
==== Front
Cureus
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus Palo Alto (CA)

10.7759/cureus.67233
Pain Management
Orthopedics
A Novel Technique for Restricted Kinematic Alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty Without Computer-Assisted Devices
Muacevic Alexander
Adler John R
Sakakibara Yuzuru 12
Yasutani Yusuke 1
Oyama Akimitsu 1
Teramoto Atsushi 2
1 Orthopedic Surgery, Muroran City General Hospital, Muroran, JPN
2 Orthopedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, JPN
Yuzuru Sakakibara sakakibara.y@sapmed.ac.jp
19 8 2024
8 2024
16 8 e6723318 8 2024
Copyright © 2024, Sakakibara et al.
2024
Sakakibara et al.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This article is available from https://www.cureus.com/articles/284505-a-novel-technique-for-restricted-kinematic-alignment-total-knee-arthroplasty-without-computer-assisted-devices
Kinematic-alignment total knee arthroplasty (KA-TKA) aims to restore natural limb alignment and joint line obliquity, thereby improving patient satisfaction. Restricted KA-TKA (rKA-TKA) addresses abnormal knee anatomies and seeks to replicate natural anatomical structures within safe alignment boundaries. This study introduces a novel device and technique that enables rKA-TKA without computer-assisted surgery (CAS). The new device allows for precise cartilage thickness measurement and adjustment of osteotomy angles, facilitating accurate alignment. A heel-lift technique for tibial osteotomy is presented, offering a reproducible method for determining the osteotomy volume and angle. These innovations make KA and rKA-TKA feasible in any surgical setting, avoiding the high costs and limited availability associated with CAS.

computer-assisted surgery
osteoarthritis of the knee
restricted kinematic alignment
kinematic alignment
total knee arthroplasty
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (MA-TKA) is the gold standard surgical treatment for knee osteoarthritis, with good long-term outcomes reported. However, some patients who undergo MA-TKA feel their knee is unnatural, and an additional 20% are dissatisfied with the surgical outcome [1,2]. Kinematic-alignment total knee arthroplasty (KA-TKA) has recently been reported to improve patient satisfaction [3-5]. KA-TKA aims to restore constitutional lower limb alignment and joint line obliquity before arthritis. KA-TKA is a joint resurfacing procedure with the advantage of minimal soft tissue release [6-8]. However, concerns remain regarding the reproduction of outliers, pathological joint surface geometry, and ligament balance. Restricted KA-TKA (rKA-TKA) was developed as an alternative to unrestricted KA-TKA in patients with abnormal or pathological knee anatomy after osteoarthritis. The rKA-TKA concept aims to recreate anatomical structures within safe boundaries while avoiding extreme varus-valgus alignment [9,10]. Meticulous preoperative planning is required to predict a patient's anatomy and ligament balance. Furthermore, actual ligament balance can only be confirmed intraoperatively. Hence, rKA-TKA requires anatomical modifications to fit within these boundaries and is ideally performed using computer-assisted surgery (CAS), such as patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), computer navigation, or robotic assistance [11]. However, CAS, such as navigation and robotics, is only available in certain institutions and is costly to implement and maintain. In this study, we propose a device and novel technique that can be used for unrestricted KA and rKA-TKA without CAS. The devices and methods presented here make it possible to perform rKA-TKA at any institution.

Technical report

Preoperative planning

The lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were measured using preoperative long-leg radiographs. The arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) was calculated by subtracting the LDFA from the MPTA. The femur can be osteotomized to the thickness of the component using the calibrated KA-TKA technique with an intramedullary rod, thus preserving femoral anatomy. Preoperative boundary planning is necessary in cases of abnormal LDFA values due to hypoplasia of the lateral condyle or excessive varus and valgus deformities resulting from bone loss. We set the aHKA from -5° to +3°, the LDFA from 85° to 95°, and the MPTA from 85° to 90° based on previous reports [2,10,12].

Surgical techniques

Distal Femoral Osteotomy

We use a cartilage thickness gauge (MicroPort®, Memphis, USA), a unique device to measure cartilage thickness in the distal femur (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Articular cartilage measuring instrument

It is possible to measure cartilage thickness by pressing against the distal femoral cartilage. The image shows a scale of 2 mm.

The cartilage thickness is measured by pressing the device against its surface. The paddle contacting the distal femur has a dial adjusted for the measured cartilage thickness (Figure 2).

Figure 2 The paddle that contacts the distal femur is equipped with a dial that adjusts for the measured cartilage

The dial is adjusted medially and laterally to account for the thickness of the implant. If there is significant bone loss or severe malalignment, the osteotomy angle can be adjusted using an angle scale as a reference. In such cases, the angle can be easily modified using a dial on the paddle.

Heel Lift Technique

This is a novel technique for kinematic alignment tibial osteotomy. After the distal femoral osteotomy, soft tissue procedures such as anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (if necessary), and meniscectomy are performed, and as many osteophytes as possible are removed. The varus-valgus alignment of the tibial osteotomy and the height of the osteotomy line can be confirmed by reference to the ligament balance obtained by inserting a unique rectangular spacer into the joint gap after distal femoral osteotomy to contact the distal femoral osteotomy surface. By lifting the heel during knee extension, the tibial osteotomy line and the amount of osteotomy required to restore the patient's individual joint line can be visualized using ligament taxis (Figure 3).

Figure 3 Heel lift technique

The unique spacer is inserted to align with the distal femoral osteotomy surface, and the heel is lifted in extension. The line parallel to the distal femoral osteotomy plane and the osteotomy volume relative to the thickness of the implant can be visualized quantitatively simultaneously.

The principle of this method is similar to manual in-line traction [13,14]; however, it is highly reproducible because it requires only lifting the heel and holding it in extension, eliminating the need to be aware of the direction and force of the traction. This technique also allows the height of the osteotomy line to be checked simultaneously. The tibial osteotomy line obtained here is marked and referred to during subsequent tibial osteotomies.

Femoral Posterior Condyle Osteotomy

The femoral posterior condyle is osteotomized to match the thickness of the component, assuming there is no cartilage defect in the femoral posterior condyle. The femoral rotation should be osteotomized parallel to the posterior condyle axis. If there is a cartilage defect, the amount of osteotomy can be adjusted by modifying the angle of external rotation to accommodate the defect or by inserting a 1-2 mm spoon gauge into the paddle on the side where cartilage wear is noted. A posterior femoral sizing guide and a four-in-one resection guide are used to determine the femoral bone size. After the four-plane femoral osteotomy, the femoral trial component is placed such that the components match the native femoral groove. Patellar tracking is then checked, and if there are no problems, a peg hole is created, and the mediolateral position of the femur is determined. The gap is then checked by inserting a spoon gauge into the medial and lateral joint space with the femoral trial component in place. The obtained gap information can be used to confirm the osteotomy volume and angle when using a double stylus for tibial osteotomy (Figure 4).

Figure 4 The medial and lateral gaps can be checked by a spoon gauge, respectively

The gap can be checked by inserting a spoon gauge into the medial and lateral joint space with the trial femoral component in place. The gap information obtained can be used in the osteotomy volume and angle when using the double stylus for tibial osteotomy.

Tibial Osteotomy

The concept of kinematic alignment is to regenerate the patient's joint surface shape through resurfacing and soft tissue respect [15,16]. Using the methods described above, femoral osteotomies can be performed relatively easily without CAS. However, for tibial osteotomies, the calipered method, which adjusts the angle based on the predicted articular surface shape, and the soft tissue-respected method, which refers to the angle obtained from ligament taxis by inline traction, are available for unrestricted KA. We also advocate the heel-lift technique as a new, highly reproducible, and visible method for confirming the angle and height of tibial osteotomy. The tibial osteotomy height and varus-valgus alignment obtained with the heel-lift technique can be easily checked with an angle wing gauge, even during tibial osteotomy (Figure 5).

Figure 5 The tibial osteotomy height and varus-valgus alignment obtained with the heel lift technique can be easily checked with an angel wing gauge, even during tibial osteotomy

Additionally, the tibial extramedullary rod developed for the rKA-TKA (MicroPort®, Memphis, USA) can be used to confirm the amount of osteotomy by placing a stylus on the medial and lateral tibial articular surfaces, respectively, which is also helpful as an indicator of osteotomy amount and angle (Figure 6).

Figure 6 A stylus on the medial and lateral tibial articular surfaces

The tibial extramedullary rod developed for the rKA-TKA can be used to confirm the amount of osteotomy by placing a stylus on the medial and lateral tibial articular surfaces, respectively, which is also helpful as an indicator of osteotomy amount and angle. The amount of osteotomy in the tibia can be checked using the medial and lateral gap information obtained from the spoon gauge as a reference.

rKA-TKA: restricted kinematic-alignment total knee arthroplasty

The extramedullary rod has an adjustable dial that can be changed in 0.5° increments up to 5° of varus and valgus, allowing restricted KA without CAS (Figure 7).

Figure 7 The extramedullary rod has an adjustable dial

The extramedullary rod has an adjustable dial that can be changed in 0.5° increments up to 5° of varus and valgus, allowing restricted KA without CAS.

KA: knee arthroplasty; CAS: computer-assisted surgery

The posterior tilt angle is adjusted to be parallel to the medial articular surface using an angel wing. If a medial bone defect is present, the intercondylar ridge base is used as a reference (Figure 8). 

Figure 8 The posterior tilt angle is adjusted to be parallel to the medial articular surface using the angel wing

At the end of the technical note, we have shared an X-ray of a case in which rKA-TKA was performed without CAS, with the tibial osteotomy angle and height determined by the heel lift technique (Figure 9).

Figure 9 A) Standing lower limb X-rays before surgery and B) standing lower limb X-rays after surgery

Discussion

Improving patient satisfaction, function, and long-term survival after TKA is a primary focus in orthopedic research. Traditional MA-TKA has long been considered crucial for enhancing long-term clinical outcomes and implant survival rates [17]. Studies indicate that KA-TKA, which restores the original joint line in individual patients, improves clinical outcomes without compromising implant survival [4,5,15]. KA-TKA aims to reestablish the original joint line orientation and constitutional alignment seen in preosteoarthritis. However, concerns exist that implant placement in extreme varus or valgus alignments may lead to early component loosening [17-20].

To address these concerns, Vendittoli proposed rKA-TKA for cases with extreme varus and valgus alignments [10]. In rKA-TKA, extreme alignments are avoided by finding an appropriate compromise within safe boundaries [9,21]. rKA-TKA was developed as an alternative to the unrestricted KA technique for patients with atypical knee anatomy. It offers a compromise that restores constitutional alignment in most cases, correcting extreme abnormal anatomy to an acceptable level with significantly less alteration to normal anatomy compared to MA. This positively impacts normal biomechanics, resulting in more balanced flexion and extension in the medial and lateral compartments [9,22]. Unlike traditional rKA-TKA procedures that require CAS tools such as robotics, navigation, and PSI, this report introduces a novel approach.

It is the first account of rKA-TKA using a conventional technique with a unique device that allows precise angle adjustment in 0.5° increments without CAS. We also introduce a new heel-lift technique, which we believe is a highly reproducible and surgeon-independent method for determining the angle and amount of tibial osteotomy required. These methods have significantly expanded the options for performing KA and rKA-TKA without CAS, making them accessible to any institution. 

Since the purpose of this study is to detail a new surgical technique, a limitation is the lack of data on surgical outcomes. Verification and reporting of data obtained using this surgical technique are necessary. Another limitation is the absence of quantitative evaluation of medial and lateral collateral ligament tension and the medial-lateral gap, a common issue in all TKA procedures not involving CAS. Even in robotic TKA, soft tissue balance is assessed manually, leading to considerable variability among surgeons. Moreover, navigation systems and robot-assisted technology have yet to resolve the issue of clinical satisfaction [23-26].

Therefore, we propose that this novel method of KA and rKA-TKA, which is not limited by cost or facility and can be performed with conventional methods, will be beneficial to all surgeons, regardless of the institution.

Conclusions

Here, we present novel surgical devices and techniques for unrestricted KA and rKA-TKA, enabling quantitative angle adjustment without using CAS. Future studies should validate and report these results using this method. Patients who have undergone r-KA TKA using this technique have shown significant improvement, albeit in a short-term evaluation. Further detailed reports with imaging and clinical evaluations will be presented in the future.

We are very grateful to Dr. Ichiro Ishikawa, hospital vice director of Muroran City General Hospital, Japan, who continues to supervise trauma and orthopedic treatment in the Western Iburi region, for his constant cooperation.

Disclosures

Author Contributions

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Concept and design:  Yuzuru Sakakibara, Yusuke Yasutani, Akimitsu Oyama, Atsushi Teramoto

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Yuzuru Sakakibara, Yusuke Yasutani, Akimitsu Oyama, Atsushi Teramoto

Drafting of the manuscript:  Yuzuru Sakakibara

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Yuzuru Sakakibara, Yusuke Yasutani, Akimitsu Oyama, Atsushi Teramoto

Supervision:  Yuzuru Sakakibara, Yusuke Yasutani, Akimitsu Oyama, Atsushi Teramoto
==== Refs
References

1 Joint perception after hip or knee replacement surgery Orthop Traumatol Surg Res Collins M Lavigne M Girard J Vendittoli PA 275 280 98 2012 22459101
2 Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res Bourne RB Chesworth BM Davis AM Mahomed NN Charron KD 57 63 468 2010 19844772
3 Alignment options for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review Orthop Traumatol Surg Res Rivière C Iranpour F Auvinet E Howell S Vendittoli PA Cobb J Parratte S 1047 1056 103 2017 28864235
4 Implant survival and function ten years after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty Howell SM Shelton TJ Hull ML 3678 3684 33 2018 30122435
5 Calipered kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty: an accurate technique that improves patient outcomes and implant survival Orthopedics Howell SM 126 135 42 2019 31099877
6 Assessment of the radii of the medial and lateral femoral condyles in varus and valgus knees with osteoarthritis J Bone Joint Surg Am Howell SM Howell SJ Hull ML 98 104 92 2010
7 Kinematic TKA using navigation: surgical technique and initial results Orthop Traumatol Surg Res Hutt JR LeBlanc MA Massé V Lavigne M Vendittoli PA 99 104 102 2016 26776100
8 Mechanical alignment: the end of an era! Orthop Traumatol Surg Res Rivière C Vigdorchik JM Vendittoli PA 1223 1226 105 2019 31378698
9 The impact of mechanical and restricted kinematic alignment on knee anatomy in total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty Almaawi AM Hutt JR Masse V Lavigne M Vendittoli PA 2133 2140 32 2017 28302462
10 Restricted kinematic alignment, the fundamentals, and clinical applications Front Surg Vendittoli PA Martinov S Blakeney WG 697020 8 2021 34355018
11 A randomized controlled trial of tibial component migration with kinematic alignment using patient-specific instrumentation versus mechanical alignment using computer-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty Bone Joint J Laende EK Richardson CG Dunbar MJ 929 940 101-B 2019 31362561
12 Restoring the constitutional alignment with a restrictive kinematic protocol improves quantitative soft-tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial Bone Joint J MacDessi SJ Griffiths-Jones W Chen DB Griffiths-Jones S Wood JA Diwan AD Harris IA 117 124 102-B 2020 31888372
13 Traction during total knee arthroplasty leads to a bone-conseving tibial resection Inter J Orthop Brown JHM 1283 1288 7 2020
14 Coronal alignment of three different types of implants in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study Open J Orthop Soda Y Nakamura M Adachi N 183 198 11 2021
15 Kinematic alignment is a possible alternative to mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Lee YS Howell SM Won YY Lee OS Lee SH Vahedi H Teo SH 3467 3479 25 2017 28439636
16 Results of an initial experience with custom-fit positioning total knee arthroplasty in a series of 48 patients Orthopedics Howell SM Kuznik K Hull ML Siston RA 857 863 31 2008 18814593
17 The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement J Bone Joint Surg Am Ritter MA Davis KE Meding JB Pierson JL Berend ME Malinzak RA 1588 1596 93 2011 21915573
18 What clinical characteristics and radiographic parameters are associated with patellofemoral instability after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? Int Orthop Nedopil AJ Howell SM Hull ML 283 291 41 2017 27619673
19 Varus tibial alignment is associated with greater tibial baseplate migration at 10 years following total knee arthroplasty Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Teeter MG Naudie DD McCalden RW Yuan X Holdsworth DW MacDonald SJ Lanting BA 1610 1617 26 2018 29147742
20 In kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty, failure to recreate native tibial alignment is associated with early revision J Arthroplasty Scanlon CM Sun DQ Alvarez AM Webb ML Perez BA Yu AS Hume EL 3166 3171 35 2020 32660798
21 Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty EFORT Open Rev Nisar S Palan J Rivière C Emerton M Pandit H 380 390 5 2020 32818065
22 How frequently do four methods for mechanically aligning a total knee arthroplasty cause collateral ligament imbalance and change alignment from normal in white patients? AAOS exhibit selection J Bone Joint Surg Am Gu Y Roth JD Howell SM Hull ML 0 96 2014
23 Gait analysis of patients following total knee replacement: a systematic review Knee McClelland JA Webster KE Feller JA 253 263 14 2007 17531493
24 Posterior cruciate ligament retention versus posterior stabilization for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis PLoS One Jiang C Liu Z Wang Y Bian Y Feng B Weng X 0 11 2016
25 Navigation and robotics improved alignment compared with PSI and conventional instrument, while clinical outcomes were similar in TKA: a network meta-analysis Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Lei K Liu L Chen X Feng Q Yang L Guo L 721 733 30 2022 33492410
26 Arthroplasty surgeons differ in their intraoperative soft tissue assessments: a study in human cadavers to quantify surgical decision-making in TKA Clin Orthop Relat Res Elmasry SS Sculco PK Kahlenberg CA 1604 1615 480 2022 35323146
