
==== Front
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int
Environmental Science and Pollution Research International
0944-1344
1614-7499
Springer Berlin Heidelberg Berlin/Heidelberg

39243327
34892
10.1007/s11356-024-34892-5
Review Article
Biotechnological potentials of surfactants in coal utilization: a review
Akimbekov Nuraly 123
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3418-0252
Digel Ilya digel@fh-aachen.de

4
Zhubanova Azhar 2
Tastambek Kuanysh T. 23
Tepecik Atakan 4
Sherelkhan Dinara 2
1 https://ror.org/04ehpm154 grid.443411.7 0000 0004 0557 4695 Scientific-Practical Center, West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov Medical University, Maresyev str. 68, Aktobe, 030019 Kazakhstan
2 https://ror.org/03q0vrn42 grid.77184.3d 0000 0000 8887 5266 Sustainability of Ecology and Bioresources, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Al-Farabi ave. 71, Almaty, 050040 Kazakhstan
3 grid.443660.3 Ecology Research Institute, Khoja Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University, Sattarhanov str. 29, Turkistan, 161200 Kazakhstan
4 https://ror.org/04tqgg260 grid.434081.a 0000 0001 0698 0538 Institute for Bioengineering, Aachen University of Applied Sciences, Heinrich-Mussmann-Straße 1, Jülich, 52428 Germany
Responsible Editor: Shimin Liu

7 9 2024
7 9 2024
2024
31 43 5509955118
23 4 2024
29 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
The quest for scientifically advanced and sustainable solutions is driven by growing environmental and economic issues associated with coal mining, processing, and utilization. Consequently, within the coal industry, there is a growing recognition of the potential of microbial applications in fostering innovative technologies. Microbial-based coal solubilization, coal beneficiation, and coal dust suppression are green alternatives to traditional thermochemical and leaching technologies and better meet the need for ecologically sound and economically viable choices. Surfactant-mediated approaches have emerged as powerful tools for modeling, simulation, and optimization of coal-microbial systems and continue to gain prominence in clean coal fuel production, particularly in microbiological co-processing, conversion, and beneficiation. Surfactants (surface-active agents) are amphiphilic compounds that can reduce surface tension and enhance the solubility of hydrophobic molecules. A wide range of surfactant properties can be achieved by either directly influencing microbial growth factors, stimulants, and substrates or indirectly serving as frothers, collectors, and modifiers in the processing and utilization of coal. This review highlights the significant biotechnological potential of surfactants by providing a thorough overview of their involvement in coal biodegradation, bioprocessing, and biobeneficiation, acknowledging their importance as crucial steps in coal consumption.

Keywords

Coal
Surfactants
Microorganisms
Biosolubilization
Biobeneficiation
Methanogenesis
Coal dust suppression
Fachhochschule Aachen (3306)Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

issue-copyright-statement© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Coal, playing a dual role as a primary energy source and key industrial raw material, has massively contributed to the economic growth of numerous nations worldwide. Recently, the scale of mining and coal processing has expanded considerably due to rapid growth and continuous advancements in automation within the coal industry. Nevertheless, there is increasing worldwide apprehension over the impact of coal consumption on environmental degradation, global warming, and climate change. The importance of research on clean coal technologies has been emphasized within the broader sustainability framework of energy production and utilization, with a focus on safety and environmental preservation (Akimbekov et al. 2023; Finkelman et al. 2021; Osborne et al. 2023). Microbiological co-processing, conversion, and beneficiation are examples of microbial-based clean coal technologies necessary for achieving considerably greener mitigation solutions and addressing the environmental challenges that arise at various stages of coal consumption (Mishra et al. 2015; B. Wang et al. 2019a, b, c; X. Wang et al. 2023a, b).

In recent years, surfactants or surface-active agents (primarily those derived from microorganisms) have been used in a variety of coal-utilization applications. Their utilization stems from their potential to make conventional energy generation more environmentally friendly, efficient, and sustainable. Surfactants exhibit impressive functional diversity, acting as emulsifiers (forming of emulsion), stabilizers, promoters, and collectors (absorbing on the mineral surface) in coal technologies (Chang et al. 2020; Guin and Singh 2023). Biosurfactants produced by various microorganisms offer great promise in the coal industry due to reduced adverse environmental impacts and improved utilization safety because of their biodegradability, nontoxicity, stability, and specific activity (Bhadra et al. 2023; Maddela et al. 2023; Oyetunji et al. 2023).

Biosurfactants are amphiphilic molecules, possessing both hydrophilic and hydrophobic moieties. The hydrophilic portion often consists of carbohydrates, amino acids, peptide anions/cations, or phosphate groups. The hydrophobic part typically comprises an elongated tail of saturated or unsaturated, linear or branched fatty acids (Banat et al. 2010; Carolin C et al., 2023). Surface-active agents reduce surface tension at liquid–liquid or liquid–solid interfaces (Pacwa-Płociniczak et al. 2011). Biosurfactants, a diverse array of secondary metabolites, are crucial to microbial survival due to the enhancement of the bioavailability of hydrophobic substrates, mediation of microbe-host interactions, and participation in quorum sensing (the ability to regulate gene expression according to population density) mechanisms. In addition, they can function as antimicrobial, insecticidal, antibiofilm, and anti-adhesive agents (Inès and Dhouha 2015). Biosurfactants can be classified according to their ionic charges (anionic, cationic, non-ionic, and neutral), molecular weight (high and low molecular weight), and secretion type (intracellular, extracellular, and adherent to microbial cells) (Marchant and Banat 2012). In 1941, Bushnell and Hass were the pioneers in demonstrating the bacterial synthesis of biosurfactants. They achieved this by cultivating Corynebacterium and Pseudomonas strains in mineral media (Ilori et al. 2008). Sophorolipids are extracellular biosurfactants produced by certain Starmerella strains, which were first discovered in the early 1960s (Jiménez-Peñalver et al. 2019; H. Wang et al. 2019a, b, c). Rhamnolipids, glycolipid-type biosurfactants produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, are among the initial biosurfactants identified for their environmental significance (Edwards and Hayashi 1965). Since then, a multitude of research has been conducted to investigate the nature and function of biosurfactants in coal processing and utilization (Chong and Li 2017).

Synthetic surfactants, mainly anionic and nonionic, are widely used in coal bioprocessing. Nonionic surfactants have the potential to enhance coal stability and hydrophilicity, accelerate degradation, and promote microbial growth. However, their high cost and required high dosage pose practical problems (Jiang et al. 2013; Shi et al. 2023a). Conversely, anionic surfactants are cost-effective and require lower dosages, but may exhibit poor solubility and often adhere readily to coal surfaces (Polman et al. 1994; West and Harwell 1992). For instance, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), an anionic surfactant, enhances the charge and hydrophilicity of coal surfaces, thus facilitating the degradation of coal by extracellular enzymes (Yin et al. 2011). Another anionic surfactant, sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (LAS), stimulates coal-bacteria interactions, which leads to shorter degradation times (Kang et al. 2021). In general, nonionic surfactants tend to stimulate the proliferation of bacteria, whereas anionic surfactants rather facilitate coal-bacteria interactions. Occasionally, a combination of the two surfactant types can be used in coal processing to enhance the benefits offered by each (Shi, Liu, Wu, et al., 2023a; Zhang et al. 2020).

The environmental effects of synthetic surfactants are of major concern because of their toxicity to living organisms and biological processes (Chen et al. 2018; Fei et al. 2020). For instance, the presence of surfactants in water can lead to the formation of stable foam on the surface, which reduces the amount of sunlight that reaches the seabed due to the turbid nature of foam, which impacts photosynthesis in plants (Effendi et al. 2017). Several studies have shown that their negative effects can be alleviated by using microorganisms that can degrade specific surfactants via bioremediation (Bubenheim et al. 1997). However, due to their molecular structure, synthetic surfactants exhibit partial biodegradability when released into the environment. As a result, they persist in natural systems for extended periods and can accumulate in sediments and soils (Pradhan and Bhattacharyya 2017). Biosurfactants, as mentioned earlier, differ from manufactured surfactants, consisting of naturally occurring compounds synthesized by microorganisms. This distinctive composition confers advantageous characteristics, such as enhanced biodegradability and reduced toxicity, while retaining surface attributes comparable to synthetic materials (Uchegbu et al. 2013).

Biosurfactants for coal applications possess numerous advantages that facilitate their implementation in coal industries from a macro perspective. Biosurfactants can be employed in a variety of forms, including biosurfactant crude extract, purified biosurfactant, and biosurfactant-producing microorganisms (Eras-Muñoz et al. 2022). Conversely, the expenses associated with biosurfactants are contingent upon the availability of substrates, the activity of microorganism-producers, and production constraints. Nevertheless, certain authors have reported on emerging technologies, such as nanotechnologies and novel purification techniques, which are critical steps in obtaining a suitable product quality (Dolman et al. 2017; Venkataraman et al. 2022). Their industrial approach is regarded as an open research field (Sahebnazar et al. 2018).

In this review, we attempted to analyze and provide an overview of the most recent and promising surfactant-mediated microbial technologies, as well as the main methodological concepts proposed for the solubilization, functional transformation, and beneficiation of coal. To our knowledge, this is the first review comprehensively addressing the role of surfactants in microbial-based technologies for producing clean coal fuels.

Surfactant-mediated coal biosolubilization

Biosolubilization, an environmentally sustainable method for utilizing low-rank coal, has garnered significant scientific interest (N. Akimbekov et al. 2021a, b). Humic acid, produced as a byproduct of coal biosolubilization/bioconversion, can significantly enhance soil quality. This approach demonstrates both feasibility and environmental friendliness due to its moderate operating conditions, minimal energy requirements, and uncomplicated equipment (N. S. Akimbekov et al. 2021a, b).

Three primary approaches are currently being explored to enhance coal biosolubilization: strain selection, coal pretreatment, and supplementation with active ingredients such as surfactants and enzymes (Ghani et al. 2015; Yuan et al. 2006). Among these, the use of surfactants seems to be especially promising, offering unique advantages over coal pretreatment and strain selection, such as ease of use and high efficiency. By increasing the hydrophobicity of the cell surface, surfactants facilitate the adsorption of hydrocarbons by microorganisms (Bezza and Chirwa 2017). Furthermore, surfactants can alter the cell membrane permeability, aiding the absorption of coal molecules and the release of microbial enzymes. Additionally, by reducing the surface tension at the coal surface, surfactants can enhance its solubility (Shen et al. 2023; Yuan et al. 2006).

Most surfactants used today are produced by chemical synthesis from petroleum-based resources. However, these surfactants may have harmful impacts on the environment since they are ecotoxic and only partly biodegradable (Vaz et al. 2012). The rise in environmental consciousness has led to a greater need for bio-based surfactants due to their potential to decrease the prevalence of synthetic analogs and alleviate their associated toxicity. Biosurfactants possess numerous advantages in coal solubilization compared to their artificial counterparts due to their superior biodegradability, minimal toxicity, and production from renewable substrates (Kiran et al. 2010). However, the positive effects of surfactants on coal biosolubilization have not always been consistent in previous research. On the one hand, in the experiments by Yuan et al. and Polman et al., surfactants have been shown to favorably influence coal biosolubilization in coal-surfactant-microorganism/enzyme systems (Polman et al. 1995; Yuan et al. 2006). On the other hand, Breckenridge et al. and Polman et al. in another (earlier) study reported that utilizing only coal-surfactant systems without microorganisms/enzymes demonstrated no effects (Breckenridge and Polman 1994; Polman et al. 1994). Substantial levels of coal biosolubilization induced by surfactants can be probably primarily attributed to the synergistic interaction among coal, surfactants, and microorganisms/enzymes, rather than the interaction between coal and surfactants alone.

Yin et al. proposed three principal interaction mechanisms (which do not exclude each other) between coal, surfactants, and enzymes (Yin et al. 2011). According to the first explanation (Fig. 1A), the surfactants first emulsify some hydrophobic components of coal. Subsequently, enzymes break down the emulsified tiny coal particles. In the second interaction model (Fig. 1B), enzyme-surfactant complexes first form in the liquid phase and then adhere to the coal surface, leading to coal biosolubilization. Finally, surfactants can first adhere to the coal surface (Fig. 1C) and solubilize it via the hydrophilic moieties; then enzymes are attached to the coal surface. Shi et al. demonstrated the combined action of an esterase enzyme and a rhamnolipid surfactant to promote coal biodegradation by Pseudomonas japonica (Shi, Liu, Zhao, et al., 2023b). According to their study, the adsorption of rhamnolipid by the cell surface increases the permeability of the cell membrane, allowing microorganisms to secrete more esterase, while rhamnolipids increase the electronegativity of coal by adsorbing onto its surface. Consequently, these processes degrade coal macromolecules into aromatic compounds, alcohols, ethers, and long-chain alkanes.Fig. 1 Three possible mechanisms of interactions between surfactants, enzymes, and coal particles during coal biosolubilization. A Surfactants emulsify the hydrophobic components of coal, facilitating subsequent breakdown by enzymes into smaller coal particles. B Formation of surfactant-enzyme complexes, which then adhere to the coal surface and enhance coal biosolubilization. C Surfactants initially adhere to the coal surface, followed by enzyme absorption, finally leading to coal solubilization via the hydrophilic portions of surfactants

Numerous studies have demonstrated that biosurfactants can enhance the coal solubilization rate, which positions them as a promising tool for humic substance production and hydrocarbon bioremediation at polluted sites (Table 1). Table 1 Microbially produced biosurfactants and their effects on coal solubilization

Microorganism	Source	Produced biosurfactant	Coal type	Reported effects	Prospects	Ref	
Pseudomonas stutzeri	The formation water of an Indian coalbed	Rhamnolipids	Lignite, bituminous, and anthracite	With lignite, P. stutzeri produced more rhamnolipid than with bituminous or anthracite	P. stutzeri may be beneficial in in situ coal biotransformation into methane and the PAHs bioremediation	(Singh and Tripathi 2013)	
Candida bombicola	Bumblebee honey	Sophorolipids	NS	The biosurfactant contributed marginally to the solubilization of coal	The potential engineering applications of biosurfactants was determined	(Breckenridge and Polman 1994)	
Bacillus licheniformis	Water from oil well	Lipopeptide biosurfactant	Lignite	Solubilization occurred with a 53,000 Da component of lignite	Biosurfactants have the potential to facilitate coal refining	(Polman et al. 1994)	
Penicillium decumbens P6	Coal mine soil	Biosurfactant containing cell-free filtrates	Lignite	The activity of lignite-attacking enzymes was increased by biosurfactants	Biosurfactants

were 10 times more effective than the artificial

products

	(Yuan et al. 2006)	
Penicillium ortum MJ51	Lignite from coal mine	Extracellular surfactants	Lignite	Alkaline substances and surfactants were the primary contributors to lignite depolymerization	P. ortum MJ51 exhibits promising potential for production of lignite-based value-added products	(Li et al. 2023)	
Pseudomonas fluorescens	NS	Extracellular surfactants	Anthracite	Surfactants reduced surface tension and improved coal solubility	The mechanism by which cellular components degrade coal is established	(Fakoussa 1988)	
Pseudomonas otitidis P4	Coal mining site	Glycolipid biosurfactant	NS	Biosurfactant production and emulsification contributed to the bioavailability of pyrene	P. otitidis P4 is potential for PAHs bioremediation and scale-up biosurfactant production	(Singh and Tiwary 2016)	
Actinomycetes	Various soils	Different biosurfactants	Coal-vitamin medium	Coal was used as only nitrogen and carbon source for microbial growth	A method was proposed for selectively isolating biosurfactant-producing actinomycetes	(Ayoib et al. 2023)	
Bacillus aryabhattai SPS1001	NS	Glycolipid biosurfactant	Waste coal tar	Nutrient medium with waste coal tar produced maximum yield of biosurfactant (0.43 g L−1)	Potential for biosurfactant-mediated bitumen recovery from oil sand	(Singh 2023)	
Bacillus Lz-2	Oil-polluted water	Rhamnolipid biosurfactant	PAHs containing solution	Biosurfactant was applied to enhance PAH solubilization	An effective tool for removing petroleum and coal compounds from polluted sites	(Li et al. 2015)	
NS not specified, PAHs polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

The surfactants used for coal biosolubilization are mostly anionic and nonionic. Nonionic surfactants may enhance microbial growth and exhibit superior stability; however, they are costly and require large dosages. Anionic surfactants readily adhere to the coal surface but they may exhibit poor solubility (Pardhi et al. 2022). The utilization of surfactant mixtures to improve the effectiveness of coal biodegradation shows great promise. Shi et al. achieved the highest coal biodegradation using the synergistic effect of the nonionic surfactant TR (octyl phenoxy poly ethoxy) mixed with anionic surfactant LAS (sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate) (Shi, Liu, Wu, et al., 2023a). They described two possible mechanisms of coal biodegradation pathways via surfactant mixtures: intracellular and extracellular one. The graphical representation of the proposed mechanisms is given in Fig. 2.Fig. 2 Possible mechanisms of coal biodegradation by a surfactant mixture (TR-LAS). Abbreviations: TR, octyl phenoxy poly ethoxy; LAS, sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate; TCA cycle, tricarboxylic acid cycle

Experimental results by Shi et al. and other research groups suggest that the mixed surfactant TR-LAS enhances the availability of –OH and –NH2 functional groups on the bacterial cell surface and at the same time improves the hydrophilicity of coal. This promotes the adsorption of bacteria and their secretions onto coal surfaces. One of the main indicators of coal biodegradation is the secretable microbial alkaline protease, whose activity is strongly correlated with the rate of coal transformation. According to the scheme illustrated in Fig. 2, within the extracellular degradation route, the hydrophilic portion of the TR-LAS mixture is attached to the oxidized coal, whereas the hydrophobic portion is attached to alkaline protease. Consequently, alkaline protease facilitates the breakdown of oxidized coal into smaller molecules such as long-chain alkanes and aromatic compounds. In the intracellular degradation route, coal samples coated with TR-LAS first penetrate the phospholipid bilayer. Reverse micelles formed in the phospholipid bilayer allow coal samples to enter the cytoplasm. Inside the cytoplasm, alkaline protease helps degrade coal particles into smaller molecular that can then enter the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle.

Many studies published so far suggest that the direct application of surfactants is an effective method for accelerating the rate and reducing the duration of coal biodegradation (Table 2). Analysis of the data in Table 2 indicates that this approach features cost-effectiveness and simplicity of operation. Table 2 Published studies on direct surfactant applications in coal biosolubilization

Surfactant	Producing microorganism	Coal type	Reported effects	Mechanism of action	Ref	
Rhamnolipid	Pseudomonas japonica	Inner Mongolia coal	The mixture of rhamnolipid and esterase significantly promoted coal biodegradation	Rhamnolipid increases coal surface, making it more amenable to esterase-coal interaction	(Shi et al. 2023b)	
SDS	Extracellular proteins of

fungus AH

	Fushun mine coal	Lack of surfactants resulted in a reduced amount of enzymes being attached to the coal surface	Surfactants changed the coal surface’s charges and hydrophilic property to allow more enzymes to solubilize	(Yin et al. 2011)	
Rhamnolipid	Pseudomonas sp.

Ph6

	PAHs containing solution	Rhamanolipid altered Ph6 cell envelope microstructures and functional groups, improving cell membrane potential	Rhamnolipid enhances the cell-surface zeta potential and hydrophobicity, thus consequently degrade PAHs	(Ma et al. 2018)	
Anionic and nonionic surfactants	Nocardia mangyaensis	Wucaiwan coal	Significant cell growth was observed in the presence of mixed surfactants	Surfactants secreted more alkaline proteases and rendered the coal more compatible with N. mangyaensis	(Shi, Liu, Wu, et al., 2023a)	
SDS, LAS, Tween 80, and Triton X-100	Ochrobactrum cytisi, Novospingobium naphthalenivorans,

Alcaligenes faecalis, and P. fluorescens

	Shenmu lignite	P. fluorescens achieved the highest coal solubilization rate of 61.9% via Triton X-100	Adding Triton X-100 could reduce the contact angle between oxidized coal and surfactant solutions	(Kang et al. 2021)	
Tween 80,

Triton X-100, and Brij30

	Sphingomonas sp. GY2B	PAHs	Tween 80 enhanced the biodegradation of PAH	Tween 80 has a positive impact by serving as an extra carbon source for GY2B	(Liu et al. 2016)	
SDS	Hypocrea lixii HN-1	Bituminous coal	Pretreatment by SDS increased coal biosolubilization	Small molecule functional groups were introduced into the coal following pretreatment	(He et al. 2022)	
Tween-80	Phanaerochaete

chrysosporium (J1) and Trametes versicolor (J2)

	Weathered coal	Coal biosolubilization was enhanced by 15% (J1) and 12% (J2) along with Tween-80	Surfactant may increase the production and consumption of humic acids	(Tong et al. 2024)	
Triton X-100, SDS and DTAB	P. aeruginosa	Low-rank coal	Coal biodegradation rates reached 78.63% (Triton X-100), 55.93% (SDS), and 20.93% (DTAB)	Triton X-100 increased coal degradation rate by increasing cell membrane permeability	(Wu et al. 2022)	
Rhamnolipid, Triton X-100, LAS and DTAB	Bacillus licheniformis	Tar-rich coal	Triton X-100 demonstrated the most significant enhancement in coal hydrophilicity	The degradation of aromatic and aliphatic structures of coal was accelerated by Triton X-100	(Shen et al. 2023)	
SDS sodium dodecyl sulfate, PAHs polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Surfactants in biogenic coal-to-methane conversion

Coalbed methane (CBM) is gaining economic and scientific attention due to the continuously escalating demand for energy and the consequent fast depletion of conventional energy resources. The majority of methane contained within CBM deposits is generated microbially. However, the bioconversion of coal to methane is a relatively slow natural process owing to the complex chemical nature of coal (Park and Liang 2016; Sharma et al. 2018). To increase process efficiency, various coal pretreatment techniques are employed—many of them use oxidants, surfactants, chelating agents, acids, and alkalis. Surfactants, by lowering the surface tension and hydrophilicity of coal, may improve coal dissolution and accelerate its biodegradation. Additionally, higher coal biodegradation rates may result from the surfactant’s ability to alter the reaction sites of certain enzymes. Prior to methane production from coal, extracellular biosurfactants secreted by microorganisms interact with coal components, thereby increasing their solubility in water (Davis and Gerlach 2018; Faiz and Hendry 2006).

Existing research indicates various biosurfactant-producing microorganisms in methane-bearing coal environments, implying the key role of biosurfactant-production in improving coal bioavailability (Table 3). Schweitzer et al. examined environmentally relevant metagenomes from coal seams in the Powder River Basin with the aim of identifying genes and functional clusters involved in coal degradation. They showed that the biosurfactant genes associated with surfactants such as surfactin and lichysein were especially abundant in metabolically active microbial populations, suggesting a significant role of these biosurfactants in coal biogasification (Schweitzer et al. 2022). According to the study by Singh and Tripathi, coal addition to a medium containing bacteria isolated from coal-formation water led to a significant increase in biosurfactant production (Singh and Tripathi 2013). Zhang et al. (2018), used a specially designed 3-L fermenter to measure coal biogasification. Their findings revealed that the fermentation broth was rich in aromatic compounds and fatty acids, among other chemical compounds. Furthermore, the broth contained substances exhibiting biosurfactant properties that lowered surface tension to 54.5 ± 2.2 mN/m, which is lower than that of pure water (~ 72 mN/m). Table 3 Published reports demonstrating the correlation of microbial biosurfactant production (or chemical surfactant addition) with coal solubilization and subsequent CBM production

Producing microorganism	Surfactant	Coal type	Reported effects	Prospects/outlook	Ref	
Pseudomonas stutzeri isolated from coalbed formation water	Rhamnolipid	Lignite	Biosurfactant exhibited emulsifying ability and stability across a broad pH, temperature, and salinity	P. stutzeri potential to facilitate in situ biotransformation of coal into methane within the coalbed	(Singh and Tripathi 2013)	
Actinobacteria from coal core samples	Biosurfactant and Tween 80	Core coal	The bioassay found that the coal was more bioavailable due to the biosurfactant, and adding nutrients promoted its in situ production	Contributes novel insights into the in situ bacterial communities linked to coal and potential pathways implicated in coal degradation	(Barnhart et al. 2016)	
Viable microbial consortia from coal seam formation water	Zonyl FSN, Triton X-100, and Brij 35	Sub-bituminous coal	Zonyl FSN addition improved initial methane production by 240% and final methane yield by 180%	An opportunity to augment coalbed methane reserves through the utilization of in situ stimulation	(Papendick et al. 2011)	
Methanogenic community	Surfactin	Lignite and bituminous coal	Surfactin yielded from bituminous coal (0.3901 ± 0.0027 SD) and contributed to enhancing its bioavailability	Enables efficient biomethane production via suitable metabolic strategies	(B. Wang et al. 2021a, b)	
In situ coal-associated

biofilms

	Lichysein, rhamnolipids	Coal seam samples	Various biosurfactant genes were most present in samples	In-depth knowledge of subsurface coal degradation strategy	(Schweitzer et al. 2022)	
NS	Fluorocarbon surfactant PMP	Coal core samples	Water-to-gas wetness conversion of the coal increased gas-flooding water recovery by 20.31%wt	Gas wettability alteration approach can enhance coal-bed methane production	(Jia et al. 2019)	
NS not specified, PMP perfluorooctyl methacrylate monomer–containing polymethacrylate

Surfactants in coal biobeneficiation

Biosurfactants produced by various microorganisms possess the capability to alter the surface characteristics of minerals because of their amphiphilic organic structure. This property plays a crucial role in mineral beneficiation. Likewise, the combination of synthetic surfactants and microorganisms can provide efficient technological solutions for mineral biobeneficiation (Abhyarthana and Rayasam 2019).

In their recent review, Asgari et al. (2024) classified microorganisms commonly utilized in mineral processing into two main process categories: “biomining” and “biobeneficiation,” where “Biomining” comprised two sub-groups: bioleaching and biooxidation. Although these two terms are frequently used synonymously, bioleaching refers to the dissolution of insoluble metals and the transfer of the target metal into a solution, while biooxidation primarily refers to the microbial decomposition of minerals without solubilizing the metal. In contrast, biobeneficiation encompasses the processes of bioflotation and bioflocculation. Here, microorganisms, functioning as reagents, collectors, or modifiers, facilitate separation selectivity in the context of these two processes. The majority of research examining the relationship between surfactant-targeted microbial activity and coal processing has focused on bioflotation (see the “Surfactants in coal bioflotation” section), whereas bioflocculation has received comparatively less attention so far.

Surfactants in coal bioleaching

Bioleaching, a process employed to dissolve/extract valuable metals from mineral resources and eliminate impurities such as sulfur from coal, is more specifically termed biodesulfurization (see the “Surfactants in coal biodesulfurization” section). Various bacterial strains, including Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, A. thiooxidans, and Bacillus mucilaginosus, have shown selective vanadium-leaching effects with respect to vanadium-bearing coal (Tupikina et al. 2013). There are techniques developed to speed up microbial leaching and increase the effectiveness of vanadium recovery, such as mineral roasting and fortification agent addition. Among them, surfactants have proven effective in accelerating the ore leaching rate, improving the ore surface’s wettability and increasing the ore pile permeability (Fang et al. 2014). In a study by Dong et al., SDS was used as a leaching enhancer for B. mucilaginosus in leaching tests on vanadium-containing coal. Their findings indicated that the appropriate dosage of surfactant (0.1 g/L) improved the properties of the mineral surface and that SDS helped in creating an optimal acidic environment, thus ensuring a smooth leaching process (Dong et al. 2023).

According to another study of Dong et al., the highest vanadium extraction rate of 30.1% was reached at an SDS concentration of 0.05 g/L in the presence of B. mucilaginosus (Dong et al. 2019). When higher surfactant concentrations were applied, the metal dissolution efficiency decreased, possibly due to inhibition of bacterial growth. Similarly, the application of Tween-20 surfactant first increased the leaching rate, but subsequently decreased it depending on the Tween-20 dosage (Dong et al. 2019).

Surfactants in coal bioflotation

The utilization of low-rank coals (LRC), especially oxidized ones, poses major environmental challenges due to their high ash content and low calorific value. Thus, improving the effectiveness of LRC combustion and reducing pollution are of great significance. Flotation, a very powerful particle separation technique, is very suitable to eliminate impurities and improve the quality of coal. Regrettably, (oxidized) LRC expose numerous hydrophilic functional groups (–COOH and –OH) on their surface, which hinder the adsorption of oily collectors and consequently diminish the flotation efficiency by forming stable hydration films (Xue et al. 2023). To increase the hydrophobicity of the coal surface prior to LRC flotation, a variety of techniques, such as chemical pretreatment, dry pulverizing, heat treatment, microwaving, and ultrasonic treatment, is implemented (Asgari et al. 2024). Nevertheless, the use of these techniques is constrained by many factors, such as increased operating costs, excessive use of aggressive chemicals, adverse environmental effects, and limited applicability (Mishra et al. 2023). Bioflotation has garnered growing interest as an addition/alternative to conventional techniques because of its notable selectivity, eco-friendliness, and cost-effectiveness. Microbial cells and their metabolites can serve as efficient frothers (forming the micro-bubbles), collectors, or depressants in bioflotation processes. Bioflotation methods can be categorized into direct (where microorganisms are directly applied to treat coal) and indirect (where microbial metabolites are used instead of microorganisms) variants (Asgari et al. 2024).

Biosurfactants, with their unique properties, confer significant advantages in the bioflotation process. Their amphiphilic structure allows them to enhance the wettability and reactivity of hydrophobic substances and to adjust the surface characteristics of bacterial cells. Due to their surface activity, biosurfactants are excellent foaming, dispersing, and emulsifying agents. Primarily utilized as frothers in the bioflotation process, biosurfactants create froth with the desired stability (Khoshdast et al. 2023). Enhanced surface activity is correlated not only with higher froth stability, but also with better frothability (which can be measured as froth height) (Didyk and Sadowski 2012; El-Midany and Abdel-Khalek 2014). In some cases, as reported by Dhar et al. and Augustyn et al., biosurfactants were used in the flotation process as depressants and collectors (Dhar et al. 2021; (Gholami and Khoshdast n.d.).

Figure 3 illustrates the bioflotational separation of hydrophobic coal particles from hydrophilic gangue minerals using microbial rhamnolipids as frothers. Rhamnolipid molecules adsorb at the air–water interface due to their folded structure, with two hydrophobic chains oriented toward the air bubbles. In turn, the interaction between the polar hydrophilic heads can generate a film that is even more densely packed than that of ethers and alcohols.Fig. 3 Schematics of a coal bioflotation reactor (left) and coal particle–rhamnolipids adsorption (right). The nonpolar head of the surfactant molecule interacts with the air/water interface, whereas the polar end forms hydrogen bonds with water. This process uses changes in water surface tension, those magnitude serves as an indicator of the surface activity of surfactants

There are many studies demonstrating that bioflotation, in which biosurfactants were combined with conventional moist techniques, can successfully and selectively purify coal materials (Table 4). Table 4 Examples of coal purification by flotation using biosurfactants derived from microorganisms

Technology	Biosurfactant	Coal type	Study type	Results reported	Ref	
Froth flotation	Surfactin from Bacillus subtilis	Sub-bituminous, South Africa	The surface interaction between surfactant and coal	Hydrophobicity of coal was increased by surfactant at pH 3 and 15 mg/L	(Augustyn et al. 2021)	
Mineral flotation	Rhamnolipid from Pseudomonas aeruginosa

MA01

	Coal, Iran	Surfactant application as a frothing agent in coal and hydrophilic mineral flotation	Surfactant decreased the ash content and coal yield of concentrates	(Khoshdast et al. 2011)	
Cadmium removal	Rhamnolipid from Pseudomonas aeruginosa MA01	Coal waste, Iran	Using depressing effect of surfactant to activate coal waste for removal of heavy metals	Absorbent to cadmium ratio of approx. 125 and 10 h contact removed over 99% cadmium at pH 9	(Boveiri Shami et al. 2019)	
Ash removal	Rhamnolipid from Pseudomonas aeruginosa	Semi bituminous coal, Iran	Impact of surfactant on the ash removal efficiency by froth flotation	Surfactant showed low selectivity and high frothability in terms of yield/ash correlation	(Khoshdast and Shojaei 2012)	
Froth flotation	Rhamnolipid from Pseudomonas aeruginosa	Coal, Iran	Surfactant production and its frothing characterization	The surfactant had high frothability in terms of lowering surface tension, froth height/stability	(Fazaelipoor et al. 2010)	
Bioflotation and artificial neural

network

	Rhamnolipid from Pseudomonas aeruginosa MA01	Coal, Iran	Importance of how surfactant impacts the efficiency of coal flotation by statistical analysis	Surfactant had a depressing effect on coal flotation	(Gholami and Khoshdast n.d.)	
Collector and frother	Biosurfactant-like substances from Bacillus	Coking coal, China	Influence of native microorganisms on coal flotation	Substances enhanced froth stability by reducing water entrainment	(X. Wang et al. 2023a, b)	
Heavy metal removal	Biosurfactants from Candida lipolytica UCP0988 and C. sphaerica UCP0995	AMD near coal mine, Brazil	Applying surfactants as alternative collectors in

flotation systems

	The surfactants achieved a removal effectiveness rate of 90% after 15 min	(Albuquerque et al. 2012)	
Bio-liquefaction and bioflotation	Biosurfactants from Hypocrea lixii AH	Lignite, China	Exploring AH as a bioflotation agent in lignite utilization	Surfactants reduced the concentration or enhances the flotation of lignite impurities	(He et al. 2023)	
Benefi-ciation	Biosurfactants from microalgae	Lignite, Indonesia	Lignite conversion with biosurfactant	The calorific value of lignite was improved	(Mahreni and Puspitasari 2020)	
AMD acid mine drainage

Surfactants in coal biodesulfurization

Despite the economic significance of coal, its combustion is accompanied by detrimental environmental issues, including sulfur oxides (SOX) emission, acid rains, and toxic airborne particle formation. Air pollution by SOX (especially by SO2) discharge exerts harmful impacts on living organisms and their environment. Obviously, reducing the sulfur content in coal prior to combustion can drastically contribute to resolving SOX emissions. Biodesulfurization techniques employing microorganisms have aroused immense interest as a novel sustainable and environmentally friendly approach for removing sulfur (specifically organic and pyritic sulfur) from coal (Çelik et al. 2019).

Recent research on biodesulfurization activity enhancement has shed light on the potential of surfactants to improve sulfur removal efficiency (Table 5). Surfactants, being amphiphilic compounds, help improve the mass transfer of the system, thereby accelerating the desulfurization process. By decreasing surface and interfacial tensions, surfactants can alter the solubility of hydrophobic compounds and enhance their transport through bacterial membranes, promoting the desulfurization rate (Mishra et al, 2018b). The presence of surfactants results in surface modifications leading to a more favorable interaction between the microbial cell and coal, which is beneficial for biodesulfurization performance (Mishra et al., 2018c). A schematic representation of typical coal biodesulfurization reactions augmented by surfactants is shown in Fig. 4. The desulfurizing microorganisms may utilize a surfactant and simultaneously attack the coal matrix to fulfill their sulfur needs. In the presence of surfactants, two types of sulfur in coal become more bioavailable: inorganic sulfides Sp (e.g., ferrous sulfide–pyrite) and organic sulfur compounds—So. Table 5 Surfactants in coal biodesulfurization: recent case study reports

Microorganism	Surfactant	Sulfur compound	Results reported	Mechanism of action	Ref	
Rhodococcus

erythropolis DSM 44308

	Span 80	Lignite (So = 2.59%)	44.6% of desulfurization using 2% v/v Span 80	R.erythropolis utilized the extra surfactant and attacked the coal matrix to fulfill its sulfur needs	(Mishra et al. 2018c)	
Rhodococcus erythropolis	Tween 80	DBT	The highest activity was reached at 1 µmol g−1 min−1 when Tween 80 above CMC	Tween 80 may improve desulfurization activity by decreasing the production of inhibitory compounds	(Feng et al. 2006)	
Corynebacterium sp. ZD-1	Brij-35, Tween 80, Triton-100X, and β-cyclodextrin	DBT	2-Hydroxybiphenyl formation was increased by 50% with Tween-80 compared to control	Tween 80 may enhance the mass transfer of DBT between organic and aqueous phases	(Wang et al. 2006)	
Acidithiobacillus

caldus and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans

	SDS, DTAB, and Tween 20	Coal (Stot = 4.55%)	When 1100 mg/L of Tween 20 was added, the overall desulfurization rate reached 29.7%	Tween 20 enhanced bacterial adsorption, leading to increased extracellular polymeric substance release	(Zhang et al. 2017)	
Thiobacillus ferrooxidans, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas putida	Tween 80	Coal (Stot = 5.05%)	P. putida

removed 58.23% of Stot with 0.1% Tween 80

	Tween 80 facilitated the mitigation of interfacial tension, thereby enhancing the affinity between coal and microorganisms	(Xu et al. 2020)	
Leptospirillum ferriphilum	Span 80	Lignite (So = 7.63%)	Span 80 (0.05% v/v) removed nearly 61% of Stot	Span 80 may enhance coal bioavailability for biodegradation	(Mishra et al. 2018b)	
Leptospirillum ferriphilum	Span 80	Lignite (So = 7.63%)	S removal was lower with Span 80 by 9% under continuous fermentation	Fe2+ may react with Span 80, resulting in the inhibition/slowing down of the Fe2+ oxidation	(Mishra et al. 2018a, b, c)	
Bacterial consortium IQMJ-5	Tween-20,

Tween-80, SDS, and EDTA

	DBT	Tween 80 showed high desulfurization rate about 66%	Tween 80 had the least inhibitory property on bacterial metabolism and growth	(Khan et al. 2022)	
DBT dibenzothiophene, CMC critical micelle concentration

Fig. 4 Possible mechanism by which surfactants influence the coal biodesulfurization efficiency of bacteria

Fernando Bautista observed a significant enhancement in the biodesulfurization capabilities of microorganisms upon the addition of surfactants above the critical micelle concentration (CMC). They attributed this effect primarily to the increased growth of bacteria in the presence of surfactants, which serve as an additional carbon source for bacteria (Fernando Bautista et al. 2009). Furthermore, surfactants can facilitate the transfer of chemicals between the aqueous and organic phases, thereby increasing coal accessibility for microbial attack (Wang et al. 2006).

Biosurfactants are proposed to play a “strategic role” in reducing the sulfur content in coal. Handayani et al. investigated the biodesulfurization of organic, pyritic sulfur, sulfate, and total sulfur in Tondongkura coal through a multi-stage bioprocess treatment employing Pseudoclavibacter sp. strain SKC/XLW-1, known for its biosurfactant production capabilities (Handayani et al. 2017). Their findings suggest that SKC/XLW-1 and its metabolic products are key players in sulfur removal from coal due to their ability to secrete biosurfactants and oxidize sulfur simultaneously.

Surfactant-aided microbial coal dust suppression

Coal mining, refining, and transportation give rise to elevated levels of particulate matter (dust) in the atmosphere, posing significant hazards such as pollution, explosion, and spontaneous combustion. Exposure of residents and workers to hazardous coal dust concentrations significantly increases their health risks (Liu and Liu 2020).

Coal dust suppression based on microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation is a relatively new technique that has gained popularity owing to its low cost, minimal environmental impact, and high particle aggregation efficiency. The fundamental principle behind this technology, thoroughly described by Seifan et al. in their recent review, is related to urea hydrolysis combined with biosurfactant action (Seifan and Berenjian 2019).

The inherent hydrophobicity of coal dust particles arises from numerous non-polar groups (aromatic and aliphatic) on their surface. Surfactants, being amphiphilic compounds, can decrease the hydrophobicity of coal’s surface and consequently significantly mitigate the hazards associated with coal dust (K. Wang et al. 2019a, b, c; Wang et al. 2020). As the particle size of coal dust decreases, its wettability diminishes, and its microstructure becomes increasingly complex. The insufficient wettability of coal dust can be successfully remedied by applying a surfactant (Li et al. 2013). In the absence of surfactants, the microbial dust suppressant forms a thin layer of CaCO3 particles, which subsequently compromises the ability of crusts to withstand external forces and eliminates the dust suppression effect. Surfactants contribute to the process in many ways: (a) they improve wetting performance by adsorbing onto the dust particle’s surface; (b) they aid in the dispersion of particles in the suppressant solution, thus facilitating better coverage of the coal dust surface; and (c) they help stabilize particle coatings by promoting the formation of more robust bonds between the aggregating agent and the dust particles. According to two recent studies, the suppression properties of microbial dust suppressants containing surfactants are between 29.61 and 31.98 times greater than those without surfactants (Y. Zhao et al. 2023a, b; Zhu et al. 2021).

Currently, there is a methodological trend toward replacing synthetic surfactants with bio-analogs, as the latter display an environmentally “benign” nature, rapid biodegradability, and minimal toxicity (Eras-Muñoz et al. 2022). Considerable research has been conducted in recent years on the impact of various surfactants and their combinations on the efficacy of urease-producing microbial dust suppressants (Table 6). Table 6 Recent studies devoted to (bio)surfactant-assisted in microbial coal dust suppression

Microorganism	Surfactant/biosurfactant	Coal type	Performance analysis	Results reported	Rate effects	Ref	
Pseudomonas PLD01	Rhamnolipid from PLD01	Coal from Suncun Coal Mine	Emulsification index, PLD01 biosurfactant production, biosurfactant characterization	The biosurfactant extracted by PLD01 exhibited superior wettability to coal in comparison to SDS	PLD01 decreased the surface tension of water from 72.8 to 40.6 mN/m	(Liu et al. 2022)	
Bacillus X4	CAB	Bituminous coal from Shandong Longyun Coal Industry Co. Ltd	Adsorption experiment, dust suppression, wind erosion experiments	The surface tension was most drastically decreased by the combined effect of bacteria and surfactants	The adsorption capacity of X4 was the highest for 40–80 mesh coal (40.71 mg/g)	(Zhang et al. 2022)	
Bacillus cereus CS1 and Sporosarcina pasteurii ATCC11859	SDBS, CTAB, CAB, and APG	Coal from Shandong

Longyun Coal Industry Co., Ltd

	Surfactant screening, dust-suppression property of suppressant	CAB-microbial dust suppressant exhibited enhanced resistance to wind erosion and evaporation	The combined efficiency was 2.40–2.71 times than surfactant alone	(Zhu et al. 2021)	
Bacillus X4 and Pseudomonas

PLD01

	Rhamnolipids from PLD01	Coal from Suncun Coal

Mine

	Co-culturing urea-hydrolysis X4 and biosurfactant PLD01	X4 provided fatty acids to produce biosurfactants, while PLD01 provided an alkaline environment for mineralization	P14X inoculation showed significant mineralization and emulsification	(Cheng et al. 2024)	
Microbial community form a waste-activated sludge	SDBS, APG, and CAB	Coal dust	Wetting test, biomineralization, coal dust consolidation	SDBS and APG may decrease the pathogenic risk of microbial dust suppressants	The rain resistance/hardness indicated that 0.2% SBDS had the best effect	(Y. Zhao et al. 2023a, b)	
NS	Bio-based rhamnolipid, APG, SDBS, CAB, SLS, OP-10	Coal from Wangpo mining area	Surfactant selection, surfactant characterization, and performance evaluation	An environmentally friendly and non-polluting rhamnolipid-based dust suppressant mixture was developed	The surface tension of mixture reduced to 23.95 mN/m, the contact angle to coal dust was 25°	(Niu et al. 2023)	
Bacillus X4	CAB	Bituminous coal from Shandong Longyun Coal Industry Co. Ltd	Isotherm adsorption, adsorption kinetics, dust suppression, wind-rain erosion	Due to the CAB’s wetting effect, the contact area between the microbial suppressant and the dust increased	Higher dust content led to improved adsorption and consolidation effects	(Y.-Y. Zhao et al. 2023a, b)	
NS	Rhamnolipid, lactan

sophorolipid, surfactin,

	Anthracite coal from Baoshan Yuan Coal

Mine

	Biological compound dust suppressant preparation, sedimentation, wettability	The ideal proportions for the dust suppressant were 12.9% rhamnolipid, 4.4% lactone sophorolipid, and 2.9% surfactin	28.515 mN/m was the minimum surface tension of the biodegradable dust suppressant	(K. Wang et al. 2021a, b)	
NS not specified, CAB cocamidopropyl betaine, SDBS sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate, APG alkyl polyglycoside, SLS sodium lauryl sulfate, OP-10 alkylphenol polyoxyethylene ether

The process of surfactant-aided coal dust suppression via urea hydrolysis operates as shown in Fig. 5. In this process, urea (CO(NH2)2) undergoes hydrolysis facilitated by the urease enzymes produced by microorganisms, resulting in the formation of carbonate anion (CO3−2) and ammonium cation (NH4+), which co-exist in water in dynamic equilibrium with ammonia (NH3). The microbial cell wall, which carries a negative charge, attracts cations (Ca2+) from the surrounding solution to form hardly soluble calcium carbonate (CaCO3), which is then precipitated in the vicinity of the microbial cell wall. As mentioned above, surfactants/biosurfactants from dust suppressants increase the wettability of coal dust particles and reduce the surface tension of the solution. Finally, the surfactant-microbial dust suppressant solution consolidates the coal dust, leading to microbially induced mineralization.Fig. 5 Surfactant-aided microbially induced coal dust precipitation mechanism. Abbreviations: ATP, adenosine triphosphate; CO(NH2)2, urea; CaCO3, calcium carbonate; CO3−2, carbonate anion; NH4+, ammonium cation; NH3, ammonia

Biomaterials containing surfactants exhibit a robust growth trend for coal dust control, mainly from the perspective of biodegradability. Various innovative approaches have been proposed and utilized to improve the dust-suppression effectiveness of microbial dust suppressants. In a recent study, Cheng et al. (2024) conducted microbiological co-culturing to synergize the emulsification performance of biosurfactant bacteria with the mineralization performance of urea hydrolysis bacteria. Their findings indicated a distinct collaborative effect between the two bacterial strains: the urea-hydrolyzing bacteria provided fatty acids to enhance rhamnolipid synthesis by the biosurfactant producer, while the biosurfactant bacteria created an alkaline environment, promoting mineralization and enhancing CaCO3 generation. In another study, Lu et al. developed a wetting agent with exceptional wetting properties by combining various synthetic surfactants with Sapindus mukorssi saponin extract (Lu et al. 2021). Similarly, Wang et al. effectively synthesized a microalgae oil–based coal dust suppressant, showing excellent performance in hard water and displaying remarkable environmental tolerance (H. Wang et al. 2023a, b).

Knowledge gaps and research priorities

The research outlined above has shed light on some fundamental concepts and practical applications of coal-microbial-surfactant systems aimed at improved energy production and environmental protection. However, while considering this topic, some critical considerations must be kept in mind:Although the technology for surfactant-mediated coal degradation has made impressive progress, there are still serious obstacles and challenges, for example, slow degradation rates (i.e., long degradation duration), which noticeably impede large-scale industrial applications. Microbial surfactants, on the other hand, are biodegradable, have high activity, are nontoxic, and remain stable under extreme conditions. Consequently, their enormous potential in the context of commercial implementation should be considered.

It is crucial to evaluate the economic viability of using biosurfactants compared with conventional synthetic surfactants. Although they are more environmentally favorable, they may also be more costly to manufacture and maintain. Consequently, it is imperative to conduct a cost–benefit analysis prior to determining the appropriate use of these surfactants in coal utilization. In general, the abovementioned studies illustrate the potential of novel biosurfactants; however, there is a dearth of information regarding their economic feasibility and operational effectiveness.

Identifying the optimal surfactant type and concentration across different coal processing technologies is essential, considering the diverse nature and properties of surfactants. Furthermore, it is crucial to pay significant attention while using large concentrations of biosurfactants due to their wide range of biological activities.

Microbial functional activity during coal processing may be diminished by the interaction of microbial cells with chemical surfactants. Particularly, the area and fluidity of microbial cell membranes may alter due to the insertion, replacement, or dissolution of phospholipids and lipopolysaccharides by surfactant molecules (Górna et al. 2011).

Concerns related to contamination may arise from the introduction of surfactants into the environment. Therefore, potential (environmental) toxicity and degradation pathways must be thoroughly examined prior to selecting a surfactant as a coal-processing tool (Edwards et al. 2003). Again, one option to overcome this problem could be to employ biosurfactant-producing microorganisms and their derivatives.

Surfactant-mediated coal processing technologies are mainly conducted in laboratory-scale settings. The feasibility and efficacy of these systems in full-scale outdoor or natural settings remain undefined. The significant limitations, including incapacity in large-scale operations, high production costs resulting from costly substrates, and patent rights, must be taken into account to fully disclose the enormous benefits of biosurfactants.

The majority of research on surfactant-mediated coal utilization currently focuses on lignite, while other varieties of LRC, such as leonardite (weathered coal) and coal waste/residue receive little attention. Therefore, more efforts should be made to promote better characterization of process efficiency across various coal types.

Conclusion

(Bio)surfactant-mediated coal–microbial systems have shown very promising versatility and impressive performance potential in the energy sector and environmental protection, even though they have not been exploited for large-scale industrial applications yet. The mechanisms behind the bioavailability of coal remain incompletely understood owing to its heterogeneous structure and the intricate interplay between coal and microbial cells. Integration of appropriate surfactant into the processes of coal biosolubilization, coal biobeneficiation, and coal dust suppression can optimize the interaction between coal particles and microbial cells, thereby enhancing process efficiency. As a result, developing and implementing highly selective surfactants may aid in addressing rate-limiting stages and improve coal utilization processes. As concluding remarks, incorporating cutting-edge technological advancements, such as genetic engineering, nanotechnology, computational modeling, and downstream processing, into interdisciplinary research would optimize biosurfactant production. In addition, further investigation is necessary to comprehend the interaction between cells, biosurfactants, and coal matrices, with the aim of enhancing our understanding of their mode of action in the context of clean coal technologies.

Author contribution

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Initial writing was performed by Nuraly Akimbekov, Azhar Zhubanova, and Kuanysh T. Tastambek. Separate chapters were written and edited by Atakan Tepecik and Dinara Sherelkhan. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Ilya Digel and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read the final manuscript.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This research was funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Grant No. AP14869934 and Grant No. BR24992833).

Data availability

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper. Should any raw data files be needed in another format, they are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethical approval

The findings are presented transparently, truthfully, and without any form of fabrication or improper data manipulation.

Consent to participate

All authors agree to continue to support the follow-up work.

Consent for publication

All authors have reviewed and approved the final version of this manuscript and consent to its publication. Each author confirms that the manuscript is an original work and has not been previously published nor is under consideration for publication elsewhere.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Abbreviations

AMD Acid mine drainage

APG Alkyl polyglycoside

CAB Cocamidopropyl betaine

CBM Coalbed methane

CMC Critical micelle concentration

DBT Dibenzothiophene

LAS Sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate

LRC Low rank coals

OP-10 Alkylphenol polyoxyethylene ether

PAHs Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

PMP Perfluorooctyl methacrylate monomer-containing polymethacrylate

SDBS Sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate

SDS Sodium dodecyl sulfate

SLS Sodium lauryl sulfate

TCA Tricarboxylic acid

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

Abhyarthana P, Rayasam V (2019) Role of surfactants in mineral processing: an overview. In: Ashim Kumar D (ed) Surfactants and detergents (pp Ch. 2). IntechOpen. 10.5772/intechopen.85947
Akimbekov N Digel I Abdieva G Ualieva P Tastambek K Lignite biosolubilization and bioconversion by Bacillus sp.: the collation of analytical data Biofuels 2021 12 3 247 258 10.1080/17597269.2020.1753936
Akimbekov N, Digel I, Abdieva G, Ualieva P, Tastambek K (2021) Lignite biosolubilization and bioconversion by Bacillus sp.: the collation of analytical data. Biofuels 12(3):247–258. 10.1080/17597269.2020.1753936
Akimbekov NS, Digel I, Tastambek KT, Sherelkhan DK, Jussupova DB, Altynbay NP (2021) Low-rank coal as a source of humic substances for soil amendment and fertility management. Agriculture 11(12):1261. 10.3390/agriculture11121261
Akimbekov NS, Digel I, Marzhan K, Tastambek KT, Sherelkhan DK, Qiao X (2023) Microbial co-processing and beneficiation of low-rank coals for clean fuel production: a review. Engineered Sci 25:942. 10.30919/es942
Albuquerque CF Luna-Finkler CL Rufino RD Luna JM de Menezes CTB Santos VA Sarubbo LA Evaluation of biosurfactants for removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous effluent using flotation techniques Int Rev Chem Eng 2012 4 2 156 161
Albuquerque CF, Luna-Finkler CL, Rufino RD, Luna JM, de Menezes CTB, Santos VA, Sarubbo LA (2012) Evaluation of biosurfactants for removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous effluent using flotation techniques. Int Rev Chem Eng 4(2):156–161
Asgari K Huang Q Khoshdast H Hassanzadeh A A review on bioflotation of coal and minerals: classification, mechanisms, challenges, and future perspectives Miner Process Extr Metall Rev 2024 45 1 46 76 10.1080/08827508.2022.2121919
Asgari K, Huang Q, Khoshdast H, Hassanzadeh A (2024) A review on bioflotation of coal and minerals: classification, mechanisms, challenges, and future perspectives. Miner Process Extr Metall Rev 45(1):46–76. 10.1080/08827508.2022.2121919
Augustyn AR Pott RWM Tadie M The interactions of the biosurfactant surfactin in coal flotation Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2021 627 127122 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.127122
Augustyn AR, Pott RWM, Tadie M (2021) The interactions of the biosurfactant surfactin in coal flotation. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 627:127122. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.127122
Ayoib A Gopinath SCB Yahya ARM Zakaria L Coal-vitamin medium for improved scheme of isolating biosurfactant-producing actinomycetes of rare species from soil samples Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 2023 10.1007/s13399-022-03691-8
Ayoib A, Gopinath SCB, Yahya ARM, Zakaria L (2023) Coal-vitamin medium for improved scheme of isolating biosurfactant-producing actinomycetes of rare species from soil samples. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery. 10.1007/s13399-022-03691-8
Banat IM Franzetti A Gandolfi I Bestetti G Martinotti MG Fracchia L Smyth TJ Marchant R Microbial biosurfactants production, applications and future potential Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010 87 2 427 444 10.1007/s00253-010-2589-0 20424836
Banat IM, Franzetti A, Gandolfi I, Bestetti G, Martinotti MG, Fracchia L, Smyth TJ, Marchant R (2010) Microbial biosurfactants production, applications and future potential. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 87(2):427–444. 10.1007/s00253-010-2589-020424836
Barnhart EP Weeks EP Jones EJP Ritter DJ McIntosh JC Clark AC Ruppert LF Cunningham AB Vinson DS Orem W Fields MW Hydrogeochemistry and coal-associated bacterial populations from a methanogenic coal bed Int J Coal Geo 2016 162 14 26 10.1016/j.coal.2016.05.001
Barnhart EP, Weeks EP, Jones EJP, Ritter DJ, McIntosh JC, Clark AC, Ruppert LF, Cunningham AB, Vinson DS, Orem W, Fields MW (2016) Hydrogeochemistry and coal-associated bacterial populations from a methanogenic coal bed. Int J Coal Geo 162:14–26. 10.1016/j.coal.2016.05.001
Bezza FA Chirwa EMN Biosurfactant-assisted bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in liquid culture system and substrate interactions Polycyclic Aromat Compd 2017 37 5 375 394 10.1080/10406638.2015.1129973
Bezza FA, Chirwa EMN (2017) Biosurfactant-assisted bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in liquid culture system and substrate interactions. Polycyclic Aromat Compd 37(5):375–394. 10.1080/10406638.2015.1129973
Bhadra S Chettri D Kumar Verma A Biosurfactants: secondary metabolites involved in the process of bioremediation and biofilm removal Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2023 195 9 5541 5567 10.1007/s12010-022-03951-3 35579742
Bhadra S, Chettri D, Kumar Verma A (2023) Biosurfactants: secondary metabolites involved in the process of bioremediation and biofilm removal. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 195(9):5541–5567. 10.1007/s12010-022-03951-335579742
Boveiri Shami R Shojaei V Khoshdast H Efficient cadmium removal from aqueous solutions using a sample coal waste activated by rhamnolipid biosurfactant Journal of Environmental Management 2019 231 1182 1192 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.126 30602243
Boveiri Shami R, Shojaei V, Khoshdast H (2019) Efficient cadmium removal from aqueous solutions using a sample coal waste activated by rhamnolipid biosurfactant. Journal of Environmental Management 231:1182–1192. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.12630602243
Breckenridge CR Polman JK Solubilization of coal by biosurfactant derived from Candida bombicola Geomicrobiol J 1994 12 4 285 288 10.1080/01490459409377996
Breckenridge CR, Polman JK (1994) Solubilization of coal by biosurfactant derived from Candida bombicola. Geomicrobiol J 12(4):285–288. 10.1080/01490459409377996
Bubenheim D Wignarajah K Berry W Wydeven T Phytotoxic effects of gray water due to surfactants J Am Soc Hortic Sci 1997 122 6 792 796 10.21273/JASHS.122.6.792
Bubenheim D, Wignarajah K, Berry W, Wydeven T (1997) Phytotoxic effects of gray water due to surfactants. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 122(6):792–796
Carolin CF Senthil Kumar P Mohanakrishna G Hemavathy RV Rangasamy G Aminabhavi MT Sustainable production of biosurfactants via valorisation of industrial wastes as alternate feedstocks Chemosphere 2023 312 137326 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137326 36410507
Carolin CF, Senthil Kumar P, Mohanakrishna G, Hemavathy RV, Rangasamy G, Aminabhavi MT (2023) Sustainable production of biosurfactants via valorisation of industrial wastes as alternate feedstocks. Chemosphere 312:137326. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.13732636410507
Çelik PA Aksoy DÖ Koca S Koca H Çabuk A The approach of biodesulfurization for clean coal technologies: a review Int J Environ Sci Technol 2019 16 4 2115 2132 10.1007/s13762-019-02232-7
Çelik PA, Aksoy DÖ, Koca S, Koca H, Çabuk A (2019) The approach of biodesulfurization for clean coal technologies: a review. Int J Environ Sci Technol 16(4):2115–2132. 10.1007/s13762-019-02232-7
Chang P Zhao Z Xu G Ghosh A Huang J Yang T Evaluation of the coal dust suppression efficiency of different surfactants: a factorial experiment Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2020 595 124686 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.124686
Chang P, Zhao Z, Xu G, Ghosh A, Huang J, Yang T (2020) Evaluation of the coal dust suppression efficiency of different surfactants: a factorial experiment. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 595:124686. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.124686
Chen J Fine JD Mullin CA Are organosilicon surfactants safe for bees or humans? Science of The Total Environment 2018 612 415 421 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.175 28863372
Chen J, Fine JD, Mullin CA (2018) Are organosilicon surfactants safe for bees or humans? Science of The Total Environment 612:415–421. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.17528863372
Cheng W-M Liu J-D Feng Y Hu X-M Zhao Y-Y Liu Y Study on the cooperation mechanism of urea-hydrolysis bacteria and biosurfactant bacteria for dust suppression Chemical Engineering Journal 2024 480 148008 10.1016/j.cej.2023.148008
Cheng W-M, Liu J-D, Feng Y, Hu X-M, Zhao Y-Y, Liu Y (2024) Study on the cooperation mechanism of urea-hydrolysis bacteria and biosurfactant bacteria for dust suppression. Chemical Engineering Journal 480:148008. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.148008
Chong H Li Q Microbial production of rhamnolipids: opportunities, challenges and strategies Microb Cell Fact 2017 16 1 137 10.1186/s12934-017-0753-2 28779757
Chong H, Li Q (2017) Microbial production of rhamnolipids: opportunities, challenges and strategies. Microb Cell Fact 16(1):137. 10.1186/s12934-017-0753-228779757
Davis KJ Gerlach R Transition of biogenic coal-to-methane conversion from the laboratory to the field: a review of important parameters and studies International Journal of Coal Geology 2018 185 33 43 10.1016/j.coal.2017.11.006
Davis KJ, Gerlach R (2018) Transition of biogenic coal-to-methane conversion from the laboratory to the field: a review of important parameters and studies. International Journal of Coal Geology 185:33–43. 10.1016/j.coal.2017.11.006
Dhar P Havskjold H Thornhill M Roelants S Soetaert W Kota HR Chernyshova I Toward green flotation: Interaction of a sophorolipid biosurfactant with a copper sulfide Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2021 585 386 399 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.11.079 33307307
Dhar P, Havskjold H, Thornhill M, Roelants S, Soetaert W, Kota HR, Chernyshova I (2021) Toward green flotation: Interaction of a sophorolipid biosurfactant with a copper sulfide. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 585:386–399. 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.11.07933307307
Didyk AM, Sadowski Z (2012) Flotation of serpentinite and quartz using biosurfactants. Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing, 48(2):607–618. https://www.journalssystem.com/ppmp/Flotation-of-serpentinite-and-quartz-using-biosurfactants,79036,0,2.html
Dolman BM Kaisermann C Martin PJ Winterburn JB Integrated sophorolipid production and gravity separation Process Biochemistry 2017 54 162 171 10.1016/j.procbio.2016.12.021
Dolman BM, Kaisermann C, Martin PJ, Winterburn JB (2017) Integrated sophorolipid production and gravity separation. Process Biochemistry 54:162–171. 10.1016/j.procbio.2016.12.021
Dong Y-B Liu Y Lin H Liu C-J Improving vanadium extraction from stone coal via combination of blank roasting and bioleaching by ARTP-mutated Bacillus mucilaginosus Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China 2019 29 4 849 858 10.1016/S1003-6326(19)64995-2
Dong Y-B, Liu Y, Lin H, Liu C-J (2019) Improving vanadium extraction from stone coal via combination of blank roasting and bioleaching by ARTP-mutated Bacillus mucilaginosus. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China 29(4):849–858. 10.1016/S1003-6326(19)64995-2
Dong Y Zan J Lin H Enhanced bioleaching efficiency of vanadium from stone coal vanadium ore by adding biochar and plasma treatment Minerals Engineering 2023 196 108059 10.1016/j.mineng.2023.108059
Dong Y, Zan J, Lin H (2023) Enhanced bioleaching efficiency of vanadium from stone coal vanadium ore by adding biochar and plasma treatment. Minerals Engineering 196:108059. 10.1016/j.mineng.2023.108059
Edwards JR Hayashi JA Structure of a rhamnolipid from Pseudomonas aeruginosa Arch Biochem Biophys 1965 111 2 415 421 10.1016/0003-9861(65)90204-3 4285853
Edwards JR, Hayashi JA (1965) Structure of a rhamnolipid from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Arch Biochem Biophys 111(2):415–421. 10.1016/0003-9861(65)90204-34285853
Edwards KR Lepo JE Lewis MA Toxicity comparison of biosurfactants and synthetic surfactants used in oil spill remediation to two estuarine species Marine Pollution Bulletin 2003 46 10 1309 1316 10.1016/S0025-326X(03)00238-8 14550343
Edwards KR, Lepo JE, Lewis MA (2003) Toxicity comparison of biosurfactants and synthetic surfactants used in oil spill remediation to two estuarine species. Marine Pollution Bulletin 46(10):1309–1316. 10.1016/S0025-326X(03)00238-814550343
Effendi I, Nedi S, Ellizal N, Feliatra F, Tanjung P, Pratama R (2017) Detergent disposal into our environmentand its impact on marine microbes. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 97(1):012030. 10.1088/1755-1315/97/1/012030
El-Midany AA Abdel-Khalek MA Reducing sulfur and ash from coal using Bacillus subtilis and Paenibacillus polymyxa Fuel 2014 115 589 595 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.07.076
El-Midany AA, Abdel-Khalek MA (2014) Reducing sulfur and ash from coal using Bacillus subtilis and Paenibacillus polymyxa. Fuel 115:589–595. 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.07.076
Eras-Muñoz E Farré A Sánchez A Font X Gea T Microbial biosurfactants: a review of recent environmental applications Bioengineered 2022 13 5 12365 12391 10.1080/21655979.2022.2074621 35674010
Eras-Muñoz E, Farré A, Sánchez A, Font X, Gea T (2022) Microbial biosurfactants: a review of recent environmental applications. Bioengineered 13(5):12365–12391. 10.1080/21655979.2022.207462135674010
Faiz M Hendry P Significance of microbial activity in Australian coal bed methane reservoirs — a review Bull Can Pet Geol 2006 54 3 261 272 10.2113/gscpgbull.54.3.261
Faiz M, Hendry P (2006) Significance of microbial activity in Australian coal bed methane reservoirs — a review. Bull Can Pet Geol 54(3):261–272. 10.2113/gscpgbull.54.3.261
Fakoussa RM Production of water-soluble coal-substances by partial microbial liquefaction of untreated hard coal Resour Conserv Recy 1988 1 3 251 260 10.1016/0921-3449(88)90020-1
Fakoussa RM (1988) Production of water-soluble coal-substances by partial microbial liquefaction of untreated hard coal. Resour, Conserv Recy 1(3):251–260. 10.1016/0921-3449(88)90020-1
Fang F Zhong H Jiang F-M Li Z-H Chen Y-F Zhan X-H Influence of surfactants on bioleaching of arsenic-containing gold concentrate Journal of Central South University 2014 21 10 3963 3969 10.1007/s11771-014-2384-7
Fang F, Zhong H, Jiang F-M, Li Z-H, Chen Y-F, Zhan X-H (2014) Influence of surfactants on bioleaching of arsenic-containing gold concentrate. Journal of Central South University 21(10):3963–3969. 10.1007/s11771-014-2384-7
Fazaelipoor MH Khoshdast H Ranjbar M Coal flotation using a biosurfactant from Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a frother Korean J Chem Eng 2010 27 5 1527 1531 10.1007/s11814-010-0223-6
Fazaelipoor MH, Khoshdast H, Ranjbar M (2010) Coal flotation using a biosurfactant from Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a frother. Korean J Chem Eng 27(5):1527–1531. 10.1007/s11814-010-0223-6
Fei D Zhou G-W Yu Z-Q Gang H-Z Liu J-F Yang S-Z Ye R-Q Mu B-Z Low-toxic and nonirritant biosurfactant surfactin and its performances in detergent formulations J Surfactants Deterg 2020 23 1 109 118 10.1002/jsde.12356
Fei D, Zhou G-W, Yu Z-Q, Gang H-Z, Liu J-F, Yang S-Z, Ye R-Q, Mu B-Z (2020) Low-toxic and nonirritant biosurfactant surfactin and its performances in detergent formulations. J Surfactants Deterg 23(1):109–118. 10.1002/jsde.12356
Feng J Zeng Y Ma C Cai X Zhang Q Tong M Yu B Xu P The surfactant Tween 80 enhances biodesulfurization Appl Environ Microbiol 2006 72 11 7390 7393 10.1128/AEM.01474-06 16980422
Feng J, Zeng Y, Ma C, Cai X, Zhang Q, Tong M, Yu B, Xu P (2006) The surfactant Tween 80 enhances biodesulfurization. Appl Environ Microbiol 72(11):7390–7393. 10.1128/AEM.01474-0616980422
Fernando Bautista L Sanz R Carmen Molina M González N Sánchez D Effect of different non-ionic surfactants on the biodegradation of PAHs by diverse aerobic bacteria Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 2009 63 7 913 922 10.1016/j.ibiod.2009.06.013
Fernando Bautista L, Sanz R, Carmen Molina M, González N, Sánchez D (2009) Effect of different non-ionic surfactants on the biodegradation of PAHs by diverse aerobic bacteria. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 63(7):913–922. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2009.06.013
Finkelman RB Wolfe A Hendryx MS The future environmental and health impacts of coal Energy Geoscience 2021 2 2 99 112 10.1016/j.engeos.2020.11.001
Finkelman RB, Wolfe A, Hendryx MS (2021) The future environmental and health impacts of coal. Energy Geoscience 2(2):99–112. 10.1016/j.engeos.2020.11.001
Ghani MJ Rajoka MI Akhtar K Investigations in fungal solubilization of coal: mechanisms and significance Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 2015 20 4 634 642 10.1007/s12257-015-0162-5
Ghani MJ, Rajoka MI, Akhtar K (2015) Investigations in fungal solubilization of coal: mechanisms and significance. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 20(4):634–642. 10.1007/s12257-015-0162-5
Gholami A, Khoshdast H (n.d.) Using artificial neural networks for the intelligent estimation of selectivity index and metallurgical responses of a sample coal bioflotation by rhamnolipid biosurfactants. Energ Source Part A: Recovery Util Environ Eff: 1–19. 10.1080/15567036.2020.1857477
Górna H Ławniczak Ł Zgoła-Grześkowiak A Kaczorek E Differences and dynamic changes in the cell surface properties of three Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from petroleum-polluted soil as a response to various carbon sources and the external addition of rhamnolipids Bioresour Technol 2011 102 3 3028 3033 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.124 21030252
Górna H, Ławniczak Ł, Zgoła-Grześkowiak A, Kaczorek E (2011) Differences and dynamic changes in the cell surface properties of three Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from petroleum-polluted soil as a response to various carbon sources and the external addition of rhamnolipids. Bioresour Technol 102(3):3028–3033. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.12421030252
Guin M, Singh NB (2023) Chapter 14 - Applications of biosurfactant as solubilizers and wetting agents. In: Inamuddin, Adetunji CO (Eds.), Applications of next generation biosurfactants in the food sector (pp 279–306). Academic Press. 10.1016/B978-0-12-824283-4.00022-8
Handayani I Paisal Y Soepriyanto S Chaerun SK Biodesulfurization of organic sulfur in Tondongkura coal from Indonesia by multi-stage bioprocess treatments Hydrometallurgy 2017 168 84 93 10.1016/j.hydromet.2016.10.027
Handayani I, Paisal Y, Soepriyanto S, Chaerun SK (2017) Biodesulfurization of organic sulfur in Tondongkura coal from Indonesia by multi-stage bioprocess treatments. Hydrometallurgy 168:84–93. 10.1016/j.hydromet.2016.10.027
He H Cheng J Song D-X Su X Wang L-N Huang Z Impacts of surfactant on bituminous coal biosolubilization by white-rot fungi Hypocrea lixii HN-1 Geomicrobiol J 2022 39 9 750 756 10.1080/01490451.2022.2074574
He H, Cheng J, Song D-X, Su X, Wang L-N, Huang Z (2022) Impacts of surfactant on bituminous coal biosolubilization by white-rot fungi Hypocrea lixii HN-1. Geomicrobiol J 39(9):750–756. 10.1080/01490451.2022.2074574
He H, Cao M, Zhan D, Xia W, Chen S, Tao X, Huang Z (2023) Preliminary study on the surface modification of lignite and bioflotation by white-rot fungi Hypocrea lixii AH. Minerals 13(12), 1492
Ilori MO Adebusoye SA Ojo AC Isolation and characterization of hydrocarbon-degrading and biosurfactant-producing yeast strains obtained from a polluted lagoon water World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2008 24 2539 2545 10.1007/s11274-008-9778-3
Ilori MO, Adebusoye SA, Ojo AC (2008) Isolation and characterization of hydrocarbon-degrading and biosurfactant-producing yeast strains obtained from a polluted lagoon water. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 24:2539–2545
Inès M Dhouha G Glycolipid biosurfactants: potential related biomedical and biotechnological applications Carbohydrate Research 2015 416 59 69 10.1016/j.carres.2015.07.016 26359535
Inès M, Dhouha G (2015) Glycolipid biosurfactants: potential related biomedical and biotechnological applications. Carbohydrate Research 416:59–69. 10.1016/j.carres.2015.07.01626359535
Jia L Li K Zhou J Yan Z Wang Y Mahlalela BM Experimental study on enhancing coal-bed methane production by wettability alteration to gas wetness Fuel 2019 255 115860 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.115860
Jia L, Li K, Zhou J, Yan Z, Wang Y, Mahlalela BM (2019) Experimental study on enhancing coal-bed methane production by wettability alteration to gas wetness. Fuel 255:115860. 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.115860
Jiang F Li Z Lv Z Gao T Yang J Qin Z Yuan H The biosolubilization of lignite by Bacillus sp. Y7 and characterization of the soluble products Fuel 2013 103 639 645 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.08.030
Jiang F, Li Z, Lv Z, Gao T, Yang J, Qin Z, Yuan H (2013) The biosolubilization of lignite by Bacillus sp. Y7 and characterization of the soluble products. Fuel 103:639–645. 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.08.030
Jiménez-Peñalver P Rodríguez A Daverey A Font X Gea T Use of wastes for sophorolipids production as a transition to circular economy: state of the art and perspectives Rev Environ Sci Bio-Technol 2019 18 3 413 435 10.1007/s11157-019-09502-3
Jiménez-Peñalver P, Rodríguez A, Daverey A, Font X, Gea T (2019) Use of wastes for sophorolipids production as a transition to circular economy: state of the art and perspectives. Rev Environ Sci Bio-Technol 18(3):413–435. 10.1007/s11157-019-09502-3
Kang H Liu X Zhang Y Zhao S Yang Z Du Z Zhou A Bacteria solubilization of Shenmu lignite: influence of surfactants and characterization of the biosolubilization products Energy Sources, Part a: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 2021 43 10 1162 1180 10.1080/15567036.2019.1635664
Kang H, Liu X, Zhang Y, Zhao S, Yang Z, Du Z, Zhou A (2021) Bacteria solubilization of Shenmu lignite: influence of surfactants and characterization of the biosolubilization products. Energy Sources, Part a: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 43(10):1162–1180. 10.1080/15567036.2019.1635664
Khan J Ali MI Jamal A Ahmad M Achakzai JK Zafar M Response of mixed bacterial culture towards dibenzothiophene desulfurization under the influence of surfactants and microscopically (SEM and TEM) characterized magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles Microsc Res Tech 2022 85 12 3838 3849 10.1002/jemt.24230 36111961
Khan J, Ali MI, Jamal A, Ahmad M, Achakzai JK, Zafar M (2022) Response of mixed bacterial culture towards dibenzothiophene desulfurization under the influence of surfactants and microscopically (SEM and TEM) characterized magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Microsc Res Tech 85(12):3838–3849. 10.1002/jemt.2423036111961
Khoshdast H Shojaei V Ash removal from a sample coal by flotation using rhamnolipid biosurfactants J Min World Express 2012 1 2 39 45
Khoshdast H, Shojaei V (2012) Ash removal from a sample coal by flotation using rhamnolipid biosurfactants. J Min World Express 1(2):39–45
Khoshdast H Sam A Vali H Noghabi KA Effect of rhamnolipid biosurfactants on performance of coal and mineral flotation Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 2011 65 8 1238 1243 10.1016/j.ibiod.2011.10.003
Khoshdast H, Sam A, Vali H, Noghabi KA (2011) Effect of rhamnolipid biosurfactants on performance of coal and mineral flotation. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 65(8):1238–1243. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2011.10.003
Khoshdast H Hassanzadeh A Kowalczuk PB Farrokhpay S Characterization techniques of flotation frothers - a review Miner Process Extr Metall Rev 2023 44 2 77 101 10.1080/08827508.2021.2024822
Khoshdast H, Hassanzadeh A, Kowalczuk PB, Farrokhpay S (2023) Characterization techniques of flotation frothers - a review. Miner Process Extr Metall Rev 44(2):77–101. 10.1080/08827508.2021.2024822
Kiran GS Thomas TA Selvin J Production of a new glycolipid biosurfactant from marine Nocardiopsis lucentensis MSA04 in solid-state cultivation Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2010 78 1 8 16 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.01.028 20202801
Kiran GS, Thomas TA, Selvin J (2010) Production of a new glycolipid biosurfactant from marine Nocardiopsis lucentensis MSA04 in solid-state cultivation. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 78(1):8–16. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.01.02820202801
Li Q Lin B Zhao S Dai H Surface physical properties and its effects on the wetting behaviors of respirable coal mine dust Powder Technology 2013 233 137 145 10.1016/j.powtec.2012.08.023
Li Q, Lin B, Zhao S, Dai H (2013) Surface physical properties and its effects on the wetting behaviors of respirable coal mine dust. Powder Technology 233:137–145. 10.1016/j.powtec.2012.08.023
Li S Pi Y Bao M Zhang C Zhao D Li Y Sun P Lu J Effect of rhamnolipid biosurfactant on solubilization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Marine Pollution Bulletin 2015 101 1 219 225 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.09.059 26494247
Li S, Pi Y, Bao M, Zhang C, Zhao D, Li Y, Sun P, Lu J (2015) Effect of rhamnolipid biosurfactant on solubilization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Mar Pollut Bull 101(1):219–225. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.09.05926494247
Li S Li F Li P Wang Y Shi Q Liu X Tan J Han Y Bio-solubilization of Yunnan lignite by Penicillium ortum MJ51 and characterization of its products Fuel 2023 331 125923 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125923
Li S, Li F, Li P, Wang Y, Shi Q, Liu X, Tan J, Han Y (2023) Bio-solubilization of Yunnan lignite by Penicillium ortum MJ51 and characterization of its products. Fuel 331:125923. 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125923
Liu T Liu S The impacts of coal dust on miners’ health: a review Environmental research 2020 190 109849 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109849 32763275
Liu T, Liu S (2020) The impacts of coal dust on miners’ health: a review. Environmental research 190:109849. 10.1016/j.envres.2020.10984932763275
Liu S Guo C Liang X Wu F Dang Z Nonionic surfactants induced changes in cell characteristics and phenanthrene degradation ability of Sphingomonas sp. GY2B Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2016 129 210 218 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.03.035 27045921
Liu S, Guo C, Liang X, Wu F, Dang Z (2016) Nonionic surfactants induced changes in cell characteristics and phenanthrene degradation ability of Sphingomonas sp. GY2B. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 129:210–218. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.03.03527045921
Liu J-D Hu X-M Feng Y Zhao Y-Y Wu M-Y Wang X-W Yu X-X Song C-Y Wang Q-S Geng Z Shen D-C Wang H-Y Study on improving the hydrophilicity of coal by a biosurfactant-producing strain screened from coal J Environ Chem Eng 2022 10 3 107764 10.1016/j.jece.2022.107764
Liu J-D, Hu X-M, Feng Y, Zhao Y-Y, Wu M-Y, Wang X-W, Yu X-X, Song C-Y, Wang Q-S, Geng Z, Shen D-C, Wang H-Y (2022) Study on improving the hydrophilicity of coal by a biosurfactant-producing strain screened from coal. J Environ Chem Eng 10(3):107764. 10.1016/j.jece.2022.107764
Lu Z Lei Z Zafar MN Synthesis and performance characterization of an efficient environmental-friendly Sapindus mukorossi saponins based hybrid coal dust suppressant Journal of Cleaner Production 2021 306 127261 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127261
Lu Z, Lei Z, Zafar MN (2021) Synthesis and performance characterization of an efficient environmental-friendly Sapindus mukorossi saponins based hybrid coal dust suppressant. J Clean Prod 306:127261. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127261
Ma Z Liu J Dick RP Li H Shen D Gao Y Waigi MG Ling W Rhamnolipid influences biosorption and biodegradation of phenanthrene by phenanthrene-degrading strain Pseudomonas sp. Ph6 Environmental Pollution 2018 240 359 367 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.125 29751332
Ma Z, Liu J, Dick RP, Li H, Shen D, Gao Y, Waigi MG, Ling W (2018) Rhamnolipid influences biosorption and biodegradation of phenanthrene by phenanthrene-degrading strain Pseudomonas sp. Ph6. Environmental Pollution 240:359–367. 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.12529751332
Maddela NR Eller LKW Prasad R Microbiology for cleaner production and environmental sustainability 2023 CRC Press
Maddela NR, Eller LKW, Prasad R (2023) Microbiology for cleaner production and environmental sustainability. CRC Press
Mahreni M Puspitasari M Preliminary study of calorific value increase on lignite coal using dialkyl carbohydrate biosurfactant The J Pure Appl Chem Res 2020 9 126 132 10.21776/ub.jpacr.2020.009.02.508
Mahreni M, Puspitasari M (2020) Preliminary study of calorific value increase on lignite coal using dialkyl carbohydrate biosurfactant.  The J Pure Appl Chem Res 9:126–132
Marchant R Banat IM Microbial biosurfactants: challenges and opportunities for future exploitation Trends Biotechnol 2012 30 11 558 565 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.003 22901730
Marchant R, Banat IM (2012) Microbial biosurfactants: challenges and opportunities for future exploitation. Trends Biotechnol 30(11):558–565. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.00322901730
Mishra S, Panda S, Pradhan N, Biswal SK, Sukla LB, Mishra BK (2015) Microbe–mineral interactions: exploring avenues towards development of a sustainable microbial technology for coal beneficiation. In: Sukla LB, Pradhan N, Panda S, Mishra BK (Eds.) Environmental microbial biotechnology (pp. 33–52). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-319-19018-1_2
Mishra S Akcil A Panda S Agcasulu I Laboratory and semipilot bioreactor feasibility tests for desulphurization of Turkish lignite using Leptospirillum ferriphilum Energy Fuels 2018 32 3 2869 2877 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b03069
Mishra S, Akcil A, Panda S, Agcasulu I (2018) Laboratory and semipilot bioreactor feasibility tests for desulphurization of Turkish lignite using Leptospirillum ferriphilum. Energy Fuels 32(3):2869–2877. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b03069
Mishra S Akcil A Panda S Erust C Biodesulphurization of Turkish lignite by Leptospirillum ferriphilum: effect of ferrous iron, Span-80 and ultrasonication Hydrometallurgy 2018 176 166 175 10.1016/j.hydromet.2018.01.021
Mishra S, Akcil A, Panda S, Erust C (2018) Biodesulphurization of Turkish lignite by Leptospirillum ferriphilum: effect of ferrous iron, Span-80 and ultrasonication. Hydrometallurgy 176:166–175. 10.1016/j.hydromet.2018.01.021
Mishra S Akcil A Panda S Tuncuk A Effect of Span-80 and ultrasonication on biodesulphurization of lignite by Rhodococcus erythropolis: lab to semi-pilot scale tests Minerals Engineering 2018 119 183 190 10.1016/j.mineng.2018.01.032
Mishra S, Akcil A, Panda S, Tuncuk A (2018) Effect of Span-80 and ultrasonication on biodesulphurization of lignite by Rhodococcus erythropolis: lab to semi-pilot scale tests. Minerals Engineering 119:183–190. 10.1016/j.mineng.2018.01.032
Mishra S Panda S Akcil A Dembele S Biotechnological avenues in mineral processing: fundamentals, applications and advances in bioleaching and bio-beneficiation Miner Process Extr Metall Rev 2023 44 1 22 51 10.1080/08827508.2021.1998043
Mishra S, Panda S, Akcil A, Dembele S (2023) Biotechnological avenues in mineral processing: fundamentals, applications and advances in bioleaching and bio-beneficiation. Miner Process Extr Metall Rev 44(1):22–51. 10.1080/08827508.2021.1998043
Niu W Nie W Bao Q Tian Q Li R Zhang X Yan X Lian J Development and characterization of a high efficiency bio-based rhamnolipid compound dust suppressant for coal dust pollution control Environmental Pollution 2023 330 121792 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121792 37169234
Niu W, Nie W, Bao Q, Tian Q, Li R, Zhang X, Yan X, Lian J (2023) Development and characterization of a high efficiency bio-based rhamnolipid compound dust suppressant for coal dust pollution control. Environmental Pollution 330:121792. 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.12179237169234
Osborne D, Tasker C, Simington IR, Arnold BJ, Diez MA, Schumacher G, Hamilton CJ (2023) 21 - Future directions toward more efficient and cleaner use of coal. In Osborne D (ed) The coal handbook, vol 2, 2nd edn. Woodhead Publishing, pp 703–734. 10.1016/B978-0-12-824327-5.00016-8
Oyetunji, OE, Kotun, BC, Thonda OA, and Ademola, EA. (2023). The role of biosurfactants in biofuel production. In R. Aslam, M. Mobin, J. Aslam, and S. Zehra (Eds.), Advancements in biosurfactants research (pp. 371–395). Springer International Publishing.  10.1007/978-3-031-21682-4_18
Pacwa-Płociniczak M Płaza GA Piotrowska-Seget Z Cameotra SS Environmental applications of biosurfactants: recent advances Int J Mol Sci 2011 12 1 633 654 10.3390/ijms12010633 21340005
Pacwa-Płociniczak M, Płaza GA, Piotrowska-Seget Z, Cameotra SS (2011) Environmental applications of biosurfactants: recent advances. Int J Mol Sci 12(1):633–654. 10.3390/ijms1201063321340005
Papendick SL Downs KR Vo KD Hamilton SK Dawson GKW Golding SD Gilcrease PC Biogenic methane potential for Surat Basin, Queensland coal seams Int J Coal Geol 2011 88 2 123 134 10.1016/j.coal.2011.09.005
Papendick SL, Downs KR, Vo KD, Hamilton SK, Dawson GKW, Golding SD, Gilcrease PC (2011) Biogenic methane potential for Surat Basin, Queensland coal seams. Int J Coal Geol 88(2):123–134. 10.1016/j.coal.2011.09.005
Pardhi DS, Panchal RR, Raval VH, Joshi RG, Poczai P, Almalki WH, Rajput KN (2022) Microbial surfactants: a journey from fundamentals to recent advances [Review]. Front Microbiol 13. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2022.98260. Accessed 15 Jan 2024
Park SY Liang Y Biogenic methane production from coal: a review on recent research and development on microbially enhanced coalbed methane (MECBM) Fuel 2016 166 258 267 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.10.121
Park SY, Liang Y (2016) Biogenic methane production from coal: a review on recent research and development on microbially enhanced coalbed methane (MECBM). Fuel 166:258–267. 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.10.121
Polman JK Miller KS Stoner DL Breckenridge CR Solubilization of bituminous and lignite coals by chemically and biologically synthesized surfactants J Chem Technol Biotechnol 1994 61 1 11 17 10.1002/jctb.280610103
Polman JK, Miller KS, Stoner DL, Breckenridge CR (1994) Solubilization of bituminous and lignite coals by chemically and biologically synthesized surfactants. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 61(1):11–17. 10.1002/jctb.280610103
Polman JK Breckenridge CR Stoner DL Andrews GF Biologically derived value-added products from coal Appl Biochem Biotechnol 1995 54 1 249 255 10.1007/BF02787923
Polman JK, Breckenridge CR, Stoner DL, Andrews GF (1995) Biologically derived value-added products from coal. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 54(1):249–255. 10.1007/BF02787923
Pradhan A Bhattacharyya A Quest for an eco-friendly alternative surfactant: surface and foam characteristics of natural surfactants Journal of Cleaner Production 2017 150 127 134 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.013
Pradhan A, Bhattacharyya A (2017) Quest for an eco-friendly alternative surfactant: surface and foam characteristics of natural surfactants. J Clean Prod 150:127–134. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.013
Sahebnazar Z Mowla D Karimi G Yazdian F Zero-valent iron nanoparticles assisted purification of rhamnolipid for oil recovery improvement from oily sludge J Environ Chem Eng 2018 6 1 917 922 10.1016/j.jece.2017.11.043
Sahebnazar Z, Mowla D, Karimi G, Yazdian F (2018) Zero-valent iron nanoparticles assisted purification of rhamnolipid for oil recovery improvement from oily sludge. J Environ Chem Eng 6(1):917–922. 10.1016/j.jece.2017.11.043
Schweitzer HD, Smith HJ, Barnhart EP, McKay LJ, Gerlach R, Cunningham AB, Malmstrom RR, Goudeau D, Fields MW (2022) Subsurface hydrocarbon degradation strategies in low- and high-sulfate coal seam communities identified with activity-based metagenomics. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 8(1):7. 10.1038/s41522-022-00267-2
Seifan M Berenjian A Microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation: a widespread phenomenon in the biological world Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2019 103 12 4693 4708 10.1007/s00253-019-09861-5 31076835
Seifan M, Berenjian A (2019) Microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation: a widespread phenomenon in the biological world. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103(12):4693–4708. 10.1007/s00253-019-09861-531076835
Sharma A Jagarapu A Micale C Walia D Jackson S Dhurjati PS Modeling framework for biogenic methane formation from coal Energy Fuels 2018 32 8 8453 8461 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b01298
Sharma A, Jagarapu A, Micale C, Walia D, Jackson S, Dhurjati PS (2018) Modeling framework for biogenic methane formation from coal. Energy Fuels 32(8):8453–8461. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b01298
Shen W, Liu X, Shi C, Yang J, Zhao S, Yang Z, Wang D (2023) Influences of four kinds of surfactants on biodegradations of tar-rich coal in the Ordos basin by Bacillus bicheniformis. Microorganisms 11(10): 2397
Shi C Liu X Wu H Zhao S Yang Z Enhancements of mixed surfactants on Wucaiwan coal biodegradation by Nocardia mangyaensis Energy 2023 266 126501 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126501
Shi C, Liu X, Wu H, Zhao S, Yang Z (2023) Enhancements of mixed surfactants on Wucaiwan coal biodegradation by Nocardia mangyaensis. Energy 266:126501. 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126501
Shi C Liu X Zhao S-S Yang Z Additions of esterase and rhamnolipid promote the degradation of Inner Mongolia coal by Pseudomonas japonica Fuel 2023 340 127640 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127640
Shi C, Liu X, Zhao S-S, Yang Z (2023) Additions of esterase and rhamnolipid promote the degradation of Inner Mongolia coal by Pseudomonas japonica. Fuel 340:127640. 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127640
Singh V Assessment of biosurfactant as an emulsifier produced from Bacillus aryabhattai SPS1001 grown on industrial waste coal tar for recovery of bitumen from oil sands Biomass Convers Biorefinery 2023 13 18 16991 17002 10.1007/s13399-022-02371-x
Singh V (2023) Assessment of biosurfactant as an emulsifier produced from Bacillus aryabhattai SPS1001 grown on industrial waste coal tar for recovery of bitumen from oil sands. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 13(18):16991–17002. 10.1007/s13399-022-02371-x
Singh P Tiwary BN Isolation and characterization of glycolipid biosurfactant produced by a Pseudomonas otitidis strain isolated from Chirimiri coal mines, India Bioresources and Bioprocessing 2016 3 1 42 10.1186/s40643-016-0119-3
Singh P, Tiwary BN (2016) Isolation and characterization of glycolipid biosurfactant produced by a Pseudomonas otitidis strain isolated from Chirimiri coal mines, India. Bioresources and Bioprocessing 3(1):42. 10.1186/s40643-016-0119-3
Singh DN Tripathi AK Coal induced production of a rhamnolipid biosurfactant by Pseudomonas stutzeri, isolated from the formation water of Jharia coalbed Bioresource Technology 2013 128 215 221 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.127 23196241
Singh DN, Tripathi AK (2013) Coal induced production of a rhamnolipid biosurfactant by Pseudomonas stutzeri, isolated from the formation water of Jharia coalbed. Bioresource Technology 128:215–221. 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.12723196241
Tong Q, Wang Y, Mao X, Wan C, Wen M, Han F (2024) The effect of surfactant on biosolubilization of weathered coal. Environ Progress Sustain Energy n/a(n/a): e14378. 10.1002/ep.14378
Tupikina OV Minnaar SH van Hille RP van Wyk N Rautenbach GF Dew D Harrison STL Determining the effect of acid stress on the persistence and growth of thermophilic microbial species after mesophilic colonisation of low grade ore in a heap leach environment Minerals Engineering 2013 53 152 159 10.1016/j.mineng.2013.07.015
Tupikina OV, Minnaar SH, van Hille RP, van Wyk N, Rautenbach GF, Dew D, Harrison STL (2013) Determining the effect of acid stress on the persistence and growth of thermophilic microbial species after mesophilic colonisation of low grade ore in a heap leach environment. Minerals Engineering 53:152–159. 10.1016/j.mineng.2013.07.015
Uchegbu IF, Schätzlein AG, Cheng WP, Lalatsa A (2013) Fundamentals of pharmaceutical nanoscience. Springer US. 10.1007/978-1-4614-9164-4
Vaz DA Gudiña EJ Alameda EJ Teixeira JA Rodrigues LR Performance of a biosurfactant produced by a Bacillus subtilis strain isolated from crude oil samples as compared to commercial chemical surfactants Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2012 89 167 174 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.09.009 21958536
Vaz DA, Gudiña EJ, Alameda EJ, Teixeira JA, Rodrigues LR (2012) Performance of a biosurfactant produced by a Bacillus subtilis strain isolated from crude oil samples as compared to commercial chemical surfactants. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 89:167–174. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.09.00921958536
Venkataraman S Rajendran DS Kumar PS Vo D-VN Vaidyanathan VK Extraction, purification and applications of biosurfactants based on microbial-derived glycolipids and lipopeptides: a review Environ Chem Lett 2022 20 1 949 970 10.1007/s10311-021-01336-2
Venkataraman S, Rajendran DS, Kumar PS, Vo D-VN, Vaidyanathan VK (2022) Extraction, purification and applications of biosurfactants based on microbial-derived glycolipids and lipopeptides: a review. Environ Chem Lett 20(1):949–970. 10.1007/s10311-021-01336-2
Wang M-D Li W Shi Y Wang D-H Feng H Effects of surfactant on biodesulfurization by Corynebacterium sp. ZD-1 in the presence of organic phase Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A 2006 7 2 371 375 10.1631/jzus.2006.AS0371
Wang M-D, Li W, Shi Y, Wang D-H, Feng H (2006) Effects of surfactant on biodesulfurization by Corynebacterium sp. ZD-1 in the presence of organic phase. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A 7(2):371–375. 10.1631/jzus.2006.AS0371
Wang B Wang Y Cui X Zhang Y Yu Z Bioconversion of coal to methane by microbial communities from soil and from an opencast mine in the Xilingol grassland of Northeast China Biotechnol Biofuels 2019 12 1 236 10.1186/s13068-019-1572-y 31624498
Wang B, Wang Y, Cui X, Zhang Y, Yu Z (2019) Bioconversion of coal to methane by microbial communities from soil and from an opencast mine in the Xilingol grassland of Northeast China. Biotechnol Biofuels 12(1):236. 10.1186/s13068-019-1572-y31624498
Wang H Roelants SLKW To MH Patria RD Kaur G Lau NS Lau CY Van Bogaert INA Soetaert W Lin CSK Starmerella bombicola: recent advances on sophorolipid production and prospects of waste stream utilization Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 2019 94 4 999 1007 10.1002/jctb.5847
Wang H, Roelants SLKW, To MH, Patria RD, Kaur G, Lau NS, Lau CY, Van Bogaert INA, Soetaert W, Lin CSK (2019) Starmerella bombicola: recent advances on sophorolipid production and prospects of waste stream utilization. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 94(4):999–1007. 10.1002/jctb.5847
Wang K Ding C Jiang S Zhengyan W Shao H Zhang W Application of the addition of ionic liquids using a complex wetting agent to enhance dust control efficiency during coal mining Process Safety and Environmental Protection 2019 122 13 22 10.1016/j.psep.2018.11.011
Wang K, Ding C, Jiang S, Zhengyan W, Shao H, Zhang W (2019) Application of the addition of ionic liquids using a complex wetting agent to enhance dust control efficiency during coal mining. Process Saf Environ Prot 122:13–22. 10.1016/j.psep.2018.11.011
Wang P Han H Tian C Liu R Jiang Y Experimental study on dust reduction via spraying using surfactant solution Atmospheric Pollution Research 2020 11 6 32 42 10.1016/j.apr.2020.02.010
Wang P, Han H, Tian C, Liu R, Jiang Y (2020) Experimental study on dust reduction via spraying using surfactant solution. Atmos Pollut Res 11(6):32–42. 10.1016/j.apr.2020.02.010
Wang B Ndayisenga F Zhang G Yu Z Deciphering the initial products of coal during methanogenic bioconversion: based on an untargeted metabolomics approach GCB Bioenergy 2021 13 6 967 978 10.1111/gcbb.12824
Wang B, Ndayisenga F, Zhang G, Yu Z (2021) Deciphering the initial products of coal during methanogenic bioconversion: based on an untargeted metabolomics approach. GCB Bioenergy 13(6):967–978. 10.1111/gcbb.12824
Wang K Zhang Y Cai W Pei X Hao H Wang Z Study on the microscopic mechanism and optimization of dust suppression by compounding biological surfactants Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2021 625 126850 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126850
Wang K, Zhang Y, Cai W, Pei X, Hao H, Wang Z (2021) Study on the microscopic mechanism and optimization of dust suppression by compounding biological surfactants. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Asp 625:126850. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126850
Wang H Cheng S Wang H He J Fan L Danilov AS Synthesis and properties of coal dust suppressant based on microalgae oil extraction Fuel 2023 338 127273 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.127273
Wang H, Cheng S, Wang H, He J, Fan L, Danilov AS (2023) Synthesis and properties of coal dust suppressant based on microalgae oil extraction. Fuel 338:127273. 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.127273
Wang X Li J Li Y Song S Farías ME Sánchez RMT Xia L The impact of indigenous microorganisms on coal flotation: a new perspective on water consumption Fuel 2023 337 126848 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126848
Wang X, Li J, Li Y, Song S, Farías ME, Sánchez RMT, Xia L (2023) The impact of indigenous microorganisms on coal flotation: a new perspective on water consumption. Fuel 337:126848. 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126848
West CC Harwell JH Surfactants and subsurface remediation Environ Sci Technol 1992 26 12 2324 2330 10.1021/es00036a002
West CC, Harwell JH (1992) Surfactants and subsurface remediation. Environ Sci Technol 26(12):2324–2330. 10.1021/es00036a002
Wu H, Liu X, Shi C, Yang J, Yang Z, Zhao S (2022) Action modes of surfactants on biodegradation of Wudong low-rank coal by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Research Square. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1410150/v1
Xu J Liu X Song C Du Z Wang F Luo J Chen X Zhou A Biodesulfurization of high sulfur coal from Shanxi: Optimization of the desulfurization parameters of three kinds of bacteria Energy Sources, Part a: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 2020 42 18 2297 2315 10.1080/15567036.2019.1675821
Xu J, Liu X, Song C, Du Z, Wang F, Luo J, Chen X, Zhou A (2020) Biodesulfurization of high sulfur coal from Shanxi: Optimization of the desulfurization parameters of three kinds of bacteria. Energy Sources, Part a: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 42(18):2297–2315. 10.1080/15567036.2019.1675821
Xue Z Feng Y Li H Zhu Z Xu C Ju J Yang Y A comprehensive review on progresses of coal and minerals bioflotation in presence of microorganisms J  Environ Chem Eng 2023 11 6 111182 10.1016/j.jece.2023.111182
Xue Z, Feng Y, Li H, Zhu Z, Xu C, Ju J, Yang Y (2023) A comprehensive review on progresses of coal and minerals bioflotation in presence of microorganisms. J  Environ Chem Eng 11(6):111182. 10.1016/j.jece.2023.111182
Yin S Tao X Shi K The role of surfactants in coal bio-solubilisation Fuel Processing Technology 2011 92 8 1554 1559 10.1016/j.fuproc.2011.03.019
Yin S, Tao X, Shi K (2011) The role of surfactants in coal bio-solubilisation. Fuel Process Technol 92(8):1554–1559. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2011.03.019
Yuan H Yang J Chen W Production of alkaline materials, surfactants and enzymes by Penicillium decumbens strain P6 in association with lignite degradation/solubilization Fuel 2006 85 10 1378 1382 10.1016/j.fuel.2005.12.003
Yuan H, Yang J, Chen W (2006) Production of alkaline materials, surfactants and enzymes by Penicillium decumbens strain P6 in association with lignite degradation/solubilization. Fuel 85(10):1378–1382. 10.1016/j.fuel.2005.12.003
Zhang M Hu T Ren G Zhu Z Yang Y Research on the effect of surfactants on the biodesulfurization of coal Energy Fuels 2017 31 8 8116 8119 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b01116
Zhang M, Hu T, Ren G, Zhu Z, Yang Y (2017) Research on the effect of surfactants on the biodesulfurization of coal. Energy Fuels 31(8):8116–8119. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b01116
Zhang J Anderson K Britt D Liang Y Sustaining biogenic methane release from Illinois coal in a fermentor for one year Fuel 2018 227 27 34 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.04.061
Zhang J, Anderson K, Britt D, Liang Y (2018) Sustaining biogenic methane release from Illinois coal in a fermentor for one year. Fuel 227:27–34. 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.04.061
Zhang R Xing Y Xia Y Guo F Ding S Tan J Che T Meng F Gui X Synergistic adsorption mechanism of anionic and cationic surfactant mixtures on low-rank coal flotation ACS Omega 2020 5 32 20630 20637 10.1021/acsomega.0c02948 32832816
Zhang R, Xing Y, Xia Y, Guo F, Ding S, Tan J, Che T, Meng F, Gui X (2020) Synergistic adsorption mechanism of anionic and cationic surfactant mixtures on low-rank coal flotation. ACS Omega 5(32):20630–20637. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0294832832816
Zhang M Zhao Y-Y Hu X-M Feng Y Cheng W-M Liu W-H Geng Z Wang Q-S Dong Y Study on the adsorption and dust suppression mechanism of urease-producing bacteria on coal dust Powder Technology 2022 409 117801 10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117801
Zhang M, Zhao Y-Y, Hu X-M, Feng Y, Cheng W-M, Liu W-H, Geng Z, Wang Q-S, Dong Y (2022) Study on the adsorption and dust suppression mechanism of urease-producing bacteria on coal dust. Powder Technology 409:117801. 10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117801
Zhao Y-Y Zhang M Hu X-M Feng Y Xue D Wang Q-S Geng Z Liu Y Zhang J Jia X-H Study on adsorption and dust suppression mechanism of urease-producing bacteria on coal-soil mixed dust J Environ Chem Eng 2023 11 6 111407 10.1016/j.jece.2023.111407
Zhao Y-Y, Zhang M, Hu X-M, Feng Y, Xue D, Wang Q-S, Geng Z, Liu Y, Zhang J, Jia X-H (2023) Study on adsorption and dust suppression mechanism of urease-producing bacteria on coal-soil mixed dust. J Environ Chem Eng 11(6):111407. 10.1016/j.jece.2023.111407
Zhao Y Liu W Hu X Li X Wang C Yu Y Zhang J Effect of surfactant on urease-producing flora from waste activated sludge using microbially induced calcite precipitation technology to suppress coal dust Environmental research 2023 237 116941 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116941 37633632
Zhao Y, Liu W, Hu X, Li X, Wang C, Yu Y, Zhang J (2023) Effect of surfactant on urease-producing flora from waste activated sludge using microbially induced calcite precipitation technology to suppress coal dust. Environ Res 237:116941. 10.1016/j.envres.2023.11694137633632
Zhu S Zhao Y Hu X Wu M Cheng W Fan Y Song C Tang X Study on preparation and properties of mineral surfactant – microbial dust suppressant Powder Technology 2021 383 233 243 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.01.053
Zhu S, Zhao Y, Hu X, Wu M, Cheng W, Fan Y, Song C, Tang X (2021) Study on preparation and properties of mineral surfactant – microbial dust suppressant. Powder Technology 383:233–243. 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.01.053
