
==== Front
Sao Paulo Med J
Sao Paulo Med J
Sao Paulo Med J
São Paulo Medical Journal
1516-3180
1806-9460
Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM

12751339
10.1590/S1516-31802003000100005
Original Article
Is automated platelet counting still a problem in thrombocytopenic blood?
Oliveira Raimundo Antônio Gomes *
Takadachi Maria Mariko *
Nonoyama Kimiyo *
de Oliveira Barretto Orlando César *
Address for correspondence Orlando Cesar de Oliveira Barretto Av. Pedroso de Morais, 70 São Paulo/SP - Brasil - CEP 05420-000 Tel.: (+55 11) 3813-6259 E-mail: ocdobarr@usp.br
Conflict of interest: None

02 1 2003
2003
121 1 1923
23 3 2002
27 8 2002
30 9 2002
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons license.
ABSTRACT

CONTEXT:

Reliable platelet counting is crucial for indicating prophylactic platelet transfusion in thrombocytopenic patients.

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the precision and accuracy of platelet counting for thrombocytopenic patients, using four different automated counters in comparison with the Brecher & Cronkite reference method recommended by the International Committee for Standardization in Hematology (ICSH).

TYPE OF STUDY:

Automated platelet counting assessment in thrombocytopenic patients.

SETTING:

Hematology Laboratory, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, and the Hematology Division of Instituto Adolfo Lutz, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

MAIN MEASUREMENTS:

Brecher & Cronkite reference method and four different automated platelet counters.

PARTICIPANTS:

43 thrombocytopenic patients with platelet counts of less than 30,000/μl

RESULTS:

The ADVIA-120 (Bayer), Coulter STKS, H1 System (Technicom-Bayer) and Coulter T-890 automatic instruments presented great precision and accuracy in relation to laboratory thrombocytopenic samples obtained by diluting blood from normal donors. However, when thrombocytopenic patients were investigated, all the counters except ADVIA (which is based on volume and refraction index) showed low accuracy when compared to the Brecher & Cronkite reference method (ICSH). The ADVIA counter showed high correlation (r = 0.947). However, all counters showed flags in thrombocytopenic samples.

CONCLUSION:

The Brecher & Cronkite reference method should always be indicated in thrombocytopenic patients for platelet counts below 30,000 plt / μl obtained in one dimensional counters.

RESUMO

CONTEXTO:

A contagem de plaquetas confiável é de grande importância para avaliar a necessidade da transfusão profilática em pacientes plaquetopênicos.

OBJETIVO:

Avaliar, em amostras plaquetopênicas, a precisão e exatidão da contagem de plaquetas em quatro contadores automáticos em comparação com método de referência de Brecher & Cronkite recomendado pelo Comitê Internacional de Estandardização em Hematologia.

TIPO DE ESTUDO:

Avaliação da contagem automatizada de plaquetas em pacientes trombocitopênicos.

LOCAL:

Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual (São Paulo - SP). Instituto Adolfo Lutz.

PARTICIPANTES:

43 pacientes trombocitopênicos com contagens de plaquetas inferiores a 30.000/μL.

VARIAVEIS ESTUDADAS:

Método de Brecher & Cronkite como padrão de referência e quatro contadores automáticos.

RESULTADOS:

Os contadores automáticos ADVIA-120 (Bayer), Coulter STKS, H1 System (Technicom-Bayer) e Coulter T-890 demonstraram boa precisão e exatidão em amostras plaquetopênicas obtidas em laboratório de hematologia a partir de amostras normais. Apenas o ADVIA-120, que utiliza dois princípios de contagem (volume e ín-dice de refração), demonstrou boa correlação com o método de referência recomendado pelo Comitê Internacional de Estandardização em Hematologia (ICSH, 1984/1988) para as amostras dos pacientes trombocitopênicos (r = 0,947). Entretanto, todos os aparelhos pediram nova contagem de plaquetas (flags) para as amostras trombocitopênicas.

CONCLUSÃO:

A utilização do método de referência de Brecher Cronkite deve ser uma conduta rotineira e indispensável em todos pacientes trombocitopênicos com contagens abaixo de 30,000 plaq /μl obtidas em contadores que utilizam-se apenas do volume como princípio de contagem.

KEY WORDS:

Platelet counting
Automatic counters
Transfusion
Thrombocytopenic patients
PALAVRAS-CHAVE:

Contagem
Plaquetas
Automação
Transfusão
Plaquetopenia
==== Body
pmcINTRODUCTION

It is widely accepted that automation has afforded high precision and accuracy for platelet counting in normal individuals.1-5 How-ever, automated counting is still very controversial in the case of samples from thrombocytopenic or other patients in which other small particles could generate electrical or optical signals that are similar to platelets, such as debris and red cell fragments.4,6-11 Most counters nowadays employ the principle of electrical impedance or optical signals for counting the platelets in peripheral blood, using the particle volume for counting them.12 On the other hand, the presence of large platelets beyond the upper threshold may lead to underestimation of the platelet counts.13-15 The use of multiple light scatter parameters rather than impedance alone has improved the ability to discriminate platelets.6

Prophylactic platelet transfusions have been successfully employed in hematological patients under chemotherapy when the platelet levels drop to lower than 20,000/μL. Nevertheless, in an attempt to lower the risks in platelet transfusions in bone marrow transplants, as well as reducing the cost, there is a great tendency to use 10,000/μL,16-21 or even 5,000/μL as advocated by Gmür et al.,22 as the threshold for prophylactic or therapeutic platelet transfusions. Thus, higher precision and accuracy in platelet counting is required.6 In fact, the Consensus Conference on Platelet Transfusion Therapy of the National Institute of Health,23 reported that there was a lack of reproducibility and a variability in platelet counts at low levels. This fact is a great problem in recommending a standard threshold for platelet transfusion in thrombocytopenic patients.

Manual platelet counting in the Neubauer chamber, by means of a phase-contrast microscope,24,25 has been recommended as the reference method for assessing the platelet number by the International Committee for Standardization in Hematology (ICSH -1984).26 Quite recently, the International Council for Standardization in Hematology and the International Society for Laboratory Hematology27 have recommended the use of labeled platelets in a fluorescence-flow cytometer, together with a semiautomated, single-channel aperture-impedance counter as the reference method for platelet counting, but few centers are able to afford this.

This investigation was thus carried out with the objective of studying the accuracy and precision of automated instruments and comparing these with the recommended manual method (ICSH 1984) for low platelet counts. Different instruments based on different technical characteristics, such as refraction index and platelet size, were used.

METHODS

Two different materials were employed:

Blood samples from four normal individuals were diluted with isotonic solution in order to make target low- platelet suspensions (30,000; 20,000; 10,000 and 5,000 platelets per μL), in accordance with Lawrence et al.16 Every target sample was counted 9 times (3 dilutions in triplicate).

Blood samples from 43 thrombocyto-penic patients presenting less than 30,000 platelets per μL, 33 of them presenting leukemia and 10 with several diseases such as idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, myelodysplastic syndrome and pancytopenia, from the Hematology Laboratory of Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo (HSPE), São Paulo, were also studied.

Four automated hematology analyzers were studied: ADVIATM 120 Hematology System (Bayer, Tarrytown, New York, USA),10,15 H1 Technicon System (Technicon Instrument Corporation/ Tarrytown, New York),28-30 Coulter STKS (Coulter, USA),31 and Coulter T-890 (Coulter, USA),32 as well as the reference method recommended by the International Committee for Standardization in Hematology (1984): the Brecher & Cronkite method.24,25

The precision and accuracy of all blood cell counters were assessed daily in comparison with standards provided by the manufacturers. All blood samples from thrombocytopenic patients were processed within 1 hour after blood draw for automated methods, and up to 3 hours for the manual counts, at room temperature. All counts were performed in triplicate. For the reference method (ICSH 1984), a minimum of 200 cells was counted in the Neubauer chamber.

Every instrument was compared with the reference method by a linear correlation test. The Student "t" test was employed for comparisons between all instrument data and for data obtained using the reference method as well, with a significance level of 5%.

RESULTS

Laboratory thrombocytopenic samples from normal donors

The ADVIA, STKS and H1 counters showed variable differences between the obtained mean values and the target values, ranging from 1.4% to 5.4% for the 5,000 target group, from −2.3% to 0.3% for the 10,000 target group, from −4.5% to 1.2% for the 20,000 target group, and from −1.6% to −0.1% for the 30,000 platelets per μL target group. The T-890 counter, however, showed mean values from 11 to 16.5% lower than the target values, for the 10,000 to 30,000 platelets per μL target groups. For the 5,000-target group, the results were 19.05% lower than the target value (Tables 1 and 2).

Table 1 Platelet counts using the ADVIA-120, STKS, H1 and T-890 systems, in target thrombocytopenic blood samples obtained in the Hematology Laboratory of Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo.

Target Counter values	Platelet * # (x 1000/µL)	**CV% ± SD	K	Platelet Correction ## (x 1000/µL)	Platelet Range (x 1000/µL)	
5,000	ADVIA	5.4 ± 0.3	7.0 ± 5.4	0.98	5.18	4 – 7	
	STKS	5.2 ± 0.7	7.1 ± 3.4	0.98	5.27	4 – 7	
	H1	4.9 ± 0.2	9.3 ± 5.0	0.97	5.07	4 – 6	
	T-890	4.1 ± 0.2	7.5 ± 4.2	0.99	4.20	3 – 5	
10,000	ADVIA	10.6 ± 0.3	6.5 ± 3.5	0.97	10.01	8 - 12	
	STKS	9.5 ± 0.8	4.7 ± 2.1	0.97	9.77	8 - 12	
	H1	9.8 ± 0.6	7.7 ± 3.0	0.98	10.03	8 - 12	
	T-890	8.4 ± 0.3	2.8 ± 2.3	1.01	8.36	8 - 10	
20,000	ADVIA	21.0 ± 1.1	5.7 ± 0.7	0.97	20.24	18- 25	
	STKS	18.6 ± 0.9	2.3 ± 0,5	0.97	19.13	17- 21	
	H1	19.2 ± 0.4	4.7 ± 1.2	1.01	19.10	18- 22	
	T-890	17.1 ± 0.5	3.8 ± 0.5	1.00	17.11	15-19	
30,000	ADVIA	30.8 ± 1.3	3.3 ± 0.7	0.98	29.97	26- 35	
	STKS	28.9 ± 0,8	3.6 ± 1,0	0.98	29.54	25- 31	
	H1	30.1 ± 1.1	4.5 ± 0.9	1.02	29.52	27- 36	
	T-890	26.8 ± 0.8	2.1 ± 0.8	1.01	26.69	24- 31	
K (dilution control constant): K > 1 artefactual concentration; K < 1 artefactual dilution;

* 9 counts for each sample (3 dilutions, each one in triplicate); n = 4 representing serial dilutions of blood samples from 4 different donors.

# mean ± SD;

## after correction by "K";

** Mean of CVs (coefficient of variation) of four samples in each target group.

Table 2 Percentile difference between target and obtained values of platelet counts, for all counters in the target thrombocytopenic blood sample groups, obtained in the Hematology Laboratory of Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo.

Counters	Target groups (platelet/µl)	
	5,000	10,000	20,000	30,000	
Percentile difference (%)	
ADVIA	+3.6	+0.1	+1.2	−0.1	
STKS	+5.4	−2.3	−4.35	−1.53	
H1	+14	+0.3	−4.5	−1.6	
T-890	−19.05	−16.4	−14.5	−11.03	

The coefficients of variations shown by the groups, for all the counters, were lower than 9.5% for the 5,000-target group, lower than 7.8% for the 10,000-target group, lower than 5.8% for the 20,000-target group and lower than 4.6% for the 30,000 platelets per ml target group (Table 1).

The dilutions of the platelet suspensions were checked by the linear correlation test and showed values of r > 0.99 for all counters. The "y" axis intercepts, which represent the number of platelets per μl, were close to zero for all counters. The slope was close to 1, except for T-890 (slope = 0.88).

Samples from thrombocytopenic patients

The mean value of the platelet counts performed in triplicate by the Brecher & Cronkite reference method was 18,040 platelets per μl. As can be observed in Table 3, ADVIA and STKS showed little deviation, but H1 and T-890 exhibited greater deviation.

Table 3 Accuracy analysis: paired "t" test for thrombocytopenic patients with less than 30,000 platelets/µl.

Methods	Mean difference	95%	Confidencet		
A	B	(A – B) platelets/µl	Interval, platelets/µl	(A x B)	p	
ICSH	ADVIA	730	−320 to 1,770	1.4	0.168	
ICSH	STKS	−940	−2,700 to 810	−1.1	0.286	
ICSH	H1	−5,160	−6,720 to –3,610	−6.7	<0.001	
ICSH	T890	−6,120	−9,490 to −2,740	−3.7	<0.001	
(A) = 18,040 platelets/ml obtained using the ICSH (Brecher-Cronkite) reference method.; ICSH = International Committee for Standardization in Hematology.

The linear correlation test between every counter and the reference method for thrombocytopenic patients are shown in Figures 1, 2, 3 and 4. The ADVIA counter exhibited the highest correlation (r = 0.947).

Figure 1 Comparison between the ADVIA counter and the International Committee for Standardization in Hematology reference method in thrombocytopenic patients.

Figure 2 Comparison between the STKS counter and the International Committee for Standardization in Hematology reference method in thrombocytopenic patients.

Figure 3 Comparison between the H1 counter and the International Committee for Standardization in Hematology reference method in thrombocytopenic patients.

Figure 4 Comparison between the T-890 counter and the International Committee for Standardization in Hematology reference method in thrombocytopenic patients.

DISCUSSION

With regard to the laboratory targets for platelet counting, the different counters used indicated great accuracy and precision. However, the Coulter T-890 exhibited 11 to 19.5% of the data lower than the desired target values (Tables 1 and 2), similar to what was obtained by Lawrence16 using a counter that also employed the impedance principle.

When dealing with the thrombocytopenic patient samples, comparative determinations between the automated methods and the reference method suggest that the two-dimensional counting system employed by the ADVIA counter demonstrates higher accuracy in differentiating between platelet and non platelet particles, in comparison with the one-dimensional system used by H1, STKS and T-890 (Figures 1, 2, 3 and 4). The data herein presented are similar to those obtained by Kunicka et al.10Dickerhoff and von Ruecker4 also showed lower correlation between the H1 counter and flow cytometry (FC) with monoclonal anti-platelet antibodies, when using thrombocytopenic samples of lower than 50,000 platelets per μL. Only FC and the Brecher & Cronkite method showed significant correlation. Interestingly, these are the two reference methods recommended by the ICSH.

Hanseler et al.11 using the H1 counter, claimed that for counts of less than 30,000 platelets per μL, the automated counting should be replaced by the manual chamber procedure. Our data obtained with thrombocytopenic patients also suggest the same for the one-dimensional STKS, H1 and T-890 counters.

The data from Ault6 and Kunicka et al.,10 as well as the data obtained in this investigation for H1, STKS and T-890, suggest that the one-dimensional platelet counters present a tendency to overestimate the platelet counts when other particles with the same platelet size are contaminating the sample. However, all counters showed flags in thrombocytopenic samples.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that for platelet counts below 30,000 platelets per μl obtained in one-dimensional counters, the counting method should be replaced by the reference manual procedure, i.e. the Brecher & Cronkite method.

Raimundo Antônio Gomes Oliveira, MsPhar. Assistant Professor in Clinical Hematology and Biochemist-Pharmacist, Pharmacy Department and University Hospital, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Maranhão, Brazil.

Maria Mariko Takadachi. Biochemist-Pharmacist, Hematology Laboratory, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Kimiyo Nonoyama, MsPhar. Hematology Division, Instituto Adolfo Lutz, São Paulo, Brazil.

Orlando César de Oliveira Barretto, MD, PhD. Associate Professor, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Laboratório de Investigação Médica-23, São Paulo, Brazil.

Sources of funding: None

Hematology Laboratory, Hospital do Servidor Público, and Hematology Division, Instituto Adolfo Lutz, São Paulo, Brazil
==== Refs
REFERENCES

1 Ross DW Bentley SA Evaluation of an automated hematology system (Technicon H-1) Arch Pathol Lab Med 1986 110 9 803 808 3019275
2 Cornbleet PJ Myrick D Judkins S Levy R Evaluation of the CELL-DYN 3000 differential Am J Clin Pathol 1992 98 6 603 614 1462958
3 Arkin CF Quality control and standardization in the hematology laboratory Bick RL Hematology: clinical and laboratory practice St Louis Mosby 1993 17 37
4 Dickerhoff R Von Ruecker A Enumeration of platelets by multiparameter flow cytometry using platelet-specific antibodies and fluorescent reference particles Clin Lab Haematol 1995 17 2 163 172 8536420
5 Jones RG Faust AM Matthews RA Quality team approach in evaluating three automated hematology analyzers with five-part differential capability Am J Clin Pathol 1995 103 2 159 166 7856558
6 Ault KA Platelet counting: Is there room for improvement? Lab Hematol 1996 2 139 143
7 Mayer K Chin B Magnes J Thaler HT Lotspeich C Baisley A Automated platelet counters: a comparative evaluation of latest instrumentation Am J Clin Pathol 1980 74 2 135 150 7405891
8 Ross DW Ayscue L Gulley M Automated platelet counts: accuracy, precision, and range Am J Clin Pathol 1980 74 2 151 156 7405892
9 Kjeldsberg CR Principles of hematologic examination Lee GR Bithell TC Foerster J Wintrobe's Clinical Hematology 9 ed. Philadelphia Lea & Febiger 1993 11 12
10 Kunicka JE Fischer G Murphy J Zelmanovic D Improved platelet counting using two-dimensional laser light scatter Am J Clin Pathol 2000 114 283 289 10941345
11 Hanseler E Fehr J Keller H Estimation of the lower limits of manual and automated platelet counting Am J Clin Pathol 1996 105 6 782 787 8659455
12 Klee GG Performance goals for internal quality control of multichannel haematology analysers Clin Lab Haematol 1990 12 Suppl 1 65 74 2282767
13 Rowan RM Platelet counting and the assessment of platelet function Keopke JA Practical Laboratory Hematology New York Churchill Livingstone 1991 157 170
14 Bode AP The use of flow cytometry in the study of blood platelets Riley RS Mahin EJ Ross W Clinical applications of flow cytometry New York Igaku-Shoin 1993 613 633
15 Stanworth SJ Denton K Monteath J Patton WN Automated counting of platelets on the Bayer ADVIA 120 analyser Clin Lab Haematol 1999 21 2 113 117 10342070
16 Lawrence JB Yomtovian RA Dillman C Reliability of automated platelet counts: comparison with manual method and utility for prediction of clinical bleeding Am J Hematol 1995 48 4 244 250 7717373
17 Gil-Fernández JJ Alegre A Fernández-Villalta MJ Clinical results of a stringent policy on prophylac-tic platelet trans-fusion: non-randomized comparative analysis in 190 bone marrow transplant patients from a single institution Bone Marrow Transplant 1996 18 5 931 935 8932847
18 Sherrill JS Corash L Shiffer C Newer approaches to platelet transfusion therapy Transfusion Medicine Education program of The American Society of Hematology, Orlando, 1996. Proceedings Philadelphia ASH 1996 119 131
19 Beutler E Platelet transfusions: the 20,000/microL trigger Blood 1993 81 6 1411 1413 8453089
20 Finazzi G Prophylactic platelet transfusion in acute leukemia: which threshold should be used Haematologica 1998 83 11 961 962 9864912
21 Navarro JT Hernández JA Ribera JM Prophylactic platelet transfusion threshold during therapy for adult acute myeloid leukemia: 10,000/microL versus 20,000/microL Haematologica 1998 83 11 998 1000 9864920
22 Gmür J Burger J Schanz U Fehr J Schaffner A Safety of stringent prophylactic platelet transfusion policy for patients with acute leukemia Lancet 1991 338 8777 1223 1226 1682642
23 Consensus Development Conference Platelet transfusion therapy JAMA 1987 257 13 1777 1780 3820494
24 Brecher G Cronkite EP Morphology and enumeration of human blood platelets J Appl Physiol 1950 3 365 377 14794596
25 Brecher G Schneiderman MA Cronkite EP The reproducibility and consistency of the platelet count Am J Clin Pathol 1953 23 15 26 13016502
26 England JM Rowan RM van Assendelft OW Protocol for evaluation of automated blood cell counters. International Committee for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) Clin Lab Haematol 1984 6 1 69 84 6734101
27 Platelet counting by the RBC/platelet ratio method: A reference method Am J Clin Pathol 2001 115 3 460 464 11246942
28 Tycko DH Metz MH Epstein EA Grinbaum A Flow-cytometric light scattering measurement of red blood cell volume and hemoglobin concentration J Applied Optics 1985 24 1355 1365
29 Technicon H*1 System Information Bulletin Technical Publication N TN8-8588-22 Tarrytown, NY Technicon Instrument Corp 12 1988 3 4
30 Technicon H*1 System: Operator's Guide International Division ed Tarrytown, NY Technicon Instrument Corp 1985 02 56 57
31 Coulter STKS Analyser with reticulocyte analysis: product reference manual n. 4237182B Miami Coulter 1995
32 Coulter T Series with differential capabilities: product reference manual n. 4235880C Miami Coulter 1993
