
==== Front
RSC Adv
RSC Adv
RA
RSCACL
RSC Advances
2046-2069
The Royal Society of Chemistry

d4ra05420b
10.1039/d4ra05420b
Chemistry
A new generation of 1,8-diaminocarbazole building blocks for the construction of fluorescent anion receptors†
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ra05420b

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5882-3742
Korczak Maria L. a
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1795-8931
U-9009-2018
Maslowska-Jarzyna Krystyna a
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3703-7670
K-7446-2017
Chmielewski Michał J. a
a Faculty of Chemistry, Biological and Chemical Research Centre, University of Warsaw Żwirki i Wigury 101 Warsaw 02-089 Poland mchmielewski@chem.uw.edu.pl

19 9 2024
18 9 2024
19 9 2024
14 41 2988329889
26 7 2024
12 9 2024
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry
2024
The Royal Society of Chemistry
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.
We describe the synthesis of a new generation of 1,8-diaminocarbazole building blocks for the construction of anion receptors and fluorescent sensors. These new building blocks feature mildly electron-withdrawing ester substituents at positions 3 and 6 of the carbazole core, which improve anion affinities and significantly enhance solubilities, without compromising fluorescent response. To demonstrate the advantages of the new building blocks, three of them were converted into model diamide receptors R1–R3. The resulting ester-substituted receptors showed greatly improved solubilities and fluorescent response in comparison to their 3,6-dichloro-substituted predecessors, while retaining very high affinity and selectivity for oxyanions, particularly dihydrogen phosphate, even in partially aqueous solutions. In view of these promising results and the known synthetic versatility of primary amines, we envisage that the new building blocks will be useful for the construction of various classes of fluorescent anion receptors with improved solubility, affinity, and fluorescent response.

New, ester-substituted diaminocarbazole building blocks are proposed for making anion receptors with significantly improved solubility, tunability, affinity, and fluorescent response.

Fundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej 10.13039/501100001870 START scholarship, edition 2023 Narodowe Centrum Nauki 10.13039/501100004281 2018/31/B/ST5/02085 pubstatusPaginated Article
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Synthetic molecules that strongly and selectively bind and detect anionic species hold great promise for numerous applications across scientific, industrial, and medicinal domains.1 Accordingly, considerable research efforts have been devoted to the development of supramolecular receptors and sensors capable of detecting various anions. Over the last 20 years, 1,8-diaminocarbazoles have emerged as particularly versatile building blocks for the construction of fluorescent and colorimetric anion sensors, owing to their powerful carbazole fluorophore and chromophore directly coupled to the anion binding site.2,3 Thanks to their rigid skeleton, which facilitates preorganization of the appended hydrogen bond donors, as well as to their appropriate geometry, the amide, thioamide, urea and thiourea derivatives of 1,8-diaminocarbazoles exhibit exceptionally high affinity towards Y-shaped oxyanions.3–6 Accordingly, 1,8-bis(amido)- and 1,8-bis(urea)carbazoles have been intensely explored for the recognition of phosphates,7–11 carboxylates,3,4,12–16 and sulfate.5,6,17 As a step towards practical applications, they were also used for the preparation of ion-selective electrodes,18–20 infrared sensors,21 and fluorescent sensors that selectively detect sulphate anions in mineral water.17 Furthermore, in recent years bis(amido)- and bis(thioamido)carbazoles have also been shown to act as potent transmembrane transporters of various biologically relevant anions.22–26

Despite all the advantages mentioned above, there are two main drawbacks that hamper further development of 1,8-diaminocarbazole-based anion receptors, sensors, and transporters. First, they are usually poorly soluble in most organic solvents and aqueous–organic mixtures.3 Second, tuning their properties by variation of substituents in the carbazole core is synthetically challenging and, in practice, restricted to positions 3 and 6. What makes it even more problematic, many electron-withdrawing substituents, introduced to improve the affinity of receptors to anions, reduce their fluorescence response.27

In our previous studies, we tried to solve the solubility problem by varying the substituents in the amide arms of 1,8-diamidocarbazole receptors.3 We noticed that the introduction of t-butyl substituents, well known as solubilising groups, as well as various other straight and branched alkyl chains, led to only very limited success in improving the solubility of the receptors in organic solvents. In another study, we introduced electron-withdrawing nitro- and cyano-substituents at positions 3 and 6 of the carbazole core (Fig. 1).27 This increased the anion binding strength of the receptors and endowed them with colorimetric anion sensing capability, but at the same time compromised their fluorescent response. Also, due to their high acidity, receptors R6 and R7 (Fig. 1) were easily deprotonated, even by moderately basic anions, such as H2PO4−.

Fig. 1 Various 1,8-diaminocarbazole building blocks for the construction of anion receptors, sensors, and transporters.

The effect of substituents at positions 3 and 6 on the properties of carbazole-based anion receptors has also been studied by other research teams.9,19 For example, Leito and co-workers introduced t-Bu groups into positions 3 and 6, what improved the solubility of the receptors in organic solvents,28 but lowered their anion binding constants29 due to the electron-donating character of the alkyl substituents.

Considering the above, we envisaged that a promising approach to improving the solubility of carbazole-based receptors without compromising their anion recognition properties might be the introduction of electron-withdrawing ester groups into positions 3 and 6 of the carbazole skeleton. Ester groups have an additional advantage that their alkoxy moieties could be easily varied, what might be utilised to modulate the properties of such receptors without developing their synthesis from scratch. In this paper, we describe the synthesis of a new generation of 1,8-diaminocarbazole building blocks for the construction of anion receptors and sensors, featuring ester substituents for improved solubility, tuneability, and fluorescent response. We present also the synthesis and anion recognition studies of the first model receptors derived from these building blocks. Encouragingly, our studies show that one of these model receptors, R1, is a strong and selective turn-ON fluorescent sensor for dihydrogen phosphate, even in highly competitive, partially aqueous solutions.

Results and discussion

Synthesis

Since efficient, chromatography-free, and multigram-scale synthesis of carbazole-3,6-dicarboxylic acid 3 from commercially available and inexpensive carbazole (Scheme 1, steps a–c) had already been developed by Weseliński et al.,30 we initially decided to use diacid 3 as a starting point of our synthetic investigations. Esterification of 3 with various alcohols, followed by nitration at positions 1 and 8 and reduction of the nitro groups, was expected to yield the desired building blocks 10–12 (Scheme 1, path A). Unfortunately, however, while esterification of 3 with MeOH was easy and high yielding (90%), the subsequent nitration of the dimethyl ester 4 proved to be very problematic due to the non-repeatability of the procedure and the low yields of the desired product (3–26%). Since this step would have to be optimised separately for each ester, we decided to test path B instead (Scheme 1, path B), because in path B the problematic nitration of positions 1 and 8 occurs earlier (at step 3 rather than at step 5), and hence there is no need to optimise its conditions for each targeted receptor. In fact, the nitration of 3,6-dicyanocarbazole 2 had previously been described by us,27 and now we have successfully scaled this procedure up, from 3 to 12 mmol of the substrate.

Scheme 1 The synthesis of receptors R1–R3: (a) NBS, DMF, −5 °C, 1 h, 57%; (b) Zn(CN)2, dppf, Zn, Zn(OAc)2, Pd2(dba)3 (cat.), DMF, H2O, 110 °C, 72 h, 97%; (c) 2 M NaOH, CuI, 100 °C, 24 h, 98%; (d) MeOH, 95% H2SO4 (cat.) reflux, 24 h, 90%; (e) 65% HNO3, 95% H2SO4 (cat.), 0 °C, 0.5 h, 26%; (f) 100% HNO3, Ac2O, AcOH, 110 °C, 49%; (g) H2O, AcOH, 95% H2SO4 (cat.), 110 °C, 16 h, 88%; (h) MeOH, 95% H2SO4 (cat.), reflux, 24 h, 78% for 7 or BuOH, 95% H2SO4 (cat.), 135 °C, 20 h, 90% for 8; (i) SOCl2, DMF, 60 °C, 4 h; (j) 2,2,3,3,4,4,4-heptafluorobutyl alcohol, DCM, TEA, 85%; (k) H2, 0.3 bar, 10% Pd/C (cat.), AN, RT, 7 h for 10 or 5 h for 11 & 12, 77% for 10, 89% for 11, 87% for 12; (l) t-butylacetyl chloride, TEA, THF, RT, 1 h, 66% for R1, 56% for R2, 73% for R3.

In path B, the key step is the hydrolysis of 3,6-dicyano-1,8-dinitrocarbazole 5 to diacid 6, because this is where the synthetic path branches out into individual esters. Unfortunately, alkaline hydrolysis of dinitrile 5, under the same conditions that led to nearly quantitative hydrolysis of dinitrile 2, resulted in extensive decomposition and hence low yields of 6. Therefore, as an alternative, acidic conditions were developed for this transformation. The best results were obtained after heating 5 to reflux (approx. 116 °C) in a mixture of sulfuric acid, acetic acid, and water (2 : 1 : 1 v/v), for 16 h. Using this method, the desired 1,8-dinitrocarbazole-3,6-dicarboxylic acid 6 was obtained in 88% yield, after repeated crystallisation from hot DMSO. The esterification of 6 with appropriate alcohols, used as both reagents and solvents, led to diesters 7 and 8 in 78% and 90% yield, respectively. Diester 9 was obtained from the same substrate, but using a different method, due to the higher cost of 2,2,3,3,4,4,4-heptafluorobutyl alcohol. Thus, diacid 6 was first converted to acid chloride 6b (in a reaction with thionyl chloride), and then reacted with 2,2,3,3,4,4,4-heptafluorobutyl alcohol to give the desired diester 9 in 85% yield. To selectively reduce the two nitro groups in 7–9 without affecting the ester substituents, we used 0.3 bar of H2 in the presence of 10% Pd/C as a catalyst, in acetonitrile as a solvent. The same method was used by us before for the reduction of 3,6-dichloro-1,8-dinitrocarbazole.2 Thus, the desired building blocks 10, 11, and 12 were obtained in 77%, 89%, and 87% yield, respectively. Finally, acylation of 10–12 with t-butylacetyl chloride gave the desired diamide receptors R1–R3 in acceptable yields (66% for R1, 56% for R2, 73% for R3). Chromatographic purification of the new receptors was significantly easier in comparison to that of other diamidocarbazoles, due to their improved solubility and hence expanded range of available eluents.

Solubility assessment of the final receptors R1–R3 was conducted in various solvents, including DCM, ACN, EA, DMF, and DMSO, and compared to the solubility of the previously described diamides R4–R7. Overall, esters R1–R3 exhibited significantly higher solubility than the carbazole-based receptors R4–R7. While receptors R4–R7 showed appreciable solubility only in DMF and DMSO, the ester-substituted receptors R1–R3 demonstrated good solubility in a broader range of solvents. For example, semi-quantitative solubility studies in ethyl acetate revealed that R3 dissolves at approximately 33.4 mg per 100 g of solvent, compared to only 4.4 mg for the 3,6-dichloro-substituted receptor R5 (see ESI, Section 5.1†). Even in DMSO, the difference was immediately apparent: the ester-substituted receptors dissolved much more readily, upon simple mixing, while other derivatives required ultrasounds and heating to achieve full dissolution.

Anion binding studies

To investigate the anion recognition properties of the new receptors, we selected five anions with diverse shapes, solvation energies, and basicities as model guests: Cl−, PhCOO−, H2PO4−, CH3COO−, and SO42−. The presence of integrated chromophores and fluorophores in the carbazole receptors allows their binding properties to be conveniently studied using various techniques, including NMR, UV-vis, and fluorescence titrations. Given that the stability constants of halide complexes with 1,8-diamidocarbazoles are typically low, we employed 1H NMR titration to measure the binding affinity of R1 to chloride. On the contrary, the stability constants of 1,8-diamidocarbazole complexes with oxyanions typically exceed the range that could be reliably determined by 1H NMR titrations. Therefore, UV-vis titrations were used to quantify the binding in these cases (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2 UV-vis titration of 0.1 mM R1 with (TBA)2SO4 (left) and TBAH2PO4 (right) in DMSO/0.5% H2O. Deprotonation of R1 occurs in the presence of sulfates.

The stability constants of the complexes of R1–R3 with various anions are presented in Table 1 and compared with the previously published data for receptors R4–R7. For the model receptor R1, the binding constants follow the order , as was the case for the previously reported diamidocarbazoles. The selectivity of R1 for H2PO4− over Cl−, expressed as the ratio of the respective binding constants, exceeds 700, while the selectivity for PhCOO− over Cl− reaches 170. The affinities of R1 to dihydrogen phosphate, benzoate, and chloride are similar to those of R5, suggesting similar electron-withdrawing strength of ester and chlorine substituents. Differences are apparent, however, in the case of the more basic acetate and sulfate anions. CH3COO− and SO42– appear to cause slight deprotonation of R1, as inferred from the comparison of the UV-vis and fluorescence titrations of R1 with TBA salts of sulfate and acetate and with TBAOH (new peaks appear in the UV-vis spectra, with absorbance maxima at 309 and 392 nm, Fig. 2, left, and ESI 3.11†). This behaviour contrasts with R5, which does not undergo appreciable deprotonation under similar conditions.3,31 It is worth noting, however, that H2PO4− does not deprotonate R1 (Fig. 2, right), even though it does so with the highly acidic receptors R6 and R7 (Table 1).

Logarithms of binding constants (Ka) for receptors R1–R7 with various anions in DMSO/0.5% H2Oa,b

Anion	Logarithms of binding constants, log Ka	
R1c, –COOCH3	R2c, –COOC4H9	R3c, –COOC4H2F7	R4d, –H	R5d, –Cl	R6d, –NO2	R7d, –CN	
Cl−e	2.09	n.d.	n.d.	1.68	2.20	2.49	2.54	
H2PO4−	4.94	4.72	5.19f	4.01	4.91	5.40f	Deprotonation	
PhCOO−	4.33	4.20	4.01f	3.67	4.47	Deprotonation	Deprotonation	
CH3COO−	Deprotonation	n.d.	n.d.	4.07	4.95	n.d.	n.d.	
SO42–	Deprotonation	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	n.d.	
a n.d. = not determined.

b Tetrabutylammonium salts were used as anion sources, 298 K.

c Fitting errors are provided in the ESI.

d Value from ref. 27.

e DMSO-d6/0.5% H2O was used instead of DMSO/0.5% H2O.

f Estimated complexation constant, disregarding partial deprotonation.

The alkoxy groups on the rear side of the carbazole cleft seem to have minor influence on anion affinities. For instance, replacing methoxy groups in R1 with butoxy groups in R2 slightly decreased the receptor's affinity for both anions (from log Ka = 4.94 to log Ka = 4.72 for H2PO4 and from log Ka = 4.33 to log Ka = 4.20 for benzoate, Table 1). Conversely, substituting the methoxy groups with –OCH2(CF2)2CF3 in R3 appears to increase the affinity for H2PO4 (from log Ka = 4.94 to log Ka = 5.19) and decrease the affinity for benzoate (from log Ka = 4.33 to log Ka = 4.01). However, R3 seems to undergo slight deprotonation in the presence of both anions, so the respective apparent binding constants should be interpreted with caution.

The very high oxyanion affinity in DMSO/0.5% H2O prompted us to increase the amount of water in the solvent mixture. In the presence of 10% H2O in DMSO, dihydrogen phosphate and benzoate still bind to R1 appreciably, giving and log KPhCOO− = 2.81, while acetate and sulfate partially deprotonate R1 (see ESI 3.7–3.10†).

Fluorescent anion sensing

To investigate the fluorescent sensing capabilities of the new receptors, we performed fluorescent titrations of R1 with the same set of model anions, starting again in DMSO/0.5% H2O (Fig. 3). For chloride, a relatively small (up to 50%) and quasi-linear increase in fluorescence emission was observed, in accord with the rather low affinity of R1 to this anion (emission maximum at 371 nm). Notably, the fluorescence increase did not reach plateau even after the addition of 100 equivalents of chloride. In contrast, benzoate, which binds much more strongly to R1, led to a significant decrease in fluorescence intensity at 380 nm, reducing it to 20% of its initial value. Strikingly, dihydrogen phosphate induced a huge fluorescent turn-ON response, resulting in 450% increase in fluorescence at 380 nm (Fig. 3 and 4A). Other oxyanions, such as hydrogensulfate, sulfate, and acetate, gave a very different fluorescent response, with minor changes at 380 nm and the emergence of a new peak at 427 nm, likely due to deprotonation of R1 (Fig. 3; see also Fig. S58† for fluorescence titration with TBAOH).

Fig. 3 Fluorescence spectra of 10 μM R1 in the presence of various TBA salts in DMSO/0.5% H2O at 298 K. EX WL: 324 nm.

Fig. 4 The fluorescence intensity of 10 μM solution of R1 at 380 nm in the presence of various anions in (A) DMSO/0.5% H2O and (B) DMSO/10% H2O at 298 K. EX WL: 324 nm. (C) The fluorescence intensity ratios of phosphate and acetate complexes of receptors R1, R4 and R5 in the presence of 50 equiv. of the anions in DMSO/0.5% H2O. EX WL: 324 nm, EM WL: 380 nm.

Somewhat surprisingly, similar behaviour was observed in DMSO/10% H2O – a significantly more competitive medium, in which the investigated oxyanions are more strongly hydrated, and therefore less basic (Fig. 4B). Such selectivity for H2PO4− over CH3COO− was not observed for the previously published carbazole-based receptors R4 and R5 (Fig. 4C). The high selectivity likely results from the finely fitted acidity of R1, which is not deprotonated by H2PO4−, but deprotonates in the presence of the competing sulfate and acetate anions. Thus, our results demonstrate that diamidocarbazole receptors can be tailored to target specific anions through strategic modification of their substituents at positions 3 and 6, yielding highly selective fluorescent anion sensors.

Determination of H2PO4− in water using receptor R1

Dihydrogen phosphate (H2PO4−) plays a critical role in various biochemical reactions32 and physiological processes,33 including signal transduction,34 gene regulation,35 and energy storage.36 Abnormal levels of phosphate in biological fluids are linked to several diseases, such as vascular calcification, hypertension, vitamin D deficiency, hyperparathyroidism, and tumour growth.37–39 Sensitive and selective fluorescent detection of phosphate could thus be very useful in biology and medicine, with potential applications in studying phosphate metabolism in vivo, cell imagining32,40 and medical diagnostics. Additionally, selective phosphate sensors could be useful also in agriculture and environmental protection – for instance, in monitoring phosphorus fertilizers in soil and in surface waters, where excessive phosphorous may cause eutrophication and algal blooms.41 However, despite its significance, selective sensors for dihydrogen phosphate are still rare.42

In view of the exceptional affinity and selective fluorescent response of R1 toward H2PO4−, we decided to explore its ability to quantify H2PO4− in aqueous samples. Since simple, hydrogen bonding and charge neutral receptors like R1 do not effectively bind anions in pure water, all the investigated aqueous solutions were diluted tenfold with DMSO. Unlike in the case of fluorescence titrations described above, this time we used sodium salt of dihydrogen phosphate, because it is more relevant to real-life applications. The addition of aqueous NaH2PO4 led to a vivid increase in the fluorescence intensity of R1. The first 4 solutions were used to construct a calibration curve, shown in Fig. 5. A linear correlation was observed between the fluorescence of R1 and the concentration of dihydrogen phosphate in the concentration range of 0 to 0.5 mM H2PO4− (Fig. 5). Using this calibration curve (correlation coefficient R = 0.9954), we successfully determined the concentration of dihydrogen phosphate in the fifth solution (0.075 mM), with a relative error of 3.7% (see ESI, Section 5†). The limit of detection (LOD) for this method was estimated to be 0.02 mM (see ESI, Section 5†).

Fig. 5 Determination of H2PO4− in real water sample using selective sensor R1.

Conclusions

In summary, we have developed the synthesis of a new generation of diaminocarbazole building blocks for the construction of fluorescent anion receptors. The new building blocks offer improved solubility, affinity, and fluorescent response owing to ester substituents at positions 3 and 6 of the carbazole core. The advantages of the new building blocks were demonstrated through the synthesis of three model diamidocarbazole receptors. One of these receptors was shown to have a strong turn-ON fluorescent response for dihydrogen phosphate, even in partially aqueous solutions.

In the future, the improved solubility of ester-substituted carbazoles is expected to enable the construction of receptors with significantly more sophisticated molecular structure, such as macrocycles, cryptands, catenanes, and rotaxanes, while their selective fluorescent response promises utility in sensing applications. Furthermore, the possibility of varying alkoxy moieties offers tunability for specific applications, such as anion sensing in water, anion transport across lipid bilayers, or selective extraction of anions from aqueous phase. Altogether, our findings showcase diaminocarbazoles as privileged building blocks for the construction of diverse families of fluorescent anion receptors for various applications.

Author contributions

M. L. K.: investigation (synthesis, 1H NMR titrations, UV-vis titrations, fluorescence titrations); data analysis; manuscript writing. K. M.-J.: conceptualisation; investigation (UV-vis titrations, fluorescence titrations); data analysis; visualisation; manuscript writing and editing. M. J. C.: conceptualisation; funding acquisition; supervision; manuscript writing and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data availability

The data supporting this article have been included as part of the ESI.†

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Supplementary Material

RA-014-D4RA05420B-s001

The authors thank the Polish National Science Centre for financial support through the research grant 2018/31/B/ST5/02085 (M. J. C.). K. M.-J. was supported by the Foundation for Polish Science (FNP) within the START scholarship, edition 2023. The study was carried out at the Biological and Chemical Research Centre, University of Warsaw, established within a project co-financed by the European Union through the European Regional Development Fund under the Operational Programme Innovative Economy 2007–2013.
==== Refs
Notes and references

Busschaert N. Caltagirone C. Rossom W. V. Gale P. A. Chem. Rev. 2015 115 8038 8155 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00099 25996028
Chmielewski M. J. Charon M. Jurczak J. Org. Lett. 2004 6 3501 3504 10.1021/ol048661e 15387533
Baąk K. M. Chabuda K. Montes H. Quesada R. Chmielewski M. J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018 16 5188 5196 10.1039/C8OB01031E 29971303
Rüütel A. Tshepelevitsh S. Leito I. J. Org. Chem. 2022 87 14186 14193 10.1021/acs.joc.2c01725 36214741
Wu X. Wang P. Lewis W. Jiang Y.-B. Gale P. A. Nat. Commun. 2022 13 4623 4630 10.1038/s41467-022-32403-z 35941124
Bąk K. M. Trzaskowski B. Chmielewski M. J. Chem. Sci. 2024 15 1796 1809 10.1039/D3SC05086F 38303949
Kadam S. A. Haav K. Toom L. Pung A. Mayeux C. Leito I. Eur. J. Org Chem. 2017 11 1396 1406 10.1002/ejoc.201601583
Sánchez G. Curiel D. Tatkiewcz W. Ratera I. Tárraga A. Veciana J. Molina P. Chem. Sci. 2014 5 2328 2335 10.1039/C3SC53058B
Sanchez G. Espinosa A. Curiel D. Tarraga A. Molina P. J. Org. Chem. 2013 78 9725 9737 10.1021/jo401430d 24025043
Ahmed N. Suresh V. Shirinfar B. Geronimo I. Bist A. Hwanga I.-C. Kim K. S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012 10 2094 2100 10.1039/C2OB06994F 22293977
Lee S. K. Han Y. Choi Y. Kang J. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2012 74 177 182 10.1007/s10847-011-0098-0
Butler S. M. Hountondji M. Berry S. N. Tan J. Maciacde L. Jolliffe K. A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2023 21 8548 8553 10.1039/D3OB01442H 37846461
Kheirjou S. Rüütel A. Darnell A. Haljasorg T. Leito I. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2022 20 2121 2130 10.1039/d1ob02398e 35225311
Berry S. N. Qin L. Lewis W. Jolliffe K. A. Chem. Sci. 2020 11 7015 7022 10.1039/D0SC02533J 33250974
Martin K. Nõges J. Haav K. Kadam S. A. Pung A. Leito I. Eur. J. Org Chem. 2017 35 5231 5237 10.1002/ejoc.201700931
Jiménez M. B. Alcázar V. Peláez R. Sanz F. de Arriba Á. L. F. Caballero M. C. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012 10 1181 1185 10.1039/C1OB06540H 22179325
Bąk K. M. Masłowska K. Chmielewski M. J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017 15 5968 5975 10.1039/C7OB01358B 28675234
Yrjänä V. Saar I. Ilisson M. Kadam S. A. Leito I. Bobacka J. Chemosensors 2021 9 4 30 10.3390/chemosensors9010004
Rüütel A. Yrjänä V. Kadam S. A. Saar I. Ilisson M. Darnell A. Haav K. Haljasorg T. Toom L. Bobacka J. Leito I. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2020 16 1901 1914 10.3762/bjoc.16.157 32802207
Martin K. Kadam S. A. Mattinen U. Bobacka J. Leito I. Electroanalysis 2019 31 1061 1066 10.1002/elan.201800790
Piotrowski P. Bukowska J. Pałys B. Pomorski R. Chmielewski M. J. Sens. Actuators, B 2019 283 172 181 10.1016/j.snb.2018.11.145
Bąk K. M. van Kolck B. Maslowska-Jarzyna K. Papadopoulou P. Kros A. Chmielewski M. J. Chem. Commun. 2020 56 4910 4913 10.1039/C9CC09888G
Pomorski R. García-Valverde M. Quesada R. Chmielewski M. J. RSC Adv. 2021 11 12249 12253 10.1039/D1RA01646F 35423746
Maslowska-Jarzyna K. Cataldo A. Marszalik A. Ignatikova I. Butler S. J. Stachowiak R. Chmielewski M. J. Valkenier H. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2022 20 7658 7663 10.1039/D2OB01461K 36134504
Maslowska-Jarzyna K. Bąk K. M. Zawada B. Chmielewski M. J. Chem. Sci. 2022 13 12374 12381 10.1039/D2SC04346G 36382290
Maslowska-Jarzyna K. Korczak M. L. Chmielewski M. J. Front. Chem. 2021 9 690035 10.3389/fchem.2021.690035 34095089
Maslowska-Jarzyna K. Korczak M. L. Wagner J. A. Chmielewski M. J. Molecules 2021 26 3205 3221 10.3390/molecules26113205 34071969
Kadam S. A. Haav K. Toom L. Pung A. Mayeux C. Leito I. Eur. J. Org Chem. 2017 11 1396 1406 10.1002/ejoc.201601583
To compare complexation constants of benzoate for carbazole-based receptors with t-Bu and –Cl substituents, see ref. 12 and 17

Weseliński Ł. J. Luebke R. Eddaoudi M. Synthesis 2014 46 596 599 10.1055/s-0033-1340557
Bąk K. M. Chmielewski M. J. Chem. Commun. 2014 50 1305 1308 10.1039/C3CC48463G
Wang K.-P. Zhang S.-J. Lv C.-D. Shang H.-S. Jin Z.-H. Chen S. Zhang Q. Zhang Y.-B. Hu Z.-Q. Sens. Actuators, B 2017 247 791 796 10.1016/j.snb.2017.03.052
Hu R. Long G. Chen J. Yin Y. Liu Y. Zhu F. Feng J. Mei Y. Wang R. Xue H. Tiana D. Li H. Sens. Actuators, B 2015 218 191 195 10.1016/j.snb.2015.04.064
Ni X.-L. Zeng X. Redshaw C. Yamato T. J. Org. Chem. 2011 76 5696 5702 10.1021/jo2007303 21630671
Seftona B. M. and Hunter T. , Protein Phosphorylation, Academic Press, New York, 1998
Johnson L. N. Lewis R. J. Chem. Rev. 2001 101 2209 2242 10.1021/cr000225s 11749371
al Law A. T. Adeloju S. B. Talanta 2013 114 191 203 10.1016/j.talanta.2013.03.031 23953460
Banach M. Rysz J. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2010 11 2575 2578 10.1517/14656566.2010.522569 20977396
Razzaque M. S. Clin. Sci. 2011 120 91 97 10.1042/cs20100377
Guo L. E. Zhang J. F. Liu X. Y. Zhang L. M. Zhang H. L. Chen J. H. Xie X. G. Zhou Y. Luo K. Yoon J. Anal. Chem. 2015 87 1196 1201 10.1021/ac503818p 25511872
Huang S.-Y. Pierre V. C. JACS Au 2022 2 1604 1609 10.1021/jacsau.2c00200 35911450
Picci G. Montis R. Gilchrist A. M. Gale P. A. Caltagirone C. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2024 501 215561 215605 10.1016/j.ccr.2023.215561
