
==== Front
Ital J Pediatr
Ital J Pediatr
Italian Journal of Pediatrics
1824-7288
BioMed Central London

39289749
1743
10.1186/s13052-024-01743-5
Research
The effect of on-site and on-call nurse on exclusive breastfeeding in two different hospital settings: a prospective observational cohort study
Latorre Giuseppe 1
Martinelli Domenico 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2194-6711
Capozza Manuela manuelacapozza26@gmail.com

2
Grosso Francesca Maria 3
Laforgia Nicola 2
Baldassarre Maria Elisabetta 2
1 Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Ecclesiastical General Hospital F. Miulli, Acquaviva Delle Fonti, Italy
2 https://ror.org/027ynra39 grid.7644.1 0000 0001 0120 3326 Section of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine (DIM), University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy
3 https://ror.org/00wjc7c48 grid.4708.b 0000 0004 1757 2822 Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
17 9 2024
17 9 2024
2024
50 1806 5 2024
31 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Background

Exclusive breastfeeding during postpartum hospitalization is very important for ensuring the success of breastfeeding at home. The aim of the study is to determine if the on-site nurse in rooming in improves exclusive breastfeeding ratio.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational cohort study to evaluate exclusive breastfeeding during the first three months of life in two Neonatology Units in the South of Italy with different hospital settings: Ente Ecclesiastico Miulli of Acquaviva delle Fonti with on-site nurse h24 (on-site group) and Policlinico of Bari with nurse available on call h24 from Neonatology Unit (on-call group).

Results

A total of 564 mother-baby dyads were admitted from 3 January to 31 March 2018 (299 in on-site group and 265 in on-call group). In the overall population, exclusive breastfeeding rate was 76.4% at 90-days, confirming the role of nurse and rooming in, independently of modality of setting. Considering the way of delivery, in infants from cesarean section there were higher rates for exclusive breastfeeding at 30 and 90 days of life in on-site group.

Conclusions

We can assume that the presence of a nurse h24 could better identify breastfeeding problems. Our study suggests the role of on-site nurse during rooming in to encourage exclusive breastfeeding until three months of life in mothers who underwent caesarean section.

Keywords

Breastfeeding
On-site nurse
On-call nurse
Rooming in
Mother-newborn dyad
issue-copyright-statement© Società Italiana di Pediatria 2024
==== Body
pmcBackground

Breastfeeding has consistently been shown to be an exceptional preventive intervention for infants and mothers alike. The “personalized medicine provided by human milk” includes protection against morbidity and mortality, higher intelligence, and probable reduction in obesity and diabetes for breastfed children compared to children who are not breastfed [1]. In regard with obesity, breastmilk seems to have a protective effect, because of a reduced percentage of proteins and the presence of leptin, insulin, GLP-1 (Glucagon-like peptide-1), gastrointestinal peptide, and adiponectin, directly involved in the mechanisms of metabolic regulation and hunger/satiety balance [2].

Long duration of breastfeeding could reduce the risk of overweight, mainly in children not exposed to antibiotics during the breastfeeding period [3]. The long-term metabolic benefits of breastfeeding are conveyed by the intestinal microbiota, because different intestinal flora influences the metabolism of fatty acids and insulin sensitivity [4]. Breastfeeding could protect against obesity both in term and in preterm newborns, but it is important also for other at risk categories (e.g. low birth weight infants) who present a higher predisposition to endocrine or other chronic diseases, due to epigenetic mechanisms. [5] For nursing women, breastfeeding reduces the risk of breast cancer, improves birth spacing, and might also reduce the risk of ovarian cancer and diabetes. [6, 7]

There are few real contraindications to breastfeeding. Often some health conditions that can simply hinder the initiation and duration of breastfeeding are mistakenly considered to be real contraindications. Often the major determinants of a woman’s final choice of whether to nurse her infant or not are the attitude of health professionals and the mother's degree of information and awareness [8].

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months of life, with continued breastfeeding alongside the introduction of complementary foods for at least 1 year. [9] Global breastfeeding rates remain far below international targets, particularly in high-income countries. Data from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's 2020 Breastfeeding Report Card indicate that less than 50% of infants in the United States were exclusively breastfed through 3 months. [10, 11] Data from WHO recommendations show only in Finland mothers do breastfeed their babies “exclusively” for six consecutive months [12].

There is often a gap between the mother's intention to breastfeed and feeding practices. Various aspects can influence the mother's desire to breastfeed, such as psychological, economic and social factors, as well as different nursing supports during the first days after delivery [13, 14]. Although the majority of nurses had a specific breastfeeding education, many women are seeking breastfeeding information online. Inadequate supply or difficulty feeding at the breast are often the reasons women cite for breastfeeding discontinuation in online-forum [15, 16]. Education and training of healthcare professionals in the knowledge and skills related to breastfeeding are very important and seem to be positively associated with improved nurses’ attitudes towards breastfeeding. [17] On the other hand, a positive relationship among mothers and nursing staff is correlated with early initiation of breastfeeding, even in preterm infants [18]. It is very important women receive this type of information as early as possible, even before birth. Many mothers feel that more support and guidance from hospital or community staff and family would have helped them to continue breastfeeding for longer. Mothers highlight specifically the lack of skilled advice and support for attachment and latching as a key factor in premature cessation of breastfeeding [19, 20]. Some studies showed that specialized health professionals could act as “breast feeding promoters” facilitating early initiation and reducing the abandonment at the first difficulties [21]. Since exclusive breastfeeding during postpartum hospitalization provides an important foundation for ensuring continued successful exclusive breastfeeding at home, support for breastfeeding in the first moments after childbirth increases the number of mothers who will then continue with exclusive breastfeeding [21, 22].

The range of different rates of initiation and continuation of breastfeeding in different settings demonstrates that the key factors influencing infant feeding rates are likely to be sociocultural and related to norms, public policy, and the availability of appropriate care and support [23, 24]. Awareness of which are the modifiable determinants affecting breastfeeding is essential in managing and supporting the breastfeeding dyad [25, 26] [27]

The aim of this study is to determine if the continuous presence of a nurse in the Rooming-in Unit, who provides information and answers mothers’ questions, could be a better practice than the presence of nurse available on call and improves exclusive breastfeeding ratio.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational cohort study to evaluate exclusive breastfeeding during the first three months of life in mother–child dyads in two Neonatology Units in the same geographical area, Apulia region, Southern Italy but with different hospital settings: Ente Ecclesiastico Ospedale Generale Miulli of Acquaviva delle Fonti, with on-site nurse h24 in the Nurse Unit (on site group) and Policlinico of Bari, with nurse not to be present in Nurse Unit but available on call h24 from Neonatology Unit which was on a different floor of the hospital (on call group).

Both Hospitals follow the steps 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative. [28] The ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding are as follows:Have a written breastfeeding policy that is routinely communicated to all healthcare staff

Train all health-care staff in the skills necessary to implement this policy

Inform all pregnant women about the benefits and management of breastfeeding

Help mothers initiate breastfeeding within a half-hour of birth

Show mothers how to breastfeed and how to maintain lactation, even if they are separated from their infants

Give newborn infants no food or drink other than breast milk, unless medically indicated

Practise rooming-in – allow mothers and infants to remain together – 24 h a day

Encourage breastfeeding on demand

Give no artificial teats or pacifiers (also called dummies or soothers) to breastfeeding infants

Foster the establishment of breastfeeding support groups and refer mothers to them on discharge from the hospital or clinic.

In particular, step 2, which requires the training of all healthcare staff, represents an important intervention that improves breastfeeding rates. A recent systematic review, which included studies in 5 countries with 390 subjects belonging to the category of healthcare professionals, showed the usefulness of the action of healthcare personnel. [1] Provision of educational interventions aimed at increasing knowledge and practice of Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative and support was found to improve health worker's knowledge, attitude, and compliance with the optimal breastfeeding practices. [1]

Both local Ethics Committees approved the study protocol.

Consecutive mother-baby dyads admitted to the units from 3 January to 31 of March 2018 were considered.

Healthy term newborns with gestational age ≥ 37 weeks in “rooming in” (baby in the same room of the mother all day) from birth to discharge and never hospitalized in Neonatal Intensive or Sub-Intensive Care Unit were included.

Exclusion criteria were all maternal and/or neonatal conditions that could interfere with breastfeeding (maternal HIV or active tuberculosis infection, herpes simplex lesions on both breasts, use of therapeutic radioactive isotopes, or exposure to radioactive materials, the use of drugs contraindicated in breastfeeding, galactosemia of the infant) or women not speaking Italian to ensure a full understanding of the questionnaire. Informed consent was obtained from both parents.

At discharge, a structured interview was performed, and a questionnaire was administered to the mother. The variables investigated with the questionnaire included sociodemographic features (maternal age and education), previous experiences (participation to a prenatal class and previous pregnancy), type of delivery, use of pacifier, nipple fissures, and satisfaction of nurse support. Variables subjected to changes during the timeframe of the study were collected by phone interview at 30 and 90 days of newborn’s life. The mode of breastfeeding was defined according to World Health Organization (WHO). The definition of breastfed infant was “an infant receives only breastmilk, no other liquids or solids are given”. [29]

During the study period, 400 infants were born in Ente Ecclesiastico Miulli Hospital: 43 preterm newborns with gestational age < 37 weeks and 51 newborns not exclusively assisted in rooming were excluded. A total of 303 dyads met the eligibility criteria. Among those, 7 were excluded (2 declined to participate and 5 did not speak Italian). In this hospital the Rooming-in Unit was continuously staffed by nurses that have additional training as lactation consultants, and who were physically present in the ward (on site group).

425 infants were born in Policlinico Hospital: 109 preterm newborns with gestational age < 37 weeks and 48 newborns not assisted in rooming-in were excluded. A total of 268 dyads met the eligibility criteria. Among those, 3 were excluded because did not speak Italian. In Policlinico Hospital a nurse with additional training as lactation consultant was available on call when a mother needed help for breastfeeding or to answer to her questions but was not physically present in the mother’s hospital ward (Rooming in Unit); they guaranteed a round in the Rooming in Unit two times a day. For the day long, a relative was present in the same room of the mother-infant dyads to take care of mother and newborn (on call group).

So, a total of 564 mother-baby dyads were examined, 299 in the on-site group and 265 in the on-call group.

In both groups no mothers reported post-partum depression, flare-up of previous breast pathologies (excluding fissures) or problems related to the family or external environment. 13/299 mothers (4,3%) in the on-site group and 35/265 (13,2%) in the on-call group reported little and/or discordant information about breastfeeding received during hospitalization. Of these, 6/13 (46,1%) in the on-site group and 17/35 (48,5%) in the on-call group were not exclusively breastfeeding at 1 and 3 months.

Data were collected by a healthcare professional at discharge and/or extracted from infants’ computerized medical charts (Neocare, I&T Informatica e Tecnologia Srl, Italy) and by phone interview at 30 and 90 days of newborn’s life. One mother did not answer at 30 days interview and 46 at 90 days and were excluded in the analysis of 30 and 90 days respectively.

Data were reported as mean ± standard deviation or percentage for categorical variables. The Student's t-test was used to compare continuous variables. Associations between categorical data were evaluated by using Chi-squared test or Fisher Exact test as appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to adjust for possible confounder factors. For all data a p-value of 0.05 or less was considered statistically significant. All analyses were conducted using STATA software, version 16 (Stata-Corp LP, College Station, Texas, USA).

Results

Questionnaires showed differences between cohorts (on site vs. on call group) in terms of maternal education, prenatal class attendance, pacifier usage, weight at birth and at discharge. In on call group of Policlinico Hospital there was a greater proportion of mothers with primary school and less frequent university education, a lower percentage of prenatal class, more recurrent pacifier usage and a slight greater weight compared to on-site group of Ente Ecclesiastico Miulli Hospital. Characteristics of mothers and infants in the two study groups are reported in Table 1. Table 1 Characteristics of mothers and infants in the two study groups

	On-site	On-call		
	n = 299	n = 265	p	
Maternal age at delivery (years)	33 ± 5	33 ± 5	0,407	
Primary school	7,8%	19,6%	0,000	
 Secondary education	56,4%	56,2%	0,963	
University degree	35,8%	24,2%	0,003	
 Parity 1	51,2%	48,3%	0,496	
 Parity 2	48,8%	51,7%	0,496	
Prenatal class	50,8%	40,4%	0,013	
 Nipple fissure	31,2%	37,0%	0,149	
Pacifier use	43,0%	58,5%	0,000	
Mother satisfaction	95,6%	84,5%	0,008	
 Female infant	53,8%	49,1%	0,256	
 Male infant	46,2%	50,9%	0,256	
 Gestational age (weeks)	39.3 ± 1.1	39.2 ± 1.2	0,196	
 Vaginal delivery	72,9%	72,1%	0,825	
 Caesarean section	27,1%	27,9%	0,825	
Weight at birth (g)	3344 ± 417	3462 ± 394	0,001	
Weight at discharge (g)	3141 ± 396	3250 ± 386	0,001	
 Weight loss (%)	6.0 ± 2.9	6.1 ± 2.5	0,665	

In the overall population, exclusive breastfeeding was observed in 550 dyads at discharge (97.5%), 444 dyads (78.9%) at 30 days and 396 dyads (76.4%) at 90-days. The shift on the non-exclusive breastfeeding was detected in 16 (2.7%) at discharge, 117 (19.9%) at 30-day and 48 (8.2%) at 90-day. No differences regarding breastfeeding proportion were detected between on site and on call groups at discharge (97.3% and 97.7%, respectively). There was a significant better proportion of exclusively breastfed infants in on site group respect to on call group at 30 days (81.5% vs. 75.8%, respectively) and 90 days (78.6% vs. 73.8%, respectively). Breastfeeding proportion in on site and on call group are reported in Fig. 1.Fig. 1 Breastfeeding proportion in overall population, in on-site and on-call groups

We divided the overall population in two groups by way of delivery: vaginal delivery group and cesarean section group. Table 2 shows characteristics of mothers and infants in the two study groups stratified for way of delivery. Table 2 Characteristics of mothers and infants in the two study groups stratified for mode of delivery

		Vaginal			Cesarean		
	On-site	On-call		On-site	On-call		
	n = 218	n = 191	p	n = 81	n = 74	P	
Maternal age at delivery (years)	32 ± 5	33 ± 5	0,322	34 ± 5	34 ± 6	0,968	
Primary school	6,5%	18,3%	0,000	11,1%	23,0%	0,048	
 Secondary education	59,1%	56,0%	0,535	49,4%	56,8%	0,358	
 University degree	34,4%	25,7%	0,055	39,5%	20,3%	0,009	
 Parity 1	55,0%	50,3%	0,334	40,7%	43,2%	0,752	
 Parity 2	45,0%	49,7%	0,334	59,3%	56,8%	0,752	
Prenatal class	52,8%	41,4%	0,021	45,7%	37,8%	0,323	
 Nipple fissure	30,9%	35,1%	0,367	32,1%	41,9%	0,207	
Pacifier use	43,3%	60,7%	0,000	42,0%	52,7%	0,181	
Mother satisfaction	95,4%	85,9%	0,001	96,3%	81,1%	0,002	
 Female infant	55,0%	48,7%	0,199	50,6%	50,0%	0,939	
 Male infant	45,0%	51,3%	0,199	49,4%	50,0%	0,939	
 Gestational age (weeks)	39.5 ± 1.0	39.3 ± 1.2	0,044	38.7 ± 1.2	38.9 ± 1.3	0,489	
Weight at birth (g)	3328 ± 41	3476 ± 38	0,000	3388 ± 42	3423 ± 41	0,607	
Weight at discharge (g)	3134 ± 40	3265 ± 37	0,001	3162 ± 38	3210 ± 42	0,459	
 Weight loss (%)	5.8 ± 2.9	6.1 ± 2.3	0,322	6.6 ± 2.8	6.3 ± 2.9	0,463	

In vaginal delivery group there were differences between cohorts in terms of maternal education, prenatal class attendance, pacifier usage, weight at birth and at discharge, and gestational age. In on call group, compared to on-site group, there was a greater proportion of mothers with primary school and less frequent university education, a lower percentage of prenatal class, more recurrent pacifier usage and a slight greater weight.

In Cesarean section group there were differences between cohorts in terms of maternal education, prenatal class attendance, satisfaction of nurse assistance during recovery. In on call group, compared to on-site group, there was a greater proportion of mothers with primary school and less frequent university education, a lower percentage of satisfaction about nurse assistance.

No statistical differences were found between on site and on call group in infants born from vaginal delivery. In newborns from cesarean section, in on site group there were higher rates for exclusive breastfeeding at 30 and 90 days of life than in on call group, while at discharge there was a similar proportion (Figs. 2 and 3). Statistical differences in Cesarean section group, both at 30 days and 90 days of infants’ life, still remained when adjusted for education (p < 0.05) and mother satisfaction of nurse (p < 0.05).Fig. 2 Breastfeeding proportion in vaginal delivered infants in on-site and on-call groups

Fig. 3 Breastfeeding proportion in caesarean section delivered infants in on-site and on-call groups

Discussion

Breastfeeding provides short-term and long-term health, economic, and environmental advantages to children, women, and society. Supporting the breastfeeding dyad, has not only health benefits, but also social implications. [30] Various support measures, at many levels, from legal and policy directives to social attitudes and values, to women's work and employment conditions, to health services, could rapidly improve breastfeeding rates [31].

There are many studies to support the fact that rooming-in increases breastfeeding rates. The practice of rooming-in as defined by the World Health Organization and United Nations Children’s Fund is a “hospital practice where postnatal mothers and normal infants stay together in the same room for 24 h a day from the time they arrive in their room after delivery”. [20] In this study rooming in is implemented in both centers with the only difference of way of nurse support. Pediatric nurse practitioners rated as slightly important the limited time during health supervision visits to address breastfeeding problems and to give routine advice on breastfeeding. [21] The continuous presence of a nurse expert in breastfeeding support independently of on site or on call setting should reduce such limitations our study suggests. The nurse's role in support of breastfeeding varies with the time and place where patient care is provided. In each setting, however, the nurse plays a significant role in helping the mother to begin breastfeeding and to enjoy it, at the same time providing her infant with optimum nutrition for his early growth and development. [17] Postnatal breastfeeding counselling and support has been shown to increase rates of breastfeeding up to 6 months of age. [22]

To encourage breastfeeding, it is important to take care of mother before delivery, with dedicated preparation courses, and after delivery, with health care providers with specific competence, including trained midwives and neonatal nurses. A recent two years retrospective study showed a significant decrease of maternal and neonatal mortality/morbidity rates could be achieved by providing effective perinatal and newborn care also in high-income countries. [32]

The high rate of breastfeeding at three months we found in the studied population confirms the role of nurse and rooming in independently of modality of their setting in the rooming in spaces. Early advices to position and attachment of newborn to the nipple can prevent breastfeeding problems later. The stay in the facility providing maternity and newborn services is an opportunity to discuss and assist the mother with questions or problems related to breastfeeding and to build confidence in mother ability to breastfed independently of where the nurse is located.

Cesarean section is a well-known determinant of reduced exclusive breastfeeding rate. [23] The presence of an on-site nurse seems to increase the exclusive breastfeeding, after the discharge, at 30 and 90 days of life. We can assume that the presence of a nurse 24 h in the same ward of the mother could better identify breastfeeding problems in mother-newborn dyad, especially in case of cesarean section that could make the interaction between mother and child more difficult.

Many interventions have been recommended to promote and increase breastfeeding, including a previous successful breastfeeding experience, a higher level of education of the mother, attending prenatal classes, no use of pacifier, rooming in practice, and breastfeeding on demand. On the other hand, factors acting negatively on breastfeeding were advanced maternal age, non-spontaneous delivery, perception of low milk supply, mastitis, and nipple fissures. [24, 25] It is important to individualize the assistance provided to breastfeeding mothers, paying special attention to personal experiences.

Conclusion

Our study suggests the role of on-site nurse during rooming in stay of the mother-infant dyad to encourage exclusive breastfeeding until three months of life in mother who underwent caesarean delivery.

A 24-h nurse, always present in the ward, ready to help the mothers, could be decisive for the "chain of solidarity" necessary to increase exclusive breastfeeding rates. However, this organization is not always possible. Organizational and management difficulties, which include the possible unavailability of a nurse on site 24 h a day, are often encountered in public hospitals. Many times the same nurses take care of rooming in and also sub-intensive or even neonatal intensive care, thus making communication with mothers and breastfeeding support during hospitalization more difficult.

More studies are needed to better understand our results.

Abbreviations

WHO World Health Organization

IUGR Intrauterin Growth Restriction

Acknowledgements

“Not applicable”.

Authors’ contributions

G.L., D.M. and M.E.B. conceptualized and designed the study, drafted the initial manuscript, and revised the manuscript; M.C. and N.L. made substantial contributions to the conception of the study and interpretation of the data; FM.G. made statistical analysis and revised the manuscript. The final version of the manuscript was critically revised and finally approved as submitted by all the authors.

Funding

“This research received no external funding”.

Availability of data and materials

“Data will be made available on reasonable request”.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

“The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Ecclesiastical General Hospital F. Miulli, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Italy, approved the study (No. 6641; January 4, 2021). The Ethics Committee of A.O.U.C. Policlinico of Bari, Italy, received the approval of the Ethics Committee of Acquaviva delle Fonti”.

“Not applicable. NICU consent, signed by parents at hospital admission, allows to use any personal data in anonymous form for scientific reason or publication”.

Consent for publication

“Not applicable”.

Competing interests

“The authors declare no conflict of interest”.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Giuseppe Latorre and Domenico Martinelli equally contributed.
==== Refs
References

1. Balogun OO Dagvadorj A Yourkavitch J Da Silva LK Suto M Takemoto Y Health Facility Staff Training for Improving Breastfeeding Outcome: A Systematic Review for Step 2 of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative Breastfeed Med 2017 12 537 546 10.1089/bfm.2017.0040 28930480
Balogun OO, Dagvadorj A, Yourkavitch J, Da Silva LK, Suto M, Takemoto Y, et al. Health Facility Staff Training for Improving Breastfeeding Outcome: A Systematic Review for Step 2 of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative. Breastfeed Med. 2017;12:537–46.28930480
2. Casazza K Fontaine KR Astrup A Birch LL Brown AW Bohan Brown MM Myths, Presumptions, and Facts about Obesity N Engl J Med 2013 368 446 454 10.1056/NEJMsa1208051 23363498
Casazza K, Fontaine KR, Astrup A, Birch LL, Brown AW, Bohan Brown MM, et al. Myths, Presumptions, and Facts about Obesity. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:446–54.23363498
3. Korpela K Salonen A Virta LJ Kekkonen RA De Vos WM Association of Early-Life Antibiotic Use and Protective Effects of Breastfeeding: Role of the Intestinal Microbiota JAMA Pediatr 2016 170 750 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0585 27294842
Korpela K, Salonen A, Virta LJ, Kekkonen RA, De Vos WM. Association of Early-Life Antibiotic Use and Protective Effects of Breastfeeding: Role of the Intestinal Microbiota. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170:750.27294842
4. Gomez-Llorente C Plaza-Diaz J Aguilera M Muñoz-Quezada S Bermudez-Brito M Peso-Echarri P Three Main Factors Define Changes in Fecal Microbiota Associated With Feeding Modality in Infants J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2013 57 461 466 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31829d519a 23752082
Gomez-Llorente C, Plaza-Diaz J, Aguilera M, Muñoz-Quezada S, Bermudez-Brito M, Peso-Echarri P, et al. Three Main Factors Define Changes in Fecal Microbiota Associated With Feeding Modality in Infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;57:461–6.23752082
5. Piro E, Serra G, Schierz IAM, Giuffrè M, Corsello G. Fetal growth restriction: a growth pattern with fetal, neonatal and long-term consequences. Euromediterranean Biomed J. 2019;14(09):038–044.
6. Victora CG Bahl R Barros AJD França GVA Horton S Krasevec J Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect The Lancet 2016 387 475 490 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7
Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJD, França GVA, Horton S, Krasevec J, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. The Lancet. 2016;387:475–90.
7. Bar S Milanaik R Adesman A Long-term neurodevelopmental benefits of breastfeeding Curr Opin Pediatr 2016 28 559 566 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000389 27386975
Bar S, Milanaik R, Adesman A. Long-term neurodevelopmental benefits of breastfeeding. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2016;28:559–66.27386975
8. Davanzo R Controversies in Breastfeeding Front Pediatr 2018 6 278 10.3389/fped.2018.00278 30443539
Davanzo R. Controversies in Breastfeeding Front Pediatr. 2018;6:278.30443539
9. Gartner LM Morton J Lawrence RA Naylor AJ O’Hare D Schanler RJ Breastfeeding and the use of human milk Pediatrics 2005 115 496 506 10.1542/peds.2004-2491 15687461
Gartner LM, Morton J, Lawrence RA, Naylor AJ, O’Hare D, Schanler RJ, et al. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2005;115:496–506.15687461
10. Patnode CD Henninger ML Senger CA Perdue LA Whitlock EP Primary Care Interventions to Support Breastfeeding: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force JAMA 2016 316 1694 1705 10.1001/jama.2016.8882 27784101
Patnode CD, Henninger ML, Senger CA, Perdue LA, Whitlock EP. Primary Care Interventions to Support Breastfeeding: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2016;316:1694–705.27784101
11. Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding. Accessible Version: https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/data/reportcard.htm. Breastfeeding Report Card United States, 2020. N Y. 2020;6.
12. UNICEF. Breastfeeding: A Mother’s Gift, for Every Child. Available online: https://data.unicef.org/resources/breastfeeding-amothers-gift-for-every-child/. (accessed on 13 Mar 2021.
13. DeMaria AL Ramos-Ortiz J Basile K Breastfeeding trends, influences, and perceptions among Italian women: a qualitative study Int J Qual Stud Health Well-Being 2020 15 1734275 10.1080/17482631.2020.1734275 33369546
DeMaria AL, Ramos-Ortiz J, Basile K. Breastfeeding trends, influences, and perceptions among Italian women: a qualitative study. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-Being. 2020;15:1734275.33369546
14. Mosca F Roggero P Garbarino F Morniroli D Bracco B Morlacchi L Determinants of breastfeeding discontinuation in an Italian cohort of mother-infant dyads in the first six months of life: a randomized controlled trial Ital J Pediatr 2018 44 134 10.1186/s13052-018-0572-z 30400806
Mosca F, Roggero P, Garbarino F, Morniroli D, Bracco B, Morlacchi L, et al. Determinants of breastfeeding discontinuation in an Italian cohort of mother-infant dyads in the first six months of life: a randomized controlled trial. Ital J Pediatr. 2018;44:134.30400806
15. Lebron CN, St. George SM, Eckembrecher DG, Alvarez LM. “Am I doing this wrong?” Breastfeeding mothers’ use of an online forum. Matern Child Nutr. 2020 [cited 2020 May 22];16. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/mcn.12890.
16. Vizzari G Morniroli D Consales A Capelli V Crippa BL Colombo L Knowledge and attitude of health staff towards breastfeeding in NICU setting: are we there yet? An Italian survey Eur J Pediatr 2020 179 1751 1759 32424743
Vizzari G, Morniroli D, Consales A, Capelli V, Crippa BL, Colombo L, et al. Knowledge and attitude of health staff towards breastfeeding in NICU setting: are we there yet? An Italian survey Eur J Pediatr. 2020;179:1751–9.32424743
17. Yang S-F Salamonson Y Burns E Schmied V Breastfeeding knowledge and attitudes of health professional students: a systematic review Int Breastfeed J 2018 13 8 10.1186/s13006-018-0153-1 29483935
Yang S-F, Salamonson Y, Burns E, Schmied V. Breastfeeding knowledge and attitudes of health professional students: a systematic review. Int Breastfeed J. 2018;13:8.29483935
18. Shattnawi KK Healthcare Professionals’ Attitudes and Practices in Supporting and Promoting the Breastfeeding of Preterm Infants in NICUs Adv Neonatal Care 2017 17 390 399 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000421 28787301
Shattnawi KK. Healthcare Professionals’ Attitudes and Practices in Supporting and Promoting the Breastfeeding of Preterm Infants in NICUs. Adv Neonatal Care. 2017;17:390–9.28787301
19. Almqvist-Tangen G Bergman S Dahlgren J Roswall J Alm B Factors associated with discontinuation of breastfeeding before 1 month of age: Factors associated with discontinuation of breastfeeding Acta Paediatr 2012 101 55 60 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02405.x 21767302
Almqvist-Tangen G, Bergman S, Dahlgren J, Roswall J, Alm B. Factors associated with discontinuation of breastfeeding before 1 month of age: Factors associated with discontinuation of breastfeeding. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101:55–60.21767302
20. Taveras EM Capra AM Braveman PA Jensvold NG Escobar GJ Lieu TA Clinician Support and Psychosocial Risk Factors Associated With Breastfeeding Discontinuation Pediatrics 2003 112 108 115 10.1542/peds.112.1.108 12837875
Taveras EM, Capra AM, Braveman PA, Jensvold NG, Escobar GJ, Lieu TA. Clinician Support and Psychosocial Risk Factors Associated With Breastfeeding Discontinuation. Pediatrics. 2003;112:108–15.12837875
21. Ragusa R Marranzano M La Rosa VL Giorgianni G Commodari E Quattrocchi R Factors Influencing Uptake of Breastfeeding: The Role of Early Promotion in the Maternity Hospital Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021 18 4783 10.3390/ijerph18094783 33946146
Ragusa R, Marranzano M, La Rosa VL, Giorgianni G, Commodari E, Quattrocchi R, et al. Factors Influencing Uptake of Breastfeeding: The Role of Early Promotion in the Maternity Hospital. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:4783.33946146
22. Hakala M Kaakinen P Kääriäinen M Bloigu R Hannula L Elo S Maternity ward staff perceptions of exclusive breastfeeding in Finnish maternity hospitals: A cross-sectional study Eur J Midwifery 2021 5 1 11 10.18332/ejm/134846
Hakala M, Kaakinen P, Kääriäinen M, Bloigu R, Hannula L, Elo S. Maternity ward staff perceptions of exclusive breastfeeding in Finnish maternity hospitals: A cross-sectional study. Eur J Midwifery. 2021;5:1–11.
23. McFadden A, Gavine A, Renfrew MJ, Wade A, Buchanan P, Taylor JL, et al. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies. Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 [cited 2020 May 18]; Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD001141.pub5.
24. Cattaneo A Burmaz T Arendt M Nilsson I Mikiel-Kostyra K Kondrate I Protection, promotion and support of breast-feeding in Europe: progress from 2002 to 2007 Public Health Nutr 2010 13 751 759 10.1017/S1368980009991844 19860992
Cattaneo A, Burmaz T, Arendt M, Nilsson I, Mikiel-Kostyra K, Kondrate I, et al. Protection, promotion and support of breast-feeding in Europe: progress from 2002 to 2007. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13:751–9.19860992
25. Colombo L Crippa B Consonni D Bettinelli M Agosti V Mangino G Breastfeeding Determinants in Healthy Term Newborns Nutrients 2018 10 48 10.3390/nu10010048 29304013
Colombo L, Crippa B, Consonni D, Bettinelli M, Agosti V, Mangino G, et al. Breastfeeding Determinants in Healthy Term Newborns. Nutrients. 2018;10:48.29304013
26. Lindau JF Mastroeni S Gaddini A Di Lallo D Fiori Nastro P Nastro PF Determinants of exclusive breastfeeding cessation: identifying an “at risk population” for special support Eur J Pediatr 2015 174 533 540 10.1007/s00431-014-2428-x 25308961
Lindau JF, Mastroeni S, Gaddini A, Di Lallo D, Fiori Nastro P, Nastro PF, et al. Determinants of exclusive breastfeeding cessation: identifying an “at risk population” for special support. Eur J Pediatr. 2015;174:533–40.25308961
27. Auerbach KG The role of the nurse in support of breast feeding J Adv Nurs 1979 4 263 285 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1979.tb03008.x 256572
Auerbach KG. The role of the nurse in support of breast feeding. J Adv Nurs. 1979;4:263–85.256572
28. World Health Organization, Unicef Protecting, promoting and supporting breastfeeding: the baby-friendly hospital initiative for small, sick and preterm newborns 2020
World Health Organization, Unicef. Protecting, promoting and supporting breastfeeding: the baby-friendly hospital initiative for small, sick and preterm newborns. 2020.
29. World Health Organization. Guideline: protecting, promoting and supporting breastfeeding in facilities providing maternity and newborn services. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017 [cited 2022 Mar 2]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/259386.
30. Serra G Giuffrè M Piro E Corsello G The social role of pediatrics in the past and present times Ital J Pediatr 2021 47 239 10.1186/s13052-021-01190-6 34922600
Serra G, Giuffrè M, Piro E, Corsello G. The social role of pediatrics in the past and present times. Ital J Pediatr. 2021;47:239.34922600
31. Rollins NC Bhandari N Hajeebhoy N Horton S Lutter CK Martines JC Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices? The Lancet 2016 387 491 504 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01044-2
Rollins NC, Bhandari N, Hajeebhoy N, Horton S, Lutter CK, Martines JC, et al. Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices? The Lancet. 2016;387:491–504.
32. Serra G Miceli V Albano S Corsello G Perinatal and newborn care in a two years retrospective study in a first level peripheral hospital in Sicily (Italy) Ital J Pediatr 2019 45 152 10.1186/s13052-019-0751-6 31783883
Serra G, Miceli V, Albano S, Corsello G. Perinatal and newborn care in a two years retrospective study in a first level peripheral hospital in Sicily (Italy). Ital J Pediatr. 2019;45:152.31783883
