
==== Front
Sci Rep
Sci Rep
Scientific Reports
2045-2322
Nature Publishing Group UK London

39289415
71825
10.1038/s41598-024-71825-1
Article
Impairment of affective and cognitive empathy in high functioning autism is mediated by alterations in emotional reactivity
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8353-6593
Kimmig Ann-Christin S. ann-christin.kimmig@med.uni-tuebingen.de

12
Burger Lina 1
Schall Marina 3
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0133-4486
Derntl Birgit 124
Wildgruber Dirk 12
1 https://ror.org/03a1kwz48 grid.10392.39 0000 0001 2190 1447 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen, Calwerstr. 14, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
2 German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Partner Site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
3 https://ror.org/01c1w6d29 grid.7359.8 0000 0001 2325 4853 Department of Psychology, University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany
4 https://ror.org/03a1kwz48 grid.10392.39 0000 0001 2190 1447 LEAD Graduate School & Research Network, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
17 9 2024
17 9 2024
2024
14 2166211 12 2023
30 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Empathy impairments are considered a key aspect of autism-spectrum disorders (ASD). Previous research consistently shows reduced cognitive empathy, but findings on affective empathy vary, possibly due to experimental design variations (e.g., stimulus modality, social distance) and individual psychological factors (e.g., perceptual abilities, emotional reactivity). This study aims to clarify deficits in affective and cognitive empathy in ASD by addressing these contributing factors. Empathy was examined in 34 autistic individuals and 33 typically developed controls (TDCs) through the Textual Empathy Test (TET). The TET was developed to assess emotional responses when imagining oneself (emotional reactivity) as compared to a target person (friend, stranger) in emotional situations presented via short verbal descriptions. Participants rated emotional states of the target person (cognitive empathy) as well as their own emotional responses when imagining the target person in that situation (affective empathy). Ratings were interpreted relative to normative mean values through standardized regression coefficients. Results showed that high-functioning autism was associated with lower cognitive and affective empathy irrespective of social distance as well as with decreased emotional reactivity compared to controls. Moreover, emotional reactivity mediated the impact of ASD on both empathic components. In summary, altered emotional reactivity may underlie impaired empathy in autistic individuals.

Keywords

High-functioning autism
Autism spectrum disorders
Cognitive empathy
Affective empathy
Emotional reactivity
Textual empathy test
Subject terms

Autism spectrum disorders
Human behaviour
501100001659 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) IRTG2804 Universitätsklinikum Tübingen (8868)Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Major hallmark characteristics of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) include deficits in empathy as well as social interactions1. Empathy is crucial for social functioning and behaviors2, as it aids the understanding of another person’s affective state and consequently facilitates the appropriate response. Most commonly two components of empathy are proposed: the cognitive and the affective empathy (e.g.,3–5). While cognitive empathy refers to perspective-taking and understanding the emotional states of others, affective empathy denotes the conscious resonation of another’s feelings (i.e., experiencing congruent emotional states). Typically, cognitive and affective empathy are regarded as largely independent but highly intertwined processes6. Furthermore, empathy is at least partly based on or influenced by processes related to attention and emotion-recognition3–5.

Studies, including a recent meta-analysis7, indicate that autistic people tend to show decreased abilities in cognitive and affective empathy compared to individuals without autism (e.g.,8–14), which may contribute to difficulties in social interactions. While some studies suggest a more consistent and larger impairment of cognitive empathy (e.g.,15–21), findings regarding affective empathy are mixed. According to Bird and Viding4 ASD is not directly associated with impairments of sharing the emotions of others. Instead, deficits in affective empathy are primarily mediated by impairments in the perception of nonverbal emotional cues and reduced attention to socially relevant stimuli, among other factors.

Moreover, the own tendency to experience emotions (i.e., emotional reactivity) could affect the intensity of emotions attributed to and/or felt for others (i.e., cognitive and affective empathy, respectively22–24). Several studies suggest that (physiological) emotional reactivity is altered in ASD25,26. Depending on the context and interindividual variance, emotional reactivity may be partly increased (e.g.,27,28) or decreased (e.g.,29–33) compared to typically developed controls (TDCs).

Lastly, the occurrence of affective empathy deficits in autistic individuals may also depend on the social distance of the target person, as suggested by studies using self-report15 and pupillary measures34. Both studies indicate that affective empathy may be primarily impaired for distant but not necessarily close target persons. Taken together, factors such as impaired recognition of emotional faces and voices (see for meta-analysis:35), altered emotional reactivity in autistic people25 and the social distance of the target person may contribute to the greater heterogeneity in findings concerning affective compared to cognitive empathy.

The aim of the present study was to gain a better understanding of empathy deficits in high functioning autistic individuals by controlling for or taking mediating and moderating factors into account such as emotion recognition skills, deviant emotional reactivity and social distance to the person to be empathized with. To this end, we used the Textual Empathy Test (TET, originally “Tübinger Empathy Test” cf.24,36), which was adapted for the application in mixed-sex samples across a broader age range (see the methods section and supplementary information for information on task adaptation). In the TET, textual descriptions of emotional situations are presented to measure cognitive and affective empathic responses toward target persons with varying levels of social distance (i.e., close and distant person perspective) as well as one’s own emotional reactivity (i.e., self-perspective). The use of textual stimuli in the TET mitigates confounding effects of emotion recognition skills, e.g., in terms of facial expressions, gestures, and speech prosody. The emotional situations in the TET are balanced for eliciting positive (i.e., joy, hope, sexual arousal, gratefulness, pride) and negative emotions (i.e., shame, anger, disgust, sadness, fear) to avoid a bias towards negative emotions, for which previous empathy tasks have been criticized (e.g.,37,38).

Regarding empathic abilities, we were firstly interested whether the extent of empathic deficit varies for cognitive and affective empathy for autistic people. Following previous literature, we predicted impaired cognitive and affective empathy in autistic individuals compared to typically developed controls (e.g.,8–14). We additionally tested whether differences in the social distance to the target person (friend/family, stranger) would affect the extent of empathic responses of ASD and TDC individuals. Cognitive and affective empathic responses were operationalized using standardized regression coefficients (betas). Separate regression analyses were performed at the participant level, using normative mean ratings from an independent sample of typically developed individuals (n = 82) as predictors for the participants’ valence ratings, which indicated the emotions the target person would experience in the same situation (representing cognitive empathy) and the emotional valence felt when imagining the target person in this situation (representing affective empathy, see method section for more detailed information). This approach was chosen to create a more sensitive and standardized measure of how well the expected emotional reaction of a target individual aligns with the predicted emotional response of the target person (cognitive empathy) as well as the own emotional response (affective empathy) to another person’s experience.

Secondly, due to the possible link between emotional reactivity and empathic abilities22–24, we accounted for emotional reactivity in our study as potential mediating factor of empathy. We predicted from previous literature that autistic individuals will show reduced (or deviant) emotional reactivity when imagining emotional situations compared to TD controls25,26. Similar to empathic responses, we conducted within-individual regressions, correlating normative valence ratings with participants’ self-ratings, and utilized standardized regression coefficients to operationalize emotional reactivity.

Finally, we expected that deviant emotional reactivity in ASD could explain cognitive and/or affective empathy deficits associated with ASD. To test this prediction, we conducted additional analyses with emotional reactivity as potential mediator of empathy.

Results

All following analyses were conducted on 34 high functioning autistic individuals and 33 typically developed controls, who were matched with regards to age, sex, education and IQ (see Table 1). Explorative analyses revealed no sex-related differences in standardized regression coefficients for empathic and emotional reactivity, therefore it was not included as a factor in the following analyses. Table 1 Comparison of demographic and neuropsychological characteristics between ASD and TDC group (mean and standard deviation if not otherwise specified).

	ASD	TDC	p-value	
N	34	33		
Age (years)	40.5 (12.1)	38.9 (10.8)	0.59	
Sex (male/female)	25/9	24/9	0.94	
Academic degree (no/yes)	21/12*	21/12	1.00	
Verbal IQ (raw scores)	32.7 (3.5)	32.5 (2.6)	0.31	
AQ (ASD traits)	38.7 (6.0)	15.0 (6.1)	 < .001	
*Missing data (n = 1).

ASD autism spectrum disorder, TDC typically developed controls, IQ intelligence quotient, AQ autism quotient.

Cognitive and affective empathy in autistic individuals and typically developed controls

A 2(group: ASD, TDC) × 2(empathy component: cognitive, affective) × 2(social distance: friend, stranger) mixed ANOVA using standardized regression coefficients (betas) for empathic responses as the dependent variable was run to investigate the first hypothesis and explorative questions concerning ASD and empathy. Cognitive and affective empathic response betas were determined through regression analyses of each participant’s respective valence ratings (dependent variables) with normative data from an independent sample of TD individuals (predictor).

The mixed-effects ANOVA on empathic responses revealed a significant main effect of group (F(1,65) = 10.32, p = 0.002, pη2 = 0.14). The effect of the interaction between group and the component of empathy as well as group and social distance were not significant (group-by-empathy type: F(1,65) = 3.72, p = 0.058, pη2 = 0.05; group-by-social distance: F(1,65) = 0.52, p = 0.472; group-by-empathy type-by-social distance: F(1,65) = 0.51, p = 0.478). Empathic response betas in autistic persons were significantly smaller compared to TD controls. Hypotheses driven Mann–Whitney U tests revealed that autistic individuals relative to TD controls exhibited significantly lower cognitive (U = 390, p1-tailed = 0.032, η2 = 0.07) and affective (U = 375, p1-tailed = 0.020, η2 = 0.08) empathic responses as represented by lower betas (see Fig. 1A). Although the ASD group reported significantly greater difficulty in imagining others in emotional situations (close: U = 365.5, p = 0.003, η2 = 0.14, distant: U = 406, p = 0.059, η2 = 0.05), including these potential confounders as covariates to the between-subjects analysis did not eliminate the group difference in empathic responses (F(1,62) = 5.92, p = 0.018, pη2 = 0.09). The ability to imagine strangers in emotional scenarios was positively associated with empathic responses (F(1,62) = 7.29, p = 0.009, pη2 = 0.10). However, within-group analyses revealed no significant associations between the level of empathic responses and the ability to imagine socially close (ASD: rho(33) = -0.04, p = 1.000; TDC: rho(33) = 0.26, p = 0.288) or socially distant (ASD: rho(33) = 0.24, p = 0.280; TDC: rho(33) = 0.39, p = 0.064) individuals after multiple-comparison correction.Fig. 1 Comparison of cognitive empathy, affective empathy and emotional reactivity between TD controls and autistic individuals. (A) shows the cognitive (left) and affective (right) empathy beta weights relating normative (i.e., acquired from an independent sample) self-ratings in emotional situations with imagining how another person (i.e., socially close: dark blue, socially distant: light blue) would feel experiencing the same situation and how the participants feel when imagining another person in this situation, respectively. The bar plot in (B) shows the difference in emotional reactivity (i.e., relating normative self-ratings to participant’s self-rating) between TD controls (red) and autistic individuals (light pink). Error bars indicate the mean standard error. Jitter represents the single datapoints per participant. ASD autism spectrum disorder, TD typically developed, *p < .05, ***p < .001.

Independently of ASD status, cognitive empathy was significantly higher than affective empathy (main effect empathy type: F(1,65) = 119.55, p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.65). Furthermore, a main effect of social distance (F(1,65) = 44.88, p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.41) and a significant interaction effect of social distance-by-empathy type (F(1,65) = 49.02, p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.43) occurred. Regarding the different types of empathy, post-hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank tests revealed that affective (z = −6.02, p < 0.001, r = 0.74), but not cognitive (z = −2.06, p = 0.08, r = 0.25) empathic response betas were higher towards socially close than distant persons (see Fig. 1A).

Additional analyses, using the leave-one-out method to tailor TDC and ASD-referenced group means based on participant self-ratings instead of normative means, supported the robustness of the reported findings, particularly for affective empathy (see supplementary information and Figure S1, S2). Standardized regression coefficients indicated the consistency or strength of the association between the expected emotional response of the target person and participants' empathic response. Unstandardized regression coefficients (B values) help understand the slope or magnitude of empathic responses. Mixed ANOVAs with B values showed similar patterns to the analyses using betas, with less pronounced group differences in empathic responses, especially for ASD-referenced B values, where no significant difference between autistic individuals and TD controls was found (see supplementary information, Figure S3–S5).

Emotional reactivity in autistic individuals and typically developed controls

The hypothesis driven Mann–Whitney U test confirmed that autistic individuals showed on average significantly smaller standardized regression coefficients for emotional reactivity than TD controls (U = 236, p < 0.001, see Fig. 1B). Perceived mental imagery ability during the self-condition was not associated with emotional reactivity within either group (ASD: rho(33) = −0.05, p = 0.784; TDC: rho(33) = 0.15, p = 0.149). The finding of reduced emotional reactivity is further supported by supplementary analyses of both referenced betas and B values for TDC and ASD (see supplementary information, Figure S1–S5).

Effect of ASD diagnosis on empathy mediated by emotional reactivity

To determine whether the group difference in empathy between ASD and TDC groups is mediated by differences in emotional reactivity, two simplified mediation analyses were conducted separately for cognitive and affective empathy. In each analysis, group was the predictor variable, emotional reactivity was the mediator, and cognitive or affective empathy served as the outcome variable (see Fig. 2). For both models, group significantly predicted empathic responses: cognitive empathy (total effect: c = −0.11, p = 0.017) and affective empathy (total effect: c = −0.12, p = 0.014). When emotional reactivity was included as a mediator in the regression model, ASD status significantly predicted emotional reactivity (a = -0.22, p < 0.001). In turn, emotional reactivity significantly predicted both cognitive empathy (b = 0.37, p = 0.002) and affective empathy (b = 0.34, p = 0.010), while accounting for the group factor (direct relationship without group: bnogroup = 0.40, p < 0.001 and bnogroup = 0.39, p < 0.001, respectively). The direct effects of group on cognitive empathy (c’ = −0.03, p = 0.610) and affective empathy (c’ = −0.04, p = 0.440) were not significant. However, the bootstrapped test of joint indirect effects of group on each component of empathy via emotional reactivity showed significant effects for cognitive empathy (ab = −0.08, 95% CI [−0.153, −0.028]) and affective empathy (ab = −0.08, 95% CI [−0.139, −0.021]). Therefore, the findings indicate that emotional reactivity mediates the relationship between group and both cognitive and affective empathy, as evidenced by the significant indirect effects and the non-significant direct effects after accounting for the mediator. Notably, there was no significant interaction effect between group and emotional reactivity on empathic responses (cognitive empathy: F(1,63) = 1.03, p = 0.313, affective empathy: F(1,63) = 3.85, p = 0.054).Fig. 2 Mediation analyses of group on (A) cognitive empathy and (B) affective empathy with the mediator emotional reactivity. Empathy and emotional reactivity betas were Box-Cox transformed prior to the analyses to increase linearity. ASD autism spectrum disorder, c total effect, c’ direct effect, *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.

Discussion

The aim of this study was to enhance the understanding of empathy deficits in autistic individuals compared to typically developed controls. To this end, we used the Textual Empathy Test (TET), which is based on textual descriptions of emotional scenarios involving individuals at varying social distances. The TET was designed to capture empathic responses to a broad range of positive and negative emotions while minimizing or accounting for confounding factors such as emotion recognition, emotion matching abilities and emotional reactivity.

In line with our first hypothesis, autistic individuals showed significantly lower levels of both cognitive and affective empathy compared to age-matched typically developed controls in our study, even when empathy was assessed independently of potential perceptual deficits, such as interpreting nonverbal emotional cues from faces, gestures, and voices. Our findings align with a recent meta-analysis7 indicating impaired cognitive and affective empathy skills in autistic individuals. However, contrary to previous studies15,34, the group differences in empathic responses appear independent of the type of empathy or the social distance to the target person. As expected in our second hypothesis, lower cognitive and affective empathy in autistic individuals were accompanied by aberrant (i.e., lower) emotional reactivity. Further analyses revealed that this aberrant emotional reactivity mediated the effect of ASD status on cognitive and affective empathy. Given the crucial role of empathic skills in social functioning2, deficits in empathy may contribute to the communication and social interaction challenges that are core symptoms of ASD. For those affected, this can result in difficulties engaging in conversations or establishing and maintaining social relationships. However, impaired emotional and empathic reactivity does not necessarily lead to reduced prosocial behavior. In autistic individuals, prosocial behaviors guided by cognitive principles, such as fair resource allocation regardless of social distance39 and moral decision-making40, tend to be more resilient to emotional deficits.

Building on Bird and Viding’s framework4, our findings of lower emotional reactivity as well as reduced cognitive and affective empathy in autistic individuals may be linked to an altered understanding of social situations, influenced by atypical social scripts and a distinct representation of affective states. Accordingly, our study indicates a fundamental dysfunction in empathic processes (mediated by aberrant emotional reactivity), rather than a selective impairment in either cognitive or affective empathy. Previous findings on affective empathy deficits in ASD have been mixed. Some studies suggest that affective empathy may be primarily impaired with distant or unfamiliar people, while remaining intact for socially close individuals15,34. The similarity hypothesis provides a possible explanation for this observation, positing that socially close individuals tend to be more similar to those with ASD and share comparable social scripts, thereby facilitating empathic processes and social bonding41. Relatives of autistic individuals are also likely to exhibit higher levels of ASD-like traits, making them more akin and understandable to autistic individuals compared to strangers42,43. Moreover, increased social attention and familiarity with emotional responses of socially close individuals may facilitate empathic responses, whereas relating to strangers could be more challenging. Therefore, it has been argued that autistic individuals may not necessarily experience general empathic deficits but instead demonstrate aberrant empathic behavior depending on the characteristics and social scripts of the target person44.

Consistent with previous literature45,46, both autistic individuals and TD controls showed significantly higher affective empathic responses for socially close compared to distant persons in the present study. However, we found no evidence supporting a preservation of affective empathy towards socially close targets in autistic individuals compared to TD control subjects. This inconsistency might be explained by the operationalization of affective empathy in our study. We calculated empathic responses using normative mean ratings from an independent sample of TD individuals, likely possessing different social scripts than those imagined by autistic individuals for socially close individuals. This discrepancy could contribute to the lower affective empathy scores observed in ASD. Nevertheless, follow-up analyses presented in the supplementary information, which considered ASD-related social scripts and altered affective responsiveness by using tailored leave-one-out means of the ASD group as predictors for cognitive and affective ratings, also revealed no moderating effect of social distance on group differences in cognitive and affective empathy. Beyond the notion of a selective preservation of affective empathy, some studies even propose an elevated affective empathy (or increased personal distress) in autistic individuals using task-based as well as questionnaire-based self-report and physiological measures (e.g.,11,17,47). Our findings provide no support of these findings on a behavioral level, whether examining the consistency of the association between the emotional states of autistic individuals and their target persons (using standardized regression coefficients) or focusing on the slope of this association (using unstandardized regression coefficients, see supplementary information), which represents relative empathic hypo- or hyperreactivity.

In addition to deviations in emotional reactivity and social scripts, factors such as alexithymia (i.e., the inability/difficulty to recognize, express or describe one’s own feelings) and depression may moderate cognitive and affective empathic deficits in autistic individuals4. These conditions also influence both physiological and self-reported emotional reactivity48,49. Given the relatively high prevalence of alexithymia and depression in autistic individuals (see for meta-analyses:50,51), our study could have benefited from assessing these factors to gain a better understanding of additional mediating effects. Consequently, our study design makes it challenging to disentangle how alexithymia and depressive symptoms might have influenced the observed differences in behavioral responses (i.e., subjective valence ratings). Furthermore, the inclusion of physiological measures such as skin conductance and heart rate could have helped to determine whether autistic individuals face challenges solely in subjectively rating their own and others’ feelings or whether these challenges are accompanied by lower physiological arousal. Reduced physiological arousal would provide a more objective measure of diminished affective empathy, thereby strengthening conclusions drawn from behavioral responses alone. Given the text-based nature of the TET, our findings rely on the participants’ ability to engage in mental imagery. However, our study lacked a true non-social imagery control condition, which would have helped account for differences in mental imagery that might explain variations in empathic responses. In fact, autistic participants reported greater difficulty in imagining themselves and others in emotional situations compared to the TD controls. Despite this, perceived difficulty in mental imagery was not correlated with empathic responses and did not account for the observed group differences. Nevertheless, future research should incorporate more objective and detailed measures of mental imagery skills to better control for any potentially confounding effects. Additionally, expanding the TET to assess other facets of empathy, such as compassionate empathy—encompassing both the desire and ability to help—could provide a more comprehensive understanding of empathic abilities in autistic individuals. Lastly, the TET falls short of being a real-life paradigm, creating an artificial setting that may not effectively trigger physiological reactions. However, unlike picture- or video-based tasks or real-life paradigms, as previously recommended for more accurate assessments of affective empathy6,52, the TET offers better control over confounding perceptual deficits (e.g., emotion recognition). To achieve a better balance, future studies could explore more naturalistic text-based paradigms. For instance, embedding emotional scenarios within text messages or social media formats could simulate interactions with both socially close and distant individuals.

To advance our understanding of the mechanisms underlying empathic processing in ASD, future studies should explore both peripheral-physiological markers and potential neural mechanisms. For this purpose, the TET could be a promising tool to be applied in an fMRI environment (see24). If future studies validate our current findings of a mediated decrease in empathic response due to aberrant emotional reactivity, likely stemming from atypical social scripts, and unveil the underlying neural substrates, this could hold significant therapeutic implications. For example, socio-cognitive training aimed at incorporating neurotypical social scripts may enhance empathic responses and, consequently, improve social functioning (e.g.,53). Furthermore, a more profound understanding of neural substrates linked to ASD-related challenges could guide the identification of promising therapeutic targets using neural modulation techniques (e.g., transcranial magnetic stimulation [TMS], transcranial direct current stimulation [tDCS], or neurofeedback). In fact, initial neuromodulation studies employing TMS and tDCS, primarily targeting the dorsolateral PFC, show some promise in alleviating ASD symptoms and improving social functioning54,55.

In conclusion, the present findings suggest that lower cognitive and affective empathic responses in autistic individuals could be mediated by differences in emotional reactivity. While a greater dissonance exists between the empathic response and the feelings of socially distant individuals compared to close ones, there is no indication of a selective preservation of affective empathy in autistic individuals toward socially close individuals. Additionally, there were no quantitative disparities in ASD-related deficits in cognitive and affective empathy. Ultimately, gaining a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms of the suggested ASD-related empathy deficits could contribute to the development of more tailored therapeutic interventions aimed at improving social functioning.

Methods

Participants

In total, 69 individuals participated in the study. Two participants were excluded due to data loss or insufficient German language skills, resulting in 34 autistic individuals and 33 typically developed controls. The ASD group was recruited via the out-patient consultation service specialized for autistic adults of the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy at the University Hospital Tübingen.

For inclusion, participants had either been diagnosed with high-functioning early childhood autism (F84.0) or Asperger-Syndrome (F84.5) according to the ICD-10 criteria by fully trained clinicians using extensive clinical examinations. These examinations consisted of a comprehensive anamnesis, an evaluation of interpersonal behavior and a battery of different questionnaires completed by the autistic participants including the autism-spectrum quotient (AQ)56, and the multiple-choice vocabulary intelligence test (MWT-B)57. Furthermore, questionnaires on the participant’s (social) behavior in the first decade of their life were completed by at least one relative who witnessed this period. These questionnaires included the social responsiveness scale (SRS)58, the social communication questionnaire (SCQ/FSK)59 and the Marburg rating scale for Asperger’s syndrome (MBAS)60 and complemented the clinical diagnosis.

Procedure

The study was carried out at the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy of the University of Tübingen. During diagnostics, autistic individuals gave consent to be informed about clinical studies and were subsequently contacted via email. For the TDC group, non-autistic, typically developed participants were matched to the ASD group with respect to age, education, and IQ (see Table 1). They were recruited via flyers distributed in Tübingen (Germany). Prior participation, all participants were informed about the study design, its voluntary nature, as well as data protection and gave informed consent. The current version of the computer based Textual Empathy Test (TET) lasted approximately 20 min. After completion of the TET, we asked all participants to rate the type of person and the social distance towards him/her, to ensure that autistic individuals and healthy controls chose comparable socially close and socially distant target persons when imaging the emotional scenarios (see supplementary information). Additionally, all participants reported their perceived difficulty (categorized as difficult, medium, or easy) in imagining themselves, the respective socially close person and socially distant person in the emotional situations. Beyond the TET, participants completed a battery of written questionnaires measuring socio-demographic data such as age and education, verbal intelligence (MWT-B)57, and the degree of ASD symptoms (AQ)56 to ensure that the groups are comparable with regards to socio-demographic characteristics and that the TDC group presents a significantly lower autism-spectrum quotient (AQ). For the ASD group, the AQ and verbal intelligence had already been determined prior to the study during the diagnostic session. In total, the appointment lasted approximately 1.5 h and was financially compensated with 10 Euro/hour. The study was approved by the Ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the University Tübingen and followed the ethical code of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki).

Development of the Textual Empathy Test (TET)

The textual stimuli of emotional everyday situations of the former Tübinger Empathy Test24,36 were revised to be compatible for both sexes and a wider age range. Furthermore, in addition to the existing emotional categories (positive: joy, sexual pleasure, gratefulness; negative: anger, disgust, fear), they were extended by short descriptions of everyday situations evoking hope, pride, relief, sadness, shame, and envy to capture empathic abilities with respect to a broad range of everyday emotional situations. Information on the validation and an overview of the final stimuli set is provided in the supplementary information.

The final selection for the Textual Empathy Test (TET) encompassed 30 short descriptions of emotional situations (i.e., 3 items per emotional category) tapping into 5 positive (joy, hope, sexual pleasure, gratefulness, pride) and 5 negative emotions (shame, anger, disgust, sadness, fear). Examples include: “She/he fought hard for his goals and achieved them.” and “She/he hears about the death of a person, she/he liked very much.” Items for relief and envy did not pass inclusion criteria, which resulted in the drop of these emotional categories. The 30 described emotional situations were repeatedly presented in three blocks, each relating to the self and to a different target person with varying degrees of social distance (partner/relative/friend, stranger). Participants were asked to rate how they would feel in that respective situation (self), how the other person would feel (cognitive rating) and which feeling they experience themselves when imagining the other person in that situation (affective rating; see Fig. 3 for illustration of the TET). The sequence of items within the blocks was randomized. Each item was shown for 7 s followed by a fixation cross (1 s) and visual analogue scale (VAS) to assess the valence ratings (i.e., one VAS for self-condition; two VAS for each other-perspective, separated by a 1 s fixation cross). Ratings from -100 (very negative) to +100 (very positive) and response times were recorded through computer mouse movements and button presses. There was no time limit for the response. An answer was mandatory to continue with the next trial. Each trial was followed by an 2 s fixation cross.Fig. 3 Illustration of the Textual Empathy Test (TET). The TET consists of three blocks (i.e., self, close and distant person as target person, respectively) with 30 textual descriptions of emotional situations each. Described emotional situations were balanced for positive and negative emotions. Each stimulus was shown for 7 s. After stimulus presentation, participants were asked to rate on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from very negative to very positive how the target person would feel in such a situation (i.e., cognitive rating). For the close and distant target person, participants were then asked with another VAS how the participant feels, when this happens to the target person (i.e., affective rating). Each trial was followed by a fixation cross lasting 2 s.

Data analysis

Data analysis was run using IBM SPSS Statistics 25 (IBM, New York). For all analyses, two tailed testing with an α–level of 0.05 was applied, if not otherwise specified.

Demographic and neuropsychological information

To demonstrate comparability of the ASD and TDC group in terms of demographic and neuropsychological factors including age, sex, educational level and verbal intelligence, analyses for group differences were carried out. AQ scores were analyzed to compare autistic traits in both groups with the expectation that these are significantly higher in the ASD group. Mann–Whitney U tests were used for group analyses regarding age, verbal intelligence, and ASD traits (i.e., AQ scores), as data was not normally distributed. Chi-square tests were run for sex (male/female) and educational level (i.e., achieved academic degree—yes/no) with group as the between-subject factor.

TET: computation of empathic responses and emotional reactivity

Cognitive and affective empathy were computed per participant by separate regression analyses using (normative) mean ratings of the self-condition collected in an independent sample (n = 82) as the predictor for (1) the self-ratings of this study’s participants (i.e., emotional reactivity; very negative to very positive), (2) the cognitive ratings for the target person’s emotional state in the same situation (i.e., cognitive empathy; very negative to very positive) and (3) the affective ratings of the emotional state they themselves are in when imagining the target person in this situation (i.e., affective empathy; very negative to very positive). Cognitive and affective empathy were thus operationalized by the resulting standardized regression coefficients, which were generated separately for close and distant condition (see for more detail: Kimmig et al.36). For one autistic individual the standardized regression weight for affective empathy towards a stranger was set to 0, as each item was rated as neutral when asked how the participant would feel when imagining the stranger in this situation.

Independent normative sample

Participants of the independent sample were recruited via convenience sampling using social media, most notably the student Facebook group of the Hochschule Fresenius in Frankfurt (Germany). The study was targeted at (mentally) healthy individuals only. The sex of participants was equally distributed, and their age ranged from 18 to 36 years (m = 24.3, sd =  ± 4.0). Most participants were university students (63.4%) or currently employed (29.3%).

The TET was employed using the SoSci Survey software (SoSci Survey GmbH).

Group differences in empathic responses and emotional reactivity

To examine empathic responses, the standardized regression coefficients (i.e., betas) were entered as dependent variables into a mixed-effects ANOVA. The mixed-effects ANOVA consisted of the within-subject factors empathy component (cognitive, affective) and personal distance (close, distant) and the between-subjects factor group (ASD, TDC). In case of non-normally distributed data, Mann–Whitney U or Wilcoxon tests instead of parametric t-tests were used for post-hoc analyses. Bonferroni correction was applied in these analyses to correct for multiple testing. Standardized regression coefficients for emotional reactivity were analyzed by a Mann–Whitney U test.

To test the robustness of our findings, we ran similar analyses using as reference for the regression coefficients the participant-tailored leave-one out TDC and ASD group means instead of the normative means of an independent sample (see supplementary information, Figure S1, S2). Moreover, the supplementary information also includes complementary analyses of the unstandardized regression coefficients (see supplementary information, Figure S3–S5).

Mediation analyses of ASD diagnosis and emotional reactivity on empathy

Two simple post-hoc mediation analyses (independent variable: group, mediator: Box-Cox transformed emotional reactivity betas, dependent variable: Box-Cox transformed cognitive or affective empathy betas, respectively; see Fig. 2) were run to determine whether an effect of group on empathic responses could be mediated by emotional reactivity. Box-Cox transforms were used to increase linearity of the data’s relationships. The analyses were performed using Hayes Process v4.2 (http://www.processmacro.org/download.html) employing model 4 with 5000 bootstrap iterations in SPSS.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-71825-1.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) [IRTG2804]. We acknowledge the support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and Open Access Publishing Fund of University of Tübingen.

Author contributions

Ann-Christin S. Kimmig: Methodology, Software, Data Curation, Formal analysis, Visualisation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. Lina Burger: Project administration, Investigation, Validation, Data Curation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. Marina Schall: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Validation, Writing—review & editing. Birgit Derntl: Methodology, Writing—review & editing. Dirk Wildgruber: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing—review & editing.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders 2013 American Psychiatric Association
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).
2. De Vignemont F Singer T The empathic brain: How, when and why? Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006 10 435 441 16949331
De Vignemont, F. & Singer, T. The empathic brain: How, when and why?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 435–441. 10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.008 (2006).16949331
3. Rijnders RJP Terburg D Bos PA Kempes MM van Honk J Unzipping empathy in psychopathy: Empathy and facial affect processing in psychopaths Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2021 131 1116 1126 34695456
Rijnders, R. J. P., Terburg, D., Bos, P. A., Kempes, M. M. & van Honk, J. Unzipping empathy in psychopathy: Empathy and facial affect processing in psychopaths. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 131, 1116–1126. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.10.020 (2021).34695456
4. Bird G Viding E The self to other model of empathy: Providing a new framework for understanding empathy impairments in psychopathy, autism, and alexithymia Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2014 47 520 532 25454356
Bird, G. & Viding, E. The self to other model of empathy: Providing a new framework for understanding empathy impairments in psychopathy, autism, and alexithymia. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 47, 520–532. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.021 (2014).25454356
5. Decety J Jackson PL The functional architecture of human empathy Behav. Cogn. Neurosci. Rev. 2004 3 71 100 15537986
Decety, J. & Jackson, P. L. The functional architecture of human empathy. Behav. Cogn. Neurosci. Rev. 3, 71–100. 10.1177/1534582304267187 (2004).15537986
6. Zaki J Ochsner KN The neuroscience of empathy: Progress, pitfalls and promise Nat. Neurosci. 2012 15 675 680 22504346
Zaki, J. & Ochsner, K. N. The neuroscience of empathy: Progress, pitfalls and promise. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 675–680. 10.1038/nn.3085 (2012).22504346
7. Fatima M Babu N Cognitive and affective empathy in autism spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis Rev. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2023
Fatima, M. & Babu, N. Cognitive and affective empathy in autism spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis. Rev. J. Autism Dev. Disord.10.1007/s40489-023-00364-8 (2023).
8. Trimmer E McDonald S Rushby JA Not knowing what I feel: Emotional empathy in autism spectrum disorders Autism 2017 21 450 457 27246093
Trimmer, E., McDonald, S. & Rushby, J. A. Not knowing what I feel: Emotional empathy in autism spectrum disorders. Autism 21, 450–457 (2017).27246093
9. Baron-Cohen S Wheelwright S The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2004 34 163 175 15162935
Baron-Cohen, S. & Wheelwright, S. The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 34, 163–175. 10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00 (2004).15162935
10. Mathersul D McDonald S Rushby JA Understanding advanced theory of mind and empathy in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 2013 35 655 668 23799244
Mathersul, D., McDonald, S. & Rushby, J. A. Understanding advanced theory of mind and empathy in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 35, 655–668. 10.1080/13803395.2013.809700 (2013).23799244
11. Adler N Dvash J Shamay-Tsoory SG Empathic embarrassment accuracy in autism spectrum disorder Autism Res. 2015 8 241 249 25732043
Adler, N., Dvash, J. & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. Empathic embarrassment accuracy in autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res. 8, 241–249. 10.1002/aur.1439 (2015).25732043
12. Aan Het Rot M Hogenelst K The influence of affective empathy and autism spectrum traits on empathic accuracy PLoS ONE 2014 9 e98436 24905105
Aan Het Rot, M. & Hogenelst, K. The influence of affective empathy and autism spectrum traits on empathic accuracy. PLoS ONE 9, e98436. 10.1371/journal.pone.0098436 (2014).24905105
13. Bos J Stokes MA Cognitive empathy moderates the relationship between affective empathy and wellbeing in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder Eur. J. Dev. Psychol. 2019 16 433 446
Bos, J. & Stokes, M. A. Cognitive empathy moderates the relationship between affective empathy and wellbeing in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Eur. J. Dev. Psychol. 16, 433–446. 10.1080/17405629.2018.1444987 (2019).
14. Lawrence EJ Shaw P Baker D Baron-Cohen S David AS Measuring empathy: Reliability and validity of the empathy quotient Psychol. Med. 2004 34 911 920 15500311
Lawrence, E. J., Shaw, P., Baker, D., Baron-Cohen, S. & David, A. S. Measuring empathy: Reliability and validity of the empathy quotient. Psychol. Med. 34, 911–920. 10.1017/S0033291703001624 (2004).15500311
15. Shirayama Y Associations among autistic traits, cognitive and affective empathy, and personality traits in adults with autism spectrum disorder and no intellectual disability Sci. Rep. 2022 12 3125 35210528
Shirayama, Y. et al. Associations among autistic traits, cognitive and affective empathy, and personality traits in adults with autism spectrum disorder and no intellectual disability. Sci. Rep. 12, 3125. 10.1038/s41598-022-07101-x (2022).35210528
16. Dziobek I Dissociation of cognitive and emotional empathy in adults with asperger syndrome using the multifaceted empathy test (MET) J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2008 38 464 473 17990089
Dziobek, I. et al. Dissociation of cognitive and emotional empathy in adults with asperger syndrome using the multifaceted empathy test (MET). J. Autism Dev. Disord. 38, 464–473. 10.1007/s10803-007-0486-x (2008).17990089
17. Smith A The empathy imbalance hypothesis of autism: A theoretical approach to cognitive and emotional empathy in autistic development Psychol. Record. 2009 59 489 510
Smith, A. The empathy imbalance hypothesis of autism: A theoretical approach to cognitive and emotional empathy in autistic development. Psychol. Record. 59, 489–510. 10.1007/BF03395675 (2009).
18. Shalev I Uzefovsky F Empathic disequilibrium in two different measures of empathy predicts autism traits in neurotypical population MoL. Autism 2020 11 59 32660537
Shalev, I. & Uzefovsky, F. Empathic disequilibrium in two different measures of empathy predicts autism traits in neurotypical population. MoL. Autism 11, 59. 10.1186/s13229-020-00362-1 (2020).32660537
19. Song Y Nie T Shi W Zhao X Yang Y Empathy impairment in individuals with autism spectrum conditions from a multidimensional perspective: A meta-analysis Front. Psychol. 2019 32116869
Song, Y., Nie, T., Shi, W., Zhao, X. & Yang, Y. Empathy impairment in individuals with autism spectrum conditions from a multidimensional perspective: A meta-analysis. Front. Psychol.10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01902 (2019).32116869
20. Lockwood P Bird G Bridge M Viding E Dissecting empathy: High levels of psychopathic and autistic traits are characterized by difficulties in different social information processing domains Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013 24294197
Lockwood, P., Bird, G., Bridge, M. & Viding, E. Dissecting empathy: High levels of psychopathic and autistic traits are characterized by difficulties in different social information processing domains. Front. Hum. Neurosci.10.3389/fnhum.2013.00760 (2013).24294197
21. Fan YT Chen C Chen SC Decety J Cheng Y Empathic arousal and social understanding in individuals with autism: evidence from fMRI and ERP measurements Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2014 9 1203 1213 23929944
Fan, Y. T., Chen, C., Chen, S. C., Decety, J. & Cheng, Y. Empathic arousal and social understanding in individuals with autism: evidence from fMRI and ERP measurements. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 9, 1203–1213. 10.1093/scan/nst101 (2014).23929944
22. Rueckert L Branch B Doan T Are gender differences in empathy due to differences in emotional reactivity? Psychology 2011 2 574 578
Rueckert, L., Branch, B. & Doan, T. Are gender differences in empathy due to differences in emotional reactivity?. Psychology 2, 574–578. 10.4236/psych.2011.26088 (2011).
23. Eisenberg N Wentzel M Harris JD The role of emotionality and regulation in empathy-related responding Sch. Psychol. Rev. 1998 27 506 521
Eisenberg, N., Wentzel, M. & Harris, J. D. The role of emotionality and regulation in empathy-related responding. Sch. Psychol. Rev. 27, 506–521. 10.1080/02796015.1998.12085934 (1998).
24. Kimmig ACS Lower affective empathy in oral contraceptive users: A cross-sectional fMRI study Cereb. Cortex 2022
Kimmig, A. C. S. et al. Lower affective empathy in oral contraceptive users: A cross-sectional fMRI study. Cereb. Cortex10.1093/cercor/bhac345 (2022).
25. Lydon S A systematic review of physiological reactivity to stimuli in autism Dev. Neurorehabilit. 2016 19 335 355
Lydon, S. et al. A systematic review of physiological reactivity to stimuli in autism. Dev. Neurorehabilit. 19, 335–355. 10.3109/17518423.2014.971975 (2016).
26. Sasson NJ Dichter GS Bodfish JW Affective responses by adults with autism are reduced to social images but elevated to images related to circumscribed interests PLoS ONE 2012 7 e42457 22870328
Sasson, N. J., Dichter, G. S. & Bodfish, J. W. Affective responses by adults with autism are reduced to social images but elevated to images related to circumscribed interests. PLoS ONE 7, e42457. 10.1371/journal.pone.0042457 (2012).22870328
27. Samson AC Huber O Gross JJ Emotion regulation in Asperger’s syndrome and high-functioning autism Emotion 2012 12 659 665 22642342
Samson, A. C., Huber, O. & Gross, J. J. Emotion regulation in Asperger’s syndrome and high-functioning autism. Emotion 12, 659–665. 10.1037/a0027975 (2012).22642342
28. Beck KB Assessment and treatment of emotion regulation impairment in autism spectrum disorder across the life span: current state of the science and future directions Child Adolesc. Psychiatr. Clin. N. Am. 2020 29 527 542 32471600
Beck, K. B. et al. Assessment and treatment of emotion regulation impairment in autism spectrum disorder across the life span: current state of the science and future directions. Child Adolesc. Psychiatr. Clin. N. Am. 29, 527–542. 10.1016/j.chc.2020.02.003 (2020).32471600
29. Bölte S Feineis-Matthews S Poustka F Brief report: Emotional processing in high-functioning autism—Physiological reactivity and affective report J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2008 38 776 781 17882540
Bölte, S., Feineis-Matthews, S. & Poustka, F. Brief report: Emotional processing in high-functioning autism—Physiological reactivity and affective report. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 38, 776–781. 10.1007/s10803-007-0443-8 (2008).17882540
30. Hubert BE Wicker B Monfardini E Deruelle C Electrodermal reactivity to emotion processing in adults with autistic spectrum disorders Autism 2009 13 9 19 19176574
Hubert, B. E., Wicker, B., Monfardini, E. & Deruelle, C. Electrodermal reactivity to emotion processing in adults with autistic spectrum disorders. Autism 13, 9–19. 10.1177/1362361308091649 (2009).19176574
31. Mathersul D McDonald S Rushby JA Automatic facial responses to affective stimuli in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder Physiol. Behav. 2013 109 14 22 23142408
Mathersul, D., McDonald, S. & Rushby, J. A. Automatic facial responses to affective stimuli in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder. Physiol. Behav. 109, 14–22. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.10.008 (2013).23142408
32. Gayle LC Gal DE Kieffaber PD Measuring affective reactivity in individuals with autism spectrum personality traits using the visual mismatch negativity event-related brain potential Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2012 6 334 23267324
Gayle, L. C., Gal, D. E. & Kieffaber, P. D. Measuring affective reactivity in individuals with autism spectrum personality traits using the visual mismatch negativity event-related brain potential. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6, 334. 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00334 (2012).23267324
33. Nuske HJ Vivanti G Hudry K Dissanayake C Pupillometry reveals reduced unconscious emotional reactivity in autism Biol. Psychol. 2014 101 24 35 25017502
Nuske, H. J., Vivanti, G., Hudry, K. & Dissanayake, C. Pupillometry reveals reduced unconscious emotional reactivity in autism. Biol. Psychol. 101, 24–35. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.07.003 (2014).25017502
34. Nuske HJ Vivanti G Dissanayake C Reactivity to fearful expressions of familiar and unfamiliar people in children with autism: An eye-tracking pupillometry study J. Neurodev. Disord. 2014 6 14 24982695
Nuske, H. J., Vivanti, G. & Dissanayake, C. Reactivity to fearful expressions of familiar and unfamiliar people in children with autism: An eye-tracking pupillometry study. J. Neurodev. Disord. 6, 14. 10.1186/1866-1955-6-14 (2014).24982695
35. Yeung MK A systematic review and meta-analysis of facial emotion recognition in autism spectrum disorder: The specificity of deficits and the role of task characteristics Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2022 133 104518 34974069
Yeung, M. K. A systematic review and meta-analysis of facial emotion recognition in autism spectrum disorder: The specificity of deficits and the role of task characteristics. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 133, 104518. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.104518 (2022).34974069
36. Kimmig ACS Wildgruber D Wendel SMU Sundström-Poromaa I Derntl B Friend vs. foe: Cognitive and affective empathy in women with different hormonal states Front. Neurosci. 2021 15 608768 608768 33762905
Kimmig, A. C. S., Wildgruber, D., Wendel, S. M. U., Sundström-Poromaa, I. & Derntl, B. Friend vs. foe: Cognitive and affective empathy in women with different hormonal states. Front. Neurosci. 15, 608768–608768. 10.3389/fnins.2021.608768 (2021).33762905
37. Kogler L Müller VI Werminghausen E Eickhoff SB Derntl B Do I feel or do I know? Neuroimaging meta-analyses on the multiple facets of empathy Cortex 2020 129 341 355 32562973
Kogler, L., Müller, V. I., Werminghausen, E., Eickhoff, S. B. & Derntl, B. Do I feel or do I know? Neuroimaging meta-analyses on the multiple facets of empathy. Cortex 129, 341–355. 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.04.031 (2020).32562973
38. Motomura Y Interaction between valence of empathy and familiarity: Is it difficult to empathize with the positive events of a stranger? J. Physiol. Anthropol. 2015 34 13 25858485
Motomura, Y. et al. Interaction between valence of empathy and familiarity: Is it difficult to empathize with the positive events of a stranger?. J. Physiol. Anthropol. 34, 13. 10.1186/s40101-015-0049-3 (2015).25858485
39. Forbes PA Chaliani I Schilbach L Kalenscher T Autistic adults show enhanced generosity to socially distant others Autism 2024 28 999 1009 37606240
Forbes, P. A., Chaliani, I., Schilbach, L. & Kalenscher, T. Autistic adults show enhanced generosity to socially distant others. Autism 28, 999–1009. 10.1177/13623613231190674 (2024).37606240
40. Brewer R The impact of autism spectrum disorder and alexithymia on judgments of moral acceptability J. Abnorm. Psychol. 2015 124 589 595 26375827
Brewer, R. et al. The impact of autism spectrum disorder and alexithymia on judgments of moral acceptability. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 124, 589–595. 10.1037/abn0000076 (2015).26375827
41. Komeda H Similarity hypothesis: Understanding of others with autism spectrum disorders by individuals with autism spectrum disorders Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2015 25852514
Komeda, H. Similarity hypothesis: Understanding of others with autism spectrum disorders by individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Front. Hum. Neurosci.10.3389/fnhum.2015.00124 (2015).25852514
42. Hoekstra RA Bartels M Verweij CJH Boomsma DI Heritability of autistic traits in the general population Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2007 161 372 377 17404134
Hoekstra, R. A., Bartels, M., Verweij, C. J. H. & Boomsma, D. I. Heritability of autistic traits in the general population. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 161, 372–377. 10.1001/archpedi.161.4.372 (2007).17404134
43. Khanjani Z Azmoodeh S Mahmoudaliloo M Noorazar G A comparison of autistic like traits in the relatives of patients with autism and schizophrenia spectrum disorder Iran J. Psychiatr. 2018 13 148 153
Khanjani, Z., Azmoodeh, S., Mahmoudaliloo, M. & Noorazar, G. A comparison of autistic like traits in the relatives of patients with autism and schizophrenia spectrum disorder. Iran J. Psychiatr. 13, 148–153 (2018).
44. Mitchell P Sheppard E Cassidy S Autism and the double empathy problem: Implications for development and mental health Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 2021 39 1 18 33393101
Mitchell, P., Sheppard, E. & Cassidy, S. Autism and the double empathy problem: Implications for development and mental health. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 39, 1–18. 10.1111/bjdp.12350 (2021).33393101
45. Meyer ML Differential neural activation to friends and strangers links interdependence to empathy Cult. Brain 2015 3 21 38
Meyer, M. L. et al. Differential neural activation to friends and strangers links interdependence to empathy. Cult. Brain 3, 21–38. 10.1007/s40167-014-0023-7 (2015).
46. Engert V Plessow F Miller R Kirschbaum C Singer T Cortisol increase in empathic stress is modulated by emotional closeness and observation modality Psychoneuroendocrinology 2014 45 192 201 24845190
Engert, V., Plessow, F., Miller, R., Kirschbaum, C. & Singer, T. Cortisol increase in empathic stress is modulated by emotional closeness and observation modality. Psychoneuroendocrinology 45, 192–201. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.04.005 (2014).24845190
47. Senland AK Higgins-D’Alessandro A Sociomoral reasoning, empathy, and meeting developmental tasks during the transition to adulthood in autism spectrum disorder J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2016 46 3090 3105 27371138
Senland, A. K. & Higgins-D’Alessandro, A. Sociomoral reasoning, empathy, and meeting developmental tasks during the transition to adulthood in autism spectrum disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 46, 3090–3105. 10.1007/s10803-016-2849-7 (2016).27371138
48. Gaigg SB Cornell AS Bird G The psychophysiological mechanisms of alexithymia in autism spectrum disorder Autism 2018 22 227 231 27811193
Gaigg, S. B., Cornell, A. S. & Bird, G. The psychophysiological mechanisms of alexithymia in autism spectrum disorder. Autism 22, 227–231. 10.1177/1362361316667062 (2018).27811193
49. Bylsma LM Morris BH Rottenberg J A meta-analysis of emotional reactivity in major depressive disorder Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2008 28 676 691 18006196
Bylsma, L. M., Morris, B. H. & Rottenberg, J. A meta-analysis of emotional reactivity in major depressive disorder. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 28, 676–691. 10.1016/j.cpr.2007.10.001 (2008).18006196
50. Kinnaird E Stewart C Tchanturia K Investigating alexithymia in autism: A systematic review and meta-analysis Eur. Psychiatr. 2019 55 80 89
Kinnaird, E., Stewart, C. & Tchanturia, K. Investigating alexithymia in autism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Psychiatr. 55, 80–89. 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.09.004 (2019).
51. Hudson CC Hall L Harkness KL Prevalence of depressive disorders in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analysis J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 2019 47 165 175 29497980
Hudson, C. C., Hall, L. & Harkness, K. L. Prevalence of depressive disorders in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analysis. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 47, 165–175. 10.1007/s10802-018-0402-1 (2019).29497980
52. Shamay-Tsoory SG Mendelsohn A Real-life neuroscience: An ecological approach to brain and behavior research Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2019 14 841 859 31408614
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. & Mendelsohn, A. Real-life neuroscience: An ecological approach to brain and behavior research. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 14, 841–859. 10.1177/1745691619856350 (2019).31408614
53. Ibrahim K Social cognitive skills groups increase medial prefrontal cortex activity in children with autism spectrum disorder Autism Res. 2021 14 2495 2511 34486810
Ibrahim, K. et al. Social cognitive skills groups increase medial prefrontal cortex activity in children with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res. 14, 2495–2511. 10.1002/aur.2603 (2021).34486810
54. Oberman LM Rotenberg A Pascual-Leone A Use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in autism spectrum disorders J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2015 45 524 536 24127165
Oberman, L. M., Rotenberg, A. & Pascual-Leone, A. Use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in autism spectrum disorders. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 45, 524–536. 10.1007/s10803-013-1960-2 (2015).24127165
55. García-González S Transcranial direct current stimulation in autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021 48 89 109 33773886
García-González, S. et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation in autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 48, 89–109. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2021.02.017 (2021).33773886
56. Baron-Cohen S Wheelwright S Skinner R Martin J Clubley E The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2001 31 5 17 11439754
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J. & Clubley, E. The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 31, 5–17. 10.1023/a:1005653411471 (2001).11439754
57. Lehrl S Mehrfachwahl-Wortschatz-Intelligenztest: MWT-B 1999 Spitta
Lehrl, S. Mehrfachwahl-Wortschatz-Intelligenztest: MWT-B (Spitta, 1999).
58. Constantino JN Gruber CP Social Responsiveness Scale: SRS-2 2012 Western psychological services Torrance
Constantino, J. N. & Gruber, C. P. Social Responsiveness Scale: SRS-2 (Western psychological services Torrance, 2012).
59. Rutter M Bailey A Lord C Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) 2003 Western Psychological Services
Rutter, M., Bailey, A. & Lord, C. Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) (Western Psychological Services, 2003).
60. Kamp-Becker I Mattejat F Wolf-Ostermann K Remschmidt H The marburg rating scale for asperger’s syndrome (MBAS)—A screening instrument for high-functioning autistic disorders Z. Kinder. Jugendpsychiatr. Psychother. 2005 33 15 26 15714837
Kamp-Becker, I., Mattejat, F., Wolf-Ostermann, K. & Remschmidt, H. The marburg rating scale for asperger’s syndrome (MBAS)—A screening instrument for high-functioning autistic disorders. Z. Kinder. Jugendpsychiatr. Psychother. 33, 15–26. 10.1024/1422-4917.33.1.15 (2005).15714837
