
==== Front
PLoS One
PLoS One
plos
PLOS ONE
1932-6203
Public Library of Science San Francisco, CA USA

10.1371/journal.pone.0308419
PONE-D-23-39869
Research Article
Medicine and Health Sciences
Women's Health
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Termination of Pregnancy
People and Places
Geographical Locations
Africa
Ethiopia
Biology and Life Sciences
Psychology
Psychological Attitudes
Social Sciences
Psychology
Psychological Attitudes
Research and Analysis Methods
Mathematical and Statistical Techniques
Statistical Methods
Metaanalysis
Physical Sciences
Mathematics
Statistics
Statistical Methods
Metaanalysis
Medicine and Health Sciences
Health Care
Health Care Providers
Research and Analysis Methods
Research Assessment
Systematic Reviews
Science Policy
Research Integrity
Publication Ethics
People and Places
Population Groupings
Professions
Medical Personnel
Midwives
Health care providers`attitude and associated factors to safe abortion in Ethiopia, 2023: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Health care providers` attitude and associated factors to safe abortion in Ethiopia, 2023
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7143-635X
Bante Simachew Animen Conceptualization Writing – original draft 1 *
Balcha Wondu Feyisa Data curation 1
Chekole Fentahun Alemnew Writing – review & editing 1
Kassahun Eden Asmare Validation 1
Getu Alemwork Abie Investigation 1
Awoke Amlaku Mulat Methodology 1
Tariku Mengistie Kassahun Formal analysis 2
Zerihun Endalamaw Erkie Resources 3
1 Department of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
2 Department of public health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Debre Markose University, Debre Markose, Ethiopia
3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
Aliyo Ali Alqeer Editor
BHU: Bule Hora University, Institute of Health, ETHIOPIA
Competing Interests: There is no any competing interest.

* E-mail: animensimachew@gmail.com
17 9 2024
2024
19 9 e03084191 12 2023
23 7 2024
© 2024 Bante et al
2024
Bante et al
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Background

In sub-Saharan Africa, the number of maternal deaths due to unsafe abortions has been gradually rising. In Ethiopia, unplanned pregnancies contribute to 25% of births, accounting for 6%–9% of the maternal deaths resulting from unsafe abortions. Despite several disjointed cross-sectional studies that have been carried out in the past, there is no comprehensive data on the attitudes of healthcare practitioners and other related aspects regarding safe abortion in Ethiopia. This study attempted to measure pooled health care providers’ attitudes and determinants of safe abortion in Ethiopia.

Methods

African Journals Online, Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, Science Direct, Hinari, and Google Scholar were the databases that were accessed. The studies were evaluated critically by using the Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal methods. The study followed the recommendations set forth by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Data were extracted in an Excel spreadsheet and imported to STATA versions 17 software for meta-analysis. The random- effects model was used to pooled the health care providers’ attitudes toward safe abortion. Heterogeneity between studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Q-test and I2 statistics (I squared statistics). To evaluate publication bias, egger’s tests and funnel plots were employed. Forest plot was used to present the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval.

Results

In this review and meta-analysis, a total of eight papers with a 2,826 sample size were considered. Overall, 65.49% of Ethiopian health care professionals had a positive attitude towards safe abortion (95%CI: 49.64, 81.34; I2 = 99.20%, P = 0.000). Knowledge of the abortion law (OR = 2.25, 95% CI: 1.06, 3.43), being a male provider (OR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.23, 2.54), receiving training on abortion (OR = 2.91, 95% CI: 1.17, 4.65), working as a midwife (OR = 3.029, 95% CI: 1.605, 4.453) and practicing abortion procedures (OR = 2.55, 95% CI: 1.32, 3.78) were positively associated with the attitudes of the providers regarding safe abortion in Ethiopia.

Conclusion

In Ethiopia, there was a low pooled prevalence of positive attitude towards safe abortion. Safe abortion services in Ethiopia are more likely to be viewed favorably by health care professionals who have received abortion service training and are familiar with abortion laws. As a result, it is imperative that all healthcare facilities and other relevant parties ensure that health professionals receive training on safe abortion services and are aware of Ethiopia’s abortion laws.

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work. Data AvailabilityAll relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Abortion is defined by the WHO as ending a pregnancy before 20 weeks of gestation or if the baby weighs less than 500grams. However, in Ethiopia, abortion is defined as ending a pregnancy before 28 weeks of gestation or if the baby weighs less than 1000grams [1]. Annually, there are approximately 208 million pregnancies worldwide. Among these, unintended pregnancies make up 41%. Worldwide, there are averages of 73.3 million induced abortions (both safe and unsafe) performed each year. Around 80,000 women lose their lives due to unsafe abortions annually, with developing nations bearing over 95% of these deaths and injuries [2]. In numerous countries, particularly in the developing world, limited access to safe abortion services remains a significant contributor to maternal mortality [3]. In sub-Saharan Africa, the incidence of maternal deaths due to unsafe abortions has seen a significant increase. An estimated 30% of women in this area die during pregnancy [4]. Approximately 25% of pregnancies in Ethiopia are unplanned [5]. This contributes 6% to 9% of all maternal deaths each year [6]. Despite the expansion of services following the 2005 reform of the abortion laws, Ethiopia still faces a high rate of complications from unsafe abortions. Nations with high maternal mortality rates, such as Ethiopia, urgently need more interventions and better education for healthcare professionals on safe abortion practices to reduce mortality associated with unsafe procedures [7]. In the federal democratic republic of Ethiopia, the House of Representatives and the Food, Medicine, and Healthcare Administration Control Council of Ministers issued Regulation No. 299/2013, which mandates that "health professionals may not refuse to provide services such as legal safe abortions on the basis of personal beliefs" [8]. Despite this regulation, many medical professionals continue to decline to offer safe abortion services due to their personal moral or religious beliefs [7]. The main obstacles to performing safe abortion procedures in Ethiopia include a lack of facilities and equipment, insufficient knowledge, and the negative attitudes of healthcare workers toward safe abortion [9]. Despite several fragmented cross-sectional studies conducted in the past, there is no cumulative data on the attitudes of Ethiopian health care providers and related factors regarding safe abortion. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate health care providers’ attitudes towards safe abortion and related factors in Ethiopia using a pooled approach.

Methods

Study design and setting

The attitudes of Ethiopian healthcare professionals regarding safe abortion were examined through a systematic review and meta-analysis. To conduct and report systematic reviews and meta-analyses, the study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, which consist of checklists (S1 Checklist). Ethiopia, categorized as a low-income country in the Horn of Africa, is projected to have a population of 123.4 million in 2022, 133.5 million in 2032, and 171.8 million in 2050. From an administrative perspective, Ethiopia is divided into 11 regions and two city administrations. These regions are further subdivided into zones, which in turn are divided into districts. Finally, districts are further divided into kebeles, which represent the smallest administrative divisions with a typical population ranging from 2000 to 3500 residents.

Search strategies and sources of information

We registered this systematic review and meta-analysis in the PROSPERO database with the ID number CRD42022342376. A compressive search from different databases was done including grey literatures. In this review the databases used were Google Scholar, Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, Science Direct, Hinari and African Journals Online. The search was conducted from February 5 to 10, 2023, and included articles published before February 10, 2023.The search was conducted using four keywords: "Health care provider," "abortion," "factor," and "Ethiopia." For each keyword, relevant Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and entry words were utilized. All the MeSH terms and entry words were combined using “OR” to retrieve a broad range of studies. Then, the four keywords were combined with each of the elements using “AND” to generate specific and relevant articles.

Inclusion criteria

The main focus of this meta-analysis and systematic review was on articles that met specific criteria. We included studies that reported the prevalence or proportion of health care providers’ attitude towards safe abortion and the associated factors. Both published English-language articles and grey literature were considered. We specifically focused on observational study designs, including case-control and cross-sectional studies, that reported the prevalence or proportion of health care providers’ attitude towards safe abortion and its associated factors. Published papers or reports up to February 10, 2023, were eligible for inclusion.

Exclusion criteria

During the selection process, we excluded articles without complete texts or abstracts. Additionally, articles that did not report on the relevant outcome were not included.

Evaluation of the studies quality

Each study’s quality was assessed by using the revised JBI critical appraisal quality assessment tools by using the revised tools for cross- sectional assessment tools [10]. The quality of each original study was independently assessed by all authors using the tools.

Data extraction

From February 11 to February 30, 2023, all authors utilized a standardized data extraction spreadsheet to gather the necessary data. Each author independently evaluated the tool and reached a consensus. This form includes the author’s name, publication year, study setting, study area/region, study design, study period, cases, sample size, providers’ attitudes towards safe abortion, and factors influencing these attitudes.

Outcomes of measurement

The overall pooled percentage of providers with a favorable attitude towards safe abortion in Ethiopia was the primary outcome of the study, whereas associated factors with the attitudes of the providers regarding safe abortion in Ethiopia were the second objective of the review.

Data analysis

Data were extracted from each study using a format created in Microsoft Excel. For the meta-analysis, the data were imported into STATA 17. The associated factors influencing providers’ attitudes towards safe abortion were examined based on eligibility criteria. At least two researches that showed a significant correlation with attitudes about safe abortion were included, taking into account their impact measurements with 95% confidence intervals. Variations between the investigations were evaluated using a random-effects model based on the DerSimonian-Laird technique. Based on the sample size, study region, and study period, subgroup analysis was also carried out. The findings, which included effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals, were displayed using text, tables, and forest plots. Statistical heterogeneity was tested with an I2 statistic at a p-value ≤ 0.05.

Heterogeneity and publication bias

Heterogeneity among the included studies was assessed using I2 test statistics and the Cochrane Q-test. The I2 value indicates the percentage of variation across studies that can be attributed to heterogeneity rather than chance. Heterogeneity was considered significant at p ≤ 0.05. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots, and Egger’s test (p < 0.05) was used to declare publication bias.

Results

Description of eligible studies

A total of 1,230 papers were identified through electronic searches. Of these, 400 duplicates were removed, and 800 articles were excluded during the screening process. The remaining 30 articles underwent a full-text review, resulting in 8 articles being considered appropriate and eligible for analysis (Fig 1).

10.1371/journal.pone.0308419.g001 Fig 1 Flow chart for study of health care providers’ attitude and associated factors to safe abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis in Ethiopia, 2023.

Characteristics of included investigations

Eight studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final systematic review and meta-analysis. The sample sizes ranged from 240 [11] to 431 [12].This systematic review and Meta- analysis consist of eight cross- sectional studies with a total of 2,826 study participants from different regions of Ethiopia. The prevalence ranged from 46.7 [13] to 96.29 [12] (Table 1).

10.1371/journal.pone.0308419.t001 Table 1 Study characteristics included in the systematic review and Meta- analysis Ethiopia (n = 8).

Authors	Publication year	Study region	Study design	Sample Size	Positive attitude (%)	
Yitagesu S et al [13]	2018	Oromia	cross-sectional	394	46.7	
Tegenu B et al [30]	2022	Harari regional state	cross-sectional	411	58.4	
Endalkachew Mekonnen Assefa [31]	2019	Adise Ababa	cross-sectional	405	54.1	
Terefe T et al [32]	Unpublished	Oromia	cross-sectional	286	53.8	
Abebay T et al [33]	Unpublished	Amhara	cross-sectional	416	70.2	
Jemila A et al [12]	2011	Adise Ababa	cross-sectional	431	96.29	
Kalkidan L et al [11]	2020	Adise Ababa	cross-sectional	240	54.2	
Zaid T et al [34]	2014	Tigray	cross-sectional	243	89.7	

Providers’ attitude to safe abortion in Ethiopia

The overall pooled percentage of providers with a favorable attitude towards safe abortion in Ethiopia was 65.49% (95%CI: 49.64, 81.34; I2 = 99.20%, = 0.000) (Fig 2) with a publication bias distribution of studies was showed by a funnel plot about providers’ attitude to safe abortion in Ethiopia (Fig 3).

10.1371/journal.pone.0308419.g002 Fig 2 Forest funnel plot of the pooled providers’ favorable attitude to safe abortion in Ethiopia, 2023.

10.1371/journal.pone.0308419.g003 Fig 3 Funnel plot to test publication bias of eight studies, 2023.

Subgroup analysis

Subgroup analysis was conducted based on participant sample size, region, and study period. Although only one study was conducted in the Tigray region, the subgroup analysis indicated that providers’ favorable attitudes towards safe abortion were highest in this region, at 89.71% (85.89–93.53).The pooled prevalence of positive attitudes towards safe abortion is nearly the same across other regions. The subgroup analysis based on sample size revealed that providers’ attitudes towards safe abortion were nearly identical. When considering the study period, providers’ favorable attitudes were highest in studies conducted in 2016 and earlier (71.76%) compared to those conducted after 2016 (59.32%) (Table 2).

10.1371/journal.pone.0308419.t002 Table 2 Subgroup analyses to providers’ attitude to safe abortion in Ethiopia.

Subgroup	Number of study	Sample size	Attitude(95% CI)	Heterogeneity	
Region	I2	P-value	
Tigray	1	243	89.71 (85.89, 93.53)	-	-	
Amhara	1	416	70.19 (65.797, 74.58)	-	-	
Oromia	2	680	50.10 (43.11, 57.10)	70.61%	0.000	
Harerege	1	411	58.39 (53.62, 63.15)	-	-	
Adise Abeba	3	1076	68.25(35.30, 101.21)	99.47%	0.000	
Sample size						
> = 353	5	2057	65.18 (42.81, 87.55)	99.42%	0.00	
<353	3	769	65.99 (39.88, 92.10)	98.66%	0.00	
Period						
2016 and before	4		71.76 (47.89, 95.64)	99.44%	0.000	
After 2016	4		59.32 (51.28, 67.36)	89.41%	0.000	

Factors influencing providers’ attitudes towards safe abortion in Ethiopia

This review and meta-analysis identified factors significantly associated with health care providers’ favorable attitudes towards safe abortion in Ethiopia. These positively associated factors include knowledge of the country’s current abortion laws, being a male health care provider, having received training on safe abortion, working as a midwife, and having experience performing abortion procedures (Table 3).

10.1371/journal.pone.0308419.t003 Table 3 Analysis of factors associated with providers’ attitude to safe abortion in Ethiopia, 2023.

Variables	Number of study	Status of heterogeneity	Sample size	OR(95% CI)	I2	P-value	
knowledge of the country’s current abortion laws	3	Moderate	1258	2.25 (1.06, 3.43)	44.77%	0.0002	
Being male provider	4	Low	1518	1.89 (1.23,2.54)	28.43%	0.0000	
Training taken on safe abortion	2	Low	827	2.91 (1.17,4.65)	6.96%	0.0010	
Midwives’ profession	2	No heterogeneity	821	3.02 (1.60, 4.45)	0.00%	0.0000	
Have ever practiced abortion procedure	2	No heterogeneity	847	2.55 (1.32, 3.78)	0.00%	0.0000	

Discussion

In this review and meta-analysis, the overall pooled favorable attitude towards safe abortion among Ethiopian healthcare providers was 65.495% (95% CI: 49.640–81.349; I2 = 99.20%, P = 0.000). The results were consistent with a systematic review conducted in Southeast Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa (70%) [14], as well as national studies conducted in South Africa (70%) [15] and Ghana (80%) [16]. The similarity between these countries could be attributed to their adherence to similar abortion regulations Moreover, healthcare providers in these countries could exchange experiences from international conferences and collaborations related to safe abortion. They could also receive training on safe abortion practices based on comparable standards. However, this review and meta-analysis reported higher figures compared to studies conducted in Ghana[41.25%] [17],Thailand [41.45%] [18], and in South Africa[38.8%] [19]. Differences in abortion laws and policies across national borders, the impact of abortion on maternal mortality rates, cultural and religious variations, and the nature of the research could all be contributing factors to the observed disparities.

Subgroup analysis by region, sample size, and study period were conducted in our review and meta-analysis. The Tigray region showed the highest positive attitude of health care providers towards safe abortion, with a rate of 89.71% (95%CI: 85.89, 93.53), despite only one study was conducted. The disparity may have resulted from the differences in training accessibility. Regions with better infrastructure and greater training opportunities may have more positive attitudes. Additionally, cultural norms and religious beliefs can significantly impact attitudes toward abortion. Regions characterized by distinct cultural practices or strong religious affiliations may display varying attitudes. Furthermore, the observed difference could be attributed to a single study conducted in the Tigray region.

Based on the findings from this review and meta-analysis, health professionals who were aware of Ethiopia’s current abortion laws were 2.25 times (95% CI: 1.066, 3.439) more likely than their peers to have a favourable attitude towards safe abortion in Ethiopia. The results are consistent with research conducted in Southeast Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa [14], Thailand [18], Palestinian [20] and USA [21]. The explanation that could apply is that healthcare providers who are familiar with Ethiopia’s current abortion laws can obtain accurate information. This familiarity ensures that they will not face legal consequences for performing the procedure, which may influence their attitudes. Besides, legal abortion laws awareness might contribute to reducing the stigma associated with abortion. When providers know that the law supports safe abortion practices, they may be less judgmental and more empathetic toward patients seeking these services.

Health providers who had received safe abortion training were 2.91 times (95% CI: 1.171, 4.653) more likely to have a favorable attitude towards abortion compared to those who had not received the training. This finding is consistent with studies conducted across twelve countries [22], Thailand [23], a systematic review in the developed world [24], national survey in Ghana [25] and Scotland [26]. This may be because current training packages emphasize knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP), and the abortion training provides an opportunity for values clarification and attitude transformation (VCAT) exercise based on real cases. By using real-life cases exercise, the training helps providers shift from a negative to a positive attitude. Moreover, topics on stigmatizing concerns related to safe abortion could be covered in training on the procedure. Thus, this training may help healthcare professionals become more compassionate and nonjudgmental in their approach, which will positively affect attitudes. It may also make them feel obligated to protect patients’ rights and well-being, which would positively affect attitudes.

Male providers were 1.89 times (95% CI: 1.237, 2.542) more likely to have a positive attitude towards safe abortion. The findings are consistent with a systematic review conducted in Southeast Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa [14]. This may be due to cultural influences. From an early age, girls are often not permitted to discuss reproductive health issues with their parents or friends in Ethiopia. Additionally, male providers might have greater exposure to discussions about safe abortion practices during their medical training or professional development. This exposure could lead to increased awareness and understanding, positively affecting their attitudes.

When comparing the attitudes of midwives to those of other health professionals, midwives were 3.02 times more likely to be in favor of safe abortion (95% CI: 1.605, 4.453). This finding aligns with research conducted in Colombia [27]. A few potential explanations include training accessibility, working atmosphere, curriculum, and proximity to the subject matter. Midwives frequently provide close prenatal, postpartum, and postpartum care to expectant patients. Because of their experiences, they might come to understand how crucial safe abortion is to maintaining one’s reproductive health. They might see it as a means of decreasing risky behaviors and maternal deaths. Furthermore, specialized training in reproductive health, including family planning and contraception, is provided to midwives. Their comprehension of the significance of safe abortion and its function within comprehensive reproductive care may be improved by this instruction.

Compared to healthcare professionals who have never performed a safe abortion, those who have practiced the procedure were 2.55 times more likely to have a positive attitude (95% CI: 1.324, 3.786). This result is supported by research conducted in Thailand [18], Thailand [28] and WHO guideline [29]. Exposure to the procedure may help reduce the anxiety and concern associated with abortion procedure and healthcare professionals might change their perspective from negative to positive attitude to safe abortion. Professionals who have performed safe abortions directly gain practical experience and exposure to the procedure. This awareness might lead to a better understanding of its safety, efficacy, and importance in reproductive healthcare. Additionally, professionals can observe the impact on patients’ lives when they are directly involved in abortion care. Being exposed firsthand can increase compassion and empathy, which can result in more supportive attitudes. Besides, the opinions of professionals who have carried out safe abortions may be supported by data and studies. They may realize that lower maternal mortality and better overall results for reproductive health depend on safe abortion practices.

Limitations

This review is limited to articles published only in English, which may lead to reporting bias.

Conclusion

In Ethiopia, the pooled prevalence of health professionals who support safe abortion is low. Health care providers’ attitudes towards safe abortion in Ethiopia are significantly influenced by their familiarity with the country’s current abortion laws, being male providers, having received training in safe abortion techniques, their profession (being midwives), and their experience with performing safe abortion procedures.

To change healthcare providers’ attitudes towards safe abortion and increase their awareness of Ethiopia’s current laws, it is crucial to offer training that focuses primarily on values clarification and attitude transformation (VCAT) regarding safe abortion. Medical universities and colleges should incorporate Ethiopia’s current safe abortion laws into their curricula.

This responsibility lies with the Ethiopian Ministry of Education.

Supporting information

S1 Checklist PRISMA 2020 checklist followed for this systematic review and meta-analysis on health care providers`attitude and associated factors to safe abortion in Ethiopia, 2023: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

(DOCX)

S1 Data Final excel extracted data for this systematic review and meta-analysis on health care providers`attitude and associated factors to safe abortion in Ethiopia, 2023: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

(XLSX)

The authors would like to thank all the authors and publishers of the primary studies.

Abbreviations

CI Confidence Interval

JBI Joanna Briggs Institute

KAP Knowledge Attitude and Practice

MeSH Medical Subject Headings

MMR Maternal Mortality Rate

OR Odds Ratio

PRISMA Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

VCAT Values Clarification and Attitude Transformation

WHO World Health Organization

10.1371/journal.pone.0308419.r001
Decision Letter 0
Aliyo Ali Alqeer Academic Editor
© 2024 Alqeer Aliyo Ali
2024
Alqeer Aliyo Ali
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Submission Version0
24 Jun 2024

PONE-D-23-39869Health care Providers` attitude and associated factors to safe abortion in Ethiopia, 2023: A systematic review and meta-analysisPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Bante,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR: The manuscript titled 'Healthcare Providers' Attitude and Associated Factors to Safe Abortion in Ethiopia, 2023: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis' has undergone review. Therefore, revisions are required for the introduction, methodology, findings, and conclusion. Extensive language editing is also necessary.=============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 08 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Alqeer Aliyo Ali, MSc

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We noticed you have some minor occurrence of overlapping text with the following previous publication(s), which needs to be addressed:

https://assets.researchsquare.com/files/rs-2305231/v1/d5756d6d-f977-469e-a7d1-f8bc3850b2be.pdf?c=1669837351

In your revision ensure you cite all your sources (including your own works), and quote or rephrase any duplicated text outside the methods section. Further consideration is dependent on these concerns being addressed.

3. When completing the data availability statement of the submission form, you indicated that you will make your data available on acceptance. We strongly recommend all authors decide on a data sharing plan before acceptance, as the process can be lengthy and hold up publication timelines. Please note that, though access restrictions are acceptable now, your entire data will need to be made freely accessible if your manuscript is accepted for publication. This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If you are unable to adhere to our open data policy, please kindly revise your statement to explain your reasoning and we will seek the editor's input on an exemption. Please be assured that, once you have provided your new statement, the assessment of your exemption will not hold up the peer review process.

4. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Introduction: The introduction is mentioned very briefly. It is better to explain more about the objectives of the study

Method: 1- Why is demographic and geographic information written in the study design section? Wouldn't it be better if these explanations were explained in the introduction?

2- Prospero code report was enough. Additional explanations in this paragraph should be deleted.

3- In the results measurement section, two variables or two results are written? (It is unclear) only one result is explained.

Discussion: It has not been strongly discussed. Only Ethiopia's cultural problems and education are mentioned. Discussion requires stronger explanations to explain the results.

Conclusion: I think the conclusion is good and practical.

It is better to enter the number of articles of each database in the Prisma flowchart. Not just the total number

The table related to the information of the final 8 articles was not in the manuscript and the supplement file

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

10.1371/journal.pone.0308419.r002
Author response to Decision Letter 0
Submission Version1
23 Jul 2024

PLOS ONE

From Simachew Animen

E- mail: animensimachew@gmail.com

Subject: Submitting a Revised Version of the Manuscript

PONE-D-23-39869

Date- 7/19/2024

Title: - Health care Providers` attitude and associated factors to safe abortion in Ethiopia, 2023: A systematic review and meta-analysis

We would like to thank the reviewers and editiorals for their valuable and constructive comments. We have taken advantage of their indispensable comments to improve our manuscript. In this document, we have described all changes made in accordance with the comments of reviewers. The language issue has been addressed rigorously.We believe that you will satisfy for the revision. Now, the revised manuscript with track changes and unmarked version revised paper without tracked changes are provided in the attached documents.

We are looking forward to hear from you.

With regards!

Attachment Submitted filename: Response to Reviewres and editors, PLOSE ONE.docx

10.1371/journal.pone.0308419.r003
Decision Letter 1
Aliyo Ali Alqeer Academic Editor
© 2024 Alqeer Aliyo Ali
2024
Alqeer Aliyo Ali
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Submission Version1
24 Jul 2024

Health care Providers` attitude and associated factors to safe abortion in Ethiopia, 2023: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PONE-D-23-39869R1

Dear Dr. Bante,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Alqeer Aliyo Ali, MSc

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

10.1371/journal.pone.0308419.r004
Acceptance letter
Aliyo Ali Alqeer Academic Editor
© 2024 Alqeer Aliyo Ali
2024
Alqeer Aliyo Ali
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
31 Jul 2024

PONE-D-23-39869R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Bante,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Mr. Alqeer Aliyo Ali

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE
==== Refs
References

1 Organization W.H. , Clinical practice handbook for safe abortion. 2014: World Health Organization.
2 Singh S. , Sedgh G. , and Hussain R. , Unintended pregnancy: worldwide levels, trends, and outcomes. Studies in family planning, 2010. 41 (4 ): p. 241–250. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2010.00250.x 21465725
3 Grimes D.A. , et al ., Unsafe abortion: the preventable pandemic. The lancet, 2006. 368 (9550 ): p. 1908–1919. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69481-6 17126724
4 Singh S. and Maddow‐Zimet I. , Facility‐based treatment for medical complications resulting from unsafe pregnancy termination in the developing world, 2012: a review of evidence from 26 countries. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2016. 123 (9 ): p. 1489–1498. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13552 26287503
5 Demographic E. , Health survey (EDHS) 2016: key indicators report, central statistical agency Addis Ababa, Ethiopia . The DHS Program ICF Rockville, Maryland, USA, 2016.
6 Gebremedhin S. , Development of a new model for estimating maternal mortality ratio at national and sub-national levels and its application for describing sub-national variations of maternal death in Ethiopia . Plos one, 2018. 13 (8 ): p. e0201990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201990 30080902
7 Ewnetu D.B. , et al ., Still a moral dilemma: how Ethiopian professionals providing abortion come to terms with conflicting norms and demands. BMC Medical Ethics, 2020. 21 (1 ): p. 1–7.31906925
8 Ethiopia F.D.R. o., The House of Peoples Representatives. Food, Medicine and Healthcare Administratuion and Control Council of Ministers Regulation No. 299/2013. Fed Negarit Gazeta, 2014. 11 (24 ): p. 7210.
9 Geressu T. , Gebrehiwot Y. , and Edelman A. , Second-trimester abortion: current practices and barriers to service in Ethiopia. 2010, IPAS.
10 Barker TH , Stone JC , Sears K , Klugar M , Tufanaru C , Leonardi-Bee J , et al . The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for randomized controlled trials. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2023;21 (3 ):494–506. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00430 36727247
11 Lakew K. and Worku D. , Safe induced abortion: knowledge and attitude among medical interns of Addis Ababa University. Ethiopian Journal of Reproductive Health, 2020. 12 (4 ): p. 7–7.
12 Abdi J. and Gebremariam M.B. , Health providers’ perception towards safe abortion service at selected health facilities in Addis Ababa . African Journal of Reproductive Health, 2011. 15 (1 ). 21987935
13 Sintayehu Y. , Hordofa B. , and Shiferaw K. , Health care providers’ perception and associated factors towards safe abortion in selected health facilities in Adama, Ethiopia. J Women’s Health Care, 2018. 7 (428 ): p. 2167–0420.1000428.
14 Rehnström Loi U. , et al ., Health care providers’ perceptions of and attitudes towards induced abortions in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia: a systematic literature review of qualitative and quantitative data. BMC public health, 2015. 15 (1 ): p. 1–13. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1502-2 25563658
15 Wheeler S.B. , et al ., Attitudes and intentions regarding abortion provision among medical school students in South Africa . International perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 2012. 38 (3 ): p. 154. doi: 10.1363/3815412 23018137
16 Morhe E. , Morhe R. , and Danso K. , Attitudes of doctors toward establishing safe abortion units in Ghana. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2007. 98 (1 ): p. 70–74.
17 Agbewoley S. , Factors Influencing Health Workers’ Attitudes and Perceptions Towards Abortion: A Case Study in the Ketu South Municipality in the Volta Region of Ghana. 2022, Ensign Global College.
18 Sinthuchai N. , et al ., Survey of knowledge and attitude regarding induced abortion among nurses in a tertiary hospital in Thailand after amendment of the abortion act: a cross-sectional study. BMC Women’s Health, 2022. 22 (1 ): p. 1–12.34986812
19 Buga G. , Attitudes of medical students to induced abortion. East African Medical Journal, 2002. 79 (5 ): p. 259–262. doi: 10.4314/eamj.v79i5.8865 12638811
20 St-Jean M. , Assessing Nursing and Midwifery Students’ Attitudes Toward Abortion and Contraception: Results of a National Survey In the Occupied Palestinian Territories. 2015, Université d’Ottawa/University of Ottawa.
21 Dodge L.E. , Haider S. , and Hacker M.R. , Attitudes toward abortion among providers of reproductive health care. Women’s Health Issues, 2016. 26 (5 ): p. 511–516. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2016.06.005 27522117
22 Turner K.L. , et al ., Values clarification workshops to improve abortion knowledge, attitudes and intentions: a pre-post assessment in 12 countries. Reproductive Health, 2018. 15 (1 ): p. 1–11.29304829
23 Sanitya R. , et al ., Healthcare providers’ knowledge and attitude towards abortions in Thailand: a pre-post evaluation of trainings on safe abortion. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. 17 (9 ): p. 3198. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093198 32375376
24 Doran F. and Nancarrow S. , Barriers and facilitators of access to first-trimester abortion services for women in the developed world: a systematic review. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 2015. 41 (3 ): p. 170–180. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2013-100862 26106103
25 Lawrence E.R. , et al ., Attitudes, experiences, and training on comprehensive abortion care: A nationwide survey of trainee physicians in Ghana. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 2022. 26 (9 ): p. 21–30. doi: 10.29063/ajrh2022/v26i9.3 37585067
26 Cochrane R.A. and Cameron S.T. , Attitudes of Scottish abortion care providers towards provision of abortion after 16 weeks’ gestation within Scotland. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 2013. 18 (3 ): p. 215–220. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2013.775240 23521135
27 Dowler M. , Rushton E. , and Kornelsen J. , Medical abortion in midwifery scope of practice: a qualitative exploration of the attitudes of registered midwives in British Columbia. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 2020. 65 (2 ): p. 231–237. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13059 31793187
28 Phuapradit W. , Sirivongs B. , and Chaturachinda K. , Abortion: an attitude study of professional staff at Ramathibodi hospital. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet, 1986. 69 (1 ): p. 22–27. 3958655
29 Organization W.H. , Health worker role in providing safe abortion care and post abortion contraception. 2015: World Health Organization.
30 Balcha T. , et al ., Attitudes toward safe abortion care and its associated factors among health care providers working in public health facilities in eastern Ethiopia. SAGE Open Medicine, 2022. 10 : p. 20503121221107792.
31 Assefa E.M. , Knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of health providers towards safe abortion provision in Addis Ababa health centers. BMC women’s health, 2019. 19 : p. 1–10.30611257
32 Zike T.T. , et al ., Assessment of health service providers’ perception on safe abortion care in Kimbibit District, North Shoa Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia, 2021. 2022.
33 Tadie A. , et al ., Attitude towards Safe Abortion and Associated Factors among Health Care Professionals at the Public Health Facilities of Bahir Dar city, Northwest, Ethiopia, 2021. 2022.
34 Tadesse Z. , et al ., Assessment of Health Care Providers’ Attitude and Associated Factors to Wards Safe Abortion at Public Hospitals, in Mekelle City, Tigray, Ethiopia; A Cross Sectional Study. 2014.
