
==== Front
Cureus
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus Palo Alto (CA)

10.7759/cureus.69737
Radiology
General Surgery
Oncology
Vanishing Act: A Case Report of Missing Breast Tumour Marker
Muacevic Alexander
Adler John R
Subramaniam Shaleene 12
Vijayananthan Anushya 1
Rahmat Kartini 1
1 Biomedical Imaging, University Malaya Medical Center, Kuala Lumpur, MYS
2 Radiology, Hospital Sultan Ismail, Johor Bahru, MYS
Shaleene Subramaniam shaleene.s@gmail.com
19 9 2024
9 2024
16 9 e6973719 9 2024
Copyright © 2024, Subramaniam et al.
2024
Subramaniam et al.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This article is available from https://www.cureus.com/articles/295282-vanishing-act-a-case-report-of-missing-breast-tumour-marker
Breast tissue markers are essential in localising tumours post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to breast-conserving surgery. However, due to the advancement in neoadjuvant therapies, greater efficacy in reducing tumour size increases the possibility of marker migration, potentially compromising surgical outcomes. We report a case of a 34-year-old woman with left breast invasive carcinoma, where the tissue marker, placed under ultrasound guidance before chemotherapy, migrated and was undetectable after eight chemotherapy cycles. The delay in surgery was resolved by identifying the marker in the left pectoral muscle using CT, though proximity to the lung prevented hook wire placement. Proposed migration mechanisms include the "accordion effect" and haematoma-induced displacement, highlighting the dynamic nature of breast tissue. Various imaging modalities, such as mammography, ultrasound, and CT, have proven helpful for marker localisation. This case underscores the need for a deeper understanding of tissue dynamics and emphasises interdisciplinary communication to adapt treatment strategies. As medical knowledge continues to evolve, insights are needed to refine best practices in breast cancer management and radiological interventions.

biopsy
mri
ultrasound
mammography
breast radiology
general surgery and breast cancer
breast cancer outcomes
general radiology
breast and endocrine surgery
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Using breast tissue markers has demonstrated considerable utility and safety in localising tumours among patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast-conserving surgery [1]. The migration of breast tissue markers is an established complication. Pronounced migration has the potential to impede the attainment of clear surgical margins, a concern that assumes heightened significance in the context of breast cancer due to the prevalent attainment of robust clinical responses following contemporary neoadjuvant systemic therapies. This renders markers a pivotal reference point for the residual lesion [2]. The migration mechanisms encompass the accordion effect, displacement facilitated by haematoma formation, and migration along the biopsy trajectory or within adipose breast tissue. This case presents an unusual occurrence involving the migration of a tissue marker in a 34-year-old female patient diagnosed with left breast invasive cancer. The tissue marker was found to have migrated onto the left pectoral muscle.

Case presentation

A 34-year-old BRCA1 gene carrier female patient was diagnosed with triple negative left breast invasive carcinoma (cT2 N0M0, stage 2a). She initially presented with a tender left breast lump. Screening ultrasound showed a suspicious left micro-lobulated hypoechoic lesion at 7 o’clock, 2 cm from the nipple, measuring 1.2x2.2x2.0 cm (Figure 1). No internal vascularity or posterior features were observed. Subsequently, an ultrasound core biopsy of the suspicious left breast lesion was performed, and the histopathological sample showed left breast invasive carcinoma, no specific type, modified Bloom and Richardson’s Grade 3.

Figure 1 Left breast ultrasound showing micro-lobulated hypoechoic lesion at 7 o’clock 2 cm FN (1.2x2.2x2.0 cm). No internal vascularity, posterior features, or significant lymphadenopathy on the left.

FN: From nipple

The patient underwent an MRI breast assessment, which showed a round circumscribed rim-enhancing mass lesion with the invasion of the underlying pectoral muscle at 7 o’clock, 7.2 cm from the nipple (Figure 2). This lesion demonstrated a Type 3 kinetic curve with rapid contrast enhancement with washout in the delayed phase (Figure 3). Staging CT showed no evidence of distant metastasis.

Figure 2 Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI breasts in axial slice showing left 7 o'clock round rim-enhancing mass lesion with invasion of the underlying left pectoral muscle. No evidence of multifocality or multicentricity.

Figure 3 Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI breast showing (A) placement of the ROI within the left breast 7 o'clock lesion rim-enhancing lesion, and (B) Type 3 kinetic curve produced for the corresponding lesion.

ROI: Region of interest

Due to the size and aggressive nature of the tumour, the treatment plan made for the patient during the multidisciplinary team meeting was for neoadjuvant chemotherapy to shrink the tumour before surgery and after a complete pathological response, the surgeons were to proceed with breast-conserving surgery. Prior to the commencement of chemotherapy, a tissue marker was inserted into the left breast lesion under ultrasound guidance. The placement of the tissue marker was further confirmed using a post-procedural mammogram (Figure 4).

Figure 4 Tumour marker insertion was done under ultrasound guidance. The placement of the marker was confirmed using the SLM view on the mammogram (white arrows).

SLM: Straight mediolateral

After eight cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, initially doxorubicin + dyclophosphamide and later a paclitaxel + carboplatin regime, she was reassessed using a mammogram and ultrasound. During this study, the left breast 7 o’clock lesion was not visualised. The tissue marker, however, was also not seen despite best efforts (Figure 5).

Figure 5 Post eight cycles of chemotherapy reassessment study showing non-visualisation of the left breast primary lesion and tumour marker on both ultrasound and mammogram.

A supplementary chest radiograph was done, but we could still not identify the tissue marker (Figure 6). The patient was then planned for hook wire localisation of the tissue marker under CT guidance. A dense foreign body was seen posterior to the left pectoral muscle during the preliminary scan (Figure 7). The hook wire was not inserted as the chances of injuring the lung parenchyma were very high. An ‘X’ was marked on the skin, overlying the tissue marker to aid the surgeons (Figure 8). She was then brought to the operating room, where a left breast-conserving surgery, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and anterior intercostal artery perforator (AICAP) flap transposition were performed. The frozen section was not sent as the surgeons could not identify the tissue marker intra-operatively. Histopathological examination results of the sample obtained showed no residual invasive carcinoma and clear margins with a complete pathological response. The patient subsequently underwent adjuvant three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) with a sequential boost to the tumour bed to consolidate the therapeutic outcomes.

Figure 6 Supplementary chest radiograph did not show radioopacity at the ROI.

ROI: Region of interest

Figure 7 CT-guided fluoroscopy in axial (A), sagittal (B) shows a dense foreign object (white arrowheads) lying posterior to the left pectoral muscle. Due to its compromising position, the decision to insert a hook wire was not taken.

Figure 8 CT-guided fluoroscopy revealing the tumour marker positioned at a depth of 2.2 cm from the skin (A). An 'X' demarcation was meticulously placed on the cutaneous surface directly above the tumour marker, facilitating precise localisation for our surgical colleagues.

Discussion

This case involves a patient with invasive breast carcinoma, wherein an Ultraclip titanium breast tissue marker migrated prior to planned surgery, prompting a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying such displacement. Initially positioned within the lesion to guide surgical resection post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the marker was unexpectedly found adjacent to the left pectoral muscle, necessitating a reassessment of the surgical strategy.

The Ultraclip titanium breast tissue marker was chosen because of its properties that minimise migration risk [2,3].  Constructed from biocompatible, inert titanium, the marker resists chemical reactions and adverse tissue responses. Its mechanical integrity and potential anchoring features help maintain its position despite the mechanical stresses of breast tissue mobility [4]. The marker's radiopaque visibility aids in accurate tracking during imaging, which is crucial for treatment planning [5].

Various radiological methods can be employed to address the challenge of locating the displaced Ultraclip titanium marker. One practical approach involves obtaining additional cleavage views during mammography [6]. The cleavage view is specifically designed to optimise visualisation of the breast tissue in the central region, where the marker's migration likely occurred. By capturing multiple angles in this area, the chances of identifying the migrated marker and assessing its proximity to surrounding structures are significantly enhanced.

Other methods include ultrasound and colour Doppler imaging, which distinguishes the marker's appearance from surrounding tissues [1]. Contrast-enhanced MRI improves marker detection by employing contrast agents to enhance structures' visibility. The Ultraclip marker's radiopacity could be accentuated by surrounding tissue enhancement, making identifying against the background tissue easier. Notably, in this case, a CT-guided fluoroscopic procedure was employed for marker identification and labeling prior to surgical excision, underlining the utility of interventional radiology approaches.

The migration mechanisms proposed to explain the displacement of the tissue marker encompass the "accordion effect," displacement facilitated by haematoma formation, and migration along the biopsy trajectory or within the adipose breast tissue [3,7]. Each of these mechanisms underscores the dynamic and intricate nature of breast tissue, which can contribute to the unintended movement of foreign bodies within the breast.

The "accordion effect" refers to the notion that markers placed within the breast tissue can experience displacement due to the inherent mobility and pliability of the breast tissue itself. During routine movements or due to changes in breast shape, the marker might shift from its original location, potentially leading to its migration over time. This emphasises the need for a comprehensive understanding of breast tissue behavior and its potential impact on market stability.

Haematoma formation as a potential facilitator of marker migration underscores the significance of post-biopsy changes within the breast tissue. Haematomas can create localised pressure gradients, forcing the marker to move away from its original position. The interaction between haematoma formation and the marker's physical properties, such as size and weight, can influence the direction and extent of migration.

Migration along the biopsy trajectory or within adipose breast tissue highlights the intricate pathways that markers can follow within the breast. The presence of biopsy tracts and the variable composition of breast tissue can lead to unexpected routes of displacement. This phenomenon serves as a reminder that the anatomical complexities of the breast demand careful consideration when planning radiological procedures and subsequent interventions.

The case report also underscores the importance of meticulous communication and collaboration among radiologists, oncologists, and surgeons. The unexpected migration of the tissue marker altered the surgical approach and necessitated a reassessment of the tumour's localisation. Such situations require interdisciplinary efforts to adapt the treatment plan effectively, ensuring the patient receives the best care.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the case report of a missing tissue marker in a patient with invasive breast carcinoma highlights the intricacies between breast tissue dynamics and radiological interventions. The proposed migration mechanisms-accordion effect, haematoma-facilitated displacement, and migration along biopsy trajectory-underscore the need for a comprehensive understanding of breast anatomy and behaviour. This case also emphasises the importance of effective interdisciplinary communication and adaptation of treatment strategies in response to unforeseen challenges. As medical knowledge continues to evolve, insights from such cases contribute to refining best practices in breast cancer management and radiological interventions.

Disclosures

Author Contributions

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Concept and design:  Shaleene Subramaniam, Anushya Vijayananthan, Kartini Rahmat

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Shaleene Subramaniam, Anushya Vijayananthan

Drafting of the manuscript:  Shaleene Subramaniam

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Shaleene Subramaniam, Anushya Vijayananthan, Kartini Rahmat

Supervision:  Anushya Vijayananthan, Kartini Rahmat
==== Refs
References

1 Ultrasonography-guided surgical clip placement for tumor localization in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer J Breast Cancer Youn I Choi SH Kook SH Choi YJ Park CH Park YL Kim DH 44 49 18 2015 25834610
2 Intraductal migration of a breast tissue marker placed under ultrasound guidance during COVID-induced delay of surgery J Breast Cancer Andrade G Pereira A Gonçalves L Videira C 402 408 24 2021 34467679
3 The disappearing clip: an unusual complication in MRI biopsy BMJ Case Rep Bourke AG Peter P Jose CL 0 2014 2014
4 Evaluation of the dislocation and long-term sonographic detectability of a hydrogel-based breast biopsy site marker Breast Cancer Sakamoto N Fukuma E Tsunoda Y Teraoka K Koshida Y 575 582 25 2018 29572658
5 Breast tissue markers: Why? What's out there? How do I choose? Clin Imaging Shah AD Mehta AK Talati N Brem R Margolies LR 123 136 52 2018 30059952
6 Immediate migration of biopsy clip markers after upright digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted core biopsy Acad Radiol Teichgraeber DC Martaindale S Omofoye TS Hess KR Parikh JR Whitman GJ 204 209 27 2020 31076332
7 Tissue marker migration after MRI-guided breast biopsy: migration frequency and associated factors Breast J Funaro K Prather A Niell B Jared Weinfurtner R 440 445 26 2020 31448455
