
==== Front
Gut Microbes
Gut Microbes
Gut Microbes
1949-0976
1949-0984
Taylor & Francis

39287010
10.1080/19490976.2024.2399360
2399360
Version of Record
Review Article
Review
Effect of diet on the gut mycobiome and potential implications in inflammatory bowel disease
J. BUTTAR ET AL.
GUT MICROBES
Buttar J. a
Kon E. b c
Lee A. d
Kaur G. b
Lunken G. a b c
a Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, Canada
b Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, Canada
c BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute , Vancouver, Canada
d Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, Canada
CONTACT G. Lunken genelle.lunken@bcchr.ca Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, 950 W 28th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
17 9 2024
2024
17 9 2024
16 1 2399360Integra14 9 2024
Integra14 9 2024
07 9 2023
31 7 2024
28 8 2024
© 2024 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
2024
The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.

ABSTRACT

The gut microbiome is a complex, unique entity implicated in the prevention, pathogenesis, and progression of common gastrointestinal diseases. While largely dominated by bacterial populations, advanced sequencing techniques have identified co-inhabiting fungal communities, collectively referred to as the mycobiome. Early studies identified that gut inflammation is associated with altered microbial composition, known as gut dysbiosis. Altered microbial profiles are implicated in various pathological diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), though their role as a cause or consequence of systemic inflammation remains the subject of ongoing research. Diet plays a crucial role in the prevention and management of various diseases and is considered to be an essential regulator of systemic inflammation. This review compiles current literature on the impact of dietary modulation on the mycobiome, showing that dietary changes can alter the fungal architecture of the gut. Further research is required to understand the impact of diet on gut fungi, including the metabolic pathways and enzymes involved in fungal fermentation. Additionally, investigating whether dietary modulation of the gut mycobiome could be utilized as a therapy in IBD is essential.

KEYWORDS

Gut
microbiome
mycobiome
diet
dietary modulation
inflammatory bowel disease
The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

The human gut is inhabited by over 100 trillion microorganisms including bacteria, archaea, viruses, and fungi. Collectively, these are referred to as the gut microbiome. Colonization begins at birth and expands in early life due to increased exposures through diet, travel, and illness.1,2 Through adulthood, the microbiome profile stabilizes but remains vulnerable to external stressors. The advent of non-culture-based techniques such as PCR and next-generation sequencing has helped identify the diverse suite of inhabitants of the microbiome. Bacteria comprise 99% of the gut microbiota, largely divided in to Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes phyla.3 Within the Bacteroidetes phylum, Bacteroides and Prevotella genera are prevalent; within the Firmicutes phylum, Lactobacillus, Bacillus, Clostridium, Enterococcus and Ruminococcus genera are prevalent.4 Fungal communities colonizing the gut, collectively known as the gut mycobiome, comprise only 0.01–0.1% of its overall diversity.5 Archaea inhabit the gut largely as hydrogenotrophs, serving to decrease the partial pressure of the colon through reduction of carbon dioxide into methane.6 Within hydrogenotrophs, Methanobrevibacter smithii and Methanosphaera stadtmanae are the most prevalent species in the human gut.7 Other archaeal phyla such as Crenarchaea and Haloarchaea have been isolated, however, at much lower abundances and are felt to be transient colonizers.8,9 Viruses inhabit the gut as either bacteriophages, those that exclusively infect and replicate in bacteria, or eukaryotic viruses, such as Adenoviridae, Anelloviridae, Astroviridae, or Parvoviridae families.10 Given the technical difficulties in accurately extracting single and double strand DNA and RNA, the virome has been historically understudied.11 Despite this, the virome has been shown in recent research to play an integral role in the homeostasis of the gut microbiome.12,13

The gut microbiome plays important physiological roles in host immunity, harvesting nutrients and strengthening the enteric epithelium.14–17 It has been extensively studied as a mediator of health.18–20 In comparison with the microbiome profile of healthy controls, the microbiome of patients with various metabolic, neurological, and autoimmune diseases is altered.21 One of the most significant influencers of the mycobiome is long-term dietary patterns. Considering the prevalence of the highly processed, low fiber Western diet, its effect on the gut mycobiome remains largely unknown. This review aims to build on current knowledge that analyzes the impact of the mycobiome in gut inflammation, with extension to inflammatory conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In addition, it serves to compile relevant literature to further our understanding of the impact of diet on the mycobiome.

Methodology

Several authors (JB, EJ, AL and GK) independently searched EMBASE and MEDLINE databases for studies published between June 1, 1947 and July 1, 2024 that evaluated the effect of dietary modulation on the mycobiome. Specific search terms can be found in Appendix A. The authors independently reviewed bibliographies of included studies and review articles to identify further citations not captured by the electronic search. In order for a citation to be included, it had to be a full-text original manuscript, published in English, which directly investigated the impact of dietary modulation on the mycobiome. Dietary modulation was defined as an alteration in the composition of subjects’ oral intake. Mycobiome was defined as the fungal constituents of the gut flora. A total of 9285 full text articles were populated in the initial search. After initial review of the titles and removal of duplicate articles, 242 articles underwent abstract review. Of these, 30 articles underwent full review. A total of 15 articles were included in this review.

Inflammatory bowel disease

IBD is a class of diseases including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), both of which are characterized by a chronic, relapsing-remitting course, with significant patient morbidity and health care burden. IBD is thought to arise from a combination of over-reactive T-cell mediated responses, genetic predisposition, environmental triggers and luminal microbiota.22 CD involves all mucosal layers, can be found in any area of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and is subcategorized into penetrating or stricturing phenotypes.23 UC involves the rectum and extends proximally, involving the mucosa and submucosa. In Canada, the prevalence of IBD has increased in the last decade, from 270,000 Canadians in 2018 to 322,600 Canadians in 2023; with numbers estimated to reach 470,000 by 2035. On a global scale, prevalence of IBD has increased 47%, from 3.32 million cases in 1990 to 4.90 million in 2010.24,25 The increasing prevalence of IBD has spurred basic science and clinical research endeavors for effective short and long-term therapies, with the unifying goal of decreasing hospitalization and improving patient quality of life.

Pharmacologic therapy in IBD is two-pronged, aiming to either induce or maintain remission. Anti-inflammatory agents, including corticosteroids and 5-aminosalicylic acid, can be administered through various modalities and are most effective in timely induction of remission for patients with active flare.26 Immunomodulators and biologic agents, contrastingly, have a slower onset of action but can alter disease trajectory by achieving long-term remission maintenance.27 Biologic agents are protein-based molecules that block pro-inflammatory cytokines.27 They were initially reserved for patients refractory to immunomodulators as they carry a significant cost to the healthcare system.28 In recent years, biologic agents have become the cornerstone of IBD management, supported by evidence demonstrating better long-term prognosis and increased efficacy when introduced earlier in the course of IBD.29,30 Further, biologic therapies have become more cost-effective in light of bio-originator compounds exhausting their patency, enabling the advent of bio-similar molecules.28 Four different classes of biologic agents are currently approved by Health Canada: anti-TNF agents, anti-integrin agents, anti-interleukin 12/23 IgG1 kappa agents and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) inhibitors.31 Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAK), commonly referred to as small molecule inhibitors, remain on the horizon with promising clinical response and superior patient convenience by offering oral administration.32 The advent of biologic therapies has led to fewer IBD-related hospitalizations and corrective abdominal surgeries, however, the overall morbidity associated with IBD remains high.33

Non-pharmacologic therapies, such as dietary modulation, have significant benefits as they are cost effective and empowering to patients. It is supported in other areas of medicine, such as cardiovascular health, as an adjunct to conventional, pharmacologic therapies to reduce risk and progression of atherosclerosis.34 However, gaps in our understanding remain regarding dietary effect on IBD progression despite its accepted role in its pathogenesis.35,36 Current guidelines are unable to define an “IBD diet” that can promote remission in adult patients with active disease.37,38 To rectify this, we must bolster our understanding of the impact of diet on the human gut, starting with a better understanding of the relationship between diet and the gut microbiome and their role in inflammation.

Fungi in the gut

Fungi are unicellular or multicellular, heterotrophic eukaryotes with an impressive ability to decompose and harvest otherwise unavailable nutrients.39 Influenced by historical studies associating Candida as a facultative pathogen, early research focused on the role of fungi as a potential detriment to gut health.40,41 With the advent of works such as the Human Microbiome Project, fungal species have gained momentum as a necessary component of the microbiome with both commensal and mutualistic relationships.5,42

To delineate which fungal species are autochthonous and contribute toward gut health, the mycobiome is categorized into resident and nonresident species. Resident species have intrinsic ability to grow in the anoxic mammalian gut environment, known for its variable pH and increased physiologic temperature of 37°C. This subgroup includes genera within the Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Zygomycota phyla, such as Candida, Malassezia and Cladosporium.5,43 In contrast, nonresident species are isolated in the gut using non-culture techniques, and are not currently felt to contribute to gut physiology. However, this is likely an overly simplistic way of characterizing fungi. Common nonresident species include Saccharomyces, Aspergillus, and Penicillium, among many others. 43 Nonresident species are often the product of external influences such as short-term dietary exposures or environmental triggers. This sub-group makes up two-thirds of isolated fungal species.44

Candida in the gut

The most frequently reported genus among resident fungi is Candida, including C.albicans, C.tropicalis, C.parapsilosis, and C.glabrata species.45 C.albicans, a dimorphic fungus, is most well known as an opportunistic pathogen of the gut, oral mucosa, vagina and blood.46 It is responsible for millions of cases of vaginal and oral infections every year, conferring significant mortality when infecting an immunocompromised host.47 However, C.albicans also demonstrates an impressive commitment to gut commensalism when it remains in its yeast form. In particular, C.albicans undergoes a “gastrointestinal induced transition” when exposed to the mammalian gut, thought to be in part due to upregulation of the WOR1 transcription factor, that results in phenotypic changes more suitable for nutrient uptake of short chain fatty acids (SCFA) and N-acetylglucosamine.48 What dictates the morphologic shift that drives C.albicans into an invasive pathogen is not fully understood, with preliminary research highlighting a novel, regulatory role of host epithelial cells.49

Malassezia in the gut

Known largely as a colonizer and pathogen of the skin, the Malassezia genus is also the second most prevalent fungal species within the gut.43,50 Among these, M.globosa, M.restricta, M.sympodalis, and M.pachydermatis are the most prevalent species in the gut.51 Nearly all species of Malassezia do not synthesize fatty acids and instead rely on external sources for lipids, explaining their proliferation on sebum-rich producing areas of the human skin.52 Within the gut, lipids are available from bile salts, synthesized from bile acids by hepatocytes.53 It remains poorly understood how Malassezia colonize the human gut, with competing hypotheses including indirect exposure from human skin or because of breast milk ingestion during infancy.53 Regardless of the mechanism, Malassezia is a predominant player of fungal colonization, with recent studies implicating it in gut symbiosis.43,54 In certain circumstances, however, Malassezia has pathogenic potential, inducing detrimental, aberrant immune reactions.55 On the skin, it has been linked to the pathogenesis of seborrheic dermatitis and pityriasis versicolor.56 Malassezia has been found in greater relative abundance in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma tissue compared to gut, implicated in oncogenesis through stimulation of the pattern recognition receptor mannose binding lectin (MBL).57 Malassezia is found at greater relative proportions in patients with IBD, compared to healthy controls, and is thought to contribute toward mucositis.58

Saccharomyces in the gut

The Saccharomyces genus is considered a nonresident fungus of the human gut, with the most predominant species being Saccharomyces cerevisiae. S.cerevisiae is commonly known as baker’s yeast and one of the most well-studied single-celled organisms. It is instrumental in leavening of bread, brewing of beer and commonly used as a food additive. Its role in the homeostasis of the gut microbiome is often overlooked as it was historically thought to be a transient colonizer and consequence of dietary habits. However, recent research has shown S.cerevisiae can indeed thrive in the gut, metabolizing the highly glycosylated protein known as mucin.59 A strain of S.cerevisiae, known as S.cerevisiae var. boulardii, is a well-known probiotic yeast species known to help resolve various GI diseases, including traveler’s diarrhea and antibiotic-associated diarrhea.60,61 The use of S.cerevisiae var. boulardii in the treatment of CD has low-grade evidence in consensus guidelines, after small pilot studies demonstrated decreased colonic permeability in CD patients.62,63

Impact of the gut mycobiome on immune responses

Gut fungi impact host immunity through the innate and adaptive immune system, initiated by the interaction between fungal cell wall components and pattern recognition receptors (PRR) of intestinal immune cells. Phagocytosis of fungi leads to activation of various immune responses, in an effort to control fungal colonization.64 When these regulatory mechanisms are dysfunctional or absent, fungal colonization is left unchecked, leading to disturbance of gut microbial architecture and intestinal inflammation.65

Through several checkpoints, the innate and adaptive immune system can distinguish between commensal or pathogenic fungi. Given that C.albicans can act as either a commensal or pathogenic agent, it is often applied in immunologic analyses to help differentiate these distinct immune responses.66 The protein associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) of C.albicans, and other fungi, interact with toll-like receptors (TLRs), C-type lectin receptors (CLRs) and NOD-like receptors (NLRs) on intestinal mononuclear phagocytes (MNPs).67 As an example, macrophage mannose receptor 1 (MMR), dendritic cell-specific ICAM3-grabbing non-integrin (DC-SIGN), and macrophage-inducible C-type lectin (MINCLE) all recognize mannose-rich structures on the cell wall of certain fungi.68 Common C-type lectin receptors that MNPs express are dectin-1 and dectin-2. Binding of dectin-1 to β-glucans of fungi stimulates a conformational change, exposing immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs (ITAM) on its tail to be phosphorylated by SRC family kinases.69 Phosphorylation of ITAMs on dectin-1 allow tandem Src-homology 2 (SH2) domains of spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) to dock, which activates it to phosphorylate caspase recruitment domain-containing 9 protein (CARD9).64 Activation of CARD9 leads to induction of Th-17 cells, which mobilize neutrophils to the intestine.70

Binding of dectin-1 to β-glucans on C.albicans or Aspergillus also promotes activation of bio-active IL-1β from its non-active form, pro-IL-1β through the noncanonical caspase-8 inflammasome.71 Importantly, activation of caspase-8 inflammasome does not rely on internalization of fungal material.71 As such, dectin-1 can mount an effective and swift response after recognition of external fungal cell wall components through activation of IL-1β. IL-1β is a member of the IL-1 family, known for inducing systemic inflammation. However, it can also function to protect against foreign antigens. In response to fungal recognition, IL-1β stimulates helper T cells, mobilizes neutrophils, and enhances phagocytosis in an effort to improve clearance of fungal pathogens from the gut.72–75

When C.albicans is seen in its commensal, yeast morphology, its PAMPS responsible for inflammasome and IL-17 pathways are hidden.67 When C.albicans transitions to its pathogenic, hyphae form, both the inflammasome pathway and IL-17 signaling pathway are activated.76 In particular, TLRs secrete cytokines including IL-1β, IL-23, and IL-6, which favor activation of CD4+ T cells into the Th17 lineage.77 Th17 cells are responsible for secreting IL-17, a cytokine which recruits macrophages, neutrophils and antimicrobial peptides to mount an effective anti-fungal response.77 Thus, the unique interaction of PAMPs on pathogenic fungi and PRRs on host dendritic cells dictate the inflammatory response.

The mycobiome plays an important role in host immunity. The macrophages and monocytes involved in fungal recognition undergo trained immunity after exposure to commensal fungal species such as S.cerevisiae, increasing TNF-alpha and IL-6 production in response to further exposure of bacterial or fungal organisms.78 Fungal commensals themselves play a direct role in the stabilization of gut homeostasis, with C.albicans able to shed its pathogenic strains in times of host stress, protecting it from bacterial and fungal pathogens.79 Fungal symbiosis also plays a protective role against colitis-related carcinogenesis. Mice depleted in fungi showed higher rates of colon tumorigenesis after azoxymethane – dextran sodium sulfate (AOM/DSS) administration compared to wild-type mice. When supplemented with exogenous IL-18, rates of tumorigenesis decreased significantly.80 As such, fungal symbiosis plays an important role in host immunity in protecting against colitis and colitis-associated cancer through the inflammasome pathway.

Inter-kingdom relationships

The GI tract hosts an array of microorganisms residing together to form complex and dynamic ecosystems. Recent attention has been paid to bacterial-fungal interactions as they have been implicated in disease.81 Bacterial-fungal interactions can be mutually beneficial, however, competition to establish a specific niche or for nutrients may result in an imbalance in bacteria and fungi. There are various mechanisms involved in both mutualistic and antagonistic bacterial-fungal communication. One study demonstrated that SCFA production by bacteria during fiber fermentation carried intrinsically anti-fungal qualities.82 Another study postulated that peptidoglycan fragments secreted during bacterial cell wall synthesis directly bind and inactivate C.albicans, preventing its transition from a budding yeast to elongated hyphae.83 Through these mechanisms, a stable and diverse bacterial gut community regulates its fungal counterparts. During times of intestinal inflammation or prolonged antibiotic use, abundance of bacteria in the gut decreases, rendering it susceptible to invasive fungal species.55 This was highlighted in a study involving mice treated with vancomycin which showed disseminated C.albicans infection in the absence of bacterial species.84 As such, pathogenic fungi are regulated not just by host immunity but also by various commensal bacterial species.

The finite supply of nutritional resources in the gut, particularly metals such as iron, has led to various relationships between fungi and bacteria.85 Non-reductive mechanisms of iron extraction involve siderophores, secreted molecules that scavenge iron in the environment and are re-absorbed.86 Commensal relationships soon emerged, such as mutant Escherichia coli strains that are deficient in siderophore synthesis and adapted to utilize those produced by Penicillium, such as ferrichrome and coprogen.87 Contrastingly, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Aspergillus fumigatus secrete siderophores only they can assimilate, further reducing nutrient supply from their competitors.88

Fungi and bacteria interact to optimize their microenvironment. Gut organisms produce an extracellular matrix known as the biofilm to protect against antimicrobial factors.89 In vitro studies showed C.tropicalis, E.coli and Serratia marcescens work symbiotically to create a significantly thicker biofilm than they are capable of producing alone.89,90 Scanning electron microscopy revealed the intimate interaction of these three organisms, with S.marcescens using fimbriae to connect E.coli and C.tropicalis together.91

Gut mycobiome in IBD

The microbiome profile in IBD patients is known to be altered, with historical studies largely focusing on the relative imbalance of bacteria.92 IBD patients have reduced bacterial biodiversity, with a relative decrease in bacteria from the Firmicutes phylum and a relative increase in bacteria from the Proteobacterium phylum.93 The mycobiome in IBD patients comprises largely of fungi from Ascomycota and Basidiomycota phyla, with the most prevalent genera including Saccharomyces, Debaryomyces, Penicillium, Aspergillus, and Candida.94,95

IBD involves a heterogenous collection of disease phenotypes. The phenotype of disease, and extent of inflammation, is associated with a unique mycobiome profile. In CD, the mycobiome profile differs based on disease involving the ileum compared to disease exclusively in the colon. In particular, ileum-sparing CD showed higher rates of Candida and Debaryomyces, while Aspergillus and Pichia were in higher abundance in ileal-involved CD.95 During a disease flare, the ratio of Basidiomycota to Ascomycota increases compared to controls.94,95 On a species level, CD patients in an active flare showed greater relative abundance of Candida species, Gibberella moniliformis, Alternaria brassicicola and Cryptococcus neoformans.96 Variations of the mycobiome profile is best highlighted in UC when categorized on extent of disease. Patients with proctitis had the highest relative abundance of Penicillium, negatively correlated as extent of disease progressed proximally.95 In contrast, Pichia was over-represented in patients with left-sided colitis compared to those with proctitis.95

As the unique microbiome profile associated with IBD flare has become more validated, the concept of fungal pathobionts contributing toward a pro-inflammatory state has emerged, starting with C.albicans.90 The abundance of C.albicans is increased in the gut of IBD patients compared to healthy controls.97 In its hyphal form, C.albicans upregulates the endothelial converting enzyme 1 (ECE1) gene, leading to greater abundance of the ECE1 protein.98 This protein undergoes proteolytic processing to release its active form, known as Candidalysin. Candidalysin is a 31-amino acid cytolytic peptide, known for damaging epithelial cell plasma membranes and stimulating transcription factors that encode pro-inflammatory cytokines.99 Candidalysin also damages the function of macrophages, negatively impacting their antifungal capacity.100 Interestingly, a cohort of CD patients demonstrated lower levels of IgA-mediated responses specific to Candidalysin compared to healthy controls.101 This suggests that highly immunogenic fungal pathogens are not sufficiently controlled in IBD patients and may contribute to its pro-inflammatory state.

As a by-product of fungal profiling in IBD, certain species have been identified as surrogate markers of inflammation. S.cerevisiae is found in greater relative abundance in non-inflamed tissue compared to inflamed tissue within the same CD patient.102 CD patients who are actively flaring show higher levels of anti-S.cerevisiae antibodies (ASCAs).102 ASCA have also been utilized in disease forecasting, with higher levels of ASCA found in patients later diagnosed with CD compared to controls.103 Additionally, ASCA has been extrapolated as a predictor of disease severity, with patients with positive ASCA IgG having higher rates of surgical interventions compared with CD patients with negative ASCA IgG.104,105 Regular screening of CD patients with ASCA has yet to permeate into regular practice in clinical medicine, however it continues to show promise as an adjunctive, noninvasive measure of disease activity and severity.

Isolating and analyzing the gut mycobiome

More than 390 fungal species have been identified across diverse body sites including the skin, urogenital, respiratory, and GI tracts. However, more than 99% of microbial genes in the gut belong to bacteria, with fungi constituting a minor fraction of the resident microbiota.106 Despite low fungal diversity and abundance compared to bacteria, considerable variability exists between individuals, however, several fungal species are shared across individuals suggesting a core gut mycobiota may exist.107 Moreover, the composition and function of fungi have been linked in various diseases, including IBD, colorectal cancer and metabolic syndrome.108 Influencing factors include mode of delivery, breastfeeding, diet, environmental fungal exposure, and age.108 However, microbiome research predominantly concentrates on bacteria, with insufficient attention given to other crucial microbial groups such as fungi. Consequently, microbiota analysis techniques often exhibit bias toward the bacteriome, hindering mycobiome studies due to suboptimal extraction methods, technical challenges, limited fungal databases, and biases in data analysis.

Designing and executing mycobiome-focused studies present several challenges. First, the choice of sample collection method significantly impacts results, favoring direct freezing over preservatives, which can adversely affect fungal species abundance.5,109 Another crucial consideration is extraction of fungal DNA, particularly when both fungal and bacterial communities are of interest. Optimal extraction methods are essential to achieve high DNA yields. Challenges arise in mixed sample types, such as stool, where the robust nature of fungal cell walls, consisting of chitin, ß-glucan, mannans and glycoproteins, requires repeated bead beating and enzymatic lysis to ensure adequate cell lysis and optimal extraction of fungal DNA. A review of fungal studies revealed the use of 33 different commercial extraction kits and 13 different customized protocols, indicating a need for standardized protocols.108

Several studies have compared the efficacy of different fungal DNA extraction kits.110–112 Shaffer et al. evaluated five commercially available kits (NucleoMag Food, Zymo MagBead, PowerSoil, PowerSoil Pro, and MagMax Microbiome) and found that for extracting fungal DNA from stool, the PowerSoil Pro and MagMax Microbiome kit outperformed the others.111 Another study comparing various DNA extraction kits (QIAamp DNA Stool, PureLink DNA, ZR Fecal DNA MiniPrep, NucleoSpin, IHMS protocol Q) showed that the noncommercial IHMS protocol Q, recommended by the International Human Microbiome Consortium, and the ZR Fecal DNA kit were the most effective.112 Given the typically low fungal biomass in stool samples, it is crucial to assess fungal kit contamination during the DNA extraction process by including water blanks.112

Various sequencing techniques can assess fungal composition and functional capacity within a sample. Amplicon sequencing, targeting the ubiquitous fungal rRNA gene locus, specifically the ribosomal small subunit (18S) and the large subunit (26S) regions separated by the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions ITS1 and ITS2, is a common approach.113 Some studies suggest that ITS fragments promote shorter amplified sequences, however, more curated and rich databases are available often making ITS preferable to 18S or 26S sequencing.114 Alternatively, metagenomic shotgun sequencing captures total DNA, including human, bacterial and fungal components. However, due to low fungal DNA concentrations, deeper and more expensive sequencing is required to generated sufficient reads. Additionally, reference databases for annotated fungal sequences are limited compared to bacteria necessitating well-curated databases like UNITE, NCBI RefSeq Targeted Loci, and MaarjAM to ensure reliable fungal taxonomic classification.115 A concerted effort to better characterize fungi is crucial to addressing these challenges and advancing mycobiome research.

Effect of diet on the gut microbiome

Given the extensive diversity within the gut microbiome and its unique, multi-modal effect on human health, mechanisms to optimize the gut microbiome to improve health have become the focus of many emerging research projects.116,117 Diet is not only a vector for many microbial constituents within the GI tract but also the primary nutrient source for its inhabitants. As such, the modulation of diet can indirectly propagate pro- or anti-inflammatory effects through changes in microbiota composition and function.118,119 To date, the impacts of diet modulation have largely focused on changes in composition and function of bacterial populations. However, given the importance of fungal communities in gut health, further research on the impact of diet modulation on this important subcommunity is warranted.

Dietary modulation is a growing field in the world of non-pharmacologic therapies for many GI diseases, as it empowers patients to play an active role in their treatment plan while also serving as a cost-effective, low-risk alternative to pharmacologic treatments. Dietary modulation encompasses various dietary modifications, ranging from a low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) diet to fiber-enriched foods. These recommendations often stem from prior research linking diet with gut health. Diets rich in tryptophan and fiber have been shown to confer immune states favoring gut health.75 Contrastingly, foods containing artificial sweeteners and emulsifiers, found in processed foods, can lead to increased gut permeability and intestinal inflammation.120,121 The Western diet is comprised of refined carbohydrates with high fat content, thought to confer lower microbial diversity compared to people in rural countries with greater access to whole foods.119 Given that most Westerners do not meet their daily fiber requirements, the impact of a fiber-enriched diet on gut health has become an emerging topic.122 The benefits of dietary fiber are multi-faceted and primarily stem from its fermentation into SCFA, particularly butyrate, acetate, and propionate. These SCFA are known to provide energy for colonic epithelial cells while also dampening down inflammatory cascades and aberrant cellular replication processes.123

Dietary modification plays an integral role in shaping the composition, function and diversity of the gut microbiome, and its effects are most often seen when applied over a long-time course. Gut microbiota are intrinsically resilient to temporary dietary regimens, with up to 60% of bacterial strains persisting for over 5 years despite intermittent dietary changes.124 As such, recommendations for dietary modifications must acknowledge feasibility, cost, and patient adherence, all of which are limiting factors in restrictive diets such as low FODMAP regimens.

Dietary therapies in IBD

IBD patients often inquire about dietary strategies to manage their GI symptoms. Studies indicate that dietary treatments can serve as adjunct therapies, modulating inflammation and promoting mucosal healing.125 The most compelling evidence supports utilizing exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) in pediatric CD patients. EEN, involving a nutritionally complete liquid diet without food intake for 8–12 weeks, shows efficacy similar to steroids, promoting growth without associated side effects.126 Partial enteral nutrition (PEN), allowing some food intake, is better tolerated than EEN, with the Crohn’s disease exclusion diet (CDED) as an example. CDED combines PEN with a diet avoiding or reducing animal/dairy fat/proteins, wheat, and food additives, allowing gradual reintroduction of fruits, vegetables, and legumes to improve food flexibility. Some diets for adult IBD patients, such as the specific carbohydrate diet (SCD), have shown promise in reducing GI symptoms. SCD restricts complex carbohydrates thought to be poorly absorbed by patients with IBD, avoiding grains, starchy vegetables, dairy products, sugars and sweeteners, and certain food additives.127 The Mediterranean diet has gained recent attention for being less restrictive yet as effective as the SCD.128 This diet emphasizes fruits, vegetables, nuts, fish, whole grains, oily fish, and olive oil known to reduce inflammation, while limiting animal fats/protein and food additives which have pro-inflammation properties.129 A Cochrane systematic review on diet for CD remission induction concluded that the evidence is low or very-low quality.130 This is possibly due to variable patient response, suggesting a personalized approach is likely more effective. While dietary fibers are generally considered beneficial to health, some IBD patients, especially during active disease, have reduced tolerance to high fiber containing foods.131,132 Armstrong et al. demonstrated in active disease patients, that certain fibers, especially oligo-fructose (FOS), triggered pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1β.133 Fermentation of FOS with microbiota from non-IBD or mildly affected patients reduced IL-1β secretion. However, this reduction was absent in microbiota from most IBD patients with moderate or severe disease, indicating insufficient fermentation of FOS by commensal microbiota might lead to abnormal immune responses. Bonazzi et al. recent study demonstrated considerable inter-individual variability in gut microbiota responses to different fibers using an in vitro microbiota modeling system.134 Microbiota composition and function varied widely with inulin and psyllium fibers, with some individuals having a fiber-resistant microbiota, while others had a fiber-sensitive microbiota. These studies underscore the necessity for personalized dietary recommendations, especially in managing gut health and inflammation.

Dietary modulation and its effect on the gut mycobiome

As response to diet, particularly in the context of IBD, is at least partially mediated by the gut microbiome, there is need for a more comprehensive understanding of how various nutrients and food groups contribute to altering specific members of the gut microbiota, extending beyond focusing solely on bacteria.135 Many studies exploring the role the gut microbiome plays in mediating the effect of diet on gut health concentrate solely on bacteria. Targeting gut bacteria through diet therapies can lead to shifts in both host and microbial factors.136 For instance, a plant-based diet was associated with a shift in gut bacteria toward a more anti-inflammatory profile, characterized by higher abundances of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Eubacterium rectale and Eubacterium biforme, all of which are butyrate producers. Conversely, adherence to a meat-based diet was associated with a more pro-inflammatory profile, characterized by Ruminococcus gnavus and Collinsella species.137 Despite these and similar findings, the majority of diet-microbiome studies do not extend their focus beyond bacteria to include other microbes such as fungi. Exploring the impact of diet on microbes outside of bacteria, including fungi, is essential. This broader perspective may enhance our understanding of how diet can target all key members of the microbiota, providing comprehensive insights into their implications on gut health and disease.

Carbohydrate-rich diets

The digestibility of dietary carbohydrates determines their metabolic fate. Digestible carbohydrates, such as monosaccharides, disaccharides, and starch polysaccharides, are broken down into energy after being digested and absorbed by the body. In contrast, most nondigestible carbohydrates or fibers interact with the gastrointestinal microbiota and undergo fermentation primarily in the colon. This fermentation process produces gas, SCFA, and other metabolites.138

Hoffman et al. showed that Candida is positively correlated with recent carbohydrate consumption. (Table 1).139 Additionally, Pizzo et al. found that high intakes of fructose, glucose, maltose, and sucrose increased the adhesion of Candida species (C.albicans, C.tropicalis, and C.krusei) to epithelial cells.140 Moreover, reducing dietary monosaccharides and starch has been shown to decrease chronic Candida overgrowth in the intestine.141Table 1. Impact of dietary carbohydrate modulation on gut mycobiome in human studies.

Author	Diet	Number of participants	Study design	Microbial Changes	
Hoffman et al.139	Retrospective diet inventories (long-term vs short-term diet).	96	- Long-term diet assessed using an FFQ and short-term diet assessed using 3-day diet recalls
- Fungi characterized by sequencing the ITS1 and 16S rRNA locus.
- Clustering method used to identify co-varying groups of dietary components (carbohydrates, protein, amino acids).	- Candida positively correlated with intake of carbohydrates and negatively associated with intake of total saturated fatty acids.
- Aspergillus negatively correlated with intake of SCFA.	
Otasevic et al.141	Study-specific diet included: avoidance of alcohol, smoking, milk and dairy products, simple sugar-containing foods, cured and fatty meats. Recommended whole grain bread and whole grain pasta, artificial sweeteners, low-fat white meat, fish, seafood, acidophilus drinks and supplements.	120 patients with ICOG (n = 80 SG; n = 40 CG)	- Pilot study – Adherence to 3 months of diet regime and 10 days of 2 × 500.00 IU nystatin TID in SG
- Adherence to 10 days of 2 × 500.00 IU nystatin TID provided in CG
- Two mycological control examinations and follow-up post-treatment: first follow-up within 10 days after anti-fungal treatment completion; second follow-up occurs 3 months after the initiation of treatment	- Adherence to study-specific diet led to lower levels of Candida compared to patients who were treated with nystatin only	
Pareek et al.142	Retrospective diet inventories	47 Japanese adults (25 Male, 22 Female)
AND
50 Indian adults (27 male, 23 female)	- Comparative study assessing fecal samples from both Japanese and Indian groups
- Fungal DNA was extracted and rRNA was amplified via PCR in the ITS1 region, followed by SMRT sequencing
- Fungal composition determined by PacBio technology	- A higher proportion of Candida and Prevotella were found in healthy Indian participants compared to the healthy Japanese population	
Tian et al.143	HC regimen (65 – 76% carbohydrate) or
LC regimen (15 – 25% carbohydrate)	28	- Cross-over study with 3 cycles − 6 days of HC diet, 6-day washout period, followed by six days of LC diet – or vice versa
- Fungal rRNA amplified via PCR from purified DNA	- HC regimen: Relative increase in Pleurotus, Kazachstania, Auricularia, Ustilaginaceae; Relative decrease in Ustilaginaceae
- LC regimen: Relative increase in Ustilaginaceae; Relative decrease in Blumeria, Agaricomycetes, Malassezia, Rhizopus, Penicillium	
Shuai et al.149	Retrospective diet inventories (long-term habitual diet)	1244	- Taxonomic profiling and comprehensive multi-omics analysis were used to identify ecological links between the fecal metabolome, bacteria, and fungi	- Dairy consumption was negatively associated with Candida but was positively associated with Saccharomyces	
Sun et al.153	Retrospective diet inventories (long-term habitual diet)	942 healthy Chinese participants from 6 ethnicities: Han, Zang, Bai, Hani, Dai, and Miao	- Cohort study where shotgun metagenomic sequencing was used to profile fecal mycobiome samples
- Dietary habits from one month was collected via a questionnaire.
- The participants’ metadata (environmental exposure, bowel habits, anthropometrics, medication) were collected.	- Mushrooms were exclusively correlated with 3 fungal species (Rhizopus stolonifer, Puccinia Sessilis, and Botryozyma species)
- Black tea and pork are significantly correlated with 4 fungal species from the genus Fusarium
- Ingestion of buttermilk and blueberry tea is correlated with Tetrapissipora blattae, Sugiyamaella lignohabitans, Kazachstania naganishii, and others.	
Ukhanova et al.154	Low-fiber American diet in addition to
0, 1.5, or 3 servings of almond or pistachio nuts	34 (almond study = 18; pistachio study = 16)	- Two separate randomized, controlled cross-over studies of almond and pistachio nuts with 3 × 18-day feeding periods separated by a washout period of at least 2 weeks
- Fungal rRNA amplified via PCR and ITS sequences were analyzed	Consumption of almonds and pistachio nuts are negatively associated with abundance of Candida and Penicillium genera.	
David et al.155	Plant-based (32% fat, 16% protein) OR
Animal-based (69% fat, 30% protein)	10 (6 male, 4 female)	- Cross-over study with a 5 day intervention period and one month washout period
- Sequencing of the ITS region mapped to RNA-seq from a reference set of fungal genomes	Animal diets had greater fungal diversity and increased Lactococcus lactis and Neosartorya fischeri.	
Hallen-Adams et al.;44
Suhr et al.50	Hallen-Adams et al.: Conventional (Western) diet
Suhr et al.: Vegetarian diet	Hallen-Adams et al.: 45 participants (21 sampled at one-time point; 24 sampled at two-time points)
Suhr et al.: 16 self-identified vegetarians	Hallen-Adams et al.:
- Fungal rRNA was amplified via PCR and sequenced at one or two time points using the fungal-specific forward primer ITS 1F and eukaryotic reverse primer TW13.
- Clustering method was used for sequence analysis and subjected to BLAST search against GEnBank’s non-redundant nucleotide database
Suhr et al.:
- Fungal rRNA from 16 fecal samples were amplified via PCR and identified using molecular cloning, 454-pyrosequencing and a Luminex ASR assay, all targeting the ITS region	- Fusarium is found in 88% and 3% of vegetarian and conventional diet samples respectively.
- Malassezia is found in 81% and 12% of vegetarians and conventional diet samples respectively.
- Penicillium is found in 75% and 1% of vegetarians and conventional diet samples respectively.
- Aspergillus is found in 68% and 6% of vegetarians and conventional diet samples respectively.	
Ghannoum et al.157	Mycobiome diet	10 healthy participants (6 male; 3 female)	- Daily food intake, weight, BM for 28 days
- Fungi from fecal samples were sequenced using ITS regions	- Adherence to the mycobiome diet decreased the abundance of Candida species overall by 72.4%
- C.albicans decreased by 1.42-fold, while C.tropicalis was undetected after 4 weeks
- Beneficial fungal species increased after 4 weeks: Galactomyces geotrichum and Pichia kluyver increased by 58.4% and 45.1% respectively	
Auchtung et al.160	S. cerevisiae-free OR
S. cerevisiae rich	1 healthy male	- S. cerevisiae-free diet for 1 week, followed by 1 day of S. cerevisiae rich diet
- Fungi, including S. cerevisiae, were analyzed using ITS and 18S sequencing	S. cerevisiae abundance changed from 0.1% on S.cerevisiae-free diet to 86% on the S.cerevisiae rich diet	
FFQ: food frequency questionnaire; HC: high carbohydrate; ITS: internal transcribed spacer; LC: low carbohydrate; SCFA: short chain fatty acids; SG: study group; CG; control group; TID: three times a day; IU: international unit; ICOG: intestinal Candida overgrowth; CFU: colony forming units; SMRT: single molecular real-time.

In 2019, Pareek et al. observed that the stool microbiota of healthy Indian adults contained a higher proportion of Candida and Prevotella compared to healthy Japanese, possibly due to the higher consumption of dietary plant polysaccharides by Indian adults.142 Tian et al. showed that a high-carbohydrate diet increased the abundance of five fungal genera (Pleurotus, Kazachstania, Auricularia, Paraphaeosphaeria, Ustilaginaceae) and decreased the Blumeria genus. Conversely, a low-carbohydrate diet resulted in notable shifts in the gut mycobiome, with a depletion of Blumeria, Agaricomycetes, Malassezia, Rhizopus, and Penicillium genera, and an increase in Ustilaginaceae.143

Multiple studies have demonstrated that Candida species contribute to the fermentation of complex carbohydrates into simple sugars, which serve as an energy source for other microbes.144 Research in pigs found that differences in dietary carbohydrate content were associated with variable fungal populations and SCFA production. Specifically, pigs on a lower carbohydrate diet had lower levels of acetate, butyrate and total SCFAs, with several fungal genera being positively correlated with these SCFAs, including Tomentella, Metschnikowia and Loreleia (Table 2).145 Therefore, dietary carbohydrate intake likely influences gut fungal populations and their metabolic activities, however, future studies should focus on elucidating the precise mechanism by which different carbohydrates affect the mycobiome.Table 2. Impact of dietary modulation on gut mycobiome in animal models.

Author	Diet	Number of participants	Study design	Microbial Changes	
Mims et al.156	Mice split evenly into SC or PD	72 mice – both sexes, 18 mice from 1 of 4 vendors	- 8 week protocol
- Fungal communities quantified using ITS2 gene sequencing	- Fungal diversity declined with exposure to PD (compared to SC)	
Heisel et al.152	Mice fed either SC (18% calories from fat) or HF diet (60% calories from fat)	18 (9 mice/group)	- 16 week protocol
- Fungal communities quantified using ITS2 sequencing	- Mice fed SC had higher rates of Alternaria, Saccharomyces, Septoriella, and Tilletiopsis genera compared to mice fed an HF diet
- The most abundant taxa in SC was S.cerevisiae, and the most abundant taxa in HF was Candida parapsilosis	
Li et al.145	3 pig breeds fed a corn-soybean diet (free of antibiotics, growth promoters, fungal growth promoters or additives)	30 pigs (10 each from 3 breeds: Chenghua, Yorkshire, and Tibetan)	- Fecal sample consistencies were visually assessed using the subjective score on a 5-point scale (1 = hard feces, 2 = firm well-formed, 3 = soft and partially formed, 4 = loose, semi-liquid, 5 = watery)
- Fungal rRNA amplified via PCR in the ITS1 region and DNA sequenced using Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform	- Tormentella positively correlates with the concentration of acetate (p < 0.01), butyrate and SCFA (p < 0.05)
- Metchinikowia positively correlates with the concentrations of all SCFAs (acetate, propionate, butyrate, and TSCFAs; p < 0.05)
- Loreleia positively correlates with the concentration of propionate (p < 0.05)	
HF: high fat; ITS: internal transcribed spacer; PD: processed diet; SC: standard chow.

Protein-rich diets

The gut microbiota is highly involved in proteolytic fermentation, producing SCFA, branched-chain fatty acids (BCFA), gas, and harmful putrefactive metabolites such as ammonia, amines and hydrogen sulfides.146

An in vitro study found that amino acid utilization was positively correlated with fungal growth. The study suggested that amino acids may function as a carbon source for C.albicans, as this fungal species produces proteases and has oligopeptide transporters, allowing C.albicans to adapt to varying environments through metabolic pathway regulation.147 In a separate study, it was found that S.cerevisiae and Aspergillus nidulans use transporters such as the Amino acid-polyamine-organoCation (APC) superfamily and Major Facilitator Superfamily (MFS) to harness amino acids, which could enhance fungal survival in the gut.148

There are limited studies that have assessed the impact of protein-rich diets in humans. However, Shuai et al. examined the factors influencing gut mycobiome homeostasis and found that dairy consumption, a high-protein food source, was negatively associated with Candida and positively associated with Saccharomyces (Table 1).149

The gut microbiota’s role in proteolytic fermentation and the interaction between amino acids and fungal growth highlight the dynamics of the gut mycobiome. Future research should focus on understanding the impact of different protein sources on fungal communities in the gut and exploring dietary interventions to promote a balanced gut mycobiome for improved health outcomes.

High-fat diets

Dietary fats are digested and absorbed in the small intestine, where they are metabolized to provide the body with energy and various fatty acids. Only one study in humans, undertaken by Hoffman et al., has demonstrated that fat impacts the gut mycobiome. Specifically, they demonstrated that Candida was negatively associated with total saturated fat consumption (Table 1).139 In vitro studies, have showed that the efficiency in metabolizing fatty acids and fatty alcohols into carbon and energy sources varies greatly among different fungal species.150 Research has demonstrated that fatty acids may suppress the growth of fungi. In studies focused on food preservation, saturated fatty acids, unsaturated fatty acids, and oxylipids were found to have antifungal properties.151 Due to the lack of studies investigating the effects of fats on the human gut mycobiome, the impact of these dietary components on the gut mycobiome remains unclear. However, in a murine study Heisel et al. showed that mice fed a high-fat diet had increases in six fungal taxa, including Alternaria, Saccharomyces, Septoriella and Tilletiopsis genera, compared to mice fed standard chow (Table 2).152

While dietary fats are crucial for energy metabolism, their impact on the gut mycobiome is not well understood. Future research is also needed to delve in to the role dietary fats have in shaping the gut mycobiome.

Dietary habits and patterns

Certain dietary habit and patterns have been found to significantly impact the composition of the gut mycobiome. Sun et al. found that variations in urbanization and dietary habits can lead to differences in the fungal composition of populations living in distinct regions within China (Table 1).153 This study identified correlations between the consumption of buttermilk and blueberry tea with the presence of Tetrapissipora blattae, Sugiyamaella lignohabitans, Kazachstania naganishii, among others. Moreover, the consumption of black tea and pork was associated with the composition of four species from the Fusarium genus.153 In a separate study by Ukhanova et al., the ingestion of almonds and pistachios was found to be negatively associated with both Candida and Penicillium.154 Additionally, David et al. performed a comparative analysis between an animal-based and plant-based diet, showing a higher abundance of Neosartorya fischeri, a fungus derived from the Penicillium genus, in the animal-based diet arm.155 Interestingly, studies have shown foodborne fungi, such as Penicillium and Aspergillus, and potentially pathogenic fungi, such as Fusarium and Malassezia, in more than 60% of stool samples from vegetarians, but these fungal taxa were infrequently found in individuals who consumed a Western diet.44,50 Both populations exhibited high proportions of Candida (68% in vegetarian diet samples and 84% in Western diet samples). Mice studies further support the effect of diet modulation on mycobiome profiles. Mims et al. showed that overall fungal diversity decreased in mice fed a processed diet compared to standard chow (Table 2).156

Furthermore, recent nutritional studies have utilized the Mycobiome diet to selectively alter the composition of the fungi in the gut. The Mycobiome diet is characterized by the consumption of lean or plant-based protein, mono- or polyunsaturated fats, fiber- and resistant starch-rich foods, and whole foods while avoiding processed, high-sugar foods. Ghannoum et al. demonstrated that following the Mycobiome diet for 28 days led to a 72.4% decrease in the abundance of Candida, particularly C.albicans and C.tropicalis, which decreased by 142% or became undetectable, respectively. Additionally, the Mycobiome diet increased concentrations of some beneficial fungal species, including Pichia kluyveri and Galactomyces geotrichum. In addition to the beneficial effects this diet had on the gut mycobiome, the diet led to a reduction in bacterial overgrowth in patients with small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, and improved fatigue, sleep, bloating, constipation, diarrhea, and gas in all participants.157

An additional noteworthy aspect is the prevalence of common gut fungi such as S.cerevisiae and Debaryomyces hansenii, in our food supply. These fungi are commonly found in dairy products, bread, fruit skins (including grapes), kombucha and cheeses which makes it difficult to determine if these fungal species truly reside in the gut or are more transient in nature.116,158,159 Auchtung et al. revealed that consuming a diet devoid of S.cerevisiae led to a large reduction in S.cerevisiae levels from 86% at baseline to 0.1% of ITS reads 2 days in to a S.cerevisiae-free diet. This suggests that abundance of S.cerevisiae is highly dependent on dietary sources of this fungal species.160 Consequently, studies exploring the potential impact specific fungal species have in disease should consider the potentially transient nature of food-derived fungal taxa. This consideration is important as it could influence the perceived importance of these species in both health and disease.

It is plausible that the influence of diet on altering the composition of the mycobiome may not be directly attributed to the effects of dietary components on gut fungi. Instead, these effects could be indirect, stemming from the modulation of gut bacteria, which, in turn influences fungal compositions. Due to limited evidence elucidating the mechanisms behind how diet modulates the gut mycobiome, further studies are necessary to discern both the direct and indirect effects of diet on the gut mycobiome.

Fungal fermentation of dietary components

Despite studies demonstrating that the mycobiome changes in response to diet, our knowledge on the potential impact of diet on the functional capacities of these microorganisms remains limited. It is understood that both bacterial and fungal communities produce metabolites that not only shape their own populations but also exert an influence on other community members and various host cell populations. In response to a high-fiber diet, gut-residing bacteria upregulate functional pathways and enzymes, enabling the fermentation of fibers to produce SCFA, particularly butyrate.161 Whether gut fungi share similar metabolic pathways is yet to be elucidated.

Fungi, being eukaryotes, exhibit metabolic distinctions from prokaryotic organisms like bacteria. This underscores the importance of understanding the specific metabolic pathways involved in fungal fermentation of fibers and other dietary components. Select bacteria are known to the produce SCFA acetate, propionate, and butyrate through fiber fermentation. Plant fungi possess metabolic pathways and enzymes to ferment plant cell walls, which predominately comprise of fibers.162 However, whether fungi in the gut share these metabolic processes remains uncertain. Some fungal species are employed in the food industry for ethanol production and generating lactic acid and gases via fermentation of fibers such as pectin, cellulose and lignin.163 Nevertheless, the specific metabolites produced by gut fungi during dietary fiber fermentation remains uncertain. Furthermore, a recent study focusing on the gut microbiome of goats revealed that fungi outperformed bacteria in degrading cellulose fiber. Fungi produced higher amounts of methane, acetate and formate, while bacteria produced more butyrate and propionate.117 Moreover, it is important to consider the role of metabolites in mediating interactions between bacteria and fungi in the gut. Metabolites, such as bile acids, may influence microbial interactions as fungi have the capacity to induce adverse effects on bacterial viability through the transformation of bile acids.164

Conclusion

The gut microbiome is a complex, unique entity responsive to changes in environment, diet, and disease. It is teeming with microorganisms from all kingdoms, interacting through complex and dynamic relationships. Fungi play a crucial role in microbiome homeostasis, involved in the regulation of opportunistic pathogens and fermentation of otherwise inaccessible nutrients. Alterations in the mycobiome architecture is associated with dysbiosis, an inflamed immune state implicated in various chronic diseases including IBD. The mycobiome profile varies based on IBD phenotype and severity, with serologic markers showing promise as indicators of disease progression. The impact of diet on the gut mycobiome remains unclear, particularly regarding whether fungi within the GI tract possess the necessary metabolic pathways and enzymes for fermenting various dietary components. Further research is essential to refine fungal DNA extraction protocols and develop databases specific to fungi sequencing. Additionally, there is a need for studies investigating the role of diet in modulating the microbiota beyond bacteria. Mechanistic studies aimed at understanding the metabolic pathways and enzymes involved in fungal fermentation/utilization of dietary components are also crucial. A more profound understanding of how diet shapes the composition and functional capacity of the gut mycobiome is necessary. This knowledge will help determine whether diet-based therapies should specifically target gut fungi, potentially reducing inflammatory processes and improving outcomes for IBD patients (Figure 1). Figure 1. Schematic highlighting what we do and don’t know about the interplay between the diet, the gut mycobiome, and inflammation.

Several studies have demonstrated that various diets impact the composition of the gut mycobiome. Other studies have additionally shown that a dysbiotic mycobiome can drive inflammation through various mechanisms and is associated with IBD. There are still many unanswered questions linking diet to the mycobiome and GI inflammation. By answering these questions, we will be one step closer to determining whether diet can be used to target the mycobiome to reduce gut inflammation, improving outcomes for IBD patients.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Appendix A Search Strategy

The following strategy was used to search MEDLINE and EMBASE databases:

[(microbiome/or microbi*) OR (mycobiome/or mycobi* or fungal community/) OR (dysbiosis/) OR (gut health.mp) AND (high fiber diet/) OR (low fiber diet/) OR (cholesterol diet/) OR (obesogenic diet/) OR (chow diet/) OR (fiber free diet/) OR (short chain fatty acid/) OR (fiber/)
==== Refs
References

1. Rodríguez JM, Murphy K, Stanton C, Ross RP, Kober OI, Juge N, Avershina E, Rudi K, Narbad A, Jenmalm MC, et al. The composition of the gut microbiota throughout life, with an emphasis on early life. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2015 Feb 2;26 . doi:10.3402/mehd.v26.26050.
2. Marques TM, Wall R, Ross RP, Fitzgerald GF, Ryan CA, Stanton C. Programming infant gut microbiota: influence of dietary and environmental factors. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2010 Apr 1;21 (2 ):149–23. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2010.03.020.20434324
3. The Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature. 2012 June;486 (7402 ):207–214.22699609
4. Rinninella E, Raoul P, Cintoni M, Franceschi F, Miggiano GAD, Gasbarrini A, Mele MC. What is the healthy gut microbiota composition? A changing ecosystem across age, environment, diet, and diseases. Microorganisms. 2019 Jan 10;7 (1 ):14. doi:10.3390/microorganisms7010014.30634578
5. Nash AK, Auchtung TA, Wong MC, Smith DP, Gesell JR, Ross MC, Stewart CJ, Metcalf GA, Muzny DM, Gibbs RA, et al. The gut mycobiome of the human microbiome project healthy cohort. Microbiome. 2017 Nov 25;5 (1 ):153. doi:10.1186/s40168-017-0373-4.29178920
6. Liu Y, Whitman WB. Metabolic, phylogenetic, and ecological diversity of the methanogenic archaea. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1125 (1 ):171–189. doi:10.1196/annals.1419.019.18378594
7. Mihajlovski A, Alric M, Brugère JF. A putative new order of methanogenic archaea inhabiting the human gut, as revealed by molecular analyses of the mcrA gene. Res Microbiol. 2008 Sep 1;159 (7 ):516–521. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2008.06.007.18644435
8. Nam YD, Chang HW, Kim KH, Roh SW, Kim MS, Jung MJ, Lee S-W, Kim J-Y, Yoon J-H, Bae J-W. Bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryal diversity in the intestines of Korean people. J Microbiol. 2008 Oct;46 (5 ):491–501. doi:10.1007/s12275-008-0199-7.18974948
9. Rieu-Lesme F, Delbès C, Sollelis L. Recovery of partial 16S rDNA sequences suggests the presence of Crenarchaeota in the human digestive ecosystem. Curr Microbiol. 2005 Nov;51 (5 ):317–321. doi:10.1007/s00284-005-0036-8.16187155
10. Lim ES, Zhou Y, Zhao G, Bauer IK, Droit L, Ndao IM, Warner BB, Tarr PI, Wang D, Holtz LR. Early life dynamics of the human gut virome and bacterial microbiome in infants. Nat Med. 2015 Oct 1;21 (10 ):1228–1234. doi:10.1038/nm.3950.26366711
11. Wang D, Spindler KR. 5 challenges in understanding the role of the virome in health and disease. PLOS Pathog. 2020 Mar;16 (3 ):e1008318. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1008318.32214384
12. Camarillo-Guerrero LF, Almeida A, Rangel-Pineros G, Finn RD, Lawley TD. Massive expansion of human gut bacteriophage diversity. Cell. 2021 Feb 18;184 (4 ):1098–1109.e9. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.029.33606979
13. Liang G, Cobián-Güemes AG, Albenberg L, Bushman F. The gut virome in inflammatory bowel diseases. Curr Opin Virol. 2021 Dec;51 :190–198. doi:10.1016/j.coviro.2021.10.005.34763180
14. Schulze J, Sonnenborn U. Yeasts in the gut: from commensals to infectious agents. Dtsch Ärztebl Int. 2009 Dec;106 (51–52 ):837–842. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2009.0837.20062581
15. Natividad JMM, Verdu EF. Modulation of intestinal barrier by intestinal microbiota: pathological and therapeutic implications. Pharmacol Res. 2013 Mar 1;69 (1 ):42–51. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2012.10.007.23089410
16. Felizardo RJF, Watanabe IKM, Dardi P, Rossoni LV, Câmara NOS. The interplay among gut microbiota, hypertension and kidney diseases: the role of short-chain fatty acids. Pharmacol Res. 2019 Mar 1;141 :366–377. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2019.01.019.30639376
17. Gensollen T, Iyer SS, Kasper DL, Blumberg RS. How colonization by microbiota in early life shapes the immune system. Science. 2016;352 (6285 ):539–544. doi:10.1126/science.aad9378.27126036
18. Chang C, Lin H. Dysbiosis in gastrointestinal disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb 1;30 (1 ):3–15. doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2016.02.001.27048892
19. Bäckhed F, Fraser CM, Ringel Y, Sanders ME, Sartor RB, Sherman PM, Versalovic J, Young V, Finlay B. Defining a healthy human gut microbiome: current concepts, future directions, and clinical applications. Cell Host & Microbe. 2012 Nov 15;12 (5 ):611–622. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2012.10.012.23159051
20. Thaiss CA, Zmora N, Levy M, Elinav E. The microbiome and innate immunity. Nature. 2016 Jul 7;535 (7610 ):65–74. doi:10.1038/nature18847.27383981
21. Almonacid DE, Kraal L, Ossandon FJ, Budovskaya YV, Cardenas JP, Bik EM, Goddard AD, Richman J, Apte ZS, et al. 16S rRNA gene sequencing and healthy reference ranges for 28 clinically relevant microbial taxa from the human gut microbiome. PLOS ONE. 2017 May 3;12 (5 ):e0176555. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176555.28467461
22. Sartor RB. Mechanisms of disease: pathogenesis of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Jul;3 (7 ):390–407. doi:10.1038/ncpgasthep0528.16819502
23. Nacer S, Haddad F, Tahiri M, Hliwa W, Badre W, Choukri EM, Jai SR, Erguibi D, Boufettal R, Chehab F. P51 predictive factors of surgery in crohn’s disease. Gut. 2022 June 1;71 (Suppl 1 ):A64–A65.
24. 2023-IBD-InfoBrochure-ENG-v1.pdf [Internet]. [cited 2023 Aug 21]. https://crohnsandcolitis.ca/Crohns_and_Colitis/documents/reports/2023-IBD-InfoBrochure-ENG-v1.pdf.
25. Wang R, Li Z, Liu S, Zhang D. Global, regional and national burden of inflammatory bowel disease in 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2019: a systematic analysis based on the global burden of disease study 2019. BMJ Open. 2023 Mar. 13 (3 ):e065186. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065186.
26. Barrett K, Saxena S, Pollok R. Using corticosteroids appropriately in inflammatory bowel disease: a guide for primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Oct;68 (675 ):497–498. doi:10.3399/bjgp18X699341.30262630
27. Chao YS, Loshak H. Biologics versus immunomodulators for the treatment of ulcerative colitis: a review of comparative clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness [internet]. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2019 [cited 2023 Nov 21]. (CADTH Rapid Response Reports). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549363/.
28. Murthy SK, Weizman AV, Kuenzig ME, Windsor JW, Kaplan GG, Benchimol EI, Bernstein CN, Bitton A, Coward S, Jones JL, et al. The 2023 impact of inflammatory bowel disease in Canada: treatment landscape. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2023 Sep 5;6 (Suppl 2 ):S97–S110. doi:10.1093/jcag/gwad015.37674501
29. Johnston SL. Biologic therapies: what and when? J Clin Pathol. 2007 Jan. 60 (1 ):8–17. doi:10.1136/jcp.2005.032300.17213345
30. Targownik LE, Bernstein CN, Benchimol EI, Kaplan GG, Singh H, Tennakoon A, Nugent Z, Coward SB, Kuenzig ME, Murthy SK, et al. Earlier anti-tnf initiation leads to long-term lower health care utilization in Crohn’s disease but not in ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Nov;20 (11 ):2607–2618.e14. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2022.02.021.35247552
31. Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, D’Haens G, Wolf DC, Jovanovic I, Hanauer SB, Ghosh S, Petersen A, Hua SY, Lee JH, et al. Ozanimod as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 30;385 (14 ):1280–1291. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2033617.34587385
32. Danese S, Vermeire S, Zhou W, Pangan AL, Siffledeen J, Greenbloom S, Hébuterne X, D’Haens G, Nakase H, Panés J, et al. Upadacitinib as induction and maintenance therapy for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: results from three phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, randomised trials. Lancet. 2022 June 4;399 (10341 ):2113–2128. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00581-5.35644166
33. Ma C, Moran GW, Benchimol EI, Targownik LE, Heitman SJ, Hubbard JN, Seow CH, Novak KL, Ghosh S, Panaccione R, et al. Surgical rates for Crohn’s disease are decreasing: a population-based time trend analysis and validation study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Dec;112 (12 ):1840–1848. doi:10.1038/ajg.2017.394.29087396
34. Richardson LA, Izuora K, Basu A. Mediterranean diet and its association with cardiovascular disease risk factors: a scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 6;19 (19 ):12762. doi:10.3390/ijerph191912762.36232062
35. Sigall-Boneh R, Levine A, Lomer M, Wierdsma N, Allan P, Fiorino G, Gatti S, Jonkers D, Kierkuś J, Katsanos KH, et al. Research gaps in diet and nutrition in inflammatory bowel disease. A topical review by D-ECCO working group [dietitians of ECCO]. J Crohns Colitis. 2017 Dec 4;11 (12 ):1407–1419. doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx109.28961811
36. Tinsley A, Ehrlich OG, Hwang C, Issokson K, Zapala S, Weaver A, Siegel CA, Melmed GY. Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding the role of nutrition in IBD among patients and providers. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016 Oct;22 (10 ):2474–2481. doi:10.1097/MIB.0000000000000901.27598738
37. Bischoff SC, Escher J, Hébuterne X, Kłęk S, Krznaric Z, Schneider S, Shamir R, Stardelova K, Wierdsma N, Wiskin AE, et al. ESPEN practical guideline: Clin Nutr in inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Nutr. 2020 Mar;39 (3 ):632–653. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2019.11.002.32029281
38. Lomer MCE, Wilson B, Wall CL. British dietetic association consensus guidelines on the nutritional assessment and dietary management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2023;36 (1 ):336–377. doi:10.1111/jhn.13054.35735908
39. Trinci APJ, Davies DR, Gull K, Lawrence MI, Bonde Nielsen B, Rickers A, Theodorou MK. Anaerobic fungi in herbivorous animals. Mycol Res. 1994 Feb 1;98 (2 ):129–152. doi:10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80178-0.
40. Bernhardt H. Fungi in the intestine–normal flora or pathogens? Z Für Ärztl Fortbild Qual. 1998;92 (3 ):154.
41. Ott SJ, Kühbacher T, Musfeldt M, Rosenstiel P, Hellmig S, Rehman A, Drews O, Weichert W, Timmis KN, Schreiber S. Fungi and inflammatory bowel diseases: alterations of composition and diversity. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jan 1;43 (7 ):831–841. doi:10.1080/00365520801935434.18584522
42. Richard ML, Sokol H. The gut mycobiota: insights into analysis, environmental interactions and role in gastrointestinal diseases. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Amp Hepatol. 2019 June 1;16 (6 ):331–336. doi:10.1038/s41575-019-0121-2.
43. Raimondi S, Amaretti A, Gozzoli C, Simone M, Righini L, Candeliere F, Brun P, Ardizzoni A, Colombari B, Paulone S, et al. Longitudinal survey of fungi in the human gut: ITS profiling, phenotyping, and colonization. Front Microbiol. 2019 Jul 10;10 :1575. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.01575.31354669
44. Hallen-Adams HE, Kachman SD, Kim J, Legge RM, Martínez I. Fungi inhabiting the healthy human gastrointestinal tract: a diverse and dynamic community. Fungal Ecol. 2015 June 1;15 :9–17. doi:10.1016/j.funeco.2015.01.006.
45. Moran G, Coleman D, Sullivan D. An introduction to the medically important candida species. In: Candida and Candidiasis [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2011 [cited 2023 Nov 23]. p. 9–25. doi:10.1128/9781555817176.ch2.
46. Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM, Seifert H, Wenzel RP, Edmond MB. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39 (3 ):309–317. doi:10.1086/421946.15306996
47. Paterson MJ, Oh S, Underhill DM. Host–microbe interactions: commensal fungi in the gut. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2017 Dec 1;40 :131–137. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2017.11.012.29175338
48. Pande K, Chen C, Noble SM. Passage through the mammalian gut triggers a phenotypic switch that promotes Candida albicans commensalism. Nat Genet. 2013 Sep 1;45 (9 ):1088–1094. doi:10.1038/ng.2710.23892606
49. Moyes DL, Naglik JR. Mucosal immunity and Candida albicans infection. Clin Dev Immunol. 2011;2011 :346307. doi:10.1155/2011/346307.21776285
50. Suhr MJ, Banjara N, Hallen-Adams HE. Sequence-based methods for detecting and evaluating the human gut mycobiome. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2016;62 (3 ):209–215. doi:10.1111/lam.12539.26669281
51. Ashbee HR. Update on the genus malassezia. Med Mycol. 2007 June;45 (4 ):287–303. doi:10.1080/13693780701191373.17510854
52. Theelen B, Cafarchia C, Gaitanis G, Bassukas ID, Boekhout T, Dawson TL. Malassezia ecology, pathophysiology, and treatment. Med Mycol. 2018 Apr 1;56 (suppl_1 ):S10–25. doi:10.1093/mmy/myx134.29538738
53. Spatz M, Richard ML. Overview of the potential role of malassezia in gut health and disease. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020 May 26;10 :201. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2020.00201.32528901
54. Hallen-Adams HE, Suhr MJ. Fungi in the healthy human gastrointestinal tract. Virulence. 2016 Oct 13;8 (3 ):352–358. doi:10.1080/21505594.2016.1247140.27736307
55. Limon JJ, Tang J, Li D, Wolf AJ, Michelsen KS, Funari V, Gargus M, Nguyen C, Sharma P, Maymi VI, et al. Malassezia is associated with Crohn’s disease and exacerbates colitis in mouse models. Cell Host & Microbe. 2019 Mar 13;25 (3 ):377–388.e6. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2019.01.007.30850233
56. Saunte DML, Gaitanis G, Hay RJ. Malassezia-associated skin diseases, the use of diagnostics and treatment. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020 Mar 20;10 :112. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2020.00112.32266163
57. Aykut B, Pushalkar S, Chen R, Li Q, Abengozar R, Kim JI, Shadaloey SA, Wu D, Preiss P, Verma N, et al. The fungal mycobiome promotes pancreatic oncogenesis via activation of MBL. Nature. 2019 Oct 10;574 (7777 ):264–3,267A–267F. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1608-2.31578522
58. Liguori G, Lamas B, Richard ML, Brandi G, da Costa G, Hoffmann TW, Di Simone MP, Calabrese C, Poggioli G, Langella P, et al. Fungal dysbiosis in mucosa-associated microbiota of Crohn’s disease patients. J Crohns Colitis. 2016 Mar 1;10 (3 ):296–305. doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjv209.26574491
59. Mercurio K, Singh D, Walden E, Baetz K. Global analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae growth in mucin. G3 GenesGenomesgenetics. 2021 Aug 18;11 (11 ):jkab294. doi:10.1093/g3journal/jkab294.
60. McFarland LV. Systematic review and meta-analysis of saccharomyces boulardii in adult patients. World J Gastroenterol WJG. 2010 May 14;16 (18 ):2202–2222. doi:10.3748/wjg.v16.i18.2202.20458757
61. McFarland LV. Meta-analysis of probiotics for the prevention of traveler’s diarrhea. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 1;5 (2 ):97–105. doi:10.1016/j.tmaid.2005.10.003.17298915
62. Floch MH, Walker WA, Guandalini S, Hibberd P, Gorbach S, Surawicz C, Sanders ME, Garcia-Tsao G, Quigley EMM, Isolauri E, et al. Recommendations for probiotic use—2008. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008 Jul;42 (Supplement 2 ):S104–8. doi:10.1097/MCG.0b013e31816b903f.18542033
63. Abid R, Waseem H, Ali J, Ghazanfar S, Muhammad Ali G, Elasbali AM, Alharethi SH. Probiotic yeast saccharomyces: back to nature to improve human health. J Fungi. 2022 Apr 24;8 (5 ):444. doi:10.3390/jof8050444.
64. Li XV, Leonardi I, Iliev ID. Gut mycobiota in immunity and inflammatory disease. Immunity. 2019 June 18;50 (6 ):1365–1379. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2019.05.023.31216461
65. Dimopoulos G, Karabinis A, Samonis G, Falagas ME. Candidemia in immunocompromised and immunocompetent critically ill patients: a prospective comparative study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol. 2007 June;26 (6 ):377–384. doi:10.1007/s10096-007-0316-2.
66. Dalle F, Wächtler B, L’Ollivier C, Holland G, Bannert N, Wilson D, Labruère C, Bonnin A, Hube B. Cellular interactions of Candida albicans with human oral epithelial cells and enterocytes. Cell Microbiol;2010;12 (2 ):248–271. doi:10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01394.x.19863559
67. Gow NAR, Van De Veerdonk FL, Brown AJP, Netea MG. Candida albicans morphogenesis and host defence: discriminating invasion from colonization. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012 Feb;10 (2 ):112–122. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2711.
68. Netea MG, Brown GD, Kullberg BJ, Gow NAR. An integrated model of the recognition of Candida albicans by the innate immune system. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008 Jan;6 (1 ):67–78. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1815.18079743
69. Leonardi I, Li X, Semon A, Li D, Doron I, Putzel G, Bar A, Prieto D, Rescigno M, McGovern DPB, et al. CX3CR1+ mononuclear phagocytes control immunity to intestinal fungi. Science. 2018 Jan 12;359 (6372 ):232–236. doi:10.1126/science.aao1503.29326275
70. Sun L, Zhao Y. The biological role of dectin-1 in immune response. Int Rev Immunol. 2007 Sep;26 (5–6 ):349–364. doi:10.1080/08830180701690793.18027205
71. Gringhuis SI, Kaptein TM, Wevers BA, Theelen B, van der Vlist M, Boekhout T, Geijtenbeek TBH. Dectin-1 is an extracellular pathogen sensor for the induction and processing of IL-1β via a noncanonical caspase-8 inflammasome. Nat Immunol. 2012 Jan 22;13 (3 ):246–254. doi:10.1038/ni.2222.22267217
72. Weaver CT, Hatton RD. Interplay between the TH17 and TReg cell lineages: a (co-)evolutionary perspective. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009 Dec;9 (12 ):883–889. doi:10.1038/nri2660.19935807
73. Altmeier S, Toska A, Sparber F, Teijeira A, Halin C, LeibundGut-Landmann S, May RC. IL-1 coordinates the neutrophil response to C. albicans in the oral mucosa. PLOS Pathog. 2016 Sep 15;12 (9 ):e1005882. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1005882.27632536
74. Griffiths JS, Camilli G, Kotowicz NK, Ho J, Richardson JP, Naglik JR. Role for IL-1 family cytokines in fungal infections. Front Microbiol. 2021 Feb 10;12 :633047. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.633047.33643264
75. Hughes RL, Marco ML, Hughes JP, Keim NL, Kable ME. The role of the gut microbiome in predicting response to diet and the development of precision nutrition models—part I: overview of current methods. Adv Nutr. 2019 Nov;10 (6 ):953–978. doi:10.1093/advances/nmz022.31225589
76. Conti HR, Gaffen SL. Host responses to Candida albicans: Th17 cells and mucosal candidiasis. Microbes Infect. 2010 Jul 1;12 (7 ):518–527. doi:10.1016/j.micinf.2010.03.013.20381638
77. Hernández-Santos N, Gaffen SL. Th17 cells in immunity to Candida albicans. Cell Host & Microbe. 2012 May 17;11 (5 ):425–435. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2012.04.008.22607796
78. Rizzetto L, Ifrim DC, Moretti S, Tocci N, Cheng SC, Quintin J, Renga G, Oikonomou V, De Filippo C, Weil T, et al. Fungal chitin induces trained immunity in human monocytes during cross-talk of the host with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 2016 Apr 8;291 (15 ):7961–7972. doi:10.1074/jbc.M115.699645.26887946
79. Tso GHW, Reales-Calderon JA, Tan ASM, Sem X, Le GTT, Tan TG, Lai GC, Srinivasan KG, Yurieva M, Liao W, et al. Experimental evolution of a fungal pathogen into a gut symbiont. Science. 2018 Nov 2;362 (6414 ):589–595. doi:10.1126/science.aat0537.30385579
80. Malik A, Sharma D, Malireddi RKS, Guy CS, Chang TC, Olsen SR, Neale G, Vogel P, Kanneganti T-D. SYK-CARD9 signaling axis promotes gut fungi-mediated inflammasome activation to restrict colitis and colon cancer. Immunity. 2018 Sep 18;49 (3 ):515–530.e5. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2018.08.024.30231985
81. Krüger W, Vielreicher S, Kapitan M, Jacobsen ID, Niemiec MJ. Fungal-bacterial interactions in health and disease. Pathogens. 2019 May 21;8 (2 ):70. doi:10.3390/pathogens8020070.31117285
82. Fan D, Coughlin LA, Neubauer MM, Kim J, Kim MS, Zhan X, Simms-Waldrip TR, Xie Y, Hooper LV, Koh AY, et al. Activation of HIF-1α and LL-37 by commensal bacteria inhibits Candida albicans colonization. Nat Med. 2015 Jul;21 (7 ):808–814. doi:10.1038/nm.3871.26053625
83. Xu XL, Lee RTH, Fang HM, Wang YM, Li R, Zou H, Zhu Y, Wang Y. Bacterial peptidoglycan triggers Candida albicans hyphal growth by directly activating the Adenylyl cyclase Cyr1p. Cell Host Microbe. 2008 Jul 17;4 (1 ):28–39. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2008.05.014.18621008
84. Drummond RA, Desai JV, Ricotta EE, Swamydas M, Deming C, Conlan S, Quinones M, Matei-Rascu V, Sherif L, Lecky D, et al. Long-term antibiotic exposure promotes mortality after systemic fungal infection by driving lymphocyte dysfunction and systemic escape of commensal bacteria. Cell Host & Microbe. 2022 Jul 13;30 (7 ):1020–1033.e6. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2022.04.013.35568028
85. Lapiere A, Richard ML. Bacterial-fungal metabolic interactions within the microbiota and their potential relevance in human health and disease: a short review. Gut Microbes. 2022 Dec 31;14 (1 ):2105610. doi:10.1080/19490976.2022.2105610.35903007
86. Kosman DJ. Molecular mechanisms of iron uptake in fungi. Mol Microbiol. 2003;47 (5 ):1185–1197. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03368.x.12603727
87. Pierce EC, Morin M, Little JC, Liu RB, Tannous J, Keller NP, Pogliano K, Wolfe BE, Sanchez LM, Dutton RJ, et al. Bacterial–fungal interactions revealed by genome-wide analysis of bacterial mutant fitness. Nat Microbiol. 2021 Jan;6 (1 ):87–102. doi:10.1038/s41564-020-00800-z.33139882
88. Sass G, Ansari SR, Dietl AM, Déziel E, Haas H, Stevens DA, Kniemeyer O. Intermicrobial interaction: Aspergillus fumigatus siderophores protect against competition by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLOS ONE. 2019 May 8;14 (5 ):e0216085. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216085.31067259
89. Chandra J, Mukherjee PK, Ghannoum MA. In vitro growth and analysis of Candida biofilms. Nat Protoc. 2008 Dec. 3 (12 ):1909–1924. doi:10.1038/nprot.2008.192.19180075
90. Hsu C, Ghannoum M, Cominelli F, Martino LD. Mycobiome and inflammatory bowel disease: role in disease pathogenesis, current approaches and novel nutritional-based therapies. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2023 Mar 1;29 (3 ):470–479. doi:10.1093/ibd/izac156.35851921
91. Hager CL, Ghannoum MA. The mycobiome: role in health and disease, and as a potential probiotic target in gastrointestinal disease. Dig Liver Dis. 2017 Nov 1;49 (11 ):1171–1176. doi:10.1016/j.dld.2017.08.025.28988727
92. Morgan XC, Tickle TL, Sokol H, Gevers D, Devaney KL, Ward DV, Reyes JA, Shah SA, LeLeiko N, Snapper SB, et al. Dysfunction of the intestinal microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease and treatment. Genome Biol. 2012 Sep 26;13 (9 ):R79. doi:10.1186/gb-2012-13-9-r79.23013615
93. Sokol H, Seksik P. The intestinal microbiota in inflammatory bowel diseases: time to connect with the host. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2010 Jul;26 (4 ):327–331. doi:10.1097/MOG.0b013e328339536b.20445446
94. Sokol H, Leducq V, Aschard H, Pham HP, Jegou S, Landman C, Cohen D, Liguori G, Bourrier A, Nion-Larmurier I, et al. Fungal microbiota dysbiosis in IBD. Gut. 2017 June 1;66 (6 ):1039–1048. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310746.26843508
95. Catalán-Serra I, Thorsvik S, Beisvag V, Bruland T, Underhill D, Sandvik AK, Van Beelen Granlund A. Fungal microbiota composition in inflammatory bowel disease patients: characterization in different phenotypes and correlation with clinical activity and disease course. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2023 Dec 16;16 (Supplement_1 ):i608–i609. doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab232.833.
96. Li Q, Wang C, Tang C, He Q, Li N, Li J. Dysbiosis of gut fungal microbiota is associated with mucosal inflammation in Crohn’s disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul;48 (6 ):513. doi:10.1097/MCG.0000000000000035.24275714
97. Li XV, Leonardi I, Putze GG, Semon A, Fiers WD, Kusakabe T, Lin W-Y, Gao IH, Doron I, Gutierrez-Guerrero A, et al. Immune regulation by fungal strain diversity in inflammatory bowel disease. Nature. 2022 Mar 24;603 (7902 ):672–678. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04502-w.35296857
98. Moyes DL, Wilson D, Richardson JP, Mogavero S, Tang SX, Wernecke J, Höfs S, Gratacap RL, Robbins J, Runglall M, et al. Candidalysin is a fungal peptide toxin critical for mucosal infection. Nature. 2016 Apr 7;532 (7597 ):64–68Q. doi:10.1038/nature17625.27027296
99. Richardson JP, Mogavero S, Moyes DL, Blagojevic M, Krüger T, Verma AH, Coleman BM, De La Cruz Diaz J, Schulz D, Ponde NO, et al. Processing of Candida albicans Ece1p is critical for candidalysin maturation and fungal virulence. mBio. 2018 Jan 23;9 (1 ):e02178–17. doi:10.1128/mBio.02178-17.29362237
100. Kasper L, König A, Koenig PA, Gresnigt MS, Westman J, Drummond RA, Lionakis MS, Groß O, Ruland J, Naglik JR, et al. The fungal peptide toxin Candidalysin activates the NLRP3 inflammasome and causes cytolysis in mononuclear phagocytes. Nat Commun [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Dec 1];9 (1 ). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6189146/. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06607-1.
101. Doron I, Mesko M, Li XV, Kusakabe T, Leonardi I, Shaw DG, Fiers WD, Lin W-Y, Bialt-DeCelie M, Román E, et al. Mycobiota-induced IgA antibodies regulate fungal commensalism in the gut and are dysregulated in Crohn’s disease. Nat Microbiol. 2021 Dec;6 (12 ):1493–1504. doi:10.1038/s41564-021-00983-z.34811531
102. Main J, McKenzie H, Yeaman GR, Kerr MA, Robson D, Pennington CR, Parratt D. Antibody to Saccharomyces cerevisiae (bakers’ yeast) in Crohn’s disease. BMJ. 1988 Oct 29;297 (6656 ):1105–1106. doi:10.1136/bmj.297.6656.1105.3143445
103. Bodecker-Zingmark L, Widbom L, Hultdin J, Eriksson C, Karling P. Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies are only modestly more common in subjects later developing Crohn’s disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Feb 1;68 (2 ):608–615. doi:10.1007/s10620-022-07630-5.35989383
104. Huang L, Zhang J, Qiao Q, Gao M, Cao Q. Clinical significance of anti-sacchromyces cerevisiae antibody in Crohn’s disease: a single-center study. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2016 Jan 1;9 :11978–11983.
105. Ferrante M, Henckaerts L, Joossens M, Pierik M, Joossens S, Dotan N, Norman GL, Altstock RT, Van Steen K, Rutgeerts P, et al. New serological markers in inflammatory bowel disease are associated with complicated disease behaviour. Gut. 2007 Oct;56 (10 ):1394–1403. doi:10.1136/gut.2006.108043.17456509
106. Qin J, Li R, Raes J, Arumugam M, Burgdorf KS, Manichanh C, Nielsen T, Pons N, Levenez F, Yamada T, et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature. 2010 Mar;464 (7285 ):59–65. doi:10.1038/nature08821.20203603
107. Szóstak N, Handschuh L, Samelak-Czajka A, Tomela K, Schmidt M, Pruss Ł, Milanowska-Zabel K, Kozlowski P, Philips A, et al. Host factors associated with gut mycobiome structure. mSystems. 2023 Feb 14;8 (2 ):e00986–22. doi:10.1128/msystems.00986-22.36786595
108. Zhang L, Zhan H, Xu W, Yan S, Ng SC. The role of gut mycobiome in health and diseases. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2021 Jan 1;14 :17562848211047130. doi:10.1177/17562848211047130.
109. Huseyin CE, Rubio RC, O’Sullivan O, Cotter PD, Scanlan PD. The fungal frontier: a comparative analysis of methods used in the study of the human gut mycobiome. Front Microbiol [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2024 Mar 1];8 . 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01432.
110. Rittenour WR, Park JH, Cox-Ganser JM, Beezhold DH, Green BJ. Comparison of DNA extraction methodologies used for assessing fungal diversity via ITS sequencing. J Environ Monit. 2012;14 (3 ):766. doi:10.1039/c2em10779a.22230933
111. Shaffer JP, Carpenter CS, Martino C, Salido RA, Minich JJ, Bryant M, Sanders K, Schwartz T, Humphrey G, Swafford AD, et al. A comparison of six DNA extraction protocols for 16S, ITS and Shotgun metagenomic sequencing of microbial communities. BioTechniques. 2022 Jul 1;73 (1 ):34–46. doi:10.2144/btn-2022-0032.35713407
112. Fiedorová K, Radvanský M, Němcová E, Grombiříková H, Bosák J, Černochová M, Lexa M, Šmajs D, Freiberger T. The impact of DNA extraction methods on stool bacterial and fungal microbiota community recovery. Front Microbiol. 2019 Apr 17;10 :821. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.00821.31057522
113. De Filippis F, Laiola M, Blaiotta G, Ercolini D, Drake HL. Different amplicon targets for sequencing-based studies of fungal diversity. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 Aug 17;83 (17 ):e00905–17. doi:10.1128/AEM.00905-17.28625991
114. Bellemain E, Carlsen T, Brochmann C, Coissac E, Taberlet P, Kauserud H. ITS as an environmental DNA barcode for fungi: an in silico approach reveals potential PCR biases. BMC Microbiol. 2010 Jul 9;10 (1 ):189. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-10-189.20618939
115. Öpik M, Vanatoa A, Vanatoa E, Moora M, Davison J, Kalwij JM, Reier Ü, Zobel M. The online database MaarjAM reveals global and ecosystemic distribution patterns in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota). New Phytol. 2010;188 (1 ):223–241. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03334.x.20561207
116. Pennacchia C, Blaiotta G, Pepe O, Villani F. Isolation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains from different food matrices and their preliminary selection for a potential use as probiotics. J Appl Microbiol. 2008;105 (6 ):1919–1928. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03968.x.19120638
117. Peng X, Wilken SE, Lankiewicz TS, Gilmore SP, Brown JL, Henske JK, Swift CL, Salamov A, Barry K, Grigoriev IV, et al. Genomic and functional analyses of fungal and bacterial consortia that enable lignocellulose breakdown in goat gut microbiomes. Nat Microbiol. 2021 Apr;6 (4 ):499–511. doi:10.1038/s41564-020-00861-0.33526884
118. Graf D, Di Cagno R, Fåk F, Flint HJ, Nyman M, Saarela M, Watzl B. Contribution of diet to the composition of the human gut microbiota. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2015 Feb 4;26 . doi:10.3402/mehd.v26.26164.
119. Yatsunenko T, Rey FE, Manary MJ, Trehan I, Dominguez-Bello MG, Contreras M, Magris M, Hidalgo G, Baldassano RN, Anokhin AP, et al. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature. 2012 June 14;486 (7402 ):222–227. doi:10.1038/nature11053.22699611
120. Yang H, Wang W, Romano KA, Gu M, Sanidad KZ, Kim D, Yang J, Schmidt B, Panigrahy D, Pei R, et al. A common antimicrobial additive increases colonic inflammation and colitis-associated colon tumorigenesis in mice. Sci Transl Med. 2018 May 30;10 (443 ):eaan4116. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aan4116.29848663
121. Suez J, Korem T, Zeevi D, Zilberman-Schapira G, Thaiss CA, Maza O, Israeli D, Zmora N, Gilad S, Weinberger A, et al. Artificial sweeteners induce glucose intolerance by altering the gut microbiota. Nature. 2014 Oct 9;514 (7521 ):181–186. doi:10.1038/nature13793.25231862
122. Quagliani D, Felt-Gunderson P. Closing America’s fiber intake gap. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2016 Jul 7;11 (1 ):80–85. doi:10.1177/1559827615588079.30202317
123. Wong JMW, de Souza R, Kendall CWC, Emam A, Jenkins DJA. Colonic health: fermentation and short chain fatty acids. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006 Mar;40 (3 ):235–243. doi:10.1097/00004836-200603000-00015.16633129
124. Faith JJ, Guruge JL, Charbonneau M, Subramanian S, Seedorf H, Goodman AL, Clemente JC, Knight R, Heath AC, Leibel RL, et al. The long-term stability of the human gut microbiota. Science. 2013;341 (6141 ):44–44. doi:10.1126/science.1237439.
125. Reznikov EA, Suskind DL. Current nutritional therapies in inflammatory bowel disease: improving clinical remission rates and sustainability of long-term dietary therapies. Nutrients. 2023 Jan;15 (3 ):668. doi:10.3390/nu15030668.36771373
126. Yu Y, Chen KC, Chen J. Exclusive enteral nutrition versus corticosteroids for treatment of pediatric Crohn’s disease: a meta-analysis. World J Pediatr. 2019 Feb 1;15 (1 ):26–36. doi:10.1007/s12519-018-0204-0.30666565
127. Levine A, Wine E, Assa A, Boneh RS, Shaoul R, Kori M, Cohen S, Peleg S, Shamaly H, On A, et al. Crohn’s disease exclusion diet plus partial enteral nutrition induces sustained remission in a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 2019 Aug 1;157 (2 ):440–450.e8. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.04.021.31170412
128. Lewis JD, Sandler RS, Brotherton C, Brensinger C, Li H, Kappelman MD, Daniel SG, Bittinger K, Albenberg L, Valentine JF, et al. A randomized trial comparing the specific carbohydrate diet to a Mediterranean diet in adults with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2021 Sep 1;161 (3 ):837–852.e9. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2021.05.047.34052278
129. Haskey N, Estaki M, Ye J, Shim RK, Singh S, Dieleman LA, Jacobson K, Gibson DL. A Mediterranean diet pattern improves intestinal inflammation concomitant with reshaping of the bacteriome in ulcerative colitis: a randomised controlled trial. J Crohns Colitis. 2023 Oct 1;17 (10 ):1569–1578. doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad073.37095601
130. Limketkai BN, Iheozor‐Ejiofor Z, Gjuladin‐Hellon T, Parian A, Matarese LE, Bracewell K, MacDonald JK, Gordon M, Mullin GE. Dietary interventions for induction and maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2024 Mar 1];(2 ). https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD012839.pub2/full.
131. Barber TM, Kabisch S, Pfeiffer AFH, Weickert MO. The health benefits of dietary fibre. Nutrients. 2020 Oct;12 (10 ):3209. doi:10.3390/nu12103209.33096647
132. Zallot C, Quilliot D, Chevaux JB, Peyrin-Biroulet C, Guéant-Rodriguez RM, Freling E, Collet-Fenetrier B, Williet N, Ziegler O, Bigard M-A, et al. Dietary beliefs and behavior among inflammatory bowel disease patients. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013 Jan 1;19 (1 ):66–72. doi:10.1002/ibd.22965.22467242
133. Armstrong HK, Bording-Jorgensen M, Santer DM, Zhang Z, Valcheva R, Rieger AM, Sung-Ho Kim J, Dijk SI, Mahmood R, Ogungbola O, et al. Unfermented β-fructan fibers fuel inflammation in select inflammatory bowel disease patients. Gastroenterology. 2023 Feb 1;164 (2 ):228–240. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2022.09.034.36183751
134. Bonazzi E, Bretin A, Vigué L, Hao F, Patterson AD, Gewirtz AT, Chassaing B. Individualized microbiotas dictate the impact of dietary fiber on colitis sensitivity. Microbiome. 2024 Jan 5;12 (1 ):5. doi:10.1186/s40168-023-01724-6.38178260
135. Tian Z, Zhuang X, Zhuo S, Zhu Y, Hu S, Zhao M, Tang C, Zhang Z, Li X, Ma R, et al. Dietary inflammatory potential mediated gut microbiota and metabolite alterations in Crohn’s disease: a fire-new perspective. Clin Nutr. 2022 June 1;41 (6 ):1260–1271. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2022.04.014.35504169
136. Riaz Rajoka MS, Shi J, Mehwish HM, Zhu J, Li Q, Shao D, Huang Q, Yang H. Interaction between diet composition and gut microbiota and its impact on gastrointestinal tract health. Food Sci Hum Wellness. 2017 Sep 1;6 (3 ):121–130. doi:10.1016/j.fshw.2017.07.003.
137. van Soest APM, Hermes GDA, Berendsen AAM, van de Rest O, Zoetendal EG, Fuentes S, Santoro A, Franceschi C, de Groot LCPGM, de Vos WM. Associations between pro- and anti-inflammatory gastro-intestinal microbiota, diet, and cognitive functioning in Dutch healthy older adults: the NU-AGE study. Nutrients. 2020 Nov;12 (11 ):3471. doi:10.3390/nu12113471.33198235
138. Silva YP, Bernardi A, Frozza RL. The role of short-chain fatty acids from gut microbiota in gut-brain communication. Front Endocrinol. 2020 Jan 31;11 :25. doi:10.3389/fendo.2020.00025.
139. Hoffmann C, Dollive S, Grunberg S, Chen J, Li H, Wu GD, Lewis JD, Bushman FD. Archaea and fungi of the human gut microbiome: correlations with diet and bacterial residents. PLOS ONE. 2013 June 17;8 (6 ):e66019. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066019.23799070
140. Samaranayake LP, MacFarlane TW. The effect of dietary carbohydrates on the in-vitro adhesion of Candida albicans to epithelial cells. J Med Microbiol. 1982 Nov;15 (4 ):511–517. doi:10.1099/00222615-15-4-511.6757438
141. Otašević S, Momčilović S, Petrović M, Radulović O, Stojanović NM, Arsić-Arsenijević V. The dietary modification and treatment of intestinal Candida overgrowth – a pilot study. J Mycol Médicale. 2018 Dec 1;28 (4 ):623–627. doi:10.1016/j.mycmed.2018.08.002.
142. Pareek S, Kurakawa T, Das B, Motooka D, Nakaya S, Rongsen-Chandola T, Goyal N, Kayama H, Dodd D, Okumura R, et al. Comparison of Japanese and Indian intestinal microbiota shows diet-dependent interaction between bacteria and fungi. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2019 Dec 20;5 (1 ):37. doi:10.1038/s41522-019-0110-9.31885873
143. Tian Y, Gou W, Ma Y, Shuai M, Liang X, Fu Y, Zheng J-S. The short-term variation of human gut mycobiome in response to dietary intervention of different macronutrient distributions. Nutrients. 2023 Apr 29;15 (9 ):2152. doi:10.3390/nu15092152.37432284
144. Bramono K, Tsuboi R, Ogawa H. A carbohydrate-degrading enzyme from Candida albicans: correlation between alpha-glucosidase activity and fungal growth. Mycoses. 1995;38 (9–10 ):349. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0507.1995.tb00063.x.8569808
145. Li J, Chen D, Yu B, He J, Huang Z, Mao X, Zheng P, Yu J, Luo J, Tian G, et al. The fungal community and its interaction with the concentration of short‐chain fatty acids in the faeces of Chenghua, Yorkshire and Tibetan pigs. Microb Biotechnol. 2019 Nov 5;13 (2 ):509–521. doi:10.1111/1751-7915.13507.31691493
146. Wu S, Bhat ZF, Gounder RS, Mohamed Ahmed IA, Al-Juhaimi FY, Ding Y, Bekhit AEDA. Effect of dietary protein and processing on gut microbiota—a systematic review. Nutrients. 2022 Jan 20. 14 (3 ):453. doi:10.3390/nu14030453.35276812
147. Miramón P, Lorenz MC. The SPS amino acid sensor mediates nutrient acquisition and immune evasion in Candida albicans. Cell Microbiol. 2016;18 (11 ):1611–1624. doi:10.1111/cmi.12600.27060451
148. Gournas C, Prévost M, Krammer EM, André B. Function and regulation of fungal amino acid transporters: insights from predicted structure. In: Ramos J, Sychrová H Kschischo M. editors. Yeast Membrane Transport [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016 [cited 2024 Jul 16]. p. 69–106. 10.1007/978-3-319-25304-6_4.
149. Shuai M, Fu Y, Zhong HL, Gou W, Jiang Z, Liang Y, Miao Z, Xu J-J, Huynh T, Wahlqvist ML, et al. Mapping the human gut mycobiome in middle-aged and elderly adults: multiomics insights and implications for host metabolic health. Gut. 2022 Sep;71 (9 ):1812–1820. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326298.35017200
150. Capuano E. The behavior of dietary fiber in the gastrointestinal tract determines its physiological effect. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017 Nov 2;57 (16 ):3543–3564. doi:10.1080/10408398.2016.1180501.27229126
151. Guimarães A, Venâncio A. The potential of fatty acids and their derivatives as antifungal agents: a review. Toxins. 2022 Mar 3;14 (3 ):188. doi:10.3390/toxins14030188.35324685
152. Heisel T, Montassier E, Johnson A, Al-Ghalith G, Lin YW, Wei LN, Knights D, Gale CA. High-fat diet changes fungal microbiomes and interkingdom relationships in the murine gut. mSphere. 2017 Oct 11;2 (5 ):e00351–17. doi:10.1128/mSphere.00351-17.29034327
153. Sun Y, Zuo T, Cheung CP, Gu W, Wan Y, Zhang F, Chen N, Zhan H, Yeoh YK, Niu J, et al. Population-level configurations of gut mycobiome across 6 ethnicities in urban and rural China. Gastroenterology. 2021 Jan 1;160 (1 ):272–286.e11. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.09.014.32956679
154. Ukhanova M, Wang X, Baer DJ, Novotny JA, Fredborg M, Mai V. Effects of almond and pistachio consumption on gut microbiota composition in a randomised cross-over human feeding study. Br J Nutr. 2014 June 28;111 (12 ):2146–2152. doi:10.1017/S0007114514000385.24642201
155. David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN, Gootenberg DB, Button JE, Wolfe BE, Ling AV, Devlin AS, Varma Y, Fischbach MA, et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2014 Jan 23;505 (7484 ):559–563. doi:10.1038/nature12820.24336217
156. Mims TS, Abdallah QA, Stewart JD, Watts SP, White CT, Rousselle TV, Gosain A, Bajwa A, Han JC, Willis KA, et al. The gut mycobiome of healthy mice is shaped by the environment and correlates with metabolic outcomes in response to diet. Commun Biol. 2021 Mar 5;4 (1 ):281. doi:10.1038/s42003-021-01820-z.33674757
157. Ghannoum M, Smith C, Adamson E, Isham N, Salem I, Retuerto M. Effect of mycobiome diet on gut fungal and bacterial communities of healthy adults. J Probiotics Health. 2020 Jan 10;8 (1 ):1–6.
158. van der Aa Kühle A, Skovgaard K, Jespersen L. In vitro screening of probiotic properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii and food-borne Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Int J Food Microbiol. 2005 May 1;101 (1 ):29–39. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.10.039.15878404
159. Banjara N, Nickerson KW, Suhr MJ, Hallen-Adams HE. Killer toxin from several food-derived Debaryomyces hansenii strains effective against pathogenic Candida yeasts. Int J Food Microbiol. 2016 Apr 2;222 :23–29. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.01.016.26828815
160. Auchtung TA, Fofanova TY, Stewart CJ, Nash AK, Wong MC, Gesell JR, Auchtung JM, Ajami NJ, Petrosino JF, et al. Investigating colonization of the healthy adult gastrointestinal tract by fungi. mSphere. 2018 Mar 28;3 (2 ):e00092–18. doi:10.1128/mSphere.00092-18.29600282
161. Yao H, Williams BA, Flanagan BM, Lisle A, Mikkelsen D, Gidley MJ. Soluble fibre concentration effects during in vitro fermentation: higher concentration leads to increased butyrate proportion. Food Hydrocoll. 2022 Sep 1. 130 :107728. doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.107728.
162. King BC, Waxman KD, Nenni NV, Walker LP, Bergstrom GC, Gibson DM. Arsenal of plant cell wall degrading enzymes reflects host preference among plant pathogenic fungi. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2011 Feb 16;4 (1 ):4. doi:10.1186/1754-6834-4-4.21324176
163. Singh I, Rajpal VR, Navi SS. editors. Fungal resources for sustainable economy: current status and future perspectives [Internet]. Singapore: Springer Nature; 2023 [cited 2024 Mar 1]. doi:10.1007/978-981-19-9103-5.
164. Morrison DJ, Preston T. Formation of short chain fatty acids by the gut microbiota and their impact on human metabolism. Gut Microbes. 2016 May 3. 7 (3 ):189–200. doi:10.1080/19490976.2015.1134082.26963409
