
==== Front
Clin Med (Lond)
Clin Med (Lond)
Clinical Medicine
1470-2118
1473-4893
Royal College of Physicians

S1470-2118(24)05423-X
10.1016/j.clinme.2024.100238
100238
Review Article
Secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease: A narrative review focus on therapeutic strategy
Tsai Shin-Hwa middy0311@gmail.com
a1
Kan Wei-Chih rockiekan@ntu.edu.tw
bc1
Jhen Rong-Na wynnazhen@gmail.com
d
Chang Yu-Ming ynk123.tw@yahoo.com.tw
d
Kao Jsun-Liang smh01068@smh.org.tw
d
Lai Hsien-Yung hamalai@yahoo.com.tw
e
Liou Hung-Hsiang hh258527@ms23.hinet.net
f
Shiao Chih-Chung chungyy2001@yahoo.com.tw
d⁎
a Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, No.7, Zhongshan S. Rd., Zhongzheng Dist., Taipei City, 100225, Taiwan, ROC
b Department of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, No.901, Zhonghua Rd., Yongkang Dist., Tainan City, 71004, Taiwan, ROC
c Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology, No.89, Wenhua 1st St., Rende Dist., Tainan City, 71703, Taiwan, ROC
d Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Camillian Saint Mary's Hospital Luodong, No. 160, Zhongzheng S. Rd., Luodong Township, 265, Yilan County, Taiwan, ROC
e Department of Anesthesiology, Da Chien General. Hospital, No. 36 Gongjing Rd., Miaoli City, Miaoli County, 360012, Taiwan, ROC
f Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hsin-Jen Hospital, No. 387 Chong-Cheng Rd., Xinzhuang District, 242009, New Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC
⁎ Corresponding author at: Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Camillian Saint Mary's Hospital Luodong, No. 160, Zhongzheng S. Rd., Luodong Township, 265, Yilan County, Taiwan, ROC. chungyy2001@yahoo.com.tw
1 These authors contributed equally to this work.

30 8 2024
9 2024
30 8 2024
24 5 10023814 5 2024
13 8 2024
15 8 2024
© 2024 The Author(s)
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects over 10% of the global population. One crucial complication of CKD is secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), marked by elevated parathyroid hormone levels due to hyperphosphataemia, hypocalcaemia, and low active vitamin D from impaired renal function. SHPT increases risks of bone deformities, vascular calcification, cardiovascular events and mortality. This review examines SHPT treatment strategies in patients with CKD. First-line treatments include phosphate binders, vitamin D receptor activators and calcimimetics. When these fail, invasive options like parathyroidectomy (PTX) and thermal ablation are considered. PTX effectively reduces symptoms and improves radiological outcomes, outperforming medical treatment alone in reducing cardiovascular risk and mortality. Thermal ablation techniques, such as microwave, radiofrequency, laser or high-intensity focused ultrasound, offer less invasive alternatives with promising results. Future research should explore the molecular mechanisms of parathyroid gland hyperplasia and evaluate various treatments’ impacts.

Keywords

Calcimimetics
Chronic kidney disease
Parathyroidectomy
Parathyroid hormone
Secondary hyperparathyroidism
Vitamin D receptor activator
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a disease with an increasing incidence and prevalence that affects over 10% of the general population.1 As kidney function declines, a complex disarrangement affecting bone, mineral metabolism and cardiovascular systems, named CKD–mineral bone disorder (CKD-MBD) occurs.2 Subsequently, the progressive decreased calcium levels or increased phosphate levels in advanced CKD stages induce overactive parathyroid glands, called secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), that is typically characterised by hypocalcaemia, hyperphosphataemia, elevated fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23), reduced 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3 [1,25(OH)2D3] and high parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels.3

Abnormalities in bone metabolism and heterotopic calcifications are common in SHPT, with radiographic features including subperiosteal bone resorption, Rugger jersey spine sign, brown tumours, pathological fractures, and deformities in severe cases.4 Besides bone and joint disorders, SHPT is also associated with symptoms like pruritis and muscle soreness,5 and some long-term consequences include renal osteodystrophy, heightened fracture risk, osteoporosis, vascular calcification, immune dysfunction, and renal hyporesponsive anaemia, imposing a significant economic burden.3,6 Further, the high PTH levels in patients with SHPT correlate with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.7

For patients with CKD equal to or more advanced than stage 3, guidelines suggest regular monitoring of calcium, phosphate and PTH levels with intervals varied by stages of CKD8, 9, 10 (Table 1). As to the recommended PTH targets for CKD-MBD patients, the National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) guideline published in 2003 suggests target ranges of PTH levels that are different in different stages of CKD.8 The 2009 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guideline suggests that PTH levels in dialysis patients should be maintained at two to nine times the upper reference limit (URL), while suggestions for CKD patients without dialysis are lacking.9 The goals for PTH levels are agreed upon in the 2017 KDIGO guidelines for CKD-MBD10 and are commonly adopted in Asian countries.11 (Table 1)Table 1 Target ranges of relevant biochemistries of SHPT by stages of CKD.

Table 1	Stage 3
eGFR = 30–59
mL/min/1.73 m2	Stage 4
eGFR = 15–29
mL/min/1.73 m2	Stage 5
eGFR <15
mL/min/1.73 m2	
			without dialysis	with dialysis	
	
Target ranges of serum phosphate	
	
KDOQI 20038	2.7–4.6 mg/dL
[0.87–1.48 mmol/L]	3.5–5.5 mg/dL
[1.12–1.76 mmol/L]	
	
KDIGO 20099 & 201710	Maintain within normal range or lower toward the normal range
2.7–4.6 mg/dL [0.87–1.48 mmol/l]	
	
JSDT 201312	Not mentioned	3.5–6.0 mg/dL
[1.12–1.92 mmol/L]	
	
Target ranges of corrected calcium	
	
KDOQI 20038	Within normal range:
8.4–10.5 mg/dL [2.1–2.6 mmol/L]	Within the normal range, prefer toward the lower end:
8.4 mg/dL [2.1 mmol/L]	
	
KDIGO 20099 & 201710	Maintain within normal range
8.4–10.5 mg/dL [2.1–2.6 mmol/L]	
	
JSDT 201312	Not mentioned	8.4–10.0 mg/dL
[2.1–2.5 mmol/L]	
	
Target ranges of PTH	
	
KDOQI
20038	35–70 pg/mL
[3.9–7.7 pmol/L]	70–110 pg/mL [7.7–12.1 pmol/L]	150–300 pg/mL
[16.5–33.0 pmol/L]	
	
KDIGO
20099 &
201710	Not known, suggest evaluating for
modifiable factors for those above URL
(*65 pg/mL [7.2 pmol/L])	Within 2–9x URL (*130–585 pg/mL [14.3–64.4 pmol/L])	
	
JSDT
201212	Not mentioned	60–240 pg/mL [6.6–26.4 pmol/L]	
Abbreviation: eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; JSDT, Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy; KDIGO, Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes; KDOQI, Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative; PTH, parathyroid hormone; URL, upper reference limit.

Note: *calculated using the reference ranges of serum intact-PTH (14–65 pg/mL [1.5–7.2 pmol/L]).

SHPT is diagnosed by biochemical abnormalities characterised by elevated levels of PTH, often accompanied by hyperphosphataemia, hypocalcaemia and vitamin D deficiency. The initial guidelines for diagnosing SHPT were established by the KDOQI in 2003. These recommendations were provided for patients with CKD stages 3 to 5, emphasising the importance of monitoring serum levels of calcium, phosphate and PTH.8 The KDOQI 2003 guideline recommends various target PTH levels in different CKD stages, with a target PTH level of 150–300 pg/mL (16.5–33.0 pmol/L) for patients with CKD stage 5 irrespective of undergoing dialysis.8 However, subsequent KDIGO guidelines in 2009 and 2017 did not specify ideal target levels of PTH for patients with CKD stages 3a to 5 who are not undergoing dialysis, but emphasise the significance of addressing modifiable factors in SHPT, such as hyperphosphataemia, hypocalcaemia or vitamin D deficiency, which can contribute to elevated PTH levels.9, 10 For patients with stage 5 CKD undergoing dialysis, the guidelines advised maintaining PTH levels within two to nine times the URL of the assay.9, 10 As a guideline from an Asian country, the 2012 Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy (JSDT) guideline suggested a narrower target range of 60–240 pg/mL (6.6–26.4 pmol/L) for PTH levels in chronic dialysis patients.12 (Table 1)

Recent data revealed that lower PTH levels in patients with SHPT patients undergoing dialysis are associated with improved hypertension correction, reduced mortality and lower cardiovascular disease risk.13 However, achieving target PTH levels through medication alone can be challenging, necessitating invasive interventions. The 2009 and 2017 KDIGO guidelines recommend parathyroidectomy (PTX) for patients with CKD equal to or worse than stage 3a, with severe SHPT unresponsive to medication.9, 10 However, evidence shows that thermal ablation is an effective alternative treatment for refractory SHPT compatible with PTX.14 This review aims to comprehensively examine the treatment strategies of SHPT in patients with CKD. We particularly highlight comparisons among different therapeutic approaches regarding safety and effectiveness, providing clear understanding and guidance to the medical community for improving the quality of care for patients with CKD-associated SHPT.

Therapeutic strategies for SHPT

With the objectives focusing on normalising serum phosphate, calcium and PTH levels, the therapeutic options are varied depending on the stages of CKD and severity of SHPT, to prevent subsequent complications of SHPT (Fig. 1).Fig. 1 Overview of therapeutic options for SHPT.

Note: The black lines denote the complications of SHPT, and the green lines denote the options for preventing or treating SHPT.

Abbreviation: CKD, chronic kidney disease; P, phosphate; SHPT, secondary hyperparathyroidism.

Fig 1

The first step for the patients diagnosed with SHPT, regardless of the stages of CKD, is evaluation and correction of the modifiable factors including hyperphosphataemia, hypocalcaemia and vitamin D deficiency. Dietary phosphate restriction is an essential strategy for managing patients with SHPT (Fig 1 and Table 2). As for the medications for treating SHPH, phosphate binder is the first drug of choice, while vitamin D receptor activator (VDRA) should be reserved for patients with CKD stage 4–5 with severe and progressive SHPT.10 In patients with CKD stage 5 undergoing dialysis, various options are suggested to control PTH levels better. These options include VDRA, calcimimetics or combination therapy.10 Finally, PTX or thermal ablation should be considered for patients with refractory SHPT who fail to respond to medical therapies (Fig 1 and Table 2).Table 2 Therapeutic options for SHPT.

Table 2Therapeutic options	Therapeutic target	Adverse effects and limitations of the therapy	
Dietary phosphate restriction	Hyperphosphataemia	Increased risk of protein malnutrition	
Phosphate binders	Hyperphosphataemia		
 Calcium-based binders	Hypercalcaemia, soft tissue and vascular calcification, gastrointestinal upset	
 Calcium-free binders		
  Aluminium-based binders	Aluminium toxicity	
  Iron-based binders	Diarrhoea, stool discoloration	
  Sevelamer/lanthanum	Gastrointestinal side effects	
	
Vitamin D receptor activator	Target on vitamin D receptors, suppression of PTH synthesis	PTH level over suppression, hypercalcaemia	
	
Calcimimetics	Target on calcium-sensing receptors, suppression of PTH synthesis	PTH level over suppression, hypocalcaemia	
	
Parathyroidectomy	Parathyroid gland hypertrophy and hyperplasia	Transient (but possibly prolonged) hungry bone syndrome with hypocalcaemia, hoarseness due to surgery-related nerve damage, over-corrected PTH level	
	
Thermal ablation	Parathyroid gland hypertrophy and hyperplasia	Lower response rate and higher recurrent rate compared to parathyroidectomy
Less hypocalcaemia, hoarseness and hypoparathyroidism compared to parathyroidectomy	
Abbreviations: PTH, parathyroid hormone.

Medical treatment

Phosphate binder

Hyperphosphataemia is frequently observed in patients with advanced CKD and is an important factor contributing to SHPT development. Phosphate binder is an effective intervention for mitigating hyperphosphataemia, which attenuates the direct stimulatory effect on PTH secretion, reduces the formation of calcium–phosphate complexes responsible for hypocalcaemia-induced PTH secretion, and lowers FGF-23 levels, indirectly influencing PTH secretion.

Calcium-based phosphate binders, including calcium acetate and calcium carbonate, are commonly prescribed for dialysis patients and effectively reduce serum phosphate levels. However, their use may heighten the risk of vascular calcification and hypercalcaemia due to increased calcium phosphate precipitate formation. It is worth mentioning that the KDIGO 2017 guideline suggests restricting the dose of calcium-based phosphate binders to avoid calcium overload and subsequent metastatic calcification.10

On the other hand, calcium-free binders such as sevelamer, lanthanum and iron-based phosphate binders present a lower risk of vascular calcification. Nonetheless, evidence regarding their effects on bone and cardiovascular outcomes remains inconclusive.15,16 Some studies suggest that sevelamer and lanthanum may confer lower all-cause mortality than calcium-based phosphate binders, with fewer incidents of hypercalcaemia.17 However, iron-based binders may induce adverse effects such as diarrhoea.18

VDRA

In patients with CKD-induced SHPT, VDRAs mitigate the effects of vitamin D deficiency by binding to vitamin D receptors (VDRs) and inhibiting PTH synthesis through gene transcription regulation.19 VDRAs also improve hypocalcaemia by modulating genes involved in calcium channels and calcium-binding proteins, enhancing calcium balance.20,21 Additionally, VDRAs influence bone resorption and increase intestinal calcium absorption, raising serum calcium and phosphate levels, which further reduces PTH synthesis.20,21

VDRAs have limitations. Reduced expression of CaRs and VDRs in parathyroid gland hyperplasia may hinder PTH regulation by serum calcium and VDRAs.22 Despite this, VDRAs are valuable for managing SHPT in CKD. Calcitriol was the first VDRA for SHPT, while alfacalcidol, doxercalciferol and paricalcitol are effective prodrugs.23 Some studies suggest paricalcitol may offer better outcomes and survival than calcitriol.

Caution is needed as overuse of VDRAs, especially calcitriol can cause hypercalcemia and hyperphosphataemia, increasing vascular calcification risk.24 Newer VDRAs like paricalcitol are preferred for their moderate impact on hypercalcaemia,25 though evidence on cardiovascular benefits is limited.26

Emerging data support the early use of extended-release calcifediol (ERC) in CKD stages 3–4 due to high vitamin D deficiency. ERC provides steady calcitriol release, reducing immediate active vitamin D levels. Meta-analyses show similar PTH reductions to paricalcitol with fewer hypercalcaemia events. ERC may help prevent SHPT in early CKD.27

Calcimimetic

The calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) is crucial as a receptor on parathyroid gland chief cells. In advanced CKD, hypocalcaemia and CaSR desensitisation due to gland hyperplasia increase PTH expression and secretion. Low extracellular calcium levels stabilise PTH mRNA, raising serum PTH levels.28 Calcimimetic agents mimic serum calcium's action on CaSRs, reducing PTH secretion. They also enhance CaSR expression and sensitivity.29 Clinical studies show that calcimimetics reduce parathyroid gland volume.30 Glands from treated patients had higher oxyphil/chief cell ratios31 and cystic degeneration,32 suggesting apoptosis as a treatment pathway for SHPT.

Calcimimetic agents have transformed CKD treatment, replacing phosphate binders and reducing vitamin D supplementation. In patients with SHPT, they improve biochemical outcomes, lowering serum PTH, calcium, phosphate and calcium–phosphate complex levels.33,34 Calcimimetics are linked to reduced PTX incidence, but evidence on mortality or cardiovascular risk is inconclusive.35 The Evaluation Of Cinacalcet HCl Therapy to Lower CardioVascular Events (EVOLVE) Trial showed fewer non-atherosclerotic cardiovascular events with cinacalcet, though not statistically significant.36

Commercially available calcimimetic agents include two oral forms (cinacalcet and evocalcet) and one intravenous form (etelcalcetide). Research by Palmer et al showed all three improved serum PTH levels short term. Etelcalcetide had the most significant reduction but a higher risk of hypocalcaemia, while cinacalcet caused nausea. Each agent has pros and cons, making preference challenging.37 A new injectable calcimimetic, Upacicalcet, which has only been licensed in Japan since 2021, is effective and safe for SHPT patients on dialysis.38 Combining cinacalcet with vitamin D significantly reduced serum phosphate, calcium–phosphate complex and PTH levels.39,40 The choice of agent depends on patient needs and tolerances. Evidence on the combination of calcimimetics and VDRAs regarding mortality and cardiovascular risks remains limited.

PTX

Indication for PTX

Patients with SHPT often exhibit parathyroid hyperplasia, marked by the enlargement of the parathyroid glands. PTX entails tissue resection and can decrease serum PTH levels, thus ameliorating clinical symptoms. Studies have demonstrated that maintaining controlled serum PTH levels within the 21–150 pg/mL (2.3–16.5 pmol/L) range can significantly reduce all-cause mortality, yielding the most favourable survival outcomes.41 Hence, PTX may be warranted when patients demonstrate the following clinical manifestations despite prolonged medication usage (typically exceeding 6 months): (1) Exacerbation of clinical signs and symptoms, such as intensified bone, joint or muscle pain, systemic pruritus adversely affecting quality of life; (2) Onset of systemic complications, including the development of bone diseases like pathological fractures, calciphylaxis, symptomatic extra-skeletal manifestations, and deteriorating anaemia unresponsive to erythropoietin; (3) Progression of laboratory abnormalities, such as persistent hypercalcaemia or hyperphosphataemia despite medication adherence.42

The KDOQI guideline for CKD-MBD in 2003 defines severe hyperparathyroidism as persistently elevated serum intact-PTH levels exceeding 800 pg/mL (88 pmol/L), accompanied by hypercalcaemia or hyperphosphataemia, and exhibiting poor responsiveness to medical interventions.43 Subsequently, the KDIGO guidelines for CKD-MBD in 2009 and 2017 recommend PTX for patients with inadequate responses to medical or pharmacological treatment to enhance clinical outcomes.9,10

Comparisons among different approaches of PTX

There are three primary surgical approaches, namely total PTX (tPTX) with autotransplantation (AT), tPTX without AT, and subtotal PTX (sPTX).42 tPTX entails the identification and removal of all four parathyroid glands. In contrast, sPTX involves the removal of 3 to 3.5 parathyroid glands while leaving remnants at their original location. During surgery, transcervical thymectomy is often conducted to prevent recurrent SHPT, as ectopic or supernumerary parathyroid glands may persist within thymomas.44 In autotransplantation cases, the parathyroid tissue fragment is carefully assessed and transplanted, typically to the forearm's brachioradialis or the sternocleidomastoid muscle.

Roughly speaking, both tPTX and sPTX are safe and effective interventions for uncontrolled SHPT, that have demonstrated notable improvements in SHPT symptoms, including radiological enhancements in bone diseases, reduced time to recurrence, and decreased rates of persistent disease.45,46 These procedures also exhibit reduced cardiovascular risk and all-cause mortality compared to sole medical management.47 Regarding the outcomes comparisons between different surgery approaches, a systemic review and meta-analysis by Yuan et al found no significant differences in postoperative clinical and laboratory conditions between tPTX+AT and sPTX.46 On the contrary, a network meta-analysis by Hou et al revealed that postoperative hypocalcaemia occurs more frequently in patients with tPTX compared to sPTX or tPTX+AT, while no significant difference exists between sPTX and tPTX+AT. However, recurrence rates are significantly higher in sPTX than tPTX, tPTX+AT than tPTX, and sPTX than tPTX+AT. Additionally, patients with sPTX experience a higher reoperation rate compared to those with tPTX+AT or tPTX.48

Although inconclusive findings exist regarding the choices of surgery approaches, it is generally accepted that tPTX with AT emerges as the recommended optimal surgical approach for SHPT, offering maximal efficacy and safety with minimal adverse effects.48 Besides, tPTX is recommended for patients with a high risk of hypercalcaemia, particularly those with a history of prior neck surgery or laryngeal nerve injury or those considered high surgical risks.49 However, tPTX without AT is not advised for patients with planned renal transplantation. On the contrary, sPTX is preferable for patients at higher risk of hypocalcaemia, offering the benefits of reduced operation duration and shorter hospital stays.45,46

It is worth mentioning the essential postoperative complication, hungry bone syndrome (HBS), which causes acute, severe hypocalcaemia after PTX, typically occurring over 4 days post-surgery.50 HBS results from sudden PTH decline, halting bone resorption and leading to rapid mineralisation, calcium and phosphate uptake, and hypophosphataemia. Hypomagnesaemia in patients with CKD worsens hypocalcaemia. Studies highlight serum calcium, intact-PTH, phosphate and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) as crucial for identifying high-risk patients.51 Low preoperative calcium and elevated ALP/intact-PTH predict HBS.52,53

Thermal ablation

For patients diagnosed with SHPT, invasive treatments are recommended if they exhibit symptoms or meet criteria such as persistent elevation in serum PTH levels, hypercalcaemia or hyperphosphataemia with inadequate medication response. However, thermal ablation offers an alternative for patients at high risk for general anaesthesia or those declining surgery. It provides rapid recovery, procedural simplicity and relative safety compared to PTX.54 Thermal ablation techniques used for SHPT include two most commonly utilised methods, microwave ablation (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and two less common methods, laser ablation and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). MWA operates within the electromagnetic spectrum, using frequencies of 915 MHz and 2.45 GHz. An antenna tip is inserted into the parathyroid gland, generating heat locally for tissue coagulation necrosis.55 RFA utilises energy from the spectrum between 3 Hz and 300 GHz. A needle guided by ultrasound creates an electrical circuit, delivering high energy to induce coagulation necrosis.56 Additionally, laser ablation delivers focused, high-energy light via an optical fibre, achieving efficient thermal ablation.57 HIFU converges ultrasound beams at a focal point, converting absorbed energy to heat and resulting in tissue necrosis.58

Research shows that MWA and RFA are effective and safe for treating SHPT. RFA significantly improves symptoms like restless legs, arthralgia, ostealgia, calcinosis cutis and pruritus. It also reduces serum PTH, calcium and phosphate levels immediately and 12 months post-treatment.59,60 A meta-analysis by Zhou et al in 2021, including 26 studies with 932 patients, found significant decreases in serum PTH at 1 and 6 months post-MWA. Reductions in serum calcium and phosphate at 6 months also indicated MWA's safety and effectiveness for SHPT.54 However, hypocalcaemia and transient hoarseness were common adverse events.54 Long-term follow-up showed significant PTH reduction over 60 months.61 A 2023 meta-analysis by Gong et al found that complete thermal ablation significantly reduced serum PTH, calcium and phosphate levels compared to partial ablation. There was no significant difference in severe hypocalcaemia incidence or symptom improvement between groups.60,62 Both MWA and RFA are effective for SHPT, with no significant differences in serum PTH, calcium and phosphate levels or adverse events up to 12 months post-ablation.63 MWA has a shorter operation time for single lesions and a higher complete ablation rate for lesions larger than 15 mm.63 Notably, thermal ablation therapy for SHPT is currently applied in a limited number of countries, mainly China, and is not yet widely utilised.

Comparisons between calcimimetic and PTX

Despite PTX's potential advantages, its rates among end-stage renal disease patients with SHPT in the USA declined from 6.07 per 1,000 patients in 2004 to 3.67 per 1,000 in 2016, possibly due to increased cinacalcet use.64 Both cinacalcet and PTX improve serum calcium, phosphate and PTH levels, enhancing survival.65 However, PTX shows superior overall survival in dialysis patients, especially those with severe SHPT (intact PTH ≥500 pg/mL [55 pmol/L]).65,66 It significantly reduces serum calcium, phosphate and PTH levels in dialysis patients.66

Regarding cardiovascular risks, neither treatment reduces left ventricular mass, vessel, heart valve calcification or arterial stiffness.66 However, PTX is linked to fewer new cardiovascular events compared to cinacalcet.67 In patients with severe SHPT undergoing peritoneal dialysis, total PTX reduces osteopenia or osteoporosis incidence and increases bone mineral density in the lumbar spine and femoral neck.68

Comparison between thermal ablation and PTX

Both thermal ablation and PTX are crucial for patients with refractory SHPT unresponsive to medication. A 2019 meta-analysis by Gong et al, involving six studies with 326 SHPT patients, compared the efficacy and complications of thermal ablation versus surgery.69 Results showed no significant differences in serum PTH, calcium or phosphate levels, or hoarseness incidence. However, thermal ablation reduced hypocalcaemia risk but increased persistent or recurrent SHPT risk.69

Recent cohort and randomised controlled trials comparing thermal ablation and PTX found that both methods achieved target serum PTH levels, though PTX often resulted in lower PTH levels.70, 71, 72, 73 No significant differences were observed in all-cause mortality or hoarseness; serum phosphate levels were similar. Some studies noted significant hypocalcaemia in the PTX group.72,73 RFA patients had similar success in reaching target PTH levels as PTX patients, with no differences in serum calcium and phosphate levels.74 RFA patients also had lower infection rates and shorter hospital stays. Preoperative bone-specific ALP concentration may predict postoperative hypocalcaemia. RFA was more cost-effective and may be an economical alternative. Thermal ablation is effective, with a lower hypocalcaemia risk and shorter hospital stays, making it a recommended option for recurrent SHPT patients (Table 3).Table 3 Comparisons of thermal ablation and PTX in SHPT patients.

Table 3Treatment type	Study	Sample size
(ablation/PTX)	Design	Dialysis duration (months)	Follow-up (months)	Study period	Baseline PTH level
(ablation/PTX)	Target
PTH level	Response rate	Adverse events	
MWA vs PTX	Jiang et al (2019)	81 (33/48)	Cohort	10 vs 12	24	Jan 2015 to Dec 2017	1796/1460	124–558 pg/mL
(13.6–61.4 pmol/L)	81.8% vs 52.6%	• No significance in hypocalcaemia and hoarseness

	
	
MWA vs tPTX	Wei et al (2020)	184 (92/92)	Cohort	96 vs 96	6	Mar 2018 to May 2019	1868/1746	-	-	• No significance in hypocalcaemia, Total PTX with longer recovery

	
	
MWA vs PTX	Diao et al (2021)	92 (47/45)	Cohort	8 vs 10	60	Jan 2010 to Mar 2019	1287/1446	150–600 pg/mL
(16.5–66.0 pmol/L)	55.3% vs 31.1%	• Hypocalcaemia more in PTX

• No significance in all-cause death

	
	
MWA vs PTX	Zhao et al (2021)	167 (79/88)	Non-RCT	7.9 vs 7.9	3	Jun 2018 to May 2020	1437/2099	> 80% reduction	85% vs 93%	• Significant hypocalcaemia in PTX compared to MWA

	
	
RFA vs. PTX	Ren et al (2022)	100 (47/53)	Cohort	7.9 vs 7.7	24	Jun 2014 to Dec 2020	1747/1857	≤ 300 pg/mL
(33.0 pmol/L)	64.1% vs 82.1%	• No significance in all-cause mortality

• The RFA group had a lower infection rate and length of hospital stay

	
Abbreviations: MWA, microwave ablation; RFA, radiofrequency ablation; PTX, parathyroidectomy; RCT, randomised controlled trial; PTH, parathyroid hormone.

Conclusions

SHPT in CKD is a complex disorder caused by imbalances in calcium, phosphate and vitamin D metabolism. SHPT increases the risk of bone deformities, vascular calcification, cardiovascular events and mortality. Initial management focuses on correcting biochemical abnormalities through diet, phosphate binders, VDRA and calcimimetics. However, some patients require invasive treatments like PTX or thermal ablation. PTX, especially tPTX with AT, is highly effective for severe or refractory SHPT, offering better survival outcomes than medication alone. Thermal ablation techniques, such as microwave and radiofrequency ablation, are promising, less invasive alternatives, particularly for high-risk patients. Both PTX and thermal ablation effectively reduce SHPT-related complications. Future research should explore the molecular mechanisms of SHPT and the long-term efficacy of various treatments to improve patient care.

Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

During the preparation of this work the authors used [Microsoft Bing / Copilot] for English editing. After using this tool/service, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the publication.

Funding

This review work received no external funding.

Ethical statement

Not applicable for a review work.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Shin-Hwa Tsai: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization. Wei-Chih Kan: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization. Rong-Na Jhen: Writing – original draft. Yu-Ming Chang: Writing – original draft. Jsun-Liang Kao: Writing – original draft. Hsien-Yung Lai: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization. Hung-Hsiang Liou: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization. Chih-Chung Shiao: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Simone Yu for the professional English editing.
==== Refs
References

1 Kovesdy CP. Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease: an update 2022 Kidney Int Suppl 12 1 2022 7 11
2 Levin A Bakris G Molitch M Prevalence of abnormal serum vitamin D, PTH, calcium, and phosphorus in patients with chronic kidney disease: results of the study to evaluate early kidney disease Kidney Int 71 1 2007 31 38 17091124
3 Lau WL Obi Y Kalantar-Zadeh K. Parathyroidectomy in the management of secondary hyperparathyroidism Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 13 6 2018 952 961 29523679
4 Lacativa PGS Franco FM Pimentel JR Patrício Filho PJdM Gonçalves MDdC Farias MLF. Prevalence of radiological findings among cases of severe secondary hyperparathyroidism Sao Paulo Med J 127 2009 71 77 19597681
5 Levy AR Xing S Brunelli SM Symptoms of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis: a prospective cohort study Am J Kidney Dis 75 3 2020 373 383 31629575
6 Reichel H Seibert E Tillmann F-P Economic burden of secondary hyperparathyroidism in Germany: a matched comparison Int Urol Nephrol 55 5 2023 1291 1300 36480088
7 Natoli JL Boer R Nathanson BH Is there an association between elevated or low serum levels of phosphorus, parathyroid hormone, and calcium and mortality in patients with end stage renal disease? A meta-analysis BMC Nephrol 14 2013 1 16 23295127
8 K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for bone metabolism and disease in chronic kidney disease Am J Kidney Dis 42 4 2003 S1 201 Suppl 3 14520607
9 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, evaluation, prevention, and treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD) Kidney Int Suppl 113 2009 S1 130
10 KDIGO 2017 Clinical Practice guideline update for the diagnosis, evaluation, prevention, and treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD) Kidney Int Suppl 7 1 2017 1 59 (2011)
11 Wang AY-M Akizawa T Bavanandan S 2017 kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) chronic kidney disease–mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) guideline update implementation: Asia summit conference report Kidney Int Rep 4 11 2019 1523 1537 31890994
12 Fukagawa M Yokoyama K Koiwa F Clinical practice guideline for the management of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder Therapeut Apheresis Dialysis 17 3 2013 247 288
13 Platt A Wilson J Hall R Comparative effectiveness of alternative treatment approaches to secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis: an observational trial emulation Am J Kidney Dis 83 1 2024 58 70 37690631
14 Chen Z Cheng L Zhang W He W. Ultrasound-guided thermal ablation for hyperparathyroidism: current status and prospects Int J Hyperthermia 39 1 2022 466 474 35271788
15 Zhao L Liu A Xu G. Safety and effectiveness of lanthanum carbonate for hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients: a meta-analysis Ren Fail 43 1 2021 1378 1393 34602015
16 Ogata H Fukagawa M Hirakata H Effect of treating hyperphosphatemia with lanthanum carbonate vs calcium carbonate on cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis: the LANDMARK randomized clinical trial JAMA 325 19 2021 1946 1954 34003226
17 Phannajit J Wonghakaeo N Takkavatakarn K The impact of phosphate lowering agents on clinical and laboratory outcomes in chronic kidney disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials J Nephrol 35 2 2022 473 491 34061337
18 Ruospo M Palmer SC Natale P Phosphate binders for preventing and treating chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8 2018
19 Silver J Levi R. Regulation of PTH synthesis and secretion relevant to the management of secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease Kidney Int 67 2005 S8 S12
20 Galuška D Pácal L Kaňková K. Pathophysiological implication of vitamin D in diabetic kidney disease Kidney Blood Pressure Res 46 2 2021 152 161
21 Cunningham J Locatelli F Rodriguez M. Secondary hyperparathyroidism: pathogenesis, disease progression, and therapeutic options Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 6 4 2011 913 921 21454719
22 Brandenburg V Ketteler M. Vitamin D and secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease: a critical appraisal of the past, present, and the future Nutrients 14 15 2022 3009 35893866
23 Geng X Shi E Wang S Song Y. A comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of paricalcitol versus other vitamin D receptor activators in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 randomized controlled trials PLoS One 15 5 2020 e0233705
24 Goodman WG Goldin J Kuizon BD Coronary-artery calcification in young adults with end-stage renal disease who are undergoing dialysis New Engl J Med 342 20 2000 1478 1483 10816185
25 Cozzolino M Bernard L Csomor PA. Active vitamin D increases the risk of hypercalcaemia in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis Clin Kidney J 14 11 2021 2437 2443 34754440
26 Anis KH Pober D Rosas SE. Vitamin D analogues and coronary calcification in CKD stages 3 and 4: a randomized controlled trial of calcitriol versus paricalcitol Kidney Med 2 4 2020 450 458 32775985
27 Franchi M Gunnarsson J Gonzales-Parra E Ferreira A Ström O Corrao G. Paricalcitol and extended release calcifediol for treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease: results from a network meta-analysis J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2023 dgad289
28 Riccardi D Martin D. The role of the calcium-sensing receptor in the pathophysiology of secondary hyperparathyroidism NDT Plus 1 suppl_1 2008 i7 i11 25983956
29 Antonsen JE Sherrard DJ Andress DL. A calcimimetic agent acutely suppresses parathyroid hormone levels in patients with chronic renal failure: rapid communication Kidney Int 53 1 1998 223 227 9453023
30 Ichii M Ishimura E Okuno S Decreases in parathyroid gland volume after cinacalcet treatment in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism Nephron Clin Pract 115 3 2010 c195 c202 20413997
31 Lomonte C Vernaglione L Chimienti D Does vitamin D receptor and calcium receptor activation therapy play a role in the histopathologic alterations of parathyroid glands in refractory uremic hyperparathyroidism? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3 3 2008 794 799 18322048
32 Sumida K Nakamura M Ubara Y Histopathological alterations of the parathyroid glands in haemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism refractory to cinacalcet hydrochloride J Clin Pathol 64 9 2011 756 760 21565858
33 Miedziaszczyk M Idasiak-Piechocka I Wiśniewski O Lacka K. A systematic review of the pharmacotherapy of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in grades 3-5 Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 26 1 2022
34 Liu Y Yang Q Chen G Zhou T. A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of calcimimetic agents in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients with chronic kidney disease Curr Pharm Des 28 40 2022 3289 3304 36305135
35 Wang G Liu H Wang C Ji X Gu W Mu Y Cinacalcet versus Placebo for secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and trial sequential analysis Sci Rep 8 1 2018 3111 29449603
36 Wheeler DC London GM Parfrey PS Effects of cinacalcet on atherosclerotic and nonatherosclerotic cardiovascular events in patients receiving hemodialysis: the EValuation Of Cinacalcet HCl Therapy to Lower CardioVascular Events (EVOLVE) trial J Am Heart Assoc 3 6 2014 e001363
37 Palmer SC Mavridis D Johnson DW Tonelli M Ruospo M Strippoli GF. Comparative effectiveness of calcimimetic agents for secondary hyperparathyroidism in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Am J Kidney Dis 76 3 2020 321 330 32475604
38 Shigematsu T Koiwa F Isaka Y Efficacy and safety of upacicalcet in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism: a randomized placebo-controlled trial Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 18 10 2023 1300 1309 37696667
39 Xu J Yang Y Ma L Fu P Peng H. Cinacalcet plus vitamin D versus vitamin D alone for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients undergoing dialysis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Int Urol Nephrol 51 2019 2027 2036 31531805
40 Ureña-Torres P Bridges I Christiano C Efficacy of cinacalcet with low-dose vitamin D in incident haemodialysis subjects with secondary hyperparathyroidism Nephrol Dialysis Transplant 28 5 2013 1241 1254
41 Xi QP Xie XS Zhang L Impact of different levels of iPTH on all-cause mortality in dialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism after parathyroidectomy Biomed Res Int 2017 2017
42 Dream S Kuo LE Kuo JH The American association of endocrine surgeons guidelines for the definitive surgical management of secondary and tertiary renal hyperparathyroidism Ann Surg 276 3 2022 e141 e176 35848728
43 Eknoyan G Levin A Levin NW. Bone metabolism and disease in chronic kidney disease Am J Kidney Dis 42 2003 1 201
44 Schneider R Waldmann J Ramaswamy A Fernández ED Bartsch DK Schlosser K. Frequency of ectopic and supernumerary intrathymic parathyroid glands in patients with renal hyperparathyroidism: analysis of 461 patients undergoing initial parathyroidectomy with bilateral cervical thymectomy World J Surg 35 2011 1260 1265 21479685
45 Zmijewski PV Staloff JA Wozniak MJ Mazzaglia PJ. Subtotal parathyroidectomy vs total parathyroidectomy with autotransplantation for secondary hyperparathyroidism in dialysis patients: short-and long-term outcomes J Am Coll Surg 228 6 2019 831 838 30776511
46 Yuan Q Liao Y Zhou R Liu J Tang J Wu G. Subtotal parathyroidectomy versus total parathyroidectomy with autotransplantation for secondary hyperparathyroidism: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis Langenbecks Arch Surg 404 2019 669 679 31377854
47 Komaba H Taniguchi M Wada A Iseki K Tsubakihara Y Fukagawa M. Parathyroidectomy and survival among Japanese hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism Kidney Int 88 2 2015 350 359 25786097
48 Hou J Shan H Zhang Y Network meta-analysis of surgical treatment for secondary hyperparathyroidism Am J Otolaryngol 41 2 2020 102370
49 Steinl GK Kuo JH. Surgical management of secondary hyperparathyroidism Kidney Int Rep 6 2 2021 254 264 33615051
50 Mehta R Rao KN Nagarkar NM Ghosh A Sakale H. Hungry bone syndrome following parathyroidectomy: a comprehensive systematic review of risk factors Indian J Surg 2023 1 13
51 Wen P Xu L Zhao S Risk factors for severe hypocalcemia in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism after total parathyroidectomy Int J Endocrinol 2021 2021
52 Wang M Chen B Zou X A nomogram to predict hungry bone syndrome after parathyroidectomy in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism J Surg Res 255 2020 33 41 32540578
53 Kritmetapak K Kongpetch S Chotmongkol W Raruenrom Y Sangkhamanon S Pongchaiyakul C. Incidence of and risk factors for post-parathyroidectomy hungry bone syndrome in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism Ren Fail 42 1 2020 1118 1126 33143476
54 Zhou X Shen Y Zhu Y Ultrasound-guided microwave ablation for secondary hyperparathyroidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis Int J Hypertherm 38 1 2021 1285 1294
55 Gala KB Shetty NS Patel P Kulkarni SS. Microwave ablation: how we do it? Indian J Radiol Imaging 30 2 2020 206 213 33100690
56 Hong K Georgiades C. Radiofrequency ablation: mechanism of action and devices J Vasc Intervent Radiol 21 8 2010 S179 S186
57 Appelbaum L Goldberg SN Ierace T Mauri G Solbiati L. US-guided laser treatment of parathyroid adenomas Int J Hypertherm 37 1 2020 366 372
58 Izadifar Z Izadifar Z Chapman D Babyn P. An introduction to high intensity focused ultrasound: systematic review on principles, devices, and clinical applications J Clin Med 9 2 2020 460 32046072
59 Chen C-C Chen H-L Chiang P-L Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation for primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism with or without previous parathyroidectomy: a retrospective study Int J Hypertherm 39 1 2022 907 917
60 Peng C Zhang Z Liu J Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of hyperplastic parathyroid gland for secondary hyperparathyroidism associated with chronic kidney disease Head Neck 39 3 2017 564 571 28032671
61 Li D Wang G Chen X Long-term effect of microwave ablation on patients undergoing hemodialysis for moderate secondary hyperparathyroidism: a retrospective cohort study J Ultrasound Med 40 11 2021 2497 2505 33484485
62 Gong L Liu X Yang Q Full thermal ablation versus partial thermal ablation for secondary hyperparathyroidism: a meta-analysis Medicine 102 48 2023 e36422 38050273
63 Xu W Li S Cheng F Microwave ablation versus radiofrequency ablation for patients with primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism: a meta-analysis Int Urol Nephrol 55 9 2023 2237 2247 36892812
64 Fligor SC Li C Hamaguchi R William J James BC. Decreasing surgical management of secondary hyperparathyroidism in the United States J Surg Res 264 2021 444 453 33848844
65 Wang AY-M Tang T-K Yau Y-Y Lo WK. Impact of parathyroidectomy versus oral cinacalcet on bone mineral density in patients on peritoneal dialysis with advanced secondary hyperparathyroidism: the PROCEED pilot randomized trial Am J Kidney Dis 2023
66 Komaba H Hamano T Fujii N Parathyroidectomy vs cinacalcet among patients undergoing hemodialysis J Clin Endocrinol Metab 107 7 2022 2016 2025 35277957
67 Kim WW Rhee Y Kim BS Clinical outcomes of parathyroidectomy versus cinacalcet in the clinical management of secondary hyperparathyroidism Endocr J 66 10 2019 881 889 31189770
68 Wang AY-M Lo WK Cheung SC-W Tang T-K Yau Y-Y Lang BH-H. Parathyroidectomy versus oral cinacalcet on cardiovascular parameters in peritoneal dialysis patients with advanced secondary hyperparathyroidism (PROCEED): a randomized trial Nephrol Dialysis Transplant 2023 gfad043
69 Gong L Tang W Lu J Xu W. Thermal ablation versus parathyroidectomy for secondary hyperparathyroidism: a meta-analysis Int J Surg 70 2019 13 18 31404676
70 Zhao J Qian L Teng C A short-term non-randomized controlled study of ultrasound-guided microwave ablation and parathyroidectomy for secondary hyperparathyroidism Int J Hypertherm 38 1 2021 1558 1565
71 Diao Z Qian L Teng C Microwave ablation versus parathyroidectomy for severe secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients on hemodialysis: a retrospective multicenter study Int J Hypertherm 38 1 2021 213 219
72 Wei Y Yu M-a Qian L-x Hypocalcemia after ultrasound-guided microwave ablation and total parathyroidectomy for secondary hyperparathyroidism: a retrospective study Int J Hypertherm 37 1 2020 819 825
73 Jiang B Wang X Yao Z Microwave ablation vs. parathyroidectomy for secondary hyperparathyroidism in maintenance hemodialysis patients Hemodialysis Int 23 2 2019 247 253
74 Ren M Zheng D Wu J Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation versus parathyroidectomy for secondary hyperparathyroidism in dialysis patients: a single-center retrospective study Sci Rep 12 1 2022 10289 35717444
