
==== Front
J Neuroinflammation
J Neuroinflammation
Journal of Neuroinflammation
1742-2094
BioMed Central London

39300451
3232
10.1186/s12974-024-03232-2
Review
A comprehensive review of AAV-mediated strategies targeting microglia for therapeutic intervention of neurodegenerative diseases
Zhou Livia kaizhou5757@126.com

1
Wang Yafeng 1
Xu Yiran 2
Zhang Yaodong 1
Zhu Changlian changlian.zhu@neuro.gu.se

23
1 grid.490612.8 Henan Neurodevelopment Engineering Research Center for Children, Children’s Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Henan Children’s Hospital Zhengzhou Children’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450018 China
2 https://ror.org/039nw9e11 grid.412719.8 Henan Key Laboratory of Child Brain Injury and Henan Pediatric Clinical Research Center, Institute of Neuroscience and The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province China
3 https://ror.org/01tm6cn81 grid.8761.8 0000 0000 9919 9582 Center for Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
19 9 2024
19 9 2024
2024
21 23213 5 2024
10 9 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Neurodegenerative diseases pose a significant health burden globally, with limited treatment options available. Among the various cell types involved in the pathogenesis of these disorders, microglia, the resident immune cells of the central nervous system, play a pivotal role. Dysregulated microglial activation contributes to neuroinflammation and neuronal damage, making them an attractive target for therapeutic intervention. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors have emerged as powerful tools for delivering therapeutic genes to specific cell types in the central nervous system with remarkable precision and safety. In the current review, we discuss the strategies employed to achieve selective transduction of microglia, including the use of cell-specific promoters, engineered capsids, and microRNA (miRNA) strategies. Additionally, we address the challenges and future directions in the development of AAV-based therapies targeting microglia. Overall, AAV-mediated targeting of microglia holds promise as a novel therapeutic approach for neurodegenerative diseases, offering the potential to modify disease progression and improve patient outcomes.

Keywords

Microglia
Adeno-associated virus (AAV)
Neurodegenerative diseases
Gene Therapy
Microglia Tropism
University of GothenburgOpen access funding provided by University of Gothenburg.

issue-copyright-statement© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Neurodegenerative diseases represent a class of debilitating disorders characterized by progressive degeneration and dysfunction of the central nervous system, leading to cognitive decline, motor impairment, and ultimately, profound disability. Neurodegenerative diseases include both common diseases and rare diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Huntington’s disease (HD), respectively, collectively affecting millions worldwide. With aging populations on the rise globally, the burden of neurodegenerative diseases is escalating, posing significant challenges to healthcare systems and economies worldwide [1]. Current therapeutic strategies often offer limited symptomatic relief but fail to halt or reverse disease progression. Thus, there is an urgent need for innovative therapeutic approaches targeting underlying disease mechanisms, ranging from neuroprotective agents to gene therapies and regenerative medicine, to address the unmet medical needs of patients and alleviate the societal burden of these devastating disorders [2, 3].

Neurodegenerative diseases associated with microglia dysfunction

Microglia are crucial immune cells in the central nervous system (CNS), and their dysfunction contributes to the pathogenesis of various neurodegenerative diseases [4]. Some diseases are specifically caused by gene mutations occurring solely within microglia, such as colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF-1R) mutation-induced neurodegenerative diseases [5]. CSF-1R is a receptor protein found on the surface of microglia in the CNS, that binds to colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1) and interleukin-34 (IL-34) [6]. Activation of CSF-1R is crucial for the development, survival, and function of microglia in the CNS [6, 7].

Hereditary Diffuse Leukoencephalopathy with Spheroids (HDLS) is a rare inherited neurodegenerative disorder characterized by a progressive decline in cognitive function, movement abnormalities, and changes in white matter in the brain, particularly in the frontal and temporal lobe [8]. Mutations in the CSF-1R gene have been identified as a genetic cause of HDLS. In individuals with HDLS caused by CSF-1R mutations, the normal functioning of microglia is disrupted, resulting in chronic inflammation, impaired clearance of cellular debris, and damage to white matter in the brain [5, 9]. Currently, there is no cure for HDLS, and treatment focuses on managing symptoms and supportive care.

Most microglia-related disorders typically involve complex interactions between multiple cell types and genetic factors rather than being solely attributed to microglial gene mutations. Due to the intricate pathology of these neurodegenerative diseases, there is currently no effective cure, and treatments primarily focus on managing symptoms. Recently, new treatments have emerged; for instance, Aβ antibody therapies for AD were approved by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [10]. Additionally, cell and gene therapies are under development in clinical trials for other diseases such as Parkinson’s disease (PD), HD, and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) [11–13]. However, the efficacy of these therapies remains limited, potentially due to the complex progression stages of these diseases and the timing of diagnosis.

Mutations in genes expressed in microglia or affecting their function can contribute to the pathogenesis of certain neurological disorders. For instance, mutations in the TREM2 gene, predominantly expressed on microglia, are associated with several neurodegenerative disorders, including Nasu-Hakola disease, frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and AD [14, 15]. Mutations in the GRN gene are a significant cause of FTD, where GRN mutations in microglia result in increased microglial activation, neuroinflammation, and impaired lysosomal function, thereby contributing to FTD pathology [16]. Additionally, mutations in the LRRK2 gene represent the most common genetic cause of familial and sporadic PD [17]. Studies have shown that LRRK2 is highly expressed in microglia and is involved in microglial inflammatory responses; mutations in LRRK2 can lead to abnormal inflammatory responses in PD [18]. Similarly, the mutant huntingtin protein (mHTT) influences microglial activation and inflammatory responses, with microglia expressing mHTT exhibiting altered cytokine release, contributing to HD [19]. Beyond these examples, genes such as C9orf72, OPTN, TBK1, SOD1, MCP-1, CSF1R, P2RY12, SALL1, and CX3CR1 are also potential targets for gene therapy aimed at modulating microglial function.

Understanding the multifaceted roles of microglia and their genetic underpinnings is crucial for unraveling the complexities of these disorders and developing targeted therapeutic strategies. In AD, studies have revealed that most risk genes are highly expressed in microglia, indicating their critical role in disease progression [20]. Dysfunctional microglia contribute to AD by becoming less effective at clearing amyloid-beta plaques, releasing pro-inflammatory cytokines and neurotoxic substances, promoting tau pathology, and impairing neuronal activity [21–23]. In PD, microglia become overactivated, releasing pro-inflammatory cytokines and neurotoxic substances that exacerbate the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra [24, 25]. This chronic inflammation further disrupts the regulatory mechanisms of microglial activity, impairing their ability to clear alpha-synuclein aggregates, a key pathological feature of PD [26, 27]. In FTD and ALS, dysfunctional microglia contribute to the inflammatory response and reduce the clearance of TDP-43, leading to damage in the frontal and temporal lobes and motor neurons in the brain and spinal cord, respectively [28, 29]. In HD, active microglia in the striatum contribute to inflammation and the loss of neuronal support [30, 31]. Furthermore, microglia expressing mHTT become more aggressive towards neurons than wild-type microglia upon activation [19]. Notably, the contribution of dysfunctional or activated microglia varies across different diseases, suggesting that microglia-targeted therapies may need to be disease-specific.

These examples illustrate instances where mutations or dysfunctions in microglia are involved in the broader disease process. However, it’s crucial to note that research into microglial genetics and their role in disease pathogenesis is ongoing, and future discoveries may shed more light on diseases directly caused by gene mutations within microglia or microglia dysfunction. Therefore, gene therapies targeting microglia may provide a promising therapeutic strategy for these challenging-to-treat diseases. Moreover, advancing techniques such as gene editing and gene delivery systems may offer novel approaches to correct aberrant microglial function and restore CNS homeostasis in various neurodegenerative disorders.

AAV therapy for neurodegenerative diseases

AAV vectors have emerged as promising tools for gene therapy in the CNS, with several products reaching clinical approval. Notable examples include the AAV2-based medication Upstaza® (INN: Eladocagene exuparvovec) for aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) deficiency, sanctioned by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2022, and Luxturna® (INN: voretigene neparvovec) for RPE65 mutation-associated retinal dystrophy, approved by FDA in 2017. Despite these advancements, the majority of current AAV serotypes or variants exhibit tropism primarily towards neurons or astrocytes [32]. As such, there is ongoing research aimed at developing AAV variants with enhanced tropism for microglia [33]. Various strategies are being explored to achieve this objective, with the ultimate goal of improving the specificity and efficacy of gene therapies targeting microglial function in neurological disorders (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1 Microglia-targeting AAV therapies for neurodegenerative diseases. An ideal therapeutic recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) with microglia-specific promoters can efficiently and specifically target microglia. This approach aims to treat dysfunctional or overly active proinflammatory microglia, ultimately refining the microenvironment and promoting neuronal survival

One approach involves screening and selecting naturally occurring AAV serotypes or variants that exhibit preferential transduction of microglia. Another strategy involves directed evolution and rational design to engineer AAV capsids with improved affinity for microglial cell surface receptors [34]. For example, engineering AAV capsids to target receptors such as CD11b or CX3CR1, which are highly expressed on microglia, may enhance their tropism for these cells. Furthermore, the development of hybrid capsids, chimeric capsids, and peptide display technologies allows for the generation of novel AAV variants with customized tropism profiles [32, 35]. These engineered AAV vectors can be designed to selectively transduce microglia while minimizing off-target effects on other cell types in the CNS (Fig. 2). The transduction efficiency, defined in this study as the percentage of total cells expressing either indicator genes or the transgene of interest for various AAV serotypes with different promoters is presented in Table 1.

Fig. 2 The comparative efficiency of various rAAVs targeting microglia within the brain. In the top-left panel, wild-type rAAV predominantly targets non-microglial cells with limited microglial transduction; the top-right panel depicts an engineered AAV with enhanced tropism towards both microglia and non-microglial cells; the bottom-left panel showcases an engineered rAAV incorporating microglia-specific promoters, while simultaneously incorporating miRNA binding sites specific to non-microglial cells, resulting in targeted microglial transduction; the bottom-right panel demonstrates the efficacy of a desired rAAV variant exhibiting robust tropism towards microglia through the utilization of ubiquitous promoters

Table 1 Efficiency of various AAV serotypes and promoters for targeting microglia in vitro and in vivo

AAV capsids	Dose (vg)	Promoters	Transduction rate	Reference	
In vitro	In vivo (brain)	
AAV2	1E8/chamber	CBA	Poor	x	Rosario, et al., 2016	
AAV2	1.75E3/cell	CMV	≥ 80%	x	Su, et al., 2016	
AAV2	unkown	CMV	High	x	Cucchiarini, et al., 2003	
AAV2	unkown	F4/80, CD68, or CD11b	low	x	Cucchiarini, et al., 2003	
AAV2	2.5E10 or 9E10	CMV	x	Low (Intracranial)	Bartlett, et al., 1998	
AAV2	2E10	CBA	x	Low (ICV)	Chakrabarty, et al., 2013	
AAV5	1E4/cell	CMV	12%	x	Lin, et al., 2022	
AAV5	1.75E3/cell	CMV	Same level of mRNA expression as AAV2	x	Su, et al., 2016	
AAV5	2E10	CBA	x	low (ICV)	Chakrabarty, et al., 2013	
AAV9	5E5 and 1E6 /cell	CBA	low	x	Gong, et al., 2015	
AAV9	1E11	CBA	x	3% (ICV, in spinal cord)	Gong, et al., 2015	
AAV9	1-3E12	CBA	x	18% (IV, in spinal cord)	Gong, et al., 2015	
AAV9	1.2E13	CD68	x	Unkown (Intrathecal, in spinal cord)	Grace, et al., 2016	
AAV9	1.95E9-3.9E10	PKG or Iba-1	x	Unkown (Intracranial)	Okada, et a., 2022	
AAV9	1E4/cell	CMV	10%	x	Lin, et al., 2022	
AAV6	1.75E3/cell	CMV	80-fold of mRNA expression as AAV2	x	Su, et al., 2016	
AAV8	1.75E3/cell	CMV	25-fold of mRNA expression as AAV2	x	Su, et al., 2016	
AAV8	1E4/cell	CMV	34%	x	Lin, et al., 2022	
AAV6TM	1E8/chamber	CBA	High mRNA and protein experssion compared with wt AAV6	x	Rosario, et al., 2016	
AAV6TM	1E8/chamber	F4/80 or CD68	95%	x	Rosario, et al., 2016	
AAV6TM	2E8	CBA, F4/80, or CD68	x	Low (ICV or Intracranial)	Rosario, et al., 2016	
AAV6TM	1E8/well	CD68	modest	x	Maes, et al., 2021	
AAV6TM	1.37E8-1.06E9	CD68	x	Low (Subretinal or intravitreal, in eyes)	Maes, et al., 2021	
AAV6TM	1E4/cell	CMV	3%	x	Lin, et al., 2022	
AAV-cMG	1E4/cell	CMV	86%	x	Lin, et al., 2022	
AAV-cMG	4E10 or 2.5E10	CMV	x	80% (Intracranial)	Lin, et al., 2022	
AAV9- ALAVPFR, ALAVPFK, HGTAASH, and YAFGGEG	1E12	CD11b	x	46.7%, 66.9%, 72.8%, and 80.8%, repectively. (IV)	Young, et al., 2023	

Targeting microglia with wildtype AAV serotypes

Recombinant AAV2 (rAAV2) containing a cytomegalovirus (CMV) enhancer/ chicken beta actin (CBA) promoter exhibited poor transduction efficiency in primary mouse microglia [36]. Conversely, an alternative study reported a notable 80% transduction efficiency of rAAV2-GFP with a CMV promotor in primary mouse microglia [37]. Additionally, primary microglia derived from rats exhibited high transduction rates with rAAV2 containing a CMV promoter, although switching the promoter to microglial-specific promoters such as f4/80, CD68, and CD11b resulted in a significant decrease in transduction efficiency [38]. Intracranial injection of 9E10 vector genome (vg) wild type AAV2 labeled with Cy3 dye and 2.5E10 vg rAAV2 with a CMV promotor demonstrated robust transduction in neurons but negligible transduction in microglia within the hippocampus and the inferior colliculus of the rat brain [39]. Similarly, another investigation observed the absence of microglial transduction following intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of 2E10vg rAAV2-GFP containing CMV enhancer/CBA promoter in neonatal mice [40]. Overall, the ubiquitous promoter exhibited stronger transduction efficiency in microglia compared to the microglia-specific promoter in rAAV2. The transduction of rAAV2 in microglia appears limited, particularly in vivo.

rAAV5 demonstrated a notable transduction efficiency in primary microglial cultures derived from rat brains; however, when employing microglia-specific promoters, such as f4/80, CD68, and CD11b, the transduction rates were markedly reduced, with rAAV5-f4/80-Laz achieving a 25% transduction rate, rAAV5-CD68-Laz reaching 10%, and rAAV5-CD11b-Laz showing minimal transduction, with one cell or less observed in a single field [38]. Notably, the f4/80 promoter exhibited the strongest expression and specificity in microglia, as evidenced by the robust expression and microglial restriction of rAAV5 when utilizing the f4/80 promoter following intracranial injection into the striatum of rat brains [38]. Nevertheless, the extent of microglial transduction remained limited in this study, underscoring the ongoing challenge of achieving widespread microglial transduction. Additionally, other investigations revealed that rAAV5 with a CMV promoter successfully transduced primary cultured mouse microglia [33, 37]. Conversely, another study revealed no microglial transduction with ICV injection of rAAV5 containing the CMV enhancer and CBA promoter in neonatal mice [40]. Overall, among the microglia-specific promoters, the F4/80 promoter demonstrated the highest transduction efficiency in microglia with rAAV5. However, the overall transduction efficiency remains limited, particularly in vivo.

In a glial cell culture system derived from Abcd1−/− mice, a model for X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD), 2% of rAAV9-ABCD1 carrying a CMV enhancer/CBA promoter successfully transduced microglia [41]. Subsequent ICV and intravenous (IV) injections of 1E11 vg and 1-3E12 vg of rAAV9, respectively, led to microglial transduction in the brain and spinal cord of Abcd1−/− mice, albeit with limited efficiency, as evidenced by the transduction rates of 3% and 18% of microglia in the spinal cord following ICV and IV administration, respectively [41]. Moreover, another investigation demonstrated that intrathecal delivery of AAV9 with a CD68 promoter specifically targeted microglia in the spinal cord [42]. However, the findings of this study have been subject to debate due to concerns regarding the quality of immunohistochemical staining techniques [34]. Thus, while rAAV9 demonstrates the potential to transduce microglia in vivo depending on delivery routes, its efficiency remains constrained.

Further enhancements in transduction efficiency and reduction of neuronal and astrocytic transduction were achieved by incorporating miR-9.T and miR-129-2-3p.T in both physiological and pathological mouse models, including those of LPS-induced neuroinflammation and neurodegenerative diseases [43]. Notably, these microRNAs (miRNAs) are exclusively expressed in non-microglial cells [44–46]. AAV9-PGK.miR-9.T demonstrated that less than 10% of the total targeting cells were microglia following intracranial injection in the cortex and striatum, with a slightly higher transduction rate observed in the cerebellum at 37%. Injection volumes of 0.5, 1, and 10 µl containing 3.9e12 vg were utilized for the cortex, striatum, and cerebellum, respectively [43], indicating that the PGK promoter with miR-9.T is not an effective strategy for widespread and specific microglial targeting in the brain. Conversely, employing the same dose of AAV9-Iba1.miR-9.T resulted in microglia transduction rates of 69%, 86%, and 2% out of the total transduced cells in the striatum, cerebellum, and cortex, respectively. These findings suggest that Iba-1 may serve as a superior promoter combined with miRNA strategy for microglial targeting in certain brain regions such as the striatum and cerebellum [43]. Even though the targeting microglia specificity increased using these strategies, the total number of transduced microglia was still limited.

Various AAV serotypes have been assessed and compared for their ability to transduce primary microglia. For instance, a study demonstrated that rAAV6-CMV-GFP and rAAV8-CMV-GFP yielded an 80-fold and 25-fold increase in transduction efficiency, respectively, compared to rAAV2-CMV-GFP [37]. Additionally, rAAV8-CMV-mScarlet and rAAV9-CMV-mScarlet achieved transduction rates of 34% and 10%, respectively, in primary cultured mouse microglia [33]. In contrast, investigations reported no transduction of microglia by rAAV serotypes 1 through 10 and rh.10 when utilizing a CBA promoter in primary cultured mouse microglia [36]. Furthermore, another study revealed the inefficacy of rAAV1, rAAV7, rAAV8, and rAAV9, with CMV enhancer and CBA promoter, respectively, in transducing microglia following ICV injection at a dose of 2E10 vg in neonatal mice [40]. Collectively, these findings underscore the limited transduction efficiency of wild-type AAV, particularly evident in vivo experiments, and highlight the high specificity but low transduction efficiency of microglia-specific promoters.

Engineered AAVs targeting microglia

The Y731F/Y705F/T492V triple-mutant (TM) AAV6 capsid (rAAV6TM), engineered with mutations affecting various surface-exposed serine and tyrosine residues, initially demonstrated efficacy in transducing primary microglia cultures and mixed neuroglial cultures from mouse [36, 47]. However, another study revealed that the transduction efficiency of rAAV6TM was limited to 3% in primary mouse microglia cultures [33]. Subsequent studies revealed microglial transduction by rAAV6TM following ICV injection in neuronal mice and intraparenchymal injection in adult mice, although the majority of transduced cells remained non-microglial [36]. To enhance microglial specificity, the F4/80 or CD68 promoter was employed, yet overall transduction efficiency for microglia remained modest [36]. Further efforts with rAAV6TM-GFP utilizing a CD68 promoter for subretinal and intravitreal targeting of retinal microglia yielded a mere 1.5% GFP + cells, with less than 10% of these being microglia, underscoring the challenges in achieving efficient and specific microglial targeting [47]. Despite additional mutations aimed at reducing extracellular matrix binding in rAAV6TM, the overall transduction rate of microglia remained low [47].

Two novel variants engineered from AAV9, designated as AAV-cMG.QRP and AAV-cMG.WPP, through the insertion of a seven-amino-acid sequence into the AAV9 VP1 protein, exhibited high transduction efficiencies of 55% and 75%, respectively, in primary mouse microglia. However, their in vivo transduction rates were limited following intra-striatal and intra-midbrain injections in the mouse brain, utilizing doses of 4E10 and 2.5E10 vg, respectively. Further refinement of AAV-cMG.QRP led to the development of an AAV-cMG variant with an enhanced primary microglia transduction rate of 86%, coupled with the absence of inflammation pathway activation. Notably, intra-striatal and midbrain injections of this optimized variant resulted in the labeling of 80% of microglia with 4E10 and 2.5E10 vg doses, respectively [33]. However, the AAV-cMGs were not selectively transduced microglia but also strongly transduced both neurons and astrocytes. Furthermore, the study utilized Cre-dependent gene expression in AAV and Cx3cr1CreER transgenic mice instead of a microglial-specific promoter to specifically target microglia, offering a potent tool for manipulating microglia in the brain [33]. Nevertheless, the potential of AAV-cMGs with a microglia-specific promoter in the realm of drug development warrants further investigation.

A novel family of AAV variants, termed the AAV-innate family, has been identified for their high transduction efficiency of microglia following IV administration at a total dose of 1E12 vg per mouse [48]. This AAV-innate family comprises four distinct variants based on AAV9, namely ALAVPFR, ALAVPFK, HGTAASH, and YAFGGEG, demonstrating transduction rates of 46.7%, 66.9%, 72.8%, and 80.8% of all microglia, respectively. Utilizing one of these variants, researchers successfully delivered diphtheria toxin A under the control of the CD11b promoter, achieving microglial depletion in the brain following IV injection [48]. Furthermore, the delivery of a short hairpin RNA (shRNA) gene under the control of the CD11b promoter led to a notable 50% suppression of gene expression specifically in microglia [48]. While these findings highlight the promising potential of AAV-innate variants for precise modulation of microglial function and gene expression in neurological disorders, further investigation is warranted to validate their efficacy and safety in diverse animal models, including rodents and non-human primates (NHPs).

Overall, the creation of AAV variants with enhanced tropism for microglia holds great promise for advancing gene therapy approaches targeting microglial function in neurological disorders. Continued research in this field is expected to lead to the development of more efficient and specific AAV vectors for therapeutic applications in microglia-related diseases.

Challenges and future directions

The engineering of AAV capsids for enhanced microglia targeting presents several challenges and prompts future research directions in gene therapy. First, achieving selective transduction of microglia while minimizing off-target effects remains a formidable hurdle. Addressing this challenge necessitates a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying microglial interaction with AAV capsids in both resting and activated states. Accordingly, optimizing capsid modifications to enhance microglial transduction efficiency and specificity, such as through rational design or directed evolution approaches, is imperative.

Another strategy to increase microglial specificity is to use microglial-specific promoters, such as iba-1, CD11-b, CD68, Cx3cr1, and F4/80. However, these promotors are usually much weaker compared to ubiquitous promoters, such as CBA and CMV, leading to lower levels of transgene expression [49, 50]. Moreover, ensuring absolute specificity is difficult, and microglia-specific promoters may exhibit some off-target expression in other cell types, such as macrophages, due to their shared lineage and similar marker expression [51]. Additionally, AAV vectors have a limited packaging capacity (around 4.7 kb), and incorporating microglia-specific promoters can limit the space available for the therapeutic gene. Furthermore, microglia exhibit heterogeneity across different brain regions and disease states, which can influence promoter activity and complicate the uniform expression of therapeutic genes [52]. miRNAs can enhance the specificity of microglial targeting, as described above. However, they do not increase the overall number of microglia infected by AAV. Additionally, incorporating miRNA binding sites occupies space within the AAV vector, potentially limiting the size of the transgene that can be delivered. Moreover, there is a risk that miRNA binding sites may elicit an unintended immune response.

Elucidating the immune responses elicited by AAV capsids in microglia is critical for ensuring long-term therapeutic efficacy and safety. Some wild-type serotypes have broad immune recognition, and this immune response may cross-react with other AAV variants. Therefore, immunosuppressive agents are often used in clinical practice. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that different delivery routes and different preclinical species may impact microglial targeting, underscoring the importance of refining delivery routes and preclinical models to precisely evaluate the biodistribution, cellular tropism, and therapeutic outcomes of novel AAV capsids targeting microglia. Lastly, none of the microglial-targeting AAVs have undergone clinical trials to date, necessitating further confirmation of safety and efficacy in NHP prior to clinical translation. Overall, advancing the engineering of AAV capsids tailored for microglia targeting represents a pivotal avenue for the development of effective gene therapies for neurodegenerative diseases and neurological disorders.

Summary

The escalating global aging demographic underscores the pressing medical necessity posed by neurodegenerative diseases. Microglia, ubiquitous within the CNS, prominently feature in the progression of virtually all neurodegenerative conditions, suggesting their potential as a strategic therapeutic target. AAV has emerged as a promising vector for CNS gene therapy delivery. However, the efficiency of AAV-mediated microglial transduction remains suboptimal. While recent advancements have yielded new AAV variants demonstrating enhanced transduction efficacy in rodent models, their translation efficiency to NHP and human subjects is unknown. The imperative for novel AAV variants tailored to target microglia is thus unequivocal, offering a critical avenue for addressing the unmet therapeutic requirements in neurodegenerative disorders.

Author contributions

LZ wrote the manuscript. All authors commented on or edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet with Grant numbers 2022 − 01019; National Natural Science Foundation of China with Grant numbers U21A20347, and Henan Provincial Medical Research SBGJ202301009, Childhood Cancerfondation, PR2021-0200, Swedish Cancerfondation 20 1121 Pj, Stiftelsen Edit Jacobsons Donationsfond 2024 − 150.

Open access funding provided by University of Gothenburg.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Ethics declaration

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Abbreviations

AAV Adeno-associated virus

AD Alzheimer’s disease

ALS Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

AADC Aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase

CNS Central nervous system

CBA Chicken beta actin

CSF-1R Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor

CSF-1 Colony-stimulating factor 1

CMV Cytomegalovirus

EMA European Medicines Agency

FDA Food and Drug Administration

FTD Frontotemporal dementia

HDLS Hereditary Diffuse Leukoencephalopathy with Spheroids

HD Huntington’s disease

INN International Nonproprietary Name

ICV Intracerebroventricular

IV Intravenous

miRNA MicroRNA

mHTT Mutant huntingtin protein

NHPs Non-human primates

PD Parkinson’s disease

rAAV2 Recombinant AAV2

shRNA Short hairpin RNA

TM Triple-mutant

X-ALD X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Zheng JC Chen S Translational neurodegeneration in the era of fast growing international brain research Transl Neurodegener 2022 11 1 1 10.1186/s40035-021-00276-9 34974845
Zheng JC, Chen S. Translational neurodegeneration in the era of fast growing international brain research. Transl Neurodegener. 2022;11(1):1.34974845
2. Sun J Roy S Gene-based therapies for neurodegenerative diseases Nat Neurosci 2021 24 3 297 311 10.1038/s41593-020-00778-1 33526943
Sun J, Roy S. Gene-based therapies for neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Neurosci. 2021;24(3):297–311.33526943
3. Temple S Advancing cell therapy for neurodegenerative diseases Cell Stem Cell 2023 30 5 512 29 10.1016/j.stem.2023.03.017 37084729
Temple S. Advancing cell therapy for neurodegenerative diseases. Cell Stem Cell. 2023;30(5):512–29.37084729
4. Hickman S Microglia in neurodegeneration Nat Neurosci 2018 21 10 1359 69 10.1038/s41593-018-0242-x 30258234
Hickman S, et al. Microglia in neurodegeneration. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21(10):1359–69.30258234
5. Konno T CSF1R-related leukoencephalopathy: a major player in primary microgliopathies Neurology 2018 91 24 1092 104 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006642 30429277
Konno T, et al. CSF1R-related leukoencephalopathy: a major player in primary microgliopathies. Neurology. 2018;91(24):1092–104.30429277
6. Elmore MR Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor signaling is necessary for microglia viability, unmasking a microglia progenitor cell in the adult brain Neuron 2014 82 2 380 97 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.040 24742461
Elmore MR, et al. Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor signaling is necessary for microglia viability, unmasking a microglia progenitor cell in the adult brain. Neuron. 2014;82(2):380–97.24742461
7. Hu B Insights into the role of CSF1R in the Central Nervous System and Neurological disorders Front Aging Neurosci 2021 13 789834 10.3389/fnagi.2021.789834 34867307
Hu B, et al. Insights into the role of CSF1R in the Central Nervous System and Neurological disorders. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:789834.34867307
8. Tamaoka A [Hereditary diffuse Leukoencephalopathy with spheroids (HDLS): clinical characteristics and pathomechanistic insights] Brain Nerve 2017 69 1 17 23 28126974
Tamaoka A. [Hereditary diffuse Leukoencephalopathy with spheroids (HDLS): clinical characteristics and pathomechanistic insights]. Brain Nerve. 2017;69(1):17–23.28126974
9. Kempthorne L Loss of homeostatic microglial phenotype in CSF1R-related Leukoencephalopathy Acta Neuropathol Commun 2020 8 1 72 10.1186/s40478-020-00947-0 32430064
Kempthorne L, et al. Loss of homeostatic microglial phenotype in CSF1R-related Leukoencephalopathy. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2020;8(1):72.32430064
10. Zhang Y Amyloid β-based therapy for Alzheimer’s disease: challenges, successes and future Signal Transduct Target Ther 2023 8 1 248 10.1038/s41392-023-01484-7 37386015
Zhang Y, et al. Amyloid β-based therapy for Alzheimer’s disease: challenges, successes and future. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):248.37386015
11. Park TY Past, present, and future of cell replacement therapy for parkinson’s disease: a novel emphasis on host immune responses Cell Res 2024 34 7 479 92 10.1038/s41422-024-00971-y 38777859
Park TY, et al. Past, present, and future of cell replacement therapy for parkinson’s disease: a novel emphasis on host immune responses. Cell Res. 2024;34(7):479–92.38777859
12. Byun S Lee M Kim M Gene Therapy for Huntington’s disease: the final strategy for a cure? J Mov Disord 2022 15 1 15 20 10.14802/jmd.21006 34781633
Byun S, Lee M, Kim M. Gene Therapy for Huntington’s disease: the final strategy for a cure? J Mov Disord. 2022;15(1):15–20.34781633
13. Stower H Opening the door to gene therapy for ALS Nat Med 2020 26 8 1170 32770163
Stower H. Opening the door to gene therapy for ALS. Nat Med. 2020;26(8):1170.32770163
14. Painter MM TREM2 in CNS homeostasis and neurodegenerative disease Mol Neurodegener 2015 10 43 10.1186/s13024-015-0040-9 26337043
Painter MM, et al. TREM2 in CNS homeostasis and neurodegenerative disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2015;10:43.26337043
15. Jay TR von Saucken VE Landreth GE TREM2 in neurodegenerative diseases Mol Neurodegener 2017 12 1 56 10.1186/s13024-017-0197-5 28768545
Jay TR, von Saucken VE, Landreth GE. TREM2 in neurodegenerative diseases. Mol Neurodegener. 2017;12(1):56.28768545
16. Wu Y Microglial lysosome dysfunction contributes to white matter pathology and TDP-43 proteinopathy in GRN-associated FTD Cell Rep 2021 36 8 109581 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109581 34433069
Wu Y, et al. Microglial lysosome dysfunction contributes to white matter pathology and TDP-43 proteinopathy in GRN-associated FTD. Cell Rep. 2021;36(8):109581.34433069
17. Li JQ Tan L Yu JT The role of the LRRK2 gene in parkinsonism Mol Neurodegener 2014 9 47 10.1186/1750-1326-9-47 25391693
Li JQ, Tan L, Yu JT. The role of the LRRK2 gene in parkinsonism. Mol Neurodegener. 2014;9:47.25391693
18. Moehle MS LRRK2 inhibition attenuates microglial inflammatory responses J Neurosci 2012 32 5 1602 11 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5601-11.2012 22302802
Moehle MS, et al. LRRK2 inhibition attenuates microglial inflammatory responses. J Neurosci. 2012;32(5):1602–11.22302802
19. Crotti A Mutant huntingtin promotes autonomous microglia activation via myeloid lineage-determining factors Nat Neurosci 2014 17 4 513 21 10.1038/nn.3668 24584051
Crotti A, et al. Mutant huntingtin promotes autonomous microglia activation via myeloid lineage-determining factors. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17(4):513–21.24584051
20. Efthymiou AG Goate AM Late onset Alzheimer’s disease genetics implicates microglial pathways in disease risk Mol Neurodegener 2017 12 1 43 10.1186/s13024-017-0184-x 28549481
Efthymiou AG, Goate AM. Late onset Alzheimer’s disease genetics implicates microglial pathways in disease risk. Mol Neurodegener. 2017;12(1):43.28549481
21. Heckmann BL LC3-Associated Endocytosis facilitates β-Amyloid clearance and mitigates neurodegeneration in murine Alzheimer’s Disease Cell 2019 178 3 536 e55114 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.056 31257024
Heckmann BL, et al. LC3-Associated Endocytosis facilitates β-Amyloid clearance and mitigates neurodegeneration in murine Alzheimer’s Disease. Cell. 2019;178(3):536–e55114.31257024
22. Gabrielli M Microglial large extracellular vesicles propagate early synaptic dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease Brain 2022 145 8 2849 68 10.1093/brain/awac083 35254410
Gabrielli M, et al. Microglial large extracellular vesicles propagate early synaptic dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2022;145(8):2849–68.35254410
23. Leng F Edison P Neuroinflammation and microglial activation in Alzheimer disease: where do we go from here? Nat Reviews Neurol 2021 17 3 157 72 10.1038/s41582-020-00435-y
Leng F, Edison P. Neuroinflammation and microglial activation in Alzheimer disease: where do we go from here? Nat Reviews Neurol. 2021;17(3):157–72.
24. Smajić S Single-cell sequencing of human midbrain reveals glial activation and a Parkinson-specific neuronal state Brain 2022 145 3 964 78 10.1093/brain/awab446 34919646
Smajić S, et al. Single-cell sequencing of human midbrain reveals glial activation and a Parkinson-specific neuronal state. Brain. 2022;145(3):964–78.34919646
25. Haque ME Targeting the microglial NLRP3 inflammasome and its role in Parkinson’s disease Mov Disord 2020 35 1 20 33 10.1002/mds.27874 31680318
Haque ME, et al. Targeting the microglial NLRP3 inflammasome and its role in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2020;35(1):20–33.31680318
26. Choi I Microglia clear neuron-released α-synuclein via selective autophagy and prevent neurodegeneration Nat Commun 2020 11 1 1386 10.1038/s41467-020-15119-w 32170061
Choi I, et al. Microglia clear neuron-released α-synuclein via selective autophagy and prevent neurodegeneration. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1386.32170061
27. Wood H α-Synuclein-activated microglia are implicated in PD pathogenesis Nat Reviews Neurol 2022 18 4 188 188
Wood H. α-Synuclein-activated microglia are implicated in PD pathogenesis. Nat Reviews Neurol. 2022;18(4):188–188.
28. Bright F Neuroinflammation in frontotemporal dementia Nat Rev Neurol 2019 15 9 540 55 10.1038/s41582-019-0231-z 31324897
Bright F, et al. Neuroinflammation in frontotemporal dementia. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15(9):540–55.31324897
29. Xie M TREM2 interacts with TDP-43 and mediates microglial neuroprotection against TDP-43-related neurodegeneration Nat Neurosci 2022 25 1 26 38 10.1038/s41593-021-00975-6 34916658
Xie M, et al. TREM2 interacts with TDP-43 and mediates microglial neuroprotection against TDP-43-related neurodegeneration. Nat Neurosci. 2022;25(1):26–38.34916658
30. Vonsattel JP Keller C Del Pilar Amaya, Neuropathology of Huntington’s disease Handb Clin Neurol 2008 89 599 618 10.1016/S0072-9752(07)01256-0 18631782
Vonsattel JP, Keller C. Del Pilar Amaya, Neuropathology of Huntington’s disease. Handb Clin Neurol. 2008;89:599–618.18631782
31. Gao C Microglia in neurodegenerative diseases: mechanism and potential therapeutic targets Signal Transduct Target Ther 2023 8 1 359 10.1038/s41392-023-01588-0 37735487
Gao C, et al. Microglia in neurodegenerative diseases: mechanism and potential therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):359.37735487
32. Castle MJ Controlling AAV Tropism in the Nervous System with Natural and Engineered Capsids Methods Mol Biol 2016 1382 133 49 10.1007/978-1-4939-3271-9_10 26611584
Castle MJ, et al. Controlling AAV Tropism in the Nervous System with Natural and Engineered Capsids. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1382:133–49.26611584
33. Lin R Directed evolution of adeno-associated virus for efficient gene delivery to microglia Nat Methods 2022 19 8 976 85 10.1038/s41592-022-01547-7 35879607
Lin R, et al. Directed evolution of adeno-associated virus for efficient gene delivery to microglia. Nat Methods. 2022;19(8):976–85.35879607
34. Maes ME Targeting microglia with lentivirus and AAV: recent advances and remaining challenges Neurosci Lett 2019 707 134310 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134310 31158432
Maes ME, et al. Targeting microglia with lentivirus and AAV: recent advances and remaining challenges. Neurosci Lett. 2019;707:134310.31158432
35. Börner K Pre-arrayed Pan-AAV peptide display libraries for Rapid single-round screening Mol Ther 2020 28 4 1016 32 10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.02.009 32105604
Börner K, et al. Pre-arrayed Pan-AAV peptide display libraries for Rapid single-round screening. Mol Ther. 2020;28(4):1016–32.32105604
36. Rosario AM Microglia-specific targeting by novel capsid-modified AAV6 vectors Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev 2016 3 16026 10.1038/mtm.2016.26 27308302
Rosario AM, et al. Microglia-specific targeting by novel capsid-modified AAV6 vectors. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2016;3:16026.27308302
37. Su W Recombinant adeno-associated viral (rAAV) vectors mediate efficient gene transduction in cultured neonatal and adult microglia J Neurochem 2016 136 0 1 49 62 10.1111/jnc.13081 25708596
Su W, et al. Recombinant adeno-associated viral (rAAV) vectors mediate efficient gene transduction in cultured neonatal and adult microglia. J Neurochem. 2016;136(0 1):49–62.25708596
38. Cucchiarini M Selective gene expression in brain microglia mediated via adeno-associated virus type 2 and type 5 vectors Gene Ther 2003 10 8 657 67 10.1038/sj.gt.3301925 12692594
Cucchiarini M, et al. Selective gene expression in brain microglia mediated via adeno-associated virus type 2 and type 5 vectors. Gene Ther. 2003;10(8):657–67.12692594
39. Bartlett JS Samulski RJ McCown TJ Selective and rapid uptake of adeno-associated virus type 2 in brain Hum Gene Ther 1998 9 8 1181 6 10.1089/hum.1998.9.8-1181 9625257
Bartlett JS, Samulski RJ, McCown TJ. Selective and rapid uptake of adeno-associated virus type 2 in brain. Hum Gene Ther. 1998;9(8):1181–6.9625257
40. Chakrabarty P Capsid serotype and timing of injection determines AAV transduction in the neonatal mice brain PLoS ONE 2013 8 6 e67680 10.1371/journal.pone.0067680 23825679
Chakrabarty P, et al. Capsid serotype and timing of injection determines AAV transduction in the neonatal mice brain. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(6):e67680.23825679
41. Gong Y Adenoassociated virus serotype 9-mediated gene therapy for x-linked adrenoleukodystrophy Mol Ther 2015 23 5 824 34 10.1038/mt.2015.6 25592337
Gong Y, et al. Adenoassociated virus serotype 9-mediated gene therapy for x-linked adrenoleukodystrophy. Mol Ther. 2015;23(5):824–34.25592337
42. Grace PM Morphine paradoxically prolongs neuropathic pain in rats by amplifying spinal NLRP3 inflammasome activation Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016 113 24 E3441 50 10.1073/pnas.1602070113 27247388
Grace PM, et al. Morphine paradoxically prolongs neuropathic pain in rats by amplifying spinal NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(24):E3441–50.27247388
43. Okada Y Development of microglia-targeting adeno-associated viral vectors as tools to study microglial behavior in vivo Commun Biol 2022 5 1 1224 10.1038/s42003-022-04200-3 36369525
Okada Y, et al. Development of microglia-targeting adeno-associated viral vectors as tools to study microglial behavior in vivo. Commun Biol. 2022;5(1):1224.36369525
44. Åkerblom M Visualization and genetic modification of resident brain microglia using lentiviral vectors regulated by microRNA-9 Nat Commun 2013 4 1770 10.1038/ncomms2801 23612311
Åkerblom M, et al. Visualization and genetic modification of resident brain microglia using lentiviral vectors regulated by microRNA-9. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1770.23612311
45. Jovičić A Comprehensive expression analyses of neural cell-type-specific miRNAs identify new determinants of the specification and maintenance of neuronal phenotypes J Neurosci 2013 33 12 5127 37 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0600-12.2013 23516279
Jovičić A, et al. Comprehensive expression analyses of neural cell-type-specific miRNAs identify new determinants of the specification and maintenance of neuronal phenotypes. J Neurosci. 2013;33(12):5127–37.23516279
46. Kim J Identification of many microRNAs that copurify with polyribosomes in mammalian neurons Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004 101 1 360 5 10.1073/pnas.2333854100 14691248
Kim J, et al. Identification of many microRNAs that copurify with polyribosomes in mammalian neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(1):360–5.14691248
47. Maes ME Optimizing AAV2/6 microglial targeting identified enhanced efficiency in the photoreceptor degenerative environment Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev 2021 23 210 24 10.1016/j.omtm.2021.09.006 34703843
Maes ME, et al. Optimizing AAV2/6 microglial targeting identified enhanced efficiency in the photoreceptor degenerative environment. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2021;23:210–24.34703843
48. Young A Targeted evolution of adeno-associated virus capsids for systemic transgene delivery to microglia and tissue-resident macrophages Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2023 120 35 e2302997120 10.1073/pnas.2302997120 37603759
Young A, et al. Targeted evolution of adeno-associated virus capsids for systemic transgene delivery to microglia and tissue-resident macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023;120(35):e2302997120.37603759
49. Chai S Strong ubiquitous micro-promoters for recombinant adeno-associated viral vectors Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev 2023 29 504 12 10.1016/j.omtm.2023.05.013 37287749
Chai S, et al. Strong ubiquitous micro-promoters for recombinant adeno-associated viral vectors. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2023;29:504–12.37287749
50. Gray SJ Optimizing promoters for recombinant adeno-associated virus-mediated gene expression in the peripheral and central nervous system using self-complementary vectors Hum Gene Ther 2011 22 9 1143 53 10.1089/hum.2010.245 21476867
Gray SJ, et al. Optimizing promoters for recombinant adeno-associated virus-mediated gene expression in the peripheral and central nervous system using self-complementary vectors. Hum Gene Ther. 2011;22(9):1143–53.21476867
51. Jurga AM Paleczna M Kuter KZ Overview of General and discriminating markers of Differential Microglia phenotypes Front Cell Neurosci 2020 14 198 10.3389/fncel.2020.00198 32848611
Jurga AM, Paleczna M, Kuter KZ. Overview of General and discriminating markers of Differential Microglia phenotypes. Front Cell Neurosci. 2020;14:198.32848611
52. Stratoulias V Microglial subtypes: diversity within the microglial community EMBO J 2019 38 17 e101997 10.15252/embj.2019101997 31373067
Stratoulias V, et al. Microglial subtypes: diversity within the microglial community. EMBO J. 2019;38(17):e101997.31373067
