
==== Front
Cureus
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus Palo Alto (CA)

10.7759/cureus.67355
Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism
Gastroenterology
General Surgery
Short-Term Efficacy of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Versus Intragastric Balloon Insertion for Obesity: An Indonesian, Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study
Muacevic Alexander
Adler John R
Limas Peter I 1
Budhipramono Jeffrey 1
Suryadi Andre S 2
Setiawan Adrian P 3
Alfara Lady D 4
1 Gastrointestinal Surgery, Sumber Waras Hospital/Tarumanegara University, Jakarta, IDN
2 Surgery, Sumber Waras Hospital/Tarumanegara University, Jakarta, IDN
3 Medicine, Sumber Waras Hospital, Jakarta, IDN
4 Physician Nutrition; Metabolic Disorders Nutrition, Sumber Waras Hospital, Jakarta, IDN
Adrian P. Setiawan medianadrian92@gmail.com
20 8 2024
8 2024
16 8 e6735510 6 2024
Copyright © 2024, Limas et al.
2024
Limas et al.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This article is available from https://www.cureus.com/articles/233402-short-term-efficacy-of-endoscopic-sleeve-gastroplasty-versus-intragastric-balloon-insertion-for-obesity-an-indonesian-single-center-retrospective-cohort-study
Introduction 

As a medical condition, obesity is a global public health concern that still has no satisfactory solution. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) and intragastric balloon (IGB) are proven to be safe and efficient in producing weight loss. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty has achieved significant success; therefore, it is timely to compare it to intragastric balloon therapy.

Methods 

We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data for patients undergoing ESG or IGB. Weight was recorded at one week, one month, and three months post-procedure, and the percentage of total body weight loss (%TBWL) was calculated. Severe adverse events requiring hospital admission/procedure reversal were also recorded. We aim to see if one procedure is more efficient in providing weight loss in a short-term period. 

Results

A total of 20 patients underwent ESG and 31 patients underwent IGB insertion. ESG patients showed a superior mean %TBWL at one-week post-procedure (%TBWL±SD = 4.87±1.88 vs 3.76±1.95). IGB patients showed a higher mean of %TBWL at one-month post-procedure (%TBWL±SD = 8.00±3.60 vs 7.25±3.29). Both procedures show similar %TBWL at three months post-procedure (%TBWL±SD ESG = 10.857±3.83 vs %TBWL ± SD IGB = 10.852±5.78).

Conclusions 

We found that both the IGB insertion and ESG procedures result in clinically significant weight loss. However, the short-term weight loss between these two procedures is similar. Although similar, the number of adverse events in the IGB group is significantly higher than in the ESG group.

weight loss
obesity
gastroplasty
efficacy
balloon insertion
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

As a medical condition, obesity is a global public health concern that still has no satisfactory solution [1]. According to WHO, obesity is defined as abnormal or excessive fat accumulation that presents health risks [2]. Bariatric surgery is the gold standard for the management of moderate to severe obesity [3]. However, the percentage of patients eligible to undergo surgery is only 1-2% each year [3,4]. Obesity is the second leading cause of preventable death in the United States, currently outdone only by smoking [4]. The degrees of obesity are defined by body mass index (BMI = weight (kg)/height(m2), which correlates body weight with height [5].

The IGB is a space-occupying device that has been safely used to induce weight loss [6-8]. The fluid-filled balloons reduce available gastric volume and may delay gastric emptying [6,7]. Systematic review and meta-analysis reported that patients undergoing IGB therapy achieved 13.16% total body weight loss (TBWL) at six months [9]. A recent review demonstrated a 9.7 % TBWL at six months, with decreasing efficacy after six months [9-11].

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is a minimally invasive endoscopic procedure, where endoscopic full-thickness suturing is used to approximate the anterior and posterior walls of the stomach to achieve tubular reconfiguration and decrease gastric volume [9]. ESG and IGB are proven to be safe and efficient in producing weight loss. Choosing one procedure over another is based on patient preference after giving informed consent. We hypothesized that ESG would be superior and more efficient in providing weight loss with fewer postoperative complications compared with the IGB.

Materials and methods

Patient population 

The method used in this research is a retrospective cohort using prospectively reviewed data from a total of 54 patients. Thirty-two patients underwent IGB placement, and 22 patients underwent ESG between June 2022 and June 2023 in a tertiary private hospital in Jakarta, Indonesia. The exclusion criteria are implant removal in the IGB group and normal BMI. Two patients with normal baseline BMI were excluded from the ESG group and one patient was excluded from the IGB group. From a total of 31 patients, five patients developed an intolerance to gastric balloons that required procedure reversal.

Before choosing the procedure, all patients had an initial consultation where they were provided with information about the weight loss program, where bariatric surgery is advised if other options failed to achieve sustainable weight loss. All procedures were self-paid, with the IGB program priced at approximately US$ 3,650 and the ESG program priced at approximately US$ 10,150. 

The participants provided their informed consent to participate in this study. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines were used to ensure the reporting of this retrospective cohort study.

Pre and post-procedural care 

All procedures were performed by a team of surgeons experienced in endoscopic suturing and intragastric balloon placement. Preoperative medication for the IGB placement patients' group is omeprazole for 10 days. The post-OP medication for IGB group patients is omeprazole for as long as the IGB is inside the patient’s stomach. Postoperative, the diet is restricted to a liquid diet for two weeks post-procedure after which it is transitioned to a soft diet and a solid diet if it’s tolerated individually.

Intragastric balloon (IGB) insertion 

Indications for IGB placement were a body mass index (BMI) > 27 kg/m2 in patients who had previously been unsuccessful in losing weight through diet, and/or exercise, and/or medications. Contraindications are patients' history of gastroesophageal surgery and active anticoagulation.

The balloon used was Orbera. The balloons were inserted endoscopically as per the manufacturer’s recommendations and filled with 500-550 cc of normal saline infused with methylene blue to detect leakage. All balloon insertions were performed with patients under general anesthesia in the operating room.

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG)

Indications for ESG were BMI >30 kg/m2 in patients who had been unsuccessful in losing weight despite undergoing diet, exercise, and/or medications. Contraindications for ESG are a history of gastric cancer, active Helicobacter (H.) pylori infection, active gastric ulcer, gastric intestinal metaplasia, and organ failure. All ESG procedures were performed on patients under general anesthesia in the operating room.

Outcomes

Patients’ data collected were age, sex, initial weight, height, and initial BMI. The patients were contacted by a clinical nurse via phone in the first week post-procedure and one month and three months post-procedure. The primary outcome was TBWL and %TBWL at each time point and adverse events were recorded at follow-up. Adverse events were recorded only if the patient required admission to the hospital. Nausea, vomiting, and abdominal discomfort were expected post-procedure and were not recorded.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were calculated for all demographic and clinical variables and presented as mean or standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was done using an independent-samples t-test for comparing the means of TBWL and %TBWL in each period post-operative (one week, one month, and three months post-procedure). All statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 23 (IBM Corp. Released 2015. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp).

Ethical approval

The participants provided their informed consent to participate in this study. The Sumber Waras Hospital ethical committee approved this study with the registered number 12/RSSW/KoM.EP/EC/X/2023.

Results

From a total of 54 patients, two patients with normal BMI were excluded from the ESG group, and one patient was excluded from the IGB group. The group was divided into those who underwent endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) and those who underwent intragastric balloon insertion (IGB). A total of 20 patients underwent ESG, and a total of 31 patients received IGB. The baseline characteristics of the two groups are further described in Table 1. The flowchart describing the research process is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1 STROBE flowchart of the research process

BMI, body mass index; ESG, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty; IGB, intragastric balloon insertion; STROBE: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of 51 patients who underwent ESG and IGB

ESG, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty; IGB, intragastric balloon

 	ESG 	IGB 	
Age, mean ±SD, years 	40.05±10.54	38.67±8.41	
Sex, female, n (%) 	17 (85.0%)	24 (77.4%)	
BMI, mean±SD, kg/m2 	31.12±5.88	31.16±4.39	

The mean age is comparable between the ESG group and the IGB group, with the IGB group having a lower mean age (40.05 vs 38.67). The number of females in the two groups was significantly higher than the males (ESG: 85% and IGB: 77.4%). The baseline BMI between the two groups is also similar (ESG: 31.12 kg/m2, IGB:31.16 kg/m2). Patients’ BMI ranges from 24.54 kg/m2 to 53.97 kg/m2 in the ESG group and ranges from 24.05 kg/m2 to 46.88 kg/m2 in the IGB group. The comparison of weight loss between these two procedures is further shown in Table 2 and Table 3.

Table 2 Percentage of total body weight loss of patients followed up at one week, one month, and three months post-procedure

*P-value (𝑝) derived from the student's t-test.

ESG, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty; IGB, intragastric balloon; TBWL, total body weight loss

Post-procedure period 	Procedure 	Number of patients followed up, n (%) 	Mean of %TBWL±SD 	P-value (𝑝)	
1 week 	ESG	20 (100)	4.87±1.88	0.053*	
IGB	31 (100)	3.76±1.95	0.052	
1 month 	ESG	18 (90.00)	7.25±3.29	0.481	
IGB	27 (87.09)	8.00±3.60	0.473	
3 months 	ESG	15 (75.00)	10.857±3.83	0.998	
IGB	21 (67.74)	10.852±5.78	0.998	

Table 3 Total body weight loss (kg) of patients followed up at one week, one month, and three months post-procedure

*P-value (𝑝) derived from students t-test.

ESG, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty; IGB, intragastric balloon; TBWL, total body weight loss

Post-procedure period 	Procedure 	Number of patients followed-up, n (%) 	Mean of TBWL, kg (SD) 	P-value (𝑝)	
1 week	ESG	20 (100)	3.89±1.56	0.161*	
IGB	31 (100)	3.13±2.04	0.139	
1 month	ESG	18 (90.0)	5.94±2.75	0.461	
IGB	27 (87.0)	6.76±4.09	0.426	
3 months	ESG	15 (75.0)	8.68±3.56	0.731	
IGB	21 (67.7)	9.29±6.05	0.709	

The ESG group has a higher mean of %TBWL and TBWL (kg) in one-week post-procedure (%TBWL±SD = 4.87±1.88% vs. 3.76±1.95; P = 0.053, TBWL (kg) = 3.89 (1.56) vs 3.13 (2.04); P=0.16). Although it has a lower one-week weight loss, the IGB group shows higher means of %TBWL in one month (%TBWL (SD) = 8.00% (3.60%) vs 7.25% (3.29%); P = 0.91). The IGB group also yields a higher mean of TBWL (kg) in one month (TBWL (kg) (SD) = 6.76 (4.09) vs 5.94 (2.75); P = 0.46) and TBWL (kg) in 3 months (TBWL (kg) (SD) = 9.29 (6.05) vs 8.68 (3.56); P = 0.73) post-procedure. Surprisingly, the ESG and IGB groups show almost similar means of %TBWL in three months post-procedure (%TBWL (SD) = 10.857 vs 10.852 (5.78); P = 0.998).

Comparing the complication rates, there was a higher complication in the IGB group that required early removal (IGB: 16.1%, ESG: 0%).

Discussion

One week after the procedure, the ESG group showed higher means of %TBWL than the IGB group (4.87% vs 3.76%). Although it averaged higher, the differences between the two groups were not significant statistically ( P>0.05). In the one-month post-procedure follow-up, the IGB group provided a higher mean of percentage weight loss compared to the ESG group (8.08% vs 7.25%). Although higher, the difference was not statistically more significant than the ESG group. This difference is, however, almost non-existent at the three-month post-procedure follow-up, where the IGB group showed a slightly lower %TBWL than the ESG group (%TBWL = 10.852% vs 10.857%). Comparing our results to the previous study, there was a notable difference in %TBWL at the one-month and three-month post-procedure follow-up in the ESG group [12]. A 2018 study by Sartoretto et al. documented 8.8% (2.5%) %TBWL in the one-month post-procedure follow-up and up to 12% (1.3%) in %TBWL at three months post-procedure in ESG patients [13]. A previous study by Fayed et al. in 2019 also showed a higher %TBWL at one-month and three-months post-procedure (9.9% (2.4%) and 14.3% (4.6%)) [12]. In contrast, the IGB group showed a higher %TBWL at one month (8.0% (3.6%) vs 6.6% (2.6%)) but a lower %TBWL at three months post-procedure (10.85% (5.78) vs 11.1% (4.4%)) than the Fayad et al. study [12].

We believe that the difference in %TBWL in our study compared with previous ones may be attributed to the significant gap in average BMI. A multi-center study by Lopez-Nava et al. in 2019 stated that a higher initial BMI predicted a higher %TBWL in one year [14]. The ESG group of a previous study by Fayed et al. had a mean BMI of 41.5 (8.5) vs 31.12 (5.88) in our group. While the IGB group base BMI is not similar between the two studies, the gap is not too significant (31.16 vs 34.5), hence the result is more similar in the IGB group.

In the three-month post-procedure follow-up, the %TBWL between the ESG and IGB groups became similar, with no group superior to the other in weight loss efficacy. This result supports a previous study by Lopez-Nava et al. in which weight loss at one year was not dependent on the type of procedure. However, in the same study, Lopez-Nava et al. state that follow-up attendance is a determining factor in providing weight loss. Frequent interaction with the multi-disciplinary team (MDT) at follow-up might have provided an opportunity to identify "at-risk-of-failure" patients and intervene at an early stage. Besides, the psychological counseling and motivation of early responders may have promoted sustained weight loss at one year [14,15].

While the efficacy between the two procedures is similar in short-term weight loss, the IGB group in our study has a higher percentage of intolerance of balloon insertion in 5 of 31 patients, a total of 16.1% compared with 0% from the ESG group. This rate of complication in the IGB group is also similar to the previous study by Fayed et al. (17%) [16]. Another previous study shows a lower percentage of early removals (7%, 9%, and 2.6%) [15]. Even though it is rare, complications for ESG are more serious and concerning (perigastric fluid collection, blood loss) [16,17]. In a previous study by Asokkumar et al. concerning the safety and early efficacy of ESG in Singapore, there is also no major complication rate recorded [18]. Multiple studies involving the Western population have established the safety and efficacy of ESG. Hedjoudje et al., in a meta-analysis involving 1772 ESG patients, showed the rate of adverse events to be 2.2% [16].

Although retrospective, our single-centered study had a similar care program and surgery team. There is a similar preoperative preparation and also similar post-procedural care. Patients in both groups also have access to the same group of dieticians who guide patients’ diet post-procedure. However, our study is also limited by the number of patients available, further studies may be needed with a higher number of patient population. We acknowledge the limitation of loss of follow-up in our patient population, which may be attributed to its retrospective model. Some loss of follow-up is also caused by patients who live in distant regions.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our study shows that ESG and IGB have similar efficacy in providing weight loss in a short-term period. Significant weight loss occurs even in a three-month period post-procedure without major morbidity or mortality. Nausea and abdominal pain are a common post-procedural complication, but the IGB group shows a notable rate of removal. As a pilot study in our center, further prospective study, especially with multicenter backgrounds with larger patient populations, is needed with long-term follow-up comparing these procedures with the same patient background.

We thank all the patients who agreed to participate in this study and the medical and surgical staff who helped to carry out this study.

Disclosures

Author Contributions

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Sumber Waras Hospital Committee of Ethics issued approval 12/RSSW/KoM.EP/EC/X/2023.

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Concept and design:  Adrian P. Setiawan, Peter I. Limas, Jeffrey Budhipramono, Andre S. Suryadi, Lady D. Alfara

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Adrian P. Setiawan

Drafting of the manuscript:  Adrian P. Setiawan, Jeffrey Budhipramono, Andre S. Suryadi, Lady D. Alfara

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Peter I. Limas, Jeffrey Budhipramono, Andre S. Suryadi, Lady D. Alfara

Supervision:  Peter I. Limas, Jeffrey Budhipramono, Lady D. Alfara
==== Refs
References

1 Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Lancet Ng M Fleming T Robinson M 766 781 384 2014 24880830
2 World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight 12 2023 2013 https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight
3 Barriers to bariatric surgery: factors influencing progression to bariatric surgery in a U.S. metropolitan area Surg Obes Relat Dis Ju T Rivas L Arnott S 261 268 15 2019 30685346
4 Bariatric surgery for obesity and metabolic disorders: state of the art Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Nguyen NT Varela JE 160 169 14 2017 27899816
5 Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery. 11th ed Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery. 11th ed. New York : Mcgraw-Hill Brunicardi CF Andersen DK Billiar TR 1100 New York McGraw-Hill 2019 2019 https://www.amazon.in/SCHWARTZS-PRINCIPLES-SURGERY-11TH-Brunicardi/dp/1259835359
6 Bariatric endoscopy: state-of-the-art Curr Opin Gastroenterol Kumbhari V Hill C Sullivan S 358 365 33 2017 28682794
7 Delayed gastric emptying as a proposed mechanism of action during intragastric balloon therapy: results of a prospective study Obesity (Silver Spring) Gómez V Woodman G Abu Dayyeh BK 1849 1853 24 2016 27465076
8 Intragastric balloon for management of severe obesity: a systematic review Obes Surg Yorke E Switzer NJ Reso A 2248 2254 26 2016 27444806
9 ASGE Bariatric Endoscopy Task Force systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting endoscopic bariatric therapies Gastrointest Endosc Abu Dayyeh BK Kumar N Edmundowicz SA 425 438 82 2015 26232362
10 Intragastric balloon treatment for obesity: review of recent studies Adv Ther Tate CM Geliebter A 1859 1875 34 2017 28707286
11 Long-term nutritional deficiencies following sleeve gastrectomy: a 6-year single-centre retrospective study Prz Menopauzalny Mulita F Lampropoulos C Kehagias D 170 176 20 2021 35069068
12 Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty versus intragastric balloon insertion: efficacy, durability, and safety Endoscopy Fayad L Cheskin LJ Adam A 532 539 51 2019 30841009
13 Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is a reproducible and effective endoscopic bariatric therapy suitable for widespread clinical adoption: a large, international multicenter study Obes Surg Sartoretto A Sui Z Hill C 1812 1821 28 2018 29450845
14 Bariatric endoscopy procedure type or follow-up: what predicted success at 1 year in 962 obese patients? Endosc Int Open Lopez-Nava G Asokkumar R Rull A Corbelle F Beltran L Bautista I 0 8 7 2019
15 Intra-gastric balloons - the past, present and future Ann Med Surg (Lond) Lari E Burhamah W Lari A Alsaeed T Al-Yaqout K Al-Sabah S 102138 63 2021 33664941
16 Efficacy and safety of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Hedjoudje A Abu Dayyeh BK Cheskin LJ 1043 1053 18 2020 31442601
17 Short-term outcomes of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty in 1000 consecutive patients Gastrointest Endosc Alqahtani A Al-Darwish A Mahmoud AE Alqahtani YA Elahmedi M 1132 1138 89 2019 30578757
18 Safety and early efficacy of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) for obesity in a multi-ethnic Asian population in Singapore JGH Open Asokkumar R Lim CH Tan AS 1351 1356 5 2021 34950778
