
==== Front
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)
ramb
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
0104-4230
1806-9282
Associação Médica Brasileira

39292087
00605
10.1590/1806-9282.20240466
Original Article
The impact of glycosylated hemoglobin and 75-g oral glucose tolerance test glucose levels on birthweight percentile
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2614-4411
Doğan Yasemin Conceptualization Formal Analysis Investigation Methodology Project administration Resources Supervision Validation Visualization Writing – original draft Writing – review & editing 1 *
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1251-5709
Daryal Ayşe Seda Data curation Formal Analysis Investigation Project administration Resources Software Visualization Writing – original draft 2
1 Kocaeli University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perinatology Unit – Kocaeli, Turkey.
2 Kocaeli University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology – Kocaeli, Turkey.
*Corresponding author: perinatolojidr@gmail.com
Conflicts of interest: the authors declare there is no conflicts of interest.

16 9 2024
2024
70 9 e2024046601 6 2024
05 6 2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
SUMMARY

OBJECTIVE:

Our research objective was to validate and contribute further evidence to the studies regarding large for gestational age and birthweight percentile by examining oral glucose tolerance test and glycosylated hemoglobin levels in both healthy women and those with gestational diabetes mellitus.

METHODS:

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital involving 106 women who delivered at gestational week 36 or later between February 2022 and February 2023. Maternal, obstetric, and neonatal data were collected from the participant's medical records. Large for gestational age and non-large for gestational age groups were compared. Correlation analysis was used to determine associations among oral glucose tolerance test, glycosylated hemoglobin levels, and the birthweight percentile.

RESULTS:

Mothers of neonates in the large for gestational age category had higher body mass indexes before pregnancy (p=0.002) and delivery (p=0.003), as well as a higher incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (p=0.027). Mothers of male large for gestational age infants had higher fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin levels compared to male non-large for gestational age infants (p=0.007 and p=0.004, respectively). There was a weak positive correlation between fasting plasma glucose levels and birthweight percentile in the overall group (r=0.342, p<0.006). Further analysis by gender showed a weak positive correlation between birthweight percentile and fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin values in male newborns (r=0.393, p=0.004 and r=0.373, p=0.006, respectively).

CONCLUSION:

Our study has established a clear association between the birthweight percentile in male infants and the levels of glycosylated hemoglobin and fasting plasma glucose measured during oral glucose tolerance test. It is imperative to devise potential strategies aimed at achieving optimal glycosylated hemoglobin and fasting plasma glucose parameters to effectively reduce the frequency of large for gestational age in male infants.

KEYWORDS:

Large for gestational age infant
Oral glucose tolerance test
Glycated hemoglobin A1c
Birthweight
==== Body
pmcINTRODUCTION

Birthweight is a crucial factor in predicting the survival of newborns and infants, as well as an important indicator of pregnancy outcomes 1 . Additionally, it has been observed that birthweight is associated with the future risk of cardio-metabolic diseases in the offspring. It was reported that 10.8% of newborns are large for gestational age (LGA), exhibiting a high birthweight percentile 2 .

Maternal glucose level is an important factor in prenatal health, as it plays a vital role in providing essential nutrients to both pregnant women and their fetuses 3 . GDM is a common metabolic disorder that refers to any degree of glucose intolerance occurring during pregnancy 4 . This condition has been linked to the passage of glucose through the placenta to the fetus, leading to increased fetal insulin production and subsequent excessive growth, resulting in LGA infants 5 . Although the diagnostic "gold-standard" for GDM is the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is a commonly used measure to evaluate long-term glucose regulation 6 . Studies have established an association among GDM, high glucose levels, third-trimester HbA1c values, and LGA infants 7 .

While a significant portion of the research on prenatal glucose regulation has primarily concentrated on diabetic pregnancies, it is important to note that negative consequences have also been observed in pregnant individuals without diabetes 8 . However, there is a scarcity of studies, particularly focusing on pregnant women who do not have GDM. Our research objective is to validate and contribute further evidence to the studies regarding LGA and birthweight percentile by examining OGTT values and HbA1c levels in both healthy women and those with GDM.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Kocaeli University Hospital, involving 106 women who delivered at gestational week 36 or later between February 2022 and February 2023. Pregnant women with chronic hypertension, pre-gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, multiple pregnancies, or major fetal anomalies, as well as those with missing OGTT values, were excluded from the study. The study adhered to the ethical principles outlined in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from the Ethics Committee of Kocaeli University (KU GOKAEK 2023/17.16). Informed written consent was obtained from the patients.

Maternal, obstetric, and neonatal data, including age, pre-pregnancy height, weight and body mass indexes (BMI) before pregnancy and before delivery, gestational weight gain, OGTT values, HbA1c levels, gestational week of delivery, mode of delivery, neonatal weight, gender, APGAR scores, umbilical cord blood pH, and glucose levels, were collected from the participant's medical records. Gestational age was determined based on the patient's last menstrual period and confirmed by first-trimester crown-rump length.

Large for gestational age was defined as a birthweight that exceeds the 90th percentile. To screen for GDM, all patients underwent a 75-g OGTT between the 24th and 28th week of pregnancy. The criteria for diagnosing GDM were based on the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) guidelines, which consider a single high value during the 2-h 75-g OGTT as diagnostic for GDM 9 . The thresholds were fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level of 92 mg/dL, 1-h glucose level of 180 mg/dL, and 2-h glucose level of 153 mg/dL. Patients whose OGTT results fell within normal ranges were classified as having normal glucose tolerance. BMI was calculated by dividing the formula weight by the square of the height (kg/m 2 ).

Glycosylated hemoglobin (%) levels were measured during the OGTT between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation. The calculation of the birthweight percentile was performed using the Fetal Medicine Foundation's neonatal population weight charts 10 .

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS version 20.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, United States). Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were used to assess the normality assumption. Continuous variables were presented with mean±standard deviation or median (IQR: interquartile range). Categorical variables were summarized as counts and percentages. Independent-samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison between groups. The association between two categorical variables was examined by the chi-square test. Spearman correlation analysis was used to determine the associations between continuous variables. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

This study included a total of 106 women. The mean maternal age was 30 ±5.6 years. The gestational age at the time of delivery varied between 36 and 40 weeks, with a mean of 38 weeks. The mean birthweight was 3400±458 g. There were 53 male and 53 female newborns. Maternal, obstetric, and neonatal characteristics of the study group are displayed in Table 1.

Table 1 Maternal, obstetric, and neonatal characteristics of the study population.

Maternal/obstetric variables		
Maternal age (years)	29 (26–34)	
Pre-pregnancy weight (kg)	66.8±13.6	
Pre-pregnancy BMI (kg/m 2 )	65 (58–73)	
Gestational weight gain (kg)	12 (10–16)	
Weight before delivery (kg)	77 (71–86)	
BMI before delivery (kg/m 2 )	29.6 (26.7–33.7)	
Parity	
	Nulliparous	37 (34.9%)	
	Multiparous	69 (65.1%)	
Mode of delivery	
	Vaginal delivery	30 (28.3%)	
	Cesarean delivery	76 (71.7%)	
	GDM	23 (21.6%)	
	HbA1c (%)	5.2 (4.9–5.3)	
	FPG (mg/dL)	82 (76–87)	
	1-h OGTT (mg/dL)	132 (114–152)	
	2-h OGTT (mg/dL)	109 (93–124)	
Neonatal variables	
	GA at delivery (weeks)	38 (38–39)	
	Birthwieght (g)	3400±458	
	Birthweight percentile	63 (31–93)	
	1st minute APGAR score	8 (7–8)	
	5th minute APGAR score	9 (9–9)	
	Umblical cord blood pH	7.33 (7.30–7.36)	
	Umblical cord blood glucose (mg/dL)	75 (66–93)	
Neonatal gender	
	Female	53 (50%)	
	Male	53 (50%)	
Data are shown as mean ± SD or median (25th–75th quartile) or number and percentage (%). BMI: body mass index; GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test; GA: gestational age.

Among 106 women, 21.6% (n=23) were diagnosed with GDM. LGA was present in 33% of the study group (n=35) while 67% (n=71) had non-LGA births. Table 2 displays the comparison of LGA and non-LGA groups for maternal, obstetric, and neonatal variables. There was a statistically significant difference in various factors such as pre-pregnancy BMI (p=0.002), BMI before delivery (p=0.003), GDM (p=0.027), and polyhydramnios (p=0.003). Additionally, the FPG values were significantly higher in the LGA group (p<0.001). LGA was more prevalent among male infants (p=0.013). One woman in the LGA group and four women in the non-LGA group used insulin (p=1). Only one woman in the LGA group and two women in the non-LGA group had unregulated glucose levels at the time of birth.

Table 2 Characteristics of the study population according to birthweight percentile categories.

	LGA	Non-LGA	p-value*	
Maternal age (years)	30 (27–36)	29 (26–33)	0.405a	
Pre-pregnancy weight (kg)	73.8±15.6	63.3±11.1	0.001b	
Pre-pregnancy BMI (kg/m 2 )	28.3±6.1	24.6±4.3	0.002b	
Gestational weight gain (kg)	12 (10–17)	12 (10–16)	0.637a	
Weight before delivery (kg)	84 (75–97)	75 (67–82)	0.001a	
BMI before delivery (kg/m 2 )	33.8 (27.7–37.3)	29.3 (26.7–31.6)	0.003a	
Parity	
	Nulliparous	13 (37.1%)	30 (42.3%)	0.769c	
	Multiparous	22 (62.9%)	41 (57.7%)		
Mode of delivery	
	Vaginal delivery	3 (8.6%)	27 (38.0%)	0.003c	
	Cesarean delivery	32 (91.4%)	44 (62%)		
		GDM	12 (34.3%)	11 (15.4%)	0.027c	
		NonGDM	23 (65.7)	60 (84.6%)		
		HbA1c (%)	5.2 (5.0–5.5)	5.1 (4.9–5.3)	0.102a	
		FPG (mg/dL)	85 (82–91)	79 (74–86)	<0.001a	
		1-h OGTT (mg/dL)	138 (118–164)	128 (111–145)	0.078a	
		2-h OGTT (mg/dL)	109 (97–128)	110 (92–123)	0.450a	
		GA at delivery (weeks)	37 (37–38)	38 (38–39)	0.007a	
		Birthweight (g)	3877±237	3165±343	<0.001b	
Amniotic fluid index	
	Polyhydramnios	8 (22.9%)	2 (2.9%)	0.003c	
	Normal	27 (77.1%)	67 (97.1%)		
Umblical cord blood pH			0.125a	
	Umblical cord blood glucose (mg/dL)	74.3±14.2	81.8±23	0.063b	
Neonatal gender	
	Female	11 (31.4%)	42 (59.2%)	0.013c	
	Male	24 (68.6%)	29 (40.8%)		
Data are shown as mean ± SD or median (25th–75th quartile) or number and percentage (%).

* p<0.05 indicates statistical significance.

a Independent-samples Mann-Whitney U test.

b Independent samples t-test.

c Chi square test. LGA: large for gestational age; BMI: body mass index; GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test; GA: gestational age.

Upon categorizing the groups by gender, it was observed that mothers of male LGA infants had higher levels of FPG and HbA1c compared to male non-LGA infants (p=0.007 and p=0.004, respectively) (Table 3).

Table 3 Comparison of glycosylated hemoglobin and oral glucose tolerance test values in large for gestational age and non-large for gestational age groups based on neonatal gender.

	Female	p-value*	Male	p-value*	
LGA	Non-LGA	LGA	Non-LGA	
HbA1c (%)	5.04±0.50	5.16±0.31	0.480a	5.35±0.44	5.02±0.32	0.004a	
FPG (mg/dL)	85 (82–91)	78 (74–86)	0.079b	86 (80–90)	80 (73–84)	0.007b	
1-h OGTT (mg/dL)	138 (122–155)	127 (105–144)	0.215b	138 (111–165)	131 (114–146)	0.288b	
2-h OGTT (mg/dL)	108 (100–124)	109 (91–123)	0.775b	111 (91–133)	110 (92–121)	0.381b	
Data are shown as mean ± SD or median (25th–75th quartile).

* p<0.05 indicates statistical significance.

a Independent-samples t-test.

b Mann-Whitney U test. LGA: large for gestational age; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test.

According to correlation analysis, no significant correlations were found between birthweight percentile and the results of 1-h OGTT, 2-h OGTT, and HbA1c (p=0.195, p=0.546, and p=0.245 respectively), but FPG level showed a weak positive correlation (r=0.342 and p<0.006) in the overall group. Further analysis stratified by gender revealed that birthweight percentile exhibited a weak positive correlation with FPG and Hba1c values in male newborns (r=0.393, p=0.004 and r=0.373, p=0.006, respectively). However, the birthweight percentile of female infants was not associated with FPG or HbA1c values (p=0.159 and p=0.42, respectively).

DISCUSSION

In our research, mothers of LGA infants tended to have a higher pre-pregnancy BMI and elevated FPG values. Our study found a correlation between the birthweight percentile and the neonatal gender, indicating a higher likelihood of classifying male newborns as LGA. Furthermore, we observed a positive correlation between HbA1c and FPG values and the birthweight percentile, particularly in male infants.

In our study, both maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and BMI before delivery were higher in the LGA group. Several research findings have indicated that a high pre-pregnancy BMI is the primary indicator for the delivery of a baby with fetal overgrowth. According to the study by Chen et al., the risk of macrosomia was significantly higher in women who were overweight or obese before pregnancy compared to women with a normal weight 11 . In another study, obese women were found to have a 2.27-fold higher likelihood of developing LGA compared to women who were not obese 12 . This observation was not limited to women with GDM but also included women with normal glucose tolerance. A large study from China underlined that male neonates, overweight, and obesity were linked with an increased risk of delivery higher than 4,000 g in nondiabetic women 13 .

The presence of GDM can have significant implications for both the mother and the fetus. The IADPSG criteria were formulated based on the findings of the hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes (HAPO) study. The HAPO study revealed a consistent and progressive correlation between fasting and post-load maternal glucose levels and the occurrence of LGA infants, high adiposity, and elevated concentrations of cord-blood C-peptide 14 .

During pregnancy, blood glucose levels of 70 mg/dL or lower in the OGTT have been associated with lower birth weight, smaller head circumference, and shorter body length in infants compared to those born to mothers with normal blood glucose levels 15 . Individuals with a lower glucose challenge test (GCT) result during the second trimester had a higher incidence of SGA newborns compared to those with a normal result 16 . On the other hand, studies have underlined that the infants born to women with high FPG levels during OGTT exhibited a significantly greater average birthweight and birthweight percentile when compared with nonGDM women and a higher risk of LGA 17,18 . Zhao et al. found that as FPG levels increased by 1 mmol/L, there was a corresponding rise in the birth weight percentile 19 . They also observed a 0.70 times decrease in the risk of SGA, while LGA increased by 1.80 times. Glucose measurements exhibited a linear correlation with LGA, with the strongest link observed for FPG. In line with the aforementioned studies, we found that median FPG levels were higher in mothers of LGA fetuses. Further analysis showed that FPG levels were correlated with the birthweight percentile in our study. On the contrary, in a recent study, there was no significant correlation observed between FPG, plasma glucose 2 h after the OGTT, postprandial blood glucose values at 28 weeks of gestation, and birthweight 20 . According to Yang et al., fetal growth is mainly influenced by postload glucose levels rather than FPG values 21 . Nevertheless, the methodologies employed in the latter two studies differ from our own.

In a recent study, no significant relationship was found between the levels of maternal HbA1c before 20 weeks of gestation and the birthweight of the neonate in women without pre-existing diabetes 22 . Silke et al. observed a positive correlation between maternal HbA1c levels and neonatal birthweight 23 . However, this association was found to be significant only in pregnancies with male fetuses. Similarly, our research revealed a positive correlation between maternal HbA1c, FPG, and birthweight percentile, but exclusively among male neonates. It is important to note that birthweight percentile rather than birthweight was evaluated in our study. A prior investigation presented proof that the glucose metabolism of mothers could potentially be influenced by the gender of the fetus, even in pregnant women with normal glucose tolerance 24 . FPG was found to be higher in mothers of male infants. The presence of a male fetus was linked to diminished β-cell function, which refers to the reduced ability of pancreatic cells involved in counteracting insulin resistance 25 .

The study's strengths lie in the balanced representation of both genders, which enhances the statistical validity. Notably, our study encompassed a substantial number of healthy women, which has offered additional understanding and the benefit of placing various pathological glucose response patterns into context.

Acknowledging the study's limitations, reliance on self-reported pre-pregnancy height and weight may introduce recall bias. To minimize this, the participant's pre-pregnancy weights and heights were recorded at the onset of pregnancy. The study population consists primarily of individuals of Caucasian ethnicity, limiting the generalizability of our findings to other ethnic groups. The variable "birthweight" is influenced by numerous predictors and confounders, but our research is limited by a restricted set of predictor variables. Data on patient's dietary habits, physical activity, parental birthweight, and paternal body habitus are lacking, which could potentially impact the outcomes of the study.

CONCLUSION

Our study has established a clear association between the birthweight percentile in male infants and the levels of HbA1c and FPG measured during OGTT. Pregnant women with abnormal glucose tolerance carrying a male fetus may require closer monitoring of fetal growth. It is imperative to devise potential strategies aimed at achieving optimal HbA1c and glucose parameters to effectively reduce the frequency of LGA in male infants, which should be considered in future research.

ETHICAL APPROVAL

This study was carried out at Kocaeli University Hospital. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study received approval from the Ethics Committee of Kocaeli University (KU GOKAEK 2023/17.16). Informed written consent was obtained from the patients.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA/MATERIALS The data supporting this study are available through the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Funding: none.
==== Refs
REFERENCES

1 Barker DJ Hales CN Fall CH Osmond C Phipps K Clark PM. Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia (syndrome X): relation to reduced fetal growth Diabetologia 1993 36 1 62 67 10.1007/BF00399095 8436255
2 Kurtoğlu S Hatipoğlu N Mazıcıoğlu MM Akın MA Çoban D Gökoğlu S Body weight, length and head circumference at birth in a cohort of Turkish newborns J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 2012 4 3 132 139 10.4274/jcrpe.693 22664362
3 Ladyman SR Brooks VL. Central actions of insulin during pregnancy and lactation J Neuroendocrinol 2021 33 4 e12946 10.1111/jne.12946 33710714
4 Coustan DR. Gestational diabetes mellitus Clin Chem 2013 59 9 1310 1321 10.1373/clinchem.2013.203331 23536513
5 Ovesen PG Fuglsang J Andersen MB Wolff C Petersen OB David McIntyre H. Temporal trends in gestational diabetes prevalence, treatment, and outcomes at Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, between 2004 and 2016 J Diabetes Res 2018 2018 5937059 10.1155/2018/5937059 29736403
6 Caulfield LE Harris SB Whalen EA Sugamori ME. Maternal nutritional status, diabetes and risk of macrosomia among Native Canadian women Early Hum Dev 1998 50 3 293 303 10.1016/s0378-3782(97)00074-1 9548033
7 Fonseca L Saraiva M Amado A Paredes S Pichel F Pinto C Third trimester HbA1c and the association with large-for-gestational-age neonates in women with gestational diabetes Arch Endocrinol Metab 2021 65 3 328 335 10.20945/2359-3997000000366 33939909
8 Bi J Ji C Wu Y Wu M Liu Y Song L Association between maternal normal range HbA1c values and adverse birth outcomes J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2020 105 6 dgaa127 10.1210/clinem/dgaa127 32166332
9 International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel Metzger BE Gabbe SG Persson B Buchanan TA Catalano PA International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy Diabetes Care. 2010 33 3 676 682 10.2337/dc09-1848 20190296
10 Nicolaides KH Wright D Syngelaki A Wright A Akolekar R. Fetal medicine foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018 52 1 44 51 10.1002/uog.19073 29696704
11 Chen CN Chen HS Hsu HC. Maternal prepregnancy body mass index, gestational weight gain, and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in Taiwan: a population-based birth cohort study Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020 17 4 1221 10.3390/ijerph17041221 32074959
12 Wang LF Wang HJ Ao D Liu Z Wang Y Yang HX. Influence of pre-pregnancy obesity on the development of macrosomia and large for gestational age in women with or without gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese population J Perinatol 2015 35 12 985 990 10.1038/jp.2015.119 26401753
13 Hua XG Jiang W Hu R Hu CY Huang K Li FL Large for gestational age and macrosomia in pregnancies without gestational diabetes mellitus J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2020 33 21 3549 3558 10.1080/14767058.2019.1578746 30714441
14 HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group Metzger BE Lowe LP Dyer AR Trimble ER Chaovarindr U Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes N Engl J Med. 2008 358 19 1991 2002 10.1056/NEJMoa0707943 18463375
15 Bayraktar B Balıkoğlu M Kanmaz AG. Pregnancy outcomes of women with hypoglycemia in the oral glucose tolerance test J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2020 49 4 101703 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101703 32018048
16 Bienstock JL Holcroft CJ Althaus J. Small fetal abdominal circumference in the second trimester and subsequent low maternal plasma glucose after a glucose challenge test is associated with the delivery of a small-for-gestational age neonate Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008 31 5 517 519 10.1002/uog.5316 18432604
17 Black MH Sacks DA Xiang AH Lawrence JM. Clinical outcomes of pregnancies complicated by mild gestational diabetes mellitus differ by combinations of abnormal oral glucose tolerance test values Diabetes Care 2010 33 12 2524 2530 10.2337/dc10-1445 20843973
18 Cosson E Tatulashvili S Vicaut E Pinto S Sal M Nachtergaele C Glycemic status during pregnancy according to fasting and post-load glucose values: the association with adverse pregnancy outcomes. An observational study Diabetes Metab 2023 49 5 101469 10.1016/j.diabet.2023.101469 37648077
19 Zhao D Liu D Shi W Shan L Yue W Qu P Association between maternal blood glucose levels during pregnancy and birth outcomes: a birth cohort study Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023 20 3 2102 10.3390/ijerph20032102 36767469
20 Banda PDNP Amarasinghe GS Agampodi SB. Determinants of birthweight in rural Sri Lanka; a cohort study BMC Pediatr 2023 23 1 40 10.1186/s12887-022-03830-0 36690991
21 Yang Y Wang Z Mo M Muyiduli X Wang S Li M The association of gestational diabetes mellitus with fetal birth weight J Diabetes Complications 2018 32 7 635 642 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2018.04.008 29907325
22 Rasmussen KV Nielsen KK Pedersen ML. No association between early maternal HbA1c and offspring birthweight among women without pre-existing diabetes in Greenland Int J Circumpolar Health 2020 79 1 1702798 10.1080/22423982.2019.1702798 31825748
23 Silke O Yim IS Shaikh K Lalani S Ghani F Wanyonyi S Is HbA1c associated with birth weight? A multivariable analysis of Pakistani pregnant women J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2023 49 8 2048 2055 10.1111/jog.15706 37343941
24 Geng X Geng L Zhang Y Lu H Shen Y Chen R Fetal sex influences maternal fasting plasma glucose levels and basal β-cell function in pregnant women with normal glucose tolerance Acta Diabetol 2017 54 12 1131 1138 10.1007/s00592-017-1055-1 29098391
25 Retnakaran R Kramer CK Ye C Kew S Hanley AJ Connelly PW Fetal sex and maternal risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: the impact of having a boy Diabetes Care 2015 38 5 844 851 10.2337/dc14-2551 25693837
