
==== Front
J Immigr Minor Health
J Immigr Minor Health
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
1557-1912
1557-1920
Springer US New York

38700575
1603
10.1007/s10903-024-01603-8
Original Paper
Effectiveness of Trained Community Lay Workers on Glycemic Control, Knowledge, and Self-Efficacy Among Agricultural Workers with Diabetes in the Texas Panhandle
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7460-5879
Rodriguez Anabel Anabelr@tamu.edu

1
Chavez Lus 2
Wagner Teresa 3
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3022-8316
Howe Carol 4
1 https://ror.org/01f5ytq51 grid.264756.4 0000 0004 4687 2082 School of Public Health College Station, Texas A&M University, Environmental and Occupational Health, 212 Adriance Lab Road, 1266 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843 USA
2 Family Support Services of Amarillo, Sembrando el Sueño, 2209 SW 7th, Amarillo, TX 79106 USA
3 https://ror.org/05msxaq47 grid.266871.c 0000 0000 9765 6057 School of Health Professions, The University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd, IREB 470C, Fort Worth, TX 76107 USA
4 https://ror.org/054b0b564 grid.264766.7 0000 0001 2289 1930 Harris College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Texas Christian University, 2800 South University Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76109 USA
3 5 2024
3 5 2024
2024
26 5 841849
17 4 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Systemic health barriers, economic challenges, and lack of follow-up care exacerbate self-management of chronic diseases like diabetes among Hispanic agricultural workers. The primary objective of this pilot project was to determine the benefit of using community coaches to decrease A1C levels and increase diabetes knowledge among agricultural workers with diagnosed diabetes in the Texas Panhandle. A longitudinal study design with two phases was used to create, deliver, and evaluate a diabetes coaching program. Phase 1 was the development of the program and community coaches training (n = 4). In Phase 2, the coaches then delivered the program over 12 weeks to thirteen clients. Phase 1: All coaches were Hispanic females, 28.3 (SD 3.8) years of age, half had at most a high school education level and the other half had a vocational certification (n = 4). Mean DKQ-24 score was 54.2% (SD = 29.7) at baseline and 75.0% (SD = 31.4) after training (t (4) = 4.6, P < 0.05). We observed a very large difference between mean baseline and exit DKQ-24 scores relative to the pooled standard deviation, resulting in an effect size estimate of 0.59 indicative of a medium to large learning effect. Phase 2: Clients were Hispanic Spanish-speaking, predominantly female (55%), 44.4 (SD 6.8) years of age with at most a high school level of education (88.9%) and occupations varied from dairy farm worker (33.3%), meat processing worker (33.3%), and other agriculture or manufacturing position (33.3%). The mean SKILLD score was 40.0% (SD = 28.7) at baseline, increasing to 72.2% (SD = 25.4) at 12 weeks upon completion of the coaching program (t (9) = 2.956, P < 0.05). We observed a very large difference between mean baseline and exit SKILLD scores relative to the pooled standard deviation, resulting in an effect size estimate of 1.13 indicative of a large learning effect. The mean A1C levels at baseline screening was 8.3% (SD = 3.0) and 7.6% (SD = 3.0) at exit screening, representing a 0.7% decrease (p = 0.4730). No statistically significant differences were observed between depression (p = 0.786) or anxiety (p = 1.000) measures at baseline compared to exit. Training and coaching programs for hard-to-reach agricultural and meat processing workers must be culturally, linguistically, and literacy appropriate for both coaches and clients. The program must be feasible and sustainable, focus on empowering community members, capitalize on technological advances and persisting new-normals from the COVID-19 pandemic as well as dismantle common systemic barriers to health and understanding lived-experiences of agricultural working populations in rural regions.

Keywords

Training
Diabetes
Rural health
Hispanic
Guatemala
K’iche’
High Plains Center for Agricultural Health and Safety CDC/NIOSHU54OH008085 issue-copyright-statement© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

A healthy and present workforce is crucial for the sustainability of modern agricultural production in the United States (U.S.) [1]. U.S. agricultural workers are predominantly immigrant [2], Hispanic males [3], of approximately 30 years of age [4] with limited English proficiency and formal education [5]. Most agricultural workers are of Mexican descent (88.5-97.1%) [4–6]. In Texas and New Mexico, there has been an increase in agricultural workers originating from the department of Quiché in Guatemala [7, 8]. In the Texas Panhandle, most immigrants find occupations deemed low-skill with low wages in the prominent dairy, farming, animal husbandry, and meatpacking industries, with little to no social support [9].

Diabetes (12.5%) among U.S. Hispanics is highest compared to non-Hispanic Blacks, Asians, and Whites (7.5%) [10] with nearly 40.0% of agricultural workers unaware of their diabetes status [11]. Rural agricultural workers often have limited access to healthcare services [12]. Barriers to access include cost, transportation, language challenges, absence of health insurance, cultural differences, limited knowledge of health centers and locations, time conflicts due to work schedules, lack of childcare, unavailability of specialty services, migratory lifestyles, and fear of law and immigration enforcement [11–21]. This can lead to the progression of diabetes with increased disease severity [13]. Consequently, increased severity of chronic illnesses leads to increased presenteeism (physically present at work but sick, stressed, or tired) [22] and absenteeism (time absent from work) [23] which leads to lost wages, decreased access to health due to costs, and ultimately lower quality of life.

One proposed way to decrease A1C levels and increase the self-management and self-efficacy among patients with diabetes is to harness social and peer support of culturally and linguistically matched community lay workers [24, 25]. The true burden of the lack of diabetes knowledge, management, and self-efficacy among Mexican (Spanish) and Guatemalan (K’iche’) agricultural workers with diabetes in the Texas Panhandle remains largely unknown [26–28]. There is a need to determine the benefits of using community lay coaches to improve A1C and knowledge about diabetes among agricultural workers. These data may inform data-driven decisions to increase the use of community coaches to help medically underserved rural communities. The primary objective of this pilot project was to determine the benefit of using community coaches to decrease A1C levels and increase diabetes knowledge among agricultural workers with diabetes in the Texas Panhandle.

Methods

A longitudinal study design with two phases was used to create, deliver, and evaluate a diabetes coaching program. Phase 1 was the program development and community coaches training. In Phase 2, the coaches delivered the program to clients over 12-weeks. This study was approved by the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Committee of the Protection of Human Subjects (HSC-SPH-21-0740).

Phase 1: Community Coaches

Participants

Eligibility criteria for coaches included being over age 18, speaking or understanding English and Spanish and/or Spanish and K’iche’. Coaches were invited from a list of community members from the Cactus Nazarene Ministry Center (CNMC), dedicated to addressing immigration, children programming, and healthcare needs of the diverse community of Cactus, Texas. Four linguistically diverse community members from or living near Moore County were recruited to participate in this training. After receiving information about the study, all signed an electronic consent on Qualtrics Mobile Survey Software®.

Diabetes Education Training

Research personnel included a registered nurse and certified diabetes care and education specialist, dietician, occupational epidemiologist, and a local agricultural worker health advocate. The diabetes care nurse and dietician developed the diabetes training program focused on (1) community coach role (2) what is diabetes, (3) healthy eating, (3) blood glucose levels and monitoring, (4) diabetes medicine, (5) physical activity, (6) early identification and treatment of complications, (7) coping with stress and depression, (8) goal setting (Table 1) [24]. A curriculum manual was provided to guide their weekly coaching sessions. Research personnel delivered the training program in English in 1-hour sessions over five-weeks, using the manual for visuals, real-life examples, and role-playing exercises (Fig. 1). The training modeled the coaching that coaches would do with participating agricultural workers with diabetes (referred to as ‘their clients’). The research team reviewed surveys that the coaches would complete with their clients. In-person training was scheduled to begin January 2022; however, COVID-19 spikes and health and safety institutional guidelines pushed us to engage virtually. One research team member acted as the local contact to manage study logistics and support coaches. Coaches received a signed certificate and $1,000 in e-gift cards over 6-months.

Table 1 Community health worker diabetes education curriculum

Session	Topic	Learning Objective	
1	Peer leader role

What is diabetes

	Describe what diabetes is

Demonstrate how to monitor blood sugar with meter

Identify target blood sugar

Describe symptoms and treatment high blood sugar

	
2	Healthy eating	Identify foods (carbohydrates) that make blood sugar go up

Understand MyPlate for portions

Set goal for healthy eating

	
3	Physical activity	Understand physical activity helps to decrease blood sugar

List positive effects of regular physical activity

Set goal for physical activity

	
4	Stress, coping	Describe how stress increases blood sugar

Identify healthy coping strategies

Identify resources for coping

	
5	Teaching and support practice	Role play to provide teaching on a topic

Provide feedback to each peer

	

Fig. 1 Coaches 5-week virtual training. Registered nurse and certified diabetes care and education specialist demonstrating how to properly use a lancing device during glucometer use module. Coaches identities hidden for confidentiality purposes

Measures

General diabetes knowledge was assessed at baseline and five-weeks upon completion of the diabetes training program with the reliable and validated 24-item version of the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire (DKQ-24) [28]. DKQ-24 questions assess knowledge of medications, diet, exercise, home glucose monitoring, foot care, and treatment modifications. Each item can be answered as ‘Yes,’ ‘No,’ or ‘I don’t know.’ Each answer is weighted equally, scored as 1 if ‘correct’ and 0 if ‘incorrect’, and totaled to maximum score of 24 points.

Phase 2. Agricultural Workers with Diabetes

Study Design

A pre-post test design was used to assess agricultural workers’ diabetes knowledge, A1C, depression, anxiety, before and after individualized coaching from trained community coaches.

Setting

The Well Health Center is a faith-based charitable clinic that provides health care to the immigrant and refugee community in Moore County. A clinic needs assessment found that one-third of patient encounters were for diabetes care with over 60% being Hispanic (Mexican and Guatemalan) patients. Clinic leadership and staff were key in collaborating and providing patient data, meeting space, A1C screening services, and medical staff support. Coaching and data collection took place between March and June 2022.

Sample

No power analysis for sample size was warranted because this exploratory study was hypotheses generating. Sample size was deliberated with The Well Health Center medical staff and determined based on time, cost, and feasibility. Eligibility criteria included being ≥ 18 years of age, speaking Spanish, K’iche’, or English, working in the agricultural industry, and having diabetes. Interested and eligible agricultural workers were scheduled for a meeting at the clinic. A total of 13 agricultural workers (10 Spanish and 3 K’iche’-speaking) were initially recruited. After local research personnel read and explained the study, clients signed an electronic informed consent on Qualtrics Mobile Survey Software®.

Coach-Client Assignments

Trained community coaches and clients were matched based on language and cultural similarities and were introduced in-person at the clinic by the local research personnel. Coaches and their clients exchanged contact information and arranged for follow up coaching sessions.

Coach-Client Follow-up

Clients were coached weekly on diabetes topics using the 12-week manual with the learning objectives and curriculum outlined for each week. Local research personnel served as support and followed-up with coaches via phone and in-person on a weekly basis. In case of specific medical questions, coaches were advised to contact study investigators and/or clinic staff.

Measures

Sociodemographic information of clients was collected, including gender, age, nationality, language, education-level, marital status, and occupation. Coaches completed all surveys verbally with patients. Client A1C levels were measured at The Well Health Center. A decrease of 0.5% in A1C levels was considered clinically significant [29].

Diabetes knowledge was assessed with the validated 10-item Spoken Knowledge in Low Literacy patients with Diabetes (SKILLD) [27]. SKILLD questions assessed knowledge of hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, foot care, eye exams, fasting glucose, A1C, exercise, and long-term complications of diabetes. Each item is weighed equally at 10 points for a total of 100 points. A total score > 50% indicates ‘high knowledge’ whereas ≤ 50% indicates ‘low knowledge.’

Depression was measured using the well validated Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) [30]. Each of the 9 items were scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Total scores and depression categories include: 0–4 as none, 5–9 as mild, 10–14 as moderate, 15–19 as moderately severe, and > 20 as severe [31, 32].

Anxiety was measured using the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), a seven-item, self-report questionnaire to assess general anxiety during the previous 2 weeks. Patients rate the 7 items from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Total scores and anxiety categories include: 0–4 as minimal anxiety, 5–9 as mild anxiety, 10–14 as moderate anxiety, and > 15 as severe anxiety [33].

SKILLD, PHQ-9, and GAD-7 measurements were collected at baseline and upon completion of the coaching program. Participants were compensated with a total of $100 in e-gift cards and a diabetes care-kit (Fig. 2).

Data Analyses

Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics of sociodemographic characteristics, test score results, and training effectiveness evaluations. Paired t-test were used to assess knowledge improvement for coaches on DKQ-24 and patient’s SKILLD and A1C at baseline and exit. Hedges’ g estimate was used to compute effect size based on a comparison of baseline and exit DKQ-24 and SKILLD mean scores relative to pooled variances. Fisher’s exact test (with one or more cells < 5) was used to measure relationships between categorical variables PHQ-9, GAD-7, and SKILLD (low and high knowledge categories) at baseline and exit. All statistical analyses was performed using Stata SE 17.0 software [34].

Fig. 2 Diabetes kit used by coaches during 12-week training program: glucometer, lancets, strips, alcohol prep pads, adhesive bandages, cotton balls, biohazard container for lancets, portion control plate, water bottle, toothbrush, toothpaste, lip balm, sunscreen and work boot socks

Results

Results Phase 1: Coaches

Sociodemographic Characteristics

Coaches were all female, Hispanic, with a mean age of 28 years and most were born in the U.S. and English was their primary language. Half had high school education and the other half vocational certifications. Half were married and all had children. Coaches worked in nursing or childcare and worked fulltime (Table 2).

Table 2 Sociodemographic characteristics of diabetes program coaches (n = 4)

Characteristics	All
(n = 4)	
Mean (SD) or n (%)	
Age (Range 24–33)	28.3 (3.8)	
Female	4 (100.0)	
Nationality	
United States	3 (75.0)	
Guatemala	1 (25.0)	
Hispanic	4 (100.0)	
Primary language	
English	3 (75.0)	
K’iche’	1 (25.0)	
Secondary language	
Spanish	4 (100.0)	
Education	
High school	2 (50.0)	
Vocational/College	2 (50.0)	
Marital status	
Single	2 (50.0)	
Married	2 (50.0)	
Children	4 (100.0)	
Number of children (Range 1–5)	2.8 (2.1)	
Full-time occupation	
Vocational nurse	2 (50.0)	
Childcare provider	1 (25.0)	
Self-employed	1 (25.0)	
Days worked per week (Range 3–6)	4.8 (1.3)	
Hours worked per day (Range 8–10)	8.8 (1.0)	

Baseline and Exit Evaluation—DKQ-24

Mean DKQ-24 score increased from 54.2% (SD = 29.7) at baseline to 75.0% (SD = 31.4) after training (t (4) = 4.6, P < 0.05). We observed a very large difference between mean baseline and exit DKQ-24 scores relative to the pooled standard deviation, resulting in an effect size estimate of 0.59 indicative of a medium to large learning effect (Table 3).

Table 3 Coach results for 24-item Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire (DKQ-24) by education, country of origin, and primary language (n = 4)

	Baseline (SD)
(n = 4)	Exit (SD)
(n = 4)	
All participants*	54.2 (29.7)	75.0 (31.4)	
Highest education level achieved	
High school	41.7 (29.2)	56.3 (27.1)	
Vocational or College	66.7 (12.5)	93.8 (6.3)	
Country of origin	
United States	68.1 (90.3)	90.3 (5.0)	
Guatemala	12.5 (0.0)	29.2 (0.0)	
Primary language	
English	68.1 (90.3)	90.3 (5.0)	
K’iche’	12.5 (0.0)	29.2 (0.0)	
* Statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences between DKQ-24 baseline and exit scores

Results Phase 2: Clients

Sociodemographic Characteristics

Mean age of clients was 44.4 (SD 6.8, Range 37–56) and 55% identified as female (Table 4). All were Spanish-speaking Hispanic, with most from Mexico, and had lived in the U.S. for over 20 years. Most had a high school education, were married, and had children. All worked in agriculture or meat processing, working 5 days a week for 9 h per day. Most had been living with diabetes for an average of 5 years and almost all were vaccinated for COVID-19. About 1/3rd reported Facebook and WhatsApp as the most trusted social media platforms for health information.

Table 4 Sociodemographic characteristics of agricultural workers with diabetes (n = 9)

Characteristics	All
(n = 9)	
Mean (SD) or n (%)	
Age (Range 37–56)	44.4 (6.8)	
Female	4 (50.0)	
Nationality	
Mexico	8 (88.9)	
Guatemala	1 (11.1)	
Years in U.S. (Range 5–40)	23.8 (10.8)	
Hispanic	9 (100.0)	
Primary language	
Spanish	9 (100.0)	
Education	
Less than high school	8 (88.9)	
College or higher	1 (11.1)	
Marital status	
Married	5 (55.6)	
Children	7 (77.8)	
Number of children (Range 2–5)	3.5 (1.0)	
Occupation	
Dairy farm	3 (33.3)	
Meat processing	3 (33.3)	
Other agriculture or manufacturing	3 (33.3)	
Years of experience (Range 5–14)	10.5 (3.3)	
Days worked per week (Range 3–7)	5.3 (1.5)	
Hours worked per day (Range 4–12)	9.2 (2.7)	
Trusted social media for health information	
Facebook	3 (33.3)	
WhatsApp	3 (33.3)	
Instagram	1 (11.1)	
None	2 (22.2)	
Years diagnosed with diabetes (Range 1–23)	5.3 (7.5)	
COVID-19 vaccinated	8 (88.9)	

Baseline and Exit Evaluation—Skilld and A1C

The mean SKILLD score was 40.0% (SD = 28.7) at baseline, increasing to 72.2% (SD = 25.4) at 12-weeks upon completion of the coaching program (t (9) = 2.956, P < 0.05). We observed a very large difference between mean baseline and exit scores relative to the pooled standard deviation, resulting in an effect size estimate of 1.13 indicative of a large learning effect. The mean A1C baseline level was 8.3% (SD = 3.0) decreasing to 7.6% (SD = 3.0) at exit screening, representing a 0.7% decrease (p = 0.4730). The goal for adults with diabetes is an A1C < 7, and changes in A1C greater than 0.5% in response to interventions is considered clinically significant [29] given the strong negative association between A1C and risk of complications, including nephropathy, retinopathy, and cardiac events [35].

Depression and Anxiety

At baseline, the majority of clients experienced from none to mild depression with one participant experiencing severe depression (Table 5). At program exit, participants experienced from none to moderate depression, with no participants experiencing severe depression. No statistically significant difference was observed between depression measures at baseline compared to exit (p = 0.786)—but at least one client improved from severe depression to moderate depression. At baseline, participants experienced minimal to moderate anxiety—with no participants experiencing severe anxiety. At program exit, participants experienced minimal to mild anxiety, with no participants experiencing moderate or severe anxiety. No statistically significant differences were observed between anxiety measures at baseline compared to exit (p = 1.000).

Table 5 Program baseline and exit evaluation measures for agricultural workers with diabetes (n = 9)

	Baseline
(n = 8)	Exit
(n = 9)	p*	
Mean (SD) or n (%)	
Depression measure (PHQ-9)	
None (0–4)	3 (37.5)	2 (22.2)	0.786	
Mild (5–9)	3 (37.5)	5 (55.6)		
Moderate (10–14)	1 (12.5)	2 (22.2)		
Moderately severe (15–19)	-	-		
Severe (20–27)	1 (12.5)	-		
Anxiety measure (GAD-7)	
Minimal anxiety (0–4)	5 (55.6)	6 (66.7)	1.000	
Mild anxiety (5–9)	3 (33.3)	3 (33.3)		
Moderate anxiety (10–14)	1 (11.1)	-		
Severe anxiety (> 15)	-	-		
SKILLD	40 (28.7)	72.2 (25.4)	0.018*	
≤50% (low knowledge)	6 (66.7)	2 (22.2)	0.583	
>50% (high knowledge)	3 (33.3)	7 (77.8)		
A1C clinical measure (Range 6.2–15.5)	8.3 (3.0)	7.6 (3.0)	0.473	
* Statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences between baseline and exit evaluations

Discussion

Clients experienced a decrease in mean A1C from 8.3 to 7.6%, a 0.7% decrease. Although this was not a statistically significant decrease in A1C levels post coaching program, a decrease > 0.5% is considered clinically significant [36]. The target for adults with diabetes is an A1C < 7%. However, A1C levels reflect an 8 to 12-week blood glucose average, taking time and consistent lifestyle changes to see noticeable decreases. A previous promotora-driven intervention for glycemic self-management among 70 farmworkers in the US-Mexico border saw decreased A1C levels by 1% among clients with high risk for diabetes complications in a 12-month period [25]. A larger sample size and a 12-month timeline was not feasible for this pilot project, but should be considered when planning interventions aimed at decreasing A1C levels among hard-to-reach populations.

Overall, clients increased their knowledge of diabetes on hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, eye exams, fasting glucose level, A1C levels, exercise, and long-term complications of diabetes. The SKILLD evaluation was administered verbally by coaches in anticipation of low literacy and levels of education among participants [27]. Consistent with previous work in this region [7, 8, 37, 38], the majority of participants had less than a high school level education from Mexico or Guatemala. The SKILLD also allowed for participants to express logic behind answers provided compared to restrictive multiple-choice formatted questions. This recorded logic then allowed research personnel to determine correct and incorrect answers based on Rothman et al. rubric [27]. The SKILLD evaluation proved to be appropriate and feasible for agricultural workers with low literacy levels.

Findings from this pilot can guide the use of lay coaches in a larger multi-year study among agricultural workers with diabetes in rural health deserts similar to Moore County. Delivering and modelling the diabetes curriculum during training sessions that coaches in turn delivered to their clients was effective, confirming previous efforts. For example, a pilot program to reduce depression and stress among immigrant Latinas used community promotoras to conduct outreach to their ‘compañeras’ (local social network). The curriculum taught promotoras specific coping skills they then taught their compañeras to decrease perceived stress and depression [39].

Virtual delivery of the training program allowed for a rich cross-institutional collaboration and, simultaneously, a long-distance reach into a rural community with limited training resources. Virtual delivery granted coaches accessibility and flexibility. All four coaches successfully completed the 5-week training. Overall, the coaches training proved effective in knowledge gained. Worth noting, our Spanish – K’iche’ speaking coach was assigned to our local research member who would visit weekly to review training content. Despite additional time and resources allocated, our Spanish – K’iche’ speaking coach was out-performed by our English – Spanish speaking coaches. Potentially, this alludes to linguistic, cultural, and educational opportunity differences between Mexican Spanish and Guatemalan Spanish and K’iche’. Guatemalan K’iche’ only recently became a written language, and certain medical terms like ‘diabetes,’ ‘kidney failure,’ ‘insulin,’ are not part of Mayan vocabulary [40]. Future work should focus on creating and evaluating diabetes educational content in K’iche’ with guidance from the Guatemalan K’iche’ community and consideration of regional dialects. Content can include colorful illustrations and minimal text or animated videos with K’iche’ voice-over. Mobile technologies should also be considered as a delivery method to increase diabetes care knowledge among agricultural workers as previously proved effective in increasing safety awareness among Mexican and Guatemalan dairy farm workers in the Texas Panhandle by Rodriguez et al. [7]. In addition, trusted social media platforms like Facebook and WhatsApp should be leveraged to deliver health information to agricultural workers in rural and medically underserved regions.

In-person and ‘personal’ delivery of the coaching program was successful due to coaches being embedded in the community and being familiar with agricultural worker lifestyles. Methods for this second phase of the pilot project aimed at dismantling systemic barriers to healthcare access such as cost (program was free), transportation (coaches and participants lived in the same community), language and translation challenges (matched based on language), absence of health insurance (charitable clinic), cultural differences (matched based on culture), limited knowledge of health centers and locations (list of local low cost services provided), time conflicts due to demanding work schedules and lack of childcare (visits or calls around their working and family schedules), migratory lifestyles (contact via phones, WhatsApp), and fear of law and immigration enforcement (documentation status not asked and no travel required) [11–21]. Future research involving agricultural workers in rural regions should intentionally consider and address all barriers to access when planning all stages of programs. Simply neglecting to address one barrier can impact participation and study attrition.

Limitations

Study limitations included small sample size and retention rate. A power analysis for an appropriate sample size would be warranted for a larger multi-year study. Despite the small sample size, we observed a very large difference between mean baseline and exit SKILLD scores relative to the pooled standard deviation, resulting in a large learning effect among clients. Study attrition was acceptable with 75% of recruited coaches retained and 69.2% of recruited clients retained. While thirteen workers with diabetes were recruited, only nine completed the program in full. Reasons for dropping included time, interest in the program, and, justifiably, the drop of one English-Spanish coach which caused the re-assignment of three Spanish-speaking clients between the two English-Spanish coaches. Even with new coach assignments, the three clients were able to reestablish relationships with new coaches and finish out the program.

New Contribution to the Literature

Lessons learned from this pilot are pivotal for clinical care of agricultural workers with diabetes—especially those in health deserts. Training and coaching programs for hard-to-reach agricultural workers must be culturally, linguistically, and literacy appropriate for both coaches and clients. Future programs must be feasible and sustainable after research support and resources are no longer readily available. Future programs must focus on empowering community members as active participants in research and outreach initiatives, interventions, and applicable results. As researchers, we also have to capitalize on technological advances and persisting ‘new-normals’ from isolation and social distancing guidelines due to the pandemic—this includes virtual: gatherings, surveys, focus groups, consent signatures, telehealth appointments, among others in order to reach medically underserved rural communities. Last, programs must focus on dismantling common systemic barriers to health and intentionally empathizing with lived-experiences of agricultural workers and their families living in rural regions.

Acknowledgements

This manuscript is supported by the High Plains Intermountain Center for Agricultural Health and Safety CDC/NIOSH Grant No. U54OH008085. Its content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of CDC/NIOSH.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial, or otherwise.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Lerman S Fatigue risk management in the workplace J Occup Environ Med 2012 54 2 231 58 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318247a3b0 22269988
Lerman S, et al. Fatigue risk management in the workplace. J Occup Environ Med. 2012;54(2):231–58.22269988
2. Passel J Cohn D Rohal M Unauthorized immigrant totals rise in 7 states, fall in 14: decline in those from Mexico fuels most state decreases 2014 Washington, DC Pew Research Center, Project HT
Passel J, Cohn D, Rohal M. Unauthorized immigrant totals rise in 7 states, fall in 14: decline in those from Mexico fuels most state decreases. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, Project HT,; 2014.
3. Adock F, Anderson D, Rosson P. The economic impacts of immigration labor on US dairy farms. 2015.
4. Roman-Muniz I Training methods and association with worker injury on Colorado dairies: a survey J Agromed 2006 11 2 19 26 10.1300/J096v11n02_05
Roman-Muniz I, et al. Training methods and association with worker injury on Colorado dairies: a survey. J Agromed. 2006;11(2):19–26.
5. Jenkins P Growth of the spanish-speaking workforce in the northeast dairy industry J Agromed 2009 14 1 58 65 10.1080/10599240802623387
Jenkins P, et al. Growth of the spanish-speaking workforce in the northeast dairy industry. J Agromed. 2009;14(1):58–65.
6. Liebman A Immigrant dairy workers’ perceptions of health and safety on the farm in America’s Heartland Am J Ind Med 2016 59 227 35 10.1002/ajim.22538 26523613
Liebman A, et al. Immigrant dairy workers’ perceptions of health and safety on the farm in America’s Heartland. Am J Ind Med. 2016;59:227–35.26523613
7. Rodriguez A Using mobile technology to increase safety awarness among dairy workers in the United States J Agromed 2018 23 4 315 26 10.1080/1059924X.2018.1502704
Rodriguez A, et al. Using mobile technology to increase safety awarness among dairy workers in the United States. J Agromed. 2018;23(4):315–26.
8. Rodriguez A et al. Bovine tuberculosis case intervention using T.SPOT.TB assay to screen dairy workers in Bailey County, Texas. Front Public Health, 2020. 8(479).
9. Ramos A Invisible no more: the impact of COVID-19 on essential food production workers J Agromed 2020 25 4 378 82 10.1080/1059924X.2020.1814925
Ramos A, et al. Invisible no more: the impact of COVID-19 on essential food production workers. J Agromed. 2020;25(4):378–82.
10. CDC. National Diabetes Statistics Report. 2020; https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/library/features/diabetes-stat-report.html.
11. Moyce S Hernandez K Schenker M Diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes among agricultural workers in California J Health Care Poor Underserved 2019 30 4 1289 301 10.1353/hpu.2019.0102 31680099
Moyce S, Hernandez K, Schenker M. Diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes among agricultural workers in California. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2019;30(4):1289–301.31680099
12. Baker D Chappelle D Health status and needs of latino dairy farmworkers in Vermont J Agromed 2012 17 3 277 87 10.1080/1059924X.2012.686384
Baker D, Chappelle D. Health status and needs of latino dairy farmworkers in Vermont. J Agromed. 2012;17(3):277–87.
13. Arcury T Quandt S Delivery of Health Services to migrant and seasonal farmworkers Annual Rev Public Health 2007 28 345 63 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102106 17291182
Arcury T, Quandt S. Delivery of Health Services to migrant and seasonal farmworkers. Annual Rev Public Health. 2007;28:345–63.17291182
14. Buckheit C, et al. Improving health care for spanish-speaking rural dairy farm workers. Journal of American Board Family Medicine. 2017;30(1):91–3.
15. Liebman A Juarez-Carrillo P Cruz-Reyes IK Immigrant dairy workers’ perceptions of health and safety on the farm in America’s Heartland Am J Ind Med 2016 59 227 35 10.1002/ajim.22538 26523613
Liebman A, Juarez-Carrillo P, Cruz-Reyes IK. Immigrant dairy workers’ perceptions of health and safety on the farm in America’s Heartland. Am J Ind Med. 2016;59:227–35.26523613
16. Lunque J Mobile farm clinic outreach to address health conditions among latino migrant farmworkers in Georgia J Agromed 2012 17 386 97 10.1080/1059924X.2012.713837
Lunque J, et al. Mobile farm clinic outreach to address health conditions among latino migrant farmworkers in Georgia. J Agromed. 2012;17:386–97.
17. Hansen E Donohoe M Health issues of migrant and seasonal farmworkers J Health Care Poor Underserved 2003 14 2 153 64 10.1353/hpu.2010.0790 12739296
Hansen E, Donohoe M. Health issues of migrant and seasonal farmworkers. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2003;14(2):153–64.12739296
18. Anthony M Williams J Avery A Health needs of migrant and seasonal farmworkers J Commun Health Nurs 2008 25 3 153 60 10.1080/07370010802221768
Anthony M, Williams J, Avery A. Health needs of migrant and seasonal farmworkers. J Commun Health Nurs. 2008;25(3):153–60.
19. Martinez-Tyson D et al. You have to control it however you can: type 2 diabetes management in a Hispanic farmworker community in rural florida. Human Organization. 2019;78(3):205–17.
20. Cristancho S Listening to rural hispanic immigrants in the Midwest: A Community-Based Participatory Assessment of Major barriers to Health Care Access and Use Qual Health Res 2008 18 5 633 46 10.1177/1049732308316669 18420537
Cristancho S, et al. Listening to rural hispanic immigrants in the Midwest: A Community-Based Participatory Assessment of Major barriers to Health Care Access and Use. Qual Health Res. 2008;18(5):633–46.18420537
21. Shobe M Coffman M Dmochowski J Achieving the American Dream: facilitators and barriers to Health and Mental Health for latino immigrants J Evid Based Soc Work 2009 6 1 92 110 10.1080/15433710802633601 19199139
Shobe M, Coffman M, Dmochowski J. Achieving the American Dream: facilitators and barriers to Health and Mental Health for latino immigrants. J Evid Based Soc Work. 2009;6(1):92–110.19199139
22. Middaugh D Presenteeism: sick and tired at work Nurs Manag 2006 15 2 103 5
Middaugh D. Presenteeism: sick and tired at work. Nurs Manag. 2006;15(2):103–5.
23. Tunceli K Glycemic control and absenteeism among individuals with diabetes Diabetes Care 2007 30 5 1283 5 10.2337/dc06-1657 17303793
Tunceli K, et al. Glycemic control and absenteeism among individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(5):1283–5.17303793
24. Aponte J. Diabetes Training for Community Health Workers. Journal of community medicine and health education. 2015;5(6).
25. Ingram M The impact of Promotoras on Social Support and Glycemic Control among members of a Farmworker Community on the US-Mexico Border Diabetes Educ 2007 33 6 S172 8 10.1177/0145721707304170
Ingram M, et al. The impact of Promotoras on Social Support and Glycemic Control among members of a Farmworker Community on the US-Mexico Border. Diabetes Educ. 2007;33(6):S172–8.
26. Nam S Effect of culturally tailored Diabetes Education in ethnic minorities with type 2 diabetes: a Meta-analysis J Cardiovasc Nurs 2012 27 6 505 18 10.1097/JCN.0b013e31822375a5 21747287
Nam S, et al. Effect of culturally tailored Diabetes Education in ethnic minorities with type 2 diabetes: a Meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2012;27(6):505–18.21747287
27. Rothman R The spoken knowledge in low literacy in diabetes scale: a diabetes knowledge scale for vulnerable patients Diabetes Educ 2005 31 2 215 24 10.1177/0145721705275002 15797850
Rothman R, et al. The spoken knowledge in low literacy in diabetes scale: a diabetes knowledge scale for vulnerable patients. Diabetes Educ. 2005;31(2):215–24.15797850
28. Garcia A The Starr County Diabetes Education Study Diabetes Care 2001 24 1 16 21 10.2337/diacare.24.1.16 11194219
Garcia A, et al. The Starr County Diabetes Education Study. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(1):16–21.11194219
29. Little RR Rohlfing CL Sacks D Status of hemoglobin A1c measurement and goals for improvement: from chaos to order for improving diabetes care Clin Chem 2011 57 2 205 14 10.1373/clinchem.2010.148841 21148304
Little RR, Rohlfing CL, Sacks D. Status of hemoglobin A1c measurement and goals for improvement: from chaos to order for improving diabetes care. Clin Chem. 2011;57(2):205–14.21148304
30. Huang FY Using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 to measure depression among racially and ethnically diverse primary care patients J Gen Intern Med 2006 21 6 547 52 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00409.x 16808734
Huang FY, et al. Using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 to measure depression among racially and ethnically diverse primary care patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(6):547–52.16808734
31. Spitzer RL Kroenke K Williams JB Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary care evaluation of Mental disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire JAMA: J Am Med Association 1999 282 18 1737 44 10.1001/jama.282.18.1737
Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary care evaluation of Mental disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. JAMA: J Am Med Association. 1999;282(18):1737–44.
32. Kroenke K Spitzer RL Williams JBW The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure J Gen Intern Medicine: JGIM 2001 16 9 606 13 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x 11556941
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Medicine: JGIM. 2001;16(9):606–13.11556941
33. Spitzer RL A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7 Arch Intern Med 2006 166 10 1092 7 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 16717171
Spitzer RL, et al. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10):1092–7.16717171
34. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: release 14, in StataCorp LP. College Station, TX; 2015.
35. Skyler J Effects of Glycemic Control on Diabetes complications and on the Prevention of Diabetes Clin Diabetes 2004 22 4 162 6 10.2337/diaclin.22.4.162
Skyler J. Effects of Glycemic Control on Diabetes complications and on the Prevention of Diabetes. Clin Diabetes. 2004;22(4):162–6.
36. Lisi D Applying recent A1C recommendations in clinical practice US Pharmacist 2018 43 10 15 22
Lisi D. Applying recent A1C recommendations in clinical practice. US Pharmacist. 2018;43(10):15–22.
37. Rodriguez A Association of category of cattle exposure with Tuberculosis knowledge among dairy workers in Bailey County, Texas J Agromed 2020 26 3 313 22 10.1080/1059924X.2020.1765931
Rodriguez A, et al. Association of category of cattle exposure with Tuberculosis knowledge among dairy workers in Bailey County, Texas. J Agromed. 2020;26(3):313–22.
38. Rodriguez A, et al. Association of exposure to cattle with self-reported history of TB among dairy workers. Workplace health & safety. 2021;69(7):306–14.
39. Tran A Results from a pilot Promotora Program to reduce depression and stress among immigrant latinas Health Promot Pract 2014 15 3 365 72 10.1177/1524839913511635 24334543
Tran A, et al. Results from a pilot Promotora Program to reduce depression and stress among immigrant latinas. Health Promot Pract. 2014;15(3):365–72.24334543
40. Rodriguez A Using mobile technology to increase safety awareness among dairy workers in the United States J Agromed 2018 23 4 315 26 10.1080/1059924X.2018.1502704
Rodriguez A, et al. Using mobile technology to increase safety awareness among dairy workers in the United States. J Agromed. 2018;23(4):315–26.
