
==== Front
Cureus
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus Palo Alto (CA)

10.7759/cureus.67359
Epidemiology/Public Health
Infectious Disease
Hematology
Ensuring Transfusion Safety: Screening Blood Donors for Human Parvovirus B19
Muacevic Alexander
Adler John R
Kumari Swati 1
Thomas Reuben Kuruvilla 1
R Krishanamoorthy 2
Barani Ramya 1
Srikanth Padma 1
1 Microbiology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND
2 Transfusion Medicine, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND
Padma Srikanth padma2srk@gmail.com
21 8 2024
8 2024
16 8 e6735920 8 2024
Copyright © 2024, Kumari et al.
2024
Kumari et al.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This article is available from https://www.cureus.com/articles/278449-ensuring-transfusion-safety-screening-blood-donors-for-human-parvovirus-b19
Ensuring the safety of blood and blood products is a vital aspect of healthcare. The potential for transmission of pathogens through blood and blood products makes transfusion safety a significant concern. Despite advancements in testing methodologies, donated blood products still pose a risk for infection transmission. Human parvovirus B19 (B19V) is a small, single-stranded, non-enveloped DNA virus transmissible parenterally by blood transfusion. B19V causes a wide range of clinical manifestations, which is generally harmless in healthy individuals. B19V infection may cause severe complications, such as aplastic crises, as it affects erythrocyte progenitor cells in individuals with increased erythrocyte turnover. Additionally, B19V can be transmitted from pregnant women to their foetus, potentially causing hydrops fetalis and foetal death. The potential for transmission through blood and blood products makes B19V a significant concern for transfusion safety. In response to the growing recognition of B19V's impact on transfusion safety, various international health organisations have introduced guidelines to minimise its transmission through blood and plasma products. However, the implementation of these guidelines varies globally, with some regions, such as India, still lacking formal protocols for B19V monitoring. This review article explores the existing methodologies for screening blood donors for B19V, assesses the associated transfusion risks, and considers the implications for public health and clinical practice. By emphasising advancements in diagnostic techniques and the challenges of their implementation, this article provides a comprehensive overview of efforts to reduce the transmission of B19V through blood transfusions, thereby ensuring safer blood supplies and improved patient outcomes.

screening methodologies
blood and plasma derivatives
b19v transmission
blood transfusion safety
human parvovirus b19 (b19v)
==== Body
pmcIntroduction and background

Overview of transfusion safety

Transfusion-transmitted infections (TTIs) pose a major concern for healthcare professionals. Nearly 119 million blood donations are collected yearly, with India requiring approximately 14.61 million units annually [1,2]. Efforts have been made to prevent TTIs, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 and HIV-2, human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV) I and II, hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and West Nile virus (WNV) [3]. Emerging infections include WNV, Trypanosoma cruzi, Plasmodium spp., Babesia spp., parvovirus B19 (B19V), dengue virus, and prions causing variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Some agents, such as human herpes virus-8 (HHV-8), Borrelia, and potentially avian flu virus, have a viraemic phase but have not been proven to be TTIs [4]. Screening for infectious agents in blood donors is essential to prevent disease transmission through transfusions. Since the beginning of the 21st century, the European Pharmacopoeia, the Plasma Protein Therapeutics Association (PPTA), and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have established guidelines aimed at reducing the risk of B19V transmission through blood and plasma derivatives.

Importance of screening for infectious agents

Blood transfusion safety has significantly improved due to advancements in donor recruitment, blood screening, sensitive testing assays, and proper clinical utilisation [5]. Traditionally, serologic testing formed the basis of screening, but newer methods such as nucleic acid testing (NAT) have further reduced the "window period" [6]. However, NAT has limitations, especially in detecting low-level viremia in blood components, which may evade detection. Despite these limitations, the combination of serological testing and NAT has significantly reduced the risk of viral transmission through blood transfusions [7]. The risk of infectious agents entering the blood supply is dynamic and can change with emerging pathogens or shifts in epidemiology [8].

Human parvovirus B19 and blood products

B19V is a common contaminant in blood and plasma donations. The virus's small size and lack of a lipid envelope make it resistant to most viral inactivation methods, increasing the probability of transmission through blood products [9]. B19V's notable resistance properties make it an effective model for studying newly emergent viruses that can contaminate blood products. Limiting the B19V viral load in source plasma pools is crucial to minimise transmission risk [10,11].

Review

Human parvovirus B19 - an overview

Virology and Structure

B19V, belonging to the Parvoviridae family and Erythrovirus genus, was first identified by Cossart et al. in 1975 [12]. It is one of the smallest DNA viruses, with virions measuring 18-26 nm [13]. B19V is non-enveloped, with a single-stranded DNA genome of about 5,600 nucleotides [14]. The icosahedral capsid comprises two structural proteins, VP1 and VP2, with VP2 making up 95% of the capsid [15]. VP1 includes the VP1 unique region (VP1u), which is essential for virus entry and the infection outcome [16]. The genome also encodes the non-structural protein NS1, which is crucial for viral DNA replication and inducing apoptosis in host cells [17]. B19V is divided into three genotypes (1, 2, and 3), each with over 10% DNA sequence variation [18]. Despite genomic differences, these genotypes share common biological traits and pathogenic capabilities [19].

Epidemiology

B19V is a globally prevalent pathogen with a seroprevalence rate that varies with age, ranging from 2% to 70%. It causes various clinical manifestations, with an attributable risk of erythema infectiosum (fifth disease) being 100% in children, aplastic crisis 70-80% in individuals with haemolytic disorders, hydrops fetalis 10-15% in pregnant women, and chronic anaemia 50% in immunocompromised patients [20]. Epidemiological studies show significant variations in B19V seroprevalence across regions and age groups. Filatova et al. reported two to three times higher incidence rates (10-20 cases per 100,000 population) typically observed from late winter to early summer in temperate climates, but in tropical climates, the virus is generally present year-round [21]. Broliden et al. noted that epidemic cycles occur every four to five years in temperate climates, necessitating adaptive screening and intervention strategies [22]. Positive cases are spread throughout the year in tropical areas, suggesting sporadic occurrences. However, undetected local outbreaks cannot be ruled out [23]. Additional studies, such as those by Abdelrahman et al. in Qatar and Chirambo-Kalolekesha et al. in Zambia, highlight significant regional variations in B19V prevalence and the need for localised public health strategies [24,25]. Continuous regional surveillance is crucial to effectively adapt public health responses to local epidemiological patterns.

B19V seroprevalence varies significantly with age: approximately 2-21% in children aged one to five years, 30-40% in adolescents, 40-60% in adults, and over 85% in elderly populations [26]. Specific IgG antibodies indicate long-term immunity following infection [20].

Mode of Transmission

B19V is primarily spread through droplets from respiratory secretions (Figure 1), with the highest infectivity during the viraemic phase [27]. Common transmission settings include households, daycares, and schools. The virus can also be transmitted vertically and through blood transfusions and organ or bone marrow transplants [28,29]. B19V transmission through blood products is feasible due to the high-level viremia often resulting from primary infections. Asymptomatic individuals in the initial phase of acute infection can have viral loads exceeding 10¹² IU/mL, increasing the risk of iatrogenic transmission [28]. Nosocomial transmission has been documented, such as the detection of B19V in a kidney transplant unit in China, raising concerns for vulnerable immunocompromised populations. Stringent hand hygiene measures and environmental disinfection effectively prevent nosocomial transmission [30].

Figure 1 Mode of transmission of parvovirus B19

Figure created by the authors

Pathogenesis and Clinical Manifestations

B19V infection complicates efforts to ensure blood transfusion safety. Two critical factors influence the virus's entry into host cells: the presence of a specific receptor on the host cell surface and a structural component of the virus. B19V specifically targets cells expressing the P blood group antigen (globoside-4 or Gb4) found on erythroblasts, megakaryoblasts, endothelial cells, and foetal myocardial cells. The VP1 unique region (VP1u) is necessary for the virus to enter the host cell. Antibodies against the VP1 component are protective and crucial in clearing the virus. The presence of IgG antibodies confers protection against new infections with any genotype of the virus [16].

B19V viremia begins approximately one week after exposure, peaks within the first two days, and typically lasts about five days. During acute infection, viral titres in peripheral blood can reach up to 10¹⁴ IU/mL [31]. IgM antibodies against B19V appear late in the viraemic stage, around 10-14 days post-infection, and can persist for up to five months, with some patients experiencing longer durations. Specific IgG antibodies become detectable around 15 days after infection, maintaining high levels for several months and persisting long term [32]. Antibodies against the VP1 component of the virus actually determine the fate of B19V infection, as these are protective and play a crucial role in clearing the virus [33]. The presence of IgG antibodies confers protection against any new infection with any genotype of the virus.

Many individuals infected with B19V show no symptoms, with roughly 25% of adults and 50% of children remaining asymptomatic during an outbreak. Symptomatic individuals typically experience mild, non-specific symptoms resembling those of a common cold [34]. The most prevalent clinical manifestation in children is erythema infectiosum, characterised by a distinctive "slapped-cheek" facial rash [35].

The severity of B19V anaemia depends on the host's haematological and immunological condition. B19V infection can lead to severe clinical outcomes in three groups: individuals with conditions that reduce RBC lifespan, such as sickle cell anaemia, thalassemia, or other hemoglobinopathies; immunosuppressed individuals; and pregnant women. B19V infection can cause life-threatening transient aplastic crises in individuals with haematological disorders, chronic anaemia in immunocompromised patients, and hydrops fetalis in pregnant women. For immunocompromised individuals, the inability to produce effective neutralising antibodies may lead to chronic anaemia. The infection can also cause a slight decrease in haemoglobin or haematocrit due to extensive apoptosis of infected erythroid precursor cells, leading to anaemia. However, this anaemia is usually short-lived in most healthy individuals, as the typical lifespan of RBCs is around 120 days. Various studies provided insights into managing chronic anaemia and other severe outcomes, emphasising the critical role of early detection and intervention, particularly in high-risk groups (Table 1) [20,26,35-51].

Table 1 Pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of parvovirus B19 infection

Host	Organ affected	Classical disease	Tissue affected by B19V	Pathology known	Management	
Immunocompetent	 	 	 	 	 	
1. Children	Skin	Erythema infectiosum	Skin and subcutaneous tissue	Immune complex deposition	Saline baths or calamine lotion, antipyretics	
2. Adult women	Multiple small joint	Arthropathy	Synovial fluid	Immune complex deposition	Antipyretics non-steroidal anti-inflammatory	
3. Pregnant women	Placenta	Hydrops fetalis Recurrent abortion Congenital anemia	Placental tissue	Placental endothelium infection, Erythroblast of fetal liver	Intrauterine blood transfusion, Intravenous and intraperitoneal immunoglobulin	
Other symptoms in immunocompetent	Heart	Myocarditis	Myocardial cells	Intracardiac arteriole endothelial cell inflammation	Intravenous immunoglobulin	
Kidney	Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis	Glomerular disease	Immune complex deposition	Intravenous immunoglobulin	
Liver	Acute hepatitis	Hepatocyte	Hepatocyte infection	 	
Brain	Meningitis Encephalitis	Central nervous system	Acute cerebellitis Molecular mimicry & autoimmunity to myelin protein	Intravenous immunoglobulin	
Individuals with increased red cell turnover	Bone marrow	Severe anemia, Transient aplastic crisis	Erythroid progenitor cell	Erythroid progenitor cell lysis	Blood transfusion Intravenous immunoglobulin	
Immunocompromised	Bone marrow	Chronic pure red cell aplasia	Erythroid progenitor cell	Cell cycle arrest	Intravenous immunoglobulin, Empirical plasmapheresis	

During pregnancy, B19V infection can result in abortion or non-immune hydrops fetalis [20,37]. In the foetus, the infection can cause myocarditis, heart failure, neurological abnormalities, or congenital anaemia, potentially leading to hydrops fetalis [38]. Additionally, B19V infection is associated with the onset or progression of autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [39]. B19V infection has also been linked to conditions such as meningitis, encephalopathy, epilepsy, myocarditis, dilated cardiomyopathy, and autoimmune hepatitis [20,39].

B19V Outcome in Blood Donors

Asymptomatic donors can donate blood due to the frequent absence of symptoms in acute infections, especially among adults. When symptoms do occur, adults may experience mild, non-specific signs that resemble a common cold or flu, such as low-grade fever, fatigue, headache, sore throat, malaise, and joint pains (arthralgia) [34].

Haematological course: Researchers in Germany investigated how B19V infection affects blood count levels among blood donors. The study compared 345 samples containing detectable B19V DNA to 100 samples without B19V DNA. The findings revealed no differences between the two groups in leukocyte, erythrocyte, or platelet counts. However, B19V DNA-positive samples had significantly lower mean haemoglobin, haematocrit, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), and mean haemoglobin concentration (MCHC) compared to B19V DNA-negative controls [52].

Immunological course: Anderson et al. detailed the typical antibody response in experimentally B19V-infected individuals. They observed that anti-B19V IgM antibodies appeared during the second week of infection, followed by the emergence of anti-B19V IgG antibodies. However, they did not specify the targeted epitopes, such as NS1, VP1, or VP2 [31]. According to the study by Emmanuel et al., viral epitopes of B19V include specific regions on the VP1 and VP2 capsid proteins. These epitopes are essential for inducing immune responses, making them crucial targets for developing vaccines and diagnostic assays. The VP1 unique region (VP1u) is particularly significant, playing a key role in eliciting protective antibodies essential for the immune system's defence against the virus [53].

A pioneering study by researchers from Germany and Austria investigated how the humoral immune response evolves concerning B19V DNA levels. This research involved analysing follow-up samples from 50 donors infected with B19V. In the first samples gathered during the acute phase of infection, around one-third of the blood donors showed detectable IgG antibodies targeting VP1 and VP2 viral capsid proteins. After 12 weeks, the first follow-up sample showed detectable IgG antibodies in every donor against the viral capsid protein [54].

Implications for Blood Transfusion

Risk of transmission: One significant risk for blood transfusion recipients is the potential transmission of B19V from asymptomatic donors. B19V can be present in high titres in donors' blood who show no symptoms, leading to an unnoticed transmission risk [55].

High viremia: During the acute phase of B19V infection, viral load in the blood can reach very high levels (up to 10¹⁴ IU/mL). Blood products collected during this period significantly increase the risk of TTIs [55,56].

Clinical Implications

Immunocompromised recipients: Immunocompromised individuals, such as those with HIV/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, or organ transplant recipients, are at a higher risk of developing severe complications from B19V infection. These patients may experience chronic anaemia due to the persistent suppression of erythropoiesis [25].

Hematologic disorders: Recipients with underlying hematologic disorders, such as sickle cell anaemia, thalassemia, or other hemoglobinopathies, are particularly vulnerable. B19V can precipitate a transient aplastic crisis in these patients, leading to severe anaemia requiring urgent medical intervention [36].

Pregnant women: Anaemia (most often mild, sometimes severe) complicating pregnancy is a common condition encountered in antenatal practice. Pregnant women receiving blood transfusions are at risk of transmitting B19V to the foetus, which can cause hydrops fetalis, severe foetal anaemia, and even foetal death. This vertical transmission is a significant concern for maternal and foetal health [57].

Autoimmune and inflammatory conditions: B19V infection has been linked to the onset or exacerbation of autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Blood transfusion recipients with pre-existing autoimmune conditions may experience worsening symptoms or new-onset autoimmune disorders [58].

Screening and Diagnostic Methods for B19V

Nucleic acid testing (NAT): NAT is a highly sensitive and specific method for detecting B19V DNA in blood and plasma products. It involves the amplification of viral DNA using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques, which are capable of identifying even low levels of viral DNA in donor blood samples. NAT can detect B19V during the viraemic phase of infection when viral loads are the highest, with a sensitivity threshold as low as 10³ IU/mL [59]. Many countries have adopted NAT for screening blood donations, often using mini-pool testing where multiple samples are pooled together for analysis. NAT reduces the risk of TTIs by identifying infected donors before distributing blood products [60]. An interesting aspect of B19V viremia is that it is short-lived, unlike infections with other blood-borne viruses, such as HIV/HBV/HCV, where viremia is persistent.

Serological testing (IgM, IgG antibodies): Serological testing for B19V involves detecting specific blood antibodies (IgM and IgG), indicating past or current infection. IgM antibodies appear 10-14 days after infection and can persist for several months, indicating a recent or acute B19V infection. IgG antibodies become detectable around 15 days post-infection and remain long term, indicating past exposure and immunity (Figure 2). High levels of IgG antibodies in a donor suggest previous infection and a low risk of a viraemic phase [61]. Serological testing helps identify donors previously exposed to B19V and those currently experiencing an acute infection. Countries may use serological tests alongside NAT to ensure comprehensive screening of blood donors [62].

Figure 2 Markers of parvovirus B19 infection

Figure created by the authors

Comparison of Different Screening Methods: NAT vs. Serological Testing

The evolution of blood transfusion safety has been marked by significant technological advancements, particularly the shift from basic serological testing to more sophisticated NAT. The limitations of serological tests were inadequate in detecting low-level viremia. This gap necessitated the adoption of NAT, significantly reducing the residual risk of TTIs, particularly during the window period of infections.

Additional studies in India (2014) and Germany (2019) emphasise the importance of NAT in reducing the incidence of TTIs and highlight the continuous need for technological advancements [63,64]. The development of multiplex NAT assays has further improved detection sensitivity and allowed for the simultaneous screening of multiple pathogens.

NAT is more sensitive and specific for detecting active B19V infection due to its ability to amplify viral DNA. It is particularly useful during the viraemic phase. Serological tests are less sensitive than NAT but provide valuable information about the immune status of donors through the detection of IgM and IgG antibodies. NAT detects B19V during the viraemic phase, making it effective for preventing TTIs from donors with high viral loads. Serological tests detect recent (IgM) and past (IgG) infections, offering a broader understanding of donor infection history [65]. Combining NAT and serological testing provides the most comprehensive screening approach, capturing active infections and immune status. This dual approach enhances blood safety by minimising the risk of TTIs from B19V [66].

Certain countries, such as Germany, the Netherlands, and Japan, have enacted specific measures to mitigate B19V transmission risk to enhance the safety of blood and blood products [3]. The Japanese Red Cross (JRC), in September 1997, introduced a haemagglutination assay to screen for B19V in all blood donations until 2007. In 2008, the JRC replaced the screening method with a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay to enhance the assay's sensitivity. The sensitivity of this test is around 10⁷ IU/mL with positive B19V DNA donor samples [67]. The testing for B19V DNA in blood donors commenced in Germany in 2000. A mini-pool real-time NAT was introduced to facilitate this, allowing for simultaneous testing of up to 96 donations. Blood products with a viral load of ≥10⁵ IU/mL for B19V were subsequently disposed of to maintain safety [54]. The Netherlands Health Council recommended a high-risk group approach for cellular blood products. This involves supplying "B19V-safe" cellular blood products sourced from donors with anti-B19V IgG antibodies identified in two blood samples taken at least six months apart for specific at-risk groups. These groups include pregnant women, individuals with haemolytic disorder, and immunocompromised individuals who also lack detectable B19V-specific antibodies [68]. In Poland, donated blood is universally screened for B19V using NAT-based algorithms [69].

Prevalence of B19V in Blood Donors

Numerous studies have shown significant variation in B19V prevalence among blood donor populations: IgG antibodies range from 6% to 79.1%, IgM antibodies from 0.72% to 7.53%, and B19V DNA from 0% to 1.3% [31,52,61,67,70-76]. While the results of these studies are generally consistent, direct comparison is challenging due to variations in study population sizes, pool sizes, and the use of tests with different sensitivities for B19V DNA detection. The prevalence of B19V DNA can be significantly influenced by the study timing, especially if the study duration does not cover an entire year. Additionally, it is known that the B19V outbreak can occur in specific years, leading to an increased number of acute infections, while other years may have only a few B19V infections [75,76]. Table 2 provides detailed prevalence data from various countries, summarising the prevalence of B19V DNA, IgM, and IgG antibodies in blood donors across different regions [24,25,52,55,61,67,77-104]. It is also noteworthy that approximately 30% of potential blood donors will not have any antibodies against B19V and will, therefore, be at risk of acquiring a new infection.

Table 2 Prevalence of B19V reported in blood donors across various countries

PCR=Polymerase chain reaction, ELISA=Enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay

Note: Data are represented as the number of positive cases (N) and percentage (%) of the total sample size. Prevalence of B19V reported in blood donors across various countries

Study	Geographical location	Sample size &Type	Method of detection	Prevalence	
 	 	 	 	DNA positive (N, %)	Anti-B19V IgM (N, %)	Anti-B19V IgG (N, %)	
Filatova et al., 2010 [21]	Russian	1000	Real‐time PCR	10 (1%)	-	-	
Abdelrahman et al., 2021 [24]	Qatar	5026 and 930 Blood donor	Real-time PCR, ELISA	70 (1.4%)-	- 20 (2.1%)	- 561 (60.3%)	
Chirambo‐Kalolekesha et al., 2018 [25]	Zambia	192	ELISA	-	30 (0.15%)	-	
Juhl et al., 2014 [52]	Germany	23,889	Real‐time PCR	157 (0.65%)	-	-	
Healy et al., 2023 [55]	Germany	1,67,123 Blood donor	Real-time PCR	22 (0.013%)	-	-	
Manaresi et al., 2004 [61]	Italy	446	ELISA	-	-	353 (79.14%)	
Sakata et al., 2008 [67]	Japan	1,035,560 and 417	Chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay, real‐time PCR	101 (0.23%)	-	-	
Sun et al., 2023 [77]	China	17,187 Plasma donor	Real-time PCR	44 (0.26%)	-	-	
Mengyi et al., 2023 [78]	China	10,720 Blood donor	Real-time PCR	58 (0.14%)	-	-	
William et al., 2022 [79]	England	76,065 Blood component, plasma product	Real-time PCR	80 (0.003%)	-	-	
Rabab Hasanain et al., 2021 [80]	Egypt	500 Blood donor	Real-time PCR and ELISA	15 (3%)	31 (6.20%)	401 (80.20%)	
Slavov et al., 2019 [81]	Brazil	480 Blood donor	Real-time PCR and ELISA	9 (1.87)	-	258 (53.75%)	
Francois et al., 2019 [82]	South Africa	1500 Blood donor	Real-time PCR	14 (0.93%)	-	-	
Raturi et al., 2018 [83]	India	800 Blood donor	ELISA	-	11 (1.4%)	273 (34.1%)	
Goral et al., 2018 [84]	Turkey	988 Blood donor	ELISA	-	39 (3.95%)	582 (58.9%)	
Faddy et al., 2018 [85]	Australia	2221 Blood donor	ELISA	-	-	1360 (61.2%)	
Osman et al., 2017 [86]	Sudan	110	Nested PCR	8 (7.27%)	-	-	
Slavov et al., 2016 [87]	Brazil	91	Real‐time PCR	1 (1.09%)	-	-	
Ou et al., 2016 [88]	China	10,452	Real‐time PCR	6 (0.057%)	-	-	
Han et al., 2015 [89]	China	5030	Real‐time PCR	3 (0.059)	-	-	
Kumar et al., 2013 [90]	India	1633	ELISA	-	123(7.53)	-	
Grabarczyk et al., 2012 [91]	Poland	980	Real‐time PCR	1 (0.102%)	-	-	
Mahmoodian‐Shooshtari et al., 2011 [92]	Iran	1640	Semi‐nested PCR and ELISA	-	8 (0.48%)	676 (41.21%)	
Ke et al., 2011 [93]	China	3957	Real‐time PCR	23 (0.58%)	-	-	
Oh et al., 2010 [94]	South Korea	10,032 and 928	Real‐time PCR, ELISA	10 (0.009%) -	- 7 (0.069%)	- 551 (5.49%)	
O’Bryan et al., 2010 [95]	USA	282	ELISA	-	-	162 (57.44%)	
Johargy, 2009 [96]	Saudi Arabia	578	ELISA	-	-	441 (76.29%)	
Mahmoudi et al., 2008 [97]	Iran	730	Semi‐nested PCR and ELISA	0	4 (0.54%)	338 (46.30%)	
Kleinman et al., 2007 [98]	USA	5020	Real‐time PCR	44 (0.87%)	-	-	
Wei et al., 2006 [99]	China	184	ELISA	-	-	102	
Henriques et al., 2005 [100]	Portugal	5025	Real‐time PCR	6 (0.119%)	-	-	
Thomas et al., 2003 [101]	Belgium	16,859	Nested PCR	27 (0.160%)	-	-	
Muñoz et al., 1998 [102]	Spain	136	ELISA	-	-	88 (64.70%)	
Letaïef et al., 1997 [103]	Belgium and Tunisia	819	ELISA	-	11 (1.34%)	572 (69.84%)	
Yoto et al., 1995 [104]	Japan	1000	Nested PCR	6 (0.6%)	-	-	

Case studies

Japan: Zanella et al. reported a case of TT-B19V infection in a 22-year-old female patient with thalassemia major. She presented with an aplastic crisis, which was followed a week later by transient heart failure and acute tricuspid valve incompetence [105]. Yu et al. discovered that 14 out of 869 (1.6%) recipients were B19V DNA positive and showed seroconversion after receiving red blood cell transfusions, as confirmed by molecular analysis of linked donor and recipient samples [60]. The JRC haemovigilance system gathered clinical reports on potential TT-B19V from 1999 to 2008. Eight patients have been identified with TT-B19V resulting from a blood transfusion. Four patients developed sustained anaemia and pure red blood cell aplasia, while one patient developed pancytopenia [106]. In a study by Yoto et al. on 1,000 serum samples from blood donors, 0.6% tested positive for B19V DNA, a rate significantly higher. Five of these samples also had anti-B19 IgM, indicating acute infection [104].

United Kingdom: Between 1996 and 2016, the UK's Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) registry documented only a single instance of significant illness resulting from a TT-B19V infection [107].

France: A sickle cell disease recipient developed erythroblastopenia following a red blood cell concentrate transfusion [108].

The reported cases are likely just the "tip of the iceberg," indicating a much larger, often hidden, burden of TT-B19V infections. This emphasizes the need for improved screening, better clinical awareness, and more comprehensive surveillance systems to ensure transfusion safety.

Global regulatory guidelines

Since the early 21st century, various regulatory bodies have established guidelines to mitigate the risk of B19V transmission through blood and plasma products (Figure 3).

Figure 3 B19V screening algorithm and outcome

Figure created by the authors.

European Pharmacopoeia and the Plasma Protein Therapeutics Association (PPTA): These organisations recommend limiting B19V DNA levels to 10⁴ IU/mL in plasma pools used for manufacturing plasma derivatives. These guidelines aim to minimise transmission risk through products such as clotting factors, immunoglobulins, and albumin [109].

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines: The FDA has issued similar guidelines, emphasising the importance of limiting B19V DNA levels in plasma pools. Additionally, the FDA requires that NAT assays used for screening detect all three B19V genotypes to ensure comprehensive coverage [110].

The FDA, European Pharmacopoeia, and the PPTA have recommended limiting B19V DNA levels in plasma derivatives to 10⁴ IU/mL [110-113]. While these guidelines provide a framework for reducing B19V transmission risk, implementation varies globally. Some countries, such as India, with many vulnerable populations, currently lack specific documentation or regulations for monitoring B19V, highlighting the need for a more uniform approach to transfusion safety.

The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) has issued a Threat Assessment Brief on the increased circulation of B19V in the EU/EEA as of June 2024. This report emphasises the need for heightened awareness among public health authorities and Substances of Human Origin (SoHO) professionals, especially for vulnerable populations such as pregnant women, immunosuppressed individuals, and those with chronic haematological conditions. The ECDC recommends enhancing risk communication and considering additional screening measures to manage and mitigate the potential health impacts. The findings underscore the importance of ongoing monitoring and targeted public health interventions [114].

Substantial disparities exist in screening practices for B19V across countries. For example, Japan's early adoption of haemagglutination assays in 1997 and the subsequent shift to chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassays in 2008 reflect a proactive approach to enhancing detection sensitivity and accuracy [67]. In contrast, Germany implemented mini-pool NAT in 2000, exemplifying a robust strategy to maintain high detection standards while managing costs [52]. This underscores the diversity in strategies driven by each country's unique healthcare infrastructure and economic considerations.

A study on Dutch blood donors reveals a complex landscape where economic and infrastructural limitations significantly impact the effectiveness of B19V screening, particularly in low-resource settings [115]. The need for international collaboration and support to bridge the gap in screening capabilities is critical for ensuring comprehensive transfusion safety globally.

Contamination of plasma derivatives

Plasma derivatives, particularly coagulation factors, are at higher risk of B19V contamination due to large volumes of plasma pooling from multiple donors [116]. Documented evidence shows a temporal link between administering plasma products and outcomes such as viremia and seroconversion in recipients. Additionally, studies have shown that groups receiving clotting factors have a significantly higher prevalence of B19V-specific antibodies than control groups [117]. In China, studies have reported B19V DNA contamination rates ranging from 5.45% to 100% in plasma pools, depending on the region and screening procedures used [118,119]. The small size and absence of an envelope make B19V resistant to many viral inactivation methods used in plasma derivative production [103,111].

A study conducted in Atlanta, United States of America, found that individuals receiving plasma-derived medicinal products were 1.7 times more likely to have IgG antibodies to B19V than non-exposed populations [120]. Another study in the United Kingdom revealed that one-fourth of albumin samples and all factor VIII concentrates were affected. One-fifth of intravenous and three-fourths of intramuscular immunoglobulin preparations were also impacted [121]. According to Alter et al., more than 60% of factor VIII, factor IX, and prothrombin complex concentrates, along with plasma pools, were found to contain B19V DNA, with viral loads varying between 1×10 and 1×10⁸ genome equivalent/mL [4].

Strategies for reducing contamination

Since B19V is thermostable and lacks a lipid envelope, it is not destroyed by the chemical and physical treatments used to inactivate lipid-enveloped viruses, such as HIV and hepatitis B and C [39].

Common viral inactivation techniques include heat treatment (e.g., pasteurisation and dry heat treatment), solvent/detergent treatment, ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, gamma irradiation, low pH treatment, and nanofiltration. These methods are designed to disrupt or remove viruses, ensuring that plasma-derived products are safe for therapeutic use. Combining multiple inactivation techniques can provide a robust defence against B19V, thereby enhancing the overall safety of blood products [54,122,123].

Limiting the viral load in plasma pools is essential to mitigate the B19V transmission risk through plasma derivatives. Implementing universal NAT screening for B19V in plasma pools and setting a stringent cut-off level for acceptable viral loads can significantly reduce the risk of contamination. Additionally, enhancing manufacturing processes to include more effective viral inactivation and removal steps can further improve the safety of plasma derivatives.

Challenges and limitations

Despite these measures, screening for B19V presents several challenges. The asymptomatic nature of the infection in many donors complicates the identification of those carrying the virus. Additionally, the persistence of B19V DNA in various tissues poses a risk of reactivation, which is not easily detectable by standard screening methods [124,125].

Persistence and reactivation

One challenge is B19V DNA persistence in various tissues long after acute infection, potentially reactivating under immunosuppressed conditions. Studies have found B19V DNA in tissues such as the liver, heart, and synovia, even in individuals who have cleared the acute infection phase. This persistence complicates efforts to ensure transfusion safety, as reactivation could lead to asymptomatic but infectious donations. Research has demonstrated that B19V DNA can remain in multiple tissues, such as the liver, heart, tonsils, and synovial membranes [126-131]. Post-acute infection, these tissues are proposed to release free B19V DNA, rather than fully formed virions, into the plasma. This persistence is of particular concern in immunocompromised individuals, who may experience reactivation of the virus, leading to potential transmission through blood and plasma products [132].

The persistence and potential reactivation of B19V DNA highlight the need for continuous monitoring and robust screening methods. Current screening techniques primarily detect active infections but may not identify donors with latent or low-level reactivated diseases, posing a risk to recipients.

Despite advancements in screening technologies, significant challenges remain in reducing B19V transmission through blood products. Studies such as those by Azzi et al. and Ke et al. highlight the asymptomatic nature of the infection in many donors, complicating carrier identification [133,93]. Additionally, the persistence of B19V DNA in various tissues poses a reactivation risk not easily detectable by standard screening methods [125]. They highlight significant issues that current screening technologies cannot fully address, emphasising the need for ongoing research and development of more effective detection methods.

Future advancements, such as high-sensitivity NAT assays and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-based diagnostic tools, promise to enhance the efficiency and comprehensiveness of blood screening processes [134]. We believe harmonising international guidelines and standards is essential to ensure consistent blood safety practices globally.

Immune response and antibody protection

Another challenge in the study of blood transfusion safety concerning B19V is that the presence of anti-B19V IgG and IgM antibodies in donors does not always prevent the transmission of the virus to recipients. This indicates that solely relying on antibody detection may be insufficient to ensure the safety of blood products. A more comprehensive approach is required to minimise the risk of TT-B19V infections. This should include NAT and monitoring viral loads to identify and manage cases where antibodies are present but not protective. Additionally, the biphasic nature of B19V viremia, with two distinct peaks, further complicates the detection and prevention of transmission, necessitating ongoing vigilance and advanced screening methods [20].

Other parvovirus and blood-borne transmission

B19V was previously considered the only pathogenic parvovirus causing human infection until the recently discovered human bocaparvoviruses (HBoV1) and parvovirus 4 (PARV4). These newly discovered viruses' epidemiology and disease associations still need to be explored [63]. PARV4, identified in 2005 in an intravenous substance user, has been found in plasma pools and clotting factor concentrates, indicating blood-borne transmission [135]. The prevalence of PARV4 varies geographically, with some regions reporting higher detection rates. HBoV1 was detected in children with respiratory illness in the same year and showed high seroprevalence [136]. However, its detection in blood donors is limited, likely due to low-level viremia. Further studies are needed to explore these newly discovered parvoviruses' clinical significance and transmission routes.

Future perspectives

Advancements in screening technology: Future advancements promise to improve B19V detection in blood donors. Developments in high-sensitivity NAT assays could lead to more sensitive and specific tests for B19V, enabling more reliable detection of low-level viremia [119]. Integrating multiplex testing, which can screen for multiple pathogens, including B19V, could also become standard practice, enhancing the efficiency and comprehensiveness of blood screening processes.

Implementation of universal screening: As technology advances, routine NAT screening for B19V in all blood donations may become more feasible and cost-effective, providing additional safety for transfusion recipients [137].

Improved risk assessment and management: Enhancing risk assessment and management strategies will improve B19V screening programs. Implementing risk-based screening that relies on donor risk profiles and epidemiological data could significantly boost the efficiency and effectiveness of these programs [69]. Moreover, using big data and machine learning to analyse donor and recipient information could help identify patterns and risk factors related to B19V transmission, enabling more informed and precise screening practices.

Global standardization and guidelines: International guidelines and standards for B19V screening in blood donors could ensure a consistent approach across countries, improving global blood safety [110-113].

Public health initiatives: Awareness campaigns to educate healthcare providers and the public about B19V could enhance understanding and improve the management of associated risks. Additionally, ongoing monitoring and surveillance of B19V prevalence in the donor population and the general public are essential. These efforts will help adapt screening strategies to evolving epidemiological trends, ensuring a responsive and practical approach to B19V management.

Vaccination programs: No commercially available vaccine for B19V exists currently. Several potential vaccine candidates are being explored, including recombinant virus-like particles (VLPs), DNA vaccines, and protein subunit vaccines [138]. Developing a B19V vaccine could drastically reduce the prevalence of the virus in the donor population, lowering the necessity for extensive screening measures. Implementing vaccination programs specifically for blood donors could diminish the risk of B19V transmission through blood products.

Economic considerations: A study by van Hoeven et al. showed that the cost-effectiveness of anti-B19V screening is similar to that of other blood safety interventions. This finding emphasises the need for a balanced approach that considers cost-effectiveness, perceived and actual risks, uncertainties, and available alternatives when implementing B19V screening in blood products [115]. The estimated cost for B19V testing in the Indian subcontinent ranges from INR 1,500 to INR 3,000 per NAT test and INR 500 to INR 1,200 per serological test. Universal NAT screening could add ₹18-₹36 billion annually to healthcare costs, while serological testing could cost ₹6-₹14.4 billion annually. To mitigate these financial burdens, pooled testing or targeted testing for high-risk groups is recommended as a more cost-effective approach [83].

Conclusions

Ensuring the safety of blood transfusions is crucial, especially regarding B19V, due to its prevalence among blood donors and the virus's persistence in asymptomatic individuals. Despite advancements in screening technologies and guidelines from regulatory bodies, the risk of B19V transmission persists. Approximately 30% of potential blood donors lack B19V-specific antibodies, making them susceptible to new infections that often go undetected, allowing the virus to enter the blood supply. NAT and serological testing are essential strategies to identify active and past infections. Countries such as Japan and Germany have shown that robust B19V screening programs effectively reduce transmission risks. However, the absence of specific guidelines in countries such as India highlights a critical gap in global transfusion safety. The most effective prevention of TT-B19V infections includes general blood donor screening for B19V DNA using NAT, antibody testing for anti-B19V IgG, and implementing pathogen reduction technologies. Despite the high seroprevalence of B19V, there is a need for increased awareness, better reporting of TT-B19V cases, and stringent screening protocols to protect high-risk groups, including individuals with haematological disorders, immunodeficient patients, and pregnant women.

Mandatory B19V screening of donated blood, especially in high-demand regions, and retrospective evaluation of recipients with unexplained anaemia or clinical symptoms post-transfusion are necessary. Emerging technologies and future perspectives, such as high-sensitivity NAT assays and potential vaccination programs, promise further improvements in screening efficacy and overall blood safety. We believe that universal and stringent screening protocols for B19V in blood donors are vital in an era of increasing organ transplantations. The rise in renal transplant recipients, driven by the global increase in type 2 diabetes mellitus, underscores the critical need for enhanced measures to prevent B19V infections. These screening protocols will protect vulnerable patient populations, including pregnant women, ensuring safer transfusion practices and improving patient outcomes globally. Identifying specific research gaps, such as long-term outcomes of B19V infection and the efficacy of new screening technologies, is crucial for guiding future research and public health strategies.

Disclosures

Author Contributions

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Concept and design:  Swati Kumari, Reuben Kuruvilla Thomas, Krishanamoorthy R, Padma Srikanth, Ramya Barani

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Swati Kumari, Reuben Kuruvilla Thomas, Krishanamoorthy R, Padma Srikanth, Ramya Barani

Drafting of the manuscript:  Swati Kumari, Reuben Kuruvilla Thomas, Krishanamoorthy R, Padma Srikanth, Ramya Barani

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Swati Kumari, Reuben Kuruvilla Thomas, Krishanamoorthy R, Padma Srikanth, Ramya Barani

Supervision:  Padma Srikanth
==== Refs
References

1 Transfusion-transmitted infections Ann Blood Bloch EM 20 7 2022
2 The clinical demand and supply of blood in India: a national level estimation study PLoS One Mammen JJ Asirvatham ES Lakshmanan J 0 17 2022
3 Prevention of transfusion-transmitted infections Blood Busch MP Bloch EM Kleinman S 1854 1864 133 2019 30808637
4 Emerging infectious diseases that threaten the blood supply Semin Hematol Alter HJ Stramer SL Dodd RY 32 41 44 2007 17198845
5 Screening donated blood for transfusion transmitted infections by serology along with NAT and response rate to notification of reactive results: an Indian experience J Blood Transfus Chaurasia R Zaman S Das B Chatterjee K 412105 2014 2014 25485163
6 Persistent B19 infection in immunocompetent individuals: implications for transfusion safety Blood Lefrere JJ Servant-Delmas A Candotti D 2890 2895 106 2005 15976179
7 Hepatitis C virus transmission by a blood donation negative in nucleic acid amplification tests for viral RNA Lancet Schüttler CG Caspari G Jursch CA Willems WR Gerlich WH Schaefer S 41 42 355 2000 10615893
8 Transfusion-transmitted infections J Transl Med Bihl F Castelli D Marincola F Dodd RY Brander C 25 5 2007 17553144
9 Heat stability of parvovirus B19: kinetics of inactivation Zentralbl Bakteriol Schwarz TF Serke S Von Brunn A Hottenträger B Huhn D Deinhardt F Roggendorf M 219 223 277 1992 1520981
10 Prevalence of human parvovirus B19 in Chinese plasma pools for manufacturing plasma derivatives Virol J Jia J Ma Y Zhao X 162 12 2015 26445095
11 Parvovirus transmission by blood products - a cause for concern? Br J Haematol Norja P Lassila R Makris M 385 393 159 2012 23025427
12 The family Parvoviridae Arch Virol Cotmore SF Agbandje-McKenna M Chiorini JA 1239 1247 159 2014 24212889
13 Parvovirus-like particles in human sera Lancet Cossart YE Field AM Cant B Widdows D 72 73 1 1975 46024
14 Nucleotide sequence and genome organization of human parvovirus B19 isolated from the serum of a child during aplastic crisis J Virol Shade RO Blundell MC Cotmore SF Tattersall P Astell CR 921 936 58 1986 3701931
15 Characterization of capsid and noncapsid proteins of B19 parvovirus propagated in human erythroid bone marrow cell cultures J Virol Ozawa K Young N 2627 2630 61 1987 3599184
16 A viral phospholipase A2 is required for parvovirus infectivity Dev Cell Zádori Z Szelei J Lacoste MC 291 302 1 2001 11702787
17 NS1 protein of parvovirus B19 interacts directly with DNA sequences of the p6 promoter and with the cellular transcription factors Sp1/Sp3 Virology Raab U Beckenlehner K Lowin T Niller HH Doyle S Modrow S 86 93 293 2002 11853402
18 Genetic diversity within human erythroviruses: identification of three genotypes J Virol Servant A Laperche S Lallemand F Marinho V De Saint Maur G Meritet JF Garbarg-Chenon A 9124 9134 76 2002 12186896
19 Keeping pace with parvovirus B19 genetic variability: a multiplex genotype-specific quantitative PCR assay J Clin Microbiol Bonvicini F Manaresi E Bua G Venturoli S Gallinella G 3753 3759 51 2013 24006003
20 Human parvovirus B19 Clin Microbiol Rev Heegaard ED Brown KE 485 505 15 2002 12097253
21 [Detection of parvovirus B19 markers in blood samples of donors] Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol Filatova EV Zubkova NV Novikova NA Golitsina LN Kuznetsov KV 67 70 2010 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21061580/
22 Clinical aspects of parvovirus B19 infection J Intern Med Broliden K Tolfvenstam T Norbeck O 285 304 260 2006 16961667
23 Seroepidemiology of human parvovirus B19 infection among the population of Vojvodina, Serbia, over a 16-year period (2008-2023) Viruses Vuković V Patić A Ristić M Kovačević G Hrnjaković Cvjetković I Petrović V 180 16 2024 38399956
24 Prevalence and phylogenetic analysis of parvovirus (B19V) among blood donors with different nationalities residing in Qatar Viruses Abdelrahman D Al-Sadeq DW Smatti MK 540 13 2021 33805034
25 Seroprevalence of parvovirus B19 in blood donors: the risks and challenges of blood transfusion in Zambia in the era of HIV/AIDS at the Kitwe Central Hospital, blood bank Afr Health Sci Chirambo-Kalolekesha M Kaile T Mwaba F Daka V Simakando M Kowa S 496 502 18 2018 30602980
26 Role of parvovirus B19 in human disease Pediatr Infect Dis J Anderson LJ 711 718 6 1987 2823211
27 The expanding range of parvoviruses which infect humans Rev Med Virol Brown KE 231 244 20 2010 20586082
28 B19 virus—a pathogenic human parvovirus Blood Rev Pattison JR 58 64 1 1987 2844330
29 Parvovirus B19 in pregnancy: possible consequences of vertical transmission Prenat Diagn Puccetti C Contoli M Bonvicini F 897 902 32 2012 22777688
30 Environmental monitoring of parvovirus B19 in the kidney transplantation ward of a Chinese teaching hospital Infect Drug Resist Wang F Zhan Q Yu SP Feng HT Hu P Zhong ZF Qu TT 1903 1910 15 2022 35465250
31 Experimental parvoviral infection in humans J Infect Dis Anderson MJ Higgins PG Davis LR 257 265 152 1985 2993431
32 Detection of antibodies and antigens of human parvovirus B19 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay J Clin Microbiol Anderson LJ Tsou C Parker RA Chorba TL Wulff H Tattersall P Mortimer PP 522 526 24 1986 3021807
33 Neutralizing linear epitopes of B19 parvovirus cluster in the VP1 unique and VP1-VP2 junction regions J Virol Saikawa T Anderson S Momoeda M Kajigaya S Young NS 3004 3009 67 1993 7684458
34 Clinical manifestations of human parvovirus B19 in adults Arch Intern Med Woolf AD Campion GV Chishick A 1153 1156 149 1989 2541666
35 An erythema infectiosum-like illness caused by human parvovirus infection N Engl J Med Plummer FA Hammond GW Forward K 74 79 313 1985 2987695
36 Human parvovirus B19 and blood product safety: a tale of twenty years of improvements Blood Transfus Marano G Vaglio S Pupella S 184 196 13 2015 25849894
37 Parvovirus B19 infection in human pregnancy BJOG Lamont RF Sobel JD Vaisbuch E 175 186 118 2011 21040396
38 Haematological parameters of parvovirus B19 infection in 13 fetuses with hydrops foetalis Br J Haematol Forestier F Tissot JD Vial Y Daffos F Hohlfeld P 925 927 104 1999 10192461
39 The role of parvovirus B19 in the pathogenesis of autoimmunity and autoimmune disease J Clin Pathol Kerr JR 279 291 69 2016 26644521
40 Clinical and Diagnostic Virology Clinical and diagnostic virology Wreghitt T Kudesia G Cambridge, ENG Cambridge university press 2009
41 Human parvovirus-associated arthritis: a clinical and laboratory description Lancet Reid DM Reid TM Brown T Rennie JA Eastmond CJ 422 425 23 1985
42 Parvovirus B19 and erosive polyarthritis Lancet Tyndall A Jelk W Hirsch HH 480 481 343 1994
43 Risk of adverse outcomes of pregnancy after human parvovirus B19 infection J Infect Dis Kinney JS Anderson LJ Farrar J 663 667 157 1988 2831283
44 Prenatal diagnosis and perinatal management of maternal—fetal congenital parvovirus B19 infection Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol Hsu ST Chen YT Huang YF Yeh TT Chen WC Ho ES Chou MM 417 422 46 2007 18182350
45 Molecular pathology of inflammatory cardiomyopathy Med Microbiol Immunol Klingel K Sauter M Bock CT Szalay G Schnorr JJ Kandolf R 101 107 193 2004 12920583
46 Interferon-beta treatment eliminates cardiotropic viruses and improves left ventricular function in patients with myocardial persistence of viral genomes and left ventricular dysfunction Circulation Kühl U Pauschinger M Schwimmbeck PL 2793 2798 107 2003 12771005
47 Parvovirus B19 DNA in kidney tissue of patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis Am J Kidney Dis Tanawattanacharoen S Falk RJ Jennette JC Kopp JB 1166 1174 35 2000 10845832
48 Parvovirus B19 infection associated with acute hepatitis and a purpuric exanthem Br J Dermatol Drago F Semino M Rampini P Rebora A 160 161 141 1999 10417538
49 Persistent human parvovirus B19 infection following an acute infection with meningitis in an immunocompetent patient Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Cassinotti P Schultze D Schlageter P Chevili S Siegl G 701 704 12 1993 8243488
50 Characterization of a virus that causes transient aplastic crisis J Clin Invest Young NS Mortimer PP Moore JG Humphries RK 224 230 73 1984 6317715
51 Costs of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in patients with unconfirmed parvovirus b19 pure red cell aplasia Clin Infect Dis Mouthon L Michel M Gandré C Montagnier-Petrissans C Chevreul K 488 60 2015 25336624
52 Parvovirus b19 infections and blood counts in blood donors Transfus Med Hemother Juhl D Steppat D Görg S Hennig H 52 59 41 2014 24659948
53 Parvovirus capsid-antibody complex structures reveal conservation of antigenic epitopes across the family Viral Immunol Emmanuel SN Mietzsch M Tseng YS Smith JK Agbandje-McKenna M 3 17 34 2021 32315582
54 Blood donor screening for parvovirus B19 in Germany and Austria Transfusion Schmidt M Themann A Drexler C 1775 1782 47 2007 17714425
55 Prevalence of parvovirus B19 viremia among German blood donations and the relationship to ABO and Rhesus blood group antigens J Infect Dis Healy K Aulin LB Freij U 1214 1218 227 2023 36408632
56 Human parvovirus B19 research concerning the safety of blood and plasma derivatives in China Ann Blood Jia J Zhang M Ma Y Zhang J 2 4 2019
57 Parvovirus B19 infection in pregnancy J Obstet Gynaecol Can Crane J Mundle W Boucoiran I 1107 1116 36 2014 25668048
58 The role of viral infections in the onset of autoimmune diseases Viruses Sundaresan B Shirafkan F Ripperger K Rattay K 782 15 2023 36992490
59 High-sensitivity PCR detection of parvovirus B19 in plasma J Clin Microbiol Daly P Corcoran A Mahon BP Doyle S 1958 1962 40 2002 12037048
60 Parvovirus B19 infection transmitted by transfusion of red blood cells confirmed by molecular analysis of linked donor and recipient samples Transfusion Yu MY Alter HJ Virata-Theimer ML 1712 1721 50 2010 20158689
61 Seroprevalence of IgG against conformational and linear capsid antigens of parvovirus B19 in Italian blood donors Epidemiol Infect Manaresi E Gallinella G Morselli Labate AM 857 862 132 2004 15473148
62 Human parvovirus B19 frequency among blood donors after an epidemic outbreak: relevance of the epidemiological scenario for transfusion medicine Heliyon Adamo MP Blanco S Viale F 0 6 2020
63 History and future of nucleic acid amplification technology blood donor testing Transfus Med Hemother Roth WK 67 75 46 2019 31191192
64 Nucleic acid testing-benefits and constraints Asian J Transfus Sci Hans R Marwaha N 2 3 8 2014 24678164
65 Human parvoviruses Clin Microbiol Rev Qiu J Söderlund-Venermo M Young NS 43 113 30 2017 27806994
66 Residual risk and waste in donated blood with pooled nucleic acid testing Stat Med Aprahamian H Bish DR Bish EK 5283 5301 35 2016 27488928
67 Impact of chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay screening for human parvovirus B19 antigen in Japanese blood donors Transfusion Sakata H Matsubayashi K Ihara H 2556 2566 53 2013 23145866
68 Blood products and parvovirus B19 8 2024 Health Council of the Netherlands 2002 https://www.healthcouncil.nl/binaries/healthcouncil/documenten/advisory-reports/2002/05/30/bloodproducts-and-parvovirus-b19-horizon-scanning-report/advisory-report-bloodproducts-and-parvovirus-b19-horizon-scanning-report.pdf
69 Identification and characterization of acute infection with parvovirus B19 genotype 2 in immunocompromised patients in Poland J Med Virol Grabarczyk P Kalińska A Kara M 142 149 83 2011 21108352
70 Human parvovirus B19 infection in blood donors Vox Sang Tsujimura M Matsushita K Shiraki H Sato H Okochi K Maeda Y 206 212 69 1995 8578732
71 A population-based epidemiological survey of human parvovirus B19 infection: a project of the Kyushu and Okinawa population study (KOPS) Arch Virol Ihara T Furusyo N Hayashi T Toyoda K Murata M Hayashi J 2465 2472 158 2013 23775357
72 Standardization of B19 IgG ELISA to study the seroepidemiology of parvovirus B19 in North Indian voluntary blood donors Med J Armed Forces India Kishore J Srivastava M Choudhary N 86 90 4 2010
73 Identification and characterization of persistent human erythrovirus infection in blood donor samples J Virol Candotti D Etiz N Parsyan A Allain JP 12169 12178 78 2004 15507603
74 Molecular and serological assessment of parvovirus B19 infections among sickle cell anemia patients J Infect Dev Ctries Obeid OE 535 539 5 2011 21795822
75 Epidemiology of high-level parvovirus B19 viraemia among Dutch blood donors, 2003-2009 Vox Sang Kooistra K Mesman HJ de Waal M Koppelman MH Zaaijer HL 261 266 100 2011 20946549
76 Experiences with the NAT testing for parvovirus B19 (B19V) and hepatitis A virus (HAV) in a five years period Transfus Med Hemother Juhl D Thiessen U Glessing P Görg S Hennig H 47 44 2017
77 Parvovirus B19 DNA and antibodies in Chinese plasma donors, plasma pools and plasma derivatives PeerJ Sun P Jiang P Liu Q 0 11 2023
78 Plasma metagenomics reveals regional variations of emerging and re-emerging pathogens in Chinese blood donors with an emphasis on human parvovirus B19 One Health Mengyi Z Yuhui L Zhan G 100602 17 2023 37520848
79 Detection frequencies and viral load distribution of parvovirus B19 DNA in blood and plasma donations in England Transfus Med Williams S Ratcliff J Nguyen D Simmonds P Harvala H 402 409 32 2022 35751630
80 Screening for human parvovirus B19 infection in Egyptian family replacement blood donors Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus Hasanain RH Saleh RM Attia FM Gomaa HH 309 312 37 2021 33867739
81 Low human parvovirus B19 (B19V) DNA prevalence in blood donors from Central-West Brazil J Med Microbiol Slavov SN Gonçalves de Noronha LA Gonzaga FA Pimentel BM Kashima S Haddad R 622 626 68 2019 30843782
82 Parvovirus B19 in South African blood donors J Med Virol Francois KL Parboosing R Moodley P 1217 1223 91 2019 30840773
83 Seroprevalence of human parvovirus B19 amongst North Indian blood donors - do current donor testing guidelines need a relook? Transfus Apher Sci Raturi G Kaur P Kaur G 646 650 57 2018 30087085
84 Parvovirus B19 seroprevalence in Turkish blood donors Turk J Med Sci Göral Ş Yenicesu İ Bozdayı G Duyan Çamurdan A Altay Koçak A 956 960 48 2018 30384560
85 Seroprevalence of antibodies to primate erythroparvovirus 1 (B19V) in Australia BMC Infect Dis Faddy HM Gorman EC Hoad VC Frentiu FD Tozer S Flower RL 631 18 2018 30526514
86 Molecular detection of human parvovirus B19 among blood donors in Southern Darfur State, Sudan Afr J Health Sci Osman EM Yassin ME Mohammed AB Bush NM 1 6 2 2017 https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?journal=Afr+J+Med+Sci&title=Bush+molecular+detection+of+human+parvovirus+B19+among+blood+donors+in+Southern+Darfur+State,+Sudan&author=EM+Osman&author=ME+Yassin&author=AB+Mohammed&author=M+Nasealdeen&volume=2&publication_year=2017&pages=12&
87 Prevalence and viral load of human parvovirus B19 (B19V) among blood donors in South-East Brazil Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus Slavov SN Otaguiri KK Covas DT Kashima S 323 325 32 2016 27408426
88 [Prevalence of parvovirus B19 infection in Chinese Xiamen area blood donors] Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi Ou SH Xie JZ Zhang YL Ni HY Song XY 1572 1576 24 2016 27784395
89 The prevalence of hepatitis A virus and parvovirus B19 in source-plasma donors and whole blood donors in China Transfus Med Han T Li C Zhang Y 406 410 25 2015 26564017
90 Seroprevalence of human parvovirus B19 in healthy blood donors Med J Armed Forces India Kumar S Gupta RM Sen S Sarkar RS Philip J Kotwal A Sumathi SH 268 272 69 2013 24600121
91 [Parvovirus B19 DNA testing in Polish blood donors, 2004-2010] Przegl Epidemiol Grabarczyk P Korzeniowska J Liszewski G 7 12 66 2012 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22708291/ 22708291
92 Detection of human parvovirus B19 markers in blood samples of donors Iran J Virol Mahmoodian-Shooshtari M Sharifi Z 9 12 5 2011
93 The prevalence of human parvovirus B19 DNA and antibodies in blood donors from four Chinese blood centers Transfusion Ke L He M Li C 1909 1918 51 2011 21382040
94 Investigation of the prevalence of human parvovirus B19 DNA in Korean plasmapheresis donors Korean J Lab Med Oh DJ Lee YL Kang JW Kwon SY Cho NS 58 64 30 2010 20197724
95 Parvovirus B19 and C-reactive protein in blood bank donors: implications for hygiene hypothesis research Lupus O'Bryan TA Wright WF 1557 1560 19 2010 20679283
96 Seroprevalence of erythrovirus B19 IgG among Saudi blood donors in Makkah, Saudi Arabia J Fam Community Med Johargy AK 111 114 16 2009 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3377043/pdf/JFCM-16-111.pdf
97 Prevalence of parvovirus B19 in blood donors tested by ELISA and PCR Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ Mahmudi F Mahmoodian Shooshtari M Sharifi Z Hosseinni M 47 52 5 2008 https://bloodjournal.ir/browse.php?a_id=222&sid=1&slc_lang=en
98 Prevalence and quantitation of parvovirus B19 DNA levels in blood donors with a sensitive polymerase chain reaction screening assay Transfusion Kleinman SH Glynn SA Lee TH 1756 1764 47 2007 17880600
99 [Prevalence of anti-human parvovirus B19 IgG antibody among blood donors in Jilin province] Zhonghua Shi Yan He Lin Chuang Bing Du Xue Za Zhi Wei Q Li Y Wang JW Wang H Qu JG Hung T 60 62 20 2006 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16816866/ 16816866
100 Prevalence of parvovirus B19 and hepatitis A virus in Portuguese blood donors Transfus Apher Sci Henriques I Monteiro F Meireles E Cruz A Tavares G Ferreira M Araújo F 305 309 33 2005 16203176
101 Prevalence of human erythrovirus B19 DNA in healthy Belgian blood donors and correlation with specific antibodies against structural and non-structural viral proteins Vox Sang Thomas I Di Giambattista M Gérard C 300 307 84 2003 12757504
102 [Seroprevalence versus parvovirus B19 in blood donors] Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin Muñoz S Alonso MA Fernández MJ Muñoz JL García-Rodríguez JA 161 162 16 1998 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9646558/ 9646558
103 Higher prevalence of parvovirus B19 in Belgian as compared to Tunisian blood donors: differential implications for prevention of transfusional transmission Transfus Sci Letaïef M Vanham G Boukef K Yacoub S Muylle L Mertens G 523 530 18 1997 10178675
104 Incidence of human parvovirus B19 DNA detection in blood donors Br J Haematol Yoto Y Kudoh T Haseyama K 1017 1018 91 1995 8547113
105 Transfusion-transmitted human parvovirus B19 infection in a thalassemic patient Transfusion Zanella A Rossi F Cesana C 769 772 35 1995 7570939
106 Symptomatic parvovirus B19 infection caused by blood component transfusion Transfusion Satake M Hoshi Y Taira R Momose SY Hino S Tadokoro K 1887 1895 51 2011 21332725
107 Annual Shot Report 2016 Annual Shot Report 2016 Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) Steering Group Manchester, UK Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) 2017 https://www.shotuk.org/wp-content/uploads/myimages/SHOT-Report-2016_web_11th-July.pdf
108 Limits of sequencing and phylogenetic analysis to assess B19V transmission by single-donor blood component Vox Sang Servant-Delmas A Laperche S Mercier M 254 255 100 2011 20735810
109 Quantitative real-time detection of parvovirus B19 DNA in plasma Transfusion Koppelman MH Cuypers HT Emrich T Zaaijer HL 97 103 44 2004 14692974
110 Guidance for industry: nucleic acid testing (NAT) to reduce the possible risk of parvovirus B19 transmission by plasma-derived products July 8 2024 2009 https://www.fda.gov/files/vaccines%2C%20blood%20%26%20biologics/published/Guidance-for-Industry---Nucleic-Acid-Testing--to-Reduce-the-Possible-Risk-of-Parvovirus-B19-Transmission-by-Plasma-Derived-Products.pdf
111 Guideline for human immunoglobulin European Pharmacopoeia (version 8 2024 5 0 2023 https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.edqm.eu/documents/52006/293206/OCABR%2BGuideline%2B05%2B-%2BHuman%2BImmunoglobulin.doc/89fe0520-3a50-b4a9-acf0-6827cff673d9%3Ft%3D1639488898199&ved=2ahUKEwiS7-79pYWIAxVY2zQHHXjSOMwQFnoECBUQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2vqU7wDYnaQydcEI-ES6cu
112 Guideline for human plasma (pooled and treated for virus inactivation) (formerly called solvent detergent (SD) plasma) European Pharmacopoeia (version 8 2024 1747 1748 2005 2015 https://www.edqm.eu/documents/52006/293206/OCABR+Guideline+06+-+Human+Plasma+(pooled+and+treated+for+virus+inactivation)+formerly+Solvent-Detergent+(SD)+Plasma.doc/be74e3cd-27ec-42b3-9d1d-3ae724e53fea?t=1639488930147
113 QSEAL NAT testing standard June 8 2024 2013 https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/638f893112c6eac0e46ac576/64517906a60bdb04ed8c3b74_NATTestingV2-3.pdf
114 Risks posed by reported increased circulation of human parvovirus B19 in the EU/EEA 8 2024 2024 https://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/risks-posed-reported-increased-circulation-human-parvovirus-b19-eueea
115 An assessment of the risk, cost-effectiveness, and perceived benefits of anti-parvovirus B19 tested blood products Transfusion van Hoeven LR Janssen MP Lieshout-Krikke RW Molenaar-de Backer MW 2352 2360 59 2019 31032994
116 Parvovirus B19V DNA contamination in Chinese plasma and plasma derivatives J Transl Med Zhang W Ke L Changqing L Zhang Y Li W 194 10 2012 22978673
117 Exposure of hematologic patients to parvovirus B19 as a contaminant of blood cell preparations and blood products Transfusion Plentz A Hahn J Knöll A Holler E Jilg W Modrow S 1811 1815 45 2005 16271109
118 Testing and analysis of human parvovirus B19 gene in blood products China Med Pharm Zheng RB Yu Y 151 153 5 2015 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7220778/
119 Preliminary study on the contamination and genotype of human parvovirus B19 in Chinese blood products Chin J Microbiol Immunol Wu Y Geng YS Wang JZ 1031 1034 29 2009 https://aob.amegroups.org/article/view/4788/html
120 Evidence for the transmission of parvovirus B19 in patients with bleeding disorders treated with plasma-derived factor concentrates in the era of nucleic acid test screening Transfusion Soucie JM De Staercke C Monahan PE 1217 1225 53 2013 22998193
121 Validation and standardisation of nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) assays for the detection of viral contamination of blood and blood products J Clin Virol Saldanha J 7 13 20 2001 11163577
122 Clinical illness due to parvovirus B19 infection after infusion of solvent/detergent-treated pooled plasma Transfusion Koenigbauer UF Eastlund T Day JW 1203 1206 40 2000 11061856
123 Nanofiltration, a new specific virus elimination method applied to high-purity factor IX and factor XI concentrates Vox Sang Burnouf-Radosevich M Appourchaux P Huart JJ Burnouf T 132 138 67 1994 7801601
124 Tissue persistence of parvovirus B19 genotypes in asymptomatic persons J Med Virol Corcioli F Zakrzewska K Rinieri A 2005 2011 80 2008 18814251
125 Evidence for persistence of human parvovirus B19 DNA in bone marrow J Med Virol Cassinotti P Burtonboy G Fopp M Siegl G 229 232 53 1997 9365887
126 Bioportfolio: lifelong persistence of variant and prototypic erythrovirus DNA genomes in human tissue Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Norja P Hokynar K Aaltonen LM 7450 7453 103 2006 16651522
127 Pathogenesis of human parvovirus B19 in rheumatic disease Ann Rheum Dis Kerr JR 672 683 59 2000 10976079
128 Persistent parvovirus B19 infection in non-erythroid tissues: possible role in the inflammatory and disease process Virus Res Adamson-Small LA Ignatovich IV Laemmerhirt MG Hobbs JA 8 16 190 2014 24998884
129 Persistence of parvovirus B19 DNA in synovial membranes of young patients with and without chronic arthropathy Lancet Söderlund M von Essen R Haapasaari J Kiistala U Kiviluoto O Hedman K 1063 1065 349 1997 9107245
130 Persistence of human parvovirus B19 in human tissues Pathol Biol (Paris) Söderlund-Venermo M Hokynar K Nieminen J Rautakorpi H Hedman K 307 316 50 2002 12116849
131 Tissue persistence and prevalence of B19 virus types 1-3 Future Virol Hokynar K Norja P Hedman K Söderlund-Venermo M 377 388 2 2007
132 Low-level DNAemia of parvovirus B19 (genotypes 1-3) in adult transplant recipients is not associated with anaemia J Clin Virol Plentz A Würdinger M Kudlich M Modrow S 443 448 58 2013 23916377
133 The transfusion-associated transmission of parvovirus B19 Transfus Med Rev Azzi A Morfini M Mannucci PM 194 204 13 1999 10425692
134 Novel nucleic acid detection for human parvovirus B19 based on Pyrococcus furiosus Argonaute protein Viruses Chen W Qiu L Luo T 595 15 2023 36992305
135 Comparison of tissue distribution, persistence, and molecular epidemiology of parvovirus B19 and novel human parvoviruses PARV4 and human bocavirus J Infect Dis Manning A Willey SJ Bell JE Simmonds P 1345 1352 195 2007 17397006
136 New DNA viruses identified in patients with acute viral infection syndrome J Virol Jones MS Kapoor A Lukashov VV Simmonds P Hecht F Delwart E 8230 8236 79 2005 15956568
137 Cloning of a human parvovirus by molecular screening of respiratory tract samples Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Allander T Tammi MT Eriksson M Bjerkner A Tiveljung-Lindell A Andersson B 12891 12896 102 2005 16118271
138 Therapeutic potential of engineered virus-like particles of parvovirus B19 Pathogens Sánchez-Moguel I Montiel C Bustos-Jaimes I 1007 12 2023 37623967
