
==== Front
Diabetologia
Diabetologia
Diabetologia
0012-186X
1432-0428
Springer Berlin Heidelberg Berlin/Heidelberg

38871836
6194
10.1007/s00125-024-06194-5
Extended Article
Non-invasive quantification of stem cell-derived islet graft size and composition
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1537-5548
Lithovius Väinö vaino.lithovius@helsinki.fi

1
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2456-5009
Lahdenpohja Salla 2
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0165-2660
Ibrahim Hazem 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8865-7060
Saarimäki-Vire Jonna 1
Uusitalo Lotta 2
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0879-1807
Montaser Hossam 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5074-9675
Mikkola Kirsi 23
Yim Cheng-Bin 2
Keller Thomas 2
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3591-0963
Rajander Johan 4
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4784-5452
Balboa Diego 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9657-1371
Barsby Tom 1
Solin Olof 245
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9597-338X
Nuutila Pirjo 267
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4468-0805
Grönroos Tove J. 23
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9190-2496
Otonkoski Timo timo.otonkoski@helsinki.fi

18
1 https://ror.org/040af2s02 grid.7737.4 0000 0004 0410 2071 Stem Cells and Metabolism Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
2 grid.1374.1 0000 0001 2097 1371 Turku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
3 https://ror.org/05vghhr25 grid.1374.1 0000 0001 2097 1371 Medicity Research Laboratories, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
4 grid.13797.3b 0000 0001 2235 8415 Accelerator Laboratory, Turku PET Centre, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland
5 https://ror.org/05vghhr25 grid.1374.1 0000 0001 2097 1371 Department of Chemistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
6 https://ror.org/05dbzj528 grid.410552.7 0000 0004 0628 215X Department of Endocrinology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
7 The Wellbeing Services County of Southwest Finland, Turku, Finland
8 https://ror.org/02e8hzf44 grid.15485.3d 0000 0000 9950 5666 Children’s Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
14 6 2024
14 6 2024
2024
67 9 19121929
12 1 2024
16 4 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Aims/hypothesis

Stem cell-derived islets (SC-islets) are being used as cell replacement therapy for insulin-dependent diabetes. Non-invasive long-term monitoring methods for SC-islet grafts, which are needed to detect misguided differentiation in vivo and to optimise their therapeutic effectiveness, are lacking. Positron emission tomography (PET) has been used to monitor transplanted primary islets. We therefore aimed to apply PET as a non-invasive monitoring method for SC-islet grafts.

Methods

We implanted different doses of human SC-islets, SC-islets derived using an older protocol or a state-of-the-art protocol and SC-islets genetically rendered hyper- or hypoactive into mouse calf muscle to yield different kinds of grafts. We followed the grafts with PET using two tracers, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor-binding [18F]F-dibenzocyclooctyne-exendin-4 ([18F]exendin) and the dopamine precursor 6-[18F]fluoro-l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine ([18F]FDOPA), for 5 months, followed by histological assessment of graft size and composition. Additionally, we implanted a kidney subcapsular cohort with different SC-islet doses to assess the connection between C-peptide and stem cell-derived beta cell (SC-beta cell) mass.

Results

Small but pure and large but impure grafts were derived from SC-islets. PET imaging allowed detection of SC-islet grafts even <1 mm3 in size, [18F]exendin having a better detection rate than [18F]FDOPA (69% vs 44%, <1 mm3; 96% vs 85%, >1 mm3). Graft volume quantified with [18F]exendin (r2=0.91) and [18F]FDOPA (r2=0.86) strongly correlated with actual graft volume. [18F]exendin PET delineated large cystic structures and its uptake correlated with graft SC-beta cell proportion (r2=0.68). The performance of neither tracer was affected by SC-islet graft hyper- or hypoactivity. C-peptide measurements under fasted or glucose-stimulated conditions did not correlate with SC-islet graft volume or SC-beta cell mass, with C-peptide under hypoglycaemia having a weak correlation with SC-beta cell mass (r2=0.52).

Conclusions/interpretation

[18F]exendin and [18F]FDOPA PET enable non-invasive assessment of SC-islet graft size and aspects of graft composition. These methods could be leveraged for optimising SC-islet cell replacement therapy in diabetes.

Graphical Abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00125-024-06194-5.

Keywords

Beta cell mass
Cell replacement therapy
Congenital hyperinsulinism
PET
Positron emission tomography
Stem cell-derived islets
Transplantation
Type 1 diabetes
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100007247 Svenska Kulturfonden 141484 http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100006306 Sigrid Juséliuksen Säätiö http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100009708 Novo Nordisk Fonden http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100011102 Seventh Framework Programme 222980 602812 http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002341 Research Council of Finland 266891 297466 312437 334310 http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008376 Helsingin ja Uudenmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri University of Helsinki (including Helsinki University Central Hospital)Open Access funding provided by University of Helsinki (including Helsinki University Central Hospital).

issue-copyright-statement© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024
==== Body
pmc

Introduction

Islet or pancreas transplantation remains the only route to independence from exogenous insulin for individuals with type 1 diabetes. Islet transplantation is limited by the scarcity of cadaveric islets, as usually at least two donors are required per individual [1]. Functional islets differentiated in vitro from pluripotent stem cells (stem cell-derived islets [SC-islets]) [2–5] on the other hand are abundant, are functionally consistent and can feasibly be genome-edited or encapsulated to circumvent the need for systemic immunosuppression [6, 7]. Given these advantages, SC-islet-based cell replacement therapy has the potential to revolutionise the treatment of type 1 diabetes [8]. SC-islet therapy has enabled insulin independence in a few individuals with type 1 diabetes after intraportal SC-islet implantation (ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT04786262) [9] and additional trials are ongoing (NCT05791201, NCT05565248) with different strategies.

Nonetheless, clinical use of stem cell-derived tissue has inherent risks. Lingering progenitor cells can differentiate in vivo to undesired pancreatic ductal cysts [10–16], potentially hampering therapeutic effectiveness. Furthermore, in vitro culture conditions can enrich chromosomal abnormalities and oncogenic mutations in pluripotent stem cells [17, 18]. If needed, the SC-islet graft can be eliminated by cessation of immunosuppressants, unless the graft is autologous or immune-evasive. Engineered immune evasion of SC-islets is under preclinical [4, 19–23] and clinical (NCT05565248) development. Immune evasion would facilitate invasion and metastasis of any neoplasm originating from the edited cells [6, 23, 24]. In an extreme demonstration of these risks, an implant of autologous stem cell-derived cells claimed to have been differentiated into SC-islets gave rise to a metastatic teratoma in 2 months [25].

Given the enormous promise and the potentially substantial risks of SC-islet cell replacement therapy, a robust non-invasive method for in vivo monitoring is needed. Optimally, it would (1) quantify graft size; (2) quantify graft composition (e.g. beta cell mass); and (3) not be affected by beta cell functionality. Improved monitoring of SC-islet grafts could be used to assess the in vivo impact of, for example, improved differentiation protocols, different implantation sites and survival improvement strategies [22, 26–31]. Detecting graft size increase or compositional change could inform immunosuppression cessation or suicide switch activation [32, 33].

Current non-invasive longitudinal monitoring methods rely mostly on C-peptide measurements. C-peptide measurements inform about beta cell function, but give little information about overall graft composition, and it is unclear how well C-peptide measurements quantify engrafted SC-islet volume.

Positron emission tomography (PET), an imaging technique employing target-specific radiotracers and the most sensitive imaging modality in humans, has long been developed for quantifying beta cell mass in the native pancreas and in primary islet grafts [34, 35]. In the primary islet transplantation context, PET and other nuclear imaging methods have been shown to enable detection of human islet grafts in human muscle [36] and liver [37, 38], as well as quantifying human islet graft size of grafts transplanted in rodent muscle [39, 40]. Many of these studies used tracers targeting the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP1R), expressed in human pancreas primarily in beta cells [41, 42]. In light of this, we recently optimised 18F-labelling of the GLP1R ligand exendin-4 ([18F]F-dibenzocyclooctyne-exendin-4, referred to as ‘[18F]exendin’ throughout this article) [43]. Imaging the pancreas with 18F-labelled 6-fluoro-l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) ([18F]FDOPA), a dopamine precursor analogue, is established in the diagnosis of the focal form of congenital hyperinsulinism (CHI) [44]. Focal CHI presents with an adenomatous lesion with hypersecretory beta cells, which has a high uptake of [18F]FDOPA, different from other pancreatic areas and enabling precise lesionectomy [45]. Furthermore, uptake of [18F]FDOPA can detect human primary islet grafts in mice [46], and the uptake of the metabolically similar tracer 11C-5-hydroxy-tryptophan ([11C]HTP) can detect them also in human liver [38]. Graft monitoring of SC-islet-derived grafts specifically was recently explored with 18F-labelled anti-DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 2 (DGCR2) antibody PET, which allowed transient visualisation of grafts in mice, but the method’s suitability for quantifying graft size and composition was not demonstrated [47].

Given the lack of methods established for SC-islet graft monitoring, we aimed to apply PET as a non-invasive monitoring method for SC-islet grafts suitable for clinical use. Specifically, we aimed to investigate the relationships of SC-islet graft volume, composition and functional state with the uptake of the PET tracers [18F]exendin and [18F]FDOPA and compare their performance with C-peptide measurements.

Methods

Stem cell lines and SC-islet differentiation

Mutation-corrected induced pluripotent cell line HEL113.5 [48]-derived SC-islets were used for cohort-1. They were differentiated according to the Balboa et al 2018 protocol, modified to use Aggrewell 400 plates (Stem Cell Technologies, Canada) for aggregation [49]. SC-islets differentiated from the H1 embryonic stem cell line (WiCell, USA) and its gene-edited counterparts according to the Barsby et al 2022 protocol were used for cohort-2 [50]. The stem cell lines tested negative for mycoplasma spp.

Genome editing of the KCNJ11 locus

The H1 cell line was separately genome-edited to generate KCNJ11 knockout and KCNJ11 R201H knockin clones using the ribonucleoprotein CRISPR-Cas9 system (electronic supplementary material [ESM] Methods).

SC-islet implant volume determination

Implant preparation volume was determined by hand-picking SC-islets for each graft (picked after the first week of stage 7 when using the Balboa et al 2018 protocol [49] and after the fifth or sixth week of stage 7 when using the Barsby et al 2022 protocol [50]) and taking an image of them, which was analysed using a custom CellProfiler pipeline (version 3.0) [51]. This reported the number and median diameter of the SC-islets for each graft, from which the total implant volume could be calculated. SC-islet doses between 1 and 6.3 mm3 of SC-islets were used in the study. This corresponds to 566–3566 islet equivalents (IEQs, spherical islets with 150 µm diameter [52], each 0.001767 mm3) or around 150–950 SC-islets (median 230 µm diameter). In cohort-1, four doses were used (volumes in mm3)—around 1.3, 2.5, 3.8 or 5.0—with the left calf implanted with a smaller graft than the right. In cohort-2, doses of either 3 or 5 mm3 of SC-islets were implanted in both legs. The left leg was implanted with KCNJ11−/− or KCNJ11+/R201H SC-islets and the right leg with KCNJ11+/+ SC-islets. Sizes for the kidney cohort were around 1, 3 or 6.3 mm3. This predetermined implant volume was then aspirated with a precision syringe (Hamilton, USA, no. 81301) into silicone tubing, compacted into a pellet by 2 min of centrifugation at 100g and kept on ice until implantation.

SC-islet implantation

Two- to five-month-old 20–30 g immunocompromised female NOD-scid-gamma mice (The Jackson Laboratory, USA; no. 005557, www.jax.org/strain/005557) were randomly allocated for different types of implants, anesthetised with isoflurane (5% induction, 2% maintenance) and shaved to expose the calves. Tubing containing the SC-islet pellet was connected to a precision syringe at one end and a 0.6 mm needle (Sarstedt, Germany, no. 85.923) at the other end. The needle was inserted into the musculus gastrocnemius through the distal, posterolateral calf and pushed approximately 5 mm inside. The SC-islets were implanted while retracting the needle by approximately 3 mm. After implantation, if any SC-islets remained inside the opaque needle, their volume was quantified and subtracted from the implanted volume. Kidney implantations were conducted on female mice as previously reported [2].

Animal husbandry and C-peptide measurements

After implantation the mice were fed irradiated standard chow ad libitum and kept on a 12 h dark/12 h light cycle. Insulin and glucose tolerance tests were conducted as previously described [2, 48], with further details in the ESM Methods.

Radiotracer synthesis

Radiotracers were synthetised in the Turku PET Centre radiochemistry laboratory, University of Turku. [18F]FDOPA was synthesised via electrophilic 18F-fluorination as previously described [53]. [18F]F-dibenzocyclooctyne-exendin-4 (Nle14,Cys40(Mal-dPEG4-DBCO-N3-PEG3-ethyl[18F]fluoro-exendin-4)) was synthesised in two steps using a prosthetic group strategy [43]. In the first step the prosthetic group, azido-PEG3-ethyl[18F]fluoride, was synthesised from tosylate precursor and K222/[18F]/K+-complex via nucleophilic fluorination. In the final step, [18F]F-dibenzocyclooctyne-exendin-4 ([18F]exendin) was synthetised from cyclooctyne-derivatised exendin-4 and azido-PEG3-ethyl[18F]fluoride via strain-promoted azide–alkyne cycloaddition. The [18F]exendin was purified via semipreparative HPLC and formulated in 10% ethanol in 0.1 mmol/l PBS containing 0.02% ascorbic acid. Molar activity of [18F]exendin was 40–100 and [18F]FDOPA >3 GBq/µmol at the end of synthesis.

PET/computed tomography imaging

Mice were fasted for 4 h prior to imaging to standardise blood glucose levels. Imaging was conducted in the early afternoon. One or two mice were scanned at a time, with small-animal PET/computed tomography (CT) (X- and β-cubes, Molecubes, Belgium) carried out after i.v. administration of approximately 2–3 MBq of either [18F]FDOPA or [18F]exendin under isoflurane anaesthesia. A 10 min CT scan for attenuation correction and anatomical reference preceded PET. Dynamic PET data were collected for 30 min, divided into 25 time frames (12 × 10 s, 6 × 30 s, 5 × 60 s, 2 × 600 s) in list mode and reconstructed with an OSEM3D algorithm included in the Molecubes scanner software. The radioactivity uptake was corrected for radionuclide decay and expressed as percentage of injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g). The scanner has a 13 cm axial field of view and a 7.2 cm transaxial field of view, generating 192 transaxial slices with voxel dimensions of 0.4 × 0.4 × 0.4 mm. PMOD software (version 4.0, PMOD Technologies, Switzerland) was used to convert reconstructed Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) images produced by the β-cube into an Inveon Research Workplace (version 4.2, Siemens Medical Solutions, Germany)-compatible DICOM format for data analyses.

PET data analysis

The image time frames were summed and scaled from 0 to 5 %ID/g for [18F]exendin and 0 to 7 %ID/g for [18F]FDOPA. Volumes of interest (VOIs) were drawn according to hotspots detected in the calf (VOI1). VOI1 inclusion was determined by contrast between background uptake and high tracer-uptake areas, as shown in the results. Areas inside the VOI1 displaying low uptake were included for all grafts. Three grafts were quantified again by excluding these low-uptake areas. Larger VOIs encompassing the entire calf muscle (VOI2) were drawn to determine background uptake. As the emission activity (A) inside VOI2 is composed of activity inside VOI1 and the background activity (AVOI2 = AVOI1 + ABg) and activity is defined as the product of the uptake or tracer concentration (C) and the volume (V) (A = C × V), the following formula can be derived:CBg=CVOI2×VVOI2-CVOI1×VVOI1/VVOI2-VVOI1

As activity inside VOI1 is the sum of activity inside the graft and background activity (AVOI1 = AGraft + ABg), and the graft volume (VGraft) was determined histologically, the uptake concentration inside the graft volume can be derived. These graft uptake values correct for dilution in uptake due to the enlarged VOI1 volume:CGraft=CVOI1×VVOI1-CBg×(VVOI1-VGraft)/VGraft

Autoradiography

After the 3 month [18F]exendin or [18F]FDOPA PET scan, mice were euthanised, and their calf muscles were excised, frozen in chilled isopentane and cut into 20 μm sections (Microm HM 500 OM, Thermo Fisher, USA). The sections were exposed to an imaging plate (BAS Imaging Plate TR2025, Fuji, Japan) for 4 h and scanned using the Fuji BAS5000 analyser. Images showing the tracer uptake were later compared with insulin immunohistochemistry of adjacent sections.

Histological examination of graft volume and cyst proportion

The total and cyst-free graft volumes were calculated using depth recorded when sectioning through paraffin-embedded graft-bearing muscle, and the total and cyst-free areas from quantified stitched images, with further details in the ESM Methods.

Histological examination of graft composition

Immunohistochemistry was conducted and analysed essentially as in [48], with full details in the ESM Methods.

Statistical methods

Prism version 9.5 (GraphPad software, USA) was used for statistical analyses. The p values for linear regression are given for the slope being non-zero. The multiple linear regression model and correlation heatmaps were created with the ‘multiple variables’ feature in Prism. Welchs’s t test was used when two groups were compared, and one- or two-way ANOVA when there were more than two groups. No corrections were made for multiple comparisons, and data were assumed to be normally distributed. Statistical tests were two-sided. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM unless indicated otherwise in the figure legends. No samples, data points or animals were excluded from the final analyses. All replicates are biological, from different batches of SC-islets, mice or SC-islet grafts. PET imaging was conducted blinded but PET analysis was not blinded. Histological analyses were conducted using an automated, blinded-by-design pipeline.

Results

Study set-up and validation of tracer receptor expression in SC-islet grafts

We implanted human SC-islets into calf muscles of immunocompromised mice in two cohorts (Fig. 1a): the first with different volumes of SC-islets (cohort-1) and the second with control SC-islets or genetically engineered hyper- or hypoactive SC-islets (cohort-2). The Balboa et al 2018 differentiation protocol was used for cohort-1, and the Barsby et al 2022 protocol for cohort-2, reported to yield immature [49] or functionally primary islet-like SC-islets, respectively [2, 50]. We followed both cohorts for 5 months with PET imaging using two tracers: [18F]exendin and [18F]FDOPA (Fig. 1b). We chose the muscle site to avoid non-specific background from the bladder and kidneys, as both tracers are excreted in urine [46, 54].Fig. 1 Study set-up and tracer cell type specificity. (a) Study set-up: cohort-1 consisted of comparison of different-sized SC-islet grafts in each leg; cohort-2 consisted of comparison of SC-islet grafts of different functional phenotypes in each leg. Immature SC-islets were differentiated as in the Balboa et al 2018 protocol [49], and functional SC-islets were differentiated as in the Barsby et al 2022 protocol [50]. Here, 1 mm3 corresponds to the volume of 566 IEQs (islets of 150 µm diameter) or 150 SC-islets (of 230 µm diameter). (b) PET tracers used in the study: [18F]exendin and [18F]FDOPA. (c–f) Tracer target expression in different cell types in SC-islet kidney subcapsular grafts at 6 months post implantation using single-cell RNA sequencing data from Balboa et al 2022 [2]. Red lines, median. The panels show GLP1R (c), SLC7A5 (d) and DDC (e) mRNA expression in the different cell types, and the percentages of different cell types expressing the tracers (f)

To verify expression of the tracer receptors/carriers in SC-islets, we reanalysed single-cell RNA sequencing data from 6 month SC-islet grafts [2]. SC-islet grafts expressed GLP1R mostly in beta and delta cells as expected [41, 42, 55], but also in enterochromaffin-like cells (EC cells), a known endocrine impurity [2, 3] (Fig. 1c, ESM Fig. 1). All cell types expressed the amino acid transporter SLC7A5 (a carrier for [18F]FDOPA) at low levels (Fig. 1d). All endocrine cell types, but especially the EC cells, expressed DDC, the rate limiting enzyme in DOPA metabolism (Fig. 1f).

KCNJ11+/+, KCNJ11−/− and KCNJ11+/R201H SC-islets exhibit expected phenotypes in vitro

To allow later examination of the consequences of stem cell-derived beta cell (SC-beta cell) functional status on tracer uptake, we sought to engineer SC-beta cells that are hyper- and hypoactive in their function by genome editing the KATP-channel gene KCNJ11, critical for triggering insulin secretion [56]. We edited the KCNJ11 locus to harbour a homozygous knockout of the gene (KCNJ11−/−), and, separately, introduced a gain-of-function mutation (KCNJ11+/R201H) (Fig. 2a, ESM Fig. 2). These mutations cause CHI and persistent neonatal diabetes, respectively. To validate the three phenotypes, we quantified insulin secretion responses in vitro to glucose and the sulfonylurea glibenclamide (GBC), a KATP-channel agonist. KCNJ11+/+ SC-beta cells increased insulin secretion in response to high glucose, GBC and KCl as primary islets would [2]. KCNJ11−/− SC-beta cells secreted three times more insulin in low glucose compared with KCNJ11+/+ SC-beta cells (Fig. 2b) and were unresponsive to GBC (Fig. 2c). Conversely, the KCNJ11+/R201H SC-beta cells were unresponsive to glucose, but hyper-responsive to GBC (Fig. 2c). These SC-islets matched previously derived mature SC-islets in their cytoarchitecture and proportions of SC-beta cells and stem cell-derived alpha cells (SC-alpha cells) (Fig. 2d,e). The KCNJ11−/− mutation slightly biased differentiation towards SC-beta cells at the expense of SC-alpha cells, as in our previous CHI model [48] (Fig. 2e). The SC-islets thus recapitulated the hyper- and hypoactive phenotypes.Fig. 2 KCNJ11 mutant SC-islet phenotypic characterisation in vitro. (a) Simplified molecular mechanism and genome editing strategy underlining the hyper-, normo- and hypoactive phenotypes of SC-islet beta cells in cohort-2. KCNJ11−/− mutation leads to loss of KATP-channel expression, leading to constant depolarisation and insulin secretion. KCNJ11R201H/+ mutation prevents KATP-channel closure under high glucose, leading to inactive beta cells. nt, nucleotide; PAM, protospacer adjacent motif; ssODN, single-stranded oligonucleotide. (b) Percentage of total insulin content secreted in 2.8 mmol/l (G3) or 16.7 mmol/l (G17) glucose, or G17 and 100 nmol/l GBC, or G3 and 30 mmol/l KCl after 6 weeks of maturation culture. The horizontal line indicates the secretion rate in G3 in KCNJ11+/+ cells. (c) Same analysis as in (b) normalised against secretion in G3. (d, e) Immunohistochemistry (d) and quantification (e) of INS+ SC-beta cells and glucagon (GCG)+ SC-alpha cells at 6 weeks of maturation culture; scale bars, 100 µm. *p<0.05 by one-way ANOVA

Engrafted SC-islets develop into either large impure grafts or small pure grafts

After the final 5 month imaging time point we euthanised the mice and retrieved the graft-bearing muscles. The grafts were sometimes visible as lightly coloured areas (Fig. 3a). We quantified the volume of the SC-islet grafts (N=36) by sectioning through the graft-bearing muscle and staining sections for graft area. Total and ‘cyst-free’ graft volumes were determined separately (Fig. 3b). The grafts consisted of either SC-islets with interspersed muscle fibres or a fused, heterogenous graft with cysts (Fig. 3b, ESM Fig. 3a). SC-islet graft volume was highly variable, ranging from <1 mm3 to 150 mm3, compared with implanted volume of 1–5 mm3 (Fig. 3c, ESM Fig. 3b).Fig. 3 Characterisation of the SC-islet grafts. (a) Skinned mouse hind leg at 5 months post implantation; arrow indicates graft. (b) Hoechst-stained muscle graft sections used for volume determination; examples of pure and impure grafts in the same scale (bar, 1000 µm). Sections are displayed as CellProfiler pipeline output images highlighting the total (blue) and cyst-free (yellow) areas. (c) Implanted SC-islet volume and histologically determined graft volume. Pink squares, ‘pure’ with >50% SYP+ endocrine cells out of all graft cells; black circles, ‘impure’ with <50% SYP+ endocrine cells. (d) Cyst proportion of the grafts, quantified from images such as (b). (e) Immunohistochemistry analysis of SYP, the SC-beta cell marker INS, the EC cell marker SLC18A1, the acinar cell marker trypsin and the ductal cell marker CK-19; scale bar, 100 µm; insets display ×4 magnification. Examples are of pure and impure KCNJ11+/+ grafts. (f) Quantification of immunohistochemistry as percentage of all cells in the graft including connective tissue. (g) Percentage of INS+ and SLC18A1+ cells in SYP+ endocrine cells. (h) Pearson’s correlation of the composition features. The scale bar displays the spectrum of colour associated with the spectrum of correlation coefficients from −1 to 1. Data in (c), (d), (f) and (g) are displayed as mean ± SD

Fluid-filled cysts and ductal mRNA expression are reported to be present in SC-islet grafts [2, 10, 12–15]. Cyst proportion was highly variable in the grafts, ranging from 1% to 50% of the total volume (Fig. 3d, ESM Fig. 3c). The contribution of synaptophysin-positive (SYP+) endocrine cells of all graft cells (including connective tissue) separated the grafts into two groups. Many grafts had ≈75% SYP+ cells (‘pure’ grafts), but the rest had <20% SYP+ cells (‘impure’ grafts) (Fig. 3e,f, ESM Fig. 3d). The pure grafts were derived with the Barsby et al 2022 protocol [50], but occasional impure grafts were generated as well.

The main tracer target cells, namely insulin (INS)+ SC-beta cells and solute carrier family 18 (vesicular monoamine transporter), member 1 (SLC18A1)+ EC cells were found in all grafts. SC-beta cells represented 10–30% of all cells (including connective tissue cells) in the pure grafts, but <5% in the impure grafts, while EC cells were present in all grafts at ≈1–5% of all cells (Fig. 3e,f, ESM Fig. 3d). Among endocrine cells, SC-beta cells contributed ≈30% and EC cells ≈10% (Fig. 3g, ESM Fig. 3e). Much of the non-endocrine tissue represented connective tissue, but we also analysed other pancreatic lineages, such as trypsin+ acinar cells and cytokeratin-19 (CK-19)+ ductal cells. No acinar cells were detected in the pure grafts, but they were present in the impure grafts (Fig. 3e,f, ESM Fig. 3d). The cysts were positive for CK-19, indicating the expected pancreatic ductal origin. Even the pure grafts that were devoid of organised cysts had interspersed CK-19+ cells representing ≈1% of all cells (Fig. 3f, ESM Fig. 3d). Large graft volume correlated with high cyst proportion and low number of endocrine cells (Fig. 3h). Pure KCNJ11−/− grafts maintained a slightly higher SC-beta cell proportion among endocrine cells (ESM Fig. 3f) than KCNJ11+/+ grafts, similar to our previous study [48].

In summary, the grafts were highly variable in size, cyst proportion and purity. This allowed exploration of the relationship between graft composition and tracer uptake, with high clinical relevance regarding SC-islet graft safety and effectiveness.

[18F]exendin and [18F]FDOPA PET accurately quantify graft size

We followed the mice for 5 months with PET imaging, followed by histological analysis (Fig. 4a). Uptake of [18F]exendin and [18F]FDOPA was detected in vivo in calf muscles where the SC-islets were implanted (Fig. 4b), while the grafts were undetectable with CT alone. We drew the borders of the uptake volume using signal-to-background difference, which was slightly higher for [18F]exendin than for [18F]FDOPA (ESM Fig. 4a,b). Graft detection rate improved over time, reaching ≈90% for [18F]exendin and ≈70% for [18F]FDOPA by the 5 month time point (Fig. 4c). We then used the resolution of the PET scanner, ≈1 mm3, as a cut-off to calculate detection rate in relation to graft size. All but one graft >1 mm3 were detected with [18F]exendin (96% detection rate), with [18F]FDOPA also performing well (85% detection rate) (Fig. 4f). [18F]exendin even detected some grafts <1 mm3 (69% rate), suggesting very high [18F]exendin uptake in this small volume (Fig. 4d). Detection of grafts <1 mm3 was unreliable with [18F]FDOPA (44% rate) (Fig. 4d).Fig. 4 Follow-up and quantification of SC-islet graft volume with PET. (a) Imaging follow-up schedule; crosses indicate imaging, ex vivo autoradiography and harvesting time points. aCohort-1 only. (b) Views of PET/CT and PET images (summed 30 min scans); arrows indicate uptake volume considered the graft; abladder, bkidneys. (c, d) Tracer detection performance per time point (N indicated on graph) (c) or according to actual graft volume (d) as a fraction of all imaged grafts detected. (e) Ex vivo autoradiography of muscle sections taken immediately after imaging with [18F]exendin or [18F]FDOPA and insulin immunohistochemistry from adjacent sections. (f) Linear regression between [18F]exendin and [18F]FDOPA uptake volume and the histologically determined graft volume (including cysts). Inset depicts low values. Values in parentheses are for [18F]FDOPA when three of the most cystic grafts are excluded (white-filled squares). (g) Example frame and VOI (blue) in [18F]exendin PET/CT highlighting low-uptake areas inside the VOI, and Hoechst-stained section of the same graft with corresponding cysts. (h) Cyst proportion determined by histology or PET (by drawing full and cyst-free uptake volumes). (i) Example of an elongated pattern in [18F]exendin PET/CT (abladder) and a Hoechst-stained section of the same graft. (j) Graft size follow-up with [18F]exendin PET, grouped by final purity and SC-islet differentiation protocol, with grafts with >50% of all cells SYP+ considered pure. n: Balboa impure = 17, Barsby impure = 11, Barsby pure = 13. *p<0.05 by unpaired Welch’s t test

Both tracers reached a steady-state concentration within 5 min after injection, which remained on a high level for the 30 min scan, suggesting the uptake corresponded to tracer-targeted SC-islet tissue (ESM Fig. 4b). For further evidence of graft specificity, we euthanised a subset of mice immediately after imaging for ex vivo autoradiography. The autoradiography sections showed uptake of both tracers at locations staining positive for INS in adjacent sections (Fig. 4e), verifying that the uptake in graft-bearing muscle is graft specific.

Importantly, we then correlated uptake volume of both tracers with histologically determined graft volume. The uptake volume of [18F]exendin correlated very strongly (r2=0.91) with actual graft volume (Fig. 4f), indicating high accuracy for graft size quantification. [18F]FDOPA uptake volume also strongly correlated with actual graft volume when analysing all but the most cystic grafts (r2=0.86). However, the precise outlines of three highly cystic grafts were difficult to determine with [18F]FDOPA, reducing the strength of correlation when included (r2=0.42) (Fig. 4f). [18F]exendin readily visualised their outlines and the largest cysts inside (Fig. 4g, ESM Fig. 4c,d). By including or excluding the cysts in the uptake volume, we could non-invasively determine the cyst proportion, which closely resembled the histologically determined cyst proportion of these three grafts (Fig. 4h). The SC-islets were implanted while retracting the needle, dispersing the SC-islets. We could observe an elongated pearls-on-a-string engraftment pattern in the pure SC-islet grafts, over a distance of up to 5 mm, in histology. The corresponding PET scan revealed [18F]exendin uptake with the same dimensions (Fig. 4i), indicating grafts could be visualised despite lengthwise dispersion.

Finally, we analysed the longitudinal uptake patterns of the scanned SC-islet grafts. The grafts displayed either consistent expansion or stability, with tracer uptake concentration also remaining relatively constant during follow-up (ESM Fig. 4e,f). After grouping the grafts by final endocrine purity, the grafts remaining pure at 5 months (all derived with the Barsby et al 2022 protocol) were stable in longitudinal imaging (Fig. 4j). Interestingly, the impure grafts derived with the Balboa et al 2018 protocol and the occasional impure grafts derived with the Barsby et al 2022 protocol showed graft expansion at different times, at 2 or 5 months, respectively (Fig. 4j). These results demonstrate that the SC-islet protocol influences graft expansion, and that different growth patterns can be detected using PET.

Taken together, these data demonstrate the validity of [18F]exendin and [18F]DOPA PET for longitudinal monitoring and quantifying the actual SC-islet graft volume non-invasively across a wide distribution of graft volumes and purities.

[18F]exendin uptake estimates graft SC-beta cell proportion and is unaffected by SC-beta cell functional state

We then investigated which aspects of graft composition and function determine uptake of the tracers; or, conversely, whether tracer uptake can be used to inform about compositional or functional aspects non-invasively. As described, the pure grafts were small, <1 mm3, but mostly still detectable due to high tracer uptake spilling over to expand the uptake volume. In this situation, much of the uptake volume consists of the muscle, diluting the measured graft uptake concentration. However, with background uptake measurements and histologically determined graft volume, we could calculate graft volume-specific uptake concentration, correcting for the dilution (Fig. 5a, Methods).Fig. 5 Correlation of graft composition and genotype with tracer uptake. (a) Schematic and associated formulas for volume dilution correction to determine graft uptake concentration. C, tracer uptake concentration; A, radioactivity (Bq); V, volume (mm3); Bg, background; VOI1, uptake volume; VOI2, additional VOI encompassing the whole muscle. (b) Pearson’s correlation of graft tracer uptake with different composition parameters. (c, d) Linear regression of graft exendin uptake and graft SC-beta cell (c) and EC cell (d) proportions. (e) Linear regression of graft [18F]exendin uptake variability and cyst proportion. CV = uptake SD/graft uptake mean × 100. (f) Graft [18F]exendin and [18F]FDOPA uptake in cohort-2 grafts of different genotypes. A single KCNJ11+/R201H graft was detected with DOPA and is not plotted

To explore which aspects of the graft composition determine tracer uptake, we correlated graft uptake concentration with histologically determined cyst proportion and cell type percentages from the same graft. Pearson’s correlation of tracer uptake and composition parameters showed negative correlation with cyst proportion and positive correlation with SC-beta and EC cell proportions (Fig. 5b). Analysed individually with linear regression, graft SC-beta cell percentage was positively correlated with both [18F]exendin (r2=0.68) and [18F]FDOPA (r2=0.52) uptake (Fig. 5c, ESM Fig. 5a). The percentage of EC cells was associated with higher uptake of [18F]FDOPA only (r2=0.48) (Fig. 5d, ESM Fig. 5b). Graft uptake of [18F]exendin and [18F]FDOPA did not correlate with the percentage of SYP+INS−SLC18A1− cells (i.e. SC-alpha cells and stem cell-derived delta cells) (ESM Fig. 5c). As multiple factors contributed to the uptake, we analysed them simultaneously using a multiple regression model. The model had a better fit with graft [18F]exendin uptake (R2=0.81) than with any of the parameters alone, with percentage of SC-beta cells the most important determinant for [18F]exendin uptake (ESM Fig. 5d,e). As most of the pure and small grafts were undetected, analyses on [18F]FDOPA relied on fewer observations, and we state conclusions on its uptake determinants with less confidence. These data show that the real-world determinants of tracer uptake correspond well to the pattern predicted based on tracer target expression in single-cell RNA sequencing (Fig. 1c). Our observations also serve as proof-of-concept of the possibility of non-invasively informing about SC-islet graft SC-beta cell percentage.

In addition to the directly visualised cysts (Fig. 4i), uptake concentration in other impure grafts was highly variable, which could be translated into the CV of tracer uptake. This [18F]exendin uptake variation correlated with cyst proportion (Fig. 5e) (r2=0.72, using graft uptake for the calculations), suggesting cyst proportion could be estimated non-invasively even when individual cysts are too small to be visualised.

The cohort-2 mice carried a hyperactive KCNJ11−/− or a hypoactive KCNJ11+/R201H graft in one leg and a normoactive KCNJ11+/+ graft in the other. We next compared graft tracer uptake in these functionally different grafts and found no significant differences (Fig. 5f). Graft genotype had low influence on tracer uptake also in the multiple regression model (ESM Fig. 5d). Graft genotype did not affect the uptake dynamics of either tracer (ESM Fig. 5f,g). This indicates that both tracers can be confidently used in SC-islet grafts exhibiting various states of beta cell functionality as even the phenotypic extremes used here did not bias the tracer uptake. Taken together, composition of the graft, namely the proportions of SC-beta cells and EC cells, rather than functional status of its SC-beta cells, determines tracer uptake.

Engrafted SC-islet graft volume and engrafted SC-beta cell mass poorly correlate with C-peptide measurements

Finally, to contextualise our findings with PET, we explored the ability of C-peptide measurements under fasted, glucose-stimulated and hypoglycaemic conditions to quantify graft size and beta cell mass. The imaged mice carried two grafts, making C-peptide measurements from them difficult to use. The sum of the grafts’ beta cell mass had no correlation with fasting C-peptide (ESM Fig. 6a). To better study the relationship between actual graft volume and C-peptide, we implanted an additional cohort of non-diabetic mice (n=14) with SC-islets under the kidney capsule in three doses, all coming from one batch of functional SC-islets.

One month after implantation, the correlation between implanted SC-islet dose and fasted C-peptide level was weak (Fig. 6a), and decreased in the subsequent 5 month follow-up (Fig. 6b). During the follow-up, the kidney grafts increased their fasting C-peptide secretion and lowered the mouse recipient’s fasting blood glucose level to human levels as expected [2], with minor differences between the doses (Fig. 6c,d). The C-peptide level was higher at 5 months in mice carrying a kidney graft compared with mice carrying two intramuscular grafts (ESM Fig. 6b). In a 5 month GTT, the mice with the lowest implanted dose failed to increase C-peptide secretion, while the mice that had received larger doses showed twofold responses (Fig. 6e,f). In a 5.5 month ITT, all grafts efficiently shut down their insulin secretion when the mice became hypoglycaemic, with ≈90% reduction from baseline (Fig. 6g,h). These data indicate the SC-islet grafts are functional in vivo, displaying glucose-regulated stimulation and shutdown of insulin secretion.Fig. 6 Relationship between C-peptide and implanted dose or engrafted volume. (a) Linear regression between SC-islet dose implanted under the kidney capsule and the fasted C-peptide level at 1 month post implantation. Implanted dose as total volume of SC-islets for each graft was quantified from stereomicroscope images. Here, 1 mm3 corresponds to 566 IEQs (150 µm diameter) or around 150 SC-islets (around 230 µm diameter). (b) Pearson’s correlation heatmap between implanted dose or histologically determined engrafted volume (total including cysts) or SC-beta cell mass (BCM) and C-peptide parameters. (c, d) Follow-up of fasting glucose (c) and fasting human-specific C-peptide (d) in the kidney cohort. n: 1 mm3 = 4; 3 mm3 = 5; 6.3 mm3 = 5. Low and high limits of human fasting normoglycaemia are indicated by horizontal lines. Vertical lines separate random-fed and fasted measurements. (e, f) Glucose (e) and C-peptide (f) following i.p. injection of glucose (3 mg/g) at 5 months post implantation, after a 5 h fast. (g, h) Glucose (g) and C-peptide (h) following i.p. injection of an insulin analogue (Actrapid, Novo Nordisk, Denmark) (0.75 mIU/g) at 5.5 months post implantation, after a 5 h fast. The low limit of human normoglycaemia is indicated by the horizontal line. (i, j) Linear regression of C-peptide parameters and total volume of the kidney graft (i) or the cyst-free, beta cell fraction-corrected graft volume (j). The C-peptide parameters were C-peptide in the fasted state (mean of 2 days) or 30 min after glucose injection or 60 min after insulin injection. The inset graph displays the same data with the y-axis scale focused to values below 200 pmol/l. Data in (c–h) are grouped by implanted SC-islet dose. Data in (i) and (j) display the histologically determined engrafted volume

Following the ITT, we determined the actual engrafted SC-islet graft volume, cyst proportion and SC-beta cell proportion histologically (ESM Fig. 6c). Critically, the implanted SC-islet dose had low correlation with the actual engrafted SC-islet graft volume (Fig. 6b). We therefore used the actual graft volume for correlation against the various C-peptide measurements from the same mice: namely, the 5 month fasting level, peak C-peptide in the GTT and nadir C-peptide in the ITT. Even though the C-peptide measurements were human specific, none of these measurements correlated with the total engrafted SC-islet graft volume, which included cysts and non-beta cells (Fig. 6i). We then determined the graft SC-beta cell mass, by subtracting the cyst volume and multiplying the remainder with its SC-beta cell proportion. In linear regression, the SC-beta cell mass weakly correlated with the C-peptide secretion remaining under hypoglycaemia (r2=0.52), but not with fasting or stimulated C-peptide (Fig. 6j). These results from non-diabetic mice indicate that human-specific C-peptide measurements do not accurately quantify engrafted SC-islet volume including cysts, nor the engrafted SC-beta cell mass.

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrate successful application of [18F]exendin and [18F]FDOPA PET as a robust SC-islet graft monitoring method. We show that the tracer uptake volume quantifies actual SC-islet graft volume, whether pure or impure. Additionally, characteristics of [18F]exendin uptake yield information about SC-islet graft SC-beta cell and cyst composition. This method enables study of SC-islet graft size and composition on a level not possible with any other non-invasive method.

We imaged the SC-islet grafts with [18F]exendin and [18F]FDOPA, providing perspective on their strengths and weaknesses (Table 1). Both performed well in quantifying graft size, but [18F]exendin was more sensitive than [18F]FDOPA in detecting the grafts, especially the small and pure ones. This heightened sensitivity was reflected in the ability of [18F]exendin to delineate large cysts inside the grafts. [18F]exendin uptake was predominantly determined by the proportion of SC-beta cells in the graft, while [18F]FDOPA uptake appeared to be determined by the proportion of both SC-beta and EC cells. The uptake of neither tracer was affected by extremes in beta cell insulin secretion functionality, which likely varies less extremely in different wild-type SC-islet batches. [18F]FDOPA has an important practical advantage, being readily available in PET centres for use in central nervous system and focal CHI imaging [44], while 68Ga- or 18F-labelled exendin is still limited to experimental use in dedicated centres. Table 1 Comparison between [18F]exendin and [18F]FDOPA imaging

Parameter	[18F]exendin	[18F]FDOPA	
Detection of grafts <1 mm3	++	+	
Detection of grafts >1 mm3	+++	++	
Quantification of graft volume	+++	++	
Assessment of cyst proportion	+	0	
Influence of SC-beta cell percentage on tracer uptake	++	+ (?)	
Influence of EC cell percentage on tracer uptake	0	+ (?)	
Influence of SC-beta cell functional state on tracer uptake	0	0	
Clinical availability	0	++	
Authors’ assessment of performance in the SC-islet graft context: +++, strong ability/effect; ++, moderate ability/effect; +, marginal ability/effect; 0, no ability/effect; (?), lower level of confidence

In recent years, multiple other tracers have been used for imaging islets in the native pancreas and after transplantation. These include [11C]HTP [38], which, similar to DOPA, is metabolised by DOPA decarboxylase (DDC); vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 (VMAT2)-targeting tracers [57]; and, more recently, prostaglandin D2 receptor 2 (GPR44) [58], dipeptidyl peptidase like 6 (DPP6) [59] and the DGCR2-targeting tracers [47]. All of these have slightly different binding profiles among endocrine cells, which might be leveraged depending on the application. In the SC-islet implantation and primary islet transplantation context, specificity over the acinar and ductal cells is of lesser concern than in the native pancreas. The newer tracers may have even higher uptake and sensitivity in SC-islets if their targets are expressed at a higher level than the GLP1R.

[18F]FDOPA visualises focal CHI lesions for an unknown reason. Hypothetically, it may be due either to hyperfunctionality of the lesion beta cells increasing their demand for metabolites such as DOPA or to the local increase in beta cells in the lesion. Based on our data showing that CHI grafts have similar [18F]FDOPA uptake as healthy and diabetic grafts, lesion visualisation is probably due to the locally increased number of beta cells. Pointing to the same conclusion, Boss et al found that focal CHI lesions can be better located with exendin PET than with DOPA PET [60], which, according to our data, would not be due to higher exendin uptake in hyperactive grafts. Even though beta cell functionality does not influence exendin uptake, extreme hyperglycaemia can increase it by increasing GLP1R expression [61].

The purity differences in the SC-islet grafts strengthened the conclusions of our imaging data but pose a challenge for clinical translation, as they have been reported by other groups as well. Rigorous pre-implantation quality control for the contaminating cell populations, such as lingering progenitors and non-pancreatic contaminants [14, 15], is needed as functional maturity does not necessarily equate to a risk-free graft. All the impure grafts from SC-islets differentiated with the Barsby et al 2022 protocol arose from two out of eight distinct pools of SC-islets used to prepare the grafts in cohort-2, with all the grafts from those two pools being impure. This suggests that the occurrence of impure grafts is not random, but is most likely due to unknown off-target cells in those pools. These two pools were combined from SC-islet cultures quality controlled for on-target cells with SYP flow cytometry, which reported 80–85% SYP+ endocrine cells (not shown), which was deemed sufficiently high, as quality control cut-offs have not been established in published works. Multiple non-endocrine off-target cell populations have been identified in SC-islets or SC-islet grafts, including SRY-box transcription factor 9 (SOX9)+chromogranin A– non-endocrine progenitors [62]; pancreatic ductal and acinar cells; FGB-, AGR2- and CDX2-expressing liver and intestinal cells [14, 15]; FOXJ2-expressing cells [13]; vimentin+ mesenchymal cells [15]; and nestin+ neuronal and retinoid isomerohydrolase (RPE65)+ retinal pigment epithelium cells [15]. As our PET methods rely on detecting the on-target cells, a high number of off-target cells cannot be directly inferred from low signal. However, devising a tracer suitable for all off-target populations might be difficult.

The large variability in graft size was probably the result of two stochastic processes: initial cell loss on engraftment [29, 63] into muscle, a challenging implantation site [28]; and subsequent growth of the engrafted cells. Both are related to cell maturity, as more mature beta cells are more susceptible to hypoxia [29] and have lower proliferation capacity [64]. Large graft size, which was easily visualised with these methods, was strongly associated with impurity. These methods could thus be useful in supplementing pre-implantation quality control by informing decisions to intervene if the graft becomes too large or too impure.

In our study, all SC-islet doses resulted in similar C-peptide levels after sufficient time to mature in mice. Despite all mice being implanted with the same batch of SC-islets, those implanted with the lowest dose failed to increase C-peptide secretion on glucose injection. This mirrors another SC-islet implantation study, where a low dose of SC-islets in an animal model of diabetes failed to reverse diabetes, and, in subsequent glucose tolerance testing, failed to respond to the glucose stimulus [28]. C-peptide level has variably been reported to be either independent or positively correlated with transplanted primary human islet dose in mice [28, 65, 66] and human recipients [67, 68], probably owing to differences in islet quality, engraftment efficiency and how long after transplantation the C-peptide measurements were taken. However, correlations with the actual engrafted islet volume are lacking. We made these correlations and found that total engrafted graft size, which includes non-beta cells, does not correlate with any of the C-peptide measures. The engrafted SC-beta cell mass did not linearly correlate with fasted or glucose-stimulated C-peptide measurements. This is understandable as excess of beta cells should not lead to excessive insulin secretion if the SC-beta cells are physiologically regulated. On induced hypoglycaemia, the grafts efficiently shut down insulin secretion by 90% from fasted levels, indicating effective glucose sensing. Despite this, we could detect low levels of inappropriate insulin release. Interestingly, this insulin leak was a weak indicator of engrafted SC-beta cell mass.

A clear advantage of PET over methods such as bioluminescence imaging is its direct translatability to clinical use. In our study, the graft volume in many of the grafts was at the lower limit of the PET scanner’s spatial resolution (of ≈1 mm3), but the grafts could still be detected. Importantly, the larger human scale would likely greatly improve the ability of these tracers to quantify both graft size and composition, as the human scanners operate on approximately threefold lower resolution, but the graft size would need to be a thousandfold larger for therapeutic effectiveness [1]. The larger graft volumes would result in lower dilution in uptake concentration, resulting in more accurate quantification of graft composition, at least if the graft is not dispersed over a relatively larger area in humans. We showed that lengthwise dispersion of the grafts does not prevent SC-graft visualisation. The encapsulation devices used in certain SC-islet implantation trials (NCT03163511, NCT05791201) are likely visible in CT and MRI. CT/MRI quantification of the encapsulated graft volume could be followed by PET to quantify graft SC-beta cell composition accurately, as mathematical corrections for graft uptake similar to those using the histologically determined graft size could be made. This might be useful particularly in the encapsulation device context, as the explanted devices have shown a low SC-beta cell percentage [69, 70]. Extrapolating from biodistribution in rats, 18F-labelled exendin has a low enough radiation dose to justify repeated scans [54]. Altogether, it would probably be more feasible to visualise SC-islet grafts in humans than in mice. If these methods were translated, an SC-islet graft recipient imaged with either tracer could have the size of their graft quantified by the uptake volume. If a large uptake concentration was measured, a higher number of SC-beta cells could be inferred to be present in the graft, at least when using [18F]exendin.

One limitation to translating these findings is standard use of the intraportal site, also used in one of the ongoing SC-islet implantation trials (NCT04786262). Imaging intrahepatic islets is challenging, as they stochastically engraft next to the blood vessels, leading to signal diffusion and background. However, in a promising outcome for applying PET for intrahepatic SC-islet grafts, a recent study showed that primary islet grafts can be detected in the liver [37] with a 68Ga-exendin tracer. Additionally, while our method was highly applicable for long-term monitoring, it was limited in mapping early post-implantation events, as 60% of the imaged grafts were not detected at the 1 month time point. The reason for this remains unknown. While the SC-islets express the tracer receptors in vitro before implantation and exhibit strong responses to GLP1R agonists [2], they might lose some of the expression during the shocking early engraftment period. Lack of detection could also be related to incomplete development of vasculature. A similar PET study using primary rodent islets suggested that vasculature is sufficiently established by 3 weeks [71], but the SC-islets could have weaker vascularisation as they lack the endothelial cells found inside primary islets. Nevertheless, these early events could be visualised by pre-labelling the SC-islet material with superparamagnetic iron oxide particles for MRI [72, 73] or with [18F]FDG for PET [74], or, in a preclinical setting, with a bioluminescent reporter system [29, 75, 76]. Alternatively, a blood marker for beta cell death, such as cell-free insulin DNA with a beta cell-specific methylation pattern, could be used as an indirect measure of engraftment [77].

One limitation of the study design was that the relationship of SC-beta cell mass and C-peptide was explored in a cohort that was not imaged and that was implanted at a different site, preventing direct comparison of PET and C-peptide measurements. Neither the intramuscular- nor the subcapsular graft-carrying mice were rendered diabetic, preventing assessment of the therapeutic potential of the SC-islet grafts. Preservation of the mouse beta cells could contribute to the glucose clearing in the glucose tolerance testing, lowering the need for the human SC-islet grafts to secrete insulin. The intact mouse beta cells could theoretically influence correlations between human SC-islet graft volume and the human C-peptide, particularly in the glucose-stimulated conditions. Several SC-islet cultures were pooled as implantation batches to increase consistency in PET; however, this limits the ability to trace back origins of off-target growth to specific features of the pre-implantation cultures. Non-blinded PET data analysis was a limitation in study execution.

The strengths of this study include the comparison of two different tracers; inclusion and quantification of grafts with different compositions; validation of tracers in SC-islets with hyper- and hypofunctional SC-beta cells; and, to a lesser extent, the context given by the parallel assessment of C-peptide measurements.

In conclusion, we propose using [18F]exendin and/or [18F]FDOPA PET imaging as a method for longitudinal monitoring of SC-islet grafts. This would allow accurate quantification of graft size and estimation of aspects of graft composition, such as cyst and SC-beta cell proportion. PET imaging could help improve the safety and efficacy of SC-islet grafts as an emerging cell replacement therapy for insulin-deficient diabetes.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.ESM (PDF 13534 KB)

Abbreviations

CHI Congenital hyperinsulinism

[11C]HTP [11C]-5-hydroxy-tryptophan

CK-19 Cytokeratin-19

CT Computed tomography

DGCR2 DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 2

DICOM Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine

DOPA 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine

EC cell Enterochromaffin-like cell

[18F]exendin [18F]F-dibenzocyclooctyne-exendin-4

[18F]FDOPA 6-[18F]fluoro-l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine

GBC Glibenclamide

GLP1R Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor

%ID/g Percentage of injected dose per gram of tissue

IEQ Islet equivalent

INS Insulin

PET Positron emission tomography

SC-alpha cell Stem cell-derived alpha cell

SC-beta cell Stem cell-derived beta cell

SC-islet Stem cell-derived islet

SLC18A1 Solute carrier family 18 (vesicular monoamine transporter), member 1

SYP Synaptophysin

VOI Volume of interest

VOI1 VOI encompassing the putative graft

VOI2 VOI encompassing the calf muscle

Funding

Open Access funding provided by University of Helsinki (including Helsinki University Central Hospital).

Acknowledgements

V. Oikonen (University of Turku) is thanked for advice regarding graft uptake calculations. O. Al-Zghool (University of Turku) and Turku PET imaging centre technicians A. Honkaniemi, M. Vehmanen, M. Eisala and P. Kotitalo are thanked for assistance in PET image acquisition and processing, and processing of grafts. S. Eurola and M. Winder (University of Helsinki) are thanked for genome editing. O. Kolari (University of Eastern Finland) is thanked for assistance in graft sectioning, immunostaining and microscopy. E. Vähäkangas, V. Chandra and E. Kuuluvainen (University of Helsinki) are thanked for feedback during the project.

Data availability

All data are available on reasonable request.

Funding

Open Access funding provided by University of Helsinki (including Helsinki University Central Hospital).The Otonkoski laboratory has received funding for this study from: the Academy of Finland (grant 297466) and as its Center of Excellence (MetaStem, grant 312437), the Sigrid Jusélius Foundation, the Novo Nordisk Foundation and the Helsinki University Hospital Funds. The Nuutila group/Turku PET Centre has received funding for this study from: the Academy of Finland CoE, European Commission FP7 programmes BetaImage (222980) and BetaCure (602812), and the Novo Nordisk Foundation. The Solin group/Turku PET Centre has received funding for this study from: the Academy of Finland (266891 and 334310) and the Swedish Cultural Foundation in Finland (151484). VL has received personal grant support from the Emil Aaltonen Foundation, Orion Research Foundation, the Finnish Medical Foundation, the Maud Kuistila Memorial Foundation, the Ida Montin Foundation and the Biomedicum Helsinki Foundation, and gratefully acknowledges their support.

Authors’ relationships and activities

The authors declare that there are no relationships or activities that might bias, or be perceived to bias, their work.

Contribution statement

VL conceptualised and coordinated the study; differentiated SC-islets; performed implantations, in vivo tests and immunohistochemistry; analysed PET imaging and immunohistochemistry data; and prepared the original manuscript and figures. SL, LU, TK, C-BY and JR synthesised the radiotracers. HI performed genome editing. JS-V and HM performed implantations and in vivo tests. KM conceptualised the study and performed PET imaging. DB analysed single-cell RNA sequencing data and edited the manuscript. TB analysed data and edited the manuscript. TJG performed PET imaging and PET data analysis, conceptualised and coordinated the study, and edited the manuscript. OS supervised radiotracer synthesis and provided resources. PN conceptualised the study and provided resources. TO conceptualised and supervised the study, edited the manuscript and provided resources. All authors reviewed the article critically for intellectual content and approved the final version to be published. VL is the guarantor for this study.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Marfil-Garza BA Imes S Verhoeff K Pancreatic islet transplantation in type 1 diabetes: 20-year experience from a single-centre cohort in Canada Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2022 10 7 519 532 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00114-0 35588757
Marfil-Garza BA, Imes S, Verhoeff K et al (2022) Pancreatic islet transplantation in type 1 diabetes: 20-year experience from a single-centre cohort in Canada. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 10(7):519–532. 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00114-035588757
2. Balboa D Barsby T Lithovius V Functional, metabolic and transcriptional maturation of human pancreatic islets derived from stem cells Nat Biotechnol 2022 40 7 1042 1055 10.1038/s41587-022-01219-z 35241836
Balboa D, Barsby T, Lithovius V et al (2022) Functional, metabolic and transcriptional maturation of human pancreatic islets derived from stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 40(7):1042–1055. 10.1038/s41587-022-01219-z35241836
3. Veres A Faust AL Bushnell HL Charting cellular identity during human in vitro β-cell differentiation Nature 2019 569 7756 368 373 10.1038/s41586-019-1168-5 31068696
Veres A, Faust AL, Bushnell HL et al (2019) Charting cellular identity during human in vitro β-cell differentiation. Nature 569(7756):368–373. 10.1038/s41586-019-1168-531068696
4. Yoshihara E O’Connor C Gasser E Immune-evasive human islet-like organoids ameliorate diabetes Nature 2020 586 7830 606 611 10.1038/s41586-020-2631-z 32814902
Yoshihara E, O’Connor C, Gasser E et al (2020) Immune-evasive human islet-like organoids ameliorate diabetes. Nature 586(7830):606–611. 10.1038/s41586-020-2631-z32814902
5. Hogrebe NJ Augsornworawat P Maxwell KG Velazco-Cruz L Millman JR Targeting the cytoskeleton to direct pancreatic differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells Nat Biotechnol 2020 38 4 460 470 10.1038/s41587-020-0430-6 32094658
Hogrebe NJ, Augsornworawat P, Maxwell KG, Velazco-Cruz L, Millman JR (2020) Targeting the cytoskeleton to direct pancreatic differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 38(4):460–470. 10.1038/s41587-020-0430-632094658
6. Hogrebe NJ Ishahak M Millman JR Developments in stem cell-derived islet replacement therapy for treating type 1 diabetes Cell Stem Cell 2023 30 5 530 548 10.1016/j.stem.2023.04.002 37146579
Hogrebe NJ, Ishahak M, Millman JR (2023) Developments in stem cell-derived islet replacement therapy for treating type 1 diabetes. Cell Stem Cell 30(5):530–548. 10.1016/j.stem.2023.04.00237146579
7. Cochrane VA Hebrok M Stem cell-derived islet therapy: is this the end of the beginning? Nat Rev Endocrinol 2023 19 12 681 682 10.1038/s41574-023-00910-8 37783847
Cochrane VA, Hebrok M (2023) Stem cell-derived islet therapy: is this the end of the beginning? Nat Rev Endocrinol 19(12):681–682. 10.1038/s41574-023-00910-837783847
8. Ramzy A Belmonte PJ Braam MJS A century-long journey from the discovery of insulin to the implantation of stem cell–derived islets Endocr Rev 2023 44 2 222 253 10.1210/endrev/bnac021 36111962
Ramzy A, Belmonte PJ, Braam MJS et al (2023) A century-long journey from the discovery of insulin to the implantation of stem cell–derived islets. Endocr Rev 44(2):222–253. 10.1210/endrev/bnac02136111962
9. Reichman TW Ricordi C Naji A 836-P: glucose-dependent insulin production and insulin-independence in type 1 diabetes from stem cell-derived, fully differentiated islet cells—updated data from the VX-880 clinical trial Diabetes 2023 72 Suppl 1 836-P 10.2337/db23-836-P
Reichman TW, Ricordi C, Naji A et al (2023) 836-P: glucose-dependent insulin production and insulin-independence in type 1 diabetes from stem cell-derived, fully differentiated islet cells—updated data from the VX-880 clinical trial. Diabetes 72(Suppl 1):836-P. 10.2337/db23-836-P
10. Rezania A Bruin JE Arora P Reversal of diabetes with insulin-producing cells derived in vitro from human pluripotent stem cells Nat Biotechnol 2014 32 11 1121 1133 10.1038/nbt.3033 25211370
Rezania A, Bruin JE, Arora P et al (2014) Reversal of diabetes with insulin-producing cells derived in vitro from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 32(11):1121–1133. 10.1038/nbt.303325211370
11. Pepper AR Bruni A Pawlick R Posttransplant characterization of long-term functional hESC-derived pancreatic endoderm grafts Diabetes 2019 68 5 953 962 10.2337/db18-0788 30455375
Pepper AR, Bruni A, Pawlick R et al (2019) Posttransplant characterization of long-term functional hESC-derived pancreatic endoderm grafts. Diabetes 68(5):953–962. 10.2337/db18-078830455375
12. Augsornworawat P Maxwell KG Velazco-Cruz L Millman JR Single-cell transcriptome profiling reveals β cell maturation in stem cell-derived islets after transplantation Cell Rep 2020 32 8 108067 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108067 32846125
Augsornworawat P, Maxwell KG, Velazco-Cruz L, Millman JR (2020) Single-cell transcriptome profiling reveals β cell maturation in stem cell-derived islets after transplantation. Cell Rep 32(8):108067. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.10806732846125
13. Sui L Xin Y Du Q Reduced replication fork speed promotes pancreatic endocrine differentiation and controls graft size JCI Insight 2021 6 5 e141553 10.1172/jci.insight.141553 33529174
Sui L, Xin Y, Du Q et al (2021) Reduced replication fork speed promotes pancreatic endocrine differentiation and controls graft size. JCI Insight 6(5):e141553. 10.1172/jci.insight.14155333529174
14. Hiyoshi H Sakuma K Tsubooka-Yamazoe N Characterization and reduction of non-endocrine cells accompanying islet-like endocrine cells differentiated from human iPSC Sci Rep 2022 12 1 4740 10.1038/s41598-022-08753-5 35304548
Hiyoshi H, Sakuma K, Tsubooka-Yamazoe N et al (2022) Characterization and reduction of non-endocrine cells accompanying islet-like endocrine cells differentiated from human iPSC. Sci Rep 12(1):4740. 10.1038/s41598-022-08753-535304548
15. Jensen NK Ingvorsen C Petersen DR Characterization of the nonendocrine cell populations in human embryonic stem cell-derived (hESC) islet-like clusters posttransplantation Toxicol Pathol 2021 49 7 1269 1287 10.1177/01926233211036395 34555946
Jensen NK, Ingvorsen C, Petersen DR et al (2021) Characterization of the nonendocrine cell populations in human embryonic stem cell-derived (hESC) islet-like clusters posttransplantation. Toxicol Pathol 49(7):1269–1287. 10.1177/0192623321103639534555946
16. Cuesta-Gomez N Verhoeff K Jasra IT Pawlick R Dadheech N Shapiro AMJ Characterization of stem-cell-derived islets during differentiation and after implantation Cell Rep 2022 40 8 111238 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111238 36001981
Cuesta-Gomez N, Verhoeff K, Jasra IT, Pawlick R, Dadheech N, Shapiro AMJ (2022) Characterization of stem-cell-derived islets during differentiation and after implantation. Cell Rep 40(8):111238. 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.11123836001981
17. Blum B Bar-Nur O Golan-Lev T Benvenisty N The anti-apoptotic gene survivin contributes to teratoma formation by human embryonic stem cells Nat Biotechnol 2009 27 3 281 287 10.1038/nbt.1527 19252483
Blum B, Bar-Nur O, Golan-Lev T, Benvenisty N (2009) The anti-apoptotic gene survivin contributes to teratoma formation by human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 27(3):281–287. 10.1038/nbt.152719252483
18. Merkle FT Ghosh S Kamitaki N Human pluripotent stem cells recurrently acquire and expand dominant negative P53 mutations Nature 2017 545 7653 229 233 10.1038/nature22312 28445466
Merkle FT, Ghosh S, Kamitaki N et al (2017) Human pluripotent stem cells recurrently acquire and expand dominant negative P53 mutations. Nature 545(7653):229–233. 10.1038/nature2231228445466
19. Gerace D Zhou Q Kenty JH-R Engineering human stem cell-derived islets to evade immune rejection and promote localized immune tolerance Cell Rep Med 2023 4 1 100879 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100879 36599351
Gerace D, Zhou Q, Kenty JH-R et al (2023) Engineering human stem cell-derived islets to evade immune rejection and promote localized immune tolerance. Cell Rep Med 4(1):100879. 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.10087936599351
20. Sintov E Nikolskiy I Barrera V Whole-genome CRISPR screening identifies genetic manipulations to reduce immune rejection of stem cell-derived islets Stem Cell Rep 2022 17 9 1976 1990 10.1016/j.stemcr.2022.08.002
Sintov E, Nikolskiy I, Barrera V et al (2022) Whole-genome CRISPR screening identifies genetic manipulations to reduce immune rejection of stem cell-derived islets. Stem Cell Rep 17(9):1976–1990. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2022.08.002
21. Chimienti R Baccega T Torchio S Engineering of immune checkpoints B7–H3 and CD155 enhances immune compatibility of MHC-I−/− iPSCs for β cell replacement Cell Rep 2022 40 13 111423 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111423 36170817
Chimienti R, Baccega T, Torchio S et al (2022) Engineering of immune checkpoints B7–H3 and CD155 enhances immune compatibility of MHC-I−/− iPSCs for β cell replacement. Cell Rep 40(13):111423. 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.11142336170817
22. Hu X White K Olroyd AG Hypoimmune induced pluripotent stem cells survive long term in fully immunocompetent, allogeneic rhesus macaques Nat Biotechnol 2023 42 413 423 10.1038/s41587-023-01784-x 37156915
Hu X, White K, Olroyd AG et al (2023) Hypoimmune induced pluripotent stem cells survive long term in fully immunocompetent, allogeneic rhesus macaques. Nat Biotechnol 42:413–423. 10.1038/s41587-023-01784-x37156915
23. Harding J Vintersten-Nagy K Yang H Immune-privileged tissues formed from immunologically cloaked mouse embryonic stem cells survive long term in allogeneic hosts Nat Biomed Eng 2023 8 427 442 10.1038/s41551-023-01133-y 37996616
Harding J, Vintersten-Nagy K, Yang H et al (2023) Immune-privileged tissues formed from immunologically cloaked mouse embryonic stem cells survive long term in allogeneic hosts. Nat Biomed Eng 8:427–442. 10.1038/s41551-023-01133-y37996616
24. Lanza R Russell DW Nagy A Engineering universal cells that evade immune detection Nat Rev Immunol 2019 19 12 723 733 10.1038/s41577-019-0200-1 31417198
Lanza R, Russell DW, Nagy A (2019) Engineering universal cells that evade immune detection. Nat Rev Immunol 19(12):723–733. 10.1038/s41577-019-0200-131417198
25. Han L He H Yang Y Distinctive clinical and pathologic features of immature teratomas arising from induced pluripotent stem cell-derived beta cell injection in a diabetes patient Stem Cells Dev 2022 31 5–6 97 101 10.1089/scd.2021.0255 35018826
Han L, He H, Yang Y et al (2022) Distinctive clinical and pathologic features of immature teratomas arising from induced pluripotent stem cell-derived beta cell injection in a diabetes patient. Stem Cells Dev 31(5–6):97–101. 10.1089/scd.2021.025535018826
26. Leite NC Pelayo GC Melton DA Genetic manipulation of stress pathways can protect stem-cell-derived islets from apoptosis in vitro Stem Cell Rep 2022 17 4 766 774 10.1016/j.stemcr.2022.01.018
Leite NC, Pelayo GC, Melton DA (2022) Genetic manipulation of stress pathways can protect stem-cell-derived islets from apoptosis in vitro. Stem Cell Rep 17(4):766–774. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2022.01.018
27. Aghazadeh Y Poon F Sarangi F Microvessels support engraftment and functionality of human islets and hESC-derived pancreatic progenitors in diabetes models Cell Stem Cell 2021 28 11 1936 1949.e8 10.1016/j.stem.2021.08.001 34480863
Aghazadeh Y, Poon F, Sarangi F et al (2021) Microvessels support engraftment and functionality of human islets and hESC-derived pancreatic progenitors in diabetes models. Cell Stem Cell 28(11):1936-1949.e8. 10.1016/j.stem.2021.08.00134480863
28. Maxwell KG Kim MH Gale SE Millman JR Differential function and maturation of human stem cell-derived islets after transplantation Stem Cells Transl Med 2022 11 3 322 331 10.1093/stcltm/szab013 35294547
Maxwell KG, Kim MH, Gale SE, Millman JR (2022) Differential function and maturation of human stem cell-derived islets after transplantation. Stem Cells Transl Med 11(3):322–331. 10.1093/stcltm/szab01335294547
29. Faleo G Russ HA Wisel S Mitigating ischemic injury of stem cell-derived insulin-producing cells after transplant Stem Cell Rep 2017 9 3 807 819 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.07.012
Faleo G, Russ HA, Wisel S et al (2017) Mitigating ischemic injury of stem cell-derived insulin-producing cells after transplant. Stem Cell Rep 9(3):807–819. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.07.012
30. Jacobs-Tulleneers-Thevissen D Bartholomeus K Suenens K Human islet cell implants in a nude rat model of diabetes survive better in omentum than in liver with a positive influence of beta cell number and purity Diabetologia 2010 53 8 1690 1699 10.1007/s00125-010-1721-0 20397000
Jacobs-Tulleneers-Thevissen D, Bartholomeus K, Suenens K et al (2010) Human islet cell implants in a nude rat model of diabetes survive better in omentum than in liver with a positive influence of beta cell number and purity. Diabetologia 53(8):1690–1699. 10.1007/s00125-010-1721-020397000
31. Liang Z Sun D Lu S Implantation underneath the abdominal anterior rectus sheath enables effective and functional engraftment of stem-cell-derived islets Nat Metab 2023 5 29 40 10.1038/s42255-022-00713-7 36624157
Liang Z, Sun D, Lu S et al (2023) Implantation underneath the abdominal anterior rectus sheath enables effective and functional engraftment of stem-cell-derived islets. Nat Metab 5:29–40. 10.1038/s42255-022-00713-736624157
32. Itakura G Kawabata S Ando M Fail-safe system against potential tumorigenicity after transplantation of iPSC derivatives Stem Cell Rep 2017 8 3 673 684 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.02.003
Itakura G, Kawabata S, Ando M et al (2017) Fail-safe system against potential tumorigenicity after transplantation of iPSC derivatives. Stem Cell Rep 8(3):673–684. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.02.003
33. Qadir MMF Álvarez-Cubela S Belle K A double fail-safe approach to prevent tumorigenesis and select pancreatic β cells from human embryonic stem cells Stem Cell Rep 2019 12 3 611 623 10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.01.012
Qadir MMF, Álvarez-Cubela S, Belle K et al (2019) A double fail-safe approach to prevent tumorigenesis and select pancreatic β cells from human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Rep 12(3):611–623. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.01.012
34. Cheung P Eriksson O The current state of beta-cell-mass PET imaging for diabetes research and therapies Biomedicines 2021 9 12 1824 10.3390/biomedicines9121824 34944640
Cheung P, Eriksson O (2021) The current state of beta-cell-mass PET imaging for diabetes research and therapies. Biomedicines 9(12):1824. 10.3390/biomedicines912182434944640
35. Murakami T Fujimoto H Inagaki N Non-invasive beta-cell imaging: visualization, quantification, and beyond Front Endocrinol 2021 12 714348 10.3389/fendo.2021.714348
Murakami T, Fujimoto H, Inagaki N (2021) Non-invasive beta-cell imaging: visualization, quantification, and beyond. Front Endocrinol 12:714348. 10.3389/fendo.2021.714348
36. Pattou F Kerr-Conte J Wild D GLP-1–Receptor scanning for imaging of human beta cells transplanted in muscle N Engl J Med 2010 363 13 1289 1290 10.1056/NEJMc1004547 20860517
Pattou F, Kerr-Conte J, Wild D (2010) GLP-1–Receptor scanning for imaging of human beta cells transplanted in muscle. N Engl J Med 363(13):1289–1290. 10.1056/NEJMc100454720860517
37. Jansen TJP Buitinga M Boss M Monitoring β-cell survival after intrahepatic islet transplantation using dynamic exendin PET imaging: a proof-of-concept study in individuals with type 1 diabetes Diabetes 2023 72 7 898 907 10.2337/db22-0884 37068261
Jansen TJP, Buitinga M, Boss M et al (2023) Monitoring β-cell survival after intrahepatic islet transplantation using dynamic exendin PET imaging: a proof-of-concept study in individuals with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 72(7):898–907. 10.2337/db22-088437068261
38. Eriksson O Selvaraju R Eich T Positron emission tomography to assess the outcome of intraportal islet transplantation Diabetes 2016 65 9 2482 2489 10.2337/db16-0222 27325286
Eriksson O, Selvaraju R, Eich T et al (2016) Positron emission tomography to assess the outcome of intraportal islet transplantation. Diabetes 65(9):2482–2489. 10.2337/db16-022227325286
39. Eter WA Van der Kroon I Andralojc K Non-invasive in vivo determination of viable islet graft volume by 111In-exendin-3 Sci Rep 2017 7 1 7232 10.1038/s41598-017-07815-3 28775287
Eter WA, Van der Kroon I, Andralojc K et al (2017) Non-invasive in vivo determination of viable islet graft volume by 111In-exendin-3. Sci Rep 7(1):7232. 10.1038/s41598-017-07815-328775287
40. Espes D Selvaraju R Velikyan I Krajcovic M Carlsson P-O Eriksson O Quantification of β-cell mass in intramuscular islet grafts using radiolabeled exendin-4 Transpl Direct 2016 2 8 e93 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000598
Espes D, Selvaraju R, Velikyan I, Krajcovic M, Carlsson P-O, Eriksson O (2016) Quantification of β-cell mass in intramuscular islet grafts using radiolabeled exendin-4. Transpl Direct 2(8):e93. 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000598
41. Pyke C Heller RS Kirk RK GLP-1 receptor localization in monkey and human tissue: novel distribution revealed with extensively validated monoclonal antibody Endocrinology 2014 155 4 1280 1290 10.1210/en.2013-1934 24467746
Pyke C, Heller RS, Kirk RK et al (2014) GLP-1 receptor localization in monkey and human tissue: novel distribution revealed with extensively validated monoclonal antibody. Endocrinology 155(4):1280–1290. 10.1210/en.2013-193424467746
42. Tornehave D Kristensen P Rømer J Knudsen LB Heller RS Expression of the GLP-1 receptor in mouse, rat, and human pancreas J Histochem Cytochem 2008 56 9 841 851 10.1369/jhc.2008.951319 18541709
Tornehave D, Kristensen P, Rømer J, Knudsen LB, Heller RS (2008) Expression of the GLP-1 receptor in mouse, rat, and human pancreas. J Histochem Cytochem 56(9):841–851. 10.1369/jhc.2008.95131918541709
43. Yim C-B, Mikkola K, Nuutila P, Solin O (2016) Synthesis of pancreatic beta cell-specific [18F]fluoro-exendin-4 via strain-promoted aza-dibenzocyclooctyne/azide cycloaddition. Presented at the 18th European Symposium on Radiopharmacy and Radiopharmaceuticals, Salzburg, Austria. 7–10 April 2016. EJNMMI radiopharm. chem. 1(Suppl 1): 10, s41181-016-0012–6
44. Otonkoski T Hussain K Rahier J Noninvasive diagnosis of focal hyperinsulinism of infancy with [18F]-DOPA positron emission tomography Diabetes 2006 55 13 18 10.2337/diabetes.55.01.06.db05-1128 16380471
Otonkoski T, Hussain K, Rahier J et al (2006) Noninvasive diagnosis of focal hyperinsulinism of infancy with [18F]-DOPA positron emission tomography. Diabetes 55:13–18. 10.2337/diabetes.55.01.06.db05-112816380471
45. Adzick NS De Leon DD States LJ Surgical treatment of congenital hyperinsulinism: Results from 500 pancreatectomies in neonates and children J Pediatr Surg 2019 54 1 27 32 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.030 30343978
Adzick NS, De Leon DD, States LJ et al (2019) Surgical treatment of congenital hyperinsulinism: Results from 500 pancreatectomies in neonates and children. J Pediatr Surg 54(1):27–32. 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.03030343978
46. Eriksson O Mintz A Liu C Yu M Naji A Alavi A On the use of [18F]DOPA as an imaging biomarker for transplanted islet mass Ann Nucl Med 2014 28 1 47 52 10.1007/s12149-013-0779-4 24166476
Eriksson O, Mintz A, Liu C, Yu M, Naji A, Alavi A (2014) On the use of [18F]DOPA as an imaging biomarker for transplanted islet mass. Ann Nucl Med 28(1):47–52. 10.1007/s12149-013-0779-424166476
47. Cheung P Thorngren J Zhang B Preclinical evaluation of Affibody molecule for PET imaging of human pancreatic islets derived from stem cells EJNMMI Res 2023 13 1 107 10.1186/s13550-023-01057-3 38100042
Cheung P, Thorngren J, Zhang B et al (2023) Preclinical evaluation of Affibody molecule for PET imaging of human pancreatic islets derived from stem cells. EJNMMI Res 13(1):107. 10.1186/s13550-023-01057-338100042
48. Lithovius V Saarimäki-Vire J Balboa D SUR1-mutant iPS cell-derived islets recapitulate the pathophysiology of congenital hyperinsulinism Diabetologia 2021 64 3 630 640 10.1007/s00125-020-05346-7 33404684
Lithovius V, Saarimäki-Vire J, Balboa D et al (2021) SUR1-mutant iPS cell-derived islets recapitulate the pathophysiology of congenital hyperinsulinism. Diabetologia 64(3):630–640. 10.1007/s00125-020-05346-733404684
49. Balboa D Saarimäki-Vire J Borshagovski D Insulin mutations impair beta-cell development in a patient-derived iPSC model of neonatal diabetes eLife 2018 7 e38519 10.7554/eLife.38519 30412052
Balboa D, Saarimäki-Vire J, Borshagovski D et al (2018) Insulin mutations impair beta-cell development in a patient-derived iPSC model of neonatal diabetes. eLife 7:e38519. 10.7554/eLife.3851930412052
50. Barsby T Ibrahim H Lithovius V Differentiating functional human islet-like aggregates from pluripotent stem cells STAR Protocols 2022 3 4 101711 10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101711 36136756
Barsby T, Ibrahim H, Lithovius V et al (2022) Differentiating functional human islet-like aggregates from pluripotent stem cells. STAR Protocols 3(4):101711. 10.1016/j.xpro.2022.10171136136756
51. McQuin C Goodman A Chernyshev V CellProfiler 3.0: next-generation image processing for biology PLoS Biol 2018 16 7 e2005970 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005970 29969450
McQuin C, Goodman A, Chernyshev V et al (2018) CellProfiler 3.0: next-generation image processing for biology. PLoS Biol 16(7):e2005970. 10.1371/journal.pbio.200597029969450
52. Ricordi C Gray DWR Hering BJ Islet isolation assessment in man and large animals Acta Diabet Lat 1990 27 3 185 195 10.1007/BF02581331
Ricordi C, Gray DWR, Hering BJ et al (1990) Islet isolation assessment in man and large animals. Acta Diabet Lat 27(3):185–195. 10.1007/BF02581331
53. Forsback S Eskola O Haaparanta M Bergmann J Solin O Electrophilic synthesis of 6-[18F]fluoro-L-DOPA using post-target produced [18F]F2 Radiochimica Acta 2008 96 12 845 848 10.1524/ract.2008.1527
Forsback S, Eskola O, Haaparanta M, Bergmann J, Solin O (2008) Electrophilic synthesis of 6-[18F]fluoro-L-DOPA using post-target produced [18F]F2. Radiochimica Acta 96(12):845–848. 10.1524/ract.2008.1527
54. Mikkola K Yim C-B Lehtiniemi P Low kidney uptake of GLP-1R-targeting, beta cell-specific PET tracer, 18F-labeled [Nle14, Lys40]exendin-4 analog, shows promise for clinical imaging EJNMMI Res 2016 6 1 91 10.1186/s13550-016-0243-2 27957723
Mikkola K, Yim C-B, Lehtiniemi P et al (2016) Low kidney uptake of GLP-1R-targeting, beta cell-specific PET tracer, 18F-labeled [Nle14, Lys40]exendin-4 analog, shows promise for clinical imaging. EJNMMI Res 6(1):91. 10.1186/s13550-016-0243-227957723
55. Gray SM Xin Y Ross EC Discordance between GLP-1R gene and protein expression in mouse pancreatic islet cells J Biol Chem 2020 295 33 11529 11541 10.1074/jbc.RA120.014368 32554468
Gray SM, Xin Y, Ross EC et al (2020) Discordance between GLP-1R gene and protein expression in mouse pancreatic islet cells. J Biol Chem 295(33):11529–11541. 10.1074/jbc.RA120.01436832554468
56. Rutter GA Pullen TJ Hodson DJ Martinez-Sanchez A Pancreatic β-cell identity, glucose sensing and the control of insulin secretion Biochem J 2015 466 2 203 218 10.1042/BJ20141384 25697093
Rutter GA, Pullen TJ, Hodson DJ, Martinez-Sanchez A (2015) Pancreatic β-cell identity, glucose sensing and the control of insulin secretion. Biochem J 466(2):203–218. 10.1042/BJ2014138425697093
57. Normandin MD Petersen KF Ding Y-S In vivo imaging of endogenous pancreatic β-cell mass in healthy and type 1 diabetic subjects using 18F-Fluoropropyl-Dihydrotetrabenazine and PET J Nucl Med 2012 53 6 908 916 10.2967/jnumed.111.100545 22573821
Normandin MD, Petersen KF, Ding Y-S et al (2012) In vivo imaging of endogenous pancreatic β-cell mass in healthy and type 1 diabetic subjects using 18F-Fluoropropyl-Dihydrotetrabenazine and PET. J Nucl Med 53(6):908–916. 10.2967/jnumed.111.10054522573821
58. Eriksson O Johnström P Cselenyi Z In vivo visualization of β-cells by targeting of GPR44 Diabetes 2018 67 2 182 192 10.2337/db17-0764 29208633
Eriksson O, Johnström P, Cselenyi Z et al (2018) In vivo visualization of β-cells by targeting of GPR44. Diabetes 67(2):182–192. 10.2337/db17-076429208633
59. Demine S Garcia Ribeiro R Thevenet J A nanobody-based nuclear imaging tracer targeting dipeptidyl peptidase 6 to determine the mass of human beta cell grafts in mice Diabetologia 2020 63 4 825 836 10.1007/s00125-019-05068-5 31873789
Demine S, Garcia Ribeiro R, Thevenet J et al (2020) A nanobody-based nuclear imaging tracer targeting dipeptidyl peptidase 6 to determine the mass of human beta cell grafts in mice. Diabetologia 63(4):825–836. 10.1007/s00125-019-05068-531873789
60. Boss M Rottenburger C Brenner W 68Ga-NODAGA-Exendin-4 PET/CT improves the detection of focal congenital hyperinsulinism J Nucl Med 2022 63 2 310 315 10.2967/jnumed.121.262327 34215672
Boss M, Rottenburger C, Brenner W et al (2022) 68Ga-NODAGA-Exendin-4 PET/CT improves the detection of focal congenital hyperinsulinism. J Nucl Med 63(2):310–315. 10.2967/jnumed.121.26232734215672
61. Buitinga M Cohrs CM Eter WA Noninvasive monitoring of glycemia-induced regulation of GLP-1R expression in murine and human islets of langerhans Diabetes 2020 69 11 2246 2252 10.2337/db20-0616 32843570
Buitinga M, Cohrs CM, Eter WA et al (2020) Noninvasive monitoring of glycemia-induced regulation of GLP-1R expression in murine and human islets of langerhans. Diabetes 69(11):2246–2252. 10.2337/db20-061632843570
62. Shilleh AH Beard S Russ HA Enrichment of stem cell-derived pancreatic beta-like cells and controlled graft size through pharmacological removal of proliferating cells Stem Cell Rep 2023 18 6 1284 1294 10.1016/j.stemcr.2023.05.010
Shilleh AH, Beard S, Russ HA (2023) Enrichment of stem cell-derived pancreatic beta-like cells and controlled graft size through pharmacological removal of proliferating cells. Stem Cell Rep 18(6):1284–1294. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2023.05.010
63. Davalli AM Scaglia L Zangen DH Hollister J Bonner-Weir S Weir GC Vulnerability of islets in the immediate posttransplantation period Diabetes 1996 45 9 1161 1167 10.2337/diab.45.9.1161 8772716
Davalli AM, Scaglia L, Zangen DH, Hollister J, Bonner-Weir S, Weir GC (1996) Vulnerability of islets in the immediate posttransplantation period. Diabetes 45(9):1161–1167. 10.2337/diab.45.9.11618772716
64. Puri S Roy N Russ HA Replication confers β cell immaturity Nat Commun 2018 9 1 485 10.1038/s41467-018-02939-0 29396395
Puri S, Roy N, Russ HA et al (2018) Replication confers β cell immaturity. Nat Commun 9(1):485. 10.1038/s41467-018-02939-029396395
65. Rodriguez-Diaz R Molano RD Weitz JR Paracrine interactions within the pancreatic islet determine the glycemic set point Cell Metab 2018 27 3 549 558.e4 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.01.015 29514065
Rodriguez-Diaz R, Molano RD, Weitz JR et al (2018) Paracrine interactions within the pancreatic islet determine the glycemic set point. Cell Metab 27(3):549-558.e4. 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.01.01529514065
66. Caiazzo R Gmyr V Kremer B Quantitative in vivo islet potency assay in normoglycemic nude mice correlates with primary graft function after clinical transplantation Transplantation 2008 86 2 360 363 10.1097/TP.0b013e31817ef846 18645503
Caiazzo R, Gmyr V, Kremer B et al (2008) Quantitative in vivo islet potency assay in normoglycemic nude mice correlates with primary graft function after clinical transplantation. Transplantation 86(2):360–363. 10.1097/TP.0b013e31817ef84618645503
67. Forbes S Flatt AJ Bennett D The impact of islet mass, number of transplants, and time between transplants on graft function in a national islet transplant program Am J Transpl 2022 22 1 154 164 10.1111/ajt.16785
Forbes S, Flatt AJ, Bennett D et al (2022) The impact of islet mass, number of transplants, and time between transplants on graft function in a national islet transplant program. Am J Transpl 22(1):154–164. 10.1111/ajt.16785
68. Keymeulen B Gillard P Mathieu C Correlation between β cell mass and glycemic control in type 1 diabetic recipients of islet cell graft Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006 103 46 17444 17449 10.1073/pnas.0608141103 17090674
Keymeulen B, Gillard P, Mathieu C et al (2006) Correlation between β cell mass and glycemic control in type 1 diabetic recipients of islet cell graft. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(46):17444–17449. 10.1073/pnas.060814110317090674
69. Shapiro AMJ Thompson D Donner TW Insulin expression and C-peptide in type 1 diabetes subjects implanted with stem cell-derived pancreatic endoderm cells in an encapsulation device Cell Rep Med 2021 2 12 100466 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100466 35028608
Shapiro AMJ, Thompson D, Donner TW et al (2021) Insulin expression and C-peptide in type 1 diabetes subjects implanted with stem cell-derived pancreatic endoderm cells in an encapsulation device. Cell Rep Med 2(12):100466. 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.10046635028608
70. Ramzy A Thompson DM Ward-Hartstonge KA Implanted pluripotent stem-cell-derived pancreatic endoderm cells secrete glucose-responsive C-peptide in patients with type 1 diabetes Cell Stem Cell 2021 28 12 2047 2061.e5 10.1016/j.stem.2021.10.003 34861146
Ramzy A, Thompson DM, Ward-Hartstonge KA et al (2021) Implanted pluripotent stem-cell-derived pancreatic endoderm cells secrete glucose-responsive C-peptide in patients with type 1 diabetes. Cell Stem Cell 28(12):2047-2061.e5. 10.1016/j.stem.2021.10.00334861146
71. Eter WA Bos D Frielink C Boerman OC Brom M Gotthardt M Graft revascularization is essential for non-invasive monitoring of transplanted islets with radiolabeled exendin Sci Rep 2015 5 1 15521 10.1038/srep15521 26490110
Eter WA, Bos D, Frielink C, Boerman OC, Brom M, Gotthardt M (2015) Graft revascularization is essential for non-invasive monitoring of transplanted islets with radiolabeled exendin. Sci Rep 5(1):15521. 10.1038/srep1552126490110
72. Toso C Vallee J-P Morel P Clinical magnetic resonance imaging of pancreatic islet grafts after iron nanoparticle labeling Am J Transpl 2008 8 3 701 706 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02120.x
Toso C, Vallee J-P, Morel P et al (2008) Clinical magnetic resonance imaging of pancreatic islet grafts after iron nanoparticle labeling. Am J Transpl 8(3):701–706. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02120.x
73. Saudek F Jirák D Girman P Magnetic resonance imaging of pancreatic islets transplanted into the liver in humans Transplantation 2010 90 12 1602 1606 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ffba5e 21197715
Saudek F, Jirák D, Girman P et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of pancreatic islets transplanted into the liver in humans. Transplantation 90(12):1602–1606. 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ffba5e21197715
74. Eich T Eriksson O Lundgren T Visualization of early engraftment in clinical islet transplantation by positron-emission tomography N Engl J Med 2007 356 26 2754 2755 10.1056/NEJMc070201 17596618
Eich T, Eriksson O, Lundgren T (2007) Visualization of early engraftment in clinical islet transplantation by positron-emission tomography. N Engl J Med 356(26):2754–2755. 10.1056/NEJMc07020117596618
75. Virostko J Chen Z Fowler M Poffenberger G Powers AC Jansen ED Factors influencing quantification of in vivo bioluminescence imaging: application to assessment of pancreatic islet transplants Mol Imaging 2004 3 4 333 342 10.1162/15353500200404133 15802050
Virostko J, Chen Z, Fowler M, Poffenberger G, Powers AC, Jansen ED (2004) Factors influencing quantification of in vivo bioluminescence imaging: application to assessment of pancreatic islet transplants. Mol Imaging 3(4):333–342. 10.1162/1535350020040413315802050
76. Lu Y Dang H Middleton B Bioluminescent monitoring of islet graft survival after transplantation Mol Ther 2004 9 3 428 435 10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.01.008 15006610
Lu Y, Dang H, Middleton B et al (2004) Bioluminescent monitoring of islet graft survival after transplantation. Mol Ther 9(3):428–435. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.01.00815006610
77. Gala-Lopez BL Neiman D Kin T Beta cell death by cell-free DNA and outcome after clinical islet transplantation Transplantation 2018 102 6 978 985 10.1097/TP.0000000000002083 29329189
Gala-Lopez BL, Neiman D, Kin T et al (2018) Beta cell death by cell-free DNA and outcome after clinical islet transplantation. Transplantation 102(6):978–985. 10.1097/TP.000000000000208329329189
