
==== Front
Chem Commun (Camb)
Chem Commun (Camb)
CC
CHCOFS
Chemical Communications (Cambridge, England)
1359-7345
1364-548X
The Royal Society of Chemistry

39229666
d4cc03364g
10.1039/d4cc03364g
Chemistry
Synthesis and characterization of chlorotriarylbismuthonium salts†
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. CCDC 2356069–2356071, 2289340, 2296787, 2289343 and 2296786. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4cc03364g

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7705-941X
Kuziola Jennifer a
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9709-8187
Nöthling Nils a
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8171-9399
Leutzsch Markus a
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4152-7098
Cornella Josep a
a Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Platz 1 45470 Mülheim an der Ruhr Germany cornella@kofo.mpg.de

27 8 2024
20 9 2024
27 8 2024
60 76 1053210535
8 7 2024
25 8 2024
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry
2024
The Royal Society of Chemistry
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.
This work reports the synthesis and structural study of a family of chlorotriarylbismuthonium salts. The abstraction of a chlorine atom with NaBArF from triarylbismuth dichloride species leads to monomeric and dimeric chlorotriarylbismuthonium species, which show a distinct behavior in solution and solid-state in comparison to their fluorotriarylbismuthonium analogues.

This work fills the synthetic gap in the series of chlorotriarylpnictonium ions, by providing the heavier analogue based on bismuth.

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 10.13039/501100001659 Germany's Excellence Strategy - EXC 2033 - 390677874 Max-Planck-Gesellschaft 10.13039/501100004189 Unassigned European Research Council 10.13039/501100000781 850496 pubstatusPaginated Article
==== Body
pmcThe synthesis and design of novel Lewis acids based on cheap and more abundant main group elements opens the door to sustainable catalysts that can have an impact in organic synthesis and applications thereof. Of particular importance, are those derived from organopnictonium ions. In this regard, numerous fluorophosphonium salts have been synthesized, demonstrating their Lewis acidity in a wide range of organic transformations (Fig. 1A).1–10 The heightened Lewis acidity observed in cationic haloorganopnictonium salts is ascribed to the low-lying σ*-orbital positioned trans to the halogen atom.11–13 In contrast to its lighter congeners, heavier analogues in the group 15 have received comparable less attention despite their well-documented electrophilicity.14–17 Remarkable examples in this front are the monomeric fluorotriarylstibonium ions developed by Gabbaï and co-workers where interaction between the cationic Sb(v) and a OTf− anion can be observed in the solid state (Fig. 1A).12 Based on our interest in the study of organometallic compounds of bismuth,18–20 our group has recently reported a structural study on a series of fluorotriarylbismuthonium salts,21 which have shown a distinctive behaviour in comparison with its lighter analogues. In contrast to the monomeric cationic salts based on P and Sb,12 we observed the formation of di- and trinuclear fluorobismuthonium compounds. This distinct behaviour was attributed to the highly electropositive Bi(v) center in combination with the strong donor–acceptor interactions between the fluorine and Bi atom. Evaluation of the steric constraints on the aryl moieties eventually led to the isolation of the first monomeric fluorotriarylbismuthonium salt (Fig. 1A). Following this rationale, we realized that in contrast to fluoropnictonium salts, few examples of chlorotriarylpnictonium salts have been reported,12,17,22–28 (Fig. 1B). Gabbaï demonstrated a remarkable example of a monomeric chlorotrimesitylstibonium hexachloroantimonate salt, and its application in the polymerization of THF and dimerization of 1,1-diphenylethylene (Fig. 1B).12 Recently, Benjamin et al. enhanced the Lewis acidity by the introduction of electron-withdrawing aryl ligands, showing also the potential for formation of C–C bonds in a Friedel–Crafts alkylation reactions (Fig. 1B).28 Moreover, the same group has demonstrated the formation of a dinuclear chlorotriarylstibonium salt by the use of 0.4 equiv. of [Et3Si(C7H8)][B(C6F5)4] as chloride abstracting agent. Based on our previous work,21 we present the synthesis and structural study of chlorotriarylbismuthonium salts, including the first example of a monomeric chlorotriarylbismuthonium salt (Fig. 1C).

Fig. 1 (A) Representative examples of mononuclear fluorotriarylpnictonium salts. (B) Examples of mononuclearchlorotriarylpnictonium salts. (C) This work: synthesis of high-valent chlorotriarylbismuthonium salts.

Our studies of chlorotriarylbismuthonium salts started with the synthesis of triarylbismuth dichlorides. In order to be able to compare the chlorobismuthonium cations with the fluorinated analogues, unsubstituted and substituted aryl ligands bearing tBu and Me groups have been selected. Oxidation of triarylbismuth complexes with 1.3 equiv. of SO2Cl2 led to the isolation of the corresponding triarylbismuth dichlorides in high yields, which have been characterized by NMR, HRMS and SC-XRD (single crystal X-ray diffraction) (see ESI† for more details) (Scheme 1). Treating Ph3BiCl2 with 1.0 equiv. of NaBArF (BArF = B[C6H3-3,5-(CF3)2]4−) in CH2Cl2 at 25 °C indicated the presence of a formally monomeric [Ph3BiCl][BArF] (9) species in solution as suggested by the integration of the phenyl signals with respect to the BArF anion in the 1H NMR spectrum.

Scheme 1 Synthesis of triarylbismuth dichlorides 5–8 and chlorotriaryl bismuthonium salts.

Crystals of compound 9 suitable for SC-XRD analysis could not be obtained and therefore its structure in the solid state remains elusive. However, when Ph3BiCl2 was treated with 0.5 equiv. of NaBArF in CH2Cl2 at 25 °C, the formation of a dinuclear chlorotriphenylbismuthonium salt [(Ph3BiCl)2Cl][BArF] (9a) was observed in solution and solid-state as analyzed by NMR spectroscopy and SC-XRD (Fig. 2). The different formation of 9 and 9a in solution is in stark contrast to our previous observations with the parent difluorotriphenylbismuth, where the amount of NaBArF did not affect the reactivity of the halogen abstraction step.21 The formation of 9a resembles rather its lighter element homologue, the chlorotriphenylstibonium cation, which was obtained after treating Ph3SbCl2 with 0.4 equiv. of [Et3Si(C7H8)] [B(C6F5)4].28 Solid-state analysis of 9a reveals no additional intermolecular Bi⋯Cl interactions between the individual units. As illustrated in Fig. 2, both Bi centres adopt a trigonal bipyramidal geometry with chlorine ligands in apical and the phenyl groups in equatorial positions. The chlorobismuthonium cation (9a) exhibits a bent Bi1–Cl3–Bi2 geometry (Bi1–Cl3–Bi2: 128.10(2)°), attributed to packing effects during crystallization and the larger atomic size of chlorine compared to fluorine. Whereas the terminal Bi1–Cl1 and Bi2–Cl2 bond lengths were determined to be 2.4856(7) Å and 2.4996(8) Å, the distances between the bridging chloride and the Bi centres are characteristically longer (Bi1–Cl3: 2.7995(7), Bi2–Cl3: 2.8274(7) Å).21

Fig. 2 Solid state structure of 9a.29 Ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms, disordered parts and BArF are omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Bi1–Cl1: 2.4856(7), Bi1–Cl3: 2.7995(7), Bi2–Cl2: 2.4996(8), Bi2–Cl3: 2.8274(7), Bi1–Cl3–Bi2: 128.10(2); Cl1–Bi1–Cl3: 179.25(2), Cl2–Bi2–Cl3: 177.70(2).

The addition of 1.0 equiv. NaBArF to (m-Xyl)3BiCl2 (6) (m-Xyl = meta-xylene) in CH2Cl2 for 2 h at 25 °C resulted in the formation of mononuclear [(m-Xyl)3BiCl][BArF] (10) in solution, as judged by the integration in the 1H NMR spectrum. Crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction confirmed the isolation of a mononuclear bismuthonium salt as depicted in Fig. 3. The solid state structure reveals that the Bi atoms adopts a distorted tetrahedral geometry (τ4 = 0.89).30 The Bi–Cl bond length of 2.4028(8) Å is slightly shorter in complex 10 compared to the terminal Bi–Cl length of complex 9a. Interestingly, the presence of the less electronegative chlorine atom prevents dimerization or trimerization processes, and stands in contrast to the observations for its fluorinated analogues, where sterics controlled these processes.21

Fig. 3 Solid state structure of 10. Ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms and BArF are omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Bi1–Cl1: 2.4028(8), Bi1–C1: 2.185(3), Bi1–C9: 2.180(3), Bi1–C17: 2.189(3), C1–Bi1–C9: 121.63(11), C1–Bi2–C17: 111.32(10), C9–Bi2–C17: 112.55(11).

After treating 6 with 0.5 equiv. of NaBArF a new set of 1H NMR signals was observed that is in line with a formally formation of a dinuclear bismuthonium [((m-Xyl)3BiCl)2Cl][BArF] species (10a) in solution as judged by 1H NMR. However, contrary to our expectations, crystallization of this compound led to an SC-XRD of (m-Xyl)3BiCl2 (6). We hypothesize that the chloride abstraction with 0.5 equiv. NaBArF leads to the formation of a monomeric chlorobismuthonium cation 10, which reacts with a neutral triarylbismuth dichloride (6) resulting in a reversible equilibrium with dinuclear chlorobismuthonium salt (10a) in solution (Scheme 2). Further crystallization leads to the precipitation of complex 6. A similar equilibrium was observed with the trimeric fluorobismuthonium salt bearing phenyl as ligands using 1.0 equiv. of BArF.21

Scheme 2 Proposed behaviour of 10a in solution and solid state. m-Xyl = 3,5-Me2-C6H3.

Increasing the steric bulk by replacing the Me groups by tBu, a different behaviour in the formation of the bismuthonium salt could be observed. The addition of 1.0 equiv. of NaBArF to complex 7 leads to a new set of 1H NMR signals that are in line with a formally monomeric chlorotriarylbismuthonium salt [tBuAr3BiCl][BArF] (11). However, crystallization of complex 11 revealed the formation of a dimeric chlorobismuthonium salt (11a) as illustrated in Fig. 4, resembling the product and structure of reported fluorine analogue.21 The solid-state structure of 11 reveals that both Bi atoms adopt a trigonal bipyramidal geometry with two chloride ligands in apical positions and aromatic rings in equatorial positions (Fig. 4A). Both Bi atoms are united by a bridging chloride ligand, generating a Bi1–Cl2–Bi1 angle of 180.0°. Whereas the terminal Bi1–Cl1 bond lengths are shorter compared to the neutral parent complex 7 [11, Bi1–Cl1: 2.4857(7) Å; 7, Bi1–Cl1: 2.5954(5) Å] (see ESI† for more details), the bond length between the bridging chlorine and both Bi atoms are increased to 2.80068(13) Å. While the Bi1–Cl2–Bi1 axis displays an angle of 180.0°, the angle of a single tBuAr3BiCl2 unit is slightly deviated from linearity [Cl1–Bi1–Cl2: 173.722(17)°]. Moreover, the presence of the chlorine atoms in the bismuthonium salt 11 allows the aromatic ligands a greater flexibility due to the longer Bi1–Cl2 bond lengths [Bi1–Cl2: 2.80068(13) Å] compared to the fluorinated analogue [Bi1–F1: 2.282(3) Å],21 leading to a propeller-like conformation of the aromatic ligands (Fig. 4B). The addition of 0.5 equiv. of NaBArF to 7 resulted in a dimeric bismuthonium salt 11a [((m-Xyl)3BiCl)2Cl][BArF] in solution and solid state (see ESI† for more details).

Fig. 4 (A) Solid state structure of 11a.29 Ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms and BArF are omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Bi1–Cl1: 2.4857(7), Bi1–Cl2: 2.80068(13), Bi1–Cl2–Bi1: 180.0, Cl1–Bi1–Cl2: 173.722(17). (B) View along the Cl–Bi–Cl–Bi–Cl axis.

When comparing the formation of complexes 10 and 11a in the solid state, it can be observed that the meta tert-butyl groups might exert an attractive effect as a consequence of the London-dispersion forces. Although the m-tBu substituents are more sterically demanding in comparison to the m-Me groups, they serve as dispersion energy donors,31 leading to the formation of a thermodynamically more stable dimeric species 11a in solid state. The influence on the stability by m-tBu groups through attractive dispersion interactions has been previously observed in the literature.31

Increasing the sterics at the ortho-position by adding Me substituents, resulted in the formation of a monomeric chlorotrimesitylbismuthonium salt 12 in solution. Despite several crystallization attempts, suitable crystals could not be obtained. In order to get more insight into the potential structure, we reacted 12 with 1.0 equiv. of pyridine-N-oxide for 2 h at 25 °C in CH2Cl2. This reaction led to the isolation of complex 13 which was confirmed by NMR and SC-XRD (Scheme 3).

Scheme 3 Synthesis of complex 13.

A broadening of the 13C NMR signals of the pyridine ring and the 15N NMR shift (δ = −108.0 ppm) indicated a weak Bi–O bond which was also supported by the results of the HRMS data, as only the chlorobismuthonium salt has been detected. The solid-state structure of 13 displays a coordination of the pyridine-N-oxide via the O atom to the Bi centre, displaying a Bi–O bond length of 2.404(6) Å (Fig. 5). Moreover, the Bi center adopts a trigonal bipyramidal geometry with the chlorine and oxygen atom in apical positions as well as Mes ligands in equatorial positions. Complex 13 exhibits a Cl–Bi–O angle of 173.5(2)°.

Fig. 5 Solid state structure of 13. Ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms and BArF are omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Bi1–Cl1: 2.507(7), Bi1–O1: 2.404(6), Bi1–C1: 2.229(6), Bi1−C10: 2.226(5), Bi1–C19: 2.236(6), N1–O1: 1.334(8), C1–Bi1–C10: 117.9(2), C1–Bi1–C19: 121.7(2), C10–Bi1–C19: 119.3(2), Cl1–Bi1–O1: 173.5(2), N1–O1–Bi: 136.7(4).

In conclusion, we have reported a series of chlorotriarylbismuthonium salts with BArF as a weakly coordinating anion and extended the library of halotriarylbismuthonium salts. Contrary to our previous work on fluorobismuthonium salts, where the formation of either mono-, di- and trinuclear formation were controlled by steric factors, the use of a chloride ligand has displayed a distinctive behaviour, leading to fast dynamic exchanges in solution. The less electronegative chlorine ligands generate more labile bismuthonium units, allowing easier access to monomeric halobismuthonium salts. However, London dispersion forces assist in the formation of dimeric species in solid-state.

Financial support for this work was provided by Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung, and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy - EXC 2033 - 390677874 - RESOLV. This project has received funding from European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Agreement No. 850496 (ERC Starting Grant, J.C.). We thank MS, GC and X-ray departments of Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung for analytic support. We thank Prof. Dr A. Fürstner for insightful discussions and generous support. Open Access funding provided by the Max Planck Society.

Data availability

The data supporting this article have been included as part of the ESI.† Crystallographic data for 6-8, 9a-11 and 13 have been deposited at the CCDC under CCDC numbers 2356069–2356071 (6, 10, 13) and 2289340 (7), 2296787 (8), 2289343 (9a), 2296786 (11a).

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Supplementary Material

CC-060-D4CC03364G-s001

CC-060-D4CC03364G-s002
==== Refs
Notes and references

Caputo C. B. Hounjet L. J. Dobrovetsky R. Stephan D. W. Science 2013 341 1374 10.1126/science.1241764 24052304
Pérez M. Hounjet L. J. Caputo C. B. Dobrovetsky R. Stephan D. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013 135 18308 10.1021/ja410379x 24256456
Caputo C. B. Winkelhaus D. Dobrovetsky R. Hounjet L. J. Stephan D. W. Dalton Trans. 2015 44 12256 10.1039/C5DT00217F 25785571
Mehta M. Holthausen M. H. Mallov I. Pérez M. Qu Z.-W. Grimme S. Stephan D. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015 54 8250 10.1002/anie.201502579
Pérez M. Mahdi T. Hounjet L. J. Stephan D. W. Chem. Commun. 2015 51 11301 10.1039/C5CC03572D
Holthausen M. H. Mehta M. Stephan D. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014 53 6538 10.1002/anie.201403693 24828457
Mehta M. Garcia de la Arada I. Perez M. Porwal D. Oestreich M. Stephan D. W. Organometallics 2016 35 1030 10.1021/acs.organomet.6b00158
Mallov I. Stephan D. W. Dalton Trans. 2016 45 5568 10.1039/C6DT00105J 26911641
Postle S. Podgorny V. Stephan D. W. Dalton Trans. 2016 45 14651 10.1039/C6DT01339B 27140402
Vogler M. Süsse L. LaFortune J. H. W. Stephan D. W. Oestreich M. Organometallics 2018 37 3303 10.1021/acs.organomet.8b00496
Benz S. Poblador-Bahamonde A. I. Low-Ders N. Matile S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018 57 5408 10.1002/anie.201801452 29558562
Yang M. Gabbaï F. P. Inorg. Chem. 2017 56 8644 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00293 28326782
Thorwart T. and Greb L. , in Encyclopedia of Inorganic and Bioinorganic Chemistry, ed. R. A. Scott, Wiley, 2021, pp. 1–26
Murray J. S. Lane P. Politzer P. A. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2007 107 2286 10.1002/qua.21352
Bauzá A. Mooibroek T. J. Frontera A. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2015 16 2496 10.1002/cphc.201500314 26118675
Murray J. S. Lane P. Clark T. Riley K. E. Politzer P. J. Mol. Model. 2012 18 541 10.1007/s00894-011-1089-1 21541742
García-Monforte M. A. Baya M. Joven-Sancho D. Ara I. Martín A. Menjón B. J. Organomet. Chem. 2019 897 185 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2019.06.033
Pang Y. Nöthling N. Leutzsch M. Kang L. Bill E. Van Gastel M. Reijerse E. Goddard R. Wagner L. SantaLucia D. DeBeer S. Neese F. Cornella J. Science 2023 380 1043 10.1126/science.adg2833 37200451
Yang X. Reijerse E. J. Nöthling N. SantaLucia D. J. Leutzsch M. Schnegg A. Cornella J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023 145 5618 10.1021/jacs.2c12564 36854169
Magre M. Kuziola J. Nöthling N. Cornella J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2021 19 4922 10.1039/D1OB00367D 33955447
Kuziola J. Magre M. Nöthling N. Cornella J. Organometallics 2022 41 1754 10.1021/acs.organomet.2c00135 36156903
Sowerby D. B. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1983 5
Godfrey S. M. McAuliffe C. A. Pritchard R. G. Sheffield J. M. Chem. Commun. 1996 2521 10.1039/CC9960002521
Nikitin K. Jennings E. V. Al Sulaimi S. Ortin Y. Gilheany D. G. Angew. Chem. 2018 130 1496 10.1002/ange.201708649
Kapuśniak Ł. Plessow P. N. Trzybiński D. Woźniak K. Hofmann P. Jolly P. I. Organometallics 2021 40 693 10.1021/acs.organomet.0c00788 33867621
Pal S. Hong L. Freire R. V. M. Farooq S. Salentinig S. Kilbinger A. F. M. Macromolecules 2023 56 7984 10.1021/acs.macromol.3c01539
Akiba K. Okada K. Ohkata K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986 27 5221 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)85174-6
Coughlin O. Krämer T. Benjamin S. L. Organometallics 2023 42 339 10.1021/acs.organomet.2c00426 36937787
Kuziola J. Dissertation: Synthesis and Characterization of Mono- and Bimetallic Organobismuth(v) Compounds, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Max-Planck Institut für Kohlenforschung, 2024
Yang L. Powell D. R. Houser R. P. Dalton Trans. 2007 955 10.1039/B617136B 17308676
(a) Grimme S. Schreiner P. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011 50 12639 10.1002/anie.201103615
(b) Wagner J. P. Schreiner P. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015 54 12274 10.1002/anie.201503476 26262562
(c) Rösel S. Becker J. Allen W. D. Schreiner P. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018 140 14421 10.1021/jacs.8b09145 30288979
(d) Solel E. Ruth M. Schreiner P. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021 143 20837 10.1021/jacs.1c09222 34846890
(e) Schümann J. M. Ochmann L. Becker J. Altun A. Harden I. Bistoni G. Schreiner P. R. J. Am, Chem. Soc. 2023 145 2093 10.1021/jacs.2c13301 36688409
