
==== Front
Cureus
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus Palo Alto (CA)

10.7759/cureus.67177
Geriatrics
Orthopedics
Total Knee Arthroplasty With Long-Stem Implant: A Case Report of a Patient With Extreme Varus Deformity
Muacevic Alexander
Adler John R
Patil Vishal S 1
Nair Vinod 1
Todkar Amogh 1
Shah Meet 1
1 Orthopaedics, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, IND
Amogh Todkar amogh0088@gmail.com
19 8 2024
8 2024
16 8 e6717727 6 2024
18 8 2024
Copyright © 2024, Patil et al.
2024
Patil et al.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This article is available from https://www.cureus.com/articles/272116-total-knee-arthroplasty-with-long-stem-implant-a-case-report-of-a-patient-with-extreme-varus-deformity
Constrained implants have become more common in difficult primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) cases in recent years because they may more effectively and conveniently handle the substantial instability that is evident in osteoarthritis of knees with severe varus deformity. However, the need for a constrained TKA in such conditions is controversial, as constraint implants come with a bargain of stability for longitivity. In this case report, we have successfully shown that even in cases of significant instability and bone loss, intraoperative conversion to a restricted device is rarely necessary.

In our case report, a 83-year-old female had complaints of severe pain in bilateral knees, with the right knee more than the left knee, since 12 years with severe varus deformity in the right knee. Physical examination revealed swelling and medial joint line tenderness with restriction of range of motion in bilateral knees. Pre-anesthetic checkup of the patient was done and patient was given clearance for surgery under American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA)-2, total knee arthroplasty with a long stem was done, extreme varus deformity was corrected, osteophytes removed and tibial bone loss was repaired with bone cement.

Post operatively patient showed significant improvement and McMaster University and Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Knee Society Scores (KSS) for pain, stiffness, and physical function during everyday activities were significantly improved compared to pre-operative assessment. 

bone defect
varus deformity
arthroplasty
long stem total knee replacement
osteoarthritis
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Bony deformity, narrowing of the joint space, and degradation of cartilage are the hallmarks of osteoarthritis (OA), which is a degenerative joint disease of the joints. The most effective procedure for elderly patients with severe knee arthritis to reduce pain and disability is total knee arthroplasty (TKA) [1]. Varus deformity is a common complication of advanced OA and can significantly impair gait, function, and quality of life. However, in cases with severe varus deformity and potential bone loss, traditional TKA components may not provide optimal stability and alignment correction. Patients undergoing TKA most commonly have a varus deformity of the affected knee(s). Cartilage and bone loss in the knee joint's medial compartment, together with medial contracture and lateral laxity of ligaments and soft tissues, are characteristics of osteoarthritic varus knees [2]. This case posed many challenges due to severe varus deformity, which included soft tissue balancing, ligament laxity, proximal tibia bone loss, and alignment of the knee joint to restore the knee biomechanics. Long-stem TKA implants can address these challenges by providing additional anchorage in the bone, facilitating deformity correction, and potentially improving long-term outcomes. Constraint implants give stability in varus and valgus knee, but they are reported to have early failure rates. This case report highlights how extreme varus deformity of the knee in osteoarthritis can be operated with conventional long stem implants with proper soft tissue release to give good results.

Case presentation

An 83-year-old female presented with a 12-year history of right knee pain, progressive worsening over the past year. She reported significant difficulty with walking, stair climbing, cross-legged sitting, and activities of daily living due to pain and stiffness in her right knee. There was no history of fall or trauma or any known history of injury to the right knee. Patient was a known case of hypertension since 10 years, which was controlled on medication. The patient had a gross varus deformity on inspection (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Gross varus deformity of right knee.

X-rays revealed Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade 4 OA with a 35° varus deformity in the right knee and a 20° varus deformity in the left knee. Lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) on X-ray was calculated to be 100° and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) was calculated to be 57° preoperatively. A physical examination confirmed the deformities, limited range of motion in both knees, and significant pain with weight-bearing activities. The McMaster University and Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score was calculated for this patient and turned out to be 76, and the Knee Society Score (KSS) was 10/100, with a Functional KSS score of 35/100, which signifies severe pain, stiffness, and affection for activities of daily living.

Given the greater severity of the right knee deformity and its greater impact on function, the decision was made to proceed with a cemented right long-stem total knee replacement. A plain radiograph of bilateral knee anterior-posterior view and lateral view (Figure 2) shows right knee involvement with large osteophytes, marked joint space narrowing, and severe sclerosis with proximal tibia posteromedial bone defect (Figure 3).

Figure 2 X-ray of right knee showing anteroposterior view and lateral views.

A- Red arrow showing proximal tibial bone loss; B- Green arrow showing femoral osteophytes and yellow arrow showing loose body.

Figure 3 Intraoperative image of surgical exposure of knee joint.

Green arrow showing the posteromedial tibial bone loss.

In this case, the patient was taken in a supine position under spinal with epidural anesthesia with a tourniquet pressure of 280 mmHg. A mid-line rectus splitting approach was taken to expose the right knee. Medial and posteromedial release was done up to pes anserinus and attachment of hamstrings. Medial osteophytes were excised, loose bodies were removed, posterior cruciate ligament was released, and the notch was cleared. Osteophytes on the femoral side below the medial collateral ligament (MCL) were removed, and femoral distal cuts were taken with a 5° intramedullary jig, and a tibial cut was taken with an intramedullary jig 10mm on the lateral side. The extension gap was achieved laterally, and slight tightness on the medial side was present. Femur sizing was done, and cuts were taken at 5° of external rotation. The posterior osteophytes of the femur were removed, and the posterior capsule was released on the medial side. The flexion gap was achieved equally on the medial and lateral sides and checked in extension as well. The implants- the tibial base plate and extension rod- were prepared. Trial was done, and the knee was found to be stable in flexion and extension, and patella tracking was good. Posteromedial bone loss was approximately 1 cm, so two titanium screws of 40 mm were fixed, and the tibial bed was prepared for cementing (Figure 4).

Figure 4 Intraoperative image showing tibial base plate with cement filling.

Green arrow showing the tibial base plate; Yellow arrow showing the cement filling in the bone defect.

Finally cemented femoral and tibial implants were fixed, and cement was filled in the posteromedial defect. Patella denervation was done with cautery, and the wound was closed in layers. There were no adverse or unanticipated complications intra-operatively or post-operatively. 

A post-surgery X-ray of the right knee was taken in antero-posterior and lateral views; it shows good implant positioning, correction of the posteromedial defect with cement, good alignment, and deformity correction. LDFA and MPTA post-operative were calculated to be 88° and 90° respectively (Figure 5).

Figure 5 Postoperative X-ray.

The extreme varus was corrected, osteophytes cleared on femoral and tibial side, posteromedial bone loss filled with cement and stabilized with screws.

Postoperatively, the patient was started on injection enoxaparin sodium 60 mg subcutaneous till post-op day two and then shifted to oral 10 mg rivaroxaban for three weeks as deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis with deep vein thrombosis stockings for six weeks as per American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines for deep vein thrombosis.

The patient was encouraged to do bedside sitting on postoperative day one, and full-weight bearing walking was started on postoperative day two onwards with a walker. The drain was removed on postoperative day two, and sutures were removed on postoperative day 14. The patient followed up in our outpatient department (OPD) at one month, three months and six months postoperatively.

Postoperatively, there was considerable improvement in the pain, stability, range of movement of the right knee, alignment of the knee, and activities of daily living. At six-month follow-up the knee society score improved to 85/100, and the functional score improved to 80/100. There was improvement in the WOMAC score as well (Figure 6).

Figure 6 Clinical image of patient at six-month follow-up.

A: Clinical image of patient, in standing position with no gross varus deformity.

B: Clinical image of patient, demonstrating right knee flexion of 80 degrees, in standing position.

C: Clinical image of patient, demonstrating right knee flexion of 110 degrees, in supine position.

Discussion

This case demonstrates the successful application of long-stem total knee replacement in managing a complex case of osteoarthritis with severe varus deformity. There are two types of deformities associated with the varus arthritic knee: soft tissue and bone. Lately, Thienpont et al. showed that varus deformity, with a joint line congruency angle of around 3°, is frequently associated with medial tibial disease and lateral joint distraction. An extra-articular deformity needs to be suspected if the varus deformity is more noticeable and the assessed deformity is more significant than the measured intra-articular angles. Femoral bending, also known as varus proximal tibia, is the most prevalent extra-articular deformity in the varus knee [3]. Varus knee also affects soft tissues, which are classified as either dynamic (tendons) or static stabilizers (ligaments). When doing a primary total knee replacement, large posteromedial bone defects are frequently found in the proximal tibia. It is not advised to remove bone down to the level of the defect because, as demonstrated by computed tomography scans, the quantity and quality of the supporting cancellous bone decrease more than 1 centimeter beyond the joint line [4], and furthermore, it is possible for attachments of the patellar ligament, iliotibial band, pes anserinus, and posterior cruciate ligament to become weakened [5]. Injecting cement into the bony defect, cement with screws, bone grafting, customized implants, or metal wedges can all be used to treat the issue of asymmetrical bone loss [6]. As bone loss in our case was less than 1 cm evident on X-ray preoperatively, we did cementing with screw fixation. The defect was very well filled and provided good support to the tibial base plate. In their cadaveric investigation, Rawlinson et al. found that using stem extenders reduces micromotion between the implant and the surrounding bone and increases knee stability [7].

Traditionally, for a successful total knee replacement, rectangular soft tissue balance is very important [8]. Hence, medial soft tissues are often released to achieve proper soft tissue balance in cases of varus deformity [9]. In our case, there was medial tightness, due to which we did MCL release up to attachment of pes anserinus, hamstrings and posterior cruciate ligament and capsule was also released posteriorly. The two most significant static stabilizers are the posterior oblique and superficial medial collateral ligaments. The semimembranosus is the dynamic stabilizer implicated in varus knees. Recently, comparing total knee replacement with a medial stabilizing approach to traditional rectangular gap-balanced total knee replacement, the latter exhibited better postoperative results while minimizing medial soft tissue release and accepting trapezoidal gaps [10]. It is crucial to emphasize that the flexion gap tends to increase more than the extension gap when anterior tissues, such as the superficial medial collateral ligament, are released. In contrast, the gap for extension will be greater than the gap for flexion if additional posterior structures (such as the semimembranosus or posterior oblique ligament) are released. Furthermore, flexion contracture is often associated with a varus deformity of the knee. To increase the flexion gap in posterio-stabilized implants, the posterior cruciate ligament has to be resected [11]. Different classifications have been described for knee deformities. De Muylder et al. have classified them into well-aligned knees (0°-3° deviation), common deformities (4°-10° deviation), substantial deformities (11°-20° deviation), important deformities (21°-30° deviation), and extreme deformities (greater than 30° deviation), which are based on the degree of deformity [12].

Preoperatively, an implant should be chosen on the basis of X-rays and/or computed tomography and clinical evaluation. In cases of minor varus knee deformity (<10°) without flexion deformity, implants like cruciate retaining, postero-stabilized, or medial congruence implants can be considered. In such situations, additional restraint is usually unnecessary because the deformity is typically reducible [13]. In our case, it was associated with flexion contracture, with a fixed flexion deformity of 20°-25° and a 35° varus deformity on X-ray. The posterior cruciate ligament was part of the deformity and was released. In cases of varus deformity, condylar-constrained implants are typically not required. However, a thorough soft tissue release is required whether there is a severe, irreversible varus deformity associated with flexion contracture or not. Furthermore, in cases of severe flexion deformity, semi-constrained implants may be utilized if the knee cannot be properly balanced throughout its range of motion [14].

The long-stem components provided additional stability and facilitated the correction of extreme varus deformity in the right knee. This highlights the potential benefits of this technique in achieving desired alignment and stability with 120 degrees of postoperative flexion of knee (Figure 5), particularly in cases with substantial posteromedial tibial bone loss.

Conclusions

It is to be concluded that in extreme varus deformity of the knee, if proper step-wise release is done, we can balance the knee without using constraint implants. Bone defects can be reconstructed using cement or augment; in this case, we used cement, and the results were satisfactory. The increasing amount of evidence that supports the use of long-stem total knee replacement for complicated knee osteoarthritis presentations is strengthened by this case report. While an extended period of observation is required to assess the longevity of implants, this case demonstrates the potential for this technique to improve pain, function, and overall quality of life.

Disclosures

Author Contributions

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Concept and design:  Amogh Todkar, Vinod Nair, Vishal S. Patil, Meet Shah

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Amogh Todkar, Vinod Nair, Vishal S. Patil, Meet Shah

Drafting of the manuscript:  Amogh Todkar, Vinod Nair, Vishal S. Patil, Meet Shah

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Amogh Todkar, Vinod Nair, Vishal S. Patil, Meet Shah

Supervision:  Amogh Todkar, Vinod Nair, Vishal S. Patil
==== Refs
References

1 Achieving coronal plane alignment in total knee arthroplasty through modified preoperative planning based on long-leg radiographs: a prospective study J Exp Orthop Singh D Patel KC Singh RD 100 8 2021 34729656
2 Factors correlated with the reducibility of varus deformity in knee osteoarthritis: an analysis using navigation guided TKA Clin Orthop Surg Moon YW Kim JG Han JH Do KH Seo JG Lim HC 36 43 5 2013 23467320
3 Bone morphotypes of the varus and valgus knee Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Thienpont E Schwab PE Cornu O Bellemans J Victor J 393 400 137 2017 28110363
4 Autograft reconstructions for bone defects in primary total knee replacement in severe varus knees Indian J Orthop Kharbanda Y Sharma M 313 318 48 2014 24932040
5 Wheeless Textbook of Orthopedics http://www.wheelesonline.com
6 Bone grafting of tibial defects in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res Windsor RE Insall JN Sculco TP 132 137 1986 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3516498/
7 Stemmed implants improve stability in augmented constrained condylar knees Clin Orthop Relat Res Rawlinson JJ Closkey RF Jr Davis N Wright TM Windsor R 2639 2643 466 2008 18709431
8 Selective medial release using multiple needle puncturing with a spacer block in situ for correcting severe varus deformity during total knee arthroplasty Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Lee HJ Kim SH Park YB 1523 1531 140 2020 32519075
9 Step-wise medial collateral ligament needle puncturing in extension leads to a safe and predictable reduction in medial compartment pressure during TKA Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Herschmiller T Grosso MJ Cunn GJ Murtaugh TS Gardner TR Geller JA 1759 1766 26 2018 29167955
10 Medial stabilizing technique preserves anatomical joint line and increases range of motion compared with the gap-balancing technique in navigated total knee arthroplasty Knee Ishibashi K Sasaki E Sasaki S Kimura Y Yamamoto Y Ishibashi Y 558 564 27 2020 32035705
11 Soft-tissue balancing during total knee arthroplasty in the varus knee J Am Acad Orthop Surg Mihalko WM Saleh KJ Krackow KA Whiteside LA 766 774 17 2009 19948701
12 Total knee arthroplasty in patients with substantial deformities using primary knee components Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc De Muylder J Victor J Cornu O Kaminski L Thienpont E 3653 3659 23 2015 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25246172/ 25246172
13 Total knee arthroplasty in the varus knee: tips and tricks Int Orthop Rossi R Cottino U Bruzzone M Dettoni F Bonasia DE Rosso F 151 158 43 2019 30141140
14 Varus-valgus constrained implants in total knee arthroplasty: indications and technique Acta Biomed Adravanti P Vasta S 112 117 88 2017 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28657572/
