
==== Front
JMIR Public Health Surveill
JMIR Public Health Surveill
JPH
publichealth
9
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
2369-2960
JMIR Publications Toronto, Canada

39259181
10.2196/54467
54467
Cross-Sectional Studies in Public Health
eHealth Literacy / Digital Literacy
Medication Adherence
Equity and Digital Divide
Aging in Place
Chronic Conditions
Original Paper
Urban-Rural Differences in the Association of eHealth Literacy With Medication Adherence Among Older People With Frailty and Prefrailty: Cross-Sectional Study
http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5662-2601
Guo Ying BA 1*2077738302@qq.com

http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4408-5113
Hong Zixuan BA 1*13485867695@163.com

http://orcid.org/0009-0002-4715-8123
Cao Chenglin BA 13234780007@qq.com

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1554-3847
Cao Wenwen BA 12245010575@stu.ahmu.edu.cn

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3626-9450
Chen Ren PhD 1chenren2006@hotmail.com

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8470-7315
Yan Jing PhD 1yj8505@mail.ustc.edu.cn

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5454-0422
Hu Zhi PhD 1aywghz@ahmu.edu.cn

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0097-3622
Bai Zhongliang PhD 12baizhongliang@ahmu.edu.cn

1 Department of Health Services Management, School of Health Services Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
2 Key Laboratory of Public Health Social Governance, Philosophy and Social Sciences of Anhui Province, Hefei, China
Mavragani Amaryllis
ZhongliangBaiPhD, Department of Health Services Management, School of Health Services Management, Anhui Medical University, No.81, Meishan Road, Hefei, 230032, China, 86 15256584720, 86 055165161151; baizhongliang@ahmu.edu.cn
* these authors contributed equally

None declared.

2024
11 9 2024
10 e5446710 11 2023
25 6 2024
26 6 2024
Copyright © Ying Guo, Zixuan Hong, Chenglin Cao, Wenwen Cao, Ren Chen, Jing Yan, Zhi Hu, Zhongliang Bai. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (https://publichealth.jmir.org)
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://publichealth.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

Abstract

Background

With advances in science and technology and improvements in health literacy, more studies have focused on frailty prevention by promoting medication adherence, emphasizing the role of eHealth literacy. However, the association between eHealth literacy and medication adherence in frail older adults has not been well studied, and it is unknown whether urban-rural differences exist in this relationship.

Objective

This study aims to examine the relationship between eHealth literacy and medication adherence in older people with different frailty statuses, emphasizing variations between rural and urban areas.

Methods

Between November and December 2020, a total of 4218 urban and rural community members (aged ≥60 years) in China were recruited as participants using a multistage random sampling method. A face-to-face structured questionnaire survey was conducted to collect information on demographic characteristics, eHealth literacy (consisting of application, evaluation, and decision dimensions), and medication adherence. eHealth literacy was assessed using the Chinese version of the eHealth Literacy Scale developed by Norman and Skinner, and medication adherence was measured using the 4-item Morisky scale. We used a general descriptive analysis and stratified logistic regression models to examine how eHealth literacy is linked to medication adherence and urban-rural differences.

Results

There were 4218 respondents, of which 2316 (54.9%) lived in urban areas and 1902 (45.1%) in rural areas, respectively. After adjusting for potential confounders, among participants with prefrailty, eHealth literacy was associated with medication adherence in urban areas in terms of less application (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.16, 95% CI 0.82‐1.63), less evaluation (AOR 1.29, 95% CI 0.92‐1.81), and less decision ability (AOR 1.20, 95% CI 0.86‐1.68); eHealth literacy was linked with medication adherence in the rural areas in terms of less application (AOR 1.10, 95% CI 0.56‐2.13), less evaluation (AOR 1.05, 95% CI 0.61‐1.79), and less decision ability (AOR 1.10, 95% CI 0.64‐1.90). Among frail participants, less eHealth literacy (AOR 0.85, 95% CI 0.48‐1.51), along with its dimensions, including less application (AOR 0.85, 95% CI 0.47‐1.54), evaluation (AOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.50‐1.57), and decision ability (AOR 0.99, 95% CI 0.55‐1.76), were associated with medication adherence in urban areas; less eHealth literacy (AOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.48‐1.65), along with its dimensions, including less application (AOR 1.23, 95% CI 0.62‐2.44), evaluation (AOR 0.98, 95% CI 0.53‐1.82), and decision ability (AOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.49‐1.67), were associated with medication adherence in rural areas.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that there is an association between eHealth literacy and medication adherence among older people with frailty and prefrailty. To promote medication adherence, eHealth literacy can be helpful in tailoring interventions.

Keywords

eHealth literacy
medication adherence
frailty
older people
China
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Population aging has become a common phenomenon worldwide and is increasing in East Asian countries. For example, the aging rate in Japan is expected to exceed 30% by 2030 [1]. China, one of the fastest aging countries in the world, is predicted to have over 402 million people aged ≥60 years by 2040. Under such background, frailty, an age-related geriatric syndrome, has become a global public health concern [23]. Frailty is a clinical condition characterized by an individual’s excessive vulnerability to stress, increasing the risk of adverse health outcomes (eg, surgical complications, disability, and fatality) in older adults [4] and reducing their quality of life [56].

Furthermore, previous research revealed that polypharmacy and irrational medication behaviors significantly increase the risk of frailty [7]. Additionally, as the vast majority of frail patients have multiple comorbidities and require long-term medication, the medical and economic burden on the family and society is increased [2]. Therefore, proper and effective measures to improve medication adherence among frail communities have become an urgent issue [89].

Medication adherence refers to the patient’s compliance to take medications as prescribed and directed until cured or until the condition has improved sufficiently [10]. Research has demonstrated poor medication adherence among older Chinese people, which leads to a decline in physical functioning and reduces their quality of life [11-13]. Additionally, a study found that frequent dissemination of health information on the internet is beneficial for cultivating good drug habits among patients (eg, taking medication on time and taking appropriate medication) [14]. Therefore, the role of eHealth literacy in improving medication adherence should be given more attention.

eHealth literacy is a multifaceted concept that describes the knowledge reserve of individuals to retrieve, understand, and evaluate health information in electronic resources as well as the ability to use this information to solve health problems [15]. Literacy comprises the application, judgment, and decision-making abilities to use health information and services [16]. In recent decades, there has been a growing focus on the positive impact of eHealth literacy on promoting healthy behaviors among patients with various diseases [17], especially medication adherence for older adults challenged by chronic diseases [18]. Additionally, studies have disclosed that in patients with hypertension and heart disease, a higher level of eHealth literacy is associated with greater drug knowledge and better their compliance with physicians’ orders [1819]. Nevertheless, little research has been conducted on the relationship between eHealth literacy and medication adherence in older people with frailty.

With the growing urbanization, disparities in socioeconomic development between urban and rural areas have become increasingly apparent, resulting in more severe health inequities [20]. Previous research has found that older adults in urban areas showed better self-rated health overall compared to those in rural areas, due to a higher frequency of exercise and more significant social activity among urban counterparts [21]. Furthermore, urban-rural differences are reflected in eHealth literacy. For instance, a study showed that older rural people had lower literacy in eHealth due to their economic and educational levels, which hampered them from using, searching for, and identifying the correct health information in electronic resources [22]. Moreover, there are differences in medication adherence between urban and rural older adult populations. Compared with older people in urban areas, adherence to osteoporosis medications was relatively low among those in rural areas. On the contrary, older people in rural areas showed better compliance with antihypertensive drugs compared to those in urban areas [23]. Consequently, it is necessary to investigate the relationship between eHealth literacy and medication adherence in older adults with frailty or prefrailty and to explore the disparities between urban and rural settings.

Currently, the association between eHealth literacy and medication adherence in older adults with frailty or prefrailty has not been well examined. In light of this, this study aimed to explore the relationship between eHealth literacy and medication adherence in older people with different frailty statuses, emphasizing variations between rural and urban areas. The evidence from this study may further contribute to developing personalized measures to improve medication adherence among older people by improving eHealth literacy, which is critical for reducing rural-urban health inequalities and promoting healthy aging.

Methods

Participants

To collect a representative sample of eligible participants, a multistage stratified random sampling approach was used between November and December 2020. The Yangtze River Delta region of China’s Shanghai, Zhejiang Province, Jiangsu Province, and Anhui Province were the sampling regions during the initial stage. Next, a simple random sampling method was used to select 2 county-level regions in each sample area. In the second stage, we randomly selected 1 or 2 townships and urban streets, and 16 street communities were included in the investigation. At last, in every chosen street and township community, 24 neighborhood committees and villages were selected as sample locations.

In this study, according to the household registration and residence information, participants were categorized as part of the urban population if they were registered or resided in the city, while the remaining ineligible participants identified as the rural population. Given the focus of this study on the frail older population and the difference between urban and rural areas, we included the older population aged 60 years and older who had lived in the locality for more than 3 years. Older adults who could not communicate with the researchers or had cognitive impairments were excluded. Among the 4257 older adults, 4218 were included in this study. Our previous published papers have provided more detailed information on the study design, data collection, and participant recruitment [112425].

Ethical Considerations

Prior to the start of the study, the purpose and procedure of the interview were explained to the participants, and all participants signed informed consent forms. The Biomedical Ethics Committee of Anhui Medical University has approved and filed the research content, investigation methods, research methodology, and informed consent involved in this study (No. 20150297).

Measurement of Frailty Status

To evaluate the frailty status of respondents, we used a questionnaire comprising 4 dimensions and 23 items. We summed the 23 items to get the total frailty status score before dividing the total frailty score by 23 to obtain the frailty status score. According to previous studies [1126], frailty was divided into 3 groups: nonfrailty (<0.12), prefrailty (0.12‐0.24), and frailty (≥0.25) based on frailty scores. Good internal consistency was demonstrated by Cronbach α of 0.771 in this sample. Additionally, the specific measurement details of this tool can be viewed in the attachment (Multimedia Appendix 1).

Measurement of Medication Adherence

In accordance with prior studies [1027], the 4-item Morisky scale [28-30] was used to measure medication adherence, the main dependent variable. The results included the following two aspects: if participants answered “No” to all questions in the questionnaire, they were classified as having good medication adherence; otherwise, they were classified as having poor medication adherence. The validity of this scale was also previously reported [11]. For details on this measurement tool, please refer to the supplemental file here (Multimedia Appendix 1 [28-30]).

Measurement of eHealth Literacy

This study adopted the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) created by Norman and Skinner [31], which has been translated into Chinese and widely used to assess eHealth literacy among Chinese older adults and has demonstrated excellent reliability and validity (Cronbach α=0.992) [163233]. The eHEALS consists of 3 dimensions and 8 items, namely, web-based health information and services application ability (items 1‐5), judgment ability (items 6‐7), and decision-making ability (item 8). A 5-point Likert scale was used (ranging from 1=“very inconsistent” to 5=“very consistent”); the total score ranged from 8 to 40. The total score of the 8 items was calculated as the eHealth literacy score, with higher scores indicating higher levels of eHealth literacy. Please refer to the supplementary file for details on this measurement tool (Multimedia Appendix 1).

Measurement of Related Variables

During data collection, we obtained information on demographic and health-related variables. These variables included age, gender, BMI, residence, educational attainment, living arrangement, and marital status. Additionally, information was collected regarding sources of income, smoking and drinking habits, depression status, and the level of functional ability (robust or limited) of the participants.

Statistical Analysis

In the first step, we used simple descriptive analyses to describe the characteristics of the sample. General characteristics were expressed as a percentage of categorical variables. In the second step, we developed stratified logistic regression models to explore urban-rural differences in the correlation between eHealth literacy and medication adherence. Next, after adjusting for potential covariates following the literature [111834], the odds ratio, adjusted odds ratio (AOR), and 95% CI were used to present the results of these models.

In this study, SPSS 23.0 (IBM Corp) was used for data analysis. P<.05 was used for statistical significance threshold.

Results

Descriptive Statistics Results

Table 1 displays the participant characteristics separated by place of residence: urban (2316/4218, 54.9%) and rural (1902/4218, 45.1%). Of these participants, the 60‐69–year age group accounted for 42.2% (1779/4218) of the participants; 64.8% (2734/4218) were women; 78.8% (3325/4218) were married or cohabiting; 86.5% (3650/4218) lived with others; over half (2571/4218, 61.0%) of the participants had education levels at or below primary school. Regarding health behavior, most participants reported never smoking (3332/4218, 79.0%) or never drinking (3386/4218, 80.3%). Regarding health status, 55.8% (2355/4218) of the participants were not depressed, 45.6% (1923/4218) were functionally limited, and more than half (2319/4218, 55.0%) were in a frail or prefrail stage. Most participants were at lower levels of application, evaluation, and decision dimensions. In terms of total eHealth literacy score, 18.9% (797/4218) were at a high level of eHealth literacy, while 81.1% (3421/4218) were at a low level of eHealth literacy.

Table 1. Characteristics of the participants aged ≥60 years by residence (N=4218).

Characteristics	Residence	
	Urban (n=2316), n (%)	Rural (n=1902), n (%)	Total (n=4218), n (%)	
Age (years)	
	60‐69	997 (43.0)	782 (41.1)	1779 (42.2)	
	70‐79	880 (38.0)	858 (45.1)	1738 (41.2)	
	≥80	439 (19.0)	262 (13.8)	701 (16.6)	
Gender	
	Male	861 (37.2)	623 (32.8)	1484 (35.2)	
	Female	1455 (62.8)	1279 (67.2)	2734 (64.8)	
BMI (kg/m 2 )	
	≤18.5	103 (4.4)	107 (5.6)	210 (5.0)	
	18.5‐22.9	709 (30.6)	674 (35.4)	1383 (32.8)	
	23‐27.4	1184 (50.9)	875 (46.0)	2059 (48.8)	
	≥27.5	320 (13.8)	246 (12.9)	566 (13.4)	
Living status	
	Living with others	1983 (85.6)	1667 (87.6)	3650 (86.5)	
	Living alone	333 (14.4)	235 (12.4)	568 (13.5)	
Marital status	
	Married/cohabited	1827 (78.9)	1498 (78.8)	3325 (78.8)	
	Single	489 (21.1)	404 (21.2)	893 (21.2)	
Education level	
	Primary school and below	980 (42.3)	1591 (83.6)	2571 (61.0)	
	Junior school	708 (30.6)	229 (12.0)	937 (22.2)	
	High school and above	628 (27.1)	82 (4.3)	710 (16.8)	
Smoking status	
	Former smoker	199 (8.6)	108 (5.7)	307 (7.3)	
	Smoker	312 (13.5)	267 (14.0)	579 (13.7)	
	Nonsmoker	1805 (77.9)	1527 (80.3)	3332 (79.0)	
Drinking status	
	Former drinker	116 (5.0)	74 (3.9)	190 (4.5)	
	Drinker	361 (15.6)	281 (14.8)	642 (15.2)	
	Nondrinker	1839 (79.4)	1547 (81.3)	3386 (80.3)	
Income	
	Salary	67 (2.9)	323 (17.0)	390 (9.2)	
	Pension	2048 (88.4)	296 (15.6)	2344 (55.6)	
	Family providing	66 (2.8)	778 (40.9)	844 (20.0)	
	Subsidy	108 (4.7)	352 (18.5)	460 (10.9)	
	Others	27 (1.2)	153 (8.0)	180 (4.3)	
Depressive status	
	No depression	1275 (55.1)	1080 (56.8)	2355 (55.8)	
	Minimal to mild depression	1011 (43.7)	793 (41.7)	1804 (42.8)	
	Depression	30 (1.3)	29 (1.5)	59 (1.4)	
Endowment insurance	
	None	119 (5.1)	419 (22.0)	538 (12.8)	
	Basic endowment insurance for the urban working group	1788 (77.2)	159 (8.4)	1947 (46.2)	
	Pension insurance for flexible employees	10 (0.4)	3 (0.2)	13 (0.3)	
	Social endowment insurance for nonworking urban residents	378 (16.3)	213 (11.2)	591 (14.0)	
	New rural social endowment insurance for rural residents	15 (0.6)	1095 (57.6)	1110 (26.3)	
	Commercial endowment insurance	6 (0.3)	13 (0.7)	19 (0.5)	
Functional ability	
	Robust	1527 (65.9)	768 (40.4)	2295 (54.4)	
	Limited	789 (34.1)	1134 (59.6)	1923 (45.6)	
Frailty status	
	Robust	1147 (49.5)	752 (39.5)	1899 (45.0)	
	Prefrail	809 (34.9)	718 (37.7)	1527 (36.2)	
	Frail	360 (15.5)	432 (22.7)	792 (18.8)	
Medication adherence	
	Adequate adherence	1572 (67.9)	1243 (65.4)	2815 (66.7)	
	Inadequate adherence	744 (32.1)	659 (34.6)	1403 (33.3)	
Application dimension	
	High	606 (26.2)	133 (7.0)	739 (17.5)	
	Low	1710 (73.8)	1769 (93.0)	3479 (82.5)	
Evaluation dimension	
	High	626 (27.0)	182 (9.6)	808 (19.2)	
	Low	1690 (73.0)	1720 (90.4)	3410 (80.8)	
Decision dimension	
	High	621 (26.8)	183 (9.6)	804 (19.1)	
	Low	1695 (73.2)	1719 (90.4)	3414 (80.9)	
eHealth literacy	
	High	620 (26.8)	177 (9.3)	797 (18.9)	
	Low	1696 (73.2)	1725 (90.7)	3421 (81.1)	

Logistic Regression Models: Relationship Between eHealth Literacy and Medication Adherence for Nonfrail Participants

Table 2 presents the results of logistic regression models after the variables were adjusted. Among urban-dwelling nonfrail participants, eHealth literacy and all its dimensions were observed to be statistically correlated with medication adherence, indicating that the AOR of having poor medication adherence was shown to be 1.50 times (95% CI 1.05‐2.14), 1.47 times (95% CI 1.04‐2.10), and 1.48 times (95% CI 1.03‐2.11) more likely for people with a lower eHealth literacy in terms of application dimension, evaluation dimension, and decision dimension, respectively. However, in rural nonfrail participants, eHealth literacy and its dimensions were not statistically associated with medication adherence.

Table 2. Results of binary logistic regression of the association between eHealth literacy and medication adherence in nonfrail participants by residence type (n=1899).

eHealth literacy	Urban	Rural	
	Unadjusted	Adjusteda	Unadjusted	Adjusteda	
	B (SE)b	ORc	95% CI	B (SE)	AORd	95% CI	B (SE)	OR	95% CI	Β (SE)	AOR	95% CI	
Lower application dimension(reference: higher application dimension)	0.23 (0.17)	1.26	0.91‐1.74	0.40 (0.18)	1.50e	1.05‐2.14	0.35 (0.38)	1.42	0.68‐2.97	0.40 (0.38)	1.49	0.70‐3.14	
Lower evaluation dimension(reference: higher evaluation dimension)	0.22 (0.16)	1.25	0.91‐1.73	0.39 (0.18)	1.47e	1.04‐2.10	0.23 (0.32)	1.25	0.67‐2.35	0.25 (0.32)	1.29	0.68‐2.43	
Lower decision dimension(reference: higher decision dimension)	0.22 (0.17)	1.25	0.90‐1.73	0.39 (0.18)	1.48e	1.03‐2.11	0.26 (0.32)	1.30	0.70‐2.43	0.29 (0.32)	1.34	0.71‐2.53	
Lower eHealth literacy score(reference: higher eHealth literacy score)	0.26 (0.17)	1.30	0.94‐1.80	0.44 (0.18)	1.55e	1.08‐2.11	0.21 (0.32)	1.23	0.66‐2.30	0.24 (0.32)	1.27	0.68‐2.41	
a Adjusted by age, gender, and education.

b B (SE): coefficient (standard error).

c OR: odds ratio.

d AOR: adjusted odds ratio.

e P<.05.

Logistic Regression Models: Relationship Between eHealth Literacy and Medication Adherence for Participants With Prefrailty

As Table 3 shows, eHealth literacy (AOR 1.30, 95% CI 0.93‐1.82), in terms of less application (AOR 1.16, 95% CI 0.82‐1.63), less evaluation (AOR 1.29, 95% CI 0.92‐1.81), and less decision ability (AOR 1.20, 95% CI 0.86‐1.68), was associated with medication adherence in urban-dwelling participants with prefrailty. eHealth literacy (AOR 1.01, 95% CI 0.58‐1.76), in terms of less application (AOR 1.10, 95% CI 0.56‐2.13), less evaluation (AOR 1.05, 95% CI 0.61‐1.79) and less decision ability (AOR 1.10, 95% CI 0.64‐1.90), was associated with medication adherence in rural residents with prefrailty.

Table 3. Results of binary logistic regression of the association between eHealth literacy and medication adherence in prefrail participants by residence type (n=1527).

eHealth literacy	Urban	Rural	
	Unadjusted	Adjusteda	Unadjusted	Adjusteda	
	B (SE)b	ORc	95% CI	B (SE)	AORd	95% CI	B (SE)	OR	95% CI	B (SE)	AOR	95% CI	
Lower application dimension(reference: higher application dimension)	−0.01 (0.16)	0.99	0.72‐1.35	0.15 (0.17)	1.16	0.82‐1.63	0.06 (0.34)	1.06	0.55‐2.05	0.09 (0.34)	1.10	0.56‐2.13	
Lower evaluation dimension(reference: higher evaluation dimension)	0.09 (0.16)	1.10	0.80‐1.50	0.26 (0.17)	1.29	0.92‐1.81	0.01 (0.27)	1.01	0.59‐1.72	0.05 (0.28)	1.05	0.61‐1.79	
Lower decision dimension(reference: higher decision dimension)	0.02 (0.16)	1.02	0.75‐1.40	0.18 (0.17)	1.20	0.86‐1.68	0.05 (0.28)	1.05	0.61‐1.81	0.10 (0.28)	1.10	0.64‐1.90	
Lower eHealth literacy score(reference: higher eHealth literacy score)	0.10 (0.16)	1.11	0.81‐1.52	0.26 (0.17)	1.30	0.93‐1.82	−0.04 (0.28)	0.96	0.56‐1.67	0.01 (0.28)	1.01	0.58‐1.76	
a Adjusted by age, gender, and education.

b B (SE): coefficient (standard error).

c OR: odds ratio.

d AOR: adjusted odds ratio.

Logistic Regression Models: Relationship Between eHealth Literacy and Medication Adherence for Participants With Frailty

Table 4 shows that after adjustment for covariates, 3 dimensions of eHealth literacy were observed to be associated with medication adherence among the urban frail population, indicating that the AOR of experiencing poor medication adherence was 0.85 times (95% CI 0.47‐1.54), 0.89 times (95% CI 0.50‐1.57), and 0.99 times (95% CI 0.55‐1.76) more likely for people with lower eHealth literacy in the application, evaluation, and decision dimensions, respectively. Among rural frail participants, the application dimension (AOR 1.23, 95% CI 0.62‐2.44) was positively correlated with medication adherence, and the eHealth literacy (AOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.48‐1.65), evaluation (AOR 0.98, 95% CI 0.53‐1.82), and decision (AOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.49‐1.67) dimensions were negatively correlated with medication adherence.

Table 4. Results of binary logistic regression of the association between eHealth literacy and medication adherence in frail participants by residence type (n=792).

eHealth literacy	Urban	Rural	
	Unadjusted	Adjusteda	Unadjusted	Adjusteda	
	B (SE)b	ORc	95% CI	B (SE)	AORd	95% CI	B (SE)	OR	95% CI	B (SE)	AOR	95% CI	
Lower application dimension(reference: higher application dimension)	−0.19 (0.28)	0.83	0.48‐1.43	−0.16 (0.30)	0.85	0.47‐1.54	0.12 (0.34)	1.13	0.57‐2.21	0.21 (0.35)	1.23	0.62‐2.44	
Lower evaluation dimension(reference: higher evaluation dimension)	−0.14 (0.27)	0.87	0.51‐1.47	−0.12 (0.29)	0.89	0.50‐1.57	−0.08 (0.31)	0.92	0.50‐1.69	−0.02 (0.31)	0.98	0.53‐1.82	
Lower decision dimension(reference: higher decision dimension)	−0.03 (0.27)	0.97	0.57‐1.65	−0.01 (0.30)	0.99	0.55‐1.76	−0.18 (0.31)	0.84	0.46‐1.54	−0.10 (0.31)	0.90	0.49‐1.67	
Lower eHealth literacy score(reference: higher eHealth literacy score)	−0.18 (0.27)	0.84	0.49‐1.42	−0.16 (0.29)	0.85	0.48‐1.51	−0.18 (0.31)	0.84	0.46‐1.54	−0.11 (0.31)	0.89	0.48‐1.65	
a Adjusted by age, gender, and education.

b B (SE): coefficient (standard error).

c OR: odds ratio.

d AOR: adjusted odds ratio.

Discussion

Principal Findings

This study, as far as we know, is the first to explore the association between eHealth literacy and medication adherence and examine the urban-rural differences in this association among older people with frailty and prefrailty. An association was found between eHealth literacy and medication adherence in prefrail and frail older adult populations, but no urban-rural differences existed.

eHealth literacy was associated with medication adherence in the nonfrail older population. All dimensions of eHealth literacy, including application, evaluation, and decision, correlated with medication adherence in nonfrail older people and were statistically significant in urban areas. In other words, higher levels of eHealth literacy lead to better medication adherence. This result may align with previous studies that demonstrated a positive correlation between education levels and eHealth literacy [3536]. Urban-dwelling older people are more likely to have access to educational opportunities, which contributes to a higher awareness and understanding of health knowledge, further enhancing their ability to access and use digital products. Effective use of electronic devices and acquiring high-quality health information may contribute to understanding drug dosage and use, allowing older adults to make informed decisions [3738]. Besides, older urban populations are mostly from families of privileged economic status. Previous research has shown that better family financial situations are associated with higher self-perceived health literacy among residents [39]. In short, residents with better family conditions could use more electronic products and have a strong sense of health care and a proactive willingness to use network health care resources.

eHealth literacy and medication adherence were positively correlated, suggesting that more eHealth literacy is more likely to result in better medication adherence in the prefrail older population. This is consistent with previous research that states that high levels of eHealth literacy are a protective factor in promoting medication adherence [18]. Unlike prior studies, our study focused specifically on the vulnerable group of older adults with frailty. Older adults with prefrailty tend to have an increased need to access health services due to physical and psychological problems [40]. At the same time, appointments may be booked and registered through mobile devices, such as mobile phones, which facilitates a range of access behaviors, increasing the use of medical devices and the frequency and ability to find health information via the internet. This encourages the older population to access digital information and improve their eHealth literacy. For example, older people can search for the precautions, dosage, and course of medication on the internet, improving medication adherence.

According to our results, eHealth literacy, including evaluation and decision skills, was negatively correlated with medication adherence in frail older adults, implying that lower levels of eHealth literacy were associated with better medication adherence compared to high levels of eHealth literacy. The following explanations could account for this result. There is a substantial amount of research reporting a heavy physical and psychological burden, including loss of audiovisual function, reduced fine motor control, cognition impairment, dementia, and even death, among older people with frailty [441]. These adverse health outcomes may render frail older adults incapable of using electronic devices, reducing their ability to access health information via the internet [4243]. Simultaneously, older adults with frailty need family companionship and medication monitoring and may receive more attention and help from social networks, such as family and carers. While the time-dependent burden on carers may be higher for more older people with frailty, the involvement of a carer leads to more consistent medication-taking behaviors, objectively reducing the probability of missing or incorrectly taking medication, and thus improving medication adherence.

However, it is concerning that this study did not find urban-rural differences in the association between eHealth literacy and medication adherence in older adults with prefrailty and frailty. There are both macrosocial and microindividual reasons for this outcome. At the macro level, on the one hand, along with the finishing of the building of a moderately prosperous society in all respects and the implementation of poverty alleviation, the most basic production and living needs of the people living in villages have been met, and the infrastructure in impoverished areas have been improved [4445]. On this basis, China has carried out top-level design and macroplanning for the construction of digital villages, accelerated the bridging of the “digital divide” between urban and rural areas, and given full play to the role of information technology as a driving force in rural revitalization [46]. At this stage, the construction of China’s digital countryside has begun to show results, with existing administrative villages across the country fully realizing the “village to village broadband.” The number of internet users in rural areas is increasing, and the gap between urban and rural areas in terms of access to the internet continues to narrow [47]. Well-established telecommunication networks and infrastructures may provide the foundation for older rural populations to use electronic devices, leading to an increased ability to use digital products and greater confidence in searching for digital health information.

On the other hand, with the deepening of China’s health care system reform and the continuous promotion of the hierarchical medical system, digital health care forms, such as remote consultation, remote treatment, and medical information sharing platforms, will help medical resources eliminate spatial constraints [48]. This helps narrow the gap between urban and rural medical resources, promotes the accessibility of health services, improves the allocation of health resources, and ensures equal use of health care [4950]. At the same time, promoting telemedicine knowledge and health education activities for older adults in rural areas is increasing trust in telemedicine and improving eHealth literacy among this population.

At the micro level, there is a growing awareness of health care among the older population. Accompanied by the rise of short videos on third-party platforms, such as TikTok, the visual presentation effectively alleviates the dilemma of low literacy rates and difficulty accessing health information among the rural older population [51]. This provides older people with a wide range of health care resources, facilitates access to health information, and improves eHealth literacy and medication adherence.

Limitations

This study faced several limitations. First, the causal relationships between eHealth literacy and medication adherence might not be appropriately confirmed using this cross-sectional study. Therefore, longitudinal or cohort research is required to validate the current investigation’s results. Second, the survey data came from self-reporting, which was prone to a risk of recall bias due to false or inaccurate responses from participants. Despite these limitations, the advantages of our study include a high response rate, a sizable representative sample size, as well as reliable and valid measurement instruments for data collection. The outcomes of this paper are provocative for developing effective measures to prevent and control the development of frailty among the older population in the future.

Conclusions

This study reports urban-rural differences in the association between eHealth literacy and medication adherence in prefrail and frail older populations. Our study found an association between eHealth literacy and medication adherence in the prefrail and frail older adult population but no urban-rural differences were found. Although our research was not statistically significant, it is an accurate picture of the urban-rural differences in the association of eHealth literacy and medication adherence in China’s frail older adult population, with rigorous data investigation and statistical analysis, and it can still provide a reference for subsequent related studies. The results of this study need to be further justified by in-depth research, and they may contribute to the development of targeted approaches to improve medication adherence among older adults from an eHealth literacy perspective.

supplementary material

10.2196/54467 Multimedia Appendix 1 Questionnaires used in the study.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to extend their sincere thanks to all the participants for their collaboration.

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (72304003); the Outstanding Research and Innovation Team Program of the Education Department of Anhui Province (2023AH010036); Anhui Provincial Social Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (2022AH020049); Key Laboratory of Public Health Social Governance, Philosophy, and Social Sciences of Anhui Province (PHG202309); the Postgraduate Academic Innovation Project of Anhui Province (2023xscx054); and the Postgraduate Innovation Research and Practice Program of Anhui Medical University (YJS20230158).

No generative artificial intelligence tool was used in manuscript preparation and revision.

Abbreviations

AOR adjusted odds ratio

eHEALS eHealth Literacy Scale

Data Availability: The data generated and analyzed in the course of this study may be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Authors’ Contributions: YG and ZH contributed to the design and writing of the paper. CC and WC contributed to data analyses. RC and JY contributed to funding acquisition and revised the manuscript. ZH and ZB contributed to funding acquisition, quality control, and data processing, and they also revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
==== Refs
References

1. Kawakami A Kwong EW Lai CK Song MS Boo S Yamamoto-Mitani N Advance care planning and advance directive awareness among East Asian older adults: Japan, Hong Kong and South Korea Geriatr Gerontol Int 01 2021 21 1 71 76 doi 10.1111/ggi.14086 Medline 33217170
2. Boccardi V Population ageing: the need for a care revolution in a world 2.0 Geriatrics (Basel) Aug 14 2019 4 3 47 doi 10.3390/geriatrics4030047 Medline 31416277
3. Dong Y Ma H Sun H et al Association of altitude and frailty in Chinese older adults: using a cumulative frailty index model Front Public Health 2024 12 1321580 doi 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1321580 Medline 38510346
4. Proietti M Cesari M Frailty: what is it? Adv Exp Med Biol 2020 1216 1 7 doi 10.1007/978-3-030-33330-0_1 Medline 31894541
5. Park C Ko FC The science of frailty: sex differences Clin Geriatr Med Nov 2021 37 4 625 638 doi 10.1016/j.cger.2021.05.008 Medline 34600727
6. Walston J Buta B Xue QL Frailty screening and interventions: considerations for clinical practice Clin Geriatr Med Feb 2018 34 1 25 38 doi 10.1016/j.cger.2017.09.004 Medline 29129215
7. Gutiérrez-Valencia M Izquierdo M Cesari M Casas-Herrero Á Inzitari M Martínez-Velilla N The relationship between frailty and polypharmacy in older people: a systematic review Br J Clin Pharmacol 07 2018 84 7 1432 1444 doi 10.1111/bcp.13590 Medline 29575094
8. Vetrano DL Palmer K Marengoni A et al Frailty and multimorbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Apr 23 2019 74 5 659 666 doi 10.1093/gerona/gly110 Medline 29726918
9. Wong CW Medication-related problems in older people: how to optimise medication management Hong Kong Med J Dec 2020 26 6 510 519 doi 10.12809/hkmj208534 Medline 33323538
10. Wang A Wan J Zhu L et al Frailty and medication adherence among older adult patients with hypertension: a moderated mediation model Front Public Health 2023 11 1283416 doi 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1283416 Medline 38115848
11. Cao W Cao C Zheng X et al Factors associated with medication adherence among community-dwelling older people with frailty and pre-frailty in China Int J Environ Res Public Health Nov 30 2022 19 23 16001 doi 10.3390/ijerph192316001 Medline 36498074
12. Ho PM Bryson CL Rumsfeld JS Medication adherence: its importance in cardiovascular outcomes Circulation Jun 16 2009 119 23 3028 3035 doi 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.768986 Medline 19528344
13. Qiao X Tian X Liu N et al The association between frailty and medication adherence among community-dwelling older adults with chronic diseases: medication beliefs acting as mediators Pat Educ Couns 05 15 2020 S0738-3991(20)30279-2 doi 10.1016/j.pec.2020.05.013 Medline 32461040
14. Lu X Zhang R Association between eHealth literacy in online health communities and patient adherence: cross-sectional questionnaire study J Med Internet Res Sep 13 2021 23 9 e14908 doi 10.2196/14908 Medline 34515638
15. Fernandes LG Saragiotto BT Clinimetrics: eHealth Literacy Scale J Physiother 01 2021 67 1 67 doi 10.1016/j.jphys.2020.07.004 Medline 32768185
16. Cui GH Li SJ Yin YT et al The relationship among social capital, eHealth literacy and health behaviours in Chinese elderly people: a cross-sectional study BMC Public Health 01 6 2021 21 1 45 doi 10.1186/s12889-020-10037-4 Medline 33407275
17. Korkmaz Aslan G Kartal A Turan T Taşdemir Yiğitoğlu G Kocakabak C Association of electronic health literacy with health-promoting behaviours in adolescents Int J Nurs Pract Apr 2021 27 2 e12921 doi 10.1111/ijn.12921 Medline 33615625
18. Huang CL Chiang CH Yang SC Wu FZ The associations among gender, age, eHealth literacy, beliefs about medicines and medication adherence among elementary and secondary school teachers Int J Environ Res Public Health Jun 6 2022 19 11 6926 doi 10.3390/ijerph19116926 Medline 35682509
19. Lin CY Ganji M Griffiths MD Bravell ME Broström A Pakpour AH Mediated effects of insomnia, psychological distress and medication adherence in the association of eHealth literacy and cardiac events among Iranian older patients with heart failure: a longitudinal study Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs Feb 2020 19 2 155 164 doi 10.1177/1474515119873648 Medline 31516036
20. Sun J Lyu S Dai Z The impacts of socioeconomic status and lifestyle on health status of residents: evidence from Chinese general social survey data Int J Health Plann Manage Oct 2019 34 4 1097 1108 doi 10.1002/hpm.2760 Medline 30875102
21. Yuan L Yu B Gao L et al Decomposition analysis of health inequalities between the urban and rural oldest-old populations in China: evidence from a national survey SSM Popul Health Mar 2023 21 101325 doi 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101325 Medline 36618546
22. Zhu X Yang F The association among eHealth literacy, depressive symptoms and health-related quality of life among older people: a cross-section study Int J Older People Nurs 01 2023 18 1 e12497 doi 10.1111/opn.12497 Medline 35945904
23. Doggrell SA Kairuz T Comparative studies of how living circumstances influence medication adherence in ≥65 year olds Int J Clin Pharm Feb 2014 36 1 30 35 doi 10.1007/s11096-013-9894-5 Medline 24317743
24. Cao C Cao W Zheng X et al Association of social capital with self-perceived eHealth literacy among community-dwelling older people: age and gender differences Front Public Health 2023 11 1088863 doi 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1088863 Medline 37124820
25. Cao C Liao S Cao W et al Differences in the association of oral health knowledge, attitudes, and practices with frailty among community-dwelling older people in China BMC Oral Health Oct 24 2023 23 1 782 doi 10.1186/s12903-023-03477-y Medline 37875820
26. Qiao X Wang C Tian X et al Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument in Chinese community-dwelling older adults Geriatr Gerontol Int Feb 2018 18 2 301 307 doi 10.1111/ggi.13183 Medline 29052953
27. Harlow C Hanna C Eckmann L et al Quality of life and medication adherence of independently living older adults enrolled in a pharmacist-based medication management program Pharmacy (Basel) Apr 6 2017 5 2 20 doi 10.3390/pharmacy5020020 Medline 28970432
28. Morisky DE Green LW Levine DM Concurrent and predictive validity of a self-reported measure of medication adherence Med Care 01 1986 24 1 67 74 doi 10.1097/00005650-198601000-00007 Medline 3945130
29. Morisky DE Malotte CK Choi P et al A patient education program to improve adherence rates with antituberculosis drug regimens Health Educ Q 1990 17 3 253 267 doi 10.1177/109019819001700303 Medline 2228629
30. Morisky DE DiMatteo MR Improving the measurement of self-reported medication nonadherence: final response J Clin Epidemiol Mar 2011 64 3 262 263 doi 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.010
31. Norman CD Skinner HA eHealth literacy: essential skills for consumer health in a networked world J Med Internet Res Jun 16 2006 8 2 e9 doi 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9 Medline 16867972
32. Dai H Sun C Chen J et al The mediating effect of ehealth literacy on the relationship between health personality and quality of life in community-dwelling older adults Geriatr Nurs 2024 56 237 243 doi 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2024.02.002 Medline 38382173
33. Ma Z Wu M The psychometric properties of the Chinese eHealth Literacy Scale (C-eHEALS) in a Chinese rural population: cross-sectional validation study J Med Internet Res Oct 22 2019 21 10 e15720 doi 10.2196/15720 Medline 31642811
34. Arcury TA Sandberg JC Melius KP et al Older adult internet use and eHealth literacy J Appl Gerontol Feb 2020 39 2 141 150 doi 10.1177/0733464818807468 Medline 30353776
35. Neter E Brainin E eHealth literacy: extending the digital divide to the realm of health information J Med Internet Res 01 27 2012 14 1 e19 doi 10.2196/jmir.1619 Medline 22357448
36. Tennant B Stellefson M Dodd V et al eHealth literacy and Web 2.0 health information seeking behaviors among baby boomers and older adults J Med Internet Res Mar 17 2015 17 3 e70 doi 10.2196/jmir.3992 Medline 25783036
37. Cheng C Beauchamp A Elsworth GR Osborne RH Applying the electronic health literacy lens: systematic review of electronic health interventions targeted at socially disadvantaged groups J Med Internet Res Aug 13 2020 22 8 e18476 doi 10.2196/18476 Medline 32788144
38. Kim M Kim B Park S Social support, eHealth literacy, and mHealth use in older adults with diabetes: moderated mediating effect of the perceived importance of app design Comput Inform Nurs Feb 1 2024 42 2 136 143 doi 10.1097/CIN.0000000000001081 Medline 38129323
39. Guo Z Zhao SZ Guo N et al Socioeconomic disparities in eHealth literacy and preventive behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic in Hong Kong: cross-sectional study J Med Internet Res Apr 14 2021 23 4 e24577 doi 10.2196/24577 Medline 33784240
40. Odaci Comertoglu E Ozturk Y Hafizoglu M et al The effect of social frailty on mental health and quality of life in older people: a cross-sectional study Eur Geriatr Med Apr 2024 15 2 453 461 doi 10.1007/s41999-024-00931-0 Medline 38332388
41. Cesari M Calvani R Marzetti E Frailty in older persons Clin Geriatr Med Aug 2017 33 3 293 303 doi 10.1016/j.cger.2017.02.002 Medline 28689563
42. Wilson J Heinsch M Betts D Booth D Kay-Lambkin F Barriers and facilitators to the use of e-health by older adults: a scoping review BMC Public Health Aug 17 2021 21 1 1556 doi 10.1186/s12889-021-11623-w Medline 34399716
43. Zhao MJ Zhu ZQ Zhang YQ Zhao CS The mediating role of health behavior between aging attitude and frailty of landless elderly [Article in Chinese] Chinese Rural Health Service Administration 2021 41 2 144 148 doi 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5916.2021.02.015
44. Dai X Wang L Ren Y The effects of China's targeted poverty alleviation policy on the health and health equity of rural poor residents: evidence from Shaanxi province Healthcare (Basel) Aug 6 2020 8 3 256 doi 10.3390/healthcare8030256 Medline 32781696
45. Wang Q Tian Z Zhu S Paired assistance and poverty alleviation: experience and evidence from China PLoS One 2024 19 2 e0297173 doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0297173 Medline 38363780
46. Lyu Y Xie J Meng X Wang X Digital economy and institutional dynamics: striving for equitable public service in a digitally transformed era Front Public Health 2024 12 1330044 doi 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1330044 Medline 38577279
47. Liu Y Shen T Nagai Y Wu W Can the income level of rural residents be improved by the Chinese “Broadband Village?”: evidence from a regression discontinuity design of the six pilot provinces PLoS One 2021 16 4 e0248079 doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0248079 Medline 33878106
48. Wu M Huang J Fu H Xie X Wu S Changes of equality of medical service utilization in China between 1993 and 2018: findings from six waves of nationwide household interview survey Int J Equity Health 05 23 2023 22 1 98 doi 10.1186/s12939-023-01909-3 Medline 37217952
49. Ta Y Zhu Y Fu H Trends in access to health services, financial protection and satisfaction between 2010 and 2016: has China achieved the goals of its health system reform? Soc Sci Med 01 2020 245 112715 doi 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112715 Medline 31825797
50. Tao W Zeng Z Dang H et al Towards universal health coverage: lessons from 10 years of healthcare reform in China BMJ Glob Health 2020 5 3 e002086 doi 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002086 Medline 32257400
51. Ding C Qiu Y Zhao B et al Access channels on nutrition and health knowledge of Chinese adults in 2021 [Article in Chinese] Wei Sheng Yan Jiu Nov 2022 51 6 886 897 doi 10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2022.06.006 Medline 36539863
