
==== Front
Heliyon
Heliyon
Heliyon
2405-8440
Elsevier

S2405-8440(24)13411-1
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37380
e37380
Research Article
Removal of microplastics from aqueous media using activated jute stick charcoal
Alom Nur ac
Roy Tapati bc
Sarkar Tanny ac
Rasel Md ac
Hossain Md Sanwar ac
Jamal Mamun mamun.jamal@chem.kuet.ac.bd
ac⁎
a Department of Chemistry, Khulna University of Engineering & Technology, Khulna, 9203, Bangladesh
b Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Khulna Agricultural University, Khulna, Bangladesh
c Microplastics Solution Ltd., Incubation Centre, KUET Business Park, Khulna, Bangladesh
⁎ Corresponding author. Department of Chemistry, Khulna University of Engineering & Technology, Khulna, 9203, Bangladesh. mamun.jamal@chem.kuet.ac.bd
03 9 2024
30 9 2024
03 9 2024
10 18 e373807 7 2024
31 8 2024
2 9 2024
© 2024 The Authors
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Microplastics (MPs), which are repositories of various pollutants, have significant effects on the people and the environment. Therefore, there is an urgent need for efficient and eco-friendly techniques to eliminate microplastics from water-based environments. This study introduces a new method for producing jute stick-activated charcoal (JSAC) by placing jute sticks on high-temperature pyrolysis without oxygen, followed by chemical activation with HCl. This process greatly enhances the adsorption capacity of JSAC for polyvinylchloride-based microplastics (PVC-MPs). JSAC was characterized using UV–Vis, FT-IR, XRD, and SEM studies both before and after adsorption. The study investigated the influence of pH, adsorbent quantity, and contact time on the optimization of the JSAC process. The PVC-MPs exhibited a maximum adsorption capacity of 94.12 % for the target MPs (5 g L−1) within 120 min when 10 g L−1 of JSAC was added at pH 7.

This work also examined adsorption rate and various isotherm models. Adsorption kinetics analysis reveals electrostatic, hydrogen bond, π-π, and hydrophobic interactions are the combined forces responsible for MPs adsorption onto JSAC. However, the decrease in hydrophobicity in acidic or basic media led to a decrease in adsorption. The isotherm analysis was conducted using the Langmuir isotherm model, and predicted the maximum adsorption capacity of PVC-MPs to be 4.4668 mg/g. Furthermore, by employing density functional theory, the interaction energy after PVC-MP adsorption was calculated to be −269 kcal/mol, demonstrating robust adsorption and agreement with the experimental findings. Due to its large surface area and porous structure containing many functional groups, JSAC can potentially be used to treat MP contamination in water.

Highlights

• An approach for removing MPs using jute stick activated charcoal (JSAC) was proposed.

• Removal efficiency of 94.12 % for MPs was found using JSAC.

• Electrostatic, hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic, and π-π interactions were the main adsorption forces.

• The experimental data is well-fitted with the Langmuir adsorption isotherm and pseudo-first-order kinetic model.

Keywords

Adsorption
Density functional theory
Kinetics
Isotherm and PVC microplastics
==== Body
pmc1 Introduction

Plastic pollution is a worldwide problem that poses a significant threat to the environment and has the potential to harm human health [1]. Marine ecosystems discover almost 12 million metric tons of plastic every year. According to projections, if the current patterns of plastic manufacture and consumption continue, by 2050, the amount of plastic in the oceans will exceed the population of fish [[2], [3], [4]]. Microplastics are chemically stable and do not pose a direct threat to human health. However, conclusive determination of their impact on human well-being remains elusive [5]. However, studies have confirmed that plastic pollution causes harm to aquatic organisms [6,7]. The release of additives from plastics during degradation produces significant detrimental byproducts. Researchers have extensively studied the characterization of "macroparticles," a crucial issue in understanding the breakdown of plastics into microplastics (MPs). Examples of MPs, commonly discussed, include Bisphenol A (BPA) and phthalates, used as plasticizers in PVC [8].

In addition, MPs provide a surface area that can adsorb different contaminants [9,10]. This feature necessitates a thorough analysis before we can conclusively confirm or reject the probability. It is possible to imagine that microparticles of a specific mass have a greater surface area than macroparticles of the same mass. Joo et al. examined the adsorption mechanisms of contaminants, namely per-/polyfluoroalkyl compounds. They identified three key processes: electrostatic repulsion, electrostatic interaction, and hydrophobic contact [11]. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which attract organic pollutants, pharmaceutical residues, insecticides, and heavy metals, pose a significant threat to aquatic life [12].

Microplastics (MPs), particles with a diameter of <5 mm, have been a major focus of concern in plastic pollution [13,14]. The long-lasting presence of MPs in natural environments can be due to their strong anti-corrosion properties [15,16]. As a result, MPs have the ability to consistently absorb persistent organic contaminants, heavy metals, and viruses from their surroundings. This poses a potential danger to the organisms that consume them as well as to the overall ecosystem, as contamination can spread via the food chain [[17], [18], [19]]. Anthropogenic wastes, such as sewage, attract MPs []. Despite the fact that sewage treatment facilities (STPs) effectively removed 90 % of MPs due to the significant volume of wastewater they released, these MPs still found their way into natural ecosystems in substantial quantities. STPs release a daily range of 15,000–4.5 million microplastic particles into surface waters; however, the rate of clearance may vary. Nanohybrid-based advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are commonly used to eliminate MPs from water [20]. Activated peroxymonosulfate creates very reactive radicals in this method, which breaks down MPs [21].

On the other hand, the AOP requires precise operational conditions, and the intermediate substances produced during the breakdown of MPs can cause additional pollution in water environments. Membrane disc filters are an excellent method for removing MPs, successfully separating around 79.4 % of these particles [[22], [23], [24]]. However, obstruction of filter modules can easily occur, leading to an increase in operational costs. Filtration encounters obstacles, such as decreased effectiveness caused by fouling and the risk of pollution from improperly handled waste membranes. Granular activated carbon and amino-functionalized zeolites effectively adsorb polyethylene-MPs and polystyrene-MPs, respectively [25,26]. The authors mentioned that both adsorbents are highly effective at removing MPs, owing to the involvement of chemisorption, physisorption, hydrophobic, and electrostatic interactions [26,27]. However, the use of effective adsorbent is limited due to some disadvantages, such as the requirement for significant modification of the adsorbent in order to remove MPs effectively. Jute stick activated charcoal (JSAC) is a new adsorbent material that has high potential to reduce pollutants. JSAC's hydrophobic and organophilic qualities make it ideal for organic pollutant adsorption in water purification and solvent recovery systems [24,28]. Just to mention, carbonaceous materials' non-polar surfaces make JSAC hydrophobic. Activation by physical or chemical means removing many surface functional groups, especially those that contain oxygen. This leaves behind a carbon-rich, less polar surface. These charcoals have multiple adsorption sites and large, specific surfaces. Activated charcoal has polar and nonpolar basal sites in oxygen-containing functional groups [29], and hydrophobic JSAC binds nonpolar MPs, such as PVC [24]. Jute sticks are available as cheap agricultural byproducts, with a huge surface area and a good number of functional groups, and shows greater adsorption capacity [24,25,30,31].

Thereby, in this work we aim to use JSAC to remove PVC-MPs from an aqueous medium and investigate its mechanism. These findings should illuminate MP removal technology. We simultaneously investigated the effect of pH, adsorbent amount, and contact time on MP degradation. We also examined the adsorption kinetics, isotherms, optimum geometry, and interaction energy, which are crucial to understanding the adsorbent-adsorbate interaction. According to our understanding, JSAC's use of aqueous media for treating PVC-MPs is a pioneering step in this field.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Materials

The jute sticks were collected from the local market in Khulna. PVC-MPs were purchased from BDH in England. Hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide were purchased from Merck, Germany. The experiments were conducted using ultrapure Millipore water (∼18.2 MΩ cm), and all reagents were laboratory-grade and used without further purification.

2.2 Preparation of jute stick activated charcoal (JSAC)

The jute sticks were chopped into small pieces and washed with water, followed by deionized water (DIW). The sticks were cleaned and dried in an oven at 110 °C for 24 h. A home blender was used to powder the dry sticks. The powder was placed in the furnace and heated for 1 h at 300, 400, and 500 °C [32,33]. During the pyrolysis process, jute stick powder was heated in an oxygen-free environment. This was achieved by conducting the pyrolysis in a controlled furnace with an inert atmosphere, using a continuous flow of nitrogen gas. The inert atmosphere prevents aerial oxidation and ensures that the organic material undergoes thermal decomposition rather than combustion [34] (Supplementary S1, Table S1). After being washed twice with DIW, the charcoal was activated by 0.5 M HCl. Briefly, a 10 % hydrochloric acid solution was prepared. Subsequently, charcoal powder was soaked in the hydrochloric acid solution, maintaining a ratio of 1:10. The soaked charcoal sample was left at room temperature for 6 h. Following this, the soaked sample was rinsed with distilled water to remove any excess acid solution, and the pH level was monitored to ensure neutrality. The sample was then filtered using a vacuum dryer and dried in an oven at a temperature of 80 °C [35].

2.3 Removal of MPs experiments

The removal of MPs was tested by adding 5g.L−1 PVC-based MPs and 10 mL DI water to a 50 mL conical flask, along with varying doses of JSAC. All of the MPs added conical flasks were shaken for 120 min at 150 rpm and 25 °C using a mechanical shaker. Thus, JSAC was used to separate the MPs from the aqueous solution [36].

2.4 Adsorption

The kinetics of JSAC adsorption were studied by filling a 50 mL conical flask with MPs, JSAC, and DIW, shaking at 150 rpm for 120 min. Utilizing the results obtained from the kinetic experiments, we calculated the adsorption equilibrium time. Subsequently, this equilibrium time was employed to establish the adsorption isotherms under the conditions of 10 gL-1 JSAC, 10 mL solution, and varying doses of 1–5 gL-1 of MPs particles. Using adsorption isotherm studies, the effects of pH on MPs adsorption by JSAC were examined.

The quantity of MPs adsorbed by AJSC, expressed in mg.g−1, was determined using a mass balance equation:(1) Qe=(Co−Ce)Vm

(2) R=(Co−Ce)Co×100%

here, C0 (mg/L) is the initial concentration, Ce (mg/L) is the concentration at the equilibrium of adsorption, V (L) is the volume of the solution, and m (g) is the quantity of the adsorbent.

2.5 Characterization of MPs and JSAC

Several methods were used to look at the samples' physical and chemical properties. These included an X-ray diffractometer (D2 PHASER, BENCHTOP XRD), a scanning electron microscope (JCM-7000, BENCHTOP SEM), fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, IR Tracer 100, SHIMADZU), and a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (UV 1800, SHIMADZU). FTIR spectroscopy was employed to obtain spectra for the samples within the range of 500–4000 cm−1 at a resolution of 0.25 cm−1. The KBr pellet method was used for FTIR measurements, with 50 scans per spectrum, and pH values were measured using a pH meter (HANNA pH Tester).

2.6 Computational method

Computational calculations were conducted using the Gaussian 9, Revision C.01 series of programs [37]. The energy of geometries, Mulliken charge, and infrared (IR) properties were computed utilizing the DFT-PBEPBE/6-311+G (d, p) level of theory. The structure of JSAC and PVC-MPs underwent complete optimization using the DFT-B3LYP/6-311+G (d,p) method simultaneously.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

Fig. 1 shows the SEM images of (a) JS powder (JS) (b) jute sticks charcoal (JSC), (c) jute sticks activated charcoal (JSAC), and (d) JSAC after adsorption. The images depict the morphological changes of carbon materials during pyrolysis, activation, and adsorption. The jute stick surfaces are relatively smooth solid surfaces with long ridges (Fig. 1a), resembling a series of parallel lines as observed in other biomasses [38]. Jute stick pyrolysis produces charcoal with organic volatiles, leaving a ruptured surface with small pores (Fig. 1b). Asadullah et al. found similar results with a composition of 49.79 wt% C, 6.02 wt% H, 41.37 wt% O, 0.19 wt% N, 0.05 wt% Cl, and 0.05 wt% S [39]. Fig. 1c illustrates the activation of charcoal with HCl, showcasing various pores with increased surface area. The number of pores in the case of JSAC is higher than that of JSC. The adsorption efficiency of JSAC is confirmed by the visible presence of PVC-MPs (Fig. 1d), indicating lignin dissolution from jute sticks through HCl activity. (Supplementary S2, Fig. S1).Fig. 1 Scanning electron micrograph of (a) JS powder; (b) JSC; (c) JSAC; (d) JSAC after adsorption.

Fig. 1

3.2 FTIR of JSC before & after activation and adsorption

Due to the existence of oxygen-containing functional groups, activated carbon possesses both polar and non-polar basal sites [27]. Fig. 2A depicts the FT-IR analysis of JSC. Spectrum (a) represents the analysis before activation, (b) represents the analysis after activation, and (c) represents the analysis of JSAC after adsorption. The distinct peak found at 3390 cm−1 in Fig. 2A (a) corresponds to the O-H stretching vibration of cellulose, pectin, absorbed water, hemicellulose, and lignin [33,40]. Just to mention, jute sticks contain a variety of phytochemicals, including cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, and other minor components. These compounds contribute to the presence of functional groups such as hydroxyl, carbonyl, and carboxyl groups in the raw material. During the pyrolysis process at 500 °C, carbonyl functional groups present in the raw material undergo significant transformations. Carbonyl groups from cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin decompose, leading to the formation of various volatile compounds and a carbonaceous solid residue. The carbonization process results in the formation of more stable aromatic structures. The unique peak observed at 3390 cm−1 in Fig. 2A (a), corresponds to the O-H stretching vibration of cellulose, pectin, absorbed water, hemicellulose, and lignin [9]. Additionally, the surfaces of JSC, JSAC, and JSAC after adsorption may adsorb moisture from the environment during handling and storage prior to FTIR analysis.Fig. 2 A. FT-IR analysis of JSC; (a) before activation; (b) after activation; (c) JSAC after adsorption; Fig. 2B. UV–Vis spectra of the PVC-MPs mixture (a); the PVC-MPs filtered through paper (b); and the PVC-MPs removed using JSAC (c); and Fig. 2C. XRD of jute sticks powder; JSC; JSAC; and JSAC after adsorption.

Fig. 2

The carbonyl group (C=O) was shown to be responsible for the strong band at 1690 cm−1. The aromatic C=C bonds were assigned a band at 1590 cm−1, whereas the aromatic methyl group was assigned a band at 1370 cm−1 (CH3). The 872 and 756 cm−1 bands correspond to = CH2 groups and C–H bending vibration, respectively [41]. The FTIR spectra of Fig. 2A (b) showed different functional groups due to the activation of JSC. It's presented that the C=O stretching of the carbonyl group in the quinone molecule was responsible for the prominent peak at 1585 cm−1. In aromatic groups, the 1429 cm−1 band showed C–O stretching [39]. The FTIR spectra of JSC shown in Fig. 2A (c), with various functional groups formed during adsorption by activated JSC. The bands at 1429 and 617 cm−1 were related to (C=C) in aromatic groups and Cl−, respectively.

3.3 UV–Vis spectroscopy analysis

Fig. 2B illustrates the UV–Vis spectra of the PVC-MPs mixture (a), the PVC-MPs filtered through paper (b), and the PVC-MPs removed using JSAC (c). Fig. 2B demonstrates that the absorptive intensity of all PVC-MPs diminishes progressively when JSAC is added to the PVC-MPs solution. This outcome illustrates that JSAC possesses a greater number of active sites on its surface, hence augmenting the process of adsorption. The concentrations of PVC-MPs prior to and after adsorption were assessed by measuring the absorptive intensities at wavelengths of 240 and 297 nm. Following the application of JSAC, there was a notable decrease in absorbance at these specific wavelengths, suggesting a substantial adsorption of MPs by JSAC [42,43].

3.4 X-ray diffraction (XRD)

Fig. 2C presents the XRD spectra of jute stick (JS) powder (a), jute stick charcoal (JSC) (b), jute stick activated charcoal (JSAC) (c), and JSAC after microplastics (MPs) adsorption (d). The XRD pattern of jute stick powder (Fig. 2C; a) displays broad diffraction peaks, indicative of its predominantly amorphous structure. This finding aligns with the lignocellulosic composition of jute, which consists mainly of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin [33]. The prominent peaks detected at around 2θ = 15.65°, 22.16°, and 34.44° are indicative of the crystalline arrangement of cellulose, which is commonly found in natural plant fibers. The presence of peaks corresponding to the (110) and (200) planes of cellulose confirms that the cellulose in the jute sticks has a semi-crystalline structure.

For JSC, the diffraction peak at 2θ = 22.58° is attributed to the (002) plane of graphitic carbon, a characteristic of amorphous carbon structures with limited crystallinity (Fig. 2C; b). The presence of a peak at 2θ = 41.31° corresponds to the (100) plane, associated with graphitic crystallites. Although this peak is less intense, it further verifies the existence of graphitic domains within the predominantly amorphous carbon matrix [33]. The emergence of this peak suggests that partial graphitization occurred during the carbonization process, resulting in the formation of small, ordered graphitic regions within the otherwise amorphous structure.

Following the activation of JSC, the XRD pattern (Fig. 2C; c) exhibits two broad peaks around 2θ = 21° and 41°, corresponding to the carbon (002) and (101) planes, respectively. These peaks can be attributed to the porous graphitic framework [24]. The XRD analysis indicates that a graphitic structure was formed after the activation process. However, the broadening of these peaks suggests a low degree of graphitization, characterized by small domains of coherent and parallel stacking of graphene layers.

After MPs adsorption, the XRD pattern shows a noticeable shift in the (002) peak to 2θ = 24.47°, commonly associated with graphitic carbon structures (Fig. 2C; d). This shift from the previously observed peak at 21° in the XRD pattern of JSAC before adsorption suggests enhanced ordering within the carbon structure. The peak at 2θ = 41° remains unchanged, indicating the persistence of graphitic domains within JSAC. Overall, the XRD pattern of JSAC exhibited minimal changes after being used for MPs removal, indicating the material's structural stability during the adsorption process [30].

3.5 Effect of pH on the adsorption

The pH of a solution significantly influences the adsorption process in experiments, as it is directly linked to the structure of both contaminants and adsorbents. Thereby, optimization was conducted to achieve maximum adsorption of PVC-MPs by JSAC across pH ranges 5–9, using 0.075 and 0.15 g/mL, respectively (Fig. 3a). Microplastics showed the highest adsorption capacity for JSAC in neutral solutions, while in acidic solutions, JSAC adsorbs fewer MPs to reach equilibrium. The reduced adsorption capacity under acidic conditions may be attributed to the formation of acidic oxygen-containing groups on the JSAC surface. This led to a reduction in hydrophobicity and hindered the hydrophobic interaction between PVC-MPs and JSAC. As a result, this influenced the hydrophobic interaction between PVC-MPs and JSAC [44]. Hence, the most effective adsorption of JSAC by MPs occurred under neutral conditions, with MPs exhibiting a reduced influence in alkaline conditions compared to acidic conditions.Fig. 3 Effect of (a) pH on the adsorption; (b) contact time for MPs removal; (c) dose for MPs removal.

Fig. 3

3.6 Effect of contact time

Adsorption occurs in three stages: rapid adsorption, lower adsorption than initial, and equilibrium state. Rapid adsorption occurs due to mass transfer, while reduced adsorption is due to minimal peripheral active binding sites (Fig. 3b). Finally, the availability of active sites for continued adsorption has become few, resulting in the formation of the adsorption equilibrium stage [45]. Here, maximum adsorption (about 94.12 %) was observed at a duration of 80 min. It is evident that there was a swift uptake as the contact time expanded, followed by a gradual decline until reaching equilibrium at approximately 80 min. This phenomenon can be explained by considering the electrostatic repulsion between MPs and JSAC, the hydrophilic-hydrophobic interactions between MPs and JSAC, and the reduced adsorption behavior of MPs on the JSAC surface, which collectively hinder the rapid decrease in removal efficiency [46].

3.7 Effect of adsorbent dose

Adsorbent dosage is a critical parameter that influences the amount of adsorbed substrate. The removal efficiency of MPs improved in tandem with the increase in JSAC dose. The inclusion of adsorbents increases the overall surface area. However, process modification is required to minimize excessive adsorbent consumption. Because active binding sites are increasingly accessible which improves the efficacy of MPs removal steadily with the rise of adsorbent quantity. The removal rate remains constant even after adding an extra amount in the equilibrium state due to the introduction of more active sites compared to lower adsorbate concentrations [47]. In this study, different doses of JSC (2 = 0.03, 4 = 0.06, 6 = 0.09, 8 = 0.12, and 10 = 0.15 g/L) were selected to determine the removal efficiency. Fig. 3c shows a significant increase in adsorbent amount from 0.03 to 0.09 g/L, followed by a gradual decrease. Due to an excessive concentration of JSAC adhering to the MPs surface, surface flaws were induced. Hence, considering its exceptional rejection capacity and high-water permeability, JSAC concentration of 6 g/L was deemed optimal for the experiment.

3.8 Adsorption kinetics

In the realm of adsorption, kinetics plays a pivotal role by influencing mechanisms such as mass transfer, reagent reaction, and diffusion control. The adsorption process unfolds in three distinct phases: the diffusion of adsorbate up to the boundary layer, the diffusion of adsorbate from the surface to the internal sites of the adsorbent, and the migration of adsorbate on the surface of the adsorbent. To assess the adsorption characteristics, the pseudo-first-order model (Fig. 4a) was employed for determining the adsorption rate, while the pseudo-second-order model (Fig. 4b) was utilized to unravel the nature of adsorption.Fig. 4 Linear Plot of (a) pseudo-first-order and (b) pseudo-second-order kinetic model.

Fig. 4

The adsorption mechanism's suitability is assessed using coefficient value (R2) [48,49]. The study investigated the effect of contact time on the adsorption of MPs by JSAC by adding 5 gL-1 MPs and 10 gL-1 JSAC to the testing bottle. The adsorption procedure's kinetics were analyzed using pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetics models, determining the amount of JSAC adsorbed at a specific time 't'.

3.8.1 Pseudo-first-order kinetics model

The pseudo-first-order kinetics is presented asln(qe−qt)=lnqe−k1t

Where qt (mg g−1) and qe (mg g−1) symbolize the amounts of the JSAC adsorbed at any time t (min) and equilibrium, k1 (min−1) is the first-order rate constants. The pseudo-first-order kinetics model focuses on the physisorption of pollutants, with the adsorption process primarily influenced by the nature of the adsorbate [30,49].

3.8.2 Pseudo-second-order kinetics model

The pseudo-second-order kinetics model assumes that the rate-limiting step involves electron transfer between the adsorbate and adsorbent.

The kinetic model is articulated as follows:tqt=1k2qe2+tqe

Where qt (mg g−1) and qe (mg g−1) represent the amounts of the JSAC adsorbed at any time t (min) and at equilibrium respectively, k2 (min−1) is the second-order rate constants. Here, the chemisorption of the pollutants is determined by the pseudo-second-order kinetics model [30]. The parameters obtained from the kinetic models are presented in Table 1.Table 1 Parameters derived from the kinetics model.

Table 1Pseudo First order	Pseudo Second Order	
qe (mg/g)	K1 (min−1)	R2	qe(mg/g)	K2 (min−1g.mg−1)	R2	
22.83	0.0129	0.94	7.14	0.000985	0.86	

In this study, Fig. 4a represents pseudo-first-order and Fig. 4b represents pseudo-second-order kinetics model where the R2 value of first-order and second-order is 0.94016 and 0.86163, respectively. Here, the value of R2 is higher in the first-order than that of the second-order kinetics model. Hence, it is evident that the adsorption of PVC-MPs by JSAC can be effectively characterized using the pseudo-first-order model. Thus, it can be concluded that the physisorption occurred with irreversible adsorption between PVC-MPs and JSAC, and there was chemosorption due to the availability of functional groups.

3.9 Adsorption isotherm

Adsorption isotherm analysis is crucial for understanding the interaction between adsorbate and adsorbent, thereby assessing the efficacy of adsorption studies. Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin isotherm models are commonly utilized to analyze adsorption capacity and interaction types during the removal process [49,50]. The determination coefficient (R2) can be applied to Fig. 5 out the fitness of these models.Fig. 5 Linear plot of (a) Langmuir isotherm; (b) Freundlich isotherm; (c) Temkin isotherm.

Fig. 5

3.9.1 Langmuir isotherm

The results from the investigation on Langmuir isotherm of the experimental data are as follows:Ceqe=1KLqm+Ceqm

Where qe (mg g−1) is the amount of adsorbed MPs at equilibrium, qm (mg g−1) is the maximum adsorption capacity; Ce is the remaining concentration of MPs at equilibrium, and KL (L mg−1) is the Langmuir constant (Fig. 5a). The model indicates that the adsorbent surface is uniform/homogeneous, and the adsorption is performed as monolayer adsorption [51].

3.9.2 Freundlich isotherm

The following equation is an illustration of the Freundlich isotherm model:lnqe=lnKF+1nlnCe

Where qe (mg g−1) is the amount of adsorbed MPs and Ce is the remaining concentration of MPs at equilibrium; KF and n are the Freundlich constants for adsorption capacity and intensity, respectively (Fig. 5b). The experiment confirmed the existence of adsorbent with heterogeneous active binding sites, indicating multilayer adsorption, as confirmed by the compatibility with the Freundlich isotherm [52].

3.9.3 Temkin isotherm

The Temkin isotherm model is a useful tool for estimating adsorbent-adsorbate surface interaction, as demonstrated in the analysis of experimental data [53].qe=RTbln(ATCe)

qe=BlnAT+BlnCe

The equations involve the Temkin isotherm constant (b), universal gas constant (RT), binding constant (AT), and adsorption heat constant (B), ensuring equilibrium adsorption energy (Fig. 5c). Table 2 displays the parameters obtained from fitting these isotherm models. In Fig. 5, the linear plots fitted to the (a) Langmuir, (b) Freundlich and (c) Temkin models are displayed where the correlation coefficients (R2) of these models were 0.98588, 0.90824, and 0.7697, respectively. The Langmuir model's calculation of PVC-MPs adsorption onto JSAC, with a capacity of 4.4668 mg/g, supports a monolayer adsorption process on homogenous material surface and the results are supported by the FTIR and SEM analysis. Based on these findings, the mechanism of PVC-MPs adsorption onto JSAC can be outlined as follows: (1) Electrostatic attractions between PVC-MPs and JSAC, (2) Hydrogen bonding interactions involving the oxygen-containing functional groups of JSAC and PVC-MPs, and (3) π−π interactions between JSAC and the aromatic ring of MPs. Consequently, the porous JSAC holds potential as an effective adsorbent for removing MPs from wastewater.Table 2 Parameters derived from the isotherm model.

Table 2Langmuir Isotherm	Freundlich isotherm	Temkin isotherm	
qmax	KL (L/mg)	R2	KF (L/mg)	n	R2	BT (J/mol)	KT (L/mg)	R2	
0.446	227.118	0.985	31.617	2.12	0.908	−1.47	0.00066	0.769	

3.10 Optimized geometry and interaction energy calculation of JSAC and PVC-MPs

In JSAC's fundamental composition, benzene rings form the core structure, a deduction drawn from solid-state 13C NMR experiments. The reaction models for the adsorption of microplastics impregnated in JSAC were established, centering on benzene ring clusters, aligning with the findings of Perry et al. [54]. To simulate the surface, zigzag edge sites were employed, given their proven suitability for JSAC modification. While the model size is not as crucial as the local shape of the active site, this study explored into a 7-fused ring to explore the impact of PVC-MPs coverage rates on adsorbent surfaces.

The optimization of PVC adsorptions on JSAC was initiated through Gaussian 09 program package, employing the DFT-B3LYP/6-311+G (d, p) level of theory for the geometrical optimization of JSAC. Fig. 6 depicts the optimized structures of (a) JSAC; (b) PVC-MPs and (c) After adsorption of PVC-MPs surface on the JSAC. The optimized structure of the smallest modeled JSAC comprised 8 aromatic rings (Fig. 6a) and two repeating units of PVC-MPs (Fig. 6b). The complete basis set 6-31+G (d, p) was applied for other elements, with due consideration has been given for spin multiplicity to determine optimal structures. Theoretical parameters, encompassing frequency, density, and additional calculations, were computed using Multiwfn post-geometry optimization (Supplementary Table S2). Among these parameters, adsorption energy stands out as a crucial factor, offering insights into the adsorption behavior of PVC-MPs on JSAC and aiding in distinguishing between physical and chemical adsorption mechanisms (Fig. 6c). The adsorption energy (Eads) was calculated for the adsorbate on the substrate. This method proves instrumental in determining interaction energy values and conducting direct interaction energy calculations (Supplementary S3, Table S3) [37,55]. The interaction energy value after PVC-MPs adsorption is recorded as −269.003987 kcal/mol. This substantial difference aligns with experimental data, emphasizing the remarkable adsorption capacity of the adsorbent towards PVC-MPs.Fig. 6 (a) Optimization structure of JSAC; (b) Optimization structure of PVC-MPs; (c) After adsorption of PVC-MPs surface on the JSAC.

Fig. 6

3.11 Frontier molecular orbitals

Molecular orbital theory is a theoretical approach used to study the stability and reactivity of molecules. Within this framework, several quantities, such as the HOMO-LUMO gap (band gap) are calculated [56,57]. The frontier molecular orbitals, comprising the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO), play a crucial role in influencing the chemical stability [58]. Molecules that possess a significant difference in energy between their highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO), known as the frontier orbital gap, demonstrate limited chemical reactivity and strong kinetic stability. This is because it requires a considerable amount of energy to either add an electron to the energetically elevated LUMO or remove an electron from the energetically lowered HOMO. In this band gap analysis, a gap of −7.01 eV was found, indicating a strong interaction between JSAC and PVC (Supplementary Table S4). The topology of the HOMO and LUMO orbitals of the JSAC-PVC complex after the adsorption of PVC is depicted in Fig. 7b and a represents the optimized geometry of JSAC-PVC MPs. These figures demonstrate that the HOMO orbitals are localized on PVC, while the LUMO orbitals are localized on JSAC. The electrostatic potential map is demonstrated in Fig. 7c.Fig. 7 (a) Optimized geometry of JSAC-PVC-MPs; (b) HOMO and LUMO orbitals of JSAC-PVC-MPs and (c) electrostatic potential map are calculated DFT-B3LYP/6-311+G (d, p) level of theory.

Fig. 7

Here, Table 3 compares various current findings on MPs adsorption. The red area in Fig. 8 shows a strong emphasis on microplastics removal and its management. However, the comparative analysis from Table 3 clarifies that research with PVC-based MPs separation is less concerned. It is vividly clear from the comparison that coagulation and electrocoagulation are commonly used methods employed for separating MPs, but these approaches also face significant limitations. These drawbacks include the frequent need for electrode material replacement, elevated maintenance costs for electrodes, and adjustment of different factors such as electrode current density, electrode gap, electrolyte concentration, anodic material fouling, solution pH adjustment, and wastewater conductivity [59]. Consequently, introducing such a tertiary treatment on a commercial scale for MPs treatment proves to be quite challenging [22,60]. Furthermore, at an industrial level, chemical coagulation requires higher chemical concentrations and results in the generation of a substantial volume of sludge. Properly handling this hazardous sludge places additional financial and environmental burdens on both the economy and the ecosystem. On the other hand, sand filtration is another method of MPs removal with conventional treatment techniques deprived of advanced treatment. Compared with coagulation, the removal efficiency of MPs through sand filtration varies from 29 to 56 %. From comparison, it is also observed that adsorption is mostly considered for excellent MPs removal efficiency. Therefore, adsorption by JSAC has some advantages over other techniques, including simple setup and operation, strong adsorption capability for hydrophobic organic pollutants like PVC-MPs in aqueous environments, and no harmful by-products.Table 3 Effectiveness of treatment methodologies for the removal of MPs.

Table 3Type of MPs	Methods	MP Size (μm)	Removal Efficiency (%)	Reference	
PVC	Adsorption	250	94.1	This work	
PS	Adsorption	1.45	92.0	[61]	
PE, PET, PA	Adsorption	48	100.0	[30]	
PVC	Adsorption	74	89	[62]	
PS	Adsorption	>425	81	[63]	
PS	Adsorption	6	48.5	[26]	
Ps	Adsorption	5	61.7	[31]	
PE	Adsorption	40–48	95.5	[25]	
PET	Coagulation	100–400	54.7	[64]	
PA, PP, PE, PVC	Active sludge	20–300	64.7	[65]	
PS	Biodegradation	300–1250	43.7	[66]	
PMMA, PE, CA, PP	Electrocoagulation	PE: 286.7	PE: 93.2	[67]	
PMMP: 6.3	PMMP: 91.7	
PP: 1000-2000	PP: 98.4	
CA: 1000-2000	CA: 98.2	
PE, PET	MBR	<5000	98.5	[68]	
PE	Grit chamber	<5000	74.0	[69]	
PS	Grit chamber	60–5000	66.0	[70]	
PES, PE, PP	Dissolved air flotation	<5000	95.0	[71]	
PET, PE, PP	Coagulation	5–10	44.5–75.0	[72]	
PE	Coagulation	<500	8.3–61.2	[73]	
PE	Coagulation	<500	11.6–90.9	[74]	
PET, PE, PS	Sand filtration	<5000	29.0–41.0	[72]	
PET, PA	Sand filtration	<5000	56.0	[75]	
PE, PP, PA	Rapid sand filtration	<5000	74.0	[21]	
PS	Biochar sand filtration	10	>95	[76]	
PAC	Granular AC	<5000	56.8–60.9	[72]	
PE, PP, PA	Ozone degrading	<5000	90.0	[21]	
Remarks: PVC – polyvinyl chloride, PS – polystyrene, PE – polyethylene, PET - polyethylene terephthalate, PA- Polyamide, PP- Polypropylene, PMMA- Polymethyl methacrylate, CA- Cellulose Acetate, PES- polyethersulfone, PAC – polyaluminum chloride.

Fig. 8 Scientometric analysis visualized the top 86 keywords from peer-reviewed articles published over the past ten years. A total of 4005 articles, identified on the Web of Science Core Collection using "removal of microplastics" as the search term, were analyzed. The analysis was conducted using the minimum co-occurrence frequency for all keywords, which were then graphically represented in VOSviewer in “Network visualization”, “overlay visualization (year)”, and “density visualization”. In these visualizations, each circle symbolizes a keyword, with its size indicating how frequently the keyword pairs have co-appeared in the literature. Different colors in the legend denote the average publication year of each keyword. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 8

4 Conclusions

This work represents the first-time utilization of jute stick-activated (JSAC) charcoal as an eco-friendly adsorbent for extracting microplastics (MPs) from water. JSAC underwent a thorough characterization process that included UV–Vis spectroscopy, FT-IR, XRD, and SEM analysis. The purpose of these experiments was to verify the adsorbent qualities, efficient removal of PVC-MP particles, and evaluation of their morphological structure. JSAC achieved a maximum efficiency of 94.12 % during the experiment. This efficiency was seen at a pH of seven and within a time period of 120 min. The adsorbent dose used was 10 g.L-1. The mechanistic analysis reveals that the hydrophobic nature of microplastics and the presence of electron conjugation, electron interaction, and hydrogen bond interactions on the surfaces of PVC-MPs have an impact on the adsorption of PVC-MPs by JSAC.

Additionally, it is crucial to take into account the pH of the MPs solution, since it has a significant impact on regulating the surface charge of MPs. On the other hand, the amount of treatment agents and the length of time they are in contact with the water also have a substantial impact on the removal of MPs from water. This study examined the process of adsorption, specifically focusing on the kinetics and isotherm models. The pseudo-first-order kinetic equation and Langmuir isotherm models were shown to be suitable for explaining the physisorption of PVC-MPs onto JSAC. This process successfully removes PVC-MPs from aqueous environments. In addition, the significant adsorption of PVC-MP on JSAC was confirmed by DFT calculations, which showed an interaction energy of −269.00 kcal/mol. The results are in line with the experimental findings, and the comparison between the calculated and observed FTIR spectra shows a significant level of agreement with the experimental data. JSAC's observed characteristics indicate that it has the potential to be a cost-efficient and eco-friendly substance for removing MPs in aquatic environment.

Funding

This work was supported by 10.13039/501100008804 Ministry of Science & Technology of Bangladesh (Grant no.: special allocation-21-22-582 Phys ).

Data availability statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Nur Alom: Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Data curation. Tapati Roy: Writing – original draft, Data curation. Tanny Sarkar: Methodology, Data curation, Conceptualization. Md Rasel: Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Data curation. Md Sanwar Hossain: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Formal analysis. Mamun Jamal: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Supervision, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Appendix A Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article:Multimedia component 1

Multimedia component 1

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to the Ministry of Science & Technology and University Grants Commission of Bangladesh for funding this work.

Appendix A Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37380.
==== Refs
References

1 Litchfield S.G. Schulz K.G. Kelaher B.P. The influence of plastic pollution and ocean change on detrital decomposition Mar. Pollut. Bull. 158 2020 111354
2 Auta H.S. Emenike C.U. Fauziah S.H. Distribution and importance of microplastics in the marine environment: a review of the sources, fate, effects, and potential solutions Environ. Int. 102 2017 165 176 28284818
3 McDevitt J.P. Criddle C.S. Morse M. Hale R.C. Bott C.B. Rochman C.M. Addressing the issue of microplastics in the wake of the microbead-free waters Act A new standard can facilitate improved policy Environmental Science & Technology 51 12 2017 6611 6617 28505424
4 Song Y.K. Hong S.H. Jang M. Han G.M. Jung S.W. Shim W.J. Combined effects of UV exposure duration and mechanical abrasion on microplastic fragmentation by polymer type Environmental Science & Technology 51 8 2017 4368 4376 28249388
5 Lu L. Luo T. Zhao Y. Cai C. Fu Z. Jin Y. Interaction between microplastics and microorganism as well as gut microbiota: a consideration on environmental animal and human health Sci. Total Environ. 667 2019 94 100 30826685
6 Wang X. Zheng H. Zhao J. Luo X. Wang Z. Xing B. Photodegradation elevated the toxicity of polystyrene microplastics to grouper (Epinephelus moara) through disrupting hepatic lipid homeostasis Environmental Science & Technology 54 10 2020 6202 6212 32207945
7 Xia X. Sun M. Zhou M. Chang Z. Li L. Polyvinyl chloride microplastics induce growth inhibition and oxidative stress in Cyprinus carpio var. larvae Sci. Total Environ. 716 2020 136479
8 Andrady A.L. Microplastics in the marine environment Mar. Pollut. Bull. 62 8 2011 1596 1605 21742351
9 Teuten E.L. Rowland S.J. Galloway T.S. Thompson R.C. Potential for plastics to transport hydrophobic contaminants Environmental Science & Technology 41 22 2007 7759 7764 18075085
10 Zhang Z. Chen Y. Effects of microplastics on wastewater and sewage sludge treatment and their removal: a review Chem. Eng. J. 382 2020 122955
11 Joo S.H. Liang Y. Kim M. Byun J. Choi H. Microplastics with adsorbed contaminants: mechanisms and treatment Environmental Challenges 3 2021 100042
12 Yuan W. Zhou Y. Chen Y. Liu X. Wang J. Toxicological effects of microplastics and heavy metals on the Daphnia magna Sci. Total Environ. 746 2020 141254
13 Yang L. Li K. Cui S. Kang Y. An L. Lei K. Removal of microplastics in municipal sewage from China's largest water reclamation plant Water Res. 155 2019 175 181 30849731
14 Yang D. Shi H. Li L. Li J. Jabeen K. Kolandhasamy P. Microplastic pollution in table salts from China Environmental Science & Technology 49 22 2015 13622 13627 26486565
15 Roy T. Dey T.K. Jamal M. Microplastic/nanoplastic toxicity in plants: an imminent concern Environ. Monit. Assess. 195 1 2023 27
16 Su Y. Zhang Z. Wu D. Zhan L. Shi H. Xie B. Occurrence of microplastics in landfill systems and their fate with landfill age Water Res. 164 2019 114968
17 Dey T.K. Rasel M. Roy T. Uddin M.E. Pramanik B.K. Jamal M. Post-pandemic micro/nanoplastic pollution: toward a sustainable management Sci. Total Environ. 867 2023 161390
18 Liu P. New insights into the aging behavior of microplastics accelerated by advanced oxidation processes Environmental Science & Technology 53 7 2019 3579 3588 30829479
19 Peng Z. Advances in the application, toxicity and degradation of carbon nanomaterials in environment: a review Environ. Int. 134 2020 105298
20 Alom N. Yeasmin H. Han T.K. Saidur R. Jamal M. (Digital presentation) electrochemical study of mxene-metal oxide composites for the degradation of PVC-based microplastics Electrochemical Society Meeting Abstracts 244 2023 61: The Electrochemical Society, Inc. 3380 3380
21 Hidayaturrahman H. Lee T.-G. A study on characteristics of microplastic in wastewater of South Korea: identification, quantification, and fate of microplastics during treatment process Mar. Pollut. Bull. 146 2019 696 702 31426211
22 Dey T.K. Jamal M. Separation of microplastics from water-What next? Journal of Water Process Engineering 44 2021 102332
23 Naushad M. Alqadami A.A. AlOthman Z.A. Alsohaimi I.H. Algamdi M.S. Aldawsari A.M. Adsorption kinetics, isotherm and reusability studies for the removal of cationic dye from aqueous medium using arginine modified activated carbon J. Mol. Liq. 293 2019 111442
24 Aziz M.A. Chowdhury I.R. Mazumder M.A.J. Chowdhury S. Highly porous carboxylated activated carbon from jute stick for removal of Pb 2+ from aqueous solution Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser. 26 2019 22656 22669
25 Amirah Mohd Napi N.n. Column-based removal of high concentration microplastics in synthetic wastewater using granular activated carbon Bioengineered 14 1 2023 2276391
26 Omorogie M.O. Helmreich B. Exploring the potential of amino-functionalized zeolite series/H3PO4-biochar for environmental microplastic removal Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 63 9 2024 3947 3961
27 Radovic L.R. Moreno-Castilla C. Rivera-Utrilla J. Carbon materials as adsorbents in aqueous solutions Chem. Phys. Carbon 2001 227 406
28 Moshwan M.M. Removal of Azo Dye from water by jute (Corchorus Capsularis) stick activated Carbon: a cost-effective ecofriendly approach GUB Journal of Science and Engineering 9 1 2022
29 Otero-González L. Mikhalovsky S.V. Václavíková M. Trenikhin M.V. Cundy A.B. Savina I.N. Novel nanostructured iron oxide cryogels for arsenic (As (III)) removal J. Hazard Mater. 381 2020 120996
30 Tang Y. Zhang S. Su Y. Wu D. Zhao Y. Xie B. Removal of microplastics from aqueous solutions by magnetic carbon nanotubes Chem. Eng. J. 406 2021 126804
31 Yuan F. Yue L. Zhao H. Wu H. Study on the adsorption of polystyrene microplastics by three-dimensional reduced graphene oxide Water Sci. Technol. 81 10 2020 2163 2175 32701494
32 Islam M.N. Khatton A. Sarker J. Sikder H.A. Chowdhury A.S. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from Jute stick by chemical activation: comparison of different activating agents Saudi J Eng Technol 7 2 2022 112 117
33 Islam M.N. Synthesis and characterization of activated carbon prepared from jute stick charcoal for industrial uses Scholars International Journal of Chemistry and Material Sciences 5 3 2022 33 39
34 Antal M.J. Grønli M. The art, science, and technology of charcoal production Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 42 8 2003 1619 1640
35 Ningrum S. Guntama D. Optimization of activated charcoal from avocado seeds in chromium (Cr) metal adsorption with H2SO4 and HCL activators AIP Conference Proceedings 2563 2022 AIP Publishing 1
36 Li S. Magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes modified with polyaluminium chloride for removal of humic acid from aqueous solution J. Mol. Liq. 279 2019 241 250
37 Copeland C. Menon O. Majumdar D. Roszak S. Leszczynski J. Understanding the influence of low-frequency vibrations on the hydrogen bonds of acetic acid and acetamide dimers Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19 36 2017 24866 24878 28869271
38 Kumar B.P. Shivakamy K. Miranda L.R. Velan M. Preparation of steam activated carbon from rubberwood sawdust (Hevea brasiliensis) and its adsorption kinetics J. Hazard Mater. 136 3 2006 922 929 16510239
39 Asadullah M. Asaduzzaman M. Kabir M.S. Mostofa M.G. Miyazawa T. Chemical and structural evaluation of activated carbon prepared from jute sticks for Brilliant Green dye removal from aqueous solution J. Hazard Mater. 174 1–3 2010 437 443 19815339
40 Gundogdu A. Duran C. Senturk H.B. Soylak M. Imamoglu M. Onal Y. Physicochemical characteristics of a novel activated carbon produced from tea industry waste J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 104 2013 249 259
41 Sarkar S. Ahmed Z. Hossain M.S. Uddin M.M. Charcoal preparation from jute stick: a new approach for sustainable economy GSC Advanced Research and Reviews 10 2 2022 14 19
42 Chen Y. Kang K. Guo L. Kang J. Qi H. Facile synthesis of functional holocellulose fibers for removal of micro-/nanoparticles of plastics from waste water Chem. Eng. J. 457 2023 141251
43 Wang C. Efficiently removing four cationic dyes from aqueous solution by magnetite@ polypyrrole@ 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid microspheres Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 700 2024 134659
44 Dey T.K. Jamal M. Uddin M.E. Fabrication and performance analysis of graphene oxide-based composite membrane to separate microplastics from synthetic wastewater Journal of Water Process Engineering 52 2023 103554
45 Anandkumar J. Mandal B. Removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solution using Bael fruit (Aegle marmelos correa) shell as an adsorbent J. Hazard Mater. 168 2–3 2009 633 640 19339109
46 Golgoli M. Microplastics fouling and interaction with polymeric membranes: a review Chemosphere 283 2021 131185
47 Bai R. Rapid and highly selective removal of lead in simulated wastewater of rare-earth industry using diglycolamic-acid functionalized magnetic chitosan adsorbents J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 59 2018 416 424
48 Mazloomi S. Yousefi M. Nourmoradi H. Shams M. Evaluation of phosphate removal from aqueous solution using metal organic framework; isotherm, kinetic and thermodynamic study Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering 17 2019 209 218 31297210
49 Roy K. Dey T.K. Jamal M. Rathanasamy R. Chinnasamy M. Uddin M.E. Fabrication of graphene oxide–keratin–chitosan nanocomposite as an adsorbent to remove turbidity from tannery wastewater Water Sci. Eng. 16 2 2023 184 191
50 Chakraborty T. Islam M. Zaman S. Kabir A. Ghosh G. Jute (Corchorus olitorius) stick charcoal as a low-cost adsorbent for the removal of methylene blue dye from aqueous solution SN Appl. Sci. 2 4 2020 765
51 Yousefi M. Gholami M. Oskoei V. Mohammadi A.A. Baziar M. Esrafili A. Comparison of LSSVM and RSM in simulating the removal of ciprofloxacin from aqueous solutions using magnetization of functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes: process optimization using GA and RSM techniques J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 9 4 2021 105677
52 Amosa M.K. Jami M.S. Alkhatib M.a.F.R. Tajari T. Jimat D.N. Owolabi R.U. Turbidity and suspended solids removal from high-strength wastewater using high surface area adsorbent: mechanistic pathway and statistical analysis Cogent Engineering 3 1 2016 1162384
53 Roy K. Dey T. Zuha S. Jamal M. Srivastava M. Uddin M. Removal of turbidity from tannery wastewater using graphene oxide-ferric oxide nanocomposites as an adsorbent Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 20 5 2023 5597 5608
54 Ullah H. Shah A.-u.-H.A. Bilal S. Ayub K. DFT study of polyaniline NH3, CO2, and CO gas sensors: comparison with recent experimental data J. Phys. Chem. C 117 45 2013 23701 23711
55 Farooqi B.A. Yar M. Ashraf A. Farooq U. Ayub K. Polyaniline emeraldine salt as selective electrochemical sensor for HBr over HCl: a systematic density functional theory study through oligomer approach J. Mol. Model. 26 2020 1 12
56 Hossain M.S. Yasmin S. Kabir M.H. Cost-effective synthesis of magnetic graphene oxide nanocomposite from waste battery for the removal of arsenic from aqueous solutions: adsorption mechanism with DFT calculation J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 28 3 2024 101873
57 Ghosh K. Bar N. Roymahapatra G. Biswas A.B. Das S.K. Adsorptive removal of toxic malachite green from its aqueous solution by Bambusa vulgaris leaves and its acid-treated form: DFT, MPR and GA modeling J. Mol. Liq. 363 2022 119841
58 Yasmin S. Azam M.G. Hossain M.S. Akhtar U.S. Kabir M.H. Efficient removal of ciprofloxacin from aqueous solution using Zn-C battery derived graphene oxide enhanced by hydrogen bonding, electrostatic and π-π interaction Heliyon 10 (12) 2024 e33317
59 Kiendrebeogo M. Estahbanati M.K. Mostafazadeh A.K. Drogui P. Tyagi R.D. Treatment of microplastics in water by anodic oxidation: a case study for polystyrene Environmental Pollution 269 2021 116168
60 Dey T.K. Uddin M.E. Jamal M. Detection and removal of microplastics in wastewater: evolution and impact Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser. 28 2021 16925 16947
61 Wan H. Wang J. Sheng X. Yan J. Zhang W. Xu Y. Removal of polystyrene microplastics from aqueous solution using the metal–organic framework material of ZIF-67 Toxics 10 2 2022 70 35202256
62 Ma J. Zhao J. Zhu Z. Li L. Yu F. Effect of microplastic size on the adsorption behavior and mechanism of triclosan on polyvinyl chloride Environmental Pollution 254 2019 113104
63 Eydi Gabrabad M. Yari M. Bonyadi Z. Using Spirulina platensis as a natural biocoagulant for polystyrene removal from aqueous medium: performance, optimization, and modeling Sci. Rep. 14 1 2024 2506 38291171
64 Zhang Y. Enhanced removal of polyethylene terephthalate microplastics through polyaluminum chloride coagulation with three typical coagulant aids Sci. Total Environ. 800 2021 149589
65 Liu X. Yuan W. Di M. Li Z. Wang J. Transfer and fate of microplastics during the conventional activated sludge process in one wastewater treatment plant of China Chem. Eng. J. 362 2019 176 182
66 Chen Z. Enhanced in situ biodegradation of microplastics in sewage sludge using hyperthermophilic composting technology J. Hazard Mater. 384 2020 121271
67 Shen M. Efficient removal of microplastics from wastewater by an electrocoagulation process Chem. Eng. J. 428 2022 131161
68 Lares M. Ncibi M.C. Sillanpää M. Sillanpää M. Occurrence, identification and removal of microplastic particles and fibers in conventional activated sludge process and advanced MBR technology Water Res. 133 2018 236 246 29407704
69 Bayo J. Olmos S. López-Castellanos J. Microplastics in an urban wastewater treatment plant: the influence of physicochemical parameters and environmental factors Chemosphere 238 2020 124593
70 Ziajahromi S. Neale P.A. Rintoul L. Leusch F.D. Wastewater treatment plants as a pathway for microplastics: development of a new approach to sample wastewater-based microplastics Water Res. 112 2017 93 99 28160700
71 Talvitie J. Mikola A. Koistinen A. Setälä O. Solutions to microplastic pollution–Removal of microplastics from wastewater effluent with advanced wastewater treatment technologies Water Res. 123 2017 401 407 28686942
72 Wang Z. Lin T. Chen W. Occurrence and removal of microplastics in an advanced drinking water treatment plant (ADWTP) Sci. Total Environ. 700 2020 134520
73 Ma B. Xue W. Hu C. Liu H. Qu J. Li L. Characteristics of microplastic removal via coagulation and ultrafiltration during drinking water treatment Chem. Eng. J. 359 2019 159 167
74 Ma B. Xue W. Ding Y. Hu C. Liu H. Qu J. Removal characteristics of microplastics by Fe-based coagulants during drinking water treatment Journal of Environmental Sciences 78 2019 267 275
75 Magni S. The fate of microplastics in an Italian wastewater treatment plant Sci. Total Environ. 652 2019 602 610 30368189
76 Wang Z. Sedighi M. Lea-Langton A. Filtration of microplastic spheres by biochar: removal efficiency and immobilisation mechanisms Water Res. 184 2020 116165
