
==== Front
Chem Sci
Chem Sci
SC
CSHCBM
Chemical Science
2041-6520
2041-6539
The Royal Society of Chemistry

39246344
d4sc02920h
10.1039/d4sc02920h
Chemistry
Controlled aggregation of Pt/PtH/Rh/RhH doped silver superatomic nanoclusters into 16-electron supermolecules†
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Computational details, X-ray structure analyses, NMR spectra, electrochemical data, ESI-MS data, crystal and TLC images, and luminescence decay curves are available in the ESI. CCDC 2342395 (1), 2342396 (2), and 2342397 (3). For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4sc02920h

Chiu Tzu-Hao a
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7799-5857
Pillay Michael N. a
Wu Ying-Yann a
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6147-3464
Niihori Yoshiki b
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3965-1399
Negishi Yuichi b
Chen Jie-Ying c
Chen Yuan Jang c
Kahlal Samia d
Saillard Jean-Yves d
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0801-6499
B-6730-2016
Liu C. W. a
a Department of Chemistry, National Dong Hwa University Hualien 97401 Taiwan Republic of China chenwei@gms.ndhu.edu.tw

b Department of Applied Chemistry, Tokyo University of Science 1-3 Kagurazaka, Shinjuku Tokyo 162-8601 Japan
c Department of Chemistry, Fu Jen Catholic University New Taipei City 24205 Taiwan Republic of China
d Univ Rennes, CNRS, ISCR-UMR 6226 F-35000 Rennes France
22 8 2024
18 9 2024
22 8 2024
15 36 1466014667
3 5 2024
11 8 2024
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry
2024
The Royal Society of Chemistry
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.
The assembly of discrete superatomic nanoclusters into larger constructs is a significant stride towards developing a new set of artificial/pseudo-elements. Herein, we describe a novel series of 16-electron supermolecules derived from the combination of discrete 8-electron superatomic synthons containing interstitial hydrides as vertex-sharing building blocks. The symmetric (RhH)2Ag33[S2P(OPr)2]17 (1) and asymmetric PtHPtAg32[S2P(OPr)2]17 (2) are characterized by ESI-MS, SCXRD, NMR, UV-vis absorption spectra, electrochemical and computational methods. Cluster 1 represents the first group 9-doped 16-electron supermolecule, composed of two icosahedral (RhH)@Ag12 8-electron superatoms sharing a silver vertex. Cluster 2 results from the assembly of two distinct icosahedral units, Pt@Ag12, and (PtH)@Ag12. In both cases, the presence of the interstitial hydrides is unprecedented. The stability of the supermolecules is investigated, and 2 spontaneously transforms into Pt2Ag33[S2P(OPr)2]17 (3) with thermal treatment. The lability of the hydride within the icosahedral framework in solution at low-temperature was confirmed by the VT-NMR.

The controlled assembly of superatoms into well-defined supermolecules represents the next evolutionary step in the field of atomically precise nanoclusters.

National Science and Technology Council 10.13039/501100020950 112-2123-M-259-001 Grand Équipement National De Calcul Intensif 10.13039/501100010190 A0030807367 pubstatusPaginated Article
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

In recent years, superatomic nanoclusters (NCs) containing hydrides encapsulated within their inner core have gained significant attention due to their highly unique bonding and promising properties.1–11 Isolating and identifying such clusters poses a considerable challenge. Nevertheless, studying these molecules is crucial for understanding their growth, synthesis, and stability. As more hydride-containing nanoclusters are discovered, the importance of the hydride position becomes increasingly evident, as hydrides in encapsulated locations exhibit properties different from traditional hydride ligands lying at the NC surface. Let us, for example, consider the centered icosahedral 8-electron [(PtH)@Ag12]5+ core of the stable PtHAg19(dtp)12 (dtp = S2P(OnPr)2) NC.4 The formal addition of two extra electrons to it results in the expulsion of the hydride outside the cage, forming an 8-electron [Pt@Ag12]4+ coordinated by a regular outer hydride (H−) ligand, i.e., {[Pt@Ag12](μ3-H)}3+ (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1 The 8-electron superatomic systems [PtHAg12]5+ (left) and [PtAg12H]3+ (right).

In the same way, as atoms combine to build molecules, superatomic clusters can assemble to form superatomic molecules (supermolecules). Such assemblies, described as “clusters of clusters” by Teo et al. in the last century, continue to attract attention.12 Most are one-dimensional assemblies,13,14 although two-dimensional15 and even three-dimensional examples have been reported.16,17 The stability of such supermolecules is governed by electron counting rules that are similar to those of simple molecules (octet rule, for example).18–21 Supermolecules of which the inner core is composed of two centered icosahedra sharing a vertex, an edge, or a face, are well-known.13,22–45 Most are composed of two quasi-independent closed-shell 8-electron superatoms, making them equivalent to the van der Waals dimers of Ne (16 valence electrons). Surface engineering,33,34 and heterometal doping35 have been common strategies to tune the properties of these 16-electron supermolecules. To our knowledge, no supermolecule containing one or several encapsulated hydrides has been reported so far. Below are the first examples of these unique supermolecules that contain interstitial hydrides, resulting in electronic stability. RhH-doped superatoms are extremely rare in current literature, and the 16-electron silver-rich homoleptic NCs of the type (RhH)2Ag33[S2P(OnPr)2]17(1) is the first of its kind. Its core comprises two vertex-sharing (RhH)@Ag12 centered icosahedral motifs.

The platinum-doped system of the type PtHPtAg32[S2P(OnPr)2]17 (2) is composed of two different 8-electron units: a (PtH)@Ag12 and a Pt@Ag12. ESI-MS and SCXRD identified the NC compositions, and the presence of hydrides was confirmed by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Furthermore, their electronic structure was analyzed by DFT. This is the first example of hydrides being incorporated into 16-electron bi-icosahedral cores and the first group 9 metal-doped 16-electron supermolecule. The low-temperature emission approaches the sort after near-infrared region, which is currently under intense investigation.36 This provides new avenues for future research on these supermolecules.

Results and discussion

The synthesis of hydride-doped NCs depends on several key factors, the reaction time of which is crucial. The sequence of the reactions is illustrated in Fig. 2, with the isolated NC highly dependent on the duration of the reaction. Compound 1 was synthesized using a one-pot co-reduction method involving the reaction of [Ag(MeCN)4]PF6, NH4[S2P(OPr)2], [Rh(COD)Cl]2, and NaBH4. The purified product was crystallized by slow evaporation in methanol, resulting in black block-shaped crystals after one week. A similar procedure was adopted for synthesizing 2, with Pt[S2P(OPr)2]2 as the dopant source. The kernel transformation of 2 into 3 was experimentally tracked by 31P NMR (Fig. S1†). In contrast, heating 1 at 333 K for 120 min does not result in the retention of the bi-icosahedra and results in the isolation of two independent 8-electron NCs of the type [RhHAg20(dtp)12] and [RhAg21(dtp)12] (Fig. S2†).

Fig. 2 Synthesis and decomposition of the hydride-containing supermolecules.

The assigned compositions of 1–3 were confirmed by ESI-MS spectroscopy. In the ESI-MS spectrum of 1, distinct signals were observed around 7500 Da and 3700 Da, with the strongest at 7392.983 Da (calc. 7392.990) corresponding to [1 + H]+. Additionally, signals for dicationic adducts, [1 + 2H]2+, [1 + H + Na]2+, [1 + H + K]2+, and [1 + Na + K]2+ were observed. ([1 + 2H]2+: exp. 3697.013 calc. 3696.998; [1 + H + Na]2+: exp. 3708.051 calc. 3707.989; [1 + H + K]2+: exp. 3715.022 calc. 3715.976; [1 + Na + K]2+: exp. 3726.485 calc. 3726.967) (Fig. 3). In the ESI-MS spectrum of 2, the signal at 3841.954 Da corresponds to [2 + 2Ag]2+ (calc. 3841.987), and the signal at 3895.446 Da corresponds to [3 + 2Ag]2+ (Fig. S3†).

Fig. 3 Positive-mode ESI mass spectrum of 1. Insets: experimental (top) and simulated (down).

The molecular structures of compounds 1–3 were determined by SCXRD analysis (see ESI†). Selected metrical data are provided in Table 1. The structure of 1 (Fig. 4) can be viewed as an (RhH)2Ag23 core, made of two vertex-sharing (RhH)@Ag12 centered icosahedra and passivated by 10 capping silver atoms (Agcap) and 17 dithiophosphate ligands (dtp) (Fig. 4a). These ligands are organized in a 1 : 5 : 5 : 5 : 1 ratio to form a large interpenetrated P17 icosahedron (Fig. 4b). The ten outer Agcap atoms are distributed in a 3 : 2 : 2 : 3 sequence, capping three among the five triangular faces at each end of the icosahedra and two intermediate triangular faces (Fig. S4†). The two (RhH)@Ag12 centered icosahedra composing the NC core are distorted, with one enlarged Ag3 triangular face (Ag⋯Ag > 2.9 Å). The continuous symmetry measure (CSM)34 values of 0.68 and 0.55 can evaluate the icosahedral distortion, which indicates substantial deviation from ideal Ih symmetry.

Selected experimental bond distances (Å) and angles (deg) for compounds 1–3

NC	1	2	3	
Superatomic core	RhH@Ag12	RhH@Ag12	Pt@Ag12	PtH@Ag12	Pt@Ag12	Pt@Ag12	
CSM	0.68	0.55	0.06	0.73	0.1	0.1	
Mcent–Agico(av.)	2.691(1)–3.117(2), [2.792(6)]	2.688(1)–3.082(2), [2.790(6)]	2.712(1)–2.790(1), [2.756(4)]	2.7065(9)–3.077(1), [2.808(3)]	2.714(1)–2.842(1), [2.759(2)]	2.714(1)–2.842(1), [2.759(2)]	
Agico–Agico(av.)	2.718(1)–3.760(2), [2.941(9)]	2.743(2)–3.726(2), [2.937(9)]	2.824(1)–3.022(1), [2.898(7)]	2.759(1)–3.782(1), [2.956(7)]	2.805(1)–3.020(1), [2.895(4)]	2.805(1)–3.020(1), [2.895(4)]	
Agico–Agcap(av.)	2.829(2)–3.158(2), [2.965(7)]	2.861(2)–3.122(2), [2.963(6)]	2.843(2)–3.184(2), [2.972(6)]	2.884(2)–3.111(2), [2.004(5)]	2.847(1)–3.228(1), [2.998(4)]	2.847(1)–3.228(1), [2.998(4)]	
Mcent–H	1.9(2)	1.6(1)	—	1.68(2)	—	—	
Ag–H(av.)	1.9(2)–1.9(2), [1.9(3)]	1.8(2)−2.3(1), [2.0(3)]	—	2.06(2)−2.08(2), [2.07(3)]	—	—	
Torsion angle between the superatoms	22	16	19	
Bond angles between the superatoms	177	175	175	

Fig. 4 (a) The disassembly diagram of a superatomic molecule and passivating layer. (b) Interpenetrated icosahedra composed of 17 P atoms (c) the (RhH)2Ag23 bi-icosahedral core of 1 (d) the (PtH)PtAg23 bi-icosahedral core of 2 (e) the Pt2Ag23 bi-icosahedral core of 3.

The icosahedra are arranged in a partial gauche rotational conformation with an average torsion angle of 22 degrees. Their hydride positions were identified through residual electron density maps and refined without constraints. They correspond to the tetrahedral cavities defined by the central Rh and the enlarged Ag3 faces. Inside these cavities, the two hydrides are found to have different coordination modes, i.e., a μ4 tetrahedral (RhAg3) and a μ3 pyramidal (RhAg2) connectives (Table 1). It is important to remember that the SCXRD location of such hydrides should be considered approximate. Not considering the somewhat different coordination modes of the hydrides, the overall ideal symmetry of 1 is C2, with the C2 axis perpendicular to the Rh⋯Rh vector containing one P atom and the Ag vertex shared by the two icosahedra (Fig. S5†).

Compound 2 exhibits an unsymmetrical bi-icosahedral core made of two different vertex-sharing centered icosahedra, namely, (PtH)@Ag12 and Pt@Ag12 (Fig. 4d). The hydride was identified through residual electron density maps and refined with partial constraint. It occupies an Ag3Pt tetrahedral cavity (μ4 coordination mode) in one of the icosahedra, causing, as in 1, the enlargement of the corresponding Ag3 face. This distortion is responsible for the relatively large associated CSM value of 0.73 (same order of magnitude as in 1), whereas that of the other icosahedron (0.06) denotes a regular structure. As in 1, the icosahedra are arranged in a gauche conformation, with an average torsion angle of 16 degrees. Overall, the passivating outer shell of 2 resembles that of 1, except that there are only 9 Agcap atoms in 2, organized in a 3 : 2 : 2 : 2 sequence, the missing Agcap being associated with the (PtH)@Ag12 icosahedron (Fig. S4†).

The overall structure of 3 is similar to that of 1, and its ideal symmetry is also C2. Yet, this time, the Pt2Ag23 core (Fig. 4e) is composed of two regular Pt@Ag12 icosahedra (CSM = 0.10 for both icosahedra). The molecular structure of 3 has been reported;29 however, the change in the synthetic route leads to a comparatively different packing arrangement in the crystal lattice. This atypical case of polymorphism is not driven by the inclusion of solvates or a change in counterion (Fig. S6†). The crystal packing in the presently reported polymorph is composed of two different layers, A and B, A being more densely packed than B. In contrast, the previously reported polymorph of 3 is only composed of type B layers (Fig. S6†).

In the similar C2 structures of 1 and 3, the 17 ligands experience nine distinct chemical environments. Consistently, the 31P NMR spectrum of compound 1 (Fig. 5 and S7†) is similar to that of compound3,29 with significantly broad resonances observed at 104.7 ppm and 96.8 ppm, along with a sharp peak at 101.0 ppm (Fig. S7†).

Fig. 5 The 31P NMR spectrum of 1 (a) and 2 (b) at 173 K, and the corresponding symmetry.

In the variable temperature (VT) 31P NMR spectra of 1, when the temperature is lowered to 213 K, the three peaks split into eight peaks of equal intensity and one with half intensity, corresponding to the ligand environments observed in the solid-state structure. The 1H NMR hydride signals are found at −12.1 ppm, with a hydride-to-ligand integration ratio of 2 : 17 (Fig. S8†). The hydride resonance of 1 remains a broad peak even at low temperatures, indicating substantial hydride mobility within the metallic framework.

The 31P NMR spectrum of compound 2, owing to its asymmetric structure, exhibits three sets of broad peaks at 106.0 ppm, 104.7 ppm, and 96.2 ppm, accompanied by a sharp peak at 101.0 ppm (Fig. S9†). The VT 31P NMR spectrum at 173 K shows a splitting into eleven peaks of varying intensity (Fig. 5 and S13†). Because of peak overlapping, it is not possible to discern individual resonances for each of the 17 symmetrically inequivalent nuclei. The hydride resonance is observed around −10.4 ppm, flanked by Pt satellites with a coupling constant of 512 Hz, confirming the interaction of the hydride with the central Pt atom (Fig. S14†). In the VT 1H NMR spectra of 2, the hydride resonance does not split due to coupling to the silver nuclei as observed in PtHAg19(dtp)12,4 but remains a broad peak with Pt satellites at 173 K (Fig. S16†). This absence of splitting is likely related to the rapid exchange of hydride positions within the metal core cavity. The 195Pt{1H} NMR spectrum of 2 exhibits a broad singlet at −7712 ppm at 173 K, which represents an upfield shift compared to most examples, except for PtHAg19(dtp)12.4 (Fig. S14–S16†).

Hydride-containing nanoclusters usually exhibit poor thermal stability, as the hydrides tend to dissociate from the clusters and reduce the metal upon further heating (Fig. 2). The thermal stability of compound 1 is better than that of compound 2. Compound 1 is persistent in THF at 60 °C for at least three hours. After six hours, it completely decomposes into RhAg21(dtp)12 and RhHAg20(dtp)12 (Fig. S2†). After heating, compound 2 decomposes to yield compound 3 and PtAg20(dtp)12 after one hour. After two hours of heating, it completely decomposes, leaving only 3 and PtAg20(dtp)12. (Fig. S1†).

The absorption spectrum of 1 displays three bands at 380 nm, 500 nm, and 708 nm, similar to 3. At 77 K, the photoluminescence spectrum shows a prominent signal near 925 nm in the near-infrared region, exhibiting a noticeable redshift compared to 3. The absorption spectrum of 2 shows a slight blueshift compared to 3, with two absorption bands at 490 nm and 700 nm. The photoluminescence spectrum at 77 K displays a slight redshift at 840 nm compared to 3 (Fig. 6). The photoluminescence decay of samples 1–3 exhibits a single exponential decay pattern, indicating a singular lifetime of 50 μs (1), 25 μs (2), and 21 μs (3) (Fig. S17–S19†), suggesting phosphorescence. The photoluminescence quantum yields (PLQY) of compounds 1, 2, and 3 are 5.5, 22, and 26%, respectively. This indicates that the Pt atom favors radiative decay, achieving superior PLQY even with the same ligand shell.

Fig. 6 Absorption (2-MeTHF, RT, red) and emission (2-MeTHF glass, 77 K, blue) spectra of (a) 1 (b) 2.

The Differential Pulse Voltammetry (DPV) of 1, 2, and 3 were performed in DCM at 233 K. Compound 1 displays seven oxidation peaks at −0.44(O1), −0.22(O2), 0.15(O3), 0.33(O4), 0.88(O5), 1.04(O6) and 1.15(O7) and one re-duction peak at −1.90(R1). Compound 2 shows six oxidation peaks at −0.38(O1), −0.12(O2), 0.15(O3), 0.33(O4), 0.87(O5) and 1.03(O6) and one reduction peak at −1.88(R1). Compound 3 displays four oxidation peaks at −0.38(O1), −0.14(O2), 0.01(O3), 0.24(O4), 0.89(O5) and 1.03(O6) and one reduction peak at −1.96(R1) (Fig. 7). The three DPV voltammograms are similar, and the corresponding electrochemical gaps are significantly smaller than for related 8-electron superatoms.7,29 (Fig. S20–S21†).

Fig. 7 DPV curves of (a) 1 (b) 2 (c) 3 were obtained in a 0.1 M DCM solution of Bu4NPF6 at 233 K. (Potential increments: 2 mV; pulse amplitude: 50 mV; pulse width: 50 ms; sampling width: 25 ms; pulse period: 100 ms.).

Compounds 1 and 2 were investigated by DFT calculations at the BP86/Def2-TZVP level of calculations (see Computational details in the ESI†). For the sake of computational limitations, the dtp ligands were replaced by S2PH2 models, a simplification which has been proved to be reasonable in many past investigations.3,7,8,29,46–54 Their geometries were fully optimized without any symmetry constraint. The resulting structures are in good agreement with their SCXRD counter-parts. Selected computed data are reported in Table 2. It is of note that the optimized structure of 1 is found of nearly C2 symmetry, with the two hydrides in equivalent μ4 co-ordination mode, with Rh–H (av.) = 1.664 Å and Ag–H (av.) = 2.074 Å. As in the experimental structure, the Ag atoms to which they are connected form an enlarged triangular face (Ag⋯Ag (av.) = 3.434 Å). Similar elongations are also found in the case of the hydride-containing icosahedron of 2 (Ag⋯Ag (av.) = 3.465 Å). Interestingly, whereas the SCXRD position of one of the hydrides in 2 is nearly perfectly μ4 (see above), it is intermediate between μ4 and μ3 in the DFT-optimized structure (Ag–H = 1.987, 2.098, and 2.376 Å). These results are consistent with a flat potential energy surface associated with the displacement of each hydride within its cage. As a whole, the CSM values follow the same trend as their experimental counterparts, but they are somewhat smaller, presumably due to the least steric hindrance of the model ligands.

Selected computed data for compounds 1–3. Distances are given in Å, with corresponding Wiberg bond indices in brackets

Compound	1	2	3	
HOMO–LUMO gap (eV)	1.24	1.23	1.28	
Superatomic core	RhH@Ag12	RhH@Ag12	Pt@Ag12	PtH@Ag12	Pt@Ag12	Pt@Ag12	
CSM	0.33	0.35	0.03	0.49	0.06	0.06	
Mcent–Agico (av.)	2.877 [0.156]	2.876 [0.155]	2.848 [0.140]	2.903 [0.116]	2.851 [0.150]	2.851 [0.150]	
Agico–Agico (av.)	2.987 [0.070]	2.987 [0.070]	2.996 [0.075]	3.052 [0.068]	2.998 [0.081]	2.998 [0.081]	
Agico–Agcap (av.)	3.070 [0.046]	3.064 [0.046]	3.097 [0.044]	3.123 [0.038]	3.092 [0.049]	3.092 [0.049]	
Mcenter–H	1.662 [0.251]	1.667 [0.246]	—	1.693 [0.224]	—	—	
Ag–H (av.)	2.073 [0.103]	2.074 [0.104]	—	2.155 [0.097]	—	—	
Natural atomic charges	M	−1.30	−1.29	−1.17	−0.94	−1.13	−1.13	
H	−0.30	−0.31	—	−0.34	—	—	
Agico (av.)	0.25	0.25	0.20	0.27	0.21	0.21	
Agcap (av.)	0.57	0.57	0.58	0.58	0.57	0.57	

With 33 Ag atoms and 17 formally anionic ligands, compound 3 has 33–17 = 16 so-called “free” electrons (of 5s(Ag) origin), which are responsible for the bonding within the bi-icosahedral core. We have shown previously29 that 3 is made of two weakly interacting vertex-sharing 8-electron icosahedral superatoms, with individual stable 1S2 1P6 closed-shell configuration.55 In other words, 3 can be described as the supermolecular equivalent of the Ne2 van-der-Waals molecule.

We have also shown previously that in clusters containing an [(MH)@Ag12]5+ (M = Pd, Pt) core, the 1s(H) atomic orbital (AO) interacts principally with a dz2(M) orbital, creating an M–H 2-electron bond and leaving the (n + 1)s AO of M almost unperturbed, but now containing one electron.4,7

From the superatomic point of view, although the 1s(H) AO does not contribute significantly to the building of the superatomic orbitals, the hydride provides one electron to the σ (n + 1)s AO of the M atom, which in turn allows the cluster “free” electron count to achieve the closed-shell count of eight. This is what happens in 2, where PtH contributes with one electron; thus, 1 (PtH) + 32 (Ag) − 17 (ligands) = 16 = 2 × 8. The same reasoning holds for 1, where RhH is a zero-donor metal1 (“isoelectronic” to Pd), thus 33 (Ag) − 17 (ligands) = 16. Viewing the three NCs as 16-electron supermolecules is confirmed by the analysis of their electronic structure. In the three NCs, the 1S and 1P orbitals of the two icosahedra generate occupied combinations. The Kohn–Sham frontier orbital diagrams of 1 and 2 are shown in Fig. 8. Their compositions are provided in Fig. S23.† The HOMO of 1 and 2 is the out-of-phase combination of the icosahedra 1Pσ orbitals, whereas the HOMO−1 and HOMO−2 are the out-of-phase combinations of their 1Pπ orbitals. The three lowest orbitals are their in-phase homologues, mixed with 4d(Agico) combinations. Similarly, the vacant 1D orbitals on the two icosahedra generate vacant combinations, the LUMO of the NCs being of 1Dσ character. The participation of the hydrides in the superatomic combinations is negligible (Fig. S23†). Nevertheless, the M–H bonding is relatively strong, as indicated by the corresponding Wiberg bond indices (Table 2), which are substantially larger than their Ag–H counterparts. These features, as well as the computed natural atomic charges (Table 2), are typical for 8-electron superatoms containing or not containing encapsulated hydrogens.4 The time-dependent-DFT (TD-DFT) simulated UV-vis spectra of 1 and 2 are shown in Fig. S24.† They are quite similar and qualitatively agree with their experimental counterparts (Fig. 6).

Fig. 8 The Kohn–Sham frontier MO diagram of compounds 1 and 2. The hydride of 2 lies in the left-side icosahedron.

For both compounds, the band (or shoulder) of the lowest energy (∼660 and ∼670 nm for 1 and 2, respectively) can be identified as of 1P → 1D nature. The next band (∼460 nm for both compounds) is also of 1P → 1D character, but with 4d(Agico) → 1D ad-mixture. The band of higher energy is of MLCT nature.

Conclusion

The controlled isolation of two novel hydride-containing 16-electron supermolecules, (RhH)2Ag33[S2P(OPr)2]17 (1), and PtHPtAg32[S2P(OPr)2]17 (2), was successful. Additionally, the interstitial hydride atom in compound 2 can be removed by thermal treatment to form Pt2Ag33[S2P(OPr)2]17 (3). Significant structural distortions can be found in the hydride-doped icosahedra. Notably, while compound 1 is the first example of a group 9-doped supermolecule, both compounds 1 and 2 are the first hydride-containing 16-electron superatomic molecules. Importantly, DPV and absorption spectroscopy measurements have confirmed that the assembly of superatoms into supermolecules leads to a significant decrease in the HOMO–LUMO gap. All NCs show strong photoluminescence in the near-infrared region at 77 K in 2-MeTHF glass. This work will provide inspiration for hydride-containing superatomic molecules, and it is expected that more complex hydride-encapsulating supermolecular architectures with potentially unprecedented properties will be synthesized in the future.

Data availability

Crystallographic data for 1–3 has been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) under 2342395, 2342396, and 2342397, and can be obtained from https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures/.

Author contributions

T.-H. C., M. N. P., investigation, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, writing. Y.-Y. W., Y. N., Y. N., J.-Y. C., Y. J. C., S. K. data curation, formal analysis. J.-Y. S. data curation, formal analysis, writing. C. W. L. supervision, writing, conceptualization, project administration, resources.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Supplementary Material

SC-015-D4SC02920H-s001

SC-015-D4SC02920H-s002

This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan (112-2123-M-259-001) and the GENCI French National Computer Resource Center (A0030807367).
==== Refs
Notes and references

Yi H. Han S. M. Song S. Kim M. Sim E. Lee D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021 60 22293 22300 10.1002/anie.202106311 34224193
Takano S. Hirai H. Muramatsu S. Tsukuda T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018 140 12314 12317 10.1021/jacs.8b06783 30179477
Ni Y.-R. Pillay M. N. Chiu T.-H. Wu Y.-Y. Kahlal S. Saillard J.-Y. Liu C. W. Chem.–Eur. J. 2023 29 e202300730 10.1002/chem.202300730 36897064
Chiu T.-Z. Liao J.-H. Gam F. Wu Y.-Y. Wang X. Kahlal S. Saillard J.-Y. Liu C. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022 144 10599 10607 10.1021/jacs.2c03715 35654753
Yi H. et al. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023 62 e202302591 10.1002/anie.202302591 37117156
Hirai H. Takano S. Tsukuda T. ACS Omega 2019 4 7070 7075 10.1021/acsomega.9b00575 31459817
Chiu T.-H. Liao J.-H. Wu Y.-Y. Chen J.-Y. Wang X. Kahlal S. Saillard J.-Y. Liu C. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023 145 16739 16747 10.1021/jacs.3c04482 37473452
Silalahi R. P. B. Jo Y. Liao J.-H. Chiu T.-H. Park E. Choi W. Liang H. Kahlal S. Saillard J.-Y. Lee D. Liu C. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023 62 e202301272 10.1002/anie.202301272 36807455
Maity S. Takano S. Masuda S. Tsukuda T. J. Phys. Chem. C 2024 128 19 30 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c07090
Ni Y.-R. Pillay M. N. Chiu T.-H. Rajaram J. Wu Y.-Y. Kahlal S. Saillard J.-Y. Liu C. W. Inorg. Chem. 2024 63 2766 2775 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c04253 38253002
Chiu T.-Z. Liao J.-H. Brocha Silalahi R. P. Pillay M. N. Liu C. W. Nanoscale Horiz. 2024 9 675 692 10.1039/D4NH00036F 38507282
Teo B. K. Zhang H. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1995 143 611 636 10.1016/0010-8545(95)01136-D
Niihori Y. Miyajima S. Ikeda A. Kosaka T. Negishi Y. Small 2023 3 2300024 10.1002/smsc.202300024
Jin S. Zou Z. Xiong L. Du W. Wang S. Pei Y. Zhu M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018 57 16768 16772 10.1002/anie.201810718 30351512
Song Y. Fu F. Zhang J. Chai J. Kang X. Li P. Li S. Zhou H. Zhu M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015 54 8430 8434 10.1002/anie.201501830 26012487
Jia T. Guan Z.-J. Zhang C. Zhu X.-Z. Chen Y.-X. Zhang Q. Yang Y. Sun D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023 145 10355 10363 10.1021/jacs.3c02215 37104621
Yang S. Chai J. Lv Y. Chen T. Wang S. Yu H. Zhu M. Chem. Commun. 2018 54 12077 12080 10.1039/C8CC06900J 30298154
Zhuang S. Chen D. Ng W.-P. Liu D. Liu L.-J. Sun M.-Y. Nawaz T. Wu X. Zhang Y. Li Z. Huang Y.-L. Yang J. Yang J. He J. JACS Au 2022 2 2617 2626 10.1021/jacsau.2c00517 36465536
Yang J. Cheng L. J. Chem. Phys. 2013 138 141101 10.1063/1.4801860 24981520
Mingos M. P. Dalton Trans. 2015 44 6680 6695 10.1039/C5DT00253B 25710593
Munoz-Castro A. Chem. Commun. 2019 55 7307 7310 10.1039/C9CC02970B 31157331
Gam F. Liu C. W. Kahlal S. Saillard J.-Y. Nanoscale 2020 12 20308 20316 10.1039/D0NR05179A 33001105
Qian H. Eckenhoff W. T. Bier M. E. Pintauer T. Jin R. Inorg. Chem. 2011 50 10735 10739 10.1021/ic2012292 21988284
Jin R. Liu R. C. Zhao S. Das A. Xing H. Gayathri C. Xing Y. Rosi N. L. Gil R. R. Jin R. ACS Nano 2015 9 8530 8536 10.1021/acsnano.5b03524 26214221
Yuan S. F. Xu C.-Q. Liu W.-D. Zhang J.-X. Li J. Wang Q.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021 143 12261 12267 10.1021/jacs.1c05283 34324334
Nair L. V. Hossain S. Takagi S. Imai Y. Hu G. Wakayama S. Kumar B. Kurashige W. Jiang D. Negishi Y. Nanoscale 2018 10 18969 18979 10.1039/C8NR04078H 30132774
Kang X. Xiang J. Lv Y. Du W. Yu H. Wang S. Zhu M. Chem. Mater. 2017 29 6856 6862 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02015
Kang X. Xiong L. Wang S. Yu H. Jin S. Song Y. Chen T. Zheng L. Pan C. Pei Y. Zhu M. Chem.–Eur. J. 2016 22 17145 17150 10.1002/chem.201603893 27754605
Bootharaju M. S. Kozlov S. M. Cao Z. Harb M. Maity N. Shkurenko A. Parida M. R. Hedhili M. N. Eddaoudi M. Mohammed O. F. Bakr O. M. Cavallo L. Basset J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017 139 1053 1056 10.1021/jacs.6b11875 28064484
Chiu T.-H. Liao J.-H. Gam F. Chantrenne I. Kahlal S. Saillard J.-Y. Liu C. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019 141 12957 12961 10.1021/jacs.9b05000 31378060
Hossain S. Miyajima S. Iwasa T. Kaneko R. Sekine T. Ikeda A. Kawawaki T. Taketsugu T. Negishi Y. J. Chem. Phys. 2021 155 024302 10.1063/5.0057005 34266257
Lummis P. A. Osten K. M. Levchenko T. I. Hazer M. S. A. Malola S. Owens-Baird B. Veinot A. J. Albright E. L. Schatte G. Takano S. Kovnir K. Stamplecoskie K. G. Tsukuda T. Häkkinen H. Nambo M. Crudden C. M. JACS Au 2022 2 875 885 10.1021/jacsau.2c00004 35557749
Shen H. Deng G. Kaappa S. Tan T. Han Y.-Z. Malola S. Lin S.-C. Teo B. K. Häkkinen H. Zheng N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019 58 17731 17735 10.1002/anie.201908983 31517436
Zhou C. Pan P. Wei X. Lin Z. Chen C. Kang X. Zhu M. Nanoscale Horiz. 2022 7 1397 1403 10.1039/D2NH00321J 36196687
Li T. Li Q. Yang S. Xu L. Chai J. Li P. Zhu M. Chem. Commun. 2021 57 4682 4685 10.1039/D1CC00577D 33977990
Miyajima S. Hosssain S. Ikeda A. Kosaka T. Kawawaki T. Niihori Y. Iwasa T. Taketsugu T. Negishi Y. Commun. Chem. 2023 6 57 10.1038/s42004-023-00854-0 36977829
Zabrodsky H. Peleg S. Avnir D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992 114 7843 7851 10.1021/ja00046a033
Yang S. Chai J. Chen T. Rao B. Pan Y. Yu H. Zhu M. Inorg. Chem. 2017 56 1771 1774 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b02016 28140578
Teo B. K. Shi X. Zhang H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991 113 4329 4331 10.1021/ja00011a045
Teo B. K. Shi X. Zhang H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1992 1195 1196 10.1039/C39920001195
Qian H. Eckenhoff W. T. Zhu Y. Pintauer T. Jin R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010 132 8280 8281 10.1021/ja103592z 20515047
Kumara C. Gagnon K. J. Dass A. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015 6 1223 1228 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00270 26262976
Ito E. Ito S. Takano S. Nakamura T. Tsukuda T. JACS Au 2022 2 2627 2634 10.1021/jacsau.2c00519 36465538
Ito E. Takano S. Nakamura T. Tsukuda T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021 60 645 649 10.1002/anie.202010342
Wang Z. Senanayake R. Aikens C. M. Chen W.-M. Tung C.-H. Sun D. Nanoscale 2016 8 18905 18911 10.1039/C6NR06615A 27747330
Dhayal R. S. Liao J.-J. Liu Y.-C. Chiang M.-H. Kahalal S. Salliard J.-Y. Liu C. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015 54 3702 3706 10.1002/anie.201410332
Barik S. K. Chiu T.-H. Liu Y.-C. Chiang M.-H. Gam F. Chantrenne I. Kahlal S. Saillard J.-Y. Liu C. W. Nanoscale 2019 11 14581 14586 10.1039/C9NR05068J 31359023
Chiu T.-H. Liao J.-H. Gam F. Chantrenne I. Kahlal S. Saillard J.-Y. Liu C. W. Nanoscale 2021 13 12143 12148 10.1039/D1NR02540F 34231628
Chang W.-T. Lee P.-Y. Liao J.-H. Chakrahari K. K. Kahlal S. Liu Y.-C. Chiang M.-H. Saillard J.-Y. Liu C. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017 56 10178 10182 10.1002/anie.201704800 28544757
Liao J.-H. Kahlal S. Liu Y.-C. Chiang M.-H. Saillard J.-Y. Liu C. W. J. Cluster Sci. 2018 29 827 835 10.1007/s10876-018-1353-y
Barik S. K. Chen C.-Y. Chiu T.-H. Ni Y.-R. Gam F. Chantrenne I. Kahlal S. Saillard J.-Y. Liu C. W. Commun. Chem. 2022 5 151 10.1038/s42004-022-00769-2 36697889
Dhayal R. S. Lin Y.-R. Liao J.-H. Chen Y.-J. Liu Y.-C. Chiang M.-H. Kahlal S. Saillard J.-Y. Liu C. W. Chem.–Eur. J. 2016 22 9943 9947 10.1002/chem.201602275 27189869
Lin Y.-R. Kishore P. V. V. N. Liao J.-H. Kahlal S. -C Liu Y. Chiang M.-H. Saillard J.-Y. Liu C. W. Nanoscale 2018 10 6855 6860 10.1039/C8NR00172C 29616252
Gam F. Chantrenne I. Kahlal S. Chiu T.-H. Liao J.-H. Liu C. W. Saillard J.-Y. Nanoscale 2022 14 196 203 10.1039/D1NR06019H 34908067
Leuchtner R. E. Harms A. C. Castleman A. W. J. Chem. Phys. 1989 91 2753 2754 10.1063/1.456988
