
==== Front
Environ Health Prev Med
Environ Health Prev Med
EHPM
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine
1342-078X
1347-4715
Japanese Society for Hygiene

39261084
24-00102
10.1265/ehpm.24-00102
ehpm-29-048
Research Article
Long working hours and preventive oral health behaviors: a nationwide study in Korea (2007–2021)
Baek Seong-Uk 1 2 3
Yoon Jin-Ha 2 4 flyinyou@yuhs.ac

Lee Yu-Min 1 2
Won Jong-Uk 1 2
1 Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
2 The Institute for Occupational Health, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
3 Graduate School, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
4 Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
12 9 2024
2024
29 4816 4 2024
25 6 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Background

This study explored the association between working hours and preventive oral health behaviors.

Methods

In total, 48,599 workers (22,992 females) were included from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2007–2021). Weekly working hours were self-reported. The following three preventive oral health behaviors were set as outcomes: participation in annual dental check-ups; adherence to the recommended toothbrushing frequency (≥twice a day); and use of interdental cleaning devices. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using logistic regression.

Results

In male workers, the adjusted OR (95% CI) of the association between working ≥55 h/week and each outcome was 0.84 (0.77–0.92) for dental check-ups, 0.82 (0.72–0.94) for toothbrushing ≥twice a day, and 0.83 (0.76–0.92) for utilization of interdental cleaning device when compared to 35–40 h/week. In female workers, the adjusted OR (95% CI) of the association between working ≥55 h/week and each outcome was 0.79 (0.70–0.89) for dental check-ups, 0.88 (0.70–1.11) for toothbrushing ≥twice a day, and 0.80 (0.71–0.90) for utilization of interdental cleaning device when compared to 35–40 h/week. Additionally, low socio-economic status, such as low educational attainment, low income level, and blue-collar occupations, were major risk factors associated with non-adherence to preventive oral health behaviors in both male and female workers.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that individuals who work long hours are more likely to exhibit undesirable oral health behaviors.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1265/ehpm.24-00102.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords:

Dental public health
Health behaviors
Health-related behaviors
Lifestyles
Oral hygiene
Overwork
Working time
==== Body
pmc1. Background

Long working hours are a major global public health concern. A report conducted by the World Health Organization (WHO) and International Labour Organization (ILO) estimated that globally, approximately 488 million individuals engage in long working hours, defined as ≥55 h/week; in 2016, this caused over 745,000 overwork-related deaths [1]. A recent shift in the economic landscape, such as the emergence of the gig economy and Industry 4.0, has the potential to further expedite this trend [1, 2]. For decades, South Korea has been recognized as being among the countries with the longest annual working hours. This has heightened societal interest in the effects of long working hours [3, 4]. In South Korea, approximately 65% of the total population participates in economic activities [5], and approximately 16% of all workers work more than 55 h/week [6].

Recently, there has been increasing research interest in the potential impact of long working hours and overwork on the dental health of workers. Previous studies suggest that long working hours are associated with poor oral health conditions [7–9]. For instance, a previous study showed that working >52 h/week was associated with a higher likelihood of periodontitis among Korean workers [8]. Additionally, Japanese workers, who frequently work overtime, are more likely to experience untreated tooth decay or poor oral health-related quality of life [7, 9]. One potential mechanism through which long working hours may contribute to poor oral health is their negative impact on workers’ oral health behaviors [10]. For instance, previous studies suggest that long working hours may constrain time, preventing workers from scheduling preventive dental care visits or seeking dental care for symptom management [11–13].

Improving preventive oral health behaviors, such as maintaining good oral self-care habits and attending regular dental check-ups, is particularly important for the working population. It not only contributes to overall well-being but also has a substantial influence on work productivity [14, 15]. Engagement in regular dental check-ups, sufficient toothbrushing, and the use of interdental cleaning devices are essential factors that have been important indicators in the previous studies for understanding the epidemiology of oral health behaviors among Koreans [16, 17]. Recognizing the importance of preventive oral health behaviors, Korea’s health insurance covers one regular dental check-up per year. Although Korea has seen a gradual improvement in the quality of oral health behaviors among workers in recent decades, certain individuals in precarious positions, including non-standard workers, are more likely to exhibit poor oral health behaviors [18–20]. According to a recent study, approximately 45% of Koreans participate in regular dental check-ups, with lower participation rates observed in households with lower income levels [21]. Concerningly, the literature contains only a limited number of studies investigating the potential relationship between long working hours and preventive oral health behaviors. Some found that those working long hours were less likely to engage in dental check-ups [12, 13]. However, to our knowledge, the association between long working hours and adherence to recommended daily toothbrushing practices and the use of interdental cleaning devices has not been explored. Furthermore, the relationship between long working hours and oral health behaviors in the Korean population has not yet been investigated.

Therefore, this study investigated the relationship between long working hours and preventive oral health behaviors in the Korean population. Specifically, using a nationally representative sample of Korean workers, we aimed to verify the hypothesis that long working hours were negatively associated with dental check-up attendance, daily toothbrushing frequency, and the use of interdental cleaning devices in both male and female workers.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Study sample

We used the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), a population-based, repeated cross-sectional survey that includes a nationwide sample of the general Korean population [22]. The Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA) has conducted the KNHANES annually since 1998 to collect information on the health status of Koreans. The KNHANES employs a multi-stage clustering sampling method to select a nationally representative sample, in which enumeration districts in Korea were selected as the primary sampling unit and households in each region were selected as the secondary unit [23]. Face-to-face interviews were conducted by trained interviewers employed by the KDCA. For each survey year, the response rates ranged from 70% to 80% [23]. To mitigate bias arising from non-response and enhance the generalizability of the sample, sampling weights were assigned to survey participants [23].

Since information on working hours has only been collected since 2007, we included KNHANES participants from 2007 to 2021. A flowchart of the study sample selection process is presented in Fig. 1. The inclusion criteria were as follows: individuals aged 19 years or older; workers (defined as those who engaged in economic activities), and observations without missing values. In total, 48,599 workers (25,607 males and 22,992 females) were included in the final sample. Approximately 3000–4000 individuals were included in each survey.

Fig. 1 Flowchart of the selection process of the study sample

2.2. Data availability and ethics statement

The KNHANES dataset is available online at https://knhanes.kdca.go.kr [22]. The Institutional Review Board of Yonsei Health System reviewed and approved this study (IRB No. 4–2023–0959; approval date: September 13, 2023).

2.3. Variables

2.3.1. Working hours

The main independent variable was the number of working hours per week. In each survey, participants were asked the following question: “What are the average working hours per week at your workplace? Taking into account overtime but not counting meal breaks” We categorized working hours per week as “<35 h,” “35–40 h,” “41–48 h,” “49–54 h,” and “≥55 h”, consistent with the categorization in previous WHO/ILO studies [24, 25]. Those working standard hours (35–40 h/week) were defined as the reference group.

2.3.2. Preventive oral health behaviors

This study focused on three preventive oral health behaviors as follows: participation in dental check-ups; adherence to the recommended toothbrushing frequency (≥twice a day); and use of interdental cleaning devices. For the first outcome, survey participants were asked the following question: “Have you undergone a dental check-up within the past year to assess your oral health condition?”. Those who responded “yes” were categorized as having undergone a dental check-up. For the second outcome, survey participants were asked whether they had brushed their teeth at eight different time points during the previous day: before and after breakfast, before and after lunch, before and after dinner, after snacking, and immediately before sleeping. Thus, daily tooth brushing frequency ranged from 0–8. Those who brushed their teeth twice or more per day were categorized as adhering to the recommended daily toothbrushing frequency [26, 27]. For the third outcome, participants were asked whether they used dental floss or interdental brushes. Individuals who used one or both of these tools were classified as using interdental cleaning devices.

2.3.3. Confounders

We selected the following covariates based on previous studies examining the association between long working hours and oral health [7–9]. Age was categorized as “19–29,” “30–39,” “40–49,” “50–59,” and “≥60.” Educational level was categorized as having completed “college or above”, “high school,” and “middle school or below”. Income level was categorized according to the quartile values of total household income in each survey year. Given the gradual inflation over the years, we categorized income levels into intervals for each year, resulting in varying cut-off values by year. The exact values for income level categorizations are provided in the analysis guidelines of the KNHANES [28]. Marital status was categorized as “married” and “unmarried or others (divorced, separated, widowed).” Employment status was categorized as “regular employment”, “fixed-term employment”, and “self-employment or other”. Occupation was categorized as “white collar”, “service or sales worker”, and “blue collar”, according to the Korean Standard Classification of Occupation. Managers, professionals and related workers; and clerks were categorized into “white collar workers.” Service workers and sale workers were categorized into “service or sale workers.” Skilled agricultural, forestry and fishery workers; craft and related trades workers; plant, machine operators and assemblers; and elementary workers were categorized into “blue collar workers.” Shift work was categorized as either “yes” or “no” based on whether the participant’s work schedule involved regular or irregular rotating shifts, or fixed evening or night working.

2.4. Statistical analysis

For the descriptive analysis, we examined the characteristics of study participants based on their weekly working hours. We then investigated the prevalence of each of the three preventive oral health behaviors according to weekly working hours.

We employed logistic regression analysis to explore the association between working hours per week and each oral health behavior. Both unadjusted and fully adjusted models were fitted to estimate the association between long working hours and each outcome. Subsequently, we investigated the association between long working hours and post-mealtime toothbrushing. Specifically, the association between working hours per week and toothbrushing after breakfast, lunch, and dinner were estimated. Effect sizes were presented as odds ratios (ORs) along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For additional analyses, we conducted stratified analyses to explored how the association between long working hours and preventive oral behaviors differs depending on occupational groups and employment types.

Statistical analyses were stratified by gender, considering that (i) there are gender differences in oral health behaviors [20, 29] and that (ii) previous studies report gender differences in the association between long working hours and oral health conditions [11, 13]. All data preparation, analyses, and visualizations were performed using R software (version 4.2.3; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Sampling weights were applied to account for the complex survey design of the KNHANES. The “survey” package was employed for the analysis of complex survey design [30]. The “svyglm” function was used for survey weight-adjusted logistic regressions.

3. Results

Table S1 presents the distribution of the study sample characteristics. Among male workers, 16.0% worked <35 h/week, 24.8% worked 35–40 h/week, 20.0% worked 41–48 h/week, 14.1% worked 49–54 h/week, and 25.1% worked ≥55 h/week. Among female workers, 35.0% worked <35 h/week, 26.7% worked 35–40 h/week, 16.1% worked 41–48 h/week, 8.0% worked 49–54 h/week, and 14.1% worked ≥55 h/week. In both genders, those who worked ≥55 h/week were predominantly older individuals, had lower educational attainment, had lower income levels, and had blue-collar occupations.

Figure S1 shows the weighted percentages of workers exhibiting each preventive oral health behavior. The percentage of workers exhibiting each oral health behavior was lower among individuals working ≥55 h/week compared with those working 35–40 h/week. Among men working ≥55 h/week, the percentages were 29.6% for dental check-ups, 85.4% for toothbrushing ≥twice a day, and 25.6% for use of interdental cleaning devices. Among women working ≥55 h/week, the percentages were 26.6% for dental check-ups, 91.4% for toothbrushing ≥twice a day, and 29.1% for use of interdental cleaning devices.

Table 1 shows the association between working hours per week and preventive oral health behaviors in men and women. In male workers, the adjusted OR (95% CI) of the association between working ≥55 h/week, when compared to 35–40 h/week, and each outcome was 0.84 (0.77–0.92) for dental check-ups, 0.82 (0.72–0.94) for toothbrushing ≥twice a day, and 0.83 (0.76–0.92) for utilization of interdental cleaning device. In female workers, the adjusted OR (95% CI) of the association between working ≥55 h/week, when compared to 35–40 h/week, and each outcome was 0.79 (0.70–0.89) for dental check-ups, 0.88 (0.70–1.11) for adherence to recommended toothbrushing frequency, and 0.80 (0.71–0.90) for utilization of interdental cleaning device. Additionally, workers with low socio-economic status, including those with low educational levels, low income levels, and blue-collar jobs, were less likely to engage in dental check-ups, brush their teeth twice or more per day, and use interdental cleaning devices, in both male and female workers. Table S2 shows that the negative association between long working hours and preventive oral health behaviors are observed across occupational groups and employment types.

Table 1 Association between working hours per week and each preventive oral health behavior.

 	Male	Female	
	
Participation in dental check-up	Toothbrushing ≥twice a day	Use of interdental cleaning device	Participation in dental check-up	Toothbrushing ≥twice a day	Use of interdental cleaning device	
	
OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)	
Participation in dental check-up	
Working hours per week	
 <35 h	1.02 (0.92–1.13)	0.80 (0.69–0.92)	1.02 (0.91–1.14)	1.01 (0.92–1.11)	1.01 (0.83–1.22)	1.20 (1.09–1.32)	
 35–40 h	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference	
 41–48 h	0.88 (0.81–0.97)	0.95 (0.82–1.10)	0.97 (0.88–1.06)	0.91 (0.82–1.01)	1.02 (0.80–1.30)	0.96 (0.86–1.06)	
 49–54 h	0.87 (0.78–0.96)	0.82 (0.70–0.97)	0.90 (0.81–1.00)	1.04 (0.90–1.19)	1.12 (0.84–1.49)	0.87 (0.76–1.00)	
 ≥55 h	0.84 (0.77–0.92)	0.82 (0.72–0.94)	0.83 (0.76–0.92)	0.79 (0.70–0.89)	0.88 (0.70–1.11)	0.80 (0.71–0.90)	
Age	
 19–29	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference	
 30–39	1.07 (0.93–1.23)	0.94 (0.76–1.15)	1.42 (1.24–1.64)	1.09 (0.96–1.24)	1.69 (1.21–2.34)	1.58 (1.40–1.79)	
 40–49	1.32 (1.14–1.52)	0.87 (0.71–1.07)	1.36 (1.17–1.58)	1.39 (1.23–1.57)	1.91 (1.41–2.59)	1.46 (1.29–1.65)	
 50–59	1.50 (1.30–1.74)	0.79 (0.64–0.97)	1.26 (1.08–1.47)	1.55 (1.36–1.77)	1.85 (1.37–2.50)	1.64 (1.43–1.89)	
 ≥60	1.73 (1.47–2.04)	0.66 (0.53–0.81)	1.33 (1.12–1.57)	1.54 (1.31–1.80)	1.39 (1.02–1.90)	1.29 (1.10–1.52)	
Education level	
 Middle school or below	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference	
 High school	1.52 (1.37–1.69)	1.61 (1.43–1.80)	2.13 (1.89–2.40)	1.52 (1.35–1.70)	2.05 (1.66–2.52)	2.19 (1.94–2.46)	
 College or above	1.98 (1.76–2.23)	1.74 (1.50–2.02)	2.97 (2.61–3.38)	2.14 (1.87–2.44)	3.33 (2.47–4.51)	3.64 (3.17–4.19)	
Marital status	
 Married	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference	
 Unmarried/others	0.80 (0.73–0.88)	0.66 (0.58–0.75)	0.91 (0.82–1.01)	0.98 (0.90–1.06)	0.90 (0.77–1.06)	0.96 (0.88–1.04)	
Income level	
 Q1	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference	
 Q2	1.03 (0.88–1.19)	1.24 (1.08–1.43)	1.42 (1.21–1.66)	1.23 (1.07–1.41)	1.38 (1.16–1.65)	1.31 (1.14–1.50)	
 Q3	1.26 (1.09–1.47)	1.55 (1.34–1.80)	1.60 (1.36–1.88)	1.40 (1.22–1.61)	1.60 (1.31–1.95)	1.50 (1.31–1.72)	
 Q4	1.64 (1.41–1.91)	1.89 (1.62–2.20)	1.64 (1.40–1.92)	1.61 (1.39–1.85)	2.10 (1.67–2.63)	1.62 (1.41–1.87)	
Occupation	
 White collar	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference	
 Service/sales worker	0.85 (0.77–0.95)	0.85 (0.73–1.00)	1.02 (0.91–1.13)	0.91 (0.83–1.00)	0.85 (0.65–1.11)	0.98 (0.89–1.09)	
 Blue collar	0.93 (0.85–1.01)	0.55 (0.48–0.63)	0.82 (0.76–0.90)	0.74 (0.66–0.83)	0.54 (0.41–0.71)	0.74 (0.66–0.83)	
Employment type	
 Permanent	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference	
 Fixed-term	0.63 (0.57–0.71)	0.84 (0.72–0.97)	0.95 (0.84–1.07)	0.86 (0.78–0.94)	0.77 (0.63–0.95)	0.93 (0.85–1.03)	
 Self-employment	0.63 (0.58–0.68)	0.64 (0.57–0.71)	0.94 (0.87–1.02)	0.72 (0.66–0.79)	0.49 (0.40–0.59)	0.91 (0.83–1.00)	
Shift work	
 No	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference	Reference	
 Yes	1.11 (1.03–1.19)	0.97 (0.88–1.07)	0.74 (0.69–0.80)	0.95 (0.88–1.03)	0.98 (0.85–1.14)	0.73 (0.68–0.79)	
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval

Figure 2 shows the association between working hours and post-mealtime toothbrushing. In male workers, the adjusted OR (95% CI) of the association between working ≥55 h/week, compared with 35–40 h/week, each post-mealtime toothbrushing was 0.84 (0.77–0.92) for breakfast, 0.90 (0.82–0.98) for lunch, 0.96 (0.88–1.05) for dinner. In female workers, the adjusted OR (95% CI) of the association between working ≥55 h/week, compared with 35–40 h/week, each post-mealtime toothbrushing was 0.91 (0.80–1.02) for breakfast, 0.87 (0.77–0.97) for lunch, and 1.00 (0.90–1.12) for dinner.

Fig. 2 Association between working hours and post-meal toothbrushing (AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval)

4. Discussion

Our study demonstrated that individuals working long hours were less likely to participate in dental check-ups and use interdental cleaning devices. Additionally, working >48 h/week is associated with non-adherence to the recommended daily toothbrushing frequency in male workers. Consequently, our findings suggest that policy efforts are required to closely monitor oral health outcomes and promote preventive oral health behaviors among those working long hours and overtime.

As shown in our descriptive analysis, approximately 34% of workers participated in annual dental check-ups, a figure similar to that reported among Japanese workers [13]. Additionally, the proportion of workers exposed to long working hours (≥55 h/week, 25.3%) was higher than in others regions, such as Europe [1]. These findings suggest the need for policy efforts to promote preventive oral health behaviors among workers and reduce long working hours.

Our findings are consistent with those of previous studies, showing that those working long hours are less likely to participate in preventive dental visits or receive dental care for symptom management. For instance, frequent overtime was negatively associated with preventive dental visits among Japanese workers [13] and working >60 h/week was negatively associated with attendance at dental check-ups among workers in the United States [12]. Additionally, previous studies have consistently shown that those working long hours are more likely to have untreated dental needs [7, 31]. This study adds to the existing body of literature by elaborating that not only the use of dental health services but also daily oral health behaviors, are affected by long working hours.

One potential mechanism through which long working hours may contribute to unfavorable oral health behaviors is the time pressure they place on workers and the challenge they pose to engaging in oral healthcare. This hypothesis is supported by previous studies showing that long working hours act as a time barrier for workers to utilize healthcare services [7, 12, 13] and other well-known health-promoting behaviors such as leisure-time physical activity [32]. In particular, this would explain our observation that long working hours are associated with the omission of tooth brushing during the morning and lunch hours; these are periods during which individuals with long working hours are more likely to face time constraints posed by commuting or daily work commitments.

One unexpected finding was that short working hours (<35 h/week) were also associated with reduced tooth brushing frequency and omission of tooth brushing after lunch. Our results are consistent with those of a previous study showing that part-time workers are less likely to brush their teeth than full-time workers [19]. Firstly, part-time workers may be less likely to be guaranteed lunch breaks. Secondly, part-time workers may have limited access to sanitary facilities in which to practice oral hygiene. These findings underscore the need for policy efforts aimed at promoting oral health behaviors among part-time workers.

From a gender perspective, the overall prevalence of preventive oral health behaviors was higher among female workers, which is in line with previous studies [20, 29]. This can be attributed to the fact that women are more likely to view oral health as having a more significant influence on their overall appearance and well-being [33] and have better oral health literacy than men [34]. While our findings suggest that long working hours are associated with poor oral health behaviors in both men and women, long working hours are negatively associated with toothbrushing twice a day in men, but not in women. In the context of societal norms, female workers are often expected to prioritize morning hygiene routines more strictly than men [35], which may result in continued tooth brushing despite time constraints in the morning.

Our findings have important public health implications. Our study suggests that poor oral health behaviors may be a crucial factor linking long working hours to adverse dental conditions. Therefore, active policy interventions, aimed at improving the oral health behaviors of workers exposed to long working hours, are required [36, 37]. For instance, considering that these workers have limited access to dental visits owing to time constraints, dental check-ups at the workplace could aid in monitoring and managing their dental condition [38]. Previous research has also documented that workplace interventions, aimed at enhancing oral health behaviors, can lead to improvements in the quality of self-care practices and dental knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors [39]. Additionally, our analysis shows that not only working hours but also low education levels, blue-collar occupations, and low income levels are associated with less engagement in preventive oral health behaviors. Therefore, this suggests the need for proactive policy efforts to promote oral health behaviors among workers with low socio-economic status.

Our study had several limitations. Firstly, because of the cross-sectional design, we could not establish the true causal effect of long working hours on preventive oral health behaviors. Therefore, future longitudinal studies are required to clarify the temporal relationship between long working hours and preventive oral health behaviors. Secondly, there is a possibility of unmeasured confounding factors, such as previous dental history and oral health literacy, introducing bias into our estimations. Additionally, we could not consider whether the workers were employed part-time or full-time owing to the lack of information. Thirdly, all variables were self-reported by the survey participants, which may have introduced measurement errors such as recall bias. Finally, in addition to tooth brushing frequency, the technique and duration of tooth brushing are important factors in oral hygiene. Unfortunately, owing to a lack of information, we could not account for these behavioral factors. Therefore, future research could derive valuable insights by incorporating survey questionnaires covering a broader range of information related to preventive oral health behaviors.

5. Conclusion

In this study, we showed that long working hours were associated with a decrease in several preventive oral health behaviors such as regular dental check-ups, adherence to the recommended daily toothbrushing frequency, and the use of interdental cleaning devices. Moreover, socio-economic status, including educational attainment, income level, and blue-collar occupations, are major determinants of preventive oral health behaviors among Korean workers. Policy interventions are required to monitor and promote favorable oral health behaviors within working populations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Table S1 Characteristics of the study sample according to working hours per week. Table S2 Association between working hours and each preventive oral health behavior according to occupational groups and employment types. Figure S1 Weight-adjusted prevalence of preventive oral health behaviors among workers.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for providing the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Ethics approval statement and consent to participate

The Institutional Review Board of author’s institution reviewed and approved this study (IRB No. 4–2023–0959). Informed consent was provided by all survey participants.

Availability of data and material

The KNHANES dataset is available online at https://knhanes.kdca.go.kr.

Competing interests

None to declare.

Authors’ contributions

Conceptualisation, S.-U.B.; data curation: S.-U.B.; methodology, S.-U.B.; formal analysis, S.-U.B.; investigation, J.-H.Y., S.-U.B.; writing—original draft preparation, S.-U.B.; writing—review and editing, J.-U.W., Y.-M.L., J.-H.Y.; visualisation, S.-U.B.; supervision, J.-U.W., Y.-M.L., J.-H.Y.
==== Refs
References

1. Pega F, Nafradi B, Momen NC, Ujita Y, Streicher KN, Pruss-Ustun AM, . Global, regional, and national burdens of ischemic heart disease and stroke attributable to exposure to long working hours for 194 countries, 2000–2016: A systematic analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury. Environ Int. 2021;154 :106595. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106595.34011457
2. Min J, Kim Y, Lee S, Jang TW, Kim I, Song J. The Fourth Industrial Revolution and Its Impact on Occupational Health and Safety, Worker’s Compensation and Labor Conditions. Saf Health Work. 2019;10 :400–8. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2019.09.005.31890322
3. Kang HT, Kim CJ, Lee DW, Park SG, Lee J, Youn K, . Statement by the Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Medicine on the proposed reform of working hours in South Korea. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2023;35 :e17.37928373
4. Kim I, Min J. Working hours and the regulations in Korea. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2023;35 :e18.37928375
5. Statistics Korea. Economically Active Population Survey in April 2024. In: Statistics Korea. 2024. https://kostat.go.kr/board.es?mid=a20105020000&bid=11732&act=view&list_no=430939. Accessed May 17, 2024.
6. Baek SU, Yoon JH. Association between long working hours and cigarette smoking, leisure-time physical activity, and risky alcohol use: Findings from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2014–2021). Prev Med. 2023;175 :107691. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107691.37652108
7. Yoshino K, Suzuki S, Ishizuka Y, Takayanagi A, Sugihara N, Kamijyo H. Relationship between amount of overtime work and untreated decayed teeth in male financial workers in Japan. J Occup Health. 2017;59 :280–5. doi: 10.1539/joh.16-0247-OA.28367874
8. Lee W, Lim SS, Kim B, Won JU, Roh J, Yoon JH. Relationship between long working hours and periodontitis among the Korean workers. Sci Rep. 2017;7 :7967. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08034-6.28801658
9. Tanemura T, Zaitsu T, Oshiro A, Inoue Y, Kawaguchi Y, Aida J. Association of overtime work duration with oral health-related quality of life in Japanese workers. J Oral Sci. 2023;65 :44–7. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.22-0267.36631125
10. Irie K, Tsuneishi M, Saijo M, Suzuki C, Yamamoto T. Occupational Difference in Oral Health Status and Behaviors in Japanese Workers: A Literature Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19 . doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138081.
11. Choi Y, Kim I, Song J. Association between long working hours and unmet dental needs in wage workers. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23 :570. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03289-0.37574543
12. Yao X, Dembe AE, Wickizer T, Lu B. Does time pressure create barriers for people to receive preventive health services? Prev Med. 2015;74 :55–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.03.008.25773470
13. Harada Y, Nagata T, Nagata M, Harada A, Oya R, Mori K. Association between overtime work hours and preventive dental visits among Japanese workers. BMC Public Health. 2021;21 :87. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10107-7.33413266
14. Shimada S, Zaitsu T, Oshiro A, Kino S, Aida J. Association of oral health with various work problems: a cross-sectional study of Japanese workers. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23 :488. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03196-4.37454055
15. Zaitsu T, Saito T, Oshiro A, Fujiwara T, Kawaguchi Y. The Impact of Oral Health on Work Performance of Japanese Workers. J Occup Environ Med. 2020;62 :e59–64. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001798.31851058
16. Jeong HJ, Kim YH, Yun JW, Oh SH, Yoon HS, Lee MK, . The effect of general health status, oral health behavior and status on quality of life in Korea adults. J Korean Acad Oral Health. 2020;44 :158–65. doi: 10.11149/jkaoh.2020.44.3.158.
17. Sim SJ. Association between oral health behaviors and health related quality of life in Korean adults. Int J Clin Prev Dent. 2019;15 :129–36.
18. Lee YR, Kim NH. Socioeconomic factors related to tooth brushing behavior among adults in Korea: analysis with 2019 Community Health Survey data. J Korean Acad Oral Health. 2022;46 :47–55. doi: 10.11149/jkaoh.2022.46.2.47.
19. Choi JS. A study on Korean workers’ practice of brushing teeth after lunch. J Korean Acad Oral Health. 2020;44 :97–101. doi: 10.11149/jkaoh.2020.44.2.97.
20. Kim YR, Kang HK. Trend Analysis of Average Frequency Using Toothbrushing per Day in South Korea: An Observational Study of the 2010 to 2018 KNHANES Data. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18 . doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073522.
21. Jung SH. Analysis of the trends in the disparities of toothbrushing and dental care use by household income level using the data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Korean Acad Oral Health. 2022;46 :147–53. doi: 10.11149/jkaoh.2022.46.3.147.
22. Kweon S, Kim Y, Jang MJ, Kim Y, Kim K, Choi S, . Data resource profile: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43 :69–77. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt228.24585853
23. Oh K, Kim Y, Kweon S, Kim S, Yun S, Park S, . Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 20th anniversary: accomplishments and future directions. Epidemiol Health. 2021;43 :e2021025. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2021025.33872484
24. Descatha A, Sembajwe G, Pega F, Ujita Y, Baer M, Boccuni F, . The effect of exposure to long working hours on stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury. Environ Int. 2020;142 :105746. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105746.32505015
25. Li J, Pega F, Ujita Y, Brisson C, Clays E, Descatha A, . The effect of exposure to long working hours on ischaemic heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury. Environ Int. 2020;142 :105739. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105739.32505014
26. Attin T, Hornecker E. Tooth brushing and oral health: how frequently and when should tooth brushing be performed? Oral Health Prev Dent. 2005;3 :135–40.16355646
27. Wainwright J, Sheiham A. An analysis of methods of toothbrushing recommended by dental associations, toothpaste and toothbrush companies and in dental texts. Br Dent J. 2014;217 :E5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.651.25104719
28. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Analysis Guideline for Using Raw Data for the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey In: Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. 2023. https://knhanes.kdca.go.kr/knhanes/sub03/sub03_06_02.do. Accessed May 20, 2023.
29. Su S, Lipsky MS, Licari FW, Hung M. Comparing oral health behaviours of men and women in the United States. J Dent. 2022;122 :104157. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104157.35545161
30. Lumley T. Analysis of complex survey samples. J Stat Softw. 2004;9 :1–19.
31. Lee HE, Kim NH, Jang TW, Kawachi I. Impact of Long Working Hours and Shift Work on Perceived Unmet Dental Need: A Panel Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18 . doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062939.
32. Angrave D, Charlwood A, Wooden M. Long working hours and physical activity. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015;69 :738–44. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-205230.25767132
33. Mc Grath C, Bedi R. Gender variations in the social impact of oral health. J Ir Dent Assoc. 2000;46 :87–91.11323941
34. Lipsky MS, Su S, Crespo CJ, Hung M. Men and Oral Health: A Review of Sex and Gender Differences. Am J Mens Health. 2021;15 :15579883211016361. doi: 10.1177/15579883211016361.33993787
35. Eriksson K, Dickins TE, Strimling P. Global sex differences in hygiene norms and their relation to sex equality. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022;2 :e0000591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000591.36962769
36. Kang HT, Kim CJ, Lee DW, Park SG, Lee J, Youn K, . Statement by the Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Medicine on the proposed reform of working hours in South Korea. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2023;35 .
37. Moon D, Kim H. The impacts of working time flexibilization on occupational safety and health: an expert survey. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2023;35 :e20. doi: 10.35371/aoem.2023.35.e20.37928376
38. Masuko S, Zaitsu T, Oshiro A, Ishimaru M, Aida J. Association between place of dental check-ups and work absenteeism among Japanese workers. J Occup Health. 2023;65 :e12415. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12415.37354491
39. Bakri NN, Smith MB, Broadbent JM, Thomson WM. Oral health promotion activities in the workplace: a scoping review. Health Promot Int. 2023;38 . doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac039.
