	
Al-Jadid 2013 [11]	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	
Al-Habib et al. 2014 [12]	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	0	
Alshahri et al. 2016 [13]	-	-	-	-	-	80 (37%)	36 (16.7%)	53 (24.5%)	47 (21.7%)	-	
Mahmoud et al. 2017 [14]	261 (84%)	25 (8%)	26 (8%)	0	-	239 (77%)	73 (23%)	-	-	-	
Mehdar et al. 2019 [15]	-	-	-	-	-	9 (5%)	5 (3%)	-	-	4 (2%)	
Alnaami et al. 2021 [16]	34 (30.4%)	6 (5.4%)	16 (14.3%)	7 (6.3%)	49 (43.8%)	-	-	-	-	-	
Dibas et al. 2022 [17]	8 (3.40%)	12 (5.11%)	7 (2.98%)	14 (5.96%)	194 (82.6%)	9 (3.8%)	6 (2.5%)	-	-	6 (2.5%)	

Evaluation of Methodological Quality

The NOS rated all studies as good or very good, signifying a low risk of bias. Seven investigations achieved scores of at least 3 to 5, while two attained a score of 6. As shown in Table 4, methodological quality was sound overall, with isolated minor concerns for some. This quality evaluation implies that results were likely dependable despite occasional shortcomings.

Table 4 Quality assessment table of the included studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for assessing the methodological quality of observational studies.

Study ID (reference)	Selection	Comparability	Outcome	Overall quality	
Al-Jadid and Robert 2010 [9]	*	*	*	Good	
Alshahri et al. 2012 [10]	**	*	**	Good	
Al-Jadid 2013 [11]	**	*	**	Good	
Al-Habib et al. 2014 [12]	**	*	**	Good	
Alshahri et al. 2016 [13]	**	*	**	Good	
Mahmoud et al. 2017 [14]	**	**	**	Very good	
Mehdar et al. 2019 [15]	**	*	**	Good	
Alnaami et al. 2021 [16]	**	*	**	Good	
Dibas et al. 2022 [17]	**	**	**	Very good	

Discussion

This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the country’s current understanding of TSCI epidemiology, drawing insights from a robust analysis of nine observational studies published between 2010 and 2022. The findings underscore the substantial burden of TSCI, with 2,356 cases reported across the included investigations. When considering these findings alongside previous research, certain consistencies and differences emerge. A 2023 meta-analysis from China estimated the global incidence of TSCI at 65.15 per million (95% confidence interval (CI) = 47.20-83.10/million), with a range of 6.7 to 569.7 per million, primarily due to motor vehicle accidents and falls. The most common types of TSCI were incomplete quadriplegia and AISA/Frankel grade D [18]. A 2009-2020 review of developing nations reported an incidence of 22.55 per million annually (95% CI = 13.52; 37.62/million/year), predominantly affecting males [19]. A 2018 Middle East-North Africa review found an incidence of 23.24 per million annually (95% CI = 5.64-49.21), primarily impacting young males via motor vehicle accidents, followed by falls. Complete paraplegia was the most common type of injury, with thoracic-level injuries being the most prevalent [20]. Our analysis corroborates motor vehicle accidents and falls as the chief causes in Saudi Arabia. It also aligns with international evidence implicating young males as the highest risk. Given the country’s historical ban on women driving until 2018, this is not surprising, given the prevalence of young males involved in automobile collisions as drivers or passengers. However, injury characteristics reported locally vary from region to region.

A prospective observational study at Prince Mohammed bin Abdulaziz Hospital from January 2017 to June 2018 aimed to determine the prevalence of spinal trauma in adults in Saudi Arabia. Out of 230 patients, 90.0% were male, with 60% in their second and third decades. Motor vehicle accidents caused 83% of cases, with 50% being drivers and 80% being unrestrained passengers. About 50% of spinal injuries were linked to injuries in other body parts. Cervical spine injuries made up 44% of cases, followed by lumbar spine injuries [21]. We conducted a thorough analysis of nine observational studies, which included a total of almost 2,356 cases, to get a comprehensive grasp of this topic. To improve understanding, it is imperative to address certain notable limitations identified in all of the research studies presented. Automobile accidents were shown to be the primary cause of SCIs in the majority of cases, as indicated by the research. Women in Saudi Arabia were not allowed to drive until 2018 due to the country’s laws. Thus, there were many accounts of automobile collisions involving young males who were either driving or riding as passengers in the age range of 20 to 29. This indicates that implementing injury prevention strategies specifically aimed at this high-risk demographic, such as more stringent enforcement of traffic safety legislation and public awareness campaigns, might potentially reduce the incidence of serious SCIs caused by car accidents [22].

Multiple research projects have shown that cervical spine fractures and dislocations are the most often-seen types of anatomical injuries. This indicates that in high-energy trauma scenarios such as vehicle accidents, the neck is particularly vulnerable [23]. Enhanced automobile and road designs that focus more on cervical spine protection might help prevent some of these accidents. Hospitals throughout the country need to establish and implement early care protocols and procedures particularly designed for cervical spine trauma. However, there was significant variation seen in the severity and scope of neurological abnormalities documented in the studies [24,25]. The lack of consistent assessment and reporting of outcomes at different follow-up periods made it difficult to make accurate comparisons. To accurately diagnose injuries and assess the progress of healing, it is necessary to use standardized classification and assessment methods that rely on trustworthy neurological tests, such as the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale [26-28]. Saudi Arabia presently does not have extensive multicenter research that utilizes standardized procedures.

Moreover, because exposures and outcomes have already occurred, the retrospective observational designs of all studies included in the analysis may be prone to confounding biases [29,30]. Using medical records to gather injury facts instead of obtaining prospective data increases the possibility of memory bias. The results might be influenced by selection bias if certain patient subgroups were excluded. Prospective cohort studies that follow patients from the time of injury until rehabilitation may provide data of superior quality. The sample sizes exhibited significant variation; studies related to a specific facility had fewer than 100 occurrences [31]. The limited sample size is a challenge to conducting rigorous statistical analyses for risk factor modeling and subgroup evaluations. It is not feasible to accurately determine regional differences in the causes and outcomes of medical conditions throughout Saudi Arabia’s many geographic areas based only on a case series from one institution [32,33]. It is necessary to conduct larger multi-site cohorts that include thousands of cases throughout the nation to examine any variations at the population level.

The length of the follow-up varied and often just included in-hospital therapy, with no information provided on the long-term functional status. The interpretation of recovery trajectories and rehabilitation needs is severely restricted. Similarly, it was unable to determine the trends in healthcare use and the costs associated with the long-term management of chronic illnesses [34,35]. It is essential to conduct studies that include long-term follow-ups of patients in the community. Loss to follow-up was often recorded but inadequately quantified, perhaps resulting in attrition bias. The grounds for not disclosing the subsequent losses. Some patients may have had challenges in their ongoing rehabilitation, experienced difficulties, or, unfortunately, succumbed, all of which might have an indeterminate effect on long-term outcomes [36,37]. Enhancing validity would be achieved by reducing attrition via dedicated monitoring efforts.

It is necessary to accurately describe the epidemiology of TSCI in Saudi Arabia, even though this review provides some useful first results. Prospective multicenter cohort studies with standardized methodologies are crucial for enrolling a large number of patients throughout the country [38-42]. To address the current gaps, it is necessary to actively collect extensive data on injury exposure, employ standardized categorization systems, analyze patterns of healthcare consumption, measure outcomes over a long period, conduct analyses on risk factors, minimize biases caused by attrition, and investigate regional differences. Prioritizing the enhancement of preventative, acute care, rehabilitation, and community reintegration services might be achieved by implementing a coordinated national registry or monitoring system, which would also maximize future research efforts. Nationally coordinated prospective research using standardized procedures is required to fully describe the injury spectrum, examine trends over time, assess outcomes, and guide evidence-based preventive and care measures specific to the Saudi population.

Conclusions

A systematic review study has not compiled epidemiological information on TSCI in Saudi Arabia. This review synthesized available epidemiological data on TSCI in Saudi Arabia between 2010 and 2022. Significant results showed that road accidents result in a high burden of illness, particularly impacting young male patients who frequently experience thoracic and cervical injuries, leading to a considerable strain on the healthcare system. Nevertheless, firm conclusions are impossible due to the methodological flaws of observational research. Our study highlights the need for evidence-based interventions to address the leading causes of TSCI in Saudi Arabia. Targeted road safety and fall prevention campaigns may help address the leading causes implicated. Clinical practices should prioritize standardized cervical spine evaluation and management protocols, while rehabilitation services should incorporate validated metrics such as ASIA to optimize patient outcomes. Future research should focus on large-scale, population-based studies employing standardized methodologies to comprehensively understand TSCI epidemiology, prognostic trajectories, and long-term disability burdens. By refining our knowledge, we can inform targeted prevention strategies and enhance clinical management and rehabilitation planning, ultimately improving patient outcomes and reducing the burden of TSCI in Saudi Arabia.

Disclosures

Author Contributions

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Bandar M. Abuageelah, Albaraa M. Almallah, Khalid M. Alameer, Abdulhadi Y. Algahtani

Drafting of the manuscript:  Bandar M. Abuageelah, Albaraa M. Almallah, Ghaida A. Albattah, Asmaa A. Altarqi, Amr A. Al Sattouf, Khalid M. Alameer, Dalal M. Hamithi, Ryan D. Alghamdi, Mohmmed S. AlShammri

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Bandar M. Abuageelah, Albaraa M. Almallah, Khalid M. Alameer, Abdulhadi Y. Algahtani

Concept and design:  Albaraa M. Almallah, Ghaida A. Albattah, Asmaa A. Altarqi, Amr A. Al Sattouf, Khalid M. Alameer, Dalal M. Hamithi, Ryan D. Alghamdi, Mohmmed S. AlShammri, Abdulhadi Y. Algahtani

Supervision:  Abdulhadi Y. Algahtani
==== Refs
References

1 Progress and challenges with clinical cell therapy in neurorestoratology J Neurorestoratol Huang H Mao G Chen L Liu A 91 95 3 2015
2 Secondary injury mechanisms in traumatic spinal cord injury: a nugget of this multiply cascade Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) Oyinbo CA 281 299 71 2011 21731081
3 Mortality rate and predicting factors of traumatic thoracolumbar spinal cord injury; a systematic review and meta-analysis Bull Emerg Trauma Azarhomayoun A Aghasi M Mousavi N 181 194 6 2018 30090812
4 Medical conditions and outcomes at 1 year after acute traumatic spinal cord injury in a Greek and a Swedish region: a prospective, population-based study Spinal Cord Divanoglou A Westgren N Bjelak S Levi R 470 476 48 2010 20029392
5 Statewide investigation of medically attended adverse health conditions of persons with spinal cord injury J Spinal Cord Med Pickelsimer E Shiroma EJ Wilson DA 221 231 33 2010 20737795
6 Clinical Neurorestorative Therapeutic Guidelines for Spinal Cord Injury (IANR/CANR version 2019) J Orthop Translat Huang H Young W Skaper S 14 24 20 2020 31908929
7 Traumatic spinal cord injury: an overview of pathophysiology, models and acute injury mechanisms Front Neurol Alizadeh A Dyck SM Karimi-Abdolrezaee S 282 10 2019 30967837
8 Traumatic spinal injury: global epidemiology and worldwide volume World Neurosurg Kumar R Lim J Mekary RA 0 63 113 2018
9 An analysis of the length of stay in traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injured patients. A rehabilitation unit experience in Saudi Arabia Saudi Med J Al-Jadid M Robert AA 555 559 31 2010 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20464047/ 20464047
10 Traumatic spinal cord injury in Saudi Arabia: an epidemiological estimate from Riyadh Spinal Cord Alshahri SS Cripps RA Lee BB Al-Jadid MS 882 884 50 2012 22777491
11 A retrospective study on traumatic spinal cord injury in an inpatient rehabilitation unit in central Saudi Arabia Saudi Med J Al-Jadid MS 161 165 34 2013 https://europepmc.org/article/med/23396462 23396462
12 Causes and patterns of spine trauma in children and adolescents in Saudi Arabia: implications for injury prevention Ann Saudi Med Al-Habib A Alaqeel A Marwa I 31 37 34 2014 24658551
13 Traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) in King Fahd Medical City, an epidemiological study Neurol Neurother Alshahri SS Alshehri BS Habtar A 1 10 1 2016 https://medwinpublishers.com/NNOAJ/NNOAJ16000106.pdf
14 Spinal cord injury rehabilitation in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: time to rehabilitation admission, length of stay and functional independence Spinal Cord Mahmoud H Qannam H Zbogar D Mortenson B 509 514 55 2017 28139661
15 Epidemiology of spinal cord injuries and their outcomes: a retrospective study at the King Khalid Hospital Cureus Mehdar KM Mahjri AA Al Rashah AA Alyazidi A 0 11 2019
16 Traumatic spinal cord injury in southern Saudi Arabia: patterns, time to surgery and outcomes J Family Med Prim Care Alnaami I Alsaleh S Al-Amri MS Al-Alamri A Al-Zahrani F Al-Amri MA Khan MA 1726 1730 10 2021 34123919
17 Characteristics, determinants, and outcomes of traumatic vertebral and spinal injuries: a retrospective study in the Al-Qassim region of Saudi Arabia Cureus Dibas M Ameer A Atiah MJ Ibrahim AA Alkhalifa O Hossain MS Saquib N 0 14 2022
18 Epidemiological features of traumatic spinal cord injury in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis Front Neurol Hu Y Li L Hong B 1131791 14 2023 37021283
19 Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in developing countries from 2009 to 2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis Neuroepidemiology Golestani A Shobeiri P Sadeghi-Naini M 219 239 56 2022 35512643
20 Epidemiological characteristics of traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) in the Middle-East and North-Africa (MENA) region: a systematic review and meta-analysis Bull Emerg Trauma Elshahidi MH Monir NY Elzhery MA Sharaqi AA Haedaya H Awad BI Zaghloul K 75 89 6 2018 29719837
21 An epidemiological overview of spinal trauma in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Spine Surg Relat Res Bakhsh A Aljuzair AH Eldawoody H 300 304 4 2020 33195853
22 Convergent validity and responsiveness of The Standing and Walking Assessment Tool (SWAT) among individuals with non-traumatic spinal cord injury Front Neurol Alavinia M Farahani F Musselman K 1280225 14 2023 38322795
23 Concomitant traumatic brain injury delays surgery in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury [in press] Neurosurgery Azad TD Raj D Ran KR 2024
24 Epidemiology of traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injury in Korea: a narrative review Korean J Neurotrauma Choi Y Leigh JH 434 445 19 2023 38222829
25 Segmental infralesional pathological spontaneous activity in subacute traumatic spinal cord injury Muscle Nerve Berger MJ Adewuyi AA Doherty C 403 408 69 2024 38294062
26 The effect of concomitant spinal cord injury on postoperative health-related quality of life after traumatic subaxial cervical spine injuries: a nationwide registry study Arch Phys Med Rehabil El-Hajj VG Stenimahitis V Singh A Blixt S Edström E Elmi-Terander A Gerdhem P 1069 1075 105 2024 38369229
27 Quantifying the association between surgical spine approach and tracheostomy timing after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury Neurosurgery Essa A Shakil H Malhotra AK 408 417 95 2024 38456683
28 Traumatic spinal cord injury among patients admitted to the spine unit in a tertiary care centre JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc Gautam S Rijal B Sharma LK 765 768 61 2023 38289780
29 Multivariable prediction models for traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil Hakimjavadi R Basiratzadeh S Wai EK 1 44 30 2024
30 Traumatic spinal cord injury Continuum (Minneap Minn) Izzy S 53 72 30 2024 38330472
31 Epidemiology features of traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injury in China, Wuhan Sci Rep Khadour FA Khadour YA Meng L XinLi C Xu T 1640 14 2024 38238504
32 Traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: comparison of two different blood pressure targets on neurological recovery Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Långsjö J Jordan S Laurila S 493 501 68 2024 38228292
33 Classifying clinical phenotypes of functional recovery for acute traumatic spinal cord injury. An observational cohort study Disabil Rehabil Mputu Mputu P Beauséjour M Richard-Denis A Fallah N Noonan VK Mac-Thiong JM 1 8 2024
34 Early management of adult traumatic spinal cord injury in patients with polytrauma: a consensus and clinical recommendations jointly developed by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) & the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) World J Emerg Surg Picetti E Demetriades AK Catena F 4 19 2024 38238783
35 Increased time to fixation after traumatic spinal cord injury influenced by race and insurance status Global Spine J Raso J Kamalapathy P Solomon E Driskill E Kurker K Joshi A Hassanzadeh H 21925682231225175 2024 38317534
36 Using nutraceuticals to help manage traumatic spinal cord injury Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Stacey P Mensinkai A Bansal P 71 17 2024 38256904
37 Effects of lercanidipine on traumatic spinal cord injury: an experimental study Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg Türk Ç Bahadır S Camlar M Gürel Ç Buhur A Kuşçu GC 73 79 30 2024 38305651
38 Increased incidence of depression and chronic pain in traumatic spinal cord injury patients with pre-injury alcohol use disorder: longitudinal analysis of insurance claim database Neurotrauma Rep Ugiliweneza B Wang D Rood B Boakye M Castillo C Hetman M 28 36 5 2024 38249325
39 Urodynamic assessment of detrusor function in the very acute phase of traumatic spinal cord injury: a prospective cohort study Indian J Urol Vasudeva P Kumar V Yadav S Prasad V Kumar N Kumar S Kumar A 31 36 40 2024 38314069
40 Prognostic value of the systemic inflammatory index (SII) and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury Eur Spine J Wang C Chen M Wang T 1245 1255 33 2024 38212411
41 Epidemiological age-based differences in traumatic spinal cord injury patients: a multicenter study based on 13,334 inpatients J Spinal Cord Med Wang C Shang S Hou M 1 9 2024
42 Multi-platform omics sequencing dissects the atlas of plasma-derived exosomes in rats with or without depression-like behavior after traumatic spinal cord injury Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry Wang Z Xie Z Zhang Z Zhou W Guo B Li M 110987 132 2024 38438071
