
==== Front
Sci Rep
Sci Rep
Scientific Reports
2045-2322
Nature Publishing Group UK London

39289462
72513
10.1038/s41598-024-72513-w
Article
The effect of hemicelluloses on biosynthesis, structure and mechanical performance of bacterial cellulose-hemicellulose hydrogels
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2007-3800
Chibrikov Vadym
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3986-3802
Pieczywek Piotr Mariusz
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3323-4535
Cybulska Justyna
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9395-1486
Zdunek Artur a.zdunek@ipan.lublin.pl

grid.424905.e 0000 0004 0479 1073 Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Doświadczalna 4 Str., 20–290 Lublin, Poland
17 9 2024
17 9 2024
2024
14 216719 5 2024
9 9 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
The primary plant cell wall (PCW) is a specialized structure composed predominantly of cellulose, hemicelluloses and pectin. While the role of cellulose and hemicelluloses in the formation of the PCW scaffold is undeniable, the mechanisms of how hemicelluloses determine the mechanical properties of PCW remain debatable. Thus, we produced bacterial cellulose–hemicellulose hydrogels as PCW analogues, incorporated with hemicelluloses. Next, we treated samples with hemicellulose degrading enzymes, and explored its structural and mechanical properties. As suggested, difference of hemicelluloses in structure and chemical composition resulted in a variety of the properties studied. By analyzing all the direct and indirect evidences we have found that glucomannan, xyloglucan and arabinoxylan increased the width of cellulose fibers both by hemicellulose surface deposition and fiber entrapment. Arabinoxylan increased stresses and moduli of the hydrogel by its reinforcing effect, while for xylan, increase in mechanical properties was determined by establishment of stiff cellulose–cellulose junctions. In contrast, increasing content of xyloglucan decreased stresses and moduli of hydrogel by its weak interactions with cellulose, while glucomannan altered cellulose network formation via surface deposition, decreasing its strength. The current results provide evidence for structure–dependent mechanisms of cellulose–hemicellulose interactions, suggesting the specific structural role of the latter.

Keywords

Bacterial cellulose
Hemicellulose
Hydrogels
Enzymolysis
Structure
Mechanical properties
Subject terms

Atomic force microscopy
Biomaterials
Composites
National Science Centre, Poland2019/35/D/NZ9/00555 2020/37/B/NZ9/03159 Cybulska Justyna issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

The primary plant cell wall (PCW) is a highly specialized structure composed primarily of water and polysaccharides, while glycoproteins, phenols, minerals, and enzymes serve as minor components. Cellulose, hemicelluloses and pectins are the three main types of PCW polysaccharides with mass fractions of 20–40%, 20–30% and 30–50% of dry mass, respectively1. Cellulose is a linear polysaccharide of β-D-glucose linked by 1 → 4 glycosidic bonds, which is considered to be the major load-bearing component of PCW 2. Hemicelluloses consist predominantly of 1 → 4-linked monosaccharides of β-D-glucose, β-D-glucuronic acid, D-xylose, β-D-mannose, β-D-galactose, α-L-fucose, and α-L-arabinose3. Due to structural similarity to cellulose, hemicelluloses are thought to enable the formation of a broad hydrogen bonding network that determines the mechanical properties of PCW4. And for the last 60 years, it allowed the scientific community to evolve through the various concepts of primary plant cell wall structure5–10. The very first PCW models considered cellulose as an organized network, immersed in amorphous matrix of PCW components5. However, the following PCW models suggested there is an option PCW matrix polysaccharides (hemicellulose, pectin) to define intefiber interactions by covalent linkages6,11, direct fiber coating7, formation of interfiber tethers8, as well as forming polysaccharide-linking amalgam in close proximity to fiber surface9,10. To the best of our knowledge, all the PCW models reported have declared undeniable role of hemicelluloses in the integrity of the PCW scaffold. So do the modern theory, supporting the notion that cellulose is the main load-bearing component of PCW, while the key component of PCW mechanical properties—interfiber adhesion—is determined by the hemicellulose-mediated interactions.

The main insights into the structure and mechanical properties of PCW can be reached by the decomposition of PCW constituents in muro12, inhibition of its biosynthesis10, in vitro solubilisation13, or chemical modification14. Beside of that, fiber networks such as those of bacterial cellulose (BC) mimic PCW fiber networks on a macroscale, being homogeneous, repeatable, modifiable, and easy to handle. The homogeneous fiber distribution and its layered structure are the key factors for the stiffness of the BC fiber network, similar to those of PCW.

Despite the most common BC-hemicellulose fiber networks, such as BC-xyloglucan, BC-pectin, and BC-xyloglucan-pectin have already been studied15–17, there is still a lack of understanding on the role of other hemicelluloses and their content on structure and mechanical properties of cellulose-hemicellulose fiber networks. Moreover, previous explorations of mechanical properties of cellulose‑hemicellulose fiber networks were limited to their study in the dry state, while its description and exploration as a water‑swollen network, analogous to in vivo PCW, was barely revealed18.

This study aimed to investigate the effect of different hemicelluloses on the process of biosynthesis, composition, structure and mechanical properties of cellulose-hemicellulose hydrogels, that mimic PCW. The study was particularly focused on the effect of post-biosynthetic enzymolysis of hemicelluloses. Current approach aimed to define the structure-dependent interaction of hemicelluloses with cellulose and to evaluate its consequences for the structure and mechanical properties of cellulose-hemicellulose hydrogels. Since the hemicelluloses differ in chemical composition (molecular weight, monosaccharide composition), their incorporation in cellulose fiber network and enzymatic degradation affect the load bearing junctions in cellulose-hemicellulose hydrogels, so that affecting its mechanical properties. Because the hemicelluloses, used in the study, represent the most common in monocots and dicots, the results obtained can serve as a reference for a wide range of PCW, their models, as well as get across the possible commercial use of respected biomaterials. To our knowledge, this study is the only integrated analysis of the role of hemicelluloses and its enzymolysis on the mechanical properties of cellulose-hemicellulose hydrogels, combined with structural studies, and exploration of its chemical composition.

Materials and methods

Sample preparation

Biosynthesis of BC-hemicellulose hydrogels

Pure BC was produced in Hestrin-Schramm (HS) culturing medium with no hemicelluloses19. The culturing medium was autoclaved at 121 ºC for 11 min, and then brought to reach room temperature. Then, 100 mL of culturing medium was transferred to sterile 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks followed by 2 mg of two‑day fresh colonies of Komagataiebacter xylinum ATCC‑53524 (LGC Standards, UK) bacteria strain. To obtain flat sheets, BC hydrogels were produced statically at 30 ± 1 ºC for 10 days. After production, samples were stirred with deionized water for 4 days to remove debris from culturing medium, bacteria trapped, proteins, as well as loosely attached hemicelluloses. BC-hemicellulose hydrogels were stored in a 0.02% mass sodium azide solution at 4 ± 1 ºC before further use20. The dry yield of biosynthesis of raw samples was calculated in triplicate as a dry mass of BC synthesized per 1 L of culturing medium.

In contrast, BC‑hemicellulose hydrogels were prepared in a HS medium with an addition of respected hemicelluloses17. The medium was prepared by dissolving 2% mass glucose (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), 0.5% mass casein peptone (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), 0.5% mass yeast extract (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), 0.27% mass anhydrous disodium phosphate (Chempur, Poland), and 0.115% mass citric acid monohydrate (Chempur, Poland) in deionized water. The pH of the culturing medium was then adjusted to 5.0 with 1 M NaOH/HCl. One of the four hemicelluloses—tamarind xyloglucan (P-XYGLN, > 95% purity, Megazyme, Bray, Ireland), beechwood xylan (P-XYLNBE-10G, > 95% purity, Megazyme, Bray, Ireland), medium-viscosity wheat flour arabinoxylan (P-WAXYL, > 95% purity, Megazyme, Bray, Ireland), and low-viscosity konjac glucomannan (P-GLCML, > 98% purity, Megazyme, Bray, Ireland) was added to culturing media. Monosaccharide composition and the weight average molecular weight of hemicelluloses used in current study is provided in Table 1.21. Table 1 Monosaccharide composition and weight average molecular weight of hemicelluloses, used in current study.

Hemicellulose	Monosaccharide composition (% dry polysaccharide mass)	Weight average molecular weight (kDa)	
Araf	Gal	Glc	GlcA	Man	Xyl	Other	
Xylan				11.3		86.1	2.6	158.3	
Arabinoxylan	37.8					61.7	0.5	323.0	
Xyloglucan	2.0	17.0	45.0			34.0	2.0	802.5	
Glucomannan			40.0		60.0			950.0*	
Abbreviation of Araf stands for arabinose, Gal galactose, Glc glucose, GlcA glucuronic acid, Man mannose, Xyl xylose. Data on monosaccharide composition and weight average molecular weight was provided by a manufacturer. Asterisk sign * refers to data from22.

The mass fractions of hemicelluloses in the culturing medium of respected hydrogels are presented in Table 2. Table 2 Samples studied, code names, and mass fractions of hemicelluloses in culturing medium.

Type of hemicellulose	Mass fraction in culturing medium (% w/v)	
0.00	0.25	0.50	1.00	
Arabinoxylan	BC	AX0.25	AX0.50	AX1.00	
Glucomannan		KGM0.25	KGM0.50	KGM1.00	
Xyloglucan		XGY0.25	XGY0.50	XGY1.00	
Xylan		XYL0.25	XYL0.50	XYL1.00	
BC stands for pure bacterial cellulose, other abbreviations stand for the specific hemicelluloses used.

At the beginning of the preparation of BC-hemicellulose hydrogels, an increasing turbidity of the culturing medium was observed, corresponding to the initiation of BC biosynthesis23, followed by the formation of a hydrogel pellicle on medium-air interphase. After terminating of cultivation and washing, BC‑hemicellulose hydrogels appeared as a round pellicles with an approximate diameter of 55 ± 2 mm, and highly hydrated (∼98% mass of water; Fig. 1a). In the following sections, current samples were defined as raw.Fig. 1 Uniaxial tensile test with cyclic load of BC hemicellulose hydrogels: (a) BC hemicellulose hydrogel on a millimeter precision scale; (b) tensile stage microtester with marked: (I) strip of BC hemicellulose hydrogel, (II) direction of loading; (c) schematic three cycle stress strain curve. The colored lines, points and areas define mechanical properties evaluated, while the annotation on the right provides the definition.

Alkali treatment and enzymolysis

Alkali treatment and enzymolysis were performed to ensure depolymerization and removal of hemicelluloses of BC-hemicellulose hydrogels. Initially, samples were washed with deionized water to remove excess sodium azide. Then, samples were treated with 0.1 M NaOH at 80 ± 1 ºC for 30 min in triplicate, to remove proteins. Subsequently, the samples were washed in deionized water at 100 ± 1 ºC for 60 min, which is supposed not to affect hemicellulose composition, and not to change the structure and properties of BC15,24. Commercial enzymes (all—Megazyme, Ireland), specific to hemicelluloses used in current study, were chosen for enzymolyses. Enzyme solutions were prepared according to the manufacturer's recommendations, and the following data are presented in Table 3. Table 3 Hemicelluloses, hemicellulose-specific enzymes used, the composition of the enzyme solutions, and the reactions catalysed by enzymes.

Hemicellulose	Enzyme	Solution composition	Reaction catalyzed	
Arabinoxylan	Endo-β-1 → 4-xylanase (EC 3.2.1.8)	0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH = 6), 0.5 mg/mL BSA	Enzymolysis of xylan to oligosaccharides	
α-L-arabinofuranosidase (EC 3.2.1.55)	0.1 M sodium acetate buffer (pH = 4)	Enzymolysis of α-1 → 2- and α-1 → 3-linked L-arabinofuranose sidechains of arabinoxylan	
Glucomannan	Endo-1 → 4-β-mannanase (EC 3.2.1.78)	0.1 M sodium acetate buffer (pH = 4)	Enzymolysis of β-1 → 4-D-mannosidic linkages of glucomannan	
Xyloglucan	Xyloglucan-specific endo-β-1 → 4-glucanase (EC 3.2.1.151)	0.1 M sodium acetate buffer (pH = 5.5), 1 mg/mL BSA	Enzymolysis of β-1 → 4-D-glycosidic linkages of xyloglucan	
Xylan	Endo-β-1 → 4-xylanase (EC 3.2.1.8)	0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH = 6), 0.5 mg/mL BSA	Enzymolysis of xylan to oligosaccharides	
EC enzyme commission number, BSA bovine serum albumin.

Enzymatic treatment of BC-hemicellulose hydrogels was conducted by immersing hydrogels in 10 U/mL enzyme solutions up to 6.67×10-3gofhydrogeldrymassmLofenzymesolution concentration. Thus, approximately 5 g of BC-hemicellulose hydrogels were immersed in 15 mL of enzyme solutions with an enzyme activity of 10 U/mL, where 1 U stands for conversion of 1 µmol of substrate per minute. The enzyme solutions were left diffusing within the samples for 3 h at 21 ± 1 ºC, followed by 5 h at 40 ± 1 ºC25. In the case of BC-arabinoxylan hydrogels, two successive enzymolyses were performed—first with endo-β-1 → 4-xylanase, followed by α-L-arabinofuranosidase. Pure BC was treated with 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH = 6) under the same conditions. Each treatment was terminated by washing hydrogels first in respected buffers, followed by deionized water. Finally, hydrogels were stored in a 0.02% mass sodium azide solution at 4 ºC prior to further use. In the following sections, the samples were defined as treated.

Monosaccharide composition

Monosaccharide composition of both raw and treated BC-hemicellulose hydrogels was conducted according to26 with slight modifications. Oven-dried and milled samples with a mass of appr. 0.1 g were first incubated at 80 ºC for 72 h in 2 M hydrochloric acid in methanol (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), followed by hydrolysis with 2 mL of 3 M trifluoroacetic acid (Merck, Germany) at 100 ºC for 7 h. Hydrolyzed samples were incubated at 70 ºC for 1 h in a mixture of 1 mL of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) water (Chempur, Poland), 0.05 mL of 0.3 M aqueous sodium hydroxide and 0.05 mL of 0.5 M 1-phenyl-3-methyl-5-pyrazolone (Thermo Scientific Chemicals, USA) solution in methanol. After that, samples were neutralized with 0.05 mL of 0.3 M aqueous hydrochloric acid (Chempur, Poland), and sample monosaccharides were extracted threefold with chloroform (Merck, Germany). Reference samples of monosaccharides and uronic acids (arabinose, galactose, galacturonic acid, glucose, glucuronic acid, mannose, rhamnose, and xylose; all—Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) were processed the same way.

Samples were analysed using a HPLC system of S1130 pump, S5300 sample injector, S4120 column oven, and S3350 photodiode array detector at 246 nm wavelength (all—Sykam GmbH, Germany). For HPLC analysis, the ZORBAX Eclipse XDB analytical column, and Eclipse XDB–C18 guard column (all—Agilent Technologies, USA) were used. For each sample, monosaccharide analysis was performed in triplicate.

Surface topography

Surface topography imaging was performed with an atomic force microscope (MultiMode 8-HR, Bruker, USA) in ScanAsyst in Air™ tapping mode on samples oven-dried at 45 ± 1 ºC up to constant mass. Two randomly chosen pieces of an approximate area of 15 mm2 were cut out and stuck to atomic force microscope (AFM) metal specimen disks. A SCANASYST-AIR AFM cantilever (Bruker, USA) was used for imaging. Overall captured area for single image was set to 2 × 2 µm with an image resolution of 1.95 nm per pixel. Images were processed with Gwyddion 2.48 software27 for correction of data artefacts. For each sample, 10 images were captured to obtain a representative number of data. Surface topography imaging of samples was performed at a temperature of 19 ± 1 ºC, and a relative humidity of 33 ± 2% Then, the average width was evaluated for 100 random cellulose fibers. In the current paper, the term microfiber characterizes a structural unit of cellulose chains of identical dimensional configuration, gathered in crystalline/semi-crystalline/amorphous domains. The term fiber refers to a group of microfibers, interacting with each other by weak forces, which structurally appear as a single unit, and in terms of applied load provide a similar response. For 10 random surface topography images of each type of bacterial cellulose-hemicellulose hydrogels, root mean square toughness was calculated according to the following equation:1 Rq=1n∑i=1nyi2

where Rq is root mean square roughness, n is a value of points measured, and y is surface profile deviation value.

Uniaxial tensile test with cyclic load

The mechanical properties of both raw and treated BC-hemicellulose hydrogels were evaluated using uniaxial tensile test with cyclic load. Pellicles (Fig. 1a) were cut into rectangular strips with an approximate length of 20 mm and width of 3 mm (Fig. 1b,I). The width of strips was defined as an average of three along the sample. The thickness of each specimen was measured using a BAKER IP54 digital micrometer (Baker Gauges India Private Limited, India). A tensile stage microtester (Deben Microtest, UK) with a 200N load cell was used for mechanical testing (Fig. 1b).

Samples were subjected to uniaxial tensile test with cyclic load at a strain rate of 500 µm/min, with the tensile strain increase of 500 µm per cycle. Prior to the initial loading of the first cycle, the sample was pre-loaded with a force of 0.05N to ensure fiber uncrimping. A dwelling time of 10 s was applied for stress relaxation within the sample between consecutive cycles. During the dwelling time of each consecutive cycle, sample was rehydrated by drop-deposition of 10 µL of deionized water to ensure sample hydration. Cyclic tension was performed up to the sample fracture. The tests were performed in 10 replicates at a temperature of 19 ± 1 ºC, and a relative humidity of 33 ± 2%. Schematic stress–strain curve with a graphical representation of the evaluated mechanical properties are given in Fig. 1c. Experimental stress–strain curve of raw BC, obtained by the uniaxial tensile test with cyclic load is provided in Supplementary Materials as Fig.S1.

Data from stress–strain curves were extracted using Python procedure28. The maximum stress and maximum strain were defined at the cycle with the highest force. Maximum modulus was defined as the maximum value of the slope of the linear part of the stress–strain curve in a single test. The total plastic strain was given as a sum of the irreversible strains in each cycle.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of experimental data was performed using RStudio v.4.1.1 software (Posit Software, USA). Differences between monosaccharide composition, and structural and mechanical properties were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey test at a significance level of p = 0.05.

Results and discussion

Dry yield of biosynthesis

Produced BC-hemicellulose hydrogels (Fig. 1a) appeared as smooth layered pellicles. The dry yield of biosynthesis of pure BC was 2.8 ± 0.4 g/L (Fig. 2), being consistent with data, reported previously16,29.Fig. 2 Dry yield of biosynthesis of BC hemicellulose hydrogels in relation to the presence of (a) xylan (XYL), (b) arabinoxylan (AX), (c) xyloglucan (XGY), and (d) glucomannan (KGM) in culturing medium. The control sample (BC) is marked with red colour. For the estimated parameters, the data points and bars refer to the mean values and standard deviation, respectively. Treatments with the same letter show a lack of statistically significant differences.

The presence of hemicelluloses in the culturing medium resulted in a change of the dry yield of biosynthesis of respected hydrogels. An increase in dry yield of biosynthesis of BC with xylan presence was obtained compared to the pure BC (Fig. 2a). Despite the presence of glucose in the culturing medium, K.xylinum has also been reported to metabolise xylose30, being involved in bacterial growth rather than BC biosynthesis. In contrast to xylan, the addition of arabinoxylan resulted in a decrease in the dry yield of biosynthesis (Fig. 2b), showing poor ability to be utilized by K.xylinum29. Compared to unsubstituted xylan, arabinose sidechains stabilize the arabinoxylan backbone, so that the degradation of arabinoxylan backbone to xylose should be considered minor.

The presence of xyloglucan in the culturing medium resulted in a decrease in dry yield of biosynthesis (Fig. 2c), which correlates with limited water solubility of xyloglucan, restricting the mobility of bacteria and nutrients. Statistically significant higher dry yield of BC biosynthesis in xyloglucan-enriched medium was previously reported for agitated culturing31. Since agitated culturing conditions provide a homogeneous distribution of bacteria and nutrients within the medium, xyloglucan may act as a stabilizer of solution, while for static culturing conditions, limited solubility and possible aggregation of xyloglucan may limit BC biosynthesis. Biosynthesis of BC in the presence of glucomannan resulted in a decrease of dry yield of biosynthesis, compared to control (Fig. 2d). A similar phenomenon has been reported for other culturing media31,32 and is related to its limited solubility and polysaccharide over supplementation of culturing medium.

Monosaccharide composition

Monosaccharide composition of both raw and treated BC-hemicellulose hydrogels is provided in Fig. 3. Apart from glucose, both raw and treated BC contained trace amounts of arabinose and xylose, originating from an entrapped medium components. Raw hydrogels, cultured in the medium with specific hemicellulose additives resulted in the presence of the respected monosaccharides—glucuronic acid and xylose—for BC–xylan hydrogels; arabinose, galactose, galacturonic acid, and xylose – for BC–arabinoxylan hydrogels; galactose, galacturonic acid and xylose—for BC–xyloglucan hydrogels; mannose—for BC–glucomannan hydrogels. What is of specific interest, is that the traces of galacturonic acid were observed in BC–hemicellulose hydrogels, possible as a backbone β-D-GalpA-(1 → 2)-α-D-Xylp inclusions33,34. Another monosaccharide, common for pectin—rhamnose—was also reported in current samples, suggesting its appearance as a co-product of hemicellulose extraction, also being reported in reducing ends of some hemicelluloses35–37. Statistically significant increase of the content of hemicellulose monosaccharides in hydrogels with an increasing hemicellulose content in culturing medium allowed us to assume that hemicelluloses incorporated within respected hydrogels in a concentration–dependent manner.Fig. 3 Monosaccharide composition of raw and treated BC–hemicellulose hydrogels in relation to the presence of xylan (XYL), arabinoxylan (AX), xyloglucan (XGY), and glucomannan (KGM) in culturing medium. Subsequent figures represent the content of (a) glucose, (b) xylose, and (c) rhamnose (for bacterial cellulose-xylan hydrogels); arabinose (for bacterial cellulose-arabinoxylan hydrogels); galactose (for bacterial cellulose-xyloglucan hydrogels) mannose (for bacterial cellulose-glucomannan hydrogels). Raw and treated samples are indicated by the bullet points of different sizes. The control sample (BC) is marked with red colour. For the estimated parameters, the data points and bars refer to the mean values and standard deviation, respectively. Treatments with the same letter show a lack of statistically significant differences. Complete data on monosaccharide composition of bacterial cellulose-hemicellulose hydrogels is provided in Fig.S2 of Supplementary Materials.

For the treated BC–hemicellulose hydrogels, a statistically significant increase in glucose content was found, in addition to the reduction of the amount of hemicellulose monosaccharides. It allowed us to assume enzymolysis of hemicelluloses in respected hydrogels took place. However, enzymolysis was not complete in terms of entire hemicellulose removal, as from half to two–thirds of its initial content were still present within treated hydrogels. We suppose that incomplete enzymolysis occur since hemicelluloses are partially trapped in/within cellulose fibers, so that can only be released by cellulase treatment9. Thus, in this study, we assume enzyme–inaccessible hemicelluloses as an integral component of BC–hemicellulose hydrogels. Another crucial point is that despite culturing at various hemicellulose concentrations, no predominant mechanism (fiber entrapment, irreversible adsorption, etc.) of cellulose–hemicellulose binding was observed, since with an increasing hemicellulose content, both amounts of enzyme–accessible and enzyme–inaccessible hemicelluloses were increasing.

Surface topography

AFM surface topography revealed that both raw and treated samples appeared as a network of randomly distributed fibers (Fig. 4–5). No detectable differences in thicknesses of raw and treated BC-hemicellulose hydrogels were observed.Fig. 4 Atomic force microscopy surface topography images of raw BC hemicellulose hydrogels in a dry state. Images are divided into rows according to the type of hemicellulose additive, while column indicate the amount of hemicellulose additive (% mass) in culturing medium. For each image, abbreviation and scale are provided.

Fig. 5 Atomic force microscopy surface topography images of treated BC hemicellulose hydrogels in a dry state. Images are divided into rows according to the type of hemicellulose additive, while column indicate the amount of hemicellulose additive (% mass) in culturing medium. For each image, abbreviation and scale are provided.

In the case of pure BC, an average fiber width of 53 ± 13 nm (Fig. 6) was observed on AFM images. In terms of length, no cellulose fiber caps were observed on either the 2 × 2 µm capturing area or the larger area tested.Fig. 6 Cellulose fiber width of raw and treated BC–hemicellulose hydrogels with (a) xylan (XYL), (b) arabinoxylan (AX), (c) xyloglucan (XGY), and d) glucomannan (KGM) in the dry state. Raw and treated samples are indicated by the bullet points of different sizes. The control sample (BC) is marked with red color. For the estimated parameters, the data points and bars refer to mean values and standard deviation, respectively. Treatments with the same letter show a lack of statistically significant differences.

With increasing xylan concentration, the fiber width of the treated samples have not changed, compared to the raw samples and pure BC (Fig. 6a). Lack of data change may be related to the xylan entrapment within cellulose fibers, or in close proximity to interfiber crosslinks, making it enzyme–inaccessible. Contrary to xylan, the addition of arabinoxylan to the culturing medium increased fiber width (Fig. 6b). We consider it to be a matter of nonspecific irreversible adsorption of arabinoxylan on the cellulose38, since arabinoxylan has been reported to interact with cellulose fibers by surface deposition. Fiber width has not decreased after enzymolysis, compared to raw samples. We suppose that the endo–β–1 → 4–xylanase treatment of arabinoxylan could be hindered sterically by arabinose substitutes, and as far as the removal of arabinose sidechains increases arabinoxylan adsorption affinity to cellulose39, the resulting change in fiber width was within the standard deviation. Another point may suggest substitution pattern define statistically significant differences in fiber width of both xylan and arabinoxylan, since it was reported to define interactions of hemicelluloses with cellulose40.

Fiber width increased almost twofold for the XGY1.00 sample, compared to pure BC (Fig. 6c). Fiber thickening may occur due to the adsorption of xyloglucan on the microfiber, which precedes fiber formation41. In addition to some entrapped xyloglucan fraction, partial xyloglucan deposition on fiber can be confirmed by the decrease in fiber width of the treated samples compared to raw.

Increasing concentration of glucomannan in the culturing medium resulted in a two– to threefold increase in fiber width in the case of the KGM1.00 sample, compared to pure BC (Fig. 6d). Heterogeneous surface structure, in which cellulose bands are hardly distinguished, was the one, specific for BC–glucomannan fiber network. It matches with the research of Szymańska–Chargot et al., who reported higher affinity of glucomannan to adsorb on apple parenchyma cellulose, compared to other hemicelluloses (Szymańska–Chargot et al.42). Treatment of BC–glucomannan hydrogels with dilute alkali and endo–1 → 4–β–mannanase resulted in a decrease of cellulose fiber width (Fig. 4d), reaching a plateau of about 90 ± 30 nm of fiber width. It allowed us to assume that enzymolysis enabled complete removal of enzyme–accessible glucomannan, reaching the minimum values of fiber width, determined by enzyme–inaccessible glucomannan.

Data on fiber width is somehow correlated with one of surface roughness, which, despite moderacy of statistical differences, was on average lower for treated samples, compared to raw (Fig. 7; Fig. S3-S4). Together with a lower data deviation for treated samples, current data may provide to a conclusion that smoother surface of oven-dried bacterial cellulose-hemicellulose hydrogels may be a matter of the removal of enzyme-accessible hemicelluloses.Fig. 7 Root mean square roughness of raw and treated bacterial cellulose-hemicellulose hydrogels in relation to the presence of (a) xylan (XYL), (b) arabinoxylan (AX), (c) xyloglucan (XGY), and (d) glucomannan (KGM) in culturing medium. Raw and treated samples are indicated by the bullet points rectangles, respectively. The control sample (BC) is marked with red colour. For the estimated parameters, the data points and bars refer to the mean values and standard deviation, respectively. Treatments with the same letter show a lack of statistically significant differences.

Mechanical properties of BC–hemicellulose hydrogels

As the concentration of xylan in the culturing medium increased, the values of the mechanical parameters decreased statistically significant for both raw and treated samples (Fig. 8). Decreasing maximum modulus (Fig. 8a) of BC–xylan hydrogels with increasing xylan content was observed. It allowed us to suggest the mechanism, according to which xylan, entrapped within cellulose fiber, affected packaging of cellulose microfibers, and promoting the formation of an amorphous cellulose. In addition, water within hydrogel may contribute to polysaccharide chains pushing away, forcing water–induced phase separation43. This is consistent with our data on the decreasing maximum modulus (Fig. 8a) of BC–xylan hydrogels with increasing xylan content, suggesting that adsorbed water reduced the friction between fibers during cyclic loading and unloading. Phase separation phenomenon was also reported for other hemicelluloses studied, with the most prominent effect reported for xylan44–46. No statistically significant changes on maximum strain of BC-xylan hydrogels were observed (Fig. 8c), while the one of total plastic strain (Fig. 8d) were moderate.Fig. 8 Mechanical properties of raw and treated BC–xylan hydrogels evaluated by cyclic tests: (a) maximum modulus, (b) maximum stress, (c) maximum strain, (d) total plastic strain. The control sample (BC) is marked in red. Raw and treated samples are indicated by bullet points and rectangles, respectively. For the estimated parameters, data points and bars refer to the mean and standard deviation, respectively. Treatments with the same letter show no statistically significant differences.

For treated BC–xylan hydrogels, values of mechanical properties increased compared to raw samples (Fig. 8). Mechanical properties of BC–xylan hydrogels were previously shown to be determined by the conformation of the xylan chain18, with patterned rigid domains of the xylan chain tightly adsorbed to cellulose47, and non–patterned irregularly substituted domains forming flexible loops and tails between the cellulose fibers. In addition, regularity/irregularity of xylose acetylation degree may facilitate tighter binding to cellulose, defining rigidity of bacterial cellulose-xylan fiber network48. It allows us to suggest a mechanism, in which enzymolysis of flexible or both rigid and flexible domains of the xylan lead to direct interactions between cellulose fibers, resulting in higher moduli and stresses (Fig. 8b) in the treated samples, compared to raw. Moderate decrease in xylose content in treated BC–xylan hydrogels (Fig. 3b) somehow confirm suggested mechanism.

The mechanical properties of raw BC–arabinoxylan hydrogels showed statistically significant increase in terms of maximum modulus (Fig. 9a), and maximum stress (Fig. 9b), compared to pure BC. The dominant idea that may be considered here is that increasing maximum stress of BC–arabinoxylan hydrogels with an increasing arabinoxylan content can be attributed to its reinforcing effect49, with unsubstituted regions of arabinoxylan chains interacting during the plastic deformation of the sample, so that enhancing the effect of fiber realignment. In addition, arabinoxylan was not reported to incorporate into cellulose fiber as xylan50, affecting the packaging of cellulose chains, but mainly adsorb nonspecifically on cellulose surface38. The same effect was also observed in BC–arabinogalactan networks51, suggesting a key role of arabinose sidechains in arabinoxylan–cellulose interactions.Fig. 9 Mechanical properties of raw and treated BC–arabinoxylan hydrogels evaluated by cyclic tests: (a) maximum modulus, (b) maximum stress, (c) maximum strain, (d) total plastic strain. The control sample (BC) is marked in red. Raw and treated samples are indicated by bullet points and rectangles, respectively. For the estimated parameters, data points and bars refer to the mean and standard deviation, respectively. Treatments with the same letter show no statistically significant differences.

The values of moduli and stresses of treated BC-arabinoxylan hydrogels showed statistically significant increase, compared to raw hydrogels, contrasting with other BC-hemicellulose hydrogels by trends on data change. Low–arabinosylated arabinoxylan with a decreased degree of polymerization were shown to exhibit lower moisture uptake compared to native arabinoxylan52, being a matter of its higher crystallinity39. It is consistent with our study and suggests that increase in moduli and stresses (Fig. 9a,b), and decrease in strains (Fig. 9c,d) of BC–arabinoxylan hydrogels were defined by both the increase in polysaccharide crystallinity within the network and reduced moisture–induced plastic deformation. In addition, the removal of the arabinose sidechains increases the flexibility of the xylan chain, as well as the number of hydroxyl groups, resulting in a reinforcing effect of the flexible, low–substituted arabinoxylan.

Contrary to both xylan and arabinoxylan, the presence of xyloglucan and glucomannan in culturing medium decreased the mechanical properties of the respective hydrogels. With increasing xyloglucan content, the values of maximum modulus, maximum stress, maximum strain, and total plastic strain decreased with a treatment–dependent trend (Fig. 10). Xyloglucan was observed to deposit on cellulose surface during fiber extrusion by bacteria53. With a sequential increase of xyloglucan content in culturing medium, its deposition within the cellulose fibers also increases, reducing a number of stiff cellulose–cellulose junctions. In that case, we consider mechanical properties of BC–xyloglucan hydrogels are predominantly determined by weaker xyloglucan–cellulose interactions, occurring both on surface of cellulose fiber and between cellulose microfibers forming fiber42, which conceptually similar to PCW biomechanical hotspots9 rather than stronger cellulose–cellulose interactions. Such a xyloglucan fraction is enzyme–inaccessible, acts as a mediate of both microfibers and fibers, and determines the trends of data change. At the same time, the presence (adsorption, adhesion, entrapment) or absence (solubilisation, enzymolysis) of enzyme–accessible xyloglucan determines data fluctuation.Fig. 10 Mechanical properties of raw and treated BC–xyloglucan hydrogels evaluated by cyclic tests: a) maximum modulus, b) maximum stress, c) maximum strain, d) total plastic strain. The control sample (BC) is marked in red. Raw and treated samples are indicated by bullet points and rectangles, respectively. For the estimated parameters, data points and bars refer to the mean and standard deviation, respectively. Treatments with the same letter show no statistically significant differences.

Suggested role of enzyme–accessible xyloglucan correlates with a statistically significant increase of moduli (Fig. 10a), and stresses (Fig. 10b) of treated samples compared to raw. As xyloglucan content in hydrogel increases, the maximum stress is determined more by enzyme–inaccessible xyloglucan–mediated interfiber interactions, so that the effect of xyloglucan enzymolysis is limited.

In contrast to the moduli and stresses, the maximum strain (Fig. 10c) was higher for raw samples, compared to treated. The total plastic strain of BC-xyloglucan hydrogels decreased (Fig. 10d) with an increasing xyloglucan content, being governed by a reduction of interfiber friction by an amorphous xyloglucan.

The decrease of the mechanical properties of BC–glucomannan hydrogels was more prominent, compared to xyloglucan (Fig. 11). An increase in glucomannan content resulted in a moderate decrease in moduli (Fig. 11a), and stresses (Fig. 11b). However, the change in maximum strain of the BC–glucomannan hydrogels was steep, decreasing from 22.6 ± 4.3% to 4.7 ± 0.2% for BC and KGM1.00, respectively (Fig. 11c). At low glucomannan content, increase in mechanical properties is hypothesized to occur due to co–crystallization of low amounts of semi–crystalline glucomannan with BC54, while with an increasing glucomannan content, decrease in mechanical properties is determined by an increasing glucomannan deposition on cellulose55. Due to the structural similarity of cellulose and glucomannan, it not only exhibits good binding affinity to cellulose, but also prevents direct assembly of microfibers and/or fibers54. The in situ interaction between glucomannan and bacteria–extruded microfibers can lead to the disruption of cellulose chain packaging56, resulting in a formation of fragile fibers and fiber network, compared to pure BC.Fig. 11 Mechanical properties of raw and treated BC–glucomannan hydrogels evaluated by cyclic tests: (a) maximum modulus, (b) maximum stress, (c) maximum strain, (d) total plastic strain. The control sample (BC) is marked in red. Raw and treated samples are indicated by bullet points and rectangles, respectively. For the estimated parameters, data points and bars refer to the mean and standard deviation, respectively. Treatments with the same letter show no statistically significant differences.

In terms of mechanical properties, enzymolysis of the BC–glucomannan hydrogels resulted in moderate data change. The higher maximum strain for raw samples (Fig. 11c), compared to treated, might indicate the role of glucomannan in resisting load at high strain, with a less pronounced effect compared to BC–xyloglucan hydrogels. Despite the decrease in fiber width for the treated BC–glucomannan hydrogels, the values were still higher compared to the control, suggesting that a part of glucomannan is enzyme–inaccessible. Therefore, the thicker fibers of raw samples resulted in limited entanglement and interfiber interactions within the network, leading to a lower maximum modulus, compared to the treated samples.

Similar to other hemicelluloses studied, glucomannan decreased the total plastic strain of BC–glucomannan hydrogels (Fig. 11d). At low glucomannan content in culturing medium, its deposition on cellulose is lower, compared to water, so irreversible deformations are likely defined by a weakened hydrogen bonding network of water–mediated cellulose–cellulose and cellulose–glucomannan slip–stick interactions57. With increasing content, glucomannan predominantly deposits on cellulose, forming a strong hydrogen bonding network. The data obtained are consistent with the predominantly reversible deformation of cellulose–glucomannan hydrogels to cyclic compression, observed previously18. Moreover, observations on fiber width allowed to hypothesize that the decrease of irreversible deformation of BC–glucomannan hydrogels was governed by the limited formation of loops of thick fibers, so that interfiber friction define irreversibility of deformation was governed by interfiber friction.

Conclusion

In current study we have investigated the interactions between bacterial cellulose (BC) and four hemicelluloses—arabinoxylan, xylan, xyloglucan, and glucomannan—in hydrogels. By examining the effects of these hemicelluloses on the structure, mechanical properties, and biosynthesis of BC-hemicellulose hydrogels, we were able to identify how the distinct structures and compositions of each hemicellulose influence these interactions.

Low-molecular-weight xylan and arabinoxylan had minimal impact on BC biosynthesis. In contrast, high-molecular-weight xyloglucan and glucomannan altered hydrogel formation due to increased medium viscosity and limited nutrient mobility. Removal of enzyme-accessible hemicelluloses, particularly xylan and xyloglucan, generally improved the mechanical properties of the hydrogels by enhancing cellulose-cellulose interactions.

The study also found that increasing xyloglucan content weakened the mechanical properties of BC–xyloglucan hydrogels due to weaker xyloglucan–cellulose interactions, while higher arabinoxylan content led to stronger hydrogels due to reinforced cellulose fibers. Glucomannan's impact on mechanical properties was less pronounced but similar to xyloglucan, with fiber network formation being altered by glucomannan deposition on and within the cellulose fibers.

These findings demonstrate the structure-dependent mechanisms of cellulose–hemicellulose interactions and suggest specific structural roles for each hemicellulose in determining the properties of BC–hemicellulose hydrogels. The results have potential applications in developing composite biomaterials for scientific and commercial use.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-72513-w.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Centre, Poland [grant numbers 2019/35/D/NZ9/00555, 2020/37/B/NZ9/03159].

Author contributions

Vadym Chibrikov: Methodology, Software, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Data Curation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft; Piotr Mariusz Pieczywek: Conceptualization, Software, Formal Analysis, Data Curation, Writing – Review & Editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project Administration, Funding Acquisition; Justyna Cybulska: Methodology; Writing – Review & Editing; Formal analysis, Funding Acquisition; Artur Zdunek: Conceptualization, Writing – Review & Editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data availability

Data will be made available on request. For data request, please contact v.chibrikov@ipan.lublin.pl.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Cosgrove DJ Jarvis MC Comparative structure and biomechanics of plant primary and secondary cell walls Front. Plant Sci. 2012 3 1 6 10.3389/fpls.2012.00204 22645563
Cosgrove, D. J. & Jarvis, M. C. Comparative structure and biomechanics of plant primary and secondary cell walls. Front. Plant Sci. 3, 1–6 (2012).22645563
2. Carpita NC Update on mechanisms of plant cell wall biosynthesis: How plants make cellulose and other (1→4)-β-D-Glycans Plant Physiol. 2011 155 171 184 10.1104/pp.110.163360 21051553
Carpita, N. C. Update on mechanisms of plant cell wall biosynthesis: How plants make cellulose and other (1→4)-β-D-Glycans. Plant Physiol. 155, 171–184 (2011).21051553
3. Scheller HV Ulvskov P Hemicelluloses Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010 61 263 289 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112315 20192742
Scheller, H. V. & Ulvskov, P. Hemicelluloses. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 61, 263–289 (2010).20192742
4. Khodayari A Thielemans W Hirn U Van Vuure AW Seveno D Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions—A nanoscale view Carbohydr. Polym. 2021 270 118364 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118364 34364609
Khodayari, A., Thielemans, W., Hirn, U., Van Vuure, A. W. & Seveno, D. Cellulose-hemicellulose interactions—A nanoscale view. Carbohydr. Polym. 270, 118364 (2021).34364609
5. Probine MC Barber NF The structure and plastic properties of the cell wall of Nitella in relation to extension growth Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1966 19 439 10.1071/BI9660439
Probine, M. C. & Barber, N. F. The structure and plastic properties of the cell wall of Nitella in relation to extension growth. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 19, 439 (1966).
6. Keegstra K Talmadge KW Bauer WD Albersheim P The structure of plant cell walls: III. A model of the walls of suspension-cultured sycamore cells based on the interconnections of the macromolecular components Plant Physiol. 1973 51 188 197 10.1104/pp.51.1.188 16658282
Keegstra, K., Talmadge, K. W., Bauer, W. D. & Albersheim, P. The structure of plant cell walls: III. A model of the walls of suspension-cultured sycamore cells based on the interconnections of the macromolecular components. Plant Physiol. 51, 188–197 (1973).16658282
7. Talbott LD Ray PM Molecular size and separability features of pea cell wall polysaccharides: Implications for models of primary wall structure Plant Physiol. 1992 98 357 368 10.1104/pp.98.1.357 16668637
Talbott, L. D. & Ray, P. M. Molecular size and separability features of pea cell wall polysaccharides: Implications for models of primary wall structure. Plant Physiol. 98, 357–368 (1992).16668637
8. Carpita NC Gibeaut DM Structural models of primary cell walls in flowering plants: Consistency of molecular structure with the physical properties of the walls during growth Plant J. 1993 3 1 30 10.1111/j.1365-313X.1993.tb00007.x 8401598
Carpita, N. C. & Gibeaut, D. M. Structural models of primary cell walls in flowering plants: Consistency of molecular structure with the physical properties of the walls during growth. Plant J. 3, 1–30 (1993).8401598
9. Park YB Cosgrove DJ A revised architecture of primary cell walls based on biomechanical changes induced by substrate-specific endoglucanases Plant Physiol. 2012 158 1933 1943 10.1104/pp.111.192880 22362871
Park, Y. B. & Cosgrove, D. J. A revised architecture of primary cell walls based on biomechanical changes induced by substrate-specific endoglucanases. Plant Physiol. 158, 1933–1943 (2012).22362871
10. Park YB Cosgrove DJ Changes in cell wall biomechanical properties in the xyloglucan-deficient xxt1/xxt2 mutant of Arabidopsis Plant Physiol. 2012 158 465 475 10.1104/pp.111.189779 22108526
Park, Y. B. & Cosgrove, D. J. Changes in cell wall biomechanical properties in the xyloglucan-deficient xxt1/xxt2 mutant of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 158, 465–475 (2012).22108526
11. Albersheim P Darvill A Roberts K Sederoff R Staehelin A Plant Cell Walls: A Renewable Material Resource 2011 Garland Science
Albersheim, P., Darvill, A., Roberts, K., Sederoff, R. & Staehelin, A. Plant Cell Walls: A Renewable Material Resource (Garland Science, 2011).
12. Hervé C Rogowski A Gilbert HJ Knox JP Enzymatic treatments reveal differential capacities for Xylan recognition and degradation in primary and secondary plant cell walls Plant J. 2009 58 413 422 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03785.x 19144002
Hervé, C., Rogowski, A., Gilbert, H. J. & Knox, J. P. Enzymatic treatments reveal differential capacities for Xylan recognition and degradation in primary and secondary plant cell walls. Plant J. 58, 413–422 (2009).19144002
13. Goulao LF Oliveira CM Cell wall modifications during fruit ripening: When a fruit is not the fruit Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2008 19 4 25 10.1016/j.tifs.2007.07.002
Goulao, L. F. & Oliveira, C. M. Cell wall modifications during fruit ripening: When a fruit is not the fruit. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 19, 4–25 (2008).
14. Kozioł A Cybulska J Pieczywek PM Zdunek A Changes of pectin nanostructure and cell wall stiffness induced in vitro by pectinase Carbohydr. Polym. 2017 161 197 207 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.014 28189229
Kozioł, A., Cybulska, J., Pieczywek, P. M. & Zdunek, A. Changes of pectin nanostructure and cell wall stiffness induced in vitro by pectinase. Carbohydr. Polym. 161, 197–207 (2017).28189229
15. Szymańska-Chargot M Simultaneous influence of pectin and xyloglucan on structure and mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose composites Carbohydr. Polym. 2017 174 970 979 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.07.004 28821155
Szymańska-Chargot, M. et al. Simultaneous influence of pectin and xyloglucan on structure and mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose composites. Carbohydr. Polym. 174, 970–979 (2017).28821155
16. Chen SQ Characterisation of bacterial cellulose from diverse Komagataeibacter strains and their application to construct plant cell wall analogues Cellulose 2017 24 1211 1226 10.1007/s10570-017-1203-3
Chen, S. Q. et al. Characterisation of bacterial cellulose from diverse Komagataeibacter strains and their application to construct plant cell wall analogues. Cellulose 24, 1211–1226 (2017).
17. Cybulska J Mechanical characteristics of artificial cell walls J. Food Eng. 2010 96 287 294 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.08.001
Cybulska, J. et al. Mechanical characteristics of artificial cell walls. J. Food Eng. 96, 287–294 (2010).
18. Berglund J Wood hemicelluloses exert distinct biomechanical contributions to cellulose fibrillar networks Nat. Commun. 2020 11 1 16 10.1038/s41467-020-18390-z 31911652
Berglund, J. et al. Wood hemicelluloses exert distinct biomechanical contributions to cellulose fibrillar networks. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–16 (2020).31911652
19. Hestrin S Schramm M Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. II. Preparation of freeze-dried cells capable of polymerizing glucose to cellulose Biochem. J. 1954 58 345 352 10.1042/bj0580345 13208601
Hestrin, S. & Schramm, M. Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. II. Preparation of freeze-dried cells capable of polymerizing glucose to cellulose. Biochem. J. 58, 345–352 (1954).13208601
20. Astley OM Chanliaud E Donald AM Gidley MJ Tensile deformation of bacterial cellulose composites Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2003 32 28 35 10.1016/S0141-8130(03)00022-9 12719129
Astley, O. M., Chanliaud, E., Donald, A. M. & Gidley, M. J. Tensile deformation of bacterial cellulose composites. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 32, 28–35 (2003).12719129
21. Chibrikov V Pieczywek PM Cybulska J Zdunek A Coarse-grained molecular dynamics model to evaluate the mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose–hemicellulose composites Carbohydr. Polym. 2024 330 121827 10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.121827 38368106
Chibrikov, V., Pieczywek, P. M., Cybulska, J. & Zdunek, A. Coarse-grained molecular dynamics model to evaluate the mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose–hemicellulose composites. Carbohydr. Polym. 330, 121827 (2024).38368106
22. Franková L Fry SC Hemicellulose-remodelling transglycanase activities from charophytes: Towards the evolution of the land-plant cell wall Plant J. 2021 108 7 28 10.1111/tpj.15500 34547150
Franková, L. & Fry, S. C. Hemicellulose-remodelling transglycanase activities from charophytes: Towards the evolution of the land-plant cell wall. Plant J. 108, 7–28 (2021).34547150
23. Avcioglu NH Birben M Seyis Bilkay I Optimization and physicochemical characterization of enhanced microbial cellulose production with a new Kombucha consortium Process Biochem. 2021 108 60 68 10.1016/j.procbio.2021.06.005
Avcioglu, N. H., Birben, M. & Seyis Bilkay, I. Optimization and physicochemical characterization of enhanced microbial cellulose production with a new Kombucha consortium. Process Biochem. 108, 60–68 (2021).
24. Wolf M Hot-water hemicellulose extraction from fruit processing residues ACS Omega 2022 7 13436 13447 10.1021/acsomega.1c06055 35559167
Wolf, M. et al. Hot-water hemicellulose extraction from fruit processing residues. ACS Omega 7, 13436–13447 (2022).35559167
25. Chanliaud E De Silva J Strongitharm B Jeronimidis G Gidley MJ Mechanical effects of plant cell wall enzymes on cellulose/xyloglucan composites Plant J. 2004 38 27 37 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02018.x 15053757
Chanliaud, E., De Silva, J., Strongitharm, B., Jeronimidis, G. & Gidley, M. J. Mechanical effects of plant cell wall enzymes on cellulose/xyloglucan composites. Plant J. 38, 27–37 (2004).15053757
26. Zhang S Hu H Wang L Liu F Pan S Preparation and prebiotic potential of pectin oligosaccharides obtained from citrus peel pectin Food Chem. 2018 244 232 237 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.10.071 29120775
Zhang, S., Hu, H., Wang, L., Liu, F. & Pan, S. Preparation and prebiotic potential of pectin oligosaccharides obtained from citrus peel pectin. Food Chem. 244, 232–237 (2018).29120775
27. Nečas D Klapetek P Gwyddion: An open-source software for SPM data analysis Cent. Eur. J. Phys. 2012 10 181 188
Nečas, D. & Klapetek, P. Gwyddion: An open-source software for SPM data analysis. Cent. Eur. J. Phys. 10, 181–188 (2012).
28. Pieczywek, P. M. TDA. https://github.com/ppieczywek/TDA (2022).
29. Fang L Catchmark JM Characterization of cellulose and other exopolysaccharides produced from Gluconacetobacter strains Carbohydr. Polym. 2015 115 663 669 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.09.028 25439946
Fang, L. & Catchmark, J. M. Characterization of cellulose and other exopolysaccharides produced from Gluconacetobacter strains. Carbohydr. Polym. 115, 663–669 (2015).25439946
30. Cavka A Production of bacterial cellulose and enzyme from waste fiber sludge Biotechnol. Biofuels 2013 6 1 10 10.1186/1754-6834-6-25 23298573
Cavka, A. et al. Production of bacterial cellulose and enzyme from waste fiber sludge. Biotechnol. Biofuels 6, 1–10 (2013).23298573
31. Gu J Catchmark JM Impact of hemicelluloses and pectin on sphere-like bacterial cellulose assembly Carbohydr. Polym. 2012 88 547 557 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.12.040
Gu, J. & Catchmark, J. M. Impact of hemicelluloses and pectin on sphere-like bacterial cellulose assembly. Carbohydr. Polym. 88, 547–557 (2012).
32. Hu Y Catchmark M Vogler EA Factors impacting the formation of sphere-like bacterial cellulose particles and their biocompatibility for human osteoblast growth Biomacromolecules 2013 14 3444 3452 10.1021/bm400744a 24010638
Hu, Y., Catchmark, M. & Vogler, E. A. Factors impacting the formation of sphere-like bacterial cellulose particles and their biocompatibility for human osteoblast growth. Biomacromolecules 14, 3444–3452 (2013).24010638
33. Kong Y York WS A Galacturonic acid—Containing Xyloglucan is involved in arabidopsis root hair tip growth Plant Cell 2012 24 4511 4524 10.1105/tpc.112.103390 23175743
Kong, Y. & York, W. S. A Galacturonic acid—Containing Xyloglucan is involved in arabidopsis root hair tip growth. Plant Cell 24, 4511–4524 (2012).23175743
34. Kaur A Isolation and characterization of arabinoxylans from wheat bran and study of their contribution to wheat flour dough rheology Carbohydr. Polym. 2019 221 166 173 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.06.002 31227155
Kaur, A. et al. Isolation and characterization of arabinoxylans from wheat bran and study of their contribution to wheat flour dough rheology. Carbohydr. Polym. 221, 166–173 (2019).31227155
35. Ray B Structural investigation of hemicellulosic polysaccharides from Argania spinosa: Characterisation of a novel xyloglucan motif Carbohydr. Res. 2004 339 201 208 10.1016/j.carres.2003.10.011 14698877
Ray, B. et al. Structural investigation of hemicellulosic polysaccharides from Argania spinosa: Characterisation of a novel xyloglucan motif. Carbohydr. Res. 339, 201–208 (2004).14698877
36. Qaisrani TB Qaisrani MM Qaisrani TM Arabinoxylans from psyllium husk: A review J. Environ. Agric. Sci. 2016 6 33 39
Qaisrani, T. B., Qaisrani, M. M. & Qaisrani, T. M. Arabinoxylans from psyllium husk: A review. J. Environ. Agric. Sci. 6, 33–39 (2016).
37. Huang Y Relationships between hemicellulose composition and lignin structure in woods J. Wood Chem. Technol. 2016 36 9 15 10.1080/02773813.2015.1039543
Huang, Y. et al. Relationships between hemicellulose composition and lignin structure in woods. J. Wood Chem. Technol. 36, 9–15 (2016).
38. Martinez-Sanz M Gidley MJ Gilbert EP Hierarchical architecture of bacterial cellulose and composite plant cell wall polysaccharide hydrogels using small angle neutron scattering Soft Matter 2016 12 1534 1549 10.1039/C5SM02085A 26658920
Martinez-Sanz, M., Gidley, M. J. & Gilbert, E. P. Hierarchical architecture of bacterial cellulose and composite plant cell wall polysaccharide hydrogels using small angle neutron scattering. Soft Matter 12, 1534–1549 (2016).26658920
39. Mikkonen KS Arabinoxylan structure affects the reinforcement of films by microfibrillated cellulose Cellulose 2012 19 467 480 10.1007/s10570-012-9655-y
Mikkonen, K. S. et al. Arabinoxylan structure affects the reinforcement of films by microfibrillated cellulose. Cellulose 19, 467–480 (2012).
40. Grantham NJ An even pattern of Xylan substitution is critical for interaction with cellulose in plant cell walls Nat. Plants 2017 3 859 865 10.1038/s41477-017-0030-8 28993612
Grantham, N. J. et al. An even pattern of Xylan substitution is critical for interaction with cellulose in plant cell walls. Nat. Plants 3, 859–865 (2017).28993612
41. Martinez-Sanz M Lopez-Sanchez P Gidley MJ Gilbert EP Evidence for differential interaction mechanism of plant cell wall matrix polysaccharides in hierarchically-structured bacterial cellulose Cellulose 2015 22 1541 1563 10.1007/s10570-015-0614-2
Martinez-Sanz, M., Lopez-Sanchez, P., Gidley, M. J. & Gilbert, E. P. Evidence for differential interaction mechanism of plant cell wall matrix polysaccharides in hierarchically-structured bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 22, 1541–1563 (2015).
42. Szymańska-Chargot M A study of the properties fo hemicelluloses adsorbed onto microfibrillar cellulose isolated from apple parenchyma Food Chem. 2024 1 137116 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137116
Szymańska-Chargot, M. et al. A study of the properties fo hemicelluloses adsorbed onto microfibrillar cellulose isolated from apple parenchyma. Food Chem. 1, 137116 (2024).
43. Kulasinski K Guyer R Derome D Carmeliet J Water adsorption in wood microfibril-hemicellulose system: Role of the crystalline-amorphous interface Biomacromolecules 2015 16 2972 2978 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00878 26313656
Kulasinski, K., Guyer, R., Derome, D. & Carmeliet, J. Water adsorption in wood microfibril-hemicellulose system: Role of the crystalline-amorphous interface. Biomacromolecules 16, 2972–2978 (2015).26313656
44. Berglund J Acetylation and sugar composition influence the (In)solubility of plant β-Mannans and their interaction with cellulose surfaces ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020 8 10027 10040 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c01716
Berglund, J. et al. Acetylation and sugar composition influence the (In)solubility of plant β-Mannans and their interaction with cellulose surfaces. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 8, 10027–10040 (2020).
45. Kishani S Vilaplana F Ruda M Hansson P Wågberg L Influence of solubility on the adsorption of different xyloglucan fractions at cellulose-water interfaces Biomacromolecules 2020 21 772 782 10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01465 31790572
Kishani, S., Vilaplana, F., Ruda, M., Hansson, P. & Wågberg, L. Influence of solubility on the adsorption of different xyloglucan fractions at cellulose-water interfaces. Biomacromolecules 21, 772–782 (2020).31790572
46. Sundberg J Toriz G Gatenholm P Effect of Xylan content on mechanical properties in regenerated cellulose/xylan blend films from ionic liquid Cellulose 2015 22 1943 1953 10.1007/s10570-015-0606-2
Sundberg, J., Toriz, G. & Gatenholm, P. Effect of Xylan content on mechanical properties in regenerated cellulose/xylan blend films from ionic liquid. Cellulose 22, 1943–1953 (2015).
47. Cosgrove DJ Nanoscale structure, mechanics and growth of epidermal cell walls Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2018 46 77 86 10.1016/j.pbi.2018.07.016 30142487
Cosgrove, D. J. Nanoscale structure, mechanics and growth of epidermal cell walls. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 46, 77–86 (2018).30142487
48. Busse-Wicher M The pattern of xylan acetylation suggests xylan may interact with cellulose microfibrils as a twofold helical screw in the secondary plant cell wall of Arabidopsis thaliana Plant J. 2014 79 492 506 10.1111/tpj.12575 24889696
Busse-Wicher, M. et al. The pattern of xylan acetylation suggests xylan may interact with cellulose microfibrils as a twofold helical screw in the secondary plant cell wall of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 79, 492–506 (2014).24889696
49. Hoije A Stememalm E Heikkinen S Tenkanen M Gatenholm P Material properties of films from enzymatically tailored arabinoxylans Biomacromolecules 2008 9 2042 2047 10.1021/bm800290m 18572963
Hoije, A., Stememalm, E., Heikkinen, S., Tenkanen, M. & Gatenholm, P. Material properties of films from enzymatically tailored arabinoxylans. Biomacromolecules 9, 2042–2047 (2008).18572963
50. Martinez-Sanz M Mikkelsen D Flanagan BM Gidley MJ Gilbert EP Multi-scale characterisation of deuterated cellulose composite hydrogels reveals evidence for different interaction mechanisms with arabinoxylan, mixed-linkage glucan and xyloglucan Polymer (Guildf) 2017 124 1 11 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.07.036
Martinez-Sanz, M., Mikkelsen, D., Flanagan, B. M., Gidley, M. J. & Gilbert, E. P. Multi-scale characterisation of deuterated cellulose composite hydrogels reveals evidence for different interaction mechanisms with arabinoxylan, mixed-linkage glucan and xyloglucan. Polymer (Guildf) 124, 1–11 (2017).
51. Lin D Lopez-Sanchez P Gidley MJ Interactions of arabinogalactans with bacterial cellulose during its synthesis: Structure and physical properties Food Hydrocoll. 2019 96 644 652 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.06.010
Lin, D., Lopez-Sanchez, P. & Gidley, M. J. Interactions of arabinogalactans with bacterial cellulose during its synthesis: Structure and physical properties. Food Hydrocoll. 96, 644–652 (2019).
52. Sternemalm E Höije A Gatenholm P Effect of arabinose substitution on the material properties of Arabinoxylan films Carbohydr. Res. 2008 343 753 757 10.1016/j.carres.2007.11.027 18206863
Sternemalm, E., Höije, A. & Gatenholm, P. Effect of arabinose substitution on the material properties of Arabinoxylan films. Carbohydr. Res. 343, 753–757 (2008).18206863
53. Whitney, S. E. C. The interaction of cellulose with xyloglucan and other glucan-binding polymers (Stirling University, 1996).
54. Berglund J Wood Hemicelluloses - Fundamental Insights on Biological and Technical Properties 2018 KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Berglund, J. Wood Hemicelluloses - Fundamental Insights on Biological and Technical Properties (KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2018).
55. Tokoh C Takabe K Fujita M Saiki H Cellulose synthesized by Acetobacter xylinum in the presence of acetyl glucomannan Cellulose 1998 5 249 261 10.1023/A:1009211927183
Tokoh, C., Takabe, K., Fujita, M. & Saiki, H. Cellulose synthesized by Acetobacter xylinum in the presence of acetyl glucomannan. Cellulose 5, 249–261 (1998).
56. Whitney SEC Brigham JE Darke AH Reid JSG Gidley MJ Structural aspects of the interaction of mannan-based polysaccharides with bacterial cellulose Carbohydr. Res. 1998 307 299 309 10.1016/S0008-6215(98)00004-4
Whitney, S. E. C., Brigham, J. E., Darke, A. H., Reid, J. S. G. & Gidley, M. J. Structural aspects of the interaction of mannan-based polysaccharides with bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr. Res. 307, 299–309 (1998).
57. Hill SJ Franich RA Callaghan PT Newman RH Nature’s nanocomposites: A new look at molecular architecture in wood cell walls New Zeal. J. For. Sci. 2009 39 251 257
Hill, S. J., Franich, R. A., Callaghan, P. T. & Newman, R. H. Nature’s nanocomposites: A new look at molecular architecture in wood cell walls. New Zeal. J. For. Sci. 39, 251–257 (2009).
