
==== Front
Gut Microbiome (Camb)
Gut Microbiome (Camb)
GMB
Gut Microbiome
2632-2897
Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK

10.1017/gmb.2022.6
S2632289722000068
Review
Modulating the gut microenvironment as a treatment strategy for irritable bowel syndrome: a narrative review
Iribarren Cristina 1 2Investigation Visualization Writing – original draft Writing – review & editing
Maasfeh Lujain 2Investigation Visualization Writing – original draft Writing – review & editing
Öhman Lena 1Funding acquisition Supervision Writing – review & editing
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1155-1313
Simrén Magnus 2 3*Conceptualization Funding acquisition Supervision Writing – review & editing
1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
2 Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
3 Center for Functional GI and Motility Disorders, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
* Corresponding author. Email: magnus.simren@medicine.gu.se
C.I. and L.M. are joint first authors.

L.Ö. and M.S. are joint senior authors.

2022
25 8 2022
3 e721 1 2022
02 6 2022
26 7 2022
© The Author(s) 2022
2022
The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a disorder of gut–brain interaction with a complex pathophysiology. Growing evidence suggests that alterations of the gut microenvironment, including microbiota composition and function, may be involved in symptom generation. Therefore, attempts to modulate the gut microenvironment have provided promising results as an indirect approach for IBS management. Antibiotics, probiotics, prebiotics, food and faecal microbiota transplantation are the main strategies for alleviating IBS symptom severity by modulating gut microbiota composition and function (eg. metabolism), gut barrier integrity and immune activity, although with varying efficacy. In this narrative review, we aim to provide an overview of the current approaches targeting the gut microenvironment in order to indirectly manage IBS symptoms.

Keywords

Antibiotics
dietary habits
faecal microbiota transplantation
irritable bowel syndrome
probiotics
prebiotics
Swedish Medical Research Council 2018–02566 Swedish Medical Research Council 2019–01052 Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg - ALF-agreement ALFGBG-722331 ALF-agreement ALFGBG-723921 Regional Executive Board, Region Västra Götaland VGFOUREG-931919 Faculty of Medicine at University of Gothenburg -
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), with a worldwide prevalence of 4 per cent (female-to-male ratio of 2:1), is an extensively researched disorder of gut–brain interaction (DGBI), formerly known as functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorders (Sperber et al., 2021). The diagnosis is based on the clinical history and symptoms. According to the Rome IV criteria, these patients are defined by the presence of chronic or recurrent abdominal pain associated with defecation and/or altered bowel habits, in the absence of positive findings on the limited number of tests recommended to exclude organic diseases. Based on bowel habits, patients are categorised into predominant constipation (IBS-C), predominant diarrhoea (IBS-D), mixed bowel habits (IBS-M) or IBS unclassified (IBS-U) (Lacy et al., 2016). Patients also often report concomitant symptoms and comorbidities such as bloating, abdominal distension, overlapping upper GI symptoms and extra-intestinal or psychological conditions (Enck et al., 2016; Lacy et al., 2016). IBS is not life-threatening but it greatly impacts the quality of life of the patients and via high health care consumption and reduced work productivity, also the society (Canavan et al., 2014).

An intricate pathophysiology with absence of organic disease or well-defined biological markers is characteristic of this disorder with unknown aetiology (Enck et al., 2016). Still, the gut-brain axis and its bidirectional interaction seem to be a cornerstone for symptom generation, hence the new term for these disorders, DGBI (Drossman, 2016). In addition, the generation of the hallmark IBS symptoms may be influenced by other factors, such as visceral hypersensitivity (Posserud et al., 2007), altered GI motility (Simrén et al., 2000), increased intestinal permeability (Piche et al., 2009) and low-grade mucosal inflammation (Spiller, 2004), along with alterations in the gut microenvironment, including gut microbiota (Öhman et al., 2015).

Gut microbiota and IBS

The link between the gut microbiota and IBS is supported by multiple studies and clinical observations. A proportion of patients with IBS develops symptoms following a resolved bacterial infection (post-infection IBS) (Barbara et al., 2019), presumably linked to alterations of gut microbiota composition (Jalanka-Tuovinen et al., 2014). Further, the use of systemic antibiotics for non-GI conditions may also have a negative impact on gut microbiota and increase the risk of various DGBI (Paula et al., 2015). On the contrary, targeting gut microbiota using non-absorbable antibiotics or probiotics holds promise as a treatment strategy in IBS (Ford et al., 2018).

Even though there are inconsistent findings in the literature, a subset of IBS patients seems to display an altered gut microbiota composition compared with healthy individuals (Liu et al., 2017; Pittayanon et al., 2019), which can be associated with clinical and psychological parameters (Jeffery et al., 2012), IBS severity or low microbial richness (Tap et al., 2017). Interestingly, specific bacteria have also been associated with IBS (eg. decrease of Bifidobacterium and Faecalibacterium and increase of the genus Bacteroides as compared to healthy subjects), as reviewed in Pittayanon et al. (2019). Pathogenic bacteria, such as Brachyspira, could potentially also play a role in the pathogenesis (Jabbar et al., 2021). Despite multiple studies indicating involvement of altered microbiota in IBS pathogenesis, the challenge lies in attributing disease causality to a gut microbiota profile or specific bacterial taxa. It is worth noting that gut microbiota in IBS seems unstable over time compared to healthy subjects (Mättö et al., 2005) and under the influence of exogenous factors (eg. diet and antibiotics) (Bhattarai et al., 2017) as well as bowel habits that shift the intestinal microenvironment (Durbán et al., 2013), making it unclear whether altered microbiota is a cause, consequence, or both, of IBS. Altogether, these findings contribute to the understanding of IBS and potentially facilitate the characterisation of patients in regards to prognosis and response to treatments in the foreseeable future (Jeffery et al., 2012).

The link between metabolites and IBS

Metabolites ensure the host-microbiota crosstalk and are involved in various biological functions in the gut, including providing energy for epithelial cells, maintenance of intestinal barrier function and nutrient absorption (Nicholson et al., 2012). Earlier studies have indicated that some IBS patients have altered levels of specific metabolite classes, such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), bile acids and amino acids (Duboc et al., 2012; Tana et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2019). More recent studies making use of untargeted metabolomics analyses have also revealed alterations in the metabolite profiles in serum (Xu et al., 2020), urine (Jeffery et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2020), and faeces (Ahluwalia et al., 2021; Jeffery et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2020; Ponnusamy et al., 2011; Zhu et al., 2019) of IBS patients. While there is no clear consensus on these changes being the cause or effect of IBS, the metabolome alterations have been found to be associated with gut microbiota composition (Jeffery et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2019), IBS symptoms (Liu et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2019) as well as psychological well-being (Liu et al., 2020). Although the metabolome profile alone fails to discriminate between IBS subtypes (Jeffery et al., 2020), combined with faecal microbiota pattern a separation between IBS-C and IBS-D can be observed (Ahluwalia et al., 2021). Metabolite alterations during IBS flares further support the link between microbial metabolism and IBS severity, as shown in a recent longitudinal study (Mars et al., 2020).

In this narrative review, we aim to provide an overview of the current strategies targeting the gut microenvironment that are proposed as treatment options for DGBI (Figure 1). Particularly we focus on studies assessing the effects on gut microenvironment, including microbiota and metabolites, and its interaction with clinical symptoms in patients with IBS.Figure 1 Therapeutic strategies proposed to modulate the gut microenvironment in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). IBS is a disorder of gut–brain interaction where alterations in either direction may influence the opposite end. The intestinal epithelial barrier separates the content of the lumen (gut microenvironment) from the underlying lamina propria. Local immune cells and enteric nerves located in the lamina propria independently or collaboratively sense and respond to signals in the gut microenvironment. Therefore, changes in the gut microenvironment are suggested to play a role in symptom generation and other factors involved in the pathophysiology of IBS. Although with mechanisms yet far from fully understood, antibiotics, probiotics, prebiotics, food and faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) may influence the gut microenvironment (eg. microbiota and metabolites) and modulate symptoms in IBS patients.

Antibiotics

Antibiotics first showed benefits in patients with diagnosis of IBS and Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO), two entities with potentially overlapping symptoms (Pimentel et al., 2000). Generally, SIBO is diagnosed using non-invasive breath tests after intake of carbohydrates, most frequently lactulose, by quantifying excreted hydrogen and methane produced by microbial fermentation (Gasbarrini et al., 2009). This test has also been suggested to reflect alterations in microbiota composition in IBS patients (Pimentel et al., 2000). However, the link between IBS and SIBO is still controversial and part of the problem is related to the absence of a gold standard to define SIBO as well as poor performance of available tests (Aziz et al., 2017). However, small bowel microbial alterations seem to be present in patients with DGBI, but are not necessarily associated with SIBO, as it is currently defined. To date, the antibiotics neomycin, rifaximin and rifamycin have been the most investigated in IBS, with potential benefits regarding improvement in IBS symptoms (Ford et al., 2018).

Neomycin

Little is known about the effects of the oral antibiotic neomycin on the gut microenvironment, but it has shown capacity to improve IBS symptoms and normalise the lactulose breath test (Pimentel et al., 2003). In patients with IBS-C presenting with excretion of methane, neomycin administration improved symptoms along with methane being eliminated on breath test (Pimentel et al., 2006), suggesting treatment-induced gut microbiota modulation.

Rifaximin

The influence of the non-absorbable antibiotic rifaximin on the gut microenvironment has been more extensively explored. Administration of rifaximin can negatively affect microbial richness, but did not influence the faecal SCFAs or bile acid production in IBS patients without constipation with no evidence of SIBO (Acosta et al., 2016). When SIBO is concomitant, rifaximin has been shown to lower the levels of potentially pathogenic Clostridium spp., and increase Faecalibaterium, while inducing only modest changes in the overall faecal microbiota composition. However, these changes could not be associated with symptom amelioration or normalisation of the lactulose breath test due to the lack of a notable shift in the faecal microbiota composition and also probably the analysis of faecal rather than small intestinal microbiota (Soldi et al., 2015). Further, rifaximin administration in IBS-D patients seems to modify faecal microbiota composition and potentially also function, as well as eradicating SIBO (Zhuang et al., 2018). Potentially, these are the mechanisms of action underlying the relief of GI symptoms after rifaximin treatment (Zhuang et al., 2018). However, during recurrent symptoms and short-term repeated courses of rifaximin, its administration could have a short-term negative influence on certain faecal bacterial taxa (Fodor et al., 2019), although without apparent evidence of acquisition of antibiotic resistance in the long term (Pimentel et al., 2017). In parallel, numerous randomised clinical trials have reported promising results in treating IBS symptoms with rifaximin (Supplementary References: Rifaximin), although with some exceptions (Tuteja et al., 2019). Indeed, rifaximin seems to have a higher clinical response rate as primary treatment, as well as retreatment, than other antibiotics used for SIBO-IBS management. Besides, it can normalise breath test results (Soldi et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2008), especially in combination with neomycin in patients with abnormal levels of methane (Low et al., 2010; Pimentel et al., 2014), potentially reflecting changes in microbial fermentation (Sharara et al., 2006). Interestingly, gut microbiota composition (Li et al., 2020) and breath tests (Rezaie et al., 2019) have been proposed as promising prognostic tools for treatment response, although the link between microbiota and symptoms calls for further investigations.

Rifamycin

Rifamycin SV is a poorly absorbed antibiotic that exerts its action in the distal small bowel and colon, at pH levels ≥7. To date, this antibiotic has not been associated with acquisition of multi-drug resistant bacteria (Steffen et al., 2018), presents in vitro proinflammatory properties (Rosette et al., 2019), and is approved in the US for treatment of traveller’s diarrhoea (Hoy, 2019). New formulations of rifamycin SV are currently under development for various GI diseases. These formulations are insignificantly absorbed in healthy individuals (Di Stefano et al., 2021) and demonstrate potential to improve abdominal pain and diarrhoea in IBS-D patients (Cosmo-Pharmaceuticals, 2021). More studies are still needed to decipher its effects on gut microenvironment, but, in the meantime, Rifamycin SV seems to be a promising new antibiotic therapy for the management of IBS.

Current recommendations

Hitherto, rifaximin is the only antibiotic treatment used and approved for IBS-D, but its use is not universally accepted. In the US, rifaximin is approved for 2-week treatment of patients with IBS-D and recommended in the IBS management guidelines by the American College of Gastroenterology (Lacy et al., 2021). In contrast, rifaximin is currently not approved for use for IBS in Europe (Vasant et al., 2021). As stated above, rifamycin SV is only approved for traveller’s diarrhoea in the US, while studies to fully support its inclusion in IBS management and its impact on gut microenvironment are awaited.

To summarise, non-absorbable antibiotics seem to be effective in the management of IBS symptoms. These antibiotics may exert their action through bactericidal effects by blocking essential biological pathways that lead to bacterial cell death (Floss and Yu, 2005; Jana and Deb, 2006). However, its use in IBS patients is still based on a hypothetical capacity of changing an imbalanced gut microbiota composition (Basseri et al., 2011) although other not yet well-defined mechanisms might be involved (Figure 2 – based on Floss and Yu (2005); Jana and Deb (2006); Pimentel (2016) – and Table 1). More studies focusing on the mechanisms of action of antibiotics and their effect on the gut microenvironment are needed to advance our understanding of how antibiotics may be used to manage IBS.Figure 2 Potential mechanisms of action of antibiotics, probiotics and prebiotics in patients with IBS. In general, anti-, pro-, and pre-biotics are suggested to exert their therapeutic activity through favourable alterations on the gut microbiota composition, microbial metabolism products (eg. short-chain fatty acids) and gut barrier function. In particular, antibiotics can induce bacterial cell death and modulate methane and hydrogen production, which may reflect the fermentation activity of the microbiota. Both probiotics and prebiotics are suggested to have immunomodulatory effects on the host. Probiotics result in the growth of the administered bacteria, while prebiotics influence the growth of specific endogenous bacteria that are suggested to be related to health.

Box 1. Antibiotics – Key points

The use of non-absorbable antibiotics in IBS is not universally approved.

Clinical studies support the potential of certain non-absorbable antibiotics to improve IBS symptoms.

The mechanisms involved in symptom improvement may include bactericidal effect, changes in gut microbiota composition and microbial fermentation.

Box 2. Probiotics – Key points

Dependent on bacterial strains and doses, probiotics may have different mechanisms of action on gut microenvironment, including modulation of microbial composition and function, immune activity and barrier function.

The large diversity of study design and bacterial strains explain gaps of knowledge and weak support of probiotics as therapeutic options in IBS.

It is necessary to improve the characterisation of the mechanisms underlying the potential clinical benefits through studies using uniform study designs, approved clinical endpoints and valid mechanistic assessments.

Table 1. Overview of studies evaluating the effects of antibiotics on the gut microenvironment and clinical outcome in patients with IBS.

Antibiotic therapy	References	Design, study cohort (n), Rome criteria	Intervention	Main findings: gut microenvironment a	Main findings: symptoms a	
Open-label antibiotics	Pimentel et al. (2000)	Retrospective study and open label, IBS patients with +LHBT and follow-up (n = 47), Rome I	10-day course of antibiotics based on the choice of the physician, followed by 7- to 10-day washout period	Reduction of hydrogen production after antibiotic treatment in 47 follow-up patients. Of them, 53% eradicated SIBO	SIBO eradication resulted in improvement of GI complaints in 48% of subjects, who no longer met Rome criteria for IBS	
Neomycin	Pimentel et al. (2003)	RCT, IBS patients (n = 111), Rome I
Healthy individuals (n = 15)	Neomycin (500 mg b) versus placebo for 10 days, followed by 7-day washout period	Abnormal LBT at baseline in 84% of IBS patients. Neomycin normalised breath test in 20% of patients with abnormal baseline LHBT. Methane excretion detected on LBT associated with severity of constipation (IBS-C)	Reduction of IBS symptoms (35% of patients in neomycin vs. 11.4% placebo) and bowel habit normalisation. Graded symptom reduction (61.7% neomycin and LBT normalisation vs. 34.4% neomycin and no LBT normalisation vs. 4.1% placebo)	
Pimentel et al. (2006)	RCT, IBS-C patients (n = 39), Rome I	Neomycin (500 mg) versus placebo for 10 days, followed by 7-day washout period	Ability of neomycin to eliminate methane on the breath test	General symptom improvement after neomycin treatment with greater efficacy in CH4-producers (67.6 vs. 32.7% H2-producers). Methane producers improved constipation and eliminated CH4 (44% neomycin vs. 5% placebo)	
Rifaximin	Acosta et al. (2016)	RCT, IBS-nonC with no evidence of SIBO (n = 24), modified Rome III	Rifaximin (1.65 g) versus placebo for 14 days, followed by 5-day washout period	Modest effect on faecal microbiota, reduction of microbial richness but no changes in the proportion of faecal SCFA or bile acid proportion	No significant effects within the first 24 hours after rifaximin intervention. Acceleration of colonic transit after 48 hours	
	Pimentel et al. (2017)	Open label + RCT, IBS-D patients (n = 103), Rome III	Open label for 2 weeks, followed by 4-week washout period. If symptom recurrence (n = 73), two 2-week course with Rifaximin (1.65 g) versus placebo, with 10 weeks between cycles	No apparent effect on antibiotic resistance to other non-absorbable antibiotics in the long-term	Not investigated	
Fodor et al. (2019)	Open label + RCT, IBS-D patients (n = 103), Rome III	Open label for 2 weeks, followed by 4-week washout period. If symptom recurrence, two 2-week course with Rifaximin (1.65 g) versus placebo, with 10 weeks between cycles	Modest and temporary decrease in the relative abundance of up to seven bacterial taxa associated with the treatment	Not investigated	
Tuteja et al. (2019)	RCT, Gulf war veterans with IBS-nonC (n = 50), Rome III	Rifaximin (1.1 g) versus placebo	Rifaximin treatment was not associated with normalisation of LHBT (7% rifaximin vs. 22% placebo, p = 0.54)	No improvement of IBS symptoms, or QoL in Gulf war veterans with IBS	
Yang et al. (2008)	Retrospective chart review, IBS patients and +LBT, and at least one follow-up visit (n = 98), Rome I	At least one course of Rifaximin (1.2 g or other doses) for 10 days versus other antibiotics	Normalisation of LBT predicted response to rifaximin (81%)	Greater improvement of IBS symptoms of rifaximin versus other antibiotics in patients with abnormal LBT. Large clinical response of rifaximin as first choice (69% vs. 38% neomycin) and higher success in cases of recurrence (75%)	
Low et al. (2010)	Retrospective chart review, IBS patients and CH4+ (n = 69)	Rifaximin (1.2 g), neomycin (1 g) or a combination of both antibiotics for 10 days	Combination of rifaximin and neomycin effective for CH4 elimination (87 vs. 33% neomycin vs. 28% rifaximin)	Combination of rifaximin and neomycin effective in improving clinical response (85 vs. 63% neomycin vs. 56% rifaximin)	
	Pimentel et al. (2014)	RCT, CH4+ IBS-C patients (n = 32), Rome II	Neomycin (1 g) plus placebo (not specified) or in combination with rifaximin (1.65 g) for 14 days	Combination of neomycin and rifaximin reduced CH4 levels (10/15 subjects). Low levels of CH4 at baseline were associated with a greater improvement in constipation	Combination of rifaximin and neomycin superior in improving IBS-C symptoms	
Sharara et al. (2006)	RCT, IBS patients (n = 124), Rome II	Rifaximin (400 mg) versus placebo for 10 days, followed by 10-day washout period	Rifaximin responders reduced H2-breath excretion, which correlated with symptoms	Relief of general IBS symptoms (40.5% rifaximin vs. 18.2%), maintained during the washout period in some patients (27%)	
Li et al. (2020)	Prospective and open label trial, IBS-D patients (n = 30), Rome III
Healthy individuals (n = 19)	Rifaximin (1.2 g) for 2 weeks	Changes in composition of faecal bacteria (↑Bifidobacterium, ↓E. coli and Enterobacter), rectal mucosal bacteria and faecal mycobiota, and certain metabolic pathways. Faecal bacterial dysbiosis identified as a tool to predict response to rifaximin	Abdominal symptoms more attenuated in IBS-D patients presenting with faecal bacterial signatures, more different from those of healthy individuals	
Rezaie et al. (2019)	Open label, IBS-D patients (n = 98), Rome III	Rifaximin (1.65 g) for 2 weeks, followed by a 4-week washout period	Normalisation of a positive LBT after rifaximin treatment, which was likely to predict response	Response to rifaximin in 48% of patients, with no symptom recurrence in 15.6% of them. Response rate higher in patients with normalised LBT post-treatment (76.5%)	
	Soldi et al. (2015)	Open label, IBS-nonC patients (n = 15), Rome II
Healthy individuals (n = 5)	Rifaximin (1.65 g) for 2 weeks, followed by a 6-week washout period
Healthy individuals did not take any drug	Moderate changes in gut microbiota composition: stable overall profile, ↓Clostridium spp., ↑Faecalibacterium prausnitzii	Relief of global IBS symptoms in most of patients (80%). Of them, the majority had −LBT and improved overall IBS symptoms at end of study (73% after treatment and 78% washout period)	
Zhuang et al. (2018)	Open label, IBS-D (n = 30), Rome III
Healthy individuals (n = 13)	Rifaximin (800 mg) for 2 weeks, followed by 10-week washout period
Healthy individuals did not take any drug	Modulation of certain bacterial taxa: ↓Firmicutes and Clostridiales, ↑ Bacteroidetes and Bacteroidales. Potential changes in microbial metabolism: ↓propanoate and butanoate	General IBS symptoms improved after treatment and relief maintained at least 10 weeks. Out of 14 patients with SIBO, 9 had −LBT at day 28	
Abbreviations: CH4, methane; CH4+, positive-methane; H2, hydrogen; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; IBS-C, irritable bowel syndrome with constipation; IBS-D, irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea; IBS-nonC, irritable bowel syndrome without constipation (=diarrhoea and mixed bowel habits); LBT, lactulose breath test (methane and hydrogen excretion); L(H)BT, lactulose (hydrogen) breath test; n, size of population (selected or randomised patients depending on study intervention); QoL, quality of life; RCT, randomised controlled trial; SCFA, short-chain fatty acid; SIBO, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. % indicates the percentage of patients or cases. Symbols: ↑, increase; ↓, decrease, +, positive; −, negative.

a Statistically significant findings unless otherwise specified.

b Reported total daily dose.

Probiotics

Probiotics [~for life] are defined as live microorganisms that confer a health benefit on the host when administered in adequate amounts (Gibson et al., 2017). The use of probiotics for the management of GI symptoms gained popularity during the 1990s (Rolfe, 2000). Here we focus on placebo-controlled studies that have investigated the effect of probiotics on gut microenvironment and their interaction with IBS symptoms. To date, studies assessing the effects of probiotics on IBS symptoms as well as published meta-analyses provide mixed results regarding the clinical efficacy of probiotic products in IBS (Ford et al., 2018; McFarland et al., 2021).

Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus spp.

Bifidobacteria is generally associated with health benefits throughout life, although its abundance varies with age (O’Callaghan and van Sinderen, 2016). Low levels of bifidobacteria in IBS (Pittayanon et al., 2019) may be improved after administration of probiotic bifidobacteria and successfully alleviate symptoms (Ford et al., 2018; Pinto-Sanchez et al., 2017). However, the link between the clinical benefit and the impact on the gut microenvironment after bifidobacteria supplementation needs further investigations (Table 2).Box 3. Prebiotics – Key points

The clinical benefit is dependent on prebiotic type and dose.

Suggested mechanisms of action of prebiotics include increase of growth and activity/function of health-associated bacteria.

Subgroup analyses and assessments of the effect of different doses are required to better understand the therapeutic potential of prebiotics in IBS.

Table 2. Overview of studies evaluating the effects of probiotics on the gut microenvironment and clinical outcome in patients with IBS.

Probiotic strain	References	Design, study cohort (n), Rome criteria	Intervention	Main findings: gut microenvironment a	Main findings: symptoms a	
Bifidobacterium spp.	Charbonneau et al. (2013)	RCT, IBS patients (n = 76), Rome II
Healthy individuals (n = 41)	Encapsulated B. infantis 35624 (109 CFU b) versus placebo for 8 weeks, and 2-week washout	Transient colonisation with B. infantis and limited effect on targeted microbiota profile	No impact on symptoms	
Pinto-Sanchez et al. (2017)	RCT, IBS-nonC patients (n = 44), Rome III	B. longum NCC3001 (1010 CFU per sachet) versus placebo for 6 weeks, and 4-week washout	Reduction of methylamines and aromatic amino acids metabolites in urine. Changes in faecal microbiota profiles, serum inflammation markers and levels of neurotrophins and neurotransmitters were independent of probiotic	Improved depression scores (64% probiotic group vs. 32% placebo) and induced changes in brain activity	
Lactobacillus spp.	Cremon et al. (2018)	RCT, IBS patients (n = 42), Rome III	Crossover study, L. paracasei CNCM I-1572 (4.8·1010 CFU) versus placebo for 4 weeks, followed by 4-week washout	Modulation of microbiota composition (↓Ruminococcus genus; ↑Lactobacillus); microbiota function (↑acetate and butyrate); and proinflammatory cytokines (↓IL-15)	Not proven to improve IBS symptoms. For example, abdominal pain/discomfort: 37.5% probiotic group vs. 30% placebo, p > 0.05	
Shin et al. (2018)	RCT, IBS-D patients (n = 60), Rome III	L. gasseri BNR17 (4·1010 CFU) versus placebo for 8 weeks	L. gasseri modulated certain bacterial taxa: ↑Actinobacteria, Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus; ↓Proteobacteria, Blautia and Faecalibacterium	Symptom improvement in both active treatment and placebo. Higher improvement of generalised symptoms and QoL in probiotic group	
Lewis et al. (2020)	RCT, IBS patients (n = 285), Rome III	L. paracasei versus B. longum (109 CFU) versus placebo for 8 weeks	L. paracasei and B. longum detected in probiotic group but no changes throughout intervention, except for some patients without bifido at baseline. No changes in the relative abundance of A. muciniphila and F. prausnitzii	Both active and placebo groups reduced symptom severity, L. paracasei beneficial for bowel movements in IBS-C and IBS-D patients. B. longum ameliorated spontaneous bowel movements in IBS-D and IBS-C. Both probiotics beneficial for QoL	
Murakami et al. (2012)	RCT, Rome III, IBS patients (n = 35)	Crossover study, L. brevis KB290 (≥1010 CFU) versus placebo for 4 weeks each treatment with 4-week washout period in between	Shifts in some of the targeted bacterial taxa such as ↑Bifidobacterium and ↓Clostridium	No differences in IBS symptoms except for reduction of frequencies of watery stools and abdominal pain as well as improved QoL during the active treatment	
Clostridium spp.	Sun et al. (2018)	RCT, IBS-D patients (n =200), Rome III	Clostridium butyricum (5.67∙107 CFU) versus placebo for 4 weeks	After intervention, microbial community more dissimilar between the groups. Clostridium sensu stricto reduced in responders of the active group. C. butyricum was predicted to be involved in amino acid, fatty acid and tryptophan metabolisms	Decrease in overall IBS symptoms, specifically frequency of bowel habits and QoL. Patients with moderate and severe symptoms at baseline benefited more from intervention with active treatment	
Mixtures	Bonfrate et al. (2020)	RCT, IBS patients (n = 25), Rome IV	Crossover study, B. longum BB536 and L. rhamnosus HN001 (5∙109 CFU) and vitamin B6 (LBB) versus placebo for 30 days each treatment with 15-day washout period	Amelioration of colonic permeability in some patients and shift in presumptive lactic acid bacteria. Some changes in faecal metabolites, for example, propanoic and butanoic acids	Decrease in IBS symptom severity, improved abdominal pain and bloating and relieved bowel habits and QoL	
Lyra et al. (2010)	RCT, IBS patients (n = 42), Rome II	L. rhamnosus GG, L. rhamnosus Lc705, Propionibacterium freudenreichii ssp. shermanii JS and B. breve Bb99 (8–9∙109 CFU) for 6 months	Modulation of faecal bacterial phylotypes (↑C. thermosuccinogenes 85% and R. torques 93%, ↓ R. torques 94%)	Not investigated	
	Yoon et al. (2015)	RCT, IBS patients (n = 81), Rome III	L. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus, B. breve, B. actis, B. longum, and S. thermophilus (1010 viable cells) versus placebo for 4 weeks	The active group changed probiotic bacteria (eg. ↑ B. bifidum, B. lactis, L. acidophilus and L. rhamnosus), but not the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio	The probiotic mixture tended to improve overall symptoms (74.4% prebiotic group vs. 61.9% placebo, p > 0.05) and was more effective in reducing diarrhoeal symptoms (p = 0.02)	
Yoon et al. (2014)	RCT, IBS patients (n = 49), Rome III	B. longum, B. bifidum, B. lactis, L acidophilus, L. rhamnosus, and S. thermophilus (1010 viable cells) versus placebo for 4 weeks	The probiotic mixture induced alterations in the composition of intestinal microbiota, for example, ↑ B. lactis, L. rhamnosus, and S. thermophilus (active group) versus ↑B. lactis (placebo group)	The probiotic group improved IBS symptoms, including reduction of abdominal pain/discomfort and bloating intensity	
Kajander et al. (2007)	RCT, IBS patients (n = 55), Rome I or II	L. rhamnosus GG, L. rhamnosus Lc705, Propionibacterium freudenreichii ssp. shermanii JS and B. breve Bb99 (9·109 CFU) for 6 months	No changes in faecal microbiota and SCFAs after the intervention, but the bacterial enzyme ß-glucuronidase decreased	Not investigated	
Ki Cha et al. (2012)	RCT, IBS-D patients (n = 50), Rome III	L. acidophilus, L. plantarum, L. rhamnosus, B. breve, B. lactis, B. longum and S. thermophilus (1·1010 CFU) versus placebo for 8 weeks, followed by 2-week washout period	Stabilisation of intestinal microbiota composition in the probiotics group (concordance rate of 69.5% active group vs. placebo 56.5%, p < 0.01)	Relief of overall IBS symptoms (48% probiotic group vs. 12% placebo), improvement of stool consistency, and a tendency towards improved IBS-QoL (p > 0.05)	
	Mezzasalma et al. (2016)	RCT, IBS-C patients (n = 150), Rome III	L. acidophilus and L. reuteri (4·109 CFU) versus L. plantarum, L. rhamnosus, and B. animalis subsp. lactis (6·109 CFU) versus placebo for 2 months, followed by 1-month washout period	Probiotic bacteria, except B. animalis subsp. Lactis, increased in the active group during the intervention with lasting effect of at least 90 days	Most patients reduced IBS-C related symptoms for at least 30 days, which correlated to improvement of QoL. The frequency of bowel movements normalised and stabilised over time	
Hod et al. (2018)	RCT, IBS-D patients (n = 109, only women), Rome III	L. rhamnosus LR5, L. casei LC5, L. paracasei LPC5, L. plantarum LP3, L. acidophilus LA, B. bifidum BF3, B. longum BG7, B. breve BR3, B. infantis BT1, S. thermophilus ST3, L. bulgaricus LG1; and Lc. lactis SL6 (5·1010 active bacteria) for 8 weeks	Stable microbial diversity with ↑ Lactobacillus. Responders: ↓ Bilophila proportion, changes in HS-CRP and faecal calprotectin. At baseline, higher proportions of Faecalibacterium, Leuconostoc and Odoribacter may predict beneficial inflammatory‐marker changes (p < 0.05)	Not investigated	
Abbreviations: B, Bifidobacterium; C, Clostridium; CFU, colony-forming units; HS‐CRP high sensitivity C-Reactive Protein; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; IBS-C, irritable bowel syndrome with constipation; IBS-D, irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea; QoL, quality of life; L., Lactobacillus; Lc, Lactococcus; RCT, randomised controlled trial; S., Streptococcus. % indicates the percentage of patients or cases. Symbols: ↑, increase; ↓, decrease.

a Statistically significant findings unless otherwise specified.

b Reported total daily dose.

Hitherto, there is no consensus concerning the potential role of Lactobacillus in IBS patients (Liu et al., 2017; Pittayanon et al., 2019). Still, the probiotic Lactobacillus is generally considered beneficial (Heeney et al., 2018) and its supplementation in IBS patients seems promising for managing their symptoms (Ford et al., 2018; Murakami et al., 2012). It has been suggested that Lactobacillus modulates specific bacterial taxa (Cremon et al., 2018; Murakami et al., 2012), alters the levels of faecal SCFAs or pro-inflammatory cytokines (Cremon et al., 2018; Shin et al., 2018), and could potentially be associated with improvement of IBS symptoms (Table 2).Box 4. Food and dietary habits – Key points

Modifying the dietary habits constitutes an accessible and, to a large extent, safe strategy for IBS management, even though more extreme diets may be unfavourable for gut microbiota composition and function.

Dietary habits impact and interact with the gut microbiota.

The existing literature suggests that the management of IBS symptoms through dietary interventions may potentially involve modulation of gut microbiota composition, microbial metabolites, immune activity and intestinal permeability.

Further studies evaluating the short- and long-term impact of dietary habits on the gut microenvironment are needed.

Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium may differ in their effect on modulating microbiota composition (Table 2; Supplementary References: Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus spp.). Overall, bifidobacteria show a greater tendency towards improvement of global IBS symptoms and pain scores (Ford et al., 2018), although lactobacilli may have a similar efficacy (Lewis et al., 2020).Box 5. FMT – Key points

FMT application in IBS is still constrained to clinical research due to limitations in safety and partly divergent efficacy data.

Donors with a favourable microbiota (ie. diverse and stable) seem to be important for FMT success.

The poor link between microbiota alterations and symptom improvements suggests the involvement of other mechanisms of action that are yet to be clarified.

FMT shows a potential as a therapy for IBS, however, optimization of the protocol (eg. delivery route, dose and frequency) is required to move forward with clinical usage.

Other probiotic bacteria and mixtures

Although the clinical potential of other single-strain probiotic bacteria has been investigated, the potential mechanisms of action are still insufficiently investigated (Ford et al., 2018). Clostridium butyricum, however, is one of very few exceptions. After 4-week supplementation, Clostridium butyricum shifts the microbiota composition, as well as potentially modulates the metabolic pathways of amino acids, fatty acids and tryptophan in patients with IBS. Further, this probiotic may provide a greater benefit to patients with moderate and severe symptoms, and may alleviate overall IBS symptoms (Sun et al., 2018).

Probiotic mixtures may possibly have better efficacy than single-strain probiotics in IBS patients (Ford et al., 2018). Multiple formulations containing different combinations of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains as well as other bacterial genera have been tested in patients with IBS. Such formulations seem to have multiple effects on gut microenvironment, that is, shifting the microbiota composition (Bonfrate et al., 2020; Lyra et al., 2010; Yoon et al., 2014, 2015), ameliorating the colonic permeability (Bonfrate et al., 2020), or changing the bacterial enzyme ß-glucuronidase activity (Kajander et al., 2007), although not all studies are in agreement (Kajander et al., 2007; Ki Cha et al., 2012; Table 2). These mixtures may be effective in improving IBS symptoms and the severity of the disorder (Bonfrate et al., 2020; Yoon et al., 2014, 2015; Supplementary References: Mixtures) in certain IBS subtypes (Hod et al., 2018; Ki Cha et al., 2012; Mezzasalma et al., 2016) In addition, the response to the probiotic formulation may be predicted by faecal bacterial patterns at baseline (Hod et al., 2018; Table 2). Further, probiotic mixtures might also have a long-term effect on symptoms or specific bacterial taxa even after the supplement removal (Mezzasalma et al., 2016), although little is known about these effects.

Current recommendations

While all these results are encouraging, the quality of evidence for IBS management is still poor and the general recommendation regarding the use of probiotics in clinical practice guidelines is weak. This reality is reflected in the recommendations in recent guidelines. In general, large professional societies recommend against widespread routine use of probiotics or avoid recommending specific products due to the weak supporting literature. Still, it is acknowledged that probiotics may be useful in select patients and that patient preference is important in the final decision of treatment regimen (Lacy et al., 2021; Su et al., 2020; Vasant et al., 2021). For this reason, further research with a higher degree of consensus concerning study design and bacterial strains may help fill the current knowledge gaps and improve the characterisation of the mechanisms of action that have so far been suggested (Figure 2).

Prebiotics

Prebiotics, unlike probiotics, are not microorganisms but substrates that are selectively metabolised by health-promoting microorganisms (Gibson et al., 2017). Prebiotics, directly or through cross-feeding, enhance the activity (eg. SCFAs production) or growth of health-associated bacteria (eg. bifidobacteria and lactobacilli), without aggravating adverse effects such as distension due to gas production (Gibson et al., 2017). Since the first definition of prebiotics in the 90s, studies assessing the direct effect of prebiotics in IBS patients have been limited (Table 3) and with sparse but still potential clinical benefits in IBS (Ford et al., 2018).Table 3. Overview of studies evaluating the effects of prebiotics on the gut microenvironment and clinical outcome in patients with IBS.

Prebiotic	References	Design, study cohort (n), Rome criteria	Intervention	Main findings: gut microenvironment a	Main findings: symptoms a	
Inulin type fructans (ITFs)	Hunter et al. (1999)	RCT, IBS patients (n = 21), –	Cross-over study, Oligofructose (6 g b) versus placebo for 4 weeks	No change in fasting breath hydrogen concentrations	No effect on symptom scores, faecal weight and pH or whole-gut transit time	
Azpiroz et al. (2017)	RCT, IBS patients with rectal hypersensitivity (n = 79), Rome III	scFOS (5 g) versus placebo for 4 weeks	↑ Bifidobacteria	Reduction of anxiety scores. Tendency towards improved rectal sensitivity in IBS-C (p = 0.051)	
Galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS)	Silk et al. (2009)	RCT, IBS patients (n = 44), Rome II	Crossover study, β-GOS (3.5 or 7 g) versus placebo for 4 weeks	↑ Bifidobacteria at both doses	Low dose modified stool consistency, reduced flatulence, bloating, composite score of symptoms, and SGA, whereas high dose decreased SGA and anxiety scores	
Human Milk Oligosaccharides (HMOs)	Iribarren et al. (2020)	RCT, IBS patients (n = 60), Rome IV	2′FL/LNnT (5 or 10 g) versus placebo for 4 weeks	↑ Bifidobacteria in high dose at week 4 (lost after 4-week washout)	No worsening of symptoms (Phase II, safety study)	
Iribarren et al. (2021)	RCT, IBS patients (n = 58), Rome IV	2′FL/LNnT (5 or 10 g) versus placebo for 4 weeks	Change in overall faecal, but not mucosal microbiota composition in high dose. Both doses: ↑faecal and mucosal bifidobacteria and modulated certain bacterial taxa. Modulation of faecal and plasma, but not urine, metabolite profiles, associated with bifidogenic effect	Not investigated	
Abbreviations: FOS, fructooligosaccharide; GOS, galactooligosaccharide; HMO, Human Milk Oligosaccharide; 2′FL/LNnT, 4:1 mix of 2′-fucosyllactose, and lacto-N-neotetraose; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; IBS-C, irritable bowel syndrome with constipation; IBS-D, irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea; QoL, quality of life; scFOS; short-chain fructooligosaccharide; SGA, subjective global assessment; RCT, randomised controlled trial. Symbols: ↑, increase; ↓, decrease.

a Statistically significant findings unless otherwise specified.

b Reported total daily dose.

Inulin type fructans

Inulin type fructans (ITFs) is a combined term for inulin, fructooligosaccharides (FOS) and oligofructose and refers to non-digestible, linear fructans, which can be found naturally in vegetables and fruits (Wilson and Whelan, 2017). Hunter et al. (1999) assessed the therapeutic effect of oligofructose (6 g/day) in IBS patients, in a 4-week crossover study, finding no modifications on symptom severity or fasting breathe hydrogen concentrations. Further, while high levels of FOS intake (20 g/day) caused transient worsening of symptoms (Olesen and Gudmand-Hoyer, 2000), a lower dose of short-chain fructooligosaccharides (scFOS) (5 g/day) was well tolerated in IBS patients with rectal hypersensitivity and led to significantly increased faecal bifidobacteria counts and decreased anxiety scores (Azpiroz et al., 2017). In this study, however, improvement in symptom severity was similar to placebo (Azpiroz et al., 2017).

Galactooligosaccharides

β-galactooligosaccharides (β-GOS) are non-digestible oligosaccharides synthesised from lactose using microbial β-galactosidases, and unlike other GOS naturally found in plants they are selectively fermented by bacteria (Wilson and Whelan, 2017). A crossover pilot trial by Silk et al. (2009) showed that 4-weeks of β-GOS treatment at both 3.5 and 7 g/day relieved symptoms and, dose dependently, increased faecal bifidobacteria. In this study, the lower dose led to decreased flatulence and bloating, while the higher dose resulted in increased bloating but improved anxiety scores (Silk et al., 2009).

Human milk oligosaccharides

Human breast milk contains high concentrations of structurally diverse glycans, collectively referred to as human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs). HMOs are non-digestible oligosaccharides, that are selectively metabolised by bacteria (eg. Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis), and beneficially influence infant gut health, and are considered as the first prebiotics new-borns encounter (Bode, 2012). However, studies on the prebiotic activity and health benefit of HMOs in adults are few. Recently our group conducted two studies on the impact of 4:1 HMO mix containing 2′-O-fucosyllactose and lacto-N-neotetraose (2´FL/LNnT) in IBS patients (Iribarren et al., 2020, 2021). Our findings show that adult patients tolerate 2′FL/LNnT supplementation, regardless of the dose (5 or 10 g/day) (Iribarren et al., 2020). Further, a potential change of the gut microenvironment was supported by modulation of the gut microbiota composition (Iribarren et al., 2020, 2021) and faecal and plasma metabolite profiles (Iribarren et al., 2021). When administered at 5 g/day for 12 weeks, the same 2′FL/LNnT formulation led to normalisation of stool forms and improvements in abdominal pain, bloating, overall IBS and quality of life scores in all IBS subgroups in a multicentre, placebo uncontrolled, open label trial (Palsson et al., 2020). However, given the large placebo effect on IBS symptoms, a placebo-controlled study is essential to confirm the clinical efficacy of HMOs in IBS.

Current recommendations

According to the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP), ITFs and β-GOS are the only accepted prebiotics, while HMOs are promising candidates (Gibson et al., 2017). Overall, despite the bifidogenic effect reported in placebo-controlled studies, prebiotics do not seem to convincingly improve IBS symptoms or quality of life in IBS patients (Wilson et al., 2019; Table 3). Furthermore, due to high fermentability followed by gas production, high doses of prebiotics entail a risk to exacerbate symptoms in IBS patients (Muir, 2019). Yet, given the specific mechanistic effect of each prebiotic type, subgroup analyses as well as assessments of different doses of prebiotics may provide a more optimistic view of their potential to improve symptoms in IBS patients.

Food and dietary habits

A large majority of IBS patients report generation and aggravation of GI symptoms following meal ingestion (Böhn et al., 2013). These symptoms are potentially triggered via primary (eg. prebiotic and osmotic effects) or secondary effects (eg. intraluminal pH and microbiome effects) (Spencer et al., 2014). Furthermore, local allergy-like reactions in the gut have recently been proposed to be of importance in subsets of patients (Aguilera-Lizarraga et al., 2021; Fritscher-Ravens et al., 2019). Patients commonly find food rich in carbohydrates and fat, dairy products or gluten as aggravating (Böhn et al., 2013). Thus, the exclusion or reduction of such food items from the diet is a regular practice to reduce symptoms (Lenhart et al., 2022), but comes with the risk of severe food avoidance and restriction in a proportion of IBS patients (Melchior et al., 2022). This habit may also negatively impact the gut microbiota (Altomare et al., 2021; Lenhart et al., 2022), reduce the quality of the diet (Altomare et al., 2021), and the overall nutrient intake (Tigchelaar et al., 2017). Hence, both positive and negative effects of dietary interventions and restrictions in IBS exist.

Targeted carbohydrate reduction diet

Impaired absorption of short-chain (eg. fructose, sorbitol, lactose and sucrose) and long-chain (eg. starch) carbohydrates by the small intestine may contribute to GI symptoms (Hasler, 2006; Yao et al., 2014). The generation of symptoms may be explained by an altered microbial fermentation and carbohydrate metabolism (Yao et al., 2014) which can potentially be identified using breath tests (Gasbarrini et al., 2009; Table 4). Hence, the elimination or reduction of specific carbohydrates may improve IBS symptoms (Berg et al., 2013; Supplementary References: Targeted carbohydrate reduction) and modulate metabolomic pathways (Stenlund et al., 2021), but there is not yet any evidence for effect on inflammatory parameters (Nilholm et al., 2021). Nonetheless, clinical benefit may not always correlate with breath test results as a measure of microbial fermentation, so the exact mechanisms underlying symptom improvement with targeted carbohydrate reduction diets are still partly unresolved (Berg et al., 2013; Yao et al., 2014; Table 4).Table 4. Overview of studies evaluating the effects of food on the gut microenvironment and clinical outcome in patients with IBS.

Diet	References	Design, study cohort (n), Rome criteria	Intervention	Main findings: gut microenvironment a	Main findings: symptoms a	
Targeted carbohydrate reduction	Berg et al. (2013)	Open RCT, IBS patients (n = 202), Rome II	IBS diet with fructose-reduced diet versus IBS diet for 4 weeks	The effects of fructose-reduced diet were independent from fructose breath test result	Improvement of symptom scores and moderate changes of stool consistency after fructose-reduced diet	
Stenlund et al. (2021)	Open RCT, IBS patients (n = 105), Rome IV	Starch- and sucrose-reduced diet versus no dietary advice for 4 weeks	Reduction of starch intake, increased polyunsaturated fat; and metabolic effects mainly related to linoleic acid metabolism, fatty acid biosynthesis, and β-oxidation, but no correlations with symptoms	The starch- and sucrose-reduced diet improved bowel symptoms	
Laatikainen et al. (2020)	RCT, IBS patients (n = 23) and other functional GI disorders (n = 18), Rome IV	Crossover study. Ordinary versus hydrolysed high-protein, lactose-free milkshakes to be consumed for 10 days with 10-day washout period between interventions	No changes in inflammatory markers (TNF-α, IL-6), intestinal permeability (FABP2) or immune activation (1-methylhistamine)	Reduction of IBS symptoms severity and scores, for example, ↓ flatulence and heartburn	
Nilholm et al. (2021)	Open RCT, IBS patients (n = 105), Rome IV
Non-IBS controls (n = 105)	Starch- and sucrose-reduced diet versus no dietary advice for 4 weeks	No changes in inflammatory cytokines	Improvement of several GI symptoms and influence on daily life scores after starch- and sucrose-reduced diet	
Low FODMAPs	Bennet et al. (2018)	RCT, IBS patients (n = 67), Rome III	Low FODMAP diet versus Traditional IBS diet for 4 weeks	The low FODMAP diet impacted the faecal microbiota, for example, ↓bifidobacteria abundance. Faecal bacterial profiles predicted clinical response to low FODMAP intervention	Not investigated	
Hustoft et al. (2017)	RCT, IBS-D and IBS-M patients (n = 20), Rome III	Low FODMAP diet for 9 weeks. After 3 weeks, crossover challenge: FOS (~high FODMAP diet) versus placebo for 10 days, followed by 3-week washout period in between	The low FODMAP diet modulated proinflammatory cytokines, microbiota profile, and faecal SCFAs, that is, ↓IL-6 and IL-8, ↓Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, and Bifidobacterium, and ↓total SCFAs and n-butyric acid	The low FODMAP diet improved IBS symptoms, with higher alleviation rate under placebo challenge (80% placebo vs. 30% FOS)	
McIntosh et al. (2017)	Single blind RCT, IBS patients (n = 40), Rome III	Low versus high FODMAP diet for 3 weeks	Induced changes in the urine metabolome and H2 production; ↓Histamine; ↑Actinobacteria richness and diversity	IBS severity decreased in the low FODMAP group, with greater proportion of responders (72% low FODMAP diet vs. 21% high FODMAP diet)	
Valeur et al. (2016)	Intervention study, IBS patients (n = 63), Rome III	FODMAP restricted diet for 4 weeks	The low FODMAP diet changed SCFAs (↓acetic and n-butyric, or ↑i-butyric) and increased faecal proteolytic fermentation, regardless of IBS symptoms	Improvement of IBS severity	
Valeur et al. (2018)	Intervention study, IBS patients (n = 63), Rome III	FODMAP restricted diet for 4 weeks	Distinct effect on certain bacterial taxa depending on clinical response. Microbiota profile at baseline predicted response to the FODMAP restricted diet	Reduction of IBS-SSS scores	
Valdez-Palomares et al. (2021)	Prospective trial, IBS patients (n = 63), Rome III	Low FODMAP diet for 4 weeks	Response to the low FODMAP diet predicted at baseline with an accuracy of 96.87% based on faecal strains belonging to Veillonella, Butyrivibrio and Ruminiclostridium	68.75% responders versus non-responders 31.25%	
Vervier et al. (2021)	Prospective study, IBS-D and IBS-M patients (n = 56), Rome IV
Household controls (n = 56 pairs)	Low FODMAP diet for 4 weeks, followed by 12 weeks of FODMAP rechallenge if symptoms improved, or usual diet if no improvement and for household control	The low FODMAP diet impacted IBS patients with pathogenic-like microbiota profile at baseline towards a health-like profile, for example, ↑Bacteroidetes, ↓ Firmicutes sp., and normalised primary metabolic genes	The low FODMAP diet had greater benefit on IBS symptoms in patients with a pathogenic-like microbiota profile (ΔIBS-SSS in pathogenic-like IBS n = 194 vs. healthy-like IBS n = 114)	
Eetemadi and Tagkopoulos (2021)	Compilation of microbiota and faecal metagenomics datasets, IBS patients (n = 152)
Healthy subjects (n = 37)	Low FODMAP diet	Impact on gut microbiome. Defined potential benefit by high colonic CH4, and SCFA production; and Ruminococcus 1, Ruminococcaceae UCG-002 and Anaerostipes	Not investigated	
	Zhang et al. (2021)	RCT, IBS-D patients (n = 108), Rome III	Low FODMAP diet versus traditional dietary advice	The low FODMAP diet impacted faecal microbiota (↓Bifidobacterium) and faecal fermentation (↓ saccharolytic fermentation). Severe symptoms and high faecal fermentation index (saccharolytic fermentation) at baseline predicted response to low FODMAP diet	The low FODMAP diet provided an earlier relief in stool frequency and excessive wind, while overall symptom reduction was similar between groups (response rate: 55.6% low FODMAP vs. 48.1% traditional diet)	
Gluten-free	Wu et al. (2017)	RCT, IBS-D patients (n = 28), Rome II	Gluten-free diet versus Gluten containing diet for 4 weeks	Changes in genes associated with intestinal permeability after gluten challenge	Not investigated	
Naseri et al. (2021)	Open RCT, IBS patients (n = 42), Rome IV	Open study. Combination of Low FODMAP and gluten-free diets for 6 weeks	Faecal microbiota modulation, for example, ↑Bacteroidetes, ↓Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio; ↓ faecal calprotectin	Improvement in IBS symptoms severity in 73.3% of the patients	
Abbreviations: CH4, methane; FABP2, Fatty Acid Binding Protein 2; FODMAP, Fermentable, Oligosaccharides, Disaccharides, Mono-saccharides, And Polyols; FOS, fructo-oligosaccharides; GI, gastrointestinal; H2, hydrogen; IL, interleukin; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; IBS-C, irritable bowel syndrome with constipation; IBS-D, irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea; IBS-M, irritable bowel syndrome with mixed bowel habits; IBS-SSS, irritable bowel syndrome-severity score system; RCT, randomised controlled trial; SCFA, short-chain fatty acid; TNF-α, tumour necrosis factor alpha. % indicates the percentage of patients or cases. Symbols: ↑, increase; ↓, decrease.

a Statistically significant findings unless otherwise specified.

Low FODMAP diet

The term Fermentable Oligo-, Di- and Mono-saccharides And Polyols (FODMAPs) was introduced by Gibson and Shepherd (2005). These dietary FODMAPs are poorly absorbed short-chain carbohydrates that reach the distal parts of the small intestine and the large intestine intact (Gibson and Shepherd, 2005). There, they constitute a source of nutrients for specific microbial species (McIntosh et al., 2017) and are fermented. As a result, gases, including hydrogen, methane and carbon dioxide, may be produced which together with increased intestinal water content via osmotic effects of the luminal carbohydrates, cause intestinal distension triggering GI symptoms. Therefore, reduction of foods rich in certain short-chain carbohydrates intake can impact hydrogen and methane production and luminal distension (Staudacher and Whelan, 2017).

Since the first retrospective study investigating the potential of a low FODMAP diet in patients with IBS and fructose malabsorption (Shepherd and Gibson, 2006), multiple studies have followed and increased the evidence-base for efficacy of the low FODMAP diet as a strategy for managing IBS (Black et al., 2021; Supplementary References: Low FODMAP diet). The positive symptomatic effect of reducing these carbohydrates may, however, in parallel negatively influence the colonic luminal microenvironment by altering gut microbiota composition and reduce bifidobacteria abundance, as well as other health-associated gut bacteria (Bennet et al., 2018; McIntosh et al., 2017; Table 4). Interestingly, the clinical response to a low FODMAP diet may be predicted by gut microbiota composition before the start of the dietary intervention (Bennet et al., 2018; Valdez-Palomares et al., 2021; Valeur et al., 2018), by high colonic methane and SCFA production (Eetemadi and Tagkopoulos, 2021), and by high saccharolytic fermentation activity (Zhang et al., 2021), supporting the importance of the gut microenvironment. However, not all studies have demonstrated a correlation between fermentation or gut microbiota profile and IBS symptoms (Table 4) or show substantial benefits in symptomatology (Nordin et al., 2022). In addition, even though a low FODMAP diet or β-GOS supplementation for 4 weeks have very similar effects on symptom improvement, discontinuation of a low FODMAP diet may lead to a faster reappearance of symptoms as compared to elimination of prebiotic β-GOS supplementation. This suggests that the effect of a low FODMAP diet on symptoms may be mediated through the food and its interactions with the microbiota, rather than a direct effect on microbiota composition (Huaman et al., 2018; Simrén, 2018).

The long-term efficacy and safety of the reduction of FODMAP intake are still surrounded by uncertainties. Even so, a low FODMAP diet seems to have a sustained effect on IBS symptoms and quality of life over at least 6 months and with a high rate of adherence (Supplementary References: Long-term low FODMAP diet). Nevertheless, to date, a long-term restrictive low FODMAP diet is not considered to be beneficial because it can result in nutritional deficiencies (Harvie et al., 2017) and it can negatively influence the gut microenvironment (Bennet et al., 2018; McIntosh et al., 2017). Although few long-term studies exist, two studies support that a modified low FODMAP diet can be nutritionally adequate up to 18 months, without adversely impacting on food-related quality of life (O’Keeffe et al., 2018), but may reduce diet quality (Staudacher et al., 2020). Consequently, following a period of strict FODMAP exclusion, a gradual reintroduction of selected FODMAP is recommended to identify tolerable long-term solutions and increase dietary variety and nutrients (Harvie et al., 2017).

Gluten/wheat-free diet

Gluten is a complex, water-soluble protein found in grains. Following gluten intake, some IBS patients may report GI and extra-intestinal symptoms such as fatigue, similar to patients with coeliac disease, even though intestinal structural alterations are absent (Biesiekierski et al., 2011). This entity is known as non-coeliac gluten/wheat intolerance and can overlap with IBS (Spencer et al., 2014). The exclusion of gluten from the diet has been shown to successfully improve IBS symptoms in subgroups of patients (Supplementary References: Gluten-free diet), but not all studies agree with this (Nordin et al., 2022). Interestingly, one study demonstrated that approximately one third of IBS patients who benefit from a gluten-free diet suffer from wheat sensitivity (Barmeyer et al., 2017), which may be triggered by high levels of the FODMAP fructan found in wheat (Spencer et al., 2014). The relevance of fructan, rather than gluten, for symptom generation in these patients was also supported by a recent randomised controlled challenge study (Skodje et al., 2018). Hence, gluten may not be the unique offensive factor (Biesiekierski et al., 2013) and it is currently often wheat, rather than gluten per se, that is considered to be linked to IBS (Zannini and Arendt, 2018).

So far, the vast knowledge about the effect of gluten/wheat restricted diets on the gut microenvironment is obtained by studies on healthy individuals. These studies have described the ability of a gluten-free diet to shape the gut microbiota composition (Bonder et al., 2016; De Palma et al., 2009; Hansen et al., 2018; Pinto-Sanchez et al., 2020) and modulate activity levels of bacterial metabolic pathways (Bonder et al., 2016). Additionally, a low gluten diet seems to induce moderate changes in the gut microbiota (eg. decreasing bifidobacteria), microbial function and host physiology biomarkers in healthy individuals. All these changes are thought to lead to relative improvements of GI symptoms (eg. bloating) although the role of gluten per se is still uncertain (Hansen et al., 2018). On the other hand, studies conducted on patients with coeliac disease show that strict gluten restriction may lead to an unbalanced diet (eg. high sugar, high fat and low fibre) and create a high risk for nutritional deficiencies (eg. calcium and iron) raising concerns regarding potential effects of long-term adherence (Bardella et al., 2000; Kinsey et al., 2008; Wild et al., 2010). To the best of our knowledge, the nutritional challenges of a gluten-free diet have not yet been studied in IBS and its effect on the gut microenvironment is poorly understood. A gluten-free diet possibly improves bowel habits (Vazquez-Roque et al., 2013) and modulates intestinal permeability (Vazquez-Roque et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2017), and a diet low in both gluten and FODMAP has been suggested to improve IBS symptoms severity while normalising the gut microbiota composition in IBS patients (Naseri et al., 2021), but more studies are certainly needed on this topic in IBS (Table 4).

Current recommendations

To conclude, exclusion of certain food items seems to relieve symptoms in a large proportion of IBS patients, at least in the short term. Moreover, professional dietary guidance can prevent avoidance of food items crucial for health (McKenzie et al., 2016) and improve quality of life and diet (Ostgaard et al., 2012). For the moment, the current guidelines carefully include the diet low in FODMAPs as a second-line dietary therapy for IBS management, because of its invasiveness, safety concerns and the low-quality evidence to support its long-term use to alleviate global IBS symptoms, even though the proof of its efficacy in the short term is good. Moreover, the low FODMAP diet is strict and requires guidance by a dietician. Due to the lack of understanding of long-term effects on nutritional adequacy and gut health, its implementation should be short-term (Moayyedi et al., 2019; van Lanen et al., 2021; Vasant et al., 2021), and thereafter a gradual reintroduction of FODMAPs is recommended (Whelan et al., 2018). The effect of a gluten-free diet, however, is unclear and there is consequently a recommendation against its widespread use in IBS. Dietary recommendations concerning other diets cannot be made due to lack of objective information. Food can be regarded as the crossroads between pathogenesis, symptom origin and symptom control (Spencer et al., 2014), and the importance of this intersection is expected to attract a lot of attention in the coming years.

Faecal microbiota transplantation

FMT is a 1,700-year-old, unconventional therapy (Zhang et al., 2012), which aims to favourably alter gut microbiota composition through administration of faecal material from healthy individuals into the GI tract of patients with presumed gut microbiota alterations. First applied to treat food poisoning and severe diarrhoea in the fourth century (Zhang et al., 2012) and now effectively used for treatment of Clostridium difficile infection, FMT has produced varying outcomes in IBS patients in regards to symptoms and gut microenvironment in research settings (König et al., 2017).

Several strategies are currently available to perform a FMT (Figure 3) and may explain the diversity of outcomes described in patients with IBS (Table 5). One way to administer FMT is through oral capsules, which have been shown to change the gut microbiota to resemble that of the donors. However, microbiota alterations do not seem to translate well into clinical improvement and contrary to what was expected, FMT treatment may have less or comparable efficacy to placebo (Aroniadis et al., 2019; Halkjær et al., 2018). While this method is easy to administer and is cost effective, it may require the intake of multiple capsules a day, which can trigger feelings of nausea and vomiting (Gulati et al., 2020). Another approach is to deliver faecal material to the colon (Holster et al., 2019; Lahtinen et al., 2020), commonly performed via colonoscopy (Gulati et al., 2020). This method of FMT may shift the recipient’s microbiota (Lahtinen et al., 2020), but does not seem to increase butyrate-producing bacteria following treatment (Holster et al., 2019) and so far has not been demonstrated to be superior to the placebo group receiving autologous stool in improving symptom severity (Holster et al., 2019; Lahtinen et al., 2020). Furthermore, the high cost and requirement of pre-treatment (ie. bowel cleansing), that may influence symptoms and gut microenvironment, make it difficult to interpret the clinical outcome of colonoscopic FMT (Gulati et al., 2020; Holster et al., 2019). Alternatively, FMT delivered by transendoscopic enteral tubing (TET) does not require bowel preparation and is convenient for multiple administrations (Gulati et al., 2020). Delivery of microbiota isolates obtained from donor faeces using TET improved symptom severity and quality of life as well as changed the dominant microbial taxa in responders following FMT (Huang et al., 2019).Figure 3 Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) as a strategy to restore healthy gut microbiota in IBS. Overall, FMT aims to shift the altered microbiota towards homeostasis through colonisation of healthy donor microbiota. The processed faecal material obtained from a healthy donor can be administered through upper (eg. oral capsules, gastroscopy and nasojejunal tube) or lower [eg. colonoscopy and transendoscopic enteral tubing (TET)] GI routes. Oral capsules generally contain very small amounts of faecal material and require multiple ingestions daily. FMT delivery through gastroscopy and nasojejunal route involves administration of a flexible tube through the mouth and nose, respectively, into the small intestine. In colonoscopy, FMT is delivered to the colon through a flexible tube inserted through the anus. The colonoscopy channel can also be used to introduce TET into the colon. The TET is then fixed to the mucosa using titanium clips for whole-colon FMT delivery.

Table 5. Overview of studies evaluating the effects of faecal microbiota transplantation on the gut microenvironment and clinical outcome in patients with IBS.

Route of administration	References	Design, study cohort (n), Rome criteria	Intervention	Main findings: gut microenvironment a	Main findings: symptoms a	
Oral	Halkjær et al. (2018)	RCT, IBS patients (n = 52), Rome III	25 FMT capsules/day containing 50 g of donor stool for 12 days versus placebo capsules	Increased faecal microbial biodiversity and shift towards donor microbiota	Placebo capsules more effective in improving IBS severity (79.2% response in placebo vs. 36.4% FMT) and QoL 3 months after treatment	
Aroniadis et al. (2019)	RCT, IBS-D patients (n = 48), Rome III	Crossover study (12-week interval), 25 FMT capsules/day containing 9.5 g for 3 days versus placebo capsules	Shift towards donor microbiota with no difference in microbial diversity and donor similarity between responders and non-responders. No change in bacterial abundance after FMT	Similar improvement in IBS severity and clinical response between FMT-first and placebo-first at 3-month post-treatment (Response rate 50 vs. 61%, respectively)	
Colonoscopy	Holster et al. (2019)	RCT, IBS patients low in butyrate-producing bacteria (n = 17), Rome III	30 g of donor stool versus autologous stool	Similar microbial diversity and butyrate-producing bacteria abundance after FMT. Alterations in faecal and mucosa adherent bacterial composition in both groups	Reduction of symptom severity (from week 4) and improvement of QoL (from week 2) only in FMT. No difference between active treatment and placebo	
Lahtinen et al. (2020)	RCT, IBS-nonC patients (n = 49), Rome III	30 g of donor stool versus autologous stool	Shift towards donor microbiota, increased bacterial richness but similar microbial diversity in the FMT group compared to baseline	Decreased symptom severity in the FMT recipient 3 months post-treatment. No difference between active treatment and placebo. No effect on QoL, depression and anxiety	
Transendoscopic enteral tubing (TET)	Huang et al. (2019)	Intervention study, refractory IBS patients (n = 30), −	Microbiota suspension from donor stool, 2–3 times every other day	IBS-D responders higher diversity at baseline. Change in dominant microbiota composition post-FMT in responders (IBS-D): Methanobrevibacter and Akkermansia most abundant bacteria post-FMT	Decreased symptom severity, and improvement of QoL at 1 month and 3-month post FMT	
Gastroscopy	Mazzawi et al. (2019)	Intervention study, IBS-D patients (n = 13), Rome III	30 g of donor stool	↑SCFA and change in microbiota composition after FMT (more similar to that of the donors). Trend towards increased bacterial diversity in both responders and non-responders. Correlations between gut microenvironment and symptom severity	Clinical response in 62% of patients. Decreased symptom severity, increased QoL and improved stool consistency in responders	
El-Salhy et al. (2020)	RCT, IBS patients (n = 164), Rome IV	30 or 60 g of donor stool versus autologous stool	No change in the dysbiosis index. Change in bacterial abundance post-treatment; 30 g: ↑Alistipes, Bacteriodes and Prevotella spp. ↓Eubacterium halii and Firmicutes spp. 60 g: ↑Alistipes and Akkermansia muciniphila spp. ↓Dorea spp.	Reduction of symptom severity, fatigue and QoL amelioration in both FMT doses compared to placebo 3 months after treatment. Response rate of 30 g, 60 g and placebo; 76.9, 89.1 and 23.6%, respectively	
El-Salhy et al. (2021)	RCT, IBS patients (n = 142), Rome IV	30 or 60 g of donor stool versus autologous stool	Both groups increased faecal butyric acid. Increased total SCFA only in the 60 g group post FMT. Increase in butyric acid inversely correlated with symptom severity and fatigue in responders	Improvement of symptom severity, fatigue and QoL compared to placebo in both doses 1 month post FMT	
Nasojejunal tube	(Holvoet et al., 2021)	RCT, refractory IBS-D or IBS-M with severe bloating (n = 62), Rome III	Crossover study, donor stool versus autologous stool	Higher microbial diversity and different overall microbial composition at baseline in responders	Ameliorated general IBS symptoms, abdominal bloating (56% response vs. 26% response in placebo), IBS symptom scores and QoL at 12 weeks post FMT	
Abbreviations: FMT, faecal microbiota transplantation; IBS, irritable bowel syndrome; IBS-D, irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea; IBS-nonC, irritable bowel syndrome without constipation (= diarrhoea and mixed bowel habits); IBS-M, irritable bowel syndrome with mixed bowel habits; QoL, quality of life; RCT, randomised controlled trial; SCFA, short-chain fatty acid. Symbols: ↑, increase; ↓, decrease.

a Statistically significant findings unless otherwise specified.

Delivery of stool transplant through gastroscopy may normalise SCFA levels (El-Salhy et al., 2021; Mazzawi et al., 2019) and change gut microbiota composition (Cruz-Aguliar et al., 2019; Mazzawi et al., 2019), while improving symptoms and QoL in IBS patients (Cruz-Aguliar et al., 2019; El-Salhy et al., 2020; Mazzawi et al., 2019). Some of the changes in the gut microenvironment correlated with IBS symptom severity in the patients responding to the FMT treatment (Cruz-Aguliar et al., 2019; El-Salhy et al., 2021). Similar to gastroscopy, the use of nasojejunal tube to deliver FMT has led to promising results including improvements in general IBS symptoms, abdominal bloating, quality of life, and decrease in selected symptom scores in the active treatment group compared to the placebo group receiving autologous stool (Holvoet et al., 2021). Furthermore, responders had higher microbial diversity and different overall microbial composition at baseline compared with non-responders (Holvoet et al., 2021). Although costly, FMT delivery through gastroscopy and nasojejunal tube, are potentially less invasive than colonoscopy and can be performed without bowel cleansing (Gulati et al., 2020).

Current recommendations

Considering the relatively benign nature of IBS, and the potential risks with FMT, the general concern has been whether it is worth the trade-off. While there is a call for caution (Camilleri, 2021), the adverse effects of FMT in IBS patients have been limited to short-term and self-limiting GI symptoms. As of now, FMT is not an accepted therapy for clinical use in IBS and should still be limited to clinical trials (König et al., 2017), even though recently published large controlled FMT trials provide hope for future use in selected patients (El-Salhy et al., 2020; Holvoet et al., 2021). Still, the efficacy is debatable, which could be attributed to differences in the methods used (Table 5). Overall, FMT delivery through gastroscopy or via a nasojejunal tube have been the most promising options and showed dose-dependent and long-term improvements in IBS patients (El-Salhy et al., 2020, 2022; Holvoet et al., 2021). The positive outcome can be attributed to the identification of a donor with well-defined favourable microbiota (diverse and stable over time) and recipients that are more likely to respond to the treatment (diverse and less disturbed microbiota) (El-Salhy et al., 2020; Holvoet et al., 2021). Overall, while these results are encouraging, data regarding the optimal FMT protocol (eg. delivery route, dose and frequency) and mechanisms underlying symptom improvement are yet to be established.

Combined treatments

The treatment strategies described in this review have yielded some clinical benefits, but with mixed and sometimes inconsistent results regarding efficacy. To overcome the limitations of single treatment interventions, combinations of different strategies have been tested.

Restrictive dietary interventions, while improving symptoms, may paradoxically have adverse effects on the gut microenvironment. The low FODMAP diet, a well-recognised IBS therapy, has been shown to reduce faecal bifidobacterial abundances and butyrate as well as total SCFA levels, which otherwise are associated with health benefit (Huaman et al., 2018; Staudacher et al., 2017; Wilson et al., 2020). Conversely, prebiotics have a bifidogenic effect and have been suggested as a supplementary treatment for the low FODMAP diet to potentially overcome the negative effects on gut microbiota composition and function with this restrictive diet (Huaman et al., 2018). Interestingly, co-administration of a probiotic mixture containing Bifidobacterium spp., together with a low FODMAP diet, increased faecal Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus abundances (Staudacher et al., 2017, 2021). However, supplementation of β-GOS during the low FODMAP diet improved symptoms, but did not lead to increase in bifidobacteria (Wilson et al., 2020). On the other hand, high levels of FOS (16 g/day), while increasing bifidobacteria, led to worsening of symptoms in IBS patients on a low FODMAP diet (Hustoft et al., 2017), highlighting the importance of the dose used.

Another strategy for combined therapy is to co-administer probiotics together with prebiotics, now referred to as complementary synbiotics. Synbiotics are “a mixture comprising live microorganisms and substrate(s) selectively utilised by host microorganisms that confers a health benefit on the host” (Swanson et al., 2020). According to this definition, synbiotics may also comprise live organisms and substrates that are not probiotics and prebiotics respectively, which in this case are referred to as synergistic synbiotics (Swanson et al., 2020). The delivery of synbiotic fermented milk, which included inulin (90 per cent) and oligofructose (10 per cent) as prebiotics together with the probiotics Lactobacillus and bifidobacteria, demonstrated transient increase in administered strains in faecal samples of IBS patients (Bogovič Matijašić et al., 2016). However, the effects of synbiotics on IBS symptoms vary across studies (Chlebicz-Wójcik and Śliżewska, 2021).

Metabolites

Metabolites produced or modulated by intestinal bacteria have been suggested to play a role in IBS pathophysiology, either directly by chemical interactions or via local modulation of microbiota and/or immune activity (Rajilić-Stojanović et al., 2015). SCFAs and bile acids are two of the most targeted metabolites in IBS related research and regarded as potential treatment targets.

Short-chain fatty acids

SCFAs, mainly acetate, propionate, and butyrate, are the most prominent by-products of colonic microbiota-mediated metabolism of indigestible dietary fibre. Their established role in intestinal homeostasis (Tan et al., 2014) and the recent suggestion of their involvement in microbiota-gut–brain interaction (Dalile et al., 2019) have attracted interest to study SCFAs in IBS pathophysiology. Some IBS patients may have lower levels of SCFA-producing bacteria (Pozuelo et al., 2015). Furthermore, a recent meta-analysis indicates globally lower SCFA levels, including butyrate, in IBS-C patients and higher SCFA levels in IBS-D patients (Sun et al., 2019). In line with this, it has been demonstrated that receiving microencapsulated sodium butyrate for 12 weeks, as a supplemental therapy, reduced the frequency of spontaneous and postprandial abdominal pain, the pain during defecation and constipation compared to placebo, while there were no significant effects on the severity of other GI symptoms (Banasiewicz et al., 2013). Furthermore, modulation of SCFAs, described in other gut microbiota-targeted therapies along with association of SCFAs to health-promoting bacteria, may serve as a potential marker linked to symptom improvement (see Tables 1–5).

Bile acid metabolism

Bile acids are synthesised in the liver and released into the intestinal lumen to be mostly reabsorbed upon reaching the terminal ileum, while the remaining bile acids (<5 per cent) pass into the colon. Once in the colon, primary bile acids are modified by the bacteria via enzymatic processes, releasing secondary bile acids that mediate series of signalling events (Zhan et al., 2020). Approximately one third of the IBS-D patients, are reported to have bile acid malabsorption (BAM) (Wedlake et al., 2009), which leads to increased amounts of bile acids reaching the colon, where they can stimulate intestinal motility and secretion and potentially also exaggerate visceral hypersensitivity (Bajor et al., 2015; Dior et al., 2016; Wei et al., 2020). Bile acid sequestrants are part of the recommended therapy for diarrhoea in IBS patients despite limited supporting evidence from large randomised controlled trials. However, side effects and possible interference with other medications may make long-term use problematic (Nee et al., 2015). Several bacteria involved in bile acid metabolism seem to be altered in IBS patients (Zhan et al., 2020). Potentially Clostridia species, enriched in a subset of IBS-D patients, suppress the feedback-loop regulating bile acid synthesis through metabolites, further increasing colonic bile acid exposure (Zhao et al., 2020). Accordingly, as shown by a longitudinal study, the microbial biotransformation of bile acids is altered in both IBS-C and IBS-D patients, with IBS-D patients having higher and IBS-C patients having lower faecal primary bile acid levels compared to healthy individuals. Furthermore, the primary bile acids were increased in both IBS groups during flares (Mars et al., 2020). While changes in gut microbiota composition seem to play an important role in altered bile acid metabolism, the microbiota-bile acid axis is rarely assessed in studies on antibiotic, dietary, prebiotic and probiotic interventions. Indeed, the microbiota-bile acid interaction may be involved in explaining the effects of the aforementioned interventions on symptoms and could be a valid treatment target in future IBS trials.

Current recommendations

Abnormalities in metabolite profiles may partially reflect affected biological pathways involved in IBS symptom generation, further reflected in metabolite alterations specific to each IBS subtype. Targeting the gut microenvironment through intervention studies (eg. antibiotics, probiotics, prebiotics and FMT), with thorough analysis of secondary effects on metabolites may be important for more effective long-term therapeutic strategies. Furthermore, metabolomic alterations, may also provide mechanistic insights into treatment response, as suggested by a post hoc analysis of a dietary intervention study (Nybacka et al., 2021). Overall, while the role of SCFA is extensively studied, the role of other metabolites, such as bile acids, neurotransmitters and vitamins, remains to be explored (James et al., 2020).

Conclusion

IBS is a multifaceted disorder with a complex pathophysiology, where the gut microenvironment seems to play a key role in symptom generation. Evidence suggest that multiple luminal factors may be associated with IBS, including gut microbiota, microbial and dietary metabolites, and immune-related factors. Therefore, interventions targeting the gut microenvironment may be a coherent approach to indirectly provide health-related benefit to patients with IBS. This narrative review gathers the current knowledge on strategies that consider gut microenvironment modulation as a therapeutic target, with a specific focus on the link between effects in the gut microenvironment and impact on IBS symptoms.

Antibiotics, probiotics, prebiotics, food and FMT are strategies with potential to manage IBS symptoms (Figure 1). They vary in their effect on the gut microenvironment and present some limitations. For antibiotics, we largely lack mechanistic understanding on symptom improvement, especially regarding their effect on microbiota and how relevant this is for symptom improvement. The effect on the gut microenvironment may be highly dependent on dose and/or type of probiotics and prebiotics, and the link to symptom improvement also remains to be fully established. Certain dietary interventions seem to have favourable effects on symptoms, but long-term commitment may lead to undesired effects on the gut microenvironment, for example, a strict low-FODMAP diet reduces health-associated bacteria in the gut. The heterogeneity in study designs in FMT makes it difficult to draw conclusions on efficacy and the impact on the gut microenvironment, as well as mechanisms behind symptom improvement and factors of importance for donor selection. Still, combination of certain therapies might be an alternative approach, although solid scientific support for this approach is needed before being implemented in the clinic. In addition, a better understanding of the importance of metabolomic alterations reflecting host and microbial metabolism could help in developing more evidence-based therapies and predicting potential response in the individual patient.

To conclude, treatments targeting the gut microenvironment are promising, but improved knowledge regarding their specific mode of action, mechanisms underlying their effects on symptoms, the effect of different doses, is still needed to potentially be able to identify the right treatment to the right patient.

Disclosure statement

C.I. and L.M. have no conflict of interest to disclose. M.S. has received unrestricted research grants from Danone Nutricia Research and Glycom A/S (now DSM), and served as a Consultant/Advisory Board member for Danone Nutricia Research, Ironwood, Menarini, Biocodex, Genetic Analysis AS, Glycom A/S (now DSM), Tillotts, Arena and Adnovate, and as in the speakers’ bureau for Tillotts, Menarini, Kyowa Kirin, Takeda, Shire, Biocodex, Alimentary Health, AlfaSigma and Falk Foundation. L.Ö. has received financial support for research from Genetic Analysis AS, Biocodex, Danone Research and AstraZeneca and served as Consultant/Advisory Board member for Genetic Analysis AS, and as a speaker for Biocodex, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, AbbVie and Meda.

Notes on contributors

C.I. has recently defended her PhD thesis at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg. Her research focuses on the host-microbiota crosstalk and the effect of the prebiotic human milk oligosaccharides in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). L.M. is a PhD student in the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg. Her research focuses on microbiologic and immunologic factors behind non-classical food allergy in patients with IBS. L.Ö is a professor of Immunology at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg. She has numerous publications focusing on describing gut microbiota, immune profile and the link to disease profile, as well as therapy outcome in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and patients with IBS. M.S. is a professor of Gastroenterology at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg; Senior Consultant at Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Adjunct Professor of Medicine at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine. His research focuses on the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of functional gastrointestinal disorders and their treatments.

Supplementary material

For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit https://doi.org/10.1017/gmb.2022.6.

click here to view supplementary material

Author contributions

Conceptualization: M.S.; Supervision: L.Ö., M.S.; Visualisation: C.I., L.M.; Writing – original draft: C.I., L.M.; Writing – review and editing: C.I., L.M., L.Ö., M.S. All authors have read and approved the final version of this manuscript.

Funding

The study was funded by Swedish Medical Research Council [grant nos. 2019-01052 (L.Ö.) and 2018-02566 (M.S.)], Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg (L.Ö.), Faculty of Medicine at University of Gothenburg (M.S.), grants from the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils; the ALF-agreement, ALFGBG-723921 (L.Ö.), ALFGBG-722331 (M.S.) and Regional Executive Board, Region Västra Götaland [grant no. VGFOUREG-931919 (L.Ö.)].
==== Refs
References

Acosta A, Camilleri M, Shin A, Linker Nord S, O’Neill J, Gray AV, Lueke AJ, Donato LJ, Burton DD, Szarka LA, Zinsmeister AR, Golden PL and Fodor A (2016) Effects of rifaximin on transit, permeability, fecal microbiome, and organic acid excretion in irritable bowel syndrome. Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology 7 (5 ), e173. 10.1038/ctg.2016.32 27228404
Aguilera-Lizarraga J, Florens MV, Viola MF, Jain P, Decraecker L, Appeltans I, Cuende-Estevez M, Fabre N, Van Beek K, Perna E, Balemans D, Stakenborg N, Theofanous S, Bosmans G, Mondelaers SU, Matteoli G, Ibiza Martínez S, Lopez-Lopez C, Jaramillo-Polanco J, Talavera K, Alpizar YA, Feyerabend TB, Rodewald HR, Farre R, Redegeld FA, Si J, Raes J, Breynaert C, Schrijvers R, Bosteels C, Lambrecht BN, Boyd SD, Hoh RA, Cabooter D, Nelis M, Augustijns P, Hendrix S, Strid J, Bisschops R, Reed DE, Vanner SJ, Denadai-Souza A, Wouters MM and Boeckxstaens GE (2021) Local immune response to food antigens drives meal-induced abdominal pain. Nature 590 (7844 ), 151–156. 10.1038/s41586-020-03118-2 33442055
Ahluwalia B, Iribarren C, Magnusson MK, Sundin J, Clevers E, Savolainen O, Ross AB, Törnblom H, Simrén M and Öhman L (2021) A distinct faecal microbiota and metabolite profile linked to bowel habits in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Cell 10 (6 ), 1459. 10.3390/cells10061459
Altomare A, Del Chierico F, Rocchi G, Emerenziani S, Nuglio C, Putignani L, Angeletti S, Lo Presti A, Ciccozzi M, Russo A, Cocca S, Ribolsi M, Muscaritoli M, Cicala M and Guarino MPL (2021) Association between dietary habits and fecal microbiota composition in irritable bowel syndrome patients: A pilot study. Nutrients 13 (5 ), 1479. 10.3390/nu13051479 33925672
Aroniadis OC, Brandt LJ, Oneto C, Feuerstadt P, Sherman A, Wolkoff AW, Kassam Z, Sadovsky RG, Elliott RJ, Budree S, Kim M and Keller MJ (2019) Faecal microbiota transplantation for diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology 4 (9 ), 675–685. 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30198-0 31326345
Aziz I, Törnblom H and Simrén M (2017) Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth as a cause for irritable bowel syndrome: Guilty or not guilty? Current Opinion in Gastroenterology 33 (3 ), 196–202. 10.1097/mog.0000000000000348 28257307
Azpiroz F, Dubray C, Bernalier-Donadille A, Cardot JM, Accarino A, Serra J, Wagner A, Respondek F and Dapoigny M (2017) Effects of scFOS on the composition of fecal microbiota and anxiety in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: A randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study. Neurogastroenterology & Motility 29 (2 ), e12911. 10.1111/nmo.12911
Bajor A, Törnblom H, Rudling M, Ung KA and Simrén M (2015) Increased colonic bile acid exposure: A relevant factor for symptoms and treatment in IBS. Gut 64 (1 ), 84–92. 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305965 24727487
Banasiewicz T, Krokowicz Ł, Stojcev Z, Kaczmarek BF, Kaczmarek E, Maik J, Marciniak R, Krokowicz P, Walkowiak J and Drews M (2013) Microencapsulated sodium butyrate reduces the frequency of abdominal pain in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Colorectal Disease 15 (2 ), 204–209. 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03152.x 22738315
Barbara G, Grover M, Bercik P, Corsetti M, Ghoshal UC, Ohman L and Rajilić-Stojanović M (2019) Rome foundation working team report on post-infection irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 156 (1 ), 46–58.e47. 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.011 30009817
Bardella MT, Fredella C, Prampolini L, Molteni N, Giunta AM and Bianchi PA (2000) Body composition and dietary intakes in adult celiac disease patients consuming a strict gluten-free diet. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 72 (4 ), 937–939. 10.1093/ajcn/72.4.937 11010934
Barmeyer C, Schumann M, Meyer T, Zielinski C, Zuberbier T, Siegmund B, Schulzke JD, Daum S and Ullrich R (2017) Long-term response to gluten-free diet as evidence for non-celiac wheat sensitivity in one third of patients with diarrhea-dominant and mixed-type irritable bowel syndrome. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 32 (1 ), 29–39. 10.1007/s00384-016-2663-x 27695975
Basseri RJ, Weitsman S, Barlow GM and Pimentel M (2011) Antibiotics for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology and Hepatology 7 (7 ), 455–493.22298980
Bennet SMP, Böhn L, Störsrud S, Liljebo T, Collin L, Lindfors P, Törnblom H, Öhman L and Simrén M (2018) Multivariate modelling of faecal bacterial profiles of patients with IBS predicts responsiveness to a diet low in FODMAPs. Gut 67 (5 ), 872–881. 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313128 28416515
Berg LK, Fagerli E, Martinussen M, Myhre AO, Florholmen J and Goll R (2013) Effect of fructose-reduced diet in patients with irritable bowel syndrome, and its correlation to a standard fructose breath test. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 48 (8 ), 936–943. 10.3109/00365521.2013.812139 23834159
Bhattarai, Y., Muniz Pedrogo, D.A., & Kashyap, P. C. (2017). Irritable bowel syndrome: a gut microbiota-related disorder? American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 312 (1 ), G52–G62. 10.1152/ajpgi.00338.2016 27881403
Biesiekierski JR, Newnham ED, Irving PM, Barrett JS, Haines M, Doecke JD, Shepherd SJ, Muir JG and Gibson PR (2011) Gluten causes gastrointestinal symptoms in subjects without celiac disease: A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. American Journal of Gastroenterology 106 (3 ), 508–514. 10.1038/ajg.2010.487 21224837
Biesiekierski JR, Peters SL, Newnham ED, Rosella O, Muir JG and Gibson PR (2013) No effects of gluten in patients with self-reported non-celiac gluten sensitivity after dietary reduction of fermentable, poorly absorbed, short-chain carbohydrates. Gastroenterology 145 (2 ), 320–328.e323. 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.04.051 23648697
Black CJ, Staudacher HM and Ford AC (2021) Efficacy of a low FODMAP diet in irritable bowel syndrome: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Gut 71 (6 ), 1117–1126. 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325214 34376515
Bode L (2012) Human milk oligosaccharides: Every baby needs a sugar mama. Glycobiology 22 (9 ), 1147–1162. 10.1093/glycob/cws074 22513036
Bogovič Matijašić B, Obermajer T, Lipoglavšek L, Sernel T, Locatelli I, Kos M, Šmid A and Rogelj I (2016) Effects of synbiotic fermented milk containing lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis BB-12 on the fecal microbiota of adults with irritable bowel syndrome: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Journal of Dairy Science 99 (7 ), 5008–5021. 10.3168/jds.2015-10743 27157575
Böhn L, Störsrud S, Törnblom H, Bengtsson U and Simrén M (2013) Self-reported food-related gastrointestinal symptoms in IBS are common and associated with more severe symptoms and reduced quality of life. American Journal of Gastroenterology 108 (5 ), 634–641. 10.1038/ajg.2013.105 23644955
Bonder MJ, Tigchelaar EF, Cai X, Trynka G, Cenit MC, Hrdlickova B, Zhong H, Vatanen T, Gevers D, Wijmenga C, Wang Y and Zhernakova A (2016) The influence of a short-term gluten-free diet on the human gut microbiome. Genome Medicine 8 (1 ), 45. 10.1186/s13073-016-0295-y 27102333
Bonfrate L, Di Palo DM, Celano G, Albert A, Vitellio P, De Angelis M, Gobbetti M and Portincasa P (2020) Effects of Bifidobacterium longum BB536 and lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 in IBS patients. European Journal of Clinical Investigation 50 (3 ), e13201. 10.1111/eci.13201 31960952
Camilleri M (2021) FMT in IBS: A call for caution. Gut 70 (2 ), 431–431. 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321529
Canavan C, West J and Card T (2014) Review article: The economic impact of the irritable bowel syndrome. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 40 (9 ), 1023–1034. 10.1111/apt.12938 25199904
Charbonneau D, Gibb RD and Quigley EM (2013) Fecal excretion of Bifidobacterium infantis 35624 and changes in fecal microbiota after eight weeks of oral supplementation with encapsulated probiotic. Gut Microbes 4 (3 ), 201–211. 10.4161/gmic.24196 23549409
Chlebicz-Wójcik A and Śliżewska K (2021) Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics in the irritable bowel syndrome treatment: A review. Biomolecules 11 (8 ), 1154. 10.3390/biom11081154 34439821
Cosmo-Pharmaceuticals (2021) Cosmo Announces Successful Outcome of Rifamycin 600mg Phase II Trial in IBS-D [Press Release], 11 January 2021. Available at https://www.cosmopharma.com/~/media/Files/C/Cosmo-Pharmaceuticals-V2/news/press/210111-cosmo-pharmaceuticals-press-release-rifa-ibsd-results-en.pdf (accessed 15 June 2021).
Cremon C, Guglielmetti S, Gargari G, Taverniti V, Castellazzi AM, Valsecchi C, Tagliacarne C, Fiore W, Bellini M, Bertani L, Gambaccini D, Cicala M, Germanà B, Vecchi M, Pagano I, Barbaro MR, Bellacosa L, Stanghellini V and Barbara G (2018) Effect of lactobacillus paracasei CNCM I-1572 on symptoms, gut microbiota, short chain fatty acids, and immune activation in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: A pilot randomized clinical trial. United European Gastroenterology Journal 6 (4 ), 604–613. 10.1177/2050640617736478 29881616
Cruz-Aguliar RM, Wantia N, Clavel T, Vehreschild MJGT, Buch T, Bajbouj M, Haller D, Busch D, Schmid RM and Stein-Thoeringer CK (2019) An open-labeled study on fecal microbiota transfer in irritable bowel syndrome patients reveals improvement in abdominal pain associated with the relative abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila. Digestion 100 (2 ), 127–138. 10.1159/000494252 30423561
Dalile B, Van Oudenhove L, Vervliet B and Verbeke K (2019) The role of short-chain fatty acids in microbiota-gut-brain communication. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology 16 (8 ), 461–478. 10.1038/s41575-019-0157-3 31123355
De Palma G, Nadal I, Collado MC and Sanz Y (2009) Effects of a gluten-free diet on gut microbiota and immune function in healthy adult human subjects. British Journal of Nutrition 102 (8 ), 1154–1160. 10.1017/s0007114509371767 19445821
Di Stefano AFD, Radicioni MM, Vaccani A, Mazzetti A, Longo LM and Moro L (2021) Pharmacokinetics and safety of rifamycin SV after single and multiple doses of MMX® modified release tablets in healthy male and female volunteers. Antibiotics 10 (2 ), 167. 10.3390/antibiotics10020167 33562091
Dior M, Delagrèverie H, Duboc H, Jouet P, Coffin B, Brot L, Humbert L, Trugnan G, Seksik P, Sokol H, Rainteau D and Sabate JM (2016) Interplay between bile acid metabolism and microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterology & Motility 28 (9 ), 1330–1340. 10.1111/nmo.12829 27060367
Drossman DA (2016) Functional gastrointestinal disorders: History, pathophysiology, clinical features, and Rome IV. Gastroenterology 150 (6 ), 1262–1279.e1262. 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.032
Duboc H, Rainteau D, Rajca S, Humbert L, Farabos D, Maubert M, Grondin V, Jouet P, Bouhassira D, Seksik P, Sokol H, Coffin B and Sabaté JM (2012) Increase in fecal primary bile acids and dysbiosis in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterology and Motility 24 (6 ), 513–520. 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01893.x 22356587
Durbán A, Abellán JJ, Jiménez-Hernández N, Artacho A, Garrigues V, Ortiz V, Ponce J, Latorre A and Moya A (2013) Instability of the faecal microbiota in diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 86 (3 ), 581–589. 10.1111/1574-6941.12184 23889283
Eetemadi A and Tagkopoulos I (2021) Methane and fatty acid metabolism pathways are predictive of low-FODMAP diet efficacy for patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Clinical Nutrition 40 (6 ), 4414–4421. 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.12.041 33504454
El-Salhy M, Hatlebakk JG, Gilja OH, Bråthen Kristoffersen A and Hausken T (2020) Efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for patients with irritable bowel syndrome in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Gut 69 (5 ), 859–867. 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319630 31852769
El-Salhy M, Kristoffersen AB, Valeur J, Casen C, Hatlebakk JG, Gilja OH and Hausken T (2022) Long-term effects of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterology & Motility 34 (1 ), e14200. 10.1111/nmo.14200 34145677
El-Salhy M, Valeur J, Hausken T and Gunnar Hatlebakk J (2021) Changes in fecal short-chain fatty acids following fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterology & Motility 33 (2 ), e13983. 10.1111/nmo.13983 32945066
Enck P, Aziz Q, Barbara G, Farmer AD, Fukudo S, Mayer EA, Niesler B, Quigley EMM, Rajilić-Stojanović M, Schemann M, Schwille-Kiuntke J, Simren M, Zipfel S and Spiller RC (2016) Irritable bowel syndrome. Nature Reviews Disease Primers 2 (1 ), 16014. 10.1038/nrdp.2016.14
Floss HG and Yu TW (2005) Rifamycin-mode of action, resistance, and biosynthesis. Chemical Reviews 105 (2 ), 621–632. 10.1021/cr030112j 15700959
Fodor AA, Pimentel M, Chey WD, Lembo A, Golden PL, Israel RJ and Carroll IM (2019) Rifaximin is associated with modest, transient decreases in multiple taxa in the gut microbiota of patients with diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Gut Microbes 10 (1 ), 22–33. 10.1080/19490976.2018.1460013 29708822
Ford AC, Harris LA, Lacy BE, Quigley EMM and Moayyedi P (2018) Systematic review with meta-analysis: The efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics and antibiotics in irritable bowel syndrome. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 48 (10 ), 1044–1060. 10.1111/apt.15001 30294792
Fritscher-Ravens A, Pflaum T, Mösinger M, Ruchay Z, Röcken C, Milla PJ, Das M, Böttner M, Wedel T and Schuppan D (2019) Many patients with irritable bowel syndrome have atypical food allergies not associated with immunoglobulin E. Gastroenterology 157 (1 ), 109–118.e105. 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.046 31100380
Gasbarrini A, Corazza GR, Gasbarrini G, Montalto M, Di Stefano M, Basilisco G, Parodi A, Usai-Satta P, Vernia P, Anania C, Astegiano M, Barbara G, Benini L, Bonazzi P, Capurso G, Certo M, Colecchia A, Cuoco L, Di Sario A, Festi D, Lauritano C, Miceli E, Nardone G, Perri F, Portincasa P, Risicato R, Sorge M and Tursi A (2009) Methodology and indications of H2-breath testing in gastrointestinal diseases: the Rome Consensus Conference. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 29 , 1–49. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.03951.x 19344474
Gibson GR, Hutkins R, Sanders ME, Prescott SL, Reimer RA, Salminen SJ, Scott K, Stanton C, Swanson KS, Cani PD, Verbeke K and Reid G (2017) Expert consensus document: The international scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology 14 (8 ), 491–502. 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.75 28611480
Gibson PR and Shepherd SJ (2005) Personal view: Food for thought – Western lifestyle and susceptibility to Crohn’s disease. The FODMAP hypothesis. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 21 (12 ), 1399–1409. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02506.x 15948806
Gulati M, Singh SK, Corrie L, Kaur IP and Chandwani L (2020) Delivery routes for faecal microbiota transplants: Available, anticipated and aspired. Pharmacological Research 159 , 104954. 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104954 32492490
Halkjær S, Christensen A, Lo B, Browne P, Günther S, Hansen LH and Petersen AM (2018) 914 - Fecal microbiota transplantation alters gut microbiota in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: Results from a randomized, double-blind placebo controlled study. Gastroenterology 154 (6 ), S-181. 10.1016/S0016-5085(18)31016-3 28912018
Hansen LBS, Roager HM, Søndertoft NB, Gøbel RJ, Kristensen M, Vallès-Colomer M, Vieira-Silva S, Ibrügger S, Lind MV, Mærkedahl RB, Bahl MI, Madsen ML, Havelund J, Falony G, Tetens I, Nielsen T, Allin KH, Frandsen HL, Hartmann B, Holst JJ, Sparholt MH, Holck J, Blennow A, Moll JM, Meyer AS, Hoppe C, Poulsen JH, Carvalho V, Sagnelli D, Dalgaard MD, Christensen AF, Lydolph MC, Ross AB, Villas-Bôas S, Brix S, Sicheritz-Pontén T, Buschard K, Linneberg A, Rumessen JJ, Ekstrøm CT, Ritz C, Kristiansen K, Nielsen HB, Vestergaard H, Færgeman NJ, Raes J, Frøkiær H, Hansen T, Lauritzen L, Gupta R, Licht TR and Pedersen O (2018) A low-gluten diet induces changes in the intestinal microbiome of healthy Danish adults. Nature Communications 9 (1 ), 4630. 10.1038/s41467-018-07019-x
Harvie RM, Chisholm AW, Bisanz JE, Burton JP, Herbison P, Schultz K and Schultz M (2017) Long-term irritable bowel syndrome symptom control with reintroduction of selected FODMAPs. World Journal of Gastroenterology 23 (25 ), 4632–4643. 10.3748/wjg.v23.i25.4632 28740352
Hasler WL (2006) Gas and bloating. Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2 (9 ), 654–662.28316536
Heeney DD, Gareau MG and Marco ML (2018) Intestinal lactobacillus in health and disease, a driver or just along for the ride? Current Opinion in Biotechnology 49 , 140–147. 10.1016/j.copbio.2017.08.004 28866243
Hod K, Dekel R, Aviv Cohen N, Sperber A, Ron Y, Boaz M, Berliner S and Maharshak N (2018) The effect of a multispecies probiotic on microbiota composition in a clinical trial of patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterology & Motility 30 (12 ), e13456. 10.1111/nmo.13456 30136337
Holster S, Lindqvist CM, Repsilber D, Salonen A, de Vos WM, König J and Brummer RJ (2019) The effect of allogenic versus autologous fecal microbiota transfer on symptoms, visceral perception and fecal and mucosal microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome: A randomized controlled study. Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology 10 (4 ), e00034. 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000034 31009405
Holvoet T, Joossens M, Vázquez-Castellanos JF, Christiaens E, Heyerick L, Boelens J, Verhasselt B, van Vlierberghe H, De Vos M, Raes J and De Looze D (2021) Fecal microbiota transplantation reduces symptoms in some patients with irritable bowel syndrome with predominant abdominal bloating: Short- and long-term results from a placebo-controlled randomized trial. Gastroenterology 160 (1 ), 145–157.e148. 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.07.013 32681922
Hoy SM (2019) Rifamycin SV MMX(®): A review in the treatment of traveller’s diarrhoea. Clinical Drug Investigation 39 (7 ), 691–697. 10.1007/s40261-019-00808-2 31172447
Huaman J-W, Mego M, Manichanh C, Cañellas N, Cañueto D, Segurola H, Jansana M, Malagelada C, Accarino A, Vulevic J, Tzortzis G, Gibson G, Saperas E, Guarner F and Azpiroz F (2018) Effects of prebiotics vs a diet low in FODMAPs in patients with functional gut disorders. Gastroenterology 155 (4 ), 1004–1007. 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.06.045 29964041
Huang HL, Chen HT, Luo QL, Xu HM, He J, Li YQ, Zhou YL, Yao F, Nie YQ and Zhou YJ (2019) Relief of irritable bowel syndrome by fecal microbiota transplantation is associated with changes in diversity and composition of the gut microbiota. Journal of Digestive Diseases 20 (8 ), 401–408. 10.1111/1751-2980.12756 31070838
Hunter JO, Tuffnell Q and Lee AJ (1999) Controlled trial of oligofructose in the management of irritable bowel syndrome. The Journal of Nutrition 129 (7 ), 1451S–1453S. 10.1093/jn/129.7.1451S 10395619
Hustoft TN, Hausken T, Ystad SO, Valeur J, Brokstad K, Hatlebakk JG and Lied GA (2017) Effects of varying dietary content of fermentable short-chain carbohydrates on symptoms, fecal microenvironment, and cytokine profiles in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterology & Motility 29 (4 ), e12969. 10.1111/nmo.12969
Iribarren C, Magnusson MK, Vigsnæs LK, Aziz I, Amundsen ID, Šuligoj T, Juge N, Patel P, Sapnara M, Johnsen L, Sørensen N, Sundin J, Törnblom H, Simrén M and Öhman L (2021) The effects of human milk oligosaccharides on gut microbiota, metabolite profiles and host mucosal response in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Nutrients 13 (11 ), 3836. 10.3390/nu13113836 34836092
Iribarren C, Törnblom H, Aziz I, Magnusson MK, Sundin J, Vigsnaes LK, Amundsen ID, McConnell B, Seitzberg D, Öhman L and Simrén M (2020) Human milk oligosaccharide supplementation in irritable bowel syndrome patients: A parallel, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Neurogastroenterology & Motility 32 (10 ), e13920. 10.1111/nmo.13920 32536023
Jabbar KS, Dolan B, Eklund L, Wising C, Ermund A, Johansson Å, Törnblom H, Simren M and Hansson GC (2021) Association between Brachyspira and irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea. Gut 70 (6 ), 1117–1129. 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321466 33177165
Jalanka-Tuovinen J, Salojärvi J, Salonen A, Immonen O, Garsed K, Kelly FM, Zaitoun A, Palva A, Spiller RC and de Vos WM (2014) Faecal microbiota composition and host-microbe cross-talk following gastroenteritis and in postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 63 (11 ), 1737–1745. 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305994 24310267
James SC, Fraser K, Young W, McNabb WC and Roy NC (2020) Gut microbial metabolites and biochemical pathways involved in irritable bowel syndrome: Effects of diet and nutrition on the microbiome. The Journal of Nutrition 150 (5 ), 1012–1021. 10.1093/jn/nxz302 31891398
Jana S and Deb JK (2006) Molecular understanding of aminoglycoside action and resistance. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 70 (2 ), 140–150. 10.1007/s00253-005-0279-0 16391922
Jeffery IB, Das A, O’Herlihy E, Coughlan S, Cisek K, Moore M, Bradley F, Carty T, Pradhan M, Dwibedi C, Shanahan F and O’Toole PW (2020) Differences in fecal microbiomes and metabolomes of people with vs without irritable bowel syndrome and bile acid malabsorption. Gastroenterology 158 (4 ), 1016–1028.e1018. 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.11.301 31843589
Jeffery IB, O’Toole PW, Öhman L, Claesson MJ, Deane J, Quigley EM and Simrén M (2012) An irritable bowel syndrome subtype defined by species-specific alterations in faecal microbiota. Gut 61 (7 ), 997–1006. 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301501 22180058
Kajander K, Krogius-Kurikka L, Rinttilä T, Karjalainen H, Palva A and and Korpela R (2007) Effects of multispecies probiotic supplementation on intestinal microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 26 (3 ), 463–473. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03391.x 17635381
Ki Cha B, Mun Jung S, Hwan Choi C, Song ID, Woong Lee H, Joon Kim H, Hyuk J, Kyung Chang S, Kim K, Chung WS and Seo JG (2012) The effect of a multispecies probiotic mixture on the symptoms and fecal microbiota in diarrhea-dominant irritable bowel syndrome: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology 46 (3 ), 220–227. 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31823712b1 22157240
Kinsey L, Burden ST and Bannerman E (2008) A dietary survey to determine if patients with coeliac disease are meeting current healthy eating guidelines and how their diet compares to that of the British general population. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 62 (11 ), 1333–1342. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602856 17700651
König J, Siebenhaar A, Högenauer C, Arkkila P, Nieuwdorp M, Norén T, Ponsioen CY, Rosien U, Rossen NG, Satokari R, Stallmach A, de Vos W, Keller J and Brummer RJ (2017) Consensus report: Faecal microbiota transfer - clinical applications and procedures. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 45 (2 ), 222–239. 10.1111/apt.13868 27891639
Laatikainen R, Salmenkari H, Sibakov T, Vapaatalo H and Turpeinen A (2020) Randomised controlled trial: Partial hydrolysation of casein protein in milk decreases gastrointestinal symptoms in subjects with functional gastrointestinal disorders. Nutrients 12 (7 ), 2140. 10.3390/nu12072140 32708428
Lacy BE, Mearin F, Chang L, Chey WD, Lembo AJ, Simren M and Spiller R (2016) Bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 150 (6 ), 1393–1407. 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.031
Lacy BE, Pimentel M, Brenner DM, Chey WD, Keefer LA, Long MD and Moshiree B (2021) ACG clinical guideline: Management of irritable bowel syndrome. American Journal of Gastroenterology 116 (1 ), 17–44. 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001036 33315591
Lahtinen P, Jalanka J, Hartikainen A, Mattila E, Hillilä M, Punkkinen J, Koskenpato J, Anttila V-J, Tillonen J, Satokari R and Arkkila P (2020) Randomised clinical trial: Faecal microbiota transplantation versus autologous placebo administered via colonoscopy in irritable bowel syndrome. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 51 (12 ), 1321–1331. 10.1111/apt.15740 32343000
Lee JS, Kim SY, Chun YS, Chun YJ, Shin SY, Choi CH and Choi HK (2020) Characteristics of fecal metabolic profiles in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with predominant diarrhea investigated using 1H-NMR coupled with multivariate statistical analysis. Neurogastroenterology & Motility 32 (6 ), e13830. 10.1111/nmo.13830 32125749
Lenhart A, Dong T, Joshi S, Jaffe N, Choo C, Liu C, Jacobs JP, Lagishetty V, Shih W, Labus JS, Gupta A, Tillisch K, Mayer EA and Chang L (2022) Effect of exclusion diets on symptom severity and the gut microbiota in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 20 (3 ), e465–e483. 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.05.027 34022450
Lewis ED, Antony JM, Crowley DC, Piano A, Bhardwaj R, Tompkins TA and Evans M (2020) Efficacy of lactobacillus paracasei HA-196 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175 in alleviating symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS): A randomized, placebo-controlled study. Nutrients 12 (4 ), 1159. 10.3390/nu12041159 32326347
Li Y, Hong G, Yang M, Li G, Jin Y, Xiong H, Qian W and Hou X (2020) Fecal bacteria can predict the efficacy of rifaximin in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Pharmacological Research 159 , 104936. 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104936 32470562
Liu T, Gu X, Li L-X, Li M, Li B, Cui X and Zuo X l (2020) Microbial and metabolomic profiles in correlation with depression and anxiety co-morbidities in diarrhoea-predominant IBS patients. BMC Microbiology 20 (1 ), 168. 10.1186/s12866-020-01841-4 32552668
Liu HN, Wu H, Chen YZ, Chen YJ, Shen XZ and Liu TT (2017) Altered molecular signature of intestinal microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome patients compared with healthy controls: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Digestive and Liver Disease 49 (4 ), 331–337. 10.1016/j.dld.2017.01.142 28179092
Low K, Hwang L, Hua J, Zhu A, Morales W and Pimentel M (2010) A combination of rifaximin and neomycin is most effective in treating irritable bowel syndrome patients with methane on lactulose breath test. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology 44 (8 ), 547–550. 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181c64c90 19996983
Lyra A, Krogius-Kurikka L, Nikkilä J, Malinen E, Kajander K, Kurikka K, Korpela R and Palva A (2010) Effect of a multispecies probiotic supplement on quantity of irritable bowel syndrome-related intestinal microbial phylotypes. BMC Gastroenterology 10 (1 ), 110. 10.1186/1471-230X-10-110 20849659
Mars RA T., Yang Y, Ward T, Houtti M, Priya S, Lekatz HR, Tang X, Sun Z, Kalari KR, Korem T, Bhattarai Y, Zheng T, Bar N, Frost G, Johnson AJ, van Treuren W, Han S, Ordog T, Grover M, Sonnenburg J, D’Amato M, Camilleri M, Elinav E, Segal E, Blekhman R, Farrugia G, Swann JR, Knights D and Kashyap PC (2020) Longitudinal multi-omics reveals subset-specific mechanisms underlying irritable bowel syndrome. Cell 182 (6 ), 1460–1473.e1417. 10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.007 32916129
Mättö J, Maunuksela L, Kajander K, Palva A, Korpela R, Kassinen A and Saarela M (2005) Composition and temporal stability of gastrointestinal microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome - A longitudinal study in IBS and control subjects. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology 43 (2 ), 213–222. 10.1016/j.femsim.2004.08.009 15747442
Mazzawi T, Hausken T, Hov JR, Valeur J, Sangnes DA, El-Salhy M, Gilja OH, Hatlebakk JG and Lied GA (2019) Clinical response to fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome is associated with normalization of fecal microbiota composition and short-chain fatty acid levels. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 54 (6 ), 690–699. 10.1080/00365521.2019.1624815 31190584
McFarland LV, Karakan T and Karatas A (2021) Strain-specific and outcome-specific efficacy of probiotics for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine 41 , 101154. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101154 34712929
McIntosh K, Reed DE, Schneider T, Dang F, Keshteli AH, De Palma G, Madsen K, Bercik P and Vanner S (2017) FODMAPs alter symptoms and the metabolome of patients with IBS: A randomised controlled trial. Gut 66 (7 ), 1241–1251. 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311339 26976734
McKenzie YA, Bowyer RK, Leach H, Gulia P, Horobin J, O’Sullivan NA, Pettitt C, Reeves LB, Seamark L, Williams M, Thompson J and Lomer MC (2016) British dietetic association systematic review and evidence-based practice guidelines for the dietary management of irritable bowel syndrome in adults (2016 update). Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 29 (5 ), 549–575. 10.1111/jhn.12385 27272325
Melchior C, Algera J, Colomier E, Törnblom H, Simrén M and Störsrud S (2022) Food avoidance and restriction in irritable bowel syndrome: Relevance for symptoms, quality of life and nutrient intake. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 20 (6 ), 1290–1298.e1294. 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.07.004 34229035
Mezzasalma V, Manfrini E, Ferri E, Sandionigi A, La Ferla B, Schiano I, Michelotti A, Nobile V, Labra M and Di Gennaro P (2016) A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial: The efficacy of multispecies probiotic supplementation in alleviating symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome associated with constipation. BioMed Research International 2016 , 4740907. 10.1155/2016/4740907 (Corrigendum: 10.1155/2019/9042956).27595104
Moayyedi P, Andrews CN, MacQueen G, Korownyk C, Marsiglio M, Graff L, Kvern B, Lazarescu A, Liu L, Paterson WG, Sidani S and Vanner S (2019) Canadian Association of Gastroenterology clinical practice guideline for the management of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology 2 (1 ), 6–29. 10.1093/jcag/gwy071 31294724
Muir J (2019) An overview of fiber and fiber supplements for irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology and Hepatology 15 (7 ), 387–389.31391809
Murakami K, Habukawa C, Nobuta Y, Moriguchi N and Takemura T (2012) The effect of lactobacillus brevis KB290 against irritable bowel syndrome: A placebo-controlled double-blind crossover trial. BioPsychoSocial Medicine 6 (1 ), 16. 10.1186/1751-0759-6-16 22863114
Naseri K, Dabiri H, Rostami-Nejad M, Yadegar A, Houri H, Olfatifar M, Sadeghi A, Saadati S, Ciacci C, Iovino P and Zali MR (2021) Influence of low FODMAP-gluten free diet on gut microbiota alterations and symptom severity in Iranian patients with irritable bowel syndrome. BMC Gastroenterology 21 (1 ), 292. 10.1186/s12876-021-01868-5 34261437
Nee J, Zakari M and Lembo AJ (2015) Novel therapies in IBS-D treatment. Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology 13 (4 ), 432–440. 10.1007/s11938-015-0068-5 26432092
Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Kinross J, Burcelin R, Gibson G, Jia W and Pettersson S (2012) Host-gut microbiota metabolic interactions. Science 336 (6086 ), 1262–1267. 10.1126/science.1223813 22674330
Nilholm C, Larsson E, Sonestedt E, Roth B and Ohlsson B (2021) Assessment of a 4-week starch- and sucrose-reduced diet and its effects on gastrointestinal symptoms and inflammatory parameters among patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Nutrients 13 (2 ), 416. 10.3390/nu13020416 33525489
Nordin E, Brunius C, Landberg R and Hellström PM (2022) Fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs), but not gluten, elicit modest symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized three-way crossover trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 115 (2 ), 344–352. 10.1093/ajcn/nqab337 34617561
Nybacka S, Simrén M, Störsrud S, Törnblom H, Winkvist A and Lindqvist HM (2021) Changes in serum and urinary metabolomic profile after a dietary intervention in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. PLoS One 16 (10 ), e0257331. 10.1371/journal.pone.0257331 34634050
O’Callaghan A and van Sinderen D (2016) Bifidobacteria and their role as members of the human gut microbiota. Frontiers in Microbiology 7 , 925. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00925 27379055
Öhman L, Törnblom H and Simrén M (2015) Crosstalk at the mucosal border: Importance of the gut microenvironment in IBS. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology 12 (1 ), 36–49. 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.200 25446728
O’Keeffe M, Jansen C, Martin L, Williams M, Seamark L, Staudacher HM, Irving PM, Whelan K and Lomer MC (2018) Long-term impact of the low-FODMAP diet on gastrointestinal symptoms, dietary intake, patient acceptability, and healthcare utilization in irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterology & Motility 30 (1 ), e13154. 10.1111/nmo.13154
Olesen M and Gudmand-Hoyer E (2000) Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of fructooligosaccharides in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 72 (6 ), 1570–1575. 10.1093/ajcn/72.6.1570 11101487
Ostgaard H, Hausken T, Gundersen D and El-Salhy M (2012) Diet and effects of diet management on quality of life and symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Molecular Medicine Reports 5 (6 ), 1382–1390. 10.3892/mmr.2012.843 22446969
Palsson OS, Peery A, Seitzberg D, Amundsen ID, McConnell B and Simrén M (2020) Human milk oligosaccharides support normal bowel function and improve symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome: A multicenter, open-label trial. Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology 11 (12 ), e00276. 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000276 33512807
Paula H, Grover M, Halder SL, Locke GR, Schleck CD, Zinsmeister AR and Talley NJ (2015) Non-enteric infections, antibiotic use, and risk of development of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Neurogastroenterology & Motility 27 (11 ), 1580–1586. 10.1111/nmo.12655 26303310
Piche T, Barbara G, Aubert P, Varannes S, Dainese R, Nano JL, Cremon C, Stanghellini V, De Giorgio R, Galmiche JP and Neunlist M (2009) Impaired intestinal barrier integrity in the colon of patients with irritable bowel syndrome: Involvement of soluble mediators. Gut 58 (2 ), 196–201. 10.1136/gut.2007.140806 18824556
Pimentel M (2016) Review article: Potential mechanisms of action of rifaximin in the management of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 43 , 37–49. 10.1111/apt.13437 26618924
Pimentel M, Cash BD, Lembo A, Wolf RA, Israel RJ and Schoenfeld P (2017) Repeat rifaximin for irritable bowel syndrome: No clinically significant changes in stool microbial antibiotic sensitivity. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 62 (9 ), 2455–2463. 10.1007/s10620-017-4598-7 28589238
Pimentel M, Chang C, Chua KS, Mirocha J, DiBaise J, Rao S and Amichai M (2014) Antibiotic treatment of constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 59 (6 ), 1278–1285. 10.1007/s10620-014-3157-8 24788320
Pimentel M, Chatterjee S, Chow EJ, Park S and Kong Y (2006) Neomycin improves constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome in a fashion that is dependent on the presence of methane gas: Subanalysis of a double-blind randomized controlled study. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 51 (8 ), 1297–1301. 10.1007/s10620-006-9104-6 16832617
Pimentel M, Chow EJ and Lin HC (2000) Eradication of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth reduces symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome. American Journal of Gastroenterology 95 (12 ), 3503–3506. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03368.x 11151884
Pimentel M, Chow EJ and Lin HC (2003) Normalization of lactulose breath testing correlates with symptom improvement in irritable bowel syndrome: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. American Journal of Gastroenterology 98 (2 ), 412–419. 10.1016/S0002-9270(02)05902-6 12591062
Pinto-Sanchez MI, Hall GB, Ghajar K, Nardelli A, Bolino C, Lau JT, Martin FP, Cominetti O, Welsh C, Rieder A, Traynor J, Gregory C, De Palma G, Pigrau M, Ford AC, Macri J, Berger B, Bergonzelli G, Surette MG, Collins SM, Moayyedi P and Bercik P (2017) Probiotic Bifidobacterium longum NCC3001 reduces depression scores and alters brain activity: A pilot study in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 153 (2 ), 448–459.e448. 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.003 28483500
Pinto-Sanchez MI, Nardelli A, Borojevic R, De Palma G, Calo NC, McCarville J, Caminero A, Basra D, Mordhorst A, Ignatova E, Hansen S, Uhde M, Norman GL, Murray JA, Smecuol E, Armstrong D, Bai JC, Schuppan D, Collins SM, Alaedini A, Moayyedi P, Verdu EF and Bercik P (2020) Gluten-free diet reduces symptoms, particularly diarrhea, in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and antigliadin IgG. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 19 (11 ), 2343–2352.e2348. 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.08.040 32827724
Pittayanon R, Lau JT, Yuan Y, Leontiadis GI, Tse F, Surette M and Moayyedi P (2019) Gut microbiota in patients with irritable bowel syndrome - A systematic review. Gastroenterology 157 (1 ), 97–108. 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.049 30940523
Ponnusamy K, Choi JN, Kim J, Lee SY and Lee CH (2011) Microbial community and metabolomic comparison of irritable bowel syndrome faeces. Journal of Medical Microbiology 60 (6 ), 817–827. 10.1099/jmm.0.028126-0 21330412
Posserud I, Stotzer PO, Björnsson ES, Abrahamsson H and Simrén M (2007) Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 56 (6 ), 802–808. 10.1136/gut.2006.108712 17148502
Pozuelo M, Panda S, Santiago A, Mendez S, Accarino A, Santos J, Guarner F, Azpiroz F and Manichanh C (2015) Reduction of butyrate- and methane-producing microorganisms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Scientific Reports 5 (1 ), 12693. 10.1038/srep12693 26239401
Rajilić-Stojanović M, Jonkers DM, Salonen A, Hanevik K, Raes J, Jalanka J, de Vos WM, Manichanh C, Golic N, Enck P, Philippou E, Iraqi FA, Clarke G, Spiller RC and Penders J (2015) Intestinal microbiota and diet in IBS: Causes, consequences, or epiphenomena? American Journal of Gastroenterology 110 (2 ), 278–287. 10.1038/ajg.2014.427 25623659
Rezaie A, Heimanson Z, McCallum R and Pimentel M (2019) Lactulose breath testing as a predictor of response to rifaximin in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea. American Journal of Gastroenterology 114 (12 ), 1886–1893. 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000444 31688023
Rolfe RD (2000) The role of probiotic cultures in the control of gastrointestinal health. The Journal of Nutrition 130 (2 ), 396S–402S. 10.1093/jn/130.2.396S 10721914
Rosette C, Agan FJ, Rosette N, Moro L, Mazzetti A, Hassan C and Gerloni M (2019) Rifamycin SV exhibits strong anti-inflammatory in vitro activity through pregnane X receptor stimulation and NFκB inhibition. Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics 34 (3 ), 172–180. 10.1016/j.dmpk.2019.01.002 31101589
Sharara AI, Aoun E, Abdul-Baki H, Mounzer R, Sidani S and Elhajj I (2006) A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of rifaximin in patients with abdominal bloating and flatulence. American Journal of Gastroenterology 101 (2 ), 326–333. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00458.x 16454838
Shepherd SJ and Gibson PR (2006) Fructose malabsorption and symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome: Guidelines for effective dietary management. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 106 (10 ), 1631–1639. 10.1016/j.jada.2006.07.010 17000196
Shin SP, Choi YM, Kim WH, Hong SP, Park JM, Kim J, Kwon O, Lee EH and Hahm KB (2018) A double blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial that breast milk derived-lactobacillus gasseri BNR17 mitigated diarrhea-dominant irritable bowel syndrome. Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition 62 (2 ), 179–186. 10.3164/jcbn.17-73 29610559
Silk DB, Davis A, Vulevic J, Tzortzis G and Gibson GR (2009) Clinical trial: The effects of a trans-galactooligosaccharide prebiotic on faecal microbiota and symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 29 (5 ), 508–518. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03911.x 19053980
Simrén M (2018) Manipulating the gut microbiome as a treatment strategy for functional gastrointestinal disorders. Gastroenterology 155 (4 ), 960–962. 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.09.008 30201361
Simrén M, Castedal M, Svedlund J, Abrahamsson H and Bjõrnsson E (2000) Abnormal propagation pattern of duodenal pressure waves in the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Digestive Diseases and Sciences 45 (11 ), 2151–2161. 10.1023/A:1010770302403 11215731
Skodje GI, Sarna VK, Minelle IH, Rolfsen KL, Muir JG, Gibson PR, Veierød MB, Henriksen C and Lundin KEA (2018) Fructan, rather than gluten, induces symptoms in patients with self-reported non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Gastroenterology 154 (3 ), 529–539.e522. 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.040 29102613
Soldi S, Vasileiadis S, Uggeri F, Campanale M, Morelli L, Fogli MV, Calanni F, Grimaldi M and Gasbarrini A (2015) Modulation of the gut microbiota composition by rifaximin in non-constipated irritable bowel syndrome patients: A molecular approach. Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology 8 , 309–325. 10.2147/ceg.S89999 26673000
Spencer M, Chey WD and Eswaran S (2014) Dietary renaissance in IBS: Has food replaced medications as a primary treatment strategy? Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology 12 (4 ), 424–440. 10.1007/s11938-014-0031-x 25219357
Sperber AD, Bangdiwala SI, Drossman DA, Ghoshal UC, Simren M, Tack J, Whitehead WE, Dumitrascu DL, Fang X, Fukudo S, Kellow J, Okeke E, Quigley EMM, Schmulson M, Whorwell P, Archampong T, Adibi P, Andresen V, Benninga MA, Bonaz B, Bor S, Fernandez LB, Choi SC, Corazziari ES, Francisconi C, Hani A, Lazebnik L, Lee YY, Mulak A, Rahman MM, Santos J, Setshedi M, Syam AF, Vanner S, Wong RK, Lopez-Colombo A, Costa V, Dickman R, Kanazawa M, Keshteli AH, Khatun R, Maleki I, Poitras P, Pratap N, Stefanyuk O, Thomson S, Zeevenhooven J and Palsson OS (2021) Worldwide prevalence and burden of functional gastrointestinal disorders, results of Rome foundation global study. Gastroenterology 160 (1 ), 99–114.e113. 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.014 32294476
Spiller RC (2004) Inflammation as a basis for functional GI disorders. Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology 18 (4 ), 641–661. 10.1016/j.bpg.2004.04.002 15324705
Staudacher HM, Lomer MCE, Farquharson FM, Louis P, Fava F, Franciosi E, Scholz M, Tuohy KM, Lindsay JO, Irving PM and Whelan K (2017) A diet low in FODMAPs reduces symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and a probiotic restores Bifidobacterium species: A randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology 153 (4 ), 936–947. 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.06.010 28625832
Staudacher HM, Ralph FSE, Irving PM, Whelan K and Lomer MCE (2020) Nutrient intake, diet quality, and diet diversity in irritable bowel syndrome and the impact of the low FODMAP diet. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics 120 (4 ), 535–547. 10.1016/j.jand.2019.01.017 31029650
Staudacher HM, Scholz M, Lomer MCE, Ralph FS, Irving PM, Lindsay JO, Fava F, Tuohy K and Whelan K (2021) Gut microbiota associations with diet in irritable bowel syndrome and the effect of low FODMAP diet and probiotics. Clinical Nutrition 40 (4 ), 1861–1870. 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.10.013 33183883
Staudacher HM and Whelan K (2017) The low FODMAP diet: Recent advances in understanding its mechanisms and efficacy in IBS. Gut 66 (8 ), 1517–1527. 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-313750 28592442
Steffen R, Jiang ZD, Gracias Garcia ML, Araujo P, Stiess M, Nacak T, Greinwald R and DuPont HL (2018) Rifamycin SV-MMX® for treatment of travellers’ diarrhea: Equally effective as ciprofloxacin and not associated with the acquisition of multi-drug resistant bacteria. Journal of Travel Medicine 25 (1 ), tay116. 10.1093/jtm/tay116 30462260
Stenlund H, Nilholm C, Chorell E, Roth B, D’Amato M and Ohlsson B (2021) Metabolic profiling of plasma in patients with irritable bowel syndrome after a 4-week starch- and sucrose-reduced diet. Metabolites 11 (7 ), 440. 10.3390/metabo11070440 34357334
Su GL, Ko CW, Bercik P, Falck-Ytter Y, Sultan S, Weizman AV and Morgan RL (2020) AGA clinical practice guidelines on the role of probiotics in the management of gastrointestinal disorders. Gastroenterology 159 (2 ), 697–705. 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.059 32531291
Sun Q, Jia Q, Song L and Duan L (2019) Alterations in fecal short-chain fatty acids in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 98 (7 ), e14513. 10.1097/md.0000000000014513 30762787
Sun Y-Y, Li M, Li Y-Y, Li L-X, Zhai W-Z, Wang P, Yang X-X, Gu X, Song L-J, Li Z, Zuo X-L and Li Y-Q (2018) The effect of clostridium butyricum on symptoms and fecal microbiota in diarrhea-dominant irritable bowel syndrome: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Scientific Reports 8 (1 ), 2964. 10.1038/s41598-018-21241-z 29445178
Swanson KS, Gibson GR, Hutkins R, Reimer RA, Reid G, Verbeke K, Scott KP, Holscher HD, Azad MB, Delzenne NM and Sanders ME (2020) The international scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of synbiotics. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology 17 (11 ), 687–701. 10.1038/s41575-020-0344-2 32826966
Tan J, McKenzie C, Potamitis M, Thorburn AN, Mackay CR and Macia L (2014) The role of short-chain fatty acids in health and disease. Advances in Immunology 121 , 91–119. 10.1016/b978-0-12-800100-4.00003-9 24388214
Tana C, Umesaki Y, Imaoka A, Handa T, Kanazawa M and Fukudo S (2010) Altered profiles of intestinal microbiota and organic acids may be the origin of symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome. Neurogastroenterology & Motility 22 (5 ), 512-e115. 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01427.x 19903265
Tap J, Derrien M, Törnblom H, Brazeilles R, Cools-Portier S, Doré J, Störsrud S, Le Nevé B, Öhman L and Simrén M (2017) Identification of an intestinal microbiota signature associated with severity of irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 152 (1 ), 111–123.e118. 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.09.049 27725146
Tigchelaar EF, Mujagic Z, Zhernakova A, Hesselink MAM, Meijboom S, Perenboom CWM, Masclee AAM, Wijmenga C, Feskens EJM and Jonkers D (2017) Habitual diet and diet quality in irritable bowel syndrome: A case-control study. Neurogastroenterology & Motility 29 (12 ), e13151. 10.1111/nmo.13151
Tuteja AK, Talley NJ, Stoddard GJ and Verne GN (2019) Double-blind placebo-controlled study of rifaximin and lactulose hydrogen breath test in gulf war veterans with irritable bowel syndrome. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 64 (3 ), 838–845. 10.1007/s10620-018-5344-5 30370492
Valdez-Palomares F, Nambo-Venegas R, Uribe-García J, Mendoza-Vargas A, Granados-Portillo O, Meraz-Cruz N and Palacios-González B (2021) Intestinal microbiota fingerprint in subjects with irritable bowel syndrome responders to a low FODMAP diet. Food & Function 12 (7 ), 3206–3218. 10.1039/D0FO03162C 33877245
Valeur J, Røseth AG, Knudsen T, Malmstrøm GH, Fiennes JT, Midtvedt T and Berstad A (2016) Fecal fermentation in irritable bowel syndrome: Influence of dietary restriction of fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols. Digestion 94 (1 ), 50–56. 10.1159/000448280 27487397
Valeur J, Småstuen MC, Knudsen T, Lied GA and Røseth AG (2018) Exploring gut microbiota composition as an indicator of clinical response to dietary FODMAP restriction in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 63 (2 ), 429–436. 10.1007/s10620-017-4893-3 29302878
van Lanen AS, de Bree A and Greyling A (2021) Efficacy of a low-FODMAP diet in adult irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Nutrition 60 (6 ), 3505–3522. 10.1007/s00394-020-02473-0 33585949
Vasant DH, Paine PA, Black CJ, Houghton LA, Everitt HA, Corsetti M, Agrawal A, Aziz I, Farmer AD, Eugenicos MP, Moss-Morris R, Yiannakou Y and Ford AC (2021) British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the management of irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 70 (7 ), 1214–1240. 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324598 33903147
Vazquez-Roque MI, Camilleri M, Smyrk T, Murray JA, Marietta E, O’Neill J, Carlson P, Lamsam J, Janzow D, Eckert D, Burton D and Zinsmeister AR (2013) A controlled trial of gluten-free diet in patients with irritable bowel syndrome-diarrhea: Effects on bowel frequency and intestinal function. Gastroenterology 144 (5 ), 903–911.e903. 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.049 23357715
Vervier K, Moss S, Kumar N, Adoum A, Barne M, Browne H, Kaser A, Kiely C, Neville BA, Powell N, Raine T, Stares MD, Zhu A, Revilla Negro JDL, Lawley T and Parkes M (2021) Two microbiota subtypes identified in Irritable Bowel Syndrome with distinct responses to the low FODMAP diet. bioRxiv, 2021.2005.2014.444142. 10.1101/2021.05.14.444142
Wedlake L, A’Hern R, Russell D, Thomas K, Walters JR and Andreyev HJ (2009) Systematic review: The prevalence of idiopathic bile acid malabsorption as diagnosed by SeHCAT scanning in patients with diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 30 (7 ), 707–717. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04081.x 19570102
Wei W, Wang HF, Zhang Y, Zhang YL, Niu BY and Yao SK (2020) Altered metabolism of bile acids correlates with clinical parameters and the gut microbiota in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. World Journal of Gastroenterology 26 (45 ), 7153–7172. 10.3748/wjg.v26.i45.7153 33362374
Whelan K, Martin LD, Staudacher HM and Lomer MCE (2018) The low FODMAP diet in the management of irritable bowel syndrome: An evidence-based review of FODMAP restriction, reintroduction and personalisation in clinical practice. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 31 (2 ), 239–255. 10.1111/jhn.12530 29336079
Wild D, Robins GG, Burley VJ and Howdle PD (2010) Evidence of high sugar intake, and low fibre and mineral intake, in the gluten-free diet. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 32 (4 ), 573–581. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04386.x 20528829
Wilson B, Rossi M, Dimidi E and Whelan K (2019) Prebiotics in irritable bowel syndrome and other functional bowel disorders in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 109 (4 ), 1098–1111. 10.1093/ajcn/nqy376 30949662
Wilson B, Rossi M, Kanno T, Parkes GC, Anderson S, Mason AJ, Irving PM, Lomer MC and Whelan K (2020) β-Galactooligosaccharide in conjunction with low FODMAP diet improves irritable bowel syndrome symptoms but reduces fecal bifidobacteria. American Journal of Gastroenterology 115 (6 ), 906–915. 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000641 32433273
Wilson B and Whelan K (2017) Prebiotic inulin-type fructans and galacto-oligosaccharides: Definition, specificity, function, and application in gastrointestinal disorders. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 32 , 64–68. 10.1111/jgh.13700
Wu RL, Vazquez-Roque MI, Carlson P, Burton D, Grover M, Camilleri M and Turner JR (2017) Gluten-induced symptoms in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome are associated with increased myosin light chain kinase activity and claudin-15 expression. Laboratory Investigation 97 (1 ), 14–23. 10.1038/labinvest.2016.118 27869798
Xu C, Jia Q, Zhang L, Wang Z, Zhu S, Wang X, Liu Y, Li M, Zhang J, Wang X, Zhang J, Sun Q, Wang K, Zhu H and Duan L (2020) Multiomics study of gut bacteria and host metabolism in irritable bowel syndrome and depression patients. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 10 (660 ), 580980. 10.3389/fcimb.2020.580980 33194817
Yang J, Lee HR, Low K, Chatterjee S and Pimentel M (2008) Rifaximin versus other antibiotics in the primary treatment and retreatment of bacterial overgrowth in IBS. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 53 (1 ), 169–174. 10.1007/s10620-007-9839-8 17520365
Yao CK, Tan HL, van Langenberg DR, Barrett JS, Rose R, Liels K, Gibson PR and Muir JG (2014) Dietary sorbitol and mannitol: Food content and distinct absorption patterns between healthy individuals and patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 27 , 263–275. 10.1111/jhn.12144 23909813
Yoon H, Park YS, Lee DH, Seo JG, Shin CM and Kim N (2015) Effect of administering a multi-species probiotic mixture on the changes in fecal microbiota and symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition 57 (2 ), 129–134. 10.3164/jcbn.15-14 26388670
Yoon JS, Sohn W, Lee OY, Lee SP, Lee KN, Jun DW, Lee HL, Yoon BC, Choi HS, Chung W-S and Seo J-G (2014) Effect of multispecies probiotics on irritable bowel syndrome: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 29 (1 ), 52–59. 10.1111/jgh.12322 23829297
Zannini E and Arendt EK (2018) Low FODMAPs and gluten-free foods for irritable bowel syndrome treatment: Lights and shadows. Food Research International 110 , 33–41. 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.04.001 30029704
Zhan K, Zheng H, Li J, Wu H, Qin S, Luo L and Huang S (2020) Gut microbiota-bile acid crosstalk in diarrhea-irritable bowel syndrome. BioMed Research International 2020 , 3828249. 10.1155/2020/3828249 33274207
Zhang Y, Feng L, Wang X, Fox M, Luo L, Du L, Chen B, Chen X, He H, Zhu S, Hu Z, Chen S, Long Y, Zhu Y, Xu L, Deng Y, Misselwitz B, Lang BM, Yilmaz B, Kim JJ, Owyang C and Dai N (2021) Low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols diet compared with traditional dietary advice for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: A parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with analysis of clinical and microbiological factors associated with patient outcomes. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 113 (6 ), 1531–1545. 10.1093/ajcn/nqab005 33740048
Zhang F, Luo W, Shi Y, Fan Z and Ji G (2012) Should we standardize the 1,700-year-old fecal microbiota transplantation? American Journal of Gastroenterology 107 (11 ), 1755–1756. 10.1038/ajg.2012.251 23160295
Zhang WX, Zhang Y, Qin G, Li KM, Wei W, Li SY and Yao SK (2019) Altered profiles of fecal metabolites correlate with visceral hypersensitivity and may contribute to symptom severity of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. World Journal of Gastroenterology 25 (43 ), 6416–6429. 10.3748/wjg.v25.i43.6416 31798278
Zhao L, Yang W, Chen Y, Huang F, Lu L, Lin C, Huang T, Ning Z, Zhai L, Zhong LL, Lam W, Yang Z, Zhang X, Cheng C, Han L, Qiu Q, Shang X, Huang R, Xiao H, Ren Z, Chen D, Sun S, El-Nezami H, Cai Z, Lu A, Fang X, Jia W and Bian Z (2020) A clostridia-rich microbiota enhances bile acid excretion in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Journal of Clinical Investigation 130 (1 ), 438–450. 10.1172/jci130976 31815740
Zhu S, Liu S, Li H, Zhang Z, Zhang Q, Chen L, Zhao Y, Chen Y, Gu J, Min L and Zhang S (2019) Identification of gut microbiota and metabolites signature in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 9 , 346. 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00346 31681624
Zhuang X, Tian Z, Li L, Zeng Z, Chen M and Xiong L (2018) Fecal microbiota alterations associated with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Frontiers in Microbiology 9 , 1600. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01600 30090090
