
==== Front
Eur J Epidemiol
Eur J Epidemiol
European Journal of Epidemiology
0393-2990
1573-7284
Springer Netherlands Dordrecht

39179945
1148
10.1007/s10654-024-01148-y
Reproductive Epidemiology
Short inter-pregnancy interval and birthweight: a reappraisal based on a follow-up study of all women in Norway with two singleton deliveries during 1970–2019
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2756-1583
Eskild Anne anne.eskild@medisin.uio.no

12
Skau Irene 3
Haavaldsen Camilla 1
Saugstad Ola Didrik 24
Grytten Jostein 13
1 https://ror.org/0331wat71 grid.411279.8 0000 0000 9637 455X Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, 1478 Norway
2 https://ror.org/01xtthb56 grid.5510.1 0000 0004 1936 8921 Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
3 https://ror.org/01xtthb56 grid.5510.1 0000 0004 1936 8921 Department of Community Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
4 https://ror.org/00j9c2840 grid.55325.34 0000 0004 0389 8485 Department of Paediatric Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
24 8 2024
24 8 2024
2024
39 8 905914
12 5 2023
7 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
We studied mean changes in birthweight from the first to the second delivery according to length of the inter-pregnancy interval. We also studied recurrence risk of low birthweight, preterm birth and perinatal death. We followed all women in Norway from their first to their second singleton delivery at gestational week 22 or beyond during the years 1970–2019, a total of 654 100 women. Data were obtained from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. Mean birthweight increased from the first to the second delivery, and the increase was highest in pregnancies conceived < 6 months after the first delivery; adjusted mean birthweight increase 227 g (g) (95% CI; 219–236 g), 90 g higher than in pregnancies conceived 6–11 months after the first delivery (137 g (95% CI; 130–144 g)). After exclusion of women with a first stillbirth, the mean increase in birthweight at inter-pregnancy interval < 6 months was attenuated (152 g, 95% CI; 143–160 g), but remained higher than at longer inter-pregnancy intervals. This finding was particularly prominent in women > 35 years (218 g, 95% CI; 139 –298 g). In women with a first live born infant weighing < 2500 g, mean birthweight increased by around 1000 g to the second delivery, and the increase was most prominent at < 6 months inter-pregnancy interval. We found increased recurrence risk of preterm birth at inter-pregnancy interval < 6 months, but no increased recurrence risk of low birthweight, small for gestational age infant or perinatal death. In conclusion, we found the highest mean increase in birthweight when the inter-pregnancy interval was short. Our results do not generally discourage short pregnancy intervals.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10654-024-01148-y.

Keywords

Pregnancy
Birthweight
Risk factors
Inter-pregnancy interval
Cohort study
Gestational age
Recurrence risk
Akershus University Hospital (AHUS)Open access funding provided by Akershus University Hospital (AHUS)

issue-copyright-statement© Pietro Paolo Sanna 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

A short inter-pregnancy interval is reported to increase the risk of giving birth to an infant with low birthweight and also increase the risk of several other adverse pregnancy outcomes [1–7]. Low birthweight has been associated with infant death and impaired health in childhood and adult life [8, 9]. Also within normal ranges, birthweight has been inversely linked to risk of neonatal death and to all-cause mortality in adult life [9–11]. It is not known whether birthweight within normal ranges is associated with the length of the inter-pregnancy interval.

Recent studies suggest that the association of short inter-pregnancy interval with adverse pregnancy outcomes is attenuated or absent if differences between successive pregnancies within the same women are studied as opposed to differences between all first and second deliveries [12, 13]. Insufficient control for time dependent confounders may also have biased previous estimates [14]. Thus, a causal relation of short inter-pregnancy interval with low birthweight and other adverse pregnancy outcomes has been questioned [15, 16].

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends women to space their childbirths, and at least 24 months inter-pregnancy interval is suggested to optimize the health of the child [17]. In many developed countries mean age of first-time mothers now exceeds 30 years, and a large proportion is 35 years or older [18]. Waiting two-three years before attempting a new pregnancy may seem long for a 35-year-old first time mother who wants more than one child. It is well known that the chances of a successful pregnancy decreases by the woman’s age [19]. Women want to optimize their children’s health, but they also want to optimize their chances of a successful new pregnancy. Thus, women need reliable information about the risks in a new pregnancy if the inter-pregnancy is short. A recent study suggests that the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes at short intervals is lowest among women with highest reproductive age [7].

Interestingly, the risk of preeclampsia and recurrent stillbirth seem to be lowest if the inter-pregnancy interval is short [20, 21]. These pregnancy complications are linked to low infant birthweight [22]. Recent studies suggest that the chance of a successful pregnancy after a miscarriage is highest if the inter-pregnancy interval is short [23–25]. These findings suggest that a short inter-pregnancy interval may be advantageous for some outcomes.

Our main aim was to study the relation of inter-pregnancy interval with changes in birthweight from the first to the second delivery. We followed all women in Norway from their first singleton delivery at gestational week 22 or beyond during the years 1970–2009, until a consecutive singleton delivery before 2020. Among women with a first live born child, we made separate analyses according to their age at the first delivery. We also studied mean increase in birthweight after a first infant with birthweight less than 2500 g, mean increase in gestational age at birth, recurrence risk of low birthweight, preterm birth, and perinatal death according to inter-pregnancy interval.

Materials and methods

Cohort selection

We performed a prospective study, and we included all women in Norway with a first and a second consecutive delivery of a singleton infant (stillborn or live born) at gestational week 22 or beyond. Women with a first delivery during the years 1970–2009 were included, and they were followed until 2020 allowing all women in the study to have an inter-pregnancy-interval of at least 10 years (120 months). The women were followed from the first to the second delivery by using data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. The Medical Birth Registry of Norway includes information about all births in Norway after 16 weeks of gestation since 1967. Reporting of births is compulsory for the midwife or the doctor who attend the delivery [26]. The women were followed from the first to the second delivery by using their unique person identification number in the Medical Birth Registry.

In total, 731 612 women had at least two singleton deliveries during our study period (Supplemental Fig. 1). We excluded women with one or two pregnancies after in vitro fertilization (IVF) (n = 8066) since birthweight and inter-pregnancy interval in these pregnancies may differ from naturally conceived pregnancies [27]. We also excluded women without information about gestational age at delivery (n = 66 226) or with a pregnancy lasting less than 22 weeks (n = 1884). Finally, we excluded women without information about offspring birthweight (n = 1336). Thus, we could include 654 100 women.

Data source

Information about all study factors was obtained from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway.

Outcomes

Our primary outcome measure was mean change from the first to the second delivery in birthweight of the infant (in grams (g)). Firstly, we calculated the change in birthweight within each woman; as birthweight at the second delivery minus birthweight at the first delivery. To estimate mean change in the study sample as a whole, the sum of individual birthweight changes (in grams) was divided by the number of women in the sample. We also used low infant birthweight as outcome; <2500 g and ≤ 5th percentile of birthweight. The birthweight percentiles were based on the distribution of birthweight among all singleton deliveries in Norway during our study period.

Mean change in gestational age from the first to the second delivery was calculated in the same manner as change in birthweight. Additional outcomes were recurrence risk of preterm birth (delivery before gestational week 37) and recurrence risk of perinatal death (stillbirth at 22 gestational week or beyond or death during the first week after birth).

Exposure

Inter-pregnancy interval is defined as the time from the first delivery until the onset of the second pregnancy. The onset of the second pregnancy was estimated by subtracting the duration of the second pregnancy (in number of days) from the date of the delivery. The length of the inter-pregnancy interval was grouped into six-month-intervals, 0–5, 6–11 months…, and > 124 months.

Covariates

As potentially confounding factors, we included in the analyses maternal age at the first delivery, grouped in five-year-intervals (< 20, 20–24…, and ≥ 35 years old) [28]. We also included presence (yes/no) in the first pregnancy or the second pregnancy of any diabetes (type-1, type-2, or gestational diabetes) or any hypertension (preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, or chronic hypertension) [20, 29]. A new father to second pregnancy [30] and the mother’s country of birth (Norway, yes/no) [31] were also included as potentially confounding factors. To adjust for possible changes in the composition of pregnancies or in health care during our study period, we included in the data analyses year of the first delivery (in five periods with equal number of women (quintiles)) [32].

Gestational age at delivery (in days) was estimated from the date of last menstrual period for births during the years 1970–1998. After 1999, gestational age at delivery was based on foetal size at routine foetal ultrasound examination 17–19 weeks after the last menstrual period (for 98% of these pregnancies).

The Medical Birth Registry holds information about smoking since the end of 1999, and smoking may affect birthweight and inter-pregnancy interval [33]. Thus, among women with a first delivery 2000–2009 (123 170 women), we made additional adjustment for daily smoking in the first trimester or in the second pregnancy (yes/no).

Statistical analyses

Firstly, we calculated the distribution of study factors (means and proportions) in the first and the second pregnancy. Thereafter, we estimated crude and adjusted mean changes in birthweight (in grams with 95% confidence intervals (CI)) from the first to the second delivery according to the length of the inter-pregnancy interval. We applied linear regression analyses. For crude birthweight changes, fixed effect for year of first delivery is presented. For the adjusted estimates, all the potentially confounding factors listed above were included.

We studied mean changes in birthweight in the study sample as a whole, and we repeated the analyses among women with and women without a first stillborn child. In women with a first live born child, we studied separately women aged < 25 years, 25–29 years, < 30 years, 30–35 years, and > 35 years at their first delivery, and also women with infant birthweight < 2500 g at the first delivery.

Additionally, we estimated crude and adjusted odds ratios (with 95% confidence intervals (CI)) of recurrence of birthweight; <2500 g and of small for gestational age infant (≤ 5th percentile) according to inter-pregnancy interval.

Finally, we studied crude and adjusted mean changes in gestational age at delivery (in days) from the first to the second delivery, recurrence risk of preterm birth (< 37 gestational week), and recurrence risk of perinatal death according to the length of the inter-pregnancy interval. Recurrence risks were estimated as adjusted odd ratios (OR) with 95% CI by applying logistic regression analyses. In these analyses, inter-pregnancy interval 8–23 months is used at the reference category, and only women with the adverse outcome of interest at first delivery were included.

We used STATA version 17.0 for the statistical analyses.

Results

Among the total of 654 100 women, 649 764 (99.3%) delivered first live born infant. Among the women with a first live born infant, mean infant birthweight was 3463 g (SD 545 g), and at the second delivery mean birthweight was 3604 g (SD 558 g) (Table 1). Mean inter-pregnancy-interval was 34.6 months (SD 29.5 months).

Table 1 Characteristics of the study sample at first and second delivery. All women in Norway with their first and second singleton delivery during the period 1970–2019 and first delivery < 2010 (n = 649 764). First stillborn exluded

Variable	First delivery		Second delivery		Change in level		
Mean (SD)							
	Birthweight (grams)	3463.2 (544.7)		3603.8 (557.9)		140.6		
	Gestational age at delivery (days)	281.3 (14.4)		280.7 (13.5)		-0.6		
	Inter pregnancy interval (months)					34.6 (29.5)		
Proportion (%)							
	Mothers age							
	< 30 years	86.5		61.7		-24.8		
	30–35 years	12.3		31.6		19.3		
	>35 years	1.2		6.7		5.5		
	Sex of child:							
	Boy	51.5		51.4		-0.1		
	Girl	48.5		48.6		0.1		
	Diabetes (any)	0.6		1.1		0.5		
	Preeclampsia/hypertension	6.2		3.6		-2.6		
	Daily smoking first trimester (from 1999)	16.1		10.3		-5.8		
	Same father to both pregnancies	90.1						
	Mother not born in Norway	18.1						

Inter-pregnancy interval and birthweight

Mean birthweight

The increase in birthweight from the first to the second delivery was most prominent if the interval between the pregnancies was short (Fig. 1, Supplemental Table 1). In pregnancies conceived < 6 months after the first delivery, adjusted mean increase in birthweight was 227 g (95% CI; 219 –236 g), 90 g higher than in pregnancies conceived 6–11 months after the first delivery (137 g (95% CI; 130–144 g). After exclusion of women with stillbirth at the first delivery, the adjusted mean increase in birthweight at inter-pregnancy intervals < 6 months was attenuated (152 g, 95% CI; 143 –160 g), but remained higher than at longer inter-pregnancy intervals (Fig. 1, Supplemental Table 1). We found no difference in adjusted birthweight increase across inter-pregnancy intervals 6 to 59 months. However, by increasing length of the interval, the point estimated difference in birthweight between the first and the second pregnancy declined. At inter-pregnancy intervals > 124 months, the adjusted mean increase in birthweight was 25 g (95% CI; 14 –37 g). The pattern of highest birthweight increase at the shortest inter-pregnancy interval was observed in each decade during our observation period (Supplemental Fig.  2). Additional adjustment for smoking did not change the estimates notably (smoking information available since 2000) (Supplemental Fig.  3).

Fig. 1 Increase in mean birthweight in grams (with 95% confidence intervals) according to the length of the inter-pregnancy interval. All women in Norway with two singleton deliveries during the period 1970-2019 and first delivery <2010. Note Crude estimates: Include fixed effect for year of first delivery in five periods with equal number of women (quintiles). Adjusted estimates: Include fixed effect for year of first delivery in five periods with equal number of women (quintiles), women’s age at the first delivery, diabetes in first or second pregnancy, hypertension in first or second pregnancy, sex of child in first and second pregnancy, a new father to the second pregnancy and whether the mother was born in Norway.

Interestingly, women older than 35 years had the highest point estimated mean increase in birthweight from the first to the second delivery (218 g, 95% CI; 139 –298 g) at inter-pregnancy intervals < 6 months (Fig. 2, Supplemental Table 2). The corresponding increase among women aged 30–35 years was 195 g (95% CI; 168 –222 g), and it was 150 g (95% CI 139 –1607 g) among women less than 25 years old.

Fig. 2 Increase in mean birthweight in grams according to inter-pregnancy interval and women’s age at first delivery. All women in Norway with two singleton deliveries during the period 1970-2019 and first delivery <2010 First stillbirth excluded. Note Crude estimates: Include fixed effect for year of first delivery in five periods with equal number of women (quintiles). Adjusted estimates: Include fixed effect for year of first delivery in five periods with equal number of women (quintiles), mother’s age at the first delivery, diabetes in first or second pregnancy, hypertension in first or second pregnancy, sex of child in first and second pregnancy, a new father to the second pregnancy and whether the mother was born in Norway. Intervals up to 72 months for mothers aged >35 years

At first delivery, 25 367 women (3.6%) gave birth to a live born infant with birthweight < 2500 g. Among these women, the adjusted mean increase in birthweight was highest among women with inter-pregnancy interval < 6 months (1177 g, 95% CI; 1127 –1226 g) (Fig. 3, Supplemental Table 3). At inter-pregnancy intervals 6–11 months, mean birthweight increase was 1002 g (95% CI 955 –1048 g). At inter-pregnancy intervals beyond 11 months, the birthweight increase had overlapping confidence intervals.

Fig. 3 Increase in mean birthweight in grams according to inter-pregnancy interval. Birthweight at first delivery <2500 g. Two singleton deliveries during the period 1970-2019 and first delivery <2010 (n=25 369). First stillbirth excluded. Note Crude estimates: Include fixed effect for year of first delivery in five periods with equal number of women (quintiles). Adjusted estimates: Include fixed effect for year of first delivery in five periods with equal number of women (quintiles), women’s age at the first delivery, diabetes in first or second pregnancy, hypertension in first or second pregnancy, sex of child in first and second pregnancy, a new father to the second pregnancy and whether the mother was born in Norway

Recurrence of low birthweight

Among the 25 369 women with birthweight < 2500 g at the second delivery, 3796 women experienced recurrence of low birthweight (15%). We estimated no differences in recurrence risk for birthweight < 2500 g according to inter-pregnancy interval (Supplemental Fig.  4). The point estimated recurrence risk for a small for a gestational age infant (< 5th percentile) was similar across all inter-pregnancy intervals (Supplemental Fig.  4).

Inter-pregnancy interval and gestational age at delivery

Mean gestational age

At inter-pregnancy intervals < 6 months, the adjusted mean increase in gestational age from the first to the second delivery was 2.3 days (95% CI; 2.1 days − 2.5 days) (Fig. 4, Supplemental Table 4). There was no difference in gestational age between first and second delivery at inter-pregnancy intervals between 6 and 35 months. However, the point estimates were decreasing, and at inter-pregnancy intervals > 36 months mean gestational age was lower than at the first delivery. At inter-pregnancy intervals > 124 months, gestational age was 3.6 days lower (95% CI; -3.7 to -3.1 days) than at the first delivery.

Fig. 4 Increase in mean gestational age at delivery (in days) according to inter-pregnancy interval. All women in Norway with two singleton deliveries during the period 1970-2019 and first delivery <2010. First stillbirth excludeds. Note Crude estimates: Include fixed effect for year of first delivery in five periods with equal number of women (quintiles).Adjusted estimates: Include fixed effect for year of first delivery in five periods with equal number of women (quintiles), women’s age at the first delivery, diabetes in first or second pregnancy, hypertension in first or second pregnancy, sex of child in first and second pregnancy, a new father to the second pregnancy and whether the woman was born in Norway

Recurrence of preterm birth

Among the 34 944 women with a first preterm delivery of a live born infant, 5714 women (16%) experienced recurrent preterm birth. The point estimated recurrence risk of preterm birth, displayed a j-shape curve with higher recurrence risk at < 6 months inter-pregnancy interval than at 6–11 months (Supplemental Fig.  4). Beyond 11 months inter-pregnancy interval, the point estimated recurrence risk of preterm delivery showed an increasing trend. Among the women with recurrent preterm birth and inter-pregnancy interval < 6 months, mean gestational age increased from the first to the second delivery from 225 days to 235 days, and mean birthweight increased from 1975 g to 2386 g (data not shown).

Recurrence of perinatal death

The risk of recurrent perinatal death was low (205 out of 6376 women, 3.3%). We estimated no difference in recurrence risk according to length of the inter-pregnancy interval (Supplemental Fig.  4).

Discussion

Main findings

We studied mean changes in birthweight from the first to the second delivery, and we found that the increase in birthweight was highest if the inter-pregnancy interval was less than six months. This finding was more prominent among women aged 35 years or older at the first delivery than among women less than 30 years. Also among women with first live born infant weighing less than 2500 g, we found the highest increase in birthweight at inter-pregnancy intervals less than six months.

Strengths and limitations

In our study, all first-time singleton mothers in Norway during 1970–2010 were followed at least 10 years for a second delivery to occur. Thus, we limited potential biases due to overrepresentation of women with short inter-pregnancy intervals. To our knowledge, this study is the largest yet to report the relation of inter-pregnancy interval with pregnancy outcome, and we had statistical power for separate analyses of subgroups of women. We studied changes from the first to the second delivery in a follow-up study. Such data analytic approach, reduces biases that may occur if women with an underlying risk of low birthweight or other adverse pregnancy outcomes also have a short inter-pregnancy interval [12, 13, 16].

We made adjustments for factors that have been associated with birthweight and/or the interval between pregnancies, such as maternal age at the first delivery, hypertensive disorders in any of the two pregnancies, and a new father to the second pregnancy. In a subgroup of women, we made additional adjustment for smoking. However, adjustments did not change our results notably.

Confounding may remain. Women’s body mass index may vary by the length of the inter-pregnancy interval [13, 34], and high body mass index has been associated with high offspring birthweight [35, 36]. Unfortunately, information about body mass index was available for the last two years of our inclusion period only, and half of these women lacked information. Thus, the results among these women were unreliable and therefore not presented. Both short inter-pregnancy interval and low birthweight have been associated with low socioeconomic status [37–39].It cannot be ruled out that changes in socioeconomic status from the first to the second pregnancy have confounded our results. Unfortunately, we lacked individual information about income and socioeconomic status.

Our results may not be generalizable to all women in the world [39, 40]. In addition to the high standard of living in Norway, antenatal and obstetric health care is public, free of charge and used by almost all pregnant women [41, 42]. First trimester pregnancy termination on the woman’s request has been legally performed since 1979, and pregnancy termination is free of charge. The quality and accessibility of health care may influence maternal morbidity, the interval between deliveries, birthweight, and other pregnancy outcomes. A short inter-pregnancy interval has been reported to increase maternal morbidity [43, 44].

Interpretations of findings

It is well known that mean birthweight increases from the first to the second delivery [45, 46]. Our results suggest that the increase in birthweight from the first to the second delivery is highest if the interval is short. Birthweight is associated with future health. Birthweight, also within normal ranges, has been inversely associated with mortality [9, 10]. The higher increase in birthweight after inter-pregnancy interval < 6 months in our study may partly be explained by higher increase in gestational age at delivery (mean increase two days). Both higher birthweight and higher gestational age may be advantageous for the infant, and these outcomes are strongly interrelated.

In most previous studies, women with stillbirth were excluded. Our study illustrates that if the first infant is stillborn or has low birthweight, birthweight is likely to be higher at the second delivery particularly if the inter-pregnancy interval is short.

In most previous studies the outcome variable was dichotomous, and a short inter-pregnancy interval has been associated adverse outcomes such as low birthweight, perinatal death, preterm birth, and poor school performance of the child [2–9, 47–49]. The strength of the associations, however, has varied considerably between studies. Studies that have applied within women analyses, questions whether the increased risk of adverse outcomes at short pregnancy intervals is causal [12, 13, 21, 25].

We estimated increased recurrence risk of preterm birth at inter-pregnancy intervals < 6 months.

Among the women with recurrent preterm birth and inter-pregnancy interval < 6 months, mean increase in gestational age from the first to the second delivery was 10 days, and mean increase in birthweight was 411 g. Such increase is favourable for the infant although delivery to term could not be reached. Previously, the risk of preterm delivery according to inter-pregnancy interval has shown inconsistent results [50]. We are not aware of previous studies of recurrent perinatal death risk according to inter-pregnancy interval.

The increase in birthweight at short inter-pregnancy intervals in our study could possibly be explained by underlying factors that are linked to both short inter-pregnancy interval and high birthweight. High fecundity could be one such factor. Women with high fecundity may get pregnant shortly after a delivery, have low risk of miscarriage, and the birthweight of their offspring may be higher than women with low fecundity [34]. A biological selection to a successful pregnancy after a short inter-pregnancy interval may be particularly pronounced among women at high reproductive age [7]. An alternative hypothesis is that at long inter-pregnancy intervals, the maternal age is increased and thereby the risk is increased of maternal complications that may affect fetal growth and duration of pregnancy.

A pregnancy enhances large changes in the maternal cardiovascular system, and these changes are essential for the provision of oxygen and nutrition to the fetus [51]. The maternal adaption to pregnancy includes increased cardiac output, new vessels, increased oxygen uptake, and higher levels of growth and pro-angiogenic factors [52, 53]. It is conceivable such changes remain after a pregnancy or may easily be reactivated, particularly shortly after a previous pregnancy. A biological memory of being pregnant is supported by the low risk of preeclampsia after a short inter-pregnancy interval [20, 43], and preeclampsia is closely linked to low maternal levels of pro-angiogenic factors [54]. Increasing evidence suggests that foetal cells that are transferred to the mother during pregnancy, have multilineage differentiation capacity [55, 56], and such cells may possibly contribute to a biological memory of being pregnant.

Conclusion

In this follow-up study of 654 100 women in Norway, we found that the increase in birthweight from the first to the second delivery was highest if the inter-pregnancy interval was less than six months. Our findings do not generally discourage a short inter-pregnancy interval.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Southeast Health Region Norway (Grant number 274908).

Author contributions

A.E. hade the original idea and wrote the manuscript. I.S. performed the data analyses, made tables and figures, and contributed to the interpretation of the results. C.H and O.D.S contributed to the writing of the manuscript and to the interpretation of the results. J.G. performed the data analyses, made tables and figures, and contributed to the interpretation of the results. J.G is also the guarantor of the study. All authors have read the last version and approved the submission of the manuscript.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Akershus University Hospital (AHUS)

Data availability

The data underlying this article may be available on request to the Medical Birth Registry of Norway.

Declarations

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics, Norway (REK 20/15255-2). We used data from the Medical Birth Registry in Norway. The reporting by health personnel of births to the Medical Birth Registry in Norway is compulsory by law. Individual informed consent is not necessary for the reporting.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Conde-Agudelo A Rosas-Bermúdez A KafuryGoeta AC Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis JAMA 2006 295 1809 23 10.1001/jama.295.15.1809 16622143
Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermúdez A, KafuryGoeta AC. Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2006;295:1809–23. 10.1001/jama.295.15.1809.16622143
2. Rutstein SO. Effects of preceding birth intervals on neonatal, infant and under-five years mortality and nutritional status in developing countries: evidence from the demographic and health surveys. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;89(S7–24 supplement). 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.11.012.
3. Zhu BP Effect of interpregnancy interval on birth outcomes: findings from three recent US studies Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005 89 S25 33 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.08.002 15820365
Zhu BP. Effect of interpregnancy interval on birth outcomes: findings from three recent US studies. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;89:S25–33. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.08.002.15820365
4. Zhu BP Rolfs RT Nangle BE Horan JM Effect of the interval between pregnancies on perinatal outcomes N Engl J Med 1999 340 589 94 10.1056/NEJM199902253400801 10029642
Zhu BP, Rolfs RT, Nangle BE, Horan JM. Effect of the interval between pregnancies on perinatal outcomes. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:589–94. 10.1056/NEJM199902253400801.10029642
5. Hegelund ER Urhoj SK Andersen AMN Mortensen LH Interpregnancy interval and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a Register-based study of 328,577 pregnancies in Denmark 1994–2010 Matern Child Health J 2018 22 1008 15 10.1007/s10995-018-2480-7 29423584
Hegelund ER, Urhoj SK, Andersen AMN, Mortensen LH. Interpregnancy interval and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a Register-based study of 328,577 pregnancies in Denmark 1994–2010. Matern Child Health J. 2018;22:1008–15. 10.1007/s10995-018-2480-7.29423584
6. DeFranco EA, Seske LM, Greenberg JM, Muglia LJ. Influence of interpregnancy interval on neonatal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212. 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.017. :386.e1-9.
7. Schummers L Hutcheon JA Hernandez-Diaz S Association of short interpregnancy interval with pregnancy outcomes according to maternal age JAMA Intern Med 2018 178 1661 70 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4696 30383085
Schummers L, Hutcheon JA, Hernandez-Diaz S, et al. Association of short interpregnancy interval with pregnancy outcomes according to maternal age. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178:1661–70. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4696.30383085
8. McCormick MC The contribution of low birth weight to infant mortality and childhood morbidity N Engl J Med 1985 312 82 90 10.1056/NEJM198501103120204 3880598
McCormick MC. The contribution of low birth weight to infant mortality and childhood morbidity. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:82–90. 10.1056/NEJM198501103120204.3880598
9. Risnes KR Vatten LJ Baker JL Birthweight and mortality in adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis Int J Epidemiol 2011 40 647 61 10.1093/ije/dyq267 21324938
Risnes KR, Vatten LJ, Baker JL, et al. Birthweight and mortality in adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40:647–61. 10.1093/ije/dyq267.21324938
10. Samuelsen SO Magnus P Bakketeig LS Birth weight and mortality in childhood in Norway Am J Epidemiol 1998 148 983 91 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009575 9829870
Samuelsen SO, Magnus P, Bakketeig LS. Birth weight and mortality in childhood in Norway. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148:983–91. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009575.9829870
11. Wilcox AJ On the importance and the unimportance of birthweight Int J Epidemiol 2000 30 1233 41 10.1093/ije/30.6.1233
Wilcox AJ. On the importance and the unimportance of birthweight. Int J Epidemiol. 2000;30:1233–41. 10.1093/ije/30.6.1233.
12. Ball SJ Gavin Pereira G Peter Jacoby P Nicholas de Klerk N Stanley FJ Re-evaluation of link between interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes: retrospective cohort study matching two intervals per mother BMJ 2014 349 g4333 10.1136/bmj.g4333 25056260
Ball SJ, Gavin Pereira G, Peter Jacoby P, Nicholas de Klerk N, Stanley FJ. Re-evaluation of link between interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes: retrospective cohort study matching two intervals per mother. BMJ. 2014;349:g4333. 10.1136/bmj.g4333.25056260
13. Hanley GE Hutcheon JA Kinniburgh BA Lee L Interpregnancy interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes: an analysis of successive pregnancies Obstet Gynecol 2017 129 408 15 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001891 28178044
Hanley GE, Hutcheon JA, Kinniburgh BA, Lee L. Interpregnancy interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes: an analysis of successive pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:408–15. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001891.28178044
14. Wendt A, Gibbs CM, Peters S, Hogue CJ. Impact of increasing inter-pregnancy interval on maternal and infant health. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012;26. 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01285.x. Suppl 1:239 – 58.
15. Ahrens KA Nelson H Stidd RL Moskosky S Hutcheon JA Short interpregnancy intervals and adverse perinatal outcomes in high-resource settings: an updated systematic review Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2019 33 O25 47 10.1111/ppe.12503 30353935
Ahrens KA, Nelson H, Stidd RL, Moskosky S, Hutcheon JA. Short interpregnancy intervals and adverse perinatal outcomes in high-resource settings: an updated systematic review. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019;33:O25–47. 10.1111/ppe.12503.30353935
16. Ahrens KA Hutcheon JA Advancing the methodological quality of studies on short birth spacing and adverse pregnancy outcomes: where to next? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2021 35 389 91 10.1111/ppe.12797 34184300
Ahrens KA, Hutcheon JA. Advancing the methodological quality of studies on short birth spacing and adverse pregnancy outcomes: where to next? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2021;35:389–91. 10.1111/ppe.12797.34184300
17. World Health Organization. Report of a WHO technical consultation on birth spacing: Geneva, Switzerland 13–15 June 2005. World Health Organization. 2007. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/69855. Accessed 8 May 2023.
18. Fertility Statistics. Eurostats. Fertility explained. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database?node_code=tps00017. Accessed 8 May 2023.
19. Eijkemans MJC van Poppel F Habbema DF Smith KR Leridon H te Velde ER Too old to have children? Lessons from natural fertility populations Hum Repr 2014 29 1304 12 10.1093/humrep/deu056
Eijkemans MJC, van Poppel F, Habbema DF, Smith KR, Leridon H, te Velde ER. Too old to have children? Lessons from natural fertility populations. Hum Repr. 2014;29:1304–12. 10.1093/humrep/deu056.
20. Trogstad L Eskild A Magnus P Samuelsen SO Nesheim B-I Changing paternity and time since last pregnancy; the impact on pre-eclampsia risk. A study of 547 238 women with and without previous pre-eclampsia Int J Epidemiol 2001 30 1317 22 10.1093/ije/30.6.1317 11821338
Trogstad L, Eskild A, Magnus P, Samuelsen SO, Nesheim B-I. Changing paternity and time since last pregnancy; the impact on pre-eclampsia risk. A study of 547 238 women with and without previous pre-eclampsia. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30:1317–22. 10.1093/ije/30.6.1317.11821338
21. Regan AK Gissler M Magnus MC Association between interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes in women with a previous stillbirth: an international cohort study Lancet 2019 393 10180 1527 35 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32266-9 30827781
Regan AK, Gissler M, Magnus MC, et al. Association between interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes in women with a previous stillbirth: an international cohort study. Lancet. 2019;393(10180):1527–35. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32266-9.30827781
22. Gardosi J, Francis A. Adverse pregnancy outcome and association with small for gestational age birthweight by customized and population-based percentiles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201. 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.04.034. :28.e1-8.
23. Wong LF, Schliep KC, Silver RM, et al. The effect of a very short interpregnancy interval and pregnancy outcomes following a previous pregnancy loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212. 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.09.020. :375.e1-11.
24. Kangatharan C Labram S Bhattacharya S Interpregnancy interval following miscarriage and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis Hum Reprod Update 2017 23 221 31 10.1093/humupd/dmw043 27864302
Kangatharan C, Labram S, Bhattacharya S. Interpregnancy interval following miscarriage and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23:221–31. 10.1093/humupd/dmw043.27864302
25. Tessema GA Håberg SE Pereira G Regan AK Dunne J Magnus MC Interpregnancy interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes among pregnancies following miscarriages or induced abortions in Norway (2008–2016): a cohort study PloS Med 2022 19 e1004129 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004129 36413512
Tessema GA, Håberg SE, Pereira G, Regan AK, Dunne J, Magnus MC. Interpregnancy interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes among pregnancies following miscarriages or induced abortions in Norway (2008–2016): a cohort study. PloS Med. 2022;19:e1004129. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004129.36413512
26. Irgens LM The Medical Birth Registry of Norway. Epidemiological research and surveillance throughout 30 years Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000 79 435 9 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2000.079006435.x 10857866
Irgens LM. The Medical Birth Registry of Norway. Epidemiological research and surveillance throughout 30 years. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79:435–9.10857866
27. Pandey S Shetty A Hamilton M Bhattacharya S Maheshwari A Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hum Reprod Update 2012 18 485 503 10.1093/humupd/dms018 22611174
Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S, Maheshwari A. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18:485–503. 10.1093/humupd/dms018.22611174
28. Haavaldsen C Samuelsen SO Eskild A The association of maternal age with placental weight: a population-based study of 536 954 pregnancies BJOG 2011 118 1470 6 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03053.x 21749632
Haavaldsen C, Samuelsen SO, Eskild A. The association of maternal age with placental weight: a population-based study of 536 954 pregnancies. BJOG. 2011;118:1470–6. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03053.x.21749632
29. Strøm-Roum EM Jukic AM Eskild A Offspring birthweight and placental weight-does the type of maternal diabetes matter? A population-based study of 319 076 pregnancies Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2021 100 1885 92 10.1111/aogs.14217 34157127
Strøm-Roum EM, Jukic AM, Eskild A. Offspring birthweight and placental weight-does the type of maternal diabetes matter? A population-based study of 319 076 pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;100:1885–92. 10.1111/aogs.14217.34157127
30. Vatten LJ Rolv Skjaerven R Effects on pregnancy outcome of changing partner between first two births: prospective population study BMJ 2003 327 1138 10.1136/bmj.327.7424.1138 14615338
Vatten LJ, Rolv Skjaerven R. Effects on pregnancy outcome of changing partner between first two births: prospective population study. BMJ. 2003;327:1138. 10.1136/bmj.327.7424.1138.14615338
31. Eskild A Sommerfelt S Skau I Grytten J Offspring birthweight and placental weight in immigrant women from conflict-zone countries; does length of residence in the host country matter? A population study in Norway Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2020 99 615 22 10.1111/aogs.13777 31774545
Eskild A, Sommerfelt S, Skau I, Grytten J. Offspring birthweight and placental weight in immigrant women from conflict-zone countries; does length of residence in the host country matter? A population study in Norway. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99:615–22. 10.1111/aogs.13777.31774545
32. Carlsen EØ Magnus MC Omsland TK Magnus PM Håberg SE Wilcox AJ Stumped by the hump: the curious rise and fall of Norwegian birthweights, 1991–2007 Epidemiology 2020 31 587 94 10.1097/ede.0000000000001211 32427635
Carlsen EØ, Magnus MC, Omsland TK, Magnus PM, Håberg SE, Wilcox AJ. Stumped by the hump: the curious rise and fall of Norwegian birthweights, 1991–2007. Epidemiology. 2020;31:587–94. 10.1097/ede.0000000000001211.32427635
33. Larsen S Haavaldsen C Bjelland EK Dypvik J Jukic AM Eskild A Placental weight and birthweight: the relations with number of daily cigarettes and smoking cessation in pregnancy. A population study Int J Epidemiol 2018 47 1141 50 10.1093/ije/dyy110 29947760
Larsen S, Haavaldsen C, Bjelland EK, Dypvik J, Jukic AM, Eskild A. Placental weight and birthweight: the relations with number of daily cigarettes and smoking cessation in pregnancy. A population study. Int J Epidemiol. 2018;47:1141–50. 10.1093/ije/dyy110.29947760
34. Ziauddeen N Roderick PJ Macklon NS Alwan NA The duration of the interpregnancy interval in multiparous women and maternal weight gain between pregnancies: findings from a UK population-based cohort Sci Rep 2019 9 9175 10.1038/s41598-019-45595-0 31235740
Ziauddeen N, Roderick PJ, Macklon NS, Alwan NA. The duration of the interpregnancy interval in multiparous women and maternal weight gain between pregnancies: findings from a UK population-based cohort. Sci Rep. 2019;9:9175. 10.1038/s41598-019-45595-0.31235740
35. Strøm-Roum EM Tanbo TG Eskild A The associations of maternal body mass index with birthweight and placental weight. Does maternal diabetes matter? A population study of 106 191 pregnancies Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2016 95 1162 70 10.1111/aogs.12947 27454190
Strøm-Roum EM, Tanbo TG, Eskild A. The associations of maternal body mass index with birthweight and placental weight. Does maternal diabetes matter? A population study of 106 191 pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95:1162–70. 10.1111/aogs.12947.27454190
36. Villamor E Cnattingius S Interpregnancy weight change and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a population-based study Lancet 2006 368 1164 70 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69473-7 17011943
Villamor E, Cnattingius S. Interpregnancy weight change and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006;368:1164–70. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69473-7.17011943
37. Rawlings JS Rawlings VB Read JA Prevalence of low birth weight and preterm delivery in relation to the interval between pregnancies among white and black women N Engl J Med 1995 332 69 74 10.1056/NEJM199501123320201 7990903
Rawlings JS, Rawlings VB, Read JA. Prevalence of low birth weight and preterm delivery in relation to the interval between pregnancies among white and black women. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:69–74. 10.1056/NEJM199501123320201.7990903
38. Pimentel J Ansari U Omer K Factors associated with short birth interval in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020 20 156 10.1186/s12884-020-2852-z 32164598
Pimentel J, Ansari U, Omer K, et al. Factors associated with short birth interval in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:156. 10.1186/s12884-020-2852-z.32164598
39. Khoshnood B Lee KS Wall S Hsieh HL Mittendorf R Short interpregnancy intervals and the risk of adverse birth outcomes among five racial/ethnic groups in the United States Am J Epidemiol 1998 148 798 805 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009701 9786235
Khoshnood B, Lee KS, Wall S, Hsieh HL, Mittendorf R. Short interpregnancy intervals and the risk of adverse birth outcomes among five racial/ethnic groups in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148:798–805. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009701.9786235
40. Nonyane BAS Norton M Begum N Pregnancy intervals after stillbirth, neonatal death and spontaneous abortion and the risk of an adverse outcome in the next pregnancy in rural Bangladesh BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019 19 62 10.1186/s12884-019-2203-0 30738434
Nonyane BAS, Norton M, Begum N, et al. Pregnancy intervals after stillbirth, neonatal death and spontaneous abortion and the risk of an adverse outcome in the next pregnancy in rural Bangladesh. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:62. 10.1186/s12884-019-2203-0.30738434
41. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). Human Development Report 2020: The Next Frontier: Human Development and the Anthropocene. New York:UNDP. 2020. https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2020. Accessed 8 May 2023.
42. Helsenorge. Pregnancy and maternity care in Norway. https://www.helsenorge.no/en/pregnancy-and-maternity-care-in-norway/. Accessed 8 May 2023.
43. Conde-Agudelo A Rosas-Bermúdez A Kafury-Goeta AC Effects of birth spacing on maternal health: a systematic review Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007 196 297 308 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.055 17403398
Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermúdez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Effects of birth spacing on maternal health: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:297–308. 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.055.17403398
44. Garg B, Darney B, Pilliod RA, Caughey AB. Long and short interpregnancy intervals increase severe maternal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.013:331.e1-331.e8.
45. Karn MN Lang Brown H MacKenzie H Penrose LS Birth weight, gestation time and survival in sibs Annals Eugenics 1951 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1949.tb02450.x
Karn MN, Lang Brown H, MacKenzie H, Penrose LS. Birth weight, gestation time and survival in sibs. Annals Eugenics. 1951. 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1949.tb02450.x. 1:306 – 22.
46. Hinkle SN Albert PS Mendola P The association between parity and birthweight in a longitudinal consecutive pregnancy cohort Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2014 28 106 15 10.1111/ppe.12099 24320682
Hinkle SN, Albert PS, Mendola P, et al. The association between parity and birthweight in a longitudinal consecutive pregnancy cohort. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2014;28:106–15. 10.1111/ppe.12099.24320682
47. de Weger FJ Hukkelhoven CWPM Serroyen J te Velde ER Smitth LJM Advanced maternal age, short interpregnancy interval, and perinatal outcome Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011 204 e4211 9 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.12.008
de Weger FJ, Hukkelhoven CWPM, Serroyen J, te Velde ER, Smitth LJM. Advanced maternal age, short interpregnancy interval, and perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:e4211–9. 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.12.008.
48. Gupta PM Freedman AA Kramer MR Interpregnancy interval and risk of stillbirth: a population-based case control study Ann Epidemiol 2019 35 34 41 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.05.001
Gupta PM, Freedman AA, Kramer MR, et al. Interpregnancy interval and risk of stillbirth: a population-based case control study. Ann Epidemiol. 2019;35:34–41. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.05.001.
49. Buckles KS Munnich EL Birth spacing and sibling outcomes J Hum Resour 2012 47 613 42 10.3368/jhr.47.3.613
Buckles KS, Munnich EL. Birth spacing and sibling outcomes. J Hum Resour. 2012;47:613–42. 10.3368/jhr.47.3.613.
50. Tessema GA Marinovich ML Håberg SE Interpregnancy intervals and adverse birth outcomes in high-income countries: an international cohort study PLoS ONE 2021 16 e0255000 10.1371/journal.pone.0255000 34280228
Tessema GA, Marinovich ML, Håberg SE, et al. Interpregnancy intervals and adverse birth outcomes in high-income countries: an international cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0255000. 10.1371/journal.pone.0255000.34280228
51. Mahendru AA Foo FL McEniery CM Everett TR Wilkinson IB Lees CC Change in maternal cardiac output from preconception to mid-pregnancy is associated with birth weight in healthy pregnancies Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017 49 78 84 10.1002/uog.17368 27859800
Mahendru AA, Foo FL, McEniery CM, Everett TR, Wilkinson IB, Lees CC. Change in maternal cardiac output from preconception to mid-pregnancy is associated with birth weight in healthy pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49:78–84. 10.1002/uog.17368.27859800
52. Red-Horse K Zhou Y Genbacev O Trophoblast differentiation during embryo implantation and formation of the maternal-fetal interface J Clin Investig 2004 114 744 54 10.1172/JCI200422991 15372095
Red-Horse K, Zhou Y, Genbacev O, et al. Trophoblast differentiation during embryo implantation and formation of the maternal-fetal interface. J Clin Investig. 2004;114:744–54. 10.1172/JCI200422991.15372095
53. Noori M Donald AE Angelakopoulou A Hingorani AD Williams DJ Prospective study of placental angiogenic factors and maternal vascular function before and after preeclampsia and gestational hypertension Circulation 2010 122 478 87 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.895458 20644016
Noori M, Donald AE, Angelakopoulou A, Hingorani AD, Williams DJ. Prospective study of placental angiogenic factors and maternal vascular function before and after preeclampsia and gestational hypertension. Circulation. 2010;122:478–87. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.895458.20644016
54. Levine RJ Maynard SE Qian C Circulating angiogenic factors and the risk of preeclampsia N Engl J Med 2004 350 672 83 10.1056/NEJMoa031884 14764923
Levine RJ, Maynard SE, Qian C, et al. Circulating angiogenic factors and the risk of preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:672–83. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa031884.14764923
55. Khosrotehrani K Johnson KL Cha DH Salomon RN Bianchi DW Transfer of fetal cells with multilineage potential to maternal tissue JAMA 2004 292 75 80 10.1001/jama.292.1.75 15238593
Khosrotehrani K, Johnson KL, Cha DH, Salomon RN, Bianchi DW. Transfer of fetal cells with multilineage potential to maternal tissue. JAMA. 2004;292:75–80. 10.1001/jama.292.1.75.15238593
56. Rosner M Kolbe T Hengstschläger M Fetomaternal microchimerism and genetic diagnosis: on the origins of fetal cells and cell-free fetal DNA in the pregnant woman Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res 2021 788 108399 10.1016/j.mrrev.2021.108399 34893150
Rosner M, Kolbe T, Hengstschläger M. Fetomaternal microchimerism and genetic diagnosis: on the origins of fetal cells and cell-free fetal DNA in the pregnant woman. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2021;788:108399. 10.1016/j.mrrev.2021.108399.34893150
