
==== Front
Odontology
Odontology
Odontology
1618-1247
1618-1255
Springer Nature Singapore Singapore

38403674
906
10.1007/s10266-024-00906-4
Original Article
Explaining the colour of natural healthy gingiva
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7663-5841
Gómez-Polo Cristina crisgodent@usal.es

1
Montero Javier 1
Martín Casado Ana Maria 2
1 https://ror.org/02f40zc51 grid.11762.33 0000 0001 2180 1817 Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno s/n, 37007 Salamanca, Spain
2 https://ror.org/02f40zc51 grid.11762.33 0000 0001 2180 1817 Department of Statistics, School of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
25 2 2024
25 2 2024
2024
112 4 12841295
20 10 2023
18 1 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
To examine the differences between natural gingival colour in men and women. To determine the degree of predictability of changes in the gingival colour coordinates recorded for healthy gingiva, according to age, long-term medication, frequency of toothbrushing, and smoking habits. The CIELAB colour coordinates were recorded using a spectrophotometer for 360 Caucasian adult participants (aged 18–92 years), in three zones of the healthy attached gingiva of the maxillary central incisor. Regression models were created for each zone and each sex, taking the L*, a* and b* coordinates as dependent variables and age, frequency of toothbrushing, smoking habits (0—non-smoker; 1—smoker) and whether participants were taking long-term medication (0—no; 1—yes) as independent variables. The statistical analysis was conducted with SPSS version 26.0, using multiple regression models. Statistically significant differences between men and women were found only for colour coordinate b*, in all three zones. The only colour coordinate on which the predictor variables had a significant effect was the L* coordinate. In men, age and long-term medication had the greatest effect as predictors (maximum R2 = 0.149). In women, frequency of toothbrushing was the strongest predictor in the predictive models (maximum R2 = 0.099). The colour of gingiva in men contained a larger amount of blue, given that significantly lower values for colour coordinate b* were recorded in men than women, although this difference lacked clinical implications. For both sexes, the regression models produced had a modest predictive capacity. The L* coordinate was the dependent variable that showed the greatest predictability.

Keywords

Spectrophotometer
Natural gingival colour
Caucasian population
Regression models
Gender
Universidad de SalamancaOpen Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature.

issue-copyright-statement© The Society of The Nippon Dental University 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

The attractiveness of a person’s face is linked closely to the beauty and harmony of the smile, which is one of the most important expressions for transmitting emotions and feelings [1, 2]. Even at a social level, an attractive smile is positively related to variables connected to personality, success in interpersonal relations, higher professional status, greater academic performance, and better future employment prospects [3].

An appealing smile requires a well-balanced facial composition, taking into account the hard and soft facial tissues (particularly the lips), configuration of the teeth (position, size, shape and colour) and their relation to gingival tissues [4]. Other authors [5, 6] have identified that altered gingival colour negatively affects people’s assessments of attractiveness, as well as kindness, decency, and intelligence. The importance of dental and gingival aesthetics therefore goes beyond beauty, affecting perceptions in the social world. That is why such emphasis is placed on creating functional, well-integrated prosthetic restorations which closely resemble natural teeth: to help individuals project a positive image and ensure that restorations provide a satisfactory result, particularly in the anterior region.

Achieving gingival aesthetics for prosthetic restorations that are as close as possible to the surrounding gingiva is complicated by a number of factors. These include the wide inter-individual and intra-individual variability of gingival dimensions (width, height, thickness, texture) [7, 8], the fact that gingival replacement techniques and materials have not developed as fast as those applied to the teeth [9, 10], the breadth of the gingival colour space [10–12], subjects’ view that colour is one of the most important factors in aesthetic perceptions [3, 13, 14], and the fact that gingival colour changes have still not been quantified.

It should be underlined that natural gingival colour is determined by multiple factors, which can be either exogenous or endogenous. It is influenced by race [15–20], the intensity of melanin pigments [21–23], sex [17, 24, 25], age [25], location [10, 26, 27], and gingival biotype [28], as well as the degree of vascularisation [21, 29–31], frequency of toothbrushing [10], smoking [11, 32–34] and whether the subject takes medication [35–37].

The use of verbal descriptions of gingival colour such as pale pink, coral pink or dark pink [11, 21] is not useful or reliable for communicating information about a colour or reproducing it. There are not enough studies providing evidence of the correspondence between these verbal descriptions of “pink” colours and the natural gingival colour. Similarly, manufacturers have failed to produce spectrophotometric results proving that the gingival colour range they offer corresponds to the actual range of natural gingival colours. In the absence of a “gold standard” gingival shade guide [10, 38], communication and reproduction of the gingival colour chart for the papilla and the three areas of attached gingiva is closely connected to the artistry of the dental technician in mixing basic gingival colours.

Studies predicting colour changes have now taken on particular importance [39], whether concerning in vitro evaluation of dental materials [40] or in vivo research on teeth [41], but there are no studies on the estimated colour range in gingival tissue. Gaining an objective understanding of how the colour of natural, healthy gingiva is influenced by sociodemographic and behavioural variables (frequency of toothbrushing, smoking habits, medication, etc.) is vital to enable customisation of the colour of prosthetic restorations, and can also help diagnose local and systemic diseases that have chromatic effects on the mucosa (e.g., gingival infections, chronic desquamative gingivitis, mucous membrane pemphigoid and gingival hyperplasia). It is significant that colour is one of the four signs by which inflammation has conventionally been identified (heat, pain, redness and swelling). While it has been suggested that certain exogenous factors can influence the gingival colour of men and women, none of the existing literature examines gender differences when exploring the differential relationships between certain variables and gingival colour coordinates.

It is worth noting that studies have been published to calculate dental colour coordinates according to sex and age, using regression models [41, 42], but there are no publications that address gingival colour. If we were able to estimate the colour changes that occur naturally in the gingiva, this information would help us more accurately select the gingival colour. Over time, it would therefore be possible to make any colour differences between natural gingival tissue and prosthetic gingival restorations as subtle as possible (clinically acceptable).

The objectives of this study are: (1) to study the differences between natural gingival colour in men and women; (2) to determine the degree of predictability of changes in the gingival colour coordinates recorded for healthy gingiva in an adult population, according to age, sex, long-term medication, frequency of toothbrushing, and smoking habits.

The null hypotheses of this study are: (1) that there are no statistically significant differences between the colour coordinates in the two sexes; (2) that the factors analysed have no explanatory power with regard to any of the colour coordinates of the gingiva in the three zones studied, in either sex.

Material and methods

This study has been approved by the Bioethics Committee of the University (CBE.USAL.16/15). In the university’s dental clinic, voluntary subjects who met the following inclusion criteria were recruited: (1) presenting with two healthy maxillary teeth; (2) aged between 18 and 92 years; (3) not presenting with gingival pigmentation; (4) having healthy gingival tissue; (5) of Caucasian race; and (6) having signed the informed consent form.

A Spectroshade Micro (MHT Optic Research) spectrophotometer was used, which had first been tested for accuracy and reliability in recording the colour coordinates. Three colour readings were taken in each gingival zone analysed (the free gingival margin [FGM], middle zone and mucogingival line) for every participant, making a total of nine chromatic measurements. The arithmetic means of the colour coordinates provided by the spectrophotometer (L*, a* and b*) were then used in the statistical analysis. To quantify colour, the Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage (CIE, International Commission on Illumination) created a uniform colour space called CIELAB, on the basis of three colour coordinates, as follows. The L* coordinate corresponds to the vertical axis and refers to the lightness of the colour (from black at 0, to white at a value of 100); the a* coordinate, on a horizontal axis, refers to redness (for positive values of a*) or greenness (for negative values); while the b* coordinate, which is also on a horizontal axis, indicates how yellow (when positive) or blue (when negative) the colour is [43].

All the colour readings were taken under standardised conditions and after calibration of the spectrophotometer: each subject, who had removed all make-up, rested their head on the same dental cabinet, under fluorescent daylight-colour lamps (Philips TLD 58/965), without resting the spectrophotometer on the tissue, and without drying the area of analysis with the air syringe. All colour readings were taken by the same operator—aged 30, with eight years of clinical experience—who had received prior theoretical and practical training on gingival colour.

In order to satisfactorily assess the individual effects of each explanatory variable, controlling for the effects of the other variables, we then proceeded to fit the multiple regression models [44]. For each sex, the three regression models were fitted in each of the gingival zones, taking the L*, a* and b* coordinates as dependent variables, and age, frequency of toothbrushing, smoking habits (0—non-smoker; 1—smoker) and whether the subject had been taking medication for over 6 months (0—no; 1—yes) as independent variables. All of the statistical analyses were conducted using IBM’s SPSS software, version 26.0.

Results

Descriptive statistics

There were 360 participants in the study: 187 men (51.9%) and 173 women (48.1%), aged between 18 and 92 years (mean age 47.2 years; SD 18.8 years). No statistically significant difference was found between the ages of the men and women who participated in the study (t = 1.407, P = 0.160). With regard to the behavioural factors: 61 of the participants were smokers (16.9%), while 299 were not (83.1%); 102 were taking long-term medication (28.3%), and 258 were not (71.7%); and the mean frequency of toothbrushing was 2.0 times per day (SD 0.8) (Table 1).Table 1 Number of participants for each category of the variables analysed

Variable	Frequency	%	
Sex	
 Male	187	51.9	
 Female	173	48.1	
Age	
 30 years or younger	89	24.7	
 From 31 to 45 years	85	23.6	
 From 46 to 60 years	89	24.7	
 From 61 to 75 years	72	20.0	
 75 years or older	25	6.9	
Frequency of toothbrushing (per day)	
 0	2	0.6	
 1	110	30.6	
 2	133	36.9	
 3	111	30.8	
 4	4	1.1	
Smoking habits	
 Smoker	61	16.9	
 Non-smoker	299	83.1	
Long-term medication	
 Yes	102	28.3	
 No	258	71.7	

Analytical statistics resulting from multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVA)

The study’s findings on the relationship between the aforementioned variables were as follows: (1) a statistically significant, negative correlation between age and the frequency of toothbrushing in the sample as a whole (r = − 0.450, P < 0.001) and in the subsamples of men (r = − 0.511, P < 0.001) and women (r = − 0.356, P < 0.001); (2) a statistically significant difference in the age of the participants who were taking long-term medication and those who were not (entire sample—61.9 vs 41.3, P < 0,001; subsample of men—62.0 vs 42.3, P < 0.001; subsample of women—61.7 vs 40.4, P < 0.001); (3) a statistically significant difference between the frequency of toothbrushing of the participants who were taking long-term medication and of those who were not (entire sample—1.6 vs 2.2, P < 0.001; subsample of men—1.6 vs 2.1; subsample of women—1.7 vs 2.2, P < 0.001); (4) a statistically significant difference between the frequency of toothbrushing in men and women (1.9 vs 2.1, P = 0.024).

Table 2 shows the mean and standard deviation for the colour coordinates in each zone of the gingiva, according to sex, as well as the P value for the multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVA) that were conducted to find out whether there were statistically significant differences between the colour coordinates for men and women.Table 2 The mean (SD) values for L*, a* and b* by gingival zone and sex, and the P value for the comparison of colour coordinates in men and women

Attached gingiva	Men
Mean (SD)	Women
Mean (SD)	F; P valuea	
L*	a*	b*	L*	a*	b*	
Mucogingival line	49.8 (6.4)	23.7 (4.0)	14.5 (2.5)	49.5 (5.9)	23.5 (4.3)	15.2 (2.8)	F = 2.771; 0.042	
Middle zone	50.3 (5.8)	24.4 (4.1)	14.7 (2.5)	50.9 (5.6)	24.0 (4.1)	15.8 (3.1)	F = 5.354; 0.001	
FGM	49.8 (6.2)	24.1 (4.3)	14.5 (2.5)	50.9 (5.6)	23.6 (4.5)	15.3 (2.7)	F = 3.833; 0.010	
The coordinate in which differences were identified is highlighted in bold text

aThe values that appear in this column are those obtained in the three one-way MANOVAs conducted in each zone of attached gingiva to compare the colour coordinates in men and women. When these were significant (in this case, in all three gingival zones), an analysis was conducted to identify which of the three coordinates differed significantly between men and women. The significant univariate effects are in bold

As the table shows, there were statistically significant differences between men and women in the three gingival zones, all of which were due to variations in the b* coordinate (Fig. 1).Fig. 1. 95% confidence interval for the L*, a* and b* coordinates in each gingival zone, according to the gender

Multiple linear regression analyses

Regression models were fitted, taking age, frequency of toothbrushing, smoking habits and long-term medication as predictor variables. The fitted regression models had low coefficients of determination. In order to improve them, the square of the frequency of toothbrushing was incorporated into the model, since this predictor seemed to have a quadratic effect on the colour coordinates, as illustrated in Fig. 2 for coordinate L* [10].Fig. 2 Mean and 95% confidence interval for the L* coordinate in each gingival zone, according to the frequency of toothbrushing

Figure 2 shows that the effect of frequency of toothbrushing on the L* coordinate is not linear. For example, an increase from brushing 0 times per day to 1 time per day (which increases the mean value for L* by approximately 4 or 5 units, depending on the gingival zone) is not the same as an increase from brushing two to three times per day (which increases the mean for L* by approximately 0–1 unit).

The fitted multiple regression models for each sex are provided below.

Regression models for men

Table 3 shows the standardised regression coefficients of the fitted models for the subsample of men (n = 187) in each of the gingival zones, the P-value of the test for significance of regression, and the coefficients of determination.Table 3 Standardised regression coefficients (in bold, the statistical significance of the regression model, P < 0.05) of the fitted models according to gingival zone, for men

	Mucogingival line	Middle zone	Free gingival margin	
L*	a*	b*	L*	a*	b*	L*	a*	b*	
Age	0.230	− 0.091	− 0.069	0.157	− 0.064	− 0.086	0.092	− 0.132	− 0.026	
Frequency of toothbrushing (per day)	0.193	− 0.597	− 0.100	0.051	− 0.061	− 0.120	0.112	− 0.061	0.083	
(Freq. toothbrushing)2	0.204	0.580	0.066	0.237	0.020	0.023	0.205	− 0.007	− 0.080	
Smoking habits	0.028	− 0.038	0.090	0.004	0.034	0.098	− 0.056	0.030	0.056	
Long-term medication	− 0.112	0.067	− 0.106	− 0.196	0.129	− 0.094	− 0.210	0.063	− 0.100	
Sig. of the regression	< 0.001	0.764	0.388	0.001	0.684	0.318	< 0.001	0.786	0.684	
R2	0.128	0.014	0.028	0.102	0.017	0.032	0.149	0.013	0.017	

The only colour coordinate upon which the factors studied have a significant effect is the L* coordinate, with a medium effect size at the mucogingival line and in the middle zone and a large effect size at the free gingival margin [45]. The fitted regression models in men were:

Mucogingival line:L∗=42.165+0.074·Age+1.444·Frequency oftoothbrushingperday+0.377·Frequency oftoothbrushing2+0.488·Smokinghabits-1.536·Long termmedication

(range of prediction errors from − 16.2 to 15.3; residual standard deviation 6.0).

Middle zone:L∗=46.447+0.045·Age+0.346·Frequency oftoothbrushingper day+0.394·Frequency oftoothbrushing2+0.069·Smoking habits-2.433·Long termmedication

(range of prediction errors from − 14.8 to 14.0; residual standard deviation 5.5).

Free gingival margin:L∗=46.280+0.028·Age+0.804·Frequency oftoothbrushingperday+0.364·Frequency oftoothbrushing2-0.944·Smoking habits-2.771·Long termmedication

(range of prediction errors from − 14.8 to 14.9; residual standard deviation 5.7).

In men, age and the behavioural habits explain 12.8% of the variation in the L* coordinate at the mucogingival line of the attached gingiva, 10.2% of its variation in the middle zone and 14.9% at the free gingival margin [44].

At the mucogingival line, the factors that most affect the L* coordinate are age and the frequency of toothbrushing. For example, the expected increase in the L* coordinate when age increases by 10 years (holding the rest of the explanatory variables constant) is 0.7 (95% CI from 0.2 to 1.3). In other words, the gingiva becomes lighter with age in the upper zone. For frequency of toothbrushing, the expected increase in the L* coordinate when the frequency increases from 2 to 3 times per day (keeping the rest of the explanatory variables constant) is 3.3 (95% CI from 1.3 to 5.4). In both situations, the L* coordinate increases, meaning that the attached gingiva in the upper area becomes lighter. In the middle zone, the factors that most affect the L* coordinate are: the frequency of toothbrushing, taking long-term medication, and age. The expected increase in the L* coordinate when age increases by 10 years (keeping the rest of the explanatory variables constant) is 0.4 (95% CI from − 0.1 to 1.0), and when frequency of toothbrushing increases from 2 to 3 times per day (keeping the rest of the explanatory variables constant), it increases by 2.3 (95% CI from 0.5 to 4.2). In both cases, the middle part of the attached gingiva becomes lighter. At the free gingival margin, the factors that contribute most to explaining the variation in the L* coordinate are long-term medication and the frequency of toothbrushing (quadratic effect). The expected increase in the L* coordinate when participants take long-term medication (keeping the rest of the explanatory variables constant) is − 2.8 (95% CI from − 4.8 to − 0.8). This means that taking long-term medication results in a darkening of the free gingival margin. In contrast, the free gingival margin becomes lighter when the frequency of toothbrushing increases from 3 to 3 times per day (keeping the rest of the explanatory variables constant): the L* coordinate increases by 2.6 (95% CI from 0.7 to 4.6).

Regression models for women

Table 5 shows the standardised regression coefficients of the fitted models for the subsample of women (n = 173) in each of the gingival zones, the P value of the test for significance of regression (the statistically significant models with P < 0.05 are highlighted in red), and the coefficients of determination.Table 5 Standardised regression coefficients (in bold, the statistical significance of the regression model, P < 0.05) of the fitted models according to gingival zone, for women

	Mucogingival line	Middle zone	Free gingival margin	
L*	a*	b*	L*	a*	b*	L*	a*	b*	
Age	− 0.042	− 0.101	− 0.140	0.008	− 0.109	− 0.161	− 0.027	− 0.095	− 0.051	
Frequency of toothbrushing (per day)	1.043	− 1.151	0.970	1.217	− 0.967	0.858	0.981	− 0.586	0.995	
(Freq. toothbrushing)2	− 0.957	0.963	− 1.040	− 1.112	0.808	− 0.881	− 0.868	0.418	− 0.982	
Smoking habits	− 0.076	− 0.027	0.069	− 0.080	− 0.013	0.010	− 0.151	0.104	0.110	
Long-term medication	0.056	− 0.038	0.015	0.062	− 0.018	0.047	0.024	− 0.063	0.002	
Sig. of the regression	0.020	0.015	0.020	0.005	0.068	0.050	0.003	0.062	0.068	
R2	0.076	0.081	0.077	0.096	0.059	0.064	0.099	0.061	0.059	

In women, the only factor that had an important effect on the colour coordinates, in all three zones, was the frequency of toothbrushing. At the mucogingival line, in contrast to the results in men, this factor affected all three coordinates, not only L*, although the effects on all of them were small. In the middle zone, it had only a moderate, significant effect on the L* and b coordinates; and at the free gingival margin, it had only a moderate, significant effect on the L* coordinate [45].

The fitted regression models in women were:

Mucogingival line:L∗=42.135-0.015·Age+7.902·Frequency oftoothbrushingper day-1.710·Frequency oftoothbrushing2-1.176·Smoking habits+0.769·Long termmedication

(range of prediction errors from − 21.5 to 14.3; residual standard deviation 5.7)a∗=31.840-0.025·Age-6.349·Frequency oftoothbrushingper day+1.253·Frequency oftoothbrushing2-0.298·Smoking habits-0.380·Long termmedication

(range of prediction errors from − 10.5 to 11.9; residual standard deviation 4.1)b∗=13.242-0.023·Age+3.435·Frequency oftoothbrushingper day-0.868·Frequency oftoothbrushing2+0.495·Smoking habits+0.097·Long termmedication

(range of prediction errors from − 7.4 to 6.6; residual standard deviation 2.7).

Middle zone:L∗=41.926+0.003·Age+8.691·Frequency oftoothbrushingper day-1.873·Frequency oftoothbrushing2-1.159·Smoking habits+0.804·Long termmedication

(range of prediction errors from − 19.7 to 12.3; residual standard deviation 5.3)b∗=14.017-0.029·Age+3.349·Frequency oftoothbrushingper day-0.811·Frequency oftoothbrushing2+0.080·Smoking habits+0.328·Long termmedication

(range of prediction errors from − 6.3 to 9.4; residual standard deviation 3.0).

Free gingival margin:L∗=44.153-0.009·Age+7.058·Frequency oftoothbrushingper day-1.473·Frequency oftoothbrushing2-2.210·Smoking habits+0.312·Long termmedication

(range of prediction errors from − 21.7 to 11.6; residual standard deviation 5.3).

In women, age and the behavioural habits analysed explain 7.6% of the variation in the L* coordinate at the mucogingival line, 9.6% in the middle zone, and 9.9% at the free gingival margin. The explained variation of the a* coordinate in the upper zone was 8.1%, while the explained variation of the b* coordinate in the upper and middle zones was 7.7% and 6.4%, respectively [44]. In women, toothbrushing had an inverse effect on the L* coordinate: lightness decreased as the frequency of toothbrushing increased in all three gingival zones, unlike the results in men. In contrast, the L* coordinate increased in women who were taking long-term medication, whereas taking long-term medication darkened the attached gingiva in men, in all three zones examined. At the mucogingival line, an increased frequency of toothbrushing resulted in an increased amount of red (a* coordinate) and a decreased amount of yellow (b* coordinate).

Discussion

Prior studies [10, 24] found differences in gingival colour between men and women, and the present results support that finding, based solely on the significant changes in the b* colour coordinate (a bluer colour having been observed in men). We therefore reject the first null hypothesis.

In this research, analysis of the effect of the predictors (age, frequency of toothbrushing, smoking habits and long-term medication) on each colour coordinate was performed separately for each sex and gingival location, because it was posited that the effects on the distinct categories of these two variables might differ. This supposition was confirmed by the present results.

For both men and women, age and the behavioural habits examined had a significant—albeit limited—effect on gingival colour in the three zones, so we also reject the second null hypothesis of the study. Nevertheless, the effect differed in each sex. In men, age and the behavioural factors predicted 12.8% of the lightness at the mucogingival line, 10.2% in the middle zone and 14.9% at the free gingival margin. Meanwhile, in women, the frequency of toothbrushing was the main variable predicting lightness in all three gingival zones, albeit with less predictive power (mucogingival line—7.6%; middle zone—9.6%, and FGM—9.9%). In the female population, the a* (8.1%) and b* (7.7%) colour coordinates could also be weakly predicted at the mucogingival line, as could the b* (6.4%) coordinate in the middle zone. Neither the importance shown by each independent predictor variable nor the direction was homogeneous in men or women (frequency of toothbrushing, smoking habits and long-term medication). This makes it difficult to establish a behavioural pattern associated with gingival colour changes in healthy attached gingiva, also considering that the predictor variables provide information that is statistically significant. When assessing the aforementioned effects, it is worth bearing in mind that only a small number of study participants brushed their teeth 0 or 4 times per day. This means that the uncertainties when assessing the effects of increasing frequency of toothbrushing from 0 to 1 and from 2 to 4 times per day are very large, and the confidence intervals are therefore wider. Information on the type of long-term medication, how long the subject had been in treatment, the dosage and similar data would be valuable in order to fit the predictive model, but the range of possible responses is extremely wide. We therefore used the dichotomous variable of whether the participant was taking long-term medication or not, so as to explore its general effect. Most of the studies cited on the effects of taking medications refer to local melanin pigmentations [35, 37] and not to potential overall changes in colour coordinates. A comparison between the percentages of variation explained by regression models fitted to predict the colour of the teeth according to sex and age (45% of the total variation in the L* coordinate, 21% of the variation in the a* coordinate, and 17% of the variation in the b* coordinate) [41] and the percentages of variation explained by the present study’s models suggests that the former models predict gingival colour slightly less effectively. Nevertheless, the quality of the fitted models for the three gingival zones in this study cannot be directly compared to the predictive models used in other research, since no similar studies exist.

There is consensus on the fact that there are several anatomically distinct regions of gingival tissue [46, 47], which results in a non-uniform colour across these areas. The gradual reduction in gingival thickness from the attached gingiva to the free gingival margin leads to a progressive chromatic change that should be taken into account in order to satisfactorily reproduce the colour and texture of the gingiva. This chromatic difference between distinct areas of attached gingiva has been considered by most authors [10, 27]. Heydecke et al. [11] also recorded the colour of the interincisal papilla, whereas other publications have only noted the colour of the central part of the attached gingiva [17, 24, 48]. The statistically significant differences found between the sexes [10, 17, 27] have led to results being presented separately for men and women, although it should be noted that not all results point to these chromatic differences [11]. There are statistically significant differences in colour between men and women in the three zones of attached gingiva, and in all cases the b* coordinate is responsible for the differences. Despite this statistical significance, it should be stressed that there are no resulting clinical implications, since the colour difference in the b* coordinate (Δb*) is around 1.0 unit. This lack of clinical significance is because the difference falls below the perceptibility thresholds for the gingival colour space (3.1 units for ΔEab* and 2.1 units for ΔE00) [48]. Nevertheless, the fact that differences are detectable through spectrophotometry opens up a field of diagnostic applications for colour with respect to gingival health, which have yet to be explored.

The differentiated effect of the independent variables examined in men and women may be key in helping practitioners take into account the degree of complexity involved in reproducing the gingival colour map. It is worth noting that increasing the frequency of toothbrushing is associated with an increase in gingival lightness in men, while it has the opposite effect in women. Various hypotheses have been proposed to explain this, including the fact that women often brush their teeth more regularly and have distinct hormonal parameters to men. Additionally, women have a thinner gingival biotype [49], making the colour of the dental root more influential, while the thicker gingival biotype in men may respond differently to less frequent toothbrushing, which may prevent the colour of the underlying root from showing through. Another differential finding in men and women is that taking long-term medication results in the gingiva becoming darker in male subjects, while it becomes lighter in female patients. This may be informed by the fact that the long-term medication prescribed to women is usually different to that prescribed to men. Generally, male participants present with long-term medication related to hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and benign prostatic hyperplasia, while female participants more frequently take medication for depression, arthritis and the menopause. Despite the distinct results in men and women, what is clear is that taking medication has a significant impact on gingival colour. Given the extensive range of possible medications, it was decided to make this a dichotomous variable in the present study, which results in a loss of specificity. Future research is needed to explore which medications are most influential in the colour change, because dichotomising between individuals who take or do not take medication essentially divides the sample into older participants (who are more likely to take one or multiple medications) and younger individuals (who are not usually on long-term medication), and this distinction may be influential in itself.

In most scientific fields, predictive models are being developed, validated, updated and put into use, in order to help practitioners with their clinical decision-making. The predictive analysis techniques used to create models are primarily based on regression techniques. In light of the maximum R2 obtained (0.149 in men and 0.099 in women), it may be advisable to increase the depth and scope of the process of selecting independent variables, to increase the fit of the regression models. This type of prediction has the potential to provide colour coordinates based on the chromatic appearance of the natural gingiva: a key step in the process of improving the accuracy of gingival colour selection. This achievement would lead to greater patient satisfaction with the aesthetic results of gingival restorations, given that the colour difference between prosthetic restorations and natural gingival colour could be reduced to the extent that it falls below the clinical perceptibility threshold [48].

Most research agrees that subjective methods for colour selection have low repeatability, [50, 51] given that factors such as age, experience, ocular fatigue, and the type of illumination and colour guide material can have a negative influence on perception of colour. Spectrophotometers have come into use to eliminate subjectivity from the process of dental colour selection. They provide an objective method of recording colour coordinates, with an approximate reliability of 96% for dental tissue [52, 53], and almost perfect repeatability and reproducibility (ICC > 0.9) for gingival tissue [55]. Their use with gingival tissue has therefore become increasingly frequent [10, 38, 55], eliminating the errors involved in traditional visual comparisons. One of the advantages of spectrophotometry—the method used in this study—is that the instruments have a longer service life than colorimeters and are not affected by metamerism [56]. The spectrophotometer used (Spectroshade Micro MHT) has a large window that captures the whole of the object to be measured, making it less susceptible to the phenomenon of edge loss [54]. Spectrophotometers are therefore currently considered the most accurate, useful and flexible instruments available for determining colour in dentistry [52, 57]. The high levels of accuracy and objectivity provided by spectophotometry when quantifying gingival colour with colour coordinates may be extremely helpful for diagnosing periodontal or buccal diseases. Establishing a range of colour coordinates for healthy attached gingiva in each sex, race and age group would enable clinicians to identify potential inflammation, lesions or buccal pathology when colour coordinates fall outside these limits. This information would be of diagnostic use, with the additional advantage of being non-invasive, as colour measurement with spectrophotometry lacks adverse effects.

There is a lack of data on patient satisfaction with the gingival colour of fixed or removable prosthetic restorations but we can say that, while most studies point to a high level of satisfaction in patients who have received implant-supported restorations [58, 59], they usually have a significantly worse opinion of the final result in the soft tissue [60, 61]. Nevertheless, completely recreating the contours of the hard and soft tissue in a predictable manner when three-dimensional defects are present remains a challenge, despite the latest advances in regenerative periodontal and peri-implant surgery. Well-designed prosthetic gingival restorations can overcome the limitations of grafts, making them an option that should be considered at the start of the treatment process [62].

This cross-sectional study is exploratory, analysing the relationship between variables, and has not been designed to examine changes over time, for which purpose longitudinal studies would be needed. Nor does this research enable us to establish cause-effect relationships, which would require an experimental study. These results illustrate the need to examine the relevance of the variables analysed in greater depth, to design longitudinal studies [22], and to incorporate new variables (to determine gingival thickness/gingival biotype in millimetres [62], quantify the amount of medication, explore hormonal factors, etc.). Chromatic analysis of the interdental papilla would also contribute significantly to achieving the level of chromatic similarity required for fixed implant- and tooth-supported prostheses, so future studies should take this into consideration. It would also be interesting to assess whether explanatory capacity varies with the race of the patient, which would necessitate broadening the samples not only in terms of numbers but the racial variability of the population. The results obtained confirmed that the regression models produced do not provide very robust predictions of gingival colour changes (dental prediction models using a similar methodology are more reliable) and showed that age is not such an important factor as it is for dental colour changes.

It is now vital to confirm the practical and clinical utility of the proposed colour prediction models and to conduct similar studies on larger samples of individuals that include racial variability, so as to predict the optical behaviour of the gingiva precisely and enable practitioners to create gingival restorations that are as well-integrated as possible from a functional and aesthetic perspective. There is still a significant lack of knowledge on the natural evolution of the form, thickness, texture and colour of the gingiva that surrounds the natural teeth, and the factors that influence this. When considering a prosthetic gingival restoration as a treatment option, studying the chromatic optical properties of the gingiva is a key step in enabling practitioners to reproduce the gingiva prosthetically using the materials available: primarily acrylic or composite resins, and ceramics.

Conclusions

the colours of gingiva in men contain a larger amount of blue, given that the values recorded for men were significantly lower than those recorded for women in the b* coordinate, but not in the other coordinates. This gingival colour difference has no clinical implications since it is not visible, falling below the gingival perceptibility thresholds.

In both sexes, age, smoking habits, frequency of toothbrushing and long-term medication have a modest capacity to explain gingival colour in all three zones of attached gingiva. The L* coordinate is the dependent variable that shows the greatest predictability. Much remains to be learned about the relative influence of each of the factors responsible for the significant variability in gingival colour.

Funding

Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature.

Data availability

The data will be available upon motivated request.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in this study.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Gómez-Polo C Montero J Santos Marino J Galindo MP Vicente MP Application of the social appeal scale to a selected spanish population Int J Prosthodont 2016 29 1 59 62 10.11607/ijp.3975 26757330
Gómez-Polo C, Montero J, Santos Marino J, Galindo MP, Vicente MP. Application of the social appeal scale to a selected spanish population. Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29(1):59–62. 10.11607/ijp.3975.26757330
2. Al Hamad KQ Almohammed SN Baba NZ Analysis of the effect magnitude of different parameters on smile attractiveness J Esthet Restor Dent 2022 34 6 888 896 10.1111/jerd.12834 34796640
Al Hamad KQ, Almohammed SN, Baba NZ. Analysis of the effect magnitude of different parameters on smile attractiveness. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34(6):888–96. 10.1111/jerd.12834. (Epub 2021 Nov 18).34796640
3. Montero J Gómez-Polo C Santos JA Portillo M Lorenzo MC Albaladejo A Contributions of dental colour to the physical attractiveness stereotype J Oral Rehabil 2014 41 768 782 10.1111/joor.12194 24905467
Montero J, Gómez-Polo C, Santos JA, Portillo M, Lorenzo MC, Albaladejo A. Contributions of dental colour to the physical attractiveness stereotype. J Oral Rehabil. 2014;41:768–82.24905467
4. Silva CO Soumaille JM Marson FC Aesthetic crown lengthening: periodontal and patient-centred outcomes J Clin Periodontol 2015 42 12 1126 1134 10.1111/jcpe.12482 26613260
Silva CO, Soumaille JM, Marson FC, et al. Aesthetic crown lengthening: periodontal and patient-centred outcomes. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(12):1126–34.26613260
5. Tjan AHL Miller GD The JG Some esthetic factors in a smile J Prosthet Dent 1984 51 24 28 10.1016/S0022-3913(84)80097-9 6583388
Tjan AHL, Miller GD, The JG. Some esthetic factors in a smile. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;51:24–8.6583388
6. Altayeb W Hamadah O Alhaffar BA Abdullah A Romanos G Gingival depigmentation with diode and Er, Cr:YSGG laser: evaluating re-pigmentation rate and patient perceptions Clin Oral Investig 2021 25 9 5351 5361 10.1007/s00784-021-03843-6 33624200
Altayeb W, Hamadah O, Alhaffar BA, Abdullah A, Romanos G. Gingival depigmentation with diode and Er, Cr:YSGG laser: evaluating re-pigmentation rate and patient perceptions. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(9):5351–61. 10.1007/s00784-021-03843-6. (Epub 2021 Feb 23).33624200
7. De Rouck T Eghbali R Collys K De Bruyn H Cosyn J The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva J Clin Periodontol 2009 36 428 433 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01398.x 19419444
De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36:428–33.19419444
8. Olsson M Lindhe J Periodontal characteristics in individual with varying form of the upper central incisors J Clin Periodontol 1991 18 78 92 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb01124.x 2045523
Olsson M, Lindhe J. Periodontal characteristics in individual with varying form of the upper central incisors. J Clin Periodontol. 1991;18:78–92.2045523
9. Schnitzer S Turp JC Heydecke G Color distribution and visual color assessment of human gingiva and mucosa: a systematic review of the literature Int J Prosthodont 2004 17 3 327 332 15237881
Schnitzer S, Turp JC, Heydecke G. Color distribution and visual color assessment of human gingiva and mucosa: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17(3):327–32.15237881
10. Gómez-Polo C Montero J Gómez-Polo M Martín Casado AM Clinical study on natural gingival color Odontology 2019 107 1 80 89 10.1007/s10266-018-0365-2 29845402
Gómez-Polo C, Montero J, Gómez-Polo M, Martín Casado AM. Clinical study on natural gingival color. Odontology. 2019;107(1):80–9. 10.1007/s10266-018-0365-2. (Epub 2018 May 29).29845402
11. Heydecke G Schnitzer S Turp JC The color of human gingiva and mucosa: visual measurement and description of distribution Clin Oral Invest 2005 9 257 265 10.1007/s00784-005-0006-3
Heydecke G, Schnitzer S, Turp JC. The color of human gingiva and mucosa: visual measurement and description of distribution. Clin Oral Invest. 2005;9:257–65.
12. Paravina RD Powers JM Esthetic color training in dentistry 2004 St.Louis Elsevier
Paravina RD, Powers JM. Esthetic color training in dentistry. St.Louis: Elsevier; 2004.
13. Montero J Gómez Polo C Rosel E Barrios R Albaladejo A López-Valverde A The role of personality traits in self-rated oral health and preferences for different types of flawed smiles J Oral Rehabil 2016 43 39 50 10.1111/joor.12341 26333128
Montero J, Gómez Polo C, Rosel E, Barrios R, Albaladejo A, López-Valverde A. The role of personality traits in self-rated oral health and preferences for different types of flawed smiles. J Oral Rehabil. 2016;43:39–50.26333128
14. Gómez-Polo C Gómez-Polo M Martínez Vázquez De Parga JA Celemín-Viñuela A Study of the shade tabs of the toothguide 3D master through cluster analysis Color Res Appl 2015 40 194 200 10.1002/col.21882
Gómez-Polo C, Gómez-Polo M, Martínez Vázquez De Parga JA, Celemín-Viñuela A. Study of the shade tabs of the toothguide 3D master through cluster analysis. Color Res Appl. 2015;40:194–200.
15. Masilana A Khammissa RAG Lemmer J Feller L Physiological oral melanin pigmentation in a south African sample: a clinical study J Investig Clin Dent 2017 10.1111/jicd.12258 28139894
Masilana A, Khammissa RAG, Lemmer J, Feller L. Physiological oral melanin pigmentation in a south African sample: a clinical study. J Investig Clin Dent. 2017. 10.1111/jicd.12258.28139894
16. Oluwole DO Gingival tissue color related with facial skin and acrylic resin denture base color in a nigerian population Afr J Biomed Res 2010 13 107 111
Oluwole DO. Gingival tissue color related with facial skin and acrylic resin denture base color in a nigerian population. Afr J Biomed Res. 2010;13:107–11.
17. Ho DK Ghinea R Herrera LJ Angelov N Paravina RD Color range and color distribution of healthy human gingiva: a prospective clinical study Sci Rep 2015 22 5 18498 10.1038/srep18498
Ho DK, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, Angelov N, Paravina RD. Color range and color distribution of healthy human gingiva: a prospective clinical study. Sci Rep. 2015;22(5):18498. 10.1038/srep18498.
18. Ponnayan D Jegadeesan V Perumal G Anusha A Correlating skin color with gingiva pigmentation patterns in South Indians—a cross sectional study Oral Health Dent Manag 2014 13 1 132 136 24603930
Ponnayan D, Jegadeesan V, Perumal G, Anusha A. Correlating skin color with gingiva pigmentation patterns in South Indians—a cross sectional study. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2014;13(1):132–6.24603930
19. Janiani P Bhat PR Trasad VA Acharya AB Thakur SL Evaluation of the intensity of gingival melanin pigmentation at different age groups in the Indian population: an observational study J Indian Soc Pedodont Prev Dent 2018 36 4 329 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_192_17
Janiani P, Bhat PR, Trasad VA, Acharya AB, Thakur SL. Evaluation of the intensity of gingival melanin pigmentation at different age groups in the Indian population: an observational study. J Indian Soc Pedodont Prev Dent. 2018;36(4):329.
20. Peeran SW Ramalingam K Peeran SA Altaher OB Alsaid FM Mugrabi MH Gingival pigmentation index proposal of a new index with a brief review of current indices Eur J Dent 2014 8 2 287 290 10.4103/1305-7456.130640 24966785
Peeran SW, Ramalingam K, Peeran SA, Altaher OB, Alsaid FM, Mugrabi MH. Gingival pigmentation index proposal of a new index with a brief review of current indices. Eur J Dent. 2014;8(2):287–90.24966785
21. Dummett CO Oral pigmentation J Periodontol 1960 31 356 360 10.1902/jop.1960.31.5.356
Dummett CO. Oral pigmentation. J Periodontol. 1960;31:356–60.
22. Longo BC Rocha TTC Santin GC Tatakis DN Silva CO Gingival pigmentation: concurrent assessment of distribution, intensity, and extent in a black population J Esthet Restor Dent 2022 34 6 897 906 10.1111/jerd.12846 34825763
Longo BC, Rocha TTC, Santin GC, Tatakis DN, Silva CO. Gingival pigmentation: concurrent assessment of distribution, intensity, and extent in a black population. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34(6):897–906. 10.1111/jerd.12846. (Epub 2021 Nov 26).34825763
23. Hegde R Padhye A Sumanth S Jain AS Thukral N Comparison of surgical stripping; erbium-doped:yttrium, aluminum, and garnet laser; and carbon dioxide laser techniques for gingival depigmentation: a clinical and histologic study J Periodontol 2013 84 6 738 748 10.1902/jop.2012.120094 23003920
Hegde R, Padhye A, Sumanth S, Jain AS, Thukral N. Comparison of surgical stripping; erbium-doped:yttrium, aluminum, and garnet laser; and carbon dioxide laser techniques for gingival depigmentation: a clinical and histologic study. J Periodontol. 2013;84(6):738–48.23003920
24. Huang JW Chen WC Huang TK Fu PS Lai PL Tsai CF Hung CC Using a spectrophotometric study of human gingival colour distribution to develop a shade guide J Dent 2011 39 e11 e16 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.10.001 22005337
Huang JW, Chen WC, Huang TK, Fu PS, Lai PL, Tsai CF, Hung CC. Using a spectrophotometric study of human gingival colour distribution to develop a shade guide. J Dent. 2011;39:e11–6.22005337
25. Naranjo MJ Gómez-Polo M Gómez-Polo C Celemin-Viñuela A Study of attached gingiva space color according to gender and age in Caucasian population J Esthet Restor Dent 2023 35 6 834 841 10.1111/jerd.13038 36951233
Naranjo MJ, Gómez-Polo M, Gómez-Polo C, Celemin-Viñuela A. Study of attached gingiva space color according to gender and age in Caucasian population. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023;35(6):834–41. 10.1111/jerd.13038. (Epub 2023 Mar 23).36951233
26. Gorsky M Buchner A Fundoianu-Dayan D Aviv I Physiologic pigmentation of the gingiva in Israeli Jews of different ethnic origin Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984 58 4 506 509 10.1016/0030-4220(84)90352-9 6593682
Gorsky M, Buchner A, Fundoianu-Dayan D, Aviv I. Physiologic pigmentation of the gingiva in Israeli Jews of different ethnic origin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984;58(4):506–9.6593682
27. Hyun HK Kim S Lee C Shin TJ Kim YJ Colorimetric distribution of human attached gingiva and alveolar mucosa J Prosthet Dent 2017 117 2 294 302 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.06.009 27666499
Hyun HK, Kim S, Lee C, Shin TJ, Kim YJ. Colorimetric distribution of human attached gingiva and alveolar mucosa. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(2):294–302.27666499
28. Claffey N Shanley D Relationship of gingival thickness and bleeding of probing attachment in shallow sites following nonsurgical periodontal therapy J Clin Periodontol 1986 13 7 654 657 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1986.tb00861.x 3531244
Claffey N, Shanley D. Relationship of gingival thickness and bleeding of probing attachment in shallow sites following nonsurgical periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol. 1986;13(7):654–7.3531244
29. Kleinheinz J Büchter A Fillies T Joos U Vascular basis of mucosal color Head Face Med 2005 1 4 1 7 16270921
Kleinheinz J, Büchter A, Fillies T, Joos U. Vascular basis of mucosal color. Head Face Med. 2005;1(4):1–7.16270921
30. Bayindir F Bayindir YZ Gozalo-Diaz DJ Wee AG Coverage error of gingival shade guide systems in measuring color of attached anterior gingiva J Prosthet Dent 2009 101 46 53 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60290-5 19105991
Bayindir F, Bayindir YZ, Gozalo-Diaz DJ, Wee AG. Coverage error of gingival shade guide systems in measuring color of attached anterior gingiva. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101:46–53.19105991
31. Van Brakel R Noordmans HJ Frenken J de Roode R de Wit GC Cune MS The effect of zirconia and titanium implant abutments on light reflection of the supporting soft tissues Clin Oral Implant Res 2011 22 10 1 7
Van Brakel R, Noordmans HJ, Frenken J, de Roode R, de Wit GC, Cune MS. The effect of zirconia and titanium implant abutments on light reflection of the supporting soft tissues. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2011;22(10):1–7.
32. Hedin CA Smokers’ melanosis. Occurrence and localization in the attached gingiva Arch Dermatol 1977 113 11 1533 1538 10.1001/archderm.1977.01640110053007 931390
Hedin CA. Smokers’ melanosis. Occurrence and localization in the attached gingiva. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113(11):1533–8.931390
33. Haresaku S Hanioka T Tsutsui A Watanabe T Association of lip pig- mentation with smoking and gingival melanin pigmentation Oral Dis 2007 13 1 71 76 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2006.01249.x 17241433
Haresaku S, Hanioka T, Tsutsui A, Watanabe T. Association of lip pig- mentation with smoking and gingival melanin pigmentation. Oral Dis. 2007;13(1):71–6.17241433
34. Sridharan S Ganiger K Satyanarayana A Rahul A Shetty S Effect of environmental tobacco smoke from smoker parents on gingival pigmentation in children and young adults: a cross-sectional study J Periodontol 2011 82 7 956 962 10.1902/jop.2010.100479 21142983
Sridharan S, Ganiger K, Satyanarayana A, Rahul A, Shetty S. Effect of environmental tobacco smoke from smoker parents on gingival pigmentation in children and young adults: a cross-sectional study. J Periodontol. 2011;82(7):956–62. 10.1902/jop.2010.100479. (Epub 2010 Dec 13).21142983
35. Holmstrup P Plemons J Meyle J Non-plaque-induced gingival diseases J Clin Periodontol 2018 45 20 S28 S43 29926497
Holmstrup P, Plemons J, Meyle J. Non-plaque-induced gingival diseases. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(20):S28–43.29926497
36. Kauzman A Pavone M Blanas N Bradley G Pigmented lesions of the oral cavity: review, differential diagnosis, and case presentations J Can Dent Assoc 2004 70 10 682 683 15530266
Kauzman A, Pavone M, Blanas N, Bradley G. Pigmented lesions of the oral cavity: review, differential diagnosis, and case presentations. J Can Dent Assoc. 2004;70(10):682–3.15530266
37. LaPorta VN Nikitakis NG Sindler AJ Reynolds MA Minocycline-associated intra-oral soft-tissue pigmentation: clinicopathologic correlations and review J Clin Periodontol 2005 32 2 119 122 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00646.x 15691339
LaPorta VN, Nikitakis NG, Sindler AJ, Reynolds MA. Minocycline-associated intra-oral soft-tissue pigmentation: clinicopathologic correlations and review. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(2):119–22.15691339
38. Hernández AD Martín Casado AM Gómez-Polo M Viñuela AC Gómez-Polo C Degree of standardisation in ceramic gingival systems Materials (Basel) 2023 16 20 6710 10.3390/ma16206710 37895692
Hernández AD, Martín Casado AM, Gómez-Polo M, Viñuela AC, Gómez-Polo C. Degree of standardisation in ceramic gingival systems. Materials (Basel). 2023;16(20):6710. 10.3390/ma16206710.37895692
39. Carrillo-Perez F Pecho OE Morales JC Paravina RD Della Bona A Ghinea R Applications of artificial intelligence in dentistry: a comprehensive review J Esthet Restor Dent 2022 34 1 259 280 10.1111/jerd.12844 34842324
Carrillo-Perez F, Pecho OE, Morales JC, Paravina RD, Della Bona A, Ghinea R, et al. Applications of artificial intelligence in dentistry: a comprehensive review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34(1):259–80.34842324
40. Tejada-Casado M Ghinea R Pérez MM Cardona JC Ionescu AM Lübbe H Herrera LJ Color prediction of layered dental resin composites with varying thickness Dent Mater 2022 38 8 1261 1270 10.1016/j.dental.2022.06.004 35715246
Tejada-Casado M, Ghinea R, Pérez MM, Cardona JC, Ionescu AM, Lübbe H, Herrera LJ. Color prediction of layered dental resin composites with varying thickness. Dent Mater. 2022;38(8):1261–70. 10.1016/j.dental.2022.06.004. (Epub 2022 Jun 15).35715246
41. Gómez-Polo C Montero J Gómez-Polo M de Parga JA Celemin-Viñuela A Natural tooth color estimation based on age and gender J Prosthodont 2017 26 2 107 114 10.1111/jopr.12345 26371458
Gómez-Polo C, Montero J, Gómez-Polo M, de Parga JA, Celemin-Viñuela A. Natural tooth color estimation based on age and gender. J Prosthodont. 2017;26(2):107–14. 10.1111/jopr.12345. (Epub 2015 Sep 15).26371458
42. Hassel AJ Johanning M Grill S Schröder J Wahl HW Corcodel N Klotz AL Rammelsberg P Zenthöfer A Changes of tooth color in middle and old age: a longitudinal study over a decade J Esthet Restor Dent 2017 29 6 459 463 10.1111/jerd.12334 28858417
Hassel AJ, Johanning M, Grill S, Schröder J, Wahl HW, Corcodel N, Klotz AL, Rammelsberg P, Zenthöfer A. Changes of tooth color in middle and old age: a longitudinal study over a decade. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29(6):459–63. 10.1111/jerd.12334. (Epub 2017 Aug 31).28858417
43. Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. CIE technical report: colorimetry. CIE Pub No. 15.3. Vienna, Austria: CIE Central Bureau;2004.
44. Montgomery DC Peck EA Vining GG Introduction to linear regression analysis 2021 6 Hoboken Wiley
Montgomery DC, Peck EA, Vining GG. Introduction to linear regression analysis. 6th ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2021.
45. Cohen J Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988 2 Hillsdale Erlbaum
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1988.
46. Bosshardt DD Lang NP The junctional epithelium: from health to disease J Dent Res 2005 84 9 20 10.1177/154405910508400102 15615869
Bosshardt DD, Lang NP. The junctional epithelium: from health to disease. J Dent Res. 2005;84:9–20.15615869
47. Berglundh T Lindhe J Ericsson I Marinello CP Liljenberg B Thomsen P The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth Clin Oral Implants Res 1991 2 81 90 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020206.x 1809403
Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Ericsson I, Marinello CP, Liljenberg B, Thomsen P. The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1991;2:81–90.1809403
48. Gómez-Polo C Martín Casado AM Gómez-Polo M Montero J Colour thresholds of the gingival chromatic space J Dent 2020 103 103502 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103502 33069771
Gómez-Polo C, Martín Casado AM, Gómez-Polo M, Montero J. Colour thresholds of the gingival chromatic space. J Dent. 2020;103: 103502. 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103502. (Epub 2020 Oct 15).33069771
49. Kolte R Kolte A Mahajan A Assessment of gingival thickness with regards to age, gender and arch location J Indian Soc Periodontol 2014 18 4 478 481 10.4103/0972-124X.138699 25210263
Kolte R, Kolte A, Mahajan A. Assessment of gingival thickness with regards to age, gender and arch location. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014;18(4):478–81. 10.4103/0972-124X.138699.25210263
50. Gómez-Polo C Gómez-Polo M Quispe López N Portillo Muñoz M Montero J 3D master toothguide is adequate to subjective shade selection? Medicina (Kaunas) 2022 58 3 457 10.3390/medicina58030457 35334632
Gómez-Polo C, Gómez-Polo M, Quispe López N, Portillo Muñoz M, Montero J. 3D master toothguide is adequate to subjective shade selection? Medicina (Kaunas). 2022;58(3):457. 10.3390/medicina58030457.35334632
51. Gómez-Polo C Gómez-Polo M Celemin-Viñuela A De Parga JAMV Differences between the human eye and the spectrophotometer in the shade matching of tooth colour J Dent 2014 42 742 745 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.006 24140995
Gómez-Polo C, Gómez-Polo M, Celemin-Viñuela A, De Parga JAMV. Differences between the human eye and the spectrophotometer in the shade matching of tooth colour. J Dent. 2014;42:742–5. 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.006.24140995
52. Chu SJ Trushkowsky RD Paravina RD Dental color matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical and research aspects J Dent 2010 38 Suppl 2 e2 16 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.07.001 20621154
Chu SJ, Trushkowsky RD, Paravina RD. Dental color matching instruments and systems. Review of clinical and research aspects. J Dent. 2010;38(Suppl 2):e2-16. 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.07.001. (Epub 2010 Aug 1).20621154
53. Dozić A Kleverlaan CJ El-Zohairy A Feilzer AJ Khashayar G Performance of five commercially available tooth color-measuring devices J Prosthodont 2007 16 2 93 100 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00163.x 17362418
Dozić A, Kleverlaan CJ, El-Zohairy A, Feilzer AJ, Khashayar G. Performance of five commercially available tooth color-measuring devices. J Prosthodont. 2007;16(2):93–100. 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00163.x.17362418
54. Sala L Carrillo-de-Albornoz A Martín C Bascones-Martínez A Factors involved in the spectrophotometric measurement of soft tissue: a clinical study of interrater and intrarater reliability J Prosthet Dent 2015 113 6 558 564 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.11.003 25794908
Sala L, Carrillo-de-Albornoz A, Martín C, Bascones-Martínez A. Factors involved in the spectrophotometric measurement of soft tissue: a clinical study of interrater and intrarater reliability. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;113(6):558–64. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.11.003. (Epub 2015 Mar 18).25794908
55. Ishikawa-Nagai S Da Silva JD Weber HP Park SE Optical phenomenon of peri-implant soft tissue. Part II. Preferred implant neck color to improve soft tissue esthetics Clin Oral Implants Res 2007 18 5 575 580 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01390.x 17655714
Ishikawa-Nagai S, Da Silva JD, Weber HP, Park SE. Optical phenomenon of peri-implant soft tissue. Part II. Preferred implant neck color to improve soft tissue esthetics. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(5):575–80. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01390.x. (Epub 2007 Jul 26).17655714
56. Paravina RD Evaluation of a newly developed visual shade-matching apparatus Int J Prosthodont Nov-Dec 2002 15 6 528 534
Paravina RD. Evaluation of a newly developed visual shade-matching apparatus. Int J Prosthodont Nov-Dec. 2002;15(6):528–34.
57. Paul S Peter A Pietrobon N Hammerle CH Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth J Dental Res 2002 81 578 582 10.1177/154405910208100815
Paul S, Peter A, Pietrobon N, Hammerle CH. Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth. J Dental Res. 2002;81:578–82.
58. Colvin J Dawson DV Gu H Marchini L Patient expectation and satisfaction with different prosthetic treatment modalities J Prosthodont 2019 28 3 264 270 10.1111/jopr.12983 30375110
Colvin J, Dawson DV, Gu H, Marchini L. Patient expectation and satisfaction with different prosthetic treatment modalities. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(3):264–70. 10.1111/jopr.12983. (Epub 2018 Oct 29).30375110
59. Dueled E Gotfredsen K Trab Damsgaard M Hede B Professional and patient-based evaluation of oral rehabilitation in patients with tooth agenesis Clin Oral Implants Res 2009 20 7 729 736 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01698.x 19515060
Dueled E, Gotfredsen K, Trab Damsgaard M, Hede B. Professional and patient-based evaluation of oral rehabilitation in patients with tooth agenesis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(7):729–36. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01698.x.19515060
60. Meijndert CM Raghoebar GM Vissink A Delli K Meijer HJA The effect of implant-abutment connections on peri-implant bone levels around single implants in the aesthetic zone: a systematic review and a meta-analysis Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021 7 6 1025 1036 10.1002/cre2.471 34418324
Meijndert CM, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Delli K, Meijer HJA. The effect of implant-abutment connections on peri-implant bone levels around single implants in the aesthetic zone: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021;7(6):1025–36. 10.1002/cre2.471. (Epub 2021 Aug 21).34418324
61. Arunyanak SP Pollini A Ntounis A Morton D Clinician assessments and patient perspectives of single-tooth implant restorations in the esthetic zone of the maxilla: a systematic review J Prosthet Dent 2017 118 1 10 17 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.036 28385430
Arunyanak SP, Pollini A, Ntounis A, Morton D. Clinician assessments and patient perspectives of single-tooth implant restorations in the esthetic zone of the maxilla: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118(1):10–7. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.036. (Epub 2017 Apr 3).28385430
62. Paniz G Bressan E Stellini E Romeo E Lops D Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of peri-implant soft tissue color Clin Oral Implants Res 2014 25 8 992 996 10.1111/clr.12201 23750735
Paniz G, Bressan E, Stellini E, Romeo E, Lops D. Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of peri-implant soft tissue color. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(8):992–6. 10.1111/clr.12201. (Epub 2013 Jun 10).23750735
