
==== Front
PLoS One
PLoS One
plos
PLOS ONE
1932-6203
Public Library of Science San Francisco, CA USA

10.1371/journal.pone.0310849
PONE-D-24-12655
Research Article
People and Places
Population Groupings
Age Groups
Adults
Elderly
Medicine and Health Sciences
Mental Health and Psychiatry
Dementia
Medicine and Health Sciences
Neurology
Dementia
Medicine and Health Sciences
Mental Health and Psychiatry
Mood Disorders
Depression
Medicine and Health Sciences
Health Care
Psychological and Psychosocial Issues
Medicine and Health Sciences
Medical Conditions
Sleep Disorders
Dyssomnias
Insomnia
Medicine and Health Sciences
Neurology
Sleep Disorders
Dyssomnias
Insomnia
Biology and Life Sciences
Psychology
Emotions
Anxiety
Social Sciences
Psychology
Emotions
Anxiety
Medicine and Health Sciences
Mental Health and Psychiatry
Mood Disorders
Depression
Geriatric Depression
Medicine and Health Sciences
Geriatrics
Geriatric Psychiatry
Geriatric Depression
Medicine and Health Sciences
Mental Health and Psychiatry
Geriatric Psychiatry
Geriatric Depression
Medicine and Health Sciences
Health Care
Quality of Life
Activities of Daily Living
Psycho-social problems among older people residing in community of Chitwan, Nepal—A cross-sectional study
Psycho-social problems
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9062-9651
Poudyal Sunita Conceptualization Formal analysis Funding acquisition Methodology Project administration Resources Software Supervision Validation Writing – original draft Writing – review & editing *
Sharma Kalpana Conceptualization Data curation Formal analysis Funding acquisition Methodology Project administration Software Supervision Validation Writing – original draft Writing – review & editing
Subba Hem Kumari Conceptualization Data curation Methodology Resources Supervision Writing – original draft Writing – review & editing
Subba Ramesh Conceptualization Methodology Writing – original draft Writing – review & editing
School of Nursing, Chitwan Medical College, Bharatpur, Nepal
Sahu Kamlesh Kumar Editor
Government Medical College and Hospital, INDIA
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

* E-mail: poudyal.sunita@cmc.edu.np
19 9 2024
2024
19 9 e03108492 4 2024
4 9 2024
© 2024 Poudyal et al
2024
Poudyal et al
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Background

Older people are vulnerable to various psycho-social problems such as depression, anxiety, insomnia, dementia, and loneliness that have profound impact on overall health and their quality of life and higher use of health services. Prevention and treatment of psychological problems in this risk group is critical for improving their quality of life.

Objective

This study aimed to find out the psycho-social problems among older people residing in community.

Methods

The study was a cross-sectional study design and 388 older people aged 65 years and above residing in different wards of Bharatpur Metropolitan city were selected using probability simple random sampling technique. Data were collected using interview schedule containing geriatric depression scale-15; Geriatric anxiety scale-10, University of California Loss Angels Loneliness Scale (UCLA-20), Anthens Insomnia Scale and Mini-Cog Test. Obtained data were analyzed in SPSS version 20 for windows. Chi-square test was applied to measure the association between psychosocial problems and selected variables.

Result

Findings of the study revealed that the mean age (± SD) of respondents was 72.92 (±7.12) years. Almost all (93.6%) older people had full functioning of activity of daily living and two third (66.5%) had other co-morbid conditions. More than two third (67.0%) of older adults had depression, 60.3% had anxiety, 53.6% had moderate to high level loneliness, 47.2% had insomnia, and 33.3% had dementia. Age, functional dependency, sex, co-morbidity, financial dependence, education and occupation were significantly associated with the psychosocial problems among older people.

Conclusion and recommendation

Psychosocial problems are common among older people residing in community of Chitwan. Hence, there is need to develop and implement health care strategy by local health care planner to prevent, treat and manage the psychosocial problems among this risk groups. Further, health care providers working in geriatric problems or psychosocial health need to conduct regular screening programs for the early diagnosis and treatment of these problems.

Nepal Health Research Council (NHRC) Pronvincial Health Research Grant FY 2079/080 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9062-9651
Poudyal Sunita This study is funded by Nepal Health Research Council as Provincial Health Research Grant FY 2079/080. But the funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish and preparation of manuscript. Data AvailabilityAll relevant data are within the manuscript and data set are also deposed directly to. OSF registries Registration DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HTGYD.
Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and data set are also deposed directly to. OSF registries Registration DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HTGYD.
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

The number of older people population is increasing dramatically around the world, including in Nepal. In recent decades, the global population of older adults has grown steadily and proportionally. In 2019, the number of persons aged 60 and over was 1 billion, which will continue to rise to 1.4 billion by 2030 and 2.1 billion by 2050 [1]. The growth rate of older adults in developing countries is much higher than that of developed countries [2]. In Nepal, there had 2.1 million senior people, accounting for 8.1% of the country’s total population [3].

Population aging is inevitable and a positive aspect of human development [4]. However, it poses a number of problems among older people. Older people are more likely to suffer from chronic or persistent somatic or physical illnesses, such as hearing loss, diabetes, cancer, arthritis, cardiovascular and/or respiratory conditions and respiratory disorders [5–8]. They face age related difficulties such as diminished mobility, persistent pain, fragility and unpleasant life experiences, bereavement and financial dependency etc. These all may lead to psychosocial problems [5–9] such as social isolation, loneliness, or emotional distress, anxiety, depression, poor relationships, financial constraints, and a lack of social networks [9–11].

Evidence showed that older people suffer from different psycho-social problems such as depression, dementia, agitation, anxiety, loneliness, social exclusion and burden to their family which have subsequent effects on their physical health [12–14]. Dementia and depression are the most prevalent illnesses affecting 5% and 7% of the senior citizens globally, respectively. Dementia is a major contributor to impairment and dependency among older people worldwide, ranking seventh among all diseases in terms of cause of death [1]. Similarly, anxiety disorders account for around 25% of fatal self-harm incidents in older adults, affecting 3.8% of them [9].

Older people residing in Nepal are not far from psychosocial and physical health problems. The prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms ranged from 4.4% (in community) to 53.2% (in hospital), and 21.7% to 32.3% respectively [15]. Similarly, 75.65% of senior citizens in geriatric homes had dementia symptoms [16]. Further, evidences showed that the severe psychosocial problems are higher in institutionalized older people compared to living in a family [17, 18].

Psychosocial problems are common among the older population but these conditions are usually under diagnosed and undertreated due to their complex and multi factorial nature. In addition, there is a dearth of information regarding these issues in our context. Hence, this study aimed to identify the psycho-social problems among older people residing in community which help to bridge the evidence gap for the successful implementation of program regarding these issues.

Materials and methods

Study design and setting

A cross-sectional survey was carried out in Bharatpur Metropolitan City, Chitwan. The Chitwan district consists of seven municipalities. Out of which one is a metropolitan city, five are urban municipalities, and one is a rural municipality. Bharatpur metropolitan city is one of the fastest-growing cities in Nepal, consisting of 29 wards.

Study population and eligibility criteria

The population of the study were those people who were 65 years and older and residing in community of Bharatpur, Chitwan. Those people who were able to give consent and willing to participate in the study were included whereas those old people who were already diagnosed with mental illness and/or were chronically ill and unable to communicate were excluded from the study.

Sample size determination and sampling technique

Cochrane’s formula (n0 = z2pq/e2) was used to calculate the needed sample size for the study considering a confidence level of 95%, an allowable error of 5%, and 45.6% prevalence of various psycho-social problems among older people in India [19].There were total 4570 older people, where in ward no. 5 = 938, ward no. 10 = 1707, ward no. 12 = 961 and ward no. 27 = 964 [20]. Calculated sample size was 352. Adding 10% non-response error rate, final sample size (n) was 388.

Two-stage sampling techniques were applied. Initially, 4 wards (ward no 5, 10, 12, and 27) were selected randomly from out of 29 wards in Bharatpur Metropolitan City. Second, a list of the older adults residing in those selected wards was obtained. Third, the desired sample was selected using probability proportionate to size.

Data collection tools and measurement

The structured interview schedule was used to collect socio-demographic information and health related information. Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living [21] was used for the assessment of adequacy of performance in the six functions of bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, continence, and feeding. A score of 4 to 6 indicates full function, 2.1 to 4 indicate moderate impairment, and 2 or less indicates severe functional impairment. Smoking status was classified as never smoker (who had never smoked) ex-smoker (who ever smoked any tobacco products in his or her lifetime but has not smoked in the last 28 days) and current smoker (who smoked currently any tobacco products such as cigarettes, pipes or cigars). Similarly, alcohol users were categorized as lifetime abstainer (never consumed alcohol in their lifetime), former drinker (used to drink alcohol but have abstained for the last 12 months) and current drinker (consumed alcohol at least once during the last 12 months and who currently drink).

For the assessment of psycho-social problems among older people, five types of tools were used: Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15) [22] for the assessment of depression, Geriatric Anxiety Scale –10 (GAS-10) [23] for anxiety, Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale [24] for the loneliness and social isolation, Anthens Insomnia Scale (AIS) [25] for the prevalence of insomnia, and Mini-Cog Test [26], a brief cognitive test for the assessment of dementia.

GDS-15 is a valid and reliable screening tool for geriatric depression with the Cronbach alpha coefficient value 0.920 [27]. It is also validated in Nepalese context with Cronbach’s alpha value 0.79 [28]. It consisted of 15 questions and the response for these questions was yes, or no. Total score ranged from 0 to 15. Scores of 0–4 are considered normal, 5–8 indicate mild depression; 9–11 indicate moderate depression and 12–15 indicate severe depression. GAS-10 [23] is a self-report measure of anxiety which had strong psychometric properties among older adults and used in Nepal [29]. It has 10 items scale ranged from 0 to 3 (0- Not at all, 1- Sometimes, 2- Most of the time and 3- All of the time). Items 1 through 10 were summed to provide a total score. The total score was calculated and classified as: Minimal anxiety (≤6); Mild (7–9); Moderate (10–12); and Severe anxiety (>12). Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale [24] is highly reliable, both in terms of internal consistency (coefficient alpha = .96) and test-retest reliability (r = .73). Its reliability was tested in Nepalese young senior citizens with Cronbach’s alpha 0.94 [30]. There were total 20 items including 10 positively worded and 10 negatively worded items designed to measure one’s subjective feelings of loneliness as well as feelings of social isolation. Each item on a scale ranged from 1 (never) to 4 (often).The range of potential scores was 20 to 80. Negative items scores were reversed. The total score of loneliness was calculated and categorized as: Low (20–34), moderate (35–49), moderately high (50–64) and high (65–80). Anthens Insomnia Scale (AIS) is valid and reliable instrument with Cronbach’s alpha value was 0.90 [25]. It consisted of eight sleep factors such as sleep induction, awakening during the night, final awakening earlier than desired, total sleep duration, overall quality of sleep, sense of well-being during the day, functioning (physical and mental during the day) and sleepiness during the day. Each item was rated on a 0–3 scale. Total score was calculated and further classified into two groups as insomnia (≥6) and normal or no insomnia (<6). The Mini-Cog, is a rapid, valid and reliable screening tool for cognitive impairment [31]. Mini-Cog Test [26] assesses the older person’s ability to recall three words and draw a clock. The recall test was graded on a scale of 0 to 3 and Clock Drawing Test (CDT) scored 0 or 2. The total score was calculated and classified as score of 0–2 dementia and score of 3–5 No dementia.

After obtaining data collection permission, researchers went to selected wards. Selected participants were identified with the help of social workers/community health volunteers. Objective of the study was explained to them and written informed consent was obtained. Those participants who gave consent were recruited in the study. Information related to socio-demographic, health related information and psychosocial problems were collected from the participants through face to face interview method using Nepalese version instruments. Each interview was taken 40–45 minutes and interview was done in separate room or corner of house with convenience of participants. The data were collected in two months period from 15th March 2023 to 15th May 2023.

Data quality control

The questionnaire were translated into Nepali language and back translated to English language by language expert for the consistency. Pre-testing of the instrument was done among older adult of similar characteristics residing in ward number 7 and excluded from the study. Reliability of the instrument was tested using data obtained from pre-test. Cronbach’s alpha value >0.75 was considered as valid instrument for the final study.

Data management and analysis

Collected data were entered into Epi data 3.1 and exported to IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 20.0 for window. Descriptive statistics were applied to report outcome variables and categorical variables. Chi-square test was performed to measure the association between selected variables and psychosocial problems. Statistical significance was set at p value <0.05.

Ethical consideration

Before data collection, ethical clearance was obtained from Chitwan Medical College, Institutional Review Committee (CMC-IRC, Ref no- CMC-IRC/079/080/095). Data collection permission was obtained from each ward office of 5, 7, 10 and 12, Bharatpur Municipality. Participants were informed about the purpose of the study. The written informed consent was obtained from all participants to maintain their right to self-determination. For the anonymity and confidentiality of information, code number was given to each participant instead of name, and they were assured that their information will not be disclosed to other unauthorized persons. Privacy was maintained during data collection by interviewing them in room or corner of house.

Results

Majority of the old people were young old (61.9%), male (52.6%), followed Hindu religion (92.3%), lived in joint family (81.4%), and married and living with spouse (73.5%). Similarly, more than half (51.8%) were literate; majorities were farmer and home maker (70.1%) and were involved in work currently (72.7%). Few older people had got pension (15.2%) and two third (66.5%) of the respondents had co-morbid conditions. Similarly, few people were current smoker (12.4%) and current drinker (2.3%). Almost all (93.6%) had full functioning activity of daily living (Table 1).

10.1371/journal.pone.0310849.t001 Table 1 Socio-demographic and personal characteristics of respondents n = 388.

Variables	Number (%)	Variables	Number (%)	
Age groups in years		Currently working		
Young old (65–74)	240 (61.9)	No	106 (27.7)	
Middle old (75–84)	121(31.2)	Yes	282(72.7)	
Old old (85 and above)	27 (7.0)	Pension facility		
Mean ± SD = 72.92 (± 7.12) year Min age:65year Max age:99 year	No	329(84.8)	
Sex		Yes	59 (15.2)	
Male	204(52.6)	Co-morbidity		
Female	184(47.4)	No	130(33.5)	
Family type		Yes	258(66.5)	
Nuclear	72 (18.6)	Activity of daily living		
Joint	316 (81.4)	Impaired	25(6.4)	
Marital status		Full functioning	363(93.6)	
Married and living with spouse	285 (73.5)	Smoking habit		
Single (widow, widower)	103(26.5)	Never smoker	210 (54.1)	
Educational status		Past smoker	130(33.5)	
Illiterate	187(48.2)	Current smoker	48 (12.4)	
Literate	201(51.8)	Alcohol habit		
Previous occupation		Abstainer	353(91.0)	
Farmer/ Homemaker	272(70.1)	Former drinker	26 (6.7)	
Service/ Business/ Labour	116 (29.8)	Current drinker	9 (2.3)	

Out of 388, 12.1% of older people had severe depression, less than half (47.2%) had insomnia, 1.5% had felt severe loneliness whereas more than half (54.6%) of older people felt moderate level of loneliness. Likewise, 33.5% of had dementia and 29.4% of had severe anxiety (Table 2).

10.1371/journal.pone.0310849.t002 Table 2 Psychosocial problems among older people n = 388.

Psychosocial Problems	Number	Percent	
Depression			
Normal (0–4)	128	33.0	
Mild (5–8)	148	38.1	
Moderate (9–11)	65	16.8	
Severe (12–15)	47	12.1	
Insomnia			
Normal (<6)	205	52.8	
Insomnia (≥6)	183	47.2	
Loneliness			
Low (20–34)	95	24.5	
Moderate (35–49)	212	54.6	
Moderately high (50–64)	75	19.3	
High (65–80)	6	1.5	
Dementia			
No dementia (3–5)	258	66.5	
Dementia (0–2)	130	33.5	
Anxiety			
Minimal (≤6)	154	39.7	
Mild (7–9)	68	17.5	
Moderate (10–12)	52	13.4	
Severe (≥12)	114	29.4	

Educational status and pension facility were significantly associated with the depression among older people. However, none of variables were significantly associated with the anxiety (Table 3).

10.1371/journal.pone.0310849.t003 Table 3 Association between anxiety and depression and selected variables n = 388.

Variables	Anxiety	Depression	
Absent	Present	P value	Absent	Present	p value	
Age groups in years							
Young old (65–74)	90 (37.5)	150 (62.5)	0.408	80 (33.3)	160 (66.7)	0.717	
Middle old (75–84)	54 (44.6)	67 (55.4)	41 (33.9)	80 (66.1)		
Old old (85 and above)	10 (37.0)	17 (63.0)	7 (25.9)	20 (74.1)		
Sex							
Male	83 (40.7)	121(59.3)	0.673	76 (37.3)	128(62.7)	0.060	
Female	71 (38.6)	113 61.4)	52 (28.3)	132(71.7)		
Marital status							
Single (widow and widower)	37 (35.9)	66 (64.1)	0.362	102 (35.8)	183 (64.2)	0.051	
Married and living with spouse	117(41.1)	168(58.9)	26 (25.2)	77 (74.8)		
Family type						
Nuclear	28 (38.9)	44 (61.1)	0.878	23 (31.9)	49 (68.1)	0.834	
Joint	126 (39.9)	190 (60.1)	105 (33.2)	211 (66.6)		
Education status							
Illiterate	65 (34.8)	122 (65.2)	0.055	50 (26.7)	137 (73.3)	0.012	
Literate	89 (44.3)	112 (55.7)	78 (38.8)	123 (61.2)		
Pension facility							
No	125 (38.0)	204 (62.0)	0.107	98 (29.8)	231 (70.2)	0.002	
Yes	29 (49.2)	30 (50.8)	30 (50.8)	29 (49.2)		
Presence of co-morbidity							
No	54 (41.5)	76 (58.5)	0.597	50 (38.5)	80 (61.5)	0.104	
Yes	100 (38.8)	158(61.2)	78 (30.2)	180 (69.8)		
Activity of daily living							
Impaired (<6)	8 (32.0)	17 (68.0)	0.416	5 (20.0)	20 (80.0)	0.153	
Full functioning (6)	146 (40.2)	217 (59.8)	123 (33.9)	240 (66.1)		
Smoking status							
Never smoker	83 (39,5)	127 (60.5)	0.813	74 (35.2)	136 (64.8)	0.276	
Past smoker	50 (38.5)	80 (61.5)	36 (27.7)	94 (72.3)		
Current smoker	21 (43.8)	27 (56.2)	18 (37.5)	30 (62.5)		
Alcohol drinker							
Abstainer	139 (39.4)	214 (60.6)	0.735	117 (33.1)	236 (66.9)	0.763	
Former drinker	3 (33.3)	6 (66.7)	2 (22.2)	7 (77.8)		
Current drinker	12 (46.2)	14 (53.8)	9 (34.6)	17 (65.4)		

The presence of co-morbidity and activity of daily living were significantly associated with the insomnia. Likewise, education was significantly associated with the loneliness among older people (Table 4).

10.1371/journal.pone.0310849.t004 Table 4 Association between insomnia and loneliness and selected variables n = 388.

Variables	Insomnia Status	p value	Loneliness Status	p value	
Absent	Present	Absent	Present	
Age groups in years							
Young old (65–74)	129 (53.8)	111 (46.2)	0.231	65 (27.1)	175 (72.9)	0.243	
Middle old (75–84)	66 (54.5)	55 (45.5)	26 (21.5)	95 (78.5)		
Old old (85 and above)	10 (37.0)	17 (63.0)	4 (14.8)	23 (85.2)		
Sex							
Male	107 (52.5)	97 (47.5)	0.873	53 (26.0)	151 (74.0)	0.471	
Female	98 (53.3)	86 (46.7)	42 (22.8)	142 (77.2)		
Marital status							
Single (widow and widower)	49 (47.6)	54 (52.4)	0.212	18 (17.5)	85 (82.5)	0.054	
Married and living with spouse	156 (54.7)	129 (45.3)	77 (27.0)	208 (73.0)		
Family type						
Nuclear	43 (59.7)	29 (40.3)	0.195	21 (29.2)	51 (70.8)	0.306	
Joint	162 (51.3)	154 (48.7)	74 (23.4)	242 (76.6)		
Education status							
Illiterate	104 (55.6)	83 (44.4)	0.290	36 (19.3)	151 (80.7)	0.021	
Literate	101 (50.2)	100 (49.8)	59 (29.4)	142 (70.6)		
Pension facility							
No	171 (52.0)	158 (48.0)	0.423	76 (23.1)	253 (76.9)	0.134	
Yes	34 (57.6)	25 (42.4)	19 (32,2)	40 (67.8)		
Presence of co-morbidity							
No	82 (63.1)	48 (36.9)	0.004	29 (22.3)	101 (77.7)	0.479	
Yes	123 (47.7)	135 (52.3)	66 (25.6)	192 (74.4)		
Activity of daily living							
Impaired (<6)	4 (16.0)	21 (84.0)	<0.001	6 (24.0)	19 (76.0)	0.954	
Full functioning (6)	201 (55.4)	162 (44.6)	89 (24.5)	274 (75.5)		
Smoking status							
Never smoker	109 (51.9)	101 (48.1)	0.573	56 (26.7)	154 (73.3)	0.340	
Past smoker	73 (56.2)	57 (43.8)	31 (23.8)	99 (76.2)		
Current smoker	23 (47.9)	25 (52.1)	8 (16.7)	40 (83.3)		
Alcohol drinker							
Abstainer	185 (52.4)	168 (47.6)	0.586	89 (25.2)	264 (74.8)	0.507	
Former drinker	4 (44.4)	5 (55.6)	1 (11.1)	8 (88.9)		
Current drinker	16 (61.5)	10 (38.5)	5 (19.2)	21 (80.8)		

Similarly, age, sex, marital status, educational status, pension facility and activity of daily living were significantly associated with dementia (Table 5).

10.1371/journal.pone.0310849.t005 Table 5 Association between dementia and selected variables n = 388.

Variables	Dementia Status	χ2	p value	
No dementia	Dementia	
Age groups in years					
Young old (65–74)	170 (70.8)	70 (29.2)	6.174	0.046	
Middle old (75–84)	74 (61.2)	47 (38.8)	
Old old (85 and above)	14 (15.9)	13 (48.1)	
Sex					
Male	155 (76.0)	49 (24.0)	17.373	<0.001	
Female	103 (56.0)	81 (44.0)	
Marital status					
Single (widow and widower)	57 (55.3)	46 (44.7)	7.832	0.005	
Married and living with spouse	201 (70.5)	84 (29.5)	
Family type					
Nuclear	54 (75.0)	18 (25.0)	2.870	0.090	
Joint	204 (64.6)	112 (35.4)	
Education status					
Illiterate	97 (51.9)	90 (48.1)	34.647	<0.001	
Literate	161 (80.1)	40 (19.9)	
Pension facility					
No	208 (63.2)	121 (36.8)	10.403	0.001	
Yes	50 (84.7)	9 (15.3)	
Presence of co-morbidity					
No	85 (65.4)	45 (34.6)	0.108	0.742	
Yes	173 (67.1)	85 (32.9)	
Activity of daily living					
Impaired (<6)	11 (44.0)	14 (56.0)	6.069	0.014	
Full functioning (6)	247 (68.0)	116 (32.0)	
Smoking status					
Never smoker	147 (70.0)	63 (30.0)	2.636	0.268	
Past smoker	82 (63.1)	48 (36.9)	
Current smoker	29 (60.4)	19 (39.6)	
Alcohol drinker					
Abstainer	234 (66.3)	119 (33.7)	0.095	0.953	
Former drinker	6 (66.7)	3 (33.3)	
Current drinker	18 (69.2)	8 (30.8)	

Discussion

Psychosocial problems such as anxiety, depression, insomnia, loneliness, and dementia are common among older people which are the main causes of impairment, morbidity and mortality in older adults.

In this study, prevalence of depression was 66.8% among older adults where 38.1%, 16.8% and 12.1% were mild, moderate and severe depression respectively. This finding is closely approximates to the previous studies conducted in the community of Kavre [32] and Sunsari and Morang [33]districts of Nepal, which reported 53.1% and 55.8% depression in older adults respectively. Similarly, systematic review reported 25.5% to 60.6% prevalence of depression among older adult in community setting of Nepal [19]. However, our finding is higher than the studies in China [34], Ethiopia [35], Sri Lanka [36], and Pakistan [37], which showed 37.34%, 41.85%, 27.8%, 40.6% depression respectively. It indicates that depression is still high among older adults in our context than the global mean. The discrepancy rates in prevalence of depression between these studies may be the cause of the disparities in regional and geographical characteristics, such as cultural background, social involvement, access to healthcare, and variation in measurement tool. Positive screening followed by clinical diagnosis is ideal; however, the current study did not account for this aspect.

Our study revealed that 60.3% of older adults experienced anxiety symptoms where 17.5% mild, 13.4% moderate and 29.4% severe anxiety. This finding is higher than the studies conducted in Nepal [15], Germany [38], Turkey [39], China [34] and Myanmar [40], which revealed 13.9%, 17.1%, 32.74%, and 39.4% of anxiety respectively. Similarly, anxiety ranged from 0.2% to 32.2% in older persons in low- and middle-income countries in Africa, Asia, and South America [41]. Another review found that the prevalence of anxiety disorders in late life ranged from 3.2% to 14.2% in Western countries [42].These variations in anxiety prevalence may be attributable to interviewing methodologies, screening tools sensitivity and usage of different cut-off scores to define anxiety.

Insomnia is one of the most frequent sleep disorders among old adult. Nearly half (47.2%) of participants of this study had insomnia. This finding is consistent with the result of the reviewed study, which reported 30 to 48% of prevalence of insomnia among of older people [43]. However; our finding is lower than the studies conducted in Nepal [44, 45], India [46] and Egypt [47] and higher than the study done in Taiwan [48]. These discrepancies may be caused up by inconsistent concept of insomnia and variation in measurement of tool. Additionally, a number of factors, including food, physical activity, lifestyle, and interviewing techniques, could be responsible for the observed variance in prevalence. Yet, those factors were not taken into consideration in this study.

The study found 33.5% of older persons had dementia. This finding is comparable with a study conducted in Indonesia, which showed dementia among 39.42% of older people in rural areas and 29.15% in suburban areas [49]. Similarly, 36.6% of Iranians had dementia to some extent [50]. However, lower prevalence of dementia was reported in other studies done in Nepal [51–54] and Jordan [55]. Another meta-analysis reported that a substantial percentage of dementia were undiagnosed; more than 60% of those with dementia are not detected in the general population [56].Variability in prevalence estimates of dementia due to geographical variations, variations in survival duration, the distribution of risk/protective variables, access to health care, study design and technique among studies.

Dementia prevalence increased with increasing years of age and decreased with more years of education [57]. This study also found that age, sex, education, marital status, pension and daily living activities were significantly associated with dementia. Similarly, another study conducted in Australia reported that age and functional impairment are related to dementia [58].

Loneliness frequency among community-dwelling older people varies by country to country due to their nature of family structure and support system. Our study showed that the 75.5% older adult experienced moderate to high level of loneliness (moderate-54.6%, moderate to high-19.3% and high-1.5).The finding is quite similar to study conducted in Nepal which revealed 38.7% and 16.9% experienced moderate to severe level of loneliness [59]. Almost similar findings revealed by the study done in Indonesia [60], in which loneliness was 64% among older people. However, studies reported lower prevalence of loneliness in Sweden [61], Norway [62] and China [63]. The difference in findings might be due to breakdown of conventional family structures, insufficient social welfare, and a lack of mental health care which may contribute to loneliness among seniors.

The current investigation discovered a significant association between depression and pension and education. Being illiterate is more prone to have depression than literate. This evidence agreed with the evidence of Thailand [64], Ethiopia [65] and Ezypt [66]. Similarly, present study found that not receiving pension or financial dependent is associated risk factor. This is similar to study done in Ethiopia which found that seniors with low incomes were approximately two times as likely as those with high incomes to experience depression [67]. Likewise, other studies in Asia (Myanma) [40], North India [68] and Portugal [69] showed similar result. Low-income older persons had a more difficult time accessing health services and care, which may have been linked to higher levels of depression [67].

Insomnia has been linked to a number of chronic disorders such as coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and brain hemorrhage [70, 71]. According to the results of the current study, co-morbidity and daily life activities were significantly associated with insomnia. The older adult who had co-morbid diseases had higher chance for insomnia compared to without co-morbidity. This finding is agreed with other studies done in Northern Taiwan [72] and Nepal [44]. Additionally; it has been shown that older adults’ sleep quality is negatively impacted by drugs [44].

The findings of the study provide information on prevalence of various psychosocial problems among older adult which might be useful to health care provider for planning and implementation of preventive and curative strategies on psychosocial problems for older people. Despite of this, the study has some limitations. This is a cross-sectional study, it cannot definitively any causal pathway; it can only determine the links between psychosocial problems and the associated factors. All the psychosocial assessment tools were self -reported tool which is subjected to recall bias. This study is conducted in community dwelling older adults’ psychosocial problems, so results cannot be generalized to older people residing in geriatric home and health care settings.

Conclusion

This study concluded that psychosocial problems such as anxiety, depression, loneliness, insomnia and dementia are common among older people. Among them, higher proportions suffer from depression, loneliness and anxiety. Age, functional dependency, sex, co-morbidity, financial dependence, education, and occupation are risk factors for psychosocial issues in older people. Therefore, local health care provider must organize and carry out routine screening, counselling, and awareness programs for the older adults in the community. Further, there is need to develop and implement health care strategy by local health care planner to prevent, treat and manage the psychosocial problems among this risk groups.

Researchers would like to thank Management Committee of Chitwan Medical College Teaching Hospital. Last but not least, researchers heartfelt thank go to participants who gave their valuable information and time for this study.

10.1371/journal.pone.0310849.r001
Decision Letter 0
Sahu Kamlesh Kumar Academic Editor
© 2024 Kamlesh Kumar Sahu
2024
Kamlesh Kumar Sahu
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Submission Version0
15 Jul 2024

PONE-D-24-12655Psycho-Social Problems among Older People Residing in Chitwan, Nepal - A Cross-sectional StudyPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Poudyal,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 29 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Kamlesh Kumar Sahu

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. 

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: 

"Nepal Health Research Council as provincial research grant."

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: ""The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."" 

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. 

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. Please provide a complete Data Availability Statement in the submission form, ensuring you include all necessary access information or a reason for why you are unable to make your data freely accessible. If your research concerns only data provided within your submission, please write "All data are in the manuscript and/or supporting information files" as your Data Availability Statement.

5. When completing the data availability statement of the submission form, you indicated that you will make your data available on acceptance. We strongly recommend all authors decide on a data sharing plan before acceptance, as the process can be lengthy and hold up publication timelines. Please note that, though access restrictions are acceptable now, your entire data will need to be made freely accessible if your manuscript is accepted for publication. This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If you are unable to adhere to our open data policy, please kindly revise your statement to explain your reasoning and we will seek the editor's input on an exemption. Please be assured that, once you have provided your new statement, the assessment of your exemption will not hold up the peer review process.

6. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

7. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

these point must be addressed:

community will be better than writing a city name in objective

refrences need to recheck and correct as per the journal stlye

conclusion needs to be in a separate heading

term "elderly" as well as being ageist terms are not inclusive terms therefore use the term older people/persons.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript has the potential to show ageing in Nepal, considering that there is little scientific evidence on the ageing process in some Asian countries. However, its treatment is purely descriptive and this reduces the scientific value of the proposal, as a frequency and/or prevalence, manuscript is more frequent in reports and other types of documents. Therefore, the proposal requires rethinking the data analyses and moving them to a multivariate level, but in addition to this substantive change to the methodology, the following is suggested to the authors:

(1) Avoid the term "elderly" as well as being ageist, it is an under-inclusive term and therefore use the term older people/persons.

(2) The introduction is also loaded with an ageist and negative view of old age, as a process of decline, multimorbidity, etc. Population ageing is a success story of societies and the group of older people is highly diverse and has different trajectories/ways of ageing.

(3) The methodology should consider whether the scales have been previously validated in older people in Nepal. The proposed descriptive analysis can be included in a first phase and then a mutivariate analysis should be carried out.

Reviewer #2: Refrences need through check as per the journal style there few mistakes

Conclusion need to be in saparete heading

In the objective 'This study aimed to find out the psycho-social problems among older people residing in

Bharatpur, Chitwan.' in place of Bharatpur, Chitwan you may write community

Reviewer #3: community will be better than writing a city name in objective

refrences need to recheck and correct as per the journal stlye

conclusion needs to be in a separate heading

term "elderly" as well as being ageist terms are not inclusive terms therefore use the term older people/persons.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

10.1371/journal.pone.0310849.r002
Author response to Decision Letter 0
Submission Version1
3 Sep 2024

Respected editors/reviewers

Thank you very much for your suggestion. We tried to incorporate them in our revise manuscript. Hope to get positive response soon.

Thank you

Attachment Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

10.1371/journal.pone.0310849.r003
Decision Letter 1
Sahu Kamlesh Kumar Academic Editor
© 2024 Kamlesh Kumar Sahu
2024
Kamlesh Kumar Sahu
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Submission Version1
5 Sep 2024

Psycho-social problems among older people residing in community of Chitwan, Nepal - A cross-sectional study

PONE-D-24-12655R1

Dear Dr. Poudyal,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Kamlesh Kumar Sahu

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

10.1371/journal.pone.0310849.r004
Acceptance letter
Sahu Kamlesh Kumar Academic Editor
© 2024 Kamlesh Kumar Sahu
2024
Kamlesh Kumar Sahu
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
9 Sep 2024

PONE-D-24-12655R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Poudyal,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Kamlesh Kumar Sahu

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE
==== Refs
References

1 World Health Organization. Ageing and Health. 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health
2 Preston SH , Stokes A . Sources of population aging in more and less developed countries. Population and Development Review. 2012 Jun; 38 (2 ):221–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00490.x 24653544
3 Central Bureau of Statistics. Population census. (2011). National Report. Kathmandu: His Majesty’s Government National Planning Commission Secretariat. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic-social/census/documents/Nepal/Nepal-Census-2011-Vol1.pdf.
4 Ismail Z , Ahmad WI , Hamjah SH , Astina IK . The impact of population ageing: a review. Iranian journal of public health. 2021 Dec; 50 (12 ):2451. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9577145/PMCID: PMC9577145; doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i12.7927 36317043
5 Bisschop MI , Kriegsman DM , Deeg DJ , Beekman AT , Van Tilburg W . The longitudinal relation between chronic diseases and depression in older persons in the community: the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2004 Feb 1; 57 (2 ):187–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.01.001 .15125629
6 Bruce ML . Psychosocial risk factors for depressive disorders in late life. Biological psychiatry. 2002 Aug 1; 52 (3 ):175–84. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01410-5 .12182924
7 Pronk M , Deeg DJ , Smits C , Twisk JW , van Tilburg TG , Festen JM , et al . Hearing loss in older persons: does the rate of decline affect psychosocial health?. Journal of Aging and Health. 2014 Aug; 26 (5 ):703–23. doi: 10.1177/0898264314529329 .24788715
8 Kramer SE , Kapteyn TS , Kuik DJ , Deeg DJ . The association of hearing impairment and chronic diseases with psychosocial health status in older age. Journal of aging and health. 2002 Feb; 14 (1 ):122–37. doi: 10.1177/089826430201400107 .11892756
9 World Health Organization. Mental health of older adults. 2017. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-of-older-adults.
10 Jr JW, Gordon JR , Jr RJ. Psychosocial issues near the end of life. Aging & mental health. 2002 Nov 1; 6 (4 ):402–12. doi: 10.1080/1360786021000007027 .12425774
11 Brady M. Pre-hospital psychosocial care: changing attitudes. Journal of Paramedic Practice. 2012 Sep 9; 4 (9 ):516–25. 10.12968/jpar.2012.4.9.516.
12 Kourkouta L , Iliadis C , Monios A . Psychosocial issues in elderly. Progress in health sciences. 2015; 5 (1 ):232–7.
13 Singh R , Singh B , Lall BS , Jain V . Psychosocial problems: an issue among the elderly in Kathmandu, Nepal. Int J Health Sci Res. 2013 Jun; 3 (6 ):48–53.
14 Adeleke RO , Adebowale TO , Oyinlola O . Profile of elderly patients presented with psychosocial problems in Ibadan. MOJ Gerontol Ger. 2017; 1 (1 ):26–36. 10.15406/mojgg.2017.01.00006.
15 Thapa DK , Visentin D , Kornhaber R , Cleary M . Prevalence of mental disorders among older people in Nepal: a systematic review. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2018 Apr 1;16 (62 ):181–90.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30636762/ PMID: 30636762. 30636762
16 Singh DR , Parajuli P , Hug J , Nath D , Koirala R , Mandal R . Dementia symptoms among senior citizens living in geriatric homes of kathmandu valley. Kathmandu University Medical Journal. 2021; 19 (74 ):195–199. .34819435
17 Ashish D. A Study of Mental Health among Old People Living In Old Age Home and Within Family Set-Up in Uttrakhand. Int J Indian Psychol. 2016; 3 (4 ). https://www.ijip.in doi: 10.25215/1102.302
18 Timalsina R , Sherpa PD , Dhakal DK . Factors Associated with Depression among Elderly Living in Old Age Homes in Kathmandu Valley. Journal of Institute of Medicine Nepal (JIOMN). 2014 Apr 1; 36 (1 ).
19 Sisodia MS , Kumar U , Kumar G . A study of the prevalence of various psychosocial problems of geriatric population in urban area of district-Hapur. Int J Community Med Public Health 2020; 7 :4947–51. 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20205167.
20 Bharatpur Metropolitan City Office of Municipal Executive Health and Social Development Division Public Health Section, Bharatpur, Chitwan. Annual Health Report. 2077/078. Available from: https://bharatpurmun.gov.np/en/content/bmc-annual-health-report-2077-78.
21 Katz S , Ford AB , Moskowitz RW , Jackson BA , Jaffe MW . Index of independence in activities of daily living. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association. 1970.10.1037/t04004-000.
22 Sheikh JI , Yesavage JA . Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): recent evidence and development of a shorter version. In Clinical gerontology 2014 Apr 4 (pp. 165–173). Routledge.10.1300/J018v05n01_09.
23 Mueller AE , Segal DL , Gavett B , Marty MA , Yochim B , June A , et al . Geriatric Anxiety Scale: item response theory analysis, differential item functioning, and creation of a ten-item short form (GAS-10). International Psychogeriatrics. 2015 Jul; 27 (7 ):1099–111. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214000210 24576589
24 Russell DW . UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of personality assessment. 1996 Feb 1; 66 (1 ):20–40. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2 8576833
25 Soldatos CR , Dikeos DG , Paparrigopoulos TJ . Athens Insomnia Scale: validation of an instrument based on ICD-10 criteria. Journal of psychosomatic research. 2000 Jun 1; 48 (6 ):555–60. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(00)00095-7 11033374
26 Borson S , Scanlan J , Brush M , Vitaliano P , Dokmak A . The mini‐cog: a cognitive ‘vital signs’ measure for dementia screening in multi‐lingual elderly. International journal of geriatric psychiatry. 2000 Nov; 15 (11 ):1021–7. doi: 10.1002/1099-1166(200011)15:11&lt;1021::aid-gps234&gt;3.0.co;2-6 11113982
27 Durmaz B , Soysal P , Ellidokuz H , Isik AT . Validity and reliability of geriatric depression scale-15 (short form) in Turkish older adults. North ClinIstanb. 2018 Sep 1; 5 (3 ):216–20. doi: 10.14744/nci.2017.85047 ; PMCID: PMC6323561.30688929
28 Risal A , Giri E , Shrestha O , Manandhar SM , Kunwar D , Amatya R , et al . Nepali Version of Geriatric Depression Scale-15–A reliability and validation study. Journal of Nepal Health Research Council, 2019 17 (4 ), 506–511. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v17i4.1984 .32001857
29 Bhattarai T , Sharma M , Sharma C , Bista AP . Status of anxiety and depression among elderly residing in a community of Tarakeshwor municipality, Kathmandu. Journal of Chitwan Medical College. 2021 Jun 19; 11 (2 ):58–62. doi: 10.54530/jcmc.406
30 Bhusal D , Adhikari KP , Chalise HN . UCLA Loneliness Scale in Nepal. Butwal Campus Journal. 2023 Dec 31;6 (1 ):21–31. 10.3126/bcj.v6i1.62951
31 Adhikari SP , Dev R , Borson S . Modifying the Mini‐Cog to Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Nonliterate Individuals. International Journal of Alzheimer’s disease. 2021; 2021 (1 ):5510093. doi: 10.1155/2021/5510093 34447592
32 Manandhar K , Risal A , Shrestha O , Manandhar N , Kunwar D , Koju R , Holen A . Prevalence of geriatric depression in the Kavre district, Nepal: Findings from a cross sectional community survey. BMC psychiatry. 2019 Dec; 19 :1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2258-5 ;PMCID: PMC6724336.30606141
33 Yadav UN , Thapa TB , Mistry SK , Pokhrel R , Harris MF . Socio-demographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, multi-morbid conditions and depressive symptoms among Nepalese older adults. BMC psychiatry. 2020 Dec; 20 :1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02680-3 ; PMCID: PMC7249669.31898506
34 Lu L , Shen H , Tan L , Huang Q , Chen Q , Liang M , et al . Prevalence and factors associated with anxiety and depression among community-dwelling older adults in Hunan, China: a cross-sectional study. BMC psychiatry. 2023 Dec; 23 (1 ):1–5. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04583-5 ; PMCID: PMC9930706.36593442
35 Kasa AS , Lee SC , Chang HC . Prevalence and factors associated with depression among older adults in the case of a low-income country, Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC psychiatry. 2022 Nov 1; 22 (1 ):675. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04282-7 36320004
36 Malhotra R , Chan A , Østbye T . Prevalence and correlates of clinically significant depressive symptoms among elderly people in Sri Lanka: findings from a national survey. International Psychogeriatrics. 2010 Mar; 22 (2 ):227–36. doi: 10.1017/S1041610209990871 .19747421
37 Bhamani MA , Karim MS , Khan MM . Depression in the elderly in Karachi, Pakistan: a cross sectional study. BMC psychiatry. 2013 Dec; 13 (1 ):1–8. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-181 23281653
38 Maatouk I , Herzog W , Böhlen F , Quinzler R , Löwe B , Saum KU , et al . Association of hypertension with depression and generalized anxiety symptoms in a large population-based sample of older adults. Journal of hypertension. 2016 Sep 1; 34 (9 ):1711–20. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001006 .27341438
39 Kirmizioglu Y , Doğan O , Kuğu N , Akyüz G . Prevalence of anxiety disorders among elderly people. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry: A journal of the psychiatry of late life and allied sciences. 2009 Sep; 24 (9 ):1026–33. doi: 10.1002/gps.2215 .19259977
40 Cho SM , Saw YM , Saw TN , Than TM , Khaing M , Khine AT , et al . Prevalence and risk factors of anxiety and depression among the community-dwelling elderly in Nay Pyi Taw Union Territory, Myanmar. Scientific Reports. 2021 May 7; 11 (1 ):9763. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88621-w ; PMCID: PMC8105404.33963225
41 Edwards N , Walker S , Paddick SM , Prina AM , Chinnasamy M , Reddy N , et al . Prevalence of depression and anxiety in older people in low-and middle-income countries in Africa, Asia and South America: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2023 Jan 18. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.01.068 .36681304
42 Wolitzky‐Taylor KB , Castriotta N , Lenze EJ , Stanley MA , Craske MG . Anxiety disorders in older adults: a comprehensive review. Depression and anxiety. 2010 Feb; 27 (2 ):190–211. doi: 10.1002/da.20653 20099273
43 Patel D , Steinberg J , Patel P . Insomnia in the elderly: a review. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine. 2018 Jun 15; 14 (6 ):1017–24. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7172 ; PMCID: PMC5991956.29852897
44 Dangol M , Shrestha S , Rai Koirala SK . Insomnia and its associated factors among older people of selected ward of Banepa municipality, Nepal. Nursing open. 2020 Jan; 7 (1 ):355–63. doi: 10.1002/nop2.396 ;PMCID: PMC691793231871720
45 Shrestha S , Roka T , Shrestha S , Shakya S . Prevalence and contributing factors of insomnia among elderly of Pashupati old aged home (Briddhashram). Mathews Journal of Psychiatry & Mental Health. 2017 Apr 11; 2 (2 ):1–0.
46 Ahmad E , Ansari AH , Khan RM . Prevalence of Bekhwabi (Insomnia) among the elderly patients attending Nium Hospital, Bangalore. India. J Community Med Health Educ. 2016 Oct 21; 6 (476 ):2161–0711.10.4172/2161-0711.1000476.
47 El-Gilany AH , Saleh NM , Mohamed HN , Elsayed EB . Prevalence of insomnia and its associated factors among rural elderly: a community based study. International Journal of Advanced Nursing Studies. 2017; 6 (1 ):56.10.14419/ijans.v6i1.7415.
48 Peng YT , Hsu YH , Chou MY , Chu CS , Su CS , Liang CK , et al . Factors associated with insomnia in older adult outpatients vary by gender: a cross-sectional study. BMC geriatrics. 2021 Dec; 21 (1 ):1–2. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02643-7 ; PMCID: PMC8650339.33388045
49 Ong PA , Annisafitrie FR , Purnamasari N , Calista C , Sagita N , Sofiatin Y , et al . Dementia prevalence, comorbidities, and lifestyle among Jatinangor elders. Frontiers in neurology. 2021 Jul 23; 12 :643480. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.643480 ; PMCID: PMC8345013.34367043
50 Kamalzadeh L , Moghaddamnia M , Malakouti SK , Rashedi V , Bahrampour S , Sharifi N , et al . Prevalence of dementia among older patients: a hospital-based study in Iran. American Journal of Alzheimer’s disease& Other Dementias®. 2019 Nov; 34 (7–8 ):500–506. doi: 10.1177/1533317519848234 ; PMCID: PMC10653364.31064201
51 Nepal S , Sapkota N , Kumar R , Deo BK , Mishra S . Psychiatric disorders in elderly patients attending OPD of tertiary care centre in eastern region of Nepal. Journal of Psychiatrists’ Association of Nepal. 2016;5 (1 ):43–8. doi: 10.3126/jpan.v5i1.18331
52 Tiwari SC , Pandey NM , Singh I . Mental health problems among inhabitants of old age homes: A preliminary study. Indian journal of psychiatry. 2012 Apr; 54 (2 ):144. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.99533 22988321
53 Shakya DR . Psychiatric morbidities of elderly psychiatry out-patients in a tertiary-care hospital. Journal of College of Medical Sciences—Nepal. 2011; 7 (4 ):1–8.
54 Khattri JB , Nepal MK . Study of depression among geriatric population in Nepal. Nepal Med Coll J. 2006 Dec 1; 8 (4 ):220–3.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17357635/ 17357635
55 Kofahi R , Aljezawi ME , Abdalrahim A , Al Qadire M , Obiedat D , Aqaileh S . Annual period prevalence and risk factors of dementia among older Jordanian hospitalized patients. International Journal of General Medicine. 2021 Feb 25 :641–647. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S299353 ; PMCID: PMC7920585.33658836
56 Lang L , Clifford A , Wei L , Zhang D , Leung D , Augustine G , et al . Prevalence and determinants of undetected dementia in the community: a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis. BMJ open. 2017 Feb 1; 7 (2 ):e011146. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011146 ; PMCID: PMC5293981.28159845
57 Palmer K , Kabir ZN , Ahmed T , Hamadani JD , Cornelius C , Kivipelto M , et al . Prevalence of dementia and factors associated with dementia in rural Bangladesh: data from a cross-sectional, population-based study. International psychogeriatrics. 2014 Nov; 26 (11 ):1905–15. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214001392 .25033341
58 Radford K , Lavrencic LM , Delbaere K , Draper B , Cumming R , Daylight G , et al . Factors associated with the high prevalence of dementia in older Aboriginal Australians. Journal of Alzheimer’s disease. 2019 Jan 1; 70 (s1 ):S75–85. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180573 ; PMCID: PMC6700619.30507573
59 Devkota R , Mishra K , Shrestha S . Loneliness and depression among older people living in a community of Nepal. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2019 Aug 4; 17 (2 ):185–192. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v0i0.1561 .31455932
60 Susanty S , Chung MH , Chiu HY , Chi MJ , Hu SH , Kuo CL , et al . Prevalence of loneliness and associated factors among community-dwelling older adults in Indonesia: A cross-sectional study. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2022 Apr 18; 19 (8 ):4911. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084911 ; PMCID: PMC9025207.35457781
61 Dahlberg L , Agahi N , Lennartsson C . Lonelier than ever? Loneliness of older people over two decades. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. 2018 Mar 1; 75 :96–103. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2017.11.004 .29220739
62 Tomstad S , Dale B , Sundsli K , Sævareid HI , Söderhamn U . Who often feels lonely? A cross‐sectional study about loneliness and its related factors among older home‐dwelling people. International journal of older people nursing. 2017 Dec; 12 (4 ):e12162. doi: 10.1111/opn.12162 .28752653
63 Teh JK , Tey NP . Effects of selected leisure activities on preventing loneliness among older Chinese. SSM-population health. 2019 Dec 1; 9 :100479. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100479 ; PMCID: PMC6804430.31646167
64 Charoensakulchai S , Usawachoke S , Kongbangpor W , Thanavirun P , Mitsiriswat A , Pinijnai O , et al . Prevalence and associated factors influencing depression in older adults living in rural Thailand: a cross‐sectional study. Geriatrics & gerontology international. 2019 Dec; 19 (12 ):1248–53. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13804 .31674121
65 Girma M , Hailu M , Wakwoya A , Yohannis Z , Ebrahim J . Geriatric depression in Ethiopia: prevalence and associated factors. J Psychiatry. 2016;20 (400 ):2.10.4172/2378-5756.1000400.
66 Odejimi O , Tadros G , Sabry N . A systematic review of the prevalence of mental and neurocognitive disorders amongst older adults’ populace in Egypt. Middle East Current Psychiatry. 2020 Dec; 27 :1–2.10.1186/s43045-020-00055-8.
67 Anbesaw T , Fekadu B . Depression and associated factors among older adults in Bahir Dar city administration, Northwest Ethiopia, 2020: Cross-sectional study. Plos one. 2022 Aug 23; 17 (8 ):e0273345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273345 35998120
68 Sharma K , Gupta A , Sharma RC , Mahajan N , Mahajan A , Sharma D , et al . Prevalence and risk factors for depression in elderly North Indians. Journal of Geriatric Mental Health. 2016 Jul 1; 3 (2 ):158–63. https://doi.org/ 0.4103/2348-9995.195673.
69 Sousa RD , Rodrigues AM , Gregório MJ , Branco JD , Gouveia MJ , Canhão H , et al . Anxiety and depression in the Portuguese older adults: Prevalence and associated factors. Frontiers in Medicine. 2017 Nov 20; 4 :196. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00196 ; PMCID: PMC5702006.29209612
70 Wang P , Song L , Wang K , Han X , Cong L , Wang Y , et al . Prevalence and associated factors of poor sleep quality among Chinese older adults living in a rural area: a population-based study. Aging clinical and experimental research. 2020 Jan; 32 :125–31. doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01171-0 ; PMCID: PMC6974488.30919262
71 Wang YM , Chen HG , Song M , Xu SJ , Yu LL , Wang L , et al . Prevalence of insomnia and its risk factors in older individuals: a community-based study in four cities of Hebei Province, China. Sleep medicine. 2016 Mar 1; 19 :116–22. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2015.10.018 .27198956
72 Tsou MT . Prevalence and risk factors for insomnia in community-dwelling elderly in northern Taiwan.” Journal of Clinical Gerontology and Geriatrics 2013; 4 : 75–79.10.14744/nci.2017.85047.
