
==== Front
Research (Wash D C)
Research (Wash D C)
RESEARCH
Research
2639-5274
AAAS

10.34133/research.0018
0018
Research Article
Self-Assembly of Silver Clusters into One- and Two-Dimensional Structures and Highly Selective Methanol Sensing
Qin Zhaoxian 1 4 †
Li Zhiwen 1 4 †
Sharma Sachil 1
Peng Yongwu 3
Jin Rongchao 2 *
Li Gao 1 4 *
1 State Key Laboratory of Catalysis, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, China.
2 Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
3 College of Materials Science and Engineering and College of Chemical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China.
4 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049 Beijing, China.
* Address correspondence to: gaoli@dicp.ac.cn (G.L.); rongchao@andrew.cmu.edu (R.J.)
These authors contributed equally to this work.

21 12 2022
2022
2022 001804 8 2022
08 11 2022
Copyright © 2022 Zhaoxian Qin et al.
2022
Zhaoxian Qin et al.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Exclusive licensee Science and Technology Review Publishing House. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY 4.0).

The development of new materials for the design of sensitive and responsive sensors has become a crucial research direction. Here, two silver cluster-based polymers (Ag-CBPs), including one-dimensional {[Ag22(L1)8(CF3CO2)14](CH3OH)2}n chain and two-dimensional {[Ag12(L2)2(CO2CF3)14(H2O)4(AgCO2CF3)4](HNEt3)2}n film, are designed and used to simulate the human nose, an elegant sensor to smells, to distinguish organic solvents. We study the relationship between the atomic structures of Ag-CBPs determined by x-ray diffraction and the electrical properties in the presence of organic solvents (e.g., methanol and ethanol). The ligands, cations, and the ligated solvent molecules not only play an important role in the self-assembly process of Ag-CBP materials but also determine their physiochemical properties such as the sensing functionality.
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

New functional materials are of great importance for the design of highly sensitive and high-precision sensors for chemicals. The selective, precise, and swift measurement of volatile alcohols is critical in various areas such as the food industry [1,2], occupational safety [3], and forensics [4,5]. Toward this direction, the multidimensional nanoscale materials have garnered a lot of attention owing to their peculiarity in structures and properties, such as atomic/molecular thickness, optical transparency, and large surface areas [6,7]. The fabrication of alcohol sensing devices is an important aspect for the application of these materials. For instance, graphene-based nanomaterials are considered as one of the frontiers of exploring the sensing materials [8–11]. The change in conductivity of graphene-based materials upon the adsorption of gas molecules leads to the gas detection. Besides this, some other 2-dimensional (2D) materials including nanostructures based on metal oxides [12,13], nanoporous silicon [14], hybrid carbon-based nanostructures [15], metal organic frameworks [16], and hybrids of fiber optics with nanostructures [17] have also displayed great promise in sensing of alcohols.

Recently, the burgeoning metal nanoclusters with well-resolved crystal structures show great prospects in fundamental research and applications in various aspects including luminescence, medicine, catalysis, energy, and biology [18–24] owing to their unique physiochemical properties. Meanwhile, multidimensional (e.g., 1D, [26–29], 2D, [27,30–34], and 3D [30,35–42]) self-assembled structures of metal nanoclusters have recently been designed to tailor their properties. For example, Mak and co-workers [30–32] have reported much work on the synthesis and structural determination of multidimensional silver nanocluster-based materials. Sun and co-workers [36,37] reported a series of multidimensional self-assembled nanocluster-based clusters with polyoxometallate as an anionic template, where organic ligands and halide atoms were used as linkers to connect clusters. Zhu and co-workers synthesized two 3D structures composed of [Au1Ag22(SAdm)12](SbF6)2Cl and [Au1Ag22(SAdm)12](SbF6)3 (SAdm = adamantanethiolate) as structural units [38]. These metal cluster-based materials have been well-developed as fluorescence probes to detect organic compounds [23–24] due to their unique fluorescence properties. However, the study of metal cluster-based materials applied as electrochemical sensors is still quite rare so far.

Here, we present the synthesis of 2 novel silver cluster-based polymers (Ag-CBPs) with atomically precise structures, including {Ag22(L1)8(CF3CO2)14(CH3OH)2}n (L1 = 3-(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)-benzonitrile) chains and {[Ag12(L2)2(CO2CF3)14(H2O)4(AgCO2CF3)4]-(HNEt3)2}n (L2 = 1-(3-mercaptoprop-1-en-2-yl)-2-methoxypyridin-1-ium) film (abbreviated as Ag22-CBP and Ag16-CBP, respectively), which are determined by single-crystal x-ray diffraction. Interestingly, they show different conductivity under an external voltage in the presence of different organic solvents, which is related to their structural differences. We further find that the charge transfer and the species of charge carriers have an important influence on the conductivity of Ag-CBPs. The different responses of Ag-CBPs to the variation of organic solvents hold promise in the design of sensitive sensors for distinguishing solvents like the nose to differentiate smells.

Materials

All chemicals were commercially available and were used as received without further purification. 3-Hydroxybenzonitrile (99%), 2-hydroxybenzonitrile (99%), silver trifluoroacetate (AgCO2CF3, 99%), silver tetrafluoroborate (AgBF6, 99%), 1-(3-mercaptoprop-1-en-2-yl)-2-methoxypyridin-1-ium bromide (99%), methanol (HPLC grade, 99.9%), ethanol (HPLC grade, 99.9%), acetone (HPLC grade, 99.9%), and toluene (HPLC grade, 99.9%) were purchased from Adamas-beta. Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) was received from Aladdin. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET; thickness of 125 μm) was obtained from Kangde Xin Composite Material Group. Ultrapure water (resistance, 18.2 MΩ·cm) was purified with a Barnstead Nanopure Di-water TM system.

Synthesis of Ag22-CBP and Ag16-CBP

All the operations were carried out in dark. In general, 10 mg of Ag-L1 was dispersed into 5 ml of MeOH, followed by the addition of AgCO2CF3 (88 mg, 0.4 mmol, dissolved in 5 ml of MeOH). A white suspension was generated. After 20 min later, filtration of the mixture gave a light-yellow solution, which was then exposed to ethyl ether for crystallization in the dark in a refrigerator. Transparent yellow block-like crystals of {Ag22(L1)8(CO2CF3)14(CH3OH)2}n (denoted as Ag22-CBP) were obtained in a few weeks. {[Ag12(L2)2(CO2CF3)14(H2O)4(AgCO2CF3)4](HNEt3)2}n (Ag16-CBP) was obtained by a similar procedure. Briefly, 10 mg of Ag-L2 (dispersed in 5 ml of MeOH) was used in the preparation of Ag16-CBP. Light-yellow plate-like crystals of Ag16-CBP were obtained after weeks in the dark in a refrigerator. The synthetic yields of Ag22-CBP and Ag16 were 41% and 62% (based on consumption of AgCO2CF3), respectively.

Sensor fabrication

For the preparation of the cluster thin-film sensor, 30 mg of the clusters was first dispersed in 5 ml of ethanol, and then 5 ml of HPMC aqueous solution (4 mg·ml−1) was added to adjust the viscosity. Next, 3 ml of cluster dispersion obtained from the previous step was dripped on PET and dried at 60 °C in an oven for 10 min. Finally, Cu wires were attached to the two ends of the film for connecting to the power supply in electrical measurements. The film of Ag-CBP sensors was sprayed into solvents. The pure solvents of methanol, ethanol, acetone, and toluene in HPLC grade and ultrapure water (resistance, 18.2 MΩ·cm) were used for the dynamic response and recovery of Ag-CBP sensors. The response time was 8 s, and the recovery time was 14 s. The sensitivity could be calculated as relative capacitance change for , where δ is relative current change Ix and I0 are measured currents when the sensor contacted with solvents and the initial current of free sensor (before dipping into solvents), respectively.The conductivity of the samples in solution was determined by a DDS-307 conductivity meter. Crystal samples were dispersed into different solution and then filtrated with a pinhole membrane filter, generating saturated solutions to be tested. Before the measurement, the conductivity meter was calibrated by a standard solution of 1408 μS·cm−1.

Results and Discussion

Atomic structure of Ag-CBPs

The cluster-based polymeric materials in this study with compositions of Ag22-CBP and Ag16-CBP were synthesized through a bottom-up synthetic strategy. Briefly, these polymeric materials were produced by the reaction and self-assembly of the corresponding silver precursors (Ag-L1 and Ag-L2) with AgCO2CF3, respectively (see the Supplementary Materials for details). Here, the alkynylate and thiolate ligands are selected to construct highly stable Ag-CBPs for their strong interaction and the flexible coordination between ligands and Ag atoms [31].

The compositions and atomic structures of the Ag-CBPs are determined by single-crystal x-ray diffraction. The Ag22-CBP crystallizes in the C2/c space group. The minimum asymmetry unit of Ag22-CBP is constructed by 4 components, including 11 Ag atoms, 7 trifluoroacetate anions, 4 L1 anions, and a methanol molecule, as depicted in Fig. 1A. An asymmetry unit rotates by 180° around a C2 axis forming the monomer of Ag22-CBP (Fig. 1B). Thus, a metal framework of 22 Ag atoms is furnished in the monomer, where the distances between the silver atoms range from 2.798(4) Å to 3.353(3) Å. The monomers connect with each other in a head to tail manner, giving rise to a 1D silver chain along the c axis (Fig. 1C) through Ag–Ag bonds [3.302(4) Å], Ag–O–C(CF3)–O–Ag and Ag–Otrifluoroacetate–Ag motifs, and Ag–alkynylate bonds (Fig. S1), which resembles a millipede. The obtained silver chains are covered by L1 ligands and trifluoroacetate ions through various bonds. For the L1 ligands, both the terminal C≡C and C≡N groups are bonded to Ag atoms (Fig. S2). Three types of coordination modes of terminal C≡C group are observed: (a) the μ4-η1, η1, η2, η2 mode (Fig. S3A), in which the C≡C group bonds to 2 Ag atoms via σ bonds and to another 2 Ag atoms through π bonds; (b) the μ5-η1, η1, η1 η2, η2 mode (Fig. S3B), in which the C≡C group links to 3 Ag atoms via σ bonds and to another 2 Ag atoms through π bonds; and (c) the μ4-η1, η1, η1, η2 mode (Fig. S3C), in which the C≡C group is bonded to 3 Ag atoms via σ bonds and to another Ag atom through π bond. Only the C≡N–Ag σ bonding mode is detected between the C≡N group and Ag (Fig. S2). Besides, 3 coordination modes are observed between trifluoroacetate ions and Ag atoms, namely, μ1–Otrifluoroacetate, μ2–Otrifluoroacetate, and μ3–Otrifluoroacetate bonding modes. Besides L1 ligands and trifluoroacetate ions, it is worth noting that the nonionized methanol molecules bind with Ag atoms through Ag–Omethanol bonds [2.425(2) Å], which are shorter than the Ag–Otrifluoroacetate bonds [2.688(5) Å] (Fig. 1A and Fig. S4). These obtained silver chains are discrete but bridged to each other by C≡C groups and C≡N groups of L1 ligands to form the final 3D structure of Ag22-CBP, as shown in Fig. 1D.

Fig. 1. Structural anatomy of Ag22-CBP. (A) The asymmetric structure of Ag22-CBP. (B) The monomer structure of Ag22-CBP. (C) 1D silver chain along the c axis. (D) 3D structure with holes. Color code: Ag, purple; F, cyan; O, red; N, blue; C, gray and black; H, white.

A 2D structure of Ag16-CBP in P-1 space group was obtained when the bidentate L1 ligand was replaced by the unidentate L2 ligand under the otherwise similar experimental conditions. As shown in Fig. S5, 8 Ag atoms, 9 CF3CO2− ions, 1 L2 ligand, 2 aqua molecules and 1 [HNEt3]+ are found in the minimum asymmetry unit. The S atom of L2 ligand bonds to 5 Ag atoms via Ag–S bonds [2.447(3) to 2.979(2) Å], forming the main body of an inverted Ag6 unit as depicted in Fig. 2A and Fig. S6A, where the Ag–Ag bond length is in the range of 2.936(4) to 3.043(3) Å. Furthermore, 2 Ag6 units connect with each other, generating a Z-motif Ag12 cluster (Fig. 2B and Fig. S7), which is covered by 14 trifluoroacetate ions via Ag–O bonds [2.215(3) to 2.428(5) Å]. A molecular cavity is formed, where 2 water molecules and 1 [HNEt3]+ ion settle down through Ag–Owater bonds of 2.481(5) to 2.669(3) Å and hydrogen bond with a D---A distance of 2.798(3) Å between the [HNEt3]+ ion and aquo molecule (Fig. S8). These Ag12 clusters relate to each other by head to tail along the b axis via (Ag12)–Otriflouroacetate–(Ag12) motifs (Fig. 2C), where the shortest Ag---Ag distance between Ag12 clusters is ~3.572 Å, beyond the limit of Ag–Ag bonds. Furthermore, the Ag2(CF3CO2)2 units (noted as Ag2, highlighted in green in Fig. 2 and Fig. S6B) serve as the linkers to connect neighboring Ag12 clusters in the bc plane, i.e., the Ag12 clusters interact with 4 neighboring Ag12 clusters through 4 Ag2 units by the (Ag12)–Otriflouroacetate–(Ag2) motifs (Fig. 2c) to form a 2D plate. Finally, the 2D plates are packed into the 3D structure through hydrogen bonds and Van der Waals forces between layers (Fig. 2D).

Fig. 2. Structural anatomy of Ag16-CBP. (A) Ag6 unit in asymmetry. (B) Ag12 unit in monomer. 2D structure (C) and 3D structure (D) of Ag16-CBP. Color code: Ag, purple and green; S, yellow; F, cyan; O, red; N, blue; C, gray and black; H, white.

Sensing response to alcohol

Different from the common silver complexes [42], silver clusters [18,19] and even silver wires [22], here, we have obtained the silver frameworks, silver chains in Ag22-CBP, and silver plates in Ag16-CBP with unique and continuous features, which provide good channels for electrons to go through and prompt us to study their conductivity in the solid state.

To further confirm the structure uniformity and purity of the obtained Ag22-CBp and Ag16-CBP samples, we performed powder x-ray diffraction (PXRD) of Ag22-CBP and Ag16-CBP with their crystals and compared with simulated ones from the single-crystal structures as shown in Figs. S9 and S10. For both Ag22-CBP and Ag16-CBP, their experimental PXRD profiles match well with the simulated curves, respectively, indicating the high purity of crystal phases and structural consistency in Ag22-CBP and Ag16-CBP. Besides, we recorded and compared the PXRD patterns of the bulk crystal and powder samples after grinding. The data showed that the structures of Ag-CBPs were the same before and after the grinding (vide infra).

We investigated the sensing property of the 1D Ag22-CBP chains and 2D Ag16-CBP plates on a home-made setup in a clean room at the ambient temperature of ~24 °C. During the tests, the powder of Ag-CBPs was painted on a flexible Polyethylene terephthalate board, which was further connected to a SourceMeter 2450 through Cu wires linking to polymer film on PET board, forming a closed circle (Figs. S11 and S12). Initially, the films made of Ag22-CBP and Ag16-CBP were insulating under dry conditions (as the reference). Once organic solvents (including protic solvents: methanol and ethanol; and aprotic solvents: acetone and toluene) were sprayed on the films, the film conductivity changes, and the film becomes conducting for methanol and ethanol but still insulating for acetone, toluene, and ultrapure water (resistance of 18.2 MΩ·cm) (Fig. 3 and Fig. S13). As shown in Fig. 3A, the electric current turns to zero again with the removal of methanol or ethanol from the thin films, indicating that the protic organic solvents should interact with Ag22-CBP and Ag16-CBP to make them conductive. On the contrary, the current was almost zero when acetone, toluene, and ultrapure water were sprayed on the films (Fig. 3A and Fig. S13), which corroborates that the Ag22-CBP and Ag16-CBP cannot detect these solvents, as these solvents cannot make the Ag22-CBP and Ag16-CBP nanomaterials conductive. The limit of detection is also evaluated in the methanol/water mixtures with different ratios, as shown in Fig. S13. The relative capacitance change of the Ag16-CBP sensor for methanol can reach up to 5,000 for the mixture of methanol and water (vAmethanol/vwater = 3:7), which is ~33-fold higher than the reported cellulose/graphene nanocomposite [43].

Fig. 3. Dynamic response and recovery characterization of Ag-CBP sensors. (A) Dynamic response and recovery curves of Ag22-CBP thin-film sensor under different organic solvents (protic solvents: methanol and ethanol; aprotic solvents: acetone and toluene). (B) Dynamic response and recovery curves of Ag22-CBP and Ag16-CBP films in the presence of methanol. All the sprays were measured at 0.1-V bias.

The different responses to organic solvents suggest that both Ag22-CBP and Ag16-CBP could serve as good sensors for the protic organic solvents (e.g., methanol and ethanol), like the nose to recognize different smells in air. In comparison, Ag22-CBP and Ag16-CBP nanomaterials showed excellent dynamic responses to the methanol and ethanol detection, which may be due to the robust nature of these Ag-CBP nanomaterials. It is worthy to note that the responding electric current in methanol sensing is 15- to 25-fold that of the ethanol detection, and the signal falling time for methanol is longer as well (Figs. S14 and S15), which may be related to the stronger interaction between methanol and Ag22-CBP or Ag16-CBP than that of ethanol. The small cavities in Ag22-CBP (2.93 Å × 4.95 Å) and Ag16-CBP (3 Å × 3 Å) formed by the surface ligands of silver frameworks are much more suitable for small molecules like methanol and water only. In contrast, larger molecules such as ethanol require larger cavities than 3 Å.

Furthermore, the electric current intensity of the Ag16-CBP film (about 600 nA) is ~10-fold that of the Ag22-CBP film (~60 nA) with almost the same size under the identical experimental conditions, and the recovery time of Ag16-CBP film (~22 s) is much longer than that of Ag22-CBP film (~5 s) (Fig. 3B). All these results suggest that the Ag16-CBP film is much more sensitive to methanol than the Ag22-CBP film, which should be caused by the methanol absorption capability of the sensing material, for which the factors including the higher density of Ag atoms in the structural arrangement, richer hydrogen bonds, ion features, and the mass transfer in the 2D film of the Ag16-CBP should also be responsible.

To reveal how the conductivity of the CBP was affected by methanol, we studied the structural variation of CBP films with PXRD as shown in Fig. 4. Powders of Ag22-CBP and Ag16-CBP were made into films on a sample stage and tested. For Ag22-CBP, the powder sample presented more obvious signals at low angles than the bulk crystal samples, which is related to the size of sample and crystal face exposed. Ag22-CBP samples show the same profiles in bulk crystal and powder status, indicating that Ag22-CBP shares the same structures in powder and crystal. After methanol spray, a subtle decrement in the degree of crystallinity was detected, suggesting that partial crystalline Ag22-CBP maybe turns into amorphous in the presence of methanol although the structure of Ag22-CBP keeps inert. Besides, no further loss in the degree of crystallinity of Ag22-CBP film occurred even using more methanol, and the loss is irreversible. The situation for the 2D Ag16-CBP is more complicated. Some peaks in the 5° to 20° range in PXRD formed and disappeared besides the loss of degree of crystallinity. X-ray diffraction peaks at 6.6°, 7.94°, 8.2°, 10°, and 19.5° disappeared after methanol spray, and 4 new peaks were found at 6.4° to 7.5° simultaneously. These results indicate that the size/structure of Ag16-CBP has been affected by the sprayed methanol, which may be related to the 2D structure of Ag16-CBP. For example, the distance between layers and the relative position of layers may be affected by inducing methanol molecular.

Fig. 4. (A) PXRD of Ag22-CBP tested before and after the spray of methanol. (B) PXRD of Ag16-CBP tested before and after the spray of methanol.

Mechanism

The sensitivity of sensors to solvents is closely related to the conductivity of Ag-CBP materials with solvents. Compared with the silver chains (1D) (Fig. 5A) in Ag22-CBP, the silver planes (2D) (Fig. 5B) in Ag16-CBP are more convenient for electrons to transfer in solid state under the applied voltage, generating a current. Furthermore, the positive pyridine rings and [HNEt3]+ in Ag16-CBP are helpful for the transfer of carrier, beside the silver planes. In fact, the dry Ag-CBP powders are insulators since the silver chains in Ag22-CBP and the silver planes in Ag16-CBP are disconnected, like a mess of broken electric wires, and no current can be generated even when a voltage is applied. However, once the Ag-CBP powders become wet by some solvents (such as methanol and ethanol would bond with the Ag atoms via Ag–O interactions), numerous microelectrolytic tanks (deep colored areas in Fig. 5) are formed among the broken silver chains and planes in Ag-CBPs, where ions dissociate from the Ag-CBPs and work as carriers in the electrolyte solution. Therefore, the solvent sensitivity of sensors made of Ag-CBPs depends on the conductivity of microelectrolytic tanks among silver chains and planes in Ag-CBP nanomaterials, as the charge transfer in solids of Ag-CBPs is immune from solvents outside.

Fig. 5. Mechanism of the charge transfer in the Ag-CBPs. The pathway for charge transfer in 1D silver (A) of Ag22-CBP and 2D Ag16-CBP (B). Notes: Ag+, purple ball; H, light blue ball; [CF3CO2]−, orange ball; [HNEt3]+, blue ball; microelectrolytic tanks, deep colored areas.

The saturated methanol solutions of Ag22-CBP and Ag16-CBP were used to simulate microelectrolytic tanks between silver chains (1D) in Ag22-CBP and the silver planes (2D) in Ag16-CBP, respectively. The conductivity of saturated methanol solution of Ag16-CBP was determined as 608 μS·cm−1, ~3-fold that of Ag22-CBP (228 μS·cm−1), indicating that the microelectrolytic tanks among silver planes in Ag16-CBP showed better conductivity than that among silver chains in Ag22-CBP. For the better conductivity of Ag16-CBP in solution, the following structural factors may be responsible: (a) The species of carriers (Ag+, CF3CO2−, [HNEt3]+, and even H+ or [H3O]+ in Ag16-CBP) could serve as carriers in solution, but only Ag+ and CF3CO2− could be disassociated from Ag22-CBP and serve as carriers in solution. (b) In the coordination modes of Ag, all the Ag+ cations were linked to L1 ligands through strong σ and π bonds, which is hard for Ag+ to disassociate, while the Ag2(CF3CO2)2 units are free to generate ions in Ag16-CBP except the Ag+ ions being bonded to L2 ligand via Ag–S bond. (c) The ligated waters and [HNEt3]+ ions in Ag16-CBP could provide more H+ ions, which are the fastest ionic carrier (in terms of mass transfer) in solution. All these structural factors determine the superior conductivity of Ag16-CBP in solution and more sensitive response to methanol. Furthermore, the conductivity of Ag-CBPs in ethanol was measured as ~50 μS·cm−1, ~0.45 μS·cm−1 in acetone, and near 0 μS·cm−1 in toluene, which could well explain the weak electric response to ethanol and null to acetone and toluene.

Conclusion

In summary, we have designed and prepared 2 novel nanocluster-based polymers that are composed of Ag nanoclusters linked with each other. Their crystal structures are determined by x-ray diffraction, which indicates that the coordination modes of ligands have an important effect on the self-assembly of cluster-based materials. Furthermore, the conductivity of the 2 polymers in the solid state could be altered by organic solvents. Interestingly, the Ag-CBPs exhibit a high electric response to methanol, suggesting that the cluster-based materials can be used to design sensitive sensors to detect organic solvents, especially methanol as demonstrated in this work. Finally, we have discussed the mechanistic insight into how the cluster-based materials work as a sensor in detecting organic solvents in the presence of ambient atmosphere. The synthesis and application of cluster-based materials enriches the application of metal nanoclusters.

Acknowledgments

Funding: G.L. acknowledges the financial support by the Natural Science Foundation of China (2217020878) and Innovation Foundation of Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics (DICP DMTO201802). Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Data Availability

All data are available in the main text and the Supplementary Materials. Other relevant data are available from corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials Experimental Procedures.

Scheme S1. The protecting organic ligands used in this work.

Fig. S1. The connection between monomers in Ag22-CBP chains.

Fig. S2. The coordination configurations of L1 ligand between the Ag22-CBP chains.

Fig. S3. The coordination configurations of C≡C group in Ag22-CBP.

Fig. S4. The coordination model of methanol in Ag22-CBP.

Fig. S5. The minimum asymmetry structure in Ag14-CBP.

Fig. S6. (A) The coordination model of L2 ligand in Ag14-CBP.

Fig. S7. The Ag12 unit in Ag14-CBP monomer.

Fig. S8. The molecule cavity filled with water molecules and hydrogen bonds in Ag14-CBP.

Fig. S9. PXRD spectroscopy of Ag22-CBP.

Fig. S10. PXRD spectroscopy of Ag22-CBP.

Fig. S11. Optical photographs of Ag-CBP sensor in (A) flat and (B) bending state.

Fig. S12. Schematic diagram and scheme of real-time sensing setup.

Fig. S13. The dynamic response over Ag16-CBP thin film for mixtures of methanol and water.

Fig. S14. The dynamic response and recovery curves of Ag22-CBP thin film for different organic solvents: (A) ethanol, (B) methanol, (C) acetone, (D) toluene, and (E) ultrapure water (resistance of 18.2 MΩ·cm), measured at 0.1-V bias.

Fig. S15. The dynamic response and recovery curves over Ag16-CBP thin film for organic solvents: (A) ethanol and (B) methanol, measured under 0.1-V bias.
==== Refs
References

1. Hamburg MA. Advancing regulatory science. Science. 2011;331 (6020 ):987.21350129
2. Akamatsu M, Mori T, Okamoto K, Komatsu H, Kumagai K, Shiratori S, Yamamura M, Nabeshima T, Sakai H, Abe M, et al. Detection of ethanol in alcoholic beverages or vapor phase using florescent molecules embedded in a nano fibrous polymer. Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7 (11 ):6189–6194.
3. Michaels D, Wagner GR. Occupational safety and health administration (OSHA) and worker safety during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA. 2020;324 (14 ):1389–1390.32936212
4. Dror IE. Biases in forensic experts. Science. 2018;360 (6386 ):243.29674567
5. de Araujo WR, Cardoso TMG, da Rocha RG, Santana MHP, Muñoz RAA, Richter EM, Paixão TRLC, Coltro WKT. Portable analytical platforms for forensic chemistry: A review. Anal Chim Acta. 2018;1034 :1–21.30193622
6. Boroujerdi R, Abdelkader A, Paul R. State of the art in alcohol sensing with 2D materials. Nano-Micro Lett. 2020;12 (1 ):33.
7. Malik R, Tomer VK, Mishra YK, Lin L. Functional gas sensing nanomaterials: A panoramic view. Appl Phys Rev. 2020;7 (2 ):021301.
8. Ahmadvand H, Iraji zad A, Mohammadpour R, Hosseini-Shokouh SH, Asadian E. Room temperature and high response ethanol sensor based on two-dimensional hybrid nanostructures of WS2/GONRs. Sci Rep. 2020;10 (1 ):14799.32908162
9. Thangamani GJ, Deshmukh K, Chidambaram K, Ahamed MB, Sadasivuni KK, Ponnamma D, Faisal M, Nambiraj NA, Pasha SKK. Influence of CuO nanoparticles and graphene nanoplatelets on the sensing behaviour of poly(vinyl alcohol) nanocomposites for the detection of ethanol and propanol vapors. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron. 2018;29 (6 ):5186–5205.
10. Lipatov A, Varezhnikov A, Wilson P, Sysoev V, Kolmakov A, Sinitskii A. Highly selective gas sensor arrays based on thermally reduced graphene oxide. Nanoscale. 2013;5 (12 ):5426–5434.23661278
11. Zhang C, Hou Z-L, Zhang B-X, Fang H-M, Bi S. High sensitivity self-recovery ethanol sensor based on polyporous graphene oxide/melamine composites. Carbon. 2018;137 :467–474.
12. Chen D, Hou X, Wen H, Wang Y, Wang H, Li X, Zhang R, Lu H, Xu H, Guan S, et al. The enhanced alcohol-sensing response of ultrathin WO3 nanoplates. Nanotechnology. 2010;21 (3 ):035501.19966401
13. Jing Z, Zhan J. Fabrication and gas-sensing properties of porous ZnO nanoplatelets. Adv Mater. 2008;20 (23 ):4547–4551.
14. Li XJ, Chen SJ, Feng CY. Characterization of silicon nanoporous pillar array as room-temperature capacitive ethanol gas sensor. Sens Actuators B. 2007;123 (1 ):461–465.
15. Muangrat W, Wongwiriyapan W, Morimoto S, Hashimoto Y. Graphene nanosheet-grafted double-walled carbon nanotube hybrid nanostructures by two-step chemical vapor deposition and their application for ethanol detection. Sci Rep. 2019;9 (1 ):7871.31133669
16. Vandezande W, Janssen KPF, Delport F, Ameloot R, De Vos DE, Lammertyn J, Roeffaers MBJ. Parts per million detection of alcohol vapors via metal organic framework functionalized surface plasmon resonance sensors. Anal Chem. 2017;89 (8 ):4480–4487.28318240
17. Sharma AK, Dominic A. Fluoride fiber-optic SPR sensor with graphene and NaF layers: Analysis of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in near infrared. IEEE Sens J. 2018;18 (10 ):4053–4058.
18. Jin R, Li G, Sharma S, Li Y, Du X. Toward active-site tailoring in heterogeneous catalysis by atomically precise metal nanoclusters with crystallographic structures. Chem Rev. 2021;121 (2 ):567–648.32941029
19. Chakraborty I, Pradeep T. Atomically precise clusters of noble metals: Emerging link between atoms and nanoparticles. Chem Rev. 2017;117 (12 ):8208–8271.28586213
20. Shi Q, Qin Z, Sharma S, Li G. Recent progress in heterogeneous catalysis by atomically and structurally precise metal nanoclusters. Chem Rec. 2021;21 (4 ):879–892.33704895
21. Kawawaki T, Ebina A, Hosokawa Y, Ozaki S, Suzuki D, Hossain S, Negishi Y. Thiolate-protected metal nanoclusters: Recent development in synthesis, understanding of reaction, and application in energy and environmental field. Small. 2021;17 (27 ):2005328.
22. Luo Z, Zheng K, Xie J. Engineering ultrasmall water-soluble gold and silver nanoclusters for biomedical applications. Chem Commun. 2014;50 (40 ):5143–5155.
23. An Y, Ren Y, Bick M, Dudek A, Hong-Wang Waworuntu E, Tang J, Chen J, Chang B. Highly fluorescent copper nanoclusters for sensing and bioimaging. Biosens Bioelectron. 2020;154 :112078.32056972
24. Qiao Z, Zhang J, Hai X, Yan Y, Song W, Bi S. Recent advances in templated synthesis of metal nanoclusters and their applications in biosensing, bioimaging and theranostics. Biosens Bioelectron. 2021;176 :112898.33358287
25. Ebina A, Hossain S, Horihata H, Ozaki S, Kato S, Kawawaki T, Negishi Y. One-, two-, and three-dimensional self-assembly of atomically precise metal nanoclusters. Nanomaterials. 2020;10 (6 ):1105.32503177
26. Yuan P, Zhang R, Selenius E, Ruan P, Yao Y, Zhou Y, Malola S, Häkkinen H, Teo BK, Cao Y, et al. Solvent-mediated assembly of atom-precise gold-silver nanoclusters to semiconducting one-dimensional materials. Nat. Commun. 2020;11 (1 ):2229.32376829
27. De Nardi M, Antonello S, Jiang D-E, Pan F, Rissanen K, Ruzzi M, Venzo A, Zoleo A, Maran F. Gold nanowired: A linear (Au25)n polymer from Au25 molecular clusters. ACS Nano. 2014;8 (8 ):8505–8512.25088331
28. Wu Z, Yao Q, Zang S, Xie J. Directed self-assembly of ultrasmall metal nanoclusters. ACS Materials Lett. 2019;1 (2 ):237–248.
29. Chen Z-Y, Tam DYS, Zhang LL-M, Mak TCW. Silver thiolate nano-sized molecular clusters and their supramolecular covalent frameworks: An approach toward pre-templated synthesis. Chem Asian J. 2017;12 (20 ):2763–2769.28914496
30. Wang Z-Y, Wang M-Q, Li Y-L, Luo P, Jia T-T, Huang R-W, Zang S-Q, Mak TCW. Atomically precise site-specific tailoring and directional assembly of superatomic silver nanoclusters. J Am Chem Soc. 2018;140 (3 ):1069–1076.29297682
31. Mak TCW, Zhao L. Multinuclear silver ethynide supramolecular synthons for the construction of coordination networks. Chem Asian J. 2007;2 (4 ):456–467.17441182
32. Li X-Y, Su H-F, Xu J. A 2D layer network assembled from an open dendritic silver cluster cl@Ag11N24 and an N-donor ligand. Inorg Chem Front. 2019;6 (12 ):3539–3544.
33. Huang R-W, Dong X-Y, Yan B-J, Du X-S, Wei D-H, Zang S-Q, Mak TCW. Tandem silver cluster isomerism and mixed linkers to modulate the photoluminescence of cluster-assembled materials. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2018;57 (28 ):8560–8566.29797756
34. Alhilaly MJ, Huang R-W, Naphade R, Alamer B, Hedhili MN, Emwas A-H, Maity P, Yin J, Shkurenko A, Mohammed OF, et al. Assembly of atomically precise silver nanoclusters into nanocluster-based frameworks. J Am Chem Soc. 2019;141 (24 ):9585–9592.31135146
35. Wang Z, Sun Y-M, Qu Q-P, Liang Y-X, Wang X-P, Liu Q-Y, Kurmoo M, Su H-F, Tung C-H, Sun D. Enclosing classical polyoxometallates in silver nanoclusters. Nanoscale. 2019;11 (22 ):10927–10931.31139811
36. Zhao M, Huang S, Fu Q, Li W, Guo R, Yao Q, Wang F, Cui P, Tung C-H, Sun D. Ambient chemical fixation of CO2 using a robust Ag27 cluster-based two-dimensional metal-organic framework. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2020;59 (45 ):20031–20036.32671971
37. Chen S, Du W, Qin C, Liu D, Tang L, Liu Y, Wang S, Zhu M. Assembly of the thiolated [Au1Ag22(S-Adm)12]3+ superatom complex into a framework material through direct linkage by SbF6− anions. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2020;59 (19 ):7542–7547.32003526
38. Lei Z, Pei X-L, Jiang Z-G, Wang Q-M. Cluster linker approach: Preparation of a luminescent porous framework with NbO topology by linking silver ions with gold(I) clusters. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2014;53 (47 ):12771–12775.25160571
39. Wu X-H, Luo P, Wei Z, Li Y-Y, Huang R-W, Dong X-Y, Li K, Zang S-Q, Tang BZ. Guest-triggered aggregation-induced emission in silver chalcogenolate cluster metal-organic frameworks. Adv Sci. 2019;6 (2 ):1801304.
40. Wei Z, Wu X-H, Luo P, Wang J-Y, Li K, Zang S-Q. Matrix coordination induced emission in a three-dimensional silver cluster-assembled material. Chem Eur J. 2019;25 (11 ):2750–2756.30536452
41. Huang R-W, Wei Y-S, Dong X-Y, Wu X-H, Du C-X, Zang S-Q, Mak TCW. Hypersensitive dual-function luminescence switching of a silver-chalcogenolate cluster-based metal-organic framework. Nat Chem. 2017;9 (7 ):689–697.28644463
42. Wang Z, Tzouras NV, Nolan SP, Bi X. Silver N-heterocyclic carbenes: Emerging powerful catalysts. Trend Chem. 2021;3 (8 ):674–685.
43. Kafy A, Sadasivuni KK, Akther A, Min S-K, Kim J. Cellulose/graphene nanocomposite as multifunctional electronic and solvent sensor material. Mater Lett. 2015;159 :20–23.
