
==== Front
Sci Rep
Sci Rep
Scientific Reports
2045-2322
Nature Publishing Group UK London

39294418
72344
10.1038/s41598-024-72344-9
Article
Protective effect of propolis in protecting against radiation-induced oxidative stress in the liver as a distant organ
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1601-6029
Cikman Oztekin 1
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6613-3082
Bulut Aziz 2
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1251-3148
Taysi Seyithan seytaysi@gantep.edu.tr

3
1 https://ror.org/041jyzp61 grid.411703.0 0000 0001 2164 6335 Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Yuzuncu Yıl University, Van, Turkey
2 https://ror.org/020vvc407 grid.411549.c 0000 0001 0704 9315 Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey
3 https://ror.org/020vvc407 grid.411549.c 0000 0001 0704 9315 Department of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University Medical School, Gaziantep, Turkey
18 9 2024
18 9 2024
2024
14 217663 7 2024
5 9 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Stresses caused by ionizing radiation can also damage tissues and organs through the circulatory system. In this study, we aimed to determine the radioprotective effect of propolis, a natural and powerful antioxidant product, against oxidative liver damage caused by cranial irradiation. Thirty-two male albino Sprague–Dawley rats, divided into four groups, were designed as sham group, irradiation (IR) group, propolis plus IR, control group of propolis. Biochemical parameters were measured in liver tissue of rats. While Total enzymatic superoxide scavenging activity (TSSA) and non-enzymatic superoxide scavenging activity (NSSA), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activities of all groups were statistically significantly higher than rats receiving only-irradiation, Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) activity in the IR group was significantly lower than in the sham control group and IR + propolis group. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in the IR group was found to be significantly higher than both the sham control group and the propolis control group, but lower than the IR + propolis group. Malondialdehyde level and xanthine oxidase activity were higher in the IR group than in the other groups. Compared to the sham control group, in the group treated with propolis, a significant elevation in antioxidant parameters, specifically TSSA, NSSA, SOD, and GST activities, was noted, with corresponding increases of 32.3%, 23.2%, 47.6%, and 22.6%, respectively. Our findings show that propolis can be a radioprotective agent against ionized radiation damage by increasing antioxidant activity and reducing oxidant stress in liver tissue.

Keywords

Cancer
Experimental study
Irradiation
Phenolic compounds
Propolis
Radiotherapy
Subject terms

Biochemistry
Cancer
issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Radiotherapy (RT) stands as an indispensable approach in the management of cancer, a paramount and challenging ailment in contemporary times. The impacts of RT, encompassing both local and systemic ramifications, largely stem from the generation of free radicals induced by ionizing radiation. The excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) is identified as oxidative and nitrosative stress, respectively, inflicting numerous deleterious effects on living organisms. These species interact with cellular macromolecules, including DNA, cytoplasmic membranes, and functional proteins, thereby eliciting inflammation, cellular dysfunction, and ultimately leading to cell death1,2.

The cytotoxic and genotoxic effects resulting from oxidative and nitrosative damage induced by ionizing radiation have been demonstrated through studies, indicating that, in addition to the targeted cancer tissue, surrounding and distant normal tissues are also impacted by radiation3. Given that the liver, as an integral component of the systemic circulation, is susceptible to the side effects of radiation, it is imperative, akin to other organs, to shield the liver from the systemic repercussions of radiotherapy administered to any part of the body3,4. When the equilibrium between stresses and antioxidant defense mechanisms is disrupted, living organisms endeavor to counteract the oxidant effects and restore redox balance by activating or suppressing genes encoding protective enzymes, transcription factors, and structural proteins3,5.

Propolis, a substance produced by honeybees with an extremely complex chemical structure and antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antitumoral properties, contains various chemical components such as polyphenols (flavonoid aglycones, phenolic acids and their esters, phenolic aldehydes, alcohols and ketones), sesquiterpene quinones, coumarins, steroids, amino acids, organic compounds and vitamins3,6. The components of propolis are responsible for many of its biological and pharmacological activities and have been reported to exhibit detoxification activity against the harmful effects of free radicals3,7. However, propolis may vary in composition and activity depending on its botanical sources and geographical origin3. In the analysis performed with a high-performance liquid chromatography device coupled to a diode array detector (HPLC–DAD), the ethanolic extract of Turkish propolis was reported to contain chrysin (641.33 µg/mL), caffeic acid phenethyl ester (630.67 µg/mL), pinocembrin (572.67 µg/mL), galangin (534.11 µg /mL), naringenin (372.39 µg/mL), as well as kaempferol, trans-cinnamic acid, caffeic acid, myricetin and quercetin6.

The results of our previous research have reported a decrease in antioxidant defense and an increase in oxidants in the lens, tongue, and brain tissues of rats subjected to total head irradiation. Conversely, in rats administered with propolis, we observed a reversal of this trend1,7,8.

Although the antioxidant properties of propolis have been investigated in various studies9,10, to the best of our knowledge, we have not come across a study specifically examining the protective effect of propolis against radiation-induced oxidative stress in the liver as a distant organ from the irradiated tissue. Therefore, our aim was to investigate whether propolis has protective effects against radiation-induced oxidative damage in the liver tissue of rats following systemic administration.

Methods

Animals and experiments

The study was conducted by ARRIVE guidelines and was carried out in the Departments of Medical Biochemistry and Radiation Oncology after receiving ethical approval from Gaziantep University Local Animal Ethics Committee (number 2017/2). Thirty-two male albino Sprague–Dawley rats, weighing 220 ± 25 g and aged 12–16 weeks, were utilized in the experiment. The rats were individually housed in LF-4 type cages (590X380X200 mm; length, width, and height, respectively) for a minimum of one week prior to radiation exposure. Standard laboratory chow and water were provided as the diet for the rats. Each cage housed eight rats in a windowless laboratory room with automated temperature control (22 ± 1 °C) and lighting controls (12 h light/12 h dark).

The rats were randomly divided into four groups, 8 rats in each group. Groups were organized as follows:

Irradiation (IR) Group: Rats in this group initially received 1 ml of saline via an orogastric tube. Subsequently, a single dose of 5 Gray (Gy) gamma irradiation was administered to the entire cranium. Rats in this group were orally administered 1 ml of saline daily for 10 consecutive days.

IR plus Propolis Group: Rats in this group were given propolis (80 mg kg-1 day-1) through an orogastric tube one hour before irradiation. This procedure was repeated daily for 10 days. Propolis was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) immediately before administration to the rats.

Propolis Control Group: Rats in this group did not receive propolis or irradiation. Instead, an equivalent volume of DMSO, in which propolis was dissolved, was orally administered via an orogastric tube. This process was carried out one hour before irradiation and repeated daily for 10 days.

Sham Control Group: Rats in this group did not receive propolis or irradiation.

Ionizing radiation application

The research was conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines set by the local Ethical Committee. Prior to total cranial irradiation, all rats were anesthetized with 80 mg/kg ketamine hydrochloride (Pfizer Ilac, Istanbul, Turkey) and positioned in the prone position on a tray. Rats in the IR and IR plus Propolis groups were irradiated from anterior areas measuring 80 cm × 5 × 5 cm at a source-to-surface distance, utilizing a Cobalt-60 teletherapy unit (Theratron Equinox, MDS Nordion, Kanata, Ontario, Canada). Total cranium gamma irradiation was administered as a single dose of 5 Gy. Rats in the normal control and propolis control groups underwent placebo irradiation. The dose rate was 0.49 Gy/min, and the central axis dose was calculated at a depth of 0.5 cm.

Biochemical analysis

Preparation of tissues for analysis

All rats were sacrificed by decapitation after anaesthesia with 50 mg of ketamine hydrochloride on the 11th day under aseptic conditions and their livers were extracted. A volume of liver tissue, along with 9 volumes of physiological saline solution, was homogenized using an IKA-NERKE homogenizer device (Staufen, Germany).

The homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000 g for 1 h to remove residues. The clear supernatant from the top was collected, and all analyses were conducted on this fraction. All procedures were performed at 4 °C.

Determination of TSSA, NSSA and SOD activities

Total enzymatic superoxide scavenging activity (TSSA) and non-enzymatic superoxide scavenging activity (NSSA) were evaluated in samples before and after the addition of trichloroacetic acid (TCA, 20%) as reported by Durak et al.10. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was calculated from the difference between TSSA and NSSA10. Results were expressed as U/mg protein.

Determination of GSH-Px, GST, XO and NOS activities

The activity of glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) was assessed following the method outlined by Paglia and Valentina11. Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) activity was determined as described by Habig et al.12. Xanthine oxidase (XO) activity was analyzed spectrophotometrically13. Nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity was measured according to the described method 14. All results are expressed as U/mg protein.

Determination of MDA levels

Malondialdehyde (MDA) was determined spectrophotometrically15, and the total thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) were expressed as MDA. The results were expressed as nmol/g wet weight. NO· levels were measured using the Griess reagent16,17, and the results were expressed as µmol/g wet weight. Protein content was determined as described18, and all measurements were conducted using a spectrophotometer (Shimadu U 1601, Japan).

Statistical analysis

The data were subjected to statistical analysis using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows (SPSS, version 23.0, Chicago, IL). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was employed to assess the normal distribution of continuous variables. Data were presented as mean ± SE (standard error). Differences between groups in normally distributed variables were evaluated using the ANOVA test, while the Kruskal–Wallis H test was utilized for data that did not exhibit a normal distribution. Statistical significance was considered when the p-value was less than 0.05.

Results

Antioxidant parameters

Antioxidant parameters measured are given in Table 1. TSSA, NSSA, GSH-Px activities of all groups were found to be statistically significantly higher when compared to rats that received only irradiation. GST activity in the IR group was significantly lower than the sham control group and IR + propolis group. SOD activity in the IR group was found to be significantly higher than both the sham control group and the propolis control group, but lower than the IR + Propolis group. In the group given propolis, a significant increase in antioxidant parameters TSSA, NSSA, SOD and GST activities was found to be 32.3%, 23.2%, 47.6% and 22.6%, respectively. This observed increase confirms our hypothesis that propolis increases antioxidant defense and prevents oxidative stress in rats receiving ionizing radiation.Table 1 Antioxidant parameters measured in the liver tissue of the rats.

	Sham control group	Control group of propolis	IR group	IR plus propolis group	
TSSA (U/mg protein)	2383.6 ± 80.7a,¥	2360.9 ± 43.7a,¥	2062.2 ± 96.5	3152.5 ± 134.9	
NSSA (U/mg protein)	1745.2 ± 111.2 k, &	1650.8 ± 46.0d,≠	1124.0 ± 91.9	2150.4 ± 113.5 k	
SOD (U/mg protein)	763.4 ± 42.0c,¥	735.2 ± 30.9b,¥	938.2 ± 37.0	1127.2 ± 59.2b	
GSH-Px (U/mg protein)	12.0 ± 0.3a	12.5 ± 0.6b	10.6 ± 0.2	12.7 ± 0.5b	
GST (U/mg protein)	175.8 ± 8.0a,*	146.7 ± 4.8¥	144.0 ± 5.9	215.6 ± 17 k	
a: p < 0.05, b: p < 0.005 c: p < 0.01, d: p < 0.001, k: p < 0.0001 vs. IR group.

*: p < 0.05, &: p < 0.005 ≠ : p < 0.001, ¥: p < 0.0001 vs. IR plus Propolis group.

IR: Irradiation.

TSSA: Total enzymatic superoxide scavenging activity.

NSSA: Non-enzymatic superoxide scavenging activity.

GSH-Px: Glutathione peroxidase.

GST: Glutathione-S-transferase.

Oxidative parameters

MDA level and XO activity in liver tissue were found to be statistically significantly higher in the IR group compared to the other groups (Table 2). Significant increases in MDA levels (Fig. 1), a marker of lipid peroxidation, and in the activity of XO (Fig. 2), an oxidant enzyme, are also important indicators of oxidative stress caused by ionizing radiation. This confirms our hypothesis that components contained in propolis reverse oxidative stress in rats receiving ionizing radiation.Table 2 Oxidant parameters measured in the liver tissue of the rats.

	Sham control group	Control group of propolis	IR group	IR plus propolis group	
MDA (nmol/gr wet weight)	9.0 ± 0.3a	9.8 ± 0.4a	13.4 ± 0.9	8.6 ± 0.3a	
XO (U/g protein)	2.8 ± 0.2a	2.9 ± 0.1a	4.4 ± 0.3	3.0 ± 0.2a	
a: p < 0.0001 vs. IR group.

MDA: Malondialdeyde.

XO: Xanthine oxidase.

Fig. 1 Xanthine oxidase activities measured in the liver of the rats.

Fig. 2 Malondialdehyde levels measured in the liver tissue of the rats.

Discussion

Exposure to ionizing radiation, which causes a significant increase in physiological and metabolic processes and oxidation chain reactions, also leads to significant increases in ROS, RNS production and ultimately lipid peroxidation, which cause stresses3. Propolis, which contains many important compounds, including aliphatic and phenolic acids, phenolic esters and flavonoids, has been carefully studied for its potential chemical inhibitory properties and its pharmacological safety has been the subject of studies1,19. For example, agents such as apigenin, ellagic acid, caffeic acid, caffeic acid phenethyl ester, kaempferol, naringenin, galangin, pinocembrin, quercetin can be given3. Scientific investigations have indicated that these plant polyphenols impede pathways associated with treatment resistance and can be utilized to enhance the sensitivity of tumor cells to chemotherapeutic agents and radiation therapy3,20–22.

In our findings, a statistically significant increase in oxidative stress markers was detected in liver tissues of rats exposed to gamma rays compared to other groups. In contrast, there was no such increase in rats receiving both propolis and ionizing radiation. This indicates that ionizing radiation has the potential to induce oxidative stress in remote tissues and organs. It supports our hypothesis that propolis protects tissues and organs away from the stresses caused by ionizing radiation.

Effects of propolis on oxidative stress parameters in liver

Interestingly, MDA values, which are a marker of lipid peroxidation, were found to be numerically lower in the propolis-administered group than in the control groups. Interestingly, it was found that the MDA values in the group given propolis were numerically slightly lower than the control groups. XO, an oxidizing enzyme, produces the superoxide anion radical (O2·–), which is a potentially highly toxic radical for cellular structures. In stress situations, lipid peroxidation reactions begin with the oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) in membrane structures and are one of the oxidative conversions to products such as MDA, often measured as thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) or lipid peroxides23. Our results were in agreement with previous studies that oxidative stress induced by ionizing radiation was reversed by propolis23,24.

Effects of propolis on antioxidant parameters in liver

Superoxide dismutase neutralizes O2·– radicals and protects living organisms against radical damage by converting O2·– radicals to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). GSH-Px neutralizes H2O2 by converting it to molecular oxygen and water. Under normal conditions, this cooperation between SOD and GSH-Px enzymes was impaired only in irradiated rats. Contrary to the significant increase in SOD activity in the IR group, the decrease in GSH-Px activity may be one of the main causes of oxidant stress in the IR group. Our findings show that propolis prevents oxidative stress caused by ionizing radiation and also leads to a statistically significant increase in antioxidant enzyme activities. This supports our hypothesis that propolis acts by a mechanism that increases antioxidant activity under stress conditions induced by ionizing radiation.

Propolis has been reported to contain more than 300 chemical compounds25,26. Of these components, CAPE, which has immunomodulatory, antitumoral, cytotoxic, antimetastatic, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties and suppresses lipid peroxidation by inhibiting lipoxygenase activities4, and Quercetin, which scavenges free radicals, chelates metal ions, XO, inhibits lipid peroxidation, shows important activities by reducing oxidative stress3.

As mentioned above, the other mechanism of propolis is to neutralize the electrons of radicals with the strong scavenging effect of the antioxidant components it contains.

Strengths and limitations of the research

One of the strengths of the current study is that, since it is an animal experiment, it does not have confounding factors such as comorbidities that are often seen in humans. In addition, direct use of liver tissue in the evaluation of oxidative damage is another advantage. The lack of histological evaluation is one of the biggest limitations.

While biochemical analyses suggest that propolis provides radioprotective effects against oxidative damage in the liver tissue of irradiated rats, it would be judicious to complement these findings with histological evaluations. Furthermore, an ideal radioprotective agent would exhibit selectivity for normal tissues, sparing tumor tissues affected by radiotherapy. Regrettably, the current study lacks data for such a comparison with propolis, presenting an additional limitation. The study, structured as an animal experiment, inherently restricted parameters to a limited number of samples and a small group of rats. Despite a statistical evaluation, conducting analogous studies with larger sample sizes would be advantageous.

Conclusions

In this study, we found that oxidative stress increased and antioxidant defense system decreased in liver tissue of irradiated rats compared to other groups. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report the radiation protective effect of propolis in rat liver tissue. This natural substance shows that it protects liver tissue against stress by reducing lipid peroxidation formation, increasing antioxidant activity and also preventing free radical formation. These findings suggest that it is likely to be a valuable agent for use as an antioxidant and/or protection against gamma radiation in cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. Nevertheless, additional research is essential to implement the utilization of natural compounds for clinical protection against ionizing radiation, particularly in the treatment of cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.

Acknowledgements

We thank all the staff of the Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Biochemistry and Department of Physiology for their contributions.

Author contributions

OC; AB and ST. wrote the manuscript; ST. designed the research; OC, AB and ST. performed the research; ST. analyzed the data.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Taysi S Alafandi N Demir E Cinar K Propolis attenuates nitrosative stress in the brain tissue of rats exposed to total head irradiation Eur. J. Ther. 2021 27 4 281 285 10.5152/eurjther.2021.21096
Taysi, S., Alafandi, N., Demir, E. & Cinar, K. Propolis attenuates nitrosative stress in the brain tissue of rats exposed to total head irradiation. Eur. J. Ther. 27(4), 281–285. 10.5152/eurjther.2021.21096 (2021).
2. Taysi S Algburi FS Mohammed Z Ali OA Taysi ME Thymoquinone: A review of pharmacological importance, oxidative stress, COVID-19, and radiotherapy Mini. Rev. Med. Chem. 2022 10.2174/1389557522666220104151225
Taysi, S., Algburi, F. S., Mohammed, Z., Ali, O. A. & Taysi, M. E. Thymoquinone: A review of pharmacological importance, oxidative stress, COVID-19, and radiotherapy. Mini. Rev. Med. Chem.10.2174/1389557522666220104151225 (2022).
3. El Adham EK Hassan AI Dawoud MMA RETRACTED ARTICLE: Evaluating the role of propolis and bee venom on the oxidative stress induced by gamma rays in rats Sci. Rep. 2022 12 1 2656 10.1038/s41598-022-05979-1 35173181
El Adham, E. K., Hassan, A. I. & Dawoud, M. M. A. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Evaluating the role of propolis and bee venom on the oxidative stress induced by gamma rays in rats. Sci. Rep. 12(1), 2656. 10.1038/s41598-022-05979-1 (2022).35173181
4. Cikman O Taysi S Gulsen MT Demir E Akan M Diril H The radio-protective effects of caffeic acid phenethyl ester and thymoquinone in rats exposed to total head irradiation Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2015 127 3–4 103 108 10.1007/s00508-014-0635-0 25409943
Cikman, O. et al. The radio-protective effects of caffeic acid phenethyl ester and thymoquinone in rats exposed to total head irradiation. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 127(3–4), 103–108. 10.1007/s00508-014-0635-0 (2015).25409943
5. Taysi S Tascan AS Ugur MG Demir M Radicals, oxidative/nitrosative stress and preeclampsia Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2019 19 3 178 193 10.2174/1389557518666181015151350 30324879
Taysi, S., Tascan, A. S., Ugur, M. G. & Demir, M. Radicals, oxidative/nitrosative stress and preeclampsia. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 19(3), 178–193. 10.2174/1389557518666181015151350 (2019).30324879
6. Bozkus TN Deger O Yasar A Chemical characterization of water and ethanolic extracts of Turkish propolis by HPLC-DAD and GC-MS J. Liq. Chromatogr. Rel. Technol. 2021 44 1–2 77 86 10.1080/10826076.2021.1883648
Bozkus, T. N., Deger, O. & Yasar, A. Chemical characterization of water and ethanolic extracts of Turkish propolis by HPLC-DAD and GC-MS. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Rel. Technol. 44(1–2), 77–86. 10.1080/10826076.2021.1883648 (2021).
7. Altay H Demir E Binici H Aytac I Taysi ME Taysi S Radioprotective effects of propolis and CAPE on the tongue tissues of total-head irradiated rats Eur. J. Ther. 2020 26 3 202 207 10.5152/eurjther.2020.19047
Altay, H. et al. Radioprotective effects of propolis and CAPE on the tongue tissues of total-head irradiated rats. Eur. J. Ther. 26(3), 202–207. 10.5152/eurjther.2020.19047 (2020).
8. Demir E Taysi S Al B Demir T Okumus S Saygili O The effects of Nigella sativa oil, thymoquinone, propolis, and caffeic acid phenethyl ester on radiation-induced cataract Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2016 128 Suppl 8 587 595 10.1007/s00508-015-0736-4 25860848
Demir, E. et al. The effects of Nigella sativa oil, thymoquinone, propolis, and caffeic acid phenethyl ester on radiation-induced cataract. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 128(Suppl 8), 587–595. 10.1007/s00508-015-0736-4 (2016).25860848
9. Caruso F Berinato M Hernandez M Belli S Smart C Rossi M Antioxidant properties of bee propolis and an important component, galangin, described by X-ray crystal structure, DFT-D and hydrodynamic voltammetry PLoS One. 2022 17 5 e0267624 10.1371/journal.pone.0267624 35584109
Caruso, F. et al. Antioxidant properties of bee propolis and an important component, galangin, described by X-ray crystal structure, DFT-D and hydrodynamic voltammetry. PLoS One. 17(5), e0267624 (2022).35584109
10. Al-Juhaimi FY Özcan MM Mohamed Ahmed IA Alsawmahia ON Özcan MM Ghafoor K Bioactive compounds, antioxidant activity, fatty acid composition, and antimicrobial activity of propolis from different locations in Turkey J. Apic. Res. 2022 61 2 246 254 10.1080/00218839.2021.1898785
Al-Juhaimi, F. Y. et al. Bioactive compounds, antioxidant activity, fatty acid composition, and antimicrobial activity of propolis from different locations in Turkey. J. Apic. Res. 61(2), 246–254 (2022).
11. Paglia DE Valentine WN Studies on the quantitative and qualitative characterization of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase J. Lab. Clin. Med. 1967 70 1 158 169 6066618
Paglia, D. E. & Valentine, W. N. Studies on the quantitative and qualitative characterization of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 70(1), 158–169 (1967).6066618
12. Habig WH Pabst MJ Jakoby WB Glutathione S-transferases. The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation J. Biol. Chem. 1974 249 22 7130 7139 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)42083-8 4436300
Habig, W. H., Pabst, M. J. & Jakoby, W. B. Glutathione S-transferases. The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J. Biol. Chem. 249(22), 7130–7139 (1974).4436300
13. Hashimoto S A new spectrophotometric assay method of xanthine oxidase in crude tissue homogenate Anal Biochem. 1974 62 2 426 435 10.1016/0003-2697(74)90175-4 4441740
Hashimoto, S. A new spectrophotometric assay method of xanthine oxidase in crude tissue homogenate. Anal Biochem. 62(2), 426–435 (1974).4441740
14. Durak I Ozturk HS Elgun S Cimen MY Yalcin S Erythrocyte nitric oxide metabolism in patients with chronic renal failure Clin. Nephrol. 2001 55 6 460 464 11434357
Durak, I., Ozturk, H. S., Elgun, S., Cimen, M. Y. & Yalcin, S. Erythrocyte nitric oxide metabolism in patients with chronic renal failure. Clin. Nephrol. 55(6), 460–464 (2001).11434357
15. Ohkawa H Ohishi N Yagi K Reaction of linoleic acid hydroperoxide with thiobarbituric acid J. Lipid. Res. 1978 19 8 1053 1057 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)40690-X 103988
Ohkawa, H., Ohishi, N. & Yagi, K. Reaction of linoleic acid hydroperoxide with thiobarbituric acid. J. Lipid. Res. 19(8), 1053–1057 (1978).103988
16. Moshage H Kok B Huizenga JR Jansen PL Nitrite and nitrate determinations in plasma: A critical evaluation Clin. Chem. 1995 41 6 Pt 1 892 896 10.1093/clinchem/41.6.892 7768008
Moshage, H., Kok, B., Huizenga, J. R. & Jansen, P. L. Nitrite and nitrate determinations in plasma: A critical evaluation. Clin. Chem. 41(6 Pt 1), 892–896 (1995).7768008
17. Bories PN Bories C Nitrate determination in biological fluids by an enzymatic one-step assay with nitrate reductase Clin. Chem. 1995 41 6 Pt 1 904 907 10.1093/clinchem/41.6.904 7768010
Bories, P. N. & Bories, C. Nitrate determination in biological fluids by an enzymatic one-step assay with nitrate reductase. Clin. Chem. 41(6 Pt 1), 904–907 (1995).7768010
18. Bradford MM A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding Anal. Biochem. 1976 7 72 248 254 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
Bradford, M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 7(72), 248–254 (1976).
19. Taysi S Okumus S Saricicek E Akyuz M Saricicek V Tascani A Propolis and caffeic acid phenethyl ester attenuates nitrosative stress in lens tissue in radiation-induced cataracts in rats West Indian Med J. 2021 69 5 362 367 10.7727/wimj.2015.445
Taysi, S. et al. Propolis and caffeic acid phenethyl ester attenuates nitrosative stress in lens tissue in radiation-induced cataracts in rats. West Indian Med J. 69(5), 362–367. 10.7727/wimj.2015.445 (2021).
20. Garg AK Buchholz TA Aggarwal BB Chemosensitization and radiosensitization of tumors by plant polyphenols Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2005 7 11–12 1630 1647 10.1089/ars.2005.7.1630 16356126
Garg, A. K., Buchholz, T. A. & Aggarwal, B. B. Chemosensitization and radiosensitization of tumors by plant polyphenols. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 7(11–12), 1630–1647. 10.1089/ars.2005.7.1630 (2005).16356126
21. Khayyo N Taysi ME Demir E Ulusal H Cinar K Tarakcioglu M Radioprotective effect of caffeic acid phenethyl ester on the brain tissue in rats who underwent total-head irradiation Eur. J. Ther. 2019 25 4 265 272 10.5152/EurJTher.2019.18052
Khayyo, N. et al. Radioprotective effect of caffeic acid phenethyl ester on the brain tissue in rats who underwent total-head irradiation. Eur. J. Ther. 25(4), 265–272. 10.5152/EurJTher.2019.18052 (2019).
22. Demir E Taysi S Ulusal H Kaplan DS Cinar K Tarakcioglu M Nigella sativa oil and thymoquinone reduce oxidative stress in the brain tissue of rats exposed to total head irradiation Int. J. Rad. Biol. 2020 96 2 228 235 10.1080/09553002.2020.1683636 31638880
Demir, E. et al. Nigella sativa oil and thymoquinone reduce oxidative stress in the brain tissue of rats exposed to total head irradiation. Int. J. Rad. Biol. 96(2), 228–235. 10.1080/09553002.2020.1683636 (2020).31638880
23. Akyuz M Taysi S Baysal E Demir E Alkis H Akan M Radioprotective effect of thymoquinone on salivary gland of rats exposed to total cranial irradiation Head Neck. 2017 39 10 2027 2035 10.1002/hed.24861 28708300
Akyuz, M. et al. Radioprotective effect of thymoquinone on salivary gland of rats exposed to total cranial irradiation. Head Neck. 39(10), 2027–2035. 10.1002/hed.24861 (2017).28708300
24. Alkis HE Kuzhan A Dirier A Tarakcioglu M Demir E Saricicek E Neuroprotective effects of propolis and caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) on the radiation-injured brain tissue (Neuroprotective effects of propolis and CAPE) Int. J. Rad. Res. 2015 13 4 297 303 10.7508/ijrr.2015.04.002
Alkis, H. E. et al. Neuroprotective effects of propolis and caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) on the radiation-injured brain tissue (Neuroprotective effects of propolis and CAPE). Int. J. Rad. Res. 13(4), 297–303. 10.7508/ijrr.2015.04.002 (2015).
25. Anjum SI Ullah A Khan KA Attaullah M Khan H Ali H Composition and functional properties of propolis (bee glue): A review Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2019 26 7 1695 1703 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.08.013 31762646
Anjum, S. I. et al. Composition and functional properties of propolis (bee glue): A review. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 26(7), 1695–1703. 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.08.013 (2019).31762646
26. Aboulghazi A Bakour M Fadil M Lyoussi B Simultaneous optimization of extraction yield, phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of moroccan propolis extracts: Improvement of ultrasound-assisted technique using response surface methodology Processes 2022 10.3390/pr10020297
Aboulghazi, A., Bakour, M., Fadil, M. & Lyoussi, B. Simultaneous optimization of extraction yield, phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of moroccan propolis extracts: Improvement of ultrasound-assisted technique using response surface methodology. Processes10.3390/pr10020297 (2022).
