
==== Front
Surg Today
Surg Today
Surgery Today
0941-1291
1436-2813
Springer Nature Singapore Singapore

38980332
2891
10.1007/s00595-024-02891-1
Review Article
Current insights on social media as a tool for the dissemination of research and education in surgery: a narrative review
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2236-7124
Yamamoto Takehito takehito_y@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp

123
Goto Kentaro 2
Kitano Shoichi 2
Maeshima Yurina 14
Yamada Toshiyuki 15
Azuma Yoko 16
Okumura Shintaro 2
Kawakubo Naonori 17
Tanaka Eiji 3
Obama Kazutaka 2
Taura Kojiro 3
Terajima Hiroaki 3
Tajiri Tatsuro 17
1 https://ror.org/03604d246 grid.458407.a 0000 0005 0269 6299 Public Relations Committee, Japan Surgical Society, Tokyo, Japan
2 https://ror.org/02kpeqv85 grid.258799.8 0000 0004 0372 2033 Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
3 https://ror.org/05rsbck92 grid.415392.8 0000 0004 0378 7849 Department of Gastroenterological Surgery and Oncology, Medical Research Institute Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
4 https://ror.org/02kpeqv85 grid.258799.8 0000 0004 0372 2033 Department of Breast Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
5 https://ror.org/04wn7wc95 grid.260433.0 0000 0001 0728 1069 Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nagoya City University Midori Municipal Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
6 https://ror.org/02hcx7n63 grid.265050.4 0000 0000 9290 9879 Division of Chest Surgery, Department of Surgery, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
7 https://ror.org/00p4k0j84 grid.177174.3 0000 0001 2242 4849 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
9 7 2024
9 7 2024
2024
54 10 11131123
30 4 2024
6 6 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
The purpose of our narrative review is to summarize the utilization of social media (SoMe) platforms for research communication within the field of surgery. We searched the PubMed database for articles in the last decade that discuss the utilization of SoMe in surgery and then categorized the diverse purposes of SoMe. SoMe proved to be a powerful tool for disseminating articles. Employing strategic methods like visual abstracts enhances article citation rates, the impact factor, h-index, and Altmetric score (an emerging alternative metric that comprehensively and instantly quantifies the social impact of scientific papers). SoMe also proved valuable for surgical education, with online videos shared widely for surgical training. However, it is essential to acknowledge the associated risk of inconsistency in quality. Moreover, SoMe facilitates discussion on specific topics through hashtags or closed groups and is instrumental in recruiting surgeons, with over half of general surgery residency programs in the US efficiently leveraging these platforms to attract the attention of potential candidates. Thus, there is a wealth of evidence supporting the effective use of SoMe for surgeons. In the contemporary era where SoMe is widely utilized, surgeons should be well-versed in this evidence.

Keywords

Social media
General surgery
Visual abstract
Hashtag
Twitter
Facebook
Instagram
YouTube
issue-copyright-statement© Japan Surgical Society 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Social media (SoMe) has changed communication worldwide. In surgery, SoMe facilitates rapid communication, knowledge sharing among users, the unlimited storage of videos or images in a web-based environment at minimal or no cost, and the borderless connection of surgeons and medical students interested in surgery [1–5]. The importance of information sharing and efficient collaboration with other domains is being increasingly recognized, particularly with the proliferation of rapidly evolving novel technologies such as surgical robots and artificial intelligence. SoMe can be effectively utilized and has attracted attention in this context. For example, the BJS Academy, the educational arm of the British Journal of Surgery Society, regularly announces and celebrates, on its webpage, the top 20 SoMe posts each month that garnered the highest number of impressions [6].

In the present review, we highlight the significance of SoMe in the field of general surgery through the following perspectives (Fig. 1): the dissemination of journal articles, surgical education, the sharing of knowledge and academic debates with other surgeons, and the recruitment of surgeons to the training programs. We also discuss the risks and future perspectives of SoMe, which surgeons must bear in mind.Fig. 1 The landscape of academic utilization of social media in surgery

The first author of this paper (TY), a colorectal surgeon in Japan, has more than 100,000 followers on Twitter (now called “X,” account name: @keiyou30). However, there are some differences between how SoMe is used in Asian countries, including Japan, and how it is used in Western countries. Many people in Asian countries use SoMe in their native language and not English, which often limits the dissemination of information to within their own country. Consequently, while most academic societies and journals in the West maintain their own SoMe accounts in English, this is rare in Asian countries. Moreover, Japanese professionals in the medical field often use SoMe for public education and information dissemination to the general public. As a result, many of their followers on SoMe are citizens. For these reasons, the opportunity for academic information, such as medical papers, to be shared internationally from Japan on SoMe is limited. This review aims to provide information about SoMe to surgeons who are unfamiliar with its academic use in the field of surgery.

Article dissemination

Enhancing article citations

Several medical journals have dedicated SoMe accounts on which they regularly post research articles. A previous study found that journals on surgery with dedicated X accounts had a significantly higher impact factor than journals without X accounts and concluded that increased X activity could have helped lift the impact factor [7]. SoMe is an exceptionally effective method of disseminating articles. Some previous articles reported that SoMe exposure increased the number of citations of journal articles [8–10]. For example, Chaus et al. investigated 169 articles in three vascular surgery journals and revealed that Facebook and X’s usage resulted in over a twofold increase in the number of citations [8]. Similarly, in their survey of 404 articles from three coloproctology journals, Jeong et al. reported that articles featured on X had significantly higher citation rates (about 2.8 times) and that X exposure was an independent predictor of a higher citation level (defined as ≥ 5 citations) [9].

The strategic utilization of SoMe is crucial for article dissemination. A retrospective study using data from Colorectal Disease, one of the leading journals of coloproctology, showed that a dedicated SoMe strategy improved a journal’s impact, with a 20-fold increase in article downloads, an 11% increase in new subscribers, a 24% increase in article submission, and a 0.9 increase in impact factor between pre- and post-SoMe intervention [11].

Before introducing academic SoMe outreach, an examination of successful cases may prove useful. For instance, Cabrera et al. presented concrete methodologies for surgeons to use X and reported favorable results [12]. Considering the impact of SoMe on the surgical field, the question arises: Should surgeons maintain their own SoMe accounts and share their work on these platforms? Coret et al. addressed this inquiry by evaluating correlations between specific activities on SoMe and the h-index, a metric of scholarly impact, among 722 surgeons in the US and Canada. They found that the number of followers, the number of people followed, and the frequency of posts were independently associated with a higher h-index [13]. Similarly, Elson et al. investigated 88 general surgery SoMe influencers from all over the world, 90% of whom were from the US, Canada, and European countries. They reported that the influencer score, based on several factors, including the number of followers/followings, views, likes, and reposts, was correlated with both the h-index and the number of publications [14]. Surgeons’ active engagement with SoMe may be effective in garnering a wider readership for their research papers and enhancing their standing as surgical scientists.

Effectiveness of visual abstracts

Visual abstracts are effective for disseminating articles on SoMe. These are graphical summaries that consist of key figures and short texts indicating the background, methods, and outcomes of studies, so readers can grasp the contents of the articles. Since the Annals of Surgery introduced visual abstracts in 2016, many journals have adopted these, and now, more than 100 journals and institutions use visual abstracts [15]. Some surgical journals, including the Journal of American College of Surgeons and JAMA Surgery, require authors to submit visual abstracts, while others, including Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, employ in-house creators of visual abstracts.

Considerable evidence exists about the effectiveness of visual abstracts. A prospective case–control study that enrolled 44 original articles in Annals of Surgery showed that articles posted with visual abstracts on X gained a 7.7-fold increase in impressions, an 8.4-fold increase in reposts, and a 2.7-fold increase in article visits [16]. Furthermore, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in the British Journal of Surgery, enrolling 41 articles, revealed that visual abstracts had a significantly greater number of total engagements on X; namely, likes, reposts, and replies, as well as impressions and link clicks, than those of plain English abstracts [17]. A recent RCT compared the effectiveness of different types of visual abstracts on X and Facebook, linking visual abstracts, expandable visual abstracts, and article figures. The study enrolled 205 RCT articles with visual abstracts in 12 JAMA Network journals [18], and the authors reported that the number of link clicks was significantly higher for linking visual abstracts than for any other type, especially on X.

Although visual abstracts are an important method for conveying research discoveries to readers, their quality varies among journals. Keegan et al. evaluated the accuracy and design of 1325 visual abstracts from 25 surgical journals and proposed a checklist to standardize the quality of visual abstracts to avoid misinformation [19]. Although the influence of visual abstract quality on the dissemination and citation rates of academic papers is undetermined, we considered that conformance to these guidelines may be crucial to effectively disseminate articles when introducing visual abstracts [20].

Altmetric

Traditionally, scientific papers are evaluated based on the number of times they have been cited. The impact factor of journals and authors’ h-index are widely used metrics based on the citation counts of research papers. Now that diverse information dissemination tools such as SoMe, web news, and blogs are widespread, the impact of papers should be evaluated comprehensively from multiple perspectives.

Altmetric is a new alternative metric that comprehensively and instantly quantifies the impact of scientific papers on society based on several parameters, including the number of page views on the webpage, downloads of the paper’s PDF, citations on SoMe, and mentions in the mass media. Currently, many major journals have introduced Altmetric and a growing trend exists of displaying Altmetric scores prominently on journal webpages. For example, both the Annals of Surgery and the Journal of Clinical Oncology display the Altmetric score prominantly alongside the article title at the top of their respective pages. Similarly, on the JAMA Network journal webpage, the Altmetric score is featured prominently above the article title, providing readers with immediate insight into the social impact of the research. Although Altmetric is associated with conventional metrics like citation numbers, the h-index, and the impact factor [7, 21–23], many previous articles have proven that it is also strongly correlated to SoMe attention [24–26]. Luc et al. reported the result of an RCT that compared original articles posted on X and those not posted, and stated that posted articles achieved significantly higher Altmetric scores and obtained more citations within 1 year of publication [25]. Luc et al. also investigated 50 articles with the highest Altmetric scores in the Annals of Thoracic Surgery in 2013, 2015, and 2017. They revealed that being posted on X or mentioned by news outlets was an independent predictor of high Altmetric scores [24].

Other important findings related to Altmetric scores have been reported. Research papers based on RCTs tend to achieve higher Altmetric scores than other types of papers [27], which means that it may be advantageous to actively disseminate papers related to RCTs through SoMe. Notably, Altmetric scores are independently predictive of being cited by public policy articles, which means that Altmetric can be considered a crucial indicator for assessing the societal impact of medical research papers [28]. Thus, Altmetric offers a significant advantage by providing an immediate quantification of a paper’s social impact; however, it has several important drawbacks. First, it just reflects online attention and does not always indicate the quality of a paper. Second, it tends to favor articles that are popular among the general public, which can lead to a commercial bias. Third, it does not always clearly show the intent or purpose behind the SoMe citations which is a disadvantage compared with traditional academic citations. Understanding these limitations, it is advisable to use Altmetric as just one of the several indicators of impact.

Surgical education

SoMe is a useful and effective tool for surgical education [29]. This trend has become particularly pronounced in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which made face-to-face education challenging [30–32]. In recent years, the widespread adoption of laparoscopic and robotic surgeries has made the review of surgical videos easier. Trainees can enhance their skills through various surgical videos. SoMe also allows for the easy sharing of surgical videos and has become a crucial tool in surgical education.

YouTube, founded in 2015, is a SoMe platform that has become a popular educational tool for storing and sharing surgical videos. According to a previous survey involving surgeons and medical students in the US, 90% used surgical videos to prepare for surgery, with YouTube being the most common platform [33]. With YouTube’s global reach, surgeons can now “see one, do one, teach one, and post one,” revolutionizing surgical education [34].

It should be noted that YouTube content differs from video articles published in academic journals as it lacks formal peer review; therefore, its use requires caution because of the variability in quality [1]. As shown in Table 1, several tools and guidelines for evaluating surgical video quality have been used in previous studies. Reports have reviewed the quality of surgical videos on YouTube, including those on esophagectomy [35], laparoscopic gastrectomy [36], laparoscopic hernia surgery [37–39], sleeve gastrectomy [40], and thoracoscopic sympathectomy [41], and most have posed caution regarding the inconsistency of quality. It was reported that the quality of most YouTube videos on bariatric surgery was reliable and misleading information was not found [42], whereas many popular videos of laparoscopic cholecystectomy were of low quality [43–45]. Notably, junior residents and medical students tended to overvalue the quality of YouTube videos on laparoscopic cholecystectomy [44]. In an investigation of YouTube videos on laparoscopic appendectomy, de Angelis et al. reported greater variability in assessments from trainees than from experienced surgeons [46]. These results suggest that in surgical training using YouTube videos, educators should guide trainees to reliable educational videos with care. Table 1 Common tools and guidelines for evaluating the quality of surgical videos

Instruments	Assessment	
Assessment tools for the information and skills		
DISCERN [106]	The quality of medical information with 16 items, each scoring 1 to 5	
JAMA benchmark criteria [107]	The quality of medical information on the internet from four aspects:

authorship, attribution, disclosure, and currency

	
GOALS (global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills) [108]	The quality of laparoscopic skills with five items, each scoring 1 to 5	
LAP-VEGaS (laparoscopic surgery video educational guidelines) [109]	The quality of laparoscopic skills with nine items, each scoring 0 to 2	
GQS (global quality score)	The quality of information with a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5	
OSATS (objective structured assessment of technical skills) [110]	The quality of operative performance with seven items, each scoring 1 to 5	
Assessment tools for the popularity of videos		
VPI (video power index)	The popularity of videos is calculated by the formula:

(like count/dislike count + like count) × 100

	
Examples of procedure-specific scales		
CVS (critical view of safety) score [111]	The quality of laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos with three items	
ESS (esophagectomy scoring system) [35]	The quality of esophagectomy videos with 15 items	
GOALS-GH (global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills of groin hernia) [112]	The quality of laparoscopic skills for groin hernia with five items	
OCRS (objective component rating scale) [113]	The quality of laparoscopic fundoplication with seven items	
SGSS (sleeve gastrectomy scoring system) [40]	The quality of sleeve gastrectomy videos with 24 items	

Websurg, a widely known educational surgical video platform, was launched in 2000 by IRCAD (Institut de Recherche contre les Cancers de l’Appareil Digestif). IRCAD is a renowned research institute that specializes in minimally invasive surgery research and education. Founded in 1994 in France, it offers advanced training for surgeons worldwide and fosters innovation in surgical technologies through global partnerships and state-of-the-art facilities. The key difference between WebSurg and YouTube is that the former employs a peer-review process, whereas the latter does not. This process is believed to ensure higher quality content than YouTube. Indeed, several studies have demonstrated that videos on WebSurg are more accurate than those on YouTube [47, 48]. Although evidence is limited, WebSurg may be a better option than YouTube for video surgery education.

Knowledge sharing and academic debate

Utility of hashtags

Hashtags are useful for participating in discussions on specific topics and aggregating posts related to issues [4]. Table 2 illustrates the creation of numerous hashtags aimed at initiating discussions within the surgical community. The most widespread and successful hashtag is #SoMe4Surgery, which was created in 2018 and used in over 10,000 posts and 30,000 reposts in the first 5 months [49]. Using this hashtag, surgeons from all over the world have conversations with each other on diverse surgical topics, mentorship, collaboration in clinical research, development of skills in drafting manuscripts, contents of medical journals, and more [50]. The X account of SoMe4Surgery (@me4_so) was created in 2018 and has over 10,000 followers, fostering discussions related to surgical research, practice, and education. Another successful hashtag is #TSSMN, which was created in 2015 by The Thoracic Surgery Social Media Network (TSSMN) with the aim of garnering attention for articles from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery and The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, which are prominent journals in cardiothoracic surgery. SoMe users can stay updated on the latest information in this field by following the hashtag #TSSMN and X account (@TSSMN) [51, 52]. The TSSMN conducted a successful TweetChat for a journal club using this hashtag [53]. A Tweetchat is a scheduled X discussion in which a selected paper is announced to followers beforehand, and the authors themselves participate in the discussion. In a previous TweetChat, which focused on supporting cardiothoracic surgeons during the COVID-19 pandemic, 273 participants joined the discussion, and their impressions reached 7.5 million people [54]. Table 2 Useful and active social media hashtags in surgery

Hashtags	Aim	Created in	
#SoMe4Surgery	To discuss diverse topics in surgery	2018	
#colorectalsurgery	To activate the global community of colorectal surgeons and collate discussions on coloproctology	2016	
#colorectalresearch	To promote articles from four major journals (Diseases of the Colon & Rectum,

Colorectal Disease, the British Journal of Surgery, and Techniques in Coloproctology)

	2016	
#TSSMN	To promote articles from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery and The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery	2015	
#globalsurgery	To discuss diverse topics in surgery	2010	
#surgicallresearch	To discuss diverse topics in surgery	2013	
#SoMeHPB	To discuss diverse topics in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery	2019	
#visualabstract	To enhance the rationale of the visual abstracts	2016	
#Donatelife	To promote the dissemination of transplant medicine	2012	
#IlookLikeASurgeon	To discuss the gender diversity in surgery	2015	

The hashtag #colorectalsurgery has a great impact on colorectal surgeons through SoMe. It was created in 2016 with the aim of activating the global community of colorectal surgeons and collating discussions on coloproctology [55]. This hashtag attracted significant attention during major international colorectal surgical conferences, and related posts reached over 60 million impressions in the first 180 days [55]. However, owing to the widespread adoption of this hashtag, an excess of unrelated noise has rendered the accurate selection of information for research on colorectal surgery difficult. Consequently, a new hashtag, #colorectalresearch, was introduced with a specific focus on colorectal surgery, aiming to promote articles from four major journals (Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, Colorectal Disease, the British Journal of Surgery, and Techniques in Coloproctology) [56]. This incident highlights the risk of information overload on SoMe, increasing the difficulty of discerning relevant information [57].

Navarro et al. investigated 2633 posts with the hashtag #GlobalSurgery and revealed a significant finding that the top 20% of X and Instagram influencers were responsible for 67% of posts, respectively [58]. This suggests that the viewpoints expressed by a minority of users, prominently visible on SoMe, may not reflect a diverse array of perspectives. This underscores another risk associated with hashtags that users should be mindful of. Numerous other active hashtags on SoMe cater to specific topics in surgery. For instance, #SoMe4HPB was established in 2019 to center discussions on hepatopancreatobiliary surgery [59], #visualabstract was created by Annals of Surgery to enhance the rationale of visual abstracts, #IlookLikeASurgeon was created to discuss gender diversity in surgery [60], and #donatelife was created in 2012 with the X account @Donatelife (currently having over 14,000 followers) to promote the dissemination of transplant medicine [61].

Academic debates in closed Facebook groups

SoMe is a useful tool used by surgeons to exchange surgical knowledge on particular diseases and surgical procedures. Facebook is considered the most suitable platform for closed communication among surgeons. In a prior survey examining Facebook groups tailored for medical students, general surgery residents, and practicing general surgeons, findings revealed that 59.5% of participants shared challenging cases for discussion with their peers, while 78.6% offered advice and insights by posting comments [62].

In 2012, the International Hernia Collaboration (IHC) became the first Facebook group created for discussions on hernia management. It now has more than 13,000 members seeking advice for difficult hernia cases. Bernardi et al. investigated 598 unique responses to 60 clinical threads using the IHC and reported that 96.6% of the responses were safe [63]. The network of surgeons within the IHC also serves as a valuable resource for referring patients to specialized facilities within their own country or even other countries for advanced care [64].

Since the development of the IHC, several other closed Facebook groups involving many surgeons have been created. For example, in 2015, a Facebook group for the Online Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) called the SAGES Foregut Surgery Masters Program focused on discussing surgery of the esophagus, stomach, and small intestine. Surgeons from 40 countries participate in this group, with the most discussed topic being operative strategy, followed by patient management [65]. SAGES also manages several Facebook groups for various surgical specialties, such as colorectal, bariatric, hepatobiliary pancreatic, and acute care surgery. These groups attract approximately 2,000–5,000 members each.

The COVID-19 pandemic intensified surgeons’ engagement in Facebook groups. Docimo et al. reported a significant (5–13%) increase in memberships in the eight SAGES closed Facebook groups from before the pandemic [31]. In 2015, a Facebook group called the “Robotic Surgery Collaboration” was created for general surgeons using robotics and the robotic industry to improve patient outcomes. It now has more than 15,000 members. Myers et al. investigated the use and engagement patterns of this group and revealed that the number of posts per day was greater on midweek days than on other days [66].

In online academic information exchange, it is preferable to make comments using real names from the perspectives of reliability and ethics. In fact, almost all physicians participating in Facebook groups disclose their real names and affiliations, and most interactions on X are also conducted using real names. Members must maintain professionalism and patient confidentiality. The SAGES Facebook Group Task Force endorses the professional use of the closed SoMe group platform and recommends the use of a public disclaimer and an informed consent template [67].

Discussion in conferences

Although the use of SoMe at scientific conferences can facilitate instant interaction among physicians and the dissemination of findings, few reports on this topic in surgery exist [68]. In other fields, SoMe influencers have played important roles in the promotion of discussion during conferences in anesthesiology [69], urology [70], and cardiology [71]. Nolte et al. reported that research presented at conferences of the American Urological Association with more SoMe engagements were significantly more likely to be published [70]. However, sharing conference slides on SoMe requires careful consideration of intellectual property rights. Although a survey targeting hernia surgeons on SoMe revealed that many users were tolerant of sharing presenters’ slides, obtaining the consent of the presenter is recommended when using SoMe at conferences [72].

Recruitment to clinical trials

The potential benefit of SoMe in the recruitment of patients to surgical clinical trials and enhancement of researcher collaboration has also been reported [73–77]. The COVID-Surg Collaborative Group (X account: @CovidSurg) is the most successful example of this. In a large surgical trial assessing the impact of COVID-19 on surgical outcomes, SoMe played an important role in the recruitment of participants globally in a very short time [76]. This group has more than 8500 X followers, with 1677 centers from 122 countries enrolled and has led to published papers in The Lancet [76], the Journal of Clinical Oncology [78], and the British Journal of Surgery [79–82].

Although the optimal use of SoMe in the promotion of clinical trials still lacks concrete evidence, some studies have indicated that the utilization of specific hashtags, eye-catching logos, and color schemes could increase SoMe engagement and attract attention to clinical trials [74, 75]. Further research on this topic should be conducted.

Recruitment of surgeons

SoMe platforms are a significant tool for the promotion and engagement of residency programs. In a survey of 613 general surgery residency applicants in the US from 2020 to 2021, 70.9% of respondents indicated that SoMe was a crucial source for obtaining information, and 62.6% indicated that SoMe contributed to cultivating a positive image of training programs [83].

According to previous studies, 47–59% of the general surgery residency programs in the US have SoMe accounts [84–86]. Instagram is the most frequently used platform, followed by X [84]. A total of 40.2% of their program directors and assistant/associate program directors had at least one account on X and/or LinkedIn [85]. This trend was accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic [86, 87]. Fang et al. investigated 319 general surgery residency programs in the US and found that 188 (59%) had SoMe accounts, 112 (32%) of which were created after the pandemic [86].

Although the majority of posts (70–81%) on general surgery residency programs were promotional, the educational content gained significantly higher engagement [88, 89]. These results suggest that excessive reliance on promotional posts for recruiting surgeons may reduce the effectiveness of dissemination efforts. Hence, maintaining a balance between promotional content and educational materials is imperative for maximizing impact.

Since the SoMe platforms utilized by applicants may vary by age, country, or specialty, a thorough understanding of SoMe usage patterns among young physicians and medical students who are targets for recruitment is essential. For instance, previous reports indicate that most young general surgery trainees in the US, with an average age of 30 years, utilize SoMe platforms such as Instagram, YouTube, and Facebook, with usage rates exceeding 80% across all platforms [90]. In comparison, most of the young general and bariatric surgeons (≤ 45 years) in Mexico prefer Facebook, followed by X and Instagram [91]. There are many other surveys on SoMe usage patterns enrolling surgeons with various specialties, such as visceral [92], colorectal [93–95], hernia [96], and transplantation surgery [97]. In contrast, based on a survey of 110 general surgery program directors in the US, Langenfeld et al. reported that directors frequently viewed the SoMe profiles of students and residents and leveraged their online behavior for ranking purposes during the hiring process [98]. Therefore, the education of young physicians in terms of SoMe professionalism is essential.

Risks and guidelines

Surgeons who use SoMe must consider its risks and limitations. First, SoMe lacks a peer-review process, and there is no obligation to disclose reliable information or references, which potentially poses a risk of spreading information with insufficient scientific evidence, leading to misunderstandings among non-specialized users [99]. Furthermore, the absence of a mandated disclosure of conflicts of interest may contribute to biased information sharing [99]. Second, SoMe posts may breach confidentiality obligations or be undesirable from the perspective of patient privacy protection. Digne-Malcolm et al. investigated 66 images posted on X in 16 countries and found that half were at risk of breaching confidentiality, with patients being identifiable, and 18 posts including identifiable location information [100]. Another study from Brazil, which included attending surgeons, residents, and graduates, showed that more than 60% of the study participants were unaware of the confidentiality preservation policy [101]. The American College of Surgeons and the Cardiothoracic Ethics Forum provide guidelines for surgeons with respect to confidentiality, disclosure of conflicts of interest, and promotion of professionalism [102–104]. Surgeons who use SoMe must conform to these guidelines.

SoMe influencers with many followers and significant speaking influence may have a considerable impact, even when their academic achievements or contributions are relatively modest [2]. The Kardashian index (K-index) was used to quantify this discrepancy. Neil Hall, the creator of this index, wrote, “If your K-index gets above 5, then it’s time to get off Twitter and write those papers” [105]. When gathering information on SoMe, readers must not be swayed solely by the influence of prominent figures on SoMe, but must diligently verify expertise and information sources.

Future perspectives

Numerous changes in SoMe have occurred, which surgeons should be aware of. In July, 2023, Twitter underwent rebranding, adopting the name X, and concurrently made ongoing modifications to its algorithm, influencing post impressions on the timeline. In addition, a subscription model was introduced, wherein subscribers paying an annual fee to X enjoy certain advantages, such as the ability to post text exceeding 280 letters. Notably, several academic accounts, including the British Journal of Surgery, the American College of Surgeons, and Harvard Health, have been registered as paying accounts. Thus, research exploring the optimal management of paying accounts in this new scenario is anticipated.

In August 2023, Google announced that YouTube would remove false information on cancer treatment based on its medical misinformation policy. While this proactive measure may enhance the reliability of YouTube video content, it may also pose a challenge for surgeons who wish to display their videos on the platform.

The new service Threads, released by Meta in July 2023, is a short-text SoMe platform that can leverage existing Instagram accounts. Notably, a substantial number of Threads followers were gained quickly by prestigious English journals such as the New England Journal of Medicine with over 86,000 followers, Nature with over 98,000 followers, and JAMA Network with over 24,000 as of the time of writing this article. Regarding how surgeons should engage in research dissemination and communication, waiting for the establishment of evidence may be prudent in this evolving landscape.

The Japan Surgical Society launched its official Facebook and X accounts in February, 2024, utilizing these platforms to introduce its official journals, promote its annual meeting, and announce seminars for members. Moving forward, the society aims to devise more efficient means to promote events that appeal to young surgeons and medical students on SoMe. Moreover, the society plans to establish a separate SoMe account dedicated to disseminating articles from its official English-language journal, Surgery Today, aiming to further enhance its recognition and increase citation numbers.

Conclusions

SoMe is beneficial for disseminating research findings and fostering connections among surgeons, and is effective for the education and recruitment of surgeons and medical students. While being mindful of certain risks and recent changes, the effective utilization of SoMe is becoming increasingly essential for surgeons.

Author contributions

Takehito Yamamoto, Kentaro Goto, Shoichi Kitano, Yurina Maeshima, Toshiyuki Yamada, Yoko Azuma, Shintaro Okumura, Naonori Kawakubo, Eiji Tanaka, Kazutaka Obama, Kojiro Taura, Hiroaki Terajima, and Tatsuro Tajiri designed the study, acquired, analyzed and interpreted the data. Takehito Yamamoto drafted the paper, and all the authors revised the manuscript critically. All the authors have read, made critical comments on the content, and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Ethical standards

Ethical approval was not required for this study, which did not involve the use of patient data and was a review paper summarizing existing literature.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Lima DL Viscarret V Velasco J Lima R Malcher F Social media as a tool for surgical education: a qualitative systematic review Surg Endosc 2022 36 4674 4684 10.1007/s00464-022-09150-9 35230534
Lima DL, Viscarret V, Velasco J, Lima R, Malcher F. Social media as a tool for surgical education: a qualitative systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2022;36:4674–84.35230534
2. Grossman R Sgarbura O Hallet J Soreide K Social media in surgery: evolving role in research communication and beyond Langenbecks Arch Surg 2021 406 505 520 10.1007/s00423-021-02135-7 33640992
Grossman R, Sgarbura O, Hallet J, Soreide K. Social media in surgery: evolving role in research communication and beyond. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021;406:505–20.33640992
3. Herweck AM Ness AR Delamater JM Diez EDT Khosravani N A medical student’s perspective on social media in the surgical field Ann Surg 2020 272 234 235 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003904 32675532
Herweck AM, Ness AR, Delamater JM, Diez EDT, Khosravani N. A medical student’s perspective on social media in the surgical field. Ann Surg. 2020;272:234–5.32675532
4. Wexner SD Petrucci AM Brady RR Ennis-O’Connor M Fitzgerald JE Mayol J Social media in colorectal surgery Colorectal Dis 2017 19 105 114 10.1111/codi.13572 27889945
Wexner SD, Petrucci AM, Brady RR, Ennis-O’Connor M, Fitzgerald JE, Mayol J. Social media in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19:105–14.27889945
5. Mayol J Dziakova J Value of social media in advancing surgical research Br J Surg 2017 104 1753 1755 10.1002/bjs.10767 29144003
Mayol J, Dziakova J. Value of social media in advancing surgical research. Br J Surg. 2017;104:1753–5.29144003
6. Velez HT, Mendoza I, Mayol J (2023) BJS academy some review for November 2023. BJS Academy
7. Mobarak S Stott MC Lee WJ Dave MS Tarazi M Macutkiewicz C The importance of social media to the academic surgical literature: relationship between Twitter activity and readership metrics Surgery 2021 170 650 656 10.1016/j.surg.2021.01.003 33612291
Mobarak S, Stott MC, Lee WJ, Dave MS, Tarazi M, Macutkiewicz C. The importance of social media to the academic surgical literature: relationship between Twitter activity and readership metrics. Surgery. 2021;170:650–6.33612291
8. Chau M Ramedani S King T Aziz F Presence of social media mentions for vascular surgery publications is associated with an increased number of literature citations J Vasc Surg 2021 73 1096 1103 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.09.029 33080327
Chau M, Ramedani S, King T, Aziz F. Presence of social media mentions for vascular surgery publications is associated with an increased number of literature citations. J Vasc Surg. 2021;73:1096–103.33080327
9. Jeong JW Kim MJ Oh HK Jeong S Kim MH Cho JR The impact of social media on citation rates in coloproctology Colorectal Dis 2019 21 1175 1182 10.1111/codi.14719 31124259
Jeong JW, Kim MJ, Oh HK, Jeong S, Kim MH, Cho JR, et al. The impact of social media on citation rates in coloproctology. Colorectal Dis. 2019;21:1175–82.31124259
10. Sathianathen NJ Lane Iii R Murphy DG Loeb S Bakker C Lamb AD Social media coverage of scientific articles immediately after publication predicts subsequent citations - #SoME_impact score: observational analysis J Med Internet Res 2020 22 e12288 10.2196/12288 32301733
Sathianathen NJ, Lane Iii R, Murphy DG, Loeb S, Bakker C, Lamb AD, et al. Social media coverage of scientific articles immediately after publication predicts subsequent citations - #SoME_impact score: observational analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22: e12288.32301733
11. Bisset CN McDermott FD Keller DS The impact of a dedicated social media strategy on enhancing surgical education Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023 408 412 10.1007/s00423-023-03148-0 37856035
Bisset CN, McDermott FD, Keller DS. The impact of a dedicated social media strategy on enhancing surgical education. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023;408:412.37856035
12. Cabrera LF Ferrada P Mayol J Mendoza AC Herrera G Pedraza M Impact of social media on the continuous education of the general surgeon, a new experience, @Cirbosque: a Latin American example Surgery 2020 167 890 894 10.1016/j.surg.2020.03.008 32359773
Cabrera LF, Ferrada P, Mayol J, Mendoza AC, Herrera G, Pedraza M, et al. Impact of social media on the continuous education of the general surgeon, a new experience, @Cirbosque: a Latin American example. Surgery. 2020;167:890–4.32359773
13. Coret M Rok M Newman J Deonarain D Agzarian J Finley C Twitter activity is associated with a higher research citation index for academic thoracic surgeons Ann Thorac Surg 2020 110 660 663 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.09.075 31756321
Coret M, Rok M, Newman J, Deonarain D, Agzarian J, Finley C, et al. Twitter activity is associated with a higher research citation index for academic thoracic surgeons. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;110:660–3.31756321
14. Elson NC Le DT Johnson MD Reyna C Shaughnessy EA Goodman MD Characteristics of general surgery social media influencers on Twitter Am Surg 2021 87 492 498 10.1177/0003134820951427 33054321
Elson NC, Le DT, Johnson MD, Reyna C, Shaughnessy EA, Goodman MD, et al. Characteristics of general surgery social media influencers on Twitter. Am Surg. 2021;87:492–8.33054321
15. Ibrahim AM Beyond research dissemination: The unrealized power of visual abstracts to improve health care delivery Surgery 2024 175 554 555 10.1016/j.surg.2023.11.001 38049362
Ibrahim AM. Beyond research dissemination: The unrealized power of visual abstracts to improve health care delivery. Surgery. 2024;175:554–5.38049362
16. Ibrahim AM Lillemoe KD Klingensmith ME Dimick JB Visual Abstracts to disseminate research on social media: a prospective, case-control crossover study Ann Surg 2017 266 e46 e48 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002277 28448382
Ibrahim AM, Lillemoe KD, Klingensmith ME, Dimick JB. Visual Abstracts to disseminate research on social media: a prospective, case-control crossover study. Ann Surg. 2017;266:e46–8.28448382
17. Chapman SJ Grossman RC FitzPatrick MEB Brady RRW Randomized controlled trial of plain English and visual abstracts for disseminating surgical research via social media Br J Surg. 2019 106 1611 6 10.1002/bjs.11307
Chapman SJ, Grossman RC, FitzPatrick MEB, Brady RRW. Randomized controlled trial of plain English and visual abstracts for disseminating surgical research via social media. Br J Surg. 2019;106:1611–6.
18. Trueger NS Aly E Haneuse S Huang E Berkwits M Randomized clinical trial visual abstract display and social media-driven website traffic JAMA 2023 330 1583 1585 10.1001/jama.2023.16839 37773505
Trueger NS, Aly E, Haneuse S, Huang E, Berkwits M. Randomized clinical trial visual abstract display and social media-driven website traffic. JAMA. 2023;330:1583–5.37773505
19. Guidolin K Lin J Zorigtbaatar A Nadeem M Ibrahim T Neilson Z Evaluating the accuracy and design of visual abstracts in academic surgical journals Ann Surg 2022 276 e275 e283 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005521 35801709
Guidolin K, Lin J, Zorigtbaatar A, Nadeem M, Ibrahim T, Neilson Z, et al. Evaluating the accuracy and design of visual abstracts in academic surgical journals. Ann Surg. 2022;276:e275–83.35801709
20. Ibrahim AM Seeing is believing: using visual abstracts to disseminate scientific research Am J Gastroenterol 2018 113 459 461 10.1038/ajg.2017.268 28925990
Ibrahim AM. Seeing is believing: using visual abstracts to disseminate scientific research. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113:459–61.28925990
21. Robinson DBT Hopkins L Brown C Abdelrahman T Powell AG Egan RJ Relative value of adapted novel bibliometrics in evaluating surgical academic impact and reach World J Surg 2019 43 967 972 10.1007/s00268-018-04893-w 30564922
Robinson DBT, Hopkins L, Brown C, Abdelrahman T, Powell AG, Egan RJ, et al. Relative value of adapted novel bibliometrics in evaluating surgical academic impact and reach. World J Surg. 2019;43:967–72.30564922
22. Fox ES McDonnell JM Wall J Darwish S Healy D Butler JS The correlation between altmetric score and traditional measures of article impact for studies published within the Surgeon Journal Surgeon 2024 22 18 24 37802706
Fox ES, McDonnell JM, Wall J, Darwish S, Healy D, Butler JS. The correlation between altmetric score and traditional measures of article impact for studies published within the Surgeon Journal. Surgeon. 2024;22:18–24.37802706
23. Mullins CH Boyd CJ Corey BL Examining the correlation between altmetric score and citations in the general surgery literature J Surg Res 2020 248 159 164 10.1016/j.jss.2019.11.008 31901796
Mullins CH, Boyd CJ, Corey BL. Examining the correlation between altmetric score and citations in the general surgery literature. J Surg Res. 2020;248:159–64.31901796
24. Luc JGY Percy E Hirji S Vervoort D Mann GK Phan K Predictors of high-impact articles in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Ann Thorac Surg 2020 110 2096 2103 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.102 32540436
Luc JGY, Percy E, Hirji S, Vervoort D, Mann GK, Phan K, et al. Predictors of high-impact articles in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;110:2096–103.32540436
25. Luc JGY Archer MA Arora RC Bender EM Blitz A Cooke DT Does Tweeting improve citations? One-year results from the TSSMN prospective randomized trial Ann Thorac Surg 2021 111 296 300 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.065 32504611
Luc JGY, Archer MA, Arora RC, Bender EM, Blitz A, Cooke DT, et al. Does Tweeting improve citations? One-year results from the TSSMN prospective randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;111:296–300.32504611
26. Luc JGY Archer MA Arora RC Bender EM Blitz A Cooke DT Social media improves cardiothoracic surgery literature dissemination: results of a randomized trial Ann Thorac Surg 2020 109 589 595 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.06.062 31404547
Luc JGY, Archer MA, Arora RC, Bender EM, Blitz A, Cooke DT, et al. Social media improves cardiothoracic surgery literature dissemination: results of a randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;109:589–95.31404547
27. Lorenzon L Grossman RC Soreide K Impact of randomized controlled trials in the social media: does science trend as much as everyday events? World J Surg 2021 45 88 96 10.1007/s00268-020-05769-8 32892272
Lorenzon L, Grossman RC, Soreide K. Impact of randomized controlled trials in the social media: does science trend as much as everyday events? World J Surg. 2021;45:88–96.32892272
28. Mullins CH Boyd CJ Ladowski JM The association between altmetric attention scores and public engagement in the medical literature J Surg Res 2023 292 324 329 10.1016/j.jss.2023.07.051 37688947
Mullins CH, Boyd CJ, Ladowski JM. The association between altmetric attention scores and public engagement in the medical literature. J Surg Res. 2023;292:324–9.37688947
29. Cassidy DJ Mullen JT Gee DW Joshi ART Klingensmith ME Petrusa E #SurgEdVidz: using social media to create a supplemental video-based surgery didactic curriculum J Surg Res 2020 256 680 686 10.1016/j.jss.2020.04.004 32418641
Cassidy DJ, Mullen JT, Gee DW, Joshi ART, Klingensmith ME, Petrusa E, et al. #SurgEdVidz: using social media to create a supplemental video-based surgery didactic curriculum. J Surg Res. 2020;256:680–6.32418641
30. Yang S Jin C Wang J Xu X The use of social media to deliver surgical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic J Invest Surg 2022 35 1350 1356 10.1080/08941939.2022.2035859 35130457
Yang S, Jin C, Wang J, Xu X. The use of social media to deliver surgical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. J Invest Surg. 2022;35:1350–6.35130457
31. Docimo S Jr Jacob B Seras K Ghanem O Closed Facebook groups and COVID-19: an evaluation of utilization prior to and during the pandemic Surg Endosc 2021 35 4986 4990 10.1007/s00464-020-07971-0 32926250
Docimo S Jr, Jacob B, Seras K, Ghanem O. Closed Facebook groups and COVID-19: an evaluation of utilization prior to and during the pandemic. Surg Endosc. 2021;35:4986–90.32926250
32. Lima DL, Lima RCLL, Benevenuto D, Raymundo TS, Shadduck PP, Bianchi JM et al. Survey of social media use for surgical education during COVID-19. JSLS 2020;24(4): e2020.00072
33. Rapp AK Healy MG Charlton ME Keith JN Rosenbaum ME Kapadia MR YouTube is the most frequently used educational video source for surgical preparation J Surg Educ 2016 73 1072 1076 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.04.024 27316383
Rapp AK, Healy MG, Charlton ME, Keith JN, Rosenbaum ME, Kapadia MR. YouTube is the most frequently used educational video source for surgical preparation. J Surg Educ. 2016;73:1072–6.27316383
34. Chan KS Shelat VG We asked the experts: What is the emerging role of YouTube surgical videos in education and training? World J Surg 2021 45 417 419 10.1007/s00268-020-05660-6 32591845
Chan KS, Shelat VG. We asked the experts: What is the emerging role of YouTube surgical videos in education and training? World J Surg. 2021;45:417–9.32591845
35. Uprak TK Ergenç M Assessment of esophagectomy videos on YouTube: is peer review necessary for quality? J Surg Res 2022 279 368 373 10.1016/j.jss.2022.06.037 35820318
Uprak TK, Ergenç M. Assessment of esophagectomy videos on YouTube: is peer review necessary for quality? J Surg Res. 2022;279:368–73.35820318
36. Zhang S Fukunaga T Oka S Orita H Kaji S Yube Y Concerns of quality, utility, and reliability of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in public video sharing platform Ann Transl Med 2020 8 196 10.21037/atm.2020.01.78 32309343
Zhang S, Fukunaga T, Oka S, Orita H, Kaji S, Yube Y, et al. Concerns of quality, utility, and reliability of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in public video sharing platform. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8:196.32309343
37. Green L Noll D Barbaro A Asokan G Hewitt J Ovenden C YouTube-friend or foe? A closer look at videos on inguinal hernia surgery as a source for patient education J Surg Res 2022 280 510 514 10.1016/j.jss.2022.07.024 36081310
Green L, Noll D, Barbaro A, Asokan G, Hewitt J, Ovenden C, et al. YouTube-friend or foe? A closer look at videos on inguinal hernia surgery as a source for patient education. J Surg Res. 2022;280:510–4.36081310
38. Reitano E, Cavalli M, de’Angelis N, Loriau J, Campanelli G. Educational value of surgical videos on transabdominal pre-peritoneal hernia repair (TAPP) on YouTube. Hernia. 2021;25:741–53.
39. Keskinkilic Yagiz B Yalaza M Sapmaz A Is YouTube a potential training source for total extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair? Surg Endosc 2021 35 2014 2020 10.1007/s00464-020-07596-3 32367448
Keskinkilic Yagiz B, Yalaza M, Sapmaz A. Is YouTube a potential training source for total extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair? Surg Endosc. 2021;35:2014–20.32367448
40. Ferhatoglu MF Kartal A Ekici U Gurkan A Evaluation of the reliability, utility, and quality of the information in sleeve gastrectomy videos shared on open access video sharing platform YouTube Obes Surg 2019 29 1477 1484 10.1007/s11695-019-03738-2 30706318
Ferhatoglu MF, Kartal A, Ekici U, Gurkan A. Evaluation of the reliability, utility, and quality of the information in sleeve gastrectomy videos shared on open access video sharing platform YouTube. Obes Surg. 2019;29:1477–84.30706318
41. Adorisio O Davoli E De Peppo F Evaluation of YouTube videos addressing thoracoscopic sympathectomy using the LAP-VEGaS guidelines Front Surg 2023 10 1133124 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1133124 37021089
Adorisio O, Davoli E, De Peppo F. Evaluation of YouTube videos addressing thoracoscopic sympathectomy using the LAP-VEGaS guidelines. Front Surg. 2023;10:1133124.37021089
42. Erdem H Sisik A The reliability of bariatric surgery videos in YouTube platform Obes Surg 2018 28 712 716 10.1007/s11695-017-2911-3 28875396
Erdem H, Sisik A. The reliability of bariatric surgery videos in YouTube platform. Obes Surg. 2018;28:712–6.28875396
43. Rodriguez HA Young MT Jackson HT Oelschlager BK Wright AS Viewer discretion advised: is YouTube a friend or foe in surgical education? Surg Endosc 2018 32 1724 1728 10.1007/s00464-017-5853-x 28916948
Rodriguez HA, Young MT, Jackson HT, Oelschlager BK, Wright AS. Viewer discretion advised: is YouTube a friend or foe in surgical education? Surg Endosc. 2018;32:1724–8.28916948
44. Jackson HT Hung CS Potarazu D Habboosh N DeAngelis EJ Amdur RL Attending guidance advised: educational quality of surgical videos on YouTube Surg Endosc 2022 36 4189 4198 10.1007/s00464-021-08751-0 34668066
Jackson HT, Hung CS, Potarazu D, Habboosh N, DeAngelis EJ, Amdur RL, et al. Attending guidance advised: educational quality of surgical videos on YouTube. Surg Endosc. 2022;36:4189–98.34668066
45. Rouhi AD Roberson JL Kindall E Ghanem YK Ndong A Yi WS What are trainees watching? Assessing the educational quality of online laparoscopic cholecystectomy training videos using the LAP-VEGaS guidelines Surgery 2023 174 524 528 10.1016/j.surg.2023.05.021 37357097
Rouhi AD, Roberson JL, Kindall E, Ghanem YK, Ndong A, Yi WS, et al. What are trainees watching? Assessing the educational quality of online laparoscopic cholecystectomy training videos using the LAP-VEGaS guidelines. Surgery. 2023;174:524–8.37357097
46. de’Angelis N, Gavriilidis P, Martinez-Perez A, Genova P, Notarnicola M, Reitano E, et al. Educational value of surgical videos on YouTube: quality assessment of laparoscopic appendectomy videos by senior surgeons vs. novice trainees.World J Emerg Surg. 2019;14:22.
47. Dincer HA Cennet O Dogrul AB Comparison of educational and academic quality of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy videos on WebSurg® and YouTube® platforms Surg Innov 2023 30 728 738 10.1177/15533506231208583 37867402
Dincer HA, Cennet O, Dogrul AB. Comparison of educational and academic quality of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy videos on WebSurg® and YouTube® platforms. Surg Innov. 2023;30:728–38.37867402
48. Yuksel C Culcu S New learning area in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: YouTube® or WebSurg®? J Minim Access Surg 2022 18 129 135 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_300_20 35017403
Yuksel C, Culcu S. New learning area in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: YouTube® or WebSurg®? J Minim Access Surg. 2022;18:129–35.35017403
49. Grossman RC Mackenzie DG Keller DS Dames N Grewal P Maldonado AA #SoMe4Surgery: from inception to impact BMJ Innovations 2020 6 72 82 10.1136/bmjinnov-2019-000356
Grossman RC, Mackenzie DG, Keller DS, Dames N, Grewal P, Maldonado AA, et al. #SoMe4Surgery: from inception to impact. BMJ Innovations. 2020;6:72–82.
50. Ioannidis A Blanco-Colino R Chand M Pellino G Nepogodiev D Wexner SD How to make an impact in surgical research: a consensus summary from the #SoMe4Surgery community Updates Surg 2020 72 1229 1235 10.1007/s13304-020-00780-z 32361962
Ioannidis A, Blanco-Colino R, Chand M, Pellino G, Nepogodiev D, Wexner SD, et al. How to make an impact in surgical research: a consensus summary from the #SoMe4Surgery community. Updates Surg. 2020;72:1229–35.32361962
51. Luc JGY Ouzounian M Bender EM Blitz A Stamp NL Varghese TK Jr The thoracic surgery social media network: early experience and lessons learned J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019 158 1127 1136 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.06.099 31422854
Luc JGY, Ouzounian M, Bender EM, Blitz A, Stamp NL, Varghese TK Jr, et al. The thoracic surgery social media network: early experience and lessons learned. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;158:1127–36.31422854
52. Ni hIci T, Archer M, Harrington C, Luc JGY, Antonoff MB. Trainee Thoracic Surgery Social Media Network: early experience with TweetChat-based journal clubs. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;109:285–90.
53. Luc JGY Varghese TK Jr Antonoff MB Participating in a TweetChat: practical tips from The Thoracic Surgery Social Media Network (#TSSMN) Ann Thorac Surg 2019 107 e229 e233 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.10.003 30403980
Luc JGY, Varghese TK Jr, Antonoff MB. Participating in a TweetChat: practical tips from The Thoracic Surgery Social Media Network (#TSSMN). Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;107:e229–33.30403980
54. Luc JGY Archer MA Arora RC Bender EM Blitz A Cooke DT The Thoracic Surgery Social Media Network experience during the COVID-19 pandemic Ann Thorac Surg 2020 110 1103 1107 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.05.006 32425205
Luc JGY, Archer MA, Arora RC, Bender EM, Blitz A, Cooke DT, et al. The Thoracic Surgery Social Media Network experience during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;110:1103–7.32425205
55. Brady R Chapman S Atallah S Chand M Mayol J Lacy A # colorectalsurgery Br J Surg 2017 104 1470 1476 10.1002/bjs.10615 28881004
Brady R, Chapman S, Atallah S, Chand M, Mayol J, Lacy A, et al. # colorectalsurgery. Br J Surg. 2017;104:1470–6.28881004
56. Keller DS Winter DC Pellino G Cologne K Smart NJ Brady RRW #colorectalresearch: Introducing a disruptive technology for academic surgery in the social media age Dis Colon Rectum 2018 61 279 280 29369897
Keller DS, Winter DC, Pellino G, Cologne K, Smart NJ, Brady RRW. #colorectalresearch: Introducing a disruptive technology for academic surgery in the social media age. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018;61:279–80.29369897
57. Soreide K Numbers needed to tweet: social media and impact on surgery Eur J Surg Oncol 2019 45 292 295 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.10.054 30343997
Soreide K. Numbers needed to tweet: social media and impact on surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45:292–5.30343997
58. Navarro SM Mazingi D Keil E Dube A Dedeker C Stewart KA Identifying new frontiers for social media engagement in global surgery: an observational study World J Surg 2020 44 2881 2891 10.1007/s00268-020-05553-8 32447417
Navarro SM, Mazingi D, Keil E, Dube A, Dedeker C, Stewart KA, et al. Identifying new frontiers for social media engagement in global surgery: an observational study. World J Surg. 2020;44:2881–91.32447417
59. Sgarbura O Mackenzie G Holmberg M Wigmore SJ Soreide K Social media for the hepato-pancreato-biliary community (#SoMe4HPB): connecting a specialized online group for scientific and clinical knowledge dissemination HPB (Oxford) 2021 23 1448 1455 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.01.017 33824082
Sgarbura O, Mackenzie G, Holmberg M, Wigmore SJ, Soreide K. Social media for the hepato-pancreato-biliary community (#SoMe4HPB): connecting a specialized online group for scientific and clinical knowledge dissemination. HPB (Oxford). 2021;23:1448–55.33824082
60. Ansari H Pitt SC #ILookLikeASurgeon: Or do I? The local and global impact of a hashtag Am J Surg 2021 221 908 909 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.10.020 33109333
Ansari H, Pitt SC. #ILookLikeASurgeon: Or do I? The local and global impact of a hashtag. Am J Surg. 2021;221:908–9.33109333
61. Martin S Rocque B Emamaullee J Social media in transplantation: an opportunity for outreach, research promotion, and enhancing workforce diversity Transplantation 2022 106 2108 2110 10.1097/TP.0000000000004143 35404874
Martin S, Rocque B, Emamaullee J. Social media in transplantation: an opportunity for outreach, research promotion, and enhancing workforce diversity. Transplantation. 2022;106:2108–10.35404874
62. Lima DL Cordeiro RN Carvalho GL Malcher F The influence of social media in minimally invasive surgery education: How surgeons exchange experience and knowledge in these platforms J Minim Access Surg 2019 15 275 276 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_270_18 30618437
Lima DL, Cordeiro RN, Carvalho GL, Malcher F. The influence of social media in minimally invasive surgery education: How surgeons exchange experience and knowledge in these platforms. J Minim Access Surg. 2019;15:275–6.30618437
63. Bernardi K Milton AN Hope W Roth JS Shah SK Shah P Are online surgical discussion boards a safe and useful venue for surgeons to ask for advice? A review of the International Hernia Collaboration Facebook Group Surg Endosc 2020 34 1285 1289 10.1007/s00464-019-06895-8 31399945
Bernardi K, Milton AN, Hope W, Roth JS, Shah SK, Shah P, et al. Are online surgical discussion boards a safe and useful venue for surgeons to ask for advice? A review of the International Hernia Collaboration Facebook Group. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:1285–9.31399945
64. Durbin BL Faulkner JD Jernigan R Hope D Jacob B Hope WW Patient referrals for hernia consultations through the International Hernia Collaboration (IHC) online social media platform Am Surg 2022 88 1026 1027 10.1177/00031348211058633 35282710
Durbin BL, Faulkner JD, Jernigan R, Hope D, Jacob B, Hope WW. Patient referrals for hernia consultations through the International Hernia Collaboration (IHC) online social media platform. Am Surg. 2022;88:1026–7.35282710
65. Jackson HT Young MT Rodriguez HA Wright AS SAGES Foregut Surgery Masters Program: a surgeon’s social media resource for collaboration, education, and professional development Surg Endosc 2018 32 2800 2807 10.1007/s00464-017-5983-1 29497827
Jackson HT, Young MT, Rodriguez HA, Wright AS. SAGES Foregut Surgery Masters Program: a surgeon’s social media resource for collaboration, education, and professional development. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:2800–7.29497827
66. Myers CG Kudsi OY Ghaferi AA Social Media as a platform for surgical learning: use and engagement patterns among robotic surgeons Ann Surg 2018 267 233 235 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002479 28857816
Myers CG, Kudsi OY, Ghaferi AA. Social Media as a platform for surgical learning: use and engagement patterns among robotic surgeons. Ann Surg. 2018;267:233–5.28857816
67. Bittner JGt, Logghe HJ, Kane ED, Goldberg RF, Alseidi A, Aggarwal R, et al. A Society of Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) statement on closed social media (Facebook®) groups for clinical education and consultation: issues of informed consent, patient privacy, and surgeon protection. Surg Endosc. 2019;33:1–7.
68. Elkbuli A Santarone K Boneva D Hai S McKenney M Analysis of the American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress Twitter hashtags and its impact on online engagement and attendance rates: the era of health care social media Am Surg 2021 87 235 241 10.1177/0003134820950289 32927993
Elkbuli A, Santarone K, Boneva D, Hai S, McKenney M. Analysis of the American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress Twitter hashtags and its impact on online engagement and attendance rates: the era of health care social media. Am Surg. 2021;87:235–41.32927993
69. Schwenk ES Jaremko KM Park BH Stiegler MA Gamble JG Chu LF I tweet, therefore I learn: an analysis of Twitter use across anesthesiology conferences Anesth Analg 2020 130 333 340 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004036 31124801
Schwenk ES, Jaremko KM, Park BH, Stiegler MA, Gamble JG, Chu LF, et al. I tweet, therefore I learn: an analysis of Twitter use across anesthesiology conferences. Anesth Analg. 2020;130:333–40.31124801
70. Nolte AC Nguyen KA Perecman A Katz MS Kenney PA Cooperberg MR Association between Twitter reception at a National Urology Conference and Future Publication Status Eur Urol Focus 2021 7 214 220 10.1016/j.euf.2019.05.004 31103604
Nolte AC, Nguyen KA, Perecman A, Katz MS, Kenney PA, Cooperberg MR, et al. Association between Twitter reception at a National Urology Conference and Future Publication Status. Eur Urol Focus. 2021;7:214–20.31103604
71. Mizuno A Rewley J Kishi T Matsumoto C Sahashi Y Ishida M Relationship between official Twitter ambassadors and the number of retweets in the annual congress - "Tweet the Meeting." Circ Rep 2021 3 414 418 10.1253/circrep.CR-21-0063 34250283
Mizuno A, Rewley J, Kishi T, Matsumoto C, Sahashi Y, Ishida M, et al. Relationship between official Twitter ambassadors and the number of retweets in the annual congress - “Tweet the Meeting.” Circ Rep. 2021;3:414–8.34250283
72. Light D Pawlak M de Beaux A Brady RR Is sharing speaker’s slides from conference presentations on social media a breach of intellectual property or a delegate’s right? Depends who you ask Int J Surg 2018 58 22 25 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.08.010 30172076
Light D, Pawlak M, de Beaux A, Brady RR. Is sharing speaker’s slides from conference presentations on social media a breach of intellectual property or a delegate’s right? Depends who you ask. Int J Surg. 2018;58:22–5.30172076
73. Stephens SW Williams C Gray R Kerby JD Wang HE Bosarge PL Using social media for community consultation and public disclosure in exception from informed consent trials J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2016 80 1005 1009 10.1097/TA.0000000000001042 26998781
Stephens SW, Williams C, Gray R, Kerby JD, Wang HE, Bosarge PL. Using social media for community consultation and public disclosure in exception from informed consent trials. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80:1005–9.26998781
74. Sayers AE, Lee MJ, Smart N, Fearnhead NS, Group NS. Optimizing collaborator recruitment and maintaining engagement via social media during large multicentre studies: lessons learned from the National Audit of Small Bowel Obstruction (NASBO). Colorectal Dis. 2018;20:1142-50.
75. Bisset CN Carter B Law J Hewitt J Parmar K Moug SJ The influence of social media on recruitment to surgical trials BMC Med Res Methodol 2020 20 201 10.1186/s12874-020-01072-1 32723388
Bisset CN, Carter B, Law J, Hewitt J, Parmar K, Moug SJ, et al. The influence of social media on recruitment to surgical trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20:201.32723388
76. Collaborative CO Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international cohort study Lancet 2020 396 27 38 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31182-X 32479829
Collaborative CO. Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international cohort study. Lancet. 2020;396:27–38.32479829
77. Bisset CN Moug SJ Collaboration is key: the role of social media in advancing surgical research Surgery 2023 174 392 394 10.1016/j.surg.2023.04.053 37230868
Bisset CN, Moug SJ. Collaboration is key: the role of social media in advancing surgical research. Surgery. 2023;174:392–4.37230868
78. Glasbey JC Nepogodiev D Simoes JFF Omar O Li E Venn ML Elective Cancer Surgery in COVID-19-free surgical pathways during the SARS-COV-2 pandemic: an international, multicenter, comparative cohort study J Clin Oncol 2021 39 66 78 10.1200/JCO.20.01933 33021869
Glasbey JC, Nepogodiev D, Simoes JFF, Omar O, Li E, Venn ML, et al. Elective Cancer Surgery in COVID-19-free surgical pathways during the SARS-COV-2 pandemic: an international, multicenter, comparative cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:66–78.33021869
79. Collaborative C Preoperative nasopharyngeal swab testing and postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing elective surgery during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic Br J Surg 2020 108 88 96 10.1093/bjs/znaa051
Collaborative C. Preoperative nasopharyngeal swab testing and postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing elective surgery during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Br J Surg. 2020;108:88–96.
80. Collaborative CO Delaying surgery for patients with a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection Br J Surg 2020 107 e601 e602 10.1002/bjs.12050 32974904
Collaborative CO. Delaying surgery for patients with a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. Br J Surg. 2020;107:e601–2.32974904
81. Collaborative CO Global guidance for surgical care during the COVID-19 pandemic Br J Surg 2020 107 1097 1103 10.1002/bjs.11646 32293715
Collaborative CO. Global guidance for surgical care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Surg. 2020;107:1097–103.32293715
82. Collaborative CO Elective surgery cancelations due to the COVID-19 pandemic: global predictive modelling to inform surgical recovery plans Br J Surg 2020 107 1440 1449 32395848
Collaborative CO. Elective surgery cancelations due to the COVID-19 pandemic: global predictive modelling to inform surgical recovery plans. Br J Surg. 2020;107:1440–9.32395848
83. Fuller CC Deckey DG Brinkman JC Tummala SV Lu PG Mishra N General surgery residency applicants’ perspective on social media as a recruiting tool J Surg Educ 2022 79 1334 1341 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.06.003 35739022
Fuller CC, Deckey DG, Brinkman JC, Tummala SV, Lu PG, Mishra N, et al. General surgery residency applicants’ perspective on social media as a recruiting tool. J Surg Educ. 2022;79:1334–41.35739022
84. Gleason A Singh G Keffer L Nepomnayshy D General surgery going viral: current trends in social media utilization by general surgery residency programs J Surg Educ 2021 78 e62 e67 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.10.014 34782270
Gleason A, Singh G, Keffer L, Nepomnayshy D. General surgery going viral: current trends in social media utilization by general surgery residency programs. J Surg Educ. 2021;78:e62–7.34782270
85. White EM Rohde SC Ruzgar NM Chan SM Esposito AC Oliveira KD Characterizing the social media footprint of general surgery residency programs PLoS ONE 2021 16 e0253787 10.1371/journal.pone.0253787 34191853
White EM, Rohde SC, Ruzgar NM, Chan SM, Esposito AC, Oliveira KD, et al. Characterizing the social media footprint of general surgery residency programs. PLoS ONE. 2021;16: e0253787.34191853
86. Fang HA Boudreau HB Khan S Singh NP Rais-Bahrami S King TW An evaluation of social media utilization by general surgery programs in the COVID-19 era Am J Surg 2021 222 937 943 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.04.014 33906728
Fang HA, Boudreau HB, Khan S, Singh NP, Rais-Bahrami S, King TW, et al. An evaluation of social media utilization by general surgery programs in the COVID-19 era. Am J Surg. 2021;222:937–43.33906728
87. Bludevich BM Fryer M Scott EM Buettner H Davids JS LaFemina J Patterns of general surgery residency social media use in the age of COVID-19 J Surg Educ 2021 78 e218 e225 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.04.017 34016568
Bludevich BM, Fryer M, Scott EM, Buettner H, Davids JS, LaFemina J. Patterns of general surgery residency social media use in the age of COVID-19. J Surg Educ. 2021;78:e218–25.34016568
88. Nikolian VC Barrett M Valbuena VS Ibrahim AM Eidy H Ghandour MH Educational content and the use of social media at US departments of surgery Surgery 2018 163 467 471 10.1016/j.surg.2017.10.039 29241992
Nikolian VC, Barrett M, Valbuena VS, Ibrahim AM, Eidy H, Ghandour MH, et al. Educational content and the use of social media at US departments of surgery. Surgery. 2018;163:467–71.29241992
89. Larkins K Murphy V Loveday BPT Use of social media for surgical education in Australia and New Zealand ANZ J Surg 2020 90 1004 1008 10.1111/ans.15768 32109343
Larkins K, Murphy V, Loveday BPT. Use of social media for surgical education in Australia and New Zealand. ANZ J Surg. 2020;90:1004–8.32109343
90. Minami HR Li X Ong SK Allen S Ansari P Balters M Frequency and characteristics of social media use among general surgery trainees J Surg Res 2022 277 342 351 10.1016/j.jss.2022.04.050 35561650
Minami HR, Li X, Ong SK, Allen S, Ansari P, Balters M, et al. Frequency and characteristics of social media use among general surgery trainees. J Surg Res. 2022;277:342–51.35561650
91. Zerrweck C Arana S Calleja C Rodriguez N Moreno E Pantoja JP Social media, advertising, and internet use among general and bariatric surgeons Surg Endosc 2020 34 1634 1640 10.1007/s00464-019-06933-5 31218423
Zerrweck C, Arana S, Calleja C, Rodriguez N, Moreno E, Pantoja JP, et al. Social media, advertising, and internet use among general and bariatric surgeons. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:1634–40.31218423
92. Bosselmann CM Griffiths B Gallagher HJ Matzel KE Brady RRW Social media use in German visceral surgeons: a cross-sectional study of a national cohort Colorectal Dis 2018 20 144 149 10.1111/codi.13839 28783240
Bosselmann CM, Griffiths B, Gallagher HJ, Matzel KE, Brady RRW. Social media use in German visceral surgeons: a cross-sectional study of a national cohort. Colorectal Dis. 2018;20:144–9.28783240
93. Kilkenny J McDonald JJ Brady RR Increased engagement with social media in colorectal surgery Colorectal Dis 2017 19 592 594 10.1111/codi.13712 28477367
Kilkenny J, McDonald JJ, Brady RR. Increased engagement with social media in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19:592–4.28477367
94. Long LE Leung C Hong JS Wright C Young CJ Patterns of internet and social media use in colorectal surgery BMC Surg 2019 19 52 10.1186/s12893-019-0518-4 31126279
Long LE, Leung C, Hong JS, Wright C, Young CJ. Patterns of internet and social media use in colorectal surgery. BMC Surg. 2019;19:52.31126279
95. Hong FC Devine P McDonald JJ Cologne K Brady RRW Social media engagement amongst 2017 colorectal surgery Tripartite Meeting attendees: updates on contemporary social media use Colorectal Dis 2018 20 O114 O118 10.1111/codi.14058 29509990
Hong FC, Devine P, McDonald JJ, Cologne K, Brady RRW. Social media engagement amongst 2017 colorectal surgery Tripartite Meeting attendees: updates on contemporary social media use. Colorectal Dis. 2018;20:O114–8.29509990
96. Lui DH McDonald JJ de Beaux A Tulloh B Brady RRW Contemporary engagement with social media amongst hernia surgery specialists Hernia 2017 21 509 515 10.1007/s10029-017-1609-8 28424931
Lui DH, McDonald JJ, de Beaux A, Tulloh B, Brady RRW. Contemporary engagement with social media amongst hernia surgery specialists. Hernia. 2017;21:509–15.28424931
97. Henderson ML Adler JT Van Pilsum Rasmussen SE Thomas AG Herron PD Waldram MM How should social media be used in transplantation? A survey of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons Transplantation 2019 103 573 580 10.1097/TP.0000000000002243 29684002
Henderson ML, Adler JT, Van Pilsum Rasmussen SE, Thomas AG, Herron PD, Waldram MM, et al. How should social media be used in transplantation? A survey of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. Transplantation. 2019;103:573–80.29684002
98. Langenfeld SJ Vargo DJ Schenarts PJ Balancing privacy and professionalism: a survey of general surgery program directors on social media and surgical education J Surg Educ 2016 73 e28 e32 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.07.010 27524278
Langenfeld SJ, Vargo DJ, Schenarts PJ. Balancing privacy and professionalism: a survey of general surgery program directors on social media and surgical education. J Surg Educ. 2016;73:e28–32.27524278
99. Price AD Shah SA Ahmad SA Social media and academic surgical research dissemination Surgery 2023 174 383 386 10.1016/j.surg.2023.04.038 37221104
Price AD, Shah SA, Ahmad SA. Social media and academic surgical research dissemination. Surgery. 2023;174:383–6.37221104
100. Digne-Malcolm H Wilson J Magee C Surgical images on social media: patient-centred or just for clicks? Br J Surg 2023 110 729 730 10.1093/bjs/znad085 37022781
Digne-Malcolm H, Wilson J, Magee C. Surgical images on social media: patient-centred or just for clicks? Br J Surg. 2023;110:729–30.37022781
101. Fanti Silva DA Colleoni R Patient’s privacy violation on social media in the surgical area Am Surg 2018 84 1900 1905 10.1177/000313481808401235 30606346
Fanti Silva DA, Colleoni R. Patient’s privacy violation on social media in the surgical area. Am Surg. 2018;84:1900–5.30606346
102. Logghe HJ Boeck MA Gusani NJ Hardaway JC Hughes KA Mouawad NJ Best Practices for surgeons’ social media use: statement of the Resident and Associate Society of the American College of Surgeons J Am Coll Surg 2018 226 317 327 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.11.022 29224795
Logghe HJ, Boeck MA, Gusani NJ, Hardaway JC, Hughes KA, Mouawad NJ, et al. Best Practices for surgeons’ social media use: statement of the Resident and Associate Society of the American College of Surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;226:317–27.29224795
103. Varghese TK Jr Entwistle JW 3rd Mayer JE Moffatt-Bruce SD Sade RM Cardiothoracic EF Ethical standards for cardiothoracic surgeons’ participation in social media Ann Thorac Surg 2019 108 666 670 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.04.003 31262490
Varghese TK Jr, Entwistle JW 3rd, Mayer JE, Moffatt-Bruce SD, Sade RM, Cardiothoracic EF. Ethical standards for cardiothoracic surgeons’ participation in social media. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;108:666–70.31262490
104. Statement on guidelines for the ethical use of social media by surgeons. The American College of Surgeons. 2019.
105. Hall N The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists Genome Biol 2014 15 424 10.1186/s13059-014-0424-0 25315513
Hall N. The Kardashian index: a measure of discrepant social media profile for scientists. Genome Biol. 2014;15:424.25315513
106. Charnock D Shepperd S Needham G Gann R DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices J Epidemiol Community Health 1999 53 105 111 10.1136/jech.53.2.105 10396471
Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53:105–11.10396471
107. Silberg WM Lundberg GD Musacchio RA Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor–Let the reader and viewer beware JAMA 1997 277 1244 1245 10.1001/jama.1997.03540390074039 9103351
Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor–Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA. 1997;277:1244–5.9103351
108. Vassiliou MC Feldman LS Andrew CG Bergman S Leffondre K Stanbridge D A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills Am J Surg 2005 190 107 113 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.04.004 15972181
Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG, Bergman S, Leffondre K, Stanbridge D, et al. A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg. 2005;190:107–13.15972181
109. Celentano V Smart N Cahill RA Spinelli A Giglio MC McGrath J Development and validation of a recommended checklist for assessment of surgical videos quality: the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool Surg Endosc 2021 35 1362 1369 10.1007/s00464-020-07517-4 32253556
Celentano V, Smart N, Cahill RA, Spinelli A, Giglio MC, McGrath J, et al. Development and validation of a recommended checklist for assessment of surgical videos quality: the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool. Surg Endosc. 2021;35:1362–9.32253556
110. Martin JA Regehr G Reznick R MacRae H Murnaghan J Hutchison C Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents Br J Surg 1997 84 273 278 9052454
Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, MacRae H, Murnaghan J, Hutchison C, et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg. 1997;84:273–8.9052454
111. Sanford DE Strasberg SM A simple effective method for generation of a permanent record of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy by intraoperative “doublet” photography J Am College Surg 2014 218 170 178 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.11.003
Sanford DE, Strasberg SM. A simple effective method for generation of a permanent record of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy by intraoperative “doublet” photography. J Am College Surg. 2014;218:170–8.
112. Kurashima Y Feldman LS Al-Sabah S Kaneva PA Fried GM Vassiliou MC A tool for training and evaluation of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: the Global Operative Assessment Of Laparoscopic Skills-Groin Hernia (GOALS-GH) Am J Surg 2011 201 54 61 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.09.006 21167366
Kurashima Y, Feldman LS, Al-Sabah S, Kaneva PA, Fried GM, Vassiliou MC. A tool for training and evaluation of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: the Global Operative Assessment Of Laparoscopic Skills-Groin Hernia (GOALS-GH). Am J Surg. 2011;201:54–61.21167366
113. Dath D Regehr G Birch D Schlachta C Poulin E Mamazza J Toward reliable operative assessment: the reliability and feasibility of videotaped assessment of laparoscopic technical skills Surg Endosc 2004 18 1800 1804 10.1007/s00464-003-8157-2 15809794
Dath D, Regehr G, Birch D, Schlachta C, Poulin E, Mamazza J, et al. Toward reliable operative assessment: the reliability and feasibility of videotaped assessment of laparoscopic technical skills. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1800–4.15809794
