
==== Front
Nat Commun
Nat Commun
Nature Communications
2041-1723
Nature Publishing Group UK London

39289342
49830
10.1038/s41467-024-49830-9
Article
Sustainable-use marine protected areas to improve human nutrition
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6000-2011
Viana Daniel F. dviana@hsph.harvard.edu

12
Gill David 3
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6008-4918
Zvoleff Alex 4
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2090-1423
Krueck Nils C. 5
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4705-0166
Zamborain-Mason Jessica 16
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2557-8920
Free Christopher M. 78
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4345-8957
Shepon Alon 9
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7572-9275
Grieco Dana 3
Schmidhuber Josef 10
Mascia Michael B. 411
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2258-7493
Golden Christopher D. 1612
1 grid.38142.3c 000000041936754X Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115 USA
2 https://ror.org/011590k05 grid.439064.c 0000 0004 0639 3060 Ocean Conservation, World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC 20037 USA
3 https://ror.org/00py81415 grid.26009.3d 0000 0004 1936 7961 Duke University Marine Laboratory, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Beaufort, NC 28516 USA
4 https://ror.org/024weye46 grid.421477.3 0000 0004 0639 1575 Moore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA USA
5 grid.1009.8 0000 0004 1936 826X Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001 Australia
6 grid.38142.3c 000000041936754X Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115 USA
7 grid.133342.4 0000 0004 1936 9676 Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA USA
8 grid.133342.4 0000 0004 1936 9676 Marine Sciences Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA USA
9 https://ror.org/04mhzgx49 grid.12136.37 0000 0004 1937 0546 Department of Environmental Studies, The Porter School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
10 Pure Harvest Smart Farms, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
11 https://ror.org/00py81415 grid.26009.3d 0000 0004 1936 7961 Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC USA
12 grid.38142.3c 000000041936754X Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115 USA
17 9 2024
17 9 2024
2024
15 77161 6 2023
20 6 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Coral reef fisheries are a vital source of nutrients for thousands of nutritionally vulnerable coastal communities around the world. Marine protected areas are regions of the ocean designed to preserve or rehabilitate marine ecosystems and thereby increase reef fish biomass. Here, we evaluate the potential effects of expanding a subset of marine protected areas that allow some level of fishing within their borders (sustainable-use MPAs) to improve the nutrition of coastal communities. We estimate that, depending on site characteristics, expanding sustainable-use MPAs could increase catch by up to 20%, which could help prevent 0.3-2.85 million cases of inadequate micronutrient intake in coral reef nations. Our study highlights the potential add-on nutritional benefits of expanding sustainable-use MPAs in coral reef regions and pinpoints locations with the greatest potential to reduce inadequate micronutrient intake level. These findings provide critical knowledge given international momentum to cover 30% of the ocean with MPAs by 2030 and eradicate malnutrition in all its forms.

Viana and colleagues evaluate the potential effects of expanding a subset of marine protected areas that allow some level of fishing within their borders (sustainable-use MPAs) to improve the nutrition of coastal communities. They estimate that, depending on site characteristics, expanding sustainable-use MPAs could increase catch by up to 20%, which could help prevent 0.3-2.85 million cases of inadequate micronutrient intake in coral reef nations.

Subject terms

Ocean sciences
Risk factors
issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Over 2 billion people are unable to access safe, nutritious, and sufficient supplies of food, which threatens human health globally1. Millions of coastal residents in tropical developing countries rely on fisheries resources as a vital source of minerals, vitamins, and fatty acids2,3, and are particularly vulnerable to nutritional deficiencies4–6. For many of these coastal populations, coral reef systems are a critical source of nutrients and livelihoods7. Yet, coral reefs around the world are being severely degraded by pollution, overfishing, and climate change, imperiling marine biodiversity and human health8. Policies governing coral reefs that attempt to address these threats not only shape the future of these ecosystems but also the health of people who depend upon them.

Marine protected areas (MPAs) are increasingly used to protect coral reef ecosystems and recover associated fisheries from depletion globally9. MPAs are areas of the ocean with specific rules and restrictions primarily designed to protect marine ecosystems from anthropogenic threats10,11. MPAs can be broadly categorized into no-take areas where all fishing is strictly prohibited and partially protected or sustainable-use areas where some forms of fishing are permitted. Sustainable-use MPAs use various fisheries management tools to support fisheries sustainability and may be zoned for multiple uses (e.g., tourism, aquaculture, conservation). Both MPA types generally have significant positive effects on the biomass of targeted fish within their boundaries compared to neighboring non-MPA areas12. Currently, there are about seventeen thousand MPAs worldwide, covering about 8.2% of the ocean13. Despite failing to reach the globally agreed target of 10% MPA coverage by 202014, there is a new global commitment to cover 30% of our oceans with MPAs and other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs) by 203014–16.

The integration of sustainable-use MPAs into the food and nutrition agendas of coral reef countries is often overlooked17. While good fisheries management holds the potential to enhance human nutrition6, its success is contingent upon the availability of high-quality data and robust management capacities. Sustainable-use MPAs emerge as a realistic and cost-effective intervention in various settings, offering a balance between conservation goals and sustainable resource utilization18. Moreover, these conservation measures play a crucial role in safeguarding the rights of local communities, protecting them from exploitation by non-local entities19. This not only underscores the significance of MPAs as a pivotal tool in sustainable resource management but also highlights their potential multifaceted impacts on both ecological conservation and human nutrition.

Here, we quantified the potential add-on human nutritional benefits that can arise from sustainable-use MPA implementation through increases in local reef fish catch and consumption. We started by compiling information on coral reef fish populations and social and environmental conditions from 2421 reef sites (1117 no-take MPA, 804 sustainable-use MPA, 500 non-MPA) in 53 countries to estimate the effect of these areas on standing reef fish biomass. We then used a Bayesian hierarchical model to estimate the expected standing reef fish biomass under non-MPA and sustainable-use MPAs conditions, accounting for other social (e.g., human population, market distance, fisheries governance, human development index) and environmental (e.g., productivity, depth, temperature, wave exposure) variables (see Supplementary Material for details). We then used the model to estimate: (1) the expected biomass and catch for all existing sustainable-use MPAs; (2) the potential biomass and catch associated with an expansion of sustainable-use MPAs to all non-MPA reefs; (3) the change in nutrient supply due to changes in coral reef fish catch; and (4) the potential changes in nutritional inadequacies associated with sustainable-use MPA expansion (see Supplementary Fig. M1 for details). We focused our analyses on zinc, iron, calcium, omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) (hereafter referred as DHA + EPA), and vitamins A and B12, which are abundant in aquatic species and critical for human health6.

Results

Conservation benefits of sustainable-use MPAs

We estimated the potential net conservation benefits of sustainable-use MPA establishment by examining the effect of sustainable-use MPAs on reef fish biomass (Fig. 1). Biomass estimates are based on underwater surveys from around the world, with most observations from Australia, the Caribbean and Southwest Pacific (Fig. 1A, B). Globally, we found that sustainable-use MPAs have on average 15% more biomass than non-MPA sites, although differences were highly dependent on the effectiveness of fisheries management in surrounding waters (Fig. 1C). Estimated differences in biomass were calculated based on the effect size of sustainable-use MPAs on reef fish biomass. Locations with high fisheries management effectiveness (FME; Fig. 1C) had a lower difference in biomass between non-MPA and sustainable-use MPA biomass relative to locations with low management effectiveness, likely because non-MPA sites in high FME locations are already well-managed and therefore less depleted.Fig. 1 Observed biomass and estimated effect size of sustainable-use marine protected areas.

Maps show A observed biomass in sustainable-use MPA sites (n = 804), and B observed biomass in non-MPA sites (n = 1117). C highlights distribution of percent differences in biomass of sustainable-use MPAs compared to non-MPA sites for locations with high (>0.5) and low (≤0.5) estimated fisheries management effectiveness (FME). Differences in biomass are the estimated effect size of sustainable-use MPAs relative to non-MPA sites.

Nutritional benefits from existing sustainable-use MPAs

We estimated the current biomass and associated catch increases from existing sustainable-use MPAs by comparing their estimated catch to the expected catch at those sites if they were not sustainable-use MPAs. Using a Schaefer model to simulate population dynamics20, this analysis was completed in three steps (see Supplementary Material for details). First, we used our hierarchical Bayesian model, which accounted for varying social and environmental contexts, to estimate the biomass of the site if it were not a sustainable-use MPA. Second, we derived the status of each site, defined as the ratio of current biomass (observed in the sustainable-use scenario and predicted in the non-MPA scenario) to the carrying capacity (see Supplementary Material for details). Finally, we derived the long-term catch under equilibrium assuming a community-wide level of productivity (i.e., a multispecies intrinsic growth rate of 0.23)21. We estimated that existing sustainable-use MPAs provide an average of 12% more catch than they would if they were not MPAs.

Expanding seafood production and consumption is an impactful pathway for addressing nutrient inadequacy6. Many existing sustainable-use MPAs are in areas with large coastal populations at high risk of inadequate nutrient intake6, such as Indonesia, the Philippines, and Haiti, where expected improvements in catch are the highest (Fig. 2). Inadequate intake values range from 0% to 100% and should be considered as the human populations’ risk of nutritional inadequacies, with higher values representing larger populations at risk of inadequate micronutrient intake22.Fig. 2 Estimated catch and nutritional benefits from existing sustainable-use MPAs.

Estimated catch effects in existing sustainable-use MPAs relative to expected catch under non-MPA conditions, plotted on a log-scale for country populations within 10 km of sustainable-use MPAs. Error lines represent the variability across reef polygons within each country. Inadequate nutrient intake is the average prevalence across key nutrients found in aquatic species in 2017 (iron, EPA + DHA, calcium, zinc, and vitamins A and B12). Points in gray represent countries with no data on the prevalence of nutrient intake. Three-letter abbreviations represent selected alpha-3 ISO country codes.

Expanding sustainable-use MPAs to improve human nutrition

Overlaying MPA boundary data from MPAtlas13 with spatial data on reef area23, we found that 37% of all coral reefs in the world are within sustainable-use MPAs, 11% are within no-take MPAs, and 51% are non-MPA reefs (Supplementary Fig. S1). We predicted the potential human nutritional benefits of expanding sustainable-use MPAs to all non-MPA reefs (~70,000 km2, Fig. 3A), by (i) calculating the potential increase in biomass and thus catch from sustainable-use MPA expansion, (ii) estimating the total number of people that could be nutritionally supported by existing and future sustainable-use MPAs, and (iii) calculating the potential change in the risk of prevalence of inadequate nutrient intake with sustainable-use MPA expansion (see Supplementary Fig. M1 in supplementary methods for details). We defined nutritional support from sustainable-use MPAs as the provision of at least 5% of aquatic animal source food intake from coral reef catch (see Supplementary Fig. S8 for sensitivity analysis). We then summed the population near reefs (10 km) above a range of threshold (5–30%) to estimate the total number of people supported by sustainable-use MPAs. We found that sustainable-use MPAs could support the nutritional needs of 2.8–30 million people by substantially contributing to overall aquatic animal source food intake.Fig. 3 Potential nutritional impacts of expanding sustainable-use MPAs into unprotected reefs.

Maps show (A) non-MPA reef area within each country based on the overlap between MPAs (sustainable-use and no-take) and reef areas; B predicted change in catch in a hypothetical sustainable-use MPA expansion into non-MPA reefs; C total number of people within 10 km of non-MPA reefs; D predicted change in per capita consumption of seafood for the population around non-MPA reefs; E prevalence of present inadequate intake across countries; and F predicted average change in inadequate intake for coral reef coastal populations across all assessed nutrients (iron, EPA + DHA, calcium, zinc, and vitamins A and B12). Countries smaller than 25,000 km2 are illustrated as points.

Next, we calculated how changes in catch due to sustainable-use MPA expansion could affect nutrient supply (Fig. 3B). We calculated changes in catch by comparing predicted biomass and catch from non-MPA reefs if they were in sustainable-use MPAs versus non-MPA and estimated overall nutrient supply from the potential catch. Differences in nutrient supply attributed to predicted changes in catch were then added to the overall diets of populations living within a 10 km buffer around reefs (see Supplement Material for sensitivity analysis) to predict the potential changes in inadequate nutrient intake risk from sustainable-use MPA expansion. We found that expanding sustainable-use MPAs to non-MPA locations could increase catch in many nutritionally vulnerable countries (i.e., populations with inadequate intakes higher than 25% across all selected nutrients), with potential positive impacts on human nutrition and health. On average, catch could increase by 12% when considering all countries or 15% (from 2–20%) if we only consider nutritionally vulnerable countries.

Overall, four major factors drive the extent of potential nutritional impacts of sustainable-use MPA expansion in our study: (i) non-MPA reef area (Fig. 3A), (ii) population size near non-MPA coral reefs (Fig. 3C), (iii) the prevalence of inadequate intake within coastal communities (Fig. 3E), and (iv) the efficacy of local fisheries management. First, the larger the area of a non-MPA reef (Fig. 3A), the larger the potential for sustainable-use MPA expansion to provide nutritional benefits. Second, the size of the local population around reefs (Fig. 3C) determines the per capita consumption estimate for reef-caught seafood (Fig. 3D). While larger local populations will lead to lower per capita impacts, with potentially higher numbers of people impacted, smaller populations can have higher per capita impacts. Third, increasing catches in coastal communities with high levels of inadequate intake (Fig. 4E) has the greatest potential to decrease nutritional risks for nutrients that are abundant in reef fish. On the other hand, increasing catch in communities that already have adequate nutrient intake will have minimal impact on nutritional health. Lastly, the data supported the addition of an interaction between sustainable-use MPA and the national efficacy of fisheries management in the model (Supplementary Fig. S2), suggesting that, as expected, changes in catch following sustainable-use MPA establishment will depend on the strength of local fisheries management in surrounding areas24. This reflects the fact that locations with high fisheries management efficacy, which may have high biomass outside of sustainable-use MPAs, have little or no potential for sustainable-use MPAs to provide net biomass increases. Because of uncertainty around these four factors, the absolute number of people impacted by sustainable-use MPA expansion is also uncertain (See Supplementary Fig. S8 for sensitivity analysis). Yet, our results provide strong support for the hypothesis that MPAs can benefit human nutrition, and the general geographical patterns appear robust. Countries such as Madagascar, Mozambique, Kiribati, Yemen, and the Solomon Islands have the highest potential reductions of inadequate nutrient intake. Other countries, including Seychelles and Sudan, have similarly high potential changes in per capita seafood availability but cannot be modeled in terms of inadequate intake because of a lack of catch or baseline nutrient supply data.Fig. 4 Potential nutritional benefits from sustainable-use MPA expansion.

Total reduction (in number of people) in the risk of inadequate intake of key nutrients from coral reef sources for coastal human populations attributed to the expansion of sustainable-use MPAs relative to non-MPA conditions. A Total reduction in inadequate intake risk by country type, across regions and across nutrients. Nutritionally vulnerable include countries with inadequate intakes higher than 25% across all selected nutrients. The range of values represents uncertainty around estimates based on Monte Carlo simulation and points represent median values from simulations. B Country-level impacts for each assessed nutrient. Countries smaller than 25,000 km2 are illustrated as points.

Globally, the expansion of sustainable-use MPAs could lead to reductions in inadequate intake across all assessed nutrients for 0.3–2.85 million individuals (reduction of 0.2–1.5 million for vitamin B12, 0.1–0.7 million for calcium, 0.05–0.5 million for omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (specifically DHA + EPA), 0.07-0.4 million for iron, 0.06–0.2 million for vitamin A, and 0.02–0.15 million for zinc inadequate intakes) (Fig. 4A). Such reduction in inadequate intake represents about 1–7% of the combined total nutritional benefit that reforms in all marine wild capture fisheries could be expected to support6. Regions such as South and Southeast Asia, Pacific, Latin America and Caribbean (see Supplementary Table 2 for a complete list of countries) have the highest potential for nutritional improvement following implementation of effective sustainable-use MPAs (Fig. 4A). For other regions such as Sub-Saharan Africa, sustainable-use MPAs can also have important effects at a local level, but on aggregate at national scales, total impact is relatively low due to reduced total reef area and lower numbers of people living around reefs.

Nutritional targeting of vulnerable populations

Because each country has different specific nutrient inadequacies, sustainable MPAs can be strategically placed in areas with the highest potential to reduce specific nutritional inadequacies (Fig. 4B). For example, creating targeted sustainable-use MPAs in Yemen and Kenya has the potential to reduce inadequate intake risks of omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (DHA + EPA). Increased intake of DHA + EPA can promote brain and eye health and is associated with reduced risk of heart disease25. India and Bangladesh could particularly benefit from increased supply of vitamin B12, where inadequacy is more than twice the global average6. Vitamin B12 deficiency is associated with increased risk of heart disease and cognitive decline26. Mozambique and Cambodia could benefit from increased supply of iron, which is particularly important for healthy brain development and growth in children27, and can prevent maternal mortality25. Sustainable-use MPAs in Nicaragua and Madagascar have the potential to reduce inadequate intake of zinc, which supports immunity and is particularly important for children and pregnant women28. Kuwait and Indonesia could benefit mostly from increased supply of calcium, which supports bone health and blood pressure29. Lastly, Oman and Kiribati could benefit from increased vitamin A supply, which supports eye health and cell growth30.

Discussion

Our analysis suggests that effective sustainable-use MPAs have the potential to increase biomass and support human nutritional security through increased sustainable catches from coral reef ecosystems. These benefits are on top of the documented MPA impacts on livelihoods11,31 and marine biodiversity12,32 (in essence, co-benefits). We predict that expansion of sustainable-use MPA to non-MPA coral reefs can have important nutritional benefits by both sustaining the currently adequate nutrition of coastal populations and decreasing the prevalence of inadequate intake of vital nutrients of vulnerable people. For coastal communities that rely on coral reef resources for key nutrient intake, increasing sustainable supply of nutritious food can have positive impacts on their health and well-being.

Many factors determine the magnitude of impacts on a local scale. These factors are related to the availability, access, and utilization of reef fish caught from sustainable-use MPAs. For example, our analysis suggests that availability will be influenced by local factors such as the productivity of the local reef system, the number of seafood consumers (which impacts per capita consumption), the prevalence of inadequate intake, and the efficacy of local fisheries management. However, for additional catch through sustainable-use MPA expansion to have an impact on nutritional health, it is important that those in need of nutrients have access to increased catch from sustainable-use MPAs. In cases where communities already have high consumption of fish33, sustainable-use MPAs can be key to maintain availability and access to nutrients from coral reefs. With seafood being one of the most widely traded food commodities in the world34,35, it is important to ensure that sustainable-use MPA catch is affordable and accessible for domestic consumption36. In addition, cultural and dietary preferences and fish utilization practices can also influence nutritional impacts. Factors such as sanitary conditions of the fish caught and sold, and seafood loss and waste can also fundamentally influence shelf life, nutritional quality, and availability of reef fish37.

Our model predictions are based on the current performance of sustainable-use MPAs. To restrict catch, these areas use an array of fisheries management tools, including gear restrictions, access rights, size limits, temporal closures, bag limits, and more9. Some sustainable-use MPAs may be zoned for multiple uses, potentially containing small no-take areas, which may benefit fished areas through spillover38. Because our results depend on the actual performance of sustainable-use MPAs, if management of these areas improves (through more investment, management capacity, planning, community participation, etc.), potential biomass increases and consequential nutritional gains could be even greater. Understanding how close sustainable-use MPAs are to their maximum sustainable yield can provide a better estimate of their true potential to provide nutritional benefits. In some cases, reef stocks could be managed to maximize specific nutritional yields, tailored to the needs of local human populations39. However, for fish stocks experiencing high fishing pressure and depletion below the biomass supporting maximum sustainable yields, recovery will likely require a short-term decrease in catch to obtain long-term gains40,41. Therefore, it is important to consider the impacts of potential short-term economic and nutritional costs to achieve predicted long-term nutritional benefits. Given that fish recovery may require restricting catch for an extended period, policy makers should seek to mitigate impacts of regulations on nutritional security in highly dependent populations.

We consider sustainable-use MPAs as all protected areas where some form of fishing is permitted10. In addition to state-managed areas, this definition encompasses many types of area-based management strategies co-managed with or solely managed by local communities. Different from top-down fisheries management strategies, these and some other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs) can empower local stakeholders and incentivize sustainable resource management, while considering local characteristics of the fishery and cultural traditions of coastal communities42. Several studies have shown that when communities are empowered and have secure rights to a fishery, there is greater incentive for successful fisheries management yielding nutritional benefits43–45. However, more research is needed to evaluate how different types of sustainable-use MPAs and restrictions affect biomass, catch, and human nutrition. Various other management measures (e.g., individual quotas) that are implemented outside of sustainable-use MPAs could also be effective at improving nutrient supply. Our analysis suggests that fisheries management effectiveness at a national level has a strong effect on reef fish biomass and can be important to providing broad nutritional benefits to coastal populations.

Nutritional benefits of sustainable-use MPAs should be viewed as an add-on benefit that supplements the marine conservation goals of MPAs. Compared to other measures to address malnutrition, sustainable-use MPAs can be costly and take a long time to provide desired benefits. Other measures such as nutritional supplements and agriculture development can be faster and more cost-effective to address malnutrition46. However, sustainable-use MPAs represent a synergistic policy that can meet multiple objectives: conservation, food security, ecosystem resilience, property rights allocation, conflict alleviation, etc., while other targeted policies are usually for single purposes. In addition, sustainable-use MPAs can act as a safety net during food supply shocks, providing a reliable nutrient source easily accessible by local communities. Moreover, sustainable-use MPAs can be important to mitigate future nutritional loss due to anthropogenic actions such as overfishing and climate change8.

Climate change impacts on reef ecosystems create an uncertain future for millions of people who depend on reef fisheries for nutrition and livelihood8. Without actions (such as sustainable-use MPAs) to ensure sustainability of catch into the future, there could be significant losses of nutritional benefits in the coming years, with important implications for public health. Therefore, it is not only the prevention of inadequate intake and the supporting benefits of sustainable-use MPAs that can be important, but also the buffering against the risk of future loss in climate-vulnerable systems. Without conservation action in the present, the risk of future negative nutritional impacts is inevitable in the long term8.

Expansion of sustainable-use MPAs depends on strong local, national, and global commitments and investments. Today, only a small fraction of resources from governments, regional development banks, and multilateral funding agencies are directed to strengthening governance of small-scale fisheries47. The lack of adequate capacity to manage sustainable-use MPAs has led to the creation of many paper parks, which are designated areas that are not effectively implemented10,12,48, thus having limited potential to provide environmental, economic, and nutritional benefits. Our results suggest that populations who depend on reef systems for nutrition would benefit from directed resources to sustainable marine resource management and to ensuring that harvested seafood is safe to eat and accessible to those in need.

Methods

Reef fish underwater surveys

We compiled information of coral reef transects from the Reef Life Survey (RLS)49 and Atlantic and Gulf Rapid Reef Assessment (AGRRA) databases50. Both databases are based on underwater fish counts by size class within a belt transect conducted from 1997 to 2020. We then calculated individual biomass by using length-weight relationships published for all species on Fishbase51 and then multiplying individual biomass by the total number of fish within each size class. The final compiled database contained 16,365 surveys from 2421 tropical coral reef sites (i.e., within 23.5 latitude degrees) distributed across 53 countries. Where data from multiple years were available for a single site, we included only the most recent year. To estimate the “fishable biomass” we retained only fish larger than 10 cm52. Because underwater fish counts do not accurately capture biomass of large schools of pelagic fish (e.g., Scombrids, Sphyraenids) or large transient fish (including shark and ray species), we removed them from the analysis52,53. Depending on the site, pelagic and large transient fish can be important for biomass, catch, and nutrition. Based on the fish captured in the underwater surveys, pelagic and transient fish represented a median of 15% of the total biomass across all sample sites. In addition, because of data constraints, we only considered reef fish catch as a nutrient source, however, invertebrate species and aquatic plants can also be an important source of nutrients in many low-income countries. Finally, underwater visual surveys can be affected by the behavior of different fish species and size of larger fish tend to be underestimated53. Therefore, results presented here are likely an underestimate of the total nutritional benefits that sustainable-use MPAs can provide to local populations.

Within each database, all survey sites are divided into three basic categories: non-MPA areas, sustainable-use MPAs, and no-take MPAs as defined by the MPAtlas database13. Non-MPA areas are all sites located outside of marine protected areas. Although these sites are subject to regional or national-level policies (whether enforced or not), they are not generally managed through additional area-based regulations. Sustainable-use MPA sites are all sites within an area-based management system that allows fishing within its borders, including areas such as multiple-use MPAs, Locally Managed Marine Areas (LMMAs), or Environmental Protection Areas (EPAs). No-take MPAs, in contrast, describe areas where no forms of fishing are allowed (also known as fully protected, marine refugia, etc.). In total, we had 1117 non-MPA sites, 804 sustainable-use MPA sites, and 500 no-take MPA sites.

Spatial analysis

For each coral reef polygon, we calculated the total reef area that is within a sustainable-use MPA, no-take MPA, and outside MPAs. To do this, we intersected all coral reef polygons23 with MPA polygons from the MPAtlas13. Within the MPAtlas database, each MPA was divided into sustainable-use or no-take MPAs, allowing the calculation of the percentage of reefs falling within each category.

Next, we calculated the population around existing MPAs and non-MPA reefs by intersecting all reef and MPA polygons with the raster of the Gridded Population of the World in 201954. We calculated the population within 5, 10, 20, 25, and 30 kilometer buffers around reefs and MPAs. To avoid double-counting coastal populations, all overlapping MPA polygon buffers were aggregated. We used the sf package55 in R statistical software56 to perform all spatial analysis.

Predicting fish biomass

We used a two-level linear Bayesian model with a normal error structure to predict log reef fish biomass (above 10 cm) in every coral reef around the world based on reef fish biomass observations. For all coral reef polygons, we predicted the biomass of reef fish (excluding pelagic or transient species) per unit area (kg/ha) under two alternative conditions: non-MPA and sustainable-use MPAs, while accounting for each site’s own environmental and social covariates (Supplementary Fig. S2). Site covariates considered in this analysis included chlorophyll concentration, sea surface temperature mean, sea surface temperature range, nitrate concentration, wave exposure, reef area, shore distance, human population, market distance, human development index, government effectiveness, and fisheries management effectiveness (see Table S1 and Supplementary Material for detailed descriptions)52,57. To account for variability in MPA effectiveness across countries (due to differences in management, staff capacity, state of the reef prior to MPA establishment, etc.), we also considered an interaction term between the presence of sustainable-use MPAs and fisheries management effectiveness (FME) across nations24. FME was calculated based on a survey with over 13,000 fisheries experts to assess the effectiveness of fisheries management regimes worldwide in 200824. In addition, we set ecoregions58 as a random effect to account for the spatial structure of the data. Collinearity among covariates was examined based on bivariate correlations and variance inflation factors (all pairwise correlations were above 0.6 and VIF below 1.5), which led to the exclusion of selected environmental variables (pH, salinity, primary productivity, and minimum sea surface temperature) and social variables (land cover and fisher density), none of which were correlated or collinear with our variables of interest (sustainable-use MPAs and fisheries management effectiveness).

We used the brms package59 to construct the model in the R statistical software. Models were run using the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo algorithm for 10,000 iterations and 4 chains. Posterior estimates were informed by the data alone (weakly informed priors). Convergence was monitored by examining posterior chains for stability and checking if the scale reduction factor was close to 1. Next, we tested a null model with intercepts only and a full model that included all covariates. We compared both models through leave-one-out cross-validation information criteria (LOOIC), ensuring that our full model performed better than the null model (elpd_diff = −95.7). In addition, we used LOOIC to test if the model with interaction performed better than the model without the interaction term between MPA and fisheries management effectiveness (elpd_diff = −0.3). To examine model fit and homoscedasticity, we checked residuals against fitted values and conducted posterior predictive checks (Supplementary Fig. S3). In addition, we evaluated the goodness-of-fit of the model using leave-one-out cross-validation (loo_r2 = 0.41). When predicting biomass in reef polygons, we assumed a model with a random intercept since not all ecoregions with reef polygons are represented in our data.

Biomass predictions per unit area (kg/ha) were then multiplied by the area in each reef polygon to estimate the total reef fish biomass on each reef. Implicitly, we thereby assumed equal biomass density across each reef polygon. Reef polygons range from about 100 m2 to 9.8 thousand km2, with a median of 6.3 km2. We acknowledge that biomass estimates are affected by (i) our reliance on biomass and social and environmental conditions for reefs within our dataset, which may or may not be representative of all reef systems, (ii) potential spatial and temporal imprecision, (iii) other factors not accounted in the model that could also drive biomass, and (iv) social and environmental conditions that can vary over smaller scales than reef polygons considered here.

Predicting potential changes in catch due to MPA establishment and operation

The potential change in catch from sustainable-use MPAs was estimated by comparing predicted biomass under non-MPA and MPA conditions. To estimate catch from biomass, we used a simple surplus production model20. This model assumes that the harvest rate that produces maximum sustainable yield (FMMSY) is half of the intrinsic population growth rate (r) of the species assemblage. Therefore, assemblages that grow and reproduce faster can sustain higher levels of harvest than slow growing assemblages. A single population-level intrinsic growth rate was assumed for the multispecies assemblage21 (r = 0.23). Catch resulting from this harvest rate will also depend on the standing biomass in each site such that sites with lower biomass should have relatively higher harvest rates than sites with higher biomass (see Supplementary Material for detailed descriptions). As a proxy for BMMSY we used the 90th biomass quantile of predicted biomass for sustainable-use MPA (544 kg/ha), assuming that these sites are fishing at MMSY or multispecies maximum sustainable yield and within limits of globally proposed BMMSY21,60 (see Supplementary Fig. S4 for a sensitivity analysis). The sensitivity of results to harvest rate assumptions are shown in Supplementary Fig. S5 (growth rates varying from 0.1 to 0.6). Regional patterns and percent changes in catch are not affected by assumptions of harvest rate. However, total absolute numbers of people affected by MPA expansion are sensitive to harvest rate assumptions, with higher harvest rates resulting in more people being benefited. Because the harvest rate is dependent on the population-level intrinsic growth rate, and this can vary significantly according to local conditions, populations with greater abundance of fast-growing species can sustain higher levels of catch and provide greater nutritional benefits.

Assigning nutritional content to reef fish catch

To assign specific species to the predicted change in reef fish catch, we used the Sea Around Us database61, allocating total catch estimates to species proportions based on the proportion of reef species caught in each country in 2014. We used SAU to account for country-level differences in catch and because our surveys did not cover all countries containing coral reef polygons. To obtain this information from SAU, we first separated production from artisanal and subsistence sectors. Next, we identified reef species as occurring in the following functional groups: Medium reef assoc. fish (30–89 cm), Large reef assoc. fish (≥90 cm), and Small reef assoc. fish (<30 cm). In addition, we restricted the data to families that were recorded in the underwater visual surveys.

To assign nutritional content to reef fish species, we used the Aquatic Foods Composition Database (AFCD), a comprehensive database containing 3750 records of nutrient content from global databases and peer-reviewed literature6. We then use a hierarchical approach6 to match species-specific taxonomic information with the AFCD and fill nutrient information for species not present in the database. This hierarchy is based on the following order: (1) scientific name, and then the taxa-specific average of (2) genus, (3) family, (4) order, and (5) class. We then matched the median values of the following nutrients: iron, zinc, DHA + EPA, vitamin A, vitamin B12, and calcium (Supplementary Fig. S6). These nutrients were chosen because of their high concentration in aquatic species, their importance in human nutrition, and their inadequate intake across many countries6. Because of variability in nutrient values depending on cooking methods and part of the fish used, we used only raw values (excluding cooked, fried, etc) and muscle tissue (excluding bones, head, liver, etc). To avoid potential errors in the data, outlier values for all considered nutrients were checked. We then multiplied the predicted catch by the edible portion of each species based on AFCD data and multiplied further by nutritional value to obtain the total nutrient supply for each nutrient.

Calculating per capita nutrient supply and catch from MPA expansion

We calculated the per capita nutrient supply by dividing total nutrient supply by the human population around reefs. Although some valuable reef species are traded in international or regional markets, we assumed for simplicity that all catch from MPA expansion will be consumed by coastal communities within a 10 km buffer around reefs (see Supplementary Fig. S7 for sensitivity analysis). Because of this assumption, results should be interpreted as the potential for sustainable-use MPAs to address malnutrition. However, other policies that improve access of the additional catch to vulnerable coastal populations are needed to ensure nutritional benefits. Therefore, at a local scale, the per capita consumption will depend on accessibility: distance of the reef from the community, the size of boats, trade dynamics, as well as other factors such as affordability and dietary preferences. For example, a 10–20 km radius will capture the travel distance that most fishers take in subsistence/artisanal fisheries62–64. However, acknowledging the high uncertainty around this value, we tested multiple alternative buffer sizes around reefs to estimate per capita nutrient supply (Supplementary Fig. S7). Larger buffers around reefs increased the number of people impacted, and, thus, lowered per capita nutrient supply. Although the magnitude of impacts changed depending on buffer size, regional patterns were not affected by the assumed human population around reefs.

To calculate the number of people supported by sustainable-use MPAs, we first estimated the per capita reef fish catch by dividing the predicted catch in each reef polygon by the population within a buffer around the reef. Next, we estimated the percent contribution of per capita reef catch relative to per capita national average consumption of aquatic animal-sourced foods based on the Global Nutrient Database (GND)65. The GND used the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Supply and Utilization Accounts to obtain estimates of apparent per capita consumption of 22 food groups and nutrient supply for 156 nutrients across 195 countries. We considered coral reefs to provide a meaningful contribution when predicted coral reef catch represented at least 5% of aquatic animal food intake (see Supplementary Fig. S8 for sensitivity analysis). We assumed the value of at least 5% for two reasons. First, coral reef catch from the species considered in this study represent a median of 3.9% of the total seafood produced in coral reef countries (Supplementary Fig. S18). Second, many coral reefs are close to large populations, which drives per capita consumption down even though not everyone is consuming this catch. Given uncertainty around this assumption, we assumed a range of threshold values to calculate the total number of people nutritionally supported by sustainable-use MPAs. We then summed across all reefs that provided a meaningful contribution to calculate the total number of people that could potentially be supported by existing and future sustainable-use MPAs.

Calculating the contribution of MPAs to human nutrition

To calculate potential nutritional effects of MPA expansion, we compared a baseline scenario with a scenario of increased reef fish consumption through an expansion of sustainable-use MPAs. Baseline conditions were calculated using estimates of nutrient consumption in 2017 from the GND. The MPA expansion scenario was calculated by adding the per capita nutrient supply from SUMPA expansion to this baseline level of nutrient intake. Because baseline nutrient consumption is a national-level estimate, coastal communities may have higher reef-fish nutrient intake relative to the national-level average. Therefore, depending on the location, nutritional benefits of sustainable-use MPAs can be underestimated, especially in locations with lower nutrient consumption than the national average.

We then calculated the prevalence of inadequate intake for current conditions and SUMPA expansion scenarios to obtain the difference in inadequate intake across both scenarios. The prevalence of inadequate intake was calculated following three main steps66. First, we disaggregated country-level mean intakes into age-sex mean intakes using the Global Expanded Nutrient Supply (GENuS) database for all nutrients except DHA + EPA and vitamin B12, which are not included in the GENuS database67. Second, using dietary recall data from SPADE (Statistical Program to Assess Habitual Dietary Exposure), we derived habitual dietary intake distributions across age-sex groups and geographies68. We used SPADE outputs to describe the shape (gamma or lognormal distribution) of intake distribution for each age-sex group and to derive age-sex mean intakes for DHA + EPA and vitamin B12. Lastly, we calculated the prevalence of inadequate intake using the summary exposure values, or SEVs6,22. SEVs estimate the population-level risk related to diets by comparing intake distributions with requirements. The latter are continuous risk curves with values of 1 for low intake, 0 for high intakes and 0.5 for intakes at the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR). These absolute risk curves are then constructed as the cumulative normal distribution function of requirements with a mean at the EAR and a coefficient of variation of 10%69. EAR estimates were derived from several sources (FAO, Institute of Medicine), and a coefficient of variation of 25% was used to account for uncertainties regarding recommended intakes. For DHA + EPA, we used the relative risk curves that are associated with ischemic heart disease and have different values for adolescent and adult subpopulations (with no risk for children)22. The estimated prevalence of inadequate intake range from 0% (no risk) to full population-level risk (100%).

Propagating uncertainty

We used Monte Carlo simulation to propagate uncertainty across all steps of the analysis. Monte Carlo simulation consists of drawing random numbers from a set of input parameters with known distribution functions to generate a distribution of the output70. Therefore, we generated 10,000 model iterations using random values for population growth rate, BMSY, coastal population size, and species nutritional value. Values generated followed a normal distribution around the parameter values used in final analysis (see supplementary methods for details on assumed mean and standard deviation values). For each iteration, we calculated the potential number of people nutritionally impacted by expansion of sustainable-use MPAs and thus generated a distribution of results (Supplementary Fig. S9) providing a realistic range of potential impact given uncertainty of parameters.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Reporting Summary

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-024-49830-9.

Acknowledgements

We thank the John and Katie Hansen Family Foundation, Betty and Gordon Moore and the National Science Foundation (HNDS 2121239 to C.D.G.) for financial support. C.M.F. was funded through the Arnhold UC Santa Barbara-Conservation International Climate Solutions Collaborative. We thank Atlantic Gulf Rapid Reef Assessment (AGRRA) contributors and data managers, Healthy Reefs Initiative, I. Williams (NOAA Coral Reef Ecosystem Program), NOAA Coral Reef Conservation Program, G. Edgar and R. Stuart-Smith (Reef Life Surveys), Wildlife Conservation Society.

Author contributions

D.V., C.D.G., M.M., A.Z. and D. Gill conceptualized the research idea, with significant methodological and design input from J.Z.M., A.S., C.M.F., J.S. and N.K. D.V. led paper analysis and visualization, with support from D. Grieco. D.V. drafted the original manuscript, and all co-authors edited and revised the writing.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Michelle Tigchelaar and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Data availability

The aggregated data generated in this study have been deposited GitHub (https://github.com/danielfvi/SustMPAs-Nutrition)71. Reef Life Survey data available online (https://reeflifesurvey.com/). AGRRA data available upon request (https://www.agrra.org/). Aquatic Food Composition Database available through Harvard dataverse72 (https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/KI0NYM). Sea Around Us database is available online (https://www.seaaroundus.org/).

Code availability

All code used in the analysis is available on GitHub (https://github.com/danielfvi/SustMPAs-Nutrition)71.

Competing interests

M.M. and A.Z. are employees of Conservation International, an organization whose mission is to empower societies to care for nature for the well-being of humanity through science, partnerships, and field demonstrations. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. FAO. Food Security and Nutrition in the World. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing (2020).
2. Thilsted SH Sustaining healthy diets: the role of capture fisheries and aquaculture for improving nutrition in the post-2015 era Food Policy 2016 61 126 131 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.02.005
Thilsted, S. H. et al. Sustaining healthy diets: the role of capture fisheries and aquaculture for improving nutrition in the post-2015 era. Food Policy 61, 126–131 (2016).
3. Cabral RB Geronimo RC How important are coral reefs to food security in the Philippines? Diving deeper than national aggregates and averages Mar. Policy 2018 91 136 141 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.02.007
Cabral, R. B. & Geronimo, R. C. How important are coral reefs to food security in the Philippines? Diving deeper than national aggregates and averages. Mar. Policy 91, 136–141 (2018).
4. Foale S Food security and the Coral Triangle Initiative Mar. Policy 2013 38 174 183 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.033
Foale, S. et al. Food security and the Coral Triangle Initiative. Mar. Policy 38, 174–183 (2013).
5. Hughes S A framework to assess national level vulnerability from the perspective of food security: the case of coral reef fisheries Environ. Sci. Policy 2012 23 95 108 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.07.012
Hughes, S. et al. A framework to assess national level vulnerability from the perspective of food security: the case of coral reef fisheries. Environ. Sci. Policy 23, 95–108 (2012).
6. Golden, C. D. et al. Aquatic foods to nourish nations. Nature.10.1038/s41586-021-03917-1 (2021).
7. Mellin C Safeguarding nutrients from coral reefs under climate change Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2022 6 1808 1817 10.1038/s41559-022-01878-w 36192542
Mellin, C. et al. Safeguarding nutrients from coral reefs under climate change. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 1808–1817 (2022).36192542
8. Hughes TP Coral reefs in the Anthropocene Nature 2017 546 82 90 10.1038/nature22901 28569801
Hughes, T. P. et al. Coral reefs in the Anthropocene. Nature 546, 82–90 (2017).28569801
9. Campbell SJ Edgar GJ Stuart-Smith RD Soler G Bates AE Fishing-gear restrictions and biomass gains for coral reef fishes in marine protected areas Conserv. Biol. 2018 32 401 410 10.1111/cobi.12996 28776761
Campbell, S. J., Edgar, G. J., Stuart-Smith, R. D., Soler, G. & Bates, A. E. Fishing-gear restrictions and biomass gains for coral reef fishes in marine protected areas. Conserv. Biol. 32, 401–410 (2018).28776761
10. Grorud-Colvert K The MPA guide: a framework to achieve global goals for the ocean Science 2021 373 eabf0861 10.1126/science.abf0861 34516798
Grorud-Colvert, K. et al. The MPA guide: a framework to achieve global goals for the ocean. Science 373, eabf0861 (2021).34516798
11. Ban NC Well-being outcomes of marine protected areas Nat. Sustain. 2019 2 524 532 10.1038/s41893-019-0306-2
Ban, N. C. et al. Well-being outcomes of marine protected areas. Nat. Sustain. 2, 524–532 (2019).
12. Gill DA Capacity shortfalls hinder the performance of marine protected areas globally Nature 2017 543 665 669 10.1038/nature21708 28329771
Gill, D. A. et al. Capacity shortfalls hinder the performance of marine protected areas globally. Nature 543, 665–669 (2017).28329771
13. MPAtlas. MPAtlas.Org (2020).
14. CBD. First Draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (CBD, 2021).
15. Jones KR Area requirements to safeguard Earth’s marine species One Earth 2020 2 188 196 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.01.010
Jones, K. R. et al. Area requirements to safeguard Earth’s marine species. One Earth 2, 188–196 (2020).
16. O’Leary BC Effective coverage targets for ocean protection Conserv. Lett. 2016 9 398 404 10.1111/conl.12247
O’Leary, B. C. et al. Effective coverage targets for ocean protection. Conserv. Lett. 9, 398–404 (2016).
17. Willett W Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems Lancet 2019 393 447 492 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4 30660336
Willett, W. et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 393, 447–492 (2019).30660336
18. Andradi-Brown DA Diversity in marine protected area regulations: protection approaches for locally appropriate marine management Front. Mar. Sci. 2023 10 1 19 10.3389/fmars.2023.1099579
Andradi-Brown, D. A. et al. Diversity in marine protected area regulations: protection approaches for locally appropriate marine management. Front. Mar. Sci. 10, 1–19 (2023).
19. Mangubhai S Wilson JR Rumetna L Maturbongs Y Purwanto Explicitly incorporating socioeconomic criteria and data into marine protected area zoning Ocean Coast. Manag. 2015 116 523 529 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.08.018
Mangubhai, S., Wilson, J. R., Rumetna, L., Maturbongs, Y. & Purwanto Explicitly incorporating socioeconomic criteria and data into marine protected area zoning. Ocean Coast. Manag. 116, 523–529 (2015).
20. Schaefer, M. B. Some aspects of the dynamics of populations important to the management of the commercial marine fisheries. Bull. Math. Biol. 53, 253–279 (1954).
21. McClanahan TR Graham NAJ Marine reserve recovery rates towards a baseline are slower for reef fish community life histories than biomass Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2015 282 20151938 10.1098/rspb.2015.1938
McClanahan, T. R. & Graham, N. A. J. Marine reserve recovery rates towards a baseline are slower for reef fish community life histories than biomass. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 282, 20151938 (2015).
22. Murray CJL Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 Lancet 2019 393 1958 1972 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30041-8 30954305
Murray, C. J. L. et al. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 393, 1958–1972 (2019).30954305
23. UNEP-WCMC, WorldFish, WRI & TNC. Global distribution of warm-water coral reefs, compiled from multiple sources including the Millennium Coral Reef Mapping Project. 10.34892/t2wk-5t34 (2021).
24. Mora C Management effectiveness of the world’s marine fisheries PLoS Biol. 2009 7 e1000131 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000131 19547743
Mora, C. et al. Management effectiveness of the world’s marine fisheries. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000131 (2009).19547743
25. Rimm EB Seafood long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and cardiovascular disease: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Circulation 2018 138 e35 e47 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000574 29773586
Rimm, E. B. et al. Seafood long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and cardiovascular disease: a science advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation 138, e35–e47 (2018).29773586
26. Balk EM Vitamin B6, B12, and folic acid supplementation and cognitive function Arch. Intern. Med. 2007 167 21 10.1001/archinte.167.1.21 17210874
Balk, E. M. Vitamin B6, B12, and folic acid supplementation and cognitive function. Arch. Intern. Med. 167, 21 (2007).17210874
27. Powers JM Buchanan GR Disorders of iron metabolism: new diagnostic and treatment approaches to iron deficiency Hematol. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 2019 33 393 408 10.1016/j.hoc.2019.01.006
Powers, J. M. & Buchanan, G. R. Disorders of iron metabolism: new diagnostic and treatment approaches to iron deficiency. Hematol. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 33, 393–408 (2019).
28. Black RE Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries Lancet 2013 382 427 451 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60937-X 23746772
Black, R. E. et al. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 382, 427–451 (2013).23746772
29. Tang BM Eslick GD Nowson C Smith C Bensoussan A Use of calcium or calcium in combination with vitamin D supplementation to prevent fractures and bone loss in people aged 50 years and older: a meta-analysis Lancet 2007 370 657 666 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61342-7 17720017
Tang, B. M., Eslick, G. D., Nowson, C., Smith, C. & Bensoussan, A. Use of calcium or calcium in combination with vitamin D supplementation to prevent fractures and bone loss in people aged 50 years and older: a meta-analysis. Lancet 370, 657–666 (2007).17720017
30. Mason J Greiner T Shrimpton R Sanders D Yukich J Vitamin A policies need rethinking Int. J. Epidemiol. 2015 44 283 292 10.1093/ije/dyu194 25306559
Mason, J., Greiner, T., Shrimpton, R., Sanders, D. & Yukich, J. Vitamin A policies need rethinking. Int. J. Epidemiol. 44, 283–292 (2015).25306559
31. Mizrahi M Diedrich A Weeks R Pressey RL A systematic review of the socioeconomic factors that influence how marine protected areas impact on ecosystems and livelihoods Soc. Nat. Resour. 2019 32 4 20 10.1080/08941920.2018.1489568
Mizrahi, M., Diedrich, A., Weeks, R. & Pressey, R. L. A systematic review of the socioeconomic factors that influence how marine protected areas impact on ecosystems and livelihoods. Soc. Nat. Resour. 32, 4–20 (2019).
32. Lester SE Halpern BS Biological responses in marine no-take reserves versus partially protected areas Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2008 367 49 56 10.3354/meps07599
Lester, S. E. & Halpern, B. S. Biological responses in marine no-take reserves versus partially protected areas. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 367, 49–56 (2008).
33. Bennett A Spatial analysis of aquatic food access can inform nutrition-sensitive policy Nat. Food 2022 3 1010 1013 10.1038/s43016-022-00642-4 37118314
Bennett, A. et al. Spatial analysis of aquatic food access can inform nutrition-sensitive policy. Nat. Food 3, 1010–1013 (2022).37118314
34. O’neill, E. D., Crona, B., Ferrer, A. J. G., Pomeroy, R. & Jiddawi, N. S. Who benefits from seafood trade? A comparison of social and market structures in small-scale fisheries. Ecol. Soc. 23, 3 (2018).
35. Nash KL Trade and foreign fishing mediate global marine nutrient supply Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2022 119 e2120817119 10.1073/pnas.2120817119 35605118
Nash, K. L. et al. Trade and foreign fishing mediate global marine nutrient supply. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2120817119 (2022).35605118
36. Robinson JPW Small pelagic fish supply abundant and affordable micronutrients to low- and middle-income countries Nat. Food 2022 3 1075 1084 10.1038/s43016-022-00643-3 37118295
Robinson, J. P. W. et al. Small pelagic fish supply abundant and affordable micronutrients to low- and middle-income countries. Nat. Food 3, 1075–1084 (2022).37118295
37. Odoli CO Post-harvest interventions in small-scale fisheries: a boon or bane to food and nutritional security in Kenya? Food Secur. 2019 11 855 868 10.1007/s12571-019-00950-x
Odoli, C. O. et al. Post-harvest interventions in small-scale fisheries: a boon or bane to food and nutritional security in Kenya? Food Secur. 11, 855–868 (2019).
38. Krueck NC Marine reserve targets to sustain and rebuild unregulated fisheries PLoS Biol. 2017 15 1 20 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000537
Krueck, N. C. et al. Marine reserve targets to sustain and rebuild unregulated fisheries. PLoS Biol. 15, 1–20 (2017).
39. Robinson JPW Managing fisheries for maximum nutrient yield Fish. Fish. 2022 23 800 811 10.1111/faf.12649
Robinson, J. P. W. et al. Managing fisheries for maximum nutrient yield. Fish. Fish. 23, 800–811 (2022).
40. Ovando, D., Dougherty, D. & Wilson, J. R. Market and design solutions to the short-term economic impacts of marine reserves. 1–16. 10.1111/faf.12153 (2016).
41. Brown CJ Abdullah S Mumby PJ Minimizing the short-term impacts of marine reserves on fisheries while meeting long-term goals for recovery Conserv. Lett. 2015 8 180 189 10.1111/conl.12124
Brown, C. J., Abdullah, S. & Mumby, P. J. Minimizing the short-term impacts of marine reserves on fisheries while meeting long-term goals for recovery. Conserv. Lett. 8, 180–189 (2015).
42. McClanahan TR Views of management effectiveness in tropical reef fisheries Fish. Fish. 2021 22 1085 1104 10.1111/faf.12570
McClanahan, T. R. et al. Views of management effectiveness in tropical reef fisheries. Fish. Fish. 22, 1085–1104 (2021).
43. Cinner JE Bright spots among the world’s coral reefs Nature 2016 535 416 419 10.1038/nature18607 27309809
Cinner, J. E. et al. Bright spots among the world’s coral reefs. Nature 535, 416–419 (2016).27309809
44. Barner AK Solutions for recovering and sustaining the bounty of the ocean Oceanoghaphy 2015 28 252 263 10.5670/oceanog.2015.51
Barner, A. K. et al. Solutions for recovering and sustaining the bounty of the ocean. Oceanoghaphy 28, 252–263 (2015).
45. Viana DF Gelcich S Aceves-Bueno E Twohey B Gaines SD Design trade-offs in rights-based management of small-scale fisheries Conserv. Biol. 2019 33 361 368 10.1111/cobi.13208 30132990
Viana, D. F., Gelcich, S., Aceves-Bueno, E., Twohey, B. & Gaines, S. D. Design trade-offs in rights-based management of small-scale fisheries. Conserv. Biol. 33, 361–368 (2019).30132990
46. Bhutta ZA Evidence-based interventions for improvement of maternal and child nutrition: What can be done and at what cost? Lancet 2013 382 452 477 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60996-4 23746776
Bhutta, Z. A. et al. Evidence-based interventions for improvement of maternal and child nutrition: What can be done and at what cost? Lancet 382, 452–477 (2013).23746776
47. Basurto, X., Virdin, J., Smith, H. & Juskus, R. Strengthening governance of small-scale fisheries: an initial assessment of the theory and practice. Oak Foundation (2017).
48. Edgar GJ Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features Nature 2014 506 216 220 10.1038/nature13022 24499817
Edgar, G. J. et al. Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features. Nature 506, 216–220 (2014).24499817
49. Edgar GJ Stuart-Smith RD Systematic global assessment of reef fish communities by the Reef Life Survey program Sci. Data 2014 1 1 8 10.1038/sdata.2014.7
Edgar, G. J. & Stuart-Smith, R. D. Systematic global assessment of reef fish communities by the Reef Life Survey program. Sci. Data 1, 1–8 (2014).
50. AGGRA. Atlantic and Gulf Rapid REef Assessment (AGGRA): an online database of AGGRA coral reef survey data. http://agrra.org (2022).
51. Froese, R. D. & Pauly, D. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org (2022).
52. Cinner JE Meeting fisheries, ecosystem function, and biodiversity goals in a human-dominated world Science 2020 368 307 311 10.1126/science.aax9412 32299952
Cinner, J. E. et al. Meeting fisheries, ecosystem function, and biodiversity goals in a human-dominated world. Science 368, 307–311 (2020).32299952
53. Edgar GJ Barrett NS Morton AJ Biases associated with the use of underwater visual census techniques to quantify the density and size-structure of fish populations J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2004 308 269 290 10.1016/j.jembe.2004.03.004
Edgar, G. J., Barrett, N. S. & Morton, A. J. Biases associated with the use of underwater visual census techniques to quantify the density and size-structure of fish populations. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 308, 269–290 (2004).
54. Center for International Earth Science Information Network - CIESIN - Columbia University. Gridded Population of the World, Version 4.11 (GPWv4): Population Count, Revision 11. 10.7927/H4JW8BX5 (NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), Palisades, NY, 2018)
55. Pebesma E Bivand RS Classes and methods for spatial data: the sp package Econ. Geogr. 2005 50 1 21
Pebesma, E. & Bivand, R. S. Classes and methods for spatial data: the sp package. Econ. Geogr. 50, 1–21 (2005).
56. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2014).
57. MacNeil, M. A. et al. Recovery potential of the world’s coral reef fishes. Nature.10.1038/nature14358 (2015).
58. Spalding MD Marine ecoregions of the world: a bioregionalization of coastal and shelf areas Bioscience 2007 57 573 583 10.1641/B570707
Spalding, M. D. et al. Marine ecoregions of the world: a bioregionalization of coastal and shelf areas. Bioscience 57, 573–583 (2007).
59. Bürkner PC Advanced Bayesian multilevel modeling with the R package brms R. J. 2018 10 395 411 10.32614/RJ-2018-017
Bürkner, P. C. Advanced Bayesian multilevel modeling with the R package brms. R. J. 10, 395–411 (2018).
60. McClanahan TR Critical thresholds and tangible targets for ecosystem-based management of coral reef fisheries Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2011 108 17230 17233 10.1073/pnas.1106861108 21949381
McClanahan, T. R. et al. Critical thresholds and tangible targets for ecosystem-based management of coral reef fisheries. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 17230–17233 (2011).21949381
61. Pauly, D., Zeller, D. & Palomares, M. L. D. Sea around us concepts, design and data (2020).
62. Clark, B. M. et al 2002 identification of subsistence fishers and srea within which they fish. 425–437 (2002).
63. Chuenpagdee R Liguori L Palomares MLD Pauly D Bottom-up, global estimates of small-scale marine fisheries catches Fish. Cent. Res. Rep. 2006 14 105
Chuenpagdee, R., Liguori, L., Palomares, M. L. D. & Pauly, D. Bottom-up, global estimates of small-scale marine fisheries catches. Fish. Cent. Res. Rep. 14, 105 (2006).
64. Dunn DC A regional analysis of coastal and domestic fishing effort in the wider Caribbean Fish. Res. 2010 102 60 68 10.1016/j.fishres.2009.10.010
Dunn, D. C. et al. A regional analysis of coastal and domestic fishing effort in the wider Caribbean. Fish. Res. 102, 60–68 (2010).
65. Schmidhuber J The Global Nutrient Database: availability of macronutrients and micronutrients in 195 countries from 1980 to 2013 Lancet Planet. Health 2018 2 e353 e368 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30170-0 30082050
Schmidhuber, J. et al. The Global Nutrient Database: availability of macronutrients and micronutrients in 195 countries from 1980 to 2013. Lancet Planet. Health 2, e353–e368 (2018).30082050
66. Passarelli S Estimating national and subnational nutrient intake distributions of global diets Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2022 116 551 560 10.1093/ajcn/nqac108 35687422
Passarelli, S. et al. Estimating national and subnational nutrient intake distributions of global diets. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 116, 551–560 (2022).35687422
67. Smith MR Micha R Golden CD Mozaffarian D Myers SS Global Expanded Nutrient Supply (GENuS) Model: a new method for estimating the global dietary supply of nutrients PLoS ONE 2016 11 e0146976 10.1371/journal.pone.0146976 26807571
Smith, M. R., Micha, R., Golden, C. D., Mozaffarian, D. & Myers, S. S. Global Expanded Nutrient Supply (GENuS) Model: a new method for estimating the global dietary supply of nutrients. PLoS ONE 11, e0146976 (2016).26807571
68. Dekkers, A. L., Verkaik-Kloosterman, J., van Rossum, C. T. & Ocké, M. C. SPADE, a new statistical program to estimate habitual dietary intake from multiple food sources and dietary supplements. J. Nutr. 144, 2083–2091 (2014).
69. Carriquiry AL Assessing the prevalence of nutrient inadequacy Public Health Nutr. 1999 2 23 33 10.1017/S1368980099000038 10452728
Carriquiry, A. L. Assessing the prevalence of nutrient inadequacy. Public Health Nutr. 2, 23–33 (1999).10452728
70. Helton JC Johnson JD Sallaberry CJ Storlie CB Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2006 91 1175 1209 10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.017
Helton, J. C., Johnson, J. D., Sallaberry, C. J. & Storlie, C. B. Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91, 1175–1209 (2006).
71. Viana, D. et al. SustMPAs-Nutrition. 10.5281/zenodo.11640385 (2024).
72. Golden, C. D. et al. Aquatic food composition database. 10.7910/DVN/KI0NYM.
