
==== Front
NPJ Sci Food
NPJ Sci Food
NPJ Science of Food
2396-8370
Nature Publishing Group UK London

39294139
299
10.1038/s41538-024-00299-2
Review Article
Recent advances and challenges in single cell protein (SCP) technologies for food and feed production
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2806-0350
Li Yu Pin liyupin2021@163.com

1
Ahmadi Fatemeh 2
Kariman Khalil 2
Lackner Maximilian m.lackner@circe.at

3
1 https://ror.org/04dpa3g90 grid.410696.c 0000 0004 1761 2898 College of Agricultural Resources and Environmental Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, 650201 China
2 https://ror.org/047272k79 grid.1012.2 0000 0004 1936 7910 School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009 Australia
3 grid.520402.1 Circe Biotechnologie GmbH, Kerpengasse 125, 1210 Vienna, Austria
18 9 2024
18 9 2024
2024
8 6631 1 2024
7 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
The global population is increasing, with a predicted demand for 1250 million tonnes of animal-derived protein by 2050, which will be difficult to meet. Single-cell protein (SCP) offers a sustainable solution. This review covers SCP production mechanisms, microbial and substrate choices, and advancements in metabolic engineering and CRISPR-Cas. It emphasizes second-generation substrates and fermentation for a circular economy. Despite challenges like high nucleic acid content, SCP promises to solve the global nutrition problem.

Subject terms

Protein delivery
Environmental impact
issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcThis review provides an update on the novel developments in single-cell protein (SCP) for feed and food over the last 7 years, as it has picked up speed and dynamics.

In recent years, global concerns surrounding food security and sustainability have become increasingly prominent1. With projections indicating a potential global population increase to 9.3 billion by 2050, a pressing need arises to address the challenges posed by rising food demands2. Compounded by issues such as undernourishment affecting millions worldwide and the alarming food wastage rate, the quest for sustainable protein sources has garnered significant attention3. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) emphasizes the critical role of proteins as essential macromolecules in cellular structures and metabolic functions4. Compared to the other bulk ingredients in human diets—fats and carbohydrates—protein are most expensive. Amongst alternative proteins, plant-based solutions, insects, lab-grown meat, and SCP have been studied. In response to the pressing challenges of providing scalable protein at low cost and environmental impact, researchers have focused on single-cell protein production.

Single-cell protein is derived from cells of certain strains of microorganisms such as yeasts, fungi, algae, and bacteria, which are grown on various carbon sources for synthesis5. They can be used as a protein supplement for animal feed6, e.g., by replacing fishmeal in the fodder of aquatic species, particularly in aquaculture, and chicken rearing. As research in this field progresses, the potential for SCP to revolutionize the protein industry and alleviate pressure on conventional food production systems becomes increasingly evident. Single-cell proteins, derived from microorganisms with high-protein content, exhibit appealing features as a nutrient supplement, providing a balanced amino acid spectrum, low-fat content, and a higher protein-to-carbohydrate ratio than forages7. Table 1 shows the typical composition of the “classic” microorganisms useful for SCP production: fungi, algae, yeast (which belong to the fungus kingdom), and bacteria8. First-generation SCP primarily involves the utilization of microorganisms, such as bacteria, yeast, and fungi, to convert various organic substrates, such as sugar, into biomass, comparable to first-generation biofuels. These microorganisms are cultivated under controlled conditions, optimizing their growth and protein production. On the other hand, the second generation of SCP explores innovative approaches, including non-food feedstocks such as agricultural residues, into protein-rich biomass9, as well as deploying genetically modified microorganisms and novel bioreactor designs, to enhance protein yields and reduce production costs10. Also, the production of specialty proteins, e.g., bioactive peptides, is being investigated. By harnessing advancements in biotechnology and fermentation techniques, researchers aim to overcome limitations associated with first-generation SCP, such as substrate availability and process scalability. SCP is part of cellular agriculture, but different from lab-grown meat (cultured meat), where animal cells are grown in bioreactors. The focus of SCP is protein; While the inactivated cells can be fed to animals directly, SCP for food entails the further purification of the protein.Table 1 Average compositions of the main groups of microorganisms (% dry weight)8

Composition	Fungi	Macroalgae	Yeast	Bacteria	
Protein	30–45	40–60	45–55	50–65	
Fat	2–8	7–20	2–6	1–3	
Ash	9–14	8–10	5–10	3–7	
Nucleic acid	7–10	3–8	6–12	8–12	

Single-cell proteins have emerged as a promising solution to address the growing demand for protein sustainably11, by allowing low-cost production with minimized demand for resources. They can be cultivated using a variety of substrates, including agricultural waste and industrial by-products, thus reducing pressure on traditional agricultural practices and mitigating issues related to land and water usage12. With ongoing advancements in biotechnology and fermentation processes, the commercial viability and scalability of SCP production are steadily improving, paving the way for their integration into mainstream food systems and contributing to global food security efforts13.

Single-cell proteins contain essential vitamins, amino acids, minerals, nucleic acids, and lipids, making them versatile for various applications, from food and feed production to additional applications in further industries such as the paper industry14. The primary sources for SCP include sugars/starch (comparable to first-generation biofuels), but also various side and waste streams, such as fruit waste, molasses, etc., as well as combustible waste and by-products like methane, methanol, and ethanol15. In this respect, SCP by gas fermentation is particularly interesting, as CO/H2 (syngas) and CH4 (biogas or obtained from CO2 via methanation) can be obtained from a broad range of waste biomass streams, and H2/CO2 allows for the recycling of carbon dioxide from (industrial) point sources or direct air capture. Utilizing waste for SCP production has numerous advantages, including converting low-cost organic materials into valuable products and reducing environmental burden11. In this manuscript, the term “waste” is used in a broad sense to encompass various types of biomass residuals. For “co-products” or “by-products” being permissible for use in food and feed production, the relevant legislation needs to be born in mind. In the EU, for instance, the key regulatory frameworks governing these aspects include the General Food Law Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, which establishes the principles of food and feed safety, and the Feed Hygiene Regulation (EC) No 183/2005, which sets the requirements for feed production. For example, Regulation (EU) No 68/2013 on the Catalog of Feed Materials specifies the conditions under which various materials, including co-products and by-products, can be used in feed. These materials must be safe, of good quality, and properly labeled. Therefore, while co-products and by-products can be used in food and feed production, they must comply with the relevant safety, quality, and traceability regulations.

Agricultural waste and side streams, such as waste wood with its components cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, serve as excellent natural sources of SCP but require pretreatment through chemical (acid hydrolysis) or enzymatic (cellulases) methods to transform the raw materials into fermentable sugars16. Additionally, domestic sewage and waste from industrial processes, e.g., starch production and food processing, can be repurposed for SCP production17. Agricultural waste not only provides a cost-effective substrate for SCP production, producing protein-enriched materials suitable for animal feed but with further processing, it can also be consumed by humans18. While first-generation substrates focus on enhancing protein security in the face of a growing global population, from edible substrates, second-generation substrates contribute to the evolving circular economy and sustainability of the food system11. These substrates involve the renewable bioconversion of waste or underutilized co-products into high-value microbial protein products19. Various fermentation technologies, including solid, liquid, and semisolid methods, have been explored for cultivating diverse strains of yeast, bacteria, algae, and filamentous fungi, with process outcomes influenced by fermentation conditions, substrate characteristics, and microbial types20.

The consumption of SCP, especially those materials derived from algae, has garnered increasing interest due to their potential as a sustainable protein source with numerous nutritional benefits7. Table 2 highlights global algae consumption as a historical food source in various countries. Both macro- and microalgae have been on humans’ diets. Macroalgae contain varying levels of nutrients depending on species, season of harvest, geographic origin, and environmental conditions21. The protein and nutritionally essential amino acids content can be rather low and variable, especially in brown (Phaeophyta), green (Chlorophyta), and red (Rhodophyta) algae macroalgae, when considered against the amino acid requirement of most aquacultural and terrestrial animal species. It is reported that marine macroalgae are rich in protein content22. Recent research findings have revived interest in marine macroalgal biomass as a potentially sustainable feedstock for protein production. Comparing the protein content of macroalgae reported in different studies can be difficult owing to methodological differences23. However, the protein content of brown macroalgae is generally low (usually under 150 g kg−1 of dry matter (DM)), whereas green macroalgae, and especially red macroalgae, have a higher protein content on a DM basis. Some red macroalgae, such as Porphyra spp., contain protein levels comparable to soybean meal18, which is around 50% on a DM basis.Table 2 Summarizes the use of algae in different global regions

Source	Protein (%)	Region	Application	Reference	
Arthrospira maxima	60–71	Alkaline brackish and saline waters in tropical and subtropical regions	Food coloring agent, Biofertilizer, Functional food ingredient	3	
Chlorella vulgaris	51–58	Freshwater environments	Nutritional supplement, Animal feed supplement, Potential for biofuel production	10	
Dunaliella salina	26–29	Worldwide in salt lakes	Production of β-carotene, Nutritional supplement, Bioremediation	12	
Haematococcus pluvialis	48	Temperate regions around the world	Astaxanthin production, Food coloring agent, Cosmetic and skincare	13	
Scenedesmus obliquus	50–56	Freshwater environments	Aquatic habitat provider	15	
Spirogyra sp.	6–20	Lakes, ponds, and wet places	Bioremediation	16	
Synechococcus sp.	73	Temperate to tropical oceans	Carbon fixation, Environmental monitoring,	19	

Nielsen et al.24 reported that species of green algae sea lettuces (Ulva genus) have been the subject of several animal experiments. Intact biomass from Ulva spp. is relatively rich in protein and has potential as an alternative protein source in animal feed. Seaweed-derived protein may offer a viable solution as seaweeds may be considered sustainable and highly nutritious, and they do not require land for cultivation25. Seaweeds have a reported protein content of between 8 and 47% dry weight, and the highest protein content is found in red and green seaweed species26. Red macroalgae of the genus Porphyra, e.g., P. purpurea, P. yezoensis, and P. dioca, have been studied as protein sources in diets. Previous research27 included P. purpurea meal containing 250 g kg−1 of protein at 165 and 330 g kg−1 in isonitrogenous and isoenergetic diets (i.e. same nitrogen and energy contents) for the omnivorous thick-lipped gray mullet (Chelon labrosus), replacing fishmeal. The results showed that body weight gain, specific growth rate, feed efficiency, and protein efficiency ratio as well as net protein utilization decreased with increasing P. purpurea inclusion levels. The protein content of macroalgae varies within seasonal cycles. One example is the protein content of the red seaweed Palmaria palmata collected on the French Atlantic coast, which showed fluctuations between 9 and 25% dry weight in protein content. The highest values occurred during winter and spring28. Macroalgae, rich in diverse nutrients and proteins, have gained attention as a potential sustainable alternative to conventional protein sources.

Microalgal biomass production has been long considered a promising way to close the predicted ‘protein gap’. Reported crude protein content of microalgal biomass varies between 30 and 80 mass percent: for example, Chlorella vulgaris, 51–58%; Arthrospira platensis 60–71%; Tetraselmischui 31–46%; Nannochloropsis oceanica 35–44%; Dunaliella salina, 50–80%; Galdieria sulphuraria, 62%29. As such, microalgal protein content generally is higher than that of dried skimmed milk (36%), soy flour (37%), chicken (24%), fish (24%), and peanuts (26%)30. Despite the high-protein content and the favorable amino acid composition, direct use of microalgal biomass as single-cell protein (SCP) is limited by its digestibility31. Galdieria sulphuraria is an extremophile red microalga that thrives in acidic environments with pH values from 0 to 4 and temperatures up to 56 °C32. It is reported that G. sulphuraria has great potential for the biotechnological production of pigmented proteins like phycocyanin33. There are proteins synthesized by G. sulphuraria of biotechnological interest, including phycobiliproteins (phycoerythrin, allophycocyanin, and phycocyanin).

However, practical barriers, such as the great difficulty of extracting proteins from microalgae, exist. The separation of microalgae proteins from cellular debris is mainly based on their dispersibility in water and the separation of the protein-rich aqueous phase from the solid phase34. Microalgae have complex cell wall structures that can be difficult to break down, making it challenging to access and extract proteins efficiently35. Traditional protein extraction methods can be expensive and energy-intensive, reducing the economic feasibility of large-scale protein production from microalgae36. It is reported that various extraction methods, including mechanical disruption, enzymatic digestion, and chemical treatments, are used for protein extraction from microalgae37. Each method has its advantages and drawbacks. Mechanical disruption, such as bead milling or ultrasonication, can break down the cell walls but may also damage the proteins and require additional purification steps. Enzymatic digestion can selectively target cell wall components but may be slow and costly. Chemical treatments may be efficient but raise concerns about residue removal and environmental impact38.

There was considerable interest in algae for biomass and biofuel production a long time ago, however much of the euphoria has subsided. There are several reasons why the initial enthusiasm for algae as a source of biomass and biofuel may have faded, such as technical challenges, economic viability, environmental concerns, and market dynamics39.

Cyanobacteria are also utilized for the production of single-cell proteins. These single cells are characterized by a low content of nucleic acids and a high amount of proteins. A cyanobacterium grows comparatively rapidly and produces good-quality proteins. It has been demonstrated that Spirulina maxima and Spirulina platensis are the most important cyanobacteria, which contain 60–70% protein content40. Due to the high quality and quantity of proteins obtained from Spirulina, it is very useful to human nutrition. Also lend themselves to the production of single-cell oil (SCO).

Table 3 outlines various substrates utilized for cultivating different organisms, as common practice in the production of single-cell proteins41. The choice of protein derived from diverse species is grounded in its chemical composition (e.g. protein and fat content) and its amino acid profile42. Fungi, particularly when cultivated for single-cell protein production, contain a substantial 30 to 50% protein content43. Their amino acid profiles adhere to the standards set by the FAO, generally characterized by richness in lysine and threonine but a deficiency in cysteine and methionine, which are sulfur-containing amino acids primarily derived from plant sources44. Noteworthy is the fungus K. fragilis, which demonstrates the ability to produce sulfur-containing amino acids when grown on whey45. Single-cell protein from fungi not only provides protein but also additional nutrients, including various B-complex vitamins such as riboflavin, niacin, thiamine, biotin, pantothenic acid, choline, pyridoxine, glutathione, pamino benzoic acid, streptogenin, and folic acid46. However, it is important to note that feeding on mycoprotein obtained from Fusarium venenatum has been reported to lead to a decrease in insulin and blood glucose levels47. Fungi also tend to have a relatively higher nucleic acid content, ranging from 7 to 10%, compared to algae48. Fusarium venenatum is used to produce the mycoprotein Quorn™, which was launched in 1985 by Marlow Foods.Table 3 List of substrates for various bacteria, algae, and fungal species30–39

	Substrates	
Bacteria		
Various bacterial species	Waste of fruit processing	
Methylococcaceae family	C-1 compounds	
Bacillus cereus	Ram horn	
Rhodopseudomonas gelatinosus	Wheat bran	
Methylomonas species	Methane broth	
Brevibacterium spp.	C-1 to C-4 compounds	
Ralstonia species	Natural gas	
Bacillus licheniformis	Potato waste	
Streptomyces species	Methanol	
Corynobacterium ammoniagenes	Fructose and glucose	
Escherichia coli	Ram horn	
Cellulomonas species	Agro-industrial wastes	
Corynebacterium glutamicum	Glucose	
Methanomonas methanica	Methane	
Cupriavidus necator	Synthetic growth media	
Methylophilus methanotrophus	Methanol	
Bacillus pumilis	Potato processing waste	
Rhodopseudomonas palustris	Rubber waste	
Bacillus subtilis	Ram horn	
Rhizospheric diazotrophs	Brewery wastewater	
Pseudomonas fluorescens	Animal waste and manure	
Cyanobacteria and algae		
Spirulina species	Carbon dioxide	
Chlorella salina	Alkaline waste effluent	
Caulerpa racemosa	Carbon dioxide	
Spirulina maxima	Sunlight and carbon dioxide	
Chlorella species	Carbon dioxide	
Sargassum	Carbon dioxide and sunlight	
Dunaliella	Carbon dioxide and sunlight	
Laminaria	Carbon dioxide and sunlight	
Diatoms and Chlorella	Carbon dioxide and sunlight	
Porphyra	Carbon dioxide and sunlight	
Fungal species		
Aspergillus flavus	Rice bran	
Aspergillus ochraceus	Rice bran	
Saccharomyces cerevisiae	Orange pulp, molasses	
Yarrowia lipolytica	crude oil	
Aspergillus niger	Apple pomace	
Trichoderma virideae	Citrus pulp	
Aspergillus ochraceus	Rice bran	
Trichoderma harzianum	Cheese whey filtrate	
Penicillium citrinum	Rice bran	
Aspergillus oryzae	Rice bran	
Kluyveromyces marxianus	Orange pulp	

Bacteria, with an exceptionally short generation time of 20 to 120 min, exhibit rapid multiplication and can grow on a diverse range of raw materials and edible (and also non-edible) substrates such as starches and sugars49. Bacteria thrive on organic matter, petrochemical wastes (hydrocarbons), and other cheap substrates, including ethanol and methanol, as well as methane and carbon monoxide. Certain bacteria, like Methylophilus spp., exhibit an impressively short generation time of 2 h and are valuable components of animal feed, offering protein that is chemically superior to yeast or fungi50.

This paper extensively reviews the current landscape of single-cell protein (SCP) technology, grouped into eight main sections. The initial sections (first to third) focus on the production perspective, addressing production mechanisms, key steps, and the involvement of relevant microbes and substrates, with a focus on recent advancements in the field. The subsequent sections (fourth and fifth) shift the focus to genetic studies related to SCP production and an examination of its sustainability prospects. The sixth section provides an update on commercial activities in the realm of SCP, while the seventh section explores feed and food legislation. The final sections (eighth and ninth) delve into the progress of sustainability research, comparing results among different countries, and addressing SCP challenges. The article concludes by summarizing key findings and highlighting future research priorities.

A comprehensive literature search was undertaken utilizing multiple academic databases, including Web of Knowledge, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and ResearchGate. The search spanned from 2016 to early 2024, focusing on various keywords related to single-cell protein, fermentation, microalgae, microbial protein, yeast, bacteria, solid-state fermentation, biomass production, wastes, and substrates. To refine the search and obtain precise results, operators like “OR” and “AND” were employed, and specific terms, such as “methane fermentation” or “gas fermentation,” were enclosed in quotation marks. References cited within the acquired publications were also collected to ensure a thorough literature review. The chosen keywords were consistently applied across all four databases to maximize search coverage and compile and analyze a comprehensive collection of literature on SCP. Bibliometrix™ was employed to identify trending keywords and topics in each specific review section. A total of 130 articles were screened and evaluated based on titles and abstracts, employing a stringent selection process that prioritized studies with quantitative information. The targeted studies addressed single-cell protein production mechanisms and sustainable production methods, challenges, and future perspectives. Following a thorough comparison and analysis of the remaining articles, they were categorized based on relevant keywords. The conducted research was summarized, and the content of the 130 studies was critically evaluated. Essential features were extracted, and key challenges warranting further investigations were identified. Through this rigorous methodology, the aim was to offer a comprehensive review that synthesizes the current state of knowledge, emphasizes significant findings, and pinpoints areas necessitating additional research attention within the context of single-cell protein mechanisms. Figure 1 summarizes the bibliometric analysis of the review sections and Fig. 2 shows the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram of this study.Fig. 1 Bibliometric analysis for the main keywords used in this study.

The size of nodes shows the frequency of recurrence of the terms, and the connections between the different nodes show their simultaneous occurrence in a piece of literature.

Fig. 2 Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram of this study.

This includes studies identified through other means, such as manual searches of reference lists, conference proceedings, or expert consultations.

The mechanism involved in the production of single-cell protein (SCP)

Figure 3 offers a simplified visual representation illustrating the sequential process flow involved in SCP production. The production journey of SCP begins with substrate preparation, a pivotal step in converting substrates into a usable carbon source51. The approach to substrate preparation is contingent upon the type of substrate and the selected fermentation method52. Recent literature introduces second-generation substrates (SGS) prepared through diverse methods, including wet, direct, and dry preparation53. These methods are intricately linked with liquid-state fermentation, solid-state fermentation, and semisolid-state fermentation, respectively54. The wet preparation method is commonly applied to substrates with high moisture content, such as fresh fruit or vegetable waste55. It involves a sequence of water or acidic washes, pulverization, filtration, and sterilization to yield a sterile liquid medium56. For low-moisture substrates, the dry method is employed, utilizing a drying procedure to eliminate moisture. This is followed by a reduction and sifting process, producing a fine powder with defined particle sizes57. The fine powder is then combined with water, filtered, and sterilized, resulting in a sterile moist-solid medium with a significant aqueous phase58.Fig. 3 A generic, simplified production flow chart of SCP that can be used directly for feed but requires additional downstream processing for food.

This flow chart provides a simplified overview of the production process of single-cell protein (SCP).

The direct method is chosen when adopting the solid-state fermentation (SSF) approach59. It encompasses water washing and hydrolytic processes, including acid, bio hydrolysis, or thermal treatment, to convert the substrate into a fermentation-ready medium60. Lignocellulosic materials, due to their low-moisture content and bulkiness, often undergo dry and direct preparation methods61. However, the grinding and digestion of the substrate remain vital in their preparation to enhance nutrient accessibility, considering the complex interaction in their chemical composition62. Sterilization of the resultant media is conventionally carried out using an autoclave at a temperature of 121 °C for ~15–60 min, with the autoclaving duration adapted based on the substrate and contamination levels63.

After the substrate preparation stage comes media enrichment, a process designed to enhance the nutritional content of the resulting medium64. When utilizing second-generation substrates for SCP production, there has been a reliance solely on the substrate as the nutrient source for the fermentation process, leading to optimal microbial doubling without additional enrichment65. This suggests the potential option of bypassing the media enrichment step66. The subsequent stage is the inoculation phase, which may involve isolating or cultivating microbial cells to attain a substantial load before introducing them to the prepared medium67. Alternatively, a viable inoculum can be acquired from suppliers and used directly, or the back-slopping procedure can be employed as necessary68. Following inoculation, the medium undergoes incubation (fermentation). Throughout this incubation period, the fermentation environment is intermittently regulated to optimize the multiplication of microbes69. The fermentation can be done with pure or mixed cultures.

Fermentation approaches

Microorganisms efficiently utilize available wastes as a growth medium to augment their cell masses, constituting the SCP70. The main process responsible for SCP production is fermentation, which can take the form of either submerged or solid-state fermentation71. Upon the completion of the fermentation process, the resulting biomass is harvested, providing a valuable protein source72. Subsequently, this biomass undergoes further processing techniques such as purification, cell disruption, washing, and protein extraction73. These steps contribute to achieving, in general, high rates of production, improved yields, and better control over the production process, e.g., nucleic acid reduction.

Solid-state fermentation (SSF)

This kind of fermentation entails the cultivation of microbes on a solid substrate without a free aqueous phase, employing various fermenter designs74. Microbes flourishing in SSF can thrive with minimal or no extra water, as the inherent moisture in the wet solid substrate provides sufficient conditions for their growth and metabolic activities. This characteristic makes SSF an efficient and resource-conserving process for microbial cultivation. This confines SSF to microorganisms well-suited for growth under low water activity, such as yeast75, and certain filamentous fungi that prefer pure solid substrates with ~60–65% moisture content76.

In SSF, microbes acquire nutrients through adsorption or penetration of the solid substrate, enabling them to multiply into protein-rich biomass77. A nutrient concentration gradient exists in SSF, necessitating nutrient diffusion for optimal access during microbial proliferation78. The fermentation process in SSF requires sufficient oxygen supply in the liquid phase, achieved through aeration and intermittent medium stirring, alongside maintaining optimal conditions for temperature, pH, ionic strength, and nutrients to ensure maximum yield79. This kind of fermentation offers advantages due to its relatively low capital investment and minimal waste generation, delivering economic and environmental benefits80. Consequently, contemporary fermentation-based research is increasingly favoring the SSF approach to enhance techno-economic and sustainability benefits81. However, SSF encounters substantial challenges requiring significant innovations to unlock its full commercial potential82. Key challenges include difficulties in scale-up, currently hindering large-scale production, and limitations in online monitoring and process control14. Moreover, addressing issues related to stirring and removing metabolic heat in SSF has been crucial for improving process efficiency, and recent developments hold promise for better system designs to overcome these limitations83. Figure 4 provides a schematic illustration of the processes that take place during SSF with fungi.Fig. 4 Micro-scale processes in solid-state fermentation (SSF) with Aspergillus oryzae: oxygen transfer dynamics.

This scheme illustrates the micro-scale processes occurring during SSF involving fungi. The top images showcase the fermentation of wheat bran with Aspergillus oryzae. In SSF systems, the transfer of oxygen is limited by the liquid film on the substrate surface, with the primary source of oxygen coming from the gas phase14.

Solid-state fermentation indeed offers several advantages, including potentially higher product yields, lower water usage, and reduced energy requirements compared to traditional submerged fermentation methods. While solid-state fermentation shows promise as a sustainable and efficient bioprocessing method, its successful implementation at a large scale requires careful evaluation of technical, economic, and market factors. It is essential to acknowledge the challenges associated with scaling up such processes to industrial levels. Furthermore, it is crucial to conduct comprehensive techno-economic analyses (TEAs) to assess the production costs and competitiveness of products derived from solid-state fermentation compared to existing alternatives.

Liquid-state (submerged) fermentation (LSF)

Unlike SS, LSF, also referred to as submerged fermentation, involves microbial cultivation in a continuous liquid-phase substrate with more than 95% water content84. Conducted in a closed bioreactor, typically in continuous mode, this submerged process ensures precise control over temperature, pH, nutrients, and oxygen supply85. It is widely adopted in industrial fermentation processes due to its advantages in comparatively easy scale-up, uniform distribution of nutrients and oxygen facilitated by the continuous liquid phase, and the ability to achieve high-protein yields86. Furthermore, submerged fermentation allows for the efficient removal of metabolic heat and online monitoring or control of the process87.

However, despite these advantages, the characteristic high capital demand and significant waste generation associated with submerged fermentation are gradually diminishing its appeal in an evolving sustainability-sensitive economy88. Although research and technological advancements are addressing these limitations to enhance system performance, the increasing emphasis on the SSF approach, driven by its sustainability prospects, raises the possibility that SSF may outpace LSF in future industrial adoption89. Yet, this potential transition may face challenges90.

Semisolid-state fermentation

Semisolid-state fermentation represents an intermediary approach between SSF and LSF91. In this method, the free-flowing liquid content is increased to enhance the distribution of nutrients and oxygen92. This positioning makes it a preferred intermediate method for microbes that require a slightly higher water activity but perform better on a solid substrate93. However, as an intermediate approach, its advantages and disadvantages fall between SSF and LSF94. For instance, while it offers moderate metabolic heat removal facilitated by its slightly higher liquid phase relative to SSF, it is characterized by a high capital investment compared to SSF and a lower protein yield compared to LSF (Table 4). Traditional fermentation. Traditional fermentation is a form of indigenous and spontaneous fermentation that involves the natural growth of microorganisms and their metabolites95. Lactic acid bacteria and yeasts are the major microorganisms involved in these spontaneous fermentations96. However, in the traditional condiments from alkaline fermentation, investigations have shown that microorganisms such as Bacillus sp. and Staphylococcus sp. were predominant97. Globally, during fermentation, microorganisms act on the available carbohydrates, converting them into organic acids, alcohols, carbon dioxide as well as bacteriocins98. Since traditional fermented foods regained great interest in the general public and scientific world, many other functional properties of these foods and the microorganisms involved in their fermentation have been revealed. The fermentation process is known to increase flavor, nutritional quality, preservative effects, detoxication, and medicinal properties99. Traditional fermentation improves the digestibility of raw products, eliminates useless compounds, and increases the bioavailability of proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, minerals, and vitamins as well100. It is reported that traditional fermented foods and beverages provide a significant source of nutrients depending on the substrate used for their production101. Fermented foods based on soybean and cabbage (chungkookjang, doenjang, meju, gochujang, natto, sauerkraut, tempeh) are a source of protein, essential fatty acids (linoleic and linolenic), soluble fiber, minerals such as iron and zinc, as well as vitamin K, vitamin B9, B1, and B6. Similarly, certain fermented foods made from milk (yogurt, kefir, dahi) contain mainly high-biological value proteins, calcium, and vitamins B2, B12, and B9102. In contrast, fermented foods made from cereals (pozol, red yeast rice) possess essential amino acids (threonine, valine, isoleucine, and leucine) and insoluble fiber, as shown in Fig. 5.Table 4 Studies on the utilization of second-generation substrates

Substrate	Microbes	Microbial type	Operational variables	Yield	Experimental setup	Media enrichment	Protein content %	Reference	
			Fermentation	Harvesting	Drying						
Liquid-state fermentation (LSF)								
Agro-industrial waste (Whey, Molasses, Potato pulp, Orange Pulp; 3:1:1:10)	Kluyveromyces marxianus	Yeast	Temp: 30◦C Time: 96 h pH: 7 Airflow rate: 0.5 L/min	Centrifugation

speed: 5000 rpm

Time: 10 min

	A	0.87 g CWM/g	Lab scale: Erlenmeyer flask	NE	30.2	23	
Agro-industrial waste (Whey, Molasses, Potato pulp, Orange Pulp; 0:1:0:2)	Saccharomyces cerevisiae	Yeast	Temp: 30◦C Time: 96 h pH: 5.5 Airflow rate: 0.5 L/min	Centrifugation speed: 5000 rpm Time: 10 min	A	0.80 g CWM/g	Lab scale: Erlenmeyer flask	NE	23.6	29	
Agro-industrial waste (Whey, Molasses, Potato pulp, Orange Pulp; 10:1:1:3)	Kefir	Yeast	Temp: 30◦C Time: 96 h pH: 5.5 Airflow rate: 0.5 L/min	Centrifugation speed: 5000 rpm Time: 10 min	A	0.48 g CWM/g	Lab scale: Erlenmeyer flask	NE	31.2	40	
Corn stover effluent	Rhodococcus opacus	Bacteria	Temp: 28◦C Time: 48 h Shaking speed: 150 rpm pH: 7.0	Centrifugation speed: 5000 rpm Time: 10 min	Freeze drying	0.27–0.33 g CDM/100 ml	Lab scale: shaking flask	NH4NO3: 0.005 or NH4Cl: 0.005	47.5–52.5	47	
Lemon waste blend	Rhodococcus opacus	Bacteria	Temp: 28◦C Time: 48 h Shaking speed: 150 rpm pH: 7.0	Centrifugation speed: 5000 rpm Time: 10 min	Freeze drying	0.22–0.33 g CDM/100 ml	Lab scale: shaking flask	NH4NO3: 0.005 or NH4Cl: 0.005 (g/L)	45.8–52.3	54	
Oat bran hydrolysate	Candida tropicalis	Yeast	Temp: 30◦C

Time: 72 h Shaking speed: 200 rpm pH: 4.5–5.0

	A	Temp: 105 ◦C Time: Overnight	7.2 g/100 g	Lab scale: shaking flask	(NH4)2SO4: 0.002 KH2PO4: 0.002 (g/L)	A	63	
Orange peel	Candida utilize	Yeast	Temp: 30◦C Time: 96 h Shaking speed: 150 rpm pH: 3.7–4.2	A	Temp: 60 ◦C Time: 24 h	1.65 g/100 ml	Lab scale: shaking flask	(NH4)2SO4 1.5 KH2PO4 0.75 K2HPO4

0.75 MgSO4 0.05 (g/L)

	A	67	
Orange peel	Candida utilize	Yeast	Temp: 30 ◦C Time: 96 h Shaking speed: 150 rpm pH: 3.7–4.2	centrifugation speed: 5000 rpm Time: 10 min	Temp: 60 ◦C Time: 24 h	1.03 g/100 ml	Lab scale: shaking flask	(NH4)2SO4 0.6 KH2PO4 0.2 FeSO4 0.002 KCl (g/L)	A	72	
Orange waste blend (pulp, peel, and juice	Rhodococcus opacus	Bacteria	Temp: 28◦C Time: 48 h Shaking speed: 150 rpm pH: 7.0	Centrifugation speed: 5000 rpm Time: 10 min	Freeze drying	0.23–0.30 gCDM/100 ml	Lab scale: shaking flask	NH4NO3: 0.005 or NH4Cl: 0.005 (g/L)	42.2–57.5	74	
Pineapple skin and rice washing water	Saccharomyces cerevisiae	Yeast	Temp: 30◦C Time: 56 h Shaking speed: a pH: 3.8–4.5	A		0.4752 g CDM/ 100 ml	Lab scale: beaker	(NH4)2SO4: 1.5 KH2PO4: 0.7 NaCl: 0.07 MgSO4: 0.38 CaCl2: 0.07 (g/L)	A	81	
Pineapple peel waste	Saccharomyces cerevisiae	Yeast	Temp: 29◦C Time: 24–48 h Shaking speed: a pH: 4.5	Centrifugation speed: 3000 rpm Time: 10 min	Temp: 60 ◦C Time: 5 h	0.72–0.84 gCDM/100 ml	Lab scale: shaking flask	Fructose	65.2–94.3	82	
Potato peel extract and glucose	Rhizopus oligosporus	Filamentous fungus	Temp: 35◦C Time: 72 h pH: 5.5	Whatman filter	Temp: 80 ◦C Time: 24 h	0.52 g CDM/ 100 ml	Lab scale: shaking flask	KH2PO4: A MgSO4: A NaCl: a Yeast extract: A	45.5–55.5	84	
Solid-state fermentation (SSF)						
Agro-industrial waste (Whey, Molasses, Potato pulp, Orange Pulp)	Pleorotus ostreatus	Filamentous fungus	Temp: 25 ◦C Time: 120–168 h pH: 4.0–7 Airflow rate: 0.5 L/min Stirring speed: 300 rpm	A		3.95–5.94 g/100 g	Lab scale: Petri dish		28.2 –39.3	84	
Agro-industrial waste (Whey, Molasses, Potato pulp, Orange Pulp; BSG, MSR; 3:1:1:10:0:8)	Kluyveromyces marxianus	Yeast	Temp: 30 ◦C Time: 96 h pH: 7	Centrifugation speed: 5000 rpm Time: 10 min		0.21gCWM/g	Lab scale: Petri dish		A	85	
Agro-industrial waste (Whey, Molasses, Potato pulp, Orange Pulp; BSG, MSR; 10:1:1:3:2.5:6)	Kefir	Yeast	Temp: 30 ◦C Time: 96 h pH: 5.5	Centrifugation speed: 5000 rpm Time: 10 min		0.10gCWM/g	Lab scale: Petri dish		A	86	
Cashew bagasse	Saccharomyces cerevisiae	Yeast	Temp: 30 ◦C Time: 9 h pH: 4.2 Setup: Lab scale (Tray type)	A	Temp: 55 ◦C Time: until constant weight	11.1 g CDM/ 100 g	Lab scale: Tray	A	15.8	88	
Guava peels	Saccharomyces cerevisiae	Yeast	Temp: 30 ◦C Time: 9 h pH: 3.6	A	Temp: 55 ◦C

Time: until constant weight

	11.3 g CDM/ 100 g	Lab scale: Tray	A	28.4	89	
Rice straw pulp	Trichoderma reesei	Filamentous fungus	Temp: 30 ◦C Time: 288 h pH: 5.0	A	A	A	Lab scale: flask	A	20.2	90	
Wheat bran	Candida utilis	Yeast	Temp: 30 ◦C Time: 96 h pH: 6.5	A	A	A	Lab scale: Erlenmeyer flask	KH2PO4: 0.25 (g/L)

MgSO4: a

	48.5	91	
CWM cell wet mass, CDM cell dry mass, NE no enrichment, A not specified, Temp temperature.

Fig. 5 Classification of traditional fermented foods and beverages based on substrate and nutritional content.

This classification scheme organizes conventional fermented foods and drinks according to their primary substrates and nutritional content99.

Furthermore, traditional fermented foods play a crucial role in promoting gut health by serving as probiotics, enhancing the gut microbiota’s diversity and balance103. This is particularly significant in today’s context, where gut health is increasingly recognized as central to overall well-being, with implications for immune function, mental health, and more104. Moreover, the fermentation process can lead to the production of bioactive compounds with potential health benefits, such as antimicrobial peptides, antioxidant compounds, and anti-inflammatory agents105. These bioactive compounds contribute to the functional properties of fermented foods, making them not only nutritious but also potentially therapeutic106. As consumers become more health-conscious and seek natural, minimally processed foods, the demand for traditional fermented products is likely to continue to grow, driven by both their cultural significance and their perceived health benefits107.

Biomass fermentation in alternative protein production

Biomass fermentation is pivotal in the alternative protein sector, particularly for the sustainable production of high-protein, fibrous microbial biomass108. This process leverages the rapid growth capabilities of specific microorganisms, such as filamentous fungi, yeast, and bacteria, to produce substantial quantities of protein-rich biomass109. These microorganisms are cultivated in controlled fermentation processes where their growth is maximized to yield biomass that is inherently rich in proteins and can be directly utilized as food ingredients110.

One of the primary applications of this technology is the production of “one-cut” meat substitutes, where the cultivated fungal biomass, due to its fibrous nature, serves as an excellent alternative to traditional meat111. The texture and nutritional profile of the produced biomass make it suitable for integration into various food products, offering a sustainable and environmentally friendly protein source that reduces reliance on conventional meat and dairy products112.

Furthermore, the versatility of biomass fermentation extends to the production of other valuable bioproducts such as enzymes and organic acids113. However, the focus in the context of alternative proteins remains on enhancing the scalability and efficiency of producing microbial biomass that meets the nutritional demands and culinary expectations of consumers worldwide114. This transformative approach not only aligns with sustainable development goals but also paves the way for a bio-based economy, where renewable biological resources are utilized efficiently to address nutritional needs and minimize environmental impacts115.

The various stages of this biomass fermentation process, including pretreatment, enzyme production, and the maximization of microbial growth, are detailed in Fig. 6. This figure illustrates the integration of bioprocessing steps, emphasizing the controlled conditions under which microbial biomass is cultivated for food applications.Fig. 6 Simplified flow diagram for biomass-to-ethanol process utilizing enzymatic hydrolysis and simultaneous saccharification and confirmation.

This diagram presents a streamlined overview of the biomass-to-ethanol process, highlighting enzymatic hydrolysis and the combined steps of saccharification and fermentation114.

Gas fermentation

Gas fermentation is a promising bioprocess that involves the conversion of gaseous substrates, such as carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), or hydrogen (H2), into biomass products through microbial activity116. This innovative approach has gained traction as a means of utilizing waste gases from industrial processes or renewable resources for the production of biochemicals and other high-value compounds117. Gas fermentation represents a sustainable alternative to traditional fermentation processes reliant on agricultural feedstocks and offers opportunities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate environmental impacts118. At the heart of gas fermentation lies a diverse array of microorganisms capable of metabolizing gaseous substrates and synthesizing target products119. One of the most extensively studied pathways in gas fermentation is the Wood–Ljungdahl pathway, also known as the reductive acetyl-CoA pathway, which enables the conversion of carbon monoxide or carbon dioxide into acetyl-CoA, a central metabolic intermediate120. Microorganisms equipped with this pathway, such as acetogens and homoacetogens, can produce a range of compounds, including ethanol, acetate, and butanol, from carbon monoxide or carbon dioxide as the sole carbon source121.

Hydrogenotrophic microorganisms, such as certain archaea and bacteria, specialize in utilizing molecular hydrogen as an energy source for growth and metabolism122. These microorganisms play vital roles in biogas fermentation processes, where hydrogen is generated through the anaerobic digestion of organic matter123. Methanogenic archaea further metabolize hydrogen and carbon dioxide to produce methane, the primary component of biogas124. Gas fermentation systems harness these microbial consortia to convert waste gases into methane-rich biogas for energy production125.

In addition to biomass production, gas fermentation holds promise for the synthesis of platform chemicals and specialty compounds with diverse industrial applications126. Microorganisms engineered to express specific enzymes or metabolic pathways can produce a wide range of products, including organic acids, alcohols, and hydrocarbons, from gaseous substrates127. These bioproducts serve as renewable alternatives to petrochemical-derived counterparts and contribute to the transition toward a bio-based economy128. Despite its potential, gas fermentation faces challenges related to process optimization, microbial strain development, and product recovery129. Efforts are underway to enhance the efficiency and scalability of gas fermentation technologies through advancements in microbial engineering, bioreactor design, and downstream processing techniques130. As research progresses and technological barriers are overcome, gas fermentation is poised to emerge as a key strategy for valorizing waste gases and enabling the sustainable production of fuels and chemicals131.

Bacteria fermenting CO2- and CO-rich gases have a range of natural products that are mainly of interest as biocommodities or biofuels, and some are already on their way to being commercialized132. Acetate is the typical product of acetogenic bacteria and advances have been made to improve the production of natural acetate producers by genetic modification133. The Wood–Ljungdahl pathway is shown in Fig. 7.Fig. 7 Wood–Ljungdahl pathway and acetogenic bacteria products.

Wood–Ljungdahl pathway and products of acetogenic bacteria. ACK acetate kinase, ACS CO dehydrogenase/acetyl-CoAsynthase, ADC acetone decarboxylase, ADHE aldehyde/alcohol dehydrogenase, ALDC acetolactate decarboxylase, ALS acetolactate synthase, AOR aldehyde: ferredoxin oxidoreductase, BCD butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase, CoFeS-P corrinoid iron-sulfur protein, CRT crotonase, CTFA/B acetoacetyl-CoA: acetate/butyrate-CoA-transferase, FAK fatty acid kinase, Fd oxidized ferredoxin, Fd2− reduced ferredoxin, FDH formate dehydrogenase, FTS formyl-THF synthetase, HBD 3-hydroxy butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase, LDH lactate dehydrogenase, MTC methenyl-THF cyclohydrolase, MTD methylene-THF dehydrogenase, MTF methyltransferase, MTR methylene-THF reductase, PFOR pyruvate: ferredoxin oxidoreductase, PTA phosphotransacetylase, PTF phosphotransferase, RNF Rnfcomplex THF: tetrahydrofolate, THL thiolase, 2,3-BDH 2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase, 2 [H], reducing equivalents (e.q. NADH or NADPH) 1057 × 793 mm (72 × 72 DPI (dots per inch))12.

Genetics studies in single-cell protein

Metabolic engineering is pivotal in optimizing the biotechnological production of SCP from bacteria, fungi, and algae. This strategy involves deliberate modifications to microbial metabolic pathways to enhance protein synthesis. Specifically, researchers focus on genes related to amino acid biosynthesis, protein folding, and nitrogen assimilation134. The optimization of amino acid biosynthesis aims to bolster the cellular pool of essential amino acids crucial for robust protein construction134. Genetic interventions such as overexpressing key biosynthetic pathway genes ensure a surplus of specific amino acids, contributing to efficient protein synthesis135. Meanwhile, ensuring proper protein folding is paramount for functional and stable proteins. Metabolic engineering addresses this by targeting genes involved in protein folding mechanisms, potentially adjusting chaperone protein expression or other folding factors136. This optimization mitigates the formation of misfolded or aggregated proteins, enhancing overall protein quality137.

Moreover, nitrogen assimilation plays a fundamental role in amino acid and protein synthesis. Metabolic engineering intervenes in bacterial nitrogen assimilation pathways to optimize nitrogen utilization for protein production138. By manipulating genes related to nitrogen uptake and assimilation, researchers ensure readily available nitrogen, crucial for amino acid and subsequent protein formation139. Techniques such as recombinant DNA technology and CRISPR-Cas9 enable precise genome editing, facilitating targeted modifications in protein synthesis-related genes140. Additionally, synthetic biology approaches aid in designing novel metabolic pathways for optimal protein production141.

The metabolic engineering’s benefits in SCP production are multifaceted. Increased protein yield, achieved by enhancing specific pathways, and resource-efficient production processes are prominent outcomes142. Customizing microbial metabolism tailors growth conditions and protein content to meet specific SCP production requirements143. The benefits of metabolic engineering in SCP production are multifaceted. Increased protein yield is a prominent outcome, achieved by enhancing specific pathways crucial for protein synthesis144. The optimization of metabolic pathways ensures efficient nutrient utilization, making the production process more resource-effective145. Metabolic engineering allows the tailoring of the microorganisms’ metabolism to meet the specific requirements for SCP production, optimizing growth conditions and protein content146. Feed and food approval with genetically modified organisms (GMO) is more complex than with naturally occurring strains.

The approaches described here can indeed be applied to various sources of SCP, including bacteria, fungi, and algae, which are representative of both first and second-generation SCP sources147. Metabolic engineering techniques are versatile and can be adapted to different microbial species to enhance protein synthesis and optimize production processes148. Regarding the potential applications for food and feed uses, the versatility of metabolic engineering allows for customization based on the intended purpose149, also known as precision fermentation Whether the SCP is destined for human consumption or animal feed, the optimization of metabolic pathways can ensure the production of high-quality protein with efficient nutrient utilization150. Therefore, these approaches can be tailored to meet the specific requirements of both food and feed applications, contributing to sustainable protein production across various sectors.

Exploring the RNA targeting process using the single-protein CRISPR effector Cas7-11

RNA interference (RNAi) is a fundamental cellular process primarily observed in eukaryotic organisms, responsible for the selective regulation of gene expression by effectively silencing specific genes. This intricate mechanism plays a crucial role in maintaining cellular functions and responding to various biological processes in eukaryotes. In the context of SCP production, while RNAi may not be directly applicable in prokaryotes, similar mechanisms of gene regulation exist, such as CRISPR-Cas systems. These systems can be employed to downregulate genes associated with undesirable traits or to fine-tune the expression of genes involved in protein synthesis in prokaryotic hosts151.

This precision in gene regulation contributes to the optimization of microbial strains for enhanced SCP production. For instance, in prokaryotic hosts, CRISPR-Cas systems can be utilized to influence the composition of SCP by selectively enhancing the expression of genes responsible for desirable nutritional attributes. By targeting specific genes involved in amino acid synthesis or bioactive compound production, researchers can tailor SCP to meet specific nutritional requirements for various applications152. Additionally, CRISPR-Cas systems offer a powerful tool for mitigating stress responses encountered by microbes during SCP production. By modulating the expression of stress-related genes, microbial cells can maintain optimal protein production levels even under challenging growth conditions, ensuring consistent SCP yields153.

CRISPR-Cas and RNAi technologies play pivotal roles in advancing SCP production, albeit in different cellular contexts. They empower researchers to engineer microbial strains with precision, optimizing metabolic pathways and gene expression to meet the evolving demands for sustainable and high-quality protein sources154. The application of these technologies ensures that SCP remains a promising solution for addressing global protein challenges155.

The CRISPR/Cas systems, primarily prokaryotic and categorized into two classes and six major types, spotlight the class 2 type II CRISPR system (CRISPR/Cas9)156. This specific system is extensively researched and developed as a versatile toolbox for gene editing and other applications, as indicated by Fig. 8. As a eukaryotic model microorganism, S. cerevisiae was one of the earliest hosts for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing156. To improve genome editing efficiency in eukaryotic hosts, considerations such as codon usage and nuclear localization sequences become crucial (Fig. 8).Fig. 8 Guidelines for expressing case proteins and sgRNA in the CRISPR/Cas system.

Guidelines for expressing Cas proteins and sgRNA within the CRISPR/Cas system. In the CRISPR/Cas9 system (A), the Cas9-sgRNA complex initiates a double-strand break (DSB) close to a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM), typically “NGG” for Cas9 from S. pyogenes. To efficiently target the nucleus in eukaryotes (B), it is recommended to fuse Cas9 with a nuclear localization sequence (NLS). The CRISPR/Cas12a (Cpf1) system (C) induces a DSB akin to Cas9 but relies on a different PAM (“NTTT”) and generates a sticky end. For sgRNA expression (D), the use of an RNA polymerase III (RNAP III) promoter and a well-designed 20 bp spacer is essential (E), Achieving multi-sgRNA expression can be done through either multiple cassettes I or a crRNA array and tracrRNA (F), GRNA multiplexing strategies (G) incorporate various elements like RNAP II and RNAP III promoters, endonucleases, ribozymes, and a polycistronic tRNA-gRNA architecture23.

The utilization of CRISPR-Cas systems in prokaryotic hosts for SCP production offers several advantages, including the ability to precisely target and modify specific genetic elements within microbial genomes. This targeted approach allows for the engineering of microbial strains with enhanced protein synthesis capabilities and improved nutritional profiles, ultimately leading to the production of SCP with higher yields and nutritional quality157,158. Moreover, CRISPR-Cas systems enable the manipulation of metabolic pathways involved in SCP production, facilitating the optimization of cellular processes to maximize protein output while minimizing resource utilization and waste production.

In contrast, the application of RNAi in eukaryotic organisms provides researchers with a powerful tool for fine-tuning gene expression and regulating cellular processes relevant to SCP production. By selectively silencing genes associated with undesirable traits or stress responses, RNAi allows for the development of microbial strains with improved protein synthesis capabilities and increased resilience to environmental challenges159. Furthermore, RNAi-mediated gene regulation can be used to enhance the nutritional quality of SCP by promoting the synthesis of specific amino acids or bioactive compounds essential for human nutrition. The integration of CRISPR-Cas and RNAi technologies into SCP production represents a significant advancement in biotechnology. These tools offer researchers unprecedented control over microbial genomes, enabling the development of tailored microbial strains optimized for SCP production. By harnessing the power of gene editing and gene regulation, scientists can address key challenges in protein production and contribute to the sustainable and efficient production of high-quality protein sources for various applications.

Microalgae metabolism encompasses biochemical mechanisms and nutrient transport, converting intake nutrients into vital components for growth, reproduction, and defense160. Distinguished by oxygen-evolving photosynthesis, microalgae exhibit specific reactions at the thylakoid membrane, occurring in the presence of light. The chemo-organotrophic metabolism in microalgae resembles bacteria, with anabolic processes possible in both light and darkness161. Photorespiration, catalyzed by specific enzymatic systems, plays a pivotal role. The synthesis of essential carbon skeletons involves sequential pathways that utilize various components, including photons, nitrogen, and compounds like ammonium nitrate, ammonium sulfate, ammonium dihydrogen phosphate, and carbon dioxide162. In the absence of light, microalgae rely on organic carbon for growth. Key metabolic pathways governing this process encompass photosynthesis, photorespiration, dark respiration, and overall algal growth. Within these classes, diverse families like Spirulina, Ulva, Fucus, and Porphyra are represented, as illustrated in Fig. 9.Fig. 9 Algal metabolism.

Glyc glycolate, PCOC photorespiratory carbon-fixation cycle (or it is equivalent), PCRC photosynthetic carbon reduction cycle, PGA 3-phosphoglycerate, Pglyc phosphoglycerate, RuBP ribulose bisphosphate, Rubisco ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase–oxygenase)150.

Environmental and social sustainability of SCP production

The preceding sections have convincingly positioned SCP as a rapidly advancing biotechnological solution for converting biomass, providing insights into its production status and promising commercial viability due to the increasing demand for protein163. This section further explores the sustainability aspect of SCP production, specifically examining the application of sustainability metrics and insights for continuous enhancement164. A thorough bibliometric exploration across diverse databases reveals the prevalent use of life cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic assessment (TEA) in evaluating SCP sustainability, highlighting the relatively unexplored nature of other sustainability metrics like life cycle cost assessment (LCCA), social life cycle assessment (SLCA), and environmental nutrition165.

Structured into three segments, the initial subsection succinctly summarizes available LCA studies, delineating their methodologies, principal findings, and relevant recommendations, while also considering the microorganism-specific impacts on environmental sustainability166. For instance, algae-based SCP production may offer advantages in terms of water and land use efficiency compared to traditional protein sources, whereas fungal SCP production could have lower energy requirements and greenhouse gas emissions due to its efficient growth on various substrates. Furthermore, it investigates the sustainability potential introduced by an innovative power-to-food (PtF), aka power-to-protein (PtP), technology in SCP production167. The second part delves into pertinent TEA studies, with a focus on economic aspects, while considering the microorganism-specific economic feasibility and scalability. For example, bacteria like Methylococcus capsulatus have been explored for their ability to utilize methane as a substrate, potentially offering cost-effective and sustainable SCP production methods in regions with abundant methane resources168. The third part identifies existing research gaps and puts forth recommendations for future studies, aiming to further deepen the comprehension and sustainable development of SCP production, taking into account the unique characteristics and potential of different microorganisms/sources.

Life cycle assessment

Table 5 furnishes a thorough summary of findings derived from various LCA studies on SCP, encapsulating their scope, methodologies, outcomes, gaps, and recommendations. Significantly, the table underscores the noteworthy environmental advantages associated with SCP, particularly in terms of global warming and land use. This underscores SCP’s potential as an eco-friendly substitute for animal-based proteins, especially within the dairy and beef sectors169. Nevertheless, the extent of these benefits hinges on factors like substitution levels, electricity usage, and the chosen assessment boundary conditions. Renewable energy emerges as a pivotal element in maximizing SCP’s environmental benefits, with recent studies indicating considerable offsets in global warming and land use5. Recommendations include embracing precision fermentation, leveraging virtual support systems, integrating multicriteria decision analysis, incorporating genetic engineering for microbial improvement, and expanding performance analysis to encompass nutrition, economic, and social dimensions170.Table 5 Summary of SCP-LCA studies

Scope of study	Methodological structure	Major findings	Recommendations	Reference	
	Functional unit	System boundary	Inventory data/modeling				
Attributional life cycle assessment of SCP production using hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria and lignocellulosic fermentation. This study encompasses a comprehensive system boundary and a spectrum of impact categories.	1 kg of microbial protein (MP) product, prepared for packaging at the factory gate, containing a moisture content of 5%. This represents the state of the product before it undergoes the final packaging process.	Cradle-to-gate with scenarios for electricity consumption created for sensitivity analysis	Data about pilot-scale production, executed within a plant area covering 1580 square meters’ It’s important to note that, in this analysis, the consideration of by-products has been deliberately excluded. The dataset used originates from the Ecoinvent 3 Impact database, enhancing the reliability and comprehensiveness of the information for assessment purposes.	• Choosing to consume SCP with an assumed protein content of 65%, rather than dairy or bovine meat, would lead to an average offset of 16 square meters and 36 square meters of Land Use (LU) per 100 grams of protein, respectively.

• Across all impact categories assessed, electricity consumption emerged as the predominant contributing factor.

	• Undertake a consequential LCA to evaluate the production of SCP and anticipate the changes expected upon its commercialization.

• Enhance the analysis by expanding the scope of impact categories to include additional factors, such as biodiversity, closely linked to conventional protein production. This holistic approach provides a more thorough understanding of the environmental consequences associated with the commercialization of SCP.

	133	
Consequential life cycle assessment to compare biorefinery pathways using organic fractions from municipal and supermarket waste. Focuses on the sustainability of valorization pathways using methane-oxidizing microbes.	Supervised and processed 1 tonne of bio-pulp, characterized by an average Total Solids (TS) content of 18.3%. This involves the management and treatment of the specified quantity of bio-pulp material.	Gate-to-gate	Laboratory-scale experiments were performed, leveraging data from the Ecoinvent database (version 3.3) as the primary information source. The impact assessment method employed in the analysis was Impact 2002+, and the entire process was facilitated using Semipros 8.5 software. Furthermore, a secondary analysis, focusing on sensitivity, was conducted to provide additional insights into the robustness and potential variations in the results. This multifaceted approach enhances the reliability and depth of the experimentation and subsequent analysis.	• Pathways based on SCP can reduce emissions by as much as 155 kg of CO2 equivalent per tonne of bio-pulp in contrast to conventional protein sources like fish, soybean, and palm kernel meals. The incorporation of renewable energy options serves to enhance the environmental savings achieved by the designed pathways. Importantly, the environmental benefits in each scenario are influenced not just by the biorefining pathway but also by the specific downstream processes selected for implementation.	• Leverage multicriteria decision support tools to conduct a thorough sustainability assessment of SCP. This holistic evaluation encompasses critical aspects such as energy performance, economic viability, environmental considerations, consumer preferences, and adherence to regional legislation. By incorporating these diverse criteria, the analysis ensures a comprehensive understanding of SCP sustainability across various dimensions, facilitating informed decision-making.	147	
Attributional life cycle assessment of single cell protein from oat side streams, evaluating environmental impacts.	1 kg of dried SCP product	Cradle-to-gate	Employing a holistic methodology, this study amalgamated experimental data, insights from literature, and technical reports. The databases integral to this extensive analysis encompass Ecoinvent 3.8, Agribalyse 3, and Agri Footprint 5.0. The impact assessment was conducted using the Recipe 2016 Midpoint (H) method, and dedicated software was employed to streamline the analytical process. This collaborative approach ensures a thorough exploration of environmental implications and enhances the reliability and depth of the overall findings.	• The evaluation of impact contributions was centered on the inherent qualities of substrates, highlighting the superior environmental outcomes associated with wet-side streams as opposed to dried-side streams. Specifically, the dried-side stream exhibited around 8% and 18% increases in fossil carbon (FC) and global warming potential (GWP) values, respectively, in comparison to the wet-side stream. This underscores the significance of substrate nature in influencing the overall environmental impact of the process.	• Genetic modification of yeast for improving biomass yield, generation time, substrate use efficiency, and nutritional value.

• Integration of renewable energy systems to enhance the environmental savings of SCP

	153	
Environmental sustainability assessment of lignocellulosic single-cell protein production using Fusarium venenatum and rice straw, compared with conventional protein sources.	1 kg mycoprotein paste at biorefinery gate, with a solids content of 25% based on a production capacity of 40,000 tonnes per year	Cradle-to-factory gate	Field and literature data were integrated for impact assessment using the Recipe 2016 Midpoint (H) method in Semipros V9 software. Secondary analyses, including Contribution and Sensitivity Analysis, were conducted for a comprehensive evaluation.	The environmental impact analysis reveals that external electricity use and production constitute 72.9% and 58.4% of global warming potential (GWP) and terrestrial acidification (TA), respectively. Additionally, straw production contributes significantly, representing approximately 75, 67.58, and 95% of water consumption (WC), marine eutrophication (ME), and land use (LU). Notably, emissions from rice production are excluded from the assessment.	• Embedding renewable energy in lignocellulosic SCP production serves as a robust decarbonization strategy.

• The controlled manufacturing environment of SCP positions it as a transformative solution for addressing future protein security challenges.

	163	
Attributional life cycle assessment of replacing soy in salmon feed with single-cell protein derived from methanotrophic bacteria and yeast, utilizing fossil methane and wheat by-products.	Per 660 g of protein (1 kg of soy protein, 0.94 kg of bacteria meal, and 1.07 kg of yeast protein concentrate)	Cradle-to-gate	Utilizing literature data and Norwegian import data, the impact assessment employed the Recipe (v.1.11) method. Calculations were performed by Pauly and Christia’sen’s (1995) equation, ensuring a robust evaluation.	Yeast-based Single showed superior environmental performance, recording the lowest impacts in all categories. Bacteria-derived SCP exhibited comparable results in climate change (CC) and freshwater consumption (FWC) to soy protein but displayed moderate performance in other environmental impact categories.	• Replacing natural gas with diverted methane in bacteria production markedly reduces environmental impacts.

• Advancements in industrial-scale production are crucial for optimizing the benefits of SCP in aquaculture.

	171	
Evaluation of environmental performance for pilot-scale single-cell protein production from starch-rich process water, comparing it to conventional feed sources.	Provision of nutritional value to edible white leg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei)	Gate-to-gate (From the supply of substrate to the management of aquaculture biowaste)	In the impact assessment, data from pilot-scale experiments and flowsheet simulations were integrated. The chosen method involved multiplying elementary flows by characterization factors.	• The environmental impact of SCP-based feed hinges on the substitution level and the type of meal being replaced. SCP feed outperformed soybean meal in global warming (GW) and land use (LU).	• Employing the bioreactor off-gas as a carbon source for hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria, purple phototrophic bacteria, or green microalgae in single SCP feed production.	180	

The study also probes into the application of innovative power-to-X (PtX) technology, specifically power-to-food (PtF) in SCP production. PtF-SCP, positioned as a self-sustaining alternative reliant on renewable energy, demonstrates a substantial 60% reduction in global warming compared to soybean production171. It holds promise in addressing the climate emergency and mitigating human health impacts, with substantial savings in land use, water use, and eutrophication compared to soybean production. The study underscores the significance of renewable electricity sources, such as wind and solar, in steering the environmental benefits of the PtF-SCP system. In summary, the analysis accentuates SCP’s considerable environmental benefits, especially in terms of land and global warming savings172. Energy modeling emerges as a critical element for advancing SCP sustainability, with a preference for renewable energy and waste heat recovery systems over electricity grids heavily reliant on fossil fuels173. The study recognizes SCP’s limitations in meeting absolute planetary boundaries, stressing the necessity for hotspot analysis and broadening impact categories to grasp trade-offs and necessary improvements for forthcoming SCP technological scenarios.

Techno-economic assessment

A recent study174 found that SCP from stranded methane can be produced below 1600 USD/ton. Previous research175 conducted a study on the production of SCP for food from straw, determining a minimum economically viable protein selling price between 5160–9007 €/ton dry mass of protein. Economies of scale can significantly reduce production costs, particularly those driven by fermentation and downstream processing. While specific studies on the TEA of SCP production remain limited, the integration of SCP production into existing industrial processes has shown promising economic advantages. For instance, in the context of bioethanol production, conventional methods involve converting whole stillage, a by-product, into distiller’s dried grains with solubles (DDGS) energy-intensive methods. However, alternative approaches have been proposed, such as one studied by previous research176, which integrates SCP production into the existing bioethanol production process. In this integrated approach, a portion of the stillage is diverted towards SCP production alongside ethanol manufacturing, resulting in the generation of both ethanol and protein-rich fungal biomass.

It is crucial to clarify that in this integrated process, the traditional production of DDGS is replaced by the production of SCP. Therefore, rather than solely producing DDGS from whole stillage, a portion of the stillage is utilized for SCP production, leading to the generation of valuable protein-rich biomass in addition to ethanol. This integration not only diversifies the product portfolio but also potentially enhances the overall economic viability of the process, as indicated by the rise in net present value (NPV) and profit margin observed in that study177. Such an integration not only enhanced technical efficiency but also demonstrated economic advantages, with increased NPV and profit margins. Another study explored the techno-economic viability of SCP production from grass silage using different techniques for biomass pretreatment, e.g. enzymatic hydrolysis, steam explosion, and alkaline pretreatment. The analysis considered CAPEX, OPEX (operational expenses), and protein quality. The study emphasized the needs such as enzyme costs, silage protein, and protein quality for commercial success178. These examples show the possible economic benefits of integrating SCP production into existing industrial processes, emphasizing the importance of considering both technical and economic aspects for sustainable and economically viable outcomes.

Commercial endeavors in the field of SCP have gained momentum as industries recognize the potential of this alternative protein source179. SCP derived from microbial biomass offers a sustainable and efficient solution to address the increasing global demand for protein180.

The fundamental condition of such use of SCP for feed and food is the demonstration of the absence of toxic compounds originating from substrates, biosynthesized by microorganisms, or formed during technological processes181. Different microorganisms may have varying capacities to metabolize substrates and produce specific compounds, influencing the safety and quality of the resulting SCP products. Furthermore, SCP preparations may vary in their potential to cause gastrointestinal disorders or allergic reactions, depending on the microorganism used and the composition of the final product182. Understanding the composition of microbiological cells, including their content of proteins, amino acids, lipids, vitamins, and minerals, is crucial for assessing the nutritional value and safety of SCP products183.

Currently, several multinational corporations and startups are involved and are starting new SCP-based industries, because human consumptive habits have changed and demand meets availability184. Global hotspots in the alternative protein space are Singapore and Israel, with commercial activities in Asia, the Americas, and Europe. Microorganisms like bacteria and fungi are commonly utilized by these industries for SCP production, with advancements in genetic engineering enabling the customization of strains to enhance productivity and nutritional content. The market players are diverse, and they follow several types of proteins for human and animal nutrition from different microorganisms, with significant variations in nutritional profiles and production methods185. Additionally, household industries are developed in villages with the support of the government and women’s empowerment groups (V–HGs - village self-help groups) for the production of mushrooms and yogurt, showcasing the versatility of microorganisms in SCP production186.

The expenses linked to single-cell protein depend on its designated use (whether for food or feed), the chosen quality of SCP, and competition from other protein products in terms of pricing24. SCP must be competitively priced compared to commercial animal and plant proteins, considering factors like price, nutritional value, and adherence to safety standards for both human and animal consumption187–191. In general, integrating microorganism/source-specific knowledge and features into the discussion of SCP production provides a more comprehensive understanding of the diverse applications and considerations associated with this promising protein source.

Precision fermentation has also emerged as a key area of innovation, to produce specific proteins with tailored functionalities192. These precision fermentation technologies hold promise for a wide range of applications spanning from food and pharmaceuticals to materials science, offering unprecedented opportunities for protein customization and optimization193.

Furthermore, the biofuel industry has seen significant advancements facilitated by genetically engineered yeasts194,195 capable of fermenting cellulose to produce second and higher-generation biofuels. This innovative approach not only offers a sustainable alternative to traditional bioethanol production but also contributes to mitigating the environmental impact of fossil fuels, marking a critical step towards a more sustainable energy future196. However, despite the promising developments in single-cell protein production, scaling up from lab and pilot studies to industrial levels presents formidable challenges197. Optimizing fermentation conditions, ensuring product purity and consistency, and addressing economic feasibility are among the key considerations in this endeavor. Moreover, the transition to commercial-scale production requires substantial investments in infrastructure, technology, and process optimization198. Addressing these challenges is essential to realizing the full potential of single-cell protein production and harnessing its benefits on a global scale199.

Single-cell proteins are growing as a revolutionary solution in the quest for sustainable protein sources, finding applications in both animal feed and direct human consumption200. The regulatory framework governing the production and utilization of SCP is pivotal to ensuring the safety, quality, and adherence to standards within the dynamic landscape of protein production201.

In the realm of animal feed, SCP is subjected to a comprehensive set of regulations. These encompass strict guidelines for composition and nutritional standards, including the requisite levels of essential nutrients and amino acids essential for animal health202. Compliance with these standards is crucial to ensuring that SCP-based feed formulations are nutritionally adequate and contribute positively to the well-being of livestock203. Safety considerations take precedence in feed regulations, with established limits on contaminants such as heavy metals, mycotoxins, and undesirable microorganisms204. Robust monitoring and testing protocols are mandated to consistently meet these safety standards, ensuring that SCP does not pose risks to either the animals consuming them or the consumers of animal products205.

Clear and accurate labeling practices are integral to feed regulations, informing consumers about the presence of SCP in animal products206. Additionally, traceability measures are enforced to identify and address potential issues promptly, facilitating recall procedures if necessary. These measures collectively contribute to the responsible integration of SCPs into animal feed, balancing innovation with safety and transparency207. Transitioning to the realm of direct human consumption, SCP encounters a distinct set of food regulations. Often categorized as novel foods, SCP undergoes rigorous regulatory approval processes involving comprehensive assessments of safety, nutritional value, and potential allergenicity208. To assess allergenicity, various experiments are typically conducted. These may include in vitro assays using serum from individuals with known allergies to assess immunoglobulin E (IgE) binding potential. Additionally, animal models such as mice or rats may be employed to evaluate immune responses upon exposure to the novel food. Human clinical trials are also crucial, involving controlled consumption studies with allergic individuals to monitor adverse reactions. Furthermore, bioinformatics analyses may be utilized to compare the amino acid sequences of proteins in the novel food to known allergens, providing insights into potential cross-reactivity209. It is important to consider regulatory frameworks such as EFSA’s Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS). This framework evaluates the safety of microorganisms intentionally added to the food chain, including SCP. Criteria for QPS include factors such as lack of pathogenicity and absence of transferable antimicrobial resistance210. Understanding and adhering to such criteria are essential steps in ensuring the safety of SCP-containing foods for human consumption. The goal is to ensure that SCP introduced into the human food chain is not only safe but also nutritionally beneficial211. Allergen declarations become paramount in SCP-containing foods, ensuring that individuals with allergies are well-informed and protected.

This aligns with broader food safety standards, dictating stringent processing and hygiene practices to prevent contamination and guarantee the microbiological safety of the final food product212. Accurate and transparent labeling is a cornerstone of food regulations for SCP, providing consumers with information about SCP content, nutritional benefits, and allergen presence. This fosters informed consumer choices and contributes to the responsible marketing and consumption of SCP-based food products213.

The feed and food legislation for SCP plays a pivotal role in shaping the trajectory of these innovative protein sources214. Compliance with these regulations is not just a legal requirement but a cornerstone of responsible innovation, ensuring that SCPs contribute positively to the global protein supply chain in a safe, sustainable, and transparent manner215. As SCPs continue to evolve and gain prominence, ongoing regulatory scrutiny remains essential to address challenges and advancements in the field. In 2022, the company Solar Foods obtained Novel Food approval in Singapore, making it a pioneer in the modern SCP feed industry216. Several decades ago, before the rise of cheap imported soy, there was an SCP industry, organized under UNICELPE, the unicellular protein producers217.

The need for novel foods (NF) approval for SCP varies depending on their intended use and the regulatory requirements of the jurisdiction where they are marketed218. While SCPs intended for direct human consumption typically require NF approval due to their novel composition, production methods, or source materials, SCPs used exclusively in animal feed or industrial applications do not necessitate NF approval219. The approval process often involves a comprehensive safety assessment, including evaluations of allergenicity, toxicity, nutritional composition, and the presence of contaminants220. Companies and researchers developing SCP must navigate the regulatory landscape, providing robust scientific evidence to support safety and efficacy while complying with applicable regulations143. Understanding these regulatory nuances is essential for ensuring consumer safety, and regulatory compliance, and fostering innovation in sustainable protein production134. While novel food approval is required for many SCP when intended for direct human consumption, it may not be necessary for SCP used exclusively in animal feed or industrial applications153. The need for NF approval depends on the specific regulatory requirements of the jurisdiction where the SCPs are intended to be marketed160.

Besides novel food regulations, SCP are subject to various other regulations depending on their intended use162. For SCP intended for animal feed, regulations governing feed safety, composition, labeling, and contaminants apply169. For SCP intended for human consumption, additional regulations related to food safety, nutritional labeling, allergen declaration, and food additives may apply182. Legislation for traditional foods may apply to SCP depending on their composition, production methods, and history of human consumption. Single-cell proteins that meet the criteria for traditional foods may benefit from certain exemptions or streamlined regulatory pathways185. However, SCP are often considered novel foods due to their innovative production methods or novel sources, which may subject them to additional regulatory requirements190. There may be regulatory gaps in the oversight of SCP, particularly in emerging areas such as cellular agriculture and biotechnology192. These gaps may arise due to the rapid pace of technological advancements outpacing regulatory frameworks, differences in regulatory approaches between jurisdictions, and the complexity of assessing novel food safety and environmental impact125. Addressing these gaps requires continuous dialog between regulators, industry stakeholders, and scientific experts to develop adaptive and robust regulatory frameworks that ensure the safety, sustainability, and ethical use of SCP186.

The safety of SCP is ensured through a multifaceted approach encompassing stringent regulatory frameworks, comprehensive safety assessments, and robust monitoring and testing protocols131. In the realm of animal feed, SCP is subjected to strict regulations governing composition, nutritional standards, and safety considerations163. Compliance with these regulations is crucial to ensure that SCP-based feed formulations meet nutrition requirements and do not pose risks to the health of livestock or consumers of animal products174. Safety measures include limits on contaminants such as heavy metals, mycotoxins, and undesirable microorganisms, with monitoring and testing protocols mandated to consistently meet these safety standards186. Clear and accurate labeling practices inform consumers about the presence of SCP in animal products, while traceability measures facilitate prompt identification and recall procedures if necessary97.

Transitioning to direct human consumption, SCP undergoes rigorous regulatory approval processes, often categorized as novel foods152. Comprehensive safety assessments evaluate allergenicity, toxicity, nutritional value, and potential risks, including bioinformatics analyses to compare protein sequences with known allergens196. Regulatory frameworks such as EFSA’s qualified presumption of safety (QPS) evaluate the safety of microorganisms intentionally added to the food chain, including SCP, based on factors such as lack of pathogenicity and absence of transferable antimicrobial resistance207. Adherence to such criteria is essential in ensuring the safety of SCP-containing foods for human consumption88.

Furthermore, broader food safety standards dictate stringent processing and hygiene practices to prevent contamination and guarantee the microbiological safety of the final food product54. Accurate and transparent labeling is integral, providing consumers with information about SCP content, nutritional benefits, and allergen presence, fostering informed consumer choices, and responsible marketing and consumption of SCP-based food products56. Overall, compliance with regulatory requirements, adherence to safety standards, and ongoing monitoring and scrutiny contribute to ensuring the safety of SCP throughout their production and utilization154.

In addition to its positive attributes, SCP presents limitations for both human and animal consumption. Notably, the heightened concentration of nucleic acids in SCP, surpassing that of traditional protein sources, poses challenges44. This elevated nucleic acid (NA) content can lead to increased serum uric acid levels and the potential formation of kidney stones, as well as contribute to the development of gout, emphasizing the need for caution in direct SCP utilization206, or NA removal Increased serum uric acid levels resulting from the elevated nucleic acid content in SCP can also contribute to a condition called hyperuricemia107. Hyperuricemia is a medical term for high levels of uric acid in the blood, which can potentially lead to other health issues such as the deposition of urate crystals in tissues (tophi), joint inflammation (arthritis), and kidney damage over time113. Therefore, hyperuricemia presents another health concern associated with the consumption of SCP due to its nucleic acid content. Despite the majority of nitrogen in SCP being in the form of amino acids, the presence of nucleic acids, particularly prevalent in rapidly growing microorganisms, raises concerns and hinders the seamless integration of SCP as a widespread protein source123, necessitating NA removal

Regarding safety requirements for SCP production, it is important to consider regulatory frameworks such as EFSA’s QPS. This framework evaluates the safety of microorganisms intentionally added to the food chain, including those used in SCP production. Criteria for QPS include factors such as lack of pathogenicity, absence of transferable antimicrobial resistance, and generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status of the host organisms. To address concerns regarding SCP consumption, researchers can conduct analytical assays to quantify nucleic acid content, followed by animal feeding trials and clinical studies to assess SCP’s impact on kidney function, serum uric acid levels, and kidney stone formation. Additionally, in vitro experiments and epidemiological studies can provide further insights into SCP’s effects on cellular mechanisms and population health, aiding in understanding its overall safety profile and potential risks56. Understanding and adhering to such criteria are essential steps in ensuring the safety of SCP products for both human and animal consumption. Single-cell protein also contains a non-digestible cell wall, rendering it unsuitable for simple-stomach (monogastric) animals and birds76. Consumption of unprocessed SCP with active microbes may result in skin and gastrointestinal infections, causing nausea and vomiting. Filamentous fungi, with higher growth rates than yeasts, present contamination risks, while bacteria, with increased RNA content and contamination risks, pose limitations34.

Certain microorganisms utilized in SCP production can produce toxic substances, including mycotoxins and cyanotoxins106. Consequently, carefully selecting microorganisms becomes crucial in SCP production to mitigate potential risks134. The presence of these substances, both in the substrate and the final product, raises concerns about indigestion and the potential formation of carcinogenic compounds, particularly during processing-related mutations23. Therefore, a cautious approach is essential in selecting microorganisms and processing techniques to guarantee the safety and integrity of SCP for consumption. Algae, while toxin-free, have a slow growth rate76. Addressing these limitations in SCP production involves optimizing fermentation protocols, selecting suitable microorganisms and substrates, and applying physical and chemical treatments11.

Recently, the adoption of LCCA has surged in economic analysis, aligning with the established standards of LCA44. This approach expands the horizon of cost analysis by incorporating externalities, particularly greenhouse gas emissions. Social life cycle assessment (SLCA) assumes a pivotal role in sustainability decisions, scrutinizing the social burdens or benefits entwined with a system. Social life cycle assessment delves into diverse social indicators, offering a qualitative portrayal of the social implications on workers, communities, consumers, and various stakeholders along the value chain22. The nascent concept of “environmental nutrition,” integrated into food and nutrition assessments, seeks to harmonize sustainability by simultaneously considering environmental and nutritional benefits56. Life cycle sustainability assessment provides a holistic view by amalgamating all sustainability metrics and applying decision analysis for optimal solutions. Despite the evident significance of these concepts in sustainability assessment, their direct application in SCP production systems remains limited, presenting an avenue for refining the SCP process and product design and facilitating sustainable decision-making across different levels.

Sustainable food security implies physical and economic access to food for all. This requires greater efforts directed at food production and distribution as well as improving the living standards of the people. In the West, interest in healthy diets and novelty food is helping to drive a new interest in SCP. The forms in which SCP may be consumed are continuing to evolve. The chemical composition of any SCP product must be characterized clearly in terms of percentage protein, type of amino acids, nucleic acid, lipids, fats, toxins, and vitamins. A microbiological description indicating species, strains, and percentage of contaminants, if any, should be indicated. Final products for human consumption must be made to undergo rigorous testing during the pre-marketing stage and obtain novel food approval. Possible toxic compounds must be assayed for and removed. It is of primary importance that SCP products are safe to eat and also inexpensive to be popular among the masses. Further, genetically improved, high-yielding, and non-pathogenic microbes can be grown for SCP production. We should therefore look forward to extensive use of value-added SCP products in the new millennium and the eradication of chronic malnutrition globally by bridging the gap between demand and supply with SCP, which can also be a solution in a global agricultural crisis221,222, and having a broad range of food products that incorporate SCP should encourage further expansion of the market.

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the editorial board and the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions, which have greatly improved the quality of our manuscript. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author contributions

Y.P.L.: wrote the original draft; F.A.: the conceptualization, writing, and editing; K.K. and M.L.: revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Data availability

Data were available upon request from the corresponding author.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Jones SW Recent advances in single cell protein use as a feed ingredient in aquaculture Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2020 61 189 197 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.12.026 31991311
Jones, S. W. et al. Recent advances in single cell protein use as a feed ingredient in aquaculture. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 61, 189–197 (2020).31991311
2. Junaid F Khawaja LA Ali S Single-cell proteins as a potential meat substitute: a critical review World J. Pharm. Res. 2020 9 141 161
Junaid, F., Khawaja, L. A. & Ali, S. Single-cell proteins as a potential meat substitute: a critical review. World J. Pharm. Res. 9, 141–161 (2020).
3. Karimi F Solid-state fermentation as an alternative technology for cost-effective production of bioethanol as useful renewable energy: a review Biomass Convers. Bioref. 2021 5 1 17
Karimi, F. et al. Solid-state fermentation as an alternative technology for cost-effective production of bioethanol as useful renewable energy: a review. Biomass Convers. Bioref. 5, 1–17 (2021).
4. Karlson B Bellavitis C France N Commercializing LanzaTech, from waste to fuel: an effectuation case J. Manag. Organ. 2021 27 175 196 10.1017/jmo.2017.83
Karlson, B., Bellavitis, C. & France, N. Commercializing LanzaTech, from waste to fuel: an effectuation case. J. Manag. Organ. 27, 175–196 (2021).
5. Anupama PR Value-added food: single cell protein Biotechnol. Adv. 2000 18 459 479 10.1016/S0734-9750(00)00045-8 14538097
Anupama, P. R. Value-added food: single cell protein. Biotechnol. Adv. 18, 459–479 (2000).14538097
6. Kelechi M Ukaegbu-Obi KM Single cell protein: a resort to global protein challenge and waste management J. Microbiol. Microb. Technol. 2016 1 5 16
Kelechi, M. & Ukaegbu-Obi, K. M. Single cell protein: a resort to global protein challenge and waste management. J. Microbiol. Microb. Technol. 1, 5–16 (2016).
7. Khan MKI Sustainable food industrial waste management through single cell protein production and characterization of protein enriched bread Food Biosci. 2022 46 101406 10.1016/j.fbio.2021.101406
Khan, M. K. I. et al. Sustainable food industrial waste management through single cell protein production and characterization of protein enriched bread. Food Biosci. 46, 101406 (2022).
8. Khoshnevisan B Environmental life cycle assessment of different biorefinery platforms valorizing municipal solid waste to bioenergy, microbial protein, lactic and succinic acid Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020 5 117
Khoshnevisan, B. et al. Environmental life cycle assessment of different biorefinery platforms valorizing municipal solid waste to bioenergy, microbial protein, lactic and succinic acid. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 5, 117 (2020).
9. Manan MA Webb C Design aspects of solid state fermentation as applied to microbial bioprocessing J. Appl. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2017 4 511 532
Manan, M. A. & Webb, C. Design aspects of solid state fermentation as applied to microbial bioprocessing. J. Appl. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 4, 511–532 (2017).
10. Khoshnevisan B Urban biowaste valorization by coupling anaerobic digestion and single cell protein production Bioresour. Technol. 2019 290 121743 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121743 31323514
Khoshnevisan, B. et al. Urban biowaste valorization by coupling anaerobic digestion and single cell protein production. Bioresour. Technol. 290, 121743 (2019).31323514
11. Kieliszek M Biotechnological use of Candida yeasts in the food industry: a review Fungal Biol. Rev. 2017 31 185 198 10.1016/j.fbr.2017.06.001
Kieliszek, M. Biotechnological use of Candida yeasts in the food industry: a review. Fungal Biol. Rev. 31, 185–198 (2017).
12. El Sheikha AF Ray RC Bioprocessing of horticultural wastes by solid-state fermentation into value-added/innovative bioproducts: a review Food Rev. Int. 2023 39 3009 3065 10.1080/87559129.2021.2004161
El Sheikha, A. F. & Ray, R. C. Bioprocessing of horticultural wastes by solid-state fermentation into value-added/innovative bioproducts: a review. Food Rev. Int. 39, 3009–3065 (2023).
13. Dorman CJ Bhriain NN CRISPR-Cas, DNA supercoiling, and nucleoid-associated proteins Trends Micro. 2020 28 19 27 10.1016/j.tim.2019.08.004
Dorman, C. J. & Bhriain, N. N. CRISPR-Cas, DNA supercoiling, and nucleoid-associated proteins. Trends Micro. 28, 19–27 (2020).
14. Ding W Zhang Y Shi S Development and application of CRISPR/Cas in microbial biotechnology Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020 8 711 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00711 32695770
Ding, W., Zhang, Y. & Shi, S. Development and application of CRISPR/Cas in microbial biotechnology. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 711 (2020).32695770
15. del Rosario Rodero M Potential of enriched phototrophic purple bacteria for H2 bioconversion into single cell protein Sci. Total Environ. 2024 4 168471 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168471
del Rosario Rodero, M. et al. Potential of enriched phototrophic purple bacteria for H2 bioconversion into single cell protein. Sci. Total Environ. 4, 168471 (2024).
16. Kim K Engineering biology to construct microbial chassis for the production of difficult-to-express proteins Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020 21 990 10.3390/ijms21030990 32024292
Kim, K. et al. Engineering biology to construct microbial chassis for the production of difficult-to-express proteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 990 (2020).32024292
17. Ito, Y. et al. Efficient microfluidic screening method using a fluorescent immunosensor for recombinant protein secretions. Small 19, 2207943 (2023).
18. Amara AA El-Baky NA Fungi as a source of edible proteins and animal feed J. Fungi 2023 9 73 82 10.3390/jof9010073
Amara, A. A. & El-Baky, N. A. Fungi as a source of edible proteins and animal feed. J. Fungi 9, 73–82 (2023).
19. Köpke M Simpson SD Pollution to products: recycling of ‘above ground’carbon by gas fermentation Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2020 65 180 189 10.1016/j.copbio.2020.02.017 32315931
Köpke, M. & Simpson, S. D. Pollution to products: recycling of ‘above ground’carbon by gas fermentation. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 65, 180–189 (2020).32315931
20. Koukoumaki DI Recent advances in the production of single cell protein from renewable resources and applications Carbon Resour. Convers. 2023 4 135 142
Koukoumaki, D. I. et al. Recent advances in the production of single cell protein from renewable resources and applications. Carbon Resour. Convers. 4, 135–142 (2023).
21. Bakratsas G Single-cell protein production by Pleurotus ostreatus in submerged fermentation Sustain Food Technol. 2023 1 377 389 10.1039/D2FB00058J
Bakratsas, G. et al. Single-cell protein production by Pleurotus ostreatus in submerged fermentation. Sustain Food Technol. 1, 377–389 (2023).
22. Koul B Yakoob M Shah MP Agricultural waste management strategies for environmental sustainability Environ. Res. 2022 206 112285 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112285 34710442
Koul, B., Yakoob, M. & Shah, M. P. Agricultural waste management strategies for environmental sustainability. Environ. Res. 206, 112285 (2022).34710442
23. Kraak VI Perspective: unpacking the wicked challenges for alternative proteins in the United States: can highly processed plant-based and cell-cultured food and beverage products support healthy and sustainable diets and food systems? Adv. Nutr. 2022 13 38 47 10.1093/advances/nmab113 34662900
Kraak, V. I. Perspective: unpacking the wicked challenges for alternative proteins in the United States: can highly processed plant-based and cell-cultured food and beverage products support healthy and sustainable diets and food systems? Adv. Nutr. 13, 38–47 (2022).34662900
24. Nielsen MM Cultivation of Ulva lactuca with manure for simultaneous bioremediation and biomass production J. Appl. Phycol. 2012 24 449 458 10.1007/s10811-011-9767-z
Nielsen, M. M. et al. Cultivation of Ulva lactuca with manure for simultaneous bioremediation and biomass production. J. Appl. Phycol. 24, 449–458 (2012).
25. Kumar Sadh P Fermentation: a boon for production of bioactive compounds by processing of food industries wastes (by-products) Molecules 2018 23 2560 10.3390/molecules23102560 30297619
Kumar Sadh, P. et al. Fermentation: a boon for production of bioactive compounds by processing of food industries wastes (by-products). Molecules 23, 2560 (2018).30297619
26. Kumar B Verma P Biomass-based biorefineries: an important architype towards a circular economy Fuel 2021 288 119622 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119622
Kumar, B. & Verma, P. Biomass-based biorefineries: an important architype towards a circular economy. Fuel 288, 119622 (2021).
27. Hardy RW Partial replacement of soybean meal with Methylobacterium extorquens single-cell protein in feeds for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum) Aquac. Res. 2018 49 2218 2224 10.1111/are.13678
Hardy, R. W. et al. Partial replacement of soybean meal with Methylobacterium extorquens single-cell protein in feeds for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum). Aquac. Res. 49, 2218–2224 (2018).
28. Altenbuchner J Editing of the Bacillus subtilis genome by the CRISPR-Cas9 system Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016 82 5421 5427 10.1128/AEM.01453-16 27342565
Altenbuchner, J. Editing of the Bacillus subtilis genome by the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 5421–5427 (2016).27342565
29. Kumar D Tewary T Techno-economic assessment and optimization of a standalone residential hybrid energy system for sustainable energy utilization Int. J. Energy Res. 2021 46 10020 10039 10.1002/er.6389
Kumar, D. & Tewary, T. Techno-economic assessment and optimization of a standalone residential hybrid energy system for sustainable energy utilization. Int. J. Energy Res. 46, 10020–10039 (2021).
30. Haroun AA Molecular identification of green algae, Spirogyra porticalis, along parts of River Kaduna and its potential for single cell protein (SCP) production NAPAS 2018 1 38 43
Haroun, A. A. et al. Molecular identification of green algae, Spirogyra porticalis, along parts of River Kaduna and its potential for single cell protein (SCP) production. NAPAS 1, 38–43 (2018).
31. Heringer HCE Valorization of spent Brewer’s yeast in the integrated production of the fungal exopolysaccharide (1→ 6)-β-D-glucan (lasiodiplodan) and single-cell protein ISBAB 2023 54 102971
Heringer, H. C. E. et al. Valorization of spent Brewer’s yeast in the integrated production of the fungal exopolysaccharide (1→ 6)-β-D-glucan (lasiodiplodan) and single-cell protein. ISBAB 54, 102971 (2023).
32. Hidalgo-Cantabrana C Goh YJ Barrangou R Characterization and repurposing of type I and type II CRISPR–Cas systems in bacteria J. Mol. Biol. 2019 431 21 33 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.09.013 30261168
Hidalgo-Cantabrana, C., Goh, Y. J. & Barrangou, R. Characterization and repurposing of type I and type II CRISPR–Cas systems in bacteria. J. Mol. Biol. 431, 21–33 (2019).30261168
33. Hoang MD Application of an Escherichia coli triple reporter strain for at‐line monitoring of single‐cell physiology during L‐phenylalanine production Eng. Life Sci. 2023 23 e2100162 10.1002/elsc.202100162 36619877
Hoang, M. D. et al. Application of an Escherichia coli triple reporter strain for at‐line monitoring of single‐cell physiology during L‐phenylalanine production. Eng. Life Sci. 23, e2100162 (2023).36619877
34. Huling, R. in Fungi and Fungal Products in Human Welfare and Biotechnology (eds Deshmukh, S. K. & Satyanarayana, T.) Ch. 13 (Springer Nature, 2023).
35. Hülsen T Simultaneous treatment and single cell protein production from agri-industrial wastewaters using purple phototrophic bacteria or microalgae–a comparison Bioresour. Technol. 2018 254 214 223 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.032 29413925
Hülsen, T. et al. Simultaneous treatment and single cell protein production from agri-industrial wastewaters using purple phototrophic bacteria or microalgae–a comparison. Bioresour. Technol. 254, 214–223 (2018).29413925
36. Hülsen T Application of purple phototrophic bacteria in a biofilm photobioreactor for single cell protein production: Biofilm vs suspended growth Water Res. 2020 181 115909 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115909 32492592
Hülsen, T. et al. Application of purple phototrophic bacteria in a biofilm photobioreactor for single cell protein production: Biofilm vs suspended growth. Water Res. 181, 115909 (2020).32492592
37. Hussain MA Novel protein sources: an overview of food regulations AP 2022 4 407 427
Hussain, M. A. Novel protein sources: an overview of food regulations. AP 4, 407–427 (2022).
38. Irfan M Optimization of process parameters for the production of single cell biomass of Candida utilis in solid state fermentation AEJAES 2011 10 264 270
Irfan, M. et al. Optimization of process parameters for the production of single cell biomass of Candida utilis in solid state fermentation. AEJAES 10, 264–270 (2011).
39. Janssen M Wijffels RH Barbosa MJ Microalgae-based production of single-cell protein Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2022 75 102705 10.1016/j.copbio.2022.102705 35231772
Janssen, M., Wijffels, R. H. & Barbosa, M. J. Microalgae-based production of single-cell protein. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 75, 102705 (2022).35231772
40. Jarvio N An attributional life cycle assessment of microbial protein production: a case study on using hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria Sci. Total Environ. 2021 776 145764 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145764 33639472
Jarvio, N. et al. An attributional life cycle assessment of microbial protein production: a case study on using hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria. Sci. Total Environ. 776, 145764 (2021).33639472
41. Jiang X Effect of aroma-producing yeasts in high-salt liquid-state fermentation soy sauce and the biosynthesis pathways of the dominant esters Food Chem. 2021 344 128681 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128681 33279349
Jiang, X. et al. Effect of aroma-producing yeasts in high-salt liquid-state fermentation soy sauce and the biosynthesis pathways of the dominant esters. Food Chem. 344, 128681 (2021).33279349
42. Jhamb V Swaminathan P Role and importance of lactic acid bacteria in different Indian fermented foods Biologia 2023 78 3609 3623 10.1007/s11756-023-01512-5
Jhamb, V. & Swaminathan, P. Role and importance of lactic acid bacteria in different Indian fermented foods. Biologia 78, 3609–3623 (2023).
43. Hansen, C. L. & Cheong, D. Y. in Handbook of Farm, Dairy and Food Machinery Engineering (ed. Kutz, M. Cahpter 3) (Academic Press, 2019).
44. Hadi J Brightwell G Safety of alternative proteins: technological, environmental and regulatory aspects of cultured meat, plant-based meat, insect protein and single-cell protein Foods 2021 10 1226 10.3390/foods10061226 34071292
Hadi, J. & Brightwell, G. Safety of alternative proteins: technological, environmental and regulatory aspects of cultured meat, plant-based meat, insect protein and single-cell protein. Foods 10, 1226 (2021).34071292
45. Gundupalli, M. P. et al. Bacterial single cell protein (BSCP): a sustainable protein source from methylobacterium species. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 147, 104426 (2020).
46. Grdeń AS Sołowiej BG Macronutrients, amino and fatty acid composition, elements, and toxins in high-protein powders of crickets, Arthrospira, single cell protein, potato, and rice as potential ingredients in fermented food products Appl. Sci. 2022 12 12831 10.3390/app122412831
Grdeń, A. S. & Sołowiej, B. G. Macronutrients, amino and fatty acid composition, elements, and toxins in high-protein powders of crickets, Arthrospira, single cell protein, potato, and rice as potential ingredients in fermented food products. Appl. Sci. 12, 12831 (2022).
47. Graham AE Ledesma-Amaro R The microbial food revolution Nat. Commun. 2023 14 2231 10.1038/s41467-023-37891-1 37076544
Graham, A. E. & Ledesma-Amaro, R. The microbial food revolution. Nat. Commun. 14, 2231 (2023).37076544
48. Kumar V Recent developments on solid-state fermentation for production of microbial secondary metabolites: challenges and solutions Bioresour. Technol. 2021 323 124566 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124566 33390315
Kumar, V. et al. Recent developments on solid-state fermentation for production of microbial secondary metabolites: challenges and solutions. Bioresour. Technol. 323, 124566 (2021).33390315
49. Aggelopoulos T Upgrading of mixed food industry side-streams by solid-state fermentation with P. ostreatus Recycling 2018 3 256 263 10.3390/recycling3020012
Aggelopoulos, T. et al. Upgrading of mixed food industry side-streams by solid-state fermentation with P. ostreatus. Recycling 3, 256–263 (2018).
50. Dawczynski C Schubert R Jahreis G Amino acids, fatty acids, and dietary fibre in edible seaweed products Food Chem. 2007 103 891 899 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.09.041
Dawczynski, C., Schubert, R. & Jahreis, G. Amino acids, fatty acids, and dietary fibre in edible seaweed products. Food Chem. 103, 891–899 (2007).
51. Davies S Brown M Camilleri M Preliminary assessment of the seaweed Porphyra purpurea in artificial diets for the tick-lipped grey mullet (Chelon labrosus) Aquaculture 1997 152 249 258 10.1016/S0044-8486(96)01513-X
Davies, S., Brown, M. & Camilleri, M. Preliminary assessment of the seaweed Porphyra purpurea in artificial diets for the tick-lipped grey mullet (Chelon labrosus). Aquaculture 152, 249–258 (1997).
52. Zannou O Traditional fermented foods and beverages: indigenous practices of food processing in the Benin Republic Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2022 27 100450 10.1016/j.ijgfs.2021.100450
Zannou, O. et al. Traditional fermented foods and beverages: indigenous practices of food processing in the Benin Republic. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 27, 100450 (2022).
53. Yap SM Enhancement of protein production using synthetic brewery wastewater by Haematococcus pluvialis J. Biotechnol. 2022 350 1 10 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2022.03.008 35331728
Yap, S. M. et al. Enhancement of protein production using synthetic brewery wastewater by Haematococcus pluvialis. J. Biotechnol. 350, 1–10 (2022).35331728
54. Bulkan G Techno-economic analysis of bioethanol plant by-product valorization: exploring market opportunities with protein-rich fungal biomass production Fermentation 2020 6 99 109 10.3390/fermentation6040099
Bulkan, G. et al. Techno-economic analysis of bioethanol plant by-product valorization: exploring market opportunities with protein-rich fungal biomass production. Fermentation 6, 99–109 (2020).
55. Cuvas-Limon RB Spontaneously fermented traditional beverages as a source of bioactive compounds: an overview Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021 61 2984 3006 10.1080/10408398.2020.1791050 32662286
Cuvas-Limon, R. B. et al. Spontaneously fermented traditional beverages as a source of bioactive compounds: an overview. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 61, 2984–3006 (2021).32662286
56. Gorte O Evaluation of downstream processing, extraction, and quantification strategies for single cell oil produced by the oleaginous yeasts Saitozyma podzolica DSM 27192 and Apiotrichum porosum DSM 27194 Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020 8 355 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00355 32391350
Gorte, O. et al. Evaluation of downstream processing, extraction, and quantification strategies for single cell oil produced by the oleaginous yeasts Saitozyma podzolica DSM 27192 and Apiotrichum porosum DSM 27194. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 355 (2020).32391350
57. Gordon, A. (ed.) Food Safety and Quality Systems in Developing Countries: Volume III: Technical and Market Considerations (Academic Press, 2020).
58. Giacomella L Techno-economic assessment (tea) and life cycle costing analysis (Lcca): discussing methodological steps and integrability Insights Region. Dev. 2021 3 176 197 10.9770/IRD.2021.3.2(2)
Giacomella, L. Techno-economic assessment (tea) and life cycle costing analysis (Lcca): discussing methodological steps and integrability. Insights Region. Dev. 3, 176–197 (2021).
59. Ghoreishi G Barrena R Font X Using green waste as a substrate to produce biostimulant and biopesticide products through solid-state fermentation Waste Manag. 2023 159 84 92 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.01.026 36738589
Ghoreishi, G., Barrena, R. & Font, X. Using green waste as a substrate to produce biostimulant and biopesticide products through solid-state fermentation. Waste Manag. 159, 84–92 (2023).36738589
60. Cho S Shin J Cho BK Applications of CRISPR/Cas system to bacterial metabolic engineering Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018 19 1089 10.3390/ijms19041089 29621180
Cho, S., Shin, J. & Cho, B. K. Applications of CRISPR/Cas system to bacterial metabolic engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 1089 (2018).29621180
61. Chilakamarry CR Advances in solid-state fermentation for bioconversion of agricultural wastes to value-added products: opportunities and challenges Bioresour. Technol. 2022 343 126065 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126065 34624472
Chilakamarry, C. R. et al. Advances in solid-state fermentation for bioconversion of agricultural wastes to value-added products: opportunities and challenges. Bioresour. Technol. 343, 126065 (2022).34624472
62. Kurambhatti C Process design and techno-economic analysis of 2’-fucosyllactose enriched distiller’s dried grains with solubles production in dry grind ethanol process using genetically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae Bioresour. Technol. 2021 341 125919 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125919 34523557
Kurambhatti, C. et al. Process design and techno-economic analysis of 2’-fucosyllactose enriched distiller’s dried grains with solubles production in dry grind ethanol process using genetically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioresour. Technol. 341, 125919 (2021).34523557
63. Afolalu, S. A. et al. A sustainable renewable source of energy review. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 012040 (IOP Publishing, 2021).
64. Fackler N Stepping on the gas to a circular economy: accelerating development of carbon-negative chemical production from gas fermentation Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 2021 12 439 470 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-120120-021122 33872517
Fackler, N. et al. Stepping on the gas to a circular economy: accelerating development of carbon-negative chemical production from gas fermentation. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 12, 439–470 (2021).33872517
65. Ewuoso MO Animashaun OH Adejumo AA Lactic acid bacteria and yeasts in spontaneously fermented sorghum sourdough Am. J. Microbiol. Res. 2020 8 63 72
Ewuoso, M. O., Animashaun, O. H. & Adejumo, A. A. Lactic acid bacteria and yeasts in spontaneously fermented sorghum sourdough. Am. J. Microbiol. Res. 8, 63–72 (2020).
66. Elyasi SN An integer superstructure model to find a sustainable biorefinery platform for valorizing household waste to bioenergy, microbial protein, and biochemicals J. Clean. Prod. 2021 278 123986 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123986
Elyasi, S. N. et al. An integer superstructure model to find a sustainable biorefinery platform for valorizing household waste to bioenergy, microbial protein, and biochemicals. J. Clean. Prod. 278, 123986 (2021).
67. Chen Z Chen JJ Fan R Single-cell protein secretion detection and profiling Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2019 12 431 449 10.1146/annurev-anchem-061318-115055
Chen, Z., Chen, J. J. & Fan, R. Single-cell protein secretion detection and profiling. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 12, 431–449 (2019).
68. Kumar R Opportunities and challenges in single‐cell protein production using lignocellulosic material Biofpr 2023 18 310 321
Kumar, R. et al. Opportunities and challenges in single‐cell protein production using lignocellulosic material. Biofpr 18, 310–321 (2023).
69. Aidoo R Overview of single cell protein: production pathway, sustainability outlook, and digital twin potentials Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2023 138 577 598 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.07.003
Aidoo, R. et al. Overview of single cell protein: production pathway, sustainability outlook, and digital twin potentials. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 138, 577–598 (2023).
70. Gesicka A Oleskowicz-Popiel P Lezyk M Recent trends in methane to bioproduct conversion by methanotrophs Biotechnol. Adv. 2021 53 107861 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107861 34710553
Gesicka, A., Oleskowicz-Popiel, P. & Lezyk, M. Recent trends in methane to bioproduct conversion by methanotrophs. Biotechnol. Adv. 53, 107861 (2021).34710553
71. Gervasi T Production of single cell protein (SCP) from food and agricultural waste by using Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nat. Prod. Res. 2018 32 648 653 10.1080/14786419.2017.1332617 28540744
Gervasi, T. et al. Production of single cell protein (SCP) from food and agricultural waste by using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Prod. Res. 32, 648–653 (2018).28540744
72. Garcia-Vaquero M Hayes M Red and green macroalgae for fish and animal feed and human functional food development Food Rev. Int. 2016 32 15 45 10.1080/87559129.2015.1041184
Garcia-Vaquero, M. & Hayes, M. Red and green macroalgae for fish and animal feed and human functional food development. Food Rev. Int. 32, 15–45 (2016).
73. Fleurence, J. in Proteins in Food Processing (ed. Yada, R. Y.) Ch. 9 (Elsevier, 2004).
74. Finnigan T Needham L Abbott C Mycoprotein: a healthy new protein with a low environmental impact Sustain. Protein Source 2017 3 305 325 10.1016/B978-0-12-802778-3.00019-6
Finnigan, T., Needham, L. & Abbott, C. Mycoprotein: a healthy new protein with a low environmental impact. Sustain. Protein Source 3, 305–325 (2017).
75. Elyamine A Aerobic and anaerobic bacterial and fungal degradation of pyrene: mechanism pathway including biochemical reaction and catabolic genes Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021 22 8202 10.3390/ijms22158202 34360967
Elyamine, A. et al. Aerobic and anaerobic bacterial and fungal degradation of pyrene: mechanism pathway including biochemical reaction and catabolic genes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 8202 (2021).34360967
76. Jean AB Brown RC Techno-economic analysis of gas fermentation for the production of single cell protein Environ. Sci. Tech. 2024 58 3823 3829 10.1021/acs.est.3c10312
Jean, A. B. & Brown, R. C. Techno-economic analysis of gas fermentation for the production of single cell protein. Environ. Sci. Tech. 58, 3823–3829 (2024).
77. Jaswal A Singh PP Mondal T Furfural–a versatile, biomass-derived platform chemical for the production of renewable chemicals Green. Chem. 2022 24 510 551 10.1039/D1GC03278J
Jaswal, A., Singh, P. P. & Mondal, T. Furfural–a versatile, biomass-derived platform chemical for the production of renewable chemicals. Green. Chem. 24, 510–551 (2022).
78. Couture JL Environmental benefits of novel nonhuman food inputs to salmon feeds Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019 53 1967 1975 10.1021/acs.est.8b03832 30653307
Couture, J. L. et al. Environmental benefits of novel nonhuman food inputs to salmon feeds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 1967–1975 (2019).30653307
79. Chen Y Partial replacement of fishmeal with Clostridium autoethanogenum single‐cell protein in the diet for juvenile black sea bream (Acanthopagrus schlegelii) Aquac. Res. 2020 51 1000 1011 10.1111/are.14446
Chen, Y. et al. Partial replacement of fishmeal with Clostridium autoethanogenum single‐cell protein in the diet for juvenile black sea bream (Acanthopagrus schlegelii). Aquac. Res. 51, 1000–1011 (2020).
80. Chen CY Optimizing heterotrophic production of Chlorella sorokiniana SU-9 proteins potentially used as a sustainable protein substitute in aquafeed Bioresour. Technol. 2023 370 128538 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128538 36581231
Chen, C. Y. et al. Optimizing heterotrophic production of Chlorella sorokiniana SU-9 proteins potentially used as a sustainable protein substitute in aquafeed. Bioresour. Technol. 370, 128538 (2023).36581231
81. Chakraborty A Bhowal J Bioconversion of jackfruit seed waste to fungal biomass protein by submerged fermentation Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2023 195 2158 2171
Chakraborty, A. & Bhowal, J. Bioconversion of jackfruit seed waste to fungal biomass protein by submerged fermentation. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 195, 2158–2171 (2023).
82. Chai KF Precision fermentation to advance fungal food fermentations Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2022 47 100881 10.1016/j.cofs.2022.100881
Chai, K. F. et al. Precision fermentation to advance fungal food fermentations. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 47, 100881 (2022).
83. Zhao Y SC-AIR-BERT: a pre-trained single-cell model for predicting the antigen-binding specificity of the adaptive immune receptor Brief. Bioinform 2023 24 bbad191 10.1093/bib/bbad191 37204192
Zhao, Y. et al. SC-AIR-BERT: a pre-trained single-cell model for predicting the antigen-binding specificity of the adaptive immune receptor. Brief. Bioinform 24, bbad191 (2023).37204192
84. Zhang Z Chen X Gao L New strategy for the biosynthesis of alternative feed protein: Single‐cell protein production from straw‐based biomass GCB Bioenergy 2024 16 e13120 10.1111/gcbb.13120
Zhang, Z., Chen, X. & Gao, L. New strategy for the biosynthesis of alternative feed protein: Single‐cell protein production from straw‐based biomass. GCB Bioenergy 16, e13120 (2024).
85. Zeng D Recycling of acetate and ammonium from digestate for single-cell protein production by a hybrid electrochemical-membrane fermentation process Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023 188 106705 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106705
Zeng, D. et al. Recycling of acetate and ammonium from digestate for single-cell protein production by a hybrid electrochemical-membrane fermentation process. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 188, 106705 (2023).
86. Yang L Hatanaka T Construction and development of a novel dual-gene coexpression system to promote heterologous protein secretion for Streptomyces Biosci. Biotechnol. 2023 87 349 357 10.1093/bbb/zbac205
Yang, L. & Hatanaka, T. Construction and development of a novel dual-gene coexpression system to promote heterologous protein secretion for Streptomyces. Biosci. Biotechnol. 87, 349–357 (2023).
87. Yafetto L Odamtten GT Wiafe-Kwagyan M Valorization of agro-industrial wastes into animal feed through microbial fermentation: a review of the global and Ghanaian case Heliyon 2023 9 e14814 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14814 37025888
Yafetto, L., Odamtten, G. T. & Wiafe-Kwagyan, M. Valorization of agro-industrial wastes into animal feed through microbial fermentation: a review of the global and Ghanaian case. Heliyon 9, e14814 (2023).37025888
88. Yafetto L Application of solid-state fermentation by microbial biotechnology for bioprocessing of agro-industrial wastes from 1970 to 2020: a review and bibliometric analysis Heliyon 2022 8 e09173 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09173 35368548
Yafetto, L. Application of solid-state fermentation by microbial biotechnology for bioprocessing of agro-industrial wastes from 1970 to 2020: a review and bibliometric analysis. Heliyon 8, e09173 (2022).35368548
89. Xue VW Wong SCC Cho WC From proteomic landscape to single-cell oncoproteomics Expert Rev. Proteom. 2021 18 1 6 10.1080/14789450.2021.1890036
Xue, V. W., Wong, S. C. C. & Cho, W. C. From proteomic landscape to single-cell oncoproteomics. Expert Rev. Proteom. 18, 1–6 (2021).
90. Weber S Insights into cell wall disintegration of Chlorella vulgaris PLoS ONE 2022 17 e0262500 10.1371/journal.pone.0262500 35030225
Weber, S. et al. Insights into cell wall disintegration of Chlorella vulgaris. PLoS ONE 17, e0262500 (2022).35030225
91. Wang Y Whole-genome analysis of probiotic product isolates reveals the presence of genes related to antimicrobial resistance, virulence factors, and toxic metabolites, posing potential health risks BMC Genomics 2021 22 1 12 33388042
Wang, Y. et al. Whole-genome analysis of probiotic product isolates reveals the presence of genes related to antimicrobial resistance, virulence factors, and toxic metabolites, posing potential health risks. BMC Genomics 22, 1–12 (2021).33388042
92. Wang J Co-production of ethanol and cellulose nanocrystals through self-cycling fermentation of wood pulp hydrolysate Bioresour. Technol. 2021 330 124969 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124969 33740586
Wang, J. et al. Co-production of ethanol and cellulose nanocrystals through self-cycling fermentation of wood pulp hydrolysate. Bioresour. Technol. 330, 124969 (2021).33740586
93. Voidarou, C. et al. Fermentative foods: microbiology, biochemistry, potential human health benefits and public health issues. Foods 10, 69 (2020).
94. Vlaeminck E Single-cell protein production from industrial off-gas through acetate: techno-economic analysis for a coupled fermentation approach Fermentation 2023 9 771 10.3390/fermentation9080771
Vlaeminck, E. et al. Single-cell protein production from industrial off-gas through acetate: techno-economic analysis for a coupled fermentation approach. Fermentation 9, 771 (2023).
95. Villa, T. G. & Abril, A. A Critical Appraisal of Current Microbiological Hot Topics (Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2023).
96. Bratosin BC Darjan S Vodnar DC Single cell protein: a potential substitute in human and animal nutrition Sustainability 2021 2021 9284 10.3390/su13169284
Bratosin, B. C., Darjan, S. & Vodnar, D. C. Single cell protein: a potential substitute in human and animal nutrition. Sustainability 2021, 9284 (2021).
97. Wan M A novel paradigm for the highly efficient production of phycocyanin from Galdieria sulphuraria Bioresour. Technol. 2016 218 272 278 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.06.045 27372006
Wan, M. et al. A novel paradigm for the highly efficient production of phycocyanin from Galdieria sulphuraria. Bioresour. Technol. 218, 272–278 (2016).27372006
98. Sadh PK Recovery of agricultural waste biomass: a path for circular bioeconomy Sci. Total Environ. 2023 870 161904 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161904 36736404
Sadh, P. K. et al. Recovery of agricultural waste biomass: a path for circular bioeconomy. Sci. Total Environ. 870, 161904 (2023).36736404
99. Ruan S Analysis in protein profile, antioxidant activity and structure-activity relationship based on ultrasound-assisted liquid-state fermentation of soybean meal with Bacillus subtilis Ultrason. Sonochem. 2020 64 104846 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104846 31987775
Ruan, S. et al. Analysis in protein profile, antioxidant activity and structure-activity relationship based on ultrasound-assisted liquid-state fermentation of soybean meal with Bacillus subtilis. Ultrason. Sonochem. 64, 104846 (2020).31987775
100. Rodriguez K Gas fermentation for microbial sustainable aviation fuel production Microbiol. Aust. 2023 4 162 173
Rodriguez, K. et al. Gas fermentation for microbial sustainable aviation fuel production. Microbiol. Aust. 4, 162–173 (2023).
101. Wada OZ Vincent AS Mackey HR Single-cell protein production from purple non-sulfur bacteria-based wastewater treatment Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2022 21 931 956 10.1007/s11157-022-09635-y
Wada, O. Z., Vincent, A. S. & Mackey, H. R. Single-cell protein production from purple non-sulfur bacteria-based wastewater treatment. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 21, 931–956 (2022).
102. Vigouroux A Bikard D CRISPR tools to control gene expression in bacteria Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2020 84 10 1128 10.1128/MMBR.00077-19
Vigouroux, A. & Bikard, D. CRISPR tools to control gene expression in bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 84, 10–1128 (2020).
103. Fernández-López L Life cycle assessment of single cell protein production–a review of current technologies and emerging challenges CLCB 2024 3 100079
Fernández-López, L. et al. Life cycle assessment of single cell protein production–a review of current technologies and emerging challenges. CLCB 3, 100079 (2024).
104. Carranza-M´endez RC Production of single-cell protein from orange peel residues by Candida Utilis ISBAB 2022 40 102298
Carranza-M´endez, R. C. et al. Production of single-cell protein from orange peel residues by Candida Utilis. ISBAB 40, 102298 (2022).
105. García Martínez JB Methane single cell protein: potential to secure a global protein supply against catastrophic food shocks Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022 10 906704 10.3389/fbioe.2022.906704 35957636
García Martínez, J. B. et al. Methane single cell protein: potential to secure a global protein supply against catastrophic food shocks. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10, 906704 (2022).35957636
106. Zhou YM Recycling of orange waste for single cell protein production and the synergistic and antagonistic effects on production quality J. Clean. Prod. 2019 213 384 392 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.168
Zhou, Y. M. et al. Recycling of orange waste for single cell protein production and the synergistic and antagonistic effects on production quality. J. Clean. Prod. 213, 384–392 (2019).
107. Vigani M Food and feed products from micro-algae: market opportunities and challenges for the EU Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2015 42 81 92 10.1016/j.tifs.2014.12.004
Vigani, M. et al. Food and feed products from micro-algae: market opportunities and challenges for the EU. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 42, 81–92 (2015).
108. Vezzoni R Green growth for whom, how, and why? The REPowerEU plan and the inconsistencies of European Union energy policy ERSS 2023 101 103134
Vezzoni, R. Green growth for whom, how, and why? The REPowerEU plan and the inconsistencies of European Union energy policy. ERSS 101, 103134 (2023).
109. Vethathirri RS Microbial community-based production of single-cell protein from soybean-processing wastewater of variable chemical composition Sci. Total Environ. 2023 873 162241 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162241 36804981
Vethathirri, R. S. et al. Microbial community-based production of single-cell protein from soybean-processing wastewater of variable chemical composition. Sci. Total Environ. 873, 162241 (2023).36804981
110. Van Heerden JH Statistics and simulation of growth of single bacterial cells: illustrations with B. subtilis and E. coli Sci. rep. 2017 7 16094 10.1038/s41598-017-15895-4 29170466
Van Heerden, J. H. et al. Statistics and simulation of growth of single bacterial cells: illustrations with B. subtilis and E. coli. Sci. rep. 7, 16094 (2017).29170466
111. Hua K The future of aquatic protein: implications for protein sources in aquaculture diets One Earth 2019 1 316 329 10.1016/j.oneear.2019.10.018
Hua, K. et al. The future of aquatic protein: implications for protein sources in aquaculture diets. One Earth 1, 316–329 (2019).
112. Kurniawan R Carotenoids composition of green algae Caulerpa racemosa and their antidiabetic, anti-obesity, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties Molecules 2023 28 3267 10.3390/molecules28073267 37050034
Kurniawan, R. et al. Carotenoids composition of green algae Caulerpa racemosa and their antidiabetic, anti-obesity, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties. Molecules 28, 3267 (2023).37050034
113. Adetunji, J. B. et al. in Next-Generation Algae, (ed. Adetunji, C. Chapter 5) (Scrivener Publishing, 2023).
114. Valentino MJ Single-cell protein potential of endophytic fungi associated with bamboo using rice bran as substrate Adv. Appl. Sci. Res. 2016 7 68 72
Valentino, M. J. et al. Single-cell protein potential of endophytic fungi associated with bamboo using rice bran as substrate. Adv. Appl. Sci. Res. 7, 68–72 (2016).
115. Upcraft T Protein from renewable resources: mycoprotein production from agricultural residues Green. Chem. 2021 23 5150 5165 10.1039/D1GC01021B
Upcraft, T. et al. Protein from renewable resources: mycoprotein production from agricultural residues. Green. Chem. 23, 5150–5165 (2021).
116. Woolley L Gas to protein: microbial single-cell protein is an alternative to fishmeal in aquaculture Sci. Total Environ. 2023 859 160141 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160141 36395832
Woolley, L. et al. Gas to protein: microbial single-cell protein is an alternative to fishmeal in aquaculture. Sci. Total Environ. 859, 160141 (2023).36395832
117. Wood JC Strategies to improve the viability of a circular carbon economy-A techno-economic review of microbial electrosynthesis and gas fermentation Water Res. 2021 201 117306 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117306 34153823
Wood, J. C. et al. Strategies to improve the viability of a circular carbon economy-A techno-economic review of microbial electrosynthesis and gas fermentation. Water Res. 201, 117306 (2021).34153823
118. Wild KJ Steing H Rodehutscord M Variability in nutrient composition and in vitro crude protein digestibility of 16 microalgae products J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2018 102 1306 1319 10.1111/jpn.12953
Wild, K. J., Steing, H. & Rodehutscord, M. Variability in nutrient composition and in vitro crude protein digestibility of 16 microalgae products. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 102, 1306–1319 (2018).
119. Tropea A Single-cell protein production through multi-food-waste substrate fermentation Fermentation 2022 8 91 99 10.3390/fermentation8030091
Tropea, A. et al. Single-cell protein production through multi-food-waste substrate fermentation. Fermentation 8, 91–99 (2022).
120. Thangaraj, R. et al. in Food Microbiology Based Entrepreneurship: Making Money From Microbes (eds Dharumadurai, D., Amaresan, N. & Babalola, O. O.) (Springer Nature, 2023).
121. Takahashi Y Koike H Katoh S Multiple forms of chlorophyll-protein complexes from a thermophilic cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp Arch. Biochem. 2018 219 209 218 10.1016/0003-9861(82)90151-5
Takahashi, Y., Koike, H. & Katoh, S. Multiple forms of chlorophyll-protein complexes from a thermophilic cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. Arch. Biochem. 219, 209–218 (2018).
122. Sun Y Metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses reveal comparisons against liquid-state fermentation of primary dark tea, green tea and white tea by Aspergillus cristatus Int. Food Res. 2023 3 113115 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113115
Sun, Y. et al. Metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses reveal comparisons against liquid-state fermentation of primary dark tea, green tea and white tea by Aspergillus cristatus. Int. Food Res. 3, 113115 (2023).
123. Bogdahn I Agriculture-independent, sustainable, fail-safe, and efficient food production by autotrophic single-cell protein PeerJ 2015 3 e1279 26468436
Bogdahn, I. Agriculture-independent, sustainable, fail-safe, and efficient food production by autotrophic single-cell protein. PeerJ 3, e1279 (2015).26468436
124. Sun Y Single-cell landscape of the ecosystem in early-relapse hepatocellular carcinoma Cell 2021 184 404 421 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.041 33357445
Sun, Y. et al. Single-cell landscape of the ecosystem in early-relapse hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell 184, 404–421 (2021).33357445
125. Sultana, S., Ali, M. E. & Ahamad, M. N. U. in Preparation and Processing of Religious and Cultural Foods (eds Ali, Md. E., Nizar, N. N. A.) Ch. 11 (Woodhead Publishing, 2018).
126. Srivastava RK Biomass utilization and production of biofuels from carbon neutral materials Environ. Pollut. 2021 276 116731 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116731 33607352
Srivastava, R. K. et al. Biomass utilization and production of biofuels from carbon neutral materials. Environ. Pollut. 276, 116731 (2021).33607352
127. Spalvins K Zihare L Blumberga D Single cell protein production from waste biomass: comparison of various industrial by-products Energy Procedia 2018 147 409 418 10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.111
Spalvins, K., Zihare, L. & Blumberga, D. Single cell protein production from waste biomass: comparison of various industrial by-products. Energy Procedia 147, 409–418 (2018).
128. Song X CRISPR-Cas9(D10A) nickase-assisted genome editing in Lactobacillus casei Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017 83 152361 10.1128/AEM.01259-17
Song, X. et al. CRISPR-Cas9(D10A) nickase-assisted genome editing in Lactobacillus casei. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83, 152361 (2017).
129. Somda MK Production of single cell protein (SCP) and essentials amino acids from Candida utilis FMJ12 by solid state fermentation using mango waste supplemented with nitrogen sources Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2018 17 716 723 10.5897/AJB2017.16361
Somda, M. K. et al. Production of single cell protein (SCP) and essentials amino acids from Candida utilis FMJ12 by solid state fermentation using mango waste supplemented with nitrogen sources. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 17, 716–723 (2018).
130. Pavithra KG Microalgae for biofuel production and removal of heavy metals: a review Environ. Chem. Lett. 2020 18 1905 1923 10.1007/s10311-020-01046-1
Pavithra, K. G. et al. Microalgae for biofuel production and removal of heavy metals: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 18, 1905–1923 (2020).
131. Passanisi, S. et al. Novel diagnostic techniques and therapeutic strategies for IgE–mediated food allergy. Allergy Asthma Proc. 42, 124–136 (2021).
132. Sillman J A life cycle environmental sustainability analysis of microbial protein production via power-to-food approaches Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2020 25 2190 2203 10.1007/s11367-020-01771-3
Sillman, J. et al. A life cycle environmental sustainability analysis of microbial protein production via power-to-food approaches. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 25, 2190–2203 (2020).
133. Sheth, U. & Patel, S. in Food Microbiology Based Entrepreneurship: Making Money From Microbes (ed. Amaresan, N. Chapet 2) (Springer Nature, 2023).
134. Sharif M Single cell protein: Sources, mechanism of production, nutritional value and its uses in aquaculture nutrition Aquaculture 2021 531 735885 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735885
Sharif, M. et al. Single cell protein: Sources, mechanism of production, nutritional value and its uses in aquaculture nutrition. Aquaculture 531, 735885 (2021).
135. Bogale TT Microbial protein production from agro-industrial wastes as food and feed Am. J. Life Sci. 2020 8 121 126
Bogale, T. T. Microbial protein production from agro-industrial wastes as food and feed. Am. J. Life Sci. 8, 121–126 (2020).
136. Shao X Integrated proteome analysis device for fast single-cell protein profiling Anal. Chem. 2018 90 14003 14010 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03692 30375851
Shao, X. et al. Integrated proteome analysis device for fast single-cell protein profiling. Anal. Chem. 90, 14003–14010 (2018).30375851
137. El Abbadi, S. H. et al. Stranded methane to food: techno-economic analysis of methanotrophic protein production. Preprint at EarthArXiv X5PP5D (2021).
138. Shaikh S Effect of nutrient deficiency on biofilm formation and single cell protein production with a purple non-sulfur bacteria enriched culture Biofilm 2023 5 100098 10.1016/j.bioflm.2022.100098 36588982
Shaikh, S. et al. Effect of nutrient deficiency on biofilm formation and single cell protein production with a purple non-sulfur bacteria enriched culture. Biofilm 5, 100098 (2023).36588982
139. Senturk S Rapid and tunable method to temporally control gene editing based on conditional cas9 stabilization Nat. Commun. 2017 8 14370 10.1038/ncomms14370 28224990
Senturk, S. et al. Rapid and tunable method to temporally control gene editing based on conditional cas9 stabilization. Nat. Commun. 8, 14370 (2017).28224990
140. Paz-Arteaga SL Bioprocessing of pineapple waste for sustainable production of bioactive compounds using solid-state fermentation Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2023 85 103313 10.1016/j.ifset.2023.103313
Paz-Arteaga, S. L. et al. Bioprocessing of pineapple waste for sustainable production of bioactive compounds using solid-state fermentation. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 85, 103313 (2023).
141. Parsons S Allen MJ Chuck CJ Coproducts of algae and yeast-derived single cell oils: a critical review of their role in improving biorefinery sustainability Bioresour. Technol. 2020 303 122862 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122862 32037189
Parsons, S., Allen, M. J. & Chuck, C. J. Coproducts of algae and yeast-derived single cell oils: a critical review of their role in improving biorefinery sustainability. Bioresour. Technol. 303, 122862 (2020).32037189
142. Panwar, J. S. & Sharma, D. (Eds.). Microbial Resource Technologies for Sustainable Development (Elsevier, (2022).
143. Sekoai PT Valorization of food waste into single-cell protein: an innovative technological strategy for sustainable protein production Microorganisms 2024 12 166 10.3390/microorganisms12010166 38257991
Sekoai, P. T. et al. Valorization of food waste into single-cell protein: an innovative technological strategy for sustainable protein production. Microorganisms 12, 166 (2024).38257991
144. Schultenkämper K Brito LF Wendisch VF Impact of CRISPR interference on strain development in biotechnology Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2020 67 7 21 10.1002/bab.1901
Schultenkämper, K., Brito, L. F. & Wendisch, V. F. Impact of CRISPR interference on strain development in biotechnology. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 67, 7–21 (2020).
145. Sarma AP Petar P Murthy SDS Spirulina as a source of single cell protein Int. J. Plant Res. 2008 21 35 45
Sarma, A. P., Petar, P. & Murthy, S. D. S. Spirulina as a source of single cell protein. Int. J. Plant Res. 21, 35–45 (2008).
146. Toghiani J Sustainable pistachio dehulling waste management and its valorization approaches: a review Curr. Pollut. Rep. 2023 9 60 72
Toghiani, J. et al. Sustainable pistachio dehulling waste management and its valorization approaches: a review. Curr. Pollut. Rep. 9, 60–72 (2023).
147. Tiwari M Solid‐state fermentation Micro. Food Indus 2023 3 355 392 10.1002/9781119776406.ch9
Tiwari, M. et al. Solid‐state fermentation. Micro. Food Indus 3, 355–392 (2023).
148. Timira V A comprehensive review on the application of novel disruption techniques for proteins release from microalgae Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022 62 4309 4325 10.1080/10408398.2021.1873734 33480267
Timira, V. et al. A comprehensive review on the application of novel disruption techniques for proteins release from microalgae. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 62, 4309–4325 (2022).33480267
149. Tikhonova EN Methylomonas Rapida sp. nov., a novel species of fast-growing, carotenoid-producing obligate methanotrophs with high biotechnological potential Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2023 46 126398 10.1016/j.syapm.2023.126398 36724672
Tikhonova, E. N. et al. Methylomonas Rapida sp. nov., a novel species of fast-growing, carotenoid-producing obligate methanotrophs with high biotechnological potential. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 46, 126398 (2023).36724672
150. Said SD Production of single cell protein by Aspergillus niger using a mixture of coffee husk and molasses as substrate J. Appl. Food Technol. 2023 10 152 160
Said, S. D. et al. Production of single cell protein by Aspergillus niger using a mixture of coffee husk and molasses as substrate. J. Appl. Food Technol. 10, 152–160 (2023).
151. Saejung C Thammaratana T Biomass recovery during municipal wastewater treatment using photosynthetic bacteria and the prospect of production of single cell protein for feedstuff Environ. Technol. 2016 37 3055 3061 10.1080/09593330.2016.1175512 27070497
Saejung, C. & Thammaratana, T. Biomass recovery during municipal wastewater treatment using photosynthetic bacteria and the prospect of production of single cell protein for feedstuff. Environ. Technol. 37, 3055–3061 (2016).27070497
152. Saejung C Salasook P Recycling of sugar industry wastewater for single-cell protein production with supplemental carotenoids Environ. Technol. 2018 3 156 164
Saejung, C. & Salasook, P. Recycling of sugar industry wastewater for single-cell protein production with supplemental carotenoids. Environ. Technol. 3, 156–164 (2018).
153. Bhatia SK Renewable biohydrogen production from lignocellulosic biomass using fermentation and integration of systems with other energy generation technologies Sci. Total Environ. 2021 765 144429 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144429 33385808
Bhatia, S. K. et al. Renewable biohydrogen production from lignocellulosic biomass using fermentation and integration of systems with other energy generation technologies. Sci. Total Environ. 765, 144429 (2021).33385808
154. Saeed MS Saeed A Adnan M Production and utilization of single cell proteins-an overview Curr. Res. Agri. Farm. 2020 1 9 12 10.18782/2582-7146.117
Saeed, M. S., Saeed, A. & Adnan, M. Production and utilization of single cell proteins-an overview. Curr. Res. Agri. Farm. 1, 9–12 (2020).
155. Anneli R Single cell protein—state-of-the-art, industrial landscape and patents 2001–2016 Front. Microbiol. 2017 8 54 62 28174566
Anneli, R. et al. Single cell protein—state-of-the-art, industrial landscape and patents 2001–2016. Front. Microbiol. 8, 54–62 (2017).28174566
156. Ribeiro GO Innovations and developments in single cell protein: bibliometric review and patents analysis Front. microbiol 2023 13 1093464 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1093464 36741879
Ribeiro, G. O. et al. Innovations and developments in single cell protein: bibliometric review and patents analysis. Front. microbiol 13, 1093464 (2023).36741879
157. Reihani SFS Khosravi-Darani K Influencing factors on single-cell protein production by submerged fermentation: a review Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2019 37 34 40 10.1016/j.ejbt.2018.11.005
Reihani, S. F. S. & Khosravi-Darani, K. Influencing factors on single-cell protein production by submerged fermentation: a review. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 37, 34–40 (2019).
158. Razzaq ZU Characterization of single cell protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae for nutritional, functional, and antioxidant properties Sens. Instrum. Food Qual. Saf. 2020 14 2520 2528
Razzaq, Z. U. et al. Characterization of single cell protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae for nutritional, functional, and antioxidant properties. Sens. Instrum. Food Qual. Saf. 14, 2520–2528 (2020).
159. Lv JY Histidine as a versatile excipient in protein-based biopharmaceutical formulations Int. J. Pharm. 2024 1 124472 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124472
Lv, J. Y. et al. Histidine as a versatile excipient in protein-based biopharmaceutical formulations. Int. J. Pharm. 1, 124472 (2024).
160. Bertini A Exploring the application of Corynebacterium glutamicum single cell protein in the diet of flathead grey mullet (Mugil cephalus): effects on growth performance, digestive enzymes activity and gut microbiota Front. Mar. Sci. 2023 10 1172505 10.3389/fmars.2023.1172505
Bertini, A. et al. Exploring the application of Corynebacterium glutamicum single cell protein in the diet of flathead grey mullet (Mugil cephalus): effects on growth performance, digestive enzymes activity and gut microbiota. Front. Mar. Sci. 10, 1172505 (2023).
161. Raziq A Single-cell protein (SCP) production and potential substrates: a comprehensive review Pure Appl. Biol. 2020 9 1743 1754 10.19045/bspab.2020.90185
Raziq, A. et al. Single-cell protein (SCP) production and potential substrates: a comprehensive review. Pure Appl. Biol. 9, 1743–1754 (2020).
162. Rasouli Z Nutrient recovery from industrial wastewater as single-cell protein by a co-culture of green microalgae and methanotrophs Biochem. Eng. J. 2018 134 129 135 10.1016/j.bej.2018.03.010
Rasouli, Z. et al. Nutrient recovery from industrial wastewater as single-cell protein by a co-culture of green microalgae and methanotrophs. Biochem. Eng. J. 134, 129–135 (2018).
163. Raji, R. O. et al. Bioconversion of biomass energy and biological residues: the role of microbes. Microb. Biotechnol. 153–177 (2024).
164. Rajendran K Rajoli S Taherzadeh M Techno-economic analysis of integrating first and second-generation ethanol production using filamentous fungi: an industrial case study Energies 2016 9 359 10.3390/en9050359
Rajendran, K., Rajoli, S. & Taherzadeh, M. Techno-economic analysis of integrating first and second-generation ethanol production using filamentous fungi: an industrial case study. Energies 9, 359 (2016).
165. Okeke ES Microalgae biorefinery: an integrated route for the sustainable production of high-value-added products Energy Convers. Manag. 2022 16 100323
Okeke, E. S. et al. Microalgae biorefinery: an integrated route for the sustainable production of high-value-added products. Energy Convers. Manag. 16, 100323 (2022).
166. Obradovic A Single-cell protein activity analysis identifies recurrence-associated renal tumor macrophages Cell 2021 184 2988 3005 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.038 34019793
Obradovic, A. et al. Single-cell protein activity analysis identifies recurrence-associated renal tumor macrophages. Cell 184, 2988–3005 (2021).34019793
167. Rahman MM Hosano N Hosano H Recovering microalgal bioresources: a review of cell disruption methods and extraction technologies Molecules 2022 27 2786 10.3390/molecules27092786 35566139
Rahman, M. M., Hosano, N. & Hosano, H. Recovering microalgal bioresources: a review of cell disruption methods and extraction technologies. Molecules 27, 2786 (2022).35566139
168. Qi N Isolation and characterization of a novel hydrolase-producing probiotic Bacillus licheniformis and its application in the fermentation of soybean meal Front. Nutr. 2023 10 1123422 10.3389/fnut.2023.1123422 36969826
Qi, N. et al. Isolation and characterization of a novel hydrolase-producing probiotic Bacillus licheniformis and its application in the fermentation of soybean meal. Front. Nutr. 10, 1123422 (2023).36969826
169. Putri, D. et al. Single cell protein production of Chlorella sp. using food processing waste as a cultivation medium. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (IOP Publishing, 2018).
170. Postigo LOC Solid-state fermentation for enhancing the nutraceutical content of agrifood by-products: recent advances and its industrial feasibility Food Biosci. 2021 41 100926 10.1016/j.fbio.2021.100926
Postigo, L. O. C. et al. Solid-state fermentation for enhancing the nutraceutical content of agrifood by-products: recent advances and its industrial feasibility. Food Biosci. 41, 100926 (2021).
171. Phlairaharn T Optimizing linear ion-trap data-independent acquisition toward single-cell proteomics Anal. Chem. 2023 95 9881 9891 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c00842 37338819
Phlairaharn, T. et al. Optimizing linear ion-trap data-independent acquisition toward single-cell proteomics. Anal. Chem. 95, 9881–9891 (2023).37338819
172. Bernheim A Inhibition of NHEJ repair by type ii-a CRISPR-Cas systems in bacteria Nat. Commun. 2017 8 2094 10.1038/s41467-017-02350-1 29234047
Bernheim, A. et al. Inhibition of NHEJ repair by type ii-a CRISPR-Cas systems in bacteria. Nat. Commun. 8, 2094 (2017).29234047
173. Peters JM A comprehensive, CRISPR-based functional analysis of essential genes in bacteria Cell 2016 165 1493 1506 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.003 27238023
Peters, J. M. et al. A comprehensive, CRISPR-based functional analysis of essential genes in bacteria. Cell 165, 1493–1506 (2016).27238023
174. Pander B Hydrogen oxidising bacteria for production of single‐cell protein and other food and feed ingredients Biol. Eng. 2020 4 21 24 10.1049/enb.2020.0005
Pander, B. et al. Hydrogen oxidising bacteria for production of single‐cell protein and other food and feed ingredients. Biol. Eng. 4, 21–24 (2020).
175. Pan D Homologous high-level lipase and single-cell protein production with engineered Yarrowia lipolytica via scale-up fermentation for industrial applications Fermentation 2023 9 268 10.3390/fermentation9030268
Pan, D. et al. Homologous high-level lipase and single-cell protein production with engineered Yarrowia lipolytica via scale-up fermentation for industrial applications. Fermentation 9, 268 (2023).
176. Özkan A Programmable RNA targeting with the single-protein CRISPR effector Cas7-11 Nature 2021 597 720 725 10.1038/s41586-021-03886-5 34489594
Özkan, A. et al. Programmable RNA targeting with the single-protein CRISPR effector Cas7-11. Nature 597, 720–725 (2021).34489594
177. Owusu-Kwarteng J Technologically relevant Bacillus species and microbial safety of West African traditional alkaline fermented seed condiments Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022 62 871 888 10.1080/10408398.2020.1830026 33030021
Owusu-Kwarteng, J. et al. Technologically relevant Bacillus species and microbial safety of West African traditional alkaline fermented seed condiments. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 62, 871–888 (2022).33030021
178. Berne C Bacterial adhesion at the single-cell level Nat. Rev. Microbiol 2018 16 616 627 10.1038/s41579-018-0057-5 30008468
Berne, C. et al. Bacterial adhesion at the single-cell level. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 616–627 (2018).30008468
179. Owsianiak M Performance of second-generation microbial protein used as aquaculture feed about planetary boundaries Resour. Conser. Recycl. 2022 180 158963 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106158
Owsianiak, M. et al. Performance of second-generation microbial protein used as aquaculture feed about planetary boundaries. Resour. Conser. Recycl. 180, 158963 (2022).
180. Mahan KM Production of single cell protein from agrowaste using rhodococcus opacus J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018 45 795 801 10.1007/s10295-018-2043-3 29915996
Mahan, K. M. et al. Production of single cell protein from agrowaste using rhodococcus opacus. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 45, 795–801 (2018).29915996
181. Machado L Carvalho G Pereira RN Effects of innovative processing methods on microalgae cell wall: prospects towards digestibility of protein-rich biomass Biomass 2022 2 80 102 10.3390/biomass2020006
Machado, L., Carvalho, G. & Pereira, R. N. Effects of innovative processing methods on microalgae cell wall: prospects towards digestibility of protein-rich biomass. Biomass 2, 80–102 (2022).
182. Øverland M Mydland LT Skrede A Marine macroalgae as sources of protein and bioactive compounds in feed for monogastric animals J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019 99 13 24 10.1002/jsfa.9143 29797494
Øverland, M., Mydland, L. T. & Skrede, A. Marine macroalgae as sources of protein and bioactive compounds in feed for monogastric animals. J. Sci. Food Agric. 99, 13–24 (2019).29797494
183. Obaeda B Yeasts as a source of single cell protein production: a review Plant Arch. 2021 21 324 328 10.51470/PLANTARCHIVES.2021.v21.S1.051
Obaeda, B. Yeasts as a source of single cell protein production: a review. Plant Arch. 21, 324–328 (2021).
184. Nyyssölä A The role of single cell protein in cellular agriculture Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2022 75 102686 10.1016/j.copbio.2022.102686 35093677
Nyyssölä, A. et al. The role of single cell protein in cellular agriculture. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 75, 102686 (2022).35093677
185. Nurmalasari A Maharani S Addition of carbon sources to pineapple waste media in the production of single cell protein biomass Saccharomyces cerevisiae J. Biol. Res. Appl. 2020 2 71 75
Nurmalasari, A. & Maharani, S. Addition of carbon sources to pineapple waste media in the production of single cell protein biomass Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Res. Appl. 2, 71–75 (2020).
186. Novita E Zaki M Said SD Solid state fermentation of rice straw pulp with a local trichoderma reesei for single cell protein production: effects of temperature, initial medium Ph and fermentation time Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019 536 13569
Novita, E., Zaki, M. & Said, S. D. Solid state fermentation of rice straw pulp with a local trichoderma reesei for single cell protein production: effects of temperature, initial medium Ph and fermentation time. Mater. Sci. Eng. 536, 13569 (2019).
187. Nguyen VG Machine learning for the management of biochar yield and properties of biomass sources for sustainable energy Biofpr 2024 18 567 593
Nguyen, V. G. et al. Machine learning for the management of biochar yield and properties of biomass sources for sustainable energy. Biofpr 18, 567–593 (2024).
188. Benoit SL Molecular hydrogen metabolism: a widespread trait of pathogenic bacteria and protists Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2020 84 10 1128 10.1128/MMBR.00092-19
Benoit, S. L. et al. Molecular hydrogen metabolism: a widespread trait of pathogenic bacteria and protists. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 84, 10–1128 (2020).
189. Nangul A Bhatia R Microorganisms: a marvelous source of single cell proteins J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2021 3 15 18
Nangul, A. & Bhatia, R. Microorganisms: a marvelous source of single cell proteins. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 3, 15–18 (2021).
190. Nadeem H Effect of pH and different fermentation time intervals on the production of single cell proteins (SCPs) from potato peels . Pak. Biomed. J. 2023 4 17 20 10.54393/pbmj.v6i02.848
Nadeem, H. Effect of pH and different fermentation time intervals on the production of single cell proteins (SCPs) from potato peels. Pak. Biomed. J. 4, 17–20 (2023).
191. Nadeem H Conversion of potato peels into single cell protein FBT 2021 3 9 13 10.54393/fbt.v1i02.26
Nadeem, H. Conversion of potato peels into single cell protein. FBT 3, 9–13 (2021).
192. Muys M High variability in nutritional value and safety of commercially available Chlorella and Spirulina biomass indicates the need for smart production strategies Bioresour. Technol. 2019 275 247 257 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.059 30594834
Muys, M. et al. High variability in nutritional value and safety of commercially available Chlorella and Spirulina biomass indicates the need for smart production strategies. Bioresour. Technol. 275, 247–257 (2019).30594834
193. Murali Sankar, P. et al. in Food Microbiology Based Entrepreneurship: Making Money from Microbes (Springer Nature, 2023).
194. Muniz CES Solid-state fermentation for single-cell protein enrichment of guava and cashew by-products and inclusion on cereal bars Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020 25 253 260 10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101576
Muniz, C. E. S. et al. Solid-state fermentation for single-cell protein enrichment of guava and cashew by-products and inclusion on cereal bars. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 25, 253–260 (2020).
195. Mujdalipah S Putri ML Utilization of pineapple peel and rice washing water to produce single cell proteins using Saccharomyces cerevisiae Earth Environ. Sci. 2020 472 132486
Mujdalipah, S. & Putri, M. L. Utilization of pineapple peel and rice washing water to produce single cell proteins using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Earth Environ. Sci. 472, 132486 (2020).
196. Morais T Seaweed potential in the animal feed: a review J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020 8 559 10.3390/jmse8080559
Morais, T. et al. Seaweed potential in the animal feed: a review. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 8, 559 (2020).
197. Molnar J Pal M Applying single cell protein as functional foods J. Microbiol. Immunol. Biotechnol. 2020 7 33 35
Molnar, J. & Pal, M. Applying single cell protein as functional foods. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Biotechnol. 7, 33–35 (2020).
198. Mensah JK Twumasi P Use of pineapple waste for single cell protein (SCP) production and the effect of substrate concentration on the yield J. Food Process Eng. 2017 40 e12478 10.1111/jfpe.12478
Mensah, J. K. & Twumasi, P. Use of pineapple waste for single cell protein (SCP) production and the effect of substrate concentration on the yield. J. Food Process Eng. 40, e12478 (2017).
199. Humphreys CM Minton NP Advances in metabolic engineering in the microbial production of fuels and chemicals from C1 gas Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2018 50 174 181 10.1016/j.copbio.2017.12.023 29414057
Humphreys, C. M. & Minton, N. P. Advances in metabolic engineering in the microbial production of fuels and chemicals from C1 gas. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 50, 174–181 (2018).29414057
200. Meng J Economical production of Pichia pastoris single cell protein from methanol at industrial pilot scale Microb. Cell Fact. 2023 22 198 211 10.1186/s12934-023-02198-9 37770920
Meng, J. et al. Economical production of Pichia pastoris single cell protein from methanol at industrial pilot scale. Microb. Cell Fact. 22, 198–211 (2023).37770920
201. Leite P Recent advances in production of lignocellulolytic enzymes by solid-state fermentation of agro-industrial wastes Curr. Opin. Green. Sustain Chem. 2021 27 100407 10.1016/j.cogsc.2020.100407
Leite, P. et al. Recent advances in production of lignocellulolytic enzymes by solid-state fermentation of agro-industrial wastes. Curr. Opin. Green. Sustain Chem. 27, 100407 (2021).
202. Leger D Photovoltaic-driven microbial protein production can use land and sunlight more efficiently than conventional crops Proc. Natl Acad.Sci. USA 2021 118 e2015025118 10.1073/pnas.2015025118 34155098
Leger, D. et al. Photovoltaic-driven microbial protein production can use land and sunlight more efficiently than conventional crops. Proc. Natl Acad.Sci. USA 118, e2015025118 (2021).34155098
203. Leeuwendaal NK Fermented foods, health, and the gut microbiome Nutrients 2022 14 1527 10.3390/nu14071527 35406140
Leeuwendaal, N. K. et al. Fermented foods, health, and the gut microbiome. Nutrients 14, 1527 (2022).35406140
204. McAuliffe GA Takahashi T Lee MR Applications of nutritional functional units in commodity-level life cycle assessment (LCA) of agri-food systems Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2020 25 208 221 10.1007/s11367-019-01679-7 32063684
McAuliffe, G. A., Takahashi, T. & Lee, M. R. Applications of nutritional functional units in commodity-level life cycle assessment (LCA) of agri-food systems. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 25, 208–221 (2020).32063684
205. Abdullahi N Dandago MA Yunusa AK Review on production of single-cell protein from food wastes TURJAF 2021 9 968 974
Abdullahi, N., Dandago, M. A. & Yunusa, A. K. Review on production of single-cell protein from food wastes. TURJAF 9, 968–974 (2021).
206. Vane LM A review of pervaporation for product recovery from biomass fermentation processes Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2005 80 603 629 10.1002/jctb.1265
Vane, L. M. A review of pervaporation for product recovery from biomass fermentation processes. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 80, 603–629 (2005).
207. Matassa S Upcycling of biowaste carbon and nutrients in line with consumer confidence: the “full gas” route to single cell protein Green. Chem. 2020 22 4912 4929 10.1039/D0GC01382J
Matassa, S. et al. Upcycling of biowaste carbon and nutrients in line with consumer confidence: the “full gas” route to single cell protein. Green. Chem. 22, 4912–4929 (2020).
208. Martinez-Garcia M van der Maarel MJEC Floridoside production by the red microalga Galdieria sulphuraria under diferent conditions of growth and osmotic stress AMB Express 2016 6 71 82 10.1186/s13568-016-0244-6 27620735
Martinez-Garcia, M. & van der Maarel, M. J. E. C. Floridoside production by the red microalga Galdieria sulphuraria under diferent conditions of growth and osmotic stress. AMB Express 6, 71–82 (2016).27620735
209. Man, Y. B. et al. in Food Waste Valorisation: Food, Feed, Fertiliser, Fuel and Value-Added Products (ed. Wang, M. Chapter 3) (World Scientific Publishing Company, 2023).
210. Bekhit, A. E. D. A., Riley, W. W. & Hussain, M. A. (eds.) Alternative Proteins: Safety and Food Security Considerations (CRC Press, 2022).
211. Lynd LR Toward low-cost biological and hybrid biological/catalytic conversion of cellulosic biomass to fuels Energy Environ. Sci. 2022 15 938 990 10.1039/D1EE02540F
Lynd, L. R. et al. Toward low-cost biological and hybrid biological/catalytic conversion of cellulosic biomass to fuels. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 938–990 (2022).
212. Lourens, V. Pre-treatment of Sugarcane bagasse for Conversion to Single Cell Protein through One-Step Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Bioconversion. Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch Univ. (2023).
213. Lourenco SO Amino acid composition, protein content and calculation of nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors for 19 tropical seaweeds Phycol. Res. 2002 50 233 241 10.1111/j.1440-1835.2002.tb00156.x
Lourenco, S. O. et al. Amino acid composition, protein content and calculation of nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors for 19 tropical seaweeds. Phycol. Res. 50, 233–241 (2002).
214. Liu X Carbon dioxide fixation coupled with ammonium uptake by immobilized Scenedesmus obliquus and its potential for protein production Bioresour. Technol. 2019 289 121685 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121685 31323715
Liu, X. et al. Carbon dioxide fixation coupled with ammonium uptake by immobilized Scenedesmus obliquus and its potential for protein production. Bioresour. Technol. 289, 121685 (2019).31323715
215. Liu X Survival-based grouping of genetic variants: a novel statistical framework with an application to TP53 mutations Cancer Res. 2024 84 3564 3564 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2024-3564
Liu, X. et al. Survival-based grouping of genetic variants: a novel statistical framework with an application to TP53 mutations. Cancer Res. 84, 3564–3564 (2024).
216. Liao SY Untargeted metabolomics and quantification analysis reveal the shift of chemical constituents between instant dark teas individually liquid-state fermented by Aspergillus cristatus, Aspergillus niger, and Aspergillus tubingensis Front. Microbiol. 2023 14 1124546 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1124546 36846747
Liao, S. Y. et al. Untargeted metabolomics and quantification analysis reveal the shift of chemical constituents between instant dark teas individually liquid-state fermented by Aspergillus cristatus, Aspergillus niger, and Aspergillus tubingensis. Front. Microbiol. 14, 1124546 (2023).36846747
217. Negrete-Romero Nutritional contributions and health associations of traditional fermented foods Fermentation 2021 7 289 10.3390/fermentation7040289
Negrete-Romero et al. Nutritional contributions and health associations of traditional fermented foods. Fermentation 7, 289 (2021).
218. Mathur S Alternative fuels for agriculture sustainability: carbon footprint and economic feasibility Agri. Eng. 2022 4 993 1015
Mathur, S. et al. Alternative fuels for agriculture sustainability: carbon footprint and economic feasibility. Agri. Eng. 4, 993–1015 (2022).
219. Matavacas J Anand D von Wachenfeldt C New insights into the disulfide stress response by the Bacillus subtilis Spx system at a single‐cell level Mol. Microbiol. 2023 3 12568
Matavacas, J., Anand, D. & von Wachenfeldt, C. New insights into the disulfide stress response by the Bacillus subtilis Spx system at a single‐cell level. Mol. Microbiol. 3, 12568 (2023).
220. Balagurunathan B Potential use of microbial engineering in single-cell protein production Curr. Opin.Biotechnol. 2022 76 102740 10.1016/j.copbio.2022.102740 35660478
Balagurunathan, B. et al. Potential use of microbial engineering in single-cell protein production. Curr. Opin.Biotechnol. 76, 102740 (2022).35660478
221. Landeta-Salgado C Cicatiello P Lienqueo ME Mycoprotein and hydrophobin like protein produced from marine fungi Paradendryphiella salina in submerged fermentation with green seaweed Ulva spp Algal Res. 2021 56 102314 10.1016/j.algal.2021.102314
Landeta-Salgado, C., Cicatiello, P. & Lienqueo, M. E. Mycoprotein and hydrophobin like protein produced from marine fungi Paradendryphiella salina in submerged fermentation with green seaweed Ulva spp. Algal Res. 56, 102314 (2021).
222. Abdullahi N Review on the production of single-cell protein from food wastes TURJAF 2021 9 968 974
Abdullahi, N. et al. Review on the production of single-cell protein from food wastes. TURJAF 9, 968–974 (2021).
